Alpha-Defensin Offers Limited Utility in Work-Up Prior to Reimplantation in Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients

Synovial absolute polymorphonuclear neutrophil cell count: A simple and inexpensive marker for diagnosing periprosthetic hip and knee joint infections

PURPOSE

This study aimed to establish the optimal cutoff value for synovial absolute polymorphonuclear neutrophil (APMN) count in distinguishing between septic and aseptic hip and knee revision arthroplasties. We also investigated its effectiveness as an indicator in revision arthroplasties with challenging microbiological findings, including (i) aseptic cases with a single unexpected positive intraoperative culture (UPICs), (ii) septic cases with unexpected negative ICs (UNICs) and (iii) infections caused by high- and low-virulent pathogens.

METHODS

A total of 616 revision arthroplasties (177:hip, 439:knee) included. Using European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria, 325 (52.8%) were classified as infection confirmed, 271 (44%) infection unlikely and 20 (3.2%) as infection likely. International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018 criteria classified 308 (50%) as infected, 269 (43.7%) not infected, and 39 (6.3%) as inconclusive. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed through receiver operating characteristic curves and area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Optimal APMN count thresholds using EBJIS criteria in hip and knee joints were 783.6 cells/µL (AUC: 0.92) and 549 cells/µL (AUC: 0.91), respectively. With the ICM criteria, its optimal cutoff values remained unchanged, except for the knee, which shifted to 594.2 cells/µL. Comparing UPICs to other aseptic cases showed no significant median APMN count differences when both criteria's applied, potentially ruling out infection suspicion. In septic cases, APMN counts differed between UNICs and culture positives but were statistically significant with EBJIS criteria (Hip:p = 0.01, Knee:p = 0.03) but not with ICM (p = 0.08). Median APMN counts were significantly elevated in high-virulent compared to low-virulent organisms, with similar trends in most of the other markers. Compared to alpha-defensin, APMN count exhibited better AUC, sensitivity and negative predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

The APMN count represents a simple and inexpensive method that may serve as a complementary diagnostic marker in hip and knee revision arthroplasties with challenging microbiological findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective study.

Leukocyte scintigraphy has high specificity but low sensitivity in diagnosing persistent periprosthetic joint infection before reimplantation in two-stage revision

INTRODUCTION

Two-stage revision is considered the gold standard treatment in chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) but no specific criteria or examination exist to determine infection eradication before reimplantation. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of leukocyte scintigraphy after the first-stage procedure in two-stage revision for chronic PJI.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients studied with leukocyte scintigraphy after cement spacer insertion for knee PJI from January 2012 to December 2021 were retrospectively included. Infection was diagnosed using the criteria of the 2018 International Consensus Meeting. When 1 or more minor criteria were positive but the score was < 6, patients were considered not infected if there was no recurrence of infection at least 24 months after the second-stage procedure. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were found.

RESULTS

The final cohort included 67 cases in 61 patients (M: F = 32:35; mean age 74 years). There were 43 true negatives, 8 true positives, 12 false negatives, and 4 false positives. The sensitivity and specificity of leukocyte scintigraphy in diagnosing PJI were respectively 40.0% and 91.5%, PPV was 66.7%, NPV was 78.2%, and accuracy was 76.1%. Staphylococcus Epidermidis was the most frequently isolated microorganism (50%).

CONCLUSION

Due to the high costs and the difficulty in its execution, LLS should not be used routinely but it could represent an additional criterion in doubtful cases. In any case, a thorough evaluation of other pre- and intra-operative tests is essential to determine whether reimplantation or spacer renewal is the best course of action. Special consideration should be given to positive LLS, as its results are highly specific and have a low rate of false positives. Conversely, in over half of infected patients, LLS could give false negatives, making negative LLS results less relevant.

Periprosthetic joint infections: state-of-the-art

In general, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is regarded as one of the most common complications of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and may lead to surgical failure, revision surgery, amputation or death. Nowadays, PJI has become a global health concern, which brings a great burden to public healthcare. In addition, there are still obstacles to achieve high success rates in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of PJI. However, promising studies are also available with the advancements in biotechnology. This article will present an overview of the current methods used in the prevention, diagnosis and management of PJI while underlining the new technologies utilized.

An overview of the current diagnostic approach to Periprosthetic Joint Infections

The diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) presents a formidable challenge to orthopaedic surgeons due to its complex and diverse manifestations. Accurate diagnosis is of utmost importance, as even mild pain following joint replacement surgery may indicate PJI in the absence of a definitive gold standard diagnostic test. Numerous diagnostic modalities have been suggested in the literature, and international societies have continually updated diagnostic criteria for this debilitating complication. This review article aims to comprehensively examine the latest evidence-based approaches for diagnosing PJI. Through a thorough analysis of current literature, we explore promising diagnostic strategies that have demonstrated effectiveness in identifying PJI. These strategies encompass the utilization of laboratory markers, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP), alongside imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and leukocyte scintigraphy. Additionally, we highlight the importance of synovial fluid analysis, including the potential role of alpha-defensin as a biomarker, and examine evolving international diagnostic criteria to standardize and improve diagnostic accuracy.

