Associations of tissue tumor mutational burden and mutational status with clinical outcomes in KEYNOTE-042: pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for advanced PD-L1-positive NSCLC

Identification of non-actionable mutations with prognostic and predictive value in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers and the leading cause of cancer death. Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients frequently harbor mutations that impact their survival outcomes. There are limited data regarding the prognostic and predictive significance of these mutations on survival outcomes in the real-world setting.

METHODS

This observational retrospective study analyzed de-identified electronic medical records from the Flatiron Health Clinico-Genomic and FoundationCore® databases to identify patients with aNSCLC who initiated first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI; alone or in combination) or chemotherapy under routine care between 2016 and 2021. The primary objectives were to assess the prevalence of non-actionable mutations and to determine their association with overall survival (OS). Real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and real-world response (rwR) were investigated as secondary exploratory outcomes.

RESULTS

Based on an assessment of 185 non-actionable mutations in 2999 patients, the most prevalent mutations were TP53 (70%), KRAS (42%), CDKN2A/B (31%), and STK11 (21%). STK11, KEAP1, and CDKN2A/B mutations were significantly associated with lower rwR, shorter rwPFS and OS. KRAS mutations were clinically associated with shorter rwPFS in CIT-treated patients. Subgroup analysis revealed that fast progressors were significantly more likely to harbor STK11, KEAP1, and CDKN2A/B mutations. Accordingly, long-term survivors (LTS) showed a significantly lower prevalence of these mutations.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide evidence on the prognostic value of STK11, KEAP1, and CDKN2A/B mutations in patients with aNSCLC. Further research is required to better understand the implications of these findings on patient management and future trial design and treatment selection.

Decision model for durable clinical benefit from front- or late-line immunotherapy alone or with chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Predictive biomarkers and models of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been extensively studied in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, evidence for many biomarkers remains inconclusive, and the opaqueness of machine learning models hinders practicality. We aimed to provide compelling evidence for biomarkers and develop a transparent decision tree model.

METHODS

We consolidated data from 3,288 ICI-treated patients with NSCLC across real-world multicenter, public cohorts and the Choice-01 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03856411). Over 50 features were examined for predicting durable clinical benefits (DCBs) from ICIs. Noteworthy biomarkers were identified to establish a decision tree model. Additionally, we explored the tumor microenvironment and peripheral CD8+ programmed death-1 (PD-1)+ T cell receptor (TCR) profiles.

FINDINGS

Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified tumor histology, PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, tumor mutational burden, line, and regimen of ICI treatment as significant factors. Mutation subtypes of EGFR, KRAS, KEAP1, STK11, and disruptive TP53 mutations were associated with DCB. The decision tree (DT10) model, using the ten clinicopathological and genomic markers, showed superior performance in predicting DCB in the training set (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.82) and consistently outperformed other models in test sets. DT10-predicted-DCB patients manifested longer survival, an enriched inflamed tumor immune phenotype (67%), and higher peripheral TCR diversity, whereas the DT10-predicted-NDB (non-durable benefit) group showed an enriched desert immune phenotype (86%) and higher peripheral TCR clonality.

CONCLUSIONS

The model effectively predicted DCB after front-/subsequent-line ICI treatment, with or without chemotherapy, for squamous and non-squamous lung cancer, offering clinicians valuable insights into efficacy prediction using cost-effective variables.

FUNDING

This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China.

Clinical Outcomes of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Among Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With BRAF, ERBB2/HER2, MET , or RET Alterations: A Systematic Literature Review

The therapeutic landscape for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rapidly evolving due to advances in molecular testing and the development of new targeted therapies and immunotherapies. However, the efficacy of programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in advanced or metastatic patients with NSCLC whose tumors harbor BRAF V600E mutation, HER2/ERBB2 alteration, MET exon 14 skipping mutation, or RET rearrangement is not completely understood. A systematic literature review was performed to summarize evidence from clinical trials and observational studies on objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival in patients whose tumors express these biomarkers and who were treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Searches of Embase, MEDLINE, conference abstracts, and a clinical trial registry identified a total of 12 unique studies: 4 studies included patients with BRAF V600E mutation, 6 studies included patients with HER2/ERBB2 alteration, 7 studies included patients with MET exon 14 skipping mutation, and 5 studies included patients with RET rearrangement. Across studies, there was heterogeneity in treatment and patient characteristics and a lack of reporting on many important predictive and prognostic factors, including treatment regimens, patients' line of therapy, and tumor PD-L1 expression, which may explain the wide variation in objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival across studies. Therefore, additional studies prospectively evaluating clinical outcomes of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors among patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC whose tumors harbor emerging predictive or prognostic biomarkers are needed to determine whether this class of immunotherapy can provide additional survival benefits for these patients.

