Warthin-like papillary renal cell carcinoma: Clinicopathologic, morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular genetic analysis of 11 cases

S S. Metastatic Oncocytic Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma of Scalp Diagnosed by Fine Needle Aspiration: A Rare Entity with Review of Literature

Fine-needle aspiration cytology is a minimally invasive, rapid, and safe technique used as a first line of investigation for confirmation of various cutaneous metastatic lesions, at times which can be the primary presenting symptom of underlying silent visceral cancers. We report a case of metastatic Oncocytic Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma (OPRCC) over the scalp as the first presentation of the underlying primary tumor diagnosed on fine-needle aspiration and confirmed by immunohistochemistry on the cell block.

What Is New in Pathologic Diagnosis and Classification of the Common Renal Cell Neoplasms?

Diagnostic challenges remain among the common renal cell carcinoma (RCC) subtypes. High-grade clear cell RCC may have deceptive patterns, for example BAP1-deficient tumors. Subtyping type 1 and 2 papillary RCC is no longer recommended, as former type 2 tumors may now be contain other diagnostic entities, such as FH-deficient RCC, MITF family RCC, or others. Clear cell papillary tumor is no longer considered carcinoma due to its highly favorable behavior. However, imperfect examples are best considered clear cell RCC. Oncocytic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential has been proposed as a borderline category in the absence of overt malignant features.

[2022 WHO classification of renal cell carcinomas: Focus on papillary renal cell carcinoma]

Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) represent a group of heterogeneous tumors whose classification has greatly evolved since 1981. The latest update in 2022 classifies all renal cell carcinomas into six categories according to their morphology or the detection of specific molecular alterations. Molecular disassembly of renal cell carcinomas with papillary features has enabled the identification of new entities characterized by a specific molecular alteration, such as Fumarate Hydratase (FH) deficient RCC, TFE3-rearranged RCC or TFEB-altered RCC. This new classification allows for a more accurate diagnosis but requires a thorough knowledge of the genomic alterations to search for with immunohistochemical or molecular biology techniques. According to the new WHO 2022 classification, papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRC) type 1 or type 2 classification is no longer recommended. A classification based on nucleolar ISUP grade must be preferred: low-grade PRC (ISUP 1-2) or high-grade PRC (ISUP 3-4). The other prognostic factors remain the same: the pTNM stage, lymphovascular invasion, and the presence or absence of dedifferentiated areas referring to sarcomatoid or rhabdoid features. Of note, the presence of necrosis is not currently recognized as a poor prognostic element for this type of carcinoma. The diagnosis of high-grade PRC is from now on a diagnosis of exclusion. It can only be sustained after having ruled out TFE3-rearranged RCC, TFEB-altered RCC, and FH-deficient RCC. For clinicians, the diagnosis of PRC implies suggesting an oncogenetic consultation to screen for an associated genetic tumor syndrome regardless of the patient's age.

Contemporary review of papillary renal cell carcinoma-current state and future directions

Historically, papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) was divided into two types, type 1 and type 2, based solely on morphology. However, it is apparent that PRCC is far more complex and represents a histological, clinical, and molecular spectrum. There has been a significant evolution in our understanding of PRCC, highlighted by the recognition of new and molecularly defined entities that were previously included in PRCC type 2. This contemporary review addresses the evolving concepts regarding the PRCC, including why it is no longer needed to subtype PRCC, the current molecular landscape, prognostic parameters, and PRCC variants, including biphasic PRCC, papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity, and Warthin-like PRCC. Pathologists should also be aware of the potential mimickers of both low-grade and high-grade PRCCs as well as some new and emerging entities that may show papillary growth that should be excluded in the diagnostic workup. The evolving knowledge of PRCC biomarkers, morphologic patterns, and PRCC variants could also have important implications for clinical management. Lastly, the heterogeneity within the PRCC spectrum needs to be further studied, aiming to better stratify PRCC for appropriate clinical management and systemic therapy.

Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: Evolving Classification by Combined Morphologic and Molecular Means

Papillary renal cell carcinoma classification has evolved as a result of attentive morphologic observations by pathologists coupled with specific immunohistochemical, molecular, and clinical data. Refinement of this relatively common diagnostic category of renal neoplasia has resulted in the parsing out of specific renal cell carcinoma subtypes that no longer belong in the papillary renal cell carcinoma category and can have distinct familial and prognostic implications (eg, fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient renal cell carcinomas). In addition, evolving classification has enabled more accurate diagnosis by surgical pathologists (through the description of recognizable morphologic variants). In many cases, molecular findings have aided and confirmed morphologic categorization. The combination of morphologic and molecular findings continues to provide important prognostic information for patients and their clinicians.

Warthin-like papillary renal cell carcinoma: A case report

BACKGROUND

Warthin-like papillary renal cell carcinoma (WPRCC) has been described as a rare pathological subtype of papillary renal cell carcinoma in the 2022 World Health Organization Classification of the Urinary and Male Reproductive System. Herein we report a case of WPRCC in the left kidney.

CASE SUMMARY

Physical examination of a previously healthy 47-year-old woman revealed a lump in her left kidney, 4.5 cm × 3.5 cm × 3.5 cm in size. Based on the clinical information, imaging data, histmorphological features, and immunohistochemistry results, the pathological diagnosis was WPRCC in left kidney.

CONCLUSION

Resection of the mass in the left kidney was performed and her postoperative course was uneventful.

WHO 2022 landscape of papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

The 5th edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary and Male Genital Systems contains relevant revisions and introduces a group of molecularly defined renal tumour subtypes. Herein we present the World Health Organization (WHO) 2022 perspectives on papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with emphasis on their evolving classification, differential diagnosis, and emerging entities. The WHO 2022 classification eliminated the type 1/2 papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) subcategorization, given the recognition of frequent mixed tumour phenotypes and the existence of entities with a different molecular background within the type 2 pRCC category. Additionally, emerging entities such as biphasic squamoid alveolar RCC, biphasic hyalinising psammomatous RCC, papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity, and Warthin-like pRCC are included as part of the pRCC spectrum, while additional morphological and molecular data are being gathered. In addition to oncocytomas and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC), a category of 'other oncocytic tumours' with oncocytoma/chRCC-like features has been introduced, including emerging entities, most with TSC/mTOR pathway alterations (eosinophilic vacuolated tumour and so-called 'low-grade' oncocytic tumour), deserving additional research. Eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC was accepted as a new and independent tumour entity. Finally, a highly reproducible and clinically relevant universal grading system for chRCC is still missing and is another niche of ongoing investigation. This review discusses these developments and highlights emerging morphological and molecular data relevant for the classification of renal cell carcinoma.

Papillary renal cell carcinoma: current and controversial issues

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is the second most frequent renal cancer subtype and represents 15-20% of all RCC. Classification of pRCC is changing because novel tumour entities have been discovered in the last years. In this review, we summarise recent studies relevant for the understanding of the molecular complexity and the broader differential diagnosis of pRCC.

RECENT FINDINGS

It has been 25 years ago, that pRCC was morphologically subdivided into type 1 and type 2. Recently described tumour entities in the 2022 WHO classification challenged this concept and allow a new view on the molecular background in pRCC. Biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous RCC and papillary renal neoplasm with reversed polarity are emerging tumour entities derived from the new concept of molecularly defined RCC subtypes. Immune checkpoint inhibition and tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been introduced as the new backbone in the first-line treatment of advanced pRCCs. To identify novel targeted treatments for patients with pRCC it is crucial to investigate the specific molecular background of pRCC considering emerging pRCC subtypes.

SUMMARY

In the future, a deeper understanding of the correlation between molecular aberrations and new pRCC subtypes may improve the classification of pRCC patients and could reveal potential predictive biomarkers for each subgroup.

Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma With Microcystic Architecture Is Strongly Associated With Extrarenal Invasion and Metastatic Disease

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) is well-recognized as a morphologically and molecularly heterogenous group of kidney tumors with variable clinical behavior. Our goal was to analyze a unique histologic pattern of PRCC we have observed in routine practice to evaluate for potential clinical significance or distinct molecular signature. We identified 42 cases of PRCC showing a morphologically distinct architecture characterized by numerous epithelial-lined cysts containing the papillary tumor (herein called "microcysts"), which are typically separated by fibrous stroma. Of the initial 42 case test set with microcystic features, 23 (55%) were stage pT3a or higher. Most tumors had strong and diffuse cytoplasmic immunoreactivity for CK7 (93%, 37/40) and AMACR (100%, 40/40). Fumarate hydratase staining was retained in all cases tested (39/39). We performed next-generation sequencing on 15 of these cases with available tissue and identified chromosomal alterations commonly reported in historically "type 1" PRCC, notably multiple chromosomal gains, particularly of chromosomes 7 and 17, and MET alterations. However, alterations in pathways associated with more aggressive behavior (including SETD2, CDKN2A, and members of the NRF pathway) were also identified in 6 of 15 cases tested (40%). Given this molecular and immunophenotypic data, we subsequently reviewed an additional group of 60 consecutive pT2b-pT3 PRCCs to allow for comparisons between cases with and without microcysts, to assess for potential associations with other recently described histologic patterns (ie, "unfavorable architecture": micropapillary, solid, and hobnail), and to assess interobserver reproducibility for diagnosing architectural patterns and grade. Of the total combined 102 PRCCs, 67 (66%) had microcystic architecture within the intrarenal component but were commonly admixed with other patterns (39% had micropapillary, 31% solid, and 31% hobnail). Twenty-seven cases (26%) had metastatic disease, and 24 of these 27 (89%) had microcystic architecture in the intrarenal tumor. Within the pT3 subset, 21 of 22 cases with metastases (95%) had extrarenal invasion as either individual microcysts in renal sinus fat or aggregates of microcysts bulging beyond the confines of the capsule. Backward elimination and stepwise regression methods to detect features significantly associated with adverse outcome identified solid architecture (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.3; confidence interval [CI]: 2.1-18.8; P=0.001), hobnail architecture (HR: 5.3; CI: 1.7-16.7; P=0.004), and microcystic architecture at the tumor-stromal interface (HR: 4.2; CI: 1.1-16.7; P=0.036) as strongest. Of architectural patterns and grade, the microcystic pattern had a substantial interobserver agreement (κ score=0.795) that was highest among the 6 observers. In summary, PRCCs with microcystic architecture represents a subset of historically "type 1" PRCC with a predilection for morphologically distinctive extrarenal involvement and metastatic disease. Microcysts co-vary with other "unfavorable" architectural patterns also associated with higher risk for aggressive disease (ie, micropapillary, hobnail, and solid), but microcysts were more common and have superior interobserver reproducibility. These findings suggest that microcystic PRCC should be recognized as a potentially aggressive histologic pattern of growth in PRCC.

Primary Warthin's-like adenocarcinoma of the lung: A clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular analysis of three cases

Three cases of primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma with prominent lymphoid stroma and papillary features mimicking Warthin's tumor are presented. The patients are two women and one man ages 52, 62, and 74 years respectively. Clinically, the patients presented with non-specific symptoms of cough, dyspnea, and chest pain. Imaging showed the presence of an intrapulmonary mass in the right lower, right upper and left lower lobe. All patients underwent lobectomy. Histologically, the tumors were characterized by the presence of and oncocytic papillary growth pattern embedded in a lymphoid rich background. Immunohistochemical stains for TTF-1, keratin 7, and beta-catenin were positive in the epithelial component, while CD20 showed strong positive staining in the lymphoid component. In addition, CD4 and CD8 also showed positive staining in a ratio of 3-4:1, EBER was negative. Kras mutations with wild type EGFR were identified in one case. Clinical follow-up ranging from 8 to 24 months was obtained showing that all patients are alive without recurrence. The cases herein presented represent an unusual histological variant of primary lung adenocarcinoma, which closely mimics Warthin's tumor.

