1
|
Pedersen JR, Strijkers R, Gerger H, Koes B, Chiarotto A. Clinical improvements due to specific effects and placebo effects in conservative interventions and changes observed with no treatment in randomized controlled trials of patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain 2024; 165:1217-1232. [PMID: 38198235 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Little is known about the contribution of placebo effects and changes observed with no treatment in interventions for nonspecific low back pain (NSLBP). This systematic review assessed the proportions of the overall treatment effect that may be attributable to specific treatment effects, placebo effects, and changes observed with no treatment in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with NSLBP. Trials published before 2019 were identified from a published systematic review, and the search was updated in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central for trials published between January 2019 and March 2023. Three-arm RCTs comparing the effects of experimental interventions vs placebo control vs no intervention reporting pain intensity, physical function, and/or health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were included. Sixteen RCTs with 1436 adults with chronic NSLBP testing conservative and mainly passive interventions were included. For pain intensity (16 studies), 33%, 18%, and 49% of the overall short-term treatment effect was attributable to specific treatment effects, placebo effects, and changes observed with no treatment, respectively. For physical function (11 studies) and HRQoL (6 studies), these proportions were 34%, 13%, and 53%, and 11%, 41%, and 48%, respectively. These results show that approximately half of the overall treatment effect of conservative and mainly passive interventions for patients with chronic NSLBP is attributable to changes observed with no treatment, rather than specific or placebo effects of treatments. However, the certainty of evidence was very low to low, suggesting that the true effects might be markedly different from the effect sizes underlying these estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Rønne Pedersen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Rob Strijkers
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Heike Gerger
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bart Koes
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health and the Center for Muscle and Joint Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Keightley JGA, Haagman B, Magner JD, Debenham JR. Models of care for musculoskeletal shoulder pain in spinal cord injury: A scoping review. J Spinal Cord Med 2024; 47:327-344. [PMID: 36913538 PMCID: PMC11044743 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2023.2183335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a neurological condition that significantly impacts a person's lifestyle, health and well-being. Many individuals with SCI experience secondary musculoskeletal shoulder pain. This scoping review examines the current research on the diagnosis and management of shoulder pain in SCI. OBJECTIVE The aim of this Scoping Review was (1) to chart peer-reviewed literature regarding the diagnosis and management of shoulder pain as it relates to SCI and (2) identify gaps in this body of literature to inform future research priorities. METHODS Six electronic databases were searched from inception until April 2022. In addition, reviewers scanned the reference lists of identified articles. Articles from peer-reviewed sources that reported diagnostic or management procedures for musculoskeletal shoulder conditions within the SCI population were considered and 1679 articles were identified. Title and abstract screening, full text review, and data extraction were undertaken by two independent reviewers. RESULTS Eighty seven articles were included, covering diagnosis or management of shoulder pain in SCI. CONCLUSION Whilst the most commonly reported diagnostic procedures and management strategies reflect contemporary practice for shoulder pain, the entire body of literature demonstrates inconsistencies in methodologies. In places, the literature continues to perceive value in procedures inconsistent with best practice. These findings encourage researchers to pursue the development of robust models of care for musculoskeletal shoulder pain in SCI using a collaborative and integrated approach, combining best practice for musculoskeletal shoulder pain alongside clinical expertise in the management of SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan G. A. Keightley
- National School of Nursing, Midwifery, Health Sciences and Physiotherapy, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
- Active Linc (Home Based Services), Innaloo, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Bianca Haagman
- National School of Nursing, Midwifery, Health Sciences and Physiotherapy, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
- Active Linc (Home Based Services), Innaloo, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Julie D. Magner
- Active Linc (Home Based Services), Innaloo, Western Australia, Australia
| | - James R. Debenham
- National School of Nursing, Midwifery, Health Sciences and Physiotherapy, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia
- Active Linc (Home Based Services), Innaloo, Western Australia, Australia
- Majarlin Kimberley Centre for Remote Health, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Broome, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Scholl Schell M, Xavier de Araujo F, Silva MF. Physiotherapy assessment and treatment of patients with tibial external fixator: a systematic scoping review. Disabil Rehabil 2024; 46:1673-1684. [PMID: 37118977 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2202419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To map evidence regarding physiotherapy assessment and treatment of patients with tibial external fixator (EF), and to point out literature gaps for further research. METHODS Systematic scoping review conducted in four databases. We included both experimental and non-experimental studies involving patients with tibial EF and outcomes of interest. We recorded study design, population, sample size, sample age, reason for EF use, type of surgery, type of EF used, instruments used for assessing function, pain, quality of life, satisfaction, psychosocial aspects, and physiotherapy treatment descriptions from included studies. We categorised data accordingly to outcomes assessed and physiotherapy treatments description. RESULTS Eighty-six studies were included involving 3070 patients. Causes of fixator use were traumatic conditions, acquired and congenital deformities, and non-traumatic conditions, like compartmental osteoarthritis. Function was assessed in about three-quarters of included studies, though other outcomes were not presented in most studies. Only one study described satisfactorily the physiotherapy treatment. Almost half of the studies did not provide any description of the rehabilitation process. CONCLUSIONS There is little evidence about the assessment of function, pain, quality of life, satisfaction, psychosocial aspects, and other outcomes in tibial EF patients. Physiotherapy treatment in these patients is poorly reported.Protocol registration: Open Science Framework: doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/UT2DA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauricio Scholl Schell
- Physiotherapy Department, Post Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | | | - Marcelo Faria Silva
- Physiotherapy Department, Post Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhou T, Salman D, McGregor AH. Recent clinical practice guidelines for the management of low back pain: a global comparison. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25:344. [PMID: 38693474 PMCID: PMC11061926 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07468-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) is a significant health problem worldwide, with a lifetime prevalence of 84% in the general adult population. To rationalise the management of LBP, clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been issued in various countries around the world. This study aims to identify and compare the recommendations of recent CPGs for the management of LBP across the world. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, and major guideline databases were searched from 2017 to 2022 to identify CPGs. CPGs focusing on information regarding the management and/or treatment of non-specific LBP were considered eligible. The quality of included guidelines was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. RESULTS Our analysis identified a total of 22 CPGs that met the inclusion criteria, and were of middle and high methodological quality as assessed by the AGREE II tool. The guidelines exhibited heterogeneity in their recommendations, particularly in the approach to different stages of LBP. For acute LBP, the guidelines recommended the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), therapeutic exercise, staying active, and spinal manipulation. For subacute LBP, the guidelines recommended the use of NSAIDs, therapeutic exercise, staying active, and spinal manipulation. For chronic LBP, the guidelines recommended therapeutic exercise, the use of NSAIDs, spinal manipulation, and acupuncture. CONCLUSIONS Current CPGs provide recommendations for almost all major aspects of the management of LBP, but there is marked heterogeneity between them. Some recommendations lack clarity and overlap with other treatments within the guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianyu Zhou
- MSk lab, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, 2nd Floor, Sir Michael Uren Hub, 86 Wood Lane, W12 0BZ, UK.
| | - David Salman
- MSk lab, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, 2nd Floor, Sir Michael Uren Hub, 86 Wood Lane, W12 0BZ, UK
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W6 8RP, UK
| | - Alison H McGregor
- MSk lab, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, 2nd Floor, Sir Michael Uren Hub, 86 Wood Lane, W12 0BZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Silişteanu SC, Antonescu E, Duică L, Totan M, Cucu AI, Costea AI. Lumbar Paravertebral Muscle Pain Management Using Kinesitherapy and Electrotherapeutic Modalities. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:853. [PMID: 38667615 PMCID: PMC11050304 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12080853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain is considered a public health problem internationally. Low back pain is a cause of disability that occurs in adolescents and causes negative effects in adults as well. The work environment and physical and psychosocial factors can influence the occurrence and evolution of low back pain. METHODS The purpose of this paper is to highlight the physiological and functional changes in young adults with painful conditions of the lumbar spine, after using exercise therapy. The study was of the longitudinal type and was carried out over a period 6 months in an outpatient setting. The rehabilitation treatment included electrotherapeutic modalities and kinesitherapy. RESULTS The results obtained when evaluating each parameter, for all moments, show statistically significant values in both groups. The results obtained regarding the relationship between the therapeutic modalities specific to rehabilitation medicine and low back pain are consistent with those reported in studies. CONCLUSIONS Depending on the clinical-functional status of each patient, kinesitherapy can accelerate the heart rate and increase the blood pressure and oxygen saturation of the arterial blood, values that can later return to their initial levels, especially through training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sînziana Călina Silişteanu
- Faculty of Medicine and Biological Sciences, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, 720229 Suceava, Romania; (S.C.S.); (A.I.C.); (A.I.C.)
| | - Elisabeta Antonescu
- Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania;
| | - Lavinia Duică
- Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania;
| | - Maria Totan
- Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania;
| | - Andrei Ionuţ Cucu
- Faculty of Medicine and Biological Sciences, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, 720229 Suceava, Romania; (S.C.S.); (A.I.C.); (A.I.C.)
| | - Andrei Ioan Costea
- Faculty of Medicine and Biological Sciences, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, 720229 Suceava, Romania; (S.C.S.); (A.I.C.); (A.I.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gianola S, Bargeri S, Castellini G, Cook C, Palese A, Pillastrini P, Salvalaggio S, Turolla A, Rossettini G. Performance of ChatGPT Compared to Clinical Practice Guidelines in Making Informed Decisions for Lumbosacral Radicular Pain: A Cross-sectional Study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024; 54:1-7. [PMID: 38284363 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2024.12151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of an artificial intelligence chatbot to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) recommendations for providing answers to complex clinical questions on lumbosacral radicular pain. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: We extracted recommendations from recent CPGs for diagnosing and treating lumbosacral radicular pain. Relative clinical questions were developed and queried to OpenAI's ChatGPT (GPT-3.5). We compared ChatGPT answers to CPGs recommendations by assessing the (1) internal consistency of ChatGPT answers by measuring the percentage of text wording similarity when a clinical question was posed 3 times, (2) reliability between 2 independent reviewers in grading ChatGPT answers, and (3) accuracy of ChatGPT answers compared to CPGs recommendations. Reliability was estimated using Fleiss' kappa (κ) coefficients, and accuracy by interobserver agreement as the frequency of the agreements among all judgments. RESULTS: We tested 9 clinical questions. The internal consistency of text ChatGPT answers was unacceptable across all 3 trials in all clinical questions (mean percentage of 49%, standard deviation of 15). Intrareliability (reviewer 1: κ = 0.90, standard error [SE] = 0.09; reviewer 2: κ = 0.90, SE = 0.10) and interreliability (κ = 0.85, SE = 0.15) between the 2 reviewers was "almost perfect." Accuracy between ChatGPT answers and CPGs recommendations was slight, demonstrating agreement in 33% of recommendations. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT performed poorly in internal consistency and accuracy of the indications generated compared to clinical practice guideline recommendations for lumbosacral radicular pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(3):1-7. Epub 29 January 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12151.
