Current practice in the perioperative management of patients with diabetes mellitus: a narrative review

Clinical value of preoperative oral carbohydrate loading in patients with diabetes: a cross-sectional study

Background

Preoperative oral carbohydrate loading (POCL) has shown benefits in non-diabetic patients, but its use in patients with diabetes remains controversial. Concerns about potential hyperglycemia and adverse outcomes have led to conflicting evidence and varied clinical practices.

Objective

To assess the impact of POCL on clinical outcomes after surgery in patients with diabetes.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed 679 patients with diabetes undergoing elective surgery from 2020 to 2023, divided into POCL and fasting groups. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 410 patients were analyzed. Primary outcomes included postoperative blood glucose levels; secondary outcomes were including glycemic variability, pulmonary infections, hospital stay length, and costs.

Results

After PSM, POCL was associated with significantly lower blood glucose levels on the first postoperative day compared to the fasting group (11.03 [9.43–12.77] vs. 11.37 [9.77–13.20], P  = 0.045). No significant differences were observed in glycemic variability. POCL patients demonstrated shorter postoperative hospital stays (5.10 [3.00-7.70] vs. 5.90 [3.80–8.50], P  = 0.022). Multivariate analysis revealed that POCL independently predicted reduced hospitalization costs (β=-3417.49, 95% CI [-6358.52, -476.46], P  = 0.023) and shorter hospital stays (β=-1.21, 95% CI [-1.83, -0.60], P  < 0.001). Higher ASA scores and longer surgical durations were associated with increased costs, while prolonged surgeries correlated with greater pulmonary infection risk (OR = 1.005, 95% CI [1.003–1.008], P  < 0.001).

Conclusion

Despite previous concerns, POCL appears to be associated with lower early postoperative blood glucose levels, shorter hospital stays, and reduced costs in patients with well-controlled diabetes (HbA1c < 7.5%). It may be a safe and effective perioperative strategy for this specific population, though individualized assessment remains essential.

Risk factors for pneumonia after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to systematically gather relevant research to determine and quantify the risk factors and pooled prevalence for pneumonia after a radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

METHODS

The reporting procedures of this meta-analysis conformed to the PRISMA 2020. Chinese Wan Fang data, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Periodical Full-text Database (VIP), Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception to January 20, 2024, were systematically searched for cohort or case-control studies that reported particular risk factors for pneumonia after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. The pooled prevalence of pneumonia was estimated alongside risk factor analysis. The quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale after the chosen studies had been screened and the data retrieved. RevMan 5.4 and R 4.4.2 were the program used to perform the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Our study included data from 20,840 individuals across 27 trials. The pooled prevalence of postoperative pneumonia was 11.0% (95% CI = 8.0% ~ 15.0%). Fifteen risk factors were statistically significant, according to pooled analyses. Several factors were identified to be strong risk factors, including smoking history (OR 2.71, 95% CI = 2.09 ~ 3.50, I2 = 26%), prolonged postoperative nasogastric tube retention (OR 2.25, 95% CI = 1.36-3.72, I2 = 63%), intraoperative bleeding ≥ 200 ml (OR 2.21, 95% CI = 1.15-4.24, I2 = 79%), diabetes mellitus (OR 4.58, 95% CI = 1.84-11.38, I2 = 96%), male gender (OR 3.56, 95% CI = 1.50-8.42, I2 = 0%), total gastrectomy (OR 2.59, 95% CI = 1.83-3.66, I2 = 0%), COPD (OR 4.72, 95% CI = 3.80-5.86, I2 = 0%), impaired respiratory function (OR 2.72, 95% CI = 1.58-4.69, I2 = 92%), D2 lymphadenectomy (OR 4.14, 95% CI = 2.29-7.49, I2 = 0%), perioperative blood transfusion (OR 4.21, 95% CI = 2.51-7.06, I2 = 90%), and hypertension (OR 2.21, 95% CI = 1.29-3.79, I2 = 0%). Moderate risk factors included excessive surgery duration (OR 1.51, 95% CI = 1.25-1.83, I2 = 90%), advanced age (OR 1.91, 95% CI = 1.42-2.58, I2 = 94%), nutritional status (OR 2.62, 95% CI = 1.55-4.44, I2 = 71%), and history of pulmonary disease (OR 1.61, 95% CI = 1.17-2.21, I2 = 79%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified 15 independent risk factors significantly associated with pneumonia after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer, with a pooled prevalence of 11.0%. These findings emphasize the importance of targeted preventive strategies, including preoperative smoking cessation, nutritional interventions, blood glucose and blood pressure control, perioperative respiratory training, minimizing nasogastric tube retention time, and optimizing perioperative blood transfusion strategies. For high-risk patients, such as the elderly, those undergoing prolonged surgeries, experiencing excessive intraoperative blood loss, undergoing total gastrectomy, or receiving open surgery, close postoperative monitoring is essential. Early recognition of pneumonia signs and timely intervention can improve patient outcomes and reduce complications.