The Morphological Spectrum of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma and Prevalence of Provisional/Emerging Renal Tumor Entities with Papillary Growth

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents a heterogeneous disease, encompassing an increasing number of tumor subtypes. Post-2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification recognized that the spectrum of papillary renal cell carcinoma is evolving and has long surpassed the dichotomic simplistic "type 1 versus type 2" classification. The differential diagnosis of pRCC includes several new provisional/emerging entities with papillary growth. Type 2 tumors have been cleared out of several confounding entities, now regarded as independent tumors with specific clinical and molecular backgrounds. In this work we describe the prevalence and characteristics of emerging papillary tumor entities in two renal tumor cohorts (one consisting of consecutive papillary tumors from a single institute, the other consisting of consultation cases from several centers). After a review of 154 consecutive pRCC cases, 58% remained type 1 pRCC, and 34% type 2 pRCC. Papillary renal neoplasm with reversed polarity (1.3%), biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous RCC (1.3%), and biphasic squamoid/alveolar RCC (4.5%) were rare. Among 281 consultation cases, 121 (43%) tumors had a dominant papillary growth (most frequently MiT family translocation RCCs, mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma and clear cell papillary RCC). Our data confirm that the spectrum of RCCs with papillary growth represents a major diagnostical challenge, frequently requiring a second expert opinion. Papillary renal neoplasm with reversed polarity, biphasic hyalinizing psammomatous RCC, and biphasic squamoid/alveolar RCC are rarely sent out for a second opinion, but correct classification and knowledge of these variants will improve our understanding of the clinical behavior of renal tumors with papillary growth.

New developments in existing WHO entities and evolving molecular concepts: The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) update on renal neoplasia

The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) reviewed recent advances in renal neoplasia, particularly post-2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, to provide an update on existing entities, including diagnostic criteria, molecular correlates, and updated nomenclature. Key prognostic features for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remain WHO/ISUP grade, AJCC/pTNM stage, coagulative necrosis, and rhabdoid and sarcomatoid differentiation. Accrual of subclonal genetic alterations in clear cell RCC including SETD2, PBRM1, BAP1, loss of chromosome 14q and 9p are associated with variable prognosis, patterns of metastasis, and vulnerability to therapies. Recent National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines increasingly adopt immunotherapeutic agents in advanced RCC, including RCC with rhabdoid and sarcomatoid changes. Papillary RCC subtyping is no longer recommended, as WHO/ISUP grade and tumor architecture better predict outcome. New papillary RCC variants/patterns include biphasic, solid, Warthin-like, and papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity. For tumors with 'borderline' features between oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC, a term "oncocytic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential, not further classified" is proposed. Clear cell papillary RCC may warrant reclassification as a tumor of low malignant potential. Tubulocystic RCC should only be diagnosed when morphologically pure. MiTF family translocation RCCs exhibit varied morphologic patterns and fusion partners. TFEB-amplified RCC occurs in older patients and is associated with more aggressive behavior. Acquired cystic disease (ACD) RCC-like cysts are likely precursors of ACD-RCC. The diagnosis of renal medullary carcinoma requires a negative SMARCB1 (INI-1) expression and sickle cell trait/disease. Mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) can be distinguished from papillary RCC with overlapping morphology by losses of chromosomes 1, 4, 6, 8, 9, 13, 14, 15, and 22. MTSCC with adverse histologic features shows frequent CDKN2A/2B (9p) deletions. BRAF mutations unify the metanephric family of tumors. The term "fumarate hydratase deficient RCC" ("FH-deficient RCC") is preferred over "hereditary leiomyomatosis and RCC syndrome-associated RCC". A low threshold for FH, 2SC, and SDHB immunohistochemistry is recommended in difficult to classify RCCs, particularly those with eosinophilic morphology, occurring in younger patients. Current evidence does not support existence of a unique tumor subtype occurring after chemotherapy/radiation in early childhood.

[The morphological characteristics and immunophenotype of renal cell carcinomas with eosinophilic cytoplasm]

Eosinophilic cellular renal cell carcinomas embrace a wide range of histological types described in the 2016 WHO International Classification of Kidney Tumors. A variety of histological manifestations associated with the features of tumor morphogenesis in this group poses difficulties in differential diagnosis.

AIM

to investigate the morphological and immunophenotypic features of rare types of renal cell carcinomas with eosinophilic cytoplasm.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

An investigation was conducted using a surgical material from 294 patients with a kidney tumor. An immunohistochemical (IHC) study was performed on paraffin sections according to the standard protocol using a wide panel of antibodies.

