Ruxolitinib as Salvage Therapy in Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients

Ruxolitinib in acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease: real life long-term experience in a multi-center study for adult and pediatric patients, on behalf of the GETH-TC

Ruxolitinib has been approved for the treatment of adults and pediatric patients ≥12 years with steroid refractory graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). However, real-life studies are needed to confirm the results of clinical trials and further assess its efficacy in special populations. We performed a descriptive, retrospective, multi-center study of 352 adults and 42 pediatric patients treated with ruxolitinib for steroid-refractory acute or chronic GvHD. Among 119 and 233 adult patients with acute and chronic GvHD, overall response rate (ORR) was 58.8% (CR 33.6%) and 65.7% (CR 18.5%), respectively. Corticosteroids were withdrawn in 59.2% and 40.1%, and ruxolitinib in 47.2% and 34.8% in the acute and chronic groups of responders. Among 29 and 13 pediatric patients with acute and chronic GvHD, ORR was 82.7% (CR 51.7%) and 100% (CR 23%), respectively. Among responder patients, corticosteroids were withdrawn in 72.7% and 50%, and ruxolitinib in 75% and 30.7% in both groups respectively. Ruxolitinib in the real world setting, showed similar results as compared to clinical trials. Its efficacy is maintained in subsequent lines of treatment. In the pediatric population, the data are more favorable. In the long-term follow-up, corticosteroids, ruxolitinib and other inmunosuppressive drugs could be eliminated in a remarkably proportion of patients.

Efficacy of Ruxolitinib in the management of chronic GVHD

OBJECTIVES

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a potentially curative treatment for hematological diseases, with success rates improving due to advancements in conditioning regimens and new anti-graft versus host disease (GVHD) drugs. Ruxolitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and 2 inhibitor has been used to mitigate the effects of various inflammatory and myeloproliferative syndromes, given the JAK kinase pathway's central role in cytokine signaling during inflammatory and immune processes. In this study we aimed to assess ruxolitinib's efficacy in patients with chronic GVHD (cGVHD).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective observational multi-center study involved 50 patients diagnosed with cGVHD after allo-HSCT in Turkey, who were treated with ruxolitinib between April 2018 and March 2024.

RESULTS

At the time of initiation of ruxolitinib treatment, most patients had severe cGVHD (n = 29, 58 %). The overall response rate at 6 months of ruxolitinib treatment was observed in 34 patients (68 %), including 6 patients (12 %) with complete responses and 28 patients (56 %) with partial responses, while 7 patients (14 %) experienced treatment failure. ECOG (2-4) performance status was established as an independent risk factor for adverse outcomes [p = 0.029, HR 3.492 (95 % CI: 1.139-10.705)]. At the two-year follow-up, the estimated survival rate was 52 %.

CONCLUSION

Ruxolitinib is safe and effective in the real-world setting for treating cGVHD, showing remission rates comparable to clinical trials. Further research with extended follow-up is necessary to confirm these findings, optimize dosing, and establish the best tapering strategies for responders.

Ruxolitinib for pediatric acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease: a single-center retrospective study of efficacy and safety

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major concern for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Ruxolitinib has been proven effective in treating adult steroid-refractory GVHD; however, studies on pediatric patients are relatively scarce. Thus, this single-center study evaluated the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in pediatric patients with steroid-refractory GVHD. We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients aged < 18 years who underwent allogeneic HSCT and received ruxolitinib treatment for either acute GVHD (aGVHD) or chronic GVHD (cGVHD) between 2018 and 2023. Data on the clinical response, concomitant and subsequent medications, adverse events, and outcomes were obtained through medical chart review. Sixteen patients were analyzed in this study: seven with aGVHD and nine with cGVHD. The overall response rate for the 16 patients was 81% (aGVHD, 86%; cGVHD, 77%). The overall survival rate was 56%: (aGVHD, 57%; cGVHD, 55%). For 11 patients with at least stable disease, steroid dosage could be reduced by at least 75%; however, corticosteroids were successfully tapered off in only six patients at the last follow-up. Among four patients with documented lung cGVHD, none experienced lung cGVHD progression at 1-year follow-up. Further, 50% of the patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia, and 56% had viral reactivation. Two patients discontinued ruxolitinib owing to adverse events. Ruxolitinib treatment for pediatric patients with aGVHD and cGVHD is associated with a high overall response rate, significant steroid-sparing effect, acceptable toxicity, and manageable adverse events. However, blood count and viral reactivation should be closely monitored during ruxolitinib use.

Ruxolitinib for pediatric patients with treatment-naïve and steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: the REACH4 study

ABSTRACT

In REACH4, a phase 1/2, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study, the pharmacokinetics (PK), efficacy, and safety of ruxolitinib were evaluated in treatment-naïve and steroid-refractory pediatric patients with grade 2 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD; n = 45). Ruxolitinib dosing was based on age and targeted the exposure in adults receiving 10 mg twice daily; group 1 (aged ≥12 to <18 years) received 10 mg twice daily and preliminary starting doses for groups 2 (aged ≥6 to <12 years) and 3 (aged ≥2 to <6 years) were 5 mg twice daily and 4 mg/m2 twice daily, respectively. The phase 1 primary objective was to assess ruxolitinib PK parameters and define an age-appropriate recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for patients aged <12 years. The phase 2 primary objective was to measure the activity of ruxolitinib as assessed by overall response rate (ORR) at day 28; the key secondary objective was to assess the durable ORR at day 56. Ruxolitinib exposure was comparable across age groups; starting doses were confirmed as the RP2D. The median duration of ruxolitinib exposure was 3.8 months (range, 0.3-11.2). ORR in all patients was 84.4% (90% confidence interval [CI], 72.8-92.5) at day 28, with a durable ORR at day 56 of 66.7% (90% CI, 53.4-78.2); high response rates were observed across age groups and in both treatment-naïve and steroid-refractory subgroups. Adverse events were consistent with those expected in patients with aGVHD (anemia, decreased neutrophil and leukocyte count) treated with ruxolitinib. In pediatric patients with aGVHD, ruxolitinib showed clinically meaningful efficacy with no new safety signals. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03491215.

Ruxolitinib Plus Basiliximab Therapy for Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation: A Large-Scale Study

Steroid-refractory (SR) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a major cause of mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ruxolitinib plus basiliximab for treating SR-aGVHD after unrelated cord blood transplantation (UCBT). Among the 1154 patients with hematological malignancies who underwent UCBT between February 2014 and May 2022, 198 patients with grade II to IV SR-aGVHD were enrolled, 112 of whom were treated with basiliximab alone (basiliximab group) and 86 of whom received basiliximab plus ruxolitinib (combined therapy group). The combined therapy group demonstrated a significantly higher complete response rate (CRR) on day 28 (36.0%) than did the basiliximab group (12.5%, P < .001). SR-aGVHD patients were further stratified into standard-risk and high-risk groups using the refined Minnesota aGVHD risk score. For standard-risk patients, combined therapy significantly improved the CRR (51.1% versus 13.6%, P < .001) and 3-year overall survival (74.5% versus 52.4%, P = .033). However, high-risk patients did not exhibit the same benefits. Compared with basiliximab monotherapy, ruxolitinib plus basiliximab therapy was an effective therapy for patients with standard-risk SR-aGVHD following UCBT. The effectiveness of combined therapy in high-risk patients was not apparent, indicating the need for other treatments.

Ruxolitinib in treatment-naive or corticosteroid-refractory paediatric patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease (REACH5): interim analysis of a single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a debilitating, and sometimes life threatening, complication of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). We aimed to investigate the activity, pharmacokinetics, and safety of ruxolitinib added to corticosteroids in paediatric patients (ie, <18 years) with moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD.

