Real-world challenges in eligibility for MMR vaccination two years after autologous and allogeneic HSCT

Measles outbreaks have raised concerns of fatal infections in immunocompromised patients. Canadian guidelines advise administration of live vaccines, such as measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR), two yearsafter hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) yet studies have not assessed eligibility based on medication contraindications. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 72 autologous (auto-HSCT) and 68 allogeneic (allo-HSCT) recipients at the Windsor Regional Cancer Center to determine MMR reactivity and eligibility based on administration of contraindicated medications two years post-HSCT. Reactivity to measles, mumps, and rubella in auto-HSCT recipients was 49.1 %, 28.8 %, and 52.3 %, respectively, and in allo-HSCT recipients was 75.6 %, 57.8 %, and 64.4 %, respectively. Immunity to all three components was significantly different between transplant types (p = 0.0002). Nearly 80 % of auto-HSCT patients were on a contraindicated medication at two years compared to 45 % of allo-HSCT recipients. Auto-HSCT recipients require MMR revaccination, but it is contraindicated in a large proportion of patients.

159 Current Practice of Intra-Operative Sampling During Revision Surgery of the Knee for Prosthetic Joint Infection at a High-Volume District General Hospital

Aim

Successful treatment of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) involves surgical interventions and identification of infecting organisms to enable targeted antimicrobial therapy. Current PHE guidelines recommend 3–5 intra-operative samples to be taken using separate instruments for each, swabs are discouraged. We audited the revision arthroplasty practice at Barking, Havering, Redbridge University Trust (BHRUT), specifically comparing intra-operative sampling for infected revision knee procedures with these guidelines.

Method

Retrospective cohort study of all prosthetic knee infection cases, as defined by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria, at BHRUT between December 2011 to May 2020. A review of case notes collected various key data points, focusing on intraoperative sample, type, number, and technique. Point biserial correlation analysis was performed to determine statistical significance.

Results

119 revision knee arthroplasty procedures were performed in the 8.5-year study period. 31 (26%) were for prosthetic joint infection (n=29 patients), n=2 patients had re-revision procedures for second PJI. Number of samples taken ranged from 1–12 with a mode of 6. N=27 (87%) cases had the recommended number of total samples taken, of these n= 20 (65%) had five or more samples taken, N=24 (77%) cases had three or more samples taken and n=18 (58%) had five or more samples.

Conclusions

Current management of infected knee arthroplasty presents great variability in intra-operative sampling technique. Sample collection adheres to national guidelines in 77% of cases. We recommend implementation of a standardised approach to sampling through inclusion of a five scalpel and five forceps pack specifically for sampling in theatre for all suspected PJI's.