1
|
Ainslie-Garcia M, Anderson LA, Bloch BV, Board TN, Chen AF, Craigie S, Danker W, Gunja N, Harty J, Hernandez VH, Lebedeva K, Mont MA, Nunley RM, Parvizi J, Perka C, Piuzzi NS, Rolfson O, Rychlik J, Romanini E, Sanz-Ruiz P, Sierra RJ, Suleiman L, Tsiridis E, Vendittoli PA, Wangen H, Zagra L. International Delphi Study on Wound Closure and Dressing Management in Joint Arthroplasty: Part 1: Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2024; 39:878-883. [PMID: 38244638 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.12.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this modified Delphi study was to obtain consensus on wound closure and dressing management in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS The Delphi panel included 20 orthopaedic surgeons from Europe and North America. There were 26 statements identified using a targeted literature review. Consensus was developed for the statements with up to three rounds of anonymous voting per topic. Panelists ranked their agreement with each statement on a five-point Likert scale. An a priori threshold of ≥ 75% was required for consensus. RESULTS All 26 statements achieved consensus after three rounds of anonymous voting. Wound closure-related interventions that were recommended for use in TKA included: 1) closing in semi-flexion versus extension (superior range of motion); 2) using aspirin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis over other agents (reduces wound complications); 3) barbed sutures over non-barbed sutures (lower wound complications, better cosmetic appearances, shorter closing times, and overall cost savings); 4) mesh-adhesives over other skin closure methods (lower wound complications, higher patient satisfaction scores, lower rates of readmission); 5) silver-impregnated dressings over standard dressings (lower wound complications, decreased infections, fewer dressing changes); 6) in high-risk patients, negative pressure wound therapy over other dressings (lower wound complications, decreased reoperations, fewer dressing changes); and 7) using triclosan-coated over non-antimicrobial-coated sutures (lower risks of surgical site infection). CONCLUSIONS Using a modified Delphi approach, the panel achieved consensus on 26 statements pertaining to wound closure and dressing management in TKA. This study forms the basis for identifying critical evidence supported by clinical practice for wound management to help reduce variability, advance standardization, and ultimately improve outcomes during TKA. The results presented here can serve as the foundation for knowledge, education, and improved clinical outcomes for surgeons performing TKAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lucas A Anderson
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah Orthopaedic Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Benjamin V Bloch
- Nottingham Elective Orthopaedic Service, City Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Tim N Board
- Professor of Orthopaedics, Centre for Hip Surgery, Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, United Kingdom
| | - Antonia F Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Samantha Craigie
- Department of Value and Evidence, EVERSANA, Burlington, Ontario, Canada
| | - Walter Danker
- Health Economics and Market Access, J&J MedTech, Raritan, New Jersey
| | - Najmuddin Gunja
- Health Economics and Market Access, J&J MedTech, Raritan, New Jersey
| | - James Harty
- Trauma and Orthopaedics Department, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Victor H Hernandez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida
| | - Kate Lebedeva
- Department of Value and Evidence, EVERSANA, Burlington, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael A Mont
- LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ryan M Nunley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Javad Parvizi
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Carsten Perka
- Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Orthop€adische Universit€atsklinik der Charit_e, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Nicolas S Piuzzi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ola Rolfson
- Professor, Department of Orthopeadics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Joshua Rychlik
- Department of Value and Evidence, EVERSANA, Burlington, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emilio Romanini
- Centre for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty, Polo Sanitario San Feliciano, Rome, Italy
| | - Pablo Sanz-Ruiz
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Rafael J Sierra
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Linda Suleiman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Eleftherios Tsiridis
- Academic Orthopedic Unit, Aristotle University Medical School, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Pascal-André Vendittoli
- Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Helge Wangen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Elverum, Norway
| | - Luigi Zagra
- Hip Department, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shul C, Hameed D, Oster B, Dubin JA, Bains SS, Mont MA, Johnson AJ. The Impact of Preoperative Weight Loss Timing on Surgical Outcomes in Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2024:S0883-5403(24)00195-5. [PMID: 38432529 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.02.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elevated body mass index (BMI) increases surgical complications post-total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the effects of rapid weight loss pre-THA remain unclear. This study evaluated patients who had initial BMIs between 40 and 50, and then achieved a BMI under 35 at various intervals before their THA. Comparisons were made with consistent obese and nonobese groups to understand potential complications. METHODS Using a national database, we categorized THA patients based on initial BMI and weight loss timing before the surgery. These were contrasted with those maintaining a steady BMI of 20 to 30 or 40 to 50. We monitored outcomes like periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), surgical site infections (SSI), and noninfectious revisions for 2 years postsurgery, incorporating demographic considerations. Statistical analyses utilized Chi-square tests for categorical outcomes and Student's t-tests for continuous variables. RESULTS Among patients who had a BMI of 45 to 50, weight loss 3 to 9 months presurgery increased PJI risks at 90 days (Odds Ratios [OR]: 