Tumor dynamics in patients with solid tumors treated with pembrolizumab beyond disease progression

Photoimmunotherapy for head and neck cancer: A systematic review

Photoimmunotherapy is a new cancer treatment that uses cetuximab sarotalocan sodium, a conjugate of cetuximab and the light activatable dye, IR700, and red light at a wavelength of 690 nm. In Japan, photoimmunotherapy for "unresectable locally advanced or locally recurrent head and neck cancer" has been covered by insurance since 2021. Although presently approved only for head and neck cancer, photoimmunotherapy is an important technology in the future of various cancer treatments. Photoimmunotherapy is an important technology for the future of various cancer treatments, and it is essential to strive for the development and widespread use of photoimmunotherapy in clinical practice. In this review, we will explain the mechanism of photoimmunotherapy, treatment cases, clinical trial data, reports from real world data in Japan, and future issues and prospects as seen in actual clinical practice.

Nomogram based on computed tomography radiomics features and clinicopathological factors to predict the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge

Background

Whether patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who experience progressive disease (PD) after the initial immunotherapy treatment benefit from subsequent immunotherapy remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to identify predictive factors and develop a nomogram to predict successful immunotherapy rechallenge for such patients with NSCLC to guide clinical treatment and improve prognosis.

Methods

Between January 2019 and December 2022, 352 patients with advanced NSCLC who received immunotherapy rechallenge after experiencing PD were divided into the training (n=246) and validation (n=106) cohorts. Clinicopathological factors and radiomics features were included in the univariate and multivariate analyses, with significant predictive factors being used to develop the nomogram.

Results

Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that time from the initial immunotherapy to PD occurrence (duration), clinical N stage, liver metastasis, treatment after PD following the first immunotherapy (post-PD treatment), and radiomics features were independent predictive factors for progression-free survival (PFS). In addition, age, duration, clinical N stage, post-PD treatment, and radiomics were independent predictive factors for overall survival (OS). Accordingly, these predictive factors were used to develop a nomogram. The area under the curves (AUCs) of the nomogram for predicting 6-, 12-, and 18-month PFS and 12-, 18-, and 24-month OS were 0.731, 0.809, 0.878, 0.742, 0.782, and 0.868, respectively, in the training cohorts, whereas the corresponding values in the validation cohort were 0.672, 0.774, 0.826, 0.833, 0.705, and 0.762. This indicated good discrimination.

Conclusions

We developed and validated a predictive nomogram based on clinicopathological factors and radiomics features for the prognosis of patients with advanced NSCLC who received immunotherapy rechallenge following PD after the first immunotherapy. The nomogram showed strong predictive utility and can be a suitable tool for such patients with advanced NSCLC.

Nab-paclitaxel combined with cadonilimab (AK104) as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer: protocol for a phase II prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial

Background

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most prevalent malignant tumors worldwide, often diagnosed at an advanced stage with a poor prognosis. Paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, and irinotecan, either as monotherapies or in combination with ramucirumab, are currently standard second-line treatments for GC. However, the efficacy of these therapies is limited, necessitating the development of new combination strategies to improve response rates. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown success in first-line treatment for advanced GC, leading to interest in immune rechallenge strategies for second-line treatment. Re-challenging patients with ICIs after progression on first-line treatment may restore immune responses and provide additional clinical benefit. Recently, cadonilimab (AK104), a bispecific antibody targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4, has demonstrated promising antitumor activity when combined with chemotherapy in advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. However, the efficacy and safety of nab-paclitaxel combined with AK104 for the treatment of advanced GC remain unclear. Furthermore, identifying predictive biomarkers of efficacy is essential to developing personalized treatment strategies. This study aims to explore the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel combined with AK104 as a second-line treatment for patients who have progressed after first-line chemoimmunotherapy, focusing on evaluating the therapeutic effect of ICIs rechallenge in gastric cancer.

Methods

This is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm Phase II clinical study. Eligible patients were histologically or cytologically diagnosed with unresectable recurrent or metastatic GC, failed first-line chemotherapy in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor, aged between 18-75 years old, expected survival ≥3 months, and with a physical status of 0 or 1 in the Eastern Cooperative Cancer Group (ECOG). Enrolled patients will receive intravenous cadonilimab (AK104) 6 mg/kg on days 1, and 15, and intravenous nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 every four weeks on days 1, 8, and 15. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The exploratory objective was to identify biomarkers associated with efficacy, mechanism of action, and safety. A total of 59 participants were planned to be recruited using Simon's two-stage design. The trial was initiated in June 2024 in China.

