Pulmonary delivery of opioids as pain therapeutics

Inhaled opioids for cancer pain relief: A narrative review

Despite the many new possibilities, cancer pain treatment is not always effective and often poses a challenge for practitioners. At the end-of-life care, both oral and subcutaneous drug delivery very often are not attainable. The increasing number of patients in terminal stage of chronic diseases forced us to look for the alternative ways of administration of pain treatment. In this context, the potentially rapid onset of action and ease of use make aerosolized drug delivery an attractive option in palliative care settings. The objective of this review was to identify literature on pain relief with inhaled opioids. The evidence suggests that nebulized opioids might be effective in the treatment of pain in various aetiologies; however, randomized controlled studies on nebulization therapy for cancer pain are lacking.

Characterization of the Presence and Function of Platelet Opioid Receptors

Opioids are typically used for the treatment of pain related to disease or surgery. In the body, they enter the bloodstream and interact with a variety of immune and neurological cells that express the μ-, δ-, and κ-opioid receptors. One blood-borne cell-like body that is not well understood in the context of opioid interactions is the platelet. The platelet is a highly sensitive anucleate cell-like fragment responsible for maintaining hemostasis through shape change and the secretion of chemical messengers. This research characterizes platelet opioid receptors, how specific receptor agonists impact platelet exocytosis, and the role of the κ-and μ-receptors in platelet function. Platelets were found to express all three opioid receptors, but upon stimulation with their respective agonist no activation was detected. Furthermore, exposure to the opioid agonists did not impact traditional platelet secretion stimulated by thrombin, a natural platelet activator. In addition, data collected from knockout mice suggest that the opioid agonists may be interacting nonspecifically with platelets. Dark-field images revealed differences in activated platelet shape between the κ- and μ-knockout platelets and the control platelets. Finally, κ-knockout platelets showed variations in their ability to adhere and aggregate compared to control platelets. Overall, these data show that platelet function is not likely to be heavily affected by blood-borne opioids.

Nebulized opioids for the palliation of dyspnea in terminally ill patients

PURPOSE

The use of nebulized opioids for the palliation of dyspnea in terminally ill patients is reviewed.

SUMMARY

More than 50% of patients with advanced diseases experience dyspnea during their final stages of life. Systemically administered opioids are recommended for the management of dyspnea in these patients, but adverse effects may limit their use. Nebulization offers an alternative route for administering opioids, providing relief of dyspnea while minimizing adverse events. An extensive literature search was conducted to identify publications evaluating nebulized opioids for the palliation of dyspnea in patients at end-of-life. Ten studies that evaluated nebulized morphine, fentanyl, hydromorphone, and morphine-6-glucuronide were reviewed; 1 of these studies evaluated 4 different opioids. Of these 10 studies, 2 had double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover designs; 1 was retrospective, and the remaining 7 were prospective studies. A total of 181 patients, all adults, were evaluated. Subjective improvement in dyspnea from baseline was observed in 9 of the 10 studies. Nebulized morphine 20 mg every 4 hours was the most common opioid studied. Other doses of nebulized opioids included fentanyl 25 and 100 μg and hydromorphone 5 mg. Nine studies reported subjective improvement of dyspnea from baseline after administering nebulized opioids. Six studies evaluated objective outcomes and showed decreased respiratory rate (morphine, fentanyl, and hydromorphone) and heart rate (hydromorphone) and increased oxygen saturation (fentanyl). Mild-to-moderate adverse effects such as claustrophobia due to nebulizer mask, drowsiness, cough, and bitter taste were described.

CONCLUSION

Nebulized opioids may provide subjective relief of dyspnea in terminally ill patients with mild-to-moderate adverse effects.