Collapse
|
7
|
Muller RD, Cooper J, Gliedt JA, Pohlman KA. Attitudes, beliefs, and recommendations for persistent low back pain patients: cross-sectional surveys of students and faculty at a chiropractic college. Chiropr Man Therap 2024; 32:7. [PMID: 38424615 PMCID: PMC10905815 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-024-00530-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While the use of chiropractic care for persistent low back pain (PLBP) is prevalent, chiropractors' attitudes and beliefs related to PLBP patients are not fully understood. The purpose of this study was to assess the attitudes, beliefs and activity/work recommendations of students and faculty at a chiropractic college regarding PLBP patients. METHODS The Health Care Providers Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS) and clinical vignettes were requested to be completed by chiropractic students and faculty at Parker University in April 2018. Higher HC-PAIRS scores indicate stronger beliefs that PLBP justifies disability and limitation of activities. Activity and work recommendations from clinical vignettes were rated as "adequate", "neutral", or "inadequate", as defined in previous literature. Descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, and logistic regression were used to analyze results. RESULTS Student and faculty response rates were 63.6% and 25.9%, respectively. Faculty mean HC-PAIRS scores (3.66 [SD:0.88]) were significantly lower than students' (4.41 [SD:0.71]). The percentage of faculty providing "adequate" activity (62.1%) and work (41.0%) recommendations was significantly greater than the percentage of students (activity: 33.9%, work: 21.2%) (p < 0.05). Higher HC-PAIRS scores in students were associated with decreased odds of providing "adequate" activity and work recommendations. CONCLUSIONS Student and faculty attitudes and beliefs, and students' activity/work recommendations were found to be dissimilar to those from similar studies and less congruent with CPG recommendations. Lower HC-PAIRS scores increased the odds of students providing "adequate" activity and work recommendations to patients with PLBP. Results from this study may help guide future research and training opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan D Muller
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
- Research Center, Parker University , Dallas, TX, USA
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jesse Cooper
- Baylor Scott & White Health, Round Rock, TX, USA
| | - Jordan A Gliedt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Grenier JP, Rothmund M. A critical review of the role of manual therapy in the treatment of individuals with low back pain. J Man Manip Ther 2024:1-14. [PMID: 38381584 DOI: 10.1080/10669817.2024.2316393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
The number of low back pain (LBP) cases is projected to increase to more than 800 million by 2050. To address the substantial burden of disease associated with this rise in prevalence, effective treatments are needed. While clinical practice guidelines (CPG) consistently recommend non-pharmacological therapies as first-line treatments, recommendations regarding manual therapy (MT) in treating low back pain vary. The goal of this narrative review was to critically summarize the available evidence for MT behind these recommendations, to scrutinize its mechanisms of action, and propose some actionable steps for clinicians on how this knowledge can be integrated into a person-centered approach. Despite disparate recommendations from CPG, MT is as effective as other available treatments and may be offered to patients with LBP, especially as part of a treatment package with exercise and education. Most of the effects of MT are not specific to the technique. MT and other interventions share several mechanisms of action that mediate treatment success. These mechanisms can encompass patients' expectations, prior experiences, beliefs and convictions, epistemic trust, and nonspecific contextual effects. Although MT is safer than opioids for patients with LBP, this alone is insufficient. Our goal is to encourage clinicians to shift away from outdated and refuted ideas in MT and embrace a person-centered approach rooted in a comprehensive biopsychosocial framework while incorporating patients' beliefs, addressing illness behaviors, and seeking to understand each patient's journey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Pascal Grenier
- Department of Physiotherapy, Health University of Applied Sciences Tyrol, Innsbruck, Austria
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Clinic Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Maria Rothmund
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, University Clinic for Psychiatry II, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hamilton M, Christine Lin CW, Arora S, Harrison M, Tracy M, Nickel B, Shaheed CA, Gnjidic D, Mathieson S. Understanding general practitioners' prescribing choices to patients with chronic low back pain: a discrete choice experiment. Int J Clin Pharm 2024; 46:111-121. [PMID: 37882955 PMCID: PMC10831024 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-023-01649-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although NSAIDs are recommended as a first line analgesic treatment, opioids are very commonly prescribed to patients with low back pain (LBP) despite risks of harms. AIM This study aimed to determine factors contributing to general practitioners' (GPs') prescribing choices to patients with chronic LBP in a primary care setting. METHOD This discrete choice experiment (DCE) presented 210 GPs with hypothetical scenarios of a patient with chronic LBP. Participants chose their preferred treatment for each choice set, either the opioid, NSAID or neither. The scenarios varied by two patient attributes; non-specific LBP or LBP with referred leg pain (sciatica) and number of comorbidities. The three treatment attributes also varied, being: the type of opioid or NSAID, degree of pain reduction and number of adverse events. The significance of each attribute in influencing clinical decisions was the primary outcome and the degree to which GPs preferred the alternative based on the number of adverse events or the amount of pain reduction was the secondary outcome. RESULTS Overall, GPs preferred NSAIDs (45.2%, 95% CI 38.7-51.7%) over opioids (28.8%, 95% CI 23.0-34.7%), however there was no difference between the type of NSAID or opioid preferred. Additionally, the attributes of pain reduction and adverse events did not influence a GP's choice between NSAIDs or opioids for patients with chronic LBP. CONCLUSION GPs prefer prescribing NSAIDs over opioids for a patient with chronic low back pain regardless of patient factors of comorbidities or the presence of leg pain (i.e. sciatica).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Hamilton
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Level 10 North, King George V Building, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (C39), Missenden Road, PO Box M179, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia.
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Chung-Wei Christine Lin
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Level 10 North, King George V Building, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (C39), Missenden Road, PO Box M179, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sheena Arora
- Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark Harrison
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- The Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences (CHEOS) at St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Marguerite Tracy
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Brooke Nickel
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Christina Abdel Shaheed
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Level 10 North, King George V Building, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (C39), Missenden Road, PO Box M179, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Danijela Gnjidic
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Stephanie Mathieson
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Level 10 North, King George V Building, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (C39), Missenden Road, PO Box M179, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW, 2050, Australia
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ceulemans D, Moens M, Reneman M, Callens J, De Smedt A, Godderis L, Goudman L, Lavreysen O, Putman K, Van de Velde D. Biopsychosocial rehabilitation in the working population with chronic low back pain: a concept analysis. J Rehabil Med 2024; 56:jrm13454. [PMID: 38226563 PMCID: PMC10802789 DOI: 10.2340/jrm.v56.13454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify the essential attributes of biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain in the working population. DESIGN A concept analysis was conducted according to the 8-step method of Walker and Avant. This framework provides a clear concept and theoretical and operational definitions. METHODS Five databases were searched, followed by a systematic screening. Subsequently, attributes, illustrative cases, antecedents, consequences and empirical referents were formulated. RESULTS Of the 3793 studies identified, 42 unique references were included. Eleven attributes were identified: therapeutic exercise, psychological support, education, personalization, self-management, participation, follow-up, practice standard, goal-setting, social support, and dietary advice. Subsequently, illustrative cases were described. Antecedents, such as motivation, preparedness and a multidisciplinary team, were found, together with consequences such as decreased pain, less sick-leave and increased function and work status. Finally, examples of empirical referents were given. CONCLUSION This study identified the attributes that are necessary to develop biopsychosocial rehabilitation intervention programmes for chronic low back pain. The defined concept of biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain may serve as a solid base to further develop and apply interventions. Future research should focus on the objectification of biopsychosocial rehabilitation and conceptualization regarding how personalization is done.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dries Ceulemans
- Faculty of Medicine and Healthcare Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Occupational Therapy Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; STIMULUS Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium.
| | - Maarten Moens
- STIMULUS Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Department of Radiology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Jette, Belgium
| | - Michiel Reneman
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jonas Callens
- STIMULUS Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research (I-CHER), Department of Public Health (GEWE), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium
| | - Ann De Smedt
- STIMULUS Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Jette, Belgium
| | - Lode Godderis
- Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Leuven, Belgium; IDEWE, External Service for Prevention and Protection at Work, Heverlee, Belgium
| | - Lisa Goudman
- STIMULUS Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Department of Neurosurgery, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Research Foundation Flanders (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Olivia Lavreysen
- STIMULUS Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Leuven, Belgium
| | - Koen Putman
- Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research (I-CHER), Department of Public Health (GEWE), Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium
| | - Dominique Van de Velde
- Faculty of Medicine and Healthcare Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Occupational Therapy Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Enthoven P, Menning L, Öberg B, Schröder K, Fors M, Lindbäck Y, Abbott A. Physiotherapists' experiences of implementation of the BetterBack model of care for low back pain in primary care - a focus group interview study. Physiother Theory Pract 2024:1-13. [PMID: 38189338 DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2023.2301436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The BetterBack model of care (MoC), a best practice physiotherapy MoC for low back pain (LBP), was implemented in Swedish primary care to improve management of patients with LBP and provide patients with support tools to better self-manage episodes of LBP. PURPOSE The objective was to describe how physiotherapists in primary care experienced the implementation of the BetterBack MoC for LBP. METHODS Focus group interviews were conducted with physiotherapists in 2018-2019, 14-18 months after the introduction of the BetterBack MoC. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. RESULTS Five focus group interviews with 23 (15 female and 8 male) physiotherapists, age range 24-61 years were analyzed. A supportive organization and adaptation to the local culture, combined with health care professionals' attitudes and collaboration between physiotherapists emerged as important factors for a successful implementation and for long-term sustainability of the MoC. Physiotherapists had differing opinions if the implementation led to change in clinical practice. Improved confidence in how to manage patients with LBP was expressed by physiotherapists. CONCLUSIONS Several barriers and facilitators influence the implementation of a best practice physiotherapy MoC for LBP in primary care, which need to be considered in future implementation and sustainability processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Enthoven
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Linnea Menning
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Birgitta Öberg
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Karin Schröder
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Maria Fors
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Activity and Health, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Yvonne Lindbäck
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Allan Abbott
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Prevention, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Orthopaedics, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
van der Vossen B, de Zoete A, Rubinstein S, Ostelo R, de Boer M. Is the use of diagnostic imaging and the self-reported clinical management of low back pain patients influenced by the attitudes and beliefs of chiropractors? A survey of chiropractors in the Netherlands and Belgium. Chiropr Man Therap 2024; 32:1. [PMID: 38191460 PMCID: PMC10775452 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-023-00523-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND No previous studies have examined the association between attitudes and beliefs of chiropractors and their adherence to low back pain (LBP) guidelines. The aim of this study is: (1) to assess the attitudes and beliefs towards the management of LBP of Dutch and Belgian chiropractors; and (2) to investigate the association of these attitudes and beliefs on the use of diagnostic imaging and on the adherence to diagnostic guidelines and guidelines in the management of patients with LBP. METHODS STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using a web-based questionnaire in chiropractic private practices in the Netherlands and Belgium. The survey included sociodemographic characteristics, use of diagnostic imaging, the Pain Attitude and Beliefs Scale-Physiotherapists (PABS.PT) and 6 vignettes (3 acute and 3 chronic LBP patients). We used Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) to categorise the chiropractors into clusters depending on their PABS.PT outcome, whereby the classes differed primarily on the biomedical score. We used linear, logistic, and mixed models to examine the associations between these clusters, and adherence to the recommendations of guidelines on: (1) diagnostic imaging use, and (2) management of LBP (i.e. advice on activity, treatment, return-to-work, and bedrest). RESULTS The response rate of the Dutch and Belgian chiropractors was 61% (n = 149/245) and 57% (n = 54/95), respectively. The majority of chiropractors scored midrange of the biomedical scale of the PABS.PT. Three clusters were identified using LPA: (1) high biomedical class (n = 18), (2) mid biomedical class (n = 117) and (3) low biomedical class (n = 23). Results from the vignettes suggest that chiropractors in the high biomedical class better adhere to diagnostic imaging guidelines and to LBP guidelines when it concerns advice on return-to-work and activity compared to the other two classes. However, no differences were identified between the classes for treatment of LBP. All chiropractors adhered to the guidelines' recommendation on bedrest. CONCLUSION The high biomedical class demonstrated better overall adherence to the practice guidelines for the management of LBP and diagnostic imaging than the other classes. Due to the small numbers for the high and low biomedical classes, these results should be interpreted with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenda van der Vossen
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Annemarie de Zoete
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sidney Rubinstein
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Raymond Ostelo
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel de Boer
- Department of Primary- and Long-Term Care, UMCG, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Duncan N, Bond J, Conallin J, Baumgartner LJ. How Useful? Fish-Friendly Irrigation Guidelines for the Lower Mekong Lack Definition in Five Key Areas. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2024; 73:102-114. [PMID: 37452853 PMCID: PMC10786998 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-023-01855-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
A proliferation of irrigation infrastructure throughout the Mekong River has impacted the ability of certain fish species to migrate to fulfil their lifecycle. In response, fishways, a type of fish-friendly irrigation structure, have been developed to provide passage for these fish. In recent years, several guidelines documents providing guidance on fish-friendly irrigation structures and their construction have been published. The development process from guideline inception to publication is unclear, while their purpose, audience, and contribution to fishway practice are vague. This study is the first to review the development of three fish-friendly guideline documents, using structural criteria analysis, combined with qualitative data from 27 key informant interviews. It aimed to understand document elements such as purpose, audience, scope, and framing. The results showed reviewed guideline utility and impact could be improved by attention to five key aspects, namely: definition of target audience; engagement of target audience in guideline design; definition of guideline scope; specificity of recommendations; and evaluation. Attention to these 5 aspects may result in guidelines that are perceived as more useful by their target audience and have greater impact on water management practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolette Duncan
- Gulbali Institute for Agriculture, Water and Environment, Charles Sturt University, P.O Box 789, Albury, NSW, 2640, Australia.
