Renal cell carcinoma with leiomyomatous stroma—further immunohistochemical and molecular genetic characteristics of unusual entity

Recurrent MTOR Mutations in Renal Cell Carcinoma With Fibromyomatous Stroma: A Report of 2 Tumors

Renal cell carcinoma with fibromyomatous stroma, recognized as a provisional entity in the current 2022 World Health Organization classification of renal neoplasms, is rare. Recent evidence suggests recurrent alterations in the mTOR pathway, supporting its recognition as a distinct entity. Herein, we report 2 renal cell carcinomas with fibromyomatous stroma with MTOR mutations occurring in 62- and 72-year-old women and review the literature to support its recognition as a distinct entity, focusing on the characteristic morphology, immunohistochemical staining patterns as well as genetic alterations.

The Application and Pitfalls of Immunohistochemical Markers in Challenging Diagnosis of Genitourinary Pathology

CONTEXT.—

The morphologic features of different entities in genitourinary pathology overlap, presenting a diagnostic challenge, especially when diagnostic materials are limited. Immunohistochemical markers are valuable when morphologic features alone are insufficient for definitive diagnosis. The World Health Organization classification of urinary and male genital tumors has been updated for 2022. An updated review of immunohistochemical markers for newly classified genitourinary neoplasms and their differential diagnosis is needed.

OBJECTIVE.—

To review immunohistochemical markers used in the diagnosis of genitourinary lesions in the kidney, bladder, prostate, and testis. We particularly emphasized difficult differential diagnosis and pitfalls in immunohistochemistry application and interpretation. New markers and new entities in the 2022 World Health Organization classifications of genitourinary tumors are reviewed. Recommended staining panels for commonly encountered difficult differential diagnoses and potential pitfalls are discussed.

DATA SOURCES.—

Review of current literature and our own experience.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of problematic lesions of the genitourinary tract. However, the immunostains must be carefully interpreted in the context of morphologic findings with a thorough knowledge of pitfalls and limitations.

Are Renal Cell Carcinoma with Fibromyomatous Stroma (RCC-FMS) and Thyroid-like Follicular Carcinoma of the Kidney (TLFCK) Really Independent Variants?

BACKGROUND

Renal cell carcinoma with fibromyomatous stroma (RCC-FMS) is a recent provisional entity already recognised in the 2016 WHO Classification of Cancer of the Urinary Tract and Male Genital Organs 4th Edition as renal cell carcinoma with (angio)leiomyomatous stroma, histologically defined as a tumour characterised by clear cells intertwined in a conspicuous vascular stroma. In the casuistry taken into consideration, another proposed variant, thyroid-like follicular carcinoma of the kidney (TLFCK), endowed with a morphology mimicking thyroid parenchyma, was examined. The aim of this work was to parse the theoretical system, experimental data and diagnostic impact of these new entities proposed in the field of renal neoplasms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An analysis of 120 cases of kidney tumours from the Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area at the University of Pisa was run. Subsequently, all samples were reassessed by two pathologists with expertise in uropathology, whose revaluation provided a histomorphological study combined with subsequent and coherent immunohistochemical analyses of CK7, CD10, CAIX, CK34betaE12, CD117, vimentin, TTF-1 and thyroglobulin. These analyses were performed using the Ventana Benchmark Automated Staining System (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) and Ventana reagents.

RESULTS

On the one hand, the data, thus brought to light, did not show an immunohistochemical profile consistent with that proposed for RCC-FMS. However, it should be emphasised that the morphological background also unearthed a poor specificity for RCC-FMS. This was specifically due to a stromal component which was, in any case, evident, although characterised by a wide range of presentation, in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). This latter is, indeed, the reference background for this theorised variant. On the other hand, a thyroid-like pattern was highlighted in 11 cases, more specifically in 10 ccRCCs and in one oncocytoma, presenting itself as a type of neoplastic appearance rather than as the peculiar morphological pattern of a standalone cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

In the light of these results, RCC-FMS and TLFCK appear to be more appropriately variants of already categorised neoplastic entities rather than new independent neoplasias.

