Biphasic fracture risk in diabetes: a population-based study

Bone metabolism in diabetes: a clinician's guide to understanding the bone-glucose interplay

Skeletal fragility is an increasingly recognised, but poorly understood, complication of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Fracture risk varies according to skeletal site and diabetes-related characteristics. Post-fracture outcomes, including mortality risk, are worse in those with diabetes, placing these people at significant risk. Each fracture therefore represents a sentinel event that warrants targeted management. However, diabetes is a very heterogeneous condition with complex interactions between multiple co-existing, and highly correlated, factors that preclude a clear assessment of the independent clinical markers and pathophysiological drivers for diabetic osteopathy. Additionally, fracture risk calculators and routinely used clinical bone measurements generally underestimate fracture risk in people with diabetes. In the absence of dedicated prospective studies including detailed bone and metabolic characteristics, optimal management centres around selecting treatments that minimise skeletal and metabolic harm. This review summarises the clinical landscape of diabetic osteopathy and outlines the interplay between metabolic and skeletal health. The underlying pathophysiology of skeletal fragility in diabetes and a rationale for considering a diabetes-based paradigm in assessing and managing diabetic bone disease will be discussed.

Effect of in vitro ribosylation on the dynamic fracture behavior of mature bovine cortical bone

In this study, the fracture behavior of ribosylated bovine cortical bone is investigated under loading conditions simulating a fall event. Single edge notched specimens, separated into a control group (n = 11) and a ribosylated group (n = 8), were extracted from the mid-diaphysis of a single bovine femur harvested from a mature cow. A seven-day ribosylation process results in the accumulation of Advanced-Glycation End Products (AGEs) cross-links and AGE adducts. Specimens were subjected to symmetric three point bending (opening mode) and an impact velocity of 1.6 m/s using a drop tower. Near-crack displacement fields up to fracture initiation are determined from high-speed images post-processed using digital image correlation. A constrained over-deterministic least squares regression and orthotropic material linear elastic fracture mechanics theory are used to extract the in-plane critical stress intensity factors at fracture initiation (i.e., fracture initiation toughness values). Statistically significant differences were not observed when comparing the in-plane fracture initiation toughness values (p≥0.96) or energy release rate (p=0.90) between the control and seven-day ribosylated groups. The intrinsic variability of bone may require high sample numbers in order to achieve an adequately powered experiment when assessing dynamic fracture behavior. While there are no detectable differences due to the ribosylation treatment investigated, this is likely due to the limited sample sizes utilized.

Role of Advanced Glycation End-Products and Oxidative Stress in Type-2-Diabetes-Induced Bone Fragility and Implications on Fracture Risk Stratification

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and osteoporosis (OP) are major causes of morbidity and mortality that have arelevant health and economic burden. Recent epidemiological evidence suggests that both of these disorders are often associated with each other and that T2D patients have an increased risk of fracture, making bone an additional target of diabetes. As occurs for other diabetic complications, the increased accumulation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) and oxidative stress represent the major mechanisms explaining bone fragility in T2D. Both of these conditions directly and indirectly (through the promotion of microvascular complications) impair the structural ductility of bone and negatively affect bone turnover, leading to impaired bone quality, rather than decreased bone density. This makes diabetes-induced bone fragility remarkably different from other forms of OP and represents a major challenge for fracture risk stratification, since either the measurement of BMD or the use of common diagnostic algorithms for OP have a poor predictive value. We review and discuss the role of AGEs and oxidative stress on the pathophysiology of bone fragility in T2D, providing some indications on how to improve fracture risk prediction in T2D patients.

Causal relationship between Type 1 diabetes and osteoporosis and fracture occurrence: a two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis

We used two-sample Mendelian Randomization to reveal causal estimates of type 1 diabetes and bone. Type 1 diabetes was found to be a risk factor for bone metabolic health, although there was no clear evidence to support a genetic association between type 1 diabetes and osteoporosis and fracture risk.

INTRODUCTION

Based on the random assignment of gametes at conception, Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis simulates randomized controlled trials in an observational setting. Therefore, we used MR to assess the association causality of type 1 diabetes (T1D) with fractures and osteoporosis.

METHODS

From a genome-wide association meta-analysis, independent single nucleotide polymorphisms closely associated with T1D were selected as instrumental variables. Data on fracture and osteoporosis were obtained from the FinnGen Consortium. We performed a two-sample MR analysis, using inverse-variance weighted (IVW) as the primary analysis method, to assess possible causal associations between T1D and bone risk. The results were verified by MR-Egger regression and median weighted method (WME). MR-PRESSO and MR-Egger intercepts were used to evaluate the horizontal pleiotropy of instrumental variables, and the Q-test and "leave-one-out" methods were used to test the heterogeneity of MR results.

RESULTS

IVW (OR=1.040, 95% CI=0.974-1.109, P=0.238), MR-Egger regression (OR=1.077, 95% CI=0.921-1.260, P=0.372) and WME (OR=1.021, 95% CI=0.935-1.114, P=0.643) all showed that there was no causal relationship between T1D and osteoporosis, but the direction was consistent. The indicative significance of IVW results in T1D and forearm fractures (OR=1.062, 95% CI=1.010-1.117, P=0.020), but the results are not robust enough. There was no causal effect in femur, lumbar and pelvis, or shoulder and upper arm fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

After MR analysis, although T1D may be a risk factor for bone health, we do not have sufficient evidence to support a causal effect of T1D on osteoporosis and fractures at a genetically predicted level. More cases need to be included for analysis.

Evaluation of Usage of a Fracture Risk Assessment by FRAX Tool in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

BACKGROUND

Fragility fractures are increasingly recognized as a complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The FRAX-Port® is a calculation tool that assesses the 10-year risk of either major and hip fracture, integrating several clinical risk factors, including T2DM. We aimed to evaluate the fracture risk in adults with T2DM and determine the rate of patients at high risk for fracture under anti-osteoporotic therapy.

METHODS

We developed a cross-sectional study, including a convenience sample of adults with T2DM, followed in our tertiary center between 2019 and 2022. Fracture risk was evaluated according to FRAX-Port®.

RESULTS

One hundred adults were included, 54% male, with a mean age of 68.4±9.2 years. Respecting fracture risk factors, 17% had a previous fragility fracture, 12% had a history of hip fracture in their parents, 9% had active alcohol consumption, and 4% had active smoking. Additionally, 17% presented secondary osteoporosis, being the most frequent cause of systemic corticosteroid exposure (10%). Regarding diabetes-specific risk factors, 94% had a diabetes duration longer than five years; HbA1c greater than 7% in 70%; 42% had diabetic retinopathy, 33% had diabetic chronic kidney disease, 18% had peripheral neuropathy, and 7% had autonomic neuropathy; 83% were on insulin, 2% on canagliflozin and 1% on pioglitazone. According to the FRAX-Port®, the median probability of major fracture was 6.8% (IQR 6.9), and hip fracture was 2.4% (IQR 3.9). Fracture risk was high, intermediate, and low at 41%, 15%, and 44%, respectively. Lastly, 56% of participants should undergo bone densitometry and 45% had a formal recommendation to begin an anti-osteoporotic treatment. However, only 6% were under anti-osteoporotic therapy: bisphosphonates (5%) and denosumab (1%).

CONCLUSIONS

More than a third of T2DM patients evaluated had a high fracture risk. We found that FRAX-Port® is an easy-to-apply tool, which helps in the decision to perform densitometry or to institute anti-osteoporotic therapy. Given the increasing prevalence of T2DM and the associated risk of falls, this study highlights the need to recognize the fracture risk in these patients, usually a forgotten complication during the screening of risk factors for adverse events in adults with T2DM.

Contributors to impaired bone health in type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with numerous complications, including increased risk of fragility fractures, despite seemingly protective factors [e.g., normal bone mineral density and increased body mass index(BMI)]. However, fracture risk in T2D is underestimated by current fracture risk calculators. Importantly, post-fracture mortality is worse in T2D following any fracture, highlighting the importance of identifying high-risk patients that may benefit from targeted management. Several diabetes-related factors are associated with increased fracture risk, including exogenous insulin therapy, vascular complications, and poor glycaemic control, although detailed comprehensive studies to identify the independent contributions of these factors are lacking. The underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are complex and multifactorial, with different factors contributing during the course of T2D disease. These include obesity, hyperinsulinaemia, hyperglycaemia, accumulation of advanced glycation end products, and vascular supply affecting bone-cell function and survival and bone-matrix composition. This review summarises the current understanding of the contributors to impaired bone health in T2D, and proposes an updated approach to managing these patients.

