Indications for Adjuvant Mediastinal Radiotherapy in Surgically Resected Small Cell Lung Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:1647-1653. [PMID: 28267977 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.11.039]

CD3, CD8, IFN-γ, tumor and stroma inflammatory cells as prognostic indicators for surgically resected SCLC: evidences from a 10-year retrospective study and immunohistochemical analysis

Current clinical guidelines limit surgical intervention to patients with cT1-2N0M0 small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Our objective was to reassess the role of surgery in SCLC management, and explore novel prognostic indicators for surgically resected SCLC. We reviewed all patients diagnosed with SCLC from January 2011 to April 2021 in our institution. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method, and independent prognostic factors were assessed through the Cox proportional hazard model. In addition, immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining was performed to evaluate the predictive value of selected indicators in the prognosis of surgically resected SCLC patients. In the study, 177 SCLC patients undergoing surgical resection were ultimately included. Both univariate and multivariate Cox analysis revealed that incomplete postoperative adjuvant therapy emerged as an independent risk factor for adverse prognosis (p < 0.001, HR 2.96). Survival analysis revealed significantly superior survival among pN0-1 patients compared to pN2 patients (p < 0.0001). No significant difference in postoperative survival was observed between pN1 and pN0 patients (p = 0.062). Patients with postoperative stable disease (SD) exhibited lower levels of tumor inflammatory cells (TIC) (p = 0.0047) and IFN-γ expression in both area and intensity (p < 0.0001 and 0.0091, respectively) compared to those with postoperative progressive disease (PD). Conversely, patients with postoperative SD showed elevated levels of stromal inflammatory cells (SIC) (p = 0.0453) and increased counts of CD3+ and CD8+ cells (p = 0.0262 and 0.0330, respectively). Survival analysis indicated that high levels of SIC, along with low levels of IFN-γ+ cell area within tumor tissue, may correlate positively with improved prognosis in surgically resected SCLC (p = 0.017 and 0.012, respectively). In conclusion, the present study revealed that the patients with pT1-2N1M0 staging were a potential subgroup of SCLC patients who may benefit from surgery. Complete postoperative adjuvant therapy remains an independent factor promoting a better prognosis for SCLC patients undergoing surgical resection. Moreover, CD3, CD8, IFN-γ, TIC, and SIC may serve as potential indicators for predicting the prognosis of surgically resected SCLC.

Application of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

One of the most important treatments for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is radiation therapy. Currently, the criteria for administering postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (PORT) in SCLC remain uncertain. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the influence of PORT on the prognosis of limited-stage SCLC (LS-SCLC).

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search across three databases, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Data analysis involved utilizing both random-effects and fixed-effects models for pooling the results. A comparative analysis was performed to assess the prognostic outcomes of patients with LS-SCLC who did and did not undergo PORT. The primary outcome assessed was overall survival (OS), while the secondary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

This analysis included 11 retrospective studies comprising 7694 eligible participants. Among the entire population of LS-SCLC patients, the OS was superior in those receiving PORT than in those not receiving it (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.79, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.87; P < 0.0001). In pN0 stage LS-SCLC patients, PORT was associated with a detrimental effect on OS (HR: 1.22, 95 % CI: 1.04-1.43; P = 0.01). In pN1 stage LS-SCLC patients, additionally administering PORT did not provide a significant OS advantage as compared to not administering it (HR: 0.82, 95 % CI: 0.60-1.12; P = 0.21). In pN2 stage LS-SCLC patients, those receiving PORT demonstrated a significant improvement in OS (HR: 0.59; 95 % CI: 0.50-0.70; P < 0.0001) as compared to those not receiving it. Regarding DFS in LS-SCLC patients, the difference in the protective effect with and without the administration of PORT was less pronounced (HR: 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.58-1.00; P = 0.053).

CONCLUSIONS

With respect to OS, PORT is not advisable in patients with pN0 or pN1 stage LS-SCLC but is highly recommended in pN2 stage LS-SCLC. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings.