Upcoming evidence in clinical practice of two-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection

Total joint arthroplasty is the recommended treatment for patients with end-stage osteoarthritis, as it reduces disability and pain and restores joint function. However, prosthetic joint infection is a serious complication of this procedure, with the two-stage exchange being the most common treatment method. While there is consensus on diagnosing prosthetic joint infection, there is a lack of agreement on the parameters that can guide the surgeon in performing definitive reimplantation in a two-stage procedure. One approach that has been suggested to improve the accuracy of microbiologic investigations before definitive reimplantation is to observe a holiday period from antibiotic therapy to improve the accuracy of cultures from periprosthetic tissues, but these cultures report some degree of aspecificity. Therefore, several pieces of evidence highlight that performing reimplantation using continuous antibiotic therapy should be considered a safe and effective approach, leading to higher cure rates and a shorter period of disability. Dosage of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ERS) and D-dimer are helpful in diagnosing prosthetic joint infection, but only D-dimer has shown sufficient accuracy in predicting the risk of infection recurrence after a two-stage procedure. Synovial fluid analysis before reimplantation has been shown to be the most accurate in predicting recurrence, and new cutoff values for leukocyte count and neutrophil percentage have shown a useful predictive rule to identify patients at risk of unfavourable outcome. A new scoring system based on a numerical score calculated from the beta coefficient derived through multivariate analysis of D-dimer levels, synovial fluid leukocytes and relative neutrophils percentage has demonstrated high accuracy when it comes to guiding the second step of two-stage procedure. In conclusion, reimplantation may be a suitable option for patients who are on continuous therapy without local symptoms, and with CRP and ERS within the normal range, with low synovial fluid leukocytes (< 952/mL) and a low relative neutrophil percentage (< 52%) and D-dimer below 1100 µg/mL. A numerical score derived from analysing these three parameters can serve as a valuable tool in determining the feasibility of reimplantation in these patients.

Diagnostics in Late Periprosthetic Infections-Challenges and Solutions

The rising number of arthroplasties is combined with a rising number of periprosthetic joint infections, which leads to life-concerning consequences for the patients, including extended antibiotic treatment, further surgery and increased mortality. The heterogeneity of the symptoms and inflammatory response of the patients due to, e.g., age and comorbidities and the absence of a single diagnostic test with 100% accuracy make it very challenging to choose the right parameters to confirm or deny a periprosthetic joint infection and to establish a standardized definition. In recent years, additional diagnostic possibilities have emerged primarily through the increasing availability of new diagnostic methods, such as genetic techniques. The aim of the review is to provide an overview of the current state of knowledge about the various tests, including the latest developments. The combination of different tests increases the accuracy of the diagnosis. Each physician or clinical department must select the tests from the available methods that can be best implemented for them in organizational and technical terms. Serological parameters and the cultivation of the samples from aspiration or biopsy should be combined with additional synovial tests to create an accurate figure for the failure of the prosthesis, while imaging procedures are used to obtain additional information for the planned therapeutic procedure.

Joint aspiration for diagnosis of chronic periprosthetic joint infection: when, how, and what tests?

Diagnosing chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) requires clinical suspicion in combination with both serological and synovial fluid tests, the results of which are generally applied to validated scoring systems or consensus definitions for PJI. As no single "gold standard" test exists, the diagnosis becomes challenging, especially in the setting of negative cultures or equivocal test results. This review aims to address the workup of chronic PJI and considerations for clinical evaluation to guide treatment. Following aspiration of the joint in question, a multitude of tests has been developed in an attempt to assist with diagnosis, including cell synovial white blood cell count, gram stain, cultures, leukocyte esterase, alpha-defensin, synovial C-reactive protein, multiplex polymerase chain reaction, next-generation sequencing, and interleukins. Each test has advantages and disadvantages and should be used in conjunction with the overall clinical picture to guide further clinical evaluation and treatment in this complex patient population.

Interval between two-stage exchanges: what is optimal and how do you know?

BACKGROUND

Two-stage exchange arthroplasty remains the most popular option for the treatment of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Determining infection eradication and optimal timing of reimplantation can be challenging. Information to allow for a truly informed evidence-based decision is scarce.

METHODS

We conducted a critical review of available evidence on the presently available tests to help determine timing of reimplantation.

RESULTS

Serology is traditionally used to follow up patients after the first stage. Despite tradition mandates waiting for normal inflammatory markers, there is actually no evidence that they correlate with persistent infection. The role of synovial fluid investigation between stages is also explored. Cultures lack sensitivity and neither differential leukocyte counts nor alternative biomarkers have proven to be accurate in identifying persistent infection with a spacer in situ. We also examined the evidence regarding the optimal time interval between resection and reimplantation and whether there is evidence to support the implementation of a two week "antibiotic holiday" prior to proceeding with reimplantation. Finally, wound healing and other important factors in this setting will be discussed.

CONCLUSION

Currently there are no accurate metrics to aid in the decision on the optimal timing for reimplantation. Decision must therefore rely on the resolution of clinical signs and down trending serological and synovial markers.

Role of Biomarkers in Periprosthetic Joint Infections

Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of the most serious complications after joint arthroplasty. The incidence rate of PJI after total joint replacement is 1-3%. Although there are different guidelines and diagnostic criteria used to diagnose PJI, diagnosing PJI is a highly difficult process for orthopedists. The current Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria are widely used for the diagnosis of PJI. These criteria include results from blood/synovial fluid tests, physical examination, and histological and microbiological analyses of intra-operative samples. However, there is currently no blood or synovial test that can definitively diagnose PJI. To make a more effective diagnosis of PJI, a large number of studies have explored and continue to investigate biomarkers. This review aims to provide general information about serum and synovial markers used for the diagnosis of PJI that may be used to create a database to guide researchers in new studies.