Mycophenolate mofetil for ocular inflammation

Clinical Characteristics, Recurrences, and Complications in the Mexican Pediatric Patients with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease

PURPOSE

To analyze the clinical characteristics, number of recurrences, and complications in the Mexican pediatric patients with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease.

METHODS

A retrospective review of pediatric patients aged 16 years and under, diagnosed with VKH, was conducted from January 1988 to February 2023 at Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera en México I.A.P.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (n = 62 eyes), with a diagnosis of VKH were identified, with a mean age of 12.06   ±   3.57 years. Follow-up was 7.22   ±   6.85 years. At initial presentation, the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 1.31   ±   0.94 LogMAR (Snellen 20/400) and final 0.5   ±   0.93 LogMAR (Snellen 20/60) (p = 0.001). The most common clinical findings in the uveitic stage were anterior chamber inflammation (70%) and serous retinal detachment (72%). The treatment approach involved a combination of oral steroids, intravenous steroids, and immunomodulatory agents. Despite the initial visual impairment, most patients achieved disease remission. However, 41.93% of the patients experienced at least one recurrence during follow-up. The most frequent complications were sunset-glow fundus 74.19% (n = 46 eyes), and glaucoma 27.41% (n = 17 eyes).

CONCLUSION

VKH disease in the Mexican pediatric patients has proved to be a challenge in management due to its aggressive course. Timely diagnosis and treatment with steroid therapy associated with a systemic immunomodulatory are essential to reduce recurrences, and complications and thus have a better visual prognosis.

Egyptian Consensus Guidance for Treatment of Adults with Non-Infectious Uveitis

PURPOSE

Developing and setting up an Egyptian consensus for the management of NIU.

METHODS

A two-phase survey was implemented to obtain expert opinions from Egyptian specialists in the management of non-infectious uveitis. A core team of specialists in management of NIU formulated 21 clinical questions that were structured according to the PICO format (population, intervention, comparison, and the outcome). The literature review team conducted a systemic literature review to address the PICO questions. Based on literature search, a set of 21 sectioned recommendation statements were developed.

RESULTS

The differences in ethnicity and socioeconomic standards of the Egyptian population raised the need to develop an Egyptian consensus guidance for management of NIU. The management statements developed in this work were based on a thorough review of the literature and consensus agreement of a national expert panel. Systemic immunosuppression should be initiated during steroid tapering and should be used as first line along with steroids in case of underlying systemic disease. The panel recommended that maintenance dose of steroids should not exceed 7.5 mg daily. A major limitation facing the Egyptian health system is the socioeconomic status and limited insurance coverage. Hence, the use of conventional immunosuppression is usually exhausted before considering biologic therapy, and the role of biosimilars is emphasized to their relatively lower cost, similar efficacy, and safety in comparison to the original molecule.

CONCLUSION

This guideline provides direction for rheumatologists and ophthalmologists making decisions on management of adults with non-infectious uveitis. Putting into consideration that clinical practice varies based on local pharmaceutical availability and patient demographics.

Barriers to Adherence with Immunosuppressive Therapy in Patients with Uveitis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the barriers to adherence with immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) for patients with uveitis across multiple regions of the United States.

METHODS

A multi-center survey of adult and pediatric patients with ocular inflammatory diseases undergoing treatment with IMT was conducted between September 2021 and August 2022. Participating sites included Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute, Wong Eye Institute of the University of Texas at Austin, University of Wisconsin-Madison, University of Minnesota, Veterans Affairs Hospital of Minneapolis, and Washington University of St. Louis. Each patient completed a self-reporting survey to identify barriers to adherence.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 98 subjects, of whom were 71% white, 67% female, and 61% had a college or advanced degree. Nearly half (49%) were on two or more IMTs of which the most common were methotrexate (38%), mycophenolate (36%), or adalimumab (36%). Nearly half (52%) of patients required reminders to take their medications and 20% found it difficult to take IMT regularly, with 12% struggling to take medications multiple times a day. A lack of refills resulted in 15% of patients missing doses. Limitations to completing laboratory studies to monitor for drug-related side-effects included finding time (10%) and cost (22%).

CONCLUSION

Barriers to IMT treatment include laboratory study cost, difficulty with medication administration, and adhering to medication schedules. Monthly cost of medication was high for some, but no patients were unable to take IMT due to insurance loss. Addressing these barriers may improve IMT adherence for uveitis patients and better clinical outcomes.

Safety of Mycophenolate Mofetil in the Treatment of Non-Infectious Uveitis and Sclerouveitis in Japanese Patients: A Feasibility Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the incidence rate and severity of adverse events associated with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the treatment of non-infectious uveitis and sclerouveitis in Japanese patients.

METHODS

This open-label, single-centre feasibility study was performed at Hiroshima University Hospital (jRCTs061220030). Patients started MMF at 1000 mg/day, increasing up to 3000 mg/day. Primary endpoints were the incidence rate and severity of adverse events associated with MMF. Secondary endpoints were the overall rate of treatment success (defined as controlled ocular inflammation according to the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature criteria for uveitis and standardised grading system for sclerouveitis in patients on oral prednisolone at ≤ 5 mg/day and/or topical betamethasone 0.1% up to twice daily) and the reason for discontinuation. Patients were followed up for 12 months.

RESULTS

Ten patients (7 women; median age, 54.5 years) with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (n = 4), retinal vasculitis (n = 3) sarcoidosis (n = 1), sympathetic ophthalmia (n = 1), or sclerouveitis (n = 1) were enrolled. At 12 months, treatment was successful in 7 of the 10 patients. The reasons for treatment failure were lack of safety (n = 1) and insufficient therapeutic effect (n = 2). One patient discontinued MMF due to elevated liver enzymes. No serious adverse events (death, hospitalization, life-threatening events) or systemic symptoms (gastrointestinal issues, headache, fatigue) occurred. The median MMF dose was 2500 mg/day, with a maximum of 3000 mg/day.

CONCLUSION

MMF may be safely used as a steroid-sparing agent in Japanese patients with non-infectious uveitis or sclerouveitis.

Effectiveness of Frequently Used TNF Inhibitors vs. Conventional Immunosuppressive Therapies for Noninfectious Uveitis

PURPOSE

To compare the corticosteroid sparing efficacy of frequently used antimetabolites to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in the management of noninfectious ocular inflammation.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with noninfectious uveitis on conventional antimetabolite (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine,or leflunomide, "CONV") or a TNF inhibitor (adalimumab or infliximab, "TNFi") with active inflammation or more than 7.5 mg daily prednisone. Eyes were assessed in three groups: CONV only, TNFi only and combination of both (COMB). Cox regression models compared treatment success, adjusted for age, race, smoking, anatomic location of uveitis, duration of uveitis and visual acuity. Corticosteroid sparing success was defined as: inactive or slightly active uveitis on <=7.5 mg daily oral prednisone and <=2 drops of prednisolone acetate 1%.

RESULTS

There were 1475 eligible patients in the analysis. By 6 and 12 months, respectively, the Cox model-predicted, percentage success was 27.6% and 44.9% for the CONV group; 34.2% and 53.9% in the TNFi group and 39.9% and 61.1% for the COMB group. COMB was more likely than CONV to achieve success (adjusted HR 1.58 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.28, 1.95, p < 0.0001). Factors associated with lower success were age under 18 years, smoking, visual acuity worse than 20/50 at cohort entry, over 4-year duration of uveitis and daily baseline prednisone 7.5 mg or higher (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest COMB is more effective than CONV at achieving disease quiescence and corticosteroid sparing success among patients with active noninfectious uveitis. More research is needed to determine if TNFi alone is superior to CONV for uveitic corticosteroid-sparing.

Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Escalation to Weekly Adalimumab for Chronic Non-Infectious Uveitis: A Multicenter Study Involving Pediatric and Adult Patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of weekly adalimumab (ADA) treatment in non-infectious uveitis (NIU) patients, including both pediatric and adult populations, and identify factors influencing treatment efficacy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study at two hospitals in Türkiye included 51 NIU patients (29 children, 22 adults) who escalated from bi-weekly to weekly ADA due to inadequate disease control. Data on six clinical parameters (anterior chamber reaction, vitreous haze, visual acuity, central macular thickness [CMT], prednisone use, uveitis flare-up frequency), adverse effects, and treatment-related factors were collected. Statistical analyses involved non-parametric tests and regression models.

