Total Aortic Arch Replacement in Patients With Arch Vessel Anomalies

Reconstruction of the isolated left vertebral artery in total aortic arch replacement for type A aortic dissection via a single upper right hemisternotomy approach

OBJECTIVES

The isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA) is a rare congenital abnormality of the branches of the aortic arch. Its presence can influence both the surgical procedure and the prognosis of total aortic arch replacement. The goal of this study was to assess the early postoperative outcomes of ILVA reconstruction performed during total aortic arch replacement via a single upper right hemisternotomy approach.

METHODS

From October 2018 to March 2024, patients diagnosed with type A aortic dissection who underwent total aortic arch replacement via a single upper right hemisternotomy at the General Hospital of the Northern Theater Command were included. Based on the presence of ILVA, the patients were divided into the ILVA group and the control group. Patients in the ILVA group underwent intraoperative ILVA reconstruction, and relevant perioperative clinical data were collected and analysed. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to balance the preoperative baseline data.

RESULTS

A total of 516 patients were included in the study. Of these, 34 patients were in the ILVA group, which included 27 males (79.4%) with a mean age of 48.9 ± 12.9 years; the remaining 482 patients were assigned to the control group, which included 360 males (74.7%) with a mean age of 50.5 ± 10.9 years. Following adjustment using the inverse probability of treatment weighting, the incidence of paraplegia was significantly lower in the ILVA group than in the control group (0% vs 2.14%, P = 0.003). Furthermore, the incidence of stroke (3.38% vs 6.55%, P = 0.354) and of in-hospital death (3.23% vs 5.58%, P = 0.454) was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The research indicates that ILVA reconstruction during total aortic arch replacement via a single upper right hemisternotomy effectively preserved ILVA patency and resulted in excellent early outcomes. Statistically, the incidence of postoperative paraplegia was significantly lower compared to the that in the control group, and no significant differences were observed in deaths or other complications between the 2 groups.

CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the General Hospital of the Northern Theater Command, Shenyang City, China [Y(2024)188].

Endovascular single-branched stent graft to treat complicated type B aortic dissection involving aortic arch anomalies

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of complicated type B aortic dissection (cTBAD) involving arch anomalies remain unclear.

METHODS

We consecutively enrolled patients with cTBAD involving arch anomalies who underwent endovascular repair using a single-branched stent graft (SBSG) at our medical center between January 2020 and January 2023. The demographics, clinical manifestation, operation detail, and follow-up outcomes of these patients were retrospectively collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients (14 men; 55.8 ± 11.7 years) were enrolled, including isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA) (n = 6), aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) (n = 7), and right aortic arch and aberrant left subclavian artery (ALSA) with Kommerell's diverticulum (KD) (n = 3). Among them, six patients with multi-branched arch anomalies. The endovascular management strategies of patients were diverse based on their aortic morphology. The early outcome demonstrated that one patient experienced an immediate intraoperative type Ia endoleak, which was resolved by balloon dilation, and two patients exhibited bird-beak configuration. After a median of follow-up of 910 (743-1023) days, the long-term outcome revealed that two patients developed endoleak. No death, retrograde type A aortic dissection (RTAD), paraplegia, stent graft-induced new entry tear (SINE), or branch section stenosis of SBSG were observed during the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our limited experience suggests that endovascular repair with a SBSG appears to be a relatively safe, feasible, and effective treatment option for patients with cTBAD and arch anomalies.

Comparative study of left vertebral artery revascularization in patients with and without aberrant left vertebral anatomy

OBJECTIVE

Left vertebral artery revascularization is indicated in surgery involving zone 2 of the aortic arch and is typically accomplished indirectly via subclavian artery revascularization. For aberrant left vertebral anatomy, direct revascularization is indicated. Our objective was to compare the outcomes of direct vertebral artery revascularization with indirect subclavian artery revascularization for treating aortic arch pathology and to identify predictors of mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary hospital, including patients who underwent open or endovascular vertebral artery revascularization from 2005 to 2022. Those who underwent direct vertebral revascularization were compared with those who were indirectly revascularized via subclavian artery revascularization. The outcomes of interest were a composite outcome (any of death, stroke, nerve injury, and thrombosis) and mortality. Univariate logistic regression models were fitted to quantify the strength of differences between the direct and indirect revascularization cohorts. Cox regression was used to identify mortality predictors.