Effect of the STK11 mutation on therapeutic efficacy and prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive study based on meta-analyses and bioinformatics analyses

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to systematically analyze the effect of a serine/threonine kinase (STK11) mutation (STK11mut) on therapeutic efficacy and prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Candidate articles were identified through a search of relevant literature published on or before April 1, 2023, in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI and Wanfang databases. The extracted and analyzed data included the hazard ratios (HRs) of PFS and OS, the objective response rate (ORR) of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and the positive rates of PD-L1 expression. The HR of PFS and OS and the merged ratios were calculated using a meta-analysis. The correlation between STK11mut and clinical characteristics was further analyzed in NSCLC datasets from public databases.

RESULTS

Fourteen retrospective studies including 4317 patients with NSCLC of whom 605 had STK11mut were included. The meta-analysis revealed that the ORR of ICIs in patients with STK11mut was 10.1% (95%CI 0.9-25.2), and the positive rate of PD-L1 expression was 41.1% (95%CI 25.3-57.0). STK11mut was associated with poor PFS (HR = 1.49, 95%CI 1.28-1.74) and poor OS (HR = 1.44, 95%CI 1.24-1.67). In the bioinformatics analysis, PFS and OS in patients with STK11 alterations were worse than those in patients without alterations (p < 0.001, p = 0.002). Nutlin-3a, 5-fluorouracil, and vinorelbine may have better sensitivity in patients with STK11mut than in those with STK11wt.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with STK11-mutant NSCLC had low PD-L1 expression and ORR to ICIs, and their PFS and OS were worse than patients with STK11wt after comprehensive treatment. In the future, more reasonable systematic treatments should be explored for this subgroup of patients with STK11-mutant NSCLC.

Exploration of efficacy of different therapy regimens for advanced NSCLC patients with KRAS mutation in the first-line treatment

PURPOSE

The treatment of the advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with KRAS mutation has been closely paid more attention. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of different first-line regimens in advanced KRAS-mutated non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

In our retrospective study, we collected patients with advanced NSCLC with KRAS mutation in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital between January 2015 and May 2023. We analyzed the benefit of different first-line therapy according to theraputic methods and the differential effect of the same treatment method among KRAS-mutated subtypes. We divided the patients into group A (A1, chemotherapy alone; A2, immunotherapy alone) and group B (B1, chemotherapy plus immunotherapy; B2, chemotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy; B3, chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic therapy). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to reflect the PFS and OS of different methods. The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were used to evaluated the response.

RESULTS

We enrolled 227 patients including eighty-two with KRAS G12C mutation. The ORR and DCR of first-line treatment in the overall population were 32.2% and 80.6% respectively. The median PFS was 6.7 months and the median OS was 17.4 months for the overall population. The PFS of the Group B was significantly better than that of the Group A (7.7 months vs 5.4 months, P = 0.003), while no significant difference in OS was observed (19.4 months vs 15.0 months, P = 0.077). In the Group B, chemotherapy combined immunotherapy with antiangiogenic therapy showed better PFS than chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (14.1 months vs 7.7 months, P = 0.049), and OS also showed that tendency of difference (31.9 months vs 19.3 months, P = 0.158). There was no statistically significant difference between KRAS G12C and non-G12C mutation according to first-line treatment methods, whereas patients with TP53 co-mutation showed a better survival benefit (OS, 23.7 vs 12.5 months, P = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

In the first-line treatment, combination regimen has advantages over single regimen. Among them, chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic therapy can achieve significant efficacy benefits.

Therapy for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Without Driver Alterations: ASCO Living Guideline, Version 2023.3

PURPOSE

To provide evidence-based recommendations for patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver alterations.