| | - Jennifer Bond
- Gulbali Institute for Agriculture, Water and Environment, Charles Sturt University, P.O Box 789, Albury, NSW, 2640, Australia
| | - John Conallin
- Gulbali Institute for Agriculture, Water and Environment, Charles Sturt University, P.O Box 789, Albury, NSW, 2640, Australia
| | - Lee J Baumgartner
- Gulbali Institute for Agriculture, Water and Environment, Charles Sturt University, P.O Box 789, Albury, NSW, 2640, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
O'Connell N, Moore RA, Stewart G, Fisher E, Hearn L, Eccleston C, Wewege M, De C Williams AC. Trials We Cannot Trust: Investigating Their Impact on Systematic Reviews and Clinical Guidelines in Spinal Pain. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2023; 24:2103-2130. [PMID: 37453533 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
We previously conducted an exploration of the trustworthiness of a group of clinical trials of cognitive-behavioral therapy and exercise in spinal pain. We identified multiple concerns in 8 trials, judging them untrustworthy. In this study, we systematically explored the impact of these trials ("index trials") on results, conclusions, and recommendations of systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). We conducted forward citation tracking using Google Scholar and the citationchaser tool, searched the Guidelines International Network library and National Institute of Health and Care Excellence archive to June 2022 to identify systematic reviews and CPGs. We explored how index trials impacted their findings. Where reviews presented meta-analyses, we extracted or conducted sensitivity analyses for the outcomes of pain and disability, to explore how the exclusion of index trials affected effect estimates. We developed and applied an 'Impact Index' to categorize the extent to which index studies impacted their results. We included 32 unique reviews and 10 CPGs. None directly raised concerns regarding the veracity of the trials. Across meta-analyses (55 comparisons), the removal of index trials reduced effect sizes by a median of 58% (Inter Quartlie Range (IQR) 40-74). 85% of comparisons were classified as highly, 3% as moderately, and 11% as minimally impacted. Nine out of 10 reviews conducting narrative synthesis drew positive conclusions regarding the intervention tested. Nine out of 10 CPGs made positive recommendations for the intervention(s) evaluated. This cohort of trials, with concerns regarding trustworthiness, has substantially impacted the results of systematic reviews and guideline recommendations. PERSPECTIVE: We found that a group of trials of CBT for spinal pain with concerns relating to their trustworthiness has had substantial impacts on the analyses and conclusions of systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines. This highlights the need for a greater focus on the trustworthiness of studies in evidence appraisal. PRE-REGISTRATION: Our protocol was preregistered on the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/m92ax/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil O'Connell
- Centre for Health and Wellbeing Across the Lifecourse, Department of Health Sciences, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UK
| | | | - Gavin Stewart
- School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle, UK
| | - Emma Fisher
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, UK
| | - Leslie Hearn
- Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Review Group, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| | - Christopher Eccleston
- Centre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, UK; Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Finland; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium, Finland
| | - Michael Wewege
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Amanda C De C Williams
- Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Heine J, Window P, Hacker S, Young J, Mitchell G, Roffey S, Cottrell M. Adherence to recommended guidelines for low back pain presentations to an Australian emergency department: Barriers and enablers. Australas Emerg Care 2023; 26:326-332. [PMID: 37193622 DOI: 10.1016/j.auec.2023.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study sought to evaluate the adherence to guidelines for the management of mechanical Low Back Pain within a single tertiary metropolitan Emergency Department setting. Our objectives were: METHODS: A two-stage multi-methods study design was undertaken. Stage 1 involved a retrospective chart audit of patients presenting with a diagnosis of mechanical Low Back Pain to establish documented adherence to clinical guidelines. Stage 2 explored clinicians' perspectives towards factors influencing adherence to the guidelines via a study-specific survey and follow up focus groups. RESULTS The audit demonstrated low adherence to the following guidelines: (i) appropriate prescription of analgesia, (ii) targeted education and advice, and (iii) attempts to mobilise. Three major themes were identified as factors influencing adherence to the guidelines: (1) clinician driven influences and factors, (2) workflow processes, and (3) patient expectations and behaviours. CONCLUSION There was low adherence to some published guidelines and factors influencing adherence to the guidelines were multi-factorial. Understanding the factors that influence care decisions and developing strategies to address these can improve Emergency Department management of mechanical Low Back Pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janelle Heine
- Emergency and Trauma Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield St, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia; Physiotherapy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield St, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia.
| | - Peter Window
- Physiotherapy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield St, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia
| | - Sarah Hacker
- Emergency and Trauma Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield St, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia; Physiotherapy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield St, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia
| | - Jordan Young
- Emergency and Trauma Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield St, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia; University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4067, Australia
| | - Gary Mitchell
- Emergency and Trauma Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield St, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia; Jamieson Trauma Institute, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia; University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4067, Australia
| | - Shea Roffey
- Emergency and Trauma Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield St, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia
| | - Michelle Cottrell
- Physiotherapy Department, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Butterfield St, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rhon DI, Davis AF, Ali J, Brandt C, Burns A, Lucio W, Vining R, Young-McCaughan S. Ambiguity in care delivery terminology: implications that affect pragmatic clinical trials using non-pharmacological interventions. BMJ Evid Based Med 2023:bmjebm-2023-112547. [PMID: 37989537 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel I Rhon
- Rehabilitation Medicine, US Army Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas, USA
- Rehabilitation Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Alison F Davis
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Joseph Ali
- Johns Hopkins University Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Cynthia Brandt
- Section of Biomedical Informatics and Data Science, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- VA Connecticut Healthcare, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Amy Burns
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- VA Connecticut Healthcare, West Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Whitley Lucio
- Rehabilitation Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- The Geneva Foundation, Tacoma, Washington, USA
| | - Robert Vining
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, Iowa, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Li Y, Yan L, Hou L, Zhang X, Zhao H, Yan C, Li X, Li Y, Chen X, Ding X. Exercise intervention for patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1155225. [PMID: 38035307 PMCID: PMC10687566 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1155225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is an aging and public health issue that is a leading cause of disability worldwide and has a significant economic impact on a global scale. Treatments for CLBP are varied, and there is currently no study with high-quality evidence to show which treatment works best. Exercise therapy has the characteristics of minor harm, low cost, and convenient implementation. It has become a mainstream treatment method in clinics for chronic low back pain. However, there is insufficient evidence on which specific exercise regimen is more effective for chronic non-specific low back pain. This network meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of different exercise therapies on chronic low back pain and provide a reference for exercise regimens in CLBP patients. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to 10 May 2022. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were used for selection. We collected information from studies to compare the effects of 20 exercise interventions on patients with chronic low back pain. Results This study included 75 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 5,254 participants. Network meta-analysis results showed that tai chi [standardized mean difference (SMD), -2.11; 95% CI, -3.62 to -0.61], yoga (SMD, -1.76; 95% CI -2.72 to -0.81), Pilates exercise (SMD, -1.52; 95% CI, -2.68, to -0.36), and sling exercise (SMD, -1.19; 95% CI, -2.07 to -0.30) showed a better pain improvement than conventional rehabilitation. Tai chi (SMD, -2.42; 95% CI, -3.81 to -1.03) and yoga (SMD, -2.07; 95% CI, -2.80 to -1.34) showed a better pain improvement than no intervention provided. Yoga (SMD, -1.72; 95% CI, -2.91 to -0.53) and core or stabilization exercises (SMD, -1.04; 95% CI, -1.80 to -0.28) showed a better physical function improvement than conventional rehabilitation. Yoga (SMD, -1.81; 95% CI, -2.78 to -0.83) and core or stabilization exercises (SMD, -1.13; 95% CI, -1.66 to -0.59) showed a better physical function improvement than no intervention provided. Conclusion Compared with conventional rehabilitation and no intervention provided, tai chi, toga, Pilates exercise, sling exercise, motor control exercise, and core or stabilization exercises significantly improved CLBP in patients. Compared with conventional rehabilitation and no intervention provided, yoga and core or stabilization exercises were statistically significant in improving physical function in patients with CLBP. Due to the limitations of the quality and quantity of the included studies, it is difficult to make a definitive recommendation before more large-scale and high-quality RCTs are conducted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Li
- College of Sports Science, Jishou University, Jishou, Hunan, China
| | - Lei Yan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanxi Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital, Taiyuan, China
- Second Clinical Medical College, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Lingyu Hou
- Department of Nursing, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Xiaoya Zhang
- School of Nursing, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Hanping Zhao
- College of Nursing, Weifang University of Science and Technology, Weifang, Shandong, China
| | - Chengkun Yan
- School of Nursing, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Xianhuang Li
- Digestive Endoscopy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Yuanhe Li
- College of Nursing, Weifang University of Science and Technology, Weifang, Shandong, China
| | - Xiaoan Chen
- College of Sports Science, Jishou University, Jishou, Hunan, China
| | - Xiaorong Ding
- Department of Nursing, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Truter P, Attwooll L, Flanagan P, McGinty C, Taylor R, Hince D, Wand BM. Comparing multi-disciplinary low back pain care in the ED to the Australian clinical care standard: The possible influence of profession, experience and back pain beliefs. Int Emerg Nurs 2023; 71:101351. [PMID: 37757581 DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2023.101351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Piers Truter
- Fiona Stanley Hospital, Emergency Department, Perth, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia; School of Health Sciences and Physiotherapy, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA 6160, Australia.
| | - Lydia Attwooll
- School of Health Sciences and Physiotherapy, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA 6160, Australia
| | - Pippa Flanagan
- Fiona Stanley Hospital, Emergency Department, Perth, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia; School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
| | - Casey McGinty
- Fiona Stanley Hospital, Emergency Department, Perth, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
| | - Rosalind Taylor
- Fiona Stanley Hospital, Emergency Department, Perth, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
| | - Dana Hince
- Institute of Health Research, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA 6160, Australia
| | - Benedict M Wand
- School of Health Sciences and Physiotherapy, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA 6160, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Panchal S, Hendrick P. The lived experiences of musculoskeletal physiotherapists managing patient expectations for diagnostic imaging: A qualitative study using a phenomenological analysis. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2023; 67:102833. [PMID: 37672861 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Unnecessary diagnostic imaging for musculoskeletal presentations is a pervasive phenomenon, placing a substantial weight on healthcare resources. Their overuse can lead to iatrogenic consequences associated with overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Factors which contribute to inappropriate imaging are multifactorial. Clinician-patient beliefs, behaviours, and expectations have been identified as central drivers. Physiotherapists play an important role in the utilisation of diagnostic imaging for musculoskeletal presentations throughout healthcare settings. This study aims to explore the lived experiences of physiotherapists managing patient expectations for diagnostic imaging. DESIGN A qualitative study using an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Five participants were purposefully recruited and took part in semi-structured individual interviews. RESULTS The central themes identified were expectations for diagnostic imaging, managing expectations, communicating imaging findings, imaging as a therapeutic tool, and risk and uncertainty. CONCLUSION The findings from this study gives new insights into how musculoskeletal physiotherapists manage expectations for diagnostic imaging, the associated complexities, and the challenges encountered.