The Role of Adjuvant Therapy Following Surgical Resection of Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multi-Center Study

PURPOSE

This multi-center, retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the long-term survival in patients who underwent surgical resection for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and to identify the benefit of adjuvant therapy following surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of 213 patients who underwent surgical resection for SCLC at four institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy or an incomplete resection were excluded.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 65.29±8.93 years, and 184 patients (86.4%) were male. Lobectomies and pneumonectomies were performed in 173 patients (81.2%), and 198 (93%) underwent systematic mediastinal lymph node dissections. Overall, 170 patients (79.8%) underwent adjuvant chemotherapy, 42 (19.7%) underwent radiotherapy to the mediastinum, and 23 (10.8%) underwent prophylactic cranial irradiation. The median follow-up period was 31.08 months (interquartile range, 13.79 to 64.52 months). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival were 53.4% and 46.9%, respectively. The 5-year OS significantly improved after adjuvant chemotherapy in all patients (57.4% vs. 40.3%, p=0.007), and the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy was significant in patients with negative node pathology (70.8% vs. 39.7%, p=0.004). Adjuvant radiotherapy did not affect the 5-year OS (54.6% vs. 48.5%, p=0.458). Age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.032; p=0.017), node metastasis (HR, 2.190; p < 0.001), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 0.558; p=0.019) were associated with OS.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection in patients with SCLC improved the OS, though adjuvant radiotherapy to the mediastinum did not improve the survival or decrease the locoregional recurrence rate.

Long-term results of postoperative unsuspected small cell lung cancer on real-world data

BACKGROUND

In traditional opinion, solid pulmonary nodule suspected lung cancer should be confirmed by pathology before the operation to exclude small cell lung cancer (SCLC), considering SCLC tends to be aggressive and surgical effect in the management of SCLC remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the survival result and risk factors of postoperative unsuspected SCLC.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients with postoperative unsuspected SCLC who were confirmed by pathology and referred to Chinese PLA General Hospital between 2000 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed (surgery group). Additionally, 120 patients with limited-stage SCLC who underwent chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the same period were enrolled in the chemoradiotherapy group.. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival; the Log-Rank test was used to compare survival rates between different groups; a COX stepwise regression model was used for multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Among 120 patients in the surgery group, 28 were with central type and other 92 with peripheral type. The median survival (OS) was 44.85 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 46%. The 5-year survival rates for stage I, II, and III were 52.1%, 45.4%, and 27.8%, respectively. The mean disease-free survival time (DFS) was 30.63 ± 4.38 months, and the 5-year DFS rate was 31.5%. In the chemoradiotherapy group, the mean OS was 21.4 ± 4.26 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 28.3%. The 5-year survival rates for clinical stage I, II, and III were 42.5%, 39.8%, and 20.5%, respectively. The mean progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.63 ± 3.6 months. In the surgery group, one-way ANOVA revealed that the gender, symptoms, smoking history, tumor location, and postoperative radiotherapy were not associated with OS (P ≥ 0.05), while age, surgical approach, surgical method, N stage, TNM stage, and vascular tumor thrombus were related to OS (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis indicated that the N stage was associated with OS (HR = 1.86 P = 0.042).

CONCLUSION

Surgery and adjuvant therapy were found to have encouraging outcomes in postoperative unsuspected SCLC. Patients with stage I, stage II and part of stage IIIA SCLC could benefit from surgery and the standard lobectomy, and systematic lymph node dissection, is also recommended for these patients.

Redefining the role of surgery in early small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Resection is guideline recommended in stage I small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) but not in stage II. In this stage, patients are treated with a non-surgical approach. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the role of surgery in both SCLC stages. Surgically treated patients were compared to non-surgical controls. Five-year survival rates were analysed.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed on December 01, 2021 in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library. Studies published since 2004 on the effect of surgery in SCLC were considered and assessed using ROBINS-I. We preformed I²-tests, Q-statistics, DerSimonian-Laird tests and Egger-regression. The meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA.

