Evidence for the cardiovascular effects of osteoporosis treatments in randomized trials of post-menopausal women: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Effect of osteoporosis medications on vascular and valvular calcification: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Vascular calcification shares many features with skeletal mineralisation and shares an inverse relationship with osteoporosis (skeletal de-mineralisation). However, medications that reduce bone loss (anti-resorptives) have had inconsistent effects on extra-skeletal mineralisation (i.e. vascular and valvular calcification). As such, this paper aims to synthesise existing literature examining the effect of anti-resorptive treatments on extra-skeletal (vascular and valvular) calcification across populations.

METHODS

Medline and Embase were searched (inception to October 2024) for studies that assessed the association between anti-resorptive medication use and vascular/valvular calcification. Pooled standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for all outcomes, using random-effects model. Leave-one-out sensitivity analyses were performed for internal validity.

RESULTS

Of 4071 articles screened, 33 were included in the review, and 15 (2344 participants) had data available for meta-analysis. Anti-resorptive use was associated with non-significant, small magnitude improvements in abdominal aortic calcification (decreased value), coronary artery calcification (decreased value) and ejection fraction (increased value) but significant small reduction in aortic valve area (representing less calcification on the valve) with standardised mean difference of - 0.45 (95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.99; 0.08, I2 = 84%), - 1.19 (95% CI - 2.92; 0.55, I2 = 91%), - 0.67 (95% CI - 1.72; 0.38, I2 = 94%), 0.26 (95% CI - 0.14; 0.66, I2 = 62%) and 0.56 (95% CI 0.07; 1.06, I2 = 76%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The significance of small positive effect of anti-resorptives on aortic stenosis is clinically uncertain. Despite strong biological links between vascular calcification and skeletal mineralisation, anti-resorptives do not appear to have a strong favourable influence on extra-skeletal mineralisation. This suggests that mechanisms that link vascular calcification with osteoporosis may be acting in pathways not influenced by anti-resorptives. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarises the effect of anti-resorptives on vascular and valvular calcification. There is a small, positive effect of anti-resorptives on aortic stenosis, though this is of uncertain clinical importance.

PTH1 receptor agonists for fracture risk: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Osteoporosis, defined by reduced bone mineral density and macro- and micro-architectural degradation, leads to increased fracture risk, particularly in aging populations. While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrate that PTH1 receptor agonists, teriparatide and abaloparatide, are effective at reducing fracture risk, real-world evidence (RWE) remains sparse. This study reviews and compares the anti-fracture efficacy of these agents, against each other and against other osteoporosis treatments using both RCTs and RWE. We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane up to May 2024, focusing on RCTs and RWE studies reporting reduction in vertebral, non-vertebral, hip, or all fractures as primary endpoint. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted, first through pairwise meta-analyses of teriparatide versus abaloparatide, then a Bayesian NMA comparing each to other treatments. Safety assessments included adverse events classified by MedDRA, with a particular attention to hypercalcemia and cardiac events. Seventeen studies (11 RCTs, 6 RWE) met inclusion criteria. Teriparatide and abaloparatide were effective in reducing vertebral and non-vertebral fractures in all pairwise meta-analyses versus placebo. Abaloparatide showed an advantage over teriparatide for non-vertebral fractures (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.80-0.95) and hip fractures (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.71-0.93). In the NMA model, teriparatide and abaloparatide were superior to placebo, raloxifene, and calcitonin in reducing vertebral fracture while teriparatide was further superior to denosumab and risedronate. For non-vertebral fracture, abaloparatide was better than any other treatment while teriparatide was only superior to alendronate or placebo. PTH1 analogs were better than placebo at reducing all fractures while no difference was observed for the risk of hip fracture. Both abaloparatide and teriparatide demonstrate comparable safety to other osteoporosis treatments, with no increased cardiovascular risk. This review highlights that PTH1 receptor agonists effectively reduce fracture risk, with abaloparatide offering enhanced benefits for non-vertebral and hip fractures compared to teriparatide. Both agents exhibit acceptable safety profiles, suggesting their valuable role in managing osteoporosis, particularly for high-risk patients.

