Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and lipid-modifying therapy prescription patterns in the real world: An analysis of more than 33,000 high cardiovascular risk patients in Japan

Serum Lipoprotein(a) Levels and Their Association with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Japan

AIMS

To investigate the distribution of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and its association with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) in Japanese patients at high risk for ASCVD using a health insurance database.

METHODS

Between July 2013 and June 2021, patients eligible for ASCVD prevention according to the 2017 Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) guidelines with documented Lp(a) test results were extracted from the Medical Data Vision claims database and divided into three groups: primary prevention high-risk (Group I), secondary prevention (Group II) and secondary prevention high-risk (Group III). Data on lipid levels, cardiovascular morbidity risk factors and lipid-lowering treatments were extracted.

RESULTS

Of 700,580 patients with documented low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), 2,967 (0.42%) were tested for Lp(a). In 2,170 eligible patients, the median [interquartile range] serum concentration of Lp(a) was 13.9 [7.5-24.6] mg/dL, with 151 patients (7.0%) above the recommended risk threshold of ≥ 50 mg/dL. Lp(a) levels increased with risk across all prevention groups. Being in the highest Lp(a) quintile (Q5) was associated with an increased frequency of ASCVD (28.9% versus 18.9% in the lowest quintile (Q1) for unstable angina; 18.7% versus 10.1% for myocardial infarction; 27.9% versus 17.0% for ischemic stroke). In the secondary prevention groups, the proportion of patients meeting an LDL-C target of ＜70 mg/dL decreased from 30.2% in Q1 to 19.0% in Q5 for Group II and from 32.9% to 16.3% for Group III.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a high prevalence of Lp(a) ≥ 50mg/dL in Japanese patients at high risk for ASCVD, it found that the Lp(a) testing rate was very low.

Assessment of prescription pattern and impact of statin in lipid profile among ischemic heart disease patients

BACKGROUND

Analysis of prescription patterns and lipid profiles can play a crucial role in rational drug use and patient safety. This study aimed to analyze the prescription pattern and impact of statin in lipid profile among ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted for 7 months in the cardiology department. IHD patients above 18 years and undergoing statin therapy for at least 3 months were enrolled. Patients with elevated liver enzymes and unfit for statin therapy, pregnant women, psychiatry patients, and critically ill subjects were excluded.

RESULTS

Of the total participants, 214 (71.8%) were males and 84 (28.2%) were females, with a mean age of 62.55 ± 9.56 years. The most common age group diagnosed with IHD was between 60 and 69 years. Hypertension was observed in 64.4% of the patients, while diabetes was present in 55.7% as the most commonly associated comorbidities. The majority of patients (75.8%) received atorvastatin. The prescription pattern for various drug classes included proton pump inhibitors (93%), antiplatelet agents (82.2%), statins (82.2%), nitrates (60.4%), beta-blockers (34.6%), diuretics (16.8%), biguanides (17.4%), and insulin (15.1%). After 3 months of statin therapy, a statistically significant change was observed in the lipid profile (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Statin agents were the most frequently prescribed class of drugs, followed by antiplatelets. Significant improvements were observed in the lipid profile after a 3-month course of statin therapy. Effective therapeutic monitoring can significantly impact a positive health outcome in patients.

Long-term Efficacy and Safety of K-924 Pitavastatin/Ezetimibe Fixed-dose Combination in Patients with Hypercholesterolemia: A Phase III, Multi-center, Open-label Trial

AIM

Ezetimibe administration with ongoing statin therapy is an effective option for further lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Thus, we investigated the long-term efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination of pitavastatin/ezetimibe (K-924 LD: 2 mg/10 mg; K-924 HD: 4 mg/10 mg).

METHODS

We conducted a phase III, multicenter, open-label trial involving patients with hypercholesterolemia receiving pitavastatin (2 or 4 mg) who had not achieved their LDL-C management target. Patients were enrolled into the K-924 LD and HD groups based on whether they had received pitavastatin 2 and 4 mg, respectively, and treated for 52 weeks. K-924 was administered orally once daily. The primary objective was to examine the percent change in LDL-C from baseline at week 52 with last observation carried forward imputation (LOCF) in all patients.

RESULTS

Of the 109 patients evaluated, 62 and 47 were assigned to the K-924 LD and HD groups, respectively. In all patients, LDL-C decreased by -30.3±14.3% (p＜0.001) from baseline (134.4±37.9 mg/dL). Consequently, 91.8% and 37.5% of the patients for primary and secondary prevention reached their LDL-C management target, respectively. These results were consistent in both the K-924 LD and HD groups. In the safety analysis, a single adverse drug reaction occurred in a patient in the K-924 HD group.

CONCLUSION

After replacing pitavastatin monotherapy, K-924 was found to be effective and well-tolerated over 52 weeks. Thus, K-924 can contribute to intensifying LDL-C-lowering therapy without increasing the number of medications.

Achievement Rates for Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goals in Patients at High Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in a Real-World Setting in Japan

AIMS

The study aimed to investigate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal achievement rates in patients receiving LDL-C-lowering therapy using recent real-world data, following the 2017 revision of the Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases (JAS GL2017).

METHODS

Patients with documented LDL-C test results were extracted from the Medical Data Vision claims database between July 2018 and June 2021 and divided into three groups according to JAS GL2017: primary prevention high risk (Group I, LDL-C goal ＜120 mg/dL), secondary prevention (Group II, LDL-C goal ＜100 mg/dL), and secondary prevention high risk (Group III, LDL-C goal ＜70 mg/dL).

RESULTS

The mean LDL-C value was 108.7 mg/dL (n=125,235), 94.4 mg/dL (n=57,910), and 90.6 mg/dL (n=33,850) in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. Intensive statin monotherapy (pitavastatin, rosuvastatin, or atorvastatin) was the most frequently prescribed lipid-lowering treatment (21.6%, 30.8%, and 42.7% in Groups I, II, and III, respectively), followed by ezetimibe (2.5%, 7.1%, and 8.5% in Groups I, II, and III, respectively). LDL-C goals were achieved by 65.5%, 60.6%, and 25.4% of patients overall in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. Achievement rates were 83.9%, 75.3%, and 29.5% in patients prescribed intensive statin monotherapy and 82.3%, 86.4%, and 46.4% in those prescribed statin and ezetimibe combinations in Groups I, II, and III, respectively. In Group III, the proportion of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia prescribed statin and ezetimibe combinations achieving LDL-C goals was low (32.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of patients achieving LDL-C goals for secondary prevention in the high-risk group remains low even with statin and ezetimibe combination therapy.

Attainment of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Targets and Prescribing Pattern of Lipid-Lowering Medications among Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia Attending Specialist Clinics

AIMS

Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are known to have higher exposure to coronary risk than those without FH with similar low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level. Lipid-lowering medications (LLMs) are the mainstay treatments to lower the risk of premature coronary artery disease in patients with hypercholesterolemia. However, the LLM prescription pattern and its effectiveness among Malaysian patients with FH are not yet reported. The aim of this study was to report the LLM prescribing pattern and its effectiveness in lowering LDL-C level among Malaysian patients with FH treated in specialist hospitals.

METHODS

Subjects were recruited from lipid and cardiac specialist hospitals. FH was clinically diagnosed using the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Criteria. Patients' medical history was recorded using a standardized questionnaire. LLM prescription history and baseline LDL-C were acquired from the hospitals' database. Blood samples were acquired for the latest lipid profile assay.

RESULTS

A total of 206 patients with FH were recruited. Almost all of them were on LLMs (97.6%). Only 2.9% and 7.8% of the patients achieved the target LDL-C of ＜1.4 and ＜1.8 mmol/L, respectively. The majority of patients who achieved the target LDL-C were prescribed with statin-ezetimibe combination medications and high-intensity or moderate-intensity statins. All patients who were prescribed with ezetimibe monotherapy did not achieve the target LDL-C.

