Safety and Seropositivity after Live Attenuated Vaccine in Adult Patients Receiving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Vaccination of Adults With Cancer: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To guide the vaccination of adults with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies.

METHODS

A systematic literature review identified systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and nonrandomized studies on the efficacy and safety of vaccines used by adults with cancer or their household contacts. This review builds on a 2013 guideline by the Infectious Disease Society of America. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 2013, to February 16, 2023. ASCO convened an Expert Panel to review the evidence and formulate recommendations.

RESULTS

A total of 102 publications were included in the systematic review: 24 systematic reviews, 14 RCTs, and 64 nonrandomized studies. The largest body of evidence addressed COVID-19 vaccines.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The goal of vaccination is to limit the severity of infection and prevent infection where feasible. Optimizing vaccination status should be considered a key element in the care of patients with cancer. This approach includes the documentation of vaccination status at the time of the first patient visit; timely provision of recommended vaccines; and appropriate revaccination after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, or B-cell-depleting therapy. Active interaction and coordination among healthcare providers, including primary care practitioners, pharmacists, and nursing team members, are needed. Vaccination of household contacts will enhance protection for patients with cancer. Some vaccination and revaccination plans for patients with cancer may be affected by the underlying immune status and the anticancer therapy received. As a result, vaccine strategies may differ from the vaccine recommendations for the general healthy adult population vaccine.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.

Safety and immunogenicity of the live-attenuated varicella vaccine in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to synthesize the available evidence on the immunogenicity, safety, and effectiveness of live-attenuated varicella vaccine in solid organ transplant recipients. Medline and EMBASE were searched using predefined search terms to identify relevant studies. The included articles reported varicella vaccine administration in the posttransplant period in children and adults. A pooled proportion of transplant recipients who seroconverted and who developed vaccine-strain varicella and varicella disease was generated. Eighteen articles (14 observational studies and 4 case reports) were included, reporting on 711 transplant recipients who received the varicella vaccine. The pooled proportion was 88.2% (95% confidence interval 78.0%-96.0%, 13 studies) for vaccinees who seroconverted, 0% (0%-1.2%, 13 studies) for vaccine-strain varicella, and 0.8% (0%-4.9%, 9 studies) for varicella disease. Most studies followed clinical guidelines for administering live-attenuated vaccines, with criteria that could include being at least 1 year posttransplant, 2 months postrejection episode, and on low-dose immunosuppressive medications. Varicella vaccination in transplant recipients was overall safe in the included studies, with few cases of vaccine-strain-induced varicella or vaccine failure, and although it was immunogenic, the proportion of recipients who seroconverted was lower than that seen in the general population. Our data support varicella vaccination in select pediatric solid organ transplant recipients.

Measles, mumps, and rubella revaccination in children after completion of chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a single-center prospective efficacy and safety analysis

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) can damage the immune system, and may result in a loss of protection from infectious diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of these treatments on the decrease in antibody titers of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and seroconversion post-revaccination of MMR.

METHODS

After completion of treatment for primary diseases, participants received an MMR revaccination. Antibody titers for MMR before revaccination were analyzed for all 110 children. After revaccination, 68 participants received a follow-up evaluation of  antibody titer and adverse reaction.

RESULTS

Multivariable analysis showed that therapeutic schedules were the only factor correlated with lack of antibody titers for measles after completing treatment (P = 0.008), while for mumps and rubella, no statistically significant difference was observed. Importantly, our study clearly demonstrated positive seroconversion rates for measles (97.5%), mumps (81.0%), and rubella (93.2%), with antibody levels rising across the board and peaking at around 6 months following revaccination. However, 6 months after revaccination, a downtrend of antibody titer levels was observed, which is comparatively earlier than the waning immunity observed in healthy children. Furthermore, we found MMR revaccination to be safe, with only a single adverse reaction (local pain at the injection site) reported.

CONCLUSIONS

MMR revaccination is immunogenic for the population. We suggest periodic monitoring of antibody titers, in addition to a booster vaccination, although the optimal timing of booster vaccination remains to be investigated further.