Treatment of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis in the Oldest Old

Osteoporosis and osteoarthritis are key diseases of musculoskeletal ageing and are increasing in prevalence and burden with the progressively ageing population worldwide. These conditions are thus particularly common in 'the oldest old', and there are complexities of managing them within the context of extensive multimorbidity, physical and mental disability, and polypharmacy, the rates for all of which are high in this population. In this narrative review, we explore the epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoarthritis in the oldest old before examining trials and real-world data relating to the pharmacological treatment of these diseases in older adults, including anti-resorptives and bone-forming agents in osteoporosis and symptomatic slow-acting drugs for osteoarthritis, paracetamol, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in osteoarthritis, recognising that the oldest old are usually excluded from clinical trials. We then review the potential benefits of nutritional interventions and exercise therapy before highlighting the health economic benefits of interventions for osteoporosis and osteoarthritis. The high prevalence of risk factors for both disease and adverse events associated with treatment in the oldest old mean that careful attention must be paid to the potential benefits of intervention (including fracture risk reduction and improvements in osteoarthritis pain and function) versus the potential harms and adverse effects. Further direct evidence relating to such interventions is urgently needed from future research.

Cardiovascular Safety of Romosozumab vs PTH Analogues for Osteoporosis Treatment: A Propensity-Score-Matched Cohort Study

CONTEXT

Romosozumab, a monoclonal sclerostin antibody, is a recently approved highly potent antiosteoporotic agent with osteoanabolic properties. Clinical use of romosozumab is hindered by the fear of adverse cardiovascular (CV) events raised following the pivotal ARCH trial.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to assess real-world CV safety of romosozumab vs alternative osteoanabolic therapies used for treatment of severe osteoporosis.

METHODS

Data were obtained from TriNetX, a global federated health research network including real-time electronic medical records from 113 health care organizations with 136 460 930 patients across 16 countries at time of analysis. Inclusion criteria were age 40 years or older, a diagnosis of osteoporosis and prescription of romosozumab or a parathyroid hormone (PTH) analogue (teriparatide/abaloparatide) during August 2019 through August 2022. Propensity-score-matched cohorts were created 1:1 using demographic variables, comorbidities, and medications. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the probability of the outcomes. Outcome measures included incident 3-point major adverse CV event or death (3P-MACE) during 1-year of follow-up after the initial prescription.

RESULTS

A total of 5626 and 15 986 patients met the criteria for romosozumab and PTH analogue cohorts, respectively, with 5610 patients per group following propensity score matching. 3P-MACE was significantly less frequent in the romosozumab vs PTH analogue cohort (158 vs 211 patients with an outcome; P = .003) with reductions in the individual components of the composite outcome: myocardial ischemic events (31 vs 58; P = .003); cerebrovascular events 56 vs 79; P = .037; deaths (83 vs 104; P = .099).

CONCLUSION

In a diverse, real-world setting, prescription of romosozumab for osteoporosis is associated with fewer adverse CV events when compared to PTH analogue therapy.

Romosozumab adverse event profile: a pharmacovigilance analysis based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2019 to 2023

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyze adverse drug events (ADE) related to romosozumab from the second quarter of 2019 to the third quarter of 2023 from FAERS database.

METHODS

The ADE data related to romosozumab from 2019 Q2 to 2023 Q3 were collected. After data normalization, four signal strength quantification algorithms were used: ROR (Reporting Odds Ratios), PRR (Proportional Reporting Ratios), BCPNN (Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network), and EBGM (Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean).

RESULTS

Screening for romosozumab-related AEs (adverse events) included 23 system organ categories (SOCs). PT (preferred terms) levels were screened for adverse drug reaction (ADR) signals. A total of 7055 reports with romosozumab as the primary suspect (PS) and 14,041 PTs induced by romosozumab as PS were identified. Common significant signals of general disorders and administration site conditions, musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders have emerged. Specifically, unexpected AEs such as gastrointestinal disorder, respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders also occur. Notably, fracture (n = 503, ROR = 107.8, PRR = 103.83, IC = 6.6, EBGM = 97.02) and bone density abnormal (n = 429, ROR = 343.65, PRR = 332.77, IC = 8.08, EBGM = 271.34) exhibited relatively high occurrence rates and signal strengths.

CONCLUSION

Our study identifies potential new AE signals and provides broader data support for the safety of romosozumab. In clinical application, doctors are provided with a warning to closely monitor adverse reactions to support their rational use in diseases such as osteoporosis.