Discussion

This study is the first prospective trial to evaluate the combination of nab-paclitaxel and cadonilimab as second-line treatment after first-line chemoimmunotherapy failure. By investigating immune rechallenge, it aims to reactivate anti-tumor immune responses and improve clinical outcomes in GC patients. The exploration of predictive biomarkers, such as ctDNA, TMB, MSI, PD-L1 expression, TIL profiles, and gut microbiota, will help personalize treatment and identify patients most likely to benefit from immune rechallenge. This trial could provide valuable insights into overcoming immune resistance and contribute to developing a promising second-line therapeutic strategy for advanced GC.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.Gov, identifier NCT06349967.

Dissection of Progressive Disease Patterns for a Modified Classification for Immunotherapy

Importance

Progressive disease (PD) in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) varies widely in outcomes according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1. Efforts to modify RECIST for ICI treatment have not resolved the heterogeneity in PD patterns, posing a clinical challenge.

Objective

To develop and validate a modified PD classification based on PD patterns and evaluate its association with postprogression survival (PPOS) in patients treated with the programmed cell death protein ligand 1 antibody atezolizumab across various solid tumors.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This study analyzed data from 5 phase 3 trials (IMmotion151, IMvigor211, OAK, Impower133, and IMspire150) involving patients treated with atezolizumab for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), urothelial carcinoma, small cell lung cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and melanoma. This post hoc analysis was conducted from March to September 2024.

Exposure

Treatment with atezolizumab.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the association of PD patterns with PPOS. Seven PD patterns were identified based on the enlargement of target and nontarget lesions or new lesions and their combinations.

Results

A total of 1377 patients were analyzed across the 5 trials. In RCC, 7 PD patterns significantly affected prognosis. The 6-month PPOS probability ranged from 26% for progression in target and nontarget lesions plus new lesions to 90% for progression in either target or nontarget lesions alone. A modified PD classification was developed that categorized PD into 3 risk levels: low risk (progression of existing lesions), intermediate risk (new lesions without progression of existing lesions), and high risk (progression of existing lesions plus new lesions). This score was associated with PPOS in ICI-treated RCC, with hazard ratios of 0.23 (95% CI, 0.13-0.41; P < .001) and 0.39 (95% CI, 0.23-0.66; P < .001) for low-risk and intermediate-risk PD compared with high-risk PD, respectively. Validation in additional trials confirmed the score's applicability across various tumors.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, a survival score was developed based on PD patterns. The risk classification was associated with PPOS across various solid tumors treated with immunotherapy and may therefore enhance prognostication and clinical decision-making, potentially providing a valuable tool for treating patients with PD who are receiving immunotherapy.

The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) can guide decisions for immunotherapy treatment beyond progression

BACKGROUND

Treatment beyond progression (TBP) is common in patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), however, there is no biomarker to select patients that are more likely to derive benefit from TBP. Here, we investigated the potential of the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) as a predictive biomarker to select patients for TBP.

METHODS

We performed a post-hoc analysis of the immunotherapy arms in the randomized phase 3 trials IMmotion151 (renal cell carcinoma), OAK (non-small cell lung cancer) and IMvigor211 (urothelial cancer). The main outcome was post-progression overall survival (PPOS) after the first investigator-assessed disease progression (PD), in mGPS risk groups. The mGPS classifies patients into three risk groups based on C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin.

RESULTS

We found a strong prognostic value for the mGPS when assessed at the time of PD (PD-mGPS) in all three trials. High-risk PD-mGPS was associated with significantly shorter PPOS compared to low-risk PD-mGPS (HR for death 18.3 (95 % CI 6.71-50.0, p < 0.001)) for RCC, UC: HR 4.16 (95 % CI 2.58-6.69, p < 0.001) and NSCLC HR 2.53 (95 % CI 1.70-3.77, p < 0.001). Importantly, patients within all three trials only derived benefit from ICI-TBP compared to switch to further-line treatment in the PD-mGPS low-risk group (RCC: HR 0.18 (95 % CI 0.06-0.55, p = 0.002); UC: HR 0.59 (95 % CI 0.34-1.00, p = 0.052); NSCLC: 0.62 (0.41-0.92, p = 0.018) compared to PD-mGPS intermediate/ high risk).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the mGPS measured at the time of radiologic PD can identify patients with a better prognosis who may benefit from continued atezolizumab therapy, aiding in the selection for TBP in clinical practice.