RESULTS

Of 143 patients who underwent vertebral artery revascularization, 21 (14.7%) had a vertebral artery originating from the aortic arch. The median length of stay was 10 days (interquartile range, 6-20 days), and demographics were similar between cohorts. The incidence of composite outcome, bypass thrombosis, and hoarseness was significantly higher in the direct group (42.9% vs 18.0%, P = .019; 33.3% vs 0.8%, P < .0001; 57.1% vs 18.0%, P < .001, respectively). The direct group was approximately three times more likely to experience the composite outcome (odds ratio, 3.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.28, 9.08); similarly, this group was approximately six times more likely to have hoarseness (odds ratio, 5.88; 95% confidence interval, 2.21, 15.62). There was no significant difference in mortality rates at 30 days, 1, 3, 5, and 10 years of follow-up. Age, length of hospital stay, and congestive heart failure were identified as predictors of higher mortality. After adjusting for these covariates, the group itself was not an independent predictor of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct vertebral revascularization was associated with higher rates of composite outcome (death, stroke, nerve injury, and thrombosis), bypass thrombosis and hoarseness. Patients with aberrant vertebral anatomy are at higher risks of these complications compared with patients with standard arch anatomy. However, after adjusting for other factors, mortality rates were not significantly different between the groups.

2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

Physician-modified fenestration or in situ fenestration for preservation of isolated left vertebral artery in thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Objective

To present our experience of preserving the isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA) with physician-modified fenestration (PM-F) or in situ fenestration (ISF) during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortic pathologies involving aortic arch.

Methods

This is a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study. Between June 2016 and December 2021, 9 patients (8 men; median age 60.0 years old) underwent TEVAR with ILVA reconstruction (PM-F, n = 6; ISF, n = 3) were identified and analyzed.

Results

The technical success rate was 100%. No early (<30 days) death occurred. No aortic rupture, major stroke or spinal cord injury was observed. The median follow up was 38.0 (rang: 1.0-66.0) months. One death occurred at 56 months, while the reason cannot be identified. No aortic rupture, major stroke or spinal cord injury was observed during follow up. No patient required reintervention. Out of the 22 successfully revascularized target vessels, 2 ILVAs were found occluded in 2 patients at 6 months and 7 months, respectively. However, these two patients were asymptomatic.

Conclusions

Our initial experience reveals that PM-F or ISF for ILVA preservation was feasible, safe, and effective during TEVAR for complex thoracic aortic pathologies. However, the patency of preserved ILVA should be improved.

2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate. Structure: Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

Two-Stage Redo Aortic Arch Repair in a Patient With an Isolated Left Vertebral Artery

A 47-year-old male presented with an enlarging distal aortic arch false lumen 6 months status post ascending and hemiarch replacement with antegrade endograft insertion for acute type A aortic dissection complicated by lower body malperfusion. Preoperative computed tomographic angiography showed an isolated but dominant left vertebral artery. A 2-stage open surgical repair was performed. First, the left subclavian artery was transposed on the common carotid and vertebral onto the subclavian. At the second stage, a redo total arch reconstruction was done with bypass grafts taken to the innominate and left common carotid arteries. The patient did well postoperatively.

Transposition of the left vertebral artery during endovascular stent-graft repair of the aortic arch

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to present our experience with the management of isolated left vertebral artery during hybrid aortic arch repairs with thoracic endovascular aortic repair completion.

