Rare cancers are not rare in Asia as well: The rare cancer burden in East Asia

Risk of thoracic soft tissue sarcoma after breast cancer radiotherapy: a population-based cohort study in Osaka, Japan

Postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer reportedly increases the risk of thoracic soft tissue sarcomas, particularly angiosarcomas; however, the risk in the Japanese population remains unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the incidence of thoracic soft tissue sarcoma among patients with breast cancer in Japan and determine its association with radiotherapy. This retrospective cohort study used data from the population-based cancer registry of the Osaka Prefecture. The inclusion criteria were female sex, age 20-84 years, diagnosis of breast cancer between 1990 and 2010, no supraclavicular lymph node or distant metastasis, underwent surgery and survived for at least 1 year. The primary outcome was the occurrence of thoracic soft tissue sarcomas 1 year or later after breast cancer diagnosis. Among the 13 762 patients who received radiotherapy, 15 developed thoracic soft tissue sarcomas (nine angiosarcomas and six other sarcomas), with a median time of 7.7 years (interquartile range, 4.0-8.6 years) after breast cancer diagnosis. Among the 27 658 patients who did not receive radiotherapy, four developed thoracic soft tissue sarcomas (three angiosarcomas and one other sarcoma), with a median time of 11.6 years after diagnosis. The 10-year cumulative incidence was higher in the radiotherapy cohort than in the non-radiotherapy cohort (0.087 vs. 0.0036%, P < 0.001). Poisson regression analysis revealed that radiotherapy increased the risk of thoracic soft tissue sarcoma (relative risk, 6.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.4-24.4). Thus, although rare, breast cancer radiotherapy is associated with an increased risk of thoracic soft tissue sarcoma in the Japanese population.

Time trend analysis of rare cancer incidence 2011-2018: Nationwide population-based cancer registries in Japan

Rare cancers collectively account for a significant proportion of the overall cancer burden in Japan. We aimed to describe and examine the incidence of each rare cancer and the temporal changes using the internationally agreed rare cancer classification. Cancer cases registered in regional population-based cancer registries from 2011 to 2015 and the National Cancer Registry (NCR) from 2016 to 2018 were classified into 18 families, 68 Tier-1 cancer groupings, and 216 single cancer entities based on the RARECAREnet list. Crude incidence rates and age-standardized incidence rates (ASR) were calculated for Tier-1 and Tier-2 cancers. The annual percent change and the 95% and 99% confidence limits for annual ASR for each of the 68 Tier-1 cancers were estimated using the log-linear regression of the weighted least squares method. The differences in ASRs between 2011 and 2018 were evaluated as an absolute change. A total of 5,640,879 cases were classified into Tier-1 and Tier-2 cancers. The ASRs of 18 out of 52 Tier-1 cancers in the rare cancer families increased, whereas the ASR for epithelial tumors of gallbladder decreased. The ASRs of 6 out of the 16 Tier-1 cancers in the common cancer families increased, whereas those of epithelial tumors of stomach and liver decreased. There was no significant change in the incidence of the other 40 Tier-1 cancers. The incidence of several cancers increased due to the dissemination of diagnostic concepts, improved diagnostic techniques, changes in coding practice, and the initiation of the NCR.

Head and neck cancers survival in Europe, Taiwan, and Japan: results from RARECAREnet Asia based on a privacy-preserving federated infrastructure

Background

The head and neck cancers (HNCs) incidence differs between Europe and East Asia. Our objective was to determine whether survival of HNC also differs between European and Asian countries.

Methods

We used population-based cancer registry data to calculate 5-year relative survival (RS) for the oral cavity, hypopharynx, larynx, nasal cavity, and major salivary gland in Europe, Taiwan, and Japan. We modeled RS with a generalized linear model adjusting for time since diagnosis, sex, age, subsite, and histological grouping. Analyses were performed using federated learning, which enables analyses without sharing sensitive data.

Findings

Five-year RS for HNC varied between geographical areas. For each HNC site, Europe had a lower RS than both Japan and Taiwan. HNC subsites and histologies distribution and survival differed between the three areas. Differences between Europe and both Asian countries persisted even after adjustments for all HNC sites but nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, when comparing Europe and Taiwan.

Interpretation

Survival differences can be attributed to different factors including different period of diagnosis, more advanced stage at diagnosis, or different availability/access of treatment. Cancer registries did not have stage and treatment information to further explore the reasons of the observed survival differences. Our analyses have confirmed federated learning as a feasible approach for data analyses that addresses the challenges of data sharing and urge for further collaborative studies including relevant prognostic factors.

