1
|
Adden A, Wibrand S, Pfeiffer K, Warrant E, Heinze S. The brain of a nocturnal migratory insect, the Australian Bogong moth. J Comp Neurol 2020; 528:1942-1963. [PMID: 31994724 DOI: 10.1002/cne.24866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2019] [Revised: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Every year, millions of Australian Bogong moths (Agrotis infusa) complete an astonishing journey: In Spring, they migrate over 1,000 km from their breeding grounds to the alpine regions of the Snowy Mountains, where they endure the hot summer in the cool climate of alpine caves. In autumn, the moths return to their breeding grounds, where they mate, lay eggs and die. These moths can use visual cues in combination with the geomagnetic field to guide their flight, but how these cues are processed and integrated into the brain to drive migratory behavior is unknown. To generate an access point for functional studies, we provide a detailed description of the Bogong moth's brain. Based on immunohistochemical stainings against synapsin and serotonin (5HT), we describe the overall layout as well as the fine structure of all major neuropils, including the regions that have previously been implicated in compass-based navigation. The resulting average brain atlas consists of 3D reconstructions of 25 separate neuropils, comprising the most detailed account of a moth brain to date. Our results show that the Bogong moth brain follows the typical lepidopteran ground pattern, with no major specializations that can be attributed to their spectacular migratory lifestyle. These findings suggest that migratory behavior does not require widespread modifications of brain structure, but might be achievable via small adjustments of neural circuitry in key brain areas. Locating these subtle changes will be a challenging task for the future, for which our study provides an essential anatomical framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Adden
- Lund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sara Wibrand
- Lund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Eric Warrant
- Lund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Stanley Heinze
- Lund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,NanoLund, Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhao XC, Xie GY, Berg BG, Schachtner J, Homberg U. Distribution of tachykinin-related peptides in the brain of the tobacco budworm Heliothis virescens. J Comp Neurol 2017; 525:3918-3934. [DOI: 10.1002/cne.24310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2017] [Revised: 07/06/2017] [Accepted: 08/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Xin-Cheng Zhao
- Department of Entomology, College of Plant Protection; Henan Agricultural University; Zhengzhou 450002 China
- Chemosensory lab/Department of Psychology; Norwegian University of Science and Technology; Trondheim 7489 Norway
| | - Gui-Ying Xie
- Department of Entomology, College of Plant Protection; Henan Agricultural University; Zhengzhou 450002 China
| | - Bente G. Berg
- Chemosensory lab/Department of Psychology; Norwegian University of Science and Technology; Trondheim 7489 Norway
| | - Joachim Schachtner
- Department of Biology, Animal Physiology; Philipps University; Marburg 35032 Germany
| | - Uwe Homberg
- Department of Biology, Animal Physiology; Philipps University; Marburg 35032 Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Urlacher E, Soustelle L, Parmentier ML, Verlinden H, Gherardi MJ, Fourmy D, Mercer AR, Devaud JM, Massou I. Honey Bee Allatostatins Target Galanin/Somatostatin-Like Receptors and Modulate Learning: A Conserved Function? PLoS One 2016; 11:e0146248. [PMID: 26741132 PMCID: PMC4704819 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2015] [Accepted: 12/15/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Sequencing of the honeybee genome revealed many neuropeptides and putative neuropeptide receptors, yet functional characterization of these peptidic systems is scarce. In this study, we focus on allatostatins, which were first identified as inhibitors of juvenile hormone synthesis, but whose role in the adult honey bee (Apis mellifera) brain remains to be determined. We characterize the bee allatostatin system, represented by two families: allatostatin A (Apime-ASTA) and its receptor (Apime-ASTA-R); and C-type allatostatins (Apime-ASTC and Apime-ASTCC) and their common receptor (Apime-ASTC-R). Apime-ASTA-R and Apime-ASTC-R are the receptors in bees most closely related to vertebrate galanin and somatostatin receptors, respectively. We examine the functional properties of the two honeybee receptors and show that they are transcriptionally expressed in the adult brain, including in brain centers known to be important for learning and memory processes. Thus we investigated the effects of exogenously applied allatostatins on appetitive olfactory learning in the bee. Our results show that allatostatins modulate learning in this insect, and provide important insights into the evolution of somatostatin/allatostatin signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elodie Urlacher
- Department of Zoology, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (UMR 5169), Toulouse, France
- Université de Toulouse, UPS Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (UMR 5169), Toulouse, France
- * E-mail:
| | - Laurent Soustelle
- CNRS, UMR 5203, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Montpellier, France
- INSERM, U1191, Montpellier, France
- Université de Montpellier, UMR 5203, Montpellier, France
| | - Marie-Laure Parmentier
- CNRS, UMR 5203, Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, Montpellier, France
- INSERM, U1191, Montpellier, France
- Université de Montpellier, UMR 5203, Montpellier, France
| | - Heleen Verlinden
- Department of Animal Physiology and Neurobiology, Zoological Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Marie-Julie Gherardi
- EA 4552 Réceptorologie et ciblage thérapeutique en cancérologie, Université de Toulouse, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | - Daniel Fourmy