Cardiovascular safety of osteoanabolic agents

PURPOSE

Several osteoanabolic agents have been developed to build new bone more efficiently than anti-resorptive drugs. Among them, romosozumab, an anti-sclerostin antibody, is a potent pharmacological tool to prevent fractures in osteoporosis patients. The efficacy of romosozumab in preventing osteoporotic fractures is robust. However, there remains a concern about increased cardiovascular (CV) adverse events related to romosozumab. Available data have been reviewed to address this concern.

METHODS

Published articles on romosozumab of which pivotal randomized controlled trials (RCTs), meta-analyses of RCTs, pharmacovigilance investigations, and retrospective observational clinical studies using real-world data were collected through PubMed and other available tools.

RESULTS

Meta-analyses of RCTs of romosozumab compared to placebo and other anti-osteoporosis drugs have left room for controversy in the CV safety of romosozumab. Investigations of the real-world data also provide no conclusive evidence in this issue.

CONCLUSION

We need more robust evidence to establish an appropriate and reasonable guide to prescribe romosozumab in our clinical practice.

Sclerostin and Cardiovascular Risk: Evaluating the Cardiovascular Safety of Romosozumab in Osteoporosis Treatment

Background/Objectives: Osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD) share common risk factors and pathophysiological mechanisms, raising concerns about the cardiovascular implications of sclerostin inhibition. Romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets sclerostin, is effective in increasing bone mineral density (BMD) and reducing fracture risk. However, evidence suggests that sclerostin inhibition may adversely affect vascular calcification, potentially increasing the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. Methods: This review synthesizes data from clinical trials, such as ARCH, BRIDGE, and FRAME, alongside genetic studies and observational analyses, to evaluate the cardiovascular safety of romosozumab. PubMed was searched for relevant studies published within the last five years. Studies addressing the relationship between romosozumab and cardiovascular outcomes were included, emphasizing both its efficacy in osteoporosis management and potential cardiovascular risks. Results: Romosozumab significantly improves BMD and reduces fracture risk in postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis. However, clinical trials report an increased incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), particularly in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular conditions such as chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes, or prior CVD. Genetic studies indicate that SOST gene variants may also influence cardiovascular outcomes. Conclusions: While romosozumab is an effective treatment for osteoporosis, careful cardiovascular risk assessment is crucial before initiating therapy, especially for high-risk populations. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate chronic safety. Future therapeutic strategies should aim to maintain bone health while minimizing cardiovascular risks, ensuring a balance between efficacy and safety in osteoporosis treatment.

Teriparatide administration is osteoanabolic but does not impact atherosclerotic plaque calcification and progression in a mouse model of menopause

Menopause exacerbates osteoporosis and increases the risk of atherosclerotic plaque rupture, leading to cardiovascular mortality. Osteoporotic women are increasingly treated with teriparatide (TPTD, 1-34 parathyroid hormone), one of the few treatments that stimulate bone formation. Despite the fact that atherosclerotic plaque calcification is a hallmark of plaque development, the impact of TPTD administration on plaque calcification remain unclear. In this context, we sought to determine the effects of TPTD administration on atherosclerosis in ovariectomized (OVX) apolipoprotein E deficient mice (ApoE-/-), as a model of postmenopausal osteoporosis. OVX ApoE-/- mice, fed a high fat, high cholesterol diet to induce atherosclerosis, received either vehicle or TPTD daily injections (40 μg/kg/d) for 4 or 10 weeks, at which points plaques are respectively weakly and heavily calcified. After sacrifice, bone remodeling was evaluated by serum markers and bone histomorphometry. Bone architectural parameters were measured by μCT. Aortic plaques were analyzed histologically, and their calcification with von Kossa staining and the calcium tracer Osteosense. Plaque inflammation and calcification markers were measured by RT-qPCR. Intermittent TPTD increased bone volume in OVX mice, due to a higher stimulation of bone formation relatively to bone resorption. These effects were not accompanied by changes in serum levels of cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose or insulin. TPTD neither significantly affected aortic plaque size, inflammation, and calcification, even if it slightly increased vascular smooth muscle cell transdifferentiation into calcifying cells. In conclusion, TPTD exhibits osteoanabolic effects in OVX ApoE-/- mice, without significantly influencing atherosclerotic plaque progression or calcification in the short term.

A practical approach for anabolic treatment of bone fragility with romosozumab

BACKGROUND

Romosozumab, a fully humanized anti-sclerostin-antibody, is a bone-builder stimulating osteoblasts and inhibiting osteoclast by activation of the canonical Wnt-beta catenin signaling. This unique mechanism of action has the potential to address unmet needs in osteoporosis management.