Collapse
|
20
|
Huang L, Li J, Xiao B, Tang Y, Huang J, Li Y, Fang F. Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends on Manual Therapy for Low Back Pain Over Past 2 Decades. J Pain Res 2023; 16:3045-3060. [PMID: 37701559 PMCID: PMC10493154 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s418458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent musculoskeletal disorder, and manual therapy (MT) is frequently employed as a non-pharmacological treatment for LBP. This study aims to explore the research hotspots and trends in MT for LBP. MT has gained widespread acceptance in clinical practice due to its proven safety and effectiveness. The study aims to analyze the developments in the field of MT for LBP over the past 23 years, including leading countries, institutions, authoritative authors, journals, keywords, and references. It endeavors to provide a comprehensive summary of the existing research foundation and to analyze the current cutting-edge research trends. Methods Relevant articles between 2000 and 2023 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC) database. We used the software VOSviewer and CiteSpace to perform the analysis and summarize current research hotspots and emerging trends. Results Through screening, we included 1643 papers from 2000 to 2023. In general, the number of articles published each year showed an upward trend. The United States had the highest number of publications and citations. Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College was the most published research institution. The University of Pittsburgh in the United States had the most collaboration with other research institutions. Long, Cynthia R. was the active author. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics was the most prolific journal with 234 publications. Conclusion This study provides an overview of the current status and trends of clinical studies on MT for LBP in the past 23 years using the visualization software, which may help researchers identify potential collaborators and collaborating institutions, hot topics, and new perspectives in research frontiers, while providing new clinical practice ideas for the treatment of LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lele Huang
- School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200093, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jiamin Li
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People’s Republic of China
| | - Baiyang Xiao
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yin Tang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jinghui Huang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ying Li
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fanfu Fang
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Olivier TJ, Konda C, Pham T, Baltich Nelson B, Patel A, Sharma GS, Trivedi K, Annaswamy TM. Clinical practice guidelines on interventional management of low back pain: A synthesis of recommendations. PM R 2023; 15:1052-1063. [PMID: 36507598 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize the recommendations on the interventional management of subacute and chronic nonradicular low back pain (LBP) from the 21 quality-appraised clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) identified in a previously published paper: "Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines on Interventional Management of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review." By disseminating this information, we aimed to facilitate the implementation of these recommendations into clinical practice. TYPE: Systematic Review LITERATURE SURVEY: Electronic bibliographic databases, guideline databases, and gray literature were searched from January 2016 to January 2020 to identify CPGs that met study criteria. METHODOLOGY A total of 21 CPGs were quality appraised and interventional management recommendations were extracted and organized into several treatment categories including epidural steroid injections, radiofrequency procedures (RF), facet injections, sacroiliac injections, and prolotherapy. Within each treatment category, the recommendations were organized based on two factors: quality of CPG and strength of recommendation. SYNTHESIS Overall, there was no consistency in recommendations for or against any interventional procedure, even when accounting for the quality of the CPG. In all of the CPGs reviewed, the most common strength of recommendation was weakly for. The second, third, and fourth most common strength of recommendations were inconclusive, weakly against, and strongly against, respectively, and the least common was strongly for. The treatment categories with the greatest number of recommendations were RF procedures (most common strength of recommendation was weakly for) and facet procedures. Among the high-quality CPGs, the most common strength of recommendation was inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS Most of the interventional management recommendations for management of nonradicular LBP in the 21 CPGs appraised in this review were either weakly for, weakly against, or inconclusive, with several recommendations within each treatment category contradicting each other. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Instrument quality appraisals of CPGs on interventional management of LBP were of unclear utility in guiding clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy J Olivier
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Chaitanya Konda
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Tri Pham
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Becky Baltich Nelson
- Clinical Library, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ankit Patel
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - G Sunny Sharma
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Kavita Trivedi
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Thiru M Annaswamy
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Service, VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Hochheim M, Ramm P, Amelung V. The effectiveness of low-dosed outpatient biopsychosocial interventions compared to active physical interventions on pain and disability in adults with nonspecific chronic low back pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Pain Pract 2023; 23:409-436. [PMID: 36565010 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of low-dosed outpatient biopsychosocial interventions versus active physical interventions on pain intensity and disability in adults with nonspecific chronic low back pain. INTRODUCTION Research has shown that primary care biopsychosocial interventions (PCBI) can reduce pain intensity and disability. While scattered studies support low-dosed (≤ 15 treatment hours) PCBI, no systematic review exists comparing the effectiveness of low-dosed PCBI treatment with traditional physical activity interventions in adults with nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP). INCLUSION CRITERIA Randomized controlled trials that evaluate low-dosed PCBI compared to physical treatment with an active component such as exercise, physical activity or usual physiotherapy treatment for adult participants (18 years or older), who suffer from CLBP were included. Not recommended interventions that feature only passive therapies, spinal surgery or pharmacological treatment, and studies with inpatient multidisciplinary-based rehabilitation (MBR) were excluded. METHODS Databases were searched from inception to December 31, 2021. Language was restricted to English or German. Keywords and derivatives of "chronic back pain", "exercise intervention", "cognitive-behavioral therapy", "primary care" and "randomized controlled trials" were used. Sources were CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Ovid Medline, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), PubMed and Web of Science. Search was finished on March 08, 2022. Data appraisal, extraction and synthesis followed JBI guidance for systematic reviews of effectiveness. Risk of Bias was assessed using JBI 13-item checklist for randomized controlled trials. The GRADE approach for grading the certainty of evidence was followed. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022302771. RESULTS Eighteen RCTs were found eligible and 15 trials comprising a total of 1531 participants suffering from CLBP were entered in the meta-analyses. Risk of Bias was low. Overall evidence was moderate. Significant effects in favor of PCBI were found for pain intensity post-treatment (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -1.84 to -0.34, I2 = 97%, p = 0.004) as well as at short-term (SMD = -0.23, 95% CI = -0.39 to -0.08, I2 = 0%, p = 0.004), long term (SMD = -0.79, 95% CI = -1.42 to -0.17, I2 = 96%, p = 0.01) and very long-term (SMD = -1.13, 95% CI = -1.93 to -0.33, I2 = 94%, p = 0.005) follow-up. Significant effects in favor of PCBI for physical function were found post-treatment (SMD = -1.33, 95% CI = -2.17 to -0.49, I2 = 97%, p = 0.002) at short-term (SMD = -0.20, 95% CI = -0.36 to -0.04, I2 = 0%, p = 0.01) and at long-term follow-up (SMD = -1.17, 95% CI = -2.06 to -0.28, I2 = 98%, p = 0.01). The results were characterized by high heterogeneity due to different types (cognitive behavioral therapy, pain-neuroscience education, mindfulness, and motivation), delivery modes (individual and/or group), durations (3-12 weeks) and contact times (2-15 h) of PCBI. In sensitivity analysis outliers were removed to reduce heterogeneity. The results remained significant for pain intensity at short-term (SMD = -0.23, 95% CI = -0.39 to -0.08, I2 = 0%, p = 0.004) and long-term follow-up (SMD = -0.22, 95% CI = -0.41 to -0.03, I2 = 39%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS This meta-analysis suggests that low-dosed PCBI has favorable effects in terms of disability and pain intensity compared to active physical treatments alone. All conducted meta-analyses indicate that biopsychosocial interventions produce better outcomes than active physical treatment alone. Therefore, we strongly recommend decision makers and clinical practitioners to analyze how psychosocial elements can be introduced into outpatient (low-dosed) CLBP interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Hochheim
- Institute of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH), Hannover, Germany
- Generali Health Solutions GmbH (GHS), Köln, Germany
| | - Philipp Ramm
- Generali Health Solutions GmbH (GHS), Köln, Germany
| | - Volker Amelung
- Institute of Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health System Research, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH), Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hanna M, Perrot S, Varrassi G. Critical Appraisal of Current Acute LBP Management and the Role of a Multimodal Analgesia: A Narrative Review. Pain Ther 2023; 12:377-398. [PMID: 36765012 PMCID: PMC10036717 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-023-00479-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Acute low back pain (LBP) stands as a leading cause of activity limitation and work absenteeism, and its associated healthcare expenditures are expected to become substantial when acute LBP develops into a chronic and even refractory condition. Therefore, early intervention is crucial to prevent progression to chronic pain, for which the management is particularly challenging and the most effective pharmacological therapy is still controversial. Current guideline treatment recommendations vary and are mostly driven by expertise with opinion differing across different interventions. Thus, it is difficult to formulate evidence-based guidance when the relatively few randomized clinical trials have explored the diagnosis and management of LBP while employing different selection criteria, statistical analyses, and outcome measurements. This narrative review aims to provide a critical appraisal of current acute LBP management by discussing the unmet needs and areas of improvement from bench-to-bedside, and proposes multimodal analgesia as the way forward to attain an effective and prolonged pain relief and functional recovery in patients with acute LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdi Hanna
- Director of the Analgesics and Pain Research Unit, APR (Ltd) Sunrise, Beckenham Place Park, Beckenham, Kent, London, BR35BN, UK.
| | - Serge Perrot
- Pain Centre, Cochin Hospital, INSERM U987, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wong CM, Rugg B, Geere JA. The effects of Pilates exercise in comparison to other forms of exercise on pain and disability in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Musculoskeletal Care 2023; 21:78-96. [PMID: 36912214 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of Pilates exercise (PE) with other forms of exercise on pain and disability in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) and to inform clinical practice and future research. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review with meta-analysis conducted and reported in line the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH Six electronic databases were searched from inception to April 2021. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of PE with other forms of exercise for adults with CNSLBP on pain and disability. DATA SYNTHESIS Two reviewers assessed the risk of bias of the trials, guided by the Cochrane RoB2 tool. Available data were extracted for meta-analysis with subgroup analysis. Pilates exercise was compared to general exercise (GE), direction-specific exercise (DSE) and spinal stabilisation exercise (SSE). Certainty of evidence was interpreted following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS Eleven RCTs were included. A low certainty of evidence supported PE was more effective than GE in pain reduction [Effect size (ES) 0.44]. Moreover, very low levels of certainty were revealed for effectiveness of PE compared with DSE for pain reduction (ES 0.65) and equivalence of PE and SSE for pain and disability. CONCLUSIONS This review found no strong evidence for using one type of exercise intervention over another when managing patients with CNSLBP. Existing evidence does not allow this review to draw definitive recommendations. In the absence of a superior exercise form clinicians should work collaboratively with the patient, using the individual's goals and preferences to guide exercise selection. Further appropriately designed research is warranted to explore this topic further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi Ming Wong
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.,Locomotor Services, Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Bradley Rugg
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.,The Clementine Churchill Hospital, Harrow, UK
| | - Jo-Anne Geere
- School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Muller RD, Graham SE, Zhao X, Bastian LA, Sites AR, Corcoran KL, Lisi AJ. A Systems Approach for Assessing Low Back Pain Care Quality in Veterans Health Administration Chiropractic Visits: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2023; 46:171-181. [PMID: 38142380 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2023.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to explore a systemwide process for assessing components of low back pain (LBP) care quality in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) chiropractic visits using electronic health record (EHR) data. METHODS We performed a cross-sectional quality improvement project. We randomly sampled 1000 on-station VHA chiropractic initial visits occurring from October 1, 2017, to September 30, 2018, for patients with no such visits within the prior 12 months. Characteristics of LBP visits were extracted from VHA national EHR data via structured data queries and manual chart review. We developed quality indicators for history and/or examination and treatment procedures using previously published literature and calculated frequencies of visits meeting these indicators. Visits meeting our history and/or examination and treatment indicators were classified as "high-quality" visits. We performed a regression analysis to assess associations between demographic/clinical characteristics and visits meeting our quality criteria. RESULTS There were 592 LBP visits identified. Medical history, physical examination, and neurologic examination were documented in 76%, 77%, and 63% of all LBP visits, respectively. Recommended treatments, such as any manipulation, disease-specific education/advice, and therapeutic exercise, occurred in 75%, 69%, and 40% of chronic visits (n = 383), respectively. In acute/subacute visits (n = 37), any manipulation (92%), manual soft tissue therapy (57%), and disease-specific advice/education (54%) occurred most frequently. Female patients and those with a neck pain comorbid diagnosis were significantly less likely to have a "high-quality" visit, while other regression associations were non-significant. CONCLUSION This study explored a systemwide process for assessing components of care quality in VHA chiropractic visits for LBP. These results produced a potential framework for uniform assessment of care quality in VHA chiropractic visits for LBP and highlight potential areas for improvements in LBP care quality assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan D Muller
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut; Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
| | - Sarah E Graham
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut; Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Xiwen Zhao
- Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Lori A Bastian
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut; Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Anna R Sites
- Quality Insights, Inc, Charleston, West Virginia
| | - Kelsey L Corcoran
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut; Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Anthony J Lisi
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut; Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Using general practitioners with an extended role in spinal practice for the initial assessment of patients referred to spinal surgeons: preliminary experience and challenges. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2023; 24:e9. [PMID: 36700455 PMCID: PMC9884532 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423622000494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To describe experience using general practitioners (GPs), with an extended role (GPwER) in spinal medicine, to expedite assessment, triage, and management of patients referred from primary care for specialist spinal surgical opinion. BACKGROUND Low back and neck pain are common conditions in primary care. Indiscriminate or inappropriate referral to a spinal surgeon contributes to long waiting times. Previous attempts at triaging patients who really require a surgical opinion have used practice nurses, physiotherapists, clinical algorithms, and interdisciplinary screening clinics. METHODS Within the setting of an independent spinal care centre, we have used GPs specially trained in spinal practice to expedite the assessment and triage of new referrals between 2015 and 2021. We reviewed feedback from a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire and the postgraduate backgrounds, training, practice with regard to triage of new referrals, and experiences of the GPs who were recruited. FINDINGS Six GPwER had a mean of 26 years of postgraduate experience before appointment (range 10-44 years). The first four GPwER, appointed between 2015 and 2018, underwent an ad hoc in-house, interdisciplinary training programme and saw 2994 new patients between 2016 and 2020. After GPwER, assessment in only 18.9% (range 12.6 to 22.7%) of these patients was a spinal surgical opinion deemed necessary. Waiting times to see the spinal surgeon remained at 6-8 weeks despite a three-fold annual increase (from 340 to 1058) in new referrals. A Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire revealed high levels of satisfaction with the performances of the GPwER across seven dimensions. A dedicated training programme was designed in 2020, and the last two appointees underwent 20 h of clinical teaching prior to practice. Initial experience using GPwER, here termed 'Spinal Clinicians', suggests they are efficient at screening for patients needing spinal surgical referral. Establishing a recognised training programme, assessment, and certification for these practitioners are the next challenges.
