The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Practice Guidelines on the Role of Multimodality Treatment for Cancer of the Esophagus and Gastroesophageal Junction

Patient, facility, and surgical factors associated with significant delays to esophagectomy and subsequent poor outcomes: An analysis of 16,486 cases

OBJECTIVE

Delays to definitive surgery in esophageal cancer may be associated with disease progression and worsened survival. The objective of this study was to perform a national assessment for predictors of delay to esophagectomy and to assess for their impact on oncologic and survival outcomes.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database, 2010 to 2020, was queried for patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (stage I-III). Patients were divided into up-front and postneoadjuvant chemoradiation cohorts. The primary outcome was time to surgery. Time to surgery was examined as a continuous and categorical variable, where patients were divided into timely and delayed cohorts (96 days for up-front cohort; 56 days for postneoadjuvant chemoradiation cohort).

RESULTS

Of 16,486 patients, 4066 (24.7%) underwent up-front surgery and 12,420 (75.3%) underwent postneoadjuvant chemoradiation surgery. In the up-front surgery group, median [interquartile range] time to surgery was 61 [40-96] days. Risk-adjusted predictors of delay included lack of insurance, lowest quartile of education, biopsy-based staging or surgical staging, and robotic-assisted approach. In the postneoadjuvant chemoradiation, cohort time to surgery was 55 [44-70] days. Risk-adjusted predictors of delay included Hispanic ethnicity, Medicaid or other government-based insurance, lowest quartile of educational status, and robotic approach. In the up-front surgery group, patients who received delayed surgery had increased odds of pathologic upstaging (1.31, 95% CI, 1.06-1.61). In the postneoadjuvant chemoradiation group, patients with surgical delay had increased odds of 90-day mortality (1.27, 95% CI, 1.06-1.51).

CONCLUSIONS

After risk adjustment for patient, oncologic, facility, and surgical characteristics, there were several predictors of increased time to esophagectomy associated with consequences of upstaging and survival.

Slicing Through the Options: A Systematic Review of Esophageal Leiomyoma Management

Esophageal leiomyomas are rare, benign tumors that can remain asymptomatic or cause dysphagia and chest discomfort when they grow large. Despite advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, optimal management remains debated. This systematic review evaluates current diagnostic modalities and treatment approaches, synthesizing findings from a comprehensive PubMed search following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 51 studies were included, comprising six original studies, 26 case reports, nine retrospective cohort studies, nine case series, and two cross-sectional studies. Findings indicate that endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is the most accurate diagnostic tool (89% accuracy), while computed tomography (CT) and barium swallow studies provide complementary structural assessments. Immunohistochemical staining differentiates leiomyomas from gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), with leiomyomas expressing desmin and smooth muscle actin (SMA) but lacking CD34 and KIT. Surgical intervention is recommended for symptomatic tumors or those exceeding 5 cm. Minimally invasive techniques, including robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER), offer superior outcomes compared to traditional open surgery. RATS demonstrates a negligible mucosal injury rate versus 1-15% for other approaches, while STER minimizes blood loss and accelerates recovery. Postoperative outcomes are generally favorable, though transient gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common complication. While STER and RATS present effective alternatives with reduced morbidity, this review highlights limitations, including variability in study designs, small sample sizes, and a lack of long-term follow-up data. Further prospective studies are needed to optimize patient selection and establish long-term efficacy. This review provides insights to inform clinical practice and guide future research in the management of esophageal leiomyomas.

A Deep Learning-Based Detection and Segmentation System for Multimodal Ultrasound Images in the Evaluation of Superficial Lymph Node Metastases

Background/Objectives: Even with today's advancements, cancer still represents a major cause of mortality worldwide. One important aspect of cancer progression that has a big impact on diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment plans is accurate lymph node metastasis evaluation. However, regardless of the imaging method used, this process is challenging and time-consuming. This research aimed to develop and validate an automatic detection and segmentation system for superficial lymph node evaluation based on multimodal ultrasound images, such as traditional B-mode, Doppler, and elastography, using deep learning techniques. Methods: The suggested approach incorporated a Mask R-CNN architecture designed specifically for the detection and segmentation of lymph nodes. The pipeline first involved noise reduction preprocessing, after which morphological and textural feature segmentation and analysis were performed. Vascularity and stiffness parameters were further examined in Doppler and elastography pictures. Metrics, including accuracy, mean average precision (mAP), and dice coefficient, were used to assess the system's performance during training and validation on a carefully selected dataset of annotated ultrasound pictures. Results: During testing, the Mask R-CNN model showed an accuracy of 92.56%, a COCO AP score of 60.7 and a validation score of 64. Furter on, to improve diagnostic capabilities, Doppler and elastography data were added. This allowed for improved performance across several types of ultrasound images and provided thorough insights into the morphology, vascularity, and stiffness of lymph nodes. Conclusions: This paper offers a novel use of deep learning for automated lymph node assessment in ultrasound imaging. This system offers a dependable tool for doctors to evaluate lymph node metastases efficiently by fusing sophisticated segmentation techniques with multimodal image processing. It has the potential to greatly enhance patient outcomes and diagnostic accuracy.

Preoperative management of patients with oesophageal cancer: Expert recommendations

The aim of this work is to establish recommendations for the preoperative evaluation and selection of patients with malignant oesophageal neoplasms, who are candidates for surgical resection with curative intent, based on the consensus established by a group of experts. Using the Delphi methodology and after 2 rounds of evaluation, responses were obtained from 37 experts to 47 questions about the preoperative management of oesophageal cancer, considering consensus if there was a mean score greater than 8 (range between 0-10). Of the respondents, 54% were women, with a mean age of 50.2 years, with more than 15 years of average experience in oesophageal surgery. In the preoperative evaluation, agreement was obtained on most of the recommendations, with the indication of a staging laparoscopy being the only one where it was not reached. In the preoperative optimisation, agreement was reached on nutritional, anaemia, physical status, respiratory and comorbidities evaluation, but no agreement was reached on recommending immunonutrition or echocardiography routinely. In the inoperability criteria were included ECOG greater than 1, impaired lung function, and/or Child B or C liver cirrhosis. Agreement was reached on considering unresectable tumours with invasion of the tracheobronchial tract, large vessels, and spinal column, multivisceral metastases, and/or peritoneal carcinomatosis. Therefore, the recommendations established in this manuscript may be useful to support decision-making in daily clinical practice, with a high degree of consensus that decisions regarding the management of these patients should be made on an individual basis and within a multidisciplinary committee of experts.

Timing of Surgery and Postoperative Outcomes in Esophagectomy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Study in North India

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy is the usual approach to manage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The optimal interval to operate after completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) still remains controversial.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted to observe and compare postoperative complications and pathological outcomes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus who underwent NACRT followed by surgery within 8 weeks or after 8 weeks of NACRT completion. The pathological complete response was assessed using the Mandard tumor regression grade. Morbidity and mortality were compared and were graded using the Clavien-Dindo scale.

RESULTS

The study included 50 patients, 19 patients in the < 8-week group and 31 in the > 8-week group study. Patients underwent thoracoscopy-assisted esophagectomy with neoesophagus formation using gastric conduit. There was a significant difference in mortality between the two groups, with three mortalities in the < 8-week group and none in the other group (p = 0.022). Postoperative complications and pathological outcomes did not have a statistically significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The pathological response in ESCC cases does not appear to be impacted by the interval between NACRT and surgery; nevertheless, early surgery was associated with a higher risk of mortality.

Adjuvant immunotherapy after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy and esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a real-world study

Background

The role of immunotherapy in the adjuvant setting seems promising in recent years. As per the findings of the CheckMate 577 trial, patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who had neoadjuvant chemoradiation with residual pathologic disease should be considered adjuvant immunotherapy (AIT). However, it is unknown if individuals with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who have received neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) followed by radical surgery also require AIT.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on the data from patients who underwent NICT and radical surgery for ESCC between 2019 and 2020. To compare disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), Kaplan-Meier survival curves were produced. To determine the parameters linked to DFS and OS, a Cox model using hazard ratios (HRs) was completed.

