On the reproductive capabilities of aneuploid human preimplantation embryos

The genetics of preimplantation embryonic arrest: the role of aneuploidies

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Aneuploidy is a major cause of embryonic arrest. While meiotic aneuploidies, especially maternal, are a well-documented cause of embryo and fetal arrest, increasing evidence highlights the crucial role played by mitotic aneuploidies. This review explores the molecular and cellular pathways underlying these abnormalities, focusing on abnormal cleavage, chromatin cohesion, spindle stability, maternal effect genes, and mitochondria.

RECENT FINDINGS

Approximately half of human embryos cease development in vitro or shortly after transfer to the uterus. Genetic investigation of these embryos has highlighted that 90% of these exhibit aneuploidies. Surprisingly, most of these arise from errors during the early mitotic divisions of preimplantation embryos. These findings strongly correlate with disruptions of early cleavage possibly due to faulty spindle assembly or mitochondrial dysfunction during the in-vitro development. Moreover, maternal effects, such as faulty meiotic recombination and variants in maternal effect genes involved in the subcortical maternal complex, may further predispose the embryo to high rates of chromosomal imbalance.

SUMMARY

Meiotic and mitotic aneuploidies play a significant role in embryo arrest, yet their molecular and cellular origin are not well understood. Investigating these pathways may lead to interventions that could be developed to improve success rates with IVF or even fertility rates in general.

Chaotic blastocysts in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: prevalence, characterization, and re-biopsy results

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reproductive potential of blastocysts designated as chaotic by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) through re-biopsy and re-analysis.

DESIGN

Retrospective study of 1,442 PGT-A cycles from November 2017 to December 2023.

SUBJECTS

Five thousand eight hundred one blastocysts from 22 in vitro fertilization clinics, including 93 chaotic blastocysts donated for re-biopsy. Chaotic embryos were classified as pure (≥5 uniform aneuploidies), mixed (combination of ≥5 uniform aneuploidies and intermediate copy number chromosomes), and mosaic (≥5 intermediate copy number chromosomes).

EXPOSURE

Re-biopsy and re-analysis of chaotic blastocysts using next-generation sequencing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence of chaotic embryos, survival rate after thawing, and concordance rate between initial and re-biopsy PGT-A results.

RESULTS

The prevalence of chaotic embryos was 4.3% (251/5,801): 13.5% (34) pure, 53.0% (133) mixed, and 33.5% (84) mosaic. After thawing 93 donated chaotic embryos, the survival rate was 74.2% (69). Surviving embryos underwent re-biopsy, yielding the following PGT-A results: 24.6% (17) euploid, 37.7% (26) chaotic, 26.1% (18) aneuploid non-chaotic, 7.2% (5) mosaic, and 4.4% (3) non-informative. Outcomes varied substantially among sub-categories of chaotic embryos. In the pure chaotic category (n = 11), 72.7% (8) yielded results identical to the initial biopsy, whereas 27.3% (3) were re-classified as aneuploid non-chaotic. Within the mixed chaotic category (n = 24), 54.2% (13) retained their mixed chaotic classification, whereas 45.8% (11) were re-classified as aneuploidy non-chaotic. Embryos re-classified into the aforementioned categories had at least one aneuploidy in common with the initial biopsy. Mosaic chaotic category (n = 31) showed the most diverse outcomes: 54.8% (17) were re-classified as euploid, 16.1% (5) remained mosaic chaotic, 16.1% (5) were re-classified as mosaic non-chaotic, and 12.9% (4) as aneuploid non-chaotic. Concordance with the initial biopsy in terms of aneuploid result was 100% in the pure and mixed chaotic categories. However, over half of embryos initially categorized as mosaic chaotic were, in fact, euploid.

CONCLUSION

Re-biopsy can potentially identify embryos with favorable reproductive potential, particularly those initially classified as mosaic chaotic. However, pure and mixed chaotic blastocysts consistently show aneuploidy on re-testing, suggesting limited benefit from re-biopsy for these categories.

Predicting frequency distributions of blastocyst biopsy genotypes by their discrete cohort size using the binomial theorem

RESEARCH QUESTION

How are blastocyst biopsy genotypes distributed as a function of cohort size, and how well does the binomial theorem predict the specific distribution of euploid genotypes across different cohort sizes?

DESIGN

This retrospective observational study included 1065 autologous blastocyst biopsies from 206 consecutive biopsy cases at a single centre. Cohorts were classified into three mutually exclusive categories: euploid+ (containing at least one euploid), euploid-mosaic/segmental+ and meiotic (containing whole chromosome errors alone), stratified by patient age (<37 years versus ≥37 years) and cohort size (10 discrete groups). 'Observed' distributions of individual euploid blastocysts/cohort were compared with binomially 'expected' distributions using the overall probability for euploidy for each age group.

RESULTS

For patients aged <37 years, cohorts were predominantly euploid+ (85.7%). The odds of being euploid increased for each 1-unit increase in cohort size. For each size group, the observed distribution of euploid blastocysts/cohort was closely concordant with distributions predicted binomially in the largest three cohort size quartiles. In contrast, cohort categories in the smallest quartile showed greater discordance. For patients aged ≥37 years, 48.5% of cohorts were euploid+ cohorts. While the odds of being euploid also increased for each 1-unit increase in cohort size, the observed peak number of euploid blastocysts/cohort was lower than predicted binomially in all size quartiles.

CONCLUSIONS

The binomial theorem can predict the probability distributions of euploid genotypes in cohort sizes exceeding four in patients aged <37 years without a biopsy. However, in smaller cohort sizes for patients aged >37 years and all cohort sizes in patients aged ≥37 years, there were fewer euploid blastocysts/cohort than predicted binomially; thus, untransferred mosaic/segmental genotypes represent a repository of pregnancy potential.

Endometrial immune assessment in patients with a history of previous euploid blastocyst failure

Background

Influx and establishment of key endometrial immune factors in the mid-luteal phase of the menstrual cycle is paramount for successful embryo implantation. Endometrial immune dysregulation is associated with repeated embryo implantation failure and miscarriage. In in vitro fertilisation cycles, approximately 30% of embryos diagnosed as chromosomally normal will still fail to produce a viable live birth, yet factors such as the endometrium are rarely clinically explored.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis, clinical outcomes were compared between patients undergoing their first euploid transfer in a conventional substituted cycle (n=612), patients undergoing a euploid transfer in a similar cycle after previous euploid failure (n=149) and the study group of patients with previous euploid transfer failure who received a modified endometrial preparatory regimen following endometrial immune profiling targeting uterine natural killer cell recruitment, maturity and activity as well as their key regulatory counterparts (n=37).

Results

Significant differences were found between first euploid attempt outcomes and patients with previous failures who didn't use endometrial testing (implantation rate 63% vs 51, P=0.02; clinical pregnancy rates 55% vs 40%, P=0.002; live birth rates 50% vs 38%, P=0.02). Patients with previous failures who underwent endometrial immune profiling and a subsequent personalised plan exhibited a trend towards improved clinical outcomes than those with previous failures and no testing (implantation rate 65% vs 51%; clinical pregnancy rate 57% vs 40%; live birth rate 54% vs 38%, respectively) although statistical significance was not demonstrated. Clinical outcomes were comparable between the endometrial immune profiling group and those undergoing a first euploid attempt (implantation rate 65% vs 63%; clinical pregnancy rate 57% vs 55%; live birth rate 54% vs 50%, respectively).

Conclusions

Patients who had a failed attempt when using a euploid embryo had lower chances of pregnancy when repeating their treatment, unless they received a personalised endometrial preparation regimen derived from the results of endometrial immune profiling. These preliminary findings indicate the potential value of guiding management based on immune endometrial testing.

The evolution of preimplantation genetic testing: where is the limit?

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) has revolutionized reproductive medicine over the past 30 years, providing a reliable method for reducing the risk of transmitting severe inherited conditions and offering the possibility of improved IVF outcomes. Today, PGT is widely accepted and integrated into fertility care in many countries around the world. Its history, however, has not been without controversy, with debate around its application to the diagnosis of late-onset disorders, conditions with incomplete penetrance and its use for embryo selection based upon human leukocyte antigen status. Nonetheless, PGT has progressively broadened its scope, and the number of embryos undergoing genetic testing continues to grow each year. Preimplantation genetic testing is most often used for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities, assisting in the identification of embryos affected by lethal aneuploidy. This application has generated the greatest debate of all, owing, in part, to difficulties delivering effective embryo testing using earlier methods. In recent years, advances in technology and rigorous validation studies have helped to improve accuracy, although variability among methods underscores the need for greater standardization and transparency. Emerging technologies, such as whole genome sequencing (WGS) and genome editing, hold promise for further advancements but introduce complex ethical, privacy and consent challenges that demand careful consideration, public engagement and thorough clinical research before implementation. Given its current trajectory, it seems likely that the use of PGT will continue to grow, offering reduced reproductive risks and the possibility of enhanced fertility treatment outcomes for ever greater numbers of patients, ultimately becoming an accepted cornerstone of reproductive care.

Human embryos with segmental aneuploidies display delayed early development: a multicenter morphokinetic analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether segmental aneuploid embryos display unique morphokinetic patterns.

DESIGN

Retrospective multicenter study including a total of 7,027 embryos cultured between 2016 and 2021 in three European in vitro fertilization centers. Analysis was performed on aggregated multicenter data and separately for data from each center. Embryos with no more than four chromosomal alterations were considered in the analysis, resulting in 3,040 euploids and 2,818 whole-chromosome and 697 segmental aneuploids. Overall, the data set contained 3,742 distinct euploid-segmental sibling pairs.

SUBJECTS

Standard morphokinetic features were annotated using various time-lapse systems. Blastocysts were subjected to comprehensive chromosomal screening via preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

EXPOSURE

Morphokinetic patterns were compared among euploid, whole-chromosome aneuploid, and segmental aneuploid embryos.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Morphokinetic timings across groups were compared using statistical analysis, and associations with cleavage features were assessed. Multicenter and center-specific multivariate logistic regression models were calibrated, and their predictive performance was evaluated on independent test set data using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) metrics.