Association of semaglutide with retained gastric contents on endoscopy: Retrospective analysis

Background and study aims

We investigated the effect of semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist therapy, on retained gastric contents during endoscopy through a retrospective case-control study.

Patients and methods

We performed a retrospective case-control study to evaluate the effect of semaglutide on rates of retained gastric contents (RGC) visualized during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). Cases and controls were matched using multidimensional propensity score matching: age, gender, body mass index, and EGD indication. Pairs were analyzed using McNemar testing and Mann-Whitney non-parametric tests.

Results

Of the patients on GLP-1 therapy at time of EGD, 12.5% had RGC, compared with 1.3% in the control group (confidence interval [CI] 7.2% to 17.7%, P < 0.0001). Approximately 23% of patients prescribed GLP-1 therapy for weight loss had RGC at time of EGD compared with the control group (CI 13.4% to 32.6%, P < 0.0001). Only 2.6% of patients prescribed GLP-1 therapy for diabetes had RGC at time of EGD compared with the control group (CI -0.9% to 6.1%, P = 0.5). Patients receiving GLP-1 therapy with RGC at time of EGD did not differ from non-RGC patients in dosing of GLP-1 agonist ( P = 0.23) or duration of GLP-1 agonist use prior to EGD ( P = 0.98).

Conclusions

Semaglutide use appears to increase risk of having retained gastric contents visualized during endoscopy. Patients on semaglutide for weight loss appear to have a greater risk of RGC compared with patients on semaglutide for glycemic control. This observation may have clinical implications for management of GLP-1 agonist use prior to endoscopy.

Impact of differential glycemic management goals in pre-anhepatic and anhepatic phase on early grafted liver function after liver transplantation: An open-label, randomized, controlled study

BACKGROUND

Liver graft function is related to the quality of liver transplantation (LT). High-quality perioperative glycemic management is considered hepatoprotective. However, no studies have explored the effects of specialized and staged blood glucose management target ranges on reducing glycemic variability (GV) and early allograft dysfunction (EAD) after LT.

METHODS

In this prospective randomized controlled trial, a total of 188 LT recipients were randomly assigned 1:1 to the less intensive glucose management (LIGM) group and the more intensive glucose management (MIGM) group. They followed goals of 7.8-10.0 mmol/L and 4.5-6.7 mmol/L in the pre-anhepatic and anhepatic phases, respectively, and the goals of 4.1-10.0 mmol/L in the neohepatic phase and postoperatively. The primary outcome was EAD, and the secondary outcomes were GV, incidence of hyperglycemia/hypoglycemia, postoperative liver enzyme levels, 30-day postoperative infection rate, one-year survival rate, and TNF-α, IL-6 and C-reactive protein levels.

RESULTS

A total of 182 adult patients (89 in the LIGM group and 93 in the MIGM group) completed the study. The mean age of the recipients was 51.46 ± 10.79 years, and the median MELD score before surgery was 16. The incidence of EAD was significantly lower in the LIGM group than in the MIGM group (10.11 % vs 31.18 %, P < 0.001), with a relative risk (RR) of 0.32 (2-sided 95 % CI 0.110-0.562). There was no statistical difference in the 30-day postoperative infection rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). The one-year survival rate of the LIGM group was higher than that of the MIGM group (92.13 % vs 82.02 %, P = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Adopting LIGM (7.8-10.0 mmol/L) during the pre-anhepatic and anhepatic phases helps to reduce the incidence of EAD after LT and promotes the recovery of liver function, but does not increase the incidence of postoperative infections.

Aspiration risk and strategic approach for patients receiving GLP-1 receptor agonists undergoing elective surgery

Perioperative management of patients receiving a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) remains challenging for the anesthesiologist. Despite the approval of GLP-1 RAs 2 decades ago, the recent reports of aspiration and postoperative pulmonary complications drew attention to this group of medications and resulted in multiple societal guidelines that would provide recommendations for anesthesiologists and proceduralists on the appropriate perioperative management of GLP-1 RAs. However, despite these guidelines and proposed options, there was a lack of adequate evidence to support holding versus continuing the medication, as well as data related to the role of gastric ultrasound in that decision-making process. The release of multiple societal guidelines and studies evaluating the impact of GLP-1 RAs on perioperative outcomes resulted in more controversy and uncertainty for the clinician anesthesiologist to follow. The ultimate goal for perioperative management of these medications is to evaluate an individual patient's risk of aspiration, rather than assuming the risk is low when holding the medication appropriately or high if not holding it. Furthermore, it is unclear whether holding these types of medicines or unnecessary postponing of surgery may result in adverse outcomes. In this narrative review, we present a summary of the existing literature on the topic with a focus on the risk of aspiration and a recommendation for perioperative management to include the utilization of gastric ultrasound for surgery patients based on their risks.