Results

Among the 292 eligible patients, 215 cases with a mean age of 63.3 ± 6.8 years, including 190 (88.4%) men and 25 (11.6%) women, were finally recruited. The percentage of R0 resection was 98.3%. After NICT, 65 (30.2%) patients achieved pathological complete response. AIT was given to 78 (36.3%) patients following radical resection. For all patients, the 3-year DFS and OS were 62.3% and 74.0%, respectively. In terms of 3-year DFS (61.5% vs. 62.8%, P=0.984) or OS (76.9% vs. 72.3%, P=0.384), no statistically significant difference was found between patients with and without AIT. AIT significantly improved survival in patients with ypT+N+ (DFS: 23.9% vs. 38.5%, P=0.036; OS: 37.0% vs. 61.5%, P=0.010), but not in those with ypT0N0 or ypT+N0. It was found that AIT was related to both DFS (HR: 0.297; P<0.001) and OS (HR: 0.321; P=0.001) in patients with ypT+N+.

Conclusion

In ypT+N+ ESCC patients, AIT after NICT followed by radical surgery reduces the recurrence and death, thereby improving the DFS and OS. Randomized controlled trials ought to be conducted to further assess the results of this retrospective investigation.

Esophageal cancer: Does inaccuracy in clinical staging affect our ability to reach optimal outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Pretreatment clinical staging is used to decide the course of treatment in early-stage esophageal cancer. Few studies assess the effect of inaccurate clinical staging on oncologic outcomes.

METHODS

We queried the National Cancer Database to identify patients undergoing esophagectomy for clinical stage cT1bN0 esophageal carcinoma between 2010 and 2019. Patients were categorized as being upstaged if, on final pathology, they had histopathologic disease that would have warranted treatment with neoadjuvant therapy. The textbook oncologic outcome was defined as margin-negative resection, 15 lymph nodes examined, a hospital stay of <21 days, no unplanned 30-day readmission or mortality, and stage-appropriate use of neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

In total, 916 patients met inclusion criteria; 378 (41.2%) had a pathologic stage that differed from their pretreatment clinical stage. By multivariable regression, factors associated upstaging included: presentation between 2015 and 2019 (odds ratio 1.92 95% confidence interval [1.19, 3.13]), delay to esophagectomy of >30 days (odds ratio 2.38 95% confidence interval [1.13, 5.57]), larger tumor size (>2 cm relative to <2 cm, odds ratio 2.73 95% confidence interval [1.72, 4.39]), and poorly differentiated histology (odds ratio 2.79 95% confidence interval [1.75, 4.49]). The rate of textbook oncologic outcome assuming reliable clinical staging was 43.8%; accounting for upstaging, the rate of textbook oncologic outcome was 22.5% (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with cT1bN0 esophageal cancer, tumor size and histology are associated with the risk of inaccurate pretreatment clinical staging. Inaccuracies in clinical staging impact the rate at which providers achieve optimal oncologic outcomes.

The Prognostic Value of Oligo-Recurrence Following Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer

Background

The concept of oligo-recurrence has not been generally applied in esophageal cancer. This study aimed to determine the prognostic significance of the number of recurrences in esophageal cancer.

Methods

Patients with squamous cell carcinoma who underwent curative esophagectomy with R0 or R1 resection and who experienced a confirmed recurrence were included. The study included 321 eligible participants from March 2001 to December 2019. The relationship between the number of recurrences and post-recurrence survival was investigated.

Results

The mean age was 63.8±8.1 years, and the majority of the participants (97.5%) were men. The median time to recurrence was 10.7 months, and the median survival time after recurrence was 8.8 months. Multiple recurrences with simultaneous local, regional, and distant locations were common (38%). In terms of the number of recurrences, single recurrences were the most common (38.3%) and had the best post-recurrence survival rate (median, 17.1 months; p<0.001). Patients with 2 or 3 recurrences showed equivalent survival to each other and longer survival than those with 4 or more (median, 9.4 months; p<0.001). In the multivariable analysis, the significant predictors of post-recurrence survival were body mass index, minimally invasive esophagectomy, N stage, R0 resection, post-recurrence treatment, and the number of recurrences (p<0.05).

Conclusion

After esophagectomy, the number of recurrences was the most significant risk factor influencing post-recurrence survival in patients with esophageal cancer. In esophageal cancer, oligo-recurrence can be defined as a recurrence with three or fewer metastases. More intensive treatment might be recommended if oligo-recurrence occurs.

Social vulnerability is associated with increased postoperative morbidity following esophagectomy

OBJECTIVES

The effect of a patient's Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) on complication rates after esophagectomy remains unstudied. The purpose of this study was to determine how social vulnerability influences morbidity following esophagectomy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of a prospectively collected esophagectomy database at one academic institution, 2016 to 2022. Patients were grouped into low-SVI (<75%ile) and high-SVI (>75%ile) cohorts. The primary outcome was overall postoperative complication rate; secondary outcomes were rates of individual complications. Perioperative patient variables and postoperative complication rates were compared between the 2 groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to control for covariates.

RESULTS

Of 149 patients identified who underwent esophagectomy, 27 (18.1%) were in the high-SVI group. Patients with high SVI were more likely to be of Hispanic ethnicity (18.5% vs 4.9%, P = .029), but there were no other differences in perioperative characteristics between groups. Patients with high SVI were significantly more likely to develop a postoperative complication (66.7% vs 36.9%, P = .005) and had greater rates of postoperative pneumonia (25.9% vs 6.6%, P = .007), jejunal feeding-tube complications (14.8% vs 3.3%, P = .036), and unplanned intensive care unit readmission (29.6% vs 12.3%, P = .037). In addition, patients with high SVI had a longer postoperative hospital length of stay (13 vs 10 days, P = .017). There were no differences in mortality rates. These findings persisted on multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with high SVI have greater rates of postoperative morbidity following esophagectomy. The effect of SVI on esophagectomy outcomes warrants further investigation and may prove useful in identifying populations that benefit from interventions to mitigate these complications.

The Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CCRTx) followed by surgery in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the data from 382 patients who received neoadjuvant CCRTx and esophagectomy for ESCC between 2003 and 2018.

RESULTS

This study included 357 (93.4%) men, and the years median patient age was 63 (range, 40 to 84 years). Overall, 69 patients (18.1%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas 313 patients (81.9%) did not. The median follow-up period was 28.07 months (interquartile range, 15.50 to 62.59). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were 47.1% and 42.6%, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve OS in all patients, but subgroup analysis revealed that adjuvant chemotherapy improved the 5-year OS in patients with ypT+N+ (24.8% vs. 29.9%, p=0.048), whereas the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy was not observed in patients with ypT0N0, ypT+N0, or ypT0N+. Multivariable analysis revealed that ypStage and adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.601; p=0.046) were associated with OS in patients with ypT+N+. Freedom from distant metastasis was marginally different according to the adjuvant chemotherapy (48.3% vs. 41.3%, p=0.141).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy after neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery reduces the distant metastasis in ypT+N+ ESCC patients, thereby improving the OS. The consideration could be given to administration of adjuvant chemotherapy to ypT+N+ ESCC patients with tolerable conditions.

Adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive patients after esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in patients with positive nodes after surgery for ESCC.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the survival outcomes of node-positive patients with ESCC who underwent curative resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy between January 1994 and December 2015.

RESULTS

We analyzed 460 patients (333 adjuvant chemotherapy, 127 surgery alone). The surgery-alone group was older (64 vs. 60 years, p < 0.001) and had more comorbidities (p = 0.004) than the adjuvant chemotherapy group. After propensity score matching, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of the adjuvant chemotherapy group were better than those of the surgery-alone group: 5-year OS rate 62.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 54.4-72.3%) vs. 46.8% (95% CI 38.5-57%, p = 0.001) and 5-year RFS rate 53.9% (95% CI 45.4-63.9%) vs. 36.2% (95% CI 28.3-46.3%, p < 0.001). Notably, in patients with pT3-4 stage, the adjuvant chemotherapy group had significantly better 5-year OS rate (41.3% [95% CI 29.3-58.3%] vs. 18% [95% CI 10-32.5%], p = 0.01) and 5-year RFS rate (37% [95% CI 25.3-53.9%] vs. 12% [95% CI 5.7-25.4%], p < 0.001) than in the surgery-alone group. In multivariable analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy had a favorable effect on both OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.562, 95% CI 0.426-0.741, p < 0.001) and RFS (HR 0.702, 95% CI 0.514-0.959; p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy may improve survival in node-positive patients with ESCC, especially in those with pT3-4 stage.