METHODS

In this single-arm, phase 2 study, patients were recruited at 21 hospitals or clinics across 14 countries in Asia, Europe, and Canada. Eligible patients were aged 28 days to younger than 18 years, had undergone allogenic HSCT, and had been diagnosed with treatment-naive or corticosteroid-refractory moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD, per 2014 National Institutes of Health consensus criteria. Patients received oral ruxolitinib dosing on the basis of their age at the start of treatment: those aged 12 years to younger than 18 years received 10 mg twice daily (age ≥12 to <18 years group), those aged 6 years to younger than 12 years (age ≥6 to <12 years group) received 5 mg twice daily, and those aged 2 years to younger than 6 years received 4 mg/m2 twice daily (age ≥2 to <6 years group). Treatment was to be administered in 28-day cycles for approximately 36 months, alongside supportive treatment per institutional guidelines. The primary activity endpoint was overall response rate at cycle 7 day 1. Activity and safety analyses are reported in the full analysis set, which included all patients who received at least one dose of ruxolitinib. Here we report the prespecified interim analysis, scheduled to occur after all patients had completed 1 year of treatment or discontinued treatment, and the results for the primary endpoint evaluation reported here is to be considered final. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03774082, enrolment is complete, and the study is ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between May 20, 2020, and Sept 17, 2021, 48 patients were screened, of whom 45 were enrolled and received at least one dose of study drug (median age was 11·0 years [IQR 7·2-14·3], 16 [36%] were female, 29 [64%] were male, 21 [47%] were White, one [2%] was Black or African American, 23 [51%] were Asian, 17 [38%] were treatment-naive, 28 [62%] were corticosteroid-refractory). As of data cutoff (Oct 19, 2022), after a median ruxolitinib exposure of 55·1 weeks (IQR 13·1-75·3), the overall response rate at cycle 7 day 1 was 40·0% (18 of 45; 90% CI 27·7-53·3), with responses seen in seven (41%) of 17 treatment-naive patients and 11 (39%) of 28 corticosteroid-refractory patients. The most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse were neutropenia (eight [18%] of 45) and thrombocytopenia (six [13%]). Seven (16%) patients had grade 3 or worse serious treatment-related adverse events; the most common was hyponatraemia (two [4%] of 45). Three (7%) patients died while on-treatment (within 30 days of treatment discontinuation), one due to Aspergillus infection, one due to septic shock, and one due to acute respiratory distress syndrome; none were considered to be related to study drug.

INTERPRETATION

Pending final analysis, this study suggests that ruxolitinib is active and well tolerated in both treatment-naive and corticosteroid-refractory patients aged 2 years to younger than 18 years with chronic GVHD, thereby supporting its use in this patient population. The safety profile of ruxolitinib in this patient population is consistent with that of adults. Final analysis of this study will provide further information on the long-term benefits of ruxolitinib in children with chronic GVHD.

FUNDING

Novartis.

Ruxolitinib for the treatment of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease in children: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

Steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GvHD) represents a major complication of pediatric allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Ruxolitinib, a selective JAK 1-2 inhibitor, showed promising results in the treatment of SR-GvHD in adult trial, including patients >12 years old. This systematic review aims to evaluate ruxolitinib use for SR-GvHD in the pediatric population. Among the 12 studies included, ruxolitinib administration presented slight differences. Overall response rate (ORR) ranged from 45% to 100% in both acute and chronic GvHD. Complete response rates (CR) varied from 9% to 67% and from 0% to 28% in aGvHD and cGvHD, respectively. Individual-patient meta-analysis from 108 children under 12 years showed an ORR and CR for aGvHD of 74% and 56%, respectively, while in cGvHD ORR was 78% but with only 11% achieving CR. Treatment-related toxicities were observed in 20% of patients, including cytopenia, liver toxicity, and infections. Age, weight, graft source, previous lines of therapy, and dose did not significantly predict response, while a higher rate of toxicities was observed in aGvHD patients. In conclusion, ruxolitinib shows promising results in the treatment of SR-GvHD in children, including those under 12 years. Specific pediatric perspective trials are currently ongoing to definitely assess its efficacy and safety.

Updates on efficacy and safety janus kinase inhibitors in juvenile dermatomyositis

INTRODUCTION

Juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) is a rare autoimmune disease most commonly with proximal weakness due to inflammation and characteristic skin rashes. Most patients have a chronic or polycyclic disease course on standard therapy so better treatments are needed. An interferon signature is well-established in key tissues of JDM. Janus kinase inhibitors (jakinibs), which can decrease IFN signaling, are therefore appealing as a targeted therapy.

AREAS COVERED

Herein is a review of the growing literature on JDM patients in jakinibs, including specifics of their jakinib exposure, summary of efficacy, disease features, and characteristics of patients treated, and safety parameters.

EXPERT OPINION

The vast majority of refractory JDM patients respond to jakinib therapy, though they have varied features, doses, and previous/concurrent medications, and data is largely retrospective. Jakinibs are an exciting and promising treatment in JDM. Evaluation with larger prospective controlled studies is needed to answer remaining questions about jakinibs in JDM regarding dosing, which JDM patients to treat with jakinibs, potential biomarkers to use, and how best to monitor safety risks in JDM.

Ruxolitinib Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics in Children with Acute and Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of oral ruxolitinib in children with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (age <12 years) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (age ≤18 years) using our published pediatric dosing. PK sampling was performed before and 2 hours after ruxolitinib administration in patients with established cGVHD. More extensive PK analyses were performed in patients with newly diagnosed aGVHD or cGVHD before and .5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after ruxolitinib administration in patients weighing >10 kg and before, 3+, and 6+ hours in children weighing <10 kg. pSTAT1, pSTAT3, and pSTAT5 expression levels were measured on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells before and 2 hours after ruxolitinib administration as a pharmacodynamic marker of JAK/STAT inhibition. Thirteen patients were prospectively enrolled, including 8 with existing cGVHD (age 0 to ≤18 years), 4 with new-onset steroid-refractory aGVHD (age 0 to <12 years) and 1 with newly diagnosed steroid-refractory cGVHD. Great variability in PK was seen. Mean oral clearance (CL/F) was 7.76 ± 4.09 L/h (range, 3.1 to 15.3 L/h). The average elimination half-life was 2.32 ± 1.0 hours. Mean ruxolitinib clearance was higher in children age <2 years versus those age >2 years (12.1 ± 3.0 L/h versus 5.7 ± 2.8 L/h; P = .005) and was reduced with concurrent treatment with azoles and azithromycin. We saw a variable reduction in pSTAT1/3/5 expression on T cells at time of peak ruxolitinib absorption (2 hours after dosing). Children <10 kg had lower ruxolitinib exposure, possibly due to inherent increased drug clearance or variability in dosing methods, leading to decreased drug absorption.

When is the best time and grade to start ruxolitinib in corticosteroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host-disease: A multi-center research

OBJECTIVE

Ruxolitinib was recently approved to treat corticosteroid-resistant acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). However, it is unknown as to whether starting ruxolitinib at a lower versus higher acute GvHD grade or earlier versus later affected outcomes. This study identified the impact of starting acute GvHD grade and start time after declaring corticosteroid resistance and the effect on complete and overall response rates to ruxolitinib therapy.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational multi-center study. We divided cohorts into starting ruxolitinib ≤ 7 days (N = 45) versus at > 7 days after declaring corticosteroid resistance (N = 24).

RESULTS

In ≤ 7 days cohort complete response (CR) rates at day 28 were 69% (54, 81%) versus 25% (11, 47%; p = .001) in > 7 days cohort, and overall response (OR) rates were 91% (78, 96%) versus 80% (48, 92%; p = .25).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that starting ruxolitinib in ≤ 7 days of declaring corticosteroid failure regardless of G vHD grade improves complete response rate but not OR rates. Starting ruxolitinib at grade I and within 7 days may get a more significant response.