RESULTS

Based on a morphological analysis and IHC study, the tumors were divided into 3 groups: 1) 127 (43%) oncocytic tumors that expressed classical IHC markers for oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma; 2) 50 (17%) oncocytic tumors that did not correspond to the immunophenotypes of oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma; and 3) 117 (40%) eosinophilic cellular nononcocytic renal tumors.

CONCLUSION

With the advent of the current differential diagnostic criteria, the classification of renal cell carcinomas continues to expand. To date, a hybrid oncocytic/chromophobic tumor, eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma, and follicular kidney cancer should be regarded as new nosological entities.

Molecular Genetics of Renal Cell Tumors: A Practical Diagnostic Approach

Renal epithelial cell tumors are composed of a heterogeneous group of tumors with variable morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features. A "histo-molecular" approach is now an integral part of defining renal tumors, aiming to be clinically and therapeutically pertinent. Most renal epithelial tumors including the new and emerging entities have distinct molecular and genetic features which can be detected using various methods. Most renal epithelial tumors can be diagnosed easily based on pure histologic findings with or without immunohistochemical examination. Furthermore, molecular-genetic testing can be utilized to assist in arriving at an accurate diagnosis. In this review, we presented the most current knowledge concerning molecular-genetic aspects of renal epithelial neoplasms, which potentially can be used in daily diagnostic practice.

Papillary renal cell carcinoma with prominent spindle cell stroma - tumor mimicking mixed epithelial and stromal tumor of the kidney: Clinicopathologic, morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular genetic analysis of 6 cases

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) is currently a well-studied type of RCC. In addition to PRCC type 1, there are a number of other subtypes and variants of PRCCs which have been reported. We describe a series of 6 PRCCs with papillary, micropapillary and/or tubulopapillary architecture and prominent spindle cell stroma, resembling stroma in mixed epithelial and stromal tumor of the kidney (MESTK) or sarcomatoid RCC. Clinicopathologic, morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular features were analyzed. All patients were males with an age range of 44-98 years (mean 65.3, median 65.5 years). Tumor size ranged from 2.4-11.4 cm (mean 5.8, median 4.5 cm). Follow-up data were available for 4 patients, ranging from 3 to 96 months (mean 42.75, median 36 months). Epithelial cells were mostly cylindrical with eosinophilic cytoplasm, showing nuclear grade 2 and 3 (ISUP/WHO). In all cases, loose to compact prominent stroma composed of spindle cells, without malignant mesenchymal heterologous elements was detected. No atypical mitoses were found, while typical mitoses were rare in both epithelial and stromal components. Epithelial cells were positive for CK7, AMACR, and vimentin in all cases, while negative for TFE3, HMB45, desmin, CD34, and actin. The stroma was positive for vimentin, actin and focally for CD34, while negative for CK7, AMACR, TFE3, HMB45, and desmin. Estrogen and progesterone receptors were completely negative. FH and SDHB expression was retained in all analyzable cases. Proliferative index was barely detectable in stromal component and low in epithelial component, ranging 0 to 5% positive stained cells/high power field. Copy number variation was variable with no distinct pattern. No mutations in CDKN2A, BAP1, MET were detected. PRCC with MESTK-like features is a distinct variant of PRCC mimicking MESTK. Our findings add to the body of literature on ever expanding variants of PRCCs. Both epithelial and stromal components lacked true Müllerian features, which was also proven by immunohistochemistry.

A first case report of primary epithelial myoepithelial carcinoma-like renal tumor showing a perivascular pseudorosette-like pattern: Description of morphologic, immunohistochemical, and genetic features

RATIONALE

Over the past decade, although several new entities of renal tumors have emerged, a form of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that morphologically resembles epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma has not been reported thus far. Herein, we describe a case of an unusual renal tumor that remained unclassified under a current RCC subtype, and briefly present its morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic features.

PATIENT CONCERNS

The patient was an 85-year-old man who presented with hematuria and flank pain. Imaging studies revealed a left renal mass without enlarged lymph nodes. There were no abnormal masses or nodules in other organs.