Hospital Volume Predicts Guideline-Concordant Care in Stage III Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer is a deadly disease requiring multidisciplinary coordination of care and surgical proficiency for adequate treatment. We hypothesize that quality of care is varied nationally.

METHODS

From published guidelines, we developed quality measures for management of stage III esophageal cancer: utilization of neoadjuvant therapy, surgical sampling of at least 15 lymph nodes, resection within 60 days of chemotherapy or radiation, and completeness of resection. Measure adherence was examined across 1345 hospitals participating in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2016. We examined the association of volume, program accreditation, safety net status, geographic region, and patient travel distance on adequate adherence (≥85% of patients are adherent) using logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS

The rate of adequate adherence was worst in nodal staging (12.6%) and highest for utilization of neoadjuvant therapy (84.8%). Academic programs had the highest rate of adequate adherence for induction therapy (77.2%; P < .001), timing of surgery (56.6%; P < .001), and completeness of resection (78.5%; P < .001) but the lowest for nodal staging (4.4%; P = .018). For every additional esophagectomy performed per year, the odds of adequate adherence increased for induction therapy (odds ratio [OR]. 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.27) and completeness of resection (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.25) but decreased for nodal staging (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.65-0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Care provided at higher volume and academic facilities was more likely to be guideline concordant in some areas but not in others. Understanding the processes that support the delivery of guideline concordant care may provide valuable opportunities for improvement.

A Review: PI3K/AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway and Its Regulated Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factors May Be a Potential Therapeutic Target in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a malignant tumor developing from the esophageal squamous epithelium, and is the most common histological subtype of esophageal cancer (EC). EC ranks 10th in morbidity and sixth in mortality worldwide. The morbidity and mortality rates in China are both higher than the world average. Current treatments of ESCC are surgical treatment, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgical resection is recommended for advanced patients. However, it does not work in the significant promotion of overall survival (OS) after such therapy. Research on targeted therapy in ESCC mainly focus on EGFR and PD-1, but neither of the targeted drugs can significantly improve the 3-year and 5-year survival rates of disease. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is an important survival pathway in tumor cells, associated with its aggressive growth and malignant progression. Specifically, proliferation, apoptosis, autophagy, and so on. Related genetic alterations of this pathway have been investigated in ESCC, such as PI3K, AKT and mTOR-rpS6K. Therefore, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway seems to have the capability to serve as research hotspot in the future. Currently, various inhibitors are being tested in cells, animals, and clinical trials, which targeting at different parts of this pathway. In this work, we reviewed the research progress on the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway how to influence biological behaviors in ESCC, and discussed the interaction between signals downstream of this pathway, especially eukaryotic translation initiation factors (eIFs) and the development and progression of ESCC, to provide reference for the identification of new therapeutic targets in ESCC.

Racial Disparities in Esophageal Cancer

Esophageal cancer is a deadly cancer. Advances in multimodal treatment have improved esophageal cancer outcomes. Advancements have not benefited all races equally. Major disparities in esophageal cancer outcomes exist. Minorities undergo fewer surgical resections of esophageal cancer and have poorer outcomes.

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted, Video-Assisted, and Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

The utilization of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer is increasing, despite limited data comparing RAMIE with other surgical approaches.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the literature for clinical outcomes of RAMIE compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (VAMIE) and open esophagectomy (OE).

DATA SOURCES

A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane, Ovid Medline, and Embase databases from January 1, 2013, to May 6, 2020, was performed.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies that compared RAMIE with VAMIE and/or OE for cancer were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline, data were extracted by independent reviewers. A random-effects meta-analysis of 9 propensity-matched studies was performed for the RAMIE vs VAMIE comparison only. A narrative synthesis of RAMIE vs VAMIE and OE was performed.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The outcomes of interest were intraoperative outcomes (ie, estimated blood loss [EBL], operative time, lymph node [LN] harvest), short-term outcomes (anastomotic leak, recurrent laryngeal nerve [RLN] palsy, pulmonary and total complications, and 90-day mortality), and long-term oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 21 studies (2 randomized clinical trials, 11 propensity-matched studies, and 8 unmatched studies) with 9355 patients were included. A meta-analysis was performed with 9 propensity-matched studies comparing RAMIE with VAMIE. The random-effects pooled estimate found an adjusted risk difference (RD) of -0.06 (95% CI, -0.11 to -0.01) favoring fewer pulmonary complications with RAMIE. There was no evidence of differences between RAMIE and VAMIE in LN harvest (mean difference [MD], -1.1 LN; 95% CI, -2.45 to 0.25 LNs), anastomotic leak (RD, 0.0; 95% CI, -0.03 to 0.03), EBL (MD, -6.25 mL; 95% CI, -18.26 to 5.77 mL), RLN palsy (RD, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.10), total complications (RD, 0.05; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.11), or 90-day mortality (RD, -0.01; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.0). There was low certainty of evidence that RAMIE was associated with a longer disease-free survival compared with VAMIE. For OE comparisons (data not pooled), RAMIE was associated with a longer operative time, decreased EBL, and less pulmonary and total complications.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, RAMIE had similar outcomes as VAMIE but was associated with fewer pulmonary complications compared with VAMIE and OE. Studies on long-term functional and cancer outcomes are needed.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma improves survival

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with positive lymph nodes after esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

Patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Henan Cancer Hospital) from 2013 to 2017 were selected for this retrospective cohort study. Patients with positive lymph nodes were grouped into the surgery alone group and adjuvant chemotherapy group. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to minimize baseline differences.

RESULTS

Among the 5118 patients who underwent esophagectomy, 792 patients were enrolled in the study. After matching, 253 (of 476) patients (adjuvant chemotherapy group) and 253 (of 316) patients (surgery alone group) were included. The median overall survival was significantly prolonged in the adjuvant chemotherapy group (54.0 months, 95% CI, 41.1-66.9 months) compared with the surgery alone group (28.0 months, 95% CI, 22.4-33.6 months) (P <0.001). A significant difference was also observed in median disease-free survival between the two groups (adjuvant chemotherapy group, 33.0 months, 95% CI, 20.8-45.2 months compared with the surgery alone group, 22.0 months, 95% CI, 17.0-27.0 months; P = 0.007). In a multivariable analysis, receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (P <0.001) was significantly associated with a reduced risk of death and dissection of more than six lymph node stations (P = 0.05) was marginally associated with a reduced risk of death.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy improves the overall survival and disease-free survival of patients with resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with positive lymph nodes.

A Clinical Nomogram for Predicting Node-positive Disease in Esophageal Cancer

OBJECTIVE

We developed and validated a nomogram predicting the likelihood of occult lymph node metastases in surgically resectable esophageal cancers.

BACKGROUND

Patients with esophageal cancer with positive lymph nodes benefit from neoadjuvant therapy, but limitations in current clinical staging techniques mean nodal metastases often go undetected preoperatively.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with clinical T1-3N0M0 cancer undergoing upfront esophagectomy from 2004 to 2014. Multivariable logistic regression was used to develop the risk model using both statistical significance and clinical importance criteria for variable selection. Predictive accuracy was assessed and bootstrapping was used for validation. A nomogram was constructed for presentation of the final model.

RESULTS

Of 3186 patients, 688 (22%) had pathologic lymph node involvement (pN+) and 2498 (78%) had pN0 status. Variables associated with pN+ status included histology [adenocarcinoma vs squamous: odds ratio (OR) 1.75], tumor stage (T1: reference, T2: OR 1.90, T3: OR 2.17), tumor size (<1 cm: reference, 1-2 cm: OR 2.25, 2-3 cm: OR 3.82, 3-4 cm: OR 5.40, 4-5 cm: OR 5.66, ≥5 cm: OR 6.02), grade (1: reference, 2: OR 2.62, 3: OR 4.39, 4: OR 4.15, X: OR 1.87), and presence of lymphovascular invasion (absent: reference, present: OR 4.70, missing: OR 1.87), all P < 0.001. A nomogram with these variables had good predictive accuracy (Brier score: 0.14, calibration slope: 0.97, c-index: 0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

We created a nomogram predicting the likelihood of pathologic lymph node involvement in patients with esophageal cancer who are clinically node negative using a generalizable dataset. Risk stratification with this nomogram could improve delivery of appropriate perioperative care.

