Guideline for the use of immunobiologicals in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in Brazil

Management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in the Asia-Pacific region and Russia: Recommendations from an expert working group

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the nasal and paranasal tissues, characterized by the presence of bilateral nasal polyps. An expert panel of specialists from the Asian-Pacific region and Russia was convened to develop regional guidance on the management of CRSwNP through a consensus approach. The present article presents the chief observations and recommendations from this panel to provide guidance for clinicians in these areas. Etiology and pathogenetic mechanisms in CRSwNP are heterogeneous and complex. In many patients, CRSwNP is primarily driven by type 2 inflammation, although this may be less important in Asian populations. Frequent comorbidities include asthma and other inflammatory diseases such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)/aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease or atopic dermatitis. Clinical management of CRSwNP is challenging, and a multidisciplinary approach to evaluation and treatment is recommended. While many patients respond to medical treatment (topical irrigation and intranasal corticosteroids, and adjunctive short-term use of systemic corticosteroids), those with more severe/uncontrolled disease usually require endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), although outcomes can be unsatisfactory, requiring revision surgery. Biological therapies targeting underlying type 2 inflammation offer additional, effective treatment options in uncontrolled disease, either as an alternative to ESS or for those patients with persistent symptoms despite ESS.

Brazilian guideline for the use of immunobiologicals in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps ‒ 2024 update

INTRODUCTION

Biologics targeting type 2 inflammation have revolutionized the way we treat patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP). Particularly in severe and difficult-to-control cases, these drugs have provided a new reality for these patients, allowing for the effective and safe treatment of extensive diseases that were not completely managed with the typical strategy of surgery and topical medications.

OBJECTIVES

The experience achieved with the approval of these medications by ANVISA for use in CRSwNP and the knowledge obtained regarding outcomes, adverse effects, and the ideal patient profile prompted the update of the previously published guideline, with a detailed review of the most recent scientific literature, the personal experiences of experts, and the adaptation to the reality of the Brazilian healthcare system, both public and private.

RESULTS

We proposed a new eligibility criterion for biologics in patients with CRSwNP based on four pillars of indication: the impact of the disease on the patient's life, whether in the presence of specific symptoms or in overall quality of life; the extent of sinonasal disease; the presence of type 2 comorbidities, considering other associated diseases that may also benefit from anti-T2 biologics, and the presence of biomarkers to define type 2 inflammation, especially those associated with worse disease prognoses.

CONCLUSIONS

This innovative and pioneering method has two major advantages. First, it ensures a comprehensive evaluation of patients; second, it is flexible, as advancements in our understanding of the disease and changes in cost-effectiveness can be addressed by simply adjusting the required score for indication, without the need to modify the entire evaluation scheme.

Management of CRSwNP in Latin America: A multidisciplinary consensus from an expert working group

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is an inflammatory condition of the nasal and paranasal tissues, characterized by the presence of bilateral nasal polyps. While etiology and pathogenetic mechanisms are heterogeneous and complex, in most patients, disease is mediated predominantly through type 2 inflammatory processes. Clinical management is challenging, and a multidisciplinary approach is preferred. Principal treatment approaches are the use of local/systemic corticosteroids and sinonasal surgery, although outcomes can be unsatisfactory. Recent availability of biological therapies targeting underlying inflammatory processes can offer effective treatment options in uncontrolled disease. Specialist guidelines greatly assist clinical decision-making, although as these are chiefly written from a global/international perspective, they may not wholly accommodate disease patterns and clinical practice at a regional level. An expert panel of specialists from Latin America was convened to develop regional guidance on the management of CRSwNP through a consensus approach. The present article presents the chief observations and recommendations which can provide guidance for clinicians in the Latin American region.

Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) in the Pan-Arab Region: Consensus Recommendations from a Multidisciplinary Expert Working Group

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a chronic and often debilitating inflammatory condition of the nasal and paranasal tissues. An expert panel of specialists from the Gulf region (the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Oman and the United Arab Emirates) and from Egypt gathered to evaluate existing guidance and develop regional guidance on the management of CRSwNP through a consensus approach. The present article presents the main observations and recommendations from this panel. CRSwNP diagnosis requires the presence of bilateral, endoscopically visualized polyps in the middle meatus (via nasal endoscopy or CT). In most patients, CRSwNP is mediated through predominantly type 2 inflammatory processes and is often observed in patients with asthma and other allergic disease. While many patients respond to medical treatment (principally topical irrigation and intranasal corticosteroids, and adjunctive short-term use of systemic corticosteroids), clinical management of CRSwNP is challenging, and a multidisciplinary approach for complete evaluation and treatment is recommended. Patients with more severe/uncontrolled disease (despite adequate medical therapies) require a complete endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), although outcomes can be unsatisfactory, and further revision surgery is common. Biological therapies targeting underlying inflammatory processes offer additional, effective treatment options for those patients with persistent symptoms despite complete ESS, and also in those patients where surgery may be contraindicated.