2.15 to 5.22, P < .001). However, weight loss a year before the surgery lowered the PJI risk (OR: 0.14 to 0.27, P < .005). Constantly obese patients faced heightened PJI risks 1 to 2 years postsurgery (OR: 1.64 to 1.95, P < .015). Regarding SSI, risks increased with weight loss 3 to 9 months before surgery, but decreased when weight loss occurred a year earlier. In the BMI 40 to 45 group, weight loss 3 to 6 months presurgery showed higher PJI and SSI at 90 days (P < .001), with obese participants consistently at greater risk. CONCLUSIONS While high BMI poses THA risks, weight loss timing plays a crucial role in postoperative complications. Weight loss closer to the surgery (0 to 9 months) can heighten risks, but shedding weight a year in advance seems beneficial. Conversely, initiating weight loss approximately a year before surgery offers potential protective effects against postoperative issues. This highlights the importance of strategic weight management guidance for patients considering THA, ensuring optimal surgical results and reducing potential adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig Shul
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Daniel Hameed
- Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Brittany Oster
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jeremy A Dubin
- Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sandeep S Bains
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Michael A Mont
- Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Aaron J Johnson
- Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ainslie-Garcia M, Anderson LA, Bloch BV, Board TN, Chen AF, Craigie S, Danker W, Gunja N, Harty J, Hernandez VH, Lebedeva K, Hameed D, Mont MA, Nunley RM, Parvizi J, Perka C, Piuzzi NS, Rolfson O, Rychlik J, Romanini E, Sanz-Ruiz P, Sierra RJ, Suleiman L, Tsiridis E, Vendittoli PA, Wangen H, Zagra L. International Delphi Study on Wound Closure and Incision Management in Joint Arthroplasty Part 2: Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2024:S0883-5403(24)00071-8. [PMID: 38325531 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.01.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This modified Delphi study aimed to develop a consensus on optimal wound closure and incision management strategies for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Given the critical nature of wound care and incision management in influencing patient outcomes, this study sought to synthesize evidence-based best practices for wound care in THA procedures. METHODS An international panel of 20 orthopedic surgeons from Europe, Canada, and the United States evaluated a targeted literature review of 18 statements (14 specific to THA and 4 related to both THA and total knee arthroplasty). There were 3 rounds of anonymous voting per topic using a modified 5-point Likert scale with a predetermined consensus threshold of ≥ 75% agreement necessary for a statement to be accepted. RESULTS After 3 rounds of voting, consensus was achieved for all 18 statements. Notable recommendations for THA wound management included (1) the use of barbed sutures over non-barbed sutures (shorter closing times and overall cost savings); (2) the use of subcuticular sutures over skin staples (lower risk of superficial infections and higher patient preferences, but longer closing times); (3) the use of mesh-adhesives over silver-impregnated dressings (lower rate of wound complications); (4) for at-risk patients, the use of negative pressure wound therapy over other dressings (lower wound complications and reoperations, as well as fewer dressing changes); and (5) the use of triclosan-coated sutures (lower risk of surgical site infection) over standard sutures. CONCLUSIONS Through a structured modified Delphi approach, a panel of 20 orthopedic surgeons reached consensus on all 18 statements pertaining to wound closure and incision management in THA. This study provides a foundational framework for establishing evidence-based best practices, aiming to reduce variability in patient outcomes and to enhance the overall quality of care in THA procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lucas A Anderson
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah Orthopaedic Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Benjamin V Bloch
- Department of Orthopaedics, Nottingham Elective Orthopaedic Service, City Hospital, Nottingham, England
| | - Tim N Board
- Department of Orthopaedics, Centre for Hip Surgery, Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, England
| | - Antonia F Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Samantha Craigie
- The Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Walter Danker
- Department of Orthopaedics, Ethicon Inc., New Jersey
| | - Najmuddin Gunja
- Department of Bioengineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas
| | - James Harty
- Trauma and Orthopaedics Department, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Victor H Hernandez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida
| | - Kate Lebedeva
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Physical Therapy, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Hameed
- Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Michael A Mont
- Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, LifeBridge Health, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ryan M Nunley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Javad Parvizi
- The Rothman Institute at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Carsten Perka
- Department of Orthopaedics, Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Orthopädische Universitätsklinik der Charité, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Nicolas S Piuzzi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Ola Rolfson
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Orthopeadics, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Joshua Rychlik
- Department of Orthopaedics, Zentrela Inc, Ontario, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Emilio Romanini
- Centre for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty, Polo Sanitario San Feliciano, Rome, Italy
| | - Pablo Sanz-Ruiz
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain
| | - Rafael J Sierra
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Linda Suleiman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Eleftherios Tsiridis
- Academic Orthopedic Unit, Aristotle University Medical School, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Pascal-André Vendittoli