Renal Cell Carcinoma With Fibromyomatous Stroma: A New Case

In the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of renal tumors, renal cell carcinoma with fibromyomatous stroma (RCC FMS) (formerly RCC with leiomyomatous or smooth muscle stroma) was classified as an emerging or provisional entity of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We report a rare case of RCC FMS in a 62-year-old male patient with hypertension, type II diabetes mellitus, and early chronic kidney disease. He was referred to the Department of Urology for an incidental finding of a 2-cm-long left renal nodule on a routine abdominal ultrasound. A laparoscopic right partial nephrectomy was performed. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry studies confirm the diagnosis of RCC FMS. The purpose of this work is to review and discuss newly acquired data and evidence on the clinical, pathological, immunohistochemical, molecular, and prognostic aspects of this unusual entity in the hopes of assisting pathologists in accurate diagnosis.

Renal Cell Carcinoma With Fibromyomatous Stroma-The Whole Story

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with fibromyomatous stroma (FMS) was included as an "emerging/provisional" entity in the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification as a "RCC with (angio) leiomyomatous stroma." It has been debated whether RCCFMS represents a separate entity or a group of RCCs with overlapping morphologies. Accordingly, various names have been used to refer to the RCCs that exhibited clear cells and prominent smooth muscle and fibromatous stroma. Recent studies have demonstrated that RCCFMS indeed represents a distinct entity with subtle but distinguishable features that can be separated from other RCCs that exhibit clear cells, as well as tubulopapillary morphology and smooth muscle/fibromatous stroma, such as clear cell RCC and clear cell papillary RCC. Microscopically, the epithelial component forms tumor nodules composed of elongated and frequently branching tubules, lined by clear or mildly eosinophilic cells containing voluminous cytoplasm. Focal papillary morphology is also frequently present. Diffuse CK7 positivity is typical and is required for the diagnosis. Molecular analysis of these tumors demonstrated recurrent mutations involving the TSC/mTOR pathway. A subset of tumors with similar morphology has shown mutations involving ELOC (previously referred to as TCEB1), typically associated with monosomy 8. Finally, in addition to the more common RCCFMS that are sporadic, essentially identical tumors have been found in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex, suggesting the existence of hereditary and sporadic counterparts of this tumor. It is currently debated whether TSC/mTOR and ELOC mutated RCCFMS should be grouped together, based on their shared and overlapping morphology and common CK7 reactivity, despite the differing molecular alterations. This review outlines evidence supporting the recognition of RCCFMS as a novel subtype of RCC with morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics distinct from clear cell RCC and clear cell papillary RCC.

Immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of renal epithelial neoplasms

Despite the increasing number of newly identified renal neoplasms, the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) can usually be reached with careful histologic examination and a limited immunohistochemical (IHC) panel. Clear cell, papillary, chromophobe RCC and oncocytoma account for more than 90% of renal neoplasia in adults, and sophisticated ancillary tools are usually unnecessary. Renal tumors with entity-defining genetic alterations may ultimately require molecular confirmation via cytogenetics or sequencing technologies, such as RCC with TFE3, TFEB, or ALK gene rearrangements, or TFEB amplified RCC. In fumarate hydratase-deficient and succinate dehydrogenase-deficient RCC, highly specific IHC markers can strongly suggest the diagnosis. In the metastatic setting, PAX8 and carbonic anhydrase 9 are among the most helpful markers for confirming RCC and clear cell type, respectively; however, caution should be exercised in the absence of a current or historical renal mass. In diagnostically challenging cases, such as renal eosinophilic tumors with low-grade nuclear features, or infiltrative high-grade tumors, careful examination coupled with a judicious panel of IHC markers usually resolves the diagnosis. This review offers concise algorithms for diagnosis of kidney neoplasia with the latest recognized, provisional, and emerging entities to daily pathology practice.