Racial disparities in provider recommendation for esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Racial disparities currently exist for the utilization rate of esophagectomy for Black patients with operable esophageal carcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 37 271 cases with the American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical stage I, II, and III esophageal carcinoma that were reported to the National Cancer Database were analyzed between 2004 and 2016. A multivariable-adjusted logistic regression model was used to evaluate differences in the odds ratio of esophagectomy not being recommended based on race. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to evaluate differences in overall survival. Propensity score methodology with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance baseline differences in patient demographics.

RESULTS

After IPTW adjustment, we identified 30 552 White patients and 3529 Black patients with clinical stage I-III esophageal carcinoma. Black patients had three times greater odds of not being recommended for esophagectomy (odds ratio: 3.03, 95% confidence interval: 2.67-3.43, p < 0.0001) compared to White patients. Black patients demonstrated significantly worse 3- and 5-year overall survival rates compared to White patients (log-rank p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Black patients with clinical stage I-III esophageal cancer were significantly less likely to be recommended for esophagectomy even after adjusting for baseline demographic covariates compared to White patients.

The emerging role of long noncoding RNAs in esophageal carcinoma: from underlying mechanisms to clinical implications

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), a type of transcriptional product more than 200 nucleotides in length, have emerged as crucial regulators in human cancers. Accumulating data have recently indicated relationships between lncRNAs and esophageal carcinoma (EC). Of note, lncRNAs act as decoys/sponges, scaffolds, guides, and signals to regulate the expression of oncogenes or tumor suppressors at epigenetic, post-transcriptional, and protein levels, through which they exert their unique EC-driving or EC-suppressive functions. Moreover, the features of EC-related lncRNAs have been gradually exploited for developing novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in clinical scenarios. LncRNAs have the potential to be used as diagnostic and prognostic indicators individually or in combination with other clinical variables. Beyond these, although the time is not yet ripe, therapeutically targeting EC-related lncRNAs via gene editing, antisense oligonucleotides, RNA interference, and small molecules is likely one of the most promising therapeutic strategies for the next generation of cancer treatment. Herein, we focus on summarizing EC-driving/suppressive lncRNAs, as well as discussing their different features regarding expression profiles, modes of action, and oncological effects. Moreover, we further discuss current challenges and future developing possibilities of capitalizing on lncRNAs for EC early diagnosis and treatment.

Change in Maximal Esophageal Wall Thickness Provides Prediction of Survival and Recurrence in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Surgery

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship of the percentage decrease of maximal esophageal wall thickness with pathological complete response (pCR) and recurrence in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Patients and Methods

A total of 146 ESCC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) and surgery were included. The prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed. The recurrence site, time, and frequency were included in the analysis. The percentage decrease of maximal esophageal wall thickness after NCRT was determined with the formula: [(pre-post)/pre] × 100.

Results

Overall, only 42 patients achieved pCR. Multivariable logistic analyses showed that the percentage decrease of maximal esophageal wall thickness (HR: 2.504; 95% CI: 1.112–5.638, P=0.027) was independently correlated with pCR. In multivariable Cox analyses, a ≤40% percentage decrease of maximal esophageal wall thickness was an independent adverse factor for both OS (HR: 1.907, 95% CI: 1.149–3.165; P=0.012) and DFS (HR: 2.054, 95% CI: 1.288–3.277; P=0.003). Compared with patients with a ≤40% percentage decrease, those with a >40% percentage decrease had better 5-year OS (29.0% vs 60.1%, P<0.05) and DFS (27.8% vs 54.4%, P<0.05). Perineural invasion (PNI) was also an unfavorable factor for OS (HR: 2.138, 95% CI: 0.094–4.178; P=0.026). Lymph vessel invasion (HR: 2.874, 95% CI: 1.574–5.248; P=0.001) and PNI (HR: 2.050; 95% CI: 1.044–4.023; P=0.037) were independent prognosticators for DFS. The rates of local and distant recurrence were also significantly difference between those with a percentage decrease of ≤40% and of >40% (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The percentage decrease of maximal esophageal wall thickness is associated with pCR and recurrence in ESCC patients who undergo NCRT and surgery and can thus be used to independently predict prognosis.

Racial Disparities in Rates of Surgery for Esophageal Cancer: a Study from the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Treatment guidelines for stage I-III esophageal cancer indicate that management should include surgery in appropriate patients. Variations in utilization of surgery may contribute to racial differences observed in survival. We sought to identify factors associated with racial disparities in surgical resection of esophageal cancer and evaluate associated survival differences.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with stage I-III esophageal cancer from 2004 to 2015 were identified using the National Cancer Database. Matched patient cohorts were created to reduce confounding. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with receipt of surgery. Multi-level modeling was performed to control for random effects of individual hospitals on surgical utilization.

RESULTS

A total of 60,041 patients were included (4402 black; 55,639 white). After 1:1 matching, there were 5858 patients evenly distributed across race. For all stages, significantly fewer black than white patients received surgery. Black race independently conferred lower likelihood of receiving surgery in single-level multivariable analysis (OR (95% CI); stage I, 0.67 (0.48-0.94); stage II, 0.76 (0.60-0.96); stage III, 0.62 (0.50-0.76)) and after controlling for hospital random effects. Hospital-level random effects accounted for one third of the unexplained variance in receipt of surgery. Risk-adjusted 1-, 3-, and 5-year mortality was higher for patients who did not undergo surgery.

CONCLUSION

Black patients with esophageal cancer are at higher risk of mortality compared to white patients. This increased risk may be influenced by decreased likelihood of receiving surgical intervention for resectable disease, in part because of between-hospital differences. Improving access to surgical care may improve disparities in esophageal cancer survival.

Current and future cancer staging after neoadjuvant treatment for solid tumors

Until recently, cancer registries have only collected cancer clinical stage at diagnosis, before any therapy, and pathological stage after surgical resection, provided no treatment has been given before the surgery, but they have not collected stage data after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Because NAT is increasingly being used to treat a variety of tumors, it has become important to make the distinction between both the clinical and the pathological assessment without NAT and the assessment after NAT to avoid any misunderstanding of the significance of the clinical and pathological findings. It also is important that cancer registries collect data after NAT to assess response and effectiveness of this treatment approach on a population basis. The prefix y is used to denote stage after NAT. Currently, cancer registries of the American College of Surgeons' Commission on Cancer only partially collect y stage data, and data on the clinical response to NAT (yc or posttherapy clinical information) are not collected or recorded in a standardized fashion. In addition to NAT, nonoperative management after radiation and chemotherapy is being used with increasing frequency in rectal cancer and may be expanded to other treatment sites. Using examples from breast, rectal, and esophageal cancers, the pathological and imaging changes seen after NAT are reviewed to demonstrate appropriate staging.

Prognosis of Interval Distant Metastases After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

In esophageal cancer patients, distant metastases develop between the start of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and planned surgery, so-called interval metastases. The primary aim of this study was to assess management, overall survival (OS), and prognostic factors for OS in these patients. A secondary aim was to compare OS with synchronous metastatic patients.

METHODS

Esophageal cancer patients with interval distant metastases were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (2010 to 2017). Management was categorized into metastasis-directed therapy (MDT), primary tumor resection, or best supportive care (BSC). The OS was calculated from the diagnosis of the primary tumor. Prognostic factors affecting OS were studied using Cox proportional hazard models. Propensity score-matching (1:3) generated matched cases with synchronous distant metastases.