DIAGNOSES

The patient underwent no other treatment except the left radical nephrectomy under a clinical diagnosis of invasive urothelial carcinoma and was discharged on the thirteenth day. Histologically, the renal tumor showed biphasic proliferation of epithelial (strongly cytokeratin-positive; P63, P40, and vimentin-negative) and myoepithelial (strongly vimentin-positive; focal P63 and P40-positive; and weakly cytokeratin-positive) cells arranged in a perivascular pseudorosette-like pattern. No mutations were detected in multiple gene tests. According to the pathological structure, the patient was diagnosed as primary epithelial myoepithelial carcinoma-like renal tumor.

INTERVENTIONS

To the best of our knowledge, the present tumor has not been previously described, and thus, this variant has not been integrated into a known form of PCC. Therefore, we cannot diagnose this type of tumor with other types of kidney tumors.

OUTCOMES

Three years after primary diagnosis, the patient died of multiple organ failure result from multiple distant metastases.

LESSONS

We present the first case of carcinoma of the kidney with EMC-like features and a perivascular pseudorosette-like growth pattern. Clinicians should be aware of the features of this uncommon variant of RCC to avoid diagnostic delays or misdiagnosis and prevent unnecessary or inappropriate treatment.

Fumarate hydratase deficient renal cell carcinoma: Chromosomal numerical aberration analysis of 12 cases

Hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell carcinoma-associated renal cell carcinoma (HLRCC)/fumarate hydratase deficient renal cell carcinoma (FHRCC) is defined by molecular genetic changes (mutation/LOH in fumarate hydratase (FH) gene). We investigated chromosomal numerical aberration pattern (CNV) in FHRCC/HLRCC using array comparative genomic hybridization analysis and low pass whole genome sequencing. Genetic analysis was successfully completed in 12 tumors. Most common chromosomal aberrations detected were a complete or partial loss of chromosome 4 (5/12 cases), chromosome 15 (4/12 cases), and chromosomes 9, 13, and 14 (each in 3/12 cases), as well as a complete or partial gain of chromosome 17 (in 4/12 cases). No chromosomal losses or gains were detected in 4 cases. Copy number variation pattern in FHRCC/HLRCC appears to be highly variable and does not provide a useful diagnostic tool in identifying these cases. Immunohistochemical staining and especially molecular genetic evaluation of FH gene mutations/LOH remain the gold standard in identifying FHRCC/HLRCC.

Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma (PRCC): An Update

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) is the second most common type of renal carcinoma following clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Papillary renal cell carcinoma is usually divided histologically into 2 types namely, type 1 and type 2. This classification, however, is unsatisfactory as many of papillary carcinoma are unclassifiable by the existing criteria. In recent years there has been a remarkable progress in our understanding of the molecular basis of PRCC. These studies have revealed that type 2 PRCCs represent a heterogenous group which may be subdivided into additional subtypes based on the genetic and molecular make up of these tumors and reflecting different clinical course and prognosis. Some of the molecular features such a hypermethylation of CPG islands in the promotor regions of genes and over expression of the antioxidant pathways within tumor cells have been recognized as markers of poor prognosis. Targeted therapies for papillary carcinoma in the past have been unsuccessful because of lack of clear understanding of the molecular basis of these tumors. It is hoped that recent progress in our understanding of the pathogenesis of various subtypes of PRCC, effective targeted therapies will eventually emerge in due course.

Chromosomal numerical aberration pattern in papillary renal cell carcinoma: Review article

Traditionally, papillary renal cell carcinomas (PRCCs) have been divided in two subgroups - type 1 and type 2. Based on recent molecular and genetic developments in the understanding of RCCs, it seems that this traditional classification may not be adequate and that the spectrum of PRCCs is much wider than initially proposed. Small series of distinct types of PRCC which do not fit into the above mentioned categories have been described in the literature. Published studies investigating molecular genetic changes in various types of PRCCs have shown that the molecular genetic features are remarkably heterogeneous across the whole spectrum of PRCCs. Of all PRCC subtypes/variants, PRCC type 1 seems to be a genetically uniform group, while other types showed different degrees of heterogeneity. Among different molecular-genetic features, chromosomal numerical aberration status is one of the most frequently studied features so far. It is becoming more evident that tumor type-specific chromosomal numerical aberration status in PRCCs may not exist. In this review, we present the most current knowledge concerning chromosomal numerical aberration status in PRCCs.