Understanding and treatment of cutaneous graft-versus-host-disease

The skin is the outermost mechanical barrier where dynamic immune reactions take place and is the most commonly affected site in both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). If not properly treated, pain and pruritis resulting from cutaneous GVHD can increase the risk of secondary infection due to erosions, ulcerations, and damage of underlying tissues. Furthermore, resulting disfiguration can cause distress and significantly impact patients' quality of life. Thus, a deeper understanding of skin-specific findings of GVHD is needed. This review will highlight some promising results of recent pre-clinical studies on the pathophysiology of skin GVHD and summarize the diagnostic and staging/grading procedures according to the clinical manifestations of skin GVHD. In addition, we will summarize outcomes of various GVHD treatments, including skin-specific response rates.

ANZTCT consensus position statement on ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease

This position paper provides an overview of the assessment and management of both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). There is a focus on the use of ruxolitinib, a selective inhibitor of Janus kinase (JAK)1 and JAK2, for the treatment of corticosteroid-refractory and corticosteroid-dependent GvHD.

Real-world data suggest effectiveness of the allogeneic mesenchymal stromal cells preparation MSC-FFM in ruxolitinib-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) not tolerating/responding to ruxolitinib (RR-aGvHD) have a dismal prognosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed real-world outcomes of RR-aGvHD treated with the random-donor allogeneic MSC preparation MSC-FFM, available via Hospital Exemption in Germany. MSC-FFM is provided as frozen cell dispersion for administration as i.v. infusion immediately after thawing, at a recommended dose of 1-2 million MSCs/kg body weight in 4 once-weekly doses. 156 patients, 33 thereof children, received MSC-FFM; 5% had Grade II, 40% had Grade III, and 54% had Grade IV aGvHD. Median (range) number of prior therapies was 4 (1-10) in adults and 7 (2-11) in children.

RESULTS

The safety profile of MSC-FFM was consistent with previous reports for MSC therapies in general and MSC-FFM specifically. The overall response rate at Day 28 was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI] 36-55%) in adults and 64% (45-80%) in children; most responses were durable. Probability of overall survival at 6, 12 and 24 months was 47% (38-56%), 35% (27-44%) and 30% (22-39%) for adults, and 59% (40-74%), 42% (24-58%) and 35% (19-53%) for children, respectively (whole cohort: median OS 5.8 months).

CONCLUSION

A recent real-world analysis of outcomes for 64 adult RR-aGvHD patients not treated with MSCs reports survival of 20%, 16% and 10% beyond 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively (median 28 days). Our data thus suggest effectiveness of MSC-FFM in RR-aGvHD.

Treatment of steroid-refractory graft versus host disease in children

Systemic steroids are still the first-line approach in acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD), and the backbone of chronic GvHD management. Refractoriness to steroid represent a major cause of morbidity and non-relapse mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In both backgrounds, several second-line immunosuppressive agents have been tested with variable results in terms of efficacy and toxicity. Solid evidence regarding these approaches is still lacking in the pediatric setting where results are mainly derived from adult experiences. Furthermore, the number of treated patients is limited and the incidence of acute and chronic GvHD is lower, resulting in a very heterogeneous approach to this complication by pediatric hematologists. Some conventional therapies and anti-cytokine monoclonal antibodies used in the adult setting have been evaluated in children. In recent years, the increasing understanding of the biological mechanisms underpinning the pathogenesis of GvHD justified the efforts toward the adoption of targeted therapies and non-pharmacologic approaches, with higher response rates and lower immunosuppressive effects. Moreover, many questions regarding the precise timing and setting in which to integrate these new approaches remain unanswered. This Review aims to critically explore the current evidence regarding novel approaches to treat SR-GvHD in pediatric HSCT recipients.

Ruxolitinib Treatment of Steroid-Refractory Graft-versus-Host Disease in Children: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Ruxolitinib has been increasingly used in the treatment of steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) patients. However, there are limited data on the use of ruxolitinib in children.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of ruxolitinib in the treatment of SR-GVHD in children.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data of patients who suffered from SR-GVHD after allo-HSCT and received ruxolitinib treatment between June 2018 and December 2020 at our center were analyzed retrospectively. The characteristics of patients, the dosage of ruxolitinib, the response, toxicity, and the survival data were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 14 pediatric patients were diagnosed with SR-GVHD after allo-HSCT and received ruxolitinib. The age of the patients ranged from 3 months to 12 years old. The dosage of ruxolitinib ranged from 2.5 mg twice daily to 7.5 mg twice daily, mainly according to patient weight. The total overall response rate (ORR) was 64.3% (9/14), with 63.6% (7/11) in aGVHD and 67% (2/3) in cGVHD. Of the 14 patients, adverse effects were observed in 9 patients (64.3%), including cytopenia, infection, and elevated alanine aminotransferase. In addition, seven reports on the treatment of SR-GVHD in children with ruxolitinib were included for systematic analysis, with the ORR ranging from 45 to 87% in aGVHD and 70-91% in cGVHD.

CONCLUSION

Given its effectiveness and safety, ruxolitinib could be used to treat SR-GVHD in children after HSCT.

Ruxolitinib as the first post-steroid treatment for acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease

INTRODUCTION

Acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) are potentially life-threatening complications occurring after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Although steroids represent the first-line treatment for both conditions, in those patients who do not adequately benefit from steroid therapy, standardized treatment algorithms are lacking. In recent years, ruxolitinib has emerged as the most promising agent for the second-line therapy of steroid-refractory (SR)-GvHD.

AREAS COVERED

This review will summarize the biological properties and the mechanistic aspects that justify the therapeutic role of ruxolitinib in GvHD. In addition, current treatment options for SR-GvHD will be briefly discussed. Finally, results of the most relevant clinical trials on the use of ruxolitinib for SR-GvHD will be analyzed, with a particular focus on two phase-III randomized trials in which ruxolitinib demonstrated its superiority in comparison with the best available therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Ruxolitinib has considerably improved the outcome of patients with SR-acute/chronic-GvHD and should be regarded as the standard-of-care option when corticosteroids fail or cannot be tapered. Nevertheless, a number of questions still remain unanswered and significant room for improvement exists. Additional observations derived from a longer follow-up will certainly increase our expertise in the management of this powerful therapy.

Dissecting the regulatory network of transcription factors in T cell phenotype/functioning during GVHD and GVT

Transcription factors play a major role in regulation and orchestration of immune responses. The immunological context of the response can alter the regulatory networks required for proper functioning. While these networks have been well-studied in canonical immune contexts like infection, the transcription factor landscape during alloactivation remains unclear. This review addresses how transcription factors contribute to the functioning of mature alloactivated T cells. This review will also examine how these factors form a regulatory network to control alloresponses, with a focus specifically on those factors expressed by and controlling activity of T cells of the various subsets involved in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and graft-versus-tumor (GVT) responses.

Addition of ruxolitinib in Graft-versus-Host disease prophylaxis for pediatric β-Thalassemia major patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the effect of addition of ruxolitinib in Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) prophylaxis on pediatric patients with β-thalassemia major after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation(HSCT).

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed 49 consecutive β-thalassemia major pediatric patients who underwent HSCT from unrelated or haploidentical donors from February 2018 to October 2022. All transplantation recipients received cyclosporine A (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and short-term methotrexate (MTX) as GVHD prophylaxis; while 27 of them in the ruxolitinib group had added ruxolitinib oral to GVHD prophylaxis regimen at 2.5 mg twice daily once successful engraftment after January 2020.

RESULTS

The outcome showed that the ruxolitinib group had a lower cumulative incidence than the control group regardless of acute GVHD (22.2% vs.40.9%; p = .153) or chronic GVHD (18.5% vs.40.9%; p = .072); especially, the incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD was reported significantly less frequently in ruxolitinib group than that of the control group (0 vs. 27.3%, p = .005). No significant difference was detected between the two groups in EBV (Epstein-Barr virus)/CMV (cytomegalovirus) reactivation and BKV (BK virus) infection (p = .703, 1.000, and .436, respectively). Twenty-six patients (96.3%) in the ruxolitinib group were alive, while two patients (9.1%) in the control group died of intestinal acute GVHD. The 2-year overall survival (OS) and thalassemia-free survival (TFS) were both 96.296% in the ruxolitinib group, while both 90.909% in the control group.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals that ruxolitinib prophylaxis is a promising option to decrease the incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD in pediatric patients with β-thalassemia major.