RESULTS

Segmental aneuploid embryos cleaved significantly slower than their euploid siblings across the first three cell cycles, with a delay reaching the blastocyst-stage of development. Specifically during these early cell cycles, segmental aneuploid embryos were also shown to be significantly slower than their aneuploid siblings. A logistic model on the basis of morphokinetic data from the multicenter data set and regressed against type of aneuploidy displayed modest predictive performance on an independent test set (train-AUROC = 0.58; test-AUROC = 0.57). Predictive performance improved on the basis of data from a single center displaying adequate predictive performance on an independent test set from the same center (train-AUROC = 0.74; test-AUROC = 0.64). However, the predictive value diminished when tested on data from other centers (AUROC = 0.52-0.55). Finally, the presence of multinucleation and blastomere exclusion at the cleavage stage were associated with segmental aneuploidies. The combination of morphokinetic features and these discrete embryo morphological features into the logistic regression model (train-AUROC = 0.71) provided an improved prediction of segmental aneuploidy, supporting future investigations using more comprehensive annotation systems.

CONCLUSION

The developed predictive framework may help improve decision-making in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles, helping in the evaluation of embryos showing segmental aneuploidy and distinguishing which embryos are more likely to not have lethal uniform aneuploidies for transfer.

Nonpronuclear- and Monopronuclear-derived Blastocysts Do Not Impair Subsequent Perinatal and Maternal Outcomes

CONTEXT

The routine clinical practice is to prioritize the transfer of blastocysts derived from 2 pronuclei (2PN) embryos if they are available. For women who only have blastocysts resulting from nonpronuclear (0PN) and monopronuclear (1PN) embryos, whether to transfer these embryos or discard them has been an ongoing debate over the years.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the perinatal and obstetric outcomes following the transfer of vitrified-warmed single blastocysts derived from 0PN and 1PN zygotes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated in vitro fertilization center.

PATIENT(S)

This study included singletons born to women who had undergone 0PN and 1PN vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfers, compared to those resulting from 2PN vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfers from 2012 to 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Perinatal and obstetric outcomes.

RESULT(S)

A total of 7284 women were included in the final analysis. Of these, 386, 316, and 6582 cycles resulted from 0PN-, 1PN-, and 2PN-derived blastocysts transfer, respectively. The rates of clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth were similar across the study cohorts in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. When comparing the 0PN and 2PN groups, no differences were found in birth outcomes after adjusting for confounders. Similarly, maternal complications and mode of delivery were comparable between these 2 study cohorts. Birth parameters were also similar between the 1PN and 2PN blastocyst groups, except for more male births in the 1PN cohort. Furthermore, a comparison between the 1PN and 2PN groups did not reveal any significant differences in maternal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The current study showed that the transfer of 0PN and 1PN blastocysts did not compromise reproductive outcomes or increase maternal and perinatal complications. This information is valuable for clinicians to counsel couples effectively and guide them in making informed decisions.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy on previously cryopreserved unbiopsied blastocysts: a cohort study in women with IVF pregnancy loss

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) on cryopreserved unbiopsied blastocysts improve pregnancy outcomes for women with previous IVF-related pregnancy loss?

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included women who underwent vitrified blastocyst warming procedures, with or without trophectoderm biopsy for PGT-A, between January 2016 and June 2023. Participants had experienced two or more clinical pregnancy losses, with at least one loss following in vitro fertilization (IVF). The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth/ongoing pregnancy rate, analyzed using generalized estimating equations (GEE) with confounding adjustments.

RESULTS

The cohort included 146 women, comprising 72 who intended to pursue PGT-A on thawed blastocysts (274 blastocysts) and 74 who proceeded directly to frozen embryo transfer (FET) without prior PGT-A (107 blastocysts). Fourteen women in the PGT-A group had no euploid embryos available for transfer. Among these, two patients had no warmed blastocysts suitable for testing, and twelve had all aneuploid embryoid. The cumulative live birth/ongoing pregnancy rate was significantly lower in the PGT-A group compared to the non-PGT-A group (34.7% [25/72] vs. 52.7% [39/74], adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26-0.99, P = 0.048). Secondary outcomes, including live birth and pregnancy loss rates after initial FET, were comparable between the two groups. Among tested blastocysts, 58 (82.9%) had at least one euploid embryo, resulting in a euploidy rate of 48.6% (125/257).

CONCLUSIONS

PGT-A on cryopreserved unbiopsied blastocysts reduces cumulative live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates and could not improve pregnancy outcomes following the initial FET cycle in women with a history of IVF pregnancy loss.

Prenatal diagnosis following preimplantation genetic testing (PGT): recommendations of the Italian Society of Human Genetics (SIGU)

This document aims to provide good practice recommendations in order to support maternal-foetal medicine specialists, clinical geneticists and clinical laboratory geneticists in the management of pregnancies obtained after the transfer of an embryo tested with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). It was drafted by geneticists expert in preimplantation genetics and prenatal genetic diagnosis belonging to the "Working Group in Cytogenomics, Prenatal and Reproductive Genetics" of the "Italian Society of Human Genetics" (SIGU). In particular, the paper addresses the diagnostic algorithm to be applied in prenatal follow-up depending on the type of PGT performed, the results obtained and the related diagnostic value based on the most recent literature data and Italian and international recommendations.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of double trophectoderm biopsy and/or cryopreservation in PGT: balancing the need for a diagnosis against the risk of harm

BACKGROUND

To prevent the transfer of embryos affected by monogenic conditions and/or chromosomal defects, preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) requires trophectoderm biopsy and cryopreservation. In 2-6% of biopsies, the diagnosis may be inconclusive due to DNA amplification failure or low-quality results. In these cases, a round of re-warming, re-biopsy, and re-cryopreservation is required to obtain a genetic diagnosis. In other cases, when the IVF centre starts providing PGT and/or when the patients develop an indication because of multiple failures, miscarriages or the birth of an affected child after IVF, cryopreserved untested embryos may be warmed, biopsied, and then re-vitrified. However, it is still unclear whether multiple manipulations may reduce reproductive outcomes after PGT.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

This study aimed at conducting a systematic review to investigate the available evidence on the safety of double biopsy and/or double cryopreservation-warming and provide recommendations in this regard. We performed meta-analyses of the differences in the reproductive outcomes (live birth per embryo transfer [LBR per ET], clinical pregnancy rate per ET [CPR per ET], and miscarriage rate per clinical pregnancy [MR per CP]) in double cryopreservation and single biopsy (CBC) or double biopsy and double cryopreservation (BCBC) flows vs the control single biopsy and single cryopreservation (BC) flow. Cryo-survival rates before ET and gestational and perinatal outcomes were also reported.

SEARCH METHODS

PRISMA guidelines were followed to gather all available information from the literature (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase). We used Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and a list of specific keywords relevant for the study question. We searched for original studies in humans, published in peer-reviewed journals in English up to April 2024. Four independent authors assessed the articles for inclusion. One included paper was retrieved from another source.

OUTCOMES

A total of 4219 records were identified, and 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Certainty of evidence level ranged from low to moderate. Both the CBC and BCBC groups showed reduced reproductive outcomes compared to the control (BC). Specifically, live birth rates per embryo transfer were lower in the CBC group (OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.38-0.81, I2 = 58%; six studies) and the BCBC group (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34-0.77, I2 = 24%; six studies). CPR per ET were also lower in the CBC group (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.51-0.92, I2 = 57%; seven studies) and the BCBC group (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.46-0.78, I2 = 0%; seven studies). Additionally, MR per CPs were higher in both the CBC group (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.02-2.77, I2 = 50%; seven studies) and the BCBC group (OR: 2.08, 95% CI: 1.13-3.83, I2 = 28%; seven studies). Cryo-survival as well as gestational and perinatal outcomes were within the expected norms in the studies reporting them.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Improved genetic technologies, standardization of laboratory protocols, operators' proficiency with biopsy and cryopreservation, and continuous monitoring of the performance are essential to minimize inconclusive diagnoses and the putative impact of additional embryo manipulations. Although poorer reproductive outcomes might result from double biopsy and/or double cryopreservations, these practices may still be worthwhile to avoid transferring affected/aneuploid blastocysts. Therefore, the risks must be weighed against the potential benefits for each specific couple.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024503678).

Current quantitative methodologies for preimplantation genetic testing frequently misclassify meiotic aneuploidies as mosaic

OBJECTIVE

To study the biological origin of chromosomal abnormalities in embryos reported as mosaic after next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and to assess the accuracy of current NGS-based methods in distinguishing meiotic from mitotic errors.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study utilizing single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping and karyomapping to identify meiotic aneuploidy in clinically reported mosaic embryos.

SUBJECTS

A total of 146 embryos from 87 patients who underwent in vitro fertilization cycles with NGS-based PGT-A between 2018 and 2020 at The Evewell, London, United Kingdom.

EXPOSURE

Embryos underwent clinical NGS-based PGT-A to identify chromosomal abnormalities. Haplotype-based methods such as single-nucleotide polymorphism-based genotyping and karyomapping were performed on the same amplified material used for NGS-based PGT-A to determine the origin of the chromosomal errors.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The proportion of embryos reported as mosaic by NGS that contained meiotic errors, and the distribution of meiotic vs. mitotic origin among chromosomal abnormalities identified in the mosaic range.

RESULTS

Of the 141 embryos identified as mosaic after NGS-based PGT-A, 32.6% (n = 46/141) contained an error of meiotic origin, challenging their classification as "mosaic embryos." In total, 191 individual chromosomal errors were reported in the mosaic range by NGS-based PGT-A. Of those, 29.3% (56/191) errors (both below and above the 50% copy number threshold) were found to be of meiotic origin. The majority (94.6%) of meiotic errors were maternal in origin. Embryos with multiple chromosomal abnormalities were significantly more likely to have at least one meiotic error. Higher intermediate copy number values correlated with an increased probability of an error being of meiotic origin.

CONCLUSION

This study presents the first direct evidence that a third of embryos reported as mosaic (both low- and high-level mosaic) by NGS-based PGT-A contain meiotic errors, highlighting the potential misclassification of aneuploid embryos as mosaic by current NGS-based PGT-A methods that cannot accurately distinguishing between meiotic and mitotic errors. Single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping provides essential information for accurately determining the origin of chromosomal abnormalities and should be integrated with NGS-based copy number analysis to enhance diagnostic accuracy. Further studies are needed to refine mosaicism classification and to better understand its true implications in in vitro fertilization treatment.

A pilot study of transcriptomic preimplantation genetic testing (PGT-T): towards a new step in embryo selection?

STUDY QUESTION

Is it possible to predict an euploid chromosomal constitution and identify a transcriptomic profile compatible with extended embryonic development from RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) data?