METHODS

This is a single-center, observational, cohort study. Between January 2007 and December 2018, 9 patients (4.5%) of 200 who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair were identified with isolated left vertebral artery. The isolated left vertebral artery was the dominant vertebral artery in 4 cases and entered the Circle of Willis to form the basilar artery in all cases. Isolated left vertebral artery transposition was performed in 2 patients during open ascending/arch repair before thoracic endovascular aortic repair completion. In 4 patients, isolated left vertebral artery transposition was performed concomitant with carotid-subclavian bypass during thoracic endovascular aortic repair completion ("zone 2" thoracic endovascular aortic repair). Primary outcomes were early (<30 days) and late survival, freedom from aortic-related mortality, and isolated left vertebral artery patency.

RESULTS

Primary technical success was achieved in all cases. Isolated left vertebral artery-related complication occurred in 1 patient (Horner syndrome). Immediate thrombosis, vagus/recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, lymphocele, and chylothorax were never observed. Postoperative cerebrovascular accident or spinal cord injury was not observed. Median follow-up was 15 months (range, 3-72). We did not observe aortic-related mortality during the follow-up. Aortic-related intervention was never required. Both isolated left vertebral artery and carotid-subclavian bypass are still patent in all patients with no sign of anastomotic pseudoaneurysm or stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Although isolated left vertebral artery is not a frequent occurrence, it is not so rare. It may pose additional difficulties during hybrid aortic arch surgical repairs, but isolated left vertebral artery transposition was feasible, safe, and a durable reconstruction.

Management of type B aortic dissection with an isolated left vertebral artery

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to report our single-center experience of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and concomitant procedures in patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) with an isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA) and the early to midterm outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

Between March 2011 and June 2018, there were 31 patients (27 men; median age, 55 years; range, 31-66 years) with TBAD and an ILVA who received TEVAR and concomitant procedures in our center. Demographics, coexisting medical conditions, imaging features, operation details, and follow-up outcomes in these patients were retrospectively collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

All patients received aortic stent grafts; nine patients also received chimney stents, and 10 patients received aortic arch bypasses. The technical success rate was 96.8% (30/31), with only one patient (3.2%) showing immediate type IA endoleak. One patient experienced transient neurologic deficit, and a puncture-related femoral artery pseudoaneurysm was observed in one patient; both recovered completely before their hospital discharge. There was no death in the early term. The median duration of follow-up was 33 months (range, 2-90 months). Reintervention for a type II endoleak by using coils to seal the origin of the left subclavian artery was performed in one (3.1%) case 72 months postoperatively. One (3.2%) death occurred 42 months after operation as a result of rectal cancer. No neurologic deficits, chimney stent occlusions, or bypass occlusions were observed during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Our limited experience reveals that TEVAR and concomitant procedures are relatively safe and viable for treatment of TBAD with an ILVA. Further studies with larger samples of patients and longer follow-ups are needed to confirm these findings.

Incidence of branching patterns variations of the arch in aortic dissection in Chinese patients