METHODS

This ASCO living guideline offers continually updated recommendations based on an ongoing systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs), with the latest time frame spanning February to October 2023. An Expert Panel of medical oncology, pulmonary, community oncology, research methodology, and advocacy experts were convened. The literature search included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials. Outcomes of interest include efficacy and safety. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

This guideline consolidates all previous updates and reflects the body of evidence informing this guideline topic. Ten new RCTs were identified in the latest search of the literature to date.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Evidence-based recommendations were updated to address first, second, and subsequent treatment options for patients without driver alterations.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/living-guidelines.

New clinical trial design in precision medicine: discovery, development and direction

In the era of precision medicine, it has been increasingly recognized that individuals with a certain disease are complex and different from each other. Due to the underestimation of the significant heterogeneity across participants in traditional "one-size-fits-all" trials, patient-centered trials that could provide optimal therapy customization to individuals with specific biomarkers were developed including the basket, umbrella, and platform trial designs under the master protocol framework. In recent years, the successive FDA approval of indications based on biomarker-guided master protocol designs has demonstrated that these new clinical trials are ushering in tremendous opportunities. Despite the rapid increase in the number of basket, umbrella, and platform trials, the current clinical and research understanding of these new trial designs, as compared with traditional trial designs, remains limited. The majority of the research focuses on methodologies, and there is a lack of in-depth insight concerning the underlying biological logic of these new clinical trial designs. Therefore, we provide this comprehensive review of the discovery and development of basket, umbrella, and platform trials and their underlying logic from the perspective of precision medicine. Meanwhile, we discuss future directions on the potential development of these new clinical design in view of the "Precision Pro", "Dynamic Precision", and "Intelligent Precision". This review would assist trial-related researchers to enhance the innovation and feasibility of clinical trial designs by expounding the underlying logic, which be essential to accelerate the progression of precision medicine.

Response to first-line pembrolizumab in metastatic KRAS-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer

Aims: This retrospective study aims to identify a possible predictive role of KRAS mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer in response to first-line pembrolizumab, either as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy. Methods: Patients received pembrolizumab alone (n = 213) or associated with chemotherapy (n = 81). Results: A mutation in the KRAS gene was detected in 27% of patients. In patients on pembrolizumab alone, median progression-free survival in KRAS-mutated cases was longer than in wild-type cases (11.3 vs 4.4 months; p = 0.019), whereas median overall survival did not reach statistical significance (22.1 vs 12.5 months; p = 0.119). Patients receiving chemo-immunotherapy with KRAS-positive tumors had a similar progression-free survival (9.7 vs 7.3 months; p = 0.435); overall survival data were immature. Conclusion: This study suggests a correlation between KRAS status and response to pembrolizumab.

Future perspective for the application of predictive biomarker testing in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer

For patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treatment strategies have changed significantly due to the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. In the last few years, we have seen an explosive growth of newly introduced targeted therapies in oncology and this development is expected to continue in the future. Besides primary targetable aberrations, emerging diagnostic biomarkers also include relevant co-occurring mutations and resistance mechanisms involved in disease progression, that have impact on optimal treatment management. To accommodate testing of pending biomarkers, it is necessary to establish routine large-panel next-generation sequencing (NGS) for all patients with advanced stage NSCLC. For cost-effectiveness and accessibility, it is recommended to implement predictive molecular testing using large-panel NGS in a dedicated, centralized expert laboratory within a regional oncology network. The central molecular testing center should host a regional Molecular Tumor Board and function as a hub for interpretation of rare and complex testing results and clinical decision-making.

In Search of Lost Biomarker for Immunotherapy in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Chemo-immunotherapy is the current standard of care for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer, but predictive biomarkers are lacking. In a recent article, the authors report the predictive role of programmed death ligand-1 expression and tissue tumor mutational burden on durvalumab ± tremelimumab + platinum-etoposide efficacy. See related article by Paz-Ares et al., p. 824.