METHODS

The multifaceted practical clinical issues related to romosozumab are discussed, especially focusing on the rationale of employing a sclerostin inhibitor to target bone fragility as first line or second line treatment in post-menopausal osteoporosis and in males at increased risk of fractures.

RESULTS

Four randomized clinical trials with several post-hoc analyses and more than ten observational studies have consistently demonstrated that romosozumab is effective in rapidly increasing bone mineral density (BMD) and decreasing risk of vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures in post-menopausal women at very-high risk of fractures. In male osteoporosis, only data on BMD are available. Noteworthy, romosozumab was shown to be more effective and rapid than teriparatide in improving BMD, bone structure and strength at the hip, especially in women already treated with anti-resorptive drugs. Interestingly, even if romosozumab displays best results in treatment-naïve patients, its favourable effects on BMD were observed even in women previously treated with teriparatide or denosumab, although to a lesser extent.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the available evidence, romosozumab could be proposed as ideal drug in several clinical settings, such as non-fractured post-menopausal women at very-high risk of fractures, patients with recent hip fracture, patients non responder to bisphosphonates and short-term denosumab therapy.

Efficacy and safety of romosozumab: a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to comprehensively compile placebo-controlled trials on the efficacy and safety of romosozumab (210 mg, subcutaneously, once monthly) in postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for relevant placebo-controlled trials (as of January 1, 2024). Percent change in bone mineral density (BMD), falls, fractures, and adverse events (AEs) after drug administration were collected. Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Six trials (7990 patients; follow-up period, 6-12 months) were included. Compared with placebo, romosozumab significantly increased lumbar spine BMD (MD = 12.69; 95% CI 11.10-14.29), total hip BMD (MD = 4.42; 95% CI 3.03-5.80), and femoral neck BMD (MD = 3.99; 95% CI 2.42-5.57) at 12 months. Romosozumab significantly decreased falls (RR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.68-0.93) and major osteoporotic fractures (RR = 0.37; 95% CI 0.25-0.54), but increased injection-site reactions (RR = 1.83; 95% CI 1.46-2.30) within 12 months. No significant differences were observed in other AEs (including cardiovascular AEs) within 12 months.

CONCLUSION

Romosozumab treatment resulted in a significant BMD gain, reduced falls and major osteoporotic fractures. It was generally well-tolerated, including the cardiovascular aspects. However, clinicians should consider the occurrence of minor AEs (e.g., injection-site reactions).

Denosumab vs. bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of comparative safety in randomized controlled trials

Denosumab and bisphosphonates for primary osteoporosis are generally well-tolerated, but their comparative safety remains unclear. We aimed to explore the comparative safety of denosumab and bisphosphonates in primary osteoporosis. Databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar were searched for relevant peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials published in English (as of December 2023). Trials comparing adverse events (AE) between denosumab and bisphosphonates in patients with primary osteoporosis were investigated. Data were pooled using a fixed- or random-effects model to determine the risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for various AEs in patients treated with denosumab in comparison to patients treated with bisphosphonates. Eleven trials (5,545 patients; follow-up period: 12-24 months) were included in this meta-analysis. All trials had a risk of bias (e.g., reporting bias linked to secondary endpoints and selection bias linked to random allocation). In comparison to bisphosphonates, denosumab was significantly associated with less withdrawal due to AEs (RR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.34-0.71), more five-point major adverse cardiovascular events (RR = 2.05; 95% CI 1.03-4.09), more cardiovascular AEs (RR = 1.61; 95% CI 1.07-2.41), more infections (RR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.02-1.27), more upper respiratory tract infections (RR = 1.56; 95% CI 1.08-2.25), less vertebral fractures (RR = 0.54; 95% CI 0.31-0.93), and less abdominal pain (RR = 0.44;95% CI 0.22-0.87). We explored the comparative safety of denosumab and bisphosphonates for primary osteoporosis, some of which could be attributed to their beneficial effects. However, all trials had a risk of bias. Further investigations are required to confirm our results.

Romosozumab versus parathyroid hormone receptor agonists: which osteoanabolic to choose and when?