Development of ciprofloxacin-loaded poly(vinyl alcohol) dry powder formulations for lung delivery

Polymeric microparticles are micro carriers for the sustained drug delivery of drugs in the lungs, used as alternatives to the use of established excipients. This study aims to develop and characterize inhalable ciprofloxacin (CPx)-loaded poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) microparticles by a single-step spray-drying procedure. The optimization of the processing parameters was achieved by an orthogonal design of the most relevant processing parameters (polymer concentration, feed rate and inlet temperature). The obtained spray-dried particles showed a drug encapsulation efficiency higher than 90%. Furthermore, PVA-CPx formulations, with drug contents up to 10 wt%, showed a morphology and size suitable for inhalation, with a sustained release profile over 24 h. Data from Fourier transformed infra-red spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry indicated absence of interaction between the polymer matrix and the drug. Aerodynamic assessment of PVA-CPx 10 wt% was determined by the next generation impactor (NGI), using spray-dried CPx as a control. The results showed improved values of mass median aerodynamic diameter (5.06±0.10μm) and a fine particle fraction (39.78±0.98%) when comparing with the CPx alone (5.33±0.39μm and 30.43±1.38%). This study highlights the potential of spray-dried PVA microparticles as drug carriers for lung local delivery of antibiotics.

Drug Delivery Devices for Inhaled Medicines

Historically, the inhaled route has been used for the delivery of locally-acting drugs for the treatment of respiratory conditions, such as asthma, COPD, and airway infections. Targeted delivery of substances to the lungs has some key advantages over systemic administration, including a more rapid onset of action, an increased therapeutic effect, and, depending on the agent inhaled, reduced systemic side effects since the required local concentration in the lungs can be obtained with a lower dose. Fortunately, when designed properly, inhaled drug delivery devices can be very effective and safe for getting active agents directly to their site of action.

Inhalation devices: from basic science to practical use, innovative vs generic products

INTRODUCTION

Inhalation therapy is a convenient method of treating respiratory diseases. The key factors required for inhalation are the preparation of drug carriers (aerosol particles) allowing reproducible dosing during administration. These technical challenges are accomplished with a variety of inhalation devices (inhalers) and medicinal formulations, which are optimized to be easily converted into inhalable aerosols. Areas covered: This review is focused on the most important, but often overlooked, effects, which are required for the reliable and reproducible inhalable drug administration. The effects of patient-related issues that influence inhalation therapy, such as proper selection of inhalers for specific cases is discussed. We also discuss factors that are the most essential if generic inhalation product should be considered equivalent to the drugs with the clinically confirmed efficacy. Expert opinion: Proper device selection is crucial in clinical results of inhalation therapy. The patients' ability to coordinate inhalation with actuation, generation of optimal flow through the device, use of optimal inspiratory volume, all produces crucial effects on disease control. Also the severity of the disease process effects proper use of inhalers. Interchanging of inhalers can produce potentially conflicting problem regarding efficacy and safety of inhalation therapy.

The function and performance of aqueous aerosol devices for inhalation therapy

OBJECTIVES

In this review paper, we explore the interaction between the functioning mechanism of different nebulizers and the physicochemical properties of the formulations for several types of devices, namely jet, ultrasonic and vibrating-mesh nebulizers; colliding and extruded jets; electrohydrodynamic mechanism; surface acoustic wave microfluidic atomization; and capillary aerosol generation.

KEY FINDINGS

Nebulization is the transformation of bulk liquids into droplets. For inhalation therapy, nebulizers are widely used to aerosolize aqueous systems, such as solutions and suspensions. The interaction between the functioning mechanism of different nebulizers and the physicochemical properties of the formulations plays a significant role in the performance of aerosol generation appropriate for pulmonary delivery. Certain types of nebulizers have consistently presented temperature increase during the nebulization event. Therefore, careful consideration should be given when evaluating thermo-labile drugs, such as protein therapeutics. We also present the general approaches for characterization of nebulizer formulations.

SUMMARY

In conclusion, the interplay between the dosage form (i.e. aqueous systems) and the specific type of device for aerosol generation determines the effectiveness of drug delivery in nebulization therapies, thus requiring extensive understanding and characterization.

Patients with chronic pain and dysphagia (CPD): unmet medical needs and pharmacologic treatment options

BACKGROUND

For properly selected patients experiencing chronic pain, extended-release opioid formulations may represent an appropriate pain management choice. For the many adults, elderly, and children who have medical conditions that make swallowing solid, oral-dose formulations difficult (dysphagia) or painful (odynophagia), this option may be limited. The combination of chronic pain with dysphagia (CPD) presents a challenge to physicians and patients alike when oral opioid analgesia is needed to control pain, but patients are unable to swallow solid, oral dosage forms.

