Pharmacokinetic properties of remimazolam in subjects with hepatic or renal impairment

Remimazolam for successful sedation in children with left-to-right shunt congenital heart disease: An up-and-down sequential allocation trial

BACKGROUND

The findings of this study offer insights into the utilisation of remimazolam for sedation in paediatric patients with left-to-right shunt congenital heart disease (CHD).

OBJECTIVE

To study the median effective dose (ED50) and 95 percentile of the effective dose (ED95) of remimazolam for successful sedation in children with CHD.

DESIGN

A nonrandomised, nonblinded study based on the Dixon sequential method.

SETTING

Tertiary hospitals in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, study dates: 20 October 2023 to 18 May 2024.

PATIENTS

A total of 78 patients, comprising 32 males and 45 females, successfully completed the study. They were selected based on the following criteria: children aged 1 to 6 years with left-to-right shunt CHD; ASA physical status II-III. The key exclusion criteria were: history of allergy to sedative drugs; administration of sedative medications other than the study drug before surgery; severe pre-operative liver or kidney dysfunction; pre-operative bradycardia; and severe pre-operative respiratory diseases.

INTERVENTION

The sedation status of the patients was observed for 5 min after intravenous administration of different doses of remimazolam.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The ED50 and ED95 of remimazolam for successful sedation in children with CHD.

RESULTS

The ED50 (95% CI) of remimazolam for successful sedation in infants, toddlers and preschool children with CHD were 0.209 (0.184 to 0.234) mg kg-1, 0.259 (0.234 to 0.284) mg kg-1 and 0.266 (0.207 to 0.325) mg kg-1, respectively. ED95 (95% CI) were 0.356 (0.282 to 0.672) mg kg-1, 0.404 (0.330 to 0.741) mg kg-1 and 0.408 (0.334 to 0.752) mg kg-1, respectively. No serious adverse reactions were observed with intravenous remimazolam.

CONCLUSION

This study explored the ED50 and ED95 of remimazolam for pre-operative sedation in children with left-to-right shunt CHD. It provides guidance for pre-operative sedation medication in children with left-to-right shunt CHD.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier: ChiCTR2300076458.

Influence of Remifentanil on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Remimazolam in Healthy Volunteers

BACKGROUND

Synergistic effects between opioids and remimazolam on Bispectral Index (BIS) and Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (MOAAS) score were previously described. This study aimed to characterize the influence of remifentanil on the sedative properties of remimazolam as measured by MOAAS, BIS, and tolerance to laryngoscopy or tetanic stimulation (TOL or TOTS) and to determine target concentrations that maximize MOAAS 2 or 3.

METHODS

A three-period, crossover, dose-ranging clinical trial was performed in 24 healthy volunteers. In all periods, remimazolam was administered using a step-up and step-down target controlled infusion protocol (50 to 2,000 ng/ml). Stable remifentanil target concentrations of 0.5 ng/ml and 0.1 to 4.0 ng/ml were maintained in periods 2 and 3, respectively. Remifentanil, remimazolam, and CNS7054 (metabolite) concentrations and MOAAS, BIS, TOL, and TOTS were collected in each step of the target controlled infusion protocol. Data were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects models, where P ≤ 0.01 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Remifentanil reduced the apparent clearance of CNS7054 with a half-maximum inhibition at 8.0 ng/ml (95% CI, 5.5 to 13.4 ng/ml). A pharmacodynamic interaction was detected on all endpoints. Simulations indicate that the probability of observing a MOAAS 2 or 3 is highest at remimazolam target concentration of 275, 250, or 200 ng/ml combined with 0, 0.1, or 0.5 ng/ml remifentanil resulting in probabilities of 45%, 45%, and 44%, respectively. Additionally, simulations indicate that the highest probability of observing TOTS and TOL was 93.3% and 85.5%, respectively, at the highest studied target concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction between remimazolam and remifentanil was quantified in this clinical trial. Appropriate target concentrations for MOAAS and BIS could be estimated, but for TOL and TOTS, the trial design did not allow to fully characterize the exposure-response relationship.

Remimazolam vs. propofol for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of emergence agitation risk in surgical populations

INTRODUCTION

The association between remimazolam and emergence agitation (EA) remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the relative risk of developing EA when using remimazolam vs. propofol in induction and maintenance of general anesthesia.

METHOD

We searched PubMed, clinicaltrials.gov, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases to identify studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the incidence of EA. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative delirium (POD) within 7 days after surgery, emergence time, extubation time, length of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay, and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 19 randomized controlled trials with 3031 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of EA (RR = 0.82; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.41-1.65; p = 0.585) between remimazolam and propofol. Likewise, there were no significant intergroup differences in POD incidence, extubation time, emergence time, or length of PACU stay. Remimazolam exhibited superior hemodynamic stability, with a significantly reduced incidence of postinduction hypotension and intraoperative hypotension compared with propofol, while maintaining comparable safety profiles in terms of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), intraoperative awareness, and hypoxemia. Subgroup analysis revealed that without routine postoperative antagonist administration, remimazolam was associated with prolonged extubation and length of PACU stay relative to propofol. In contrast, following antagonizing with flumazenil, the extubation and emergence times of the remimazolam group were shorter than those of the propofol group, while comparable PACU discharge time was maintained.

CONCLUSION

The use of remimazolam for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia does not lead to a higher occurrence of EA in adult patients undergoing surgery, relative to propofol. However, in patients with ASA III-IV, remimazolam may be linked to a greater risk of POD than propofol.

Endoscopy Sedation Challenges in Patients With Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Focused Review on Propofol and Selective Use of Benzodiazepines

BACKGROUND

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) presents a significant challenge in gastrointestinal endoscopy sedation due to impaired liver function, which alters drug metabolism and increases the risk of adverse effects. In the absence of clear guidelines and specific biomarkers for diagnosis and assessment of HE, there is insufficient evidence to formulate standardized protocols for management, diagnosis, and sedation during endoscopy.

AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY

Rigid protocols for sedation are difficult to implement due to wide variation in patient age, comorbidities, and disease severity, which creates a "gray zone." This leaves decisions heavily reliant on the clinician's preference or experience, patient characteristics, and institutional protocols. This review highlights the strengths and limitations of propofol, midazolam, and remimazolam in efforts to improve sedation strategies for endoscopic procedures in patients with HE.

DATA SOURCES

A review was conducted using PubMed and Scopus databases, keeping in view recent publications. Only primary research studies were considered for this review. Inclusion was based on the relevance of patient side effects, sedation outcomes, and safety profiles, with a particular focus on gastrointestinal endoscopy procedures and their implications in HE.

RESULTS

Propofol remains preferred in patients with HE, demonstrating manageable cardiovascular and respiratory events without worsening encephalopathy. However, its safety requires careful consideration in this high-risk population. The combination of propofol with adjuncts, such as esketamine, has shown potential in mitigating adverse effects and optimizing sedation protocols in challenging cases. Midazolam, though historically used, is not recommended in HE due to exacerbation of encephalopathy and unfavorable safety profiles. While remimazolam shows promise, no evidence in HE populations precludes definitive conclusions about its efficacy and safety.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research should focus on optimizing sedation protocols according to the needs of HE patients, including tools for risk stratification and guidelines considering individual patient profiles. Furthermore, studies must be performed to evaluate remimazolam's outcomes and safety profiles, both as a standalone sedative and in combination with other agents.

ED50 and ED95 of remimazolam for loss of consciousness in young children

BACKGROUND

The optimal single i.v. bolus dose of remimazolam for induction of general anaesthesia in children is not defined. We aimed to determine the 50% (ED50) and 95% (ED95) effective doses of remimazolam for inducing loss of consciousness in children.

METHODS

A total of 120 children, aged 1-12 yr, were divided into three groups, with 40 children in each group: toddler (1 to <3 yr), preschool (≥3 to <6 yr), and school-age group (≥6 to <12 yr). Each child received a single i.v. bolus of remimazolam, with doses determined using a biased coin design up-and-down method. The primary outcome was the ED50 and ED95 of remimazolam for inducing loss of consciousness. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of hypotension, respiratory depression, and adverse events.

RESULTS

The ED50 and ED95 of remimazolam were 0.42 mg kg-1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-0.44) and 0.57 mg kg-1 (95% CI 0.48-0.59), respectively, in the toddler group; 0.41 mg kg-1 (95% CI 0.35-0.47) and 0.57 mg kg-1 (95% CI 0.50-0.59), respectively, in the preschool group; and 0.30 mg kg-1 (95% CI 0.28-0.34) and 0.43 mg kg-1 (95% CI 0.37-0.44), respectively, in the school-age group. No significant cases of hypotension, respiratory depression, bradycardia, or other adverse events occurred in any of the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A single i.v. bolus of remimazolam at estimated doses of 0.45-0.60 mg kg-1 for children aged 1-6 yr and 0.35-0.45 mg kg-1 for those aged 6-12 yr effectively induces loss of consciousness in children.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06061159).