CONCLUSION

The majority of Malaysian patients with FH received LLMs, but only a small fraction achieved the therapeutic target LDL-C level. Further investigation has to be conducted to identify the cause of the suboptimal treatment target attainment, be it the factors of patients or the prescription practice.

Achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol targets in Chinese patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease after receiving statins and ezetimibe

Background

The importance of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk is strongly emphasized. If the LDL-C goals are not achieved with statin therapy, combination with ezetimibe is recommended. Studies revealed a substantial gap between obtained LDL-C levels and LDL-C target in ASCVD patients. However, little is known about the achievement of LDL-lowering treatment targets in ASCVD patients receiving ezetimibe in addition to statins.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective cohort study based on EHR data from the regional health information system of Yinzhou, an eastern coastal area of China. ASCVD Patients stratified as very high risk, taking both statin and ezetimibe for lipid control, and had at least one lipid test after ezetimibe initiation were included between January 2013 and July 2020. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the LDL-C values and target value (1.8 mmol/L according to the Chinese guideline, 1.4 mmol/L according to the European guideline) achievements. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore the influencing factors of target achievement rate.

Results

A total of 1,727 patients were included. The median follow-up time was 15.0 months. Taking 1.8 mmol/L as the target value, the achievement rates of LDL-C over the first 3 follow up years were 50.6, 31.3, and 30.3%, respectively. Taking 1.4 mmol/L as the target value, the achievement rates were 25.6, 15.5, and 16.5%, respectively. Multivariable analysis suggested that male patients (OR = 1.78, 95%CI: 1.27-2.49), combined use of atorvastatin or rosuvastatin with ezetimibe (vs other statins, OR = 4.64, 95% CI: 1.83-11.76), better medication adherence (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04) and smoking cessation (vs smoking, OR = 2.26, 95% CI: 1.27-4.02) were associated with a higher achievement rate, while baseline LDL-C level (OR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.41-0.56) and treatment course of statin before ezetimibe (OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89-0.98) were negatively associated with achievement rate.

Conclusion

Long-term follow-up data based on a Chinese regional database shows that in very high-risk ASCVD patients taking ezetimibe in addition to statins, achievement rate of LDL-lowering treatment targets is still low and far from satisfactory in real-world setting. More efforts are needed to achieve optimal LDL-C levels.

Lipid lowering therapy patterns and the risk of cardiovascular events in the 1-year after acute myocardial infarction in United Arab Emirates

Aim

In United Arab Emirates, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of mortality and 22% of CVD deaths are attributable to acute myocardial infarction (MI). Adherence to guidelines for lipid management is incompletely described in the Middle East. This study aimed to characterize lipid lowering therapy (LLT) patterns and the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events (CVEs) in the first year after MI.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study using the Dubai Real-World Claims Database, including all patients discharged with MI between January 01, 2015 and December 31, 2018, followed-up until December 31, 2019.

Results

In the first year after MI, 8.42% of 4,595 patients included experienced at least one recurrent MI (rate 6.77 events/100 person-years [PYs]), 2.94% had one revascularization (cumulative rate 0.55 events/100 PYs) and 2.66% had one hospitalization due to unstable angina (cumulative rate 5.16 new events/100 PYs). The majority (60.40%) of the patients presented with LDL-C levels ≥ 70 mg/dL after MI. In the first year after MI, 93.45% of the patients received LLT, mainly high-intensity statin (67.79%); with a minority of patients receiving statin + ezetimibe (4.55%), PCSK9i (0.20%) or ezetimibe alone (0.07%).

Conclusion

Patients hospitalized with MI in Dubai present an increased risk of CVEs in their first-year post-discharge. Majority of the patients presented with LDL-C levels above 70 mg/dL, which indicates suboptimal lipid control with existing LLT, particularly in high-risk patients.

The current status of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol for primary prevention of coronary artery disease in late-stage elderly persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A retrospective, single-center study

Aims/Introduction

The importance of low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease has recently been reported in the population aged ≥75 years with hypercholesterolemia. Therefore, the current status of LDL‐C management for primary prevention of coronary artery disease in patients aged ≥75 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus was investigated.

Materials and Methods

A total of 124 patients aged ≥75 years who had type 2 diabetes mellitus, but no coronary artery disease, were investigated. The patients' background characteristics, LDL‐C, glycemic status, ankle‐brachial index and cardio‐ankle vascular index were compared between patients taking and not taking LDL‐C‐lowering agents, such as hydroxymethylglutaryl‐CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) and ezetimibe. The details of the antihyperlipidemic and antidiabetic agents used in the present study were also examined.

Results

LDL‐C was significantly lower in patients taking LDL‐C‐lowering agents (LDLCLT[+]) than in patients not taking them (LDLCLT[−]), although LDL‐C was maintained <120 mg/dL in both groups (93.0 mg/dL vs 102.1 mg/dL). Approximately half of the cases in the LDLCLT(+) group received moderate‐intensity statins, with pitavastatin being the most prescribed statin. Glycated hemoglobin was significantly lower in the LDLCLT(+) group than in the LDLCLT(−) group (6.9% vs 7.3%). Sodium‐glucose transporter 2 inhibitors were more frequently used in the LDLCLT(+) group than in the LDLCLT(−) group. The ankle‐brachial index/cardio‐ankle vascular index did not differ between the groups.

Conclusion

Low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol was properly managed for primary prevention of coronary artery disease in patients aged ≥75 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus regardless of the presence or absence of LDL‐C‐lowering agents.

Lower levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol are associated with a lower prevalence of thin-cap fibroatheroma in statin-treated patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels with statins slows the progression of atherosclerotic plaques and reduces cardiovascular events. The 2019 European Society of Cardiology/European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines recommend absolute LDL-C treatment targets of <100 mg/dL, <70 mg/dL and <55 mg/dL according to coexisting patient risk factors.

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the difference in the plaque characteristics of coronary lesions associated with these LDL-C levels in statin-treated patients.

METHODS

A total of 685 consecutive statin-treated patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging of culprit lesions were enrolled. The characteristics of culprit plaques evaluated by OCT were compared among the high LDL-C group (≥100 mg/dL, n=247), the moderate LDL-C group (70-100 mg/dL, n=289), the low LDL-C group (55-70 mg/dL, n=106) and the very low LDL-C group (<55 mg/dL, n=43).

RESULTS

A significant trend toward a lower prevalence of thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA) associated with the LDL-C groups was observed (23.1, 18.3, 9.4 and 11.6%, respectively, in each group; p=0.002). A trend toward a lower prevalence of TCFAs associated with the LDL-C groups was also observed among patients with lower hemoglobin A1c (<6.2%; p=0.003). LDL-C <70 mg/dL (the low/very low group) was independently associated with the lack of TCFAs (odds ratio, 0.50; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.87, p=0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower LDL-C levels were associated with a lower prevalence of TCFAs in culprit plaques among statin-treated patients with CAD.

Attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals in statin treated patients: real-world evidence from Australia

OBJECTIVE

Little is known about the attainment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets in patients treated with statins in Australian primary healthcare setting that are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from electronic medical records of patients treated by general practitioners across Australia. LDL-C target attainment was defined as LDL-C levels ≤ 2 mmol/L for all risk groups, in line with Australian guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify the factors associated with LDL-C target attainment.

RESULTS

Overall, 61,407 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 65 years (± standard deviation [SD] 12.1); 52.0% were males.. Overall, the median LDL-C level was 2.3 mmol/L (IQR = 1.8 - 2.8) and 36.0% of the study population met therapeutic targets. Increased likelihood to achieve LDL-C targets was observed in patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.92 - 2.24), stroke (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.39 - 1.79, p< 0.001) or chronic heart disease (OR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.55 - 1.81, p<0.001). Patients diagnosed with dyslipidaemia (OR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.55 - 0.64, p < 0.001), hypertension (OR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.83 - 1.00, p< 0.05) and current smokers (OR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.71 - 1.00, p <0.05), were less likely to attain LDL-C targets, regardless of the type, intensity and length of use of the prescribed statin.