Osteoanabolic agents are used as a first line treatment in patients at high fracture risk. The PTH receptor 1 (PTH1R) agonists teriparatide (TPTD) and abaloparatide (ABL) increase bone formation, bone mineral density (BMD), and bone strength by activating PTH receptors on osteoblasts. Romosozumab (ROMO), a humanized monoclonal antibody against sclerostin, dramatically but transiently stimulates bone formation and persistently reduces bone resorption. Osteoanabolic agents increase BMD and bone strength while being more effective than antiresorptives in reducing fracture risk in postmenopausal women. However, direct comparisons of the antifracture benefits of osteoanabolic therapies are limited. In a direct comparison of TPTD and ABL, the latter resulted in greater BMD increases at the hip. While no differences in vertebral or non-vertebral fracture risk were observed between the two drugs, ABL led to a greater reduction of major osteoporotic fractures. Adverse event profiles were similar between the two agents except for hypercalcemia, which occurred more often with TPTD. No direct comparisons of fracture risk reduction between ROMO and the PTH1R agonists exist. Individual studies have shown greater increases in BMD and bone strength with ROMO compared with TPTD in treatment-naive women and in women previously treated with bisphosphonates. Some safety aspects, such as a history of tumor precluding the use of PTH1R agonists, and a history of major cardiovascular events precluding the use of ROMO, should also be considered when choosing between these agents. Finally, convenience of administration, reimbursement by national health systems and length of clinical experience may influence patient choice.

Effects of tetrahedral DNA nanostructures on the treatment of osteoporosis

Osteoporosis (OP) is a common disease characterized by bone loss and bone tissue microstructure degradation. Drug treatment is a common clinical treatment that aims to increase bone mass and bone density. Tetrahedral DNA nanostructures (TDNs) are three-dimensional tetrahedral frames formed by folding four single-stranded DNA molecules, which have good biological safety and can promote bone regeneration. In this study, a mouse model of OP was established by ovariectomy (OVX) and TDN was injected into the tail vein for 8 weeks. We found that ovariectomized mice could simulate some physiological changes in OP. After treatment with TDNs, some of this destruction in mice was significantly improved, including an increase in the bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and bone trabecular number (Tb. N), decrease in bone separation (Tb. SP), reduction in the damage to the mouse cartilage layer, reduction in osteoclast lacunae in bone trabecula, and reduction in the damage to the bone dense part. We also found that the expression of ALP, β-Catenin, Runx2, Osterix, and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)2 significantly decreased in OVX mice but increased after TDN treatment. Therefore, this study suggests that TDNs may regulate the Wnt/β-Catenin and BMP signalling pathways to improve the levels of some specific markers of osteogenic differentiation, such as Runx2, ALP, and Osterix, to promote osteogenesis, thus showing a therapeutic effect on OP mice.

Parathyroid hormone-PTH1R signaling in cardiovascular disease and homeostasis

Primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) afflicts our aging population with an incidence approaching 50 per 100 000 patient-years at a female:male ratio of ~3:1. Decisions surrounding surgical management are currently driven by age, hypercalcemia severity, presence of osteoporosis, renal insufficiency, or hypercalciuria with or without nephrolithiasis. Cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD) is not systematically considered. This is notable since the parathyroid hormone (PTH) 1 receptor (PTH1R) is biologically active in the vasculature, and adjusted CV mortality risk is increased almost threefold in individuals with pHPT who do not meet contemporary recommendations for surgical cure. We provide an overview of epidemiology, pharmacology, and physiology that highlights the need to: (i) identify biomarkers that establish a healthy 'set point' for CV PTH1R signaling tone; (ii) better understand the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationships of PTH1R ligands in CV homeostasis; and (iii) incorporate CVD risk assessment into the management of hyperparathyroidism.

The Safety and Efficacy of Abaloparatide on Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aging of the population increases the incidence of postmenopausal osteoporosis, which threatens the health of elderly women. Abaloparatide is a synthetic peptide analogue of the human parathyroid hormone-related protein that has recently been approved for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Its efficacy and safety have not been systematically evaluated. Therefore, studies on the efficacy and safety of abaloparatide could be of assistance in the clinical medication of postmenopausal osteoporosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of abaloparatide in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases were electronically searched from inception to July 6, 2023, for relevant randomized controlled trials. Two review authors independently conducted the study screening, quality assessment (based on the Risk of Bias Assessment Tool recommended in the Cochrane handbook), and data extraction. Outcome measures included bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover and metabolic markers, incidence of fractures, and adverse events. Data analyses were processed by using Stata SE15.