Risk of fracture in adults with type 2 diabetes in Sweden: A national cohort study

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is considered a risk factor for fracture but the evidence regarding the impact of T2DM on fracture risk is conflicting. The objective of the study was to determine if patients with T2DM have increased fracture risk and if T2DM-related risk factors could be identified.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

In this national cohort study in Sweden, we investigated the risk of fracture in 580,127 T2DM patients, identified through the national diabetes register including from both primary care and hospitals, and an equal number of population-based controls without diabetes matched for age, sex, and county from 2007 to 2017. The mean age at entry was 66.7 years and 43.6% were women. During a median follow-up time of 6.6 (interquartile range (IQR) 3.1 to 9.8) years, patients with T2DM had a marginally but significantly increased risk of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) (hazard ratio (HR) 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00 to 1.03)) and hip fracture (HR 1.06 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.08)) compared to controls, associations that were only minimally affected (HR 1.05 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.06) and HR 1.11 (95% CI 1.09 to 1.14), respectively) by multivariable adjustment (age, sex, marital status, and an additional 20 variables related to general morbidity, cardiovascular status, risk of falls, and fracture). In a multivariable-adjusted Cox model, the proportion of the risk for all fracture outcomes (Heller's R2) explained by T2DM was below 0.1%. Among the T2DM patients, important risk factors for fracture were a low BMI (<25 kg/m2), long diabetes duration (≥15 years), insulin treatment, and low physical activity. In total, 55% of the T2DM patients had none of these risk factors and a significantly lower fracture risk than their respective controls. The relatively short mean duration of T2DM and lack of bone density data, constitute limitations of the analysis.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we observed only a marginally increased fracture risk in T2DM, a condition that explained less than 0.1% of the fracture risk. Consideration of the herein identified T2DM-related risk factors could be used to stratify T2DM patients according to fracture risk.

The incidence of fractures at various sites in newly treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Purpose

In this descriptive study, we examined the incidence of fractures in patients with newly treated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) compared to matched reference population.

Methods

Participants from the UK Clinical Practice research datalink (CPRD) GOLD (1987-2017), aged ≥30 years, with a T2D diagnosis code and a first prescription for a non-insulin anti-diabetic drug (n = 124,328) were included. Cases with T2D were matched by year of birth, sex and practice to a reference population (n = 124,328), the mean follow-up was 7.7 years. Crude fracture incidence rates (IRs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated. Analyses were stratified by fracture site and sex and additionally adjusted for BMI, smoking status, alcohol use and history of any fracture at index date.

Results

The IR of all fractures and major osteoporotic fractures was lower in T2D compared to the reference population (IRR 0.97; 95%CI 0.94-0.99). The IRs were lower for clavicle (IRR 0.67; 0.56-0.80), radius/ulna (IRR 0.81; 0.75-0.86) and vertebral fractures (0.83; 0.75-0.92) and higher for ankle (IRR 1.16; 95%CI 1.06-1.28), foot (1.11; 1.01-1.22), tibia/fibula (1.17; 1.03-1.32) and humerus fractures (1.11; 1.03-1.20). Differences in IRs at various fracture sites between T2D and the reference population were more pronounced in women than in men. In contrast, BMI adjusted IRs for all fractures (IRR 1.07; 1.04-1.10) and most individual fracture sites were significantly higher in T2D, especially in women.

Conclusion

The crude incidence of all fractures was marginally lower in patients with newly treated T2D compared to the matched reference population but differed according to fracture site, especially in women. BMI adjusted analyses resulted in higher incidence rates in T2D at almost all fracture sites compared to crude incidence rates and this was more pronounced in women than in men. This implies that BMI may have a protective impact on the crude incidence of fractures, especially in women with newly treated T2D.

Effects of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Osteoclast Differentiation, Activity, and Cortical Bone Formation in POSTmenopausal MRONJ Patients

Osteoporosis is a common metabolic bone disease in patients with diabetes, which can develop simultaneously with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in postmenopausal women. Bisphosphonate (BP) is administered to patients with both conditions and may cause medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). It affects the differentiation and function of osteoclasts as well as the thickness of the cortical bone through bone mineralization. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effects of T2D on osteoclast differentiation and activity as well as cortical bone formation in postmenopausal patients with MRONJ. Tissue samples were collected from 10 patients diagnosed with T2D and stage III MRONJ in the experimental group and from 10 patients without T2D in the control group. A histological examination was conducted, and the expression of dendritic cell-specific transmembrane protein (DC-STAMP) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) was assessed. Cortical bone formation was analyzed using CBCT images. The number of TRAP-positive osteoclasts and DC-STAMP-positive mononuclear cells was significantly less in the experimental group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the thickness and ratio of cortical bone were significantly greater in the experimental group (p < 0.05). In conclusion, T2D decreased the differentiation and function of osteoclasts and increased cortical bone formation in postmenopausal patients with MRONJ.

Bone fragility in diabetes: novel concepts and clinical implications

Increased fracture risk represents an emerging and severe complication of diabetes. The resulting prolonged immobility and hospitalisations can lead to substantial morbidity and mortality. In type 1 diabetes, bone mass and bone strength are reduced, resulting in up to a five-times greater risk of fractures throughout life. In type 2 diabetes, fracture risk is increased despite a normal bone mass. Conventional dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry might underestimate fracture risk, but can be improved by applying specific adjustments. Bone fragility in diabetes can result from cellular abnormalities, matrix interactions, immune and vascular changes, and musculoskeletal maladaptation to chronic hyperglycaemia. This Review summarises how the bone microenvironment responds to type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and the mechanisms underlying fragility fractures. We describe the value of novel imaging technologies and the clinical utility of biomarkers, and discuss current and future therapeutic approaches that protect bone health in people with diabetes.

Associations of Obesity Indices with Bone Mineral Densities and Risk of Osteoporosis Stratified Across Diabetic Vascular Disease in T2DM Patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate associations of obesity indices with bone mineral densities (BMD) and risk of osteoporosis in T2DM patients totally and stratified across presence of any diabetic cardiovascular complications.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analyses of baseline information on a cohort of 250 T2DM patients were conducted in Xiamen, China. Obesity indices included body weight, height, body mass index (BMI), waist and waist hip ratio (WHR). BMD was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at three different sites, and osteoporosis was defined based on the minimum T-scores of BMD. Presence of any diabetic vascular complications was confirmed by checking their medical records histories.

RESULTS

Among the 250 T2DM patients, 50 (20.0%) were defined as osteoporosis. Multivariable linear regression and multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that igher obesity indices, including body weight, BMI and waist, but neither body height nor waist hip ratio, were positively associated with the minimum T-scores of BMD and had significantly decreased risk of osteoporosis. Stratified analyses across presence of any of diabetic vascular complications showed similar results for those with any of diabetic vascular complications, while no significant association between obesity indices and minimum T-scores of BMD was found for those without. Postmenopausal women (vs men) and ever drinking were significantly associated with increased risk of osteoporosis, and the adjusted odds ratios (95% CIs) were 5.165 (1.762-15.138, p = 0.003) and 3.789 (1.087-13.214, p = 0.037), respectively. None of metabolic profiles, including systolic and diastolic blood pressure, triglyceride, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HbA1c and blood uric acid, was significantly associated with either minimum T-scores of BMD or risk of osteoporosis.

CONCLUSION

Associations of obesity indices with either BMD or risk of osteoporosis in T2DM patients varied by presence of any diabetic vascular complication and should be not interpreted as causal without considering the often-unmeasured effect modification by health status.

Differential risk of fracture attributable to type 2 diabetes mellitus according to skeletal site

BACKGROUND

Impaired bone quality, especially related to accumulation of advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) and higher incidence of falls contribute substantially to a higher risk of fracture associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). These factors may predispose to fractures more at skeletal sites where impaired bone toughness and falls play a larger pathogenic role (such as hip fractures) compared to skeletal sites where they are less important (such as vertebral fractures).

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the associations of T2DM with prevalent and incident vertebral fractures are as strong as they are for hip and other non-vertebral fractures.