Real-world challenges in eligibility for MMR vaccination two years after autologous and allogeneic HSCT

Measles outbreaks have raised concerns of fatal infections in immunocompromised patients. Canadian guidelines advise administration of live vaccines, such as measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR), two yearsafter hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) yet studies have not assessed eligibility based on medication contraindications. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 72 autologous (auto-HSCT) and 68 allogeneic (allo-HSCT) recipients at the Windsor Regional Cancer Center to determine MMR reactivity and eligibility based on administration of contraindicated medications two years post-HSCT. Reactivity to measles, mumps, and rubella in auto-HSCT recipients was 49.1 %, 28.8 %, and 52.3 %, respectively, and in allo-HSCT recipients was 75.6 %, 57.8 %, and 64.4 %, respectively. Immunity to all three components was significantly different between transplant types (p = 0.0002). Nearly 80 % of auto-HSCT patients were on a contraindicated medication at two years compared to 45 % of allo-HSCT recipients. Auto-HSCT recipients require MMR revaccination, but it is contraindicated in a large proportion of patients.

Antibody Response against Vaccine Antigens in Children after TCRαβ-Depleted Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation: Is It Similar to That in Recipients with Fully Matched Donors?

Recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with HLA-mismatched donors are more immune suppressed than those with fully matched donors. The immunologic response to vaccines also may differ in HLA-mismatched haploidentical HSCT recipients. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the antibody response to vaccines in pediatric TCRαβ-depleted haploidentical HSCT recipients. This longitudinal study included a study group of 21 children who underwent haploidentical HSCT without CD19 depletion and with TCRαβ depletion and a control group of 38 children who underwent fully matched donor HSCT. Antibody levels were quantified by serologic tests before vaccination and after each dose against tetanus, diphtheria, pneumococcus, hepatitis B, hepatitis A, measles, rubella, mumps, and varicella. The median recipient age was significantly lower (P = .037) and the median donor age was significantly higher (P = .000) in the haploidentical group compared with the fully matched group. At the months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 post-transplantation, the median CD4, CD8, and CD19 cell counts and lymphocyte counts were similar in the haploidentical and fully matched groups. The median natural killer cell count was higher in the haploidentical group at the months 1, 3, and 6 post-transplantation (P = .001, .006, and .004, respectively). The median time to first vaccination was similar in the 2 groups (12.5 [range, 11 to 14] months for the haploidentical group and 11 [range, 9 to 13] months for the fully matched group; P = .441). Seroprotection rates were 100% in both groups after the second and third doses of diphtheria vaccine, the third dose of tetanus vaccine, the third dose of hepatitis B vaccine, the second and third doses of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV13), and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PSPV23), although lower after the initial doses and before vaccination. Seroprotection for hepatitis A, rubella, and varicella was >90% in the fully matched group and 100% for the haploidentical group after the second doses. Measles and mumps seroprotection rates were >80% in the haploidentical group and approximately 70% for the fully matched group after the second dose. Antibody response and seroprotection rates against vaccine antigens were similar in the haploidentical group and the fully matched when revaccination was started at 12 months post-transplantation. These findings support the idea that TCRαβ-depleted haploidentical HSCT recipients can be revaccinated according to the same vaccination schedule as fully matched HSCT recipients. Revaccination earlier after transplantation and vaccine responses for recipients of different types of HSCT should be evaluated in future studies.

Vaccine Responses in Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Comprehensive Review

Simple Summary

Patients who recently received a stem cell transplantation are at greater risk for infection due to impairment of their immune system. In order to prevent severe infection, these patients are vaccinated after their stem cell transplantation with childhood immunization vaccines. Timing of this vaccination is important in order to be effective and obtain proper immune response. Postponement of vaccination would lead to better immune response but would also cause longer-lasting risk of infection. This review describes available data on the timing of vaccination and its vaccine responses. Optimal timing of vaccination might require an individualized approach per patient.