Perioperative Considerations of Novel Antidiabetic Agents in Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, including heart failure (HF). A high proportion of DM patients eventually require cardiac surgery. While the traditional approach to DM therapy focuses on tight glucose control with insulin and oral hypoglycemic agents, novel antidiabetic drugs have emerged over the past two decades that offer not only improved glycemic control but also cardiovascular and renal protection, such as benefits in HF management. The aim of this review is to examine and evaluate the perioperative risk and benefits of novel antidiabetic agents in HF treatment for both DM and non-DM patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We specifically studied glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is). Although studies on novel antidiabetic therapy in cardiac surgeries were limited, the results showed all three agents to be safe for use in the perioperative period, with SLGT2i demonstrating the most benefits in HF management for those with or without DM and kidney impairment undergoing cardiac surgery. Future research on larger study populations and using a more rigorous study design is necessary in bridging current knowledge to improve patient outcomes.

Perioperative glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use and retained gastric contents: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing elective upper endoscopy

INTRODUCTION

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists have been increasingly prescribed for weight loss and glycemic control. The potential side effect of slowed gastric emptying may increase risk of regurgitation and aspiration. Our primary aim was to investigate the incidence of retained gastric contents (RGCs) among appropriately fasted patients taking a GLP-1R agonist compared to those not taking a GLP-1R agonist presenting for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UE).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing UE was conducted. For the GLP-1R group, included were patients aged 18 years or older who had documentation of taking a GLP-1R agonist within 30 days prior to the procedure, adhered to standard fasting guidelines, and had clear documentation in the electronic medical record of gastric findings during endoscopy. This group was compared to a group of agematched controls. The primary outcome was the incidence of RGCs. Secondary outcome included a propensity-weighted analysis of the odds ratio of taking a GLP-1R and having RGCs.

RESULTS

Included were 940 patients who presented for UE between July 2022 and December 2023 (470 GLP-1R and 470 controls). RGCs were found in 59/470 (12.6 %) of GLP-1R patients compared to 26/470 (5.5 %) of controls (P < 0.001). Propensity-weighted analysis found a significant association between the use of GLP-1R and retained gastric contents [OR = 1.92, 95 % CI (1.04, 3.53)].

CONCLUSIONS

A higher incidence of RGCs was found in appropriately fasted patients on a GLP-1R agonist who presented for UE. After controlling for the differences between the two study groups, RGC's were correlated to GLP-1R agonist use. Anesthesiologists should remain vigilant regarding a potential increased risk of RGCs in appropriately fasted patients taking a GLP-1R agonist who present for surgery.

Study on the development of nanoparticles based on levan for oral insulin delivery

Oral insulin administration has gained attention as a promising alternative to injections. However, its effectiveness is hindered by the major challenge of degradation by gastric acid. Biopolymer-based nanocarriers have been explored as a solution to address this challenge. This study examines levan, a biopolymer derived fromBacillus licheniformisBK1, for its viability as a nanocarrier for insulin. Levan was modified through acetylation, and both levan (I-Lv) and its acetylated (I-ALv) form were utilized as carriers for insulin in a nanoparticles (NPs) delivery system. The resulting NPs were spherical, with diameters ranging from 250 to 500 nm and encapsulation efficiencies of 78.64% and 88.30%, respectively. The insulin release from I-Lv NPs in simulated gastric fluid exhibited a burst release pattern that was more rapid than that of I-ALv. To further evaluate, the conformational stability of insulin in NPs was analyzed by measuring the transition enthalpy of secondary and tertiary structures. The stability of the secondary structure was determined through alpha-helix content using circular dichroism, while the tertiary structure stability was evaluated via the fluorescence intensity of tryptophan residues. The result revealed that insulin in I-ALv NPs exhibited enhanced conformational stability compared to free-state (FS) insulin and I-Lv NP, with transition enthalpies of 0.91 ± 0.62 and 4.42 ± 0.46 kcal mol-1for secondary and tertiary structures, respectively. Moreover, preliminaryin vivostudies revealed that I-ALv had a significant impact compared to FS insulin and I-Lv, demonstrating reduction in blood glucose levels. These findings highlight the potential of I-ALv as a promising candidate for antidiabetic therapy and an efficient oral delivery system.

Stress hyperglycemia ratio and machine learning model for prediction of all-cause mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

The stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) was developed to reduce the effects of long-term chronic glycemic factors on stress hyperglycemia levels, which was associated with adverse clinical outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the relationship between the postoperative SHR index and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Data for this study were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Patients were categorized into four groups based on postoperative SHR index quartiles. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality, while the secondary outcomes included in-hospital, 90-day and 360-day all-cause mortality. The SHR index was analyzed using quartiles, and Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to compare outcomes across groups. Cox proportional hazards regression and restricted cubic splines (RCS) were employed to assess the relationship between the SHR index and the outcomes. LASSO regression was used for feature selection. Six machine learning algorithms were used to predict in-hospital all-cause mortality and were further extended to predict 360-day all-cause mortality. The SHapley Additive exPlanations method was used for visualizing model characteristics and individual case predictions.