METHODS

Amongst 80,238 individuals in the Manitoba Bone Density Program database (mean [SD] age 64.4 [11.1] years, 89.8% female, 8676 with diagnosed T2DM) with a baseline BMD test (1996-2016), we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for incident clinical fracture at different skeletal sites in those with compared to those without T2DM using Cox proportional hazards models over a mean (SD) 9.0 (5.0) year follow-up period. We also estimated odds ratios for prevalent vertebral fracture on VFA images amongst 9594 individuals (mean [SD] 76 [6.8] years, 1185 with T2DM diagnosis at time of DXA-VFA) and for prior clinical fractures at different skeletal sites using logistic regression models.

RESULTS

After multivariable adjustment, T2DM was associated with incident hip (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.44 to 1.85) and proximal humerus fractures (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.39 to 1.83), but was not associated with incident forearm fracture (HR 1.00, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.17) and only weakly with incident clinical vertebral fracture (HR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.33). Similarly, T2DM was associated with prior hip (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.61) and prior proximal humerus fracture (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.68) but not with prior forearm (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.06) or prevalent vertebral fracture on VFA images (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.08).

CONCLUSION

T2DM is a stronger risk factor for hip and proximal humerus fractures than for vertebral and wrist fractures. Further research is warranted to determine if the known differences in falls and/or bone quality between T2DM and age-related osteoporosis account for these differential associations.

Fracture Patterns in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review of Recent Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this narrative review, we have summarized the literature on fracture risk in T1DM and T2DM with a special focus on fracture site, time patterns, glucose-lowering drugs, and micro- and macrovascular complications.

RECENT FINDINGS

T1DM and T2DM were associated with an overall increased fracture risk, with preferent locations at the hip, vertebrae, humerus, and ankle in T1DM and at the hip, vertebrae, and likely humerus, distal forearm, and foot in T2DM. Fracture risk was higher with longer diabetes duration and the presence of micro- and macrovascular complications. In T2DM, fracture risk was higher with use of insulin, sulfonylurea, and thiazolidinediones and lower with metformin use. The increased fracture risk in T1DM and T2DM concerns specific fracture sites, and is higher in subjects with longer diabetes duration, vascular complications, and in T2DM with the use of specific glucose-lowering medication.

Management of bone fragility in type 2 diabetes: Perspective from an interdisciplinary expert panel

AIM

Bone fragility is increasingly recognized as a relevant complication of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and diabetic patients with fragility fractures have higher mortality rates than non diabetic individuals or diabetic patients without fractures. However, current diagnostic approaches for fracture risk stratification, such as bone mineral density measurement or the use of risk assessment algorithms, largely underestimate fracture risk in T2D patients. A multidisciplinary expert panel was established in order to in order to formulate clinical consensus recommendations on bone health assessment and management of fracture risk in patients with T2D.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The following key questions were addressed: a) which are the risk factors for bone fragility in T2D?, b) which diagnostic procedures can be currently used to stratify fracture risk in T2D patients?, c) which are the effects of antidiabetic treatments on bone?, and d) how to prevent and treat bone fragility in T2D patients? Based on the available data members of this panel suggest that the stratification of fracture risk in patients with diabetes should firstly rely on the presence of a previous fragility fracture and on the individual risk profile, with the inclusion of T2D-specific risk factors (namely T2D duration above 10 yrs, presence of chronic T2D complications, use of insulin or thiazolidinediones and persistent HbA1c levels above 8% for at least 1 year). Two independent diagnostic approaches were then suggested in the presence or the absence of a prevalent fragility fracture, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical trials in T2D patients at risk for fragility fractures are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of available antiresorptive and anabolic agents in this specific setting.

Bone fragility in patients with diabetes mellitus: A consensus statement from the working group of the Italian Diabetes Society (SID), Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE), Italian Society of Gerontology and Geriatrics (SIGG), Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (SIOT)

Bone fragility is one of the possible complications of diabetes, either type 1 (T1D) or type 2 (T2D). Bone fragility can affect patients of different age and with different disease severity depending on type of diabetes, disease duration and the presence of other complications. Fracture risk assessment should be started at different stages in the natural history of the disease depending on the type of diabetes and other risk factors. The risk of fracture in T1D is higher than in T2D, imposing a much earlier screening and therapeutic intervention that should also take into account a patient's life expectancy, diabetes complications etc. The therapeutic armamentarium for T2D has been enriched with drugs that may influence bone metabolism, and clinicians should be aware of these effects. Considering the complexity of diabetes and osteoporosis and the range of variables that influence treatment choices in a given individual, the Working Group on bone fragility in patients with diabetes mellitus has identified and issued recommendations based on the variables that should guide screening of bone fragility and management of diabetes and bone fragility: (A)ge, (B)MD, (C)omplications, (D)uration of disease, & (F)ractures (ABCD&F). Consideration of these parameters may help clinicians identify the best time for screening, the appropriate glycaemic target and anti-osteoporosis drug for patients with diabetes at risk of or with bone fragility.

Type 2 diabetes and bone fragility- An under-recognized association

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Diabetes and osteoporosis are common chronic disorders with growing prevalence in the aging population. Skeletal fragility secondary to diabetes increases the risk of fractures and is underestimated by currently available diagnostic tools like fracture risk assessment (FRAX) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). In this narrative review we describe the relationship and pathophysiology of skeletal fragility and fractures in Type 2 diabetes (T2DM), effect of glucose lowering medications on bone metabolism and the approach to diagnosing and managing osteoporosis and bone fragility in people with diabetes (PWD).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted on PubMed for articles in English that focused on T2DM and osteoporosis or bone/skeletal fragility. Articles considered to be of direct clinical relevance to physicians practicing diabetes were included.

RESULTS

T2DM is associated with skeletal fragility secondary to compromised bone remodeling and bone turnover. Long duration, poor glycemic control, presence of chronic complications, impaired muscle function, and anti-diabetic medications like thiazolidinediones (TZD) are risk factors for fractures among PWD. Conventional diagnostic tools like DXA and FRAX tool underestimate fracture risk in diabetes. Presence of diabetes does not alter response to anti-osteoporotic treatment in post-menopausal women.

CONCLUSION

Estimation of fragility fracture risk should be included in standard of care for T2DM along with screening for traditional complications. Physicians should proactively screen for and manage osteoporosis in people with diabetes. It is important to consider effects on bone health when selecting glucose lowering agents in people at risk for fragility fractures.

Association Between Parental Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Diagnosis and Major Osteoporotic Fracture Risk in Adult Offspring: A Population-Based Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Previous research suggests an intergenerational influence of diabetes on bone health. We examined the association between parental diabetes and major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) risk in offspring.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study used de-identified administrative health data from Manitoba, Canada, which capture population-level records of hospitalizations, physician visits and drug dispensations. The cohort included individuals 40⁺ years with at least 1 parent identified in the data between 1997 and 2015. The exposure was parental diagnosis of diabetes since 1970; the outcome was offspring incident MOF diagnosis of the hip, forearm, spine or humerus. Both measures were identified from hospital and physician visit records using validated case definitions. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models tested the association of parental diabetes and offspring MOF risk.

RESULTS

The cohort included 279,085 offspring; 48.5% were females and 86.8% were ≤44 years of age. Both parents were identified for 89.4% of the cohort; 36.7% had a parental diabetes diagnosis. During a median follow up of 12.0 (interquartile range, 6.0 to 18.0) years, 8,762 offspring had a MOF diagnosis. After adjusting for fracture risk factors, parental diabetes diagnosis was not associated with MOF risk, whether diagnosed in fathers (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97 to 1.08), mothers (aHR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.07) or both parents (aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.11). The results remained consistent in a stratified analysis by offspring sex, secondary analysis based on MOF site and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate parental diabetes is not associated with offspring MOF risk.

The risk of hip fractures in individuals over 50 years old with prediabetes and type 2 diabetes - A longitudinal nationwide population-based study

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to investigate the association between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hip fractures using a large-scale nationwide population-based cohort that is representative of the Republic of Korea. We determined the risks of hip fractures in individuals with prediabetes and T2DM with different diabetes durations, and compared them with the risks of hip fractures in individuals without T2DM.

METHODS

A total of 5,761,785 subjects over 50 years old who underwent the National Health Insurance Service medical checkup in 2009-2010 were included. Subjects were classified into 5 groups based on the diabetes status; Normal, Prediabetes, Newly-diagnosed T2DM, T2DM less than 5 years, and T2DM more than 5 years. They were followed from the date of the medical checkup to the end of 2016. The endpoint was a new development of hip fracture during follow-up. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of hip fractures for each group were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression models after adjusting for age, sex, smoking, alcohol drinking, regular exercise, body mass index, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and chronic kidney disease.