SUMMARY ANSWER

It has been possible to obtain a karyotype comparable to preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), in addition to a transcriptomic signature of embryos which might be suggestive of improved implantation capacity.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Conventional assessment of embryo competence, based on morphology and morphokinetic, lacks knowledge of molecular aspects and faces controversy in predicting ploidy status. Understanding the embryonic transcriptome is crucial, as gene expression influences development and implantation. PGT has improved pregnancy rates, but problems persist when high-quality euploid embryos do not reach term. In fact, only around 50-60% implant, of which 10% result in miscarriage. Comprehensive approaches, including RNA-Seq, offer the potential to discover molecular markers of reproductive competence, and could theoretically be combined with extended-embryo culture platforms up to Day 14 that can be utilized as a proxy to study embryo development at post-implantation stages.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This prospective pilot cohort study was conducted from March 2023 to August 2023. A total of 30 vitrified human blastocysts with previous PGT-A diagnosis on Day 5 (D5) or Day 6 (D6) of development were analysed: n = 15 euploid and n = 15 aneuploid. Finally, 21 embryo samples were included in the study; the rest (n = 9) were excluded due to poor quality pre-sequencing data (n = 7) or highly discordant data (n = 2).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Following warming and re-expansion, embryos underwent a second trophectoderm (TE) biopsy. The embryos were then cultured until day 11 to assess their development. Biopsy analysis by RNA-Seq, studied the differential expressed genes (DEG) to compare embryos which did not or did attach to the plate: unattached embryos (n = 12) versus attached embryos (n = 9). Thus, we also obtained a specific transcriptomic signature of embryos with a "theoretical" capacity for sustained implantation, based on plate attachment on day 11.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The digital karyotype obtained by RNA-Seq showed good concordance with the earlier PGT-A data, with a sensitivity of 0.81, a specificity of 0.83, a Cohen's Kappa of 0.66, and an area under the ROC of 0.9. At the gene level, 76 statistically significant DEGs were found in the comparison unattached versus attached embryos (Padj < 0.05; FC > 1). To address the functional implications of these differences, significantly deregulated pathways according to GO and KEGG categories were identified. The mural trophectoderm (TE) of the unattached blastocysts showed 63 significantly deregulated terms, displaying upregulation in autophagy, apoptosis, protein kinase and ubiquitin-like protein ligase activity, and downregulation of ribosome, spliceosome, kinetochore, segregation, and chromosome condensation processes. The overall transcriptomic signature specific to embryos still attached to the plate on day 11 (with a theoretically higher implantation capacity) consists of 501 genes, including: EMP2, AURKB, FOLR1, NOTCH3, LRP2, FZD5, MDH1, APOD, GPX8, COLEC12, HSPA1A, CMTM7, BEX3, which are related to implantation and embryonic development (raw P-value < 0.05; shrunk LFC > 1.1). These findings indicate that it might be possible to identify euploid embryos with a greater capacity for implantation and development, after excluding those embryos that present chromosomal alterations.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study included a small sample size, remarkable variability between samples, and low success rate of RNA amplification. Also, structural chromosomal abnormalities were not included, and it was not possible to diagnose mosaic embryos. TE biopsy does not assure the chromosomal status of the whole embryo. The maximum day for in vitro development was Day 11, and attachment to the plate on this day does not provide a clear indication of implantation capacity and viability, which was not tested in this study.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The short-term goals following on from this pilot study is to expand the sample size with embryos of more complex abnormalities, and to perform a prospective in vitro preclinical validation. In a more distant future and with optimal results, this technique could have clinical application, thus increasing clinical outcomes by assessing both chromosomal content and transcriptomic profiling.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The Institut Valencià de Competitivitat Empresarial (IVACE) (IMIDCA/2022/39) and Generalitat Valenciana (CIACIF/2021/11) supported the present study. A.C. is an employee of JUNO Genetics. He has received honoraria for an IBSA lecture and a Merck lecture. He is also a minor shareholder of IVIRMA Global. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Value of PGT-A when only one or two blastocysts are obtained: propensity-score matching and cost-effectiveness study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and cost of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) when only one or two blastocysts are obtained.

METHODS

A dataset was gathered from 1829 patients including 368 non-PGT-A and 1461 PGT-A cycles with one or two blastocysts obtained, between April 2013 and July 2022. Patients were matched 1:1 by propensity-score matching for maternal age, number of metaphase-II oocytes inseminated and number of blastocysts obtained, achieving a database of 242 patients per group. The non-PGT-A and PGT-A groups were compared for differences in live birth rate (LBR) per embryo transfer (ET), cumulative LBR per patient, miscarriage rate (MR) per clinical pregnancy, number of days between oocyte retrieval and conclusion of the IVF cycle (primary outcome), mean expenses incurred at the clinic and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

RESULTS

More than twice as many ETs were conducted in the non-PGT-A group compared with the PGT-A group, yet the cumulative LBR per patient was similar between groups (23.6% (95% CI, 18.5-29.5%) vs 27.3% (95% CI, 21.9-33.4%)). This outcome was achieved with a higher LBR per ET (16.2% (95% CI, 12.6-20.5%) vs 41.5% (95% CI, 33.9-49.4%)) and lower MR per clinical pregnancy (30.1% (95% CI, 21.8-42.6%) vs 13.9% (95% CI, 7.5-24.0%)) in the PGT-A group. The MR per patient was also lower in the PGT-A group (9.5% (95% CI, 6.2-14.1%) vs 4.5% (95% CI, 2.4-8.2%)). The mean duration between oocyte retrieval and IVF cycle conclusion was 131 (95% CI, 113-150) days in the non-PGT-A group vs 74 (95% CI, 61-87) days in the PGT-A group (P < 0.001; power = 99.8%). The ICER of PGT-A for the months saved between oocyte retrieval and conclusion of the IVF cycle was €499 overall, ranging between €170 and €2065 according to the number of blastocysts obtained and/or maternal age. The ICER of PGT-A for prevented miscarriages was €18 968, decreasing to €3525 when calculated among patients aged ≥ 35 years with two blastocysts obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

When conducted in expert IVF clinics for patients indicated for the procedure, PGT-A is clinically valuable even when only one or two blastocysts are obtained. PGT-A reduces the number of ETs and miscarriages while the cumulative LBR per patient remains unaffected, and allows these outcomes to be achieved in a shorter timeframe. The ICER of PGT-A vs non PGT-A decreased as maternal age increased. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements by genome-wide SNP genotyping and haplotype analysis: a prospective multicenter clinical study

BACKGROUND

Preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) has been widely utilized to select euploid embryos in patients carrying balanced chromosomal rearrangements (BCRs) by chromosome copy number analysis. However, reliable and extensively validated PGT-SR methods for selecting embryos without BCRs in large-cohort studies are lacking.

METHODS

In this prospective, multicenter, cohort study, carriers with BCRs undergoing PGT-SR were recruited across 12 academic fertility centers within China. PGT-SR was performed using genome-wide SNP genotyping and haplotyping approach. Parental haplotypes were phased by available genotypes from a close relative or an unbalanced embryo. The karyotypes of embryos were inferred from the haplotypes. Only a single embryo was transferred in each cycle.

FINDINGS

Between April 2018 and March 2023, 1298 carriers we randomly enrolled. A total of 7867 blastocysts from 1603 PGT-SR cycles were biopsied, in which 7750 (98.51%) were successfully genotyped and analyzed. Overall, 75.98% (1218/1603) of cycles obtained euploid embryos and 53.15% (852/1603) generated non-carrier embryos. The proportion of carrier and non-carrier embryos was similar in different subgroups. A total of 1030 non-carrier and 439 carrier embryos were transferred, 817 healthy babies were delivered cumulatively. Our results demonstrate that SNP-haplotyping method is highly accurate (sensitivity 95% CI: 98.34%-100%, specificity 95% CI: 96.63%-100%, respectively), and can be applied universally to different BCR types. Moreover, the clinical outcomes were comparable between the carrier and non-carrier embryo groups.

INTERPRETATION

This study demonstrates the effectiveness of preimplantation genetic genome-wide SNP-genotyping and haplotyping method, resulting in the delivery of more babies with a normal karyotype.

FUNDING

This study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC2703200, 2021YFC2700600, 2021YFC2700500), National Natural Science Foundation of China (82201807, 82171639, 82071717). Shanghai Science and Technology Innovation Action Plan Program (18411953800), and the Municipal Human Resources Development Program for Outstanding Young Talents in Medical and Health Sciences in Shanghai (2022YQ075).

Genetics in Reproductive Medicine

Thanks to advances in technology, genetic testing is now available to explore the causes of infertility and to assess the risk of a given couple passing on a genetic disorder to their offspring. This allows at-risk couples to make an informed decision when opting for assisted reproduction and allows professionals to offer pre-implantation diagnosis when appropriate. Genetic screening of an infertile couple has thus become standard practice for an appropriate diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic assessment. This review aims to highlight the conditions under which genetic screening plays a role in improving reproductive outcomes for infertile couples.

Confirmation and pathogenicity of small copy number variations incidentally detected via a targeted next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy platform

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the technical accuracy, inheritance, and pathogenicity of small copy number variants (CNVs) detected by a targeted next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) platform.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study performed between 2020 and 2022.

SETTING

Clinic.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 12,157 patients who underwent clinical PGT-A performed by targeted next-generation sequencing for whole chromosome and large segmental aneuploidies.

INTERVENTION(S)

An incidental finding was reported when a CNV gain/loss of at least 3 consecutive amplicons appeared in at least 2 embryos from the same in vitro fertilization cycle.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome measures were the specificity, incidence, inheritance, and pathogenicity of small CNVs detected by the PGT-A platform. Accuracy of the PGT-A platform CNV calls was assessed via concordance with the CNV calls (size and genomic location) on chromosomal microarray of the gamete provider(s). Parental origin of the CNV and pathogenicity classifications were also reported.

RESULT(S)

An incidental finding that met reporting criteria was identified in 75 (0.62%; 95% confidence interval, 0.5%-0.8%) of 12,157 unique PGT-A patients. Chromosomal microarray follow-up was requested for all cases, and results were received for 1 or both members of 65 reproductive couples. In all cases, 1 of the gamete providers was confirmed to have the CNV identified in the embryos (100.0%, N = 65/65; 95% confidence interval, 94.5-100). The identified CNV was of maternal origin in 34 cases (52.3%) and of paternal origin in 31 cases (47.7%). A significant correlation was identified between PGT-A-predicted CNV sizes and chromosomal microarray detected sizes (r = 0.81) and genomic coordinates on parental deoxyribonucleic acid. Twenty-six (40%) of the CNVs were classified as benign/likely benign, 30 (46.2%) as a variant of uncertain significance, and 9 (13.8%) as pathogenic/likely pathogenic.