Ruxolitinib-induced reactivation of cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus in graft-versus-host disease

OBJECTIVES

Steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD) is a challenging complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and leads to high morbidity and mortality rates. The orally administered, selective Janus-associated kinase 1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib gives overall response rates (ORR) of more than 70 % in acute and chronic SR-GVHD. However, several studies have highlighted an elevated risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in patients with ruxolitinib-treated SR-GVHD.

METHODS

We therefore analyzed risk of CMV and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) primary infection or reactivation in 57 patients with ruxolitinib-treated GVHD, while taking account of the competing risk (CR) of death prior to the first reactivation.

RESULTS

Initiation of ruxolitinib treatment was a significant adverse prognostic factor for the CR of first CMV reactivation (hazard ratio (HR)= 1.747, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.33-2.92, p < 0.0001) and first EBV reactivation (HR=2.657, 95 % CI: 1.82-3.87, p < 0.0001) during GVHD. In our cohort of ruxolitinib-treated patients, the ORR (48 % and 58 % for acute and chronic GVHD, respectively) and the toxicity profile (haematological adverse events in 29.8 % of the patients) were similar to the literature values.

CONCLUSION

Given ruxolitinib's efficacy in SR-GVHD, use of this drug should not be limited by the fear of viral reactivation; however, our present results emphasize the importance of monitoring the viral load.

Pharmacological Modulation of the Crosstalk between Aberrant Janus Kinase Signaling and Epigenetic Modifiers of the Histone Deacetylase Family to Treat Cancer

Hyperactivated Janus kinase (JAK) signaling is an appreciated drug target in human cancers. Numerous mutant JAK molecules as well as inherent and acquired drug resistance mechanisms limit the efficacy of JAK inhibitors (JAKi). There is accumulating evidence that epigenetic mechanisms control JAK-dependent signaling cascades. Like JAKs, epigenetic modifiers of the histone deacetylase (HDAC) family regulate the growth and development of cells and are often dysregulated in cancer cells. The notion that inhibitors of histone deacetylases (HDACi) abrogate oncogenic JAK-dependent signaling cascades illustrates an intricate crosstalk between JAKs and HDACs. Here, we summarize how structurally divergent, broad-acting as well as isoenzyme-specific HDACi, hybrid fusion pharmacophores containing JAKi and HDACi, and proteolysis targeting chimeras for JAKs inactivate the four JAK proteins JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and tyrosine kinase-2. These agents suppress aberrant JAK activity through specific transcription-dependent processes and mechanisms that alter the phosphorylation and stability of JAKs. Pharmacological inhibition of HDACs abrogates allosteric activation of JAKs, overcomes limitations of ATP-competitive type 1 and type 2 JAKi, and interacts favorably with JAKi. Since such findings were collected in cultured cells, experimental animals, and cancer patients, we condense preclinical and translational relevance. We also discuss how future research on acetylation-dependent mechanisms that regulate JAKs might allow the rational design of improved treatments for cancer patients. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Reversible lysine-ɛ-N acetylation and deacetylation cycles control phosphorylation-dependent Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription signaling. The intricate crosstalk between these fundamental molecular mechanisms provides opportunities for pharmacological intervention strategies with modern small molecule inhibitors. This could help patients suffering from cancer.

Strategies for Potentiating NK-Mediated Neuroblastoma Surveillance in Autologous or HLA-Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplants

Simple Summary

High-risk neuroblastomas (HR-NB) are malignant tumors of childhood that are treated with a very aggressive and life-threatening approach; this includes autologous hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and the infusion of a mAb targeting the GD2 tumor-associated antigen. Although the current treatment provided benefits, the 5-year overall survival remains below 50% due to relapses and refractoriness to therapy. Thus, there is an urgent need to ameliorate the standard therapeutic protocol, particularly improving the immune-mediated anti-tumor responses. Our review aims at summarizing and critically discussing novel immunotherapeutic strategies in HR-NB, including NK cell-based therapies and HLA-haploidentical HSCT from patients’ family.

Abstract

High-risk neuroblastomas (HR-NB) still have an unacceptable 5-year overall survival despite the aggressive therapy. This includes standardized immunotherapy combining autologous hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and the anti-GD2 mAb. The treatment did not significantly change for more than one decade, apart from the abandonment of IL-2, which demonstrated unacceptable toxicity. Of note, immunotherapy is a promising therapeutic option in cancer and could be optimized by several strategies. These include the HLA-haploidentical αβT/B-depleted HSCT, and the antibody targeting of novel NB-associated antigens such as B7-H3, and PD1. Other approaches could limit the immunoregulatory role of tumor-derived exosomes and potentiate the low antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity of CD16 dim/neg NK cells, abundant in the early phase post-transplant. The latter effect could be obtained using multi-specific tools engaging activating NK receptors and tumor antigens, and possibly holding immunostimulatory cytokines in their construct. Finally, treatments also consider the infusion of novel engineered cytokines with scarce side effects, and cell effectors engineered with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs). Our review aims to discuss several promising strategies that could be successfully exploited to potentiate the NK-mediated surveillance of neuroblastoma, particularly in the HSCT setting. Many of these approaches are safe, feasible, and effective at pre-clinical and clinical levels.

Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib for steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies

Background

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for haematological disorders. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a cause of morbidity and mortality is treated with corticosteroids. However, patients with steroid-refractory GVHD after HSCT have a poor prognosis. Ruxolitinib, a selective Janus kinase inhibitor, is a novel treatment strategy for steroid-refractory GVHD.

Objectives

To assess the efficacy of ruxolitinib for the treatment of steroid-refractory GVHD and analyse its adverse effects.

Study design

Meta-analysis.

Search methods

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs of ruxolitinib-based therapy in patients with steroid-refractory GVHD were found in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science in March 2021. Outcomes included overall response rate, survival, and adverse effects. The Methodological Index for Non-randomised Studies (MINORS) and the Cochrane collaboration risk-of-bias tool were used to assess methodological quality. Funnel plots, Egger’s test, and the trim and fill method were used to assess publication bias.

Results

In total, 1470 studies were identified; 19 studies (17 non-RCTs, 2 RCTs) involving 1358 patients met our inclusion criteria. Survival rates at the longest follow-up in non-RCTs, were 57.5% (95% CI 46.9–67.4) and 80.3% (95% CI 69.7–87.9) for acute GVHD (aGVHD) and chronic GVHD (cGVHD), respectively. In non-RCTs, the overall response was 74.9% (95% CI 66.6–81.8, I² = 49%) in aGVHD and 73.1% (95% CI 62.5–81.6, I² = 49%) in cGVHD. In aGVHD, the response rates were gastrointestinal, 61.4–90.2%; skin, 52.5–80.6%; and liver, 41.8–71.8%. In cGVHD, the response rates were gastrointestinal, 30.1–70.4%; skin, 30.1–84.4%; lung, 27.0–83.0%; and mouth 3.5–98.1%. In addition, a lower aGVHD grade and moderate cGVHD were associated with a better clinical response. Common adverse events were cytopenia and infectious complications.

Conclusions

Our systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that ruxolitinib therapy could be a potentially effective and safe treatment for patients with steroid-refractory GVHD.

Physicochemical Stability Study of Oral Suspension Containing Ruxolitinib in Children with Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Ruxolitinib, used in children with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host (GVH) disease, is currently commercially available only as a tablet adult dosage. For the paediatric population, an oral liquid would be an adapted dosage formulation. The aim of this study was to develop ruxolitinib compounded oral suspensions at 2 mg/mL by using commercial tablets in available aqueous vehicle (Inorpha) and to measure its stability at both room temperature and under refrigeration. Chemical stability of suspensions containing ruxolitinib was evaluated for 60 days based on pH, degradation, and drug content. Physical stability of the drug suspension was evaluated by visual aspect and odour. The remaining ruxolitinib concentration of the suspension was at least 95% of the initial concentration after 60 days at both temperatures. The pH, colour, and odour of the suspensions throughout the study remained unchanged with respect to the initial time point.