Novel, emerging and provisional renal entities: The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) update on renal neoplasia

The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) undertook a critical review of the recent advances in renal neoplasia, particularly focusing on the newly accumulated evidence post-2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. In the era of evolving histo-molecular classification of renal neoplasia, morphology is still key. However, entities (or groups of entities) are increasingly characterized by specific molecular features, often associated either with recognizable, specific morphologies or constellations of morphologies and corresponding immunohistochemical profiles. The correct diagnosis has clinical implications leading to better prognosis, potential clinical management with targeted therapies, may identify hereditary or syndromic associations, which may necessitate appropriate genetic testing. We hope that this undertaking will further facilitate the identification of these entities in practice. We also hope that this update will bring more clarity regarding the evolving classification of renal neoplasia and will further reduce the category of "unclassifiable renal carcinomas/tumors". We propose three categories of novel entities: (1) "Novel entity", validated by multiple independent studies; (2) "Emerging entity", good compelling data available from at least two or more independent studies, but additional validation is needed; and (3) "Provisional entity", limited data available from one or two studies, with more work required to validate them. For some entities initially described using different names, we propose new terminologies, to facilitate their recognition and to avoid further diagnostic dilemmas. Following these criteria, we propose as novel entities: eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC), renal cell carcinoma with fibromyomatous stroma (RCC FMS) (formerly RCC with leiomyomatous or smooth muscle stroma), and anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement-associated renal cell carcinoma (ALK-RCC). Emerging entities include: eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT) and thyroid-like follicular renal cell carcinoma (TLFRCC). Finally, as provisional entities, we propose low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT), atrophic kidney-like lesion (AKLL), and biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous renal cell carcinoma (BHP RCC).

Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma: an update after 15 years

Fifteen years since the first recognition of clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma, this distinct renal tumour type is now well accepted as a distinct entity in major classification schemes. It occurs both with and without end-stage renal disease and may be multifocal or bilateral in both scenarios. Recognisable morphological features include clear cells lining branching glands and variable papillary formations with nuclear alignment. Most tumours are small (pT1a) and nucleolar grade 1-2. Immunohistochemistry consistently shows positivity for carbonic anhydrase IX and cytokeratin 7, and often high molecular weight cytokeratin or GATA3, the latter suggesting distal nephron phenotype. Labeling for AMACR and CD10 is consistently negative or minimal. Despite a resemblance to clear cell renal cell carcinoma, molecular alterations of VHL and chromosome 3p are typically lacking, with debatable rare exceptions. Potential mimics include clear cell renal cell carcinoma (with branching architecture or nuclear alignment), papillary renal cell carcinoma with clear cytoplasm, or rarely MITF family translocation renal cell carcinoma. Clinical behaviour is highly favourable with rare, debatable reports of aggressive behaviour. Combined with striking similarity to several extrarenal benign neoplasms, it would be reasonable to reclassify this entity as a benign or low malignant potential neoplasm. Using the nomenclature of the extrarenal counterparts, clear cell papillary (cyst)adenoma is proposed.

Renal cell carcinoma with leiomyomatous stroma in tuberous sclerosis complex: a distinct entity

Renal cell carcinoma with leiomyomatous stroma (RCCLS) is an emerging entity frequently associated with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). We described herein a series of RCCLS in TSC patients at pathological and cytogenetic levels. Three male patients with TSC and RCCLS were identified between 2000 and 2019 at the University Hospital of Rennes. Histologically, the architecture was tubulo-papillary with thick bundles of smooth muscle cells. The tumor cells showed clear cytoplasm with eosinophilic globules. The immunohistochemical profile was identical with an intense positivity of CK7, CAIX, and CD10 and a heterogeneous positivity of CK20. SDHB was low but positive and TFE3 was not expressed. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) did not show any quantitative chromosome abnormality. No recurrence was observed with a median follow-up of 4 years. RCCLS in TSC patients has morphological, immunohistochemical, and cytogenetic distinct features that could constitute a distinct entity and a sentinel manifestation for the diagnosis of TSC.