Several authors have described anatomic variations of the aortic arch in 13% to 20% of the patients who do not have aortic disease. However, few studies have evaluated these patterns in the thoracic aortic dissection (TAD). In the authors' knowledge, this is the first survey that specifically investigates the frequency of these variations in a broad, nonselected group of Chinese patients with aortic dissection. Furthermore, it compares this group with a group of patients without aortic disease.The objective of this study was to define the variation frequency of the aortic arch branches pattern using the tomographic studies of 525 Chinese patients with a diagnosis of TAD. The Stanford classification was used to set the site of the initial tear of the dissection. In addition, we performed an epidemiological analysis of the aortic arch anatomic variations in TAD, and its possible implications for surgical or endovascular treatment. The general hypothesis proposal asserted that Chinese patients with dissection of the aorta have a similar incidence of variations of the aortic arch to the patients without aortic disease.A retrospective study of cases and controls was carried out using the tomographic studies (CT) of all patients admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, located at Henan-China, with a confirmed diagnosis of aortic dissection from January 2012 until December 2014. The group of cases consisted of 525 patients: 374 men and 151 women, with a mean age of 52.27 years (range, 20-89). The average age of the patients with Stanford A and B aortic dissection was 49.46 and 53.67, respectively. The control group consisted of 525 unselected patients without TAD who underwent a CT scan of the chest due to other indications. This group consisted of 286 men and 239 women, with a mean age of 53.60 years (range, 18-89). All the patients with aneurysm or dissection were excluded from the control group. We performed a statistical analysis of demographic data.The study found 7 different patterns of the aortic arch on both groups of cases and controls. Within the 525 patients with TAD were observed 85 (16.19%) anatomical variations, while the control group showed 112 variations (21.33%); P = 0.033. The most common anatomical variant was the bovine arch, found in 62 (11.80%) cases of TAD compared with 77 (14.66%) in the control group; P = 0.172. Anatomical variations were observed in 14.32% of the patients with Stanford A dissection and 17.09% of the patients with Stanford B dissection; P = 0.425. Patients with Stanford A dissection showed the pattern of bovine arch in 23 (13.21%) of 174 cases. In contrast, the patients with Stanford B dissection showed it in 39 (11.11%) of 351 cases; P = 0.481. The anatomical variant defined as vertebral artery of direct origin of the aortic arch was more frequent in the patients with Stanford B dissection (5.12%). The patients with Stanford A dissection presented this pattern in 1.14% of the cases; P = 0.025. This study observed an increased frequency of aortic dissection in the subgroup from 41 to 60 years old. In the subgroup from 41 to 60 years old without TAD, a greater frequency of anatomical variations were found than in the patients with TAD (20.81% vs 14.23%; P = 0.050). The same fashion was seen in patients older than 80 years (27.27% vs 0%; P = 0.030). The anatomical variations of the aortic arch with TAD occurred in 14.97% of the male patients and 19.20% of the female patients compared to 21.67% to 20.92% in the control group; P = 0.026 and P = 0.681, respectively.The aortic arch variations were found less frequently in the TAD group than in the control group in the present Chinese series. The bovine arch was considered the variant pattern of the major frequency in the patients with TAD and the control group. The anatomical variant of 4 branches, defined as vertebral artery of direct origin of the aortic arch, was more frequent in patients with Stanford B aortic dissection than in the patients with Stanford A.This finding might show an association between the geometry of the aortic arch and the site of onset of first intimal tear of dissection.

Deployment of proximal thoracic endograft in zone 0 of the ascending aorta: treatment options and early outcomes for aortic arch aneurysms in a high-risk population

OBJECTIVES

Open repair of aortic arch aneurysms can be technically challenging. Hybrid approaches have been developed to facilitate arch repairs and improve their clinical outcomes in high-risk patients. We examined treatment options and early outcomes in patients whose thoracic endografts were deployed to include Zone 0.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2011, a hybrid approach in which the endograft was deployed in the ascending aorta was used in 29 patients (median age 67 years, range 32-85 years). The indication for surgery was saccular arch aneurysm in 11 patients (37.9%), fusiform arch aneurysm with or without involvement of the proximal descending aorta in 10 (34.5%), proximal Type I endoleak after endovascular repair of the descending aorta in 5 (17.2%), chronic Type III (Type B) aortic dissection with aneurysmal arch formation in 2 (6.9%) and acute Type I (Type A) dissection with prior repair of an extent I thoracoabdominal aneurysm in 1 (3.4%). Six patients (20.7%) had previously undergone a sternotomy. One-, two- or three-branch aortobrachiocephalic de-branching, with or without concomitant heart surgery, was performed in 28 patients and extra-anatomic bypass in 1.

RESULTS

Two patients (6.9%) died during postoperative hospitalization. Overall survival during the follow-up period (median 411 days) was 79.3%. Five neurological events occurred: one extensive stroke, two minor strokes (10.3%) and two episodes of paraparesis (6.9%), one with partial recovery and one with full recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

The hybrid approach enables the treatment of aortic arch disease in high-risk individuals. Long-term follow-up data are needed.