RESULTS

In all, 208 patients with interval metastases were identified: in 87 patients (42%) MDT was initiated; in 10%, primary tumor resection only; in 7%, primary tumor resection plus MDT; and in 41%, BSC. Median OS was 10 months (interquartile range, 8.6 to 11.1). Compared with BSC, superior OS was independently associated with MDT (hazard ratio [HR] 0.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26 to 0.49), primary tumor resection (HR 0.55; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.94), and primary tumor resection plus MDT (HR 0.20; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.38). Worse OS was independently associated with signet ring cell carcinoma (HR 1.92; 95% CI, 1.12 to 3.28) and poor differentiation grade (HR 1.96; 95% CI, 1.35 to 2.83). The OS was comparable between matched patients with interval and synchronous distant metastases (10.2 versus 9.4 months, P = .760).

CONCLUSIONS

In esophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with interval distant metastases, the OS was poor and comparable to that of synchronous metastatic patients.

Esophageal Neoplasms: Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation

The epidemiology and clinical management of esophageal carcinomas are changing, and clinical imagers are required to understand both the imaging appearances of common cancers and the pathologic diagnoses that drive management. Rare esophageal malignancies and benign esophageal neoplasms have distinct imaging features that may suggest a diagnosis and guide the next steps clinically. Furthermore, these imaging features have a basis in pathology, and this article focuses on the relationship between pathologic features and imaging manifestations that will help an informed imager maintain clinical relevance.

The Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in (Future) Cancer Staging: Note the Nodes

The presence or absence of lymph node metastases is a very important prognostic factor in patients with solid tumors. Current invasive and noninvasive diagnostic methods for N-staging like lymph node dissection, morphologic computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or positron emission tomography-computed tomography have significant limitations because of technical, biological, or anatomical reasons. Therefore, there is a great clinical need for more precise, reliable, and noninvasive N-staging in patients with solid tumors. Using ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of ironoxide (USPIO)-enhanced MRI offers noninvasive diagnostic possibilities for N-staging of different types of cancer, including the 4 examples given in this work (head and neck cancer, esophageal cancer, rectal cancer, and prostate cancer). The excellent soft tissue contrast of MRI and an USPIO-based differentiation of metastatic versus nonmetastatic lymph nodes can enable more precise therapy and, therefore, fewer side effects, essentially in cancer patients in oligometastatic disease stage. By discussing 3 important questions in this article, we explain why lymph node staging is so important, why the timing for more accurate N-staging is right, and how it can be done with MRI. We illustrate this with the newest developments in magnetic resonance methodology enabling the use of USPIO-enhanced MRI at ultrahigh magnetic field strength and in moving parts of the body like upper abdomen or mediastinum. For prostate cancer, a comparison with radionuclide tracers connected to prostate specific membrane antigen is made. Under consideration also is the use of MRI for improvement of ex vivo cancer diagnostics. Further scientific and clinical development is needed to assess the accuracy of USPIO-enhanced MRI of detecting small metastatic deposits for different cancer types in different anatomical locations and to broaden the indications for the use of (USPIO-enhanced) MRI in lymph node imaging in clinical practice.

Adherence to quality measures improves survival in esophageal cancer in a retrospective cohort study of the national cancer database from 2004 to 2016

Background

We assessed adherence to four novel quality measures in patients with stage III esophageal cancer, a leading cause of death among GI malignancies.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 22,871 stage III esophageal cancer patients identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2004 and 2016. Four quality measures were defined from published guidelines: administration of induction therapy, >15 lymph nodes sampled, surgery within 60 days of neoadjuvant treatment, and R0 resection. The association of patient demographic and treatment variables with measure adherence was assessed using multiple logistic regression. Risk of all-cause mortality was assessed comparing adherent and non-adherent cases using Cox modeling. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates of groups that adhered to zero to four out of four quality measures were performed.

Results

Adherence was high for neoadjuvant treatment (93.7%), timing of surgery (85.7%) and completeness of resection (92.0%), but low for nodal evaluation (45.9%). Medicaid insurance status was associated with decreased odds of adherence for neoadjuvant treatment [odds ratio (OR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.54–0.99], nodal evaluation (OR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.68–0.96), and completeness of resection (OR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54–0.92). From 2010 to 2016, when compared to cases from 2004 to 2005, there was a progressive increase in the odds of adequate induction therapy, nodal staging, and completeness of resection, but a progressive decrease in odds of well-timed surgery. Adherence was associated with decreased all-cause mortality for induction therapy, nodal staging, and R0 resection, but not for timing of surgery. Survival improved as the number of quality measures an individual patient adhered to increased.

Conclusions

Adherence to quality measures is associated with improved survival in patients with stage III esophageal cancer. Understanding variability in measure adherence may identify targets for quality improvement initiatives.

Routine intraoperative jejunostomy placement and minimally invasive oesophagectomy: an unnecessary step?†

OBJECTIVES

Adequate nutrition is challenging after oesophagectomy. A jejunostomy is commonly placed during oesophagectomy for nutritional support. However, some patients develop jejunostomy-related complications and the benefit over oral nutrition alone is unclear. This study aims to assess jejunostomy-related complications and the impact of intraoperative jejunostomy placement on weight loss and perioperative outcomes in patients with oesophageal cancer treated with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy (MIE).

METHODS

From a prospectively maintained database, patients were identified who underwent MIE with gastric reconstruction. Between 2007 and 2016, a jejunostomy was routinely placed during MIE. After 2016, a jejunostomy was not utilized. Postoperative feeding was performed according to a standardized protocol and similar for both groups. The primary outcomes were jejunostomy-related complications, relative weight loss at 3 and 6 months postoperative and perioperative outcomes, including anastomotic leak, pneumonia and length of stay, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 188 patients were included, of whom 135 patients (72%) received a jejunostomy. Ten patients (7.4%) developed jejunostomy-related complications, of whom 30% developed more than 1 complication. There was no significant difference in weight loss between groups at 3 months (P = 0.73) and 6 months postoperatively (P = 0.68) and in perioperative outcomes (P-value >0.999, P = 0.591 and P = 0.513, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a routine intraoperative jejunostomy appears to be an unnecessary step in patients undergoing MIE. Intraoperative jejunostomy placement is associated with complications without improving weight loss or perioperative outcomes. Its use should be tailored to individual patient characteristics. Early oral nutrition allows patients to maintain an adequate nutritional status.

Balloon Dilation for Endosonographic Staging in Esophageal Cancer: A Phase 1 Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Dilation in patients with malignant esophageal strictures precluding the passage of the endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) scope allows complete evaluation; however, it may be associated with complications. This study evaluates the safety and clinical value of balloon dilation to complete EUS in patients with stenotic esophageal cancers.

METHODS

This study consists of a phase I clinical trial. One-hundred-and fifty patients were recruited. Endoscopic balloon dilation was performed before EUS in patients with high-grade stenosis. The analysis was focused on the ability to complete an endosonographic examination after dilation, 30-day morbidity, and change in the final stage or definitive management based on the completed endosonographic examination.

RESULTS

Dilation was required in 55 patients (36.7%), with a complication rate of 10.9% (n = 6). Dilation allowed completion of EUS in 53 patients (96.4%), leading to a modification of the clinical stage for 18 patients (34%) and a deviation in the treatment plan in 7 patients (13.2%). No differences were found in these variables when compared with the group that did not require dilation (26.3% and 14.7%, P = .33 and P = .79, respectively). Dilation was associated with more advanced disease on final pathology among patients who underwent surgical resection (P = .006).

CONCLUSIONS

High-grade malignant esophageal strictures that preclude the passage of the ultrasound probe are associated with advanced stage disease. Owing to the high risk of perforation and the limited benefit in staging, balloon dilation to complete the EUS staging should be avoided. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01950442.).

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for clinical node-negative esophageal carcinoma

Background

The impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) on early stage esophageal cancer is unknown. Here, we compared the outcomes after esophagectomy alone or nCRT plus surgery for clinically staged node‐negative esophageal cancer.

Methods

We searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for patients with clinically node‐negative (cN0) esophageal cancer from 2004 to 2016 who underwent surgery alone or nCRT plus surgery. Propensity score matching and Cox regression analysis were used to identify covariates associated with overall survival and cancer‐specific survival.