"Renal Cell Carcinoma With Leiomyomatous Stroma" Harbor Somatic Mutations of TSC1, TSC2, MTOR, and/or ELOC (TCEB1): Clinicopathologic and Molecular Characterization of 18 Sporadic Tumors Supports a Distinct Entity

Renal cell carcinoma with (angio) leiomyomatous stroma (RCCLMS) is included as a provisional entity in the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of renal epithelial neoplasia; however, debate remains whether it represents a distinct entity or a heterogenous group of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) with overlapping morphology. Also, its relationship to similar tumors occurring in the setting of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is not fully addressed. We analyzed the clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics of 23 sporadic RCCs associated with smooth muscle stroma and classified them into 2 groups, independent of molecular results: (1) RCCLMS (n=18) and (2) clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) (n=5). The classification of a case as "RCCLMS" was based on morphologic comparison with 5 "index" RCCs from 3 patients with TSC showing similar features and the presence of diffuse CK7 expression. To investigate mutational and copy number alterations, a 170-gene solid tumor panel was utilized to sequence 14 RCCLMSs and control of 5 CCRCCs. Also, 4 RCCLMSs, suspicious for chromosome 8 monosomy, were further evaluated by a broader 479 gene sequencing panel that included ELOC (also referred to as TCEB1). Clinical information and follow-up data were obtained from electronic medical records. The mean age of patients with RCCLMS was 52 years (range, 33 to 69) with male:female ratio of 1:2. Macroscopically, all tumors were solitary and predominantly (82%) tan/red, circumscribed, and solid. The average tumor size was 2.3 cm (range, 1.1 to 4.5). Microscopically, the distinctive feature included tumor nodules of elongated and frequently branching tubules lined by cells with voluminous clear to mildly eosinophilic cytoplasm (100%), separated by focal to prominent smooth muscle stroma. Additional frequently identified features included: biphasic pattern of collapsed acini surrounding tubules with voluminous cytoplasm (50%), focal papillary architecture (39%), peritumoral lymphoid aggregates (39%), and hemosiderin-laden macrophages (33%). All 11 (100%) RCCLMSs with available staging information were pT1; 78% were WHO/International Society of Urologic Pathology (ISUP) grade 2 and 22% grade 3. Immunophenotypically, RCCLMSs were characterized by diffuse CK7, CAM5.2 and CD10 reactivity (100%). All patients with available follow-up (n=10) were alive and without disease progression after a mean and median follow-up of 25.2 (range: 1 to 58) and 25 months, respectively. The molecular results showed recurrent mutations in all RCCLMS: TSC1 (4), TSC2 (4), MTOR (6), and/or ELOC (2). Five control CCRCCs demonstrated primary alterations in VHL gene, while all 14 RCCLMS cases tested had intact VHL gene. Of 2 RCCLMSs with confirmed monosomy 8, 1 showed a hotspot ELOC mutation without TSC/MTOR mutations, and 1 showed a previously undescribed 3-bp in-frame ELOC deletion, along with a truncating TSC1 mutation. In conclusion, RCCLMS, as defined herein, harbors recurrent mutations of TSC1/TSC2, MTOR, and/or ELOC, consistent with hyperactive MTOR complex. Our findings argue that these tumors represent the sporadic counterpart to morphologically identical tumors occurring in TSC patients. Finally, the data support that RCCLMS is a novel subtype of RCC with unique morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular characteristics that is distinct from CCRCC and clear cell-papillary RCC.

