Randomized clinical trial of vessel sealing system (LigaSure) in esophagogastric devascularization and splenectomy in patients with portal hypertension

Surgical Considerations in Portal Hypertension

This review provides an in-depth exploration of portal hypertension (PH) and its implications in various surgical procedures. The prevalence of clinically significant PH is 50% to 60% in compensated cirrhosis and 100% in decompensated cirrhosis. The feasibility and safety of hepatic and nonhepatic surgical procedures in patients with PH has been shown. Adequate preoperative risk assessment and optimization of PH are integral parts of patient assessment. The occurrence of adverse outcomes after surgery has decreased over time in this specific population, due to the development of techniques and improved perioperative multidisciplinary care.

LigaSure technique for splenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to clarify the optimal management of the LigaSure technique and conventional techniques during splenectomy.

METHODS

All databases, including CBM, CNKI, WFPD, Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases up to April 2023, were searched for relevant studies comparing the LigaSure technique with conventional techniques. Six studies, extracted by 2 independent reviewers, were evaluated for blood loss, operative time, conversion, mortality, hospital stay, and transfusion.

RESULTS

The blood loss was significantly higher in the convention group than in the LigaSure group (WMD = -48.98, 95% CI: -62.41 to -35.55, P < .00001). Meanwhile, the mean operative time was significantly shorter in LigaSure group than in convention group (WMD = -10.57; 95% CI: -12.35 to -8.78), P < .00001). No significant differences were found regarding the conversion rate, hospital stay, morbidity, and transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

The LigaSure technique has comparable effects to conventional techniques, but to some extent reduces blood loss and operative time.

High-energy devices in different surgical settings: lessons learnt from a full health technology assessment report developed by SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica)

BACKGROUND

The present paper aims at evaluating the potential benefits of high-energy devices (HEDs) in the Italian surgical practice, defining the comparative efficacy and safety profiles, as well as the potential economic and organizational advantages for hospitals and patients, with respect to standard monopolar or bipolar devices.

METHODS

A Health Technology Assessment was conducted in 2021 assuming the hospital perspective, comparing HEDs and standard monopolar/bipolar devices, within eleven surgical settings: appendectomy, hepatic resections, colorectal resections, cholecystectomy, splenectomy, hemorrhoidectomy, thyroidectomy, esophago-gastrectomy, breast surgery, adrenalectomy, and pancreatectomy. The nine EUnetHTA Core Model dimensions were deployed considering a multi-methods approach. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used: (1) a systematic literature review for the definition of the comparative efficacy and safety data; (2) administration of qualitative questionnaires, completed by 23 healthcare professionals (according to 7-item Likert scale, ranging from - 3 to + 3); and (3) health-economics tools, useful for the economic evaluation of the clinical pathway and budget impact analysis, and for the definition of the organizational and accessibility advantages, in terms of time or procedures' savings.

RESULTS

The literature declared a decrease in operating time and length of stay in using HEDs in most surgical settings. While HEDs would lead to a marginal investment for the conduction of 178,619 surgeries on annual basis, their routinely implementation would generate significant organizational savings. A decrease equal to - 5.25/-9.02% of operating room time and to - 5.03/-30.73% of length of stay emerged. An advantage in accessibility to surgery could be hypothesized in a 9% of increase, due to the gaining in operatory slots. Professionals' perceptions crystallized and confirmed literature evidence, declaring a better safety and effectiveness profile. An improvement in both patients and caregivers' quality-of-life emerged.

CONCLUSIONS

The results have demonstrated the strategic relevance related to HEDs introduction, their economic sustainability, and feasibility, as well as the potentialities in process improvement.

Clinical benefits of vessel sealing system (LigaSure™) during surgery for soft tissue sarcoma: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas arise in the deep sites of the buttocks and lower extremities. Since a tourniquet is not applied during surgery for soft tissue sarcomas at such sites, excessive intraoperative blood loss may occur. Various devices, including LigaSure™ (Medtronic, Dublin, Ireland), are used as electrothermal bipolar vessel sealers. However, its clinical relevance in soft tissue sarcomas surgery remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of LigaSure™ in soft tissue sarcomas surgery.