RESULTS

The HRs of hip fractures were 1 in the Normal group, 1.032 (95% CI: 1.009, 1.056) in the Prediabetes group, 1.168 (95% CI: 1.113, 1.225) in the Newly-diagnosed T2DM2, 1.543 (95% CI: 1.495, 1.592) in the T2DM less than 5 years and 2.105 (95% CI: 2.054, 2.157) in the T2DM more than 5 years. The secular trend of the HRs of hip fractures according to the duration of T2DM was statistically significant (P < .001). Subgroup analyses also showed the same increasing pattern of the HRs of hip fractures according to the duration of T2DM in both sexes and all age groups (50-64 years, 65-74 years, over 75 years).

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, this large-scale, retrospective, longitudinal, nationwide population-based cohort study of 5,761,785 subjects demonstrated that the risks of hip fractures started to increase in prediabetes and was associated linearly with the duration of T2DM. The secular trend of risks of hip fractures according to the duration of T2DM was consistent in both sexes and all age groups.

Incident Type 2 Diabetes and Risk of Fracture: A Comparative Cohort Analysis Using U.K. Primary Care Records

OBJECTIVE

To estimate risk of fracture in men and women with recent diagnosis of type 2 diabetes compared with individuals without diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this cohort study, we used routinely collected U.K. primary care data from The Health Improvement Network. In adults (>35 years) diagnosed with type 2 diabetes between 2004 and 2013, fractures sustained until 2019 were identified and compared with fractures sustained in individuals without diabetes. Multivariable models estimated time to first fracture following diagnosis of diabetes. Annual prevalence rates included at least one fracture in a given year.

RESULTS

Among 174,244 individuals with incident type 2 diabetes and 747,290 without diabetes, there was no increased risk of fracture among males with diabetes (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.97 [95% CI 0.94, 1.00]) and a small reduced risk among females (aHR 0.94 [95% CI 0.92, 0.96]). In those aged ≥85 years, those in the diabetes cohort were at significantly lower risk of incident fracture (males: aHR 0.85 [95% CI 0.71, 1.00]; females: aHR 0.85 [95% CI 0.78, 0.94]). For those in the most deprived areas, aHRs were 0.90 (95% CI 0.83, 0.98) for males and 0.91 (95% CI 0.85, 0.97) for females. Annual fracture prevalence rates, by sex, were similar for those with and without type 2 diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence to suggest a higher risk of fracture following diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. After a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, individuals should be encouraged to make positive lifestyle changes, including undertaking weight-bearing physical activities that improve bone health.

Diabetes mellitus and risk of low-energy fracture: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Low-energy fracture risk is significantly increased in diabetes mellitus, the purpose of this article is to systematically evaluate the association between diabetes mellitus and risk for low-energy fracture.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search of Medline, Embase, Science Citation Index, Wiley Online Library database through January 2019. Pooled relative risks (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated with random-effects model to assess the strength of association.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria, which included 3,123,382 participants. The pooled RR of any fracture in people with diabetes mellitus was 1.5 (95% CI 1.3-1.8; P < 0.05). The significant association not found in subgroup analysis of prospective design, follow-up period ≥ 10 year (all P > 0.05). The pooled RR of hip fracture in people with diabetes mellitus was 2.0 (95% CI 1.8-2.3; P < 0.05). In addition, subgroup analysis shown higher risk of hip fracture in type 1 diabetes (RR: 5.3). The pooled RR of vertebral fracture with diabetes mellitus was 1.4 (95% CI 0.9-2.2; P = 0.196). Subgroup analysis by type of diabetes showed that the RR of vertebral fracture for patients with unknown-type diabetes was 2.4 (95% CI 1.4-4.0; P < 0.05). Diabetes mellitus was associated with fractures at other sites, and effect estimates was statically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes mellitus is an independent risk factor for low-energy fracture, and this relationship is more pronounced in hip fracture.

Comparison of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and bone densitometry parameters as fracture risk predictors in type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIM

To investigate the utility of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound compared with bone densitometry (DXA) in predicting incident low-trauma fracture in type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included a subset of participants in the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study who had concurrent calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and DXA measurement, comprising 809 people without type 2 diabetes and 96 with type 2 diabetes. Fracture data had been collected prospectively. Cox proportional hazard models and receiver operating curves (ROC) were used to compare calcaneal quantitative ultrasound and DXA parameters as predictors for any low-trauma fracture.

RESULTS

The median age of participants was 71 years (IQR 68-76, 50% men) for those without type 2 diabetes and 70 years (IQR 68-76, 55% men) for those with type 2 diabetes. There was no difference in low-trauma fracture incidence between groups when stratified by sex. In those without type 2 diabetes, the hazard ratio for fracture per 1 sd decrease in broadband ultrasound attenuation and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) was 1.47 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-1.71] and 1.39 (95% CI 1.17-1.64), respectively. The corresponding figures in type 2 diabetes were 1.81 (95% CI 1.03-3.19) for broadband ultrasound attenuation and 2.55 (95% CI 1.28-5.08) for femoral neck BMD.

CONCLUSION

Broadband ultrasound attenuation is comparable with femoral neck BMD as a predictor for low trauma incident fracture in type 2 diabetes. Calcaneal quantitative ultrasound offers several advantages over DXA and should be considered in further studies of bone health screening or in clinical practice where DXA is unavailable.

Metformin Attenuates Osteoporosis in Diabetic Patients with Carcinoma in Situ: A Nationwide, Retrospective, Matched-Cohort Study in Taiwan

Patients with diabetes are at increased risk of cancer development and osteoporosis. Metformin is an effective agent for diabetes management. Epidemiological studies have identified an association between metformin use and cancer prevention. This article outlines the potential for metformin to attenuate the rate of osteoporosis in diabetic patients with carcinoma in situ (CIS). From the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan, 7827 patients with diabetes with CIS who were receiving metformin therapy were selected, along with 23,481 patients as 1:3 sex-, age- and index year-matched controls, who were not receiving metformin therapy. A Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to compare the rate of osteoporosis during an average of 15-year follow-up. Of the subjects who were enrolled, 801 (2.56%) had osteoporosis, including 168 from the metformin group (2.15%) and 633 from the without metformin group (2.70%). The metformin group presented a lower rate of osteoporosis at the end of follow-up (p = 0.009). The Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed a lower rate of osteoporosis for the metformin group (adjusted hazard ratio of 0.820; 95% confidence interval = 0.691–0.972, p = 0.022). Diabetic patients with CIS under metformin therapy presented lower osteoporosis rate than those who were not receiving metformin therapy.

The risk of hip and non-vertebral fractures in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis update

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is associated with increased fracture risk but we do not know what affects this risk. We investigated the risk of hip and non-vertebral fractures in diabetes and whether this risk was affected by age, gender, body mass index, diabetes type and duration, insulin use and diabetic complications.

METHODS

We selected a previously published review to be updated. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched up to March 2020. We included observational studies with age and gender-adjusted risk of fractures in adults with diabetes compared to adults without diabetes. We extracted data from published reports that we summarised using random effects model.

FINDINGS

From the 3140 records identified, 49 were included, 42 in the hip fracture analysis, reporting data from 17,571,738 participants with 319,652 fractures and 17 in the non-vertebral fracture review, reporting data from 2,978,487 participants with 181,228 fractures. We found an increase in the risk of fracture in diabetes both for hip (RR 4.93, 3.06-7.95, in type 1 diabetes and RR1.33, 1.19-1.49, in type 2 diabetes) and for non-vertebral fractures (RR 1.92, 0.92-3.99, in type 1 and RR 1.19, 1,11-1.28 in type 2). At the hip, the risk was higher in the younger population in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. In those with type 2 diabetes, longer diabetes duration and insulin use was associated with an increased risk. We did not investigate the effect of bone density, falls, anti-diabetic drugs and hypoglycemia.

CONCLUSION

Diabetes is associated with an increase in both hip and non-vertebral fracture risk.