Durvalumab ± Tremelimumab + Platinum-Etoposide in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (CASPIAN): Outcomes by PD-L1 Expression and Tissue Tumor Mutational Burden

PURPOSE

In the CASPIAN trial, first-line durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide (EP) significantly improved overall survival (OS) versus EP alone in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). We report exploratory analyses of CASPIAN outcomes by programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and tissue tumor mutational burden (tTMB).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to durvalumab (1,500 mg) plus EP, durvalumab plus tremelimumab (75 mg) plus EP, or EP alone. Treatment effects in PD-L1 and tTMB subgroups were estimated using an unstratified Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

The PD-L1 and tTMB biomarker-evaluable populations (BEP) comprised 54.4% (438/805) and 35.2% (283/805) of the intention-to-treat population, respectively. PD-L1 prevalence was low: 5.7%, 25.8%, and 28.3% had PD-L1 expression on ≥1% tumor cells (TC), ≥1% immune cells (IC), and ≥1% TCs or ICs, respectively. OS benefit with durvalumab plus EP versus EP was similar across PD-L1 subgroups, with HRs all falling within the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the PD-L1 BEP (0.47‒0.79). OS benefit with durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus EP versus EP was greater in PD-L1 ≥1% versus <1% subgroups, although CIs overlapped. There was no evidence of an interaction between tTMB and treatment effect on OS (durvalumab plus EP vs. EP, P = 0.916; durvalumab plus tremelimumab plus EP vs. EP, P = 0.672).

CONCLUSIONS

OS benefit with first-line durvalumab plus EP in patients with ES-SCLC was observed regardless of PD-L1 or tTMB status. PD-L1 expression may prove to be a useful biomarker for combined treatment with PD-(L)1 and CTLA-4 inhibition, although this requires confirmation with an independent dataset. See related commentary by Rolfo and Russo, p. 652.

Clinical outcomes of atezolizumab versus standard-of-care docetaxel with and without ramucirumab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who received prior immunotherapy

Background

Atezolizumab is superior to docetaxel for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are pretreated with platinum-based chemotherapy based on the POPLAR and OAK trials. However, patients who received prior immunotherapy were excluded from these trials. The standard of care second-line therapy for these patients remains to be docetaxel with or without ramucirumab. The efficacy and safety of atezolizumab as a subsequent therapy in immunotherapy-pretreated patients are unknown.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of all patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who were pretreated with immunotherapy at Mayo Clinic Jacksonville and Rochester from 2016 to 2022. Patients who received subsequent therapy of atezolizumab alone (Atezo), docetaxel (Doce), or docetaxel + ramucirumab (Doce+Ram) were included.

Results

In this cohort of 165 patients, 12.7% (n=21), 49.1% (n=81), and 38.2% (n=63) patients received subsequent Atezo, Doce, and Doce+Ram, respectively. 1-year landmark progression-free survival (PFS) were 23.8%, 6.2%, and 3.2% (p=0.006), and 2-year landmark PFS were 14.3%, 0%, and 0% (p<0.0001), in the Atezo, Doce, and Doce+Ram groups, respectively. About 20% patients with positive PD-L1 had durable response to atezolizumab. The Atezo group showed significantly greater overall survival (OS) improvement over Doce group (median OS 17.7 vs. 7.7 months, HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29 - 0.76, p=0.008), and over Doce+Ram group (median OS 17.7 vs. 8.9 months, HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.32 - 0.95, p=0.047). 4 of 21 (19%) patients in the Atezo group developed immune-related adverse events (irAE).

Conclusion

We observed statistically significant and clinically meaningful overall survival benefits of atezolizumab monotherapy compared with docetaxel +/- ramucirumab in patients with advanced NSCLC who were pretreated with immunotherapy. The survival benefit seems to be mainly from PD-L1 positive patients. Subsequent immunotherapy with Atezolizumab did not increase irAE rate.

Edaravone: A Novel Possible Drug for Cancer Treatment?

Despite significant advancements in understanding the causes and progression of tumors, cancer remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide. In light of advances in cancer therapy, there has been a growing interest in drug repurposing, which involves exploring new uses for medications that are already approved for clinical use. One such medication is edaravone, which is currently used to manage patients with cerebral infarction and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Due to its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, edaravone has also been investigated for its potential activities in treating cancer, notably as an anti-proliferative and cytoprotective drug against side effects induced by traditional cancer therapies. This comprehensive review aims to provide updates on the various applications of edaravone in cancer therapy. It explores its potential as a standalone antitumor drug, either used alone or in combination with other medications, as well as its role as an adjuvant to mitigate the side effects of conventional anticancer treatments.