Collapse
|
27
|
Saleh NEH, Hamdan Y, Shabaanieh A, Housseiny N, Ramadan A, Diab AH, Sadek Z. Global perceived improvement and health-related quality of life after physical therapy in Lebanese patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2023; 36:1421-1428. [PMID: 37482984 DOI: 10.3233/bmr-220423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of physical therapy (PT) in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) is mainly evaluated through pain, disability, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). However, recent studies have recommended the consideration of improvement from patients' perspectives. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the global perception of improvement in Lebanese patients with CNSLBP who have undergone PT, the HRQOL levels, as well as pain intensity. METHODS 132 patients with CNSLBP who have undergone PT completed a questionnaire consisting of sociodemographic and CNSLBP characteristics questions, pain intensity numeric scale (NRS), 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), and the Global Perceived Effect scale (GPE). Binary logistic regressions and Pearson correlation coefficient were used for analyses. RESULTS Global perceived improvement of PT varies according to HRQOL levels. A significant correlation was found between pain intensity after PT, perceived improvement from PT, and HRQOL. Educational level and pain irradiation have been shown to be predictive factors of perceived improvement after PT. CONCLUSION Pain and HRQOL are interrelated and contributed to elucidating the global perception of improvement after PT in patients with CNSLBP. The findings suggest that patients' global perception of improvement should be considered in evaluating the benefits of physical therapy in addition to pain and HRQOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nour El Hoda Saleh
- Department of Research, Health, Rehabilitation, Integration, and Research Center (HRIR), Beirut, Lebanon
- Physical Therapy Department, Faculty of Public Health, Islamic University of Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Yara Hamdan
- Physical Therapy Department, Faculty of Public Health, Islamic University of Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Abdullah Shabaanieh
- Physical Therapy Department, Faculty of Public Health, Islamic University of Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Nourhan Housseiny
- Physical Therapy Department, Faculty of Public Health, Islamic University of Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Ahmad Ramadan
- Department of Research, Health, Rehabilitation, Integration, and Research Center (HRIR), Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Aly Haj Diab
- Department of Research, Health, Rehabilitation, Integration, and Research Center (HRIR), Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Zahra Sadek
- Physical Therapy Department, Faculty of Public Health, Islamic University of Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon
- Physical Therapy Department, Faculty of Public Health, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pakkir Mohamed SH, Al Amer HS, Nambi G. The effectiveness of Kinesio taping and conventional physical therapy in the management of chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Rheumatol 2023; 42:233-244. [PMID: 36045306 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-022-06352-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 08/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of the study was to find out the effectiveness of Kinesio taping (KT) and conventional physical therapy (CPT) such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and supervised exercise therapy and CPT alone in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. METHODS This randomized clinical trial conducted between June 2019 and December 2020, who were randomly assigned to two groups: the experimental group (KT with CPT) and the control group (CPT only). The following outcomes were measured at baseline and at the second and sixth weeks: pain using the Numerical Pain Rating Scale, lumbar flexion range of motion (ROM) by the modified Schober's method, and functional disability using the Oswestry Disability Index. Treatment effects were investigated using separate 2 × 3 mixed-model analyses of variance (ANOVAs). RESULTS A total of 60 male adults with CLBP were included in this study. The experimental group showed a greater decrease in pain than the control group after 2 week of intervention (mean between-group difference 1.97 (95%CI 1.64-2.29). This was maintained during a 6-week follow-up of 2.71 (95%CI 2.54-2.87). At 2 weeks, the experimental group had a significantly greater improvement in disability, by 13.45 (95%CI 11.98-14.91). This effect was significant at the 6-week follow-up of 14.10 (95%CI 13.11-15.08). Similarly, lumbar flexion ROM was significantly better at the 2-week - 2.7 (95%CI -3.15- - 2.42) and 6-week follow-ups -3.9 (95%CI - 4.42- - 3.49). CONCLUSION The study concluded that Kinesio taping with conventional physical therapy reduces pain and disability and improves lumbar flexion range of motion after 2 and 6 weeks of application. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05173948. Key Points • This is the first clinical study found the short-term clinical effectiveness of Kinesio taping and conventional physical therapy in the management of chronic low back pain. • This study found a new clinical evidence that Kinesio taping and conventional physical therapy provides better short-term outcomes in chronic low back pain. • These reports helpful for the clinicians and physical therapists to prevent and treat the symptoms and consequences of chronic low back pain in an effective manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hamad S Al Amer
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia
| | - Gopal Nambi
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bernaers L, Cnockaert E, Braeckman L, Mairiaux P, Willems TM. Disability and return to work after a multidisciplinary intervention for (sub)acute low back pain: A systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2022; 37:964-974. [DOI: 10.1177/02692155221146447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Objective This systematic review aimed to examine pain, functional status and return to work after a multidisciplinary intervention, with or without additional workplace intervention, for (sub)acute low back pain among adults. Data sources A comprehensive search was completed (November 2022) in six electronic databases (Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane, CENTRAL and Scopus) and in the reference list of all identified studies. Review methods The search results were screened against predefined eligibility criteria by two independent researchers. Included articles were systematic reviews or randomized controlled trials examining the effect of a multidisciplinary intervention, with or without workplace intervention, in working adults with (sub)acute low back pain. Relevant information was summarized and clustered, and the methodological quality and certainty of evidence were assessed respectively using the RoB 2-tool, the ROBIS tool and the GRADE criteria. Results The search resulted in a total of 3020 articles. After the screening process, 12 studies remained (11 randomized controlled trials and 1 systematic review), which studied overall 2751 patients, with a follow-up period of at least 12 months. Conclusions A multidisciplinary intervention is favorable compared to usual care for pain intensity and functional status but this is less clear for return to work. Comparable work-related effects were found when comparing a multidisciplinary intervention with a less extensive intervention, whereas uncertainties exist regarding outcomes of pain intensity and functional status. Furthermore, adding a workplace intervention to usual care and subdividing patients based on work-related characteristics seems beneficial for return to work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Bernaers
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Elise Cnockaert
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lutgart Braeckman
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Philippe Mairiaux
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health Sciences, Liège University, Liège, Belgium
- Federal Agency for Occupational Risks, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tine Marieke Willems
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ho-A-Tham N, Struyf N, Ting-A-Kee B, de Almeida Mello J, Vanlandewijck Y, Dankaerts W. Physical activity, fear avoidance beliefs and level of disability in a multi-ethnic female population with chronic low back pain in Suriname: A population-based study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0276974. [PMID: 36315484 PMCID: PMC9621425 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is an important cause for reduced daily physical activity (PA) and loss of quality of life, especially in women. In Suriname, a middle-income country in South America, the relationship between PA and CLBP is still unknown. AIMS To assess the level of PA in women with CLBP of different ethnicity, and to identify whether fear avoidance beliefs (FAB), disability, co-occurring musculoskeletal pain sites and various sociodemographic and lifestyle factors were associated with self-reported PA. METHODS A cross-sectional community-based house-to-house survey was conducted between April 2016 and July 2017. The survey followed the Community Oriented Program for Control of Rheumatic Diseases methodology. Selection criteria were being female of Asian-Surinamese, African-Surinamese or of Mixed ethnicity and aged 18 or older, living in an urban area, and reporting CLBP. Data was collected on PA, FAB, disability, co-occurring musculoskeletal pain sites, CLBP intensity and sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. RESULTS Urban adult women with current CLBP (N = 210) were selected. Nearly 57% of the population met the WHO recommendation on PA, with work-related PA as the largest contributor to total self-reported PA. Most women showed low FAB scores (FABQ-Work ≤34 (96.2%) and FABQ-PA ≤14 (57.6%)) and low disability levels (Oswestry Disability Index ≤20 (62.4%)). An inverse association between total PA and FABQ-Work (OR = 0.132, CI: 0.023; 0.750) was found. In contrast, total PA had a significant, positive association with disability (OR = 2.154, CI: 1.044; 4.447) and workload (OR = 2.224, CI: 1.561; 3.167). All other variables showed no association with total PA. CONCLUSION This was the first study in Suriname reporting that 43.3% of urban adult women with CLBP were physically inactive. Total self-reported PA is influenced by FABQ-Work, average to heavy workload and moderate to severe disability. In this study, PA-Work was the major contributor to total PA. Therefore, future longitudinal studies should evaluate different types and aspects of PA in relation to CLBP management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Ho-A-Tham
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Anton de Kom University of Suriname, Paramaribo, Suriname
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Research Group for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Faculty of Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- * E-mail: ,
| | - Niels Struyf
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Anton de Kom University of Suriname, Paramaribo, Suriname
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Research Group for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Faculty of Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Beverly Ting-A-Kee
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Anton de Kom University of Suriname, Paramaribo, Suriname
| | | | - Yves Vanlandewijck
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Research Group of Adapted Physical Activity and Psychomotor Rehabilitation, Faculty of Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Physiology, Nutrition and Biomechanics, Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Wim Dankaerts
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Research Group for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Faculty of Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Treatment of low back pain with exercise language Author: Amir Mohammadamini Published by Lambert Publications, No. Shaik ISBN: 978-613-9-95598-5 This book is in Farsi, Kurdish, English, Russian, Italian, Polish, Dutch, French languages. , German, Spanish, Portuguese
edition Kurdish 9786229434529
”Treatment of low back pain with exercise language“
Author:Amir Mohammadamini
Edition Persian
9876229876886
”Treatment of low back pain with exercise language“
Author:Amir Mohammadamini
ISBN-13
978-6200987136
Amir Mohammadamini
Traitement de la lombalgie par l'exercice du langage
Edition Français
ISBN-13
978-6200987082
Amir Mohammadamini
Behandeling van lage rugpijn met oefentaal (Dutch Edition)
Dutch Edition ISBN-13
978-6200987112
Амир Мохаммадамини
Лечение болей в пояснице с помощью языка упражнений
Edition Russe
ISBN-13
978-6200987129
Tratamiento del dolor de espalda baja con lenguaje de ejercicios-edition Spanish
ISBN
9786200987099
Amir Mohammadamini
Amir Mohammadamini
Behandlung von Kreuzschmerzen mit Bewegungssprache (German Edition)
German Edition ISBN-13
978-6200987075
Amir Mohammadamini
Leczenie bólu w okolicy lędźwiowej kręgosłupa za pomocą języka ćwiczeń
Edition Polonais
ISBN-13
978-6200987143
Amir Mohammadamini
Tratamento de dores lombares (Portuguese Edition)
Portuguese Edition
ISBN-13
978-6200987105