Epidemiology of rare cancers in India and South Asian countries - remembering the forgotten

Background

Rare cancers (RCs) are challenging to manage and are "forgotten cancers" though they collectively constitute a significant proportion of all cancers (∼20%). As a first step towards streamlining care, there is an unmet need to map the epidemiology of RCs in South Asian Association for Regional Collaboration (SAARC) countries.

Methods

The authors collected data from 30 Population-Based Cancer Registries (PBCR) of India and the published national registries of Nepal, Bhutan and Sri Lanka (SL) and compared them with the standard RARECAREnet RC list.

Findings

With the standard definition of crude incidence rates (CR) ≤6/100,0000 per population, 67.5%, 68.3%, 62.3% and 37% of all incident cancers qualify as RCs in India, Bhutan, Nepal and SL, respectively. An arbitrary cut-off CR ≤3 appears more appropriate with 43%, 39.5%, 51.8% and 17.2% of cancers identified as RCs, respectively, due to the lower cancer incidence.There are similarities and notable differences between the RC lists of the SAARC region with that of the European RC list. Oral cavity cancers are rare in Europe, while pancreas, rectum, urinary bladder and melanomas are common. In addition, uterine, colon and prostatic cancers are rare in India, Nepal and Bhutan. In SL, thyroid cancer is common. There are gender-related and regional differences in RC trends in the SAARC countries.

Interpretation

There is an unmet need in SAARC nations to capture epidemiological nuances in rare cancers. Understanding the unique issues in the developing world may guide policymakers to adopt appropriate measures to improve RC care and tailor public health interventions.

Funding

None.

Geographical and spatial disparities in the incidence and survival of rare cancers in Australia

Rare cancers collectively account for around a quarter of cancer diagnoses and deaths. However, epidemiological studies are sparse. We describe spatial and geographical patterns in incidence and survival of rare cancers across Australia using a population-based cancer registry cohort of rare cancer cases diagnosed among Australians aged at least 15 years, 2007 to 2016. Rare cancers were defined using site- and histology-based categories from the European RARECARE study, as individual cancer types having crude annual incidence rates of less than 6/100 000. Incidence and survival patterns were modelled with generalised linear and Bayesian spatial Leroux models. Spatial heterogeneity was tested using the maximised excess events test. Rare cancers (n = 268 070) collectively comprised 22% of all invasive cancer diagnoses and accounted for 27% of all cancer-related deaths in Australia, 2007 to 2016 with an overall 5-year relative survival of around 53%. Males and those living in more remote or more disadvantaged areas had higher incidence but lower survival. There was substantial evidence for spatial variation in both incidence and survival for rare cancers between small geographical areas across Australia, with similar patterns so that those areas with higher incidence tended to have lower survival. Rare cancers are a substantial health burden in Australia. Our study has highlighted the need to better understand the higher burden of these cancers in rural and disadvantaged regions where the logistical challenges in their diagnosis, treatment and support are magnified.

Increased incidence of rare cancers and varied age distributions by cancer group: A population-based cancer registry study in Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological characteristics of many types of rare cancers are limited especially in Asia. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the burden and changing time trends of rare cancers in Hiroshima, Japan.

METHODS

The internationally agreed RARECAREnet list of rare cancers was used to identify patients diagnosed with cancers from 2005 to 2015 who were registered in the Hiroshima Prefecture Cancer Registry. Quality indicators specific to rare cancers were assessed by cancer grouping. Crude incidence rates (IRs) and age-standardized rates (ASRs) were calculated for 216 single cancers (rare and common) included in the list. A joinpoint regression was used to analyze age distribution and time trends in the ASRs for 12 internationally agreed rare cancer families. Quality indicators, ASRs, and IRs in Japan were identified to examine IR differences and the effects on data accuracy.

RESULTS

The 231,328 cases were used to calculate the IRs of each cancer. Epithelial tumors in rare families increased with age, but nonepithelial tumors occurred at any age. The proportion of rare cancer families to total cancers was stable. The time trend for families of head and neck cancers (annual percent change and 95 % confidence interval: 2.4 %; 1.2-3.7 %), neuroendocrine tumors (6.6 %; 5.1-8.1 %), and hematological cancers (4.3 %; 3.2-5.5 %) markedly increased.

CONCLUSION

The ASRs of several rare cancers increased because of increased knowledge of these diseases, improved diagnostic techniques, and aggressive diagnoses.