CONCLUSION(S)

Certain PGT-A platforms may enable the detection of inherited, small CNVs with extremely high specificity without prior knowledge of parental status. Most CNVs in this data set were confirmed to be benign/likely benign or a variant of uncertain significance. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs associated with a broad range of phenotypic features may also be detected, although a reliable negative predictive value for small CNVs with current PGT-A technologies is unknown because of the many technical challenges.

Screening embryos for polygenic disease risk: a review of epidemiological, clinical, and ethical considerations

BACKGROUND

The genetic composition of embryos generated by in vitro fertilization (IVF) can be examined with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). Until recently, PGT was limited to detecting single-gene, high-risk pathogenic variants, large structural variants, and aneuploidy. Recent advances have made genome-wide genotyping of IVF embryos feasible and affordable, raising the possibility of screening embryos for their risk of polygenic diseases such as breast cancer, hypertension, diabetes, or schizophrenia. Despite a heated debate around this new technology, called polygenic embryo screening (PES; also PGT-P), it is already available to IVF patients in some countries. Several articles have studied epidemiological, clinical, and ethical perspectives on PES; however, a comprehensive, principled review of this emerging field is missing.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

This review has four main goals. First, given the interdisciplinary nature of PES studies, we aim to provide a self-contained educational background about PES to reproductive specialists interested in the subject. Second, we provide a comprehensive and critical review of arguments for and against the introduction of PES, crystallizing and prioritizing the key issues. We also cover the attitudes of IVF patients, clinicians, and the public towards PES. Third, we distinguish between possible future groups of PES patients, highlighting the benefits and harms pertaining to each group. Finally, our review, which is supported by ESHRE, is intended to aid healthcare professionals and policymakers in decision-making regarding whether to introduce PES in the clinic, and if so, how, and to whom.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched for PubMed-indexed articles published between 1/1/2003 and 1/3/2024 using the terms 'polygenic embryo screening', 'polygenic preimplantation', and 'PGT-P'. We limited the review to primary research papers in English whose main focus was PES for medical conditions. We also included papers that did not appear in the search but were deemed relevant.

OUTCOMES

The main theoretical benefit of PES is a reduction in lifetime polygenic disease risk for children born after screening. The magnitude of the risk reduction has been predicted based on statistical modelling, simulations, and sibling pair analyses. Results based on all methods suggest that under the best-case scenario, large relative risk reductions are possible for one or more diseases. However, as these models abstract several practical limitations, the realized benefits may be smaller, particularly due to a limited number of embryos and unclear future accuracy of the risk estimates. PES may negatively impact patients and their future children, as well as society. The main personal harms are an unindicated IVF treatment, a possible reduction in IVF success rates, and patient confusion, incomplete counselling, and choice overload. The main possible societal harms include discarded embryos, an increasing demand for 'designer babies', overemphasis of the genetic determinants of disease, unequal access, and lower utility in people of non-European ancestries. Benefits and harms will vary across the main potential patient groups, comprising patients already requiring IVF, fertile people with a history of a severe polygenic disease, and fertile healthy people. In the United States, the attitudes of IVF patients and the public towards PES seem positive, while healthcare professionals are cautious, sceptical about clinical utility, and concerned about patient counselling.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

The theoretical potential of PES to reduce risk across multiple polygenic diseases requires further research into its benefits and harms. Given the large number of practical limitations and possible harms, particularly unnecessary IVF treatments and discarded viable embryos, PES should be offered only within a research context before further clarity is achieved regarding its balance of benefits and harms. The gap in attitudes between healthcare professionals and the public needs to be narrowed by expanding public and patient education and providing resources for informative and unbiased genetic counselling.

In vitro fertilization and perinatal outcomes of patients with advanced maternal age after single frozen euploid embryo transfer: a propensity score-matched analysis of autologous and donor cycles

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate in vitro fertilization (IVF) and perinatal outcomes of donor egg and autologous cycles in patients with advanced reproductive age after undergoing single frozen euploid embryo transfer.

DESIGN

A multicenter, retrospective, cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated and private IVF centers.

PATIENT(S)

Patients aged 39-46 years who underwent IVF with intracytoplasmic sperm injection and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy using whole-chromosome sequencing with donor (n = 278) or autologous (n = 278) oocytes between October 2017 and October 2021.

INTERVENTION(S)

Single frozen euploid embryo transfer with donor or autologous euploid embryo.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The main outcome measure was the live birth rate (LBR) after the first embryo transfer, calculated per embryo transfer. The secondary outcomes included the implantation rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and gestational age and birth weight at the time of delivery.

RESULT(S)

Patients using donor or autologous oocytes had a similar likelihood of implantation (57.91% [51.87-63.78] vs. 57.19% [51.15-63.09]) and LBR (41.01% [95% confidence interval {CI}, 35.17-47.04] vs. 42.45% [95% CI, 36.56-48.49]). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the ectopic pregnancy rate (0.72% [0.09-2.57] vs. 0.36% [0.01-1.99]), miscarriage rate (16.19% [12.06-21.05] vs. 14.39% [95% CI, 10.48-19.08]), gestational age (38.50 [38.08-38.92] vs. 39.16 [38.25-40.07] weeks), or birth weight of infants (2,982.25 [2,606.69-3,357.81] vs. 3,128.24 [2,962.30-3,294.17] kg). The univariate analysis showed no association between advanced maternal age and the LBR (relative risk, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.84-1.25]). Multivariate analysis using putative confounders for embryo competency found no associations with LBR (adjusted relative risk, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.75-1.98]).

CONCLUSION(S)

Patients with euploid blastocysts derived from donor or autologous oocytes did not reveal statistically significant differences in the LBR, implantation rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, duration of gestation, or infant birth weight. These findings suggest that age-related reproductive decline and/or poor IVF outcomes associated with women with advanced reproductive age undergoing IVF are heavily driven by embryonic aneuploidy.

Aligning genotyping and copy number data in single trophectoderm biopsies for aneuploidy prediction: uncovering incomplete concordance

STUDY QUESTION

To what extent can genotype analysis aid in the classification of (mosaic) aneuploid embryos diagnosed through copy number analysis of a trophectoderm (TE) biopsy?

SUMMARY ANSWER

In a small portion of embryos, genotype analysis revealed signatures of meiotic or uniform aneuploidy in those diagnosed with intermediate copy number changes, and signatures of presumed mitotic or putative mosaic aneuploidy in those diagnosed with full copy number changes.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) for preimplantation genetic testing has provided valuable insights into the prevalence of (mosaic) chromosomal aneuploidy at the blastocyst stage. However, diagnosis of (mosaic) aneuploidy often relies solely on (intermediate) copy number analysis of a single TE biopsy. Integrating genotype information allows for independent assessment of the origin and degree of aneuploidy. Yet, studies aligning both datasets to predict (putative mosaic) aneuploidy in embryos remain scarce.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

A single TE biopsy was collected from 1560 embryos derived from 221 couples tested for a monogenic disorder (n = 218) or microdeletion-/microduplication syndrome (n = 3). TE samples were subjected to both copy number and genotyping analysis.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

Copy number and SNP genotyping analysis were conducted using GENType. Unbalanced chromosomal anomalies ≥10 Mb (or ≥20 Mb for copy number calls <50%) were classified by degree, based on low-range intermediate (LR, 30-50%), high-range intermediate (HR, 50-70%) or full (>70%) copy number changes. These categories were further subjected to genotyping analysis to ascertain the origin (and/or degree) of aneuploidy. For chromosomal gains, the meiotic division of origin (meiotic I/II versus non-meiotic or presumed mitotic) was established by studying the haplotypes. The level of monosomy (uniform versus putative mosaic) in the biopsy could be ascertained from the B-allele frequencies. For segmental aneuploidies, genotyping was restricted to deletions.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Of 1479 analysed embryos, 24% (n = 356) exhibited a whole-chromosome aneuploidy, with 19% (n = 280) showing full copy number changes suggestive of uniform aneuploidy. Among 258 embryos further investigated by genotyping, 95% of trisomies with full copy number changes were identified to be of meiotic origin. For monosomies, a complete loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the biopsy was observed in 97% of cases, yielding a 96% concordance rate at the embryo level (n = 248/258). Interestingly, 4% of embryos (n = 10/258) showed SNP signatures of non-meiotic gain or putative mosaic loss instead. Meanwhile, 5% of embryos (n = 76/1479) solely displayed HR (2.5%; n = 37) or LR (2.6%; n = 39) intermediate copy number changes, with an additional 2% showing both intermediate and full copy number changes. Among embryos with HR intermediate copy number changes where genotyping was feasible (n = 25/37), 92% (n = 23/25) showed SNP signatures consistent with putative mosaic aneuploidy. However, 8% (n = 2/25) exhibited evidence of meiotic trisomy (9%) or complete LOH in the biopsy (7%). In the LR intermediate group, 1 of 33 (3%) genotyped embryos displayed complete LOH. Furthermore, segmental aneuploidy was detected in 7% of embryos (n = 108/1479) (or 9% (n = 139) with added whole-chromosome aneuploidy). These errors were often (52%) characterized by intermediate copy number values, which closely aligned with genotyping data when examined (94-100%).

LARGE SCALE DATA

N/A.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

The findings were based on single TE biopsies and the true extent of mosaicism was not validated through embryo dissection. Moreover, evidence of absence of a meiotic origin for a trisomy should not be construed as definitive proof of a mitotic error. Additionally, a genotyping diagnosis was not always attainable due to the absence of a recombination event necessary to discern between meiotic II and non-meiotic trisomy, or the unavailability of DNA from both parents.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Interpreting (intermediate) copy number changes of a single TE biopsy alone as evidence for (mosaic) aneuploidy in the embryo remains suboptimal. Integrating genotype information alongside the copy number status could provide a more comprehensive assessment of the embryo's genetic makeup, within and beyond the single TE biopsy. By identifying meiotic aberrations, especially in presumed mosaic embryos, we underscore the potential value of genotyping analysis as a deselection tool, ultimately striving to reduce adverse clinical outcomes.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

L.D.W. was supported by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO; 1S74621N). M.B., K.T., F.V.M., S.J., A.V.T., V.S., D.S., A.D., and S.S. are supported by Ghent University Hospital. B.M. was funded by Ghent University. The authors have no conflicts of interest.