METHODS

A Medline search was performed (1990 to 2013) using the search terms swallowing difficulties, dysphagia, odynophagia, adults, pediatrics, elderly, chronic pain, pain, and opioids. The following websites were searched: American Dysphagia Network, Dysphagia Research Society, World Health Organization, American Pain Society, International Association for the Study of Pain, American Academy of Pain Medicine, and American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians. Chronic pain guidelines from the following professional organizations were searched: American Pain Society, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians, British Geriatric Society, European Society of Medical Oncology, World Health Organization, and the European Association for Palliative Care.

FINDINGS

There is an unmet medical need for greater recognition of dysphagia, awareness of potential problems with medication administration in these patients, recognition of alternative drug formulations that are available for use in CPD, and an appreciation that there are new, solid, oral-dose, opioid formulations in development that can mitigate these issues associated with swallowing difficulty while still providing practical, effective analgesia. Current pharmacologic treatments have limitations; new, prospective opioid formulations in clinical development may offer physicians and patients with CPD effective treatment options while mitigating accidental exposure and abuse liability.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of patients with CPD may be larger than is currently anticipated by healthcare providers. Physicians should proactively include a discussion of dysphagia as part of the patient examination. CPD is an unmet medical need. There are novel opioid formulations in clinical development that address the limitations of current opioid treatments. This manuscript reviews the problems associated with dysphagia on medication administration and adherence, currently available treatment options, and opioid analgesic formulations currently in clinical development.

Alternative routes to oral opioid administration in palliative care: a review and clinical summary

OBJECTIVE

A major goal of palliative care is to provide comfort, and pain is one of the most common causes of treatable suffering in patients with advanced disease. Opioids are indispensable for pain management in palliative care and can usually be provided by the oral route, which is safe, effective, and of lowest cost in most cases. As patients near the end of life, however, the need for alternate routes of medication increases with up to 70% of patients requiring a nonoral route for opioid administration. In order to optimize patient care, it is imperative that clinicians understand existing available options of opioid administration and their respective advantages and disadvantages.

METHODS

We performed a literature review to describe the most commonly used and available routes that can substitute for oral opioid therapy and to provide a summary of factors affecting choice of opioid for use in palliative care in terms of benefits, indications, cautions, and general considerations.

RESULTS

Clinical circumstances will largely dictate appropriateness of the route selected. When the oral route is unavailable, subcutaneous, intravenous, and enteral routes are preferred in the palliative care population. The evidence supporting sublingual, buccal, rectal, and transdermal gel routes is mixed.

CONCLUSIONS

This review is not designed to be a critical appraisal of the quality of current evidence; rather, it is a summation of that evidence and of current clinical practices regarding alternate routes of opioid administration. In doing so, the overarching goal of this review is to support more informed clinical decision making.

Recent advances in the pharmaceutical management of pain

Pain is an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience for patients. Management of pain is the most frequent issue encountered by clinicians and treatment is usually with pharmacological therapy. This review discusses recent pharmaceutical advances in pain management with respect to new modes of analgesic delivery, as well as new analgesic agents and adjuvants that are currently being investigated for their analgesic properties. New modes of administration include transdermal delivery in the form of skin patches, transmucosal delivery, inhalational administration, various patient-controlled devices and extended-release analgesic formulations. Up-to-date research is presented on classical analgesics, such as opioids, anti-inflammatory agents, including cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and paracetamol (acetaminophen), local anesthetics and ketamine. In addition, newer agents such as antidepressants and antiepileptic drugs as well as medicinal cannabinoids are discussed. As our understanding of the multiple pain pathways involved in the pathogenesis of pain expands, further compounds with analgesic properties will be developed.

Inhaled fentanyl aerosol in healthy volunteers: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

BACKGROUND

Rapid delivery of potent opioid to the systemic circulation is an important feature for the effective treatment of acute and acute-on-chronic breakthrough pain. The delivery of different opioids by the pulmonary route has been inconsistent, usually resulting in low bioavailability of the drug. Staccato® Fentanyl for Inhalation is a handheld inhaler producing a single metered dose of aerosolized fentanyl during a single inspiration. The aerosol is of high purity (≥98%) at a particle size (1 to 3.5 microns) shown to be best for pulmonary absorption.