- EA 4552 Réceptorologie et ciblage thérapeutique en cancérologie, Université de Toulouse, UPS, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Jean-Marc Devaud
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (UMR 5169), Toulouse, France
- Université de Toulouse, UPS Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (UMR 5169), Toulouse, France
| | - Isabelle Massou
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (UMR 5169), Toulouse, France
- Université de Toulouse, UPS Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (UMR 5169), Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Farris SM. Evolution of complex higher brain centers and behaviors: behavioral correlates of mushroom body elaboration in insects. BRAIN, BEHAVIOR AND EVOLUTION 2013; 82:9-18. [PMID: 23979452 DOI: 10.1159/000352057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Large, complex higher brain centers have evolved many times independently within the vertebrates, but the selective pressures driving these acquisitions have been difficult to pinpoint. It is well established that sensory brain centers become larger and more structurally complex to accommodate processing of a particularly important sensory modality. When higher brain centers such as the cerebral cortex become greatly expanded in a particular lineage, it is likely to support the coordination and execution of more complex behaviors, such as those that require flexibility, learning, and social interaction, in response to selective pressures that made these new behaviors advantageous. Vertebrate studies have established a link between complex behaviors, particularly those associated with sociality, and evolutionary expansions of telencephalic higher brain centers. Enlarged higher brain centers have convergently evolved in groups such as the insects, in which multimodal integration and learning and memory centers called the mushroom bodies have become greatly elaborated in at least four independent lineages. Is it possible that similar selective pressures acting on equivalent behavioral outputs drove the evolution of large higher brain centers in all bilaterians? Sociality has greatly impacted brain evolution in vertebrates such as primates, but it has not been a major driver of higher brain center enlargement in insects. However, feeding behaviors requiring flexibility and learning are associated with large higher brain centers in both phyla. Selection for the ability to support behavioral flexibility appears to be a common thread underlying the evolution of large higher brain centers, but the precise nature of these computations and behaviors may vary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M Farris
- Department of Biology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kromann SH, Hansson BS, Ignell R. Distribution of neuropeptides in the antennal lobes of male Spodoptera littoralis. Cell Tissue Res 2013; 354:431-40. [PMID: 23955643 DOI: 10.1007/s00441-013-1703-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2012] [Accepted: 07/10/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Olfaction is an important sensory modality that regulates a plethora of behavioural expressions in insects. Processing of olfactory information takes place in the primary olfactory centres of the brain, namely the antennal lobes (ALs). Neuropeptides have been shown to be present in the olfactory system of various insect species. In the present study, we analyse the distribution of tachykinin, FMRFamide-related peptides, allatotropin, allatostatin, myoinhibitory peptides and SIFamide in the AL of the male Egyptian cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis. Immunocytochemical analyses revealed that most neuropeptides were expressed in different subpopulations of AL neurons. Their arborisation patterns within the AL suggest a significant role of neuropeptide signalling in the modulation of AL processing. In addition to local interneurons, our analysis also revealed a diversity of extrinsic peptidergic neurons that connected the antennal lobe with other brain centres. Their distributions suggest that extrinsic neurons perform various types of context-related modulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie H Kromann
- Department of Plant Protection Biology, Unit of Chemical Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 102, 230 53, Alnarp, Sweden,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Short neuropeptide F acts as a functional neuromodulator for olfactory memory in Kenyon cells of Drosophila mushroom bodies. J Neurosci 2013; 33:5340-5. [PMID: 23516298 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2287-12.2013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
In insects, many complex behaviors, including olfactory memory, are controlled by a paired brain structure, the so-called mushroom bodies (MB). In Drosophila, the development, neuroanatomy, and function of intrinsic neurons of the MB, the Kenyon cells, have been well characterized. Until now, several potential neurotransmitters or neuromodulators of Kenyon cells have been anatomically identified. However, whether these neuroactive substances of the Kenyon cells are functional has not been clarified yet. Here we show that a neuropeptide precursor gene encoding four types of short neuropeptide F (sNPF) is required in the Kenyon cells for appetitive olfactory memory. We found that activation of Kenyon cells by expressing a thermosensitive cation channel (dTrpA1) leads to a decrease in sNPF immunoreactivity in the MB lobes. Targeted expression of RNA interference against the sNPF precursor in Kenyon cells results in a highly significant knockdown of sNPF levels. This knockdown of sNPF in the Kenyon cells impairs sugar-rewarded olfactory memory. This impairment is not due to a defect in the reflexive sugar preference or odor response. Consistently, knockdown of sNPF receptors outside the MB causes deficits in appetitive memory. Altogether, these results suggest that sNPF is a functional neuromodulator released by Kenyon cells.