The comparision among euploidy of preimplantation blastocysts in different controlled ovary stimulation (COH) protocols

PURPOSE

To compare differences in euploidy rates for blastocysts in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) long and short protocols, GnRH-antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocol, progestin-primed ovarian stimulation and mild stimulation protocols, and other ovary stimulation protocols.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study from the Assisted Reproductive Medicine Department of Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital. A total of 1657 PGT-A cycles with intracytoplasmic sperm injection after different controlled ovary hyperstimulation protocols were analyzed, and a total of 3154 embryos were biopsied. Differences in euploidy rate per embryo biopsied, embryo euploidy rate per oocyte retrieved and cycle cancellation rate were compared.

RESULTS

For the PGT-A cycles, the euploidy rate per embryo biopsied was lower in the GnRH-ant protocol than in the GnRH-a long protocol (53.26 vs. 58.68%, respectively). Multiple linear regression showed that the GnRH-ant protocol was associated with a lower euploidy rate per embryo biopsied (β =  -0.079, p = 0.011). The euploidy rate per embryo biopsied was not affected by total gonadotropin dosage, duration of stimulation and number of oocytes retrieved. The embryo euploidy rate per oocyte retrieved was similar in all protocols and was negatively correlated with the total number of oocytes retrieved (β =  -0.003, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the GnRH-a long protocol, the GnRH-ant protocol was associated with a lower euploidy rate per embryo biopsied. The total gonadotropin dosage, duration of stimulation and number of oocytes retrieved did not appear to significantly influence euploidy rates.

An expert opinion on rescuing atypically pronucleated human zygotes by molecular genetic fertilization checks in IVF

IVF laboratories routinely adopt morphological pronuclear assessment at the zygote stage to identify abnormally fertilized embryos deemed unsuitable for clinical use. In essence, this is a pseudo-genetic test for ploidy motivated by the notion that biparental diploidy is required for normal human life and abnormal ploidy will lead to either failed implantation, miscarriage, or significant pregnancy complications, including molar pregnancy and chorionic carcinoma. Here, we review the literature associated with ploidy assessment of human embryos derived from zygotes displaying a pronuclear configuration other than the canonical two, and the related pregnancy outcome following transfer. We highlight that pronuclear assessment, although associated with aberrant ploidy outcomes, has a low specificity in the prediction of abnormal ploidy status in the developing embryo, while embryos deemed abnormally fertilized can yield healthy pregnancies. Therefore, this universal strategy of pronuclear assessment invariably leads to incorrect classification of over 50% of blastocysts derived from atypically pronucleated zygotes, and the systematic disposal of potentially viable embryos in IVF. To overcome this limitation of current practice, we discuss the new preimplantation genetic testing technologies that enable accurate identification of the ploidy status of preimplantation embryos and suggest a progress from morphology-based checks to molecular fertilization check as the new gold standard. This alternative molecular fertilization checking represents a possible non-incremental and controversy-free improvement to live birth rates in IVF as it adds to the pool of viable embryos available for transfer. This is especially important for the purposes of 'family building' or for poor-prognosis IVF patients where embryo numbers are often limited.

Preconception carrier screening and preimplantation genetic testing in the infertility management

BACKGROUND

Genetic testing serves as a valuable element of reproductive care, applicable at various stages of the reproductive journey: (i) before pregnancy, when a couple's genetic reproductive risk can be evaluated; (ii) before embryo implantation, as part of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment, to ascertain several inherited or de novo genetic/chromosomal diseases of the embryo before transfer; (iii) during the prenatal period, to assess the genetic costitution of the fetus. Preconception carrier screening (CS) is a genetic test typically performed on couples planning a pregnancy. The primary purpose of CS is to identify couples at-risk of conceiving a child affected by a severe genetic disorder with autosomal recessive or X-linked inheritance. Detection of high reproductive risk through CS allows prospective parents to be informed of their predisposition and improve reproductive decision-making. These include undergoing IVF with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) or donor gametes, prenatal diagnosis, adoption, remaining childless, taking no actions. Both the presence of the affected gene (PGT-M) and chromosomal status (PGT-A) of the embryo can be comprehensively assessed through modern approaches.

OBJECTIVES

We provide a review of CS and PGT applications to equip healthcare providers with up-to-date information regarding their opportunities and complexities.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The use of CS and PGT is currently considered the most effective intervention for avoiding both an affected pregnancy whilst using autologous gametes in couples with known increased risk, and chromosomal abnormalities. As our understanding in the genetic component in pathological conditions increases, the number of tested disorders will expand, offering a more thorough assessment of one's genetic inheritance. Nevertheless, implementation and development in this field must be accompanied by scientific and ethical considerations to ensure this approach serves the best long-term interests of individuals and society, promoting justice and autonomy and preserving parenthood and the healthcare system.

CONCLUSION

The combination of CS and PGT aligns with principles of personalized medicine by offering reproductive care tailored to the individual's genetic makeup.

Best quality vs. sex selection - an analysis of embryo selection preferences for patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy over a 10-year period

PURPOSE

Investigate patient preferences in embryo selection for transfer regarding quality versus sex in IVF/ICSI cycles with PGT-A and assess associated clinical implications.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study at a university fertility practice from January 2012 to December 2021. Included were patients undergoing single frozen euploid transfers with at least one embryo of each sex available. Primary outcomes were preference for embryo selection (quality vs. sex) and sex preference (male vs. female). Trends over 10 years were evaluated and clinical outcomes, including clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), sustained implantation rate (SIR), and live birth rate (LBR), were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 5,145 embryo transfer cycles were included; 54.5% chose the best-quality embryo, while 45.5% selected based on sex. Among those choosing based on sex, 56.5% chose male embryos and 43.5% chose female. Preference for quality remained consistent over the decade (p = 0.30), while male embryos were consistently favored (p = 0.64). Best-quality embryos had higher grades (p < 0.001). Clinical outcomes were similar between groups (CPR: 74.4% vs. 71.9%, p = 0.05; SIR: 64.9% vs. 63.4%, p = 0.26; LBR: 58.8% vs. 56.7%, p = 0.13), and between male and female embryo selections.

CONCLUSIONS

Sex selection remains common, with 45.5% selecting embryos based on sex, predominantly favoring males. This trend persisted over 10 years, with comparable clinical outcomes regardless of selection criteria.

A pilot study to investigate the clinically predictive values of copy number variations detected by next-generation sequencing of cell-free deoxyribonucleic acid in spent culture media

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the positive predictive value and false positive risk of copy number variations (CNV's) detected in cell free deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from spent culture media for nonviable or aneuploid embryos.

DESIGN

Diagnostic/prognostic accuracy study.

PATIENT(S)

Patients aged 35 and younger with an indication for IVF-ICSI and elective single frozen embryo transfer at a single, private IVF center.

INTERVENTION

Embryo selection was performed according to the conventional grading, blinded to noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (niPGT-A) results. After clinical outcomes were established, spent culture media samples were analyzed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prognostic accuracy of CNVs according to niPGT-A results to predict nonviability or clinical aneuploidy.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty patients completed the study. Interpretations of next-generation sequencing (NGS) profiles were as follows: 7.5% (n = 9) failed quality control; 62.5% (n = 75) no CNVs detected; and 30% (n = 36) abnormal copy number detected. Stratification of abnormal NGS profiles was as follows: 15% (n = 18) whole chromosome and 15% (n = 18) uncertain reproductive potential. An intermediate CNV was evident in 27.8% (n = 5) of the whole chromosome abnormalities. The negative predictive value for samples with no detected abnormality was 57.3% (43/75). Whole chromosome abnormality was associated with a positive predictive value of 94.4% (17/18), lower sustained implantation rate (5.6%, 1/18), and higher relative risk (RR) for nonviability compared with no detected abnormalities (RR 2.21, 95% CI: 1.66-2.94). No other CNVs were associated with significant differences in the sustained implantation or RRs for nonviability. Unequal sex chromosome proportions suggested that maternal contamination was not uncommon. A secondary descriptive analysis of 705 supernumerary embryos revealed proportions of NGS profile interpretations similar to the transferred cohort. Significant median absolute pairwise differences between certain subcategories of CNV abnormalities were apparent.

CONCLUSION

Whole chromosome abnormalities were associated with a high positive predictive value and significant RR for nonviability. Embryos associated with other CNVs had sustained implantation rates similar to those with no abnormalities detected. Further studies are required to validate the clinical applicability of niPGT-A.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04732013).

Trophectoderm cells of human mosaic embryos display increased apoptotic levels and impaired differentiation capacity: a molecular clue regarding their reproductive fate?