Rare molecular subtypes of lung cancer

Oncogenes that occur in ≤5% of non-small-cell lung cancers have been defined as 'rare'; nonetheless, this frequency can correspond to a substantial number of patients diagnosed annually. Within rare oncogenes, less commonly identified alterations (such as HRAS, NRAS, RIT1, ARAF, RAF1 and MAP2K1 mutations, or ERBB family, LTK and RASGRF1 fusions) can share certain structural or oncogenic features with more commonly recognized alterations (such as KRAS, BRAF, MET and ERBB family mutations, or ALK, RET and ROS1 fusions). Over the past 5 years, a surge in the identification of rare-oncogene-driven lung cancers has challenged the boundaries of traditional clinical grade diagnostic assays and profiling algorithms. In tandem, the number of approved targeted therapies for patients with rare molecular subtypes of lung cancer has risen dramatically. Rational drug design has iteratively improved the quality of small-molecule therapeutic agents and introduced a wave of antibody-based therapeutics, expanding the list of actionable de novo and resistance alterations in lung cancer. Getting additional molecularly tailored therapeutics approved for rare-oncogene-driven lung cancers in a larger range of countries will require ongoing stakeholder cooperation. Patient advocates, health-care agencies, investigators and companies with an interest in diagnostics, therapeutics and real-world evidence have already taken steps to surmount the challenges associated with research into low-frequency drivers.

WT1 Trio Peptide-Based Cancer Vaccine for Rare Cancers Expressing Shared Target WT1

No standard treatment has been established for most rare cancers. Here, we report a clinical trial of a biweekly WT1 tri-peptide-based vaccine for recurrent or advanced rare cancers. Due to the insufficient number of patients available for a traditional clinical trial, the trial was designed for rare cancers expressing shared target molecule WT1. The recruitment criteria included WT1-expressing tumors as well as HLA-A*24:02 or 02:01. The primary endpoints were immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody (Ab) production against the WT1-235 cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) epitope and delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) skin reactions to targeted WT1 CTL epitopes. The secondary endpoints were safety and clinical efficacy. Forty-five patients received WT1 Trio, and 25 (55.6%) completed the 3-month protocol treatment. WT1-235 IgG Ab was positive in 88.0% of patients treated with WT1 Trio at 3 months, significantly higher than 62.5% of the weekly WT1-235 CTL peptide vaccine. The DTH positivity rate in WT1 Trio was 62.9%, which was not significantly different from 60.7% in the WT1-235 CTL peptide vaccine. The WT1 Trio safety was confirmed without severe treatment-related adverse events, except grade 3 myasthenia gravis-like symptoms observed in a patient with thymic cancer. Fifteen (33.3%) patients achieved stable disease after 3 months of treatment. In conclusion, the biweekly WT1 Trio vaccine containing the WT1-332 helper T lymphocyte peptide induced more robust immune responses targeting WT1 than the weekly WT1-235 CTL peptide vaccine. Therefore, WT1-targeted immunotherapy may be a potential therapeutic strategy for rare cancers.

Cancer of the nasopharynx in Aotearoa New Zealand from 1994 to 2018: Incidence and survival in a population-based, national registry cohort study

BACKGROUND

Cancer of the nasopharynx has remarkable geographic and ethnic variation in incidence and outcomes globally. Recent advances in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies provide new opportunities for early detection and improved outcomes. This study aimed to determine the incidence, demographics, outcomes and time trends of cancer of the nasopharynx in Aotearoa New Zealand over the last 25 years.

METHODS

In a population-based, national registry cohort study of notifications of malignant neoplasms of the nasopharynx made to the New Zealand Cancer Registry between 1994 and 2018, age-specific and age-standardised incidence rates and survival outcomes were evaluated.

FINDINGS

577 registrations of nasopharyngeal cancer from between 1994 and 2018 were analysed; median age at diagnosis 54 years; 72.4% male; 37.4% Asian, 24.3% New Zealand European, 25.3% Pacific peoples, 13.0% Māori. Age-standardised annual incidence remained low (<1/100,000 person-years) and stable from 1994 to 2018. Age-standardised incidence rates in Pacific peoples, Asian and Māori were 21 (95% CI 12.07-35.21)-, 17 (10.95-25.33)- and 4 (2.79-7.07)-fold higher, respectively, than New Zealand Europeans. Epstein-Barr virus-related morphologies predominated keratinising squamous cell carcinoma and not-otherwise-specified morphological subtypes. Ten-year overall survival rate for the cohort was 49.2% (95% CI 44.7-53.5). Older age at diagnosis (65-94 years), Māori or Pacific ethnicity, keratinising squamous cell carcinoma and distant disease were associated with shorter overall survival, whereas younger age at diagnosis (10-29 years), and Asian ethnicity were associated with longer survival.