- Department of Surgery, Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital, Montreal University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Helge Wangen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Elverum
| | - Luigi Zagra
- Hip Department, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Klemt C, Yeo I, Harvey M, Burns JC, Melnic C, Uzosike AC, Kwon YM. The Use of Artificial Intelligence for the Prediction of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2024; 37:158-166. [PMID: 36731501 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1761259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for aseptic failure is associated with poor outcomes, patient morbidity, and high health care expenditures. The aim of this study was to develop novel machine learning algorithms for the prediction of PJI following revision TKA for patients with aseptic indications for revision surgery. A single-institution database consisting of 1,432 consecutive revision TKA patients with aseptic etiologies was retrospectively identified. The patient cohort included 208 patients (14.5%) who underwent re-revision surgery for PJI. Three machine learning algorithms (artificial neural networks, support vector machines, k-nearest neighbors) were developed to predict this outcome and these models were assessed by discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis. This is a retrospective study. Among the three machine learning models, the neural network model achieved the best performance across discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.78), calibration, and decision curve analysis. The strongest predictors for PJI following revision TKA for aseptic reasons were prior open procedure prior to revision surgery, drug abuse, obesity, and diabetes. This study utilized machine learning as a tool for the prediction of PJI following revision TKA for aseptic failure with excellent performance. The validated machine learning models can aid surgeons in patient-specific risk stratifying to assist in preoperative counseling and clinical decision making for patients undergoing aseptic revision TKA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Klemt
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ingwon Yeo
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael Harvey
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jillian C Burns
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher Melnic
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Akachimere Cosmas Uzosike
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Young-Min Kwon
- Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Traverso G, Núñez JH, Gehrke T, Citak M. Hypoalbuminemia increases the risk of failure following one-stage septic revision for periprosthetic joint infection. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143:5641-5648. [PMID: 37071192 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-023-04885-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Malnutrition is a potentially modifiable risk factor of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The purpose of this study was to analyze the role of nutritional status as a risk factor for failure after one- stage revision hip or knee arthroplasty for PJI. METHODS Retrospective, single-center, case-control study. Patients with PJI according to the 2018 International Consensus Meeting criteria were evaluated. Minimum follow-up was 4 years. Total lymphocyte count (TLC), albumin values, hemoglobin, C-reactive protein, white blood cell (WBC) count and glucose levels were analyzed. An analysis was also made of the index of malnutrition. Malnutrition was defined as serum albumin < 3.5 g/dL and TLC < 1500/mm3. Septic failure was defined as the presence of local or systemic symptoms of infection and the need of further surgery as a result of persistent PJI. RESULTS No significant differences were found between increased failure rates after a one-stage revision hip or knee arthroplasty for PJI and TLC, hemoglobin level, WBC count, glucose levels, or malnutrition. Albumin and C-reactive protein values were found to have a positive and significant relationship with failure (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression identified only hypoalbuminemia (serum albumin < 3.5 g/dL) (OR 5.64, 95% CI 1.26-25.18, p = 0.023) as a significant independent risk factor for failure. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the model yielded an area under the curve of 0.67. CONCLUSION TLC, hemoglobin; WBC count; glucose levels; and malnutrition, understood as the combination of albumin and TLC, were not found to be statically significant risk factors for failure after single-stage revision for PJI. However, albumin < 3.5 g/dL, alone was a statically significant risk factor for failure after single-stage revision for PJI. As hypoalbuminemia seems to influence the failure rate, it is advisable to measure albumin levels in preoperative workups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Traverso
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstr 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genova, Italy
| | - Jorge H Núñez
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Mutua Terrasa, Plaça del Doctor Robert, 5, 08221, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Thorsten Gehrke
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstr 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Mustafa Citak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Holstenstr 2, 22767, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tarabichi S, Parvizi J. Prevention of surgical site infection: a ten-step approach. ARTHROPLASTY 2023; 5:21. [PMID: 37029444 PMCID: PMC10082525 DOI: 10.1186/s42836-023-00174-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery. Similarly, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), is a major cause of failure after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). As the annual volume of TJA procedures is projected to rise, so will the rate of subsequent SSI and PJI. Currently, prevention has been identified as the single most important strategy for combating SSI/PJI. Hence, the present article will serve as a summary of an evidence-based ten-step approach for SSI/PJI prevention that may help orthopedic surgeons with their infection prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saad Tarabichi
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
| | - Javad Parvizi