RESULTS

Weekly ADA led to clinical improvement in 88.2% of patients, with uveitis control achieved in 76.4% by the 6th month. Escalation to weekly dosing significantly improved all clinical parameters compared to the 6-month period before ADA initiation (p < 0.001). Patients on combined weekly ADA and DMARD therapy experienced fewer uveitis attacks (B = - 2.272, 95% CI = [-4.289, -0.254], p = 0.028). Starting ADA as first-line treatment reduced uveitis attacks (p = 0.002) and increased the likelihood of inactive uveitis (OR = 10.349, 95% CI = [1.379, 77.687], p = 0.023). Patients resistant to multiple biologics had worse preADA visual acuity (p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Weekly ADA is effective and safe for controlling NIU when bi-weekly dosing is insufficient. Combining ADA with DMARDs enhances outcomes and reduce uveitis attacks. Poor preADA visual acuity may suggest resistance to biologics. Prospective studies should validate these findings, explore anti-ADA antibody development, and assess how DMARD addition affects immunological parameters and treatment efficacy.

Anterior uveitis for the comprehensive ophthalmologist

Anterior uveitis presents a diagnostic challenge due to its wide array of etiologies and clinical manifestations. This narrative review aims to equip general ophthalmologists with a comprehensive understanding of anterior uveitis epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Particular emphasis is placed on developing a tailored and stepwise strategy, rather than a one-size-fits-all approach, for the workup and treatment of anterior uveitis. Chest radiography and serologic testing for syphilis, human leukocyte antigen B27, and angiotensin-converting enzyme are appropriate routine investigations in cases of severe, bilateral, recurrent, or chronic anterior uveitis. Additional testing should be guided by clinical findings and regional epidemiology, especially when considering expensive and invasive modalities. Investigations that are obtained in the absence of clinical and epidemiologic orientation are of limited utility and incur significant costs to patients and health care systems. Most cases of anatomically isolated anterior uveitis resolve with topical corticosteroids, but some patients require escalation to systemic immunomodulatory therapy (IMT). IMT should be considered in patients who respond poorly to corticosteroids, develop side effects related to corticosteroids that limit their use, require high doses to maintain disease remission, or have concomitant systemic inflammatory disease. Comprehensive ophthalmologists should feel comfortable comanaging patients that require conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs/antimetabolite therapy (i.e., methotrexate, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil) with rheumatologists and providing guidance on ocular dosing. When uveitis quiescence cannot be achieved despite maximally tolerated antimetabolite therapy, patients should be referred to a uveitis specialist for consultation and consideration of IMT escalation. The timing of uveitis referral may depend on local factors specific to health care jurisdictions.

Use of immunomodulatory treatment for non-infectious uveitis: an International Ocular Inflammation Society report of real-world practice

BACKGROUND

Non-infectious uveitis is a diverse group of inflammatory conditions that collectively account for substantial blindness worldwide. Expert guidelines and results of clinical trials guide treatment, but real-world clinical care is impacted by additional factors. In 2023, an international group of uveitis-specialised ophthalmologists formed the International Study Group for Systemic Immunomodulatory Drug Treatment of Non-Infectious Uveitis to report current practice.

METHODS

221 study group members from 53 countries completed a 30-item questionnaire on their management of non-infectious uveitis including: indications for and investigations prior to initiating systemic immunomodulatory drugs, use of conventional and biological drugs, and follow-up of treated patients.

RESULTS

Major indications to initiate systemic immunomodulatory drugs were: uveitis not controlled with oral prednis(ol)one (n=208, 94.1%), specific uveitis diagnosis (n=197, 89.1%), and patient intolerance of oral prednis(ol)one (n=186, 84.2%). All members (n=221, 100%) performed pretreatment screens including: blood chemistry (n=217, 98.2%), blood examination (n=207, 93.7%), and Quantiferon assay (n=196, 88.7%). Eight conventional and 14 biological drugs were prescribed: methotrexate was the preferred conventional drug overall (n=126, 57.0%) and for 9 of 11 uveitides, and adalimumab was the preferred biological drug overall (n=216, 97.7%) and for 11 of 11 uveitides. When drugs were combined, methotrexate plus adalimumab was most popular (n=158 of 188 members, 84.0%). Patients with inactive uveitis were typically evaluated and screened for drug toxicity every 6-12 weeks (n=161, 72.9%, and 165, 74.7%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our report describes practice patterns of a large international group of uveitis specialists treating non-infectious uveitis with systemic immunomodulatory drugs.

Drug Retention Time of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Behcet's Uveitis

PURPOSE

Behcet's Disease is a chronic multisystem vasculitis associated with a blinding uveitis. Few comparative studies exist between conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biologic DMARDs in Behcet's uveitis (BU). We therefore used drug retention time (DRT), an accepted surrogate measure of pharmacological efficacy and tolerability, to compare these treatments in patients with BU.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients who met the revised International Criteria for Behcet's Disease (ICBD) treated at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Australia, between 1985-2021. DRT was analysed with Kaplan-Meier plots and defined as total time on drug in the first medication-period for each DMARD in each patient.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients (37 males) with median age of 28.6 years were followed-up for a median of 8.0 years. At initial presentation, half had bilateral disease and median logMAR visual acuity was 0.176 (Snellen 6/9) in 62 uveitic eyes (16 anterior uveitis, 11 intermediate, 2 posterior, and 33 panuveitis). Thirty-three patients met ICBD initially. Prescribed corticosteroid-sparing agents were Cyclosporin (N = 24), Mycophenolate (N = 22), Azathioprine (N = 22), Methotrexate (N = 16), and Adalimumab (N = 15). Median DRT was 14.0, 27.4, 8.3, 24.0, and 52.0 months, respectively. DMARDs were discontinued 116 times and adverse effects (N = 37) were the main reason for cessation. Over time, patients were switched from Cyclosporin to Adalimumab earlier in the disease course due to poorer tolerance of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Adalimumab's drug retention time was found to be similar to and possibly better than cDMARDs in patients with BU, who often suffer from vision-threatening disease at first presentation.

Methotrexate versus conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the treatment of non-anterior sarcoidosis-associated uveitis

AIMS

To compare the safety and efficacy of methotrexate (MTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) in non-anterior sarcoidosis-associated uveitis.

METHODS

Retrospective study including non-anterior sarcoidosis-associated uveitis according to the revised International Workshop on Ocular Sarcoidosis criteria. The primary outcome was defined as the median time to relapse or occurrence of serious adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation.

RESULTS

58 patients with non-anterior sarcoidosis-associated uveitis (MTX (n=33), MMF (n=16) and AZA (n=9)) were included. The time to treatment failure (ie, primary outcome) after adjustment for corticosteroids dose and the presence of vasculitis was significantly higher with MTX (median time of 34.5 months with MTX (IQR: 11.8 -not reached) vs 8.4 months (3.1-22.9) with MMF and 16.8 months (8.0-90.1) with AZA (p=0.020)). The risk of relapse at 12 months was more than twice lower in MTX as compared with MMF (p=0.046). Low visual acuity at the last visit was significantly lower with MTX (4% vs 9% in MMF vs 57% in AZA group (p=0.008)). Regarding all 75 lines of treatment (MTX (n=39), MMF (n=24) and AZA (n=12)), MTX was more effective than MMF and AZA to obtain treatment response at 3 months (OR 10.85; 95% CI 1.13 to 104.6; p=0.039). Significant corticosteroid-sparing effect at 12 months (p=0.035) was only observed under MTX. Serious adverse events were observed in 6/39 (15%), 5/24 (21%) and 2/12 (17%) with MTX, MMF and AZA, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In non-anterior sarcoidosis-associated uveitis, MTX seems to be more efficient compared with AZA and MMF and with an acceptable safety profile.

Effect of Therapeutic Pars Plana Vitrectomy on Total Immunosuppression Load in Patients with Non-Infectious Uveitis

PURPOSE

The anti-inflammatory effect of therapeutic pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in the management of posterior segment uveitis is incompletely quantified. In this study, we evaluated the change in total immunosuppression load (TIL) following PPV for the eyes of patients with non-infectious uveitis.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients with non-infectious posterior segment uveitis on continuous anti-inflammatory therapy (systemic corticosteroids ± immunomodulatory therapy [IMT]) ±3 months, who received therapeutic PPV for non-resolving inflammation. The TIL scores were calculated by adding the total daily dose of prednisolone graded on a scale of 0-9, and of the IMT graded between 0 and 3, and calculating the mean values for the pre-operative and post-operative visits, respectively.

RESULTS

Sixty-five eyes of 65 patients were included. Mean follow-up was 19.1 ± 14.6 months pre-operatively and 9.4 ± 7.1 months post-operatively. Mean TIL scores for the post-operative visits (2.6 ± 1.9) were significantly lower than the pre-operative (4.4 ± 1.7) visits (p < 0.001). Mean logMAR BCVA was four lines better 1 month post-operatively (0.5 ± 0.4) than the immediate pre-operative vision (0.9 ± 0.6, p < 0.001). On multivariate regression analyses, the reduction in mean TIL scores post-operatively was more with longer durations of pre-operative treatment (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] = -0.04, p = 0.04), while the improvement in one-month post-operative BCVA was more if pre-operative vitreous haze was ≥2+ (aRR = -0.25, p = 0.02). Post-operative adverse outcomes included new-onset cystoid macular edema (n = 6), raised intraocular pressure (n = 5), and intra-operative retinal break (n = 1). Eleven (16.9%) patients were off all immunosuppression during the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic PPV allowed control of intraocular inflammation on less intensive systemic anti-inflammatory therapy. Post-operative adverse outcomes observed were manageable.