Collapse
|
7
|
Heuer CM, Kollmann M, Binzer M, Schachtner J. Neuropeptides in insect mushroom bodies. ARTHROPOD STRUCTURE & DEVELOPMENT 2012; 41:199-226. [PMID: 22401884 DOI: 10.1016/j.asd.2012.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2011] [Revised: 02/22/2012] [Accepted: 02/23/2012] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Owing to their experimental amenability, insect nervous systems continue to be in the foreground of investigations into information processing in - ostensibly - simple neuronal networks. Among the cerebral neuropil regions that hold a particular fascination for neurobiologists are the paired mushroom bodies, which, despite their function in other behavioral contexts, are most renowned for their role in learning and memory. The quest to understand the processes that underlie these capacities has been furthered by research focusing on unraveling neuroanatomical connections of the mushroom bodies and identifying key players that characterize the molecular machinery of mushroom body neurons. However, on a cellular level, communication between intrinsic and extrinsic mushroom body neurons still remains elusive. The present account aims to provide an overview on the repertoire of neuropeptides expressed in and utilized by mushroom body neurons. Existing data for a number of insect representatives is compiled and some open gaps in the record are filled by presenting additional original data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carsten M Heuer
- Philipps-University Marburg, Department of Biology, Animal Physiology, Marburg, Germany.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nässel DR. Neuropeptide signaling near and far: how localized and timed is the action of neuropeptides in brain circuits? INVERTEBRATE NEUROSCIENCE 2009; 9:57-75. [PMID: 19756790 DOI: 10.1007/s10158-009-0090-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2009] [Accepted: 08/24/2009] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Neuropeptide signaling is functionally very diverse and one and the same neuropeptide may act as a circulating neurohormone, as a locally released neuromodulator or even as a cotransmitter of classical fast-acting neurotransmitters. Thus, neuropeptides are produced by a huge variety of neuron types in different parts of the nervous system. Within the central nervous system (CNS) there are numerous types of peptidergic interneurons, some with strictly localized and patterned branching morphologies, others with widespread and diffuse arborizations. From morphology alone it is often difficult to predict the sphere of influence of a peptidergic interneuron, especially since it has been shown that neuropeptides can diffuse over tens of micrometers within neuropils, and that peptides probably are released exclusively in perisynaptic (or non-synaptic) regions. This review addresses some questions related to peptidergic signaling in the insect CNS. How diverse are the spatial relations between peptidergic neurons and their target neurons and what determines the sphere of functional influence? At one extreme there is volume transmission and at the other targeted cotransmission at synapses. Also temporal aspects of peptidergic signaling are of interest: how transient are peptidergic messages? Factors important for these spatial and temporal aspects of peptidergic signaling are proximity between release sites and cognate receptors, distribution of peptidase activity that can terminate peptide action and colocalization of other neuroactive compounds in the presynaptic peptidergic neuron (and corresponding receptors in target neurons). Other factors such as expression of different channel types, receptor inactivation mechanisms and second messenger systems probably also contribute to the diversity in temporal properties of peptide signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dick R Nässel
- Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|