An eosinophil peroxidase activity assay accurately predicts eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

A definitive diagnosis of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (eCRS) requires invasive surgical tissue sampling and histologic enumeration of intact eosinophils. Eosinophil peroxidase (EPX) is an accurate biomarker of sinonasal tissue eosinophilia in CRS regardless of polyp status. A less invasive and rapid method that accurately identifies tissue eosinophilia would be of great benefit to patients.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate a new clinical tool that uses a nasal swab and colorimetric EPX activity assay to predict a diagnosis of eCRS.

METHODS

A prospective, observational cohort study was conducted using nasal swabs and sinonasal tissue biopsies obtained from patients with CRS electing endoscopic sinus surgery. Patients were classified as non-eCRS (n = 19) and eCRS (n = 35) on the basis of pathologically determined eosinophil counts of less than 10 or greater than or equal to 10 eosinophils/HPF, respectively. Swab-deposited EPX activity was measured and compared with tissue eosinophil counts, EPX levels, and CRS-specific disease metrics.

RESULTS

EPX activity was significantly increased in patients with eCRS than in patients without eCRS (P < .0001). With a relative absorbance unit cutoff value of greater than or equal to 0.80, the assay demonstrated high sensitivity (85.7%) and moderate specificity (79.0%) for confirming eCRS. Spearman correlations between EPX activity and tissue eosinophil counts (rs = 0.424), EPX levels (rs = 0.503), and Lund-Kennedy endoscopy scores (rs = 0.440) in eCRS were significant (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

This investigation evaluates a nasal swab sampling method and EPX activity assay that accurately confirms eCRS. This method could potentially address the unmet need to identify sinonasal tissue eosinophilia at the point-of-care, as well as to longitudinally monitor eosinophil activity and treatment response.

Comparison of guidelines for prescription and follow-up of biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

PURPOSE

To compare international and regional guidelines for prescription and monitoring of response to biologics in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).

METHODS

A literature review was performed to identify publications reporting indications for biologic therapy in CRSwNP. A full-text reading identified specific issues for comparison: prior surgery, evidence of type 2 inflammation (T2I), smell function, comorbidities, use of systemic corticosteroids, impact on quality of life, and endoscopic and CT findings were compared for the prescription, while the monitoring of the treatment was described in relation to timing, classification of response and criteria for withdrawal.

RESULTS

Ten publications were found. Prior surgery was strictly necessary in five guidelines, while in all the remaining it was variably recommended. A confirmation of T2I was considered necessary in one publication, unnecessary in two, and recommended or constituted only one of the factors to consider in seven. All the other issues analyzed were variably considered. Reevaluation was suggested at 4-6 months and 1 year, mostly assessing improvement in the same criteria used for prescription.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of subjective and objective findings is used for the identification of patients with CRSwNP who are indicated for biologic therapy. Major debate has developed on the need for previous surgery, which is generally recommended, or strictly necessary for some authors. Confirmation of T2I is generally suggested, but compulsory only in a minority of guidelines. Smell function, use of systemic corticosteroids, and the impact on quality of life are the other factors most frequently considered.

Three-dimensional cell culture for the study of nasal polyps

OBJECTIVES

Three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures have many applications such as stem cell biology research, new drug discovery, cancer, and Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP). This disease is characterized by a significant impact on quality of life and productivity. The diversity of factors that act in the progression of CRSwNP point to the creation of a cell culture model that allows the integration of different cell types with extracellular matrix. This work aimed to create a cell culture model in 3 dimensions (spheroids) for the study of Nasal Polyposis.

METHODS

Nasal polyp tissue from patients diagnosed with CRSwNP was mechanically dissociated using tweezers and a scalpel and the solution containing cells and small aggregates of nasal polyps was transferred to a Petri dish containing 5 mL of culture medium at the concentration of 10⁶ cells/mL.

RESULTS

The spheroids were cultivated for 20 days, fixed and analyzed using confocal microscopy. In a 3D culture environment, the spheroids were formed both by clustering cells and from small tissue fragments. In the cultures analyzed, the ciliary beat was present from the dissociation of the cells up to 20 days in culture.

CONCLUSION

Our findings also point to these characteristics showing the environment generated in our study, the cells remained differentiated for a longer time and with ciliary beating. Thus, this work shows that nasal polyp-derived cells can be maintained in a 3D environment, enabling better strategies for understanding CRSwNP in situations similar to those found in vivo.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Laboratory studies.