CONCLUSION

Longer duration and higher intensity statin were associated with more patients achieving targeted LDL-C goal, however nearly two thirds of Australians still failed to achieve targeted outcome even after 24 months of statin therapy.

Clinical Characteristics, Achievement of Secondary Prevention Goals, and Outcomes of Patients with Recurrent Acute Coronary Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Because development of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) worsens the prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease, preventing recurrent ACS is crucial. However, the degree to which secondary prevention treatment goals are achieved in patients with recurrent ACS is unknown.

METHODS

214 consecutive ACS patients were classified as having First ACS (n=182) or Recurrent ACS (n=32), and the clinical characteristics of these groups were compared. Fifteen patients died or developed cardiovascular (CV) events during hospitalization, and the remaining 199 patients were followed from the date of hospital discharge to evaluate subsequent CV events.

RESULTS

Patients in the Recurrent ACS group were older than those in the First ACS group (76.8±10.8 years vs 68.8±13.4 years, p=0.002) and had a higher rate of diabetes mellitus (DM) (65.6% vs 36.8%, p=0.003). The rate of achieving a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level of <70 mg/dL in the Recurrent ACS group was only 28.1%, even though 68.8% of these patients were taking statins. An HbA1c level of <7.0% was achieved in 66.7% of patients with recurrent ACS who had been diagnosed with DM. Overall, 12.5% of patients with recurrent ACS had received optimal treatment for secondary prevention. CV events after hospital discharge were noted in 37.9% of the Recurrent ACS group and 21.2% of the First ACS group (log-rank test: p=0.004). However, recurrent ACS was not an independent risk factor for CV events (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.09, 95% confidence interval: 0.95 to 4.63, p=0.068).

CONCLUSION

Optimal treatment for secondary prevention was not achieved in some patients with recurrent ACS, and achievement of the guideline-recommended LDL-C goal for secondary prevention was especially low in this population.

Lipid-lowering and anti-thrombotic therapy in patients with peripheral arterial disease: European Atherosclerosis Society/European Society of Vascular Medicine Joint Statement

Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are at very high risk of cardiovascular events, but risk factor management is usually suboptimal. This Joint Task Force from the European Atherosclerosis Society and the European Society of Vascular Medicine has updated evidence on the management on dyslipidaemia and thrombotic factors in patients with PAD. Guidelines recommend a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) goal of more than 50% reduction from baseline and <1.4 mmol/L (<55 mg/dL) in PAD patients. As demonstrated by randomized controlled trials, lowering LDL-C not only reduces cardiovascular events but also major adverse limb events (MALE), including amputations, of the order of 25%. Addition of ezetimibe or a PCSK9 inhibitor further decreases the risk of cardiovascular events, and PCSK9 inhibition has also been associated with reduction in the risk of MALE by up to 40%. Furthermore, statin-based treatment improved walking performance, including maximum walking distance, and pain-free walking distance and duration. This Task Force recommends strategies for managing statin-associated muscle symptoms to ensure that PAD patients benefit from lipid-lowering therapy. Antiplatelet therapy, either daily clopidogrel 75 mg or the combination of aspirin 100 mg and rivaroxaban (2 × 2.5 mg) is also indicated to prevent cardiovascular events. Dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and rivaroxaban) may be considered following revascularization, taking into account bleeding risk. This Joint Task Force believes that adherence with these recommendations for lipid-lowering and antithrombotic therapy will improve the morbidity and mortality in patients with PAD.

Lipid-lowering and anti-thrombotic therapy in patients with peripheral arterial disease

Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are at very high risk of cardiovascular events, but risk factor management is usually suboptimal. This Joint Task Force from the European Atherosclerosis Society and the European Society of Vascular Medicine has updated evidence on the management on dyslipidaemia and thrombotic factors in patients with PAD. Guidelines recommend a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLC) goal of more than 50% reduction from baseline and <1.4 mmol/L (<55 mg/dL) in PAD patients. As demonstrated by randomized controlled trials, lowering LDL-C not only reduces cardiovascular events but also major adverse limb events (MALE), including amputations, of the order of 25%. Addition of ezetimibe or a PCSK9 inhibitor further decreases the risk of cardiovascular events, and PCSK9 inhibition has also been associated with reduction in the risk of MALE by up to 40%. Furthermore, statin- based treatment improved walking performance, including maximum walking distance, and pain-free walking distance and duration. This Task Force recommends strategies for managing statin-associated muscle symptoms to ensure that PAD patients benefit from lipid-lowering therapy. Antiplatelet therapy, either daily clopidogrel 75 mg or the combination of aspirin 100 mg and rivaroxaban (2×2.5 mg) is also indicated to prevent cardiovascular events. Dual pathway inhibition (aspirin and rivaroxaban) may be considered following revascularization, taking into account bleeding risk. This Joint Task Force believes that adherence with these recommendations for lipid-lowering and antithrombotic therapy will improve the morbidity and mortality in patients with PAD.

Guideline-directed low-density lipoprotein management in high-risk ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack admissions in China from 2015 to 2019

Background

Lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is crucial for secondary stroke prevention in stroke patients with preexisting cardiovascular diseases (CVD) or cerebrovascular diseases (CeVD). However, data on attainment of guideline-recommended LDL-C levels are lacking.

Methods

We analyzed data from the Chinese Stroke Center Alliance (CSCA) program for patients with ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) hospitalized between August 2015 and July 2019. Participants were classified into different disease groups according to preexisting CeVD (stroke/TIA) or CVD [coronary heart disease (CHD) or myocardial infarction (MI)].

Results

Of 858,509 patients presenting with an acute stroke/TIA, 251,176 (29.3%) had a preexisting CeVD, 44,158 (5.1%) had preexisting CVD, 33,070 (3.9%) had concomitant preexisting CeVD and CVD, and 530,105 (61.7%) had no documented history of CeVD/CVD. Overall, only 397,596 (46.3%) met the target for LDL-C <2.6 mmol/L, 128,177 (14.9%) for LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L and 55,275 (6.4%) for LDL-C <1.4 mmol/L, and patients with concomitant CeVD and CVD had higher attainment rates than other disease groups (P<0.001). Despite improvements over time in the proportion of patients who attain LDL-C targets (P for trend <0.05), it remains suboptimal. Younger age, women, having a history of hypertension or dyslipidemia, current smoking or drinking, and being admitted to hospitals located in eastern China were associated with lower odds of meeting the LDL-C goals.

Conclusions

Overall attainment of guideline LDL-C targets in a population of stroke/TIA patients is low and indicates the need for better management of dyslipidemia, particularly for high-risk stroke patients with pre-existing CeVD or CVD.

Changes in the Penetration Rate of Biosimilar Infliximab Within Japan Using a Japanese Claims Database

Purpose

Infliximab, which was approved in 2002, had its first biosimilar launched in 2014 across Japan. However, the penetration rate of this biosimilar remains unclear given the limited data regarding its current clinical use throughout Japan. This study was conducted to describe the current clinical characteristics of patients receiving infliximab and the penetration rate of the reference infliximab and/or biosimilar infliximab using a Japanese administrative claims database.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective, descriptive study utilized the Japan Medical Data Vision database, a nationwide hospital-based database. Data on patients receiving infliximab recorded from April 2008 to March 2019 were extracted from the database. Patient characteristics of the reference and biosimilar infliximab groups and penetration rates according to fiscal year, target diseases diagnosis, and subsidy for intractable diseases were examined.