https://www.lap-publishing.com/. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0273983. [PMID: 36048791 PMCID: PMC9436074 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Best outpatient treatment of nonspecific chronic low back pain is high-dosed exercise that is maintained after therapy. Primary care biopsychosocial intervention (PCBI) is an outpatient multicomponent intervention that includes an active component (exercise, physical activity, or physiotherapy) and at least one psychological, social, or occupational component. Research has shown that PCBI can reduce pain intensity and disability. While scattered studies support low-dosed (<15 treatment hours) PCBI, there is no systematic review comparing the effectiveness of low-dosed PCBI treatment with traditional physical activity interventions in adults with nonspecific chronic low back pain (CLBP). Inclusion criteria Randomised controlled trials that evaluate low-dosed outpatient biopsychosocial interventions compared to physical treatment with an active component such as exercise, physical activity or usual physiotherapy treatment for adult participants (18 years or older) who suffer from nonspecific CLBP will be included. Methods A comprehensive search of multiple databases will be used to find relevant studies. The databases will be searched from inception to December 2021, with English or German language restrictions imposed. Keywords and derivatives of “chronic back pain”, “exercise intervention”, “cognitive-behavioral therapy”, “primary care” and “randomized controlled trials” will be used. Sources will include CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Ovid Medline, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), PubMed and Web of Science. Discussion To our knowledge, this will be the first systematic review and meta-analysis of narrowly defined low- dosed PCBI across populations with nonspecific chronic low back pain. The objective of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of low-dosed outpatient biopsychosocial interventions versus physical active interventions on pain intensity and disability in adults with CLBP. This study will provide evidence that could improve treatment options for patients with nonspecific CLBP. Trail registration Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022302771. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022302771
Collapse
|
32
|
Varrassi G, Hanna M, Coaccioli S, Suada M, Perrot S. DANTE Study: The First Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo and Active-Controlled, Parallel Arm Group Study Evaluating the Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Dexketoprofen TrometAmol aNd Tramadol Hydrochloride Oral FixEd Dose Combination on Moderate to Severe Acute Pain in Patients with Acute Low Back Pain-Rationale and Design. Pain Ther 2022; 11:1055-1070. [PMID: 35788976 PMCID: PMC9314501 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-022-00407-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite a wide range of treatment approaches and the availability of treatment recommendations or guidelines, no consensus on the most effective pharmacological therapy of low back pain (LBP) has been reached yet. Therefore, additional clinical evidence, particularly if built upon a rigorous clinical trial design, an evidence-based medication choice, and broader inclusion criteria better acknowledging the heterogeneity and intrinsic variability of LBP is needed. The DANTE study has been designed to comprehensively assess the analgesic efficacy and tolerability of dexketoprofen/tramadol (DKP/TRAM) 75/25 mg in a large cohort of patients with moderate to severe acute LBP. METHODS The DANTE study is a phase IV, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy parallel group, placebo, and active controlled study. The DANTE study encompasses a single-dose phase (day 1, t0-t8h) and a multiple-dose phase (from t8h to 8 h after intake of last dose at day 5). The DANTE study population includes patients naïve to LBP or patients with previous history of LBP experiencing a new episode of moderate to severe intensity with or without radiculopathy. The clinical phase of the DANTE study started in September 2020 and the anticipated completion date is April 2022. PLANNED OUTCOMES The primary endpoint is the time to first achieve a numeric rating scale-pain intensity (NRS-PI) score of < 4 or a pain intensity reduction ≥ 30% from drug intake up to 8 h after the first dose (t8h). Secondary objectives aim are: (1) to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of TRAM/DKP 75/25 mg versus TRAM 100 mg after the first dose; (2) to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of TRAM/DKP 75/25 mg versus TRAM 100 mg after the multiple doses (from t8h until day 5, multiple dose); and (3) to assess the safety and tolerability of the TRAM/DKP 75/25 mg fixed combination after single and multiple doses. DANTE STUDY REGISTRATION EudraCT number: 2019-003656-37.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Magdi Hanna
- Analgesics and Pain Research (APR) Ltd, Beckenham, UK
| | | | - Meto Suada
- grid.417562.30000 0004 1757 5468Global Medical Affairs, Menarini, Florence, Italy
| | - Serge Perrot
- grid.508487.60000 0004 7885 7602Pain Center, INSERM U987, Hôpital Cochin, University of Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ayre J, Jenkins H, McCaffery KJ, Maher CG, Hancock MJ. Unique considerations for exercise programs to prevent future low back pain: the patient perspective. Pain 2022; 163:e953-e962. [PMID: 34799535 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT There is moderate quality evidence that exercise can help to prevent future low back pain (LBP). This study aimed to explore patient needs and preferences for exercise programs to prevent LBP and the outcomes of these programs that would be most important to a patient. Researchers conducted 26 semistructured interviews with people with LBP. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using framework thematic analysis. Three themes were developed. Theme 1 emphasised that everyone's LBP was different, translating to preferences for tailored prevention programs with a high level of initial supervision and individualised biomedical explanations for the program. Theme 2 highlighted important outcomes. Pain was considered not only for intensity but also for the duration, frequency, and severity of flare-ups or episodes. Other important outcomes were general fitness and capacity to engage in everyday activities, social interactions, and work. Theme 3 outlined aspects of exercise programs that were considered important for people with fluctuating pain, including how to foster a sense of "progress," set realistic expectations, and support patients to establish exercise routines that can adapt to fluctuating pain. Theme 4 discussed participants' desire for social connection. Patients want exercise programs for LBP prevention, which are highly individualised, provide meaningful explanations of exercises, and help them maintain exercise in the long-term. Clinicians should discuss with patients the transition from a focus on treatment to the prevention of LBP. This provides greater opportunity to adjust goals and expectations and provide relevant education. Balancing the need for individualised care against affordability presents an ongoing challenge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Ayre
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Hazel Jenkins
- Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Christopher G Maher
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, Sydney Local Health District and The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mark J Hancock
- Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Gianola S, Bargeri S, Cinquini M, Iannicelli V, Meroni R, Castellini G. More than one third of clinical practice guidelines on low back pain overlap in AGREE II appraisals. Research wasted? BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22:184. [PMID: 35790902 PMCID: PMC9254584 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01621-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Systematic reviews can apply the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE) II tool to critically appraise clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for treating low back pain (LBP); however, when appraisals differ in CPG quality rating, stakeholders, clinicians, and policy-makers will find it difficult to discern a unique judgement of CPG quality. We wanted to determine the proportion of overlapping CPGs for LBP in appraisals that applied AGREE II. We also compared inter-rater reliability and variability across appraisals. Methods For this meta-epidemiological study we searched six databases for appraisals of CPGs for LBP. The general characteristics of the appraisals were collected; the unit of analysis was the CPG evaluated in each appraisal. The inter-rater reliability and the variability of AGREE II domain scores for overall assessment were measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient and descriptive statistics. Results Overall, 43 CPGs out of 106 (40.6%) overlapped in seventeen appraisals. Half of the appraisals (53%) reported a protocol registration. Reporting of AGREE II assessment was heterogeneous and generally of poor quality: overall assessment 1 (overall CPG quality) was rated in 11 appraisals (64.7%) and overall assessment 2 (recommendation for use) in four (23.5%). Inter-rater reliability was substantial/perfect in 78.3% of overlapping CPGs. The domains with most variability were Domain 6 (mean interquartile range [IQR] 38.6), Domain 5 (mean IQR 28.9), and Domain 2 (mean IQR 27.7). Conclusions More than one third of CPGs for LBP have been re-appraised in the last six years with CPGs quality confirmed in most assessments. Our findings suggest that before conducting a new appraisal, researchers should check systematic review registers for existing appraisals. Clinicians need to rely on updated CPGs of high quality and confirmed by perfect agreement in multiple appraisals. Trial Registration Protocol Registration OSF: https://osf.io/rz7nh/ Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-022-01621-w.
Collapse
|
35
|
Emergency department evaluation, treatment, and functional outcomes among patients presenting with low back pain. Am J Emerg Med 2022; 59:37-41. [PMID: 35777258 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.06.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Low back pain (LBP) leads to more than 4.3 million emergency department (ED) visits annually. Despite the number of ED visits for LBP, emergency medicine societies have not established clear guidelines for the evaluation and care of these patients. This study aims to describe patterns in the evaluation, treatment, and outcomes of patients presenting to an urban, academic ED for atraumatic LBP. METHODS We prospectively identified a convenience sample of patients presenting with LBP to the University of Utah Hospital ED between January 2017 and June 2018. We collected baseline demographic information and calculated the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Short Form 12a (PROMIS PFSF-12a) score to assess patient function and mobility (50 = average PROMIS PFSF-12a score, with higher scores indicating better function). We contacted patients 6 weeks after the ED visit to assess outpatient follow-up and functional outcomes. RESULTS Over the 18-month study period, 103 patients presented with a chief complaint of LBP and agreed to participate in the study. Average age of the cohort was 48.5 years (SD = 18.3) and 55 (53.4%) were female. Notably, 61 patients (59.2%) had been seen previously in the ED for LBP and 32 (31.1%) had received an opioid for LBP in the preceding 3 months. In the ED, 35.9% of patient received an opioid while 18.5% had an opioid prescription at discharge. While in the ED, 37 (35.9%) had an x-ray and 47 (45.6%) underwent computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. At 6-week follow-up, 22 of 68 (32.4%) patients reported having missed work due to pain. PROMIS PFSF-12a score improved from 32.2 ("low" range) at time of ED visit to 42.0 ("low-average" range) at the 6-week follow up. Regarding outpatient follow-up after the ED visit, 22 patients (21.4%) saw a primary care provider, 12 patients (17.8%) saw orthopedics or neurosurgery, and 8 patients (11.8%) attended physical therapy. CONCLUSIONS Patients receiving ED care for LBP had a significant improvement in PROMIS PFSF-12a scores 6 weeks after the ED but return to function continued to lag despite interventions. Imaging patterns, medication prescriptions, and outpatient follow-up varied widely, emphasizing the needs for clear guidelines and treatment pathways for ED patients with LBP.
Collapse
|
36
|
Management of people with low back pain: a survey of opinions and beliefs of Dutch and Belgian chiropractors. Chiropr Man Therap 2022; 30:29. [PMID: 35725617 PMCID: PMC9208165 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00437-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chiropractors commonly provide care to people with low-back pain (LBP). The aim of this survey was to determine the opinions and beliefs of chiropractors regarding the support and management of LBP. We also investigated whether their management is in accordance with the three most commonly recommended approaches to LBP based upon international guidelines (i.e. advice regarding return-to-work, limit bedrest, and stay active). Methods A web-based survey was sent out in 2013 to collect data from registered Dutch and Belgian chiropractors. In addition to providing a description of their sociodemographic and practice characteristics, chiropractors were asked to complete six patient vignettes representing people with LBP who typically present to a chiropractor. The respondents indicated which intervention(s) they would recommend or undertake. Based upon these vignettes, we were able to determine whether their management approach adhered to clinical guidelines. Generalized mixed models were used to explore guidelines adherence and their relationship to chiropractors’ characteristics. Results In total, 60% (n = 203/340) of the chiropractors who were invited, chose to participate. Chiropractors reported applying a chiropractic adjustment in 90% of all vignettes, while the advice to exercise varied from one-third in the chronic cases to approximately half of those with acute LBP. More than 75% of the chiropractors would initially treat LBP 1–2 times a week. More than 90% of the chiropractors advised against bedrest. Overall, self-reported adherence to clinical guidelines for all six vignettes was [64.5% (CI 58.7–70.0)]. Adherence in the chronic vignettes [73.4% (CI 66.7–79.2)] was better than in the acute vignettes [55.9% (CI 50.5–61.1)]. Importantly, regarding recommended approaches to LBP, chiropractors more consistently followed guidelines regarding advice to limit bedrest [98.5% (CI 97.3–99.1)] than advice to stay active [77.5% (CI 72.3–81.9)] or return-to-work [59.4% (CI 55.2–63.4)]. Finally, Dutch chiropractors were more likely to adhere to the guidelines than Belgian chiropractors. Conclusions Chiropractic adjustments were the most common self-reported treatment modalities supplemented by exercise in the management of LBP patients. Two-thirds of the chiropractors reported adhering to the guidelines regarding management and advice for LBP patients. Practitioners should improve guideline adherence, particularly for acute LBP cases, and when advising on return-to-work. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12998-022-00437-1.