Safety and efficacy of remimazolam tosilate for general anaesthesia in paediatric patients undergoing elective surgery: a multicentre, randomised, single-blind, controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Remimazolam is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine sedative drug. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of remimazolam with propofol for induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia in children undergoing elective surgery.

METHODS

Children (aged 3-6 y, ASA physical status 1 or 2, BMI 14-25 kg.m-2) undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation were eligible for inclusion. Children were allocated randomly using a web-based system to receive either remimazolam or propofol in a 3:1 ratio. After receiving fentanyl 3 μg.kg-1, children received their allocated drug for both induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia. Induction doses were remimazolam 0.3 mg.kg-1 or propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1, with a second dose given should they not achieve loss of consciousness. After neuromuscular blockade and tracheal intubation, maintenance anaesthesia was achieved with an infusion either remimazolam 1-3 mg.kg-1.h-1 or propofol 4-12 mg.kg-1.h-1, alongside a remifentanil infusion (0.1-0.5 μg.kg-1.min-1) titrated to surgical stimulus and haemodynamic parameters. Primary outcomes were the incidence of successful induction and maintenance of anaesthesia. Secondary outcomes included: time to loss of consciousness, awakening and tracheal extubation; incidence of emergence delirium and moderate or severe pain in post-anaesthesia care unit; incidence of negative behaviour change after surgery at postoperative day 3; and incidence of adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 187 children were analysed (140 allocated to remimazolam and 47 to propofol). All children achieved successful induction of anaesthesia. Successful maintenance of anaesthesia was achieved in 139 (99%) children who received remimazolam compared with 46 (98%) who received propofol (rate difference 1.4%, 95%CI -2.9-5.8%, p = 0.441). Adverse events occurred in 27 (19%) children who received remimazolam and 23 (49%) who received propofol.

DISCUSSION

Remimazolam was well tolerated for the induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia in pre-school-age children and was non-inferior to propofol.

Optimizing Pediatric Sedation: Evaluating Remimazolam and Dexmedetomidine for Safety and Efficacy in Clinical Practice

Daily, children undergo countless investigations and interventions, which require sedation and immobilization to ensure safety and accuracy. This remains associated with a persistent risk of sedation-induced life-threatening events as children are particularly vulnerable to adverse medical events and complications. Consequently, there is an urgent need to increase the safety of pediatric sedation and anesthesia. An ideal approach involves the use of drugs with fewer intrinsic side effects. In this context, on the basis of their pharmacokinetic properties, remimazolam (RMZ) and dexmedetomidine (DEX) were evaluated for their suitability as ideal sedatives. RMZ and DEX, both of which are currently available in pediatric medicine, have shown great promise in initial publications. To date, only very limited data concerning RMZ in small children are available. RMZ is a novel, ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine that is metabolized by tissue esterase, largely independent of organ function. It has a context-sensitive half-life of approximately 10 min, with minimal accumulation even with prolonged use. Its effects can be completely reversed with flumazenil. DEX, an isomer of medetomidine, is a potent α2-receptor-agonist with multiple indications in anesthesia and intensive care medicine. It has coanalgesic potential, allows for 'arousal sedations' and has a low profile for cardiorespiratory side effects. DEX is metabolized in the liver and is predominantly excreted renally. Both drugs show potential in the prevention and treatment of delirium, with DEX having additional neuroprotective effects. DEX and RMZ possess several properties of an optimal sedative, including clinically insignificant main metabolites and a broad dosage range, indicating their potential to reduce the incidence of sedation-related life-threatening events in children. However, further clinical research is necessary to better evaluate their potential risks.

Postoperative delirium under general anaesthesia by remimazolam versus propofol: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, has similar clinical effects to propofol for sedation in general anaesthesia. However, it remains uncertain whether remimazolam could increase postoperative delirium (POD) compared with propofol.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of our study was to compare the incidence of POD between remimazolam and propofol as sedative agents in general anaesthesia.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched for prospective RCTs published through September 16, 2024. RCTs reporting the incidence of POD and comparing remimazolam with propofol for general anaesthesia were included. Odds ratio (ORs) were calculated using a random-effects model. The primary outcome was the incidence of POD. The secondary outcomes included time to extubation, awakening time, and adverse events such as intraoperative hypotension.

RESULTS

A total of six RCTs involving 1107 patients were included in this meta-analysis. For the primary outcome, the incidence of POD did not differ between the remimazolam and propofol groups (OR, 0.92; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.58-1.44). Regarding the secondary outcomes, remimazolam was associated with a lower incidence of intraoperative hypotension compared with propofol (OR, 0.31; 95 % CI, 0.21-0.46). There were no significant differences in other secondary outcomes. In the sensitivity analysis on three RCTs including only older patients (≥60 years old), there was no significant difference in the incidence of POD (OR, 1.00; 95 % CI, 0.52-1.93).

CONCLUSION

Perioperative remimazolam administration did not increase POD and reduced the risk of intraoperative hypotension compared to propofol. Further large-scale RCTs are warranted to explore the association of remimazolam and POD. Systematic review protocol: PROSPERO CRD42024544122.

Procedural sedative effect of remimazolam in ICU patients on invasive mechanical ventilation: a randomised, prospective study

BACKGROUND

Invasive procedures and environmental factors in the intensive care unit (ICU) may cause anxiety and discomfort in patients, who often require sedation therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of remimazolam tosilate for procedural sedation in ICU patients receiving mechanical ventilation following endotracheal intubation. Eighty patients from a single centre were randomly assigned to either the propofol group or the remimazolam group. Blood tests were conducted to evaluate changes in lactate, blood lipids, liver and kidney function, and inflammatory markers, and patients' vital signs were observed over several periods. This study compared the incidence of delirium, the impact on liver and kidney function, circulatory effects, and changes in blood lipids between the two groups. These findings have optimised the selection of medications, providing ICU patients with more options for sedation therapy.

METHODS

In this single-centre randomised controlled trial, intubated patients were randomly assigned to the remimazolam group or the propofol group. Under the same analgesic regimen, the two groups received remimazolam and propofol for procedural sedation.

RESULTS

Our primary outcome was the mean arterial pressure (MAP), which significantly differed on Days 4 and 7 (P = 0.021, control group vs. experimental group = 85.23 ± 11.24 vs. 94.36 ± 13.18, P = 0.023, 83.55 ± 8.94 vs. 92.66 ± 7.02). With respect to liver and kidney function, the ∆AST value in the remimazolam group was significantly lower than that in the control group on Day 7 (P = 0.023). There were significant differences in triglyceride (TG) levels on Days 4 and 7 (P = 0.020) and in the ∆LDL on Day 7 (P = 0.027). Furthermore, the rates of dyslipidaemia and delirium in the remimazolam group were lower than those in the propofol group (85.0%, n = 40 vs. 90.0%, n = 40; 27.5%, n = 40 vs. 55%, n = 40).

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam is a novel benzodiazepine that has demonstrated promising applications in general anaesthesia and procedural sedation; however, its use in ICU sedation is still in the early stages of research. Current evidence suggests that remimazolam is a safe sedative that is particularly well suited for patients with haemodynamic instability. Large sample-size randomised clinical trials are warranted.

Effects of different doses of remimazolam on the quality of sedation and cardiac function in elderly patients: a double-blind randomised controlled study

Background

We intended to observe the effects of different doses of remimazolam besylate via intravenous induction on the quality of sedation and cardiac function in elderly patients.

Methods

A total of 135 ASA I-III patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were selected. They were divided into three groups and they were randomized. Low dose group (Group L): Remimazolam besylate 0.2 mg/kg; middle dose group (Group M): Remimazolam besylate 0.3 mg/kg; High dose group (Group H): Remimazolam besylate 0.4 mg/kg. There were 45 patients in each group. The blood pressure, heart rate, BIS values, cardiac function before induction (T0), after induction (T1) and after intubation (T2), as well as the length of loss of consciousness, duration of sedation, and extubation and adverse events were recorded.

Results

At T1 and T2, systolic and diastolic blood pressure in Group M were lower than those in Group L, but higher than those in Group H, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). At T1 and T2, the BIS value in Group M was lower than that in Group L, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) in BIS values between Group M and Group H; At T1 and T2, the cardiac output and stroke volume in Group M were higher than those in Group H, while the systemic vascular resistance in Group M was lower than that in Group H, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05); The incidences of bucking when moving and hiccup in Group L were higher than those in Group M and Group H, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). The number of vasoactive drugs used in Group H was higher than that in Group L and Group M, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

General anesthesia induction with remimazolam besylate at 0.3 mg/kg in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy showed good quality of sedation, could achieve rapid intubation, with minimal effect on cardiac function and generally favorable safety profile.