Results

A total of 9735 patients were extracted for analysis, among whom 92% (n=8950) and 8% (n=785) received only reference infliximab and its biosimilar, respectively. Both groups exhibited similar clinical characteristics. The biosimilar penetration rate increased from 0.8% in 2014 to 22.5% in 2018, with overall penetration rates throughout the period according to diagnosis (with or without subsidy) being 14.4% (with, 4.1%; without, 16.4%), 4.7% (with, 3.7%; without, 10.6%), 5.7% (with, 4.5%; without, 13.5%), and 7.5% (with, 4.4%; without, 8.2%) for rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, and psoriasis, respectively.

Conclusion

Biosimilar infliximab is prescribed for patients with similar characteristics to reference infliximab. Despite the increasing penetration rates according to target disease, they remain much lower among patients receiving subsidy for intractable disease than among those who do not.

Echolucency of carotid plaque is useful for selecting high-risk patients with chronic coronary artery disease who benefit from intensive lipid-lowering therapy

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound assessment of the carotid artery provides prognostic information on coronary events. This study examined whether ultrasound assessments of plaque echolucency of the carotid artery are useful for identifying patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) who are at high risk but could benefit from lipid-lowering therapy for secondary prevention.

METHODS

Ultrasound assessment of carotid plaque echolucency with integrated backscatter (IBS) analysis was performed in 393 chronic CAD patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels <100 mg/dL on statin therapy. All patients were prospectively followed up for a maximum of 96 months or until the occurrence of one of the following coronary events: cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unstable angina pectoris requiring unplanned revascularization.

RESULTS

During the follow-up period, 45 coronary events occurred. Patients were stratified by IBS (≤-16.3 or >-16.3 dB, median value) and LDL-C level (<70 or 70-99 mg/dL). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that patients with lower IBS and LDL-C 70-99 mg/dL had significantly higher probabilities of coronary events compared with those with higher IBS and LDL-C <70 mg/dL, after adjustment for a baseline model of risk factors (hazard ratio 5.15; 95% confidence interval 1.21-22.0, p = 0.03). In contrast, patients with lower IBS and LDL-C <70 mg/dL had an improved prognosis comparable with those with higher IBS. Addition of LDL-C levels to the baseline model of risk factors improved net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) in patients with lower IBS (NRI, 0.44, p = 0.04; and IDI, 0.035, p < 0.01), but not in those with higher IBS.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of echolucency of the carotid artery was useful for selecting CAD patients at high risk of secondary coronary events but who could benefit from lipid-lowering therapy.

A randomized, open-label, parallel, multi-center Phase IV study to compare the efficacy and safety of atorvastatin 10 and 20 mg in high-risk Asian patients with hypercholesterolemia

Background

Although accumulating evidence suggests a more extensive reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), it is unclear whether a higher statin dose is more effective and cost-effective in the Asian population. This study compared the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of atorvastatin 20 and 10 mg in high-risk Asian patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Methods

A 12-week, open-label, parallel, multicenter, Phase IV randomized controlled trial was conducted at ten hospitals in the Republic of Korea between October 2017 and May 2019. High-risk patients with hypercholesterolemia, defined according to 2015 Korean guidelines for dyslipidemia management, were eligible to participate. We randomly assigned 250 patients at risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease to receive 20 mg (n = 124) or 10 mg (n = 126) of atorvastatin. The primary endpoint was the difference in the mean percentage change in LDL-C levels from baseline after 12 weeks. Cost-effectiveness was measured as an exploratory endpoint.

Results

LDL-C levels were reduced more significantly by atorvastatin 20 mg than by 10 mg after 12 weeks (42.4% vs. 33.5%, p < 0.0001). Significantly more patients achieved target LDL-C levels (<100 mg/dL for high-risk patients, <70 mg/dL for very high-risk patients) with atorvastatin 20 mg than with 10 mg (40.3% vs. 25.6%, p < 0.05). Apolipoprotein B decreased significantly with atorvastatin 20mg versus 10 mg (−36.2% vs. −29.9%, p < 0.05). Lipid ratios also showed greater improvement with atorvastatin 20 mg than with 10 mg (total cholesterol/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, −33.3% vs. −29.4%, p < 0.05; apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1 ratio, −36.7% vs. −31.4%, p < 0.05). Atorvastatin 20 mg was more cost-effective than atorvastatin 10 mg in terms of both the average and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Safety and tolerability of atorvastatin 20 mg were comparable to those of atorvastatin 10 mg.

Conclusion

In high-risk Asian patients with hypercholesterolemia, atorvastatin 20 mg was both efficacious in reducing LDL-C and cost-effective compared with atorvastatin 10 mg.

Improved lipid target level attainment in patients with peripheral artery disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) fall under the category of a very high cardiovascular risk. Although, consequent lipid lowering therapy (LLT) is advised, only sparse data on attained target level in PAD exists.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to analyse contemporary guideline recommendations for LLT in symptomatic PAD patients.

METHODS

monocentric, prospective, observational study involving 200 symptomatic PAD patients. Guideline target level attainment and LLT were analysed between 2017 and 2019.

RESULTS

Overall 78.5% of the patients were on statin therapy, mainly of high intensity with atorvastatin in 50% and rosuvastatin in 33% of the cases. Average statin dosage adjusted for simvastatin was 55 mg/d. Low density lipoproteincholesterol (LDL-C) was <1.8 mmol/L in 53% and <1.4 mmol/L in 34% of the cases. Mean LDL-C levels were at 1.85 ± 0.88 mmol/L. We observed no difference in the treatment and the target level attainment of patients with a stable PAD (intermittent claudication) or chronic critical PAD. However, patients with ≥1 vascular region affected (i.e. coronary and/or cerebrovascular) were treated more intensively and had lower LDL-C levels than patients with PAD alone.

CONCLUSION

It appears that there is more awareness and improvement of previously documented undertreatment of LDL-C levels in symptomatic PAD patients. Although statin treatment is initiated in the majority of patients, our findings call for a continuously intensified LLT in symptomatic PAD patients.

Effects of Phase II Comprehensive Cardiac Rehabilitation on Risk Factor Modification and Exercise Capacity in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome ― Results From the JACR Registry ―

Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is categorized as a Class I recommendation in guidelines for the management of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS); however, nationwide studies on CR in patients with ACS remain limited in Japan.

Methods and Results: The Japanese Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation (JACR) Registry is a nationwide, real-world database for patients participating in CR. From the JACR Registry database, we analyzed 924 patients participating in Phase II CR in 7 hospitals between September 2014 and December 2016. The mean age of patients was 65.9±12.0 years, and 80% were male. The prevalence of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI (NSTEMI), and unstable angina pectoris (UAP) was 58%, 9%, and 33%, respectively. The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, current smoking, and a family history was 55%, 27%, 67%, 21%, and 10%, respectively. Among the entire CR cohort at baseline, 96%, 78%, and 92% were treated with aspirin, β-blockers, and statins, respectively. After CR, the values of body mass index, the lipid profile, and exercise capacity significantly improved in the STEMI, NSTEMI and UAP groups.

Conclusions: In the JACR Registry, a high rate of guideline-recommended medications at baseline and improvements in both coronary risk factors and exercise capacity after CR were observed in patients with ACS.

Utilization of statins and LDL-cholesterol target attainment in Turkish patients with type 2 diabetes - a nationwide cross-sectional study (TEMD dyslipidemia study)

BACKGROUND

Attaining acceptable levels of LDL Cholesterol (LDL-C) significantly improves cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The LDL-C target attainment and the characteristics of patients attaining these targets were investigated in this study. Furthermore, the reasons for not choosing statins and the physicians' attitudes on the treatment of diabetic dyslipidemia were also examined.

METHODS

A nationwide, cross-sectional survey was conducted in tertiary centers for diabetes management. Adult patients with T2DM, who were under follow-up for at least a year in outpatient clinics, were consecutively enrolled for the study. LDL-C goals were defined as below 70 mg/dL for patients with macrovascular complications or diabetic nephropathy, and below 100 mg/dL for other patients. Data about lipid-lowering medications were self-reported.