- Rothman Orthopaedic Institute at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brodke D, O'Hara N, Devana S, Hernandez A, Burke C, Gupta J, McKibben N, O'Toole R, Morellato J, Gillon H, Walters M, Barber C, Perdue P, Dekeyser G, Steffenson L, Marchand L, Fairres MJ, Black L, Working Z, Roddy E, El Naga A, Hogue M, Gulbrandsen T, Atassi O, Mitchell T, Shymon S, Lee C. Predictors of Deep Infection After Distal Femur Fracture: A Multicenter Study. J Orthop Trauma 2023; 37:161-167. [PMID: 36302354 DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000002514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify potentially modifiable risk factors for deep surgical site infection after distal femur fracture. DESIGN Multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTING Ten Level-I trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS Patients with OTA/AO 33A or C distal femur fractures (n = 1107). INTERVENTION Surgical fixation of distal femur fracture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT The outcome of interest was deep surgical site infection. RESULTS There was a 7% rate (79/1107) of deep surgical site infection. In the multivariate analysis, predictive factors included alcohol abuse [odds ratio (OR) = 2.36; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.17-4.46; P = 0.01], intra-articular injury (OR = 1.73; 95% CI, 1.01-3.00; P = 0.05), vascular injury (OR = 3.90; 95% CI, 1.63-8.61; P < 0.01), the use of topical antibiotics (OR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.25-0.92; P = 0.03), and the duration of the surgery (OR = 1.15 per hour; 95% CI, 1.01-1.30; P = 0.04). There was a nonsignificant trend toward an association between infection and type III open fracture (OR = 1.73; 95% CI, 0.94-3.13; P = 0.07) and lateral approach (OR = 1.60; 95% CI, 0.95-2.69; P = 0.07). The most frequently cultured organisms were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (22%), methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (20%), and Enterobacter cloacae (11%). CONCLUSIONS Seven percent of distal femur fractures developed deep surgical site infections. Alcohol abuse, intra-articular fracture, vascular injury, and increased surgical duration were risk factors, while the use of topical antibiotics was protective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dane Brodke
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Nathan O'Hara
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | - Sai Devana
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Adolfo Hernandez
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Cynthia Burke
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jayesh Gupta
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | - Natasha McKibben
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | - Robert O'Toole
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center at the University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
| | - John Morellato
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS
| | - Hunter Gillon
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS
| | - Murphy Walters
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS
| | - Colby Barber
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Paul Perdue
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Graham Dekeyser
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Lillia Steffenson
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Lucas Marchand
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Marshall James Fairres
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, Los Angeles County Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Loren Black
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Zachary Working
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Erika Roddy
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Ashraf El Naga
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Matthew Hogue
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA; and
| | - Trevor Gulbrandsen
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA; and
| | - Omar Atassi
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Thomas Mitchell
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Stephen Shymon
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, Los Angeles County Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Christopher Lee
- Department of Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Webb ML. CORR Insights®: Do Cultures Obtained During Primary THA Predict the Likelihood of Revision? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2023; 481:786-788. [PMID: 36749837 PMCID: PMC10013621 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000002566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew L Webb
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
La Camera F, de Matteo V, Di Maio M, Verrazzo R, Grappiolo G, Loppini M. Clinical Outcomes and Complication Rate after Single-Stage Hardware Removal and Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched-Pair Controlled Study. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041666. [PMID: 36836201 PMCID: PMC9958733 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Single-stage hardware removal and total hip arthroplasty is a complex surgical procedure, comparable to revision surgery. The purpose of the current study is to evaluate single-stage hardware removal and THA outcomes, compare this technique with a matched control group that has undergone primary THA and assess the risk of periprosthetic joint infection with a 24-month minimum follow-up. METHODS This study included all those cases treated with THA and concomitant hardware removal from 2008 to 2018. The control group was selected on a 1:1 ratio among patients who underwent THA for primary OA. The Harris Hip (HHS) and University of California at Los Angeles Activity (UCLA) scores, infection rate and early and delayed surgical complications were recorded. RESULTS One hundred and twenty-three consecutive patients (127 hips) were included, and the same number of patients was assigned to the control group. The final functional scores were comparable between the two groups; a longer operative time and transfusion rate were recorded in the study group. Finally, an increased incidence of overall complications was reported (13.8% versus 2.4%), but no cases of early or delayed infection were found. CONCLUSIONS Single-stage hardware removal and THA is a safe and effective but technically demanding technique, with a higher incidence of overall complications, making it more similar to revision THA than to primary THA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco La Camera