Challenges and Future Directions in the Management of Tumor Mutational Burden-High (TMB-H) Advanced Solid Malignancies

A standardized assessment of Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) poses challenges across diverse tumor histologies, treatment modalities, and testing platforms, requiring careful consideration to ensure consistency and reproducibility. Despite clinical trials demonstrating favorable responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), not all patients with elevated TMB exhibit benefits, and certain tumors with a normal TMB may respond to ICIs. Therefore, a comprehensive understanding of the intricate interplay between TMB and the tumor microenvironment, as well as genomic features, is crucial to refine its predictive value. Bioinformatics advancements hold potential to improve the precision and cost-effectiveness of TMB assessments, addressing existing challenges. Similarly, integrating TMB with other biomarkers and employing comprehensive, multiomics approaches could further enhance its predictive value. Ongoing collaborative endeavors in research, standardization, and clinical validation are pivotal in harnessing the full potential of TMB as a biomarker in the clinic settings.

STK11/LKB1-Deficient Phenotype Rather Than Mutation Diminishes Immunotherapy Efficacy and Represents STING/Type I Interferon/CD8+ T-Cell Dysfunction in NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Conflicting findings have been reported regarding the association between STK11/LKB1 mutations and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICB) efficacy in NSCLC. It has been reported that tumors could exhibit impaired STK11/LKB1 function even without STK11 mutations. We hypothesized that STK11 phenotype rather than mutation may better stratify ICB outcomes.

METHODS

Selected functional STK11 events and LKB1 protein data were leveraged to establish a transcriptomics-based classifier of STK11 phenotype (STK11-deficient [-def] or -proficient [-prof]). We analyzed in-house and Genentech/Roche's data of three randomized trials of programmed cell death protein-1 or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition in NSCLC (ORIENT-11, n = 171; OAK, n = 699; POPLAR, n = 192) and The Cancer Genome Atlas-NSCLC cohort.

RESULTS

Tissue STK11 mutation did not affect ICB outcomes. However, the survival benefit of ICB versus chemotherapy were lost or reversed in STK11-def tumors (hazard ratios for death, 95% confidence interval: OAK [0.97, 0.69-1.35]; POPLAR [1.61, 0.88-2.97]; ORIENT-11 [1.07, 0.50-2.29]), while remaining in STK11-prof tumors (hazard ratios for death, 95% confidence interval: OAK [0.81, 0.66-0.99]; POPLAR [0.66, 0.46-0.95]; ORIENT-11 [0.59, 0.37-0.92]). In tumors differentially classified by phenotype and mutation status, STK11-wild-type/def tumors had significantly worse ICB outcomes than STK11-mutated (STK11-MUT)/prof tumors (p < 0.05). The deleterious impact of STK11 deficiency was independent of STK11/KRAS/KEAP1 status or PD-L1 expression. The STING/interferon-I signaling, which was previously shown to be suppressed in STK11-MUT models, was perturbed in patients with STK11-def tumors rather than those with STK11-MUT tumors. Surprisingly, whereas high CD8+ T-cell infiltration was significantly associated with prolonged survival with ICB in STK11-prof tumors (p < 0.05 for 3 trials), it predicted an opposite trend toward worse ICB outcomes in STK11-def tumors across three trials. This suggested an association between STK11 deficiency and CD8+ T-cell dysfunction, which might not be reversed by programmed cell death protein 1 or PD-L1 blockade.

CONCLUSIONS

STK11 phenotype rather than mutation status can accurately identify patients with ICB-refractory NSCLC and reflect immune suppression. It can help refine stratification algorithms for future clinical research and also provide a reliable resource aiding basic and translational studies in identifying therapeutic targets.

Real-World Outcomes of Immunotherapy in Second- or Later-Line Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Actionable Genetic Alterations

INTRODUCTION

While the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with actionable genetic alterations (AGAs) is modest, certain patients demonstrate improved survival. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the benefits of ICIs in NSCLC patients with diverse AGAs and verify the predictive biomarkers of ICI efficacy.