METHODS

This study included 168 patients who underwent surgeries for soft tissue sarcomas in the deep sites in the buttocks and lower extremities between January 2004 and March 2018. The primary outcome was intraoperative blood loss, and secondary outcomes were surgery duration, wound complications, perioperative haemoglobin concentrations and intraoperative blood transfusion. To reduce selection biases, propensity score matching was applied. We defined the matched cases wherein LigaSure™ was used as the 'using group' and the other matched cases as the 'non-using group'. Outcomes were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

From each group, 35 cases were selected using propensity score matching. The intraoperative blood loss was significantly smaller statistically in the using group (181.5 ± 240.4 ml vs. 394.7 ± 547.3 ml, respectively; P = 0.041). The duration of operation was longer in the using group (189.9 ± 97.6 min vs. 140.6 ± 75.7 min, respectively; P = 0.007). There were no significant differences in other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

By using LigaSure™ for soft tissue sarcomas occurring in the buttocks and lower extremities, we observed a trade-off between reduced intraoperative blood loss and longer operative time.

Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis in Liver Cirrhosis After Splenectomy or Splenic Artery Embolization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Splenectomy and splenic artery embolization are major treatment options for hypersplenism and portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis, but may lead to splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT), which is potentially lethal. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the incidence of SVT in liver cirrhosis after splenectomy or splenic artery embolization and the risk factors for SVT.

METHODS

All relevant studies were searched through the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. The incidence of SVT in liver cirrhosis after splenectomy or splenic artery embolization was pooled. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Sixty-six studies with 5632 patients with cirrhosis were included. The pooled incidence of SVT after splenectomy and splenic artery embolization was 24.6% (95% CI 20.2-29.3%) and 11.7% (95% CI 7.1-17.3%), respectively. A meta-analysis of three comparative studies demonstrated that the incidence of SVT after splenectomy was statistically similar to that after splenic artery embolization (OR 3.15, P = 0.290). Platelet count, mean platelet volume, preoperative splenic or portal vein diameter, preoperative or postoperative portal blood velocity, splenic volume and weight, and periesophagogastric devascularization were significant risk factors for SVT after splenectomy. Postoperative use of preventive antithrombotic therapy was a significant protective factor against SVT after splenectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

SVT is common in liver cirrhosis after splenectomy and splenic artery embolization. Coagulation and hemostasis factors, anatomical factors, and surgery-related factors have been widely identified for the assessment of high risk of SVT after splenectomy. Prophylactic strategy after splenectomy, such as antithrombotic therapy, might be considered in such high-risk patients.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study was registered in PROSPERO with a registration number of CRD42019129673.

Safety and Effectiveness of Vessel Sealing for Dissection during Pancreaticoduodenectomy

Traditional pancreaticoduodenectomy dissection techniques are tedious and time-consuming. The LigaSure® Vessel Sealing System is an alternative to standard dissection methods. LigaSure® can be used in replace of ligatures, clips, and sutures in most of the pancreaticoduodenectomy procedure. The objective of this study was to examine our experience with LigaSure® in pancreaticoduodenectomies and to show the safety and time-effectiveness. Forty-three pancreaticoduodenectomies were performed by a single surgeon using the LigaSure® device in place of traditional dissection techniques. A retrospective chart review was conducted to evaluate patient management and outcome. Demographics, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were analyzed. The average patient age was 61 years. Primary pathologic diagnoses were: periampullary carcinoma (56%), chronic pancreatitis (5%), cystic lesion (26%), neuroendocrine tumor (7%), and other (5%). Our patient population demonstrated American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I (2%), Class II (14%), III (75%), and IV (9%). Average operative time was 4:11 hours. The study group required an average of 0.49 ± 1.35 units of blood. Eight patients (19%) received blood transfusion, receiving an average of 2.63 ± 2.13 units. Patients had a median hospital stay of 10 days (range, 5 to 41 days). An oral diet was ordered for most patients by Day 4. Fourteen patients (32.5%) had a complication, including two patients requiring additional surgery for drainage of abscess. There were no postoperative deaths. The use of LigaSure® is a practical and safe alternative to standard dissection techniques. Operative time, blood loss, and complication rate are favorable compared with published series.

Postoperative survival analysis and prognostic nomogram model for patients with portal hypertension

AIM

To analyse the postoperative survival of patients with portal hypertension and determine the factors that influence survival and construct nomograms.