Total arch replacement in patients with aortic dissection with an isolated left vertebral artery

BACKGROUND

The presence of an isolated left vertebral artery requires changes in the aortic arch reconstruction techniques and cerebral protection methods in patients with total arch replacement. The best method for surgical repair of the isolated left vertebral artery is controversial. We retrospectively reviewed our experience of total arch replacement in patients with aortic dissection with this vessel anomaly.

METHODS

Between August 2003 and December 2008, 21 patients with aortic dissection (type A dissection, n = 20; type B dissection, n = 1) with an isolated left vertebral artery underwent total arch replacement under hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass combined with selective cerebral perfusion. Concomitant stented elephant trunk was implanted in 20 patients.

RESULTS

There was no in-hospital death. Injury to the spinal cord occurred in 2 patients with chronic dissection using stented elephant trunk implantation. One had weakness in the left lower extremity, and the other patient had paraparesis: both recovered during the follow-up period. One patient experienced transient neurologic deficit, and acute renal failure was observed in 1 patient: both recovered completely before hospital discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Acceptable results were obtained in patients with aortic dissection with an isolated left vertebral artery. Although there was no clear evidence that the spinal cord injury was related to the isolated left vertebral artery using stented elephant trunk implantation, the isolated left vertebral artery was constructed as soon as possible in patients with this vessel anomaly.

Aortic arch aneurysm associated with arch vessel anomalies: truncus bicaroticus and retroesophageal right subclavian artery

An atherosclerotic aortic arch aneurysm associated with a common origin for both carotid arteries is a rare condition. An aberrant right subclavian artery is just as rare, especially with a retroesophageal course. A combination of these two conditions, we believe, has never been reported.

Anesthesia management in a child with PHACE syndrome and agenesis of bilateral internal carotid arteries

This is the first case report of successful anesthesia management in a high-risk neurological procedure in a patient with PHACE syndrome. PHACE syndrome is rare but an important clinical entity. Anesthesiologists should be aware of the neurological, otolaryngogical, and vascular risk associated with this syndrome.

Aortic Arch Replacement With a Trifurcated Graft

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to review the results of aortic arch replacement using a trifurcated arch graft in conjunction with hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (SCP).

METHODS

One hundred fifty consecutive patients (91 male; mean age, 63 +/- 14 years; range, 20 to 87) had aortic arch replacement using a trifurcated arch graft and HCA/SCP from September 1999 to December 2005. The axillary artery was used for cannulation; a trifurcated graft was sewn to the arch vessels during a short interval of HCA; SCP was utilized through the trifurcation graft during the proximal and distal arch repair, and then the trifurcation graft was sewn to the arch graft. Fifty-five patients had chronic dissection; 48 had atherosclerotic and 29 had degenerative aneurysms; 74 had undergone previous cardiac surgery. Isolated arch reconstruction was undertaken in 38 patients: concomitant procedures included ascending aortic replacement in 74; ascending aorta and root replacement in 21; descending replacement in 4, and coronary artery bypass grafting in 36. An elephant trunk was used in 144, but distal to the left subclavian artery in only 87; in 34, it was distal to the left carotid, in 9, it was between the brachiocephalic and left carotid, and in 18, it was proximal to all arch branches. Mean HCA duration was 31.1 +/- 6.5 minutes; SCP lasted 66.6 +/- 21.0 minutes, at a mean temperature of 15.8 +/- 2.1 degrees C.

RESULTS

Adverse outcome occurred in 13 of 150 patients (8.7%): there were 7 hospital deaths and 6 permanent strokes. Temporary neurologic dysfunction was seen in only 7 patients, and renal failure was transient in 9 patients requiring dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a trifurcated arch graft with HCA and SCP is a safe and versatile technique for repair of arch aneurysms.