Neutralizing GDF-15 can overcome anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 resistance in solid tumours

Cancer immunotherapies with antibodies blocking immune checkpoint molecules are clinically active across multiple cancer entities and have markedly improved cancer treatment1. Yet, response rates are still limited, and tumour progression commonly occurs2. Soluble and cell-bound factors in the tumour microenvironment negatively affect cancer immunity. Recently, growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15), a cytokine that is abundantly produced by many cancer types, was shown to interfere with antitumour immune response. In preclinical cancer models, GDF-15 blockade synergistically enhanced the efficacy of anti-PD-1-mediated checkpoint inhibition3. In a first-in-human phase 1-2a study (GDFATHER-1/2a trial, NCT04725474 ), patients with advanced cancers refractory to anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 therapy (termed generally as anti-PD-1/PD-L1 refractoriness) were treated with the neutralizing anti-GDF-15 antibody visugromab (CTL-002) in combination with the anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab. Here we show that durable and deep responses were achieved in some patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer and urothelial cancer, two cancer entities identified as frequently immunosuppressed by GDF-15 in an in silico screening of approximately 10,000 tumour samples in The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Increased levels of tumour infiltration, proliferation, interferon-γ-related signalling and granzyme B expression by cytotoxic T cells were observed in response to treatment. Neutralizing GDF-15 holds promise in overcoming resistance to immune checkpoint inhibition in cancer.

Treatment options for tumor progression after initial immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A real-world study

OBJECTIVE

Whether to continue administering immunotherapy to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have experienced tumor progression remains controversial after immunotherapy. The aims were to explore survival outcomes after further immunotherapy post-progression and to determine the optimal combination therapy in such cases.

METHODS

Overall, 507 patients with NSCLC who underwent immunotherapy and experienced tumor progression were retrospectively divided into Immuno-combination and No-immuno groups according to whether additional combination therapy involving immunotherapy was administered post-progression. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the different treatment regimens for patients in the Immuno-combination group.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, there were 150 patients in the No-immuno group and 300 patients in the Immuno combination group. Superior PFS was observed in the Immuno-combination group compared with those in the No-immuno group (6-month PFS: 25.3 % vs. 60.6 %; 12-month PFS: 6.7 % vs. 24.4 %; P < 0.001). Similar intergroup differences were observed for OS (12-month OS: 22.3 % vs. 69.4 %; 18-month OS: 6.4 % vs. 40.4 %; P < 0.001). Superior PFS outcomes were observed in the Immuno+Antiangiogenic group compared with the Immuno+Chemo group (6-month PFS: 51.3 % vs. 71.5 %; 12-month PFS: 23.1 % vs. 25.7 %; P = 0.017). Similar differences in OS were observed between those same subgroups (12-month OS: 62.1 % vs. 77.9 %; 18-month OS: 33.3 % vs. 48.7 %; P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Patients with NSCLC experiencing tumor progression post-immunotherapy can still benefit from further treatment, with immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy the most efficacious option.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors rechallenge in non-small cell lung cancer: Current evidence and future directions

Immunotherapy, remarkably immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has significantly altered the treatment landscape for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite their success, the discontinuation of ICIs therapy may occur due to factors such as prior treatment completion, disease progression during ICIs treatment, or immune-related adverse events (irAEs). As numerous studies highlight the dynamic nature of immune responses and the sustained benefits of ICIs, ICIs rechallenge has become an attractive and feasible option. However, the decision-making process for ICIs rechallenge in clinical settings is complicated by numerous uncertainties. This review systematically analyses existing clinical research evidence, classifying ICIs rechallenge into distinct clinical scenarios, exploring methods to overcome ICIs resistance in rechallenge instances, and identifying biomarkers to select patients likely to benefit from rechallenge. By integrating recent studies and new technologies, we offer crucial recommendations for future clinical trial design and provide a practical guideline to maximize the therapeutic benefits of immunotherapy for NSCLC patients.

The efficacy of first and second immunotherapy exposure in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

Immunotherapy has led to changes in cervical cancer guidelines. Therefore, additional biomarkers to identify the ideal patient who would experience the most benefit may be important.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected 208 patients with R/M CC and recorded clinicopathologic information, peripheral blood markers and treatments to analyze the prognostic factors of clinical outcomes. Response rate comparison, univariate, and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the efficacy of different factors.