RESULTS

A total of 3,848 participants were included in the study, with a mean age of 68 ± 12 years and female participants comprised 30.6% (1,179). Higher postoperative SHR index levels were associated with an increased risk of in-hospital, 90-day and 360-day all-cause mortality as shown by Kaplan-Meier curves (log-rank P < 0.05). Cox regression analysis revealed that the highest postoperative SHR quartile was associated with a significantly higher risk of mortality at these time points (P < 0.05). RCS analysis demonstrated nonlinear relationships between the postoperative SHR index and all-cause mortality (P for nonlinear < 0.05). The Naive Bayes model achieves the highest area under the curve (AUC) for predicting both in-hospital mortality (0.7936) and 360-day all-cause mortality (0.7410).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, higher postoperative SHR index levels were significantly associated with increased risk of in-hospital, 90-day and 360-day all-cause mortality. The SHR index may serve as a valid tool for assessing the severity after cardiac surgery and guiding treatment decisions.

Preoperative management of diabetes mellitus: A comparative narrative review of the recommendations of three professional organizations with Hamad Medical Corporation guidelines

Background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a prevalent condition that requires careful management in the perioperative setting to reduce surgical risks and optimize patient outcomes. The preoperative care of diabetic patients is complex because glucose control must be balanced with minimizing hypoglycemic or hyperglycemic events during surgery. A variety of diabetic medications such as insulin, dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, and biguanides such as metformin present unique challenges and considerations due to their different mechanisms, benefits, and potential adverse effects. In recent years, professional organizations have developed recommendations on the perioperative management of these therapies, although there remain some variations in guidelines related to medication cessation and dosage adjustments. Standardized protocols in preoperative DM care remain a topic of interest to ensure consistent and safe practices across healthcare settings, and further collaborative research efforts could provide clarity and consensus in managing this diverse patient population.

Objective

The objective of this study was to provide an overview of guidelines and practices to support healthcare professionals in delivering improved preoperative care for diabetic patients. This initiative aims to enhance surgical outcomes and minimize the occurrence of complications.

Methods

This is a comparative review that provides a systematic comparison of the similarities and differences in the guidelines and recommendations of three professional organizations along with Hamad Medical Corporation. All guidelines were from official websites including Hamad Medical Corporation.

Conclusion

Although the reviewed guidelines for the preoperative care of diabetes patients share some similarities, there are also a number of differences due to outdated data and expert opinions, and therefore differ in practices around the world. While the key elements are agreed upon, more research and global collaboration are needed to create consistent guidelines and improve patient outcomes.

Effects of Perioperative Glycemic Management Protocol on Glycemic Outcomes of Type 2 Diabetic Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to reveal the effects of a glycemic control protocol directed by nurses during the perioperative period on glycemic outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort study METHODS: The study was conducted at the Department of General Surgery of a research and training hospital in Turkey. The study included 47 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who underwent elective major abdominal surgery between September 2017 and December 2018. The number of patients in the intervention and the control groups was 22 and 25, respectively. Routine clinical glycemic control was implemented in the control group, whereas a glycemic management protocol developed by a multidisciplinary team was implemented in the intervention group. We collected data on the control group first, followed by the introduction of the glycemic management protocol to clinical staff and glycemia data collection using the new protocol. Blood glucose (BG) levels in patients and the factors that may affect BG were measured in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods. Data on glycemic control was also collected. Furthermore, we measured the satisfaction of the nurses implementing the glycemic management protocol.

FINDINGS

The rate of hyperglycemia in intensive care unit was 21% in the intervention group and 59% in the control group (P < .05). Time spent in the target BG range during insulin infusion was 76% in the intervention group and 35% in the control group (P < .05). The time required to achieve target BG range during insulin infusion was 6 hours for the intervention group and 15 hours for the control group, indicating that less time was required to achieve the target BG range in the intervention group (P < .05). Moreover, the insulin consumption rate in the intensive care unit was lower in the intervention group (P < .05). The satisfaction levels of the nurses that used the glycemic management protocol was 92.61 ± 7.93%.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this study showed that the implementation of a glycemic management protocol by nurses for patients undergoing major abdominal surgery decreases the rate of hyperglycemia, insulin consumption rate, and the time required to achieve the targeted BG range during the perioperative period. Therefore, it is recommended to use a glycemia management protocol to control glycemia in patients during the surgical process.