Comparison of Remimazolam-Flumazenil and Propofol on Psychomotor Function and Emergence Following General Anesthesia in Surgical Abortion: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective

 This study aims to compare the recovery profiles of remimazolam combined with flumazenil against those of propofol in patients undergoing painless surgical abortion, focusing on psychomotor function and emergence. Rapid recovery and restoration of psychomotor function are critical for enhancing patient safety and satisfaction in outpatient procedures like surgical abortion.

Methods

A total of 110 patients scheduled for surgical abortion were randomly assigned to either the remimazolam group (Group R) or the propofol group (Group P) in a 1:1 ratio. Both groups received intravenous sufentanil for induction, followed by either remimazolam or propofol. Psychomotor function was assessed using the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and Trieger Dot Test (TDT) at 30, 60, and 90 minutes post-anesthesia. Emergence parameters, including time to first eye opening and first verbal response, were recorded. Adverse events and hemodynamic parameters were also monitored.

Results

The DSST scores at 30, 60, and 90 minutes post-anesthesia were similar between the Remimazolam group and the Propofol group (F=50.61, P>0.05, η²=0.0051). The TDT results were also comparable between the groups at all time points (F=0.12, 0.11 and 0.30, all P>0.05, η²=0.0002, 0.0003 and 0.0008). At 30 or 60 minutes post-anesthesia, DSST scores or TDT performance were significantly worse compared to preoperative baseline in both groups, indicating reduced psychomotor function (P<0.05). The Remimazolam group showed significantly shorter times to first eye opening (54.48±3.45 s vs 99.22±11.78 s, P=0.0014, Cohen's d=5.15) and to obey verbal commands (61.85±3.78 s vs 131.1±12.79 s, P<0.0001, Cohen's d=7.34) compared to the Propofol group.The incidence of injection pain and respiratory depression was significantly lower in the remimazolam group (P<0.05), while hiccups were more common. Hemodynamic stability was maintained in both groups, with no significant differences in blood pressure or oxygen saturation (P>0.05).

Conclusion

 Remimazolam combined with flumazenil provides faster emergence and comparable psychomotor function to propofol in patients undergoing painless surgical abortion. This combination offers a promising anesthetic profile for procedures requiring quick recovery and minimal postoperative complications.

Trial Registration

ChiCTR2300075375, date of registration: 03/09/2023.

Anesthesia management using remimazolam for coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement in a patient with severe cardiac dysfunction: A case report

Remimazolam, a short-acting benzodiazepine approved for use in general anesthesia in Japan in 2020, has cardiovascular stability superior to conventional anesthetics. Anesthesia management using remimazolam of a patient with impaired cardiac function and several complications is reported. A man in his 50s with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease (G 5) on dialysis came to our hospital with a chief complaint of exertional dyspnea and chest tightness, and a close examination showed stenoses of three coronary arteries. The patient was managed under anesthesia using remimazolam as a sedative because anesthetics could easily induce circulatory failure. Cardiopulmonary bypass was initiated without causing any circulatory failure, and coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement were performed. The patient was successfully weaned with a small dose of catecholamine. Remimazolam was selected for this patient because of its minimal effect on cardiac rhythm, and the anesthesia was safely administered.

Remimazolam

Remimazolam is a new reversible γ-aminobutyric acid type A agonist benzodiazepine that displays a fast onset of action, short recovery time with a safe cardiopulmonary profile and favorable pharmacokinetics in comparison with other intravenous sedatives.

Hemodynamic Stability of Midazolam versus Remimazolam During Outpatient Genitourinary Interventional Radiology Procedures in a Patient With Aortic Stenosis: A Case Report

Patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and other significant cardiopulmonary comorbidities are vulnerable to hemodynamic instability during anesthesia. This case report compares the use of remimazolam and midazolam in a 71-year-old man with symptomatic AS, chronic kidney disease, and ischemic cardiomyopathy. The patient underwent multiple short ambulatory interventional radiology procedures. While moderate sedation with midazolam resulted in significant hypotension, use of remimazolam in subsequent procedures demonstrated a stable hemodynamic profile despite increased disease burden. This report highlights the potential advantages of remimazolam compared to midazolam in high-risk patients undergoing interventional radiology procedures.

Remimazolam Use in Cardiac Anesthesia: A Narrative Review

Remimazolam, a novel ultra-short-acting intravenous benzodiazepine, has garnered recent attention for its use as a general anesthetic. This narrative review aims to summarize and analyze the available literature on the effects of remimazolam use in cardiac surgical patients, including its effects on hemodynamics, safety in patients with baseline myocardial dysfunction, and impact on postoperative management including time to emergence and extubation. Finally, there is discussion regarding potential drawbacks of adopting remimazolam as a routine anesthetic for cardiac surgery.

Case report of atypical re-sedation after general anesthesia using remimazolam

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting anesthetic with flumazenil as a reversal agent, typically facilitates patient awakening postoperatively. However, our case reveals an unusual occurrence: despite flumazenil initially restoring consciousness, re-sedation due to remimazolam ensued six hours later.

CASE

A 65-year-old woman underwent total intravenous general anesthesia with remimazolam and remifentanil during the 140-min surgery. Despite an initially smooth recovery, she progressively became drowsy upon transfer to the general ward, eventually reaching a stuporous state. Multiple interventions, including opioid reversal (intravenous patient-controlled analgesia discontinuation, and naloxone administration) were attempted. Neurological consultation revealed no issues; however, immediate improvement after flumazenil administration suggested remimazolam's involvement. The patient was discharged without complications.

CONCLUSIONS

This case challenges our understanding of remimazolam's dynamics, emphasizing the necessity for vigilant post-anesthesia monitoring, even in seemingly low-risk cases. It advocates for standardized response protocols to promptly manage unforeseen events and ensure patient safety.

Comparison between hemodynamic effects of remimazolam and propofol during general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The need for safe anesthetic agents with minimal side effects has led to the development of remimazolam, a new benzodiazepine designed to be an alternative to the commonly used drug propofol, which has significant hemodynamic effects. This study aims to compare the hemodynamic effects of remimazolam with propofol during general anesthesia.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic search was conducted in Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and PubMed databases on 13/02/2023, following the recommendations of Cochrane Handbook and the PRISMA statement. The measure of association used was Risk Ratio (RR) or standardized mean difference, with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and 95% Prediction intervals (PI). An additional search was conducted on 04/09/2023. A Trial Sequential Analysis and a GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) evidence table were conducted based on the editor's recommendation.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

After applying eligibility criteria and removing duplicates, 16 randomized clinical trials comprising 1951 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Significant associations favoring remimazolam over propofol were observed in the following aspects: intraoperative hypotension events (RR=0.47; 95% CI=0.41 to 0.54; 95% PI=0.40 to 0.55); frequency of vasoactive drug administration (RR=0.54; 95% CI=0.46 to 0.64; 95% PI=0.41 to 0.74); intraoperative bradycardia (RR=0.39; 95% CI=0.27 to 0.57; 95% PI=0.26 to 0.66); mean arterial pressure at induction (MD=7.77; 95% CI=6.00 to 9.55; 95% PI=4.39 to 11.15); heart rate at induction (MD=6.40; 95% CI=4.07 to 8.73; 95% PI=0.33 to 12.48); and heart rate at intubation (MD=6.06; 95% CI=2.33 to 9.78; 95% PI=-5.59 to 17.71).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that remimazolam induces fewer cardiorespiratory depressant effects and has a more favorable side effect profile compared to propofol during general anaesthesia.

Efficacy of Single-Bolus Administration of Remimazolam During Induction of Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Center, Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam is a recently marketed ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine. This drug is considered safe and effective during general anesthesia; however, limited information is available about its effects on patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Therefore, the present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and hemodynamic stability of a bolus administration of remimazolam during anesthesia induction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery were randomly assigned to any 1 of the following 3 groups: anesthesia induction with a continuous infusion of remimazolam 6 mg/kg/h (continuous group), a single-bolus injection of remimazolam 0.1 mg/kg (bolus 0.1 group), or a single-bolus injection of remimazolam 0.2 mg/kg (bolus 0.2 group). Time to loss of responsiveness, defined as modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale <3, and changes in hemodynamic status during anesthetic induction were measured.

RESULTS

Times to loss of responsiveness were 137 ± 20, 71 ± 35, and 48 ± 9 seconds in the continuous, bolus 0.1, and bolus 0.2 groups, respectively. The greatest mean difference was observed between the continuous and bolus 0.2 groups (89.0, 95% confidence interval [CI], 79.1-98.9), followed by the continuous and bolus 0.1 groups (65.8, 95% CI, 46.9-84.7), and lastly between the bolus 0.2 and bolus 0.1 groups (23.2, 95% CI, 6.6-39.8). No significant differences were found in terms of arterial blood pressures and heart rates of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A single-bolus injection of remimazolam provided efficient anesthetic induction in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. A 0.2 mg/kg bolus injection of remimazolam resulted in the shortest time to loss of responsiveness among the 3 groups, without significantly altering the hemodynamic parameters. Therefore, this dosing can be considered a favorable anesthetic induction method for patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

[Remimazolam-Update on basic pharmacologic principles and clinical potential]

In recent years the still relatively new short-acting benzodiazepine remimazolam has been approved and clinically implemented in several countries and regions. Remimazolam is also now approved in the EU and the market launch in Germany is expected in the not too distant future. This is therefore a good point in time to summarize the current evidence for various areas of application, including general anesthesia, sedation and intensive care medicine as well as different dosing schemes.