Use of immunomodulators in non-infectious uveitis: lights and shadows

Non-infectious uveitis (NIU) is one of the leading causes of sight impairment worldwide. Corticosteroids are the mainstay treatment for acute NIU, although their known systemic and ocular side effects limit their long-term use. The most common types of immunosuppressants used as steroid-sparing treatment are non-biologic drugs, particularly antimetabolites (methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, and azathioprine) and biologic drugs, mainly TNF-α inhibitors such as Adalimumab or Infliximab. Antimetabolites have shown their effectiveness in the treatment of NIU in individual and comparative studies, being methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil usually preferred over azathioprine. The choice of which antimetabolite to use at first is not well defined, and decisions usually depend on the patient's characteristics and the physician's preferences. Treatment of NIU with biologic drugs, and particularly TNF-α inhibitors, has significantly increased in the last years and is considered an important alternative in patients not responding to first-line immunomodulators such as antimetabolites. However, data regarding how different immunomodulators or biologic drugs perform in different NIU is still limited, and little is known about the optimization of both biologic and non-biologic drugs when used in NIU. Further randomized clinical trials and comparative studies are required to achieve more understanding and better results when addressing complicated NIU. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the use of non-biologic and biologic drugs in NIU, which may be useful for clinicians in their daily practice, and to address those aspects that are less known about these treatments as well as their weaknesses.

The management of adult and paediatric uveitis for rheumatologists

Uveitis encompasses multiple different conditions that are all characterized by intra-ocular inflammation. Uveitis occurs in the context of many different rheumatological conditions and carries a substantial risk to vision. Uveitis can develop both at the early stages of rheumatic diseases, sometimes even preceding other clinical features, and at later stages of disease. Uveitis can also occur as either a direct or an indirect complication of therapies used to treat patients with rheumatic disease. Conversely, patients with uveitis of non-rheumatic aetiology sometimes require immunosuppression, a treatment option that is not readily accessible to ophthalmologists. Thus, collaborative working between rheumatologists and ophthalmologists is critical for optimal management of patients with uveitis. This Review is written with rheumatologists in mind, to assist in the care of patients with uveitis. We collate and summarize the latest evidence and best practice in the diagnosis, management and prognostication of uveitis, including future trends and research priorities.

Prescription Patterns of Mycophenolate Mofetil in a Group of Patients from Colombia

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolate mofetil is used for the prevention of solid organ transplant rejection and for other indications, such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prescription patterns of mycophenolate mofetil in a group of Colombian patients.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil between 2021 and 2022. The data were obtained from a drug dispensing database. Sociodemographic, clinical (diagnostic), and pharmacological variables were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 979 patients who underwent treatment were identified; their mean age was 45.9 ± 17.1 years, and 87.4% were women. The main diagnosis associated with the use of mycophenolate mofetil was SLE (39.1%), followed by other rheumatic diseases (8.5%), nephrotic syndrome (7.5%), and solid organ transplantation (6.4%). The relationship between the mean dose and the defined daily dose was 0.75. Ten percent of patients received mycophenolate alone, whereas 32.9% received mycophenolate in combination therapy with conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and glucocorticoids. A total of 76.2% had polypharmacy (five or more drugs).

CONCLUSIONS

Mycophenolate mofetil is used mainly in combination therapy for patients with SLE and other rheumatological diseases and for solid organ transplants at doses lower than those recommended.

Trends in Immunosuppressive Agent Use for Non-Infectious Uveitis by US Ophthalmologists in Medicare Beneficiaries and Association with Physician-Industry Interactions

PURPOSE

To report the trends of immunosuppressive drug use for non-infectious uveitis and explore their relationship with industry payments.

METHODS

A retrospective review of ophthalmologists reimbursed by Medicare for the administration of adalimumab (ADA), repository corticotropin (RCI), methotrexate (MTX), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) between 2014 and 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 316 ophthalmologists were reimbursed by Medicare for 1567 ADA, 465 RCI, 1752 MTX, and 12 333 MMF administrations. The number and dollar amount of industry payments were positively associated with ADA and RCI use (P < 0.001). From 2014 to 2018, there was a positive trend in the proportion of ADA (P = 0.007) and RCI (P = 0.007) used and negative trend in the proportion of MMF (P = 0.025) used.

CONCLUSION

From 2014 to 2018, the use of ADA and RCI increased while MMF decreased and MTX remained stable. There was a positive association between ADA and RCI use and physician-industry interactions. A causal relationship is not determined.

Ocular Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid: The Effect of Risk Factors at Presentation on Treatment Outcomes

PURPOSE

Analyze the influence of risk factors at presentation in the long-term immunosuppressive therapy (IMT) outcomes of ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid (OMMP).

DESIGN

Retrospective multicenter study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with OMMP seen at the Duke Eye Center, Tecnologico de Monterrey, and Hospital Clinic of Barcelona from 1990 to 2022.

METHODS

Data at presentation on demographics, direct immunofluorescence, ocular findings, sites of extraocular manifestations (EOMs), and previous treatments in patients with a clinical or laboratory diagnosis of OMMP, were analyzed with multivariable analysis and Kaplan-Meier plots to identify factors associated with adverse outcomes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

(1) Inflammatory control (no conjunctival inflammation in both eyes at 3 months on IMT); (2) relapse (new-onset inflammation after absolute control in either eye); (3) progression (≥ 1 cicatrizing stage progression in either eye); and (4) vision loss (≥ 2 Snellen lines).

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients (234 eyes), 61% (71/117) of whom were women, with a mean age of 66.6 (SD: 12.4) years (range: 37-97 years) and median follow-up of 34 months (interquartile range: 16-66 months; range: 3-265 months), were enrolled. Inflammatory control was achieved in 57% of patients (67/117), with high-risk EOM (HR-EOM), including esophageal, nasopharyngeal, and/or genital involvement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 12.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.61-59.99; P = 0.002) and corneal scarring (aOR: 3.06; 95% CI, 1.15-8.14; P = 0.025), as significant risk factors for persistent inflammation. Disease relapse, progression, and vision loss occurred in 20% of patients (23/117), 12% of patients (14/117), and 27% of patients (32/117), respectively. Baseline corneal scarring was a risk factor for relapse (adjusted hazard ratio: 4.14; 95% CI: 1.61-10.62; P = 0.003), progression (aOR: 11.46; 95% CI: 1.78-73.75; P = 0.010), and vision loss (aOR: 3.51; 95% CI: 1.35-9.10; P = 0.010). HR-EOM was associated with stage progression (aOR, 34.57; 95% CI, 6.57-181.89; P<0.001) and vision loss (aOR, 8.42; 95% CI, 2.50-28.42; P = 0.001). No significant differences were found between IMT regimes and relapse (P = 0.169).

CONCLUSIONS

Ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid presenting with HR-EOMs and corneal scarring has an increased risk of stage progression and vision loss. Corneal scarring and severe inflammation at baseline were associated with an increased risk of relapse. A disease progression staging system incorporating both the HR-EOMs and corneal involvement is required to predict the visual outcome of OMMP better.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Reduced Dose Methotrexate and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Noninfectious Uveitis: A Sub-Analysis from the First-Line Antimetabolites as Steroid Sparing Therapy (FAST) Trial

PURPOSE

Some patients taking methotrexate (MTX) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) experience intolerable side effects at full doses. We evaluated whether dose reduction affected treatment outcomes in uveitis patients.

METHODS

Subanalysis of the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) uveitis trial. Patients were randomized to receive MTX (25 mg weekly) or MMF (3 g daily). A pre-specified dose reduction protocol could be employed for intolerable side effects. Primary analysis was performed at 6 months.

RESULTS

43/194 patients (22%) required dose reduction. 88/151 patients (58%) on maximum doses and 32/43 patients (74%) on reduced doses were deemed treatment successes at 6 months. The odds ratio point estimate (1.60, 95% CI 0.72-3.74) favored dose-reduction but this was not significant. Following reduction, adverse events improved at the subsequent study visit (79 events reduced to 63 events).

CONCLUSION

Dose reduction of antimetabolites was not associated with worse outcomes in this subanalysis of a uveitis trial.