STUDY QUESTION

Are there cell lineage-related differences in the apoptotic rates and differentiation capacity of human blastocysts diagnosed as euploid, mosaic, and aneuploid after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) based on concurrent copy number and genotyping analysis?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Trophectoderm (TE) cells of mosaic and aneuploid blastocysts exhibit significantly higher levels of apoptosis and significantly reduced differentiation capacity compared to those of euploid blastocysts.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Embryos diagnosed as mosaic after PGT-A can develop into healthy infants, yet understanding the reasons behind their reproductive potential requires further research. One hypothesis suggests that mosaicism can be normalized through selective apoptosis and reduced proliferation of aneuploid cells, but direct evidence of these mechanisms in human embryos is lacking. Additionally, data interpretation from studies involving mosaic embryos has been hampered by retrospective analysis methods and the high incidence of false-positive mosaic diagnoses stemming from the use of poorly specific PGT-A platforms.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Prospective cohort study performing colocalization of cell-lineage and apoptotic markers by immunofluorescence (IF). We included a total of 64 human blastocysts donated to research on Day 5 or 6 post-fertilization (dpf) by 43 couples who underwent in vitro fertilization treatment with PGT-A at IVI-RMA Valencia between September 2019 and October 2022. A total of 27 mosaic blastocysts were analyzed.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The study consisted of two phases: Phase I (caspase-3, n = 53 blastocysts): n = 13 euploid, n = 22 mosaic, n = 18 aneuploid. Phase II (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling (TUNEL), n = 11 blastocysts): n = 2 euploid, n = 5 mosaic, n = 4 aneuploid. Following donation for research, vitrified blastocysts were warmed, cultured until re-expansion, fixed, processed for IF, and imaged using confocal microscopy. For each blastocyst, the following cell counts were conducted: total cells (DAPI+), TE cells (GATA3+), inner cell mass (ICM) cells (GATA3-/NANOG+), and apoptotic cells (caspase-3+ or TUNEL+). The incidence of apoptosis was calculated for each blastocyst by dividing the number of caspase-3+ cells (Phase I) or TUNEL+ cells (Phase II) by the number of TE or ICM cells. Statistical analysis was performed according to data type and distribution (P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Phase I: Mosaic blastocysts displayed a similar number of total cells (49.6 ± 15 cells at 5 dpf; 58.8 ± 16.9 cells at 6 dpf), TE cells (38.8 ± 13.7 cells at 5 dpf; 49.2 ± 16.2 cells at 6 dpf), and ICM cells (10.9 ± 4.2 cells at 5 dpf; 9.7 ± 7.1 cells at 6 dpf) compared to euploid and aneuploid blastocysts (P > 0.05). The proportion of TE cells retaining NANOG expression increased gradually from euploid blastocysts (9.7% = 63/651 cells at 5 dpf; 0% = 0/157 cells at 6 dpf) to mosaic blastocysts (13.1% = 104/794 cells at 5 dpf; 3.4% = 12/353 cells at 6 dpf) and aneuploid blastocysts (27.9% = 149/534 cells at 5 dpf; 4.6% = 19/417 cells at 6 dpf) (P < 0.05). At the TE level, caspase-3+ cells were frequently observed (39% = 901/2310 cells). The proportion of caspase-3+ TE cells was significantly higher in mosaic blastocysts (44.1% ± 19.6 at 5 dpf; 43% ± 16.8 at 6 dpf) and aneuploid blastocysts (45.9% ± 16.1 at 5 dpf; 49% ± 15.1 at 6 dpf) compared to euploid blastocysts (26.6% ± 16.6 at 5 dpf; 17.5% ± 14.8 at 6 dpf) (P < 0.05). In contrast, at the ICM level, caspase-3+ cells were rarely observed (1.9% = 11/596 cells), and only detected in mosaic blastocysts (2.6% = 6/232 cells) and aneuploid blastocysts (2.5% = 5/197 cells) (P > 0.05). Phase II: Consistently, TUNEL+ cells were only observed in TE cells (32.4% = 124/383 cells). An increasing trend was identified toward a higher proportion of TUNEL+ cells in the TE of mosaic blastocysts (37.2% ± 21.9) and aneuploid blastocysts (39% ± 41.7), compared to euploid blastocysts (23% ± 32.5), although these differences did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The observed effects on apoptosis and differentiation may not be exclusive to aneuploid cells. Additionally, variations in aneuploidies and unexplored factors related to blastocyst development and karyotype concordance may introduce potential biases and uncertainties in the results.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our findings demonstrate a cell lineage-specific effect of aneuploidy on the apoptotic levels and differentiation capacity of human blastocysts. This contributes to unravelling the biological characteristics of mosaic blastocysts and supports the concept of clonal depletion of aneuploid cells in explaining their reproductive potential.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was funded by grants from Centro para el Desarrollo Tecnológico Industrial (CDTI) (20190022) and Generalitat Valenciana (APOTIP/2019/009). None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Metabolic imaging of human embryos is predictive of ploidy status but is not associated with clinical pregnancy outcomes: a pilot trial

STUDY QUESTION

Does fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM)-based metabolic imaging assessment of human blastocysts prior to frozen transfer correlate with pregnancy outcomes?

SUMMARY ANSWER

FLIM failed to distinguish consistent patterns in mitochondrial metabolism between blastocysts leading to pregnancy compared to those that did not.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

FLIM measurements provide quantitative information on NAD(P)H and flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD+) concentrations. The metabolism of embryos has long been linked to their viability, suggesting the potential utility of metabolic measurements to aid in selection.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This was a pilot trial enrolling 121 IVF couples who consented to have their frozen blastocyst measured using non-invasive metabolic imaging. After being warmed, 105 couples' good-quality blastocysts underwent a 6-min scan in a controlled temperature and gas environment. FLIM-assessed blastocysts were then transferred without any intervention in management.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Eight metabolic parameters were obtained from each blastocyst (4 for NAD(P)H and 4 for FAD): short and long fluorescence lifetime, fluorescence intensity, and fraction of the molecule engaged with enzyme. The redox ratio (intensity of NAD(P)H)/(intensity of FAD) was also calculated. FLIM data were combined with known metadata and analyzed to quantify the ability of metabolic imaging to differentiate embryos that resulted in pregnancy from embryos that did not. De-identified discarded aneuploid human embryos (n = 158) were also measured to quantify correlations with ploidy status and other factors. Statistical comparisons were performed using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with 5-fold cross-validation averaged over 100 repeats with random sampling. AUC values were used to quantify the ability to distinguish between classes.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

No metabolic imaging parameters showed significant differences between good-quality blastocysts resulting in pregnancy versus those that did not. A logistic regression using metabolic data and metadata produced an ROC AUC of 0.58. In contrast, robust AUCs were obtained when classifying other factors such as comparison of Day 5 (n = 64) versus Day 6 (n = 41) blastocysts (AUC = 0.78), inner cell mass versus trophectoderm (n = 105: AUC = 0.88) and aneuploid (n = 158) versus euploid and positive pregnancy embryos (n = 108) (AUC = 0.82).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The study protocol did not select which embryo to transfer and the cohort of 105 included blastocysts were all high quality. The study was also limited in number of participants and study sites. Increased power and performing the trial in more sites may have provided a stronger conclusion regarding the merits of the use of FLIM clinically.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

FLIM failed to distinguish consistent patterns in mitochondrial metabolism between good-quality blastocysts leading to pregnancy compared to those that did not. Blastocyst ploidy status was, however, highly distinguishable. In addition, embryo regions and embryo day were consistently revealed by FLIM. While metabolic imaging detects mitochondrial metabolic features in human blastocysts, this pilot trial indicates it does not have the potential to serve as an effective embryo viability detection tool. This may be because mitochondrial metabolism plays an alternative role post-implantation.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was sponsored by Optiva Fertility, Inc. Boston IVF contributed to the clinical site and services. Becker Hickl, GmbH, provided the FLIM system on loan. T.S. was the founder and held stock in Optiva Fertility, Inc., and D.S. and E.S. had options with Optiva Fertility, Inc., during this study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The study was approved by WCG Connexus IRB (Study Number 1298156).

Chromosome Division in Early Embryos-Is Everything under Control? And Is the Cell Size Important?

Chromosome segregation in female germ cells and early embryonic blastomeres is known to be highly prone to errors. The resulting aneuploidy is therefore the most frequent cause of termination of early development and embryo loss in mammals. And in specific cases, when the aneuploidy is actually compatible with embryonic and fetal development, it leads to severe developmental disorders. The main surveillance mechanism, which is essential for the fidelity of chromosome segregation, is the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC). And although all eukaryotic cells carry genes required for SAC, it is not clear whether this pathway is active in all cell types, including blastomeres of early embryos. In this review, we will summarize and discuss the recent progress in our understanding of the mechanisms controlling chromosome segregation and how they might work in embryos and mammalian embryos in particular. Our conclusion from the current literature is that the early mammalian embryos show limited capabilities to react to chromosome segregation defects, which might, at least partially, explain the widespread problem of aneuploidy during the early development in mammals.

Single-cell DNA sequencing reveals a high incidence of chromosomal abnormalities in human blastocysts

Aneuploidy, a deviation from the normal chromosome copy number, is common in human embryos and is considered a primary cause of implantation failure and early pregnancy loss. Meiotic errors lead to uniformly abnormal karyotypes, while mitotic errors lead to chromosomal mosaicism: the presence of cells with at least 2 different karyotypes within an embryo. Knowledge about mosaicism in blastocysts mainly derives from bulk DNA sequencing (DNA-Seq) of multicellular trophectoderm (TE) and/or inner cell mass (ICM) samples. However, this can only detect an average net gain or loss of DNA above a detection threshold of 20%-30%. To accurately assess mosaicism, we separated the TE and ICM of 55 good-quality surplus blastocysts and successfully applied single-cell whole-genome sequencing (scKaryo-Seq) on 1,057 cells. Mosaicism involving numerical and structural chromosome abnormalities was detected in 82% of the embryos, in which most abnormalities affected less than 20% of the cells. Structural abnormalities, potentially caused by replication stress and DNA damage, were observed in 69% of the embryos. In conclusion, our findings indicated that mosaicism was prevalent in good-quality blastocysts, whereas these blastocysts would likely be identified as normal with current bulk DNA-Seq techniques used for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

Preimplantation genetic testing: A remarkable history of pioneering, technical challenges, innovations, and ethical considerations

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) has emerged as a powerful companion to assisted reproduction technologies. The origins and history of PGT are reviewed here, along with descriptions of advances in molecular assays and sampling methods, their capabilities, and their applications in preventing genetic diseases and enhancing pregnancy outcomes. Additionally, the potential for increasing accuracy and genome coverage is considered, as well as some of the emerging ethical and legislative considerations related to the expanding capabilities of PGT.

PGT-A mosaicism based on NGS intermediate copy numbers: is it time to stop reporting them?

Mosaicism represents a genuine real phenomenon, but its high prevalence and undisclosed clinical significance, stress the burden on genetic counseling and the management of PGT-A results. Even though the assumption of mosaicism from NGS intermediate chromosome copy number profiles may represent a reasonable interpretation, other potential technical reasons, including amplification bias, contamination, biopsy technique, or the analysis algorithms, may constitute alternative explanations. Thresholds confining mosaicism ranges are established according to models employing mixtures of normal and abnormal cells with steady conditions of quantity and quality which are unable to reflect the full extent of variability present in a trophectoderm (TE) biopsy specimen. When the concordance of TE with the ICM is considered, mosaic TE biopsies poorly correlate with the chromosomal status of the remaining embryo, displaying mostly ICM aneuploidy in cases of TE high-range mosaics diagnosis and euploidy when mosaicism grade in TE is less than 50% (low-mid range mosaicism), which implies an evident overestimation of mosaicism results. Indeed, a binary classification of NGS profiles that excludes mosaic ranges, including only euploid and aneuploid diagnosis, provides higher specificity and accuracy in identifying abnormal embryos and discarding them. As intermediate copy number profiles do not represent strong evidence of mosaicism but only an inaccurate and misleading assumption, and considering that no increased risk has been reported in the offspring, until diagnosis specificity is improved and its clinical implications are determined, laboratories should consider limiting predictions to euploid and aneuploid and stop reporting mosaicism.