RESULTS

A total of 4504 patients (female: 58.6%) were enrolled for the study. The mean HbA1c and diabetes duration was 7.73 ± 1.74% and 10.9 ± 7.5 years, respectively. The need for statin treatment was 94.9% (n = 4262); however, only 42.4% (n = 1807) of these patients were under treatment, and only 24.8% (n = 448) of these patients achieved LDL-C targets. The main reason for statin discontinuation was negative media coverage (87.5%), while only a minority of patients (12.5%) mentioned side effects. Physicians initiated lipid-lowering therapy in only 20.3% of patients with high LDL-C levels. It was observed that the female gender was a significant independent predictor of not attaining LDL-C goals (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59-0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Less than 50 % of patients with T2DM who need statins were under treatment, and only a quarter of them attained their LDL-C targets. There exists a significant gap between the guideline recommendations and the real-world evidence in the treatment of dyslipidemia in T2DM.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a strong predictor of LDL cholesterol target achievement in patients with peripheral artery disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at a very high risk of cardiovascular events and strongly benefit from lowering LDL cholesterol (LDL-C); updated European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend an LDL-C target of at least <55 mg/dl for these patients. Whether the presence of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) affects LDL-C target achievement in PAD patients is unknown and is addressed in the present study.

METHODS

We investigated an unselected consecutive series of 319 patients with sonographically proven PAD, of whom 136 (42.6%) had T2DM.

RESULTS

The LDL-C target of <55 mg/dl was met by 8.1% of T2DM patients and by 2.2% of non-diabetic patients (p = 0.014); LDL-C was <70 mg/dl in 22.8% of patients with T2DM and in 9.8% of non-diabetic patients (p = 0.002). Logistic regression analysis showed that the presence of T2DM was an independent and strong predictor of LDL-C target achievement after multivariate adjustment including age, gender, potency adjusted statin use, BMI, smoking, hypertension and other lipid-modifying therapy for the <55 mg/dl target (OR 3.58 [1.08-11.90]; p = 0.038) as well as for the <70 mg/dl target (OR 2.78 [1.40-5.35]; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that T2DM is a strong and independent predictor of LDL-C target achievement among PAD patients; however, also among PAD patients with T2DM only a minority meets the current target of <55 mg/dl and most patients do not even have an LDL-C < 70 mg/dl.

Effects of PCSK9 Inhibitor on Favorable Limb Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of evolocumab on favorable limb events in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).

Methods: A single-center, prospective observational study was performed on 30 patients with CLTI. The subjects were divided into 2 groups based on evolocumab administration: evolocumab-treated (E) group ( n =14) and evolocumab non-treated (non-E) group ( n =16). The primary outcome was 12-month freedom from major amputation. The secondary outcomes were 12-month amputation-free survival (AFS), overall survival (OS), and wound-free limb salvage. The mean follow-up period was 18±11 months.

Results: No significant difference was detected between the two groups for the 12-month freedom from major amputation (log-rank p =0.15), while the 12-month AFS rate was significantly higher in the E group than that in the non-E group (log-rank p =0.02). The 12-month OS rate in the E group was shown a tendency for improvement, as compared with that in the non-E group (log-rank p =0.056). Evolocumab administration was not associated with a significant change in freedom from major amputation (HR, 0.23, 95% CI, 0.03-2.07, p =0.19). However, evolocumab administration was related to a tendency for improvement of AFS and OS (HR, 0.13, 95% CI, 0.02-1.06, p =0.056; HR, 0.16, 95% CI, 0.02-1.37, p =0.09, respectively). Moreover, The E group had a higher proportion of wound-free limb salvage at 12 months (92% vs. 42%, p =0.03).

Conclusion: Evolocumab administration was associated with a better AFS outcome in patients with CLTI. Long-term administration of evolocumab over 12 months contributed to improving proportion of wound-free limb salvage.

Impact of intensively lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol on deferred lesion prognosis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of intensively lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level on the deferred lesion prognosis after revascularization deferral based on fractional flow reserve (FFR).

BACKGROUND

Lowering LDL-C is associated with lower cardiovascular event rate, but its benefit on the deferred lesion prognosis has not been well evaluated.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center, observational study analyzed 192 deferred lesions with FFR value >0.80 in 192 patients with stable coronary artery disease. According to the first follow-up LDL-C level, they were assigned to the LOW group (<70 mg/dL) or the HIGH group (≥70 mg/dL). Deferred lesion failure (DLF) was defined as the composite of deferred lesion revascularization and deferred vessel myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

Of all participants, 61 and 131 patients were assigned to the LOW and the HIGH group, respectively. During the median follow-up of 2.8 years, DLF occurred in 1 and 14 patients in the LOW group and the HIGH group (1.6% and 10.7%, log-rank p = .043), respectively. The incidence of any unplanned revascularization was also significantly lower in the LOW group than in the HIGH group (3.3% vs. 14.5%, log-rank p = .032).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of DLF was significantly lower in the patients with LDL-C < 70 mg/dL than in those with LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL at the first follow-up after FFR-based deferral of revascularization.

Blood Metabolite Signature of Metabolic Syndrome Implicates Alterations in Amino Acid Metabolism: Findings from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA) and the Tsuruoka Metabolomics Cohort Study (TMCS)

Rapid lifestyle and dietary changes have contributed to a rise in the global prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS), which presents a potential healthcare crisis, owing to its association with an increased burden of multiple cardiovascular and neurological diseases. Prior work has identified the role that genetic, lifestyle, and environmental factors can play in the prevalence of MetS. Metabolomics is an important tool to study alterations in biochemical pathways intrinsic to the pathophysiology of MetS. We undertook a metabolomic study of MetS in serum samples from two ethnically distinct, well-characterized cohorts-the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (BLSA) from the U.S. and the Tsuruoka Metabolomics Cohort Study (TMCS) from Japan. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify metabolites that were associated with MetS in both cohorts. Among the top 25 most significant (lowest p-value) metabolite associations with MetS in each cohort, we identified 18 metabolites that were shared between TMCS and BLSA, the majority of which were classified as amino acids. These associations implicate multiple biochemical pathways in MetS, including branched-chain amino acid metabolism, glutathione production, aromatic amino acid metabolism, gluconeogenesis, and the tricarboxylic acid cycle. Our results suggest that fundamental alterations in amino acid metabolism may be central features of MetS.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol treatment and outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease: Insights from TECOS

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients are at increased risk for cardiovascular (CV) events. Most guidelines recommend treating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels to ≤70 mg/dL (1.8 mM) for patients with T2D and established atherosclerotic CV disease, and some a more aggressive target of ≤55 mg/dL (1.4 mM). Our objective was to assess the degree to which these LDL-C targets are achieved in routine practice.

METHODS

Using data from TECOS, an international pragmatic CV outcomes trial of sitagliptin vs placebo, we assessed lipid-lowering treatment among patients with T2D and CV disease, baseline lipid values, and the association between baseline LDL-C and 5-year risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE; ie, CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke).

RESULTS

Overall, 11,066 of 14,671 TECOS participants (75.4%) had LDL-C measured at baseline. Median age was 65 years, 72% were male, and median T2D duration was 10 years. Overall, 82.5% of patients were on statins; only 5.8% were on ezetimibe. At baseline, 14.3% had LDL-C ≤55 mg/dL, 18.4% between 55.1 and 70 mg/dL, 35% between 70.1 and 100 mg/dL, and 32.3% >100 mg/dL. Each 10 mg/dL higher LDL-C value was associated with a higher risk of MACE (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.07) or CV death (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Although most high-risk patients with T2D and CV disease were on lipid-lowering therapy, only 1:3 had LDL-C <70 mg/dL and 1:6 had LDL-C <55 mg/dL. Each 10 mg/dL higher LDL-C value was associated with a 5% and 6% higher 5-year incidence of MACE and CV death, respectively. (TECOS, NCT00790205).