Results

A total of 1587 patients were retrospectively identified, of whom 49.8% (n = 791) received nCRT and 80.2% (n = 1273) were truly node‐negative diseases. For the entire cohort, surgery alone was associated with a statistically significant but modest absolute increase in survival outcomes (P < 0.01). After matching, nCRT was associated with improved five‐year overall survival for pT3‐4N0 (localized) disease (59.6% vs. 37.7%; P < 0.001) and pathological node‐positive disease (60.5% vs. 40.7%; P = 0.002). Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that the addition of nCRT for truly node‐negative patients with tumor length ≥ 3 cm, pT1‐2N0 (early‐staged) and localized disease were independent risk factors for survival than surgery alone (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Compared with surgery alone, patients with cN0 esophageal cancer with pathological node‐positive or localized true node‐negative disease gain a significant survival benefit from nCRT. However, nCRT plus surgery was associated with decreased survival for early‐staged true node‐negative patients. This finding may have significant implications on the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiation in patients with cN0 disease.

Selecting esophageal cancer patients for lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a modeling study

OBJECTIVES

Two-thirds of patients do not harbor lymph node (LN) metastases after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Our aim was to explore under which circumstances a selective lymph node dissection (LND) strategy, which selects patients for LND based on the restaging results after nCRT, has added value compared with standard LND in esophageal cancer.

DESIGN

A decision tree with state-transition model was developed. Input data on short-term and long-term consequences were derived from literature. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess promising scenarios and uncertainty.

SETTING

Dutch healthcare system.

PARTICIPANTS

Hypothetical cohort of esophageal cancer patients who have already received nCRT and are scheduled for esophagectomy.

INTERVENTIONS

A standard LND cohort was compared with a cohort of patients that received selective LND based on the restaging results after nCRT.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), residual LN metastases and LND-related complications.

RESULTS

Selective LND could have short-term benefits, that is, a decrease in the number of performed LNDs and LND-related complications. However, this may not outweigh a slight increase in residual LN metastases which negatively impacts QALYs in the long-term. To accomplish equal QALYs as with standard LND, a new surgical strategy should have the same or higher treatment success rate as standard LND, that is, should show equal or less recurrences due to residual LN metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

The reduction in LND-related complications that is accomplished by selecting patients for LND based on restaging results after nCRT seems not to outweigh a QALY loss in the long-term due to residual LN metastases. Despite the short-term advantages of selective LND, this strategy can only match long-term QALYs of standard LND when its success rate equals the success rate of standard LND.

Evaluating the eighth edition TNM staging system for esophageal cancer among patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy: A SEER study

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of the eighth edition of ypTNM staging system for patients with esophageal cancer was limited in the setting of neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

A total of 2324 patients with esophageal cancer receiving radio(chemo)therapy prior to surgery from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2013 were eligible for the analysis. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate overall survivals.

RESULTS

Among patients with preoperative therapy, both the seventh edition TNM grouping and the eighth edition ypTNM grouping could significantly stratify the overall survival (both log-rank P < .001). There was not significant difference in the C-index of the seventh edition TNM grouping (0.575; 95%CI, 0.558-0.593) and the eighth edition ypTNM grouping (0.569; 95%CI, 0.551-0.587) (P = .098). In multivariable Cox analysis, ypN category was the strongest predictor of overall survival (P < .001), followed by tumor grade (HR, 1.33; 95%CI, 1.12-1.56; P = .001). The combination of ypT, ypN, and ypG categories yielded significantly higher C-index (0.591; 95%CI, 0.573-0.609) than that of the seventh edition TNM staging (P = .024).

CONCLUSION

Tumor grade remained an independent predictor of overall survival in the setting of neoadjuvant therapy, and could improve the performance of ypTNM staging system.

Extent and consequences of lymphadenectomy in oesophageal cancer surgery: case vignette survey

Objectives

Lymph node dissection (LND) is part of the standard operating procedure in patients with resectable oesophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regardless of lymph node (LN) status. The aims of this case vignette survey were to acquire expert opinions on the current practice of LND and to determine potential consequences of non-invasive LN staging on the extent of LND and postoperative morbidity.

Design

An online survey including five short clinical cases (case vignettes) was sent to 272 oesophageal surgeons worldwide.

Participants

86 oesophageal surgeons (median experience in oesophageal surgery of 15 years) participated in the survey (response rate 32%).

Main outcome measures

Extent of standard LND, potential changes in LND based on accurate LN staging and consequences for postoperative morbidity were evaluated.

Results

Standard LND varied considerably between experts; for example, pulmonary ligament, splenic artery, aortopulmonary window and paratracheal LNs are routinely dissected in less than 60%. The omission of (parts of) LND is expected to decrease the number of chyle leakages, pneumonias, and laryngeal nerve pareses and to reduce operating time. In order to guide surgical treatment decisions, a diagnostic test for LN staging after neoadjuvant therapy requires a minimum sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 90%.

Conclusions

This expert case vignette survey study shows that there is no consensus on the extent of standard LND. Oesophageal surgeons seem more willing to extend LND rather than omit LND, based on accurate LN staging. The majority of surgeons expect that less extensive LND can reduce postoperative morbidity.

Detecting Pathological Complete Response in Esophageal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Therapy Based on Imaging Techniques: A Diagnostic Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Up to 32% of patients with esophageal cancer show a pathological complete response (ypCR) after neoadjuvant therapy. To prevent overtreatment, the indication to perform esophagectomy in these patients should be reconsidered. Implementing an organ-preserving strategy for patients with ypCR requires an accurate assessment of residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment. The aim of this study was to systematically review the effectiveness of imaging techniques used for detection of ypCR after neoadjuvant therapy but before resection in patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed from January 1, 2000, to December 13, 2017. Eligible studies were diagnostic studies that compared results of imaging modalities after neoadjuvant therapy to histopathological findings in the resection specimen after esophagectomy. Methodological quality was assessed by the Cochrane Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies, version 2, model. Primary outcome measures were true positive, false-positive, false-negative, and true negative values of imaging techniques predicting ypCR. A meta-analysis was performed by pooling sensitivities and specificities by using a bivariate model.

RESULTS

A total of 4420 articles were identified. After exclusion of irrelevant titles and abstracts, 360 articles were reviewed in full text. In total, four imaging modalities (computed tomography [CT], positron emission tomography [PET-CT], endoscopic ultrasound [EUS], and magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) were used for restaging. The meta-analysis was conducted with data from 56 studies involving 3625 patients. The pooled sensitivities of CT, PET-CT, EUS, and MRI for detecting ypCR were 0.35, 0.62, 0.01 and 0.80, respectively, whereas the pooled specificities were 0.83, 0.73, 0.99, and 0.83, respectively. The positive predictive value in detecting ypCR was 0.47 for CT, 0.41 for PET-CT, not applicable for EUS, and 0.61 for MRI.

CONCLUSION

Current imaging modalities such as CT, PET-CT, and EUS seem to be insufficiently accurate to identify complete responders. More accurate diagnostic tests are needed to improve restaging accuracy for patients with esophageal cancer.

Adjuvant Therapy for Node-Positive Esophageal Cancer After Induction and Surgery: A Multisite Study

BACKGROUND

The benefit of adjuvant treatment for esophageal cancer patients with positive lymph nodes after induction therapy and esophagectomy is uncertain. This in-depth multicenter study assessed the benefit of adjuvant therapy in this population.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study from 9 institutions included patients who received neoadjuvant treatment, underwent esophagectomy from 2000 to 2014, and had positive lymph nodes on pathology. Factors associated with administration of adjuvant therapy were assessed using multilevel random-intercept modeling to account for institutional variation in practice. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed based on adjuvant treatment status. Variables associated with survival were identified using Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

The study analyzed 1082 patients with node-positive cancer after induction therapy and esophagectomy: 209 (19.3%) received adjuvant therapy and 873 (80.7%) did not. Administration of adjuvant treatment varied significantly from 3.2% to 50.0% between sites (P < .001). Accounting for institution effect, factors associated with administration of adjuvant therapy included clinically positive and negative prognostic characteristics: younger age, higher pathologic stage, pathologic grade, no neoadjuvant radiotherapy nonsmoking status, and absence of postoperative infection. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed patients receiving adjuvant therapy had a longer median survival of 2.6 years vs 2.3 years (P = .02). Cox modeling identified adjuvant treatment as independently associated with improved survival, with a 24% reduction in mortality (hazard ratio, 0.76; P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant therapy was associated with improved overall survival. Therefore, consideration should be given to administration of adjuvant therapy to esophageal cancer patients who have persistent node-positive disease after induction therapy and esophagectomy and are able to tolerate additional treatment.