Steroid sensitive acute GVHD, but not steroid dependent or steroid resistant, results in similar infection risk as no GVHD following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Patients with acute GVHD (aGVHD) have an increased risk for infectious complications after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but the risk according to response to therapy is not well studied. We performed a retrospective analysis of the infectious complications for 1 year following allogeneic HCT at the University of Minnesota for 1143 pediatric and adult patients with and without aGVHD. Patients with aGVHD were classified into treatment response groups based on response to corticosteroids as first-line therapy: steroid sensitive (SS, n=114), steroid resistant (SR, n=103) and steroid dependent (SD, n=168) aGVHD. We observed that the cumulative incidence and density of infections for patients with SS aGVHD parallels those having no GVHD. Infection density (the number of infections that occurred per 100 days at risk) was greater for aGVHD than patients with no GVHD over both early and later post-transplant periods. For GVHD patients, among the infections developed from onset of aGVHD through 80 days of treatment, and until 1-year following transplantation, SS and SD patients had fewer bacterial and viral infections than SR patients. The overlap of non-relapse mortality between SS and SD GVHD patients is a function of SD GVHD being responsive to steroid therapy, even if continued therapy is required. In summary, while valid goals may include reducing unneeded antibacterial antibiotic therapy and preserving microbiome diversity, these data suggest that anti-infective therapy is justified by the density of infections observed during active GVHD treatment.

Early Use of Low-Dose Ruxolitinib: A Promising Strategy for the Treatment of Acute and Chronic GVHD

Janus kinases (JAK) are a family of tyrosine kinases (JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and TYK2) that transduce cytokine-mediated signals through the JAK–STAT metabolic pathway. These kinases act by regulating the transcription of specific genes capable of inducing biological responses in several immune cell subsets. Inhibition of Janus kinases interferes with the JAK–STAT signaling pathway. Besides being used in the treatment of cancer and inflammatory diseases, in recent years, they have also been used to treat inflammatory conditions, such as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and cytokine release syndrome as complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and cell therapy. Recently, the FDA approved the use of ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, in the treatment of acute steroid-refractory GVHD (SR-aGVHD), highlighting the role of JAK inhibition in this immune deregulation. Ruxolitinib was initially used to treat myelofibrosis and true polycythemia in a high-dose treatment and caused hematological toxicity. Since a lower dosage often could not be effective, the use of ruxolitinib was suspended. Subsequently, ruxolitinib was evaluated in adult patients with SR-aGVHD and was found to achieve a rapid and effective response. In addition, its early low-dose use in pediatric patients affected by GVHD has proved effective, safe, and reasonably preventive. The review aims to describe the potential properties of ruxolitinib to identify new therapeutic strategies.

Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Enhancing Hematopoietic Engraftment and Treatment of Graft-Versus-Host Disease, Hemorrhages and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) possess profound immunomodulatory and regenerative properties that are of clinical use in numerous clinical indications with unmet medical need. Common sources of MSCs include among others, bone marrow (BM), fat, umbilical cord, and placenta-derived decidua stromal cells (DSCs). We here summarize our more than 20-years of scientific experience in the clinical use of MSCs and DSCs in different clinical settings. BM-MSCs were first explored to enhance the engraftment of autografts in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and osteogenesis imperfecta around 30 years ago. In 2004, our group reported the first anti-inflammatory use of BM-MSCs in a child with grade IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Subsequent studies have shown that MSCs appear to be more effective in acute than chronic GvHD. Today BM-MSC-therapy is registered for acute GvHD in Japan and for GvHD in children in Canada and New Zeeland. MSCs first home to the lung following intravenous injection and exert strong local and systemic immunomodulatory effects on the host immune system. Thus, they were studied for ameliorating the cytokine storm in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Both, MSCs and DSCs were used to treat SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus-induced disease 2019 (COVID-19)-induced ARDS. In addition, they were also used for other novel indications, such as pneumomediastinum, colon perforation, and radiculomyelopathy. MSC and DSCs trigger coagulation and were thus explored to stop hemorrhages. DSCs appear to be more effective for acute GvHD, ARDS, and hemorrhages, but randomized studies are needed to prove superiority. Stromal cell infusion is safe, well tolerated, and only gives rise to a slight fever in a limited number of patients, but no major side effects have been reported in multiple safety studies and metaanalysis. In this review we summarize current evidence from in vitro studies, animal models, and importantly our clinical experience, to support stromal cell therapy in multiple clinical indications. This encloses MSC's effects on the immune system, coagulation, and their safety and efficacy, which are discussed in relation to prominent clinical trials within the field.

Ruxolitinib for Treatment of Steroid-Refractory Graft-versus-Host Disease: Real-World Data from Chinese Patients

Background

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a main complication following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and is a leading cause of non-relapse-related death. Unsatisfactory response to standard first-line therapy with glucocorticoids is a predictor of a poor prognosis in patients with GVHD. Ruxolitinib is a selective Janus kinases 1/2 inhibitor which has been shown to control acute (a) and chronic (c) GVHD while maintaining graft-versus-tumor effects.

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in the treatment of steroid-refractory GVHD (SR-GVHD) in a population of Chinese patients.

Methods

We report the results of 55 patients, including 23 patients with aGVHD and 32 patients with cGVHD, who were treated with ruxolitinib as salvage therapy between August, 2017 and December, 2020.

Results

In patients with aGVHD, the overall response rate (ORR) was 86.9%, and the 1-year overall survival (OS) was 82.6% (95% CI, 67.1–98.1%). The 1-year OS was significantly improved in responders than in non-responders (90.0% vs 33.3%, P=0.004). In patients with cGVHD, the ORR was 78.1%, and the 1-year OS was 81.3% (95% CI, 67.8–94.8%). There was no significant difference in the 1-year OS between responders and non-responders (84.0% vs 71.4%, P=0.327). Cytopenia, cytomegalovirus-reactivation and infections were common adverse events, particularly in patients with aGVHD.

Conclusion

Our real-world data from Chinese patients further confirm that ruxolitinib is a safe and effective treatment for SR-GVHD.

Immune Dysregulation and Infectious Complications in MPN Patients Treated With JAK Inhibitors

BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms are burdened by a reduced life expectancy mostly due to an increased risk of thrombo-hemorrhagic events, fibrotic progression/leukemic evolution, and infectious complications. In these clonal myeloid malignancies, JAK2V617F is the main driver mutation, leading to an aberrant activation of the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) signaling pathway. Therefore, its inhibition represents an attractive therapeutic strategy for these disorders. Several JAK inhibitors have entered clinical trials, including ruxolitinib, the first JAK1/2 inhibitor to become commercially available for the treatment of myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera. Due to interference with the JAK-STAT pathway, JAK inhibitors affect several components of the innate and adaptive immune systems such as dendritic cells, natural killer cells, T helper cells, and regulatory T cells. Therefore, even though the clinical use of these drugs in MPN patients has led to a dramatic improvement of symptoms control, organ involvement, and quality of life, JAK inhibitors–related loss of function in JAK-STAT signaling pathway can be a cause of different adverse events, including those related to a condition of immune suppression or deficiency. This review article will provide a comprehensive overview of the current knowledge on JAK inhibitors’ effects on immune cells as well as their clinical consequences, particularly with regards to infectious complications.