Effectiveness of difluprednate in addition to systemic therapy for the treatment of anterior scleritis

AIM

To describe the effectiveness and side-effect profile of adding difluprednate therapy to patients with anterior scleritis being treated systemically.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review. Charts from all patients with anterior scleritis who were treated with topical difluprednate in addition to systemic therapy from 1 January 2018 to 1 January 2020 were reviewed. Data collected included: demographics, scleritis type, systemic diagnosis, presence of nodules or necrosis, changes in scleritis activity, intraocular pressure (IOP), number of difluprednate drops used, type of systemic treatment used, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and lens status. The primary outcome was clinical resolution of scleritis. Secondary outcomes included BCVA loss ≥2 lines, change in lens status or cataract surgery and IOP ≥24 mm Hg.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (44 eyes) were analysed. The median age was 57 years (IQR 52, 72); 59% were female; 72% were Caucasian. An associated systemic disease was present in 59%. Systemic therapies used when difluprednate was added were: 65% immunosuppressive agents, 43% prednisone and 25% non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The addition of difluprednate resulted in clinical resolution in 79.6% of the treated eyes. Median time to inactivity was 9 weeks (IQR 5, 20). Eyes initially using 2-4 drops per day had a higher response rate (89%, p=0.005). Over a median follow-up of 34 weeks (IQR 21, 74), 11 eyes had IOP elevation; 6 eyes lost ≥2 lines of BCVA, 5 eyes had cataract progression.

CONCLUSION

Most eyes treated with difluprednate achieved inactivity. The addition of difluprednate to systemic therapies provides an alternative to achieve control of inflammation.

Immunomodulatory Treatment Versus Systemic Steroids in Inflammatory Choroidal Neovascularization Secondary to Idiopathic Multifocal Choroiditis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) on visual and treatment outcomes of inflammatory choroidal neovascularization (iCNV) in patients affected by multifocal choroiditis (MFC), and to compare them to patients treated with steroids as needed.

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective matched cohort study.

METHODS

Patients affected by MFC with iCNV were divided into a IMT group and a "steroids as needed" group and matched according to the time between diagnosis and beginning of systemic treatment. Visual acuity (VA), number of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) intravitreal injections, and number of iCNV reactivations during 2 years of follow-up after treatment initiation were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

A total of 66 eyes of 58 patients were included, equally divided into the 2 groups. Patients in the IMT group had a lower relative risk (RR) of iCNV reactivation (0.64, P = .04) and of anti-VEGF intravitreal injection retreatment (0.59, P = .02). Relapses of MFC-related inflammation were independently associated with a higher RRs of iCNV reactivation (1.22, P = .003). Final VA was higher in the IMT compared to the steroids as needed group (mean [SD], 69.1 [15.1] vs 77.1 [8.9] letters, P = .01), and IMT was associated with greater VA gains over time (+2.5 letters per year, P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

IMT was associated with better visual and treatment outcomes in MFC complicated by iCNV compared to steroids as needed. The better outcomes of the IMT group and the association between MFC-related inflammation and iCNV reactivations highlight the need for tighter control of inflammation to prevent iCNV relapses and visual loss.

Punctate inner choroidopathy: A review of the current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches

Punctate inner choroidopathy (PIC) is an uncommon idiopathic inflammatory condition characterized by multifocal chorioretinopathy that primarily affects young adults, with a predilection for myopic females. Clinically, it manifests as small, yellowish-white lesions in the inner choroid and outer retina, often associated with inflammatory changes. Accurate diagnosis remains a challenge due to its resemblance to other posterior uveitic entities, necessitating an astute clinical eye and advanced imaging techniques for differentiation. Multimodal imaging plays a crucial role by offering valuable insights, as it enables the visualization of various abnormalities related to uveitis. The pathogenesis of PIC is still a subject of debate, with a complex interplay of genetic, immunological, and environmental factors proposed. Managing PIC presents multiple challenges for clinicians. Firstly, variable disease severity within and among patients requires diverse treatments, from observation to aggressive immunosuppression and/or anti-VEGF therapy. Secondly, treatment must distinguish between primary causes of vision loss. New or worsening PIC lesions suggest active inflammation, while new neovascular membranes may indicate secondary neovascular processes. Thirdly, deciding on maintenance therapy is complex, balancing PIC prognosis variability against immunosuppression risks. Some patients have long periods of inactivity and remission, while others face sudden, vision-threatening episodes during quiescent phases. Through a systematic review of the literature, this paper sheds light on the current understanding of PIC, its challenges, and the prospects for future research. By synthesizing existing knowledge, it aims to aid clinicians in accurate diagnosis and guide treatment decisions for improved visual outcomes in individuals affected by PIC.

Clinical Pharmacology in Sarcoidosis: How to Use and Monitor Sarcoidosis Medications

When sarcoidosis needs treatment, pharmacotherapy is usually required. Although glucocorticoids work reliably and relatively quickly for sarcoidosis, these drugs are associated with numerous significant side effects. Such side effects are common in sarcoidosis patients, as the disease frequently has a chronic course and glucocorticoid treatment courses are often prolonged. For these reasons, corticosteroid-sparing and corticosteroid-replacing therapies are often required for sarcoidosis. Unfortunately, many healthcare providers who care for sarcoidosis patients are not familiar with the use of these agents. In this manuscript, we provide a review of the pharmacotherapy of sarcoidosis. We discuss the mechanism of action, dosing, side-effect profile, approach to monitoring and patient counselling concerning glucocorticoids, and the common alternative drugs recommended for use in the recent European Respiratory Society (Lausanne, Switzerland) Sarcoidosis Treatment Guidelines. We also discuss the use of these agents in special situations including hepatic insufficiency, renal insufficiency, pregnancy, breastfeeding, vaccination, and drug-drug interactions. It is hoped that this manuscript will provide valuable practical guidance to clinicians who care for sarcoidosis patients.

The Humira in Ocular Inflammations Taper (HOT) Study

PURPOSE

To assess factors that impact the risk of relapse in patients with noninfectious uveitis (NIU) who undergo adalimumab tapering after achieving remission.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

In this multicenter study, patients with NIU were treated with adalimumab and subsequently tapered. Patient demographics, type of NIU, onset and duration of disease, the period of inactivity before tapering adalimumab, and the tapering schedule were collected. The primary outcome measures were independent predictors of the rate of uveitis recurrence after adalimumab tapering.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty-eight patients were included (54.6% female) with a mean age of 34.3 years. The mean time between disease onset and initiation of adalimumab therapy was 35.2 ± 70.1 weeks. Adalimumab tapering was commenced after a mean of 100.8 ± 69.7 weeks of inactivity. Recurrence was observed in 39.6% of patients at a mean of 44.7 ± 61.7 weeks. Patients who experienced recurrence were significantly younger than those without recurrence (mean 29.4 years vs 37.5 years, P = .0005), and the rate of recurrence was significantly higher in younger subjects (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.88 per decade of increasing age, P = .01). The lowest rate of recurrence was among Asian subjects. A faster adalimumab taper was associated with an increased recurrence rate (HR = 1.23 per unit increase in speed, P < .0005). Conversely, a more extended period of remission before tapering was associated with a lower rate of recurrence (HR = 0.97 per 10-weeks longer period of inactivity, P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

When tapering adalimumab, factors that should be considered include patient age, race, and duration of disease remission on adalimumab. A slow tapering schedule is advisable.

Adalimumab vs placebo as add-on to Standard Therapy for autoimmune Uveitis: Tolerability, Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness-a protocol for a randomised controlled trial (ASTUTE trial)

INTRODUCTION

Adalimumab is an effective treatment for autoimmune non-infectious uveitis (ANIU), but it is currently only funded for a minority of patients with ANIU in the UK as it is restricted by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance. Ophthalmologists believe that adalimumab may be effective in a wider range of patients. The Adalimumab vs placebo as add-on to Standard Therapy for autoimmune Uveitis: Tolerability, Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness (ASTUTE) trial will recruit patients with ANIU who do and do not meet funding criteria and will evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of adalimumab versus placebo as an add-on therapy to standard care.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The ASTUTE trial is a multicentre, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, pragmatic randomised controlled trial with a 16-week treatment run-in (TRI). At the end of the TRI, only responders will be randomised (1:1) to 40 mg adalimumab or placebo (both are the study investigational medicinal product) self-administered fortnightly by subcutaneous injection. The target sample size is 174 randomised participants. The primary outcome is time to treatment failure (TF), a composite of signs indicative of active ANIU. Secondary outcomes include individual TF components, retinal morphology, adverse events, health-related quality of life, patient-reported side effects and visual function, best-corrected visual acuity, employment status and resource use. In the event of TF, open-label drug treatment will be restarted as per TRI for 16 weeks, and if a participant responds again, allocation will be switched without unmasking and treatment with investigational medicinal product restarted.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial received Research Ethics Committee (REC) approval from South Central - Oxford B REC in June 2020. The findings will be presented at international meetings, by peer-reviewed publications and through patient organisations and newsletters to patients, where available.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN31474800. Registered 14 April 2020.