METHODS

We conducted the study in healthy volunteers in 2 stages. In the crossover stage, 10 subjects received IV fentanyl 25 µg and inhaled fentanyl 25 µg on separate occasions. The dose escalation stage was a multidose, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-period dose escalation study of inhaled fentanyl (50 to 300 µg). Serial blood sampling was performed over an 8-hour period after drug administration to determine the pharmacokinetic profile, and serial pupillometry was performed as a measure of pharmacodynamic effect.

RESULTS

In the crossover stage the pharmacokinetic profiles of the inhaled and IV fentanyl showed similar peak arterial concentrations and areas under the curve. The time to maximum concentration was slightly shorter for the inhaled than IV fentanyl, 20.5 and 31.5 seconds, respectively. In the dose escalation stage the administration of repeated doses resulted in predictable, dose-dependent serum concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has demonstrated that the pharmacokinetic profile of single doses of inhaled fentanyl is comparable to IV administration.

Lactose engineering for better performance in dry powder inhalers

Dry powder inhaler (DPI) is generally formulated as a powder mixture of coarse carrier particles and micronized drug with aerodynamic diameters of 1-5 μm. Carrier particles are used to improve drug particle flowability, thus improving dosing accuracy, minimizing the dose variability compared with drug alone and making them easier to handle during manufacturing operations. Lactose is the most common and frequently used carrier in DPIs formulations and nowadays various inhalation grades of lactose with different physico-chemical properties are available on the market. Therefore, the purpose of this manuscript is to review evolution of lactose as a carrier in inhalable formulations, their production and the impact of its physico-chemical properties on drug dispersion. This review offers a perspective on the current reported studies to modify lactose for better performance in DPIs.

Pulmonary delivery of therapeutic compounds for treating CNS disorders

Delivering therapeutic compounds via the lungs presents potential advantages relative to other routes of administration. Depending on the compound and the disease state, these advantages may include: non-invasive medication delivery, ease of administration, higher bioavailability leading to dose sparing and lower systemic toxicity, potentially greater blood–brain barrier penetration and rapid pharmacodynamic effect. The practice of inhaling drugs has been around for centuries, including both medical and recreational usage. It is only more recently that formal clinical development programs have been undertaken specifically to use medication delivery via the lung to achieve systemic blood levels for the treatment of CNS disorders. At present, there are several CNS therapies being developed for pulmonary administration, with some of those programs at or near the marketing authorization stage. While there are still regulatory hurdles before these therapies can be put into practice, the success of these programs thus far demonstrates the scientific viability of inhalation therapies for treating CNS disorders.

Non-clinical safety and pharmacokinetic evaluations of propylene glycol aerosol in Sprague-Dawley rats and Beagle dogs

Aerosolized propylene glycol (PG) was generated as log-normally distributed particulate clouds in different concentrations using a novel capillary aerosol generator (CAG) and evaluated in a battery of non-clinical studies intended to assess its potential inhalation and systemic toxicity in 2 species before ICH-compliant "first-time-in-man" studies. Exposures were nose-only in rats, and via face mask with oropharyngeal tube in dogs. The CAG-generated PG aerosol had a mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of 2.29μm, with a 1.56 geometric standard deviation (GSD) in the rat studies, and a MMAD of 1.34μm (1.45 GSD) in the dog studies, consistent with expected particle size exposures in man. International Congress on Harmonization (ICH) Guidelines were followed, which recommend preliminary non-clinical safety studies using the vehicle and device (CAG-PG) prior to the first human exposure including safety pharmacology, pharmacokinetic (PK) studies, single dose toxicity studies, and repeated dose toxicity studies in two species. In the rat, the only biologically relevant findings included clinical signs of ocular and nasal irritation indicated by minor bleeding around the eyes and nose, and minimal laryngeal squamous metaplasia. This finding is commonly observed in inhalation studies in the rat, and likely related to the unique sensitivity of the tissue, as well as the circuitous airflow pathway through the larynx which increases particle deposition. In the female Beagle dog, treatment-related decreases in hemoglobin, red blood cells and hematocrit were observed in the two highest exposure groups, equivalent to approximately 18 and 60mg/kg/day. In male dogs from the high dose group, similar small decreases, albeit, non-statistically significant decreases were observed in these hematological markers as well. PK studies in rats and dogs showed that the absorption of PG following pulmonary inhalation exposure occurs rapidly, and equilibrium between lung tissue and plasma is achieved quickly. With daily inhalations of PG aerosols, there is evidence of minor tissue accumulation of PG in each species. Inhalation exposure to CAG-generated PG aerosols achieved PG concentrations in the systemic circulation that were similar to those attained via the oral route. Systemic elimination of PG appears to be saturable, presumably via hepatic metabolism. PG elimination in the high dose groups for both species showed terminal plasma and lung concentration-time profiles suggesting a zero-order elimination process. There was no apparent tissue toxicity of the lung, liver and kidney in these studies. Under the conditions of these studies, the NOEL for the rat was determined to be 20mg/kg/day for the 28-day study. In the Beagle dog, the NOEL was approximately 6.05mg/kg/day for the 28-day study. Overall, these studies allowed us to conclude that PG aerosol generated with the capillary aerosol generator could be administered safely in man, with an adequate margin of safety needed to conduct "first-time-in-man" human exposure studies.