METHODS

We retrospectively followed 1045 patients who underwent splenectomy plus pericardial devascularisation (SPD) between January 2002 and December 2017. Two SPD types are used in our department: splenectomy plus simplified pericardial devascularisation (SSPD) and splenectomy plus traditional pericardial devascularisation (STPD). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate the prognostic effects of multiple parameters on overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and bleeding-free survival (BFS). Significant prognostic factors were combined to build nomograms to predict the survival rate of individual patients.

RESULTS

Five hundred and fifty-seven (53.30%) patients were successfully followed with 192 in the SSPD group and 365 in the STPD group; 93 (16.70%) patients died, of whom 42 (7.54%) died due to bleeding. Postoperative bleeding was observed in 84 (15.10%) patients. The 5- and 10-year OS, DSS and BFS rates in the group of patients who underwent SSPD were not significantly different from those in patients who underwent STPD. Independent prognostic factors for OS were age, operative time, alanine transaminase level and albumin-bilirubin score. Independent prognostic factors for BFS were male sex, age, intraoperative blood loss and time to first flatus. Independent prognostic factors for DSS were the Comprehensive Complication Index and age. These characteristics were used to establish nomograms, which showed good accuracy in predicting 1-, 3- and 5-year OS and BFS.

CONCLUSION

SSPD achieves or surpasses the long-term survival effect of traditional pericardial devascularisation and is worthy of clinical promotion and application. Nomograms are effective at predicting prognosis.

Efficacy and safety of a vessel sealing system in oral cancer resection and reconstructive surgery

OBJECTIVE

Currently, many studies are being performed that focus on the efficacy and safety of the vessel sealing system (VSS) in various fields of surgery. However, in the field of oral cancer surgery, the efficacy and safety of VSS use have not been clarified.

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-one patients underwent oral cancer resection and reconstructive surgery. They were divided into two groups: Ligasure vessel sealing system (LVSS) group and conventional surgery (CS) as control. Intra-operative blood loss, operating time, and incidence of post-operative complications and recurrence were analyzed.

RESULTS

LVSS use significantly reduced intra-operative blood loss. The operating time was shortened only in mandibular gingiva cancer surgery. There were no differences between the two groups with regard to the incidence of post-operative complications and recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

LVSS use was found to be effective and proved to be efficient and safe, and may be useful in oral cancer surgery.

Laparoscopic gastric devascularization without splenectomy is effective for the treatment of gastric varices

•

Devascularization without splenectomy for gastric varices reduces the complication.

•

Laparoscopic devascularization without splenectomy is effective and less invasive.

•

Further improvement of laparoscopic devices will enhance the safety operation.

•

The new preoperative criteria to predict the difficulty of surgery is required.

Introduction

Laparoscopic gastric devascularization of the upper stomach in patients with gastric varices has rarely been reported. Perioperative clinical data were compared with patients who underwent open surgery.

Presentation of cases

From 2009 to 2012, we performed laparoscopic gastric devascularization without splenectomy for the treatment of gastric varices in eight patients. The patients included four males and four females. Peri-gastric vessels were divided using electrical coagulating devices or other devices according to the diameter of the vessels. Two patients underwent conversion to open surgery due to intraoperative bleeding.

Discussion

Intraoperative blood loss in patients who accomplished laparoscopic devascularization was very small (mean 76 ml). However, once bleeding occurs, there is a risk of causing massive bleeding.

Conclusion

With further improvement of laparoscopic devices, laparoscopic gastric devascularization without splenectomy must be an effective and less-invasive surgical procedure in the treatment of gastric varices.

Comparison of Ligasure Versus Conventional Surgery for Curative Gastric Cancer Resection: a Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The LigaSure vessel sealing system has been proposed to save operation time and reduce intraoperative blood loss for various surgeries. However, its usage for gastric cancer is still controversial. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to compare the effectiveness of LigaSure with conventional surgery in gastrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sources were retrieved from the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Google Scholar until February, 2015. All randomized controlled trials comparing LigaSure with conventional surgery in curative gastric cancer resection were selected. After data extraction, statistics were performed by Review Manager 5.1 software.

RESULTS

Three eligible randomized controlled trials were evaluated, with a total of 335 patients. The quality of the included trials was good, yet some methodological and clinical heterogeneity existed. There were no significant differences between the LigaSure and conventional groups in operative time (weighted mean difference [WMD], -22.95 minutes; 95% confidence interval [CI], [-59.75, 13.85]; P = 0.22), blood loss (WMD, -45.8 ml; 95% CI, [-134.5, 42.90]; P = 0.31), nor the incidence of surgical complications (odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, [0.68, 2.05]; P = 0.54). But there was a longer duration of hospital stay in LigaSure group (WMD, 1.41 days; 95% CI, [0.14, 2.68]; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

All available randomized evidence has been summarized. LigaSure does not confer significant advantage over conventional surgery for curative gastric cancer resection. The usefulness of the device may be limited in gastrectomy. But, more trials are needed for further assessment of the LigaSure system for gastric cancer.