Pathophysiology and Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Bone Fragility

Individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have an increased risk of bone fragility fractures compared to nondiabetic subjects. This increased fracture risk may occur despite normal or even increased values of bone mineral density (BMD), and poor bone quality is suggested to contribute to skeletal fragility in this population. These concepts explain why the only evaluation of BMD could not be considered an adequate tool for evaluating the risk of fracture in the individual T2DM patient. Unfortunately, nowadays, the bone quality could not be reliably evaluated in the routine clinical practice. On the other hand, getting further insight on the pathogenesis of T2DM-related bone fragility could consent to ameliorate both the detection of the patients at risk for fracture and their appropriate treatment. The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the increased risk of fragility fractures in a T2DM population are complex. Indeed, in T2DM, bone health is negatively affected by several factors, such as inflammatory cytokines, muscle-derived hormones, incretins, hydrogen sulfide (H2S) production and cortisol secretion, peripheral activation, and sensitivity. All these factors may alter bone formation and resorption, collagen formation, and bone marrow adiposity, ultimately leading to reduced bone strength. Additional factors such as hypoglycemia and the consequent increased propensity for falls and the direct effects on bone and mineral metabolism of certain antidiabetic medications may contribute to the increased fracture risk in this population. The purpose of this review is to summarize the literature evidence that faces the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying bone fragility in T2DM patients.

Association of type 2 diabetes with anthropometrics, bone mineral density, and body composition in a large-scale screening study of Korean adults

OBJECTIVES

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a common, chronic disease that is closely associated with anthropometric indices related to obesity. However, no study published to date has simultaneously examined the associations of T2DM with anthropometrics, bone mineral density (BMD), and body composition variables. The present study aimed to evaluate the associations of T2DM with anthropometrics, BMD and body composition variables and to identify the best indicator of T2DM in Korean adults.

METHODS

The data used in this study were obtained from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted from 2008 to 2011. A total of 7,835 participants aged from 40 to 90 years were included in this study. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the significance of differences between the groups with and without T2DM, and the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUCs) curves were calculated to compare the predictive power of all variables.

RESULTS

In men, waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) displayed the strongest association with T2DM (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.838 [1.513-2.233], adjusted p<0.001), and waist circumference (WC) and WHtR were the best indicators (WC: AUC = 0.662 [0.639-0.685], WHtR: AUC = 0.680 [0.658-0.703]) of T2DM among all the variables. In women, left leg (LL) and right leg (RL) fat displayed strong negative associations with T2DM (LL fat: adjusted OR = 0.367 [0.321-0.419], adjusted p<0.001, RL fat: adjusted OR = 0.375 [0.329-0.428], adjusted p<0.001), and WC and WHtR were excellent indicators (WC: AUC = 0.730 [0.709-0.750], WHtR: AUC = 0.747 [0.728-0.766]) of T2DM among all the variables. In particular, the WHtR in men and LL and RL fat in women exhibited the strongest associations with T2DM, and the predictive power of the WC and WHtR was stronger than BMD, fat, and muscle mass variables in both men and women. Additionally, the predictive power of the WC and WHtR was stronger in women than in men.

DISCUSSION

Of the anthropometric indices, BMD, and body fat and muscle variables, the best indicators of T2DM were WC and WHtR in both Korean men and women. The results of the present investigation will provide basic information for clinical studies of patients with T2DM and evidence for the prevention and management of T2DM.

Poor Sleep Quality Is Associated with a Higher Risk of Pulmonary tuberculosis in Patients with a Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Course for More than 5 Years

A case-control study was conducted in Shandong from January to December 2017 to explore the relationship between sleep quality and the risk of active pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). Seventy-nine patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus coincident with newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis (DM-PTB) and 169 age, sex, and DM course frequency-matched controls (DM alone) were enrolled. Univariate and multivariable unconditional logistic regression analyses were conducted. We further conducted subgroup analyses to explore the relationship between sleep quality and PTB risk, including DM course (≤5 and ＞5 years), age, sex, and the presence of overweight or obesity (body mass index (BMI) ＞ 24 kg/m²). Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that poor sleep quality had a borderline negative association with the odds of PTB (P ＝ 0.065). Subgroup multivariate analyses showed that poor sleep quality increased the risk of PTB to more than 3 times among patients with a DM course ＞ 5 years (odds ratio 3.31, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-10.13; P ＝ 0.036) after adjusting for potential confounding factors including residential area, educational level, BMI, history of contact with tuberculosis patients, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical exercise, immune status, and frequency of blood glucose monitoring. In conclusion, poor sleep quality is an independent risk factor of PTB among DM patients with a course of ＞ 5 years, which indicates significant epidemiological implications for PTB control.

Calcaneal tuberosity fractures through prior Schantz pin sites in patients with diabetic neuropathy

Schantz pin placement in the calcaneal tuberosity is a common procedure known to be complicated by pin site infections and nerve injuries. Fractures through Schantz pin sites has been reported mostly in diaphyseal bone. This case series highlights three patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and diabetic neuropathy who were fixed in an external fixator frame with a pin through the calcaneal tuberosity. At an average of 13 weeks, the patients presented with fracture through the pin site at the calcaneal tuberosity. One patient was treated with open reduction and internal fixation of the calcaneus and two patients were treated nonoperatively. These cases suggest that placement of calcaneal pins in patients with diabetic neuropathy harbors risk of iatrogenic fracture, a complication that has not been reported in the literature.

Diabetes and bone

Bone disease is a serious complication to diabetes. Patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) suffer from an increased risk of fracture, most notably at the hip, compared with patients without diabetes. Confounders such as patient sex, age, body mass index, blood glucose status, fall risk, and diabetes medications may influence the fracture risk. Different underlying mechanisms contribute to bone disease in patients with diabetes. Bone quality is affected by low bone turnover in T1D and T2D, and furthermore, incorporation of advanced glycation end-products, changes in the incretin hormone response, and microvascular complications contribute to impaired bone quality and increased fracture risk. Diagnosis of bone disease in patients with diabetes is a challenge as current methods for fracture prediction such as bone mineral density T-score and fracture risk assessment tools underestimate fracture risk for patients with T1D and T2D. This review focuses on bone disease and fracture risk in patients with diabetes regarding epidemiology, underlying disease mechanisms, and diagnostic methods, and we also provide considerations regarding the management of diabetes patients with bone disease in terms of an intervention threshold and different treatments.

Diabetes mellitus and the risk of fractures at specific sites: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with an increased fracture risk; however, the impact of DM and subsequent fracture at different sites and the associations according to patient characteristics remain unknown.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis DATA SOURCES: The PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to March 2018.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included prospective and retrospective cohort studies on the associations of DM and subsequent fracture risk at different sites.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the study quality. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated using a random-effects model, and the heterogeneity across the included studies was evaluated using I² and Q statistics.

RESULTS

Overall, DM was associated with an increased risk of total (RR: 1.32; 95% CI 1.17 to 1.48; p<0.001), hip (RR: 1.77; 95% CI 1.56 to 2.02; p<0.001), upper arm (RR: 1.47; 95% CI 1.02 to 2.10; p=0.037) and ankle fractures (RR: 1.24; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.40; p<0.001), whereas DM had no significant impact on the incidence of distal forearm (RR: 1.02; 95% CI 0.88 to 1.19; p=0.809) and vertebral fractures (RR: 1.56; 95% CI 0.78 to 3.12; p=0.209). RR ratios suggested that compared with patients with type 2 DM (T2DM), patients with type 1 DM (T1DM) had greater risk of total (RR: 1.24; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.41; p=0.002), hip (RR: 3.43; 95% CI 2.27 to 5.17; p<0.001) and ankle fractures (RR: 1.71; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.78; p=0.029). Although no other significant differences were observed between subgroups, the association of DM with upper arm or ankle, vertebrae and total fracture differed according to sex, study design and country, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with DM had greater risks of total, hip, upper arm and ankle fractures, with T1DM having a more harmful effect than T2DM.

Diagnosis and management of bone fragility in diabetes: an emerging challenge

Fragility fractures are increasingly recognized as a complication of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, with fracture risk that increases with disease duration and poor glycemic control. Yet the identification and management of fracture risk in these patients remains challenging. This review explores the clinical characteristics of bone fragility in adults with diabetes and highlights recent studies that have evaluated bone mineral density (BMD), bone microstructure and material properties, biochemical markers, and fracture prediction algorithms (i.e., FRAX) in these patients. It further reviews the impact of diabetes drugs on bone as well as the efficacy of osteoporosis treatments in this population. We finally propose an algorithm for the identification and management of diabetic patients at increased fracture risk.