Cancer breakthrough pain in the presence of cancer-related chronic pain: fact versus perceptions of health-care providers and patients

Cancer breakthrough pain is a flare in pain that "breaks through" well-controlled persistent cancer pain. Although the condition is highly prevalent, the concept of cancer breakthrough pain is not well understood and is therefore underdiagnosed and undertreated. The purpose of this review is to examine the roles the health-care practitioner and patient/family caregiver play in the undertreatment of breakthrough pain. A lack of technical knowledge about pain management and pain assessment, attitudes about opioid addiction, and regulatory guidelines influence the manner in which opioids are prescribed. Patients harbor a variety of fears and misconceptions, such as opioid addiction, tolerance, side effects, and the meaning of pain, which can create a barrier to effective communication with their health-care provider regarding their cancer pain management and specifically their breakthrough pain. Identifying these issues gives health-care professionals and patients an opportunity to develop strategies that can improve the treatment of cancer breakthrough pain.

Recent advances in liposomal dry powder formulations: preparation and evaluation

Liposomal drug dry powder formulations have shown many promising features for pulmonary drug administration, such as selective localization of drug within the lung, controlled drug release, reduced local and systemic toxicities, propellant-free nature, patient compliance, high dose carrying capacity, stability and patent protection. Critical review of the recent developments will provide a balanced view on benefits of liposomal encapsulation while developing dry powder formulations and will help researchers to update themselves and focus their research in more relevant areas. In liposomal dry powder formulations (LDPF), drug encapsulated liposomes are homogenized, dispersed into the carrier and converted into dry powder form by using freeze drying, spray drying and spray freeze drying. Alternatively, LDPF can also be formulated by supercritical fluid technologies. On inhalation with a suitable inhalation device, drug encapsulated liposomes get rehydrated in the lung and release the drug over a period of time. The prepared LDPF are evaluated in vitro and in vivo for lung deposition behavior and drug disposition in the lung using a suitable inhaler device. The most commonly used liposomes are composed of lung surfactants and synthetic lipids. Delivery of anticancer agents for lung cancer, corticosteroids for asthma, immunosuppressants for avoiding lung transplantation rejection, antifungal drugs for lung fungal infections, antibiotics for local pulmonary infections and cystic fibrosis and opioid analgesics for pain management using liposome technology are a few examples. Many liposomal formulations have reached the stage of clinical trials for the treatment of pulmonary distress, cystic fibrosis, lung fungal infection and lung cancer. These formulations have given very promising results in both in vitro and in vivo studies. However, modifications to new therapies for respiratory diseases and systemic delivery will provide new challenges in conducting well-designed inhalation toxicology studies to support these products, especially for chronic diseases.