Papillary renal cell carcinoma with prominent spindle cell stroma - tumor mimicking mixed epithelial and stromal tumor of the kidney: Clinicopathologic, morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular genetic analysis of 6 cases

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) is currently a well-studied type of RCC. In addition to PRCC type 1, there are a number of other subtypes and variants of PRCCs which have been reported. We describe a series of 6 PRCCs with papillary, micropapillary and/or tubulopapillary architecture and prominent spindle cell stroma, resembling stroma in mixed epithelial and stromal tumor of the kidney (MESTK) or sarcomatoid RCC. Clinicopathologic, morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular features were analyzed. All patients were males with an age range of 44-98 years (mean 65.3, median 65.5 years). Tumor size ranged from 2.4-11.4 cm (mean 5.8, median 4.5 cm). Follow-up data were available for 4 patients, ranging from 3 to 96 months (mean 42.75, median 36 months). Epithelial cells were mostly cylindrical with eosinophilic cytoplasm, showing nuclear grade 2 and 3 (ISUP/WHO). In all cases, loose to compact prominent stroma composed of spindle cells, without malignant mesenchymal heterologous elements was detected. No atypical mitoses were found, while typical mitoses were rare in both epithelial and stromal components. Epithelial cells were positive for CK7, AMACR, and vimentin in all cases, while negative for TFE3, HMB45, desmin, CD34, and actin. The stroma was positive for vimentin, actin and focally for CD34, while negative for CK7, AMACR, TFE3, HMB45, and desmin. Estrogen and progesterone receptors were completely negative. FH and SDHB expression was retained in all analyzable cases. Proliferative index was barely detectable in stromal component and low in epithelial component, ranging 0 to 5% positive stained cells/high power field. Copy number variation was variable with no distinct pattern. No mutations in CDKN2A, BAP1, MET were detected. PRCC with MESTK-like features is a distinct variant of PRCC mimicking MESTK. Our findings add to the body of literature on ever expanding variants of PRCCs. Both epithelial and stromal components lacked true Müllerian features, which was also proven by immunohistochemistry.

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma with wild-type von Hippel-Lindau gene: a non-existent or new tumour entity?

The current World Health Organisation (WHO) classification of renal tumours is based on characteristic histological features or specific molecular alterations. von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) alteration is the hallmark of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). After identification of the MiT translocation family of tumours, clear cell papillary renal cancer and others, the group of ccRCC with wild-type VHL is small. TCEB1 mutation combined with chromosome 8q loss is an emerging tumour entity with wild-type VHL. Inactivation of TCEB1 increases HIF stabilisation via the same mechanism as VHL inactivation. Importantly, recent molecular analyses suggest the existence of another 'VHL wild-type' evolutionary subtype of clear cell RCC in addition to TCEB1 mutated RCC and clear cell papillary renal cancer. These tumours are characterised by an aggressive behaviour, high tumour cell proliferation rate, elevated chromosomal instability and frequent presence of sarcomatoid differentiation. Future clinicopathological studies will have to provide data to determine whether TCEB1 tumours and clear cell RCC with wild-type VHL are separate tumour entities or represent variants of a clear cell RCC tumour family.

Low-grade spindle cell proliferation in clear cell renal cell carcinoma is unlikely to be an initial step in sarcomatoid differentiation

AIMS

Spindle cell proliferation within clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is usually considered as a sarcomatoid differentiation. Low-grade spindle cell proliferation (LG-SCP) in ccRCC was first described in 2001. This phenomenon is not common and can pose diagnostic challenges, particularly in core biopsies. The aim of this study was to describe morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics of ccRCCs with LG-SCP.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eleven cases of ccRCC with LG-SCP were retrieved from approximately 21 000 renal tumours in our registry. Ten cases of conventional ccRCC and 10 cases of typical sarcomatoid ccRCC were included as control groups. Morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) were analysed. Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome gene abnormalities were also analysed using molecular genetics. Among ccRCC with LG-SCP cases, there were five males and five females (clinical information was not available in one case) with a median age of 67 years (mean: 68.5, range: 60-81 years). Average tumour size was 7.1 cm (median:7.5, range:1.7-12 cm). Follow-up data were available in nine cases (mean: 44.78 months), with no aggressive behaviour seen. On average, LG-SCP areas constituted 5-80% of tumour volume (mean: 32.3%). Necrotic/regressed areas were seen in all cases ranging from 5% to 30%. LG-SCP was clearly epithelial, with no mitoses or any evidence of mesenchymal differentiation. Immunohistochemical profile of LG-SCP was consistent with 'conventional' ccRCC. Compared with sarcomatoid ccRCC, some EMT markers showed alteration in LG-SCP, including lower expression of N-cadherin and Zeb1 as well as higher expression of E-cadherin. However, there were no significant differences in EMT markers between LG-SCP and conventional ccRCC. Abnormalities in VHL (mutations, LOH3p) were found in six of 11 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings showed that LG-SCP in ccRCC have comparable immunohistochemical and molecular characteristics to those seen in 'conventional' ccRCC. Further, immunohistochemical analysis of EMT markers showed that LG-SCP did not differ from 'conventional' ccRCC. We believe that LG-SCP is a part of morphological heterogeneity in ccRCCs and that they may not represent an initial stage of sarcomatoid differentiation. This is supported further by the fact that ccRCC with LG-SCP did not display more aggressive behaviour than 'conventional' ccRCC.