Blinded rebiopsy and analysis of noneuploid embryos with 2 distinct preimplantation genetic testing platforms for aneuploidy

OBJECTIVE

To determine how often a noneuploid result from a single trophectoderm (TE) biopsy tested with the next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is concordant with rebiopsies tested with a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array-based PGT-A platform.

DESIGN

Blinded prospective cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated fertility center.

PATIENT(S)

One hundred blastocysts were chosen from donated samples; on TE biopsy with NGS-based PGT-A, 40 had at least one whole chromosome full copy number aneuploidy alone, 20 had a single whole chromosome intermediate copy number ("whole chromosome mosaic"), 20 had a single full segmental aneuploidy (segA), and 20 had a single segmental intermediate copy number ("segmental mosaic").

INTERVENTIONS

Four rebiopsies were collected from each embryo: 3 TE biopsies and the remaining embryo. Each rebiopsy was randomized, blinded, and assessed with an SNP array-based PGT-A platform that combines copy number and allele ratio analyses, without mosaicism reporting.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Concordance between the NGS result and rebiopsy results and within each embryo's blinded rebiopsy results.

RESULT(S)

Next-generation sequencing-diagnosed whole chromosome aneuploidy (WCA) was reconfirmed in 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 83%-99%) of embryos; 2 embryos with NGS-diagnosed WCA were called euploid on all conclusive rebiopsies. Among embryos with NGS-diagnosed whole chromosome mosaicism, 35% (95% CI, 15%-59%) were called euploid and 15% (95% CI, 3%-38%) were called whole chromosome aneuploid on all conclusive rebiopsies. A total of 30% (95% CI, 12%-54%) of embryos with NGS-diagnosed segA and 65% (95% CI, 41%-85%) of embryos with NGS-diagnosed segmental mosaicism were called euploid on all conclusive rebiopsies. In total, 13% (95% CI, 6%-25%) of embryos with NGS-diagnosed full copy number aneuploidy and 50% (95% CI, 34%-66%) of embryos with NGS-diagnosed mosaicism had uniformly euploid SNP results. Conversely, all embryos with at least one noneuploid SNP result (n = 72) either had SNP-diagnosed aneuploidy on another rebiopsy from the same embryo or NGS-diagnosed aneuploidy/mosaicism involving the same chromosome.

CONCLUSION(S)

Next-generation sequencing-diagnosed WCA is highly concordant with rebiopsies tested with an SNP array-based PGT-A; however, whole chromosome mosaicism, segA, and segmental mosaicism are less concordant, reinforcing that embryos with these results may have reproductive potential and be suitable for transfer.

The effect of vitrification on blastocyst mitochondrial DNA dynamics and gene expression profiles

PURPOSE

Does vitrification/warming affect the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) content and the gene expression profile of blastocysts?

METHODS

Prospective cohort study in which 89 blastocysts were obtained from 50 patients between July 2017 and August 2018. mtDNA was measured in a total of 71 aneuploid blastocysts by means of real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Transcriptomic analysis was performed by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) in an additional 8 aneuploid blastocysts cultured for 0 h after warming, and 10 aneuploid blastocysts cultured for 4-5 h after warming.

RESULTS

A significant decrease in mtDNA content just during the first hour after the warming process in blastocysts was found (P < 0.05). However, mtDNA content experimented a significantly increased along the later culture hours achieving the original mtDNA levels before vitrification after 4-5 h of culture (P < 0.05). Gene expression analysis and functional enrichment analysis revealed that such recovery was accompanied by upregulation of pathways associated with embryo developmental capacity and uterine embryo development. Interestingly, the significant increase in mtDNA content observed in blastocysts just after warming also coincided with the differential expression of several cellular stress response-related pathways, such as apoptosis, DNA damage, humoral immune responses, and cancer.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating in humans, a modulation in blastocysts mtDNA content in response to vitrification and warming. These results will be useful in understanding which pathways and mechanisms may be activated in human blastocysts following vitrification and warming before a transfer.

Opening the black box: why do euploid blastocysts fail to implant? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A normal chromosomal constitution defined through PGT-A assessing all chromosomes on trophectoderm (TE) biopsies represents the strongest predictor of embryo implantation. Yet, its positive predictive value is not higher than 50-60%. This gap of knowledge on the causes of euploid blastocysts' reproductive failure is known as 'the black box of implantation'.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

Several embryonic, maternal, paternal, clinical, and IVF laboratory features were scrutinized for their putative association with reproductive success or implantation failure of euploid blastocysts.

SEARCH METHODS

A systematic bibliographical search was conducted without temporal limits up to August 2021. The keywords were '(blastocyst OR day5 embryo OR day6 embryo OR day7 embryo) AND (euploid OR chromosomally normal OR preimplantation genetic testing) AND (implantation OR implantation failure OR miscarriage OR abortion OR live birth OR biochemical pregnancy OR recurrent implantation failure)'. Overall, 1608 items were identified and screened. We included all prospective or retrospective clinical studies and randomized-controlled-trials (RCTs) that assessed any feature associated with live-birth rates (LBR) and/or miscarriage rates (MR) among non-mosaic euploid blastocyst transfer after TE biopsy and PGT-A. In total, 41 reviews and 372 papers were selected, clustered according to a common focus, and thoroughly reviewed. The PRISMA guideline was followed, the PICO model was adopted, and ROBINS-I and ROB 2.0 scoring were used to assess putative bias. Bias across studies regarding the LBR was also assessed using visual inspection of funnel plots and the trim and fill method. Categorical data were combined with a pooled-OR. The random-effect model was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Between-study heterogeneity was addressed using I2. Whenever not suitable for the meta-analysis, the included studies were simply described for their results. The study protocol was registered at http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ (registration number CRD42021275329).

OUTCOMES

We included 372 original papers (335 retrospective studies, 30 prospective studies and 7 RCTs) and 41 reviews. However, most of the studies were retrospective, or characterized by small sample sizes, thus prone to bias, which reduces the quality of the evidence to low or very low. Reduced inner cell mass (7 studies, OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.27-0.52, I2 = 53%), or TE quality (9 studies, OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.43-0.67, I2 = 70%), overall blastocyst quality worse than Gardner's BB-grade (8 studies, OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.24-0.67, I2 = 83%), developmental delay (18 studies, OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.49-0.63, I2 = 47%), and (by qualitative analysis) some morphodynamic abnormalities pinpointed through time-lapse microscopy (abnormal cleavage patterns, spontaneous blastocyst collapse, longer time of morula formation I, time of blastulation (tB), and duration of blastulation) were all associated with poorer reproductive outcomes. Slightly lower LBR, even in the context of PGT-A, was reported among women ≥38 years (7 studies, OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.75-1.00, I2 = 31%), while obesity was associated with both lower LBR (2 studies, OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.55-0.79, I2 = 0%) and higher MR (2 studies, OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.08-2.99, I2 = 52%). The experience of previous repeated implantation failures (RIF) was also associated with lower LBR (3 studies, OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55-0.93, I2 = 0%). By qualitative analysis, among hormonal assessments, only abnormal progesterone levels prior to transfer were associated with LBR and MR after PGT-A. Among the clinical protocols used, vitrified-warmed embryo transfer was more effective than fresh transfer (2 studies, OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.05-2.33, I2 = 23%) after PGT-A. Lastly, multiple vitrification-warming cycles (2 studies, OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22-0.77, I2 = 50%) or (by qualitative analysis) a high number of cells biopsied may slightly reduce the LBR, while simultaneous zona-pellucida opening and TE biopsy allowed better results than the Day 3 hatching-based protocol (3 studies, OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.18-1.69, I2 = 0%).

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Embryo selection aims at shortening the time-to-pregnancy, while minimizing the reproductive risks. Knowing which features are associated with the reproductive competence of euploid blastocysts is therefore critical to define, implement, and validate safer and more efficient clinical workflows. Future research should be directed towards: (i) systematic investigations of the mechanisms involved in reproductive aging beyond de novo chromosomal abnormalities, and how lifestyle and nutrition may accelerate or exacerbate their consequences; (ii) improved evaluation of the uterine and blastocyst-endometrial dialogue, both of which represent black boxes themselves; (iii) standardization/automation of embryo assessment and IVF protocols; (iv) additional invasive or preferably non-invasive tools for embryo selection. Only by filling these gaps we may finally crack the riddle behind 'the black box of implantation'.

Automatic Ploidy Prediction and Quality Assessment of Human Blastocyst Using Time-Lapse Imaging

Assessing fertilized human embryos is crucial for in vitro-fertilization (IVF), a task being revolutionized by artificial intelligence and deep learning. Existing models used for embryo quality assessment and chromosomal abnormality (ploidy) detection could be significantly improved by effectively utilizing time-lapse imaging to identify critical developmental time points for maximizing prediction accuracy. Addressing this, we developed and compared various embryo ploidy status prediction models across distinct embryo development stages. We present BELA (Blastocyst Evaluation Learning Algorithm), a state-of-the-art ploidy prediction model surpassing previous image- and video-based models, without necessitating subjective input from embryologists. BELA uses multitask learning to predict quality scores that are used downstream to predict ploidy status. By achieving an AUC of 0.76 for discriminating between euploidy and aneuploidy embryos on the Weill Cornell dataset, BELA matches the performance of models trained on embryologists' manual scores. While not a replacement for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), BELA exemplifies how such models can streamline the embryo evaluation process, reducing time and effort required by embryologists.

ESHRE Working Group on Recurrent Implantation Failure, Cimadomo D, de los Santos MJ, Griesinger G, Lainas G, Le Clef N, McLernon DJ, Montjean D, Toth B, Vermeulen N, Macklon N. ESHRE good practice recommendations on recurrent implantation failure

STUDY QUESTION

How should recurrent implantation failure (RIF) in patients undergoing ART be defined and managed?