Pharmacotherapy for acute pain: implications for practice

Effective treatment of perioperative acute pain requires that information about the patient's goals for pain relief, previous history with analgesics, and type of surgical procedure is used to guide decisions about analgesic regimens. Analgesics are selected based on the location of surgery, degree of anticipated pain, and patient characteristics (such as comorbidities), and routes of administration and dosing schedules are determined to maximize the effectiveness and safety of analgesia while minimizing the potential for adverse events. Pain management therapy is then extended into the postsurgical phase of recovery. To accomplish this, nurses must have a thorough understanding of the pharmacology of analgesics. This article provides useful information for commonly used analgesics, primarily nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, and local anesthetics for control of acute postoperative pain.

Relief of incident dyspnea in palliative cancer patients: a pilot, randomized, controlled trial comparing nebulized hydromorphone, systemic hydromorphone, and nebulized saline

Acute episodic breathlessness in patients receiving palliative care is a distressing symptom with little evidence-base to inform management. This pilot, double-blind, controlled, crossover study compared the effects of nebulized hydromorphone, systemic hydromorphone and nebulized saline for the relief of episodic breathlessness in advanced cancer patients. On three occasions of acute breathlessness, patients randomly received either nebulized hydromorphone, a systemic breakthrough dose of hydromorphone or nebulized saline together with a blinding agent. Breathlessness was scored before and 10, 20, 30, and 60 minutes post-treatment completion using a 100 mm visual analog scale. Twenty patients completed the trial. Ratings did not differ significantly across pretest treatments. Change in ratings from pretest to 10 minutes after completion of nebulization (about 20 minutes after administration of systemic hydromorphone) indicated that each of the treatments resulted in statistically significant improvements in breathlessness, with no significant differences between treatments. Over time, breathlessness decreased significantly for all treatments, with no significant differences between treatments. Only nebulized hydromorphone produced a rapid improvement in breathlessness that reached a magnitude considered to be clinically important. Interpretation of these results is considered in relation to our definition of clinical significance, the dose of hydromorphone used and the possibility of a placebo effect. This study can serve to inform the design of future trials to investigate the management of incident breathlessness.

Advanced formulation design: improving drug therapies for the management of severe and chronic pain

Chronic pain is a condition affecting a vast patient population and resulting in billions of dollars in associated health care costs annually. Sufferers from severe chronic pain often require [correction of requite] twenty-four hour drug treatment through intrusive means and/or repeated oral dosing. Although the oral route of administration is most preferred, conventional immediate release oral dosage forms lead to inconvenient and suboptimal drug therapies for the treatment of chronic pain. Effective drug therapies for the management of chronic pain therefore require advanced formulation design to optimize the delivery of potent analgesic agents. Ideally, these advanced delivery systems provide efficacious pain therapy with minimal side effects via a simple and convenient dosing regime. In this article, currently commercialized and developing drug products for pain management are reviewed with respect to dosage form design as well as clinical efficacy. The drug delivery systems reviewed herein represent advanced formulation designs that are substantially improving analgesic drug therapies.

Dry powder inhalers (DPIs)--a review of device reliability and innovation

A wide range of dry powder inhaler (DPI) devices are currently available on the market to deliver drugs into lungs with a view to maximise drug delivery with low variability. DPIs also face numerous clinical challenges, particularly related to variable patient factors such as age, clinical condition and inspiratory flow. Due to the drug formulation and the design of devices, different DPIs do not show the same performance and manufacturers are taking a variety of device design approaches. The characteristics of an ideal DPI, recent innovations in powder formulation and device design are not universally reliable in terms of dose variability, clinical efficacy, user friendliness and economy. This mini review examines whether device reliability is more important than innovation. This study enables a comparison of the relative merits of optimising existing DPIs or seeking to develop novel devices.

Pharmacotherapy for acute pain: implications for practice

Effective treatment of perioperative acute pain requires that information about the patient's goals for pain relief, previous history with analgesics, and type of surgical procedure is used to guide decisions about analgesic regimens. Analgesics are selected based on the location of surgery, degree of anticipated pain, and patient characteristics such as comorbidities, and routes of administration and dosing schedules are determined to maximize the effectiveness and safety of analgesia, while minimizing the potential for adverse events. Pain management therapy is then extended into the postsurgical phase of recovery. To accomplish this, nurses must have a thorough understanding of the pharmacology of analgesics. This article provides useful information for commonly used analgesics, primarily nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, and local anesthetics for control of acute postoperative pain.