RESULTS

Out of 6826 records, we identified seven original studies with a total of 15,170 patients that met our inclusion criteria. We found heterogeneity between these studies and ruled out any publication bias. Patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the two groups (p-value > 0.05). The 5-year survival rates in stage I were 47.4 ± 11.6% for the 'surgery group' and 21.7 ± 11.3% for the 'non-surgery group' (p-value = 0.0006). Our analysis of stage II SCLC revealed a significant survival benefit after surgery (40.2 ± 21.6% versus 21.2 ± 17.3%; p-value = 0.0474).

CONCLUSION

Based on our data, the role of surgery in stage I and II SCLC is robust, since it improves the long-term survival in both stages significantly. Hence, feasibility of surgery as a priority treatment should always be evaluated not only in stage I SCLC but also in stage II, for which guideline recommendations might have to be reassessed.

The Construction and Validation of Nomogram to Predict the Prognosis with Small-Cell Lung Cancer Followed Surgery

This study constructed and validated a prognostic model to evaluate the survival of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients following surgery, and shed light on the strategy of postoperative radiotherapy. A total of 882 patients from Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital and the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database after lung resection were selected. Multivariable Cox analysis was used to identify the indicators affecting long-term survival in patients. A nomogram was constructed to predict the prognosis of eligible patients. Indices of concordance (C-index) was used to access the predictive ability of cancer-specific survival (CSS) for the prognostic model. CSS discrimination in the prognostic model was comparable in the training and validation cohorts (C-index = 0.637[NORAD-T], 0.660[NORAD-V], 0.656[RAD] and 0.627[our hospital], respectively. Stratification based on the cutoff value of the nomogram yielded low- and high-risk subgroups in four cohorts. For patients in the high-risk group, postoperative radiotherapy was considered a survival-promoting strategy (unadjusted HR 0.641, 95% CI 0.469-0.876, p = 0.0046). In the low-risk group, however, the implementation of radiotherapy barely had an influence on CSS. In conclusion, the nomogram we constructed and validated could predict the prognosis of SCLC patients followed surgery and identify high-risk patients who were likely to benefit from postoperative radiotherapy.

Impact of Adjuvant Therapy on Survival in Surgically Resected Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background

Data on efficacy of adjuvant therapy for surgically resected small cell lung cancer are scant. This study was determined to reveal the survival benefits of different adjuvant treatment modalities for limited-stage small cell lung cancer patients following surgical resection.

Methods

Data of patients with histologically confirmed small cell lung cancer after surgical resection were collected from November 2006 to June 2019. Survival analyses were calculated by Kaplan–Meier method, with log-rank test to evaluate statistical significance. Prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis using cox proportional hazards model. Further survival analysis and cox regression analysis stratified by clinicopathologic features were conducted to evaluate the survival benefits of different adjuvant treatment modalities.

Results

In total, 153 out of 157 patients were analyzed. Multivariate analysis showed male sex, lymph node metastasis, residual tumor, VPI and non-adjuvant therapy were independently associated with poor prognosis. Subgroup analyses revealed both adjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy were significantly associated with superior survival for stage pT2-4 (HR=0.176, 95%CI:0.053-0.578, p=0.004; and HR=0.115, 95%CI:0.033-0.405, p=0.001) and pure SCLC patients (HR=0.182, 95%CI:0.067-0.494, p=0.001; and HR=0.181, 95%CI:0.071-0.465, p<0.001). For pN0 patients, adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with better survival (HR=0.219, 95%CI:0.054-0.891, p=0.034), while adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with improved survival for pN+ patients (HR=0.324, 95%CI:0.138-0.760, p=0.010).

Conclusions

For patients without pathologic lymph node metastasis, there is a survival benefit with adjuvant chemotherapy. However, for patients with pathologic lymph node metastasis, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy might achieve a significant survival benefit. Further prospective studies are needed to validate the results.