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Alessandro Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
- Fondazione Livio Sciutto Ricerca Biomedica in Ortopedia-ONLUS, Via A. Magliotto 2, 17100 Savona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo de Matteo
- Section of Orthopaedic Surgery Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, “Federico II” University of Naples, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Di Maio
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Raffaele Verrazzo
- Section of Orthopaedic Surgery Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, “Federico II” University of Naples, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Guido Grappiolo
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Alessandro Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
- Fondazione Livio Sciutto Ricerca Biomedica in Ortopedia-ONLUS, Via A. Magliotto 2, 17100 Savona, Italy
| | - Mattia Loppini
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Alessandro Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
- Fondazione Livio Sciutto Ricerca Biomedica in Ortopedia-ONLUS, Via A. Magliotto 2, 17100 Savona, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Humphrey TJ, Tatara AM, Bedair HS, Alpaugh K, Melnic CM, Nelson SB. Rates and Outcomes of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Persons Who Inject Drugs. J Arthroplasty 2023; 38:152-157. [PMID: 35931269 PMCID: PMC9979100 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is higher in persons who inject drugs (PWID) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), though reported rates vary widely. This study was designed to assess outcomes of TJA in PWID and to describe factors associated with improved PJI outcomes among PWID. METHODS A retrospective matched cohort study was performed using a 1:4 match among those with and those without a history of injection drug use (IDU) undergoing TJA. Demographic, surgical, and outcome variables were compared in multivariate logistic regressions to determine PJI predictors. Kaplan-Meier analyses were constructed to characterize the difference in survival of patients who did not have PJI or undergo joint explantation between PWID and the matching cohort. RESULTS PWID had a 9-fold increased risk of PJI compared to the matched cohort (odds ratio 9.605, 95% CI 2.781-33.175, P < .001). Ten of 17 PWID whose last use was within 6 months (active use) of primary TJA had a PJI, while 7 of 41 PWID who did not have active use developed a PJI. Of PWID with PJI, treatment failure was seen in 15 of 17, while in patients who did not have an IDU history, 5 of 8 with PJI had treatment failure. CONCLUSION IDU is a significant risk factor for PJI following TJA. Future work investigating the effect of a multidisciplinary support team to assist in cessation of IDU and to provide social support may improve outcomes and reduce morbidity in this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler J Humphrey
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Alexander M Tatara
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hany S Bedair
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kyle Alpaugh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher M Melnic
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sandra B Nelson
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Periprosthetic Infection in the Setting of Periprosthetic Total Hip Fractures: Evaluation and Management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30:957-964. [PMID: 36200815 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-21-00083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidences of periprosthetic fracture and periprosthetic joint infection after total hip arthroplasty are expected to increase exponentially over the coming decades. Epidemiologic data suggest that many periprosthetic fractures after THA occur concurrently with a loose femoral implant. Recent studies suggest an approximately 8% incidence of indolent infection in cases of suspected aseptic loosening. The available data, therefore, suggest that periprosthetic fracture and infection may coexist, and this possibility should be considered, particularly in patients with a loose femoral stem and high pretest possibility. Although currently limited, the available literature provides some guidance as how to manage this complex issue.
Collapse
|
12
|
Barretto JM, Campos ALS, Ooka NHM. Periprosthetic Knee Infection - Part 1: Risk Factors, Classification and Diagnosis. Rev Bras Ortop 2022; 57:185-192. [PMID: 35652026 PMCID: PMC9142234 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Infection is one of the most feared complications in the postoperative period of knee arthroplasties. With the progressive aging of the population and the increased incidence of degenerative joint diseases, there is an exponential increase in the number of arthroplasties performed and, consequently, in the number of postoperative infections. The diagnosis of these should follow a hierarchical protocol, with well-defined criteria, which lead to diagnostic conclusion, thus guiding the most appropriate treatment. The aim of the present update article is to present the main risk factors, classifications and, mainly, to guide diagnostic investigation in an organized manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - André Luiz Siqueira Campos
- Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologista, Hospital Federal dos Servidores do Estado, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
| | - Nelson Hiroyuki Miyabe Ooka
- Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologista, Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.,Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologista, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Simon S, Hollenbeck B. Risk factors for surgical site infections in knee and hip arthroplasty patients. Am J Infect Control 2022; 50:214-216. [PMID: 34793889 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2021.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
We performed a retrospective cohort study to identify risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) in patients with hip and knee arthroplasty in a high-volume orthopedic center with low overall SSI rates. Active smoking and revision arthroplasty both increased the risk for SSI. Former smokers were seen to have a lower SSI risk, demonstrating a potential benefit in implementing mandated smoking secession programs.