Immunology of Retinitis Pigmentosa and Gene Therapy-Associated Uveitis

The underlying immune state of inherited retinal degenerations (IRDs) and retinitis pigmentosa (RP) has been an emerging area of interest, wherein the consequences have never been greater given the widespread recognition of gene therapy-associated uveitis (GTU) in gene therapy clinical trials. Whereas some evidence suggests that the adaptive immune system may play a role, the majority of studies indicate that the innate immune system is likely the primary driver of neuroinflammation in RP. During retinal degeneration, discrete mechanisms activate resident microglia and promote infiltrating macrophages that can either be protective or detrimental to photoreceptor cell death. This persistent stimulation of innate immunity, overlaid by the introduction of viral antigens as part of gene therapy, has the potential to trigger a complex microglia/macrophage-driven proinflammatory state. A better understanding of the immune pathophysiology in IRD and GTU will be necessary to improve the success of developing novel treatments for IRDs.

[Scleritis and episcleritis]

Scleritis and episcleritis are rare ocular inflammatory diseases but deserve to be known by internists because of their frequent association with systemic autoimmune diseases. It is important to distinguish them between because their prognosis, therapeutic management and potential complications are very different. Episcleritis represents a superficial ocular inflammation with usually benign visual prognosis, no complication with local treatment, and is associated with a systemic autoimmune disease in rare cases. In contrast, scleritis is a potentially serious ophthalmological condition that can threaten the visual prognosis in the absence of appropriate systemic treatment. It is associated with an underlying disease in 40-50% of cases, in particular a systemic autoimmune disease (25-35% of cases) or an infectious cause (5-10% of cases). Rheumatoid arthritis and systemic vasculitides, particularly antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitides, are the main autoimmune causes of scleritis and episcleritis. Scleritis can reveal the underlying autoimmune disease and requires systematic etiological investigations. Aggressive, complicated, refractory forms or those associated with a systemic autoimmune disease require glucocorticoids or even immunosuppressants, and close collaboration between ophthalmologists and internists is required. The development of biologic agents offers new effective therapeutic tools in the management of these difficult cases.

Mycophenolate mofetil may be an alternative for maintenance therapy of Behçet syndrome uveitis: a single-center retrospective analysis

Experience with mycophenolate in uveitis due to Behçet syndrome (BS) is limited. Twelve patients with panuveitis or posterior uveitis who were started mycophenolate were included. Data on demographic characteristics, therapies, ocular attacks, and adverse events were extracted from patient charts. Seven patients with BS uveitis were prescribed mycophenolate for remission induction, of which 6 were refractory/intolerant to conventional immunosuppressives. Mycophenolate was combined with anti-TNFs in 3 patients, resulting in no further ocular attacks. Mycophenolate had to be stopped in the fourth patient due to adverse events. The remaining 3 patients continued to have ocular attacks and were switched to other agents without any drop in visual acuity. Among the 5 patients who were prescribed mycophenolate for maintenance, 2 were relapse free, but 3 experienced ocular attacks. One patient had an exacerbation of mucocutaneous lesions, and 2 experienced adverse events. Mycophenolate monotherapy may not be adequate for remission induction of refractory BS uveitis, but it can be a safe and effective alternative when combined with a biologic agent. It may also be an option for maintenance therapy.

Response to Acthar Gel in sarcoidosis uveitis: A prospective open label study

PURPOSE

To investigate the response to Acthar Gel® in patients with moderate to severe sarcoidosis uveitis.

METHODS

This is a prospective open-label study that enrolled patients with moderate to severe sarcoidosis uveitis to receive 80 units daily of Acthar Gel for ten days followed by maintenance treatment with 80 units twice weekly. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients meeting at least one of the following variables 1) improved visual acuity, 2) resolution of intraocular inflammation, 3) ability to taper ocular or oral steroids by at least 50% or 4) reduction of cystoid macular edema, with no worsening of any single measure and no need for additional sarcoidosis therapies at 24 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of nine patients were enrolled in the study. Four patients completed the full 24-week course of Acthar Gel, and three of these met the primary endpoint. Among the five patients who did not complete the 24-week course of treatment, four discontinued the treatment due to worsening ocular inflammation. One patient discontinued treatment due to severe adverse effects. The most common adverse effects were fluid retention (77%), insomnia (44%), hypertension (44%) and hyperglycemia (44%).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a clinical response to Acthar Gel in some patients with moderate to severe sarcoidosis uveitis, but a substantial proportion either failed to respond or did not tolerate the therapy. These observations may serve as preliminary data for controlled trials of Acthar Gel, but they do not support its role prior to failure of other agents.

TACROLIMUS FOR IMMUNOSUPPRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH NONINFECTIOUS INTERMEDIATE, POSTERIOR, OR PANUVEITIDES

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of tacrolimus in patients with noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis needing a two-immunosuppressive-agent regimen.

METHODS

Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Two tertiary-care uveitis practices at academic medical centers. Patient population: Thirty-two patients with noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitides in whom single-agent immunosuppression was inadequate to effect successful corticosteroid sparing. Intervention: tacrolimus, added as the second immunosuppressive agent. Main outcome measure: successful corticosteroid sparing, defined as inactive uveitis at a dose of prednisone ≤7.5 mg/day.

RESULTS

Active uveitis was present in 65.6% of patients at initiation of tacrolimus, and the median time to inactive uveitis was 1.5 months (95% confidence interval 1.2, 4.08). The median time to successful corticosteroid sparing was 3.9 months (95% confidence interval 1.41, 6.67), and by 6 months of follow-up successful corticosteroid sparing was achieved in 75% of patients. Tacrolimus was discontinued for side effects in five patients, three for tremor, and two for hyperglycemia. All side effects were reversible with tacrolimus discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Tacrolimus seems to have efficacy as a second immunosuppressive agent in two-immunosuppressive drug regimens, when a single agent does not permit successful corticosteroid sparing. Side effects were reversible with tacrolimus discontinuation.

Risk of failing both methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil from the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) uveitis trial

BACKGROUND

The antimetabolites methotrexate (MTX) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are commonly used as initial corticosteroid-sparing treatment for uveitis. There is little data examining risk factors for failing both MTX and MMF. The objective of this study is to determine risk factors for failing both MTX and MMF in patients with non-infectious uveitis.

MAIN BODY

This is a sub-analysis of the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) uveitis trial, which was an international, multicenter, block-randomized, observer-masked, comparative effectiveness trial comparing MTX and MMF as initial treatments for non-infectious uveitis. This study was undertaken at multiple referral centers in India, the United States, Australia, Saudi Arabia and Mexico between 2013 and 2017. A total of 137 patients who completed all 12 months of follow-up from the FAST trial, were included in this study. The primary outcome was failing both antimetabolites over the 12 months of the trial. Potential predictors included: age, sex, bilateral involvement, anatomic location of the uveitis, presence of cystoid macular edema (CME) and retinal vasculitis at baseline visit, uveitis duration, and country/study sites as risk factors for failing both MTX and MMF. The presence of retinal vasculitis posterior to the equator on fluorescein angiogram was associated with failing both MTX and MMF.

CONCLUSION

Retinal vasculitis may be a risk factor for failing multiple antimetabolites. Clinicians could consider more quickly advancing these patients to other medication classes, such as biologics.

A 10-Year Review of the Management of Ocular Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid: A Private Practice Experience

PURPOSE

Ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid (OcMMP) is a rare and potentially blinding condition for which consensus treatment guidelines do not exist. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of various immunomodulatory agents in the treatment of OcMMP in a private practice setting.

METHODS

We conducted a 10-year retrospective chart review of patients managed with OcMMP (n = 22). The median age at diagnosis was 73 (range: 35-91) years, and 59% (13/22) of patients were female. Visual acuity, Foster stage, and adverse effects (AEs) were documented. Treatment outcomes for each treatment episode were qualified at 3 months as complete response (CR), response (R), or failure (F). After 3 months, CR was then further subqualified as sustained CR, reactivation after initial CR, or AE after initial CR. The Fisher exact test P values were calculated for each outcome in comparison with mycophenolate.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were treated with an immunomodulatory agent for a total of 55 treatment episodes. In comparison to dapsone, mycophenolate was more likely to achieve sustained CR (50% vs. 0%, P = 0.022) and R (100% vs. 50%, P = 0.007), and less likely to fail (0% vs. 50%, P = 0.007). Dapsone was also more likely to be discontinued because of AEs than mycophenolate (40% vs. 6%, P = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

Mycophenolate is a superior first-line agent to dapsone in the treatment of OcMMP. Although not statistically significant, mycophenolate trends toward superiority over methotrexate as well. Mycophenolate is very effective when used in combination with rituximab. Azathioprine remains a reasonable second-line agent.