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal attainment rates in high-risk patients with cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus in Korea: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Real-world evidence of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment rates for Asian patients is deficient. The objective of this study was to assess the status of dyslipidemia management, especially in high-risk patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) including stroke and acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 514,866 subjects from the National Health Insurance Service-National Health Screening Cohort database in Korea. Participants were followed up from 2002 to 2015. Subjects with a high-risk of CVD prior to LDL-C measurement and subjects who were newly-diagnosed for high-risk of CVD following LDL-C measurement were defined as known high-risk patients (n = 224,837) and newly defined high-risk patients (n = 127,559), respectively. Data were analyzed by disease status: stroke, ACS, coronary heart disease (CHD), peripheral artery disease (PAD), diabetes mellitus (DM) and atherosclerotic artery disease (AAD).

RESULTS

Overall, less than 50% of patients in each disease category achieved LDL-C goals (LDL-C < 70 mg/dL in patients with stroke, ACS, CHD and PAD; and LDL-C < 100 mg/dL in patients with DM and AAD). Statin use was observed in relatively low proportions of subjects (21.5% [known high-risk], 34.4% [newly defined high-risk]). LDL-C goal attainment from 2009 to 2015 steadily increased but the goal-achiever proportion of newly defined high-risk patients with ACS remained reasonably constant (38.7% in 2009; 38.1% in 2015).

CONCLUSIONS

LDL-C goal attainment rates in high-risk patients with CVD and DM in Korea demonstrate unmet medical needs. Proactive management is necessary to bridge the gap between the recommendations of clinical guidelines and actual clinical practice.

Association between Prescription and Control Status of Dyslipidemia and Hypertension among Japanese Patients with Diabetes

Aims: The proper management of atherosclerotic risk factors (ARFs) and attainment of target levels (TLs) for ARFs are crucial in preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). In this study, utilizing data from the “Specific Health Check and Guidance in Japan,” which was conducted from 2008 to 2011, we examined TL attainment status of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and blood pressure (BP) and prescription status of dyslipidemia and hypertension in patients with diabetes undergoing medical treatment, and analyzed the factors that affected prescription status.

Methods: Subjects receiving medical treatment for diabetes were selected from the database. Subjects were classified by prescription status for dyslipidemia and hypertension, and TL attainment status was assessed for each ARF.

Results: The percentage of subjects who did not attain TLs and were not under medication was higher for LDL-C than for BP. The un-prescribed rates among non-TL-attained subjects were 60%–75% for LDL-C, and around 30%–40% for BP. The un-prescribed rates to those who were qualified for prescription therapy were also higher for LDL-C than for BP. Logistic regression analyses revealed that the subjects who were prescribed for dyslipidemia had the following characteristics compared with the un-prescribed non-TL-attained subjects: older age, higher body mass index, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, previous heart or cerebrovascular disease, and higher medication rate for other ARFs.

Conclusions: The present study revealed that, in Japan, the adequate prescription rate for dyslipidemia was lower than that for hypertension in patients with diabetes, suggesting the proper prescription therapy for dyslipidemia should be pursued to further prevent ASCVD.

Drug Treatment of Hyperlipidemia in Chinese Patients: Focus on the Use of Simvastatin and Ezetimibe Alone and in Combination

Elevated serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a major risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). Many guidelines recommend LDL-C as a primary treatment target, and statins represent the cornerstone of treatment for lipid management. Recently revised guidelines recommend even more intense management of LDL-C, especially in patients at moderate and high risk. However, LDL-C levels in the Chinese population differ from those in Western populations, and the benefits and safety of the maximum allowable dose of statins have yet to be determined. Furthermore, in practice, many patients do not achieve the increasingly stringent LDL-C goals. Consequently, alternative approaches to lipid management are required. Combination therapy with ezetimibe and a statin, which have complementary mechanisms of action, is more effective than statin monotherapies, even at high doses. Several clinical studies have consistently shown that combination therapy with ezetimibe and simvastatin lowers LDL-C more potently than statin monotherapies. Moreover, the safety and tolerability profile of the combination therapy appears to be similar to that of low-dose statin monotherapies. This review discusses the role of simvastatin in combination with ezetimibe in controlling dyslipidemia in Chinese patients, particularly the efficacy and safety of combination therapy in light of recently published clinical data.

12-Week Effectiveness and Safety of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol-Lowering Therapy by Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibition in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Hypercholesterolemia - Data From a Real-World Observational Study of Evolocumab in Japan

Background: Evolocumab is the first monoclonal antibody against proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) approved in Japan for the treatment of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and hypercholesterolemia (HC). This study assessed the 12-week effectiveness and safety of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering therapy by PCSK9 inhibition in patients with FH (homozygous [HoFH] or heterozygous [HeFH]) and HC by analyzing evolocumab data collected in the real-world setting in Japan.

Methods and Results: Overall, 427 patients (mean±SD age, 61.6±13.8 years; female, 38.4%; 28 HoFH, 320 HeFH, 79 HC), enrolled from 299 clinical sites, were included in the safety analysis set. The major cardiovascular risk factors were coronary artery disease (77.3%), diabetes mellitus/impaired glucose tolerance (38.6%), and hypertension (65.1%). Median follow-up duration was 85.0 days. After 12 weeks of evolocumab treatment, the mean±SD percent change from baseline in LDL-C was −45.5%±27.0% (n=23) in HoFH (P<0.001 vs. baseline; t-test), −54.2%±29.0% (n=280) in HeFH (P<0.001), and −64.6%±22.4% (n=72) in HC (P<0.001) patients. The incidence of adverse drug reactions was 5.4% (23/427).

Conclusions: Results suggest that patients receiving evolocumab treatment in the real-world setting were predominantly those with FH and HC in the secondary prevention group. LDL-C-lowering effectiveness with evolocumab was observed in FH (both HoFH and HeFH) and HC patients.

Risk factors affecting the failed low-density lipoprotein level achievement rate in working-age male population at high cardiovascular risk

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to clarify the low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-C level achievement rate and detect factors affecting the failed LDL-C achievement rate in patients treated with statins and anti-platelet agents using a large insurance claim database and health check-up data.

METHODS

Access to a large health insurance claims database, and health check-up data were obtained from Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) Co. Ltd., Tokyo. The database was searched to identify employed working-age male patients who had started treatment with statin and anti-platelet drugs for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events. These patients were enrolled in the retrospective cohort study, which included screening at 3 months and observation for 3 years. LDL-C levels were obtained from the annual health check-up data. The achievement rate for LDL-C < 100 was assessed for three consecutive years. Adherence was assessed using the proportion of days covered (PDC) for the statin, which was calculated from prescription data over a 3-year period.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Overall, 294 patients (male/female, 294/0; age, 47.8 ± 6.0 years; body mass index, 24.8 ± 4.2 kg/m² ; hypertension, 76.2%; and diabetes mellitus, 20.4%) were included. The LDL-C achievement rate for three consecutive years after starting treatment with statin and aspirin was 49.7%, 51.4% and 45.9%, respectively. Factors affecting failed LDL-C on adjusted odds were lower adherence to PDC [0.96 (0.94-0.99), P < 0.001, 1% increase] and higher baseline LDL-C [1.01 (1.00-1.02), P = 0.037, 1 mg/dL increase].

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that in the working-age male population need to improve statin adherence, especially those with higher baseline LDL-C levels.

Cultural Barriers in the Treatment of Dyslipidemia: A Survey of Japanese Physician Attitudes

Aims: To gain a more accurate understanding of the current real-world management of dyslipidemia in Japan, an online survey was conducted in a variety of physicians from five medical fields.

Methods: A web-based survey with online questionnaire was designed, and members of an on-line information service for physicians were invited to participate. The survey enrolled 500 physicians, 100 in each of five categories: cardiology; diabetes, metabolism and endocrinology; neurology/neurosurgery/stroke medicine; general internal medicine (hospitals ≥ 20 beds), and general internal medicine (self-employed practitioners at clinics or small hospitals ≤ 19 beds).