Preoperative Optimization Strategies in Elective Spine Surgery

» Although spine surgery is effective in reducing pain and improving functional status, it is associated with unacceptably high rates of complications, thus necessitating comprehensive preoperative patient optimization.» Numerous risk factors that can impact long-term surgical outcomes have been identified, including malnutrition, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, substance use, and more.» Preoperative screening and personalized, evidence-based interventions to manage medical comorbidities and optimize medications can enhance clinical outcomes and improve patient satisfaction following spine surgery.» Multidisciplinary team-based approaches, such as enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and multidisciplinary conferences, can further facilitate coordinated care from across specialties and reduce overall hospital length of stay.

Predicting postoperative pulmonary infection risk in patients with diabetes using machine learning

Background

Patients with diabetes face an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary infection (PPI). However, precise predictive models specific to this patient group are lacking.

Objective

To develop and validate a machine learning model for predicting PPI risk in patients with diabetes.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 1,269 patients with diabetes who underwent elective non-cardiac, non-neurological surgeries at our institution from January 2020 to December 2023. Predictive models were constructed using nine different machine learning algorithms. Feature selection was conducted using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) logistic regression. Model performance was assessed via the Area Under the Curve (AUC), precision, accuracy, specificity and F1-score.

Results

The Ada Boost classifier (ADA) model exhibited the best performance with an AUC of 0.901, Accuracy of 0.91, Precision of 0.82, specificity of 0.98, PPV of 0.82, and NPV of 0.82. LASSO feature selection identified six optimal predictive factors: postoperative transfer to the ICU, Age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) status, surgical department, and duration of surgery.

Conclusion

Our study developed a robust predictive model using six clinical features, offering a valuable tool for clinical decision-making and personalized prevention strategies for PPI in patients with diabetes.

Guidelines and consensus: Jejunoileostomy for diabetes mellitus-surgical norms and expert consensus (2023 version)

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a group of diseases characterized by high blood glucose caused by insufficient absolute or relative secretion of insulin. Once diagnosed, patients need long-term treatment with hypoglycemic drugs. Currently, the existing first-line hypoglycemic drugs do not provide effective treatment for DM and its complications. In the past, the first generation and the second generation of weight loss surgery, such as gastric bypass and sleeve gastric surgery, had strict body mass index requirements. Moreover, post-surgery, patients are prone to fluctuating hypoglycemia, gastroesophageal reflux, and dumping syndrome. Hence, the curative effect of this type of surgery was compromised to a certain extent. Jejunoileostomy is a third-generation surgery for patients with DM, which has been shown to improve glucose and lipid metabolism, without changing the original gastrointestinal tract structure. Different from previous weight loss surgeries, jejunoileostomy has been clinically observed to delay the development of DM-related complications. Additionally, the postoperative complications are mild and do not affect the patient's quality of life. Based on our clinical observations from multi-center large samples, our team developed a consensus on the operative period and perioperative management of jejunoileostomy as a reference for clinical researchers.

The Performance of Continuous Glucose Monitoring During the Intraoperative Period: A Scoping Review

Introduction: Perioperative dysglycemia is associated with negative surgical outcomes, including increased risk of infections and longer hospital stays. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides real-time glucose data, potentially improving glycemic control during surgery. However, the performance of CGM in the intraoperative environment has not been well established. This scoping review aimed to evaluate the performance of CGM systems during the intraoperative period, focusing on their technical reliability, accuracy, adverse device effects, and efficacy. Inclusion criteria: Studies that assessed intraoperative CGM performance, focusing on technical reliability, accuracy, adverse effects, or efficacy, were included. No restrictions were placed on the study design, surgical type, participant demographics, or publication date. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, covering publications up to 12 June 2024. Two independent reviewers screened and selected the studies for inclusion based on predefined eligibility criteria. Data extraction focused on the study characteristics, CGM performance, and outcomes. Results: Twenty-two studies were included, the majority of which were prospective cohort studies. CGM systems demonstrated a high technical reliability, with sensor survival rates above 80%. However, the accuracy varied, with some studies reporting mean or median absolute relative differences of over 15%. The adverse effects were minimal and mainly involved minor skin irritation. One randomized trial found no significant difference between CGM and point-of-care glucose monitoring for glycemic control. Conclusions: Although CGM has the potential to improve intraoperative glycemic management, its accuracy remains inconsistent. Future research should explore newer CGM technologies and assess their impact on surgical outcomes.

GLT-1 downregulation in hippocampal astrocytes induced by type 2 diabetes contributes to postoperative cognitive dysfunction in adult mice

AIMS

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is related to an increased risk of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), which may be caused by neuronal hyperexcitability. Astrocyte glutamate transporter 1 (GLT-1) plays a crucial role in regulating neuron excitability. We investigated if T2DM would magnify the increased neuronal excitability induced by anesthesia/surgery (A/S) and lead to POCD in young adult mice, and if so, determined whether these effects were associated with GLT-1 expression.