Role of topical and systemic immunosuppression in aqueous-deficient dry eye disease

Immunosuppression in aqueous-deficient dry eye disease (ADDE) is required not only to improve the symptoms and signs but also to prevent further progression of the disease and its sight-threatening sequelae. This immunomodulation can be achieved through topical and/or systemic medications, and the choice of one drug over the other is determined by the underlying systemic disease. These immunosuppressive agents require a minimum of 6-8 weeks to achieve their beneficial effect, and during this time, the patient is usually placed on topical corticosteroids. Antimetabolites such as methotrexate, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil, along with calcineurin inhibitors, are commonly used as first-line medications. The latter have a pivotal role in immunomodulation since T cells contribute significantly to the pathogenesis of ocular surface inflammation in dry eye disease. Alkylating agents are largely limited to controlling acute exacerbations with pulse doses of cyclophosphamide. Biologic agents, such as rituximab, are particularly useful in patients with refractory disease. Each group of drugs has its own side-effect profiles and requires a stringent monitoring schedule that must be followed to prevent systemic morbidity. A customized combination of topical and systemic medications is usually required to achieve adequate control, and this review aims to help the clinician choose the most appropriate modality and monitoring regimen for a given case of ADDE.

Systemic Administration of Acazicolcept, a Dual CD28 and Inducible T cell Costimulator Inhibitor, Ameliorates Experimental Autoimmune Uveitis

Purpose

Combined inhibition of CD28 and inducible T cell costimulator (ICOS) pathways with acazicolcept (ALPN-101) represents a potential new treatment for uveitis. Here, we evaluate preclinical efficacy using experimental autoimmune uveitis (EAU) in Lewis rats.

Methods

Efficacy was tested in 57 Lewis rats treated with either systemic (subcutaneous) or local (intravitreal) administration of acazicolcept and compared to treatment with a matched Fc-only control or corticosteroid. Impact of treatment on uveitis was assessed using clinical scoring, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and histology. Ocular effector T cell populations were determined using flow cytometry, and multiplex ELISA used to measure aqueous cytokine concentrations.

Results

When compared to Fc control treatment, systemic acazicolcept led to statistically significant decreases in clinical score (P < 0.01), histologic score (P < 0.05), and number of ocular CD45+ cells (P < 0.01). Number of ocular CD4+ and CD8+ T cells expressing IL-17A+ and IFNγ+ were also decreased with statistical significance (P < 0.01). Similar results were achieved with corticosteroids. Intravitreal acazicolcept decreased inflammation scores when compared to untreated fellow eyes and to Fc control treated eyes, although not statistically significant. Systemic toxicity, measured by weight loss, occurred in the corticosteroid-treated, but not in the acazicolcept-treated animals.

Conclusions

Systemic treatment with acazicolcept statistically significantly suppressed EAU. Acazicolcept was well-tolerated without the weight loss associated with corticosteroids. Acazicolcept may be an effective alternative to corticosteroids for use in treating autoimmune uveitis. Additional studies are needed to clarify the optimal dose and route for use in humans.

Translational Relevance

We show that T cell costimulatory blockade could be an effective mechanism for treating uveitis.

Selective Transcription Factor Blockade Reduces Human Retinal Endothelial Cell Expression of Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 and Leukocyte Binding

The interaction between leukocytes and cytokine-activated retinal endothelium is an initiating step in non-infectious uveitis involving the posterior eye, mediated by cell adhesion molecules. However, because cell adhesion molecules are required for immune surveillance, therapeutic interventions would ideally be employed indirectly. Using 28 primary human retinal endothelial cell isolates, this study sought to identify transcription factor targets for reducing levels of the key retinal endothelial cell adhesion molecule, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, and limiting leukocyte binding to the retinal endothelium. Five candidate transcription factors-C2CD4B, EGR3, FOSB, IRF1, and JUNB-were identified by differential expression analysis of a transcriptome generated from IL-1β- or TNF-α-stimulated human retinal endothelial cells, interpreted in the context of the published literature. Further filtering involved molecular studies: of the five candidates, C2CD4B and IRF1 consistently demonstrated extended induction in IL-1β- or TNF-α-activated retinal endothelial cells and demonstrated a significant decrease in both ICAM-1 transcript and ICAM-1 membrane-bound protein expression by cytokine-activated retinal endothelial cells following treatment with small interfering RNA. RNA interference of C2CD4B or IRF1 significantly reduced leukocyte binding in a majority of human retinal endothelial cell isolates stimulated by IL-1β or TNF-α. Our observations suggest that the transcription factors C2CD4B and IRF1 may be potential drug targets for limiting leukocyte-retinal endothelial cell interactions in non-infectious uveitis involving the posterior eye.

Therapeutic Response After Immunosuppressive Drug Prescription in Non-infectious Uveitis: A Survival Analysis

INTRODUCTION

To identify factors affecting the response rate to immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs) in patients with non-infectious uveitis (NIU).

METHODS

This longitudinal retrospective cohort study included patients from the Hospital Clinico San Carlos Uveitis Clinic diagnosed with NIU from 1992 to 2016. Subjects were followed up from ISD prescription until the achievement of good therapeutic response (GTR), ISD treatment change, or up to 12 months. GTR was defined as the complete resolution of the eye inflammatory manifestations with a corticosteroid dose ≤ 10 or ≤ 5 mg per day of prednisone or equivalent (GTR10 and GTR5, respectively) maintained for at least 28 days. Kaplan-Meier curves were estimated for GTR. Demographic, clinical, and treatment-related factors were analyzed using Cox robust regression.

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients (100 episodes of ISD prescription) were analyzed. In 44 and 41 episodes, GTR10 and GTR5 were achieved, respectively. A lower hazard for both GTRs was associated with uveitic macular edema at prescription and with a higher "highest oral corticosteroid dose prescribed in the year before ISD prescription". GTR10 was higher if cyclosporine was prescribed (compared to other ISDs), and if a higher number of ISDs had been previously prescribed. GTR5 hazard was lower for patients with posterior uveitis or if the ISDs were prescribed before 2008, and higher if periocular corticosteroids had been administered before ISD prescription, or if the duration of the posterior segment activity was shorter.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors associated with GTR to ISDs may help to identify patients with NIUs who could benefit from a thorough follow-up.

Pediatric Scleritis: An Update

Posterior idiopathic scleritis is the most common type of scleritis observed in childhood. Nevertheless, anterior and even necrotizing inflammatory scleritis may occur as well. Although less frequently than in the adult population, scleral inflammation can be associated with systemic disorders, which should be promptly recognized and treated to avoid both ocular and systemic complications. Hence, a multidisciplinary diagnostic work-up should be performed to rule out primarily infectious and autoimmune causes, such as viral and bacterial infections, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis, pediatric sarcoidosis, Behçet's disease and HLA-B27-associated diseases. Treatment of scleritis should aim to control ocular inflammation, relieve symptoms and prevent relapses, to avoid complications, preserve visual acuity and improve the child's quality of life. It should be tailored to the patient, considering the type and severity of scleritis, the possible identification of an infectious cause or the presence of an associated rheumatologic condition.

The Conundrum of Clinical Trials for the Uveitides: Appropriate Outcome Measures for One Treatment Used in Several Diseases

The uveitides consist of >30 diseases characterized by intraocular inflammation. Noninfectious intermediate, posterior, and panuveitides typically are treated with oral corticosteroids and immunosuppression, with a similar treatment approach for most diseases. Because these uveitides collectively are considered a rare disease, single-disease trials are difficult to impractical to recruit for, and most trials have included several different diseases for a given protocol treatment. However, measures of uveitis activity are disease specific, resulting in challenges for trial outcome measures. Several trials of investigational immunosuppressive drugs or biologic drugs have not demonstrated efficacy, but design problems with the outcome measures have limited the ability to interpret the results. Successful trials have included diseases for which a single uveitis activity measure suffices or a composite measure of uveitis activity is used. One potential solution to this problem is the use of a single, clinically relevant outcome, successful corticosteroid sparing, defined as inactive uveitis with a prednisone dose ≤7.5 mg/day coupled with disease-specific guidelines for determining inactive disease. The clinical relevance of this outcome is that active uveitis is associated with increased risks of visual impairment and blindness, and that prednisone doses ≤7.5 mg/day have a minimal risk of corticosteroid side effects. The consequence of this approach is that trial visits require a core set of measures for all participants and a disease-specific set of measures, both clinical and imaging, to assess uveitis activity. This approach is being used in the Adalimumab Versus Conventional Immunosuppression (ADVISE) Trial.