Results: Regardless of their specialties, most physicians recognized high low density lipoprotein cholesterol level as an important risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Physicians with expertise in cardiology, diabetes, metabolism and endocrinology were most in favor of drug-based cholesterol lowering. Specialists in neurology/neurosurgery/stroke medicine and in general internal medicine were more concerned about statin safety and aggressive lipid-lowering therapy than those in cardiology and diabetes, metabolism and endocrinology, and tended to treat fewer patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Especially, those in general internal medicine (self-employed practitioners at clinics or small hospitals ≤ 19 beds) made less use of techniques for diagnosing FH.

Conclusions: Awareness of target values for lipid management and of adverse reactions to drug therapy appears to vary somewhat depending on the participant's medical specialty. We also found that FH is probably underdiagnosed in Japan today. Further educations on proper diagnosis and management of dyslipidemia are required for physicians who are not specialized in cardiovascular health.

Co-insurance and health care utilization in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a discontinuity regression approach

Background

Co-insurance rates in Japan decrease when patients turn 70 years of age. We aim to compare changes in medical demand for Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at age 70 prior to 2014, when there was a reduction in co-insurance rates from 30 to 10%, with changes in medical demand at age 70 after 2014 when co-insurance rates decreased from 30% to only 20%.

Methods

We used administrative data from large Japanese hospitals. We employed a discontinuity regression (RD) approach to control for unobserved endogeneity in the data.

Results

We identified a total of 7343 patients with RA, 4905 (67%) turned age 70 before April, and found that a 20% decrease in co-insurance was associated with increased utilization of more expensive biologic RA drugs, more outpatient visits and higher total medical costs. However, a 10% decrease in co-insurance for patients who turned 70 after 2014 did not significantly change demand for medical services.

Conclusions

For the younger cohort, we did not observe any changes in medical demand after a price decrease. We therefore conclude that the economic goal of cost sharing, namely a behavioural change towards lower health-care utilization, is not achieved in this particular cohort of chronic patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12939-019-0920-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Adherence and persistence to hyperlipidemia medications in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and those with diabetes mellitus based on administrative claims data in Japan

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Real-world data on treatment patterns in Japanese hyperlipidemia patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) or prior atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) are lacking.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, longitudinal cohort analysis of administrative claims data (Japan Medical Data Center [JMDC] and Medical Data Vision [MDV] databases) for patients prescribed a new hyperlipidemia medication between 2014 and 2015. Patients were followed for ≥12 months. Outcomes included prescribing patterns, persistence (discontinuations), and adherence (proportion of days covered).

RESULTS

Data were analyzed for 11,718 and 27,746 DM, and 4101 and 14,356 ASCVD patients from the JMDC and MDV databases, respectively. Among previously-untreated patients, index prescriptions were primarily for moderate statins in the DM (JMDC: 74.7%, MDV: 77.5%) and ASCVD (JMDC: 75.4%, MDV: 78.5%) sub-cohorts. Combinations were rarely prescribed (≤2.5%). Previously-treated patients were most frequently prescribed combinations in the DM (JMDC: 46.7%, MDV: 53.6%) and ASCVD (JMDC: 49.3%, MDV: 53.3%) sub-cohorts. Intensive statins were rarely used by previously-untreated (≤1%) or previously-treated (≤8%) patients in either sub-cohort. Approximately half of previously-untreated patients discontinued hyperlipidemia therapy within 12 months. Adherence was ≥80% across most drug classes.

CONCLUSIONS

Many Japanese hyperlipidemia patients with DM or ASCVD are prescribed single-agent lipid-lowering therapy. Use of intensive therapy is lower than expected, and is suggestive of under-treatment. The low persistence rates are concerning, and warrant further study.

Efficacy and safety of alirocumab 150mg every 4 weeks in hypercholesterolemic patients on non-statin lipid-lowering therapy or lowest strength dose of statin: ODYSSEY NIPPON

BACKGROUND

Alirocumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, given every 2 weeks (Q2W), significantly reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels in Japanese hypercholesterolemic patients on background statin. We evaluated alirocumab 150mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) in patients on lowest-dose statin or non-statin lipid-lowering therapy (LLT).

METHODS

ODYSSEY NIPPON was a double-blind study conducted in Japanese patients with LDL-C ≥100mg/dL (heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia or non-familial hypercholesterolemia with coronary heart disease) or ≥120mg/dL (non-familial hypercholesterolemia, Japan Atherosclerosis Society category III) on atorvastatin 5mg/day or non-statin LLT. Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to subcutaneous alirocumab 150mg Q4W, alirocumab 150mg Q2W, or placebo for the 12-week double-blind treatment period (DBTP), followed by a 52-week open-label treatment period (OLTP). At entry into the OLTP, patients received alirocumab 150mg Q4W, with possible up-titration to 150mg Q2W at Week 24.

RESULTS

Least-square mean percent change in LDL-C from baseline at Week 12 (primary efficacy endpoint) was -43.8% for alirocumab Q4W, -70.1% for Q2W, and -4.3% for placebo. During the OLTP, mean LDL-C change from baseline was -45.1% at Week 20, with a further reduction at Week 36, with achieved levels maintained to Week 64. Percent of patients with ≥1 adverse event (DBTP) was 51.9% with alirocumab Q4W, 47.2% with Q2W, and 46.4% with placebo. Most common adverse events were infections and infestations (25.9%, 22.6%, 17.9%, respectively), gastrointestinal disorders (13.0%, 9.4%, 12.5%), nervous system disorders (5.6%, 7.5%, 10.7%), and general disorders and administration-site conditions (3.7%, 11.3%, 5.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Hypercholesterolemic Japanese patients who tolerate only lowest-strength dose statin or non-statin LLT can achieve robust LDL-C reduction with alirocumab 150mg Q4W, in addition to their current LLT. Alirocumab 150mg Q4W dosing was efficacious and generally well tolerated without new safety concerns. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02584504).

Persistence with Biological Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs and Its Associated Resource Utilization and Costs

Objective

The study assessed persistence rates of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in Japan and compared resource utilization and treatment costs between persistence and non-persistence groups.

Methods

Data were extracted from a Japanese claims database between 2009 and 2015. bDMARD-naïve patients were identified and included in the final analysis. Survival analysis was used to estimate 1-year persistence rates for current bDMARDs. Propensity score matching was applied to control for potential treatment selection bias. Resource utilization and healthcare costs were calculated 1 year before and after initiation of bDMARDs and compared between persistence and non-persistence groups.

Results

A total of 6153 bDMARD-naïve patients were identified and the overall 1-year persistence rate was 85% (95% CI 84–86). Overall, 1-year outpatient visits increased from 10 at baseline to 16 after bDMARD treatment, while the number of hospital admissions declined from 3.3 to 1.6. The non-persistence group had a larger increase in outpatient visits after bDMARD initiation compared with the persistence group (8–16 vs. 10–16, respectively) and a smaller decrease in hospital admissions (3.1–1.9 vs. 3.5–1.4, respectively). Persistence was associated with a reduction in total healthcare costs of US$760.

Conclusions

Japanese bDMARD-naïve patients with RA have a high persistence rate with those treatments. The reduction in medication costs in non-persistent patients is offset by higher hospitalization costs, making non-persistence more expensive.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40801-018-0139-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in Japanese Patients with Diabetes Mellitus: Post-hoc Subanalysis of ODYSSEY Japan

Aim: To examine the efficacy and safety of alirocumab in Japanese patients with dyslipidemia with or without diabetes mellitus (DM).

Methods: Patients (n = 216) with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (heFH), non-FH at high cardiovascular risk with coronary artery disease (CAD), or category III (primary prevention) were enrolled; 148 (68.5%) patients had a diagnosis of DM at baseline. Patients were randomized (2:1), with stratification factor (heFH, non-FH), to alirocumab (75 mg every 2 weeks [Q2W] with increase to 150 mg if week 8 LDL-C was above predefined limits) or placebo subcutaneously for 52 weeks on top of stable statin therapy.