METHODS

From January 2018 to July 2022, this study compared the progression-free survival (PFS) of NSCLC patients with different AGAs treated with ICI monotherapy as second- or later-line therapy at Samsung Medical Center. To ascertain the predictors of ICIs efficacy, we adjusted ICIs' effects on PFS in terms of clinical and molecular biomarkers.

RESULTS

EGFR (46.0%) was the most prevalent mutation in 324 patients. In multivariate analysis, PD-L1 positivity (tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 1%) (HR = 0.41) and the use of steroids for immune-related adverse events (HR = 0.46) were positive factors for ICI therapy in the AGAs group. Co-existing mutation of STK11 with KRAS mutation (HR = 4.53) and TP53 with MET mutation (HR = 9.78) was negatively associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of ICI treatment varied across AGA subtypes, but patients with KRAS, MET, and BRAF mutations demonstrated relatively long-duration benefits of ICI therapy. PD-L1 was a significant positive predictive biomarker in all AGA groups.

Biomarkers for Immunotherapy in Driver-Gene-Negative Advanced NSCLC

Outcome improvement in patients with driver-gene-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been significantly enhanced through targeting the immune system, specifically the PD-L1/PD-1 axis. Nevertheless, only a subset of patients with advanced NSCLC may derive benefits from immuno-monotherapy or immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy. Hence, in order to identify patients who will gain the maximum advantage from immunotherapy, it is crucial to investigate predictive biomarkers. This review provides a summary of the currently identified biomarkers associated with the extent of benefit from immuno-monotherapy or immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. These biomarkers can be categorized into three groups: tumor-related, tumor-microenvironment-related, and host-factor-related.Tumor-related factors include PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden and specific genetic mutations, while tumor-microenvironment-related factors include extracellular vesicles and T-cell receptors, and host-related factors include systemic inflammation, circulating fatty acid profile, and the microbiome.

Breaking the 'Undruggable' Barrier: Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with KRAS Mutations-A Comprehensive Review and Description of Single Site Experience

Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) gene mutations are among the most commonly found oncogenic alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Unfortunately, KRAS mutations have been considered "undruggable" for many years, making treatment options very limited. Immunotherapy targeting programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), programmed death 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) has emerged as a promising therapeutic option for NSCLC patients. However, some studies have suggested a lower response rate to immunotherapy in KRAS-mutated NSCLC patients with the coexistence of mutations in the STK11 (Serine/Threonine Kinase 11) gene. However, recent clinical trials have shown promising results with the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy or immunotherapy and KRAS inhibitors (sotorasib, adagrasib) in such patients. In other studies, the high efficacy of immunotherapy has been demonstrated in NSCLC patients with mutations in the KRAS gene that do not coexist with other mutations or coexist with the TP53 gene mutations. In this paper, we review the available literature on the efficacy of immunotherapy in KRAS-mutated NSCLC patients. In addition, we presented single-site experience on the efficacy of immunotherapy in NSCLC patients with KRAS mutations. The effectiveness of chemoimmunotherapy or immunotherapy as well as KRAS inhibitors extends the overall survival of advanced NSCLC patients with the G12C mutation in the KRAS gene to 2-3 years. This type of management has become the new standard in the treatment of NSCLC patients. Further studies are needed to clarify the potential benefits of immunotherapy in KRAS-mutated NSCLC patients and to identify potential biomarkers that may help predict response to therapy.

Stratification of patients with KRAS-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer: improving prognostics

INTRODUCTION

KRAS is the most frequently mutated oncogene in cancer and encodes a key signaling protein in tumors. Due to its high affinity for GTP and the lack of a large binding pocket that allosteric inhibitors can occupy, KRAS has long been considered 'non-druggable.' Finding effective treatment measures for patients with KRAS mutations is our top priority.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we will provide an overview of the KRAS pathway and review the current state of therapeutic strategies for targeting oncogenic KRAS, as well as their potential to improve outcomes in patients with KRAS-mutant malignancies. We will also discuss the development of these strategies and gave an outlook on prospects.

EXPERT OPINION

KRAS mutations have posed a significant challenge in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over the past few decades. However, the emergence of immunotherapy and KRAS inhibitors, such as Sotorasib (AMG 510) and Adagrasib (MRTX849), has marked a new era in cancer therapy. As more research and clinical trials continue, we anticipate the development of more effective treatment strategies and better options for lung cancer patients.