Morphologic, Molecular, and Taxonomic Evolution of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Conceptual Perspective With Emphasis on Updates to the 2016 World Health Organization Classification

Molecular and morphologic interrogation has driven a much-needed reexamination of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Indeed, the recently released 2016 World Health Organization classification now recognizes 12 distinct RCC subtypes, as well as several other emerging/provisional RCC entities. From a clinical perspective, accurate RCC classification may have important implications for patients and their families, including prognostic risk stratification, targeted therapeutics selection, and identification for genetic testing. In this review, we provide a conceptual framework for approaching RCC diagnosis and classification by categorizing RCCs as tumors with clear cytoplasm, papillary architecture, and eosinophilic (oncocytic) cytoplasm. The currently recognized 2016 World Health Organization classification for RCC subtypes is briefly discussed, including new diagnostic entities (clear cell papillary RCC, hereditary leiomyomatosis and RCC-associated RCC, succinate dehydrogenase-deficient RCC, tubulocystic RCC, and acquired cystic disease-associated RCC) and areas of evolving RCC classification, such as transcription elongation factor B subunit 1 (TCEB1)-mutated RCC/RCC with angioleiomyoma-like stroma/RCC with leiomyomatous stroma, RCC associated with anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement, thyroidlike follicular RCC, and RCC in neuroblastoma survivors. For each RCC subtype, relevant clinical, molecular, gross, and microscopic findings are reviewed, and ancillary studies helpful for its differential diagnosis are presented, providing a practical approach to modern RCC classification.

Incidence of Clear Cell Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma in Low-Grade Renal Cell Carcinoma Cases

Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma (CCPRCC) is a recently recognized subtype of renal cell carcinoma entity after 2004 World Health Organization classification of renal tumors. CCPRCC has unique histomorphological and immunohistochemical characteristics. The distinction of CCPRCC from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with clear cell morphology is crucial because the former is considered to have a favorable clinical outcome. CCPRCC may be interpreted in the past as other renal cell carcinomas, particularly low-grade clear cell RCC. In this study, the frequency of CCPRCC in previously diagnosed low-grade RCC and its clinicopathologic features were examined. A total of 126 cases of stage T1a with low nuclear grade RCC were identified from 625 consecutive RCCs removed by radical/partial nephrectomy over 12-year period (2000-2011). Archival tissue sections were retrospectively reviewed along with patient medical charts. Eight cases (1.3% of all RCC, 6.3% of pT1a low grade RCC) with characteristic histologic features of CCPRCC were confirmed by immunohistochemical studies. Seven cases were previously diagnosed as clear cell RCC and one as multilocular cystic RCC. Radiographically, CCPRCC favored a mid-pole location in the kidneys. At a median follow-up period of 52 months (range 20-114.5 months), there were no cases of local or distant recurrence. In conclusion, CCPRCC is not uncommon among small low-grade RCC tumors. CCPRCC can be correctly recognized by its unique histomorphological features and confirmed by immunohistochemistry studies, which is important due to the excellent clinical outcome following resection.