METHODS

T2DM model was induced by high fat diet (HFD) and injecting STZ. Then, we evaluated the spatial learning and memory of T2DM mice after A/S with the novel object recognition test (NORT) and object location test (OLT). Western blotting and immunofluorescence were used to analyze the expression levels of GLT-1 and neuronal excitability. Oxidative stress reaction and neuronal apoptosis were detected with SOD2 expression, MMP level, and Tunel staining. Hippocampal functional synaptic plasticity was assessed with long-term potentiation (LTP). In the intervention study, we overexpressed hippocampal astrocyte GLT-1 in GFAP-Cre mice. Besides, AAV-Camkllα-hM4Di-mCherry was injected to inhibit neuronal hyperexcitability in CA1 region.

RESULTS

Our study found T2DM but not A/S reduced GLT-1 expression in hippocampal astrocytes. Interestingly, GLT-1 deficiency alone couldn't lead to cognitive decline, but the downregulation of GLT-1 in T2DM mice obviously enhanced increased hippocampal glutamatergic neuron excitability induced by A/S. The hyperexcitability caused neuronal apoptosis and cognitive impairment. Overexpression of GLT-1 rescued postoperative cognitive dysfunction, glutamatergic neuron hyperexcitability, oxidative stress reaction, and apoptosis in hippocampus. Moreover, chemogenetic inhibition of hippocampal glutamatergic neurons reduced oxidative stress and apoptosis and alleviated postoperative cognitive dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the adult mice with type 2 diabetes are at an increased risk of developing POCD, perhaps due to the downregulation of GLT-1 in hippocampal astrocytes, which enhances increased glutamatergic neuron excitability induced by A/S and leads to oxidative stress reaction, and neuronal apoptosis.

Perioperative Management of Patients with Diabetes and Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities

BACKGROUND

Both diabetes and cancer are major global health issues that are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality. There is a high prevalence of diabetes among cancer patients, many of whom require a surgical procedure. This review focuses on the operative complications in patients with diabetes and cancer, and the perioperative management of diabetes in cancer patients.

METHODOLOGY

A literature search of articles in English-published between January 2010 and May 2024-was carried out using the databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. The search primarily focused on the operative complications in patients with diabetes and cancer, and perioperative management strategies.

RESULTS

The relationship between cancer and diabetes is complex; cancer patients have a high risk of developing diabetes, while diabetes is a risk factor for certain cancers. In addition, various cancer therapies can induce or worsen diabetes in susceptible patients. Many individuals with cancer and diabetes require surgery, and due to underlying diabetes, they may have elevated risks for operative complications. Optimal perioperative management for these patients includes managing perioperative glycemia and other comorbid illnesses, adjusting diabetic and cancer treatments, optimizing nutrition, minimizing the duration of fasting, supporting early mobilization, and providing patient education to enable self-management.

CONCLUSIONS

While evidence is limited, optimal perioperative management for patients with both diabetes and cancer is necessary in order to reduce surgical complications. Future studies are needed to develop evidence-informed perioperative strategies and improve outcomes for these patients.

Postoperative outcomes in patients with diabetes after enhanced recovery thoracoscopic lobectomy

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is considered a general surgical risk factor, but with few data from enhanced recovery (ERAS) otherwise known to improve outcome. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate postoperative outcomes of patients with diabetes who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy in an established ERAS setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed outcome data (hospital stay (LOS), readmissions, and mortality) from a prospective database with consecutive unselected ERAS VATS lobectomies from 2012 to 2022. Complete follow-up was secured by the registration system in East Denmark.

RESULTS

We included 3164 patients of which 323 had diabetes, including 186 treated with insulin and antidiabetic medicine, 35 with insulin only and 102 with antidiabetic medicine only. The median LOS was 3 days, stable over the study period. There were no differences in terms of LOS, postoperative complications, readmissions or 30 days alive and out of hospital. Patients with diabetes had significantly higher 30- and 90-day mortality rates compared to those without diabetes (p < .001), but also had higher preoperative comorbidity. Preoperative HbA1c levels did not correlate with postoperative outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In an ERAS setting, diabetes may not increase the risk for prolonged LOS, complications, and readmissions after VATS lobectomy, however with higher 30- and 90-day mortality probably related to more preoperative comorbidities.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a narrative review of clinical pharmacology and implications for peri-operative practice

BACKGROUND

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are used increasingly in the management of patients living with type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity. In patients using glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, a key concern in the peri-operative period is the increased risk of pulmonary aspiration due to delayed gastric emptying. This review provides an overview of the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and the risk of delayed gastric emptying and aspiration.

METHODS

We conducted searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases of articles published before January 2024 using the keywords and medical subject headings: incretins; glucagon-like peptide-1; GLP-1; glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists; GLP-1 RA; peri-operative period; perioperative; peri-operative; stomach emptying; gastric emptying; pulmonary aspiration; aspiration; food regurgitation; and regurgitation. The evidence was analysed, synthesised and reported narratively.