Abstract

Consensus on timing of post-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) vaccination is currently lacking and is therefore assessed in this review. PubMed was searched systematically for articles concerning vaccination post-HSCT and included a basis in predefined criteria. To enable comparison, data were extracted and tables were constructed per vaccine, displaying vaccine response as either seroprotection or seroconversion for allogeneic HSCT (alloHSCT) and autologous HSCT (autoHSCT) separately. A total of 33 studies were included with 1914 patients in total: 1654 alloHSCT recipients and 260 autoHSCT recipients. In alloHSCT recipients, influenza vaccine at 7–48 months post-transplant resulted in responses of 10–97%. After 12 months post-transplant, responses were >45%. Pneumococcal vaccination 3–25 months post-transplant resulted in responses of 43–99%, with the response increasing with time. Diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis and Haemophilus influenzae type b at 6–17 months post-transplant: 26–100%. Meningococcal vaccination at 12 months post-transplant: 65%. Hepatitis B vaccine at 6–23 months post-transplant: 40–94%. Measles, mumps and rubella at 41–69 months post-transplant: 19–72%. In general, autoHSCT recipients obtained slightly higher responses compared with alloHSCT recipients. Conclusively, responses to childhood immunization vaccines post-HSCT are poor in comparison with healthy individuals. Therefore, evaluation of response might be indicated. Timing of revaccination is essential for optimal response. An individualized approach might be necessary for optimizing vaccine responses.

Immunity and Vaccination Against Measles, Mumps, and Rubella in Adult Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Large outbreaks of measles or rubella occasionally occur around the world, and measles infection can be severe and even fatal in transplant patients. However, limited data are available on immunity to measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) in adult patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the immune status against MMR and the effects of vaccination against MMR in adult patients after allo-HCT. A total of 135 adult patients who were alive without relapse and new malignancy at 2 years after allo-HCT were included in this study. We measured IgG antibody to MMR before allo-HCT and annually thereafter. The probabilities of being seropositive to measles, mumps or rubella after allo-HCT were estimated according to the Kaplan-Meier method and compared among groups with the log-rank test. The probability of being seropositive at 2 years after allo-HCT in patients who were seropositive before allo-HCT was 60.6% for measles, 39.7% for mumps, and 52.2% for rubella. History of chronic graft-versus-host disease tended to be a risk factor for the loss of immunity against measles (hazard ratio [HR] 1.69, P = .064) and rubella (HR 1.75, P = .056). To predict the loss of immunity against MMR at 2 years after allo-HCT, we defined the following cutoff values for the IgG index before HCT: 18.2 for measles, 5.3 for mumps, and 21.4 for rubella using a receiver-operating characteristics curve. The lower-IgG groups experienced a significant loss of seropositivity at 2 years (39% versus 82% for measles, P < .001; 13% versus 59% for mumps, P < .001; and 33% versus 90% for rubella, P < .001). After this loss of immunity, 25 patients received a single vaccination against MMR. The seroconversion rates were 64%, 36%, and 72% for measles, mumps, and rubella, respectively. Loss of immunity to MMR commonly occurs in the first several years after transplantation. In the patients who lose the immunity, the seroconversion rate after 1 dose of MMR vaccine given at ≥2 years after transplantation is suboptimal.

Preventing Measles in Immunosuppressed Cancer and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Patients: A Position Statement by the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy

Until recently, measles exposures were relatively rare and so, consequently, were an afterthought for cancer patients and/or blood and marrow transplant recipients and their providers. Declines in measles herd immunity have reached critical levels in many communities throughout the United States due to increasing vaccine hesitancy, so that community-based outbreaks have occurred. The reemergence of measles as a clinical disease has raised serious concerns among immunocompromised patients and those who work within the cancer and hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) community. Since live attenuated vaccines, such as measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR), are contraindicated in immunocompromised patients, and with no approved antiviral therapies for measles, community exposures in these patients can lead to life-threatening infection. The lack of data regarding measles prevention in this population poses a number of clinical dilemmas. Herein specialists in Infectious Diseases and HCT/cellular therapy endorsed by the American Society of Transplant and Cellular Therapy address frequently asked questions about measles in these high-risk cancer patients and HCT recipients and provide expert opinions based on the limited available data.