Comparative study on the impact of remimazolam and sevoflurane on quality of recovery after transurethral resection of bladder tumor: A randomized controlled noninferiority study

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam is manifested by rapid action, hemodynamic stability, and fast recovery. Our study aimed to investigate whether the quality of recovery (QoR) after remimazolam anesthesia in patients undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor, which is predominantly performed in the elderly population, is not inferior to that after conventional anesthesia using sevoflurane.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients were randomly allocated into either of group S (n = 17, receiving sevoflurane anesthesia), or group R (n = 17, receiving remimazolam anesthesia). The QoR was assessed by Korean version of QoR-15 questionnaire, on the day before and after the surgery. Scores acquired for each individual item, QoR-15 scores categorized into 5 dimensions (physical comfort, physical independence, psychological support, emotional state, and pain), and overall global score were subjected to comparative analysis. The primary outcome was postoperative global QoR-15, and a noninferiority delta value of 8.0 was employed.

RESULTS

The postoperative global QoR-15 in the group S was 141 (134-146), and in the groups R was 133 (128-142) (P = .152). The mean difference of global QoR-15 (group S-group R) was 1.471 (95% confidence interval of -10.204 to 13.146), and the lower 95% confidence interval margin was lower than the noninferiority margin of -8.0. When comparing the QoR-15 sorted by 5 dimensions, pain scored higher in the group S (20 [18-20]) compared to the group R (15 [15-20], P = .032).

CONCLUSION

The postoperative QoR following transurethral resection of bladder tumor was found to be lower in patients anesthetized with remimazolam in comparison to those anesthetized with sevoflurane.

Safety and efficacy of remimazolam versus propofol during EUS: a multicenter randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Propofol, a widely used sedative in GI endoscopic procedures, is associated with cardiorespiratory suppression. Remimazolam is a novel ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine sedative with rapid onset and minimal cardiorespiratory depression. This study compared the safety and efficacy of remimazolam and propofol during EUS procedures.

METHODS

A multicenter randomized controlled study was conducted between October 2022 and March 2023 in patients who underwent EUS procedures. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either remimazolam or propofol as a sedative agent. The primary endpoint was cardiorespiratory adverse events (AEs) during the procedure, including desaturation, respiratory depression, hypotension, and tachycardia. Secondary endpoints were the time to achieve sedation, recovery time, quality of sedation, pain at the injection site, and satisfaction of both endoscopists and patients.

RESULTS

Four hundred patients enrolled in the study: 200 received remimazolam (10.8 ± 7.7 mg) and 200 received propofol (88.0 ± 49.1 mg). For cardiorespiratory AEs, the remimazolam group experienced fewer occurrences than the propofol group (8.5% vs 16%, P = .022). A nonsignificant trend was found toward less oxygen desaturation (1.0% vs 3.5%, P = .09), respiratory depression (.5% vs 1.5%, P = .62), hypotension (2.5% vs 5.5%, P = .12), and tachycardia (4.5% vs 5.5%, P = .68) with remimazolam than with propofol. Remimazolam showed a shorter induction time than propofol while maintaining comparable awakening and recovery times. Injection site pain was significantly lower in the remimazolam group than in the propofol group. The remimazolam group demonstrated a significantly higher quality of sedation and satisfaction scores than the propofol group, as evaluated by both endoscopists and patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Remimazolam was superior to propofol in terms of safety and efficacy during EUS examinations. (Clinical trial registration number: KCT 0007643.).

Remimazolam: its clinical pharmacology and evolving role in anesthesia and sedation practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Remimazolam is a novel benzodiazepine anesthetic/sedative, designed as a rapidly metabolized carboxylic acid. Since its recent launch, the role of remimazolam in modern anesthesia and sedation practice is still evolving. This review aims to outline the clinical pharmacology and clinical utility of remimazolam to elucidate its potential advantages and limitations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Remimazolam is "short-acting" but not ultra-short-acting compared with propofol based on context-sensitive decrement times. But compared to propofol, the availability of the benzodiazepine antagonist, flumazenil, is considered an advantage, particularly in certain emergency situations such as in patients with difficult airways. However, because flumazenil is shorter acting than remimazolam when remimazolam accumulates or is present in a high concentration, the reappearance of remimazolam sedation may occur after the initial reversal of anesthesia/sedation from flumazenil administration. Although it is beneficial that remimazolam causes less respiratory depression and hypotension than propofol, serious respiratory depression and hypotension can still occur. Remimazolam administration causes minimal or no pain on injection. Remimazolam is associated with less postoperative nausea and vomiting than inhaled anesthetics, but propofol is clearly superior in this regard. The anesthetic/sedative effects may be prolonged by severe hepatic impairment; remimazolam tolerance can occur in long-term benzodiazepine users.

SUMMARY

Remimazolam may be beneficial to use in procedural sedation and general anesthesia for patients with difficult airways or hemodynamic instability. Further clinical studies with remimazolam are warranted to identify the potential benefits in other settings and patient populations.

Remimazolam As a Sole Sedative Agent for Gastrostomy Tubes Placed in the Interventional Radiology Suite: A Case Series

Remimazolam is an ultrashort acting intravenous sedative-hypnotic approved for procedural sedation. We report a series of 8 cases of radiographically placed gastrostomy tubes using remimazolam as the sole anesthetic agent. Interventional radiology (IR) gastrostomy tube placement entails anesthetizing often complex patients in a nonoperating room environment. All 8 patients reported here underwent successful gastrostomy tube placement without the need for conversion to general anesthesia. Remimazolam is a feasible option to sedate patients for gastrostomy tube placement in the IR suite.

Remimazolam and Its Place in the Current Landscape of Procedural Sedation and General Anesthesia

Remimazolam was derived from its parent compound by adding an ester linkage into its structure so that the drug becomes a substrate for ester metabolism. As a result, it undergoes organ-independent ester hydrolysis, although the clinical benefits in terms of shorter recovery are not uniformly observed in clinical practice. Remimazolam is mainly tested in procedural sedation. In comparison to propofol, the current gold standard for procedural sedation, its proposed attractiveness is shorter wake-up times and a clear-headed recovery. Its clear advantages over propofol are better hemodynamic stability, lack of pain on injection and availability of a reversal agent in the form of flumazenil. Data on patient and proceduralist satisfaction are lacking. Remimazolam is also used for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in Japan (where it is approved for this purpose). In this scenario, it is not clear if it can achieve the same degree of lack of recall as propofol. The use of remimazolam in obstetrics, pediatrics and high-risk populations is an emerging area.

Remimazolam protects the liver from ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting the MAPK/ERK pathway

BACKGROUND

Ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury is a major factor in liver damage following hepatic resection and liver transplantation, with anesthetics demonstrating the ability to shield organs from this type of injury.

METHODS

Hypoxia-reoxygenation (H/R) was used to create in vitro I/R hepatocyte cell injury models. The CCK-8 assay, flow cytometer, LDH assay, and ELSIA were utilized to assess hepatocyte injury. The in vivo I/R injury rat model was then built. HE and TUNEL staining were used to assess liver tissue damage. Western-blot was applied to assess the activation of the MAPK/ERK pathway.

RESULTS

Remimazolam (RMZL) remarkably improved cell viability and decreased apoptosis in H/R-induced hepatocyte injury. RMZL reduced the release of H/R-induced inflammatory mediators (TNF-α and IL-6) as well as LDH levels. We also discovered that RMZL inhibited p38 and ERK1/2 phosphorylation in vivo and in vitro. The stimulation of MAPK/ERK, on the other hand, abolished RMZL's anti-inflammation effects in H/R-induced hepatocyte injury. Furthermore, RMZL reduced liver tissue injury in I/R rats.

CONCLUSION

RMZL prevented hepatic I/R damage by inhibiting MAPK/ERK signaling.

Remimazolam for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A comprehensive review

Worldwide, a majority of routine endoscopic procedures are performed under some form of sedation to maximize patient comfort. Propofol, benzodiazepines and opioids continue to be widely used. However, in recent years, Remimazolam is gaining immense popularity for procedural sedation in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. It is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine sedative which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in July 2020 for use in procedural sedation. Remimazolam has shown a favorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile in terms of its non-specific metabolism by tissue esterase, volume of distribution, total body clearance, and negligible drug-drug interactions. It also has satisfactory efficacy and has achieved high rates of successful sedation in GI endoscopy. Furthermore, studies have demonstrated that the efficacy of Remimazolam is non-inferior to Propofol, which is currently a gold standard for procedural sedation in most parts of the world. However, the use of Propofol is associated with hemodynamic instability and respiratory depression. In contrast, Remimazolam has lower incidence of these adverse effects intra-procedurally and hence, may provide a safer alternative to Propofol in procedural sedation. In this comprehensive narrative review, highlight the pharmacologic characteristics, efficacy, and safety of Remimazolam for procedural sedation. We also discuss the potential of Remimazolam as a suitable alternative and how it can shape the future of procedural sedation in gastroenterology.