Potential therapeutic strategies for photoreceptor degeneration: the path to restore vision

Photoreceptors (PRs), as the most abundant and light-sensing cells of the neuroretina, are responsible for converting light into electrical signals that can be interpreted by the brain. PR degeneration, including morphological and functional impairment of these cells, causes significant diminution of the retina's ability to detect light, with consequent loss of vision. Recent findings in ocular regenerative medicine have opened promising avenues to apply neuroprotective therapy, gene therapy, cell replacement therapy, and visual prostheses to the challenge of restoring vision. However, successful visual restoration in the clinical setting requires application of these therapeutic approaches at the appropriate stage of the retinal degeneration. In this review, firstly, we discuss the mechanisms of PR degeneration by focusing on the molecular mechanisms underlying cell death. Subsequently, innovations, recent developments, and promising treatments based on the stage of disorder progression are further explored. Then, the challenges to be addressed before implementation of these therapies in clinical practice are considered. Finally, potential solutions to overcome the current limitations of this growing research area are suggested. Overall, the majority of current treatment modalities are still at an early stage of development and require extensive additional studies, both pre-clinical and clinical, before full restoration of visual function in PR degeneration diseases can be realized.

Use of Systemic Mycophenolate Mofetil Therapy in Ocular Surface Inflammatory Pathologies at the Initiative and Responsibility of the Ophthalmologist

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of systemic mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment in ocular surface inflammatory diseases.

METHODS

For this retrospective study, patients who were treated with systemic MMF for ocular surface inflammatory diseases between March 2020 and March 2022 were evaluated. Apart from demographic data, examination notes including MMF treatment indication and systemic side effect interrogation and routine laboratory examinations during drug treatment were extracted from the patient records. Detailed staging scores were performed according to the diagnosis including Foster and Mondino for ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) and limbal stem cell deficiency scoring for limbal transplantation. For thorough evaluation, anterior segment pictures were used.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were enrolled to the study, with a mean age of 58 ± 12. MMP (6, 42.8%) and limbal allograft transplantation (6, 42.8%) constituted the main indications for the MMF treatment, followed by keratitis-ichthyosis-deafness (KID) syndrome (1, 7.2%) and Mooren's ulcer (1, 7.2%). Five of six patients with MMP regressed according to both staging systems. Only one remained stable which was evaluated as Stage 3. Furthermore, while all limbal transplant groups (6) stabilized and showed regression according to the individualized limbal stem cell deficiency staging system with no rejection during follow-up. Furthermore, patients with Mooren's ulcer and KID syndrome showed control of the inflammation and stabilization after MMF treatment. No significant systemic side effects apart from constipation and nausea (3) were observed in patients whose routine laboratory tests were stable throughout the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

MMF has the potential to be a valuable and safe systemic agent of first choice in the control of ocular surface inflammatory disorders, especially when topical treatment is not effective. With such studies, it is predicted that MMF may reach wider usage areas with the increase in its effectiveness and safety in its use for ocular surface inflammatory pathologies.

Efficacy of Tacrolimus in Uveitis, and the Usefulness of Serum Tacrolimus Levels in Predicting Disease Control. Results from a Single Large Center

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy of tacrolimus in patients with noninfectious uveitis, as well as the usefulness of serum tacrolimus concentration measurements in predicting disease control.

METHODS

A retrospective review was carried out on 71 eligible patients from a single specialist uveitis center for minimum 1-year follow-up. Analysis was carried out on disease activity, visual acuity, and trough serum tacrolimus concentrations (STC).

RESULTS

At 1-year follow-up, disease control was achieved in 49 patients (69.0%), this was significantly more likely in patients with trough STC levels above 5 ng/mL (88% vs 53%, p = .002). There was a significant reduction in oral prednisolone (dose ≥7.5 mg, 86% vs 54%, p < .0001). Tacrolimus was discontinued in 12 patients (17%) due to side effects.

DISCUSSION

In this study cohort, oral tacrolimus was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of noninfectious uveitis. Trough STC between 5 ng/mL and 10 ng/ml was associated with better disease control at 1-year follow-up.

Clinical patterns and risk factors in scleritis: a multicentric study in Colombia

PURPOSE

This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics of scleritis in a large cohort of Colombian patients and identify factors associated with the clinical presentation.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of patients with scleritis from 2015 to 2020. Clinical records were obtained from seven uveitis referral centers in Colombia. Patients with a diagnosis of episcleritis were excluded.

RESULTS

We evaluated 389 patients with scleritis (509 eyes). There was a female predominance (75.6%) with a mean age of 51 ± 15 years. Most cases were noninfectious (94.8%) and unilateral (69.2%). The most frequent type of inflammation was diffuse anterior scleritis (41.7%), followed by nodular scleritis (31.9%) and necrotizing scleritis (12.3%). Systemic autoimmune diseases were found in 41.3% of patients, the most common being rheumatoid arthritis (18.5%) and granulomatosis with polyangiitis (5.9%). Polyautoimmunity was found in 10.4% of those with a systemic autoimmune disease. The most frequent treatment was systemic steroids (50.9%), followed by systemic NSAIDs (32.4%). Steroid-sparing immunosuppression was required in 49.1% of patients. Systemic autoimmune diseases were more common in patients with necrotizing scleritis and those older than 40 years of age. Best-corrected visual acuity of 20/80 or worse at presentation was more common in necrotizing scleritis and subjects with associated uveitis, ocular hypertension, or who were over 40 years of age.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study in Colombia and the largest in Latin America describing the clinical characteristics and presentation patterns of scleritis. The most common presentation was in females, with unilateral, anterior diffuse noninfectious scleritis. Systemic autoimmune diseases and polyautoimmunity were frequent, as was the need for steroid-sparing immunosuppression. Age over 40 and necrotizing scleritis were associated with higher odds of having a systemic autoimmune disease and worse visual acuity at presentation.

Clinical profile, treatment, and visual outcome of scleritis: A single ophthalmologist experience

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical profile of patients with scleritis managed by a single ophthalmologist in a tertiary eye care center.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 107 eyes of 96 patients with scleritis from January 2007 to December 2018.

RESULTS

Female predominance (68%) with a relatively young-onset (46 ± 14 years) of scleritis was observed. Diffuse anterior scleritis (41%) was the most common subtype of scleritis, and the most common systemic association was rheumatoid arthritis (18%). Three-fourth of patients received immunosuppressive treatment (74%) along with corticosteroids. The mean follow-up period was 3 ± 2.5 (range: 0.6-10) years. Necrotizing scleritis was at a 3.5 times higher risk of developing ocular complications. Eighty percent of patients maintained the same vision. Recurrence of scleritis was noted in 25 eyes (23%).

CONCLUSION

Diffuse scleritis is the most common scleritis in our population. Tuberculosis was commonly seen with diffuse scleritis. The likelihood of developing ocular complications (cataract and glaucoma) was higher in necrotizing scleritis, thus requiring periodic monitorization.

Mycophenolate versus Methotrexate in Non-infectious Ocular Inflammatory Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus methotrexate (MTX) in non-infectious ocular inflammatory disease (NIOID).

METHODS

The study was performed as per the PRISMA Guidelines. A search identified all studies comparing MMF versus MTX in NIOID. Treatment result and side effects were primary outcomes.

RESULTS

Four studies enrolling 905 patients were identified. There was no significant difference between MMF and MTX groups in overall treatment success (OR = 0.97, P = .96), treatment failure (OR = 0.86, P = .85). MTX showed a significantly improved effect in cases involving posterior uveitis and panuveitis (OR = 0.41, P = .003). In addition, MTX was associated with a faster median time to treatment success and had less side effects when compared to MTX, however this was not significant. For secondary outcomes, no significant difference was found in visual acuity and resolution of macular oedema.

CONCLUSION

MMF is comparable to MTX in the treatment of NIOID.

Management of noninfectious scleritis

Scleritis is a manifestation of inflammatory eye disease that involves the sclera. It can be divided into multiple subtypes, including diffuse anterior, nodular anterior, necrotizing, and posterior scleritis. In many cases, scleritis is restricted to the eye; however, it can occur in the context of systemic illness, particularly autoimmune and infectious conditions. Patients with autoimmune conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, and polyangiitis with granulomatosis, may develop scleritis flares that may require topical and systemic therapy. Initial therapy typically involves oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); however, it is important to address the underlying condition, particularly if systemic. Other treatment regimens typically involve either local or systemic steroids or the use of immunomodulatory agents, which have a wide range of efficacy and documented use in the literature. There is a myriad of immunomodulatory agents used in the treatment of scleritis including antimetabolites, calcineurin inhibitors, biologics, and alkylating agents. In this review, we highlight the various subtypes of noninfectious scleritis and explore each of the mainstay agents used in the management of this entity. We explore the use of steroids and NSAIDs in detail and discuss evidence for various immunomodulatory agents.

Topical 0.03% tacrolimus versus systemic mycophenolate mofetil as adjuncts to systemic corticosteroids for preventing graft rejection after repeat keratoplasty: one-year results of a randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of topical 0.03% tacrolimus in combination with systemic corticosteroids versus systemic mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids in preventing corneal allograft rejection after repeat keratoplasty.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized clinical trial enrolled 63 consecutive eyes of 63 patients who underwent repeat keratoplasty after a failed penetrating keratoplasty. Group 1 (32 eyes) received MMF orally 1 g twice daily for the first 6 months and then 1 g daily for the next 6 months, and group 2 (31 eyes) received topical 0.03% tacrolimus four times a day for 12 months. All patients were treated with topical and oral corticosteroids postoperatively. The participants were observed closely for signs of graft rejection, and the rates of rejection-free graft survival were calculated and compared between the two groups at postoperative month 12.