Collapse
|
37
|
Killingmo RM, Storheim K, van der Windt D, Zolic-Karlsson Z, Vigdal ØN, Kretz L, Småstuen MC, Grotle M. Healthcare utilization and related costs among older people seeking primary care due to back pain: findings from the BACE-N cohort study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e057778. [PMID: 35725262 PMCID: PMC9214384 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe healthcare utilization and estimate associated costs during 1 year of follow-up among older people seeking primary care due to a new episode back pain and to describe healthcare utilization across patients with different risk profiles stratified using the StarT Back Screening Tool (SBST). DESIGN Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING A total of 452 people aged ≥55 years seeking Norwegian primary care with a new episode of back pain were included. OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome of this study was total cost of healthcare utilization aggregated for 1 year of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included components of healthcare utilization aggregated for 1 year of follow-up. Healthcare utilization was self-reported and included: primary care consultations, medications, examinations, hospitalisation, rehabilitation stay, and operations. Costs were estimated based on unit costs collected from national pricelists. Healthcare utilization across patients with different SBST risk profiles was compared using Kruskal-Wallis test, post hoc Mann-Whitney U tests and Bonferroni adjustment. RESULTS In total, 438 patients were included in the analysis. Mean (BCa 95% CI) total cost per patient over 1 year was €825 (682-976). Median (BCa 95% CI) total cost was €364 (307-440). The largest cost category was primary care consultations, accounting for 56% of total costs. Imaging rate was 34%. The most commonly used medication was paracetamol (27%-35% of patients). Medium- and high-risk patients had a significantly higher degree of healthcare utilization compared with low-risk patients (p<0.030). CONCLUSION This study estimated a 1 year mean and median cost of healthcare utilization of €825 and €364, respectively. Patients within the top 25th percentile accounted for 77% of all costs. Patients classified as medium risk and high risk had a significantly higher degree of healthcare utilization compared with patients classified as low risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04261309, results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kjersti Storheim
- Department of Physiotherapy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
- Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | | | - Lise Kretz
- Department of Physiotherapy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Margreth Grotle
- Department of Physiotherapy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
- Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lena O, Todri J, Todri A, Papajorgji P, Martínez-Fuentes J. A randomized controlled trial concerning the implementation of the postural Mézières treatment in elite athletes with low back pain. Postgrad Med 2022; 134:559-572. [PMID: 35708481 DOI: 10.1080/00325481.2022.2089464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the impact of adding the Mézières Method (MM) to the standard rehabilitation protocol for the elite athletes with low back pain (LBP) in reducing lumbar pain than only using the traditional rehabilitation protocol treatment. The disciplines considered in this study were soccer, rhythmic gymnastics, and basketball. DESIGN Randomized controlled trial. SETTING Training Camp. PARTICIPANTS One hundred thirty-nine elite athletes with low back pain of whom 69 were assigned to the experimental group. INTERVENTION The intervention consists of treatment with three lying postures in a 40-minutes long session twice a week. The session goal was to focus on breathing exercises, spine mobility, and stretching of the back muscles, with particular attention to the diaphragmatic, paravertebral, and latissimus dorsi muscles. OUTCOME MEASURES Assessments as Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Sit and Reach flexibility test, Roland-Morris Questionnaire, and health status questionnaire (SF12) were used. RESULTS The evaluation of all outcomes in 4 measurement periods of the study (baseline, 4, 12, and 24 weeks) showed a significant difference between groups. Also, at the 6-month of the intervention, a significant difference in the means (SD) was observed in pain (VAS), back flexibility (Sit & Reach) and back disability (QRM) outcomes in favor of the experimental group with a medium-large effect size comparing with the control group. CONCLUSION The MM approach can also be applied in established conventional protocols to alleviate pain and functionality. The obtained results include improving the quality of life of the athletes and their physical and emotional states. Clinical trial registration number ID: NCT03849053.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orges Lena
- Health Sciences Department, Universidad Catolica de Murcia UCAM, Spain
| | - Jasemin Todri
- Health Sciences Department, Universidad Catolica de Murcia UCAM, Spain
| | - Ardita Todri
- Statistics Specialist Area. Economics Department, Universiteti "Aleksander Xhuvani", Elbasan, Albania
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Alsiaf H, O'Neill TW, Callaghan MJ, Goodwin PC. Physical therapy of patients undergoing first-time lumbar discectomy: a survey of current UK practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:503. [PMID: 35624458 PMCID: PMC9137089 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05346-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The type, timing, and extent of provision of rehabilitation for lumbar discectomy patients in the UK are currently unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the provision and type of rehabilitation for patients undergoing lumbar discectomy in UK neurosurgical centers. METHOD Physical therapists involved in treating lumbar discectomy patients in UK neurosurgery centers were invited to complete an online survey that asked about the type, timing (preop, postop), and rehabilitation content for patients undergoing lumbar discectomy. RESULTS Seventeen UK neurosurgery centers completed the survey. Twelve (36%) responded from the 33 centers targeted as well as an additional five private centers. All participating centers provided a rehabilitation service for lumbar discectomy patients. Rehabilitation was provided preoperatively in n = 6 (35%) centers, postoperatively as an inpatient in all centers, and postoperatively as an outpatient in n = 14 (82%) centers. Factors that influenced the decision to provide rehabilitation included both external and internal or patient-related factors. Preoperative rehabilitation focused mainly on education, whilst postoperative outpatient rehabilitation focused more on exercises. Rehabilitation consistently included mobility, functional task training, and exercise prescription. CONCLUSIONS Whilst all neurosurgical centers in this survey provided some form of rehabilitation for patients undergoing LD surgery, the approach remains inconsistent. Rehabilitation was delivered most frequently postoperatively, with one in three centers providing it preoperatively. Rehabilitation content also varied depending on when it was provided. Further research is needed to determine the optimum timing, contents, and target of rehabilitation for patients undergoing LD surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanan Alsiaf
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. .,Department of Physiotherapy, King Fahad Military Medical Complex - KFMMC, Dhahran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
| | - Terence W O'Neill
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.,Department of Rheumatology, Salford Royal, NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Michael J Callaghan
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Department of health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.,Medical, Manchester United Ltd, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter C Goodwin
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Department of health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Patients' Perceptions and Outcome Measures after Undergoing the Enhanced Transtheoretical Model Intervention (ETMI) for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Mixed-Method Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19106106. [PMID: 35627641 PMCID: PMC9140490 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19106106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the outcome measures and perceptions of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) after being treated with the Enhanced Transtheoretical Model Intervention (ETMI). In this process evaluation mixed-methods study, 30 patients with CLBP electronically completed self-reported measures (function, pain, and fear-avoidance beliefs) before and after ETMI treatment. Subsequently, each patient participated in one-on-one, semi-structured interviews, which were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically. Quantitative analysis showed significant improvements in function (p < 0.001), pain (p < 0.001), and fear-avoidance beliefs (p < 0.001) after receiving ETMI treatment, with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.234). Moreover, the average number of physiotherapy sessions was 2.6 ± 0.6 for the ETMI intervention, while the annual average number in Maccabi is estimated at 4.1 ± 1.5. Three main themes emerged from the thematic analysis: (1) communication between the patient and the practitioner; (2) psychosocial treatment elements, and (3) ETMI as a long-term solution for CLBP. The findings of the current study highlight patients’ perceived need for an open and sincere dialogue and for receiving reassurance and encouragement about their LBP. Notably, they had no problem with the fact that they did not receive passive treatment. Accordingly, together with the significant improvement in post-treatment outcome measures, patients perceived the ETMI method as a practical tool for self-managing their back problems in the long term.
Collapse
|
41
|
Minakawa Y, Miyazaki S, Waki H, Yoshida N, Iimura K, Itoh K. Trigger Point Acupuncture and Exercise for Chronic Low Back Pain in Older Adult: a Preliminary Randomized Clinical Trial. J Acupunct Meridian Stud 2022; 15:143-151. [DOI: 10.51507/j.jams.2022.15.2.143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yoichi Minakawa
- Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Faculty of Health Care, Teikyo Heisei University, Tokyo, Japan
- Research Institute of Oriental Medicine, Teikyo Heisei University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shogo Miyazaki
- Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Faculty of Health Care, Teikyo Heisei University, Tokyo, Japan
- Research Institute of Oriental Medicine, Teikyo Heisei University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideaki Waki
- Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Faculty of Health Care, Teikyo Heisei University, Tokyo, Japan
- Research Institute of Oriental Medicine, Teikyo Heisei University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naruto Yoshida
- Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Faculty of Health Care, Teikyo Heisei University, Tokyo, Japan
- Research Institute of Oriental Medicine, Teikyo Heisei University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kaori Iimura
- Autonomic Neuroscience, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazunori Itoh
- Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Meiji University of Integrative Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Schröder K, Öberg B, Enthoven P, Hedevik H, Abbott A. Improved adherence to clinical guidelines for low back pain after implementation of the BetterBack model of care: A stepped cluster randomized controlled trial within a hybrid type 2 trial. Physiother Theory Pract 2022:1-15. [PMID: 35230212 DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2022.2040669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The BetterBack model of care (MoC) for low back pain (LBP) was recently developed in Swedish physiotherapy (PT) primary care. OBJECTIVE To evaluate if PTs' adherence to LBP clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) improves after implementation of the BetterBack MoC (intervention). METHODS This was a stepped, single-blinded cluster randomized controlled trial. Patients nested in the three clusters were allocated to routine care (n = 222) or intervention (n = 278). The primary outcome was referral to specialist consultation. This was among five best practice recommendations divided into an assessment quality index (no referral to specialist consultation and no medical imaging) and a treatment quality index (use of educational interventions; use of exercise interventions; no use of non-evidence-based physiotherapy). For overall adherence, patients had to be treated with all five recommendations fulfilled. Logistic regression was used for between-group comparisons. RESULTS The proportion of patients receiving referral to specialist consultation during the PT treatment period was low in both groups with no between-group differences. However, patients in the intervention group showed significantly higher assessment quality index, treatment quality index and overall adherence compared to routine care. Adherence to the separate recommendations showed improved stratified number of visits, use of exercise was maintained high, patient educational intervention increased and use of non-evidence-based physiotherapy decreased. A reduction of medical imaging during the physiotherapy treatment period was also observed. CONCLUSIONS The adoption of CPGs could be substantially improved by introducing a MoC through PT training and supportive materials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Schröder
- Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Birgitta Öberg
- Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Paul Enthoven
- Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Henrik Hedevik
- Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Allan Abbott
- Unit of Physiotherapy, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Alhowimel AS, Alotaibi MA, Alamam DM, Alodaibi FA, Fritz JM. Attitudes and Beliefs of Primary Care Physicians Working in Saudi Arabia Regarding the Management of Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Gen Med 2022; 14:10225-10233. [PMID: 35002292 PMCID: PMC8728917 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s343775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Healthcare professionals’ beliefs and attitudes towards low back pain management play a significant role during treatment. This is a crucial aspect of primary care physicians working as a first point of contact for people seeking healthcare for low back pain. Aim To identify the beliefs and behaviors of frontline healthcare professionals (primary care physicians) working in the Riyadh region with regard to low back pain management. Methods A cross-sectional design was implemented, in which the Pain Attitude and Beliefs Scale (PABS) questionnaire was used along with a low back pain clinical vignette with some questions. The PABS assesses healthcare provider orientations toward low back pain with two subscales: biomedical and behavioral. In total, 400 primary care physicians working in the Riyadh region of Saudi Arabia were invited to participate. Results The responding primary care physicians (n = 72, response rate = 18%) provided an average score on the behavioral subscale (mean = 31.5±7.1) that was lower than that on the biomedical subscale (36.5±7.8) of the PABS. The lower scores in the biomedical subscale are associated with the using of clinical guidelines for low back pain management (χ2 (1) = 4.7, p = 0.03). Moreover, providing guideline-based advices regarding activity and work was more likely to come from those scoring above the mean in the behavioral subscale. Conclusion The results of this study show that Saudi Arabian primary care physicians manage their patients within a biomedical framework; there is some compliance to the current low back pain clinical guidelines among these physicians, with under/post-graduate education being needed for these professionals to adopt a more biopsychosocial framework during low back pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed S Alhowimel
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mazyad A Alotaibi
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dalyah M Alamam
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Faris A Alodaibi
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Julie M Fritz