Ruxolitinib in the management of steroid-resistant/-dependent acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease: results of routine practice in an academic centre

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is an important complication after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Corticosteroids are the standard first-line treatment. Steroid-resistant/-dependent (SR/D) acute and chronic GVHD (aGVHD, cGVHD) lead to significant morbidity/mortality. The JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib has recently been shown in clinical trials to be effective in SR/D aGVHD and cGVHD. We retrospectively analysed the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in a cohort of SR/D aGVHD and cGVHD patients treated in a non-trial setting. In the aGVHD cohort, there were 14 men and 12 women, median age at 38 (19-63) years. At day 28 post-ruxolitinib, the overall response rate (ORR) was 86% (complete response, CR, 36%; partial response, PR, 50%). Continued ruxolitinib beyond day 28 resulted in a final CR of 68%. However, 3/15 (20%) of CR patients developed cGVHD. In the cGVHD cohort, there were 16 men and 15 women, median age at 33 (21-64) years. The ORR, CR and PR rates changed with continued ruxolitinib treatment, being 86%, 17% and 69% at 1 month; 79%, 38% and 41% at 3 months; and 83%, 52% and 31% at 6 months. Five patients had overlap GVHD, four of whom achieved CR. Multivariate analysis showed that superior overall survival and failure-free survival were associated with CR at day 28 for aGVHD, and CR at 1 year for cGVHD. Ruxolitinib treatment was efficacious for SR/D aGVHD and cGVHD, and continued treatment for at least 6 months was needed to maximize benefit.

Serious consequences of Epstein-Barr virus infection: Hemophagocytic lymphohistocytosis

Human is the host of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) especially in childhood and adolescence. Most of them are asymptomatic infection and self-limiting. However, for those patients who suffer from immune dysfunction, EBV infection will be life-threatening. Epstein-Barr virus-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistocytosis (EBV-HLH) is one of the severe effects. The diagnosis and differential diagnosis of EBV-HLH and other EBV infectious diseases are mentioned in this paper. The molecular biology mechanism and complications of EBV-HLH are equally briefly presented. It also provides a practical method for the genetic diagnosis of such diseases and the differential diagnosis with other human immunodeficiency diseases for medical scientists in routine clinical practice.

Janus Kinase Inhibitors and Cell Therapy

Cellular therapies such as allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and immune-effector cell therapy (IECT) continue to have a critical role in the treatment of patients with high risk malignancies and hematologic conditions. These therapies are also associated with inflammatory conditions such as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and cytokine release syndrome (CRS) which contribute significantly to the morbidity and mortality associated with these therapies. Recent advances in our understanding of the immunological mechanisms that underly GVHD and CRS highlight an important role for Janus kinases (JAK). JAK pathways are important for the signaling of several cytokines and are involved in the activation and proliferation of several immune cell subsets. In this review, we provide an overview of the preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the use of JAK inhibitors for acute and chronic GVHD and CRS.

JAK inhibition for murine HLH requires complete blockade of IFNg signaling and is limited by toxicity of JAK2 inhibition

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is an inflammatory disorder in which numerous cytokines are elevated, though interferon gamma (IFN-g) is central to disease pathogenesis and a key therapeutic target. Experimental and early clinical reports have shown that ruxolitinib, a small molecule inhibitor of Janus kinases (JAKs) which are essential for cytokine signaling, may be therapeutic in HLH. In contrast, we found that intermittently administered ruxolitinib at various dose levels failed to prevent HLH development or treat established murine HLH. High doses of ruxolitinib blocked IFN-g signaling only transiently after administration, consistent with human pharmacokinetics, and only continuously administered drug could prevent HLH development or treat established HLH. Continuously administered ruxolitinib was therapeutic in only a narrow dose range and intermittently dosed ruxolitinib worsened survival and decreased bone marrow cellularity of animals concurrently treated with anti-IFN-g antibody, indicating a narrow therapeutic window and potential toxicity. As JAK2 is essential for hematopoietic cytokine signaling, we also tested a JAK1-selective inhibitor and observed therapeutic benefit without apparent toxicity, though it did not improve survival when combined with anti-IFN-g. We conclude that continuous blockade of IFN-g signaling is necessary for optimal control of HLH and that JAK2 inhibition may be toxic in this disorder.

Efficiency and Toxicity of Ruxolitinib as a Salvage Treatment for Steroid-Refractory Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), especially steroid-refractory GVHD, remains a life-threatening complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The effect of the JAK1/2 kinase inhibitor ruxolitinib on treating steroid-refractory acute GVHD has been verified by the REACH1/2 study; however, its safety and efficacy in patients with steroid-refractory chronic GVHD (SR-cGVHD) remain unclear. In this retrospective study, 70 patients received ruxolitinib as a salvage therapy for SR-cGVHD. Twenty-four weeks after ruxolitinib treatment, the overall response rate (ORR) was 74.3% (52/70), including 34 patients who achieved complete remission (CR) and 18 who achieved partial remission (PR). The main adverse event was cytopenia, which occurred in 51.4% (36/70) of patients. After ruxolitinib treatment, the percentage of CD4 cells increased from 18.20% to 23.22% (P<0.001), while the percentages of NK (CD16⁺CD56⁺) cells and regulatory T cells (CD4⁺CD127 ^± CD25⁺) decreased (P<0.001, P<0.001). Among the B cell subsets, the proportion of total B cells approximately tripled from 3.69% to 11.16% (P<0.001). Moreover, we observed a significant increase in IL-10 levels after ruxolitinib treatment (P=0.025) and a remarkable decrease in levels of suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) from 229.90 ng/ml to 72.65 ng/ml. The median follow-up after the initiation of ruxolitinib treatment was 401 (6-1076) days. The estimated one-year overall survival rate of the whole group was 66.0% (54.4-77.6%, 95% CI), and the one-year overall survival rate of patients with mild and moderate cGVHD was 69.6% (57.4-81.8%, 95% CI), which was better than that of patients with severe cGVHD (31.3%, 0.0-66.2%, 95% CI) (P=0.002). Patients who achieved a CR and PR achieved better survival outcomes (84.5%, 73.9-95.1%, 95% CI) than those who showed NR to ruxolitinib treatments (16.7%, 0-34.3%, 95% CI) (P<0.001). At the final follow-up, cGVHD relapse occurred in six patients after they reduced or continued their ruxolitinib doses. Collectively, our results suggest that ruxolitinib is potentially a safe and effective treatment for SR-cGVHD.

The development of ruxolitinib for glucocorticoid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a life-threatening complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Despite the use of prophylactic immunosuppression including calcineurin inhibitors, antimetabolites, antithymocyte globulin, or posttransplant cyclophosphamide, patients still develop severe aGVHD. In particular, patients with glucocorticoid-refractory GVHD (SR-GVHD) have a dismal prognosis with a low 1-year post-allo-HCT survival rate. Most classical drugs used to prevent or treat aGVHD target 1 specific pathway such as calcineurin inhibitors or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, or they interfere with fast-dividing activated cells (eg, methotrexate, mycophenolate, and cyclophosphamide). In contrast to these drugs, inhibition-of-signaling molecules, used by multiple immune cells and critical for signal transduction of multiple proinflammatory cytokines, could be more efficacious at blocking GVHD. Ruxolitinib blocks Janus kinases 1 and 2, which are required to mediate the downstream signaling of multiple cytokine receptors. Recently, a multicenter phase 3 clinical trial showed that ruxolitinib led to significant improvements in efficacy outcomes compared to best available therapy, which will lead to a paradigm shift in the treatment of SR-GVHD.

Efficacy and feasibility of ruxolitinib in chronic steroid-refractory GVHD in a pediatric intestine transplant

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) has been a clinical problem in solid organ transplant that includes intestine due to the donor lymphoid tissue mass which accompanies the intestinal component of the graft. We report a case that demonstrated the efficacy and feasibility of ruxolitinib a JAK 1/2 inhibitor in the treatment of chronic steroid-refractory GVHD (SR-GVHD). The child developed SR-GVHD following a composite intestine transplant (small bowel, colon, liver, and pancreas). And after receiving ruxolitinib 1.25 mg (0.15 mg/kg/dose) per gastric tube (G-tube) daily, the child appeared to have improved skin rash and sigmoidoscopy was negative. Nonetheless, we encourage close monitoring of hematologic and infectious adverse effect during dose escalation, and individualizing patient maximum effective dose with the least adverse effect possible. We stress the importance of early diagnosis and hyper-alertness of GVHD in intestinal transplant patients.