Thoracic radiotherapy in small cell lung cancer-a narrative review

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents 10–15% of all lung cancers and has a poor prognosis. Thoracic radiotherapy plays a central role in current SCLC management. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) is the standard of care for localised disease (stage I−III, limited-stage, LS). Definitive thoracic radiotherapy may be offered in metastatic patients (stage IV, extensive stage, ES-SCLC) after chemotherapy. For LS-SCLC, the gold standard is early accelerated hyperfractionated twice-daily CTRT (4 cycles of cisplatin etoposide, starting with the first or second chemotherapy cycle). Modern radiation techniques should be used with involved-field radiotherapy based on baseline CT and PET/CT scans. In ES-SCLC, thoracic radiotherapy should be discussed in cases of initial bulky mediastinal disease/residual thoracic disease not progressing after induction chemotherapy. This strategy was however not assessed in recent trials establishing chemo-immunotherapy as the standard first line treatment in ES-SCLC. Future developments include technical radiotherapy advances and the incorporation of new drugs. Thoracic irradiation is delivered more precisely given technical developments (IMRT, image-guided radiotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy), reducing the risks of severe adverse events. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy may be discussed in rare early stage (T1 to 2, N0) inoperable patients. A number of current clinical trials are investigating immunoradiotherapy. In this review, we highlight the current role of thoracic radiotherapy and describe ongoing research in the integration of biological surrogate markers, advanced radiotherapy technologies and novel drugs in SCLC patients.

GOECP/SEOR radiotherapy guidelines for small-cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 20% of all lung cancers. The main treatment is chemotherapy (Ch). However, the addition of radiotherapy significantly improves overall survival (OS) in patients with non-metastatic SCLC and in those with metastatic SCLC who respond to Ch. Prophylactic cranial irradiation reduces the risk of brain metastases and improves OS in both metastatic and non-metastatic patients. The 5-year OS rate in patients with limited-stage disease (non-metastatic) is slightly higher than 30%, but less than 5% in patients with extensive-stage disease (metastatic). The present clinical guidelines were developed by Spanish radiation oncologists on behalf of the Oncologic Group for the Study of Lung Cancer/Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology to provide a current review of the diagnosis, planning, and treatment of SCLC. These guidelines emphasise treatment fields, radiation techniques, fractionation, concomitant treatment, and the optimal timing of Ch and radiotherapy. Finally, we discuss the main indications for reirradiation in local recurrence.

Intent-to-cure surgery for small-cell lung cancer in the era of contemporary screening and staging methods

OBJECTIVES

Our goal was to report on the contemporaneous single-centre experience of patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) who had lung resection with curative intent.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2018, 31 patients were operated on for SCLC with curative intent. There were 11 women and 20 men whose ages averaged 63 ± 10 years. The clinical diagnosis was incidental in 16 patients (51.6%). All patients were screened with high-resolution computed tomography, positron emission tomography and brain imaging. Eight patients (25.8%) had invasive mediastinal lymph node staging.

RESULTS

Preoperative tissue diagnosis was unknown or erroneous in 26 patients (83.9%). Lung resections comprised mainly lobectomies (n = 23; 74.2%). Lymphadenectomies harvested a mean of 16.3 ± 3 lymph nodes, leading to upstaging in 38.7% of the cases. An R0 resection was achieved in 28 patients (90.3%). Pathological analysis disclosed pure small cell histological specimens in 24 patients (77.4%). There were no 90-day deaths. Perioperative platinum-based chemotherapy was performed in 27 patients (87.1%); adjuvant thoracic irradiation, in 7 (50%) of the 14 N+ patients; and prophylactic cranial irradiation, in 8 (29.6%) of the 27 potential candidates. Overall, disease-free and disease-specific survival rates at 5 years were 32.9 ± 10%, 35.2 ± 10% and 44.1 ± 11.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the use of contemporary screening and staging methods, selection of SCLC candidates for surgery remained haphazard, surgery was typically performed in ignorance of the actual histological and adherence to treatment guidelines was inconsistent. Nevertheless, one-third of patients with SCLC who were operated on were cured, even in cases of regional or oligometastatic disease.

Predictors of survival following surgical resection of limited-stage small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant chemotherapy, postoperative radiation (PORT), and prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) have been individually examined in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). There is a paucity of data on the effectiveness of each adjuvant treatment modality when used in combination after surgical resection of SCLC.