The association between diabetes status, HbA1c, diabetes duration, microvascular disease, and bone quality of the distal radius and tibia as measured with high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography-The Maastricht Study

In this small cross-sectional study of predominantly well-treated participants with relatively short-term type 2 diabetes duration, HbA1c > 7% (53 mmol/mol) was associated with lower cortical density and thickness and higher cortical porosity at the distal radius, lower trabecular thickness at the distal tibia, and higher trabecular number at both sites.

INTRODUCTION

To examine the association between diabetes status and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), bone microarchitecture and strength of the distal radius and tibia as assessed with HR-pQCT. Additionally-in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), to examine the association between HbA1c, diabetes duration, and microvascular disease (MVD) and bone parameters.

METHODS

Cross-sectional data from 410 (radius) and 198 (tibia) participants of The Maastricht Study (mean age 58 year, 51% female). Diabetes status (normal glucose metabolism, prediabetes, or T2DM) was based on an oral glucose tolerance test and medication history.

RESULTS

After full adjustment, prediabetes and T2DM were not associated with vBMD, bone microarchitecture, and strength of the radius and tibia, except for lower trabecular number (Tb.N) of the tibia (- 4%) in prediabetes and smaller cross-sectional area of the tibia (- 7%) in T2DM. In T2DM, HbA1c > 7% was associated with lower cortical vBMD (- 5%), cortical thickness (- 16%), higher cortical porosity (+ 20%) and Tb.N (+ 9%) of the radius, and higher Tb.N (+ 9%) and lower trabecular thickness (- 13%) of the tibia. Diabetes duration > 5 years was associated with higher Tb.N (+ 6%) of the radius. The presence of MVD was not associated with any bone parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study with predominantly well-treated T2DM participants with relatively short-term diabetes duration, inadequate blood glucose control was negatively associated with cortical bone measures of the radius. In contrast, trabecular number was increased at both sites. Studies of larger sample size are warranted for more detailed investigations of bone density and bone quality in patients with T2DM.

FRAX tool in type 2 diabetic subjects: the use of HbA1c in estimating fracture risk

AIMS

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have an increased risk of fractures, despite having greater bone mineral density (BMD) than non-diabetic subjects. This has led to the hypothesis that the presence of impaired bone quality among diabetics reduces bone strength. The Fracture Risk Assessment Score (FRAX) algorithm, introduced to facilitate the evaluation of fracture risk, underestimates the risk of fracture in diabetic patients. The purpose of this study is to confirm the relationship between the degree of metabolic compensation and the 10-year probability of a major fracture or a hip osteoporotic fracture observed in our previous study and to ascertain whether glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) can improve the predictive value of FRAX in patients with T2DM.

METHODS

Our data derive from a retrospective clinical study conducted at the "Tor Vergata" Polyclinic in Rome on 6355 subjects over 50 years of age evaluated for osteoporosis. All available clinical records were examined. HbA_1c was available for 242 of these subjects and all had had a Dual-energy X-ray Absorption (DXA) scan of the lumbar spine and femoral neck. The risk of fracture was estimated using the Italian version of the FRAX algorithm.

RESULT

Patients with T2DM had BMD and T-scores higher than those of non-diabetic subjects, while FRAX average values were higher in the non-diabetic group. HbA_1c and FRAX are inversely correlated with each other: for each incremental percentage point of HbA_1c growth, the FRAX major osteoporotic fracture probability is reduced by 0.915 points and the FRAX hip osteoporotic fracture probability by 1.438 points. The introduction of a correction factor derived from HbA_1c, resulted in mean FRAX values of diabetic patients equivalent to those of non-diabetic subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

We propose a correction factor derived from HbA_1c that could enhance the predictive ability of fracture risk estimated by the FRAX algorithm in subjects with T2DM.

A positive correlation between blood glucose level and bone mineral density in Taiwan

This study was undertaken to assess the effect of blood glucose on BMD and interactions with age, sex, and BMI in a Taiwanese population. Both obese and non-obese people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) had higher BMD, at lumbar spine and femoral neck, compared with healthy subjects. In addition, the prevalence of osteoporosis significantly decreased with blood sugar and HbA1c.

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to assess the effect of blood glucose on BMD and possible interactions with age, sex, and BMI in a Taiwanese population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study was a retrospective cross-sectional study using data from the Health Examination Database of Changhua Christian Hospital. Data on BMD of the lumbar spine and femoral neck were obtained by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and other relevant clinical and laboratory data were recorded.

RESULTS

The type 2 diabetes (T2DM) group had a higher BMD than the controls. When comparing the prevalence of osteoporosis between subjects by glucose and HbA1c level, the prevalence of osteoporosis significantly decreased with blood glucose and HbA1c. In addition, the BMD of the lumbar spine and femoral neck was higher in the T2DM group than in the controls. Osteoporosis was negatively associated with DM, BMI, and drinking, but positively associated with age, female gender, previous fracture history, and other diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue. The association between diabetes and osteoporosis remained statistically significant after adjusting for the above factors. T2DM was associated with lower odds of osteoporosis in both obese (OR = 0.77) and non-obese (OR = 0.63) (p for interaction = 0.555).

CONCLUSIONS

Both obese and non-obese people with T2DM had higher BMD, at lumbar spine and femoral neck, compared with healthy subjects. In addition, the prevalence of osteoporosis significantly decreased with blood glucose and HbA1c.

Diabetes mellitus and bone health: epidemiology, etiology and implications for fracture risk stratification

Skeletal fractures can result when there are co-morbid conditions that negatively impact bone strength. Fractures represent an important source of morbidity and mortality, especially in older populations. Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder that has reached worldwide epidemic proportions and is increasingly being recognized as a risk factor for fracture. Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes have different effects on bone mineral density but share common pathways, which lead to bone fragility. In this review, we discuss the available data on diabetes and fractures, bone density and the clinical implications for fracture risk stratification in current practice.

Fracture risk in women with type II diabetes. Results from a historical cohort with fracture follow-up

PURPOSE

To examine the independent association between type II diabetes and fracture risk in a population of predominantly postmenopausal women referred to a specialist clinic for osteoporosis evaluation.

METHODS

Type II diabetes associated fracture risk were evaluated among to 229 patients with type II diabetes in a cohort of 6285 women followed on average (until major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), death or end of study) for 5.8 years. Information of fracture risk factors was obtained from a clinical database and from national registries.

RESULTS

An elevated fracture risk was present. Prevalent fractures (43.7 vs. 33.2%, p = 0.0010) and prevalent MOF (26.2 vs. 20.5% p = 0.038) were more common among patients with type II diabetes. The unadjusted incident fracture risk was increased with a higher relative risk of 42%. An elevated MOF hazard ratio was present (HR = 1.726, p = 0.0006). Adjustment for prevalent osteoporosis and other possible confounders did not change this finding (HR = 1.558, p = 0.0207).

CONCLUSIONS

An association between type II diabetes and an increased risk of MOF primarily driven by an increased hip fracture risk was documented. This finding was independent of the presence of osteoporosis. Clinicians need to be aware of and adjust for these findings when evaluating patients with diabetes. Additional research examining pathophysiological mechanisms are needed.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus and bone

Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is a rapidly growing public health problem. It is associated with an increased risk of fracture, particularly of the hip, despite normal or high bone mineral density. Longer duration of disease and poor glycaemic control are both associated with higher fracture risk. The factors underlying increased fracture risk have not been clearly established, but increased falls risk, obesity, sarcopenia and co-morbidities are likely to contribute. The basis for reduced bone strength despite higher bone mineral density remains to be fully elucidated. Bone turnover is reduced in individuals with T2DM, with evidence of impaired bone formation. Most studies indicate normal or superior trabecular bone structure although reduced lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS) has been reported. Deficits in cortical bone structure have been demonstrated in some, but not all, studies whilst reduced bone material strength index (BMSi), as assessed by microindentation, has been a consistent finding. Accumulation of advanced glycation end products in bone may also contribute to reduced bone strength. The use of FRAX in individuals with T2DM underestimates fracture probability. Clinical management should focus on falls prevention strategies, avoidance of known risk factors, maintenance of good glycaemic control and bone protective intervention in individuals at high risk of fracture. Dietary and surgical strategies to reduce weight have beneficial effects on diabetes but may have adverse effects on skeletal health. Future research priorities include better definition of the mechanisms underlying increased fracture risk in T2DM and optimal strategies for identifying and treating those at high risk.

Clinical Fractures Among Older Men With Diabetes Are Mediated by Diabetic Complications

INTRODUCTION

Type 2 diabetes mellitus among older women has been associated with increased bone mineral density, but paradoxically with increased fracture risk. Findings among older men have varied, and potential mechanisms have not been fully elucidated.