RESULTS

A total of 1213 articles were located after duplicates were removed. Two authors screened the titles and abstracts to identify those studies which assessed specifically the risk of delayed gastric emptying and pulmonary aspiration or regurgitation in the peri-operative period. We searched manually the reference lists of relevant studies to identify any additional case reports. Ten studies were identified. Available evidence was limited to case reports, case series and observational work.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to put forward definitive guidance regarding the ideal cessation period for glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists before elective surgery. Precautionary practice is required until more evidence becomes available. We suggest an individualised, evidence-based approach. In patients living with type 2 diabetes mellitus, there is concern that prolonged cessation before surgery will have a detrimental effect on peri-operative glycaemic control and discussion with an endocrinologist is advised. For patients taking glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight management, these drugs should be withheld for at least three half-lives before an elective surgical procedure.

The Relation of Preoperative HbA1c Level With Intraoperative and Postoperative Complications in Type-2 Diabetic Patients: An Observational Study

Background Perioperative dysglycemia increases morbidity and mortality, particularly among those with diabetes mellitus (DM), and elevated HbA1c levels, reflecting long-term blood glucose, are linked to poor healing and higher infection rates. This study investigates the link between preoperative HbA1c levels and perioperative outcomes in type-2 DM patients. Methodology This prospective observational study was conducted in India between January 2021 and April 2022. Sixty patients aged 18-60 with type-2 DM who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia (GA) were included; the American Society of Anesthesiologists class >III and patients with severe organ failures were excluded. Participants were divided into two groups: A (HbA1c ≤7.5%) and B (HbA1c >7.5%). Data on preoperative vitals, intraoperative hemodynamics, and postoperative complications were collected. SPSS v23 was used for data analysis; p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Results The mean age of the participants was 48.22 years; males comprised 58.3%. Group A had a higher proportion of oral hypoglycemic agents. Group B showed higher maximum mean blood pressure and intraoperative blood sugar levels at one hour. Postoperatively, Group B had higher glucose levels, more prevalent hyperglycemia, and higher preoperative and postoperative blood urea levels. No significant differences were found in postoperative outcomes like acute kidney injury (AKI), leukocytopenia, leucocytosis, fever, and intensive care admission. Surgical site infection (SSI) incidence was higher in group B, though not statistically significant. Group B had more extended hospital stays. Conclusion Preoperative HbA1c above 7.5% was associated with impaired perioperative glycemic control and higher dysglycemic episodes. Higher preoperative HbA1c was found to be linked to increased postoperative hyperglycemia, AKI, intensive care admissions, and more extended hospital stays, though not statistically significant. SSI incidence was higher, highlighting its importance over preoperative HbA1c.

Perioperative Immunosuppressive Factors during Cancer Surgery: An Updated Review

Surgical excision of the primary tumor represents the most frequent and curative procedure for solid malignancies. Compelling evidence suggests that, despite its beneficial effects, surgery may impair immunosurveillance by triggering an immunosuppressive inflammatory stress response and favor recurrence by stimulating minimal residual disease. In addition, many factors interfere with the immune effectors before and after cancer procedures, such as malnutrition, anemia, or subsequent transfusion. Thus, the perioperative period plays a key role in determining oncological outcomes and represents a short phase to circumvent anesthetic and surgical deleterious factors by supporting the immune system through the use of synergistic pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches. In line with this, accumulating studies indicate that anesthetic agents could drive both protumor or antitumor signaling pathways during or after cancer surgery. While preclinical investigations focusing on anesthetics' impact on the behavior of cancer cells are quite convincing, limited clinical trials studying the consequences on survival and recurrences remain inconclusive. Herein, we highlight the main factors occurring during the perioperative period of cancer surgery and their potential impact on immunomodulation and cancer progression. We also discuss patient management prior to and during surgery, taking into consideration the latest advances in the literature.

Perioperative management of patients on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To summarize the mechanism of action, clinical outcomes, and perioperative implications of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1-RAs). Specifically, this review focuses on the available literature surrounding complications (primarily, bronchoaspiration) and current recommendations, as well as knowledge gaps and future research directions on the perioperative management of GLP-1-RAs.

RECENT FINDINGS

GLP-1-RAs are known to delay gastric emptying. Accordingly, recent case reports and retrospective observational studies, while anecdotal, suggest that the perioperative use of GLP-1-RAs may increase the risk of bronchoaspiration despite fasting intervals that comply with (and often exceed) current guidelines. As a result, guidelines and safety bulletins have been published by several Anesthesiology Societies.

SUMMARY

While rapidly emerging evidence suggests that perioperative GLP-1-RAs use is associated with delayed gastric emptying and increased risk of bronchoaspiration (particularly in patients undergoing general anesthesia and/or deep sedation), high-quality studies are needed to provide definitive answers with respect to the safety and duration of preoperative drug cessation, and optimal fasting intervals according to the specific GLP-1-RA agent, the dose/duration of administration, and patient-specific factors. Meanwhile, clinicians must be aware of the potential risks associated with the perioperative use of GLP-1-RAs and follow the recommendations put forth by their respective Anesthesiology Societies.