Results: At Week 24, least square (LS) mean ± standard error changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentration from baseline in alirocumab-treated patients were −63.1 ± 1.6% and −60.8 ± 2.7% in those with and without DM. These LDL-C reductions were maintained to Week 52: −63.0 ± 1.6% (LS mean difference vs placebo −62.4 ± 3.0%; P < 0.0001) with DM and −61.3 ± 2.8% (LS mean difference vs placebo − 53.4 ± 4.0%; P < 0.0001) without DM. The most common adverse events in the alirocumab group were nasopharyngitis, back pain, injection site reaction, and fall. No particular safety signals or concerns were noted between DM and non-DM groups at 52 weeks. A dose-increase in alirocumab from 75 to 150 mg Q2W was necessary in two heFH patients, neither of whom had DM.

Conclusions: In high-cardiovascular-risk Japanese patients with hypercholesterolemia on stable statin therapy, alirocumab produced substantial and sustained LDL-C reductions throughout the 52-week study regardless of DM status at baseline, with a similar safety profile to placebo.

Abbreviations: Apo: apolipoprotein, CAD: coronary artery disease, DM: diabetes mellitus, FH: familial hypercholesterolemia, FPG: fasting plasma glucose, HbA_1c: glycated hemoglobin, HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, JAS: Japan Atherosclerosis Society, LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, heFH: heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, ITT: intention to treat, LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LLT: lipid-lowering therapy, Lp(a): lipoprotein(a), LS: least square, PCSK9: proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9, Q2W: every 2 weeks, SC: subcutaneous, SE: standard error, SD: standard deviation, TG: triglycerides

Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus with or without mixed dyslipidaemia: Analysis of the ODYSSEY LONG TERM trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Alirocumab, a monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, significantly reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of alirocumab in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with versus without mixed dyslipidaemia (MDL, defined as baseline LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL [1.8 mmol/L] and triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL [1.7 mmol/L]).

METHODS

Data from 812 individuals with T2DM, from the placebo-controlled, 78-week, Phase 3 ODYSSEY LONG TERM trial of alirocumab 150 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W), on a background of maximally tolerated statins ± other lipid-lowering therapies, were pooled according to MDL status. Efficacy endpoints included percentage change from baseline to Week 24 in calculated LDL-C and other lipids/lipoproteins.

RESULTS

In individuals with T2DM who received alirocumab 150 mg Q2W, mean LDL-C changes from baseline to Week 24 were -62.6% (vs. -6.0% with placebo) in those with MDL and -56.1% (vs. 5.6%) in those without MDL, with no significant between-group difference (p-interaction = 0.0842). Risk-based LDL-C goals (<70 [1.8 mmol/L] or <100 mg/dL [2.6 mmol/L]) were achieved by 69.1% and 72.4% of alirocumab-treated individuals with and without MDL, respectively. Mean reductions in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (49.2% and 47.8%) and apolipoprotein B (50.2% and 49.1%) with alirocumab were also similar in those with and without MDL, respectively. Treatment-emergent adverse event rates were comparable between alirocumab-treated individuals with T2DM, with and without MDL.

CONCLUSIONS

Reductions in LDL-C and other lipids with alirocumab, as well as safety and tolerability, were comparable between individuals with T2DM and with versus without MDL.

Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goal Attainment Rates by Initial Statin Monotherapy Among Patients With Dyslipidemia and High Cardiovascular Risk in Japan - A Retrospective Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

To understand the recent management status in Japan, we determined the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment (GA) rate of patients initiating statin monotherapy for dyslipidemia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Dyslipidemic patients undergoing either primary prevention with high cardiovascular risk or secondary prevention (defined by 2012 Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines) were retrospectively analyzed from a hospital-based claims database. In both groups, the LDL-C levels and GA rates of patients treated with intensive or standard statin monotherapy for ≥4 weeks (January 2012-August 2016) were evaluated. Among 1,501,013 dyslipidemic patients, 11,695 and 9,642 were included in the primary and secondary prevention groups, respectively. A total of 94% of patients underwent statin monotherapy as the initial lipid-lowering therapy, of which most (≥80%) took intensive statins. The proportions of patients in the primary prevention group who achieved an LDL-C goal <120 mg/dL by intensive and standard statins were 81.1% and 61.2%, respectively, and the proportions of those who achieved a goal <100 mg/dL in the secondary prevention group were 73.3% and 48.1%, respectively. The GA rates were similar regardless of disease complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients (>70%) in both groups achieved LDL-C management goals using intensive statin monotherapy. Further treatment approaches are required for high-risk patients not achieving LDL-C goals by initial statin monotherapy. Continuous efforts are crucial for adherence and persistence of lipid-lowering therapies.

Achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals in 18 countries outside Western Europe: The International ChoLesterol management Practice Study (ICLPS)

Background

Little is known about the achievement of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets in patients at cardiovascular risk receiving stable lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in countries outside Western Europe.

Methods

This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in 452 centres (August 2015−August 2016) in 18 countries in Eastern Europe, Asia, Africa, the Middle East and Latin America. Patients (n = 9049) treated for ≥3 months with any LLT and in whom an LDL-C measurement on stable LLT was available within the previous 12 months were included.

Results

The mean±SD age was 60.2 ± 11.7 years, 55.0% of patients were men and the mean ± SD LDL-C value on LLT was 2.6 ± 1.3 mmol/L (101.0 ± 49.2 mg/dL). At enrolment, 97.9% of patients were receiving a statin (25.3% on high intensity treatment). Only 32.1% of the very high risk patients versus 51.9% of the high risk and 55.7% of the moderate risk patients achieved their LDL-C goals. On multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with not achieving LDL-C goals were no (versus lower dose) statin therapy, a higher (versus lower) dose of statin, statin intolerance, overweight and obesity, female sex, neurocognitive disorders, level of cardiovascular risk, LDL-C value unknown at diagnosis, high blood pressure and current smoking. Diabetes was associated with a lower risk of not achieving LDL-C goals.

Conclusions

These observational data suggest that the achievement of LDL-C goals is suboptimal in selected countries outside Western Europe. Efforts are needed to improve the management of patients using combination therapy and/or more intensive LLTs.

Treatment patterns in hyperlipidaemia patients based on administrative claim databases in Japan

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Real-world evidence on treatment of hyperlipidaemia (HLD) in Japan is limited. We aimed to describe treatment patterns, persistence with, and adherence to treatment in Japanese patients with HLD.

METHODS

Retrospective analyses of adult HLD patients receiving drug therapy in 2014-2015 were conducted using the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) and Medical Data Vision (MDV) databases. Depending on their HLD treatment history, individuals were categorised as untreated (UT) or previously treated (PT), and were followed for at least 12 months. Outcomes of interest included prescribing patterns of HLD drug classes, persistence with treatment at 12 months, and adherence to treatment.

RESULTS

Data for 49,582 and 53,865 patients from the JMDC and MDV databases, respectively, were analysed. First-line HLD prescriptions for UT patients were predominantly for moderate statins (JMDC: 75.9%, MDV: 77.0%). PT patients most commonly received combination therapy (JMDC: 43.9%, MDV: 52.6%). Approximately half of the UT patients discontinued treatment during observation. Within each cohort, persistence rates were lower in UT patients than in PT patients (JMDC: 45.0% vs. 77.5%; MDV: 51.9% vs. 85.3%). Adherence was ≥80% across almost all HLD drug classes, and was slightly lower in the JMDC cohort than MDV cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Most common prescriptions were moderate statins in UT patients and combination therapy in PT patients. The high discontinuation rate of HLD therapy in UT patients warrants further investigation and identification of methods to encourage and support long-term persistence.