FINDINGS

Ultimately, 8 randomized controlled trials, involving a total of 3705 postmenopausal women, were included. Meta-analysis showed that abaloparatide administration significantly increased the BMD of the lumbar vertebrae (standardized mean difference [SMD], 1.28 [95% CI, 0.81-1.76); I2 = 78.5%]), femoral neck (SMD, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.17-1.23; I2 = 75.7%]), and hip bone (SMD, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.53-1.20; I2 = 60.4%]) in postmenopausal women compared with the control group. Type I procollagen N-terminal propeptide, a bone formation marker, was also elevated after abaloparatide administration. The incidence of vertebral fracture was lower in the abaloparatide group than in the control group (risk ratio, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.06-0.26; I2 = 0%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the abaloparatide and the placebo groups (risk ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.99-1.06; I2 = 0%).

IMPLICATIONS

Abaloparatide has a protective effect on women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. It could reduce their risk for vertebral fracture; increase their BMD of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and hip; and alleviate symptoms and complications of postmenopausal osteoporosis with considerable safety. Limitations of this study include not searching the gray literature and not performing a subgroup analysis. PROSPERO Registration No.: CRD42022370944.

Safety and efficacy of sequential treatments for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Background

The sequential anti-osteoporotic treatment for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) is important, but the order in which different types of drugs are used is confusing and controversial. Therefore, we performed a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of available sequential treatments to explore the most efficacious strategy for long-term management of osteoporosis.

Methods

In this network meta-analysis, we searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to September 19, 2023 to identify randomised controlled trials comparing sequential treatments for women with PMO. The identified trials were screened by reading the title and abstract, and only randomised clinical trials involving sequential anti-osteoporotic treatments and reported relevant outcomes for PMO were included. The main outcomes included vertebral fracture risk, the percentage change in bone mineral density (BMD) in different body parts, and all safety indicators in the stage after switching treatment. A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed using the multivariate random effects method and evaluated using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Confidence in the Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) framework. This study is registered with PROSPERO: CRD42022360236.

Findings

A total of 19 trials comprising 18,416 participants were included in the study. Five different sequential treatments were investigated as the main interventions and compared to the corresponding control groups. The intervention groups in this study comprised the following treatment switch protocols: switching from an anabolic agent (AB) to an anti-resorptive agent (AR) (ABtAR), transitioning from one AR to another AR (ARtAAR), shifting from an AR to an AB (ARtAB), switching from an AB to a combined treatment of AB and AR (ABtC), and transitioning from an AR to a combined treatment (ARtC). A significant reduction in the incidence of vertebral fractures was observed in ARtC, ABtAR and ARtAB in the second stage, and ARtC had the lowest incidence with 81.5% SUCRA. ARtAAR and ABtAR were two effective strategies for preventing fractures and improving BMD in other body parts. Especially, ARtAAR could improve total hip BMD with the highest 96.1% SUCRA, and ABtAR could decrease the risk of total fractures with the highest 94.3% SUCRA. Almost no difference was observed in safety outcomes in other comparisons.

Interpretation

Our findings suggested that the ARtAAR and ABtAR strategy are the effective and safe sequential treatment for preventing fracture and improving BMD for PMO. ARtC is more effective in preventing vertebral fractures.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (82170900, 81970762), the Hunan Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine, and the Hunan Province High-level Health Talents "225" Project.

Regulatory Effects of Quercetin on Bone Homeostasis: Research Updates and Future Perspectives

The imbalance of bone homeostasis has become a major public medical problem amid the background of an aging population, which is closely related to the occurrence of osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and fractures. Presently, most drugs used in the clinical treatment of bone homeostasis imbalance are bisphosphonates, calcitonin, estrogen receptor modulators, and biological agents that inhibit bone resorption or parathyroid hormone analogs that promote bone formation. However, there are many adverse reactions. Therefore, it is necessary to explore potential drugs. Quercetin, as a flavonol compound with various biological activities, is widely distributed in plants. Studies have found that quercetin can regulate bone homeostasis through multiple pathways and targets. An in-depth exploration of the pharmacological mechanism of quercetin is of great significance for the development of new drugs. This review discusses the therapeutic mechanisms of quercetin on bone homeostasis, such as regulating the expression of long non-coding RNA, signaling pathways of bone metabolism, various types of programmed cell death, bone nutrients supply pathways, anti-oxidative stress, anti-inflammation, and activation of Sirtuins. We also summarize recent progress in improving quercetin bioavailability and propose some issues worth paying attention to, which may help guide future research efforts.