Etomidate Combined with Propofol versus Remimazolam for Sedation in Elderly Patients During Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial

Purpose

Remimazolam is a novel short-acting benzodiazepine used for sedation and general anesthesia. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate in elderly patients who underwent diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Patients and Methods

A total of 120 patients aged 60-75 years were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Remifentanil 0.3μg/kg was used for analgesia. Patients were administered remimazolam besylate 7 mg (R group) or etomidate 0.1 mg/kg combined with 1% propofol 0.5 mg/kg (EP group) for induction, supplemental repeated doses were given as needed. Some time metrics, vital signs, adverse events were evaluated. Patients' Mini-cog score and recovery questionnaires were compared.

Results

Compared to the EP group, the induction time was slightly longer in the R group (1.50 VS 1.15 minutes) (P<0.05), the time spent in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) was shorter (15.17 VS 17.40 minutes) (P<0.05). Compare with EP group, SBP was lower in R group at T15 and T25 time point, but heart rate was higher in T2, T3, T5 (P< 0.05). The Mini-Cog score was higher after the procedure (2.83 VS 2.58) (P<0.05). The incidence of respiratory adverse events was higher in the EP group than R group (18.3% VS 5.0%, P < 0.05). The most common adverse event in R group was hiccups. The sedation satisfaction rate and degree of amnesia were higher in the R group (66.7% VS 11.7%) (P < 0.05), and the effect on patient's life within 24 hours was lower (12.0% VS 30.5%) (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

The safety and efficacy of remimazolam besylate are not inferior to those of etomidate combined with propofol, rendering it a safe option for sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy in ASA I-II elderly patients, but care should be taken to monitor the occurrence of hiccups.

Remimazolam for anesthesia and sedation in cardiac surgery and for cardiac patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a systematic-narrative hybrid review

INTRODUCTION

Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine recognized and approved as an anesthetic and sedative in multiple countries, offers a distinctive pharmacokinetic profile, boasting advantages such as rapid onset, short action duration, and rapid recovery. These attributes may contribute to enhanced hemodynamic stability and a diminished risk of respiratory depression compared to other sedatives.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted the first comprehensive systematically structured narrative review to evaluate the role and potential application of remimazolam in cardiac surgery. Twenty-one studies published from 2021 to 2023 delved into remimazolam's application in open cardiac surgery, cardiac catheterization or electrophysiology laboratories, and high-risk cardiovascular patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall, remimazolam usage was apparently linked to potentially superior hemodynamic stability compared to other hypnotic drugs. However, findings regarding the reduction in postoperative delirium incidence with remimazolam and the doses of remimazolam for anesthesia induction and maintenance were inconsistent across the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Though remimazolam has demonstrated potential safety, efficacy, and ease-of-use for both anesthesia induction and maintenance in cardiac surgery patients and high-risk cardiovascular patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, further research is imperative to delve into specific patient subgroups (e.g., the elderly or emergent procedures) so as to ascertain optimal dose ranges to suit diverse clinical scenarios.

Effect of Remimazolam on Induction and Maintenance of General Anesthesia in Kidney Transplant Patients

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate the effect of remimazolam on induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in kidney transplant patients.

Methods

120 patients undergoing kidney transplant were divided into two groups: Propofol group (Group P) and Remimazolam group (Group R). Anesthesia induction: remimazolam had injected IV at a dose of 0.15-0.35 mg/kg in Group R, while propofol had injected IV at a dose of 2.0-2.5 mg/kg in Group P. Anesthesia maintenance: remimazolam was injected IV at a dose of 0.3-1.0 mg·kg-1·h-1 and propofol was injected IV at a dose of 1-12 mg·kg-1·h-1 in Group R, propofol was injected IV at a dose of 3-12 mg·kg-1·h-1 in Group P. All patients have the same remaining anesthesia durgs.

Results

Compared with Group P, in Group R the time of disappearance of the eyelash reflex and the time to drop to 60 in BIS was longer (P < 0.05), the time of awakening was shorted (P < 0.05), the MAP of T6 was fluctuated less (P < 0.05), the incidence of hypotension and injection pain during induction was reduced (P < 0.001), the incidence of intraoperative bradycardia during operation was reduced (P < 0.05), the dosages of sedatives drug during maintenance was reduced (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative renal function between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Remimazolam can be safely and effectively used for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in kidney transplant patients.

Relationship between age and remimazolam dose required for inducing loss of consciousness in older surgical patients

Background

Remimazolam is a new ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine for procedural sedation and general anaesthesia, characterised by rapid onset of action, quick recovery, and organ-independent metabolism. Older patients tend to sustain more treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and worse perioperative prognoses after receiving remimazolam. However, few studies have investigated the appropriate dose of remimazolam for loss of consciousness (LOC) in geriatric patients. We designed this study to provide evidence for dose references and elucidate the relationship between age and remimazolam requirement for inducing LOC during anaesthesia induction.

Methods

Exactly 120 patients scheduled for general surgery under general anaesthesia were included and divided into two groups: Group A (60 patients, 18-64 years) and Group B (60 patients, ≥ 65 years). LOC, defined as a Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation score at 1 had been reached, emerged after all participants received a continuous infusion of remimazolam at a rate of 0.05 mg/kg/min.

Results

The remimazolam required for inducing LOC was 0.26 and 0.19 mg/kg in groups A and B, respectively, and the remimazolam dose in group B decreased by 26.9% compared to group A. According to the bivariate linear correlation analysis, remimazolam requirement was negatively correlated with age. Multivariable linear regression models and further adjustments for potential impact factors indicated that age was an independent factor for the remimazolam dose required for LOC.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that age was significantly and independently correlated with the remimazolam requirement for inducing LOC. To obtain haemodynamic stability during the induction of general anaesthesia, appropriately reducing the remimazolam dose is recommended for geriatric patients.

Quality of Postoperative Recovery in Total Intravenous Anesthesia between Remimazolam and Propofol for Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring: A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

This study compared the overall postoperative recovery of patients who underwent total intravenous anesthesia with remimazolam or propofol, using the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire (QoR-15). Seventy-two patients who underwent spine surgery with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) were randomly categorized into the remimazolam group (group R) or propofol group (group P). On the first postoperative day, the QoR-15 scores for groups P and R were 114 and 112, respectively, indicating no significant difference (p = 0.691). Similarly, group-time interaction effects on QoR-15 scores were not significantly different. In the post-anesthesia care unit, the pain intensity at rest was notably higher in group P than in group R (3.0 [0.0] vs. 2.8 [0.5], respectively, p = 0.009). Although the intraoperative consumption of remifentanil was higher in group R (1452.4 µg vs. 2066.8 µg, respectively, p < 0.001), the intraoperative use of vasopressors was lower in group R (1705.6 µg vs. 286.1 µg, respectively, p < 0.001) compared to group P. Group R exhibited significantly lower variability in mean blood pressure over time compared to group P. Remimazolam was viewed as a promising intravenous agent for general anesthesia, showing potential to replace propofol in spine surgery with IONM, considering both recovery quality and intraoperative hemodynamic stability.

The Safety and Efficacy of Remimazolam Compared to Dexmedetomidine for Awake Tracheal Intubation by Flexible Bronchoscopy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial

Background

Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine sedative that has the potential to be an alternative for procedural sedation due to its rapid sedation and recovery, no accumulation effect, stable hemodynamics, minimal respiratory depression, anterograde amnesia effect, and specific antagonist. Here, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of remimazolam with dexmedetomidine for awake tracheal intubation by flexible bronchoscopy (ATI-FB).

Methods

Ninety patients scheduled for ATI-FB were randomly divided into three groups, each consisting of 30 cases: dexmedetomidine 0.6 µg/kg + sufentanil (group DS), remimazolam 0.073 mg/kg + sufentanil (group R1S), or remimazolam 0.093 mg/kg + sufentanil (group R2S). The primary outcome was the success rate of sedation. Secondary outcomes were MOAA/S scores, hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, intubation conditions, intubation time, tracheal intubation amnesia, and adverse events.

Results

The success rates of sedation in groups R2S and DS were higher than that in group R1S (93.3%, 86.7%, respectively, vs 58.6%; P = 0.002), and intubation conditions were better than those in group R1S (P < 0.05). Group R2S had shorter intubation times than groups R1S and DS (P = 0.003), and a higher incidence of tracheal intubation amnesia than group DS (P = 0.006). No patient in the three groups developed hypoxemia or hypotension, and there were no significant differences in oligopnea, PetCO2, or bradycardia (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

In conclusion, both DS and R2S had higher success rates of sedation, better intubation conditions, and minor respiratory depression, but R2S, with its shorter intubation time, higher incidence of anterograde amnesia, and ability to be antagonized by specific antagonists, may be a good alternative sedation regimen for patients undergoing ATI-FB.