METHODS

A retrospective study of male veterans 65 to 99 years of age who received primary care in the Veterans Health Administration from 2000 to 2010, using administrative data from all 146 Veterans Health Administration medical centers linked to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare fee-for-service data. Potential mediating factors of the diabetes-associated risk were evaluated using negative binomial regression models with the outcomes of any clinical fracture and hip fracture.

RESULTS

Of 2,798,309 Veterans included in the cohort, 900,402 (32.3%) had a diagnosis of diabetes. After adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, body mass index, alcohol and tobacco use, rheumatoid arthritis, and corticosteroid use, the risk of any clinical fracture associated with diabetes was 1.22 (95% confidence interval, 1.21 to 1.23) and that of hip fracture was 1.21 (95% confidence interval, 1.19 to 1.23). Significant mediating factors included peripheral neuropathy, cardiovascular disease, and congestive heart failure, with 45.5% of the diabetes-associated fracture risk explained by these diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Older male Veterans with diabetes have a 22% increased risk of incident clinical fracture compared with those without. A significant portion of this risk is explained by diabetes-related comorbidities, specifically peripheral neuropathy and congestive heart failure. Identification of these mediating factors suggests possible mechanisms, as well as potential interventions.

Increased risk of hip fractures in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes: a 6-year nationwide population-based study

We compared the incidence and risk of hip fractures in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes and non-diabetic subjects in a nationwide population-based study. The study included 17,110 patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in 2004 and 34,220 randomly selected age- and sex-matched control subjects drawn from the Korean National Health Insurance Research database. Fracture events occurring between 2004 and 2010 were identified from medical claims data. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for fractures associated with diabetes were calculated. A total of 3855 fractures of any type (3029 in females and 826 in males) and 493 hip fractures (353 in females and 140 in males) were observed in 51,330 subjects over a 6-year follow-up period. The risk of hip fractures was significantly higher in female (HR 1.73; 95% CI 1.38-2.16) and male (HR 1.84; 95% CI 1.29-2.63) diabetics than in non-diabetic controls after adjusting for multiple confounders. Stratification by age revealed that the adjusted HR for hip fractures was highest in diabetic patients aged 50-64 years (HR 2.54 in females and 2.70 in males) and decreased with increasing age. The risk of other fractures did not differ between the groups. Korean males and females with type 2 diabetes are at an increased risk of hip fractures compared with non-diabetic individuals. Osteoporosis assessments and fracture prevention strategies are necessary for Koreans with type 2 diabetes.

Clinical aspects and management of osteoporosis and fragility fractures in patients with diabetes

Both diabetes and osteoporosis are assuming epidemic proportions throughout the world. Accumulating data suggest that both types 1 and 2 diabetes are associated with an increased risk of fragility fractures. This increased risk appears to be largely independent of bone mineral density (BMD) which is most often noted to be low in type 1 diabetes and normal or increased in type 2 diabetes. This review explores the clinical characteristics of bone fragility in patients with diabetes and highlights studies that have evaluated BMD and fracture prediction tools in these patients. It also briefly reviews the current management principles of osteoporosis in diabetes, with special emphasis on the impact of diabetes medications on bone health as well as explores the efficacy of currently available antiosteoporosis pharmacotherapy in the diabetic population.

Fracture risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and possible risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have an increased risk of bone fractures. A variable increase in fracture risk has been reported depending on skeletal site, diabetes duration, study design, insulin use, and so on. The present meta-analysis aimed to investigate the association between T2DM with fracture risk and possible risk factors.

Methods

Different databases including PubMed, Institute for Scientific Information, and Scopus were searched up to May 2016. All epidemiologic studies on the association between T2DM and fracture risk were included. The relevant data obtained from these papers were analyzed by a random effects model and publication bias was assessed by funnel plot. All analyses were done by R software (version 3.2.1) and STATA (version 11.1).

Results

Thirty eligible studies were selected for the meta-analysis. We found a statistically significant positive association between T2DM and hip, vertebral, or foot fractures and no association between T2DM and wrist, proximal humerus, or ankle fractures. Overall, T2DM was associated with an increased risk of any fracture (summary relative risk =1.05, 95% confidence interval: 1.04, 1.06) and increased with age, duration of diabetes, and insulin therapy.

Conclusion

Our findings strongly support an association between T2DM and increased risk of overall fracture. These findings emphasize the need for fracture prevention strategies in patients with diabetes.

Diabetes and Bone Disease

The World Health Organization estimates that diabetes mellitus occurs in more than 415 million people; this number could double by the year 2040. Epidemiologic data have shown that the skeletal system may be a target of diabetes-mediated damage, leading to the development of diabetes-induced osteoporosis. T1D and T2D have been associated with an increased risk of fracture. Bone mineral density and fracture risk prediction tools developed for the general population capture some of the risk associated with diabetes. Recent adaptations to these tools have improved their efficacy in patients with diabetes.

Type 2 Diabetes and Risk of Hip Fractures and Non-Skeletal Fall Injuries in the Elderly: A Study From the Fractures and Fall Injuries in the Elderly Cohort (FRAILCO)

Questions remain about whether the increased risk of fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is related mainly to increased risk of falling or to bone-specific properties. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the risk of hip fractures and non-skeletal fall injuries in older men and women with and without T2DM. We included 429,313 individuals (aged 80.8 ± 8.2 years [mean ± SD], 58% women) from the Swedish registry "Senior Alert" and linked the data to several nationwide registers. We identified 79,159 individuals with T2DM (45% with insulin [T2DM-I], 41% with oral antidiabetics [T2DM-O], and 14% with no antidiabetic treatment [T2DM-none]) and 343,603 individuals without diabetes. During a follow-up of approximately 670,000 person-years, we identified in total 36,132 fractures (15,572 hip fractures) and 20,019 non-skeletal fall injuries. In multivariable Cox regression models where the reference group was patients without diabetes and the outcome was hip fracture, T2DM-I was associated with increased risk (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI] 1.24 [1.16-1.32]), T2DM-O with unaffected risk (1.03 [0.97-1.11]), and T2DM-none with reduced risk (0.88 [0.79-0.98]). Both the diagnosis of T2DM-I (1.22 [1.16-1.29]) and T2DM-O (1.12 [1.06-1.18]) but not T2DM-none (1.07 [0.98-1.16]) predicted non-skeletal fall injury. The same pattern was found regarding other fractures (any, upper arm, ankle, and major osteoporotic fracture) but not for wrist fracture. Subset analyses revealed that in men, the risk of hip fracture was only increased in those with T2DM-I, but in women, both the diagnosis of T2DM-O and T2DM-I were related to increased hip fracture risk. In conclusion, the risk of fractures differs substantially among patients with T2DM and an increased risk of hip fracture was primarily found in insulin-treated patients, whereas the risk of non-skeletal fall injury was consistently increased in T2DM with any diabetes medication. © 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Is Diabetic Skeletal Fragility Associated with Microvascular Complications in Bone?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The objective of this literature review is to determine whether there are indications that microvascular complications occur in diabetic bone. Evidence definitively linking diabetic skeletal fragility with microvascular complications in bone remains elusive.

RECENT FINDINGS

Circumstantial evidence, some recent and some lost to time, suggests that atherosclerotic vascular diseases such as peripheral arterial disease cause poor blood perfusion of bone and subsequent hypoxia and contribute to low bone density and high cortical porosity, patterns similar to some recently observed in diabetic subjects. Evidence also exists to suggest that potentially anti-angiogenic conditions, such as impaired vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling, predominate in diabetic bone. Microvascular complications may contribute, in part, to diabetic skeletal fragility but data supporting this interpretation are primarily circumstantial at this time. This review highlights gaps in our knowledge and hopefully spurs further discussions and research on this topic.

Epidemiology of Fractures in Diabetes

Diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of fracture. The risk of a hip fracture is up to sevenfold increased in patients with type 1 diabetes and about 1.3-fold increased in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, these relative risk estimates may depend on the age and gender distribution of the population in question. Bone mineral density and the fracture risk assessment tool do not explain the increased fracture risk in patients with diabetes. Shared risk factors as pancreatitis, alcohol use, smoking and oral glucocorticoids may influence the observed fracture risk in patients with diabetes. This review examines the association between diabetes and fracture and attempts to disentangle the tight connection between diabetes per se, diabetes-related complications, comorbidities and shared risk factors. This is of great importance as the number of diabetes patients' increases with growing and aging populations and putting even more at risk of fracture.