Collapse
|
14
|
Tucker K, Günther KP, Kjaersgaard-Andersen P, Lützner J, Kretzer JP, Nelissen RGHH, Lange T, Zagra L. EFORT recommendations for off-label use, mix & match and mismatch in hip and knee arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev 2021; 6:982-1005. [PMID: 34909220 PMCID: PMC8631244 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Off-label use is frequently practiced in primary and revision arthroplasty, as there may be indications for the application of implants for purposes outside the one the manufacturers intended. Under certain circumstances, patients may benefit from selective application of mix & match. This can refer to primary hip arthroplasty (if evidence suggests that the combination of devices from different manufacturers has superior results) and revision hip or knee arthroplasty (when the exchange of one component only is necessary and the invasiveness of surgery can be reduced). Within the EFORT ‘Implant and Patient Safety Initiative’, evidence- and consensus-based recommendations have been developed for the safe application of off-label use and mix & match in primary as well as revision hip and knee arthroplasty. Prior to the application of a medical device for hip or knee arthroplasty off-label and within a mix & match situation, surgeons should balance the risks and benefits to the patient, obtain informed consent, and document the decision process appropriately. Nevertheless, it is crucial for surgeons to only combine implants that are compatible. Mismatch of components, where their sizes or connections do not fit, may have catastrophic effects and is a surgical mistake. Surgeons must be fully aware of the features of the components that they use in off-label indications or during mix & match applications, must be appropriately trained and must audit their results. Considering the frequent practice of off-label and mix & match as well as the potential medico-legal issues, further research is necessary to obtain more data about the appropriate indications and outcomes for those procedures.
Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:982-1005. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210080
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith Tucker
- Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP), Norwich, UK
| | - Klaus-Peter Günther
- University Centre of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Jörg Lützner
- University Centre of Orthopedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Jan Philippe Kretzer
- Laboratory of Biomechanics and Implant Research, Clinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rob G H H Nelissen
- Department of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Toni Lange
- Center for Evidence-based Healthcare, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - Luigi Zagra
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Hip Department, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Intra-Articular Injections Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty Do Not Increase the Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Prospective Cohort Study. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021; 10:antibiotics10030330. [PMID: 33801092 PMCID: PMC8004162 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10030330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) occur in 0.5 to 2.8% of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) and expose them to an increase of morbidity and mortality. TKA are mainly performed after failure of non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis, which frequently includes intra-articular injections of corticosteroids or hyaluronic acid. Concerning the potential impact of intra-articular injections on TKA infection, literature provides a low level of evidence because of the retrospective design of the studies and their contradictory results. In this prospective cohort study, we included patients after a total knee arthroplasty, at the time of their admission in a rehabilitation center, and we excluded patients with any prior knee surgery. 304 patients were included. Mean follow-up was 24.9 months, and incidence proportion of PJI was 2.6%. After multivariate logistic regression, male was the only significant risk factor of PJI (OR = 19.6; p = 0.006). The incidence of PJI did not differ between patients who received prior intra-articular injections and others, especially regarding injections in the last 6 months before surgery. The use of intra-articular injection remains a valid therapeutic option in the management of knee osteoarthritis, and a TKA could still be discussed.
Collapse
|
16
|
Rupp M, Kerschbaum M, Freigang V, Bärtl S, Baumann F, Trampuz A, Alt V. [PJI-TNM as new classification system for periprosthetic joint infections : An evaluation of 20 cases]. DER ORTHOPADE 2021; 50:198-206. [PMID: 32533215 PMCID: PMC8222041 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-020-03933-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current classifications for periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) often lack a detailed description of the overall underlying situation of a patient. The PJI-TNM classification uses the principles of the TNM classification from oncology for the description of critical parameters in PJIs: affected joint, type of implant and implant stability, soft tissue conditions, maturity of biofilm formation, causative microorganism, comorbidities of the patient and recurrence of infection. The aim of the current work is to evaluate the feasibility of this new PJI-TNM classification in clinical practice. METHODS The PJI-TNM classification was used in 20 patients with hip, knee and shoulder PJIs. Based on a retrospective chart review, the respective parameters T (tissue and implants), N (non-eukaryotic cells and fungi), M (morbidity) and r (reinfection) were classified for each case. RESULTS All 20 cases (12 male, 8 female, average age 72.2 (40-88 years)) with 13 hip, 6 knee and 1 shoulder PJIs were to