Reliability and safety of minimally invasive esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a retrospective study

Background

Thoracic surgeons have recognized the advantages of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE). However, MIE for locally advanced esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) is controversial. This study aimed to nvestigate and summarise the reliability and safety of MIE after NCRT.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the perioperative outcomes of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy from January 2016 to January 2018, and compared them with patients who underwent MIE alone during the same period.

Results

In total, 107 patients were eligible for the study. Forty-four patients underwent MIE after NCRT (CRM), and 63 patients underwent MIE alone (MA). The surgical duration (253.59 ± 47.51 vs. 222.86 ± 42.86 min), intraoperative blood loss (164.55 ± 109.09 vs. 146.19 ± 112.89 ml), number of lymph nodes resected (18.36 ± 8.01 vs. 22.10 ± 12.03), duration of the postoperative hospital stay (12.84 ± 6.57 vs. 14.60 ± 8.48 days), postoperative intubation time (5.68 ± 3.08 vs. 6.54 ± 4.97 days), total incidence of complications (34.10% vs. 31.7%), and R0 resection rate (95.45% vs. 96.83%) had no significant difference. The incidence of arrhythmia was higher in CRM (P < 0.02). No mortality occurred postoperatively within 30 days in either group.

Conclusion

Minimally invasive esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is a feasible, safe, and beneficial for postoperative recovery of patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13019-019-0920-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Influence of Neoadjuvant Radiation Dose on Patients Undergoing Esophagectomy and Survival in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by resection is standard of care for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, however, a significant portion of these patients do not undergo surgical intervention. This study evaluates radiation dose and other factors associated with undergoing esophageal resection and their impact on outcomes including survival.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer between 2010 and 15 were queried from the National Cancer Database and stratified into low-dose radiation (41.4 Gy) (LDR) or high-dose radiation (50.0 or 50.4 Gy) (HDR) groups. Multivariable Logistic and Cox Regression analyses were performed to investigate the effect of multiple variables on the likelihood of undergoing esophagectomy and overall survival, respectively. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce bias between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 3633 patients met study criteria with 3005 (82.7%) undergoing esophagectomy. A greater proportion received HDR (3163 (87.1%)) than LDR (470 (12.9%)). The use of LDR increased from 4.7% (n = 22) in 2010 to 20.7% (n = 154) in 2015. Factors associated with undergoing esophagectomy included LDR, adenocarcinoma histology, and younger age. Radiation dosage did not impact overall survival, but undergoing esophagectomy was associated with improved survival. After propensity matching, a greater portion of the LDR group underwent esophagectomy (87.0 vs 81.1%, p = 0.013). There was no difference in R0 3 resection (93.2 vs 92.4%, p = 0.678) or complete pathologic response (19.3 vs 21.5%, p = 0.442) between LDR and HDR groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of LDR is increasing but still underutilized. LDR is associated with increased rates of esophagectomy without negatively impacting overall survival, R0 resection, or complete pathologic response.

miR-135 promotes proliferation and stemness of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma by targeting RERG

MicroRNA (miRNA) plays an important role in tumourigenesis and cancer development by regulating oncogenes or tumour suppressor that are implicated in cell cycle, cell mobility and even cell senescence. Due to the resistance to enzymes that could degrade nucleotides, miRNAs have been considered proper for diagnosis and prognosis evaluation of cancer. The present study was designed to investigate miRNA associated with ESCC and identified effective miRNAs, which could serve as biomarker or targets. We first performed miRNA profiling to identify a subset of dysregulated miRNAs in ESCC. miR-135, miR-451 and miR-186 were the most differentially expressed miRNAs. Subsequent RT-PCR validated that miR-135 was upregulated in ESCC cell lines TE2 and TE9, implying the promise as a prognostic and diagnostic marker. The Cox regression analysis suggests the correlation of miR-135 expression and tumour stages. Survival analysis demonstrated metastatic samples largely have higher miR-135 expression. Downregulation of miR-135 suppressed proliferation and invasion of TE2 and TE9 cell lines. Subsequent target prediction combined with functional enrichment analysis identified "Small GTPase superfamily" that are possibly targeted by miR-135, which offers candidates for further investigation. Finally, RERG was identified as a target of miR-135. Downregulation of RERG could inhibit the cell proliferation and sphere formation ability of TE2 and TE9. Taken together, miR-135 was proved to promote tumour development of ESCC, which promises the prospect of using miR-135 as a biomarker indicator in diagnosis and prognosis.

Efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis

Background

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the predominant type of esophageal cancer and most clinically curable patients are diagnosed with locally advanced disease. While the efficacy of preoperative treatment is relatively clear and well characterized, the effect of postoperative treatment, especially postoperative chemotherapy, remains controversial, and its role in the treatment strategy is obscure. We conducted an updated meta‐analysis to include recent developments.

Methods

A comprehensive search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify studies published from the inception of each database to February 2018. The overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) rates of patients treated with and without postoperative chemotherapy were analyzed and compared. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the associations between postoperative chemotherapy and patient survival. Potential publication bias was assessed using Egger's line regression test.

Results

A total of nine studies, including three randomized controlled trials and six retrospective studies, were retrieved from the databases, comprising a total of 1684 cases. The results showed that postoperative chemotherapy could improve OS (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66–0.91; P = 0.002) and DFS (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.6–0.86; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

The current meta‐analysis supports postoperative chemotherapy as an independent favorable prognostic factor for ESCC, which could improve both OS and DFS.

Surgical resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for oesophageal adenocarcinoma: what is the optimal timing?

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal timing of surgical resection of oesophageal adenocarcinoma following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

METHODS

nCRT before resection of oesophageal adenocarcinoma yields improved overall and progression-free survival. Despite the wide acceptance of tri-modal therapy, the optimal timing of surgical resection after nCRT is not well defined and existing studies are limited. Adults with Stage II/III oesophageal adenocarcinoma undergoing nCRT before surgery were identified from the National Cancer Database. Multivariable analysis using restricted cubic splines was used to identify an inflection point in clinical outcomes as a function of time between nCRT and surgery, dividing the cohort into short- and long-interval treatment groups, which were then compared. Adjusted rates of survival and margin status were compared between groups using multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

Among 2444 patients, restricted cubic splines identified an inflection point at 56 days, dividing our cohort into 1533 short-interval and 911 long-interval patients. Long-interval patients had a higher adjusted incidence of pathologic downstaging (odds ratio 1.38, confidence interval 1.02-1.85, P = 0.04) but no difference in margin positivity compared with short-interval patients (odds ratio 0.91, confidence interval 0.56-1.47, P = 0.69). Worse overall survival was noted in the long-interval subgroup (hazard ratio 1.44, confidence interval 1.22-1.71, P < 0.001), but 30-day postoperative mortality was not statistically different (odds ratio 1.56, confidence interval 0.9-2.72, P = 0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Restricted cubic splines provides an objective mechanism to more accurately delineate optimum timing between nCRT and surgical resection. A time interval of 56 days represents an interval where increased pathologic downstaging is balanced by decreased overall survival.

Prognosis of oesophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma following surgery and no surgery in a nationwide Swedish cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To assess the recent prognostic trends in oesophageal adenocarcinoma and oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma undergoing resectional surgery and no such surgery. Additionally, risk factors for death were assessed in each of these patient groups.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

A population-based, nationwide study in Sweden.

PARTICIPANTS

All patients diagnosed with oesophageal adenocarcinoma and oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Sweden from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 2013, with follow-up until 14 May 2017.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Observed and relative (to the background population) 1-year , 3-year and 5-year survivals were analysed using life table method. Multivariable Cox regression provided HR with 95% CI for risk factors of death.