METHODS

Data were collected from 5 cancer centers on all patients with limited-stage SCLC who underwent surgical resection between 1986 and 2019. Univariate and multivariable models were conducted to identify predictors of long-term outcomes, focusing on freedom from recurrence and survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy, PORT, and PCI.

RESULTS

A total of 164 patients were analyzed. Multivariable Cox regression analysis did not identify any adjuvant therapies to significantly influence recurrence in this cohort. Specifically, PORT was not associated with a significant influence on locoregional recurrence and PCI was not significantly associated with intracranial outcomes. Adjuvant chemotherapy improved survival in all stage I through III disease (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.81; P = .005) and even in pathologically node negative patients (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.91; P = .024). Although PCI was found to improve survival in univariate analysis, it was not significant in a multivariable model. PORT was not found to affect survival on either univariate or multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This is among the largest multi-institutional studies on surgically resected limited-stage SCLC. Our results highlight survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy, but did not identify a statistically significant influence from mediastinal PORT or PCI in our cohort. Larger prospective studies are needed to determine the benefit of PORT or PCI in a surgically resected limited-stage SCLC population.

Defining the role of adjuvant therapy for early-stage large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma is a rare, high-grade neuroendocrine tumor. The mainstay of treatment for early, node-negative disease is surgical resection, and optimal adjuvant treatment strategies are not well defined.

METHODS

Patients with early, node-negative large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma were identified in the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2014. Patient, tumor, treatment, and hospital characteristics were examined. Survival differences in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and adjusted multivariate Cox models were constructed. A conditional landmark analysis was used to address immortal time bias. T-stage-specific propensity score matching was used to address covariate imbalances between groups.

RESULTS

One thousand seven hundred seventy patients were identified, of whom 463 (26.2%) received AC. Patients receiving AC were younger, less comorbid, and more likely to have T2 tumors. AC was associated with significantly longer survival, which persisted after adjustment in Cox models, for patients overall (5-year overall survival, 59.2% vs 45.3%; hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-0.82; P < .0001), T2 tumors (overall survival, 59.8% vs 42.1%; hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.81; P < .0001), and tumors 2 to 3 cm (overall survival, 60.0% vs 42.6%; hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.8; P = .002), but not tumors smaller than 2 cm. Adjuvant chest radiotherapy was not associated with longer survival. Sublobar resection was associated with worse overall survival compared with lobectomy (hazard ratio, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.64; P < .0001). Propensity score matching confirmed these findings, but the association with survival for tumors 2 to 3 cm in size was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In this national study of early-stage large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, AC was associated with significantly longer survival for tumors larger than 3 cm, and possibly for tumors 2 to 3 cm. Adjuvant radiation was not associated with prolonged survival.

Survival after adjuvant radiation therapy in localized small cell lung cancer treated with complete resection

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether there is an overall survival (OS) benefit to the addition of thoracic radiation therapy (RT) following R0 resection of pathologic (p) T1 or pT2 N0 M0 small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis. Patients who underwent R0 resection for pT1 or p2 N0 M0 small cell lung cancer, stratified by receipt of adjuvant thoracic RT, were compared on the basis of OS using hierarchical Cox Proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Of 4969 patients diagnosed with pT1or pT2 N0 M0 SCLC from 2004 to 2014, 1617 (33%) underwent R0 resection of their primary tumor; of these resected patients, 146 (9.0%) had adjuvant thoracic RT. In unadjusted analysis, there was no significant difference in OS between groups (median survival: surgery alone, 62.2 months vs surgery+RT, 43.8 months; P = .1436). In multivariable analysis, RT was not associated with improved survival (P = .099). There was no significant difference in unadjusted or adjusted survival associated with receipt of RT in both a young and healthy cohort (P = .647 for unadjusted and P = .858 for adjusted) and a matched cohort (P = .867 and P = .954). In the matched cohort, improved OS was associated with younger patient age (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.10; P < .001), female sex (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.68, 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.97; P = .035), and smaller tumors (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.03; P = .005). Having 2 or more comorbidities was associated with worse OS (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-3.86; P = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

Although complete resection was accomplished in a minority of patients, for these patients, survival was good. The addition of thoracic RT to complete resection does not appear to confer additional survival benefit.