Ruxolitinib for steroid-refractory graft versus host disease in pediatric HSCT: high response rate and manageable toxicity

Ruxolitinib, a selective Janus Kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor, is a promising treatment for the steroid-refractory graft-vs-host disease (GvHD) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Most studies have been performed in the adult population showing efficacy against GvHD. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the outcomes of 19 children who received ruxolitinib for refractory acute or chronic GvHD (cGvHD) after HSCT from two Pediatric Hemato-Oncology Departments in Spain between March 2017 and December 2018. Patients received a median number of 4 (IQR 2) previous lines of treatment before starting ruxolitinib. The overall response rate in acute GvHD (aGvHD) and cGvHD was 87% and 91%, respectively. Complete response (CR) was observed in 37% of aGvHD and 8.3% of cGvHD. Remarkably, 43% and 40% of patients with steroid-refractory gastrointestinal aGvHD and lung cGvHD achieved CR. During ruxolitinib treatment, there were 36%, 31%, and 10% infections caused by viruses, bacteria, and fungi, respectively. Overall, four patients interrupted ruxolitinib due to infectious complications, hematological, and liver toxicity. The 2-year overall survival was 71.9% (CI 95% 58.6-85.2). Our experience supports the use of ruxolitinib as an effective treatment for steroid-refractory acute and cGvHD in children with a moderate toxicity profile.

Ruxolitinib for the treatment of chronic GVHD and overlap syndrome in children and young adults

BACKGROUND

Ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, is used to treat chronic graft-versus-host-disease (cGVHD) in adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients, but experience in children is limited, perhaps due to lack of pediatric dosing information. In this report we describe our pediatric and young adult dosing strategy experience in cGVHD.

METHODS

Ruxolitinib was administered orally at 5mg twice daily for children ≥25kg or 2.5mg twice daily if <25kg. The dose was halved with concurrent azole administration and increased to a maximum of 10mg twice daily if tolerated. Responses were evaluated using the 2014 NIH consensus criteria. Phosphorylation of lymphocyte STAT5 following dosing, a surrogate of JAK inhibition, was evaluated by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with a median age 14.6 years (range 5-26 years) received ruxolitinib for severe (n=9) and moderate (n=11) cGVHD. Median steroid dose was 0.5mg/kg/day (range 0.08-1.5mg/kg/day) at ruxolitinib initiation. Two patients with moderate cGVHD achieved a complete response (CR), while 12 patients achieved a partial response (PR) at a median of 48 days (range 17-98 days) from first ruxolitinib dose, for an overall response rate of 70%. Eleven patients are maintaining their PRs. pSTAT5 on lymphocytes was absent or decreased (0-6% events) in 5 evaluated patients, suggesting adequate inhibition. Three patients discontinued ruxolitinib due to neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, or elevated alanine aminotransferase. Four patients developed bacterial infections, and three experienced symptomatic viral infections. Two patients died from complications related to progressive severe cGVHD.

CONCLUSION

Ruxolitinib using our dosing strategy demonstrates promise for treating cGVHD in children.Supplemental Visual Abstract; http://links.lww.com/TP/C202.

The Effectiveness of Ruxolitinib for Acute/Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease in Children: A Retrospective Study

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Ruxolitinib for acute/chronic graft-versus-host disease in children.

Methods

This study was a retrospective trial. We analyzed the clinical characteristics of children who responded poorly to previous treatment for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and received ruxolitinib treatment after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) as an additional or replacement therapy.

Results

A total of 53 patients were analyzed: aGVHD and cGVHD. The overall response rate (ORR) to ruxolitinib was 75.5%. The ORR was 64.7% (11/17) in the aGVHD group including 6, 5, and 6 patients with partial responses (PRs), complete responses (CRs), and treatment failure, respectively. The ORR was 80.6% (29/36) in the cGVHD group including 10 with CRs and 19 with PRs. Five and 2 patients showed no response and treatment failure, respectively. Four and 14 patients were GVHD recurrence in aGVHD and cGVHD respectively. A total of 14 patients (39%) discontinued steroids and 8 patients (22.2%) reduced steroids. The incidence of obvious adverse events was 94.1% (16/17) in the aGVHD group, which was higher than that in the cGVHD group. Meanwhile, the prognosis of children with cGVHD was superior to that of children with aGVHD after treatment with ruxolitinib. During the ruxolitinib treatment, only 1 patient suffered a relapse of the primary tumor. Eleven patients also suffered transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) after allo-HSCT.

Conclusion

Pediatric patients with GVHD (especially cGVHD) responded well to ruxolitinib treatment. Ruxolitinib can also be used as an alternative treatment for patients with TMA.

Immunopathology and biology-based treatment of steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease

Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is 1 of the major life-threating complications after allogeneic cell transplantation. Although steroids remain first-line treatment, roughly one-half of patients will develop steroid-refractory GVHD (SR-GVHD), which portends an extremely poor prognosis. Many agents that have shown encouraging response rates in early phase 1/2 trials for prevention and treatment have been unsuccessful in demonstrating a survival advantage when applied in the setting of SR-GVHD. The discovery of novel treatments has been further complicated by the absence of clinically informative animal models that address what may reflect a distinct pathophysiology. Nonetheless, the combined knowledge of established bone marrow transplantation models and recent human trials in SR-GVHD patients are beginning to illuminate novel mechanisms for inhibiting T-cell signaling and promoting tissue tolerance that provide an increased understanding of the underlying biology of SR-GVHD. Here, we discuss recent findings of newly appreciated cellular and molecular mechanisms and provide novel translational opportunities for advancing the effectiveness of treatment in SR-GVHD.

Current Prophylaxis and Treatment Approaches for Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Children With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, higher event-free survival (EFS) was observed in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) and grade II aGvHD vs. patients with no or grade I GvHD in the randomised, controlled, open-label, international, multicentre Phase III For Omitting Radiation Under Majority age (FORUM) trial. This finding suggests that moderate-severity aGvHD is associated with a graft-versus-leukaemia effect which protects against leukaemia recurrence. In order to optimise the benefits of HSCT for leukaemia patients, reduction of non-relapse mortality-which is predominantly caused by severe GvHD-is of utmost importance. Herein, we review contemporary prophylaxis and treatment options for aGvHD in children with ALL and the key challenges of aGvHD management, focusing on maintaining the graft-versus-leukaemia effect without increasing the severity of GvHD.

Multidisciplinary Guidance Regarding the Use of Immunomodulatory Therapies for Acute Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Pediatric Patients

BACKGROUND

Immune-mediated lung injury and systemic hyperinflammation are characteristic of severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in adults. Although the majority of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections in pediatric populations result in minimal or mild COVID-19 in the acute phase of infection, a small subset of children develop severe and even critical disease in this phase with concomitant inflammation that may benefit from immunomodulation. Therefore, guidance is needed regarding immunomodulatory therapies in the setting of acute pediatric COVID-19. This document does not provide guidance regarding the recently emergent multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C).

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel of pediatric subspecialty physicians and pharmacists with expertise in infectious diseases, rheumatology, hematology/oncology, and critical care medicine was convened. Guidance statements were developed based on best available evidence and expert opinion.

RESULTS

The panel devised a framework for considering the use of immunomodulatory therapy based on an assessment of clinical disease severity and degree of multiorgan involvement combined with evidence of hyperinflammation. Additionally, the known rationale for consideration of each immunomodulatory approach and the associated risks and benefits was summarized.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunomodulatory therapy is not recommended for the majority of pediatric patients, who typically develop mild or moderate COVID-19. For children with severe or critical illness, the use of immunomodulatory agents may be beneficial. The risks and benefits of such therapies are variable and should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis with input from appropriate specialty services. When available, the panel strongly favors immunomodulatory agent use within the context of clinical trials. The framework presented herein offers an approach to decision-making regarding immunomodulatory therapy for severe or critical pediatric COVID-19 and is informed by currently available data, while awaiting results of placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials.