Randomized controlled trial of the LigaSure vessel sealing system versus conventional open gastrectomy for gastric cancer

PURPOSE

LigaSure, a bipolar electronic vessel sealing system, has become popular in abdominal surgery but few clinical studies have been conducted to evaluate its effectiveness in radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

In this multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial, patients with curative gastric cancer were randomly assigned to undergo gastrectomy either with LigaSure or a conventional technique.

RESULTS

Of the 160 patients enrolled, 80 were randomized to the LigaSure group and 78 to the conventional group. Patient characteristics were well balanced in the two groups. There were no significant differences between the LigaSure and conventional groups in blood loss (288 vs. 260 ml, respectively; P = 0.748) or operative time (223 and 225 min, respectively; P = 0.368); nor in the incidence of surgical complications or duration of postoperative hospital stay. In a subgroup analysis of patients who underwent gastrectomy that preserved the distal part of the greater omentum, the use of LigaSure significantly reduced blood loss (179 vs. 245 ml; P = 0.033), and the duration of the operation (195 vs. 221 min; P = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

LigaSure did not contribute to reducing intraoperative blood loss, operative time, or other adverse surgical outcomes. The usefulness of the device may be limited to a specific part of the surgical procedure in open gastrectomy.

Efficiency of the LigaSure vessel sealing system for recipient hepatectomy in liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Although the LigaSure device is widely used, its use in liver transplantation, where compounding factors of portal hypertension, coagulopathy, and thrombocytopenia exist, is poorly described.

METHODS

From October 1, 2011, to December 31, 2011, 6 patients underwent liver transplantation with recipient hepatectomy utilizing the LigaSure device. Outcomes using the device were compared with 6 contemporaneous patients in whom the device was not used.

RESULTS

Patient demographics, preoperative laboratory values, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores were not different. Recipient hepatectomy was performed, on average, 43 minutes faster using the LigaSure device (P = .02). Although total operative time and intraoperative blood product usage were lower when the LigaSure was used, these differences did not attain statistical significance. Duration of stay and recipient readmission rates were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

LigaSure vessel sealing is an efficient method for recipient hepatectomy in liver transplantation. Vessel sealing of caval, portal, and other structures can be safely performed in the setting of end-stage liver disease.

Chylous ascites after liver transplantation: incidence and risk factors

In this study, we evaluated the diagnosis, epidemiology, risk factors, and treatment of chylous ascites developing after liver transplantation (LT). Between 2002 and 2011, LT was performed 693 times in 631 patients at our clinic. One-hundred fifteen of these patients were excluded for reasons such as retransplantation, early postoperative mortality, and insufficient data. Chylous ascites developed after LT (mean ± SD = 8.0 ± 3.2 days, range = 5-17 days) in 24 of the 516 patients included in this study. Using univariate and multivariate analyses, we examined whether the following were risk factors for developing chylous ascites: age, sex, body mass index, graft-to-recipient weight ratio, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, vena cava cross-clamping time, total operation time, Child-Pugh classification, sodium level, portal vein thrombosis or ascites before transplantation, donor type, albumin level, and perihepatic dissection technique [LigaSure vessel sealing system (LVSS) versus conventional suture ligation]. According to a univariate analysis, a low albumin level (P = 0.04), the presence of ascites before transplantation (P = 0.03), and the use of LVSS for perihepatic dissection (P < 0.01) were risk factors for developing chylous ascites. According to a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, the presence of pretransplant ascites [P = 0.04, hazard ratio (HR) = 2.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.1-13.5] and the use of LVSS for perihepatic dissection (P = 0.01, HR = 5.4, 95% CI = 1.5-34.4) were independent risk factors. In conclusion, the presence of preoperative ascites and the use of LVSS for perihepatic dissection are independent risk factors for the formation of chylous ascites. To our knowledge, this study is the most extensive examination of the development of chylous ascites. Nevertheless, our results should be supported by new prospective trials.