Image-guided surgery in cancer: A strategy to reduce incidence of positive surgical margins

Primary treatment for many solid cancers includes surgical excision or radiation therapy, with or without the use of adjuvant therapy. This can include the addition of radiation and chemotherapy after primary surgical therapy, or the addition of chemotherapy and salvage surgery to primary radiation therapy. Both primary therapies, surgery and radiation, require precise anatomic localization of tumor. If tumor is not targeted adequately with initial treatment, disease recurrence may ensue, and if targeting is too broad, unnecessary morbidity may occur to nearby structures or remaining normal tissue. Fluorescence imaging using intraoperative contrast agents is a rapidly growing field for improving visualization in cancer surgery to facilitate resection in order to obtain negative margins. There are multiple strategies for tumor visualization based on antibodies against surface markers or ligands for receptors preferentially expressed in cancer. In this article, we review the incidence and clinical implications of positive surgical margins for some of the most common solid tumors. Within this context, we present the ongoing clinical and preclinical studies focused on the use of intraoperative contrast agents to improve surgical margins. This article is categorized under: Laboratory Methods and Technologies > Imaging.

The role of radiation therapy in the management of small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a very aggressive form of lung cancer. SCLC treatment requires multidisciplinary management and timely treatment. Radiation therapy is an important part of management of all stages of SCLC, in the curative as well as in the palliative setting. The role of radiation therapy in all stages of SCLC has changed in recent years; this article describes these changes and highlights the role of radiation therapy in the management of SCLC.

Surgical Treatment for Early Small Cell Lung Cancer: Variability in Practice and Impact on Survival

BACKGROUND

Surgical resection with lobectomy is recommended for T1/T2 N0 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients after negative mediastinal staging. We sought to characterize variation in surgical therapy for early SCLC and determine the effect of a hospital's practice patterns on patient survival.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was examined from 2004 to 2013. Risk- and reliability-adjusted hierarchical logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted odds of resection by hospital. Hospitals were then grouped into quartiles by observed-to-expected rates of surgical treatment. Patient, tumor, and hospital characteristics were compared across quartiles. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazard models were built to compare patient survival as a function of a hospital's tendency to use surgical intervention.

RESULTS

We identified 5,079 patients with T1/T2 N0 SCLC in 317 hospitals, and 1,260 underwent resection. Analysis after adjusting for demographic, comorbidity, and tumor factors showed patients treated at hospitals in the highest quartile of surgical use were 17 times more likely to undergo surgical resection than those in the lowest quartile (44.8% vs 7.6%; odds ratio, 16.7l; 95% confidence interval, 12.59 to 22.18). Hospitals in the highest quartile were more likely to be academic centers (48% vs 21%), more likely to perform lobectomy (28.3% vs 5.0%), and treated more mixed-histology tumors (11.1% vs 4.5%). Survival was significantly longer for patients treated at hospitals most likely to use surgical therapy (median, 25.3 vs. 18.8 months; p < 0.0001). Hazard ratio differences in mortality persisted in multivariate Cox models (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.72 to 0.89; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Large variation exists in the use of surgical therapy for early SCLC in the United States, which may represent a significant quality improvement opportunity for patients with early SCLC.

Recent developments in radiotherapy for small-cell lung cancer: a review by the Oncologic Group for the Study of Lung Cancer (Spanish Radiation Oncology Society)

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 13% of all lung tumours. The standard treatment in patients with limited-stage disease is radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy. In extensive SCLC, the importance of consolidation thoracic radiotherapy in patients with a good treatment response has become increasingly recognized. In both limited and extensive disease, prophylactic cranial irradiation is recommended in patients who respond to treatment. New therapeutic approaches such as immunotherapy are being increasingly incorporated into the treatment of SCLC, although more slowly than in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Diverse radiation dose and fractionation schemes, administered in varying combinations with these new drugs, are being investigated. In the present study we review and update the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of SCLC. We also discuss the main clinical trials currently underway in order to identify future trends.