INTERPRETATION

Aotearoa New Zealand has a distinct profile of nasopharyngeal cancer, with age, ethnicity and morphology among the main determinants of incidence and survival.

FUNDING

None.

The gap between rare and common cancers still exists: Results from a population-based study in the Netherlands

INTRODUCTION

Epidemiological discrepancies exist between rare and common cancers. The aim of this population-based study was to compare rare versus common adult solid cancers in the Netherlands, by providing incidence, prevalence and survival rates, evaluating trends in survival and comparing individual entities within domains and families.

METHODS

All adult patients with malignant solid cancers in the Netherlands between 1995 and 2019 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Data on patient, tumour and treatment characteristics were collected, and relative survival and survival trends were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 170,628 patients with rare adult solid cancers and 806,023 patients with common adult solid cancers were included. Rare cancers accounted for 18% of all cancer diagnoses (mean incidence), and 15% of the total ten-year cancer prevalence during 2010-2019. Overall 5-year survival was worse for rare cancers than for common cancers (52.0% versus 68.7%). Between 1995-1999 and 2015-2019, 5-year survival rates for rare cancers increased to a lesser extent (from 46.2% to 52.6%, i.e. 6.4%) than for common cancers (56.9%-70.1%, i.e. 13.2%), and for most rare cancer domains compared to common cancer domains. The majority of rare cancer entities did not show an improvement in 5-year survival. Differences for individual entities between domains and families were found.

CONCLUSION

Differences in survival between rare and common cancers indicate major challenges for rare cancer care and emphasise that improvement is highly needed. Observed inequalities need to be overcome by investing in early diagnosis, novel therapies, scientific research and in establishing centres of expertise.

The epidemiology of rare types of hepatobiliary and pancreatic cancer from national cancer registry

BACKGROUND

Information on rare hepatobiliary and pancreatic (HBP) subtypes of cancer is scarce. We aimed to elucidate the incidence and clinical features of rare tumors in Japan using the National Cancer Registry (NCR), a new nationwide integrated population-based registry.

METHODS

The data of patients diagnosed in 2016-2017 were extracted from the NCR database, and classified by topography: liver cells, intrahepatic bile duct, gallbladder, extrahepatic bile duct, ampulla of Vater, and pancreas. Data were described and analyzed using the World Health Organization and General Rules tumor classifications. The incidences for all rare tumors including hepatoblastoma and adenosquamous cell carcinoma were calculated as the number of new cases divided by the corresponding total person years.

RESULTS

The NCR data yielded 8,239 patients with rare HBP tumors between 2016 and 2017. The ratios of rare tumors to all cancer types were 0.5%, 0.7%, 3.9%, 1.6%, 0.8%, and 7.2% in the liver, intrahepatic bile duct, gallbladder, extrahepatic bile duct, ampulla of Vater, and pancreas, respectively. Rare tumors occurred more frequently in men, except for gallbladder tumors. The main tumor stage was localized in liver cells (42.4%) and the intrahepatic bile duct (51.6%); more patients were diagnosed in advanced stage with gallbladder (84.1%) and extrahepatic bile duct (74.4%) tumors. Approximately equal percentage of patients were diagnosed at designated cancer care hospitals (DCCHs) and non-DCCHs, whereas 60% to 70% patients received treatment at DCCHs.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report to provide comprehensive information on the epidemiological status of rare HBP tumors in Japan by utilizing population-based NCR data.

International strategy in cancer epidemiology: Japan's involvement in global projects and future role

In recent years, collaboration among researchers in the field of cancer epidemiology has been accelerating in various forms. Here, we review recent trends in international collaborative research activities in the cancer epidemiology field in Japan. These include not only support for other countries with less developed cancer statistics infrastructures, but also large-scale compilations and international comparisons through collaborative studies, as well as integration with analytical epidemiology and clinical research. Formation of international cohort consortia and estimates of cancer and risk factors in each country have contributed to raising the skill levels of cancer epidemiologists as well as to expanding research networks and activities among cancer epidemiologists. Molecular and genome epidemiological studies on cancer have progressed over decades and these continue to increase in size and dimension. Application of evidence from this area in prevention is still underway and needs further effort. Japanese epidemiologists have great potential to assume international leadership roles by taking advantage of the uniqueness, originality and characteristics of Japanese cohorts.