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Csiernik B, Smith A, Plener J, Tibbles A, Young JJ. Intervention usage for the management of low back pain in a chiropractic teaching clinic. Chiropr Man Therap 2022; 30:3. [PMID: 35000607 PMCID: PMC8743057 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-022-00412-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite numerous low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines, published studies suggest guideline nonconcordant care is still offered. However, there is limited literature evaluating the degree to which chiropractors, particularly students, follow clinical practice guidelines when managing LBP. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of use of specific interventions for LBP by students at a chiropractic teaching clinic, mapping recommended, not recommend, and without recommendation interventions based on two clinical practice guidelines. Methods This was a retrospective chart review of patients presenting to the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College teaching clinic with a new complaint of LBP from January to July 2019. Interventions provided under treatment plans for each patient were extracted. Interventions were classified as recommended, not recommended, or without recommendation according to two guidelines, the NICE and OPTIMa LBP guideline. Results 1000 patient files were identified with 377 files meeting the inclusion criteria. The most frequent interventions provided to patients were manipulation/mobilization (99%) and soft tissue therapy (91%). Exercise, localized percussion, and advice and/or education were included in just under half of the treatment plans. Patient files contained similar amounts of recommended (70%) and not recommended (80%) interventions according to the NICE guideline classification, with half the treatment plans including an intervention without recommendation. Under the OPTIMa acute guideline, patient files contained similar amounts of recommended and not recommended care, while more recommended care was provided than not recommended under the OPTIMa chronic guideline. Conclusions Despite chiropractic interns providing guideline concordant care for the majority of LBP patients, interventions classified as not recommended and without recommendation are still frequently offered. This study provides a starting point to understand the treatment interventions provided by chiropractic interns. Further research should be conducted to improve our understanding of the use of LBP guideline recommended care in the chiropractic profession. Trial registration Open Science Framework # g74e8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Csiernik
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ali Smith
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Canada
| | - Joshua Plener
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Canada.,University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - James J Young
- Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, Canada. .,Center for Muscle and Joint Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Santos RP, Alonso TP, Correia IMT, Nogueira LC, Meziat-Filho N, Reis FJJ. Patients should not rely on low back pain information from Brazilian official websites: A mixed-methods review. Braz J Phys Ther 2022; 26:100389. [PMID: 35091137 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 10/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Raiany Pires Santos
- Instituto Brasileiro de Medicina de Reabilitação in Rio de Janeiro (IBMR), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Thamires Prazeres Alonso
- Instituto Brasileiro de Medicina de Reabilitação in Rio de Janeiro (IBMR), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Igor Macedo Tavares Correia
- Postgraduation Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta (UNISUAM), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Leandro Calazans Nogueira
- Postgraduation Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta (UNISUAM), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Physical Therapy Department, Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Ney Meziat-Filho
- Postgraduation Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Centro Universitário Augusto Motta (UNISUAM), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Felipe J J Reis
- Physical Therapy Department, Instituto Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Postgraduation Program in Clinical Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil; Pain in Motion Research Group, Department of Physical Therapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physical Therapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hall A, Penney T, Simmons K, Peters N, O’Brien D, Richmond H. Physical Therapy Management of Low Back Pain: A Survey of Physiotherapists' Current Assessment and Treatment Practices. Physiother Can 2022; 74:66-74. [PMID: 35185250 PMCID: PMC8816360 DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2020-0078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine current physiotherapy practice for managing chronic low back pain (LBP). Method: We administered a cross-sectional survey to all physiotherapists working in Eastern Health (EH) Regional Health Authority, Newfoundland and Labrador, by email. To ascertain how physiotherapists assessed and treated patients with LBP, the survey included multiple-choice and open-ended questions, along with case vignettes. We explored the respondents' confidence about implementing all aspects of guideline-based care, as well as their use of treatment outcome measures. Results: A total of 76 physiotherapists responded to the survey (84% response rate); 56 (74%) reported that they treated patients with LBP as part of their regular practice. More than half had managed LBP for more than 10 years. The most frequently used treatments were self-management advice, followed by home and supervised exercise. The majority of respondents lacked confidence about implementing cognitive-behavioural treatment techniques. The Numeric Pain Rating Scale was the most commonly used outcome measure; disability outcome measures were not frequently used. Conclusions: The majority of LBP management in EH aligns with guideline recommendations. Increased uptake of guidelines recommending assessment and management of LBP using a bio-psychosocial approach will require training and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Hall
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Tracy Penney
- Ambulatory Care Physiotherapy, Eastern Health Regional Health Authority, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Kathy Simmons
- Ambulatory Care Physiotherapy, Eastern Health Regional Health Authority, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Nicole Peters
- Ambulatory Care Physiotherapy, Eastern Health Regional Health Authority, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Dana O’Brien
- Ambulatory Care Physiotherapy, Eastern Health Regional Health Authority, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Helen Richmond
- Primary Healthcare Research Unit, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Zhang SK, Yang Y, Gu ML, Mao SJ, Zhou WS. Effects of Low Back Pain Exercises on Pain Symptoms and Activities of Daily Living: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Percept Mot Skills 2021; 129:63-89. [PMID: 34911404 DOI: 10.1177/00315125211059407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Our objective in this paper was to systematically review evaluations of the effects of exercises on pain symptoms and activities of daily living (ADL) in middle-aged and elderly patients with low back pain (LBP). We searched Web of Science, PubMed, EBSCO, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI) databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on this topic. We evaluated the methodological quality of included articles using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale, and we statistically analyzed these studies using RevMan software. We reviewed 18 RCTs (23 comparison groups) with a total of 910 participants, and our meta-analysis confirmed that exercises significantly improved both pain and ADLs measured on visual analog scales (VAS) (SMD = -0.91, 95% CI: [-1.3, -0.52], p < 0.00001) and on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (SMD = -2.07, 95% CI: [-3.19, -0.96], p < 0.00001). We conclude that exercises can reduce pain severity and improve ADL capacity in middle-aged and elderly persons with LBP, confirming that exercise can serve as a medical intervention for these indivdiuals. However, given the high heterogeneity of responses among individual participants, there remains a need for further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shi-Kun Zhang
- Department of Police Physical Education, 164369Jiangsu Police Institute, Nanjing, China
| | - Yong Yang
- Institute of Sport, Henan University, Kai Feng, China
| | - Mei-Ling Gu
- Nanjing Tian-zheng Primary School, Nanjing, China
| | - Su-Jie Mao
- 71198Graduate School of Nanjing University of Physical Education, Nanjing, China
| | - Wen-Sheng Zhou
- Department of Physical Education, 74587Nanjing Xiao-Zhuang University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Arcanjo FL, Martins JVP, Moté P, Leporace G, Oliveira DAD, Sousa CSD, Saquetto MB, Gomes-Neto M. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation training reduces pain and disability in individuals with chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2021; 46:101505. [PMID: 34852989 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2021.101505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND and purpose: Although proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) exercises are used in rehabilitation practice, their effects in patients with low back pain (LBP) remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of PNF training for pain and disability in patients with LBP. METHODS In this systematic review, we searched five databases from the earliest date available to October 2020. Three comparisons were performed: PNF versus control, PNF versus core strengthening, and PNF versus conventional physical therapy. RESULTS Sixteen studies met the eligibility criteria (722 patients). PNF training improved pain (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -2.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -4.2 to -0.9, n = 174) and disability (SMD: -3.29; 95% CI: -5.3 to -1.3, n = 144) compared to the control. PNF training also yielded a greater benefit for pain reduction (mean difference [MD]: -1.8, 95% CI: -2.2 to -0.3, n = 177) and disability improvement (MD: -6.6, 95% CI: -9.3 to -3.8, n = 113) than did core strengthening. CONCLUSION PNF training seems to be a useful strategy for decreasing pain and improving disability in patients with LBP. However, the quality of evidence for the outcomes of both pain and disability was low to moderate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Luciano Arcanjo
- Postgraduate Program in Medicine and Health, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA) Salvador, Bahia, Brazil; Physiotherapy Research Group, UFBA, Brazil; AF-Physioteherapy, Brazil
| | - José Vicente Pereira Martins
- Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; International Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Association (IPNFA), Brazil; Integrated Aquatic Therapy and Rehabilitation Center, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Paulo Moté
- International Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Association (IPNFA), Brazil; Integrated Aquatic Therapy and Rehabilitation Center, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Gustavo Leporace
- Department of Research in Biomechanics, Institute Brazil of Technologies in Health, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | - Micheli Bernardone Saquetto
- Postgraduate Program in Medicine and Health, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA) Salvador, Bahia, Brazil; Physiotherapy Research Group, UFBA, Brazil; Physical Therapy Department, UFBA, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
| | - Mansueto Gomes-Neto
- Postgraduate Program in Medicine and Health, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA) Salvador, Bahia, Brazil; Physiotherapy Research Group, UFBA, Brazil; Physical Therapy Department, UFBA, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ho-A-Tham N, Ting-A-Kee B, Struyf N, Vanlandewijck Y, Dankaerts W. Low back pain prevalence, beliefs and treatment-seeking behaviour in multi-ethnic Suriname. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2021; 5:rkab074. [PMID: 34778699 PMCID: PMC8578690 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkab074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The aims were to determine, for the first time, the prevalence of low back pain (LBP) in urban and rural communities and to assess back beliefs and treatment-seeking behaviour in Suriname, a multi-ethnic country in the Caribbean community. Methods A cross-sectional community-based survey using the Community Oriented Program for the Control of Rheumatic Diseases methodology was performed between April 2016 and July 2017. Information was collected on LBP prevalence and LBP-related treatment seeking, beliefs about LBP [Back Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ)], level of disability (Oswestry Disability Index) and the risk of developing persistent disabling pain (Start Back Screening Tool). Results A total of 541 out of 2902 individuals reported current acute or chronic LBP. It was more prevalent in urban (20.2%) than in rural (13.7%) communities, especially in females and older adults (>55 years of age). Individuals from rural areas [median BBQ = 18.00 (14.00-22.00)] had significantly more negative beliefs than the urban population [median BBQ = 25.00 (19.00-31.00); P < 0.001]. Maroons displayed more negative beliefs than Creole (P = 0.040), Hindustani (P < 0.001), Javanese (P < 0.001) and mixed ethnicity (P < 0.001) groups. At least 75% of the LBP population sought care, especially from a western health-care practitioner. Seeking treatment and having a higher risk of developing persistent disabling pain was significantly associated with more disability (P < 0.001). Age ≥45 years (P < 0.001), Indigenous ethnicity (P < 0.05) and functional disability (P < 0.001) were factors influencing treatment seeking. Conclusion Low back pain is a prevalent health problem in the Surinamese urban community, especially in older adults and among females. Most individuals experiencing LBP visited a western health-care practitioner and had more negative beliefs compared with other communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Ho-A-Tham
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Anton de Kom University of Suriname, Paramaribo, Suriname.,Research Group for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Beverly Ting-A-Kee
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Anton de Kom University of Suriname, Paramaribo, Suriname
| | - Niels Struyf
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Anton de Kom University of Suriname, Paramaribo, Suriname.,Research Group for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Yves Vanlandewijck
- Research Group of Adapted Physical Activity and Psychomotor Rehabilitation, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Physiology, Nutrition and Biomechanics, The Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences (GIH), Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Wim Dankaerts
- Research Group for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Feldman R, Nudelman Y, Haleva-Amir S, Ben Ami N. Patients' prior perceptions and expectations of the Enhanced Transtheoretical Model Intervention for chronic low back pain: A qualitative study. Musculoskeletal Care 2021; 20:371-382. [PMID: 34726320 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Enhanced Transtheoretical Model Intervention (ETMI) is an approach for treating chronic low back pain (CLBP), which demonstrated clinical and cost-effectiveness outcomes. ETMI highlights reassurance, return to normal activities and encouragement of recreational physical activity. In order to optimally implement ETMI, it is important to gain an understanding of the expectations and perceptions of patients before they engage with the intervention. OBJECTIVES To explore CLBP patients' perceptions and expectations of the ETMI method prior to their first consultation with physiotherapist. METHODS Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 CLBP patients. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, coded, and analysed thematically. Patients were first asked about their expectations of treatment, then they were asked to comment on the ETMI method. RESULTS Three main themes emerged from the interviews: (1) Patient's perceptions of LBP; (2) patient's expectations from current physiotherapy and (3) Patient's expectations from ETMI method. The patients' perceptions of back pain centred on biomechanical causal factors, a desire for diagnostic tests and beliefs that rest cures the pain. Their expectations from current physiotherapy included pain reduction, passive treatment, a structured exercise program and clear information about LBP. In reference to the ETMI method, patients expected pain reduction, practical tools to self-manage, and a combination of ETMI with passive treatment. CONCLUSION addressing issues around patient's perceptions and expectations of current physiotherapy and of the ETMI method, prior to their first consultation with physiotherapist, could be beneficial for understanding how to improve the ETMI implementation in the health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron Feldman
- Department of Physiotherapy, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.,Department of Physiotherapy, 'Maccabi' Healthcare Services, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Yaniv Nudelman
- Department of Physiotherapy, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.,Department of Physiotherapy, 'Maccabi' Healthcare Services, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Noa Ben Ami
- Department of Physiotherapy, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
| |
Collapse
|