RESULTS

Among 3794 patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma and 4631 with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma, 82% and 63% were men, respectively. From 1990-1994 to 2010-2013, the relative 5-year survival increased from 12% to 15% for oesophageal adenocarcinoma and from 9% to 12% for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The corresponding survival following surgery increased from 27% to 45% in oesophageal adenocarcinoma and from 24% to 43% in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. In patients not undergoing surgery, the survival increased from 3% to 4% for oesophageal adenocarcinoma and from 3% to 6% for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Women with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma had better prognosis than men both following surgery (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.83) and no surgery (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis has improved over calendar time both in oesophageal adenocarcinoma and oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma in Sweden that did and did not undergo surgery. Women appear to have better prognosis in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma than men, independent of treatment.

Surveillance versus esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients with a clinical complete response after induction chemoradiation

There currently exists an area of controversy in treatment of esophageal cancer for patients who have an apparent clinical complete response (cCR) after induction chemoradiation. A standard treatment is to offer these patients an esophagectomy, but increasingly there is interest from both the patient and provider for active surveillance with so-called "salvage" esophagectomies for local recurrence as an alternative treatment paradigm. In this article, we review the existing evidence that stakeholders should consider for clinical decision-making in this specific patient population, including: the accuracy of post-induction clinical restaging, the reliability of operative risk assessment, the feasibility and adherence to surveillance strategies, and the observed outcomes in these patients after salvage esophagectomy or continued active surveillance. We also briefly discuss quality of life and future directions for this field.

Prolonged interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy does not benefit the outcome in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Whether a prolonged interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and esophagectomy could benefits conditions such as rectal cancer, still remains unknown. We therefore performed the current study to evaluate the influence of the interval between nCRT and esophagectomy on the clinical outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. PubMed and Embase were searched to identify eligible cohort studies. The primary outcome was five-year overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes included the incidence of anastomotic complications, perioperative mortality, pathologic complete response (pCR) rate, positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) rate, and R0 resection rate. A random-effects model was used for all meta-analyses irrespective of heterogeneity. Ten cohort studies with 2383 patients were included. Overall, the pooled estimate revealed that the prolonged interval has no impact on five-year OS (odds ratio (OR) 0.87, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.14, P = 0.30), with low heterogeneity (PH = 0.78, I2 = 0%). However, it was associated with an increased risk of anastomotic complication (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.54, P = 0.008), with no effect on perioperative mortality (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.83, P = 0.40). Additionally, the prolonged interval failed to increase the pCR rate (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.33, P = 0.89). Even worse, it was correlated with a decreased R0 resection rate (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.88, P = 0.009) and increased positive CRM rate (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.44 to 3.36, P < 0.001). This study suggests that the prolonged interval between nCRT and esophagectomy fails to result in better outcomes, and in fact, could worsen clinical outcomes, with increasing anastomotic complications, and undermine resection completeness. However, this conclusion should be treated with caution because of the limitations of retrospective cohort study and substantial clinical heterogeneity. (The study was registered at PRESPERO as CRD42016048210).

The use of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in an analysis of 5016 patients from 305 designated cancer care hospitals in Japan

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for resectable locally advanced thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The aim of our study was to elucidate the use of neoadjuvant therapy for thoracic ESCC in Japan.

METHODS

Data on patients with stage IB-III thoracic ESCC were retrieved from the national database of hospital-based cancer registries combined with claims data between 2012 and 2013. These data were analyzed using a mixed-effect logistic regression analysis, with a focus on exploring patterns in the first-line treatment for ESCC, including proportion of patients who received neoadjuvant therapy, and investigating the hospital characteristics and patient factors associated with the use of neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 5016 patients with stage IB-III thoracic ESCC at the 305 participating hospitals, 34.2% received neoadjuvant therapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 29.5%; neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 4.7%). The therapy was less likely to be administered to older patients (≤64 years, 48.8%; 65-70 years, 42.0%; 70-75 years, 33.9%; 75-80 years, 22.2%; 80-85 years, 3.8%; ≥85 years, 1.4%) and at hospitals with a low volume of patients (very high, 42.1%; high, 37.5%; low, 30.7%; and very low, 26.4%). This trend was confirmed by regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results, in Japan, relatively few patients with resectable locally advanced thoracic ESCC receive neoadjuvant therapy, with older patients and patients at lower volume hospitals being less likely than other patients to receive the neoadjuvant therapy. We recommend that the process of treatment decision-making be assessed at both the patient and hospital levels so that patients can consider various treatment options, including neoadjuvant therapy with surgery in Japan.

Oncologic Quality Indicators in Thoracic Surgery

This article outlines a structure for assessing thoracic surgical quality and provides an overview of evidence-based quality metrics for surgical care in both lung cancer and esophageal cancer, with a focus on process and outcome measures in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative setting.

Adhering to Quality Measures in Esophagectomy Is Associated With Improved Survival in All Stages of Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Quality measures for patients with early and locally advanced esophageal cancer undergoing esophagectomy have been made by national organizations. The rate of adherence to these measures as well as their association with overall survival are unknown.

METHODS

Esophagectomy patients were abstracted from the National Cancer Database. Because neoadjuvant status was available since 2006, the analysis of locally advanced patients began at this time point. Selected measures included: R0 resection, evaluation of 15 or more lymph nodes, and induction therapy for locally advanced tumors. Multivariate models identified variables associated with achieving quality measures. A Cox proportional hazards model evaluated factors associated with mortality.

RESULTS

From 1998 to 2012, 4,908 of 16,040 (30.6%) early-stage esophageal cancer patients (clinical T1A to T2N0 <2cm, well-differentiated) underwent esophagectomy. Of 4,672 patients 4,518 (96.7%) achieved R0 resection and 1,395 of 4,686 (29.8%) had 15 or more lymph nodes sampled. High-volume center type (>20 esophagectomies/year) was independently associated with meeting both measures (odds ratio [OR] 2.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9 to 2.5). From 2006 to 2012, 7,747 of 20,437 (37.9%) locally advanced patients (clinical Stage IIB to IIIB) received esophagectomy. Of 6,966 patients 5,977 (85.8%) received induction therapy, 6,394 (91.8%) had R0 resection, and 2,852 (40.9%) had 15 or more lymph nodes sampled. High-volume center type was, again, associated with increased likelihood of meeting all quality measures (OR 2.17, 95% CI: 1.92 to 2.46). Meeting all quality measures was associated with the largest decrease in mortality for both early-stage (hazard ratio [HR] 0.27, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.39) and locally advanced (HR 0.54, 95% CI: 0.40 to 0.73) esophageal cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to recommended quality measures is independently associated with improved overall survival in both early and locally advanced stages of esophageal cancer. Currently, few patients are receiving care in accordance with these recommendations.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy versus Chemoradiation Prior to Esophagectomy: Impact on Rate of Complete Pathologic Response and Survival in Esophageal Cancer Patients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in pathologic complete response (pCR) rates and overall survival among patients receiving either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation before esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with esophageal cancer receiving either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation before esophagectomy were identified using the National Cancer Database. Univariate analysis compared patient, tumor, and postoperative outcome characteristics. Logistic regression was performed to identify variables associated with achieving pCR. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare overall median survival by neoadjuvant therapy type and pCR status. Finally, a Cox proportional hazards model was fitted to identify variables associated with increased mortality hazard.

RESULTS

From 2006 to 2012, a total of 916 of 7338 of patients (12.5%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy whereas 6422 (87.5%) received neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation were more likely to achieve a pCR (17.2% versus 6.4%, p < 0.001) and less likely to have positive margins (5.6% versus 11.5%, p < 0.001) than were patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with no difference in 30- or 90-day mortality. Achieving a pCR was associated with improved overall median survival (59.5 ± 4.0 months versus 30.1 ± 0.76 months for those with persistent disease, p < 0.001). On logistic regression, neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy was independently associated with achieving a pCR (OR = 2.75, 95% confidence interval: 2.01-3.77, p < 0.001). Despite improvement in the pCR rate with neoadjuvant chemoradiation, neoadjuvant therapy type was not independently associated with long-term survival (hazard ratio = 1.12; 95% confidence interval: 0.97-1.30, p = 0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Although neoadjuvant chemoradiation is more successful in downstaging esophageal cancer before esophagectomy, it was not independently prognostic for improved long-term survival. Other factors affecting long-term survival among pathologic complete responders and among patients with persistent disease should be investigated to clarify this association.