EndoBridge 2023: highlights and pearls

EndoBridge 2023 took place on October 20-22, 2023, in Antalya, Turkey. Accredited by the European Council, the 3-day scientific program of the 11th Annual Meeting of EndoBridge included state-of-the-art lectures and interactive small group discussion sessions incorporating interesting and challenging clinical cases led by globally recognized leaders in the field and was well attended by a highly diverse audience. Following its established format over the years, the program provided a comprehensive update across all aspects of endocrinology and metabolism, including topics in pituitary, thyroid, bone, and adrenal disorders, neuroendocrine tumors, diabetes mellitus, obesity, nutrition, and lipid disorders. As usual, the meeting was held in English with simultaneous translation into Russian, Arabic, and Turkish. The abstracts of clinical cases presented by the delegates during oral and poster sessions have been published in JCEM Case Reports. Herein, we provide a paper on highlights and pearls of the meeting sessions covering a wide range of subjects, from thyroid nodule stratification to secondary osteoporosis and from glycemic challenges in post-bariatric surgery to male hypogonadism. This report emphasizes the latest developments in the field, along with clinical approaches to common endocrine issues. The 12th annual meeting of EndoBridge will be held on October 17-20, 2024 in Antalya, Turkey.

Protocol for a prospective multicentre cohort study to address the question whether diabetes and its management is still a risk factor in fast-track joint arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Perioperative glycaemic control is important. However, the complexity of guidelines for perioperative diabetes management is complicated due to different and novel antihyperglycaemic medications, limited procedure-specific data and lack of data from implemented fast-track regimens which otherwise are known to reduce morbidity and glucose homeostasis disturbances. Consequently, outcome in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) after surgery and the influence of perioperative diabetes management on postoperative recovery remains poorly understood.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A prospective observational multicentre study involving 8 arthroplasty centres across Denmark with a documented implemented fast-track programme (median length of hospitalisation (LOS) 1 day). We will collect detailed perioperative data including preoperative haemoglobin A1c and antidiabetic treatment in 1400 unselected consecutive patients with DM undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty from September 2022 to December 2025, enrolled after consent. Follow-up duration is 90 days after surgery. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with DM with LOS >4 days and 90-day readmission rate after fast-track total hip arthroplasty (THA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The secondary outcome is the association between perioperative diabetes treatment and LOS >2 days, 90-day readmission rate, other patient demographics and Comprehensive Complication Index for patients with DM after THA/TKA/UKA in a fast-track regimen.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study will follow the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and ICH-Good Clinical Practice guideline. Ethical approval was not necessary as this is a non-interventional observational study on current practice. The trial is registered in the Region of Southern Denmark and on ClinicalTrials.gov. The main results and all substudies of this trial will be published in peer-reviewed international medical journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05613439.

Perioperative use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for diabetes mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is an increasingly common long-term condition, and suboptimal perioperative glycaemic control can lead to postoperative harms. The advent of new antidiabetic drugs, in particular glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, has enabled perioperative continuation of these medicines, thus avoiding the harms of variable rate i.v. insulin infusions whilst providing glycaemic control. There are differences between medicines regulatory agencies and organisations on how these classes that are most often used to treat diabetes mellitus, (but also in the case of SGLT2 inhibitors chronic kidney disease and heart failure in those without diabetes) should be managed in the perioperative period. In this commentary, we argue that GLP-1 receptor agonists should continue during the perioperative period and that SGLT2 inhibitors should only be omitted the day prior to a planned procedure . The reasons for the differing advice advocated between regulatory agencies and what anaesthetic practitioners should do in the face of continuing uncertainty are discussed.

Preoperative considerations for patients with diabetes

INTRODUCTION

Patients undergoing surgery require a thorough assessment preoperatively. Hyperglycemia is associated with poor outcomes, and stability of glucose levels is an important factor in preoperative management. Diabetes presents a particular challenge since patients are often on multiple medications encompassing glycemic management and cardiovascular therapies.

AREAS COVERED

A PubMed search of published data and reviews on preoperative approaches in diabetes was conducted. Consensus opinion drives most of the guidelines and recommendations for management of diabetes in surgical patients. Pathophysiology is often complex with varying levels of glucose and surgical stress. Establishing well-controlled diabetes prior to surgical intervention should be standard practice in non-emergent procedures. We review the best practices for implementing preoperative assessment, with diabetes with a focus on diabetes medications.

EXPERT OPINION

The management of a patient preoperatively varies by region and country. Institutions differ in approaches to preoperative evaluation and the establishment of consistent approaches would provide a platform for monitoring patient outcomes. Multidisciplinary teams and pre-assessment clinics for preoperative evaluation can enhance patient care for those undergoing surgery.