RESULTS

The groups were balanced in patient's age and risk factors for graft rejection (e.g., original diagnosis, number of previous grafts, and quadrants of corneal vascularization). Endothelial graft rejection occurred in 5 eyes (15.6%) of group 1 and 6 eyes (19.4%) of group 2 (P = 0.75). Irreversible endothelial graft rejection resulting in graft failure occurred in 3 eyes of each group (P = 0.99). The rate of rejection-free graft survival was 84.4% in group 1 and 80.6% in group 2 at postoperative month 12 (P = 0.74).

CONCLUSION

Topical 0.03% tacrolimus was as effective as systemic MMF as adjuncts to topical and systemic corticosteroids in reducing endothelial graft rejection with 12 months follow up after repeat keratoplasty.

Insights into multiple sclerosis-associated uveitis: a scoping review

PURPOSE

This paper is a scoping review of research on multiple sclerosis (MS)-associated uveitis to determine its epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical features and treatment.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the medical databases MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane was carried out on 25 November 2019, to identify papers published between 1980 and 2019 that focus on patients with MS-associated uveitis.

RESULTS

Based on large cohort studies (n ≥ 1000), the prevalence of uveitis in patients with MS is estimated to be 0.53-1.34% (mean = 0.83%), and MS is diagnosed in 0.52-3.20% (mean = 1.30%) of patients with uveitis. The condition is most frequent among middle-aged women. Patients usually complain of floaters and/or blurred vision, with bilateral intermediate uveitis (with retinal vasculitis) as the most frequent ophthalmological finding. Both MS and intermediate uveitis are associated with HLA-DRB1*15:01 and IL-2RA gene polymorphism rs2104286 A > G, suggesting a common genetic background. T cells, and possibly B cells, play an important role in both autoimmune disorders. Multiple sclerosis (MS)-related uveitis is classically treated as non-infectious uveitis, with corticosteroids as the first treatment step. Other treatments include immunosuppressants, cryotherapy, laser photocoagulation and vitrectomy. These treatment options have a limited, if any, effect on the course of MS and can be complicated by side-effects. As treatment strategies for MS have increased in the last decade, it would be interesting to evaluate the efficacy of these new treatments during the course of uveitis. Moreover, the correlation between retinal periphlebitis and MS could be established more accurately with the recently developed techniques of wide-field fluorescein angiography in a large cohort of MS patients.

CONCLUSION

MS-associated uveitis is a rare, highly discussed pathology about which much is still unknown. Large epidemiological studies and extrapolation of new MS treatments to this condition are warranted.

Systemic Immunosuppression in Cornea and Ocular Surface Disorders: A Ready Reckoner for Ophthalmologists

Purpose: Many diseases of the cornea and ocular surface are manifestations of an underlying autoimmune process and require systemic immunosuppression for their management. These cases often present to a general ophthalmologist before being referred to an ocular immunologist or rheumatologist. However, the patients do need to be followed by the ophthalmologist to assess disease progression or for management of ocular co-morbidities and for taking care of ocular complications of the disease. Undeniably, there is a certain hesitance to promptly initiate them on systemic therapy because the literature regarding the indications, dosages, and side effects of this group of drugs is vast and dispersed.The aim of this review is to provide a source of ready reference for the general ophthalmologist as well as trainees and residents, on systemic immunosuppression for corneal and ocular surface disease. Methods: This review included 153 studies which were published as randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, or as nonrandomized comparative studies (cohort or case-control series) on the topic of systemic immunosuppression in cornea and ocular surface disorders.Results: This review provides a concise summary of both the types of drugs and the common indications where they would be indicated, along with treatment and monitoring algorithms for each specific disease condition. The most used group of drugs are corticosteroids, which have significant side effects, particularly when administered systemically or for longer periods of time. To overcome this, steroid-sparing immunosuppressants are recommended. The four main classes of immunosuppressants used today are antimetabolites, T-cell inhibitors, alkylating agents and biologic agents. This review details the use of these drugs in ocular surface inflammation, including the dosing schedule, side effects and monitoring in allergic conjunctivitis, mucous membrane pemphigoid, peripheral ulcerative keratitis, immunological rejection against corneal allografts, anterior scleritis and aqueous deficiency dry eyes. Conclusions: This review provides an uncluttered and wholesome understanding of systemic immunosuppression in cornea and ocular surface diseases, with the hope that this will serve as a ready reckoner and help bridge the gap between ophthalmology and rheumatology for the betterment of our patients.

Perspectives for immunotherapy in noninfectious immune mediated uveitis

Introduction: Noninfectious uveitis (NIU) is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide. In adult patients, anterior NIU is usually managed with topical corticosteroids. In intermediate, posterior uveitis. and panuveitis, systemic corticosteroids are used especially in case of bilaterality or association with systemic disease. Biotherapies are recommended in case of inefficacy or intolerance to corticosteroids or conventional immunosuppressive drugs. Anti-TNF-α agents are by far the most widely used biotherapies. In case of failure or poor tolerance to anti-TNF-α, new targeted therapies can be proposed.Areas covered: We present and discuss an updated overview on biologics and biotherapies in NIU.Expert opinion: In case of dependency to systemic or intravitreal steroids, sight-threatening disease, and/or failure of conventional immunosuppressive drugs, anti-TNF-α are used as first-line biologics to achieve quiescence of inflammation. Anti-interleukin-6 is another option that may be proposed as first-line biologic or in case of poor efficacy of anti-TNF-α. Interferon can be directly proposed in specific indications (e.g. refractory macular edema, sight-threatening Behçet's uveitis). In the rare cases that remain unresponsive to traditional biotherapies, novel molecules, such as Janus-associated-kinase and anti-phosphodiesterase-4-inhibitors can be used. Therapeutic response must always be evaluated by clinical and appropriate ancillary investigations.

New pharmacotherapy options for noninfectious posterior uveitis

INTRODUCTION

Noninfectious inflammation of the posterior eye segment represents an important cause of visual impairment. It often affects relatively young people and causes a significant personal and social impact. Although steroids and nonbiologic- Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (nbDMARDs) are effective both in acute and long- lasting diseases, however they are increasingly being replaced by biologic (DMARDs). bDMARD. This article therefore aims to identify recent advances in the therapy of noninfectious posterior segment uveitis.

METHODS

A Medline-search was conducted using the terms: nbDMARD, bDMARD, posterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis, treatment, corticosteroid. In addition, clinical studies were included as registered at ClinicalTrials.gov.

RESULTS

Currently two major lines of treatments can be identified: (1) the intraocular application of anti-inflammatory agents and (2) the introduction of new agents, e.g., (bDMARDs) and small-molecule-inhibitors. Whereas intravitreal treatments have the advantage to avoid systemic side effects, new systemic agents are progressively earning credit on the basis of their therapeutic effects.

CONCLUSION

Even when current treatment strategies are still hampered by the limited number of randomized controlled trials, promising progress and continuous efforts are seen.

A Systematic Switch From Originator Infliximab to Biosimilar Infliximab in Patients With Non-Infectious Uveitis

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy of biosimilar infliximab compared to that of the originator infliximab for the treatment of chronic non-infectious uveitis.

DESIGN

Before-and-after study.

METHODS

All patients in the Central Norway Health Region between 2007 and 2018 were included. They were switched from originator to biosimilar infliximab therapy from 2014 to 2017. The primary outcome was quiescence of uveitis before and after the switch. All patients were seen every 1-3 months. Visits were binned into 3-month long periods for each patient takingboth medications. Poisson regression analysis was used to estimate the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of quiescence between the 2 treatments.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were treated with infliximab. Twenty-three of those patients were switched from originator to biosimilar infliximab. The majority were white (87%), female (92%), and had chronic anterior uveitis (65%). For patients taking the originator and biosimilar drugs, the median treatment duration was38 months (range: 8-131 months) and 15 months (range: 5-55 months), respectively. Concomitant immunosuppressive medications and topical and oral steroids were used similarly during treatment with both originator and biosimilar infliximab. The IRR for quiescence was 0.91 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.7-1.1; P = 0.38), which indicated no statistically significant differences in achieving quiescence after the switch. Also, there were no differences in the incidence rate of flare events with the switch (IRR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.36-2.98; P = 0.95). IRR adjusted for intraocular surgery was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.7-1.1; P = 0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

No evidence of differences in effectiveness were found in comparing biosimilar to originator infliximab in patients with chronic non-infectious uveitis.