Remimazolam attenuates inflammation and kidney fibrosis following folic acid injury

The transition of acute kidney injury (AKI) to chronic kidney disease (CKD) is characterized by intense inflammation and progressive fibrosis. Remimazolam is widely used for procedural sedation in intensive care units, such as AKI patients. Remimazolam has been shown to possess anti-inflammatory and organ-protective properties. However, the role of remimazolam in inflammation and renal fibrosis following AKI remains unclear. Here, we explored the effects of remimazolam on the inflammatory response and kidney fibrogenesis of mice subjected to folic acid (FA) injury. Our results showed that remimazolam treatment alleviated kidney damage and dysfunction. Mice treated with remimazolam presented less collagen deposition in FA-injured kidneys compared with FA controls, which was accompanied by a reduction of extracellular matrix proteins accumulation and fibroblasts activation. Furthermore, remimazolam treatment reduced inflammatory cells infiltration into the kidneys of mice with FA injury and inhibited proinflammatory or profibrotic molecules expression. Finally, remimazolam treatment impaired the activation of bone marrow-derived fibroblasts and blunted the transformation of macrophages to myofibroblasts in FA nephropathy. Additionally, the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist PK-11195 partially reversed the protective effect of remimazolam on the FA-injured kidneys. Overall, remimazolam attenuates the inflammatory response and renal fibrosis development following FA-induced AKI, which may be related to the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor pathway.

Comparison of the negative effect of remimazolam and propofol on cardiac contractility: Analysis of a randomised parallel-group trial and a preclinical ex vivo study

Remimazolam is a newly developed ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine that exerts sedative effects. This study aimed to clarify the effects of remimazolam on cardiac contractility. In a randomised-parallel group trial, haemodynamic parameters were compared between propofol (n = 11) and remimazolam (n = 12) groups during the induction of general anaesthesia in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. In a preclinical study, the direct effects of remimazolam on cardiac contractility were also evaluated using isolated rat hearts. RNA sequence data obtained from rat and human hearts were analysed to assess the expression patterns of the cardiac γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA ) receptor subunits. In a clinical study, the proportional change of the maximum rate of arterial pressure rise was milder during the study period in the remimazolam group (propofol: -52.6 [10.2] (mean [standard deviation])% vs. remimazolam: -39.7% [10.5%], p = 0.007). In a preclinical study, remimazolam did not exert a negative effect on left ventricle developed pressure, whereas propofol did exert a negative effect after bolus administration of a high dose (propofol: -26.9% [3.5%] vs. remimazolam: -1.1 [6.9%], p < 0.001). Analysis of the RNA sequence revealed a lack of γ subunits, which are part of the major benzodiazepine binding site of the GABAA receptor, in rat and human hearts. These results indicate that remimazolam does not have a direct negative effect on cardiac contractility, which might contribute to its milder effect on cardiac contractility during the induction of general anaesthesia. The expression patterns of cardiac GABAA receptor subunits might be associated with the unique pharmacokinetics of benzodiazepines in the heart.

Utility of Remimazolam for Fast-Track Recovery Following Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in an Elderly Patient With Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Case Report

Remimazolam is an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine that has minimal hemodynamic effects and is useful for early extubation after cardiac surgery. We present a case of an elderly patient with severe aortic stenosis (AS) who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR), was extubated in the operating room, and recovered quickly without postoperative delirium. An 87-year-old woman with severe AS underwent AVR under cardiopulmonary bypass. General anesthesia was induced with remimazolam 10 mg over one minute and fentanyl 100 µg, and maintained with remimazolam 0.4-0.7 mg/kg/hour, fentanyl, and remifentanil. Intraoperative hemodynamic condition was stable without vasopressors. Remimazolam was discontinued after sternum closure. She recovered consciousness five minutes after the completion of the surgery, and the tracheal tube was removed in the operating room. Remimazolam may be useful for fast-track recovery following surgical AVR in an elderly patient with severe AS.

Benefits of remimazolam as an anesthetic sedative for older patients: A review

Owing to the decreased levels of receptors in the peripheral and central nervous systems, the functions of various organ systems decline in older patients. When administering anesthesia to older patients, it is necessary to consider the effects of medication on the homeostatic balance. Remimazolam, a new benzodiazepine, was recently developed as an anesthetic drug that has shown promise in clinical anesthesia application owing to its molecular structure, targets, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetic characteristics. Remimazolam exhibits a rapid onset and metabolism, with minor effects on liver and kidney functions. Moreover, the drug has a specific antagonist, flumazenil. It is safer to use in older patients than other anesthetic sedatives and has been widely used since its introduction. Comparisons of the pharmacokinetics, metabolic pathways, effects on target organs, and hemodynamics of different drugs with those of commonly used anesthetic sedative drugs are useful to inform clinical practice. This article elaborates on the benefits of remimazolam compared with those of other anesthetic sedatives for sedation in older patients to demonstrate how it offers a new option for anesthetics in older patients. In cases involving older patients with increased clinical complexities or very old patients requiring anesthesia, remimazolam can be selected as the preferred anesthetic sedative, as outlined in this review.

Simultaneously Predicting the Pharmacokinetics of CES1-Metabolized Drugs and Their Metabolites Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model in Cirrhosis Subjects

Hepatic carboxylesterase 1 (CES1) metabolizes numerous prodrugs into active ingredients or direct-acting drugs into inactive metabolites. We aimed to develop a semi-physiologically based pharmacokinetic (semi-PBPK) model to simultaneously predict the pharmacokinetics of CES1 substrates and their active metabolites in liver cirrhosis (LC) patients. Six prodrugs (enalapril, benazepril, cilazapril, temocapril, perindopril and oseltamivir) and three direct-acting drugs (flumazenil, pethidine and remimazolam) were selected. Parameters such as organ blood flows, plasma-binding protein concentrations, functional liver volume, hepatic enzymatic activity, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and gastrointestinal transit rate were integrated into the simulation. The pharmacokinetic profiles of these drugs and their active metabolites were simulated for 1000 virtual individuals. The developed semi-PBPK model, after validation in healthy individuals, was extrapolated to LC patients. Most of the observations fell within the 5th and 95th percentiles of simulations from 1000 virtual patients. The estimated AUC and Cmax were within 0.5-2-fold of the observed values. The sensitivity analysis showed that the decreased plasma exposure of active metabolites due to the decreased CES1 was partly attenuated by the decreased GFR. Conclusion: The developed PBPK model successfully predicted the pharmacokinetics of CES1 substrates and their metabolites in healthy individuals and LC patients, facilitating tailored dosing of CES1 substrates in LC patients.

Target-controlled Infusion of Remimazolam in Healthy Volunteers Shows Some Acute Tolerance

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam exhibits sedative properties by binding to γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors. Remimazolam is administered as a bolus dose or continuous infusion, but has not been studied using target-controlled infusion (TCI). The study quantified the relationship between the remimazolam concentration, Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness and Sedation (MOAAS) score, and bispectral index (BIS) using TCI.

METHODS

The authors performed a three-period, crossover, dose-ranging clinical trial in 24 healthy volunteers using age and sex stratification. Data collected in the first period, where remimazolam was administered alone using a step-up and step-down TCI protocol, were used for this analysis. Remimazolam concentrations, MOAAS scores, and BIS values were collected at each step at steady state. Data were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling methodology.

RESULTS

The relationship between remimazolam, BIS, and MOAAS differed between step-up and step-down infusions at similar remimazolam target concentrations. Tolerance, driven by remimazolam or CNS7054, significantly improved overall model fit (P < 0.01) for both BIS and MOAAS models. After 30 min of repeated bolus dosing, mimicking the regimen in the label for procedural sedation, the BIS and probability of MOAAS 2/3 were predicted to be 54 (95% prediction interval, 44 to 67) and 2% (95% prediction interval, 0 to 32%) versus 58 (95% prediction interval, 48 to 70) and 8% (95% prediction interval, 0 to 36%) in a model without and with tolerance, respectively. After 60 min of continuous infusion, mimicking the regimen in the label for general anesthesia, the BIS and probability of MOAAS 0 were predicted to be 40 (95% prediction interval, 33 to 50) and 87% (95% prediction interval, 18 to 100%) versus 50 (95% prediction interval, 41 to 60) and 59% (95% prediction interval, 6 to 99%) in a model without and with tolerance, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, it was shown that remimazolam-induced sedation is prone to tolerance development, which is potentially mediated by the CNS7054 concentration. The clinical consequences are, however, limited in situations where remimazolam is titrated to effect.

EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE

Preliminary Experience With Remimazolam for Procedural Sedation and as an Adjunct to General Anesthesia During Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Procedures

Background

Remimazolam is a benzodiazepine which, like midazolam, has sedative, anxiolytic, and amnestic properties. Ester metabolism results in a half-life of 5 - 10 min, a limited context sensitive half-life, and rapid recovery when the infusion is discontinued.

Methods

Following the Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, we performed a retrospective chart review of patients who received remimazolam in the cardiac catheterization, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and electrophysiology suites. The primary objective was to assess efficacy and safety. The secondary objective was to describe bolus and infusion dosing of remimazolam and the need for adjunctive agents to optimize procedural sedation conditions.

Results

The study cohort included 26 patients with a median age of 18 years and a total of 33 anesthetic encounters. The most common procedures were endomyocardial biopsy or isolated hemodynamic assessment (right or left heart catheterization). Remimazolam was the primary agent for sedation in 82% of the procedures. The majority of cases (25 encounters, 76%) included a bolus dose of remimazolam prior to the start of an infusion. For those patients who received a starting bolus dose, dosing typically ranged between 30 and 110 µg/kg. Continuous infusion rates of remimazolam varied from 5 to 20 µg/kg/min. No adverse hemodynamic or respiratory effects were noted. Midazolam, fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine were the most frequently used adjunctive agents. One patient required transition to general anesthesia due to the need for a surgical intervention based on the findings of the cardiac catheterization. All other patients were effectively sedated.

Conclusions

Our preliminary experience demonstrates that remimazolam effectively provided sedation for diagnostic and therapeutic cardiovascular procedures. Future studies are needed to further define dosing parameters for both bolus dosing and continuous infusion as well as to compare remimazolam to other commonly used for procedural sedation in patients with congenital and acquired heart disease.

The Role of Remimazolam in Neurosurgery and in Patients With Neurological Diseases: A Narrative Review

Remimazolam is a novel ultrashort-acting benzodiazepine that produces sedation by acting as a positive allosteric modulator of the gamma-amino butyric acid-A receptor. Its high water solubility and metabolism via tissue esterases allow for a rapid onset of sedation/anesthesia and prompt arousal despite prolonged use. In addition, the effects of remimazolam can be reversed with flumazenil. This narrative review discusses the role of remimazolam in patients undergoing neurosurgical and neuroradiological procedures, specifically its role during awake craniotomies and compatibility with neuromonitoring. Considerations for remimazolam use in patients with neurological diseases are also highlighted. In addition, the impact of remimazolam on postoperative excitation, risk for postoperative delirium, and delayed neurocognitive recovery are discussed. Although there seems to be a clinical promise for remimazolam based on limited case studies and our own institutional experience of its use, further clinical investigation is warranted to understand the potential impact of remimazolam on surgical and neurological outcomes.

Remimazolam sedation for awake tracheal intubation

We present a case of a 55-year-old woman presenting for an elective minor procedure. Following a previous anaesthetic, a 'can't intubate, can't oxygenate' incident had been documented. She had since undergone awake tracheal intubation for procedures requiring general anaesthesia. We were able to safely facilitate awake tracheal intubation using remimazolam for sedation. Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short acting benzodiazepine with similar pharmacodynamic effects to its parent compound midazolam, having minimal cardiovascular or respiratory effects and offering excellent anxiolysis and amnesia. It has a significantly shorter duration of action than midazolam, making it a valuable sedative agent for awake tracheal intubation. The patient remained stable throughout the procedure, with minimal effects on the respiratory and cardiovascular systems. The quality of sedation was reported as highly satisfactory by both the patient and the team.

Safety and efficacy of remimazolam tosilate combined with low-dose fentanyl for procedural sedation in obese patients undergoing gastroscopy: study protocol for a single-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Obese patients are susceptible to hypoxaemia during procedural sedation. Propofol combined with low-dose opioids is commonly used as a sedation strategy, but it can exacerbate hypoxaemia by causing cardiopulmonary depression and airway obstruction, especially in obese patients. Remimazolam, a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, has minimal accumulative effects and less cardiorespiratory depression. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining remimazolam tosilate with low-dose fentanyl as an alternative option for procedural sedation in obese patients undergoing gastroscopy.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted in the Endoscopy Centre of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, recruiting 174 participants scheduled for painless gastroscopy with a body mass index of 30-39.9 kg×m-2. All patients will be randomly divided into two groups in a 1:1 ratio. The sedation strategy of the intervention group is remimazolam tosilate combined with fentanyl, while the control group is propofol combined with fentanyl. The primary outcome is the incidence of hypoxaemia and the secondary outcomes include the time to ambulation, need for airway manoeuvres and rescue sedation, sleep quality, the incidence of sedation failure, adverse events and the cost of sedatives. All statistical tests will be performed using IBM SPSS V.20.0 statistical software. A p value<0.05 is considered statistically significant.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This RCT was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University (Scientific Research Ethics Review 2022, No.093). The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2200067076.

Efficacy and safety of remimazolam compared with propofol in hypertensive patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: a single-center, randomized, controlled study

BACKGROUND

Remimazolam, as a novel anesthetic, has recently been shown to improve hemodynamic stability during anesthesia induction and maintenance; however, it has not been reported in the hypertensive population. This study aimed to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol on hemodynamic stability in hypertensive patients undergoing breast cancer surgery.

METHODS

We enrolled 120 hypertensive patients undergoing breast cancer surgery in this prospective study and randomly allocated them to remimazolam (n = 60) or propofol (n = 60) groups. Anesthesia regimens were consistent between groups, except for the administration of remimazolam and propofol. Our primary outcome was the incidence of post-induction hypotension, which was either an absolute mean arterial pressure (MAP) < 60 mmHg or a > 30% relative drop in MAP compared to baseline within 20 min of induction or from induction to the start of surgery. Secondary outcomes included minimum MAP and MAP at different time points during anesthesia, the application of vasoactive drugs, adverse events, and the patient's self-reported Quality of Recovery-40 scale for the day after surgery.

RESULTS

The incidence of post-induction hypotension was lower and the minimum MAP during induction was higher in the remimazolam group than those in the propofol group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the remaining outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam is safe and effective in hypertensive patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Induction with remimazolam in hypertensive patients may result in more stable hemodynamics than propofol.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry ( http://www.chictr.org.cn ) on 03/12/2020, with registration number ChiCTR2000040579.

Remimazolam Pilot for Office-Based Dental Sedation: Adverse Events, Awareness and Outcomes

In recent years, remimazolam has gained approval for use in adult procedural sedation in both the United Kingdom and the United States, potentially offering an alternative to conventional sedatives like propofol and midazolam for procedural sedation. However, there is a limited body of literature that systematically reviews the outcomes of a remimazolam-alfentanil combination protocol for routine office-based dental procedures. The primary objective of this pilot study was to assess the occurrence of significant adverse events associated with the use of a remimazolam-alfentanil sedation protocol for adult dental procedures. Secondary outcomes included evaluating physiological responses, sedation effectiveness, patient and clinician satisfaction and the incidence of intraprocedural awareness. Notably, no significant adverse events were reported among the 25 adult subjects who received remimazolam and alfentanil, and all dental procedures were successfully completed. Patients and clinicians expressed high levels of satisfaction, and patients did not report any distressing memories associated with the dental procedure. These findings suggest that in a limited cohort, the remimazolam-alfentanil regimen appears to be well tolerated and effective for office-based dental procedures in adult patients, with a low risk of adverse events, acceptable hemodynamic effects, rapid onset and recovery and minimal intraoperative awareness. This study provides valuable insights into the potential use of the remimazolam-alfentanil combination in dental sedation practice.

Effect of pre-use of Dexmedetomidine on the effective inhibitory dose of remimazolam tosilate on positive cardiovascular response in double-lumen endobronchial intubation: a clinical study

BACKGROUND

Herein, the effect of pre-use of Dexmedetomidine(Dex) on the half-effective dose (ED50) and 95%-effective dose (ED95) of Remimazolam tosilate(RT) in inhibiting the positive cardiovascular response(CR) which means blood pressure or heart rate rises above a critical threshold induced by double-lumen bronchial intubation was evaluated.

METHODS

Patients who underwent video-assisted thoracic surgery were divided into groups A (0), B (0.5 µg/kg), and C (1 µg/kg) based on different Dex doses. Group A included subgroups comprising young (A-Y) and elderly (A-O) patients. Neither groups B nor C included elderly patients due of the sedative effect of Dex. Based on the previous subject's CR, the dose of RT was increased or decreased in the next patient using the sequential method. This trial would be terminated when the seventh crossover occurred, at which point the sample size met the stable estimate of the target dose. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were monitored throughout the trial, and sedation was assessed using the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scale. HR and MAP were recorded at baseline (T1), the end of Dex (T2), and the end of RT (T3), the maximum HR and MAP were recorded within 3 min of intubation from beginning to end (T4). There was a positive CR when the T4 levels rose above 15% of the baseline. The ED50/ED95 and corresponding confidence interval were calculated using probability regression.