Descriptive epidemiological study of rare, less common and common cancers in Western Australia

Background

There are no epidemiological studies describing rare cancers in Western Australia (WA). We aimed to fill this gap by estimating the incidence and five-year survival of rare, less common and common cancers in WA, based on definitions for rarity used by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare and cancer groupings from the project on Surveillance of Rare Cancers in Europe (RARECARE). This research will enable policy- and decision-makers to better understand the size and nature of the public health problem presented by rare cancers in WA. It is anticipated that this study will inform improved health service design and delivery for all WA cancer patients, but particularly those with rare and less common cancers.

Methods

We estimated incidence and five-year survival rates of rare, less common and common cancers in WA using data sourced from the WA Cancer Registry for the 2013–2017 period. Cancers were defined as rare (< 6), less common (6–12), or common (> 12) based on their crude incidence rate per 100,000 people per year.

Results

Rare cancers make up 21.5% of all cancer diagnoses in WA, with a significantly poorer five-year survival of 58.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 57.3–59.1%), compared to patients diagnosed with a common cancer, whose five-year survival was 87.8% (95% CI 87.3–88.3%). Survival for less common cancers was significantly poorer than both rare and common cancers, at 48.1% (95% CI 47.3–49.0%). Together, rare and less common cancers represent 48.4% of all cancer diagnoses in WA.

Conclusions

While rare cancers are individually scarce, collectively over one in five cancer patients in WA are diagnosed with a rare cancer. These patients experience significantly worse prognoses compared to patients with common cancers.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08501-4.

Ultra-rare sarcomas: A consensus paper from the Connective Tissue Oncology Society community of experts on the incidence threshold and the list of entities

BACKGROUND

Among sarcomas, which are rare cancers, many types are exceedingly rare; however, a definition of ultra-rare cancers has not been established. The problem of ultra-rare sarcomas is particularly relevant because they represent unique diseases, and their rarity poses major challenges for diagnosis, understanding disease biology, generating clinical evidence to support new drug development, and achieving formal authorization for novel therapies.

METHODS

The Connective Tissue Oncology Society promoted a consensus effort in November 2019 to establish how to define ultra-rare sarcomas through expert consensus and epidemiologic data and to work out a comprehensive list of these diseases. The list of ultra-rare sarcomas was based on the 2020 World Health Organization classification, The incidence rates were estimated using the Information Network on Rare Cancers (RARECARENet) database and NETSARC (the French Sarcoma Network's clinical-pathologic registry). Incidence rates were further validated in collaboration with the Asian cancer registries of Japan, Korea, and Taiwan.

RESULTS

It was agreed that the best criterion for a definition of ultra-rare sarcomas would be incidence. Ultra-rare sarcomas were defined as those with an incidence of approximately ≤1 per 1,000,000, to include those entities whose rarity renders them extremely difficult to conduct well powered, prospective clinical studies. On the basis of this threshold, a list of ultra-rare sarcomas was defined, which comprised 56 soft tissue sarcoma types and 21 bone sarcoma types.

CONCLUSIONS

Altogether, the incidence of ultra-rare sarcomas accounts for roughly 20% of all soft tissue and bone sarcomas. This confirms that the challenges inherent in ultra-rare sarcomas affect large numbers of patients.

An Asian Body to Tackle Cancers in Asia - The Asian National Cancer Centers Alliance

The socioeconomic burden of cancer is growing rapidly in the Asian region, with a concentrated burden on low- and middle- income countries. The residents of this region, representing almost 60% of the global population, demonstrate an eclectic and complex nature, with huge disparities in ethnicity, sociocultural practices among others. The Asian National Cancer Centers Alliance (ANCCA) was established in 2005 by heads of several national cancer centers (NCCs) in the region to address common issues and concerns among Asian countries. During the first 13 years of ANCCA’s existence, the participating NCCs’ senior managers paved the way toward collaboration through transparent sharing of key facts and activities. Concrete achievements of the Alliance include the Asia Tobacco-Free Declaration, the establishment of the ANCCA Constitution in 2014 as well as the creation of an official website more recently. In November 2019, the most active ANCCA members (China, India, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Mongolia, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam) strengthened the bonds of the entity with the clear aim to halt the increase in cancer and mortality rates in Asian countries by 2030. New opportunities including accelerated cooperation between members as well as collaboration with external and multidisciplinary stakeholders at local, regional and international levels are an essential step to most effectively tackle cancers in Asia.