be classified with the new TNM-PJI classification system. There was a considerable heterogeneity among the cases: 12 protheses were fixed (T0), 6 were loosened (T1) and 2 were associated with a soft tissue defect (T2). Biofilm formation was considered immature in 7 cases (N0). Out of the PJIs, 13 were considered to be associated with mature biofilm formation. Out of the patients, 9 were systemically not or only mildly compromised (M0), 7 patients moderately (M1) and 3 patients (M2) severely compromised. One patient refused surgical treatment (M3a). Recurrent infections (r) were diagnosed in three cases. CONCLUSIONS The principles of the TNM classification from oncology can also be used for the classification of PJIs. Despite the limited number of cases in this study, a considerable heterogeneity of the evaluated PJIs is shown, which is a phenomenon that is also known from clinical practice. This heterogeneity can be adequately addressed by this new classification, which might be beneficial in decision-making in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Rupp
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg (UKR), Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Maximilian Kerschbaum
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg (UKR), Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Viola Freigang
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg (UKR), Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Susanne Bärtl
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg (UKR), Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Florian Baumann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg (UKR), Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Andrej Trampuz
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin und Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Volker Alt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg (UKR), Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Månsson E, Tevell S, Nilsdotter-Augustinsson Å, Johannesen TB, Sundqvist M, Stegger M, Söderquist B. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis Lineages in the Nasal and Skin Microbiota of Patients Planned for Arthroplasty Surgery. Microorganisms 2021; 9:microorganisms9020265. [PMID: 33525409 PMCID: PMC7911009 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9020265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 01/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Staphylococcus epidermidis, ubiquitous in the human nasal and skin microbiota, is a common causative microorganism in prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). A high proportion of PJI isolates have been shown to harbor genetic traits associated with resistance to/tolerance of agents used for antimicrobial prophylaxis in joint arthroplasties. These traits were found within multidrug-resistant S. epidermidis (MDRSE) lineages of multiple genetic backgrounds. In this study, the aim was to study whether MDRSE lineages previously associated with PJIs are present in the nasal and skin microbiota of patients planned for arthroplasty surgery but before hospitalization. We cultured samples from nares, inguinal creases, and skin over the hip or knee (dependent on the planned procedure) taken two weeks (median) prior to admittance to the hospital for total joint arthroplasty from 66 patients on agar plates selecting for methicillin resistance. S. epidermidis colonies were identified and tested for the presence of mecA. Methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis (MRSE) were characterized by Illumina-based whole-genome sequencing. Using this method, we found that 30/66 (45%) of patients were colonized with MRSE at 1–3 body sites. A subset of patients, 10/66 (15%), were colonized with MDRSE lineages associated with PJIs. The qacA gene was identified in MRSE isolates from 19/30 (63%) of MRSE colonized patients, whereas genes associated with aminoglycoside resistance were less common, found in 11/30 (37%). We found that MDRSE lineages previously associated with PJIs were present in a subset of patients’ pre-admission microbiota, plausibly in low relative abundance, and may be selected for by the current prophylaxis regimen comprising whole-body cleansing with chlorhexidine-gluconate containing soap. To further lower the rate of S. epidermidis PJIs, the current prophylaxis may need to be modified, but it is important for possible perioperative MDRSE transmission events and specific risk factors for MDRSE PJIs to be investigated before reevaluating antimicrobial prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emeli Månsson
- School of Medical Sciencies, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, SE-701 82 Örebro, Sweden; (S.T.); (M.S.); (B.S.)
- Centre for Clinical Research, Region Västmanland—Uppsala University, Hospital of Västmanland, Västerås, SE-721 89 Västerås, Sweden
- Correspondence:
| | - Staffan Tevell
- School of Medical Sciencies, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, SE-701 82 Örebro, Sweden; (S.T.); (M.S.); (B.S.)
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Karlstad Hospital and Centre for Clinical Research and Education, County Council of Värmland, SE-651 82 Karlstad, Sweden
| | - Åsa Nilsdotter-Augustinsson
- Department of Infectious Diseases, and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, SE-60182 Norrköping, Sweden;
| | - Thor Bech Johannesen
- Department of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark;
| | - Martin Sundqvist
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, SE-701 82 Örebro, Sweden;
| | - Marc Stegger
- School of Medical Sciencies, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, SE-701 82 Örebro, Sweden; (S.T.); (M.S.); (B.S.)
- Department of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Statens Serum Institut, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark;
| | - Bo Söderquist
- School of Medical Sciencies, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, SE-701 82 Örebro, Sweden; (S.T.); (M.S.); (B.S.)