RESULTS

In total, 114 patients completed the trial. Without the use of Dex, the ED50/ED95 of TR inhibiting the positive CR caused by double-lumen bronchial intubation was 0.198/0.227 and 0.155/0.181 mg/kg in groups A-Y and A-O, respectively. The changes in vital signs from T1 to T3 were similar in the subgroups, indicating that the elderly patients were more sensitive to the dose of RT. The ED50/ED95 of RT inhibiting the positive CR caused by double-lumen endobronchial intubation was 0.122/0.150 and 0.068/0.084 mg/kg in groups B and C, respectively. And, the fluctuation of blood pressure from T3 to T4 was reduced by using Dex. RT was 100% effective in sedation with no significant inhibition of circulation. Apart from one case of hypotension occurred in group A-Y, two cases of low HR in group B, and one case of low HR in group C, no other adverse events were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal dose of RT to inhibit positive CR induced by double-lumen bronchial intubation in elderly patients was 0.18 mg/kg and 0.23 mg/kg in younger patients. When the pre-use dose of Dex was 0.5 µg/kg, the optimal dose to inhibit positive CR of RT was 0.15 mg/kg. And, when the pre-use dose of Dex was 1 µg/kg, the optimal dose of RT was 0.9 mg/kg.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05631028.

Remimazolam and serious adverse events: A scoping review

Remimazolam is anticipated to be an interesting anaesthetic and sedative. It combines the pharmacodynamic properties of midazolam with pharmacokinetic properties similar to remifentanil. However, worrisome case reports of anaphylaxis, delayed emergence and re-sedation have emerged recently and necessitate further investigation.PubMed (including MEDLINE) and EMBASE were searched for all studies reporting serious adverse events where remimazolam was administered for sedation or anaesthesia.Thirty-six case reports and 73 trials were identified, involving a total of 6740 patients who received remimazolam. Hypotension was reported in 911 cases, delayed emergence in 68 cases, anaphylaxis in 10 cases and re-sedation in 8 cases. The incidence of hypotension seems to be lower compared with other anaesthetics, even in high-risk patients.Delayed emergence might be related to the metabolism of remimazolam through carboxylesterase 1 (CES1), a tissue esterase predominant in the liver. There is significant interindividual variation, and it is inhibited by flavonoids, fatty acids and alcohol. Individual benzodiazepine sensitivity has also been reported. A higher BMI, older age and low plasma albumin concentration are risk factors for delayed emergence. Anaphylaxis might be related to a non-IgE-mediated effect of the excipient dextran-40 or a partially IgE-mediated reaction to remimazolam itself. Resedation has been reported after flumazenil reversal and is explained by the specific pharmacokinetic properties of flumazenil and remimazolam. Reversal by flumazenil should be reserved for and used carefully in patients with delayed emergence.

VISUAL ABSTRACT

http://links.lww.com/EJA/A864 .

Pharmacokinetics of remimazolam after intravenous infusion in anaesthetised children

BACKGROUND

The pharmacokinetic properties of the new benzodiazepine remimazolam have been studied only in adults. We investigated the pharmacokinetics of remimazolam after i.v. infusion in anaesthetised paediatric patients.

METHODS

Twenty-four children (2-6 yr, ASA physical status 1-2, BMI 15-18 kg m-2) undergoing general anaesthesia with sevoflurane were enrolled. During surgery, remimazolam was administered as an i.v. infusion over 1 h at 5 mg kg-1 h-1 for 5 min, followed by 1.5 mg kg-1 h-1 for 55 min. Plasma concentrations of remimazolam and its metabolite CNS7054 were determined from arterial blood samples using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic modelling was performed by population analysis.

RESULTS

Pharmacokinetics were best described by a three-compartment model for remimazolam and a two-compartment model for CNS7054 linked by a transit compartment. Remimazolam showed a high clearance of 15.9 (12.9, 18.2) ml kg-1 min-1 (median, Q25, Q75), a small central volume of distribution of 0.11 (0.08, 0.14) L kg-1 and a short terminal half-life of 67 (49, 85) min. The context-sensitive half-time after an infusion of 4 h was 17 (12, 21) min. The metabolite CNS7054 showed a low clearance of 0.89 (0.33, 1.40) ml kg-1 min-1, a small central volume of distribution of 0.011 (0.005, 0.016) L kg-1, and a long terminal half-life of 321 (230, 770) min.

CONCLUSIONS

Remimazolam in children was characterised by a high clearance and short context-sensitive half-time. When normalised to weight, pharmacokinetic properties were similar to those reported for adults.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2200057629.

Remimazolam tosylate's long-term sedative properties in ICU patients on mechanical ventilation: effectiveness and safety

OBJECTIVE

This study compared remimazolam tosylate with propofol or midazolam to assess its safety and effectiveness for long-term sedation of intensive care unit (ICU) patients requiring mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

Adult patients in the ICU receiving sedation and mechanical ventilation for longer than 24 h were included in this single-center, prospective, observational study. Depending on the sedatives they were given, they were split into two groups (midazolam or propofol group; remimazolam group). ICU mortality was the main result. Laboratory tests, adverse events, and the length of ICU stay were considered secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients were involved (46 received propofol or midazolam versus 60 received remimazolam). Age (P = 0.182), gender (P = 0.325), and the amount of time between being admitted to the ICU and receiving medication infusion (P = 0.770) did not substantially differ between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in ICU mortality between the two groups. The remimazolam group showed less variability in heart rate (P = 0.0021), pH (P = 0.048), bicarbonate (P = 0.0133), lactate (P = 0.0002), arterial blood gas analyses, liver, and kidney function. The Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale scores, length of ICU stay, and occurrence of adverse events did not exhibit significant differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam tosylate did not increase the total inpatient cost, the incidence of adverse events, and ICU mortality in patients with mechanical ventilation. These findings suggest that remimazolam may represent a promising alternative for sedation in the ICU setting.

The Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam Besylate Combined with Esketamine for Outpatient Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

Purpose

Evaluate the efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate combined with esketamine for outpatient colonoscopy.

Patients and methods

A total of 150 outpatients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized into two groups. A MOAA/S score ≤3 was maintained. The primary outcome was the rate of successful colonoscopy completion. Time indicators, hemodynamic parameters, the consumption of lidocaine, esketamine, propofol and remimazolam besylate, MOAA/S scores and bispectral index (BIS) values, the lowest SpO2, body movement, the use of rescue medication, endoscopist and patient satisfaction, recall of the procedure, mini-mental state examination (MMSE), fatigue level and adverse events were recorded.

Results

Procedure completion was equivalent between groups (P > 0.05). Both induction and awakening times were significantly shorter in the P group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in colonoscopy time and discharge time (P > 0.05). The lowest SpO2 was significantly lower in the P group, while the level of fatigue was higher (P < 0.05). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in the R group (P < 0.05). Endoscopist satisfaction was significantly higher in the P group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure between groups except at T5 and T6 (P > 0.05). Both HR and RR were significantly lower in the P group from T3 to T5 (P < 0.05). BIS values were significantly lower in the P group from T3 to T5, while MOAA/S was significantly lower in the P group at T3 and T4 (P < 0.05). Pain on injection was significantly higher in the P group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Remimazolam besylate has a similar efficacy to propofol when combined with subanesthetic doses of esketamine during outpatient colonoscopy. Remimazolam besylate combined with esketamine resulted in less injection pain and more stable hemodynamics, although it prolonged induction and awakening time.

Effects of Remimazolam and Propofol on Emergence Agitation in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Replacement: A Clinical, Randomized, Controlled Study

Purpose

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of remimazolam and propofol on emergence agitation (EA) in elderly patients undergoing hip replacement.

Methods

A total of 60 elderly patients undergoing hip replacement were recruited for this prospective, single-center, clinical, randomized, controlled study from February to April 2023. They were randomly assigned to two groups: the remimazolam group (group R) and the propofol group (group P). In group R, remimazolam was administered intravenously during the induction and maintenance of anesthesia, In group P, propofol was used during the induction and maintenance of anesthesia. The incidence of EA was recorded as the primary indicator. Secondary indicators included heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) values at the following moments: 5 min prior to anesthetic induction (T0), 1 min following induction (T1), 5 min after the laryngeal mask was inserted (T2), the beginning of surgery (T3), the moment the laryngeal mask was removed (T4), and the overall incidence of postoperative adverse events (bleeding or splitting of the surgical incision, removal of the intravenous infusion needle, falling off the bed, hypoxemia, and hypertension).

Results

The incidence of EA was significantly lower in group R than in group P (10% vs 33%, P < 0.05). At T1, T2, and T3, the HR and MAP values of group R were higher than those of group P (P < 0.05). The overall incidence of postoperative adverse events was significantly lower in group R than in group P (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Remimazolam further reduced the incidence of emergence agitation when compared to propofol during geriatric hip replacement. Moreover, it has a minor hemodynamic effect and lower the incidence of postoperative adverse events.