DXA-Based Measurements in Diabetes: Can They Predict Fracture Risk?

In the absence of a fragility fracture, osteoporosis is usually diagnosed from bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Osteoporosis is an increasingly prevalent disease, as is diabetes [in particular type 2 diabetes (T2D)], in part due to aging populations worldwide. It has been suggested that an increased risk of fracture may be another complication ensuing from longstanding diabetes. The purpose of this review is to concentrate on skeletal parameters and techniques readily available from DXA scanning, and their utility in routine clinical practice for predicting fracture risk. In addition to BMD, other applications and measures from DXA include trabecular bone score (TBS), skeletal geometry and DXA-based finite-element analysis, vertebral fracture assessment, and body composition. In type 1 diabetes (T1D), BMD and FRAX^R (when secondary osteoporosis is included without BMD) only partially account for the excess risk of fracture in T1D. Consistent data exist to show that BMD and FRAX^R can be used to stratify fracture risk in T2D, but do not account for the increased risk of fracture. However, several adjustments to the FRAX score can be made as proxies for T2D to inform the use of FRAX by primary care practitioners. Examples include using the rheumatoid arthritis input (as a proxy for T2D), lumbar spine TBS (to adjust FRAX probability) or an altered hip T-score (lowered by 0.5 units). These adjustments can improve fracture risk prediction in T2D and help to avoid systematically underestimating the risk of osteoporosis-related fractures in those with diabetes.

Longer Duration of Diabetes Strongly Impacts Fracture Risk Assessment: The Manitoba BMD Cohort

CONTEXT

Type 2 diabetes is associated with a higher risk for major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture than predicted by the World Health Organization fracture risk assessment (FRAX) tool.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to examine the impact of diabetes duration on fracture risk.

METHODS

Using a clinical dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry registry linked with the Manitoba administrative databases, we identified all women age 40 years or older with 10 or more years of prior health care coverage undergoing hip dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry measurements (1996-2013). Incident MOF and incident hip fractures were each studied over 7 years. Cox proportional hazards models were adjusted for FRAX (FRAX adjusted) and then FRAX plus comorbidity, falls, osteoporosis therapy, or insulin (fully adjusted). FRAX calibration was assessed comparing observed vs predicted probabilities.

RESULTS

There were 49 098 women without and 8840 women with diabetes (31.4% >10 y duration; 20.1% 5-10 y; 23.7% <5 y; 24.8% new onset). In FRAX-adjusted analyses, only duration longer than 10 years was associated with a higher risk for MOF (hazard ratio [HR] 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-1.66), and this was similar in the fully adjusted models (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.17-1.54). In contrast, a higher risk for hip fracture was seen for all durations in a dose-dependent fashion (eg, FRAX adjusted HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.71-2.59 for duration >10 y vs HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.03-1.69 for new onset). FRAX significantly underestimated the MOF risk (calibration ratio 1.24, 95% CI 1.08-1.39) and hip fracture risk (1.93, 95% CI 1.50-2.35) in those with a diabetes duration longer than 10 years.

CONCLUSION

Diabetes is a FRAX-independent risk factor for MOF only in women with a long duration of diabetes, but diabetes increases hip fracture risk, regardless of duration. Those with diabetes longer than 10 years are at particularly high risk of fracture, and this elevated risk is currently underestimated by FRAX.

A relationship between vitamin D, parathyroid hormone, calcium levels and lactose intolerance in type 2 diabetic patients and healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is chronic metabolic disorder. Common gastrointestinal symptoms in type 2 diabetic patients are flatulence, constipation and/or diarrhea. Reason for these may be lactose intolerance leading to change in vitamin D, Calcium and parathyroid hormone which further regulate bone mineralization.

AIM

To measure lactose intolerance, vitamin D, calcium and parathyroid hormone in type 2 diabetic patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

150 type 2 diabetic patients attending Endocrinology Clinic in PGI, Chandigarh and 150 age and sex matched healthy controls were enrolled. Lactose intolerance was measured using non-invasive lactose breath test. 25-hydroxyvitamin D (total) and Parathyroid hormone were measured in plasma using immunoassay. Serum calcium was measured using auto analyzer. T score was recorded from DXA scan for bone mineral density measurement.

RESULTS

Lactose intolerance was observed significantly higher (p<0.001) diabetic patients (59.3%) as compared to controls (42%). Levels of plasma 25-OH vitamin D (total), parathyroid hormone and serum calcium were significantly lower in patients as compared to controls. Furthermore, levels of plasma 25-OH vitamin D (total), parathyroid hormone and serum calcium were more decreased in lactose intolerant diabetic patients than lactose tolerant patients. Sixty seven percent (67%) of diabetic patients suffered from osteoporosis and 20% of controls. Eighty percent (80%) diabetic patients and 16% controls with osteoporosis suffered from lactose intolerance.

CONCLUSION

From this study we can conclude that measurement of lactose intolerance using non-invasive lactose breath test is suggested for type 2 diabetic patients along with timely measurement of 25-OH vitamin D (total), calcium and parathyroid hormone levels.

Changes in the Fracture Resistance of Bone with the Progression of Type 2 Diabetes in the ZDSD Rat

Individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have a higher fracture risk compared to non-diabetics, even though their areal bone mineral density is normal to high. Identifying the mechanisms whereby diabetes lowers fracture resistance requires well-characterized rodent models of diabetic bone disease. Toward that end, we hypothesized that bone toughness, more so than bone strength, decreases with the duration of diabetes in ZDSD rats. Bones were harvested from male CD(SD) control rats and male ZDSD rats at 16 weeks (before the onset of hyperglycemia), at 22 weeks (5-6 weeks of hyperglycemia), and at 29 weeks (12-13 weeks of hyperglycemia). There were at least 12 rats per strain per age group. At 16 weeks, there was no difference in either body weight or glucose levels between the two rat groups. Within 2 weeks of switching all rats to a diet with 48 % of kcal from fat, only the ZDSD rats developed hyperglycemia (>250 mg/dL). They also began to lose body weight at 21 weeks. CD(SD) rats remained normoglycemic (<110 mg/dL) on the high-fat diet and became obese (>600 g). From micro-computed tomography (μCT) analysis of a lumbar vertebra and distal femur, trabecular bone volume did not vary with age among the non-diabetic rats but was lower at 29 weeks than at 16 weeks or at 22 weeks for the diabetic rats. Consistent with that finding, μCT-derived intra-cortical porosity (femur diaphysis) was higher for ZDSD following ~12 weeks of hyperglycemia than for age-matched CD(SD) rats. Despite an age-related increase in mineralization in both rat strains (μCT and Raman spectroscopy), material strength of cortical bone (from three-point bending tests) increased with age only in the non-diabetic CD(SD) rats. Moreover, two other material properties, toughness (radius) and fracture toughness (femur), significantly decreased with the duration of T2D in ZDSD rats. This was accompanied by the increase in the levels of the pentosidine (femur). However, pentosidine was not significantly higher in diabetic than in non-diabetic bone at any time point. The ZDSD rat, which has normal leptin signaling and becomes diabetic after skeletal maturity, provides a pre-clinical model of diabetic bone disease, but a decrease in body weight during prolonged diabetes and certain strain-related differences before the onset of hyperglycemia should be taken into consideration when interpreting diabetes-related differences.

Assessment of bone turnover and bone quality in type 2 diabetic bone disease: current concepts and future directions

Substantial evidence exists that in addition to the well-known complications of diabetes, increased fracture risk is an important morbidity. This risk is probably due to altered bone properties in diabetes. Circulating biochemical markers of bone turnover have been found to be decreased in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and may be predictive of fractures independently of bone mineral density (BMD). Serum sclerostin levels have been found to be increased in T2D and appear to be predictive of fracture risk independent of BMD. Bone imaging technologies, including trabecular bone score (TBS) and quantitative CT testing have revealed differences in diabetic bone as compared to non-diabetic individuals. Specifically, high resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HRpQCT) imaging has demonstrated increased cortical porosity in diabetic postmenopausal women. Other factors such as bone marrow fat saturation and advanced glycation endproduct (AGE) accumulation might also relate to bone cell function and fracture risk in diabetes. These data have increased our understanding of how T2D adversely impacts both bone metabolism and fracture risk.