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, SE-701 82 Örebro, Sweden;
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Intravenous tranexamic acid is associated with safe reduced blood loss and transfusion rate in one-stage exchange for infected hip arthroplasty. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2021; 32:17-21. [PMID: 33463413 PMCID: PMC8073466 DOI: 10.5606/ehc.2021.77652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives
This study aims to investigate if the use of intravenous (IV) tranexamic acid (TXA) during one-stage exchange for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the hip that necessitates an extensive debridement is associated with decreased blood loss, if the rate of blood transfusion that may lead to side effects can be lowered with IV TXA, and if there is any difference regarding the occurrence of postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE). Patients and methods
We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent one-stage exchange for PJI of the hip with perioperative IV administration of TXA (n=163; 90 males, 73 females; mean age 68±10.3; range, 25 to 90 years) between January 2015 and December 2016 and compared them to another group (n=190; 106 males, 84 females; mean age 71±10.1; range, 39 to 92 years) who underwent one-stage exchange for PJI of the hip without perioperative IV administration of TXA between January 2006 and December 2012. Blood loss, transfusion rates, amount of transfused blood, and occurrence of VTE complications were observed. Results
Mean blood loss of the TXA group was significantly lower than that of the non-TXA group (2.4 L and 4.5 L, respectively; p<0.001). Patients in non-TXA group experienced significantly higher rate of blood transfusion (71.1% and 58.3%, respectively; p=0.014) and higher quantity of transfused packed red blood cells (3.2 and 1.9 units, respectively; p<0.001). There was one patient with VTE complication in each group. Conclusion
Even in the presence of infection, usage of IV TXA during one-stage exchange for PJI of the hip is associated with significantly lower blood loss and transfusion rates showing no higher risk of VTE events.
Collapse
|
19
|
Thever Y, Teo BJX, Tan HCA. Predictive value of common serum glycaemic markers on periprosthetic joint infection following Total Joint Arthroplasty: A review of the literature. J Orthop 2020; 22:278-281. [PMID: 32581459 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Revised: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
It is well established that diabetes mellitus and osteoarthritis commonly exist together and among various treatment modalities for osteoarthritis, Total Joint Arthroplasty (TJA) has been effective. Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) is a serious complication of TJA with high costs and morbidity associated with it. The aim of this study is to provide background information and relevance of diabetes on PJI, and to conduct a review on existing literature, to find out if common serum glycaemic markers in diabetes could be used as predictors for PJI after TJA. These markers include measuring pre-operative glucose levels with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) or capillary blood glucose, peri-operative or post-operative blood glucose levels. We have found that existing literature studying these markers as predictors of PJI after TJA has been largely contentious. Despite not being used widely in clinical practice, serum fructosamine has been shown to be more reliable and accurate than the above-mentioned markers. Future studies should be carried out to confirm and better understand this association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yogen Thever
- National University of Singapore Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, 10 Medical Dr, 117597, Singapore
| | - Bryon Jun Xiong Teo
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, 169608, Singapore
| | - Hwee Chye Andrew Tan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, 169608, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Alt V, Rupp M, Langer M, Baumann F, Trampuz A. Can the oncology classification system be used for prosthetic joint infection?: The PJI-TNM system. Bone Joint Res 2020; 9:79-81. [PMID: 32435459 PMCID: PMC7229309 DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.92.bjr-2019-0134.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Cite this article:Bone Joint Res. 2020;9(2):79–81.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volker Alt
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Markus Rupp
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Martin Langer
- Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Florian Baumann
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Andrej Trampuz
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Webb ML. CORR Insights®: Does an Antimicrobial Incision Drape Prevent Intraoperative Contamination? A Randomized Controlled Trial of 1187 Patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2020; 478:1016-1018. [PMID: 32187092 PMCID: PMC7170697 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
|
22
|
Roerdink RL, Huijbregts HJTAM, van Lieshout AWT, Dietvorst M, van der Zwaard BC. The difference between native septic arthritis and prosthetic joint infections: A review of literature. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2020; 27:2309499019860468. [PMID: 31284831 DOI: 10.1177/2309499019860468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Current literature occasionally considers septic arthritis in native joints and prosthetic joint infections as equal pathologies. However, significant differences can be identified. The aim of this review of literature is to describe these differences in definitions, pathology, diagnostic workups, treatment strategies, and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramon Lucas Roerdink
- 1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jeroen Bosch General Hospital, Henri Dunantstraat, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Martijn Dietvorst
- 4 Department of Orthopedic Surgery at Máxima Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Babette Corine van der Zwaard
- 1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jeroen Bosch General Hospital, Henri Dunantstraat, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lespasio M, Mont M, Guarino A. Identifying Risk Factors Associated With Postoperative Infection Following Elective Lower-Extremity Total Joint Arthroplasty. Perm J 2020; 24:1-3. [PMID: 33482967 DOI: 10.7812/tpp/20.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
This article addresses the importance of identifying risk factors associated with postoperative infection following elective lower-extremity total joint arthroplasty. Specifically, this review discusses risk factors recognized by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons that should be carefully considered and assessed by the orthopaedic team in collaboration with the primary care provider before proceeding with surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Lespasio
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Michael Mont
- Northwell Health Physician Partners Orthopaedic Institute at Lenox Hill, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|