SUMMARY ANSWER

This is the first ESHRE good practice recommendations paper providing a definition for RIF together with recommendations on how to investigate causes and contributing factors, and how to improve the chances of a pregnancy.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

RIF is a challenge in the ART clinic, with a multitude of investigations and interventions offered and applied in clinical practice, often without biological rationale or with unequivocal evidence of benefit.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

This document was developed according to a predefined methodology for ESHRE good practice recommendations. Recommendations are supported by data from the literature, if available, and the results of a previously published survey on clinical practice in RIF and the expertise of the working group. A literature search was performed in PubMed and Cochrane focussing on 'recurrent reproductive failure', 'recurrent implantation failure', and 'repeated implantation failure'.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

The ESHRE Working Group on Recurrent Implantation Failure included eight members representing the ESHRE Special Interest Groups for Implantation and Early Pregnancy, Reproductive Endocrinology, and Embryology, with an independent chair and an expert in statistics. The recommendations for clinical practice were formulated based on the expert opinion of the working group, while taking into consideration the published data and results of the survey on uptake in clinical practice. The draft document was then open to ESHRE members for online peer review and was revised in light of the comments received.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The working group recommends considering RIF as a secondary phenomenon of ART, as it can only be observed in patients undergoing IVF, and that the following description of RIF be adopted: 'RIF describes the scenario in which the transfer of embryos considered to be viable has failed to result in a positive pregnancy test sufficiently often in a specific patient to warrant consideration of further investigations and/or interventions'. It was agreed that the recommended threshold for the cumulative predicted chance of implantation to identify RIF for the purposes of initiating further investigation is 60%. When a couple have not had a successful implantation by a certain number of embryo transfers and the cumulative predicted chance of implantation associated with that number is greater than 60%, then they should be counselled on further investigation and/or treatment options. This term defines clinical RIF for which further actions should be considered. Nineteen recommendations were formulated on investigations when RIF is suspected, and 13 on interventions. Recommendations were colour-coded based on whether the investigations/interventions were recommended (green), to be considered (orange), or not recommended, i.e. not to be offered routinely (red).

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

While awaiting the results of further studies and trials, the ESHRE Working Group on Recurrent Implantation Failure recommends identifying RIF based on the chance of successful implantation for the individual patient or couple and to restrict investigations and treatments to those supported by a clear rationale and data indicating their likely benefit.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This article provides not only good practice advice but also highlights the investigations and interventions that need further research. This research, when well-conducted, will be key to making progress in the clinical management of RIF.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

The meetings and technical support for this project were funded by ESHRE. N.M. declared consulting fees from ArtPRED (The Netherlands) and Freya Biosciences (Denmark); Honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter, Merck, Abbott, and IBSA; being co-founder of Verso Biosense. He is Co-Chief Editor of Reproductive Biomedicine Online (RBMO). D.C. declared being an Associate Editor of Human Reproduction Update, and declared honoraria for lectures from Merck, Organon, IBSA, and Fairtility; support for attending meetings from Cooper Surgical, Fujifilm Irvine Scientific. G.G. declared that he or his institution received financial or non-financial support for research, lectures, workshops, advisory roles, or travelling from Ferring, Merck, Gedeon-Richter, PregLem, Abbott, Vifor, Organon, MSD, Coopersurgical, ObsEVA, and ReprodWissen. He is an Editor of the journals Archives of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biomedicine Online, and Editor in Chief of Journal Gynäkologische Endokrinologie. He is involved in guideline developments and quality control on national and international level. G.L. declared he or his institution received honoraria for lectures from Merck, Ferring, Vianex/Organon, and MSD. He is an Associate Editor of Human Reproduction Update, immediate past Coordinator of Special Interest Group for Reproductive Endocrinology of ESHRE and has been involved in Guideline Development Groups of ESHRE and national fertility authorities. D.J.M. declared being an Associate Editor for Human Reproduction Open and statistical Advisor for Reproductive Biomedicine Online. B.T. declared being shareholder of Reprognostics and she or her institution received financial or non-financial support for research, clinical trials, lectures, workshops, advisory roles or travelling from support for attending meetings from Ferring, MSD, Exeltis, Merck Serono, Bayer, Teva, Theramex and Novartis, Astropharm, Ferring. The other authors had nothing to disclose.

DISCLAIMER

This Good Practice Recommendations (GPR) document represents the views of ESHRE, which are the result of consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders and are based on the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation. ESHRE GPRs should be used for information and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care, or be exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. They do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, or variations based on locality and facility type. Furthermore, ESHRE GPRs do not constitute or imply the endorsement, or favouring, of any of the included technologies by ESHRE.

Does PGT-A affect cumulative live birth rate?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Preimplantation genetic testing for the purpose of aneuploidy screening (PGT-A) has increased in use over the last decade.

RECENT FINDINGS

Whether PGT-A benefits all of the patients that choose to employ it has been a concern, as recent studies have highlighted a potential decrease in cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) for younger patients undergoing embryo transfer. However, there are limitations to many of these studies and the intended benefit of PGT-A, which is to aid as a selection tool, thus increasing the live birth rate per transfer, must not be ignored.

SUMMARY

PGT-A was never intended to increase CLBR. The purpose of PGT-A is to maximize the chance at live birth per transfer while minimizing the risk of clinical miscarriage, ongoing aneuploid pregnancy and futile transfers. However, if it harms CLBR in the process that has to be taken into consideration. This review will discuss PGT-A in terms of its benefits, risks, and how it has been shown to affect the cumulative live birth rate within in-vitro fertilization cycles.

Identifying parental and cell-division origins of aneuploidy in the human blastocyst

Preimplantation genetic testing commonly employs simplistic copy-number analyses to screen for aneuploidy in blastocyst trophectoderm biopsies. Interpreting intermediate copy number alone as evidence of mosaicism has led to suboptimal estimation of its prevalence. Because mosaicism originates from mitotic nondisjunction, utilizing SNP microarray technology to identify the cell-division origins of aneuploidy might provide a more accurate estimation of its prevalence. The present study develops and validates a method of determining the cell-division origin of aneuploidy in the human blastocyst by using both genotyping and copy-number data in parallel. The concordance of predicted origins with expected results was demonstrated in a series of truth models (99%-100%). This included determination of X chromosome origins from a subset of normal male embryos, determination of the origins of translocation chromosome-related imbalances via embryos from couples with structural rearrangements, and prediction of either mitotic or meiotic origins via multiple rebiopsies of embryos with aneuploidy. In a cohort of blastocysts with parental DNA (n = 2,277), 71% were euploid, 27% were meiotic aneuploid, and 2% were mitotic aneuploid, indicating a low frequency of bona fide mosaicism in the human blastocyst (mean maternal age: 34.4). Chromosome-specific trisomies in the blastocyst were also consistent with observations previously established in products of conception. The ability to accurately identify mitotic-origin aneuploidy in the blastocyst could benefit and better inform individuals whose IVF cycle results in all aneuploid embryos. Clinical trials with this methodology might also help provide a definitive answer regarding the reproductive potential of bona fide mosaic embryos.

Towards Automation in IVF: Pre-Clinical Validation of a Deep Learning-Based Embryo Grading System during PGT-A Cycles

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) is arguably the most effective embryo selection strategy. Nevertheless, it requires greater workload, costs, and expertise. Therefore, a quest towards user-friendly, non-invasive strategies is ongoing. Although insufficient to replace PGT-A, embryo morphological evaluation is significantly associated with embryonic competence, but scarcely reproducible. Recently, artificial intelligence-powered analyses have been proposed to objectify and automate image evaluations. iDAScore v1.0 is a deep-learning model based on a 3D convolutional neural network trained on time-lapse videos from implanted and non-implanted blastocysts. It is a decision support system for ranking blastocysts without manual input. This retrospective, pre-clinical, external validation included 3604 blastocysts and 808 euploid transfers from 1232 cycles. All blastocysts were retrospectively assessed through the iDAScore v1.0; therefore, it did not influence embryologists' decision-making process. iDAScore v1.0 was significantly associated with embryo morphology and competence, although AUCs for euploidy and live-birth prediction were 0.60 and 0.66, respectively, which is rather comparable to embryologists' performance. Nevertheless, iDAScore v1.0 is objective and reproducible, while embryologists' evaluations are not. In a retrospective simulation, iDAScore v1.0 would have ranked euploid blastocysts as top quality in 63% of cases with one or more euploid and aneuploid blastocysts, and it would have questioned embryologists' ranking in 48% of cases with two or more euploid blastocysts and one or more live birth. Therefore, iDAScore v1.0 may objectify embryologists' evaluations, but randomized controlled trials are required to assess its clinical value.

Mosaic results after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy may be accompanied by changes in global gene expression

Aneuploidy in preimplantation embryos is a major cause of human reproductive failure. Unlike uniformly aneuploid embryos, embryos diagnosed as diploid-aneuploid mosaics after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) can develop into healthy infants. However, the reason why these embryos achieve full reproductive competence needs further research. Current RNA sequencing techniques allow for the investigation of the human preimplantation transcriptome, providing new insights into the molecular mechanisms of embryo development. In this prospective study, using euploid embryo gene expression as a control, we compared the transcriptome profiles of inner cell mass and trophectoderm samples from blastocysts with different levels of chromosomal mosaicism. A total of 25 samples were analyzed from 14 blastocysts with previous PGT-A diagnosis, including five low-level mosaic embryos and four high-level mosaic embryos. Global gene expression profiles visualized in cluster heatmaps were correlated with the original PGT-A diagnosis. In addition, gene expression distance based on the number of differentially expressed genes increased with the mosaic level, compared to euploid controls. Pathways involving apoptosis, mitosis, protein degradation, metabolism, and mitochondrial energy production were among the most deregulated within mosaic embryos. Retrospective analysis of the duration of blastomere cell cycles in mosaic embryos revealed several mitotic delays compared to euploid controls, providing additional evidence of the mosaic status. Overall, these findings suggest that embryos with mosaic results are not simply a misdiagnosis by-product, but may also have a genuine molecular identity that is compatible with their reproductive potential.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: challenges in clinical practice

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has been used widely during in vitro fertilization procedures in assisted reproductive centers throughout the world. Despite its wide use, concerns arise from the use of PGT-A technology in clinical decision-making. We address knowledge gaps in PGT-A, summarizing major challenges and current professional guidelines. First, PGT-A is a screening test and not a diagnostic test. Second, mosaicism is much higher in the blastocyst stage from PGT-A than had been recognized previously and a mosaic embryo may not accurately represent the genetic disease risk for future fetal disorders. Third, PGT-A was not validated clinically before use in patients; the best use of this technology for selected age-groups remains uncertain. Given these gaps, we believe that current professional policies relying on industry-self-regulation are insufficient. In the USA, the Food and Drug Administration may be the most appropriate agency to provide more definitive guidelines and regulations that are needed for better practice.