Ruxolitinib is an effective salvage treatment for multidrug-resistant graft-versus-host disease after haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation without posttransplant cyclophosphamide

The purpose of our study is to identify the efficacy of ruxolitinib in human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) recipients with multidrug-resistant (MDR)-graft-versus-host disease (GVHD, n = 34). MDR-GVHD was defined as GVHD showing no improvement after at least 3 types of treatments. The median number of previous GVHD-therapies was 4 for both MDR-acute GVHD (aGVHD) and MDR-chronic GVHD (cGVHD). For MDR-aGVHD (n = 15), the median time to response was 10 days (range 2 to 65), and the overall response rate (ORR) was 60.0% (9/15), including 40.0% (6/15) complete response (CR) and 20.0% (3/15) partial response (PR). The 1-year probability of overall survival after ruxolitinib was 66.7%. The rates of hematologic and infectious toxicities were 73.3% and 46.7% after ruxolitinib treatment. For MDR-cGVHD (n = 19), the median time to response was 29 days (range 6 to 175), and the ORR was 89.5% (17/19), including 26.3% (5/19) CR and 63.2% (12/19) PR. All patients remained alive until our last follow-up. The rates of hematologic and infectious toxicities were 36.8% and 47.4% after ruxolitinib treatment. Ruxolitinib is an effective salvage treatment for MDR-GVHD in haplo-HSCT recipients.

JAK Inhibitors for the Treatment of Pediatric Alopecia Areata

Alopecia areata is a common autoimmune condition that disproportionately affects children and can significantly hinder quality of life. Few safe and effective therapies are available for the treatment of severely affected pediatric patients. JAK inhibitors have been recently established as an effective and well-tolerated therapy in adults, but there are limited data regarding the use of JAK inhibitors to treat alopecia areata in children. Here, we review the available literature regarding the use of JAK inhibitors in children in dermatology and across other medical disciplines.

Ruxolitinib for hematopoietic cell transplantation-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a severe complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and can cause graft failure or multi-organ failure. Here, we report two children with refractory HCT-associated HLH treated with ruxolitinib. In the first patient, ruxolitinib resolved fever, cytopenia and hyperferritinemia. In another patient, although severe hepatic failure, which developed and worsened before the administration of ruxolitinib, was irreversible, rapid improvement in fever, leukopenia and hyperferritinemia was observed. Of note, multiplex cytokine profiling showed amelioration of cytokine storm in both patients. Ruxolitinib may be an encouraging option for HCT-associated HLH.

Ruxolitinib Combined with Corticosteroids as First-Line Therapy for Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients

Corticosteroids are commonly used as first-line treatment for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD); however, they are effective in only approximately one-half of patients. This study prospectively evaluated the use of ruxolitinib combined with 1 mg/kg methylprednisolone in the initial treatment of aGVHD. A total of 32 patients were enrolled. aGVHD involved the skin (53.1%), gastrointestinal tract (68.8%), and liver (6.0%). The complete response rate at day +28 was 96.9%. The 1-year and 2-year cumulative incidence rates of chronic GVHD were 9.4% and 13.8%, respectively. The 1- year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 8.7%, and the Kaplan-Meier curve estimated 1-year overall survival after transplantation at 73.4%. This prospective study suggests that patients with aGVHD show a high response rate to ruxolitinib (5 mg/day) combined with 1 mg/kg/day methylprednisolone. This novel regimen was seen to spare steroid exposure, alleviate toxicity, and improve long-term survival.

Ruxolitinib combined with etanercept induce a rapid response to corticosteroid-refractory severe acute graft vs host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: Results of a multi-center prospective study

About half of patients with severe acute graft vs host disease (aGVHD) show resistance to treatment with first-line steroids. We enrolled 64 patients with grades III-IV SR-aGVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT), to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of ruxolitinib and etanercept. The overall response rate was 87.5% (95% CI, 79.7%-95.3%) at day 28 of the combination treatment, from which 73.4% reached complete response (CR). A marked reduction ≥75% in daily corticosteroid dosing was documented in 75.4% of patients at day 28. Delayed time from aGVHD to ruxolitinib (OR = 4.88, 95% CI, 0.98-23.56), stages 3-4 liver aGVHD (OR = 8.57, 95% CI, 0.96-46.59) and gut Enterobacteriaceae colonization (OR = 12.39, 95% CI, 1.71-59.77) were related to incomplete response. Grades 3/4 anemia, leukopenia, or thrombocytopenia and CMV-reactivation were found in 29.7%, 26.6%, 39.1%, and 50.0% of patients, respectively. So, 25 (39.1%) experienced complications of severe infection ≥3 grade, in which pulmonary infections were most frequent (15/64, 23.4%). The 2-year overall survival (OS) after the combination therapy was 61.2%. The 2-year incidence of non-relapse mortality and relapse of the underlying malignancy was 26.7% and 15.7%, respectively. Combined treatment with ruxolitinib and etanercept was very effective and relatively safe for severe aGVHD patients, while the various infection complications deserve more attention. This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1900024408).

Ruxolitinib in children with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: A retrospective multicenter study of the pediatric group of SFGM-TC

BACKGROUND

We conducted a national multicenter retrospective study in France to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of ruxolitinib in children with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

PROCEDURE

Patients were recruited from the 15 pediatric transplantation centers. Transplanted patients were eligible if they met the following criteria: aged ≤ 18 years at transplantation, receiving a myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant, having an aGVHD of grade ≥2, and treated with ruxolitinib for steroid-refractory aGVHD.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients received ruxolitinib for steroid-refractory aGVHD. Six patients achieved a complete response at day 28 after the start of treatment but finally 19 patients (65.5%) achieved a complete response (CR) with a median delay of 41 days (5-93 days). Two patients had a partial response. All patients who achieved CR or partial response discontinued corticosteroid treatment. Eight patients showed treatment failure. The overall response rate was 72.4%. Twenty-three of 29 patients were alive at a median follow-up of 685 days (177-1042 days) after the hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Viral replication was observed in 41.4% of cases. We did not observe severe hematological adverse events and cytopenia requiring a modification of ruxolitinib doses always resolved. The median initial dose of ruxolitinib was 12.6 mg/m² /day with an important range. We could not demonstrate any relationship between initial dose and effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Ruxolitinib may constitute a promising second-line treatment for children with steroid-refractory aGVHD that should be validated in a prospective large-scale pharmacokinetic and efficacy trial.

JAK/STAT pathway inhibition sensitizes CD8 T cells to dexamethasone-induced apoptosis in hyperinflammation

Cytokine storm syndromes (CSS) are severe hyperinflammatory conditions characterized by excessive immune system activation leading to organ damage and death. Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), a disease often associated with inherited defects in cell-mediated cytotoxicity, serves as a prototypical CSS for which the 5-year survival is only 60%. Frontline therapy for HLH consists of the glucocorticoid dexamethasone (DEX) and the chemotherapeutic agent etoposide. Many patients, however, are refractory to this treatment or relapse after an initial response. Notably, many cytokines that are elevated in HLH activate the JAK/STAT pathway, and the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib (RUX) has shown efficacy in murine HLH models and humans with refractory disease. We recently reported that cytokine-induced JAK/STAT signaling mediates DEX resistance in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) cells, and that this could be effectively reversed by RUX. On the basis of these findings, we hypothesized that cytokine-mediated JAK/STAT signaling might similarly contribute to DEX resistance in HLH, and that RUX treatment would overcome this phenomenon. Using ex vivo assays, a murine model of HLH, and primary patient samples, we demonstrate that the hypercytokinemia of HLH reduces the apoptotic potential of CD8 T cells leading to relative DEX resistance. Upon exposure to RUX, this apoptotic potential is restored, thereby sensitizing CD8 T cells to DEX-induced apoptosis in vitro and significantly reducing tissue immunopathology and HLH disease manifestations in vivo. Our findings provide rationale for combining DEX and RUX to enhance the lymphotoxic effects of DEX and thus improve the outcomes for patients with HLH and related CSS.