RESULTS

A total of 43.27% patients achieved objective responses, including 18 with complete response and 72 with partial response. Patients receiving first-line immunotherapy had much higher objective response rate (ORR) than the remaining patients (53.8% vs. 34.8%, p = 0.006). CRP >3 ECOG ≥1 and recurrence in 6 months predicted shorter progression free survival (PFS). CRP >3, GLU >6.1 independently predicted unfavorable overall survival (OS). Compared with no antiangiogenic therapy, previous antiangiogenic therapy reduced the median OS by nearly 14 months. Immunotherapy rechallenge was still effective after first immunotherapy failure, and combined with dual-immunotherapy or bevacizumab combined with chemoradiotherapy resulted in a 60.00% or 62.50% ORR, respectively. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma, with stable disease or objective response in the first immunotherapy or without chemotherapy in second immunotherapy had favorable clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

The baseline CRP levels in serum was an independent factor for PFS and OS of R/M CC patients treated with immunotherapy, and previous antiangiogenic therapy was associated with poor OS. Patients still show response to immunotherapy rechallenge and combined treatment with bevacizumab or candonilimab showed higher response rate than anti-PD-1 after immunotherapy failure.

A novel nomogram for predicting the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients following immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment beyond progression: a single center study based on Chinese population

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) persists as a dominant cause of cancer-related mortality globally, with a notably rapid escalation in mortality rates. The advent of immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has ushered in a new era in the management of liver cancer, albeit with unresolved challenges in the context of treatment beyond progression (TBP) and stratified prognosis in diverse populations. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel nomogram model to identify factors that predict the benefit of continued immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients following disease progression in clinical practice.

Methods

This study retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of ICIs in TBP, focusing on the Chinese population with advanced liver cancer. A nomogram was constructed based on four independent risk factors identified through Cox multivariate analysis, aiming to predict patient prognosis post-ICI treatment. The model was validated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and categorized patients into high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups, with further validation using calibration plots and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

The low-risk group demonstrated significantly enhanced overall survival (OS) compared to the high-risk group, with the nomogram predictions aligning closely with actual outcomes for 6- and 9-month OS. The model exhibited commendable predictive accuracy, achieving a C-index exceeding 0.7 in both training and validation datasets. The DCA underscored the clinical utility of the nomogram-based prognostic model, further substantiated by the area under the ROC curve (AUC).

Conclusions

The developed nomogram presents a potentially valuable tool for predicting the prognosis of HCC patients undergoing ICI therapy beyond progression, particularly within the Chinese demographic. However, the study is constrained by its retrospective, single-center nature and necessitates further validation through large-scale, multicenter clinical studies across varied populations.

Hyper-late major response after 5 years of nivolumab: role of treatment beyond progression in head and neck cancer

Patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) platinum-refractory squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) have fewer treatment options and harbor an especially poor prognosis. Maintaining treatment with anti-PD1 agents beyond response evaluation criteria in solid tumors-defined disease progression (TBP) has been shown to be efficacious in several solid tumors, including head and neck cancer. We present the case of a platinum-refractory locally recurrent, PD-L1-negative hypopharyngeal carcinoma, that received second-line nivolumab which was then maintained beyond progression under the following criteria: no Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status deterioration, no rapidly progressive disease, no severe toxicity, and evidence of overall treatment benefit. The patient achieved a partial response 8 months after starting second-line nivolumab, with progressive disease at 26 months, then followed by the first TBP with nivolumab lasting for 15 months due to a new tumor progression. A second TBP with nivolumab lasting for 7 months, was followed by a third TBP with nivolumab for 12 months and achieving a major tumor response. Treatment is still ongoing 60 months after starting nivolumab, with excellent tolerance to therapy. Maintaining anti-PD1 agents beyond progression is an efficacious treatment option for patients with R/M SCCHN, that may achieve very durable disease control and even late major responses.

Safety, Efficacy, and Biological Data of T-Cell-Enabling Oncolytic Adenovirus TILT-123 in Advanced Solid Cancers from the TUNIMO Monotherapy Phase I Trial

PURPOSE

TILT-123 (igrelimogene litadenorepvec) is an oncolytic adenovirus armed with TNFa and IL2, designed to induce T-cell infiltration and cytotoxicity in solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

TUNIMO (NCT04695327) was a single-arm, multicenter phase I dose-escalation trial designed to assess the safety of TILT-123 in advanced solid cancers refractory to standard therapy. Patients received intravenous and intratumoral TILT-123. The primary endpoint was safety by adverse events (AE), laboratory values, vital signs, and electrocardiograms. Secondary endpoints included tumor response, pharmacokinetics, and predictive biomarkers.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were enrolled, with a median age of 58 years. Most prevalent cancer types included sarcomas (35%), melanomas (15%) and ovarian cancers (15%). No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The most frequent treatment-related AEs included fever (16.7%), chills (13.0%), and fatigue (9.3%). Ten patients were evaluable for response on day 78 with RECIST 1.1, iRECIST or PET-based evaluation. The disease control rate by PET was 6/10 (60% of evaluable patients) and 2/10 by RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST(20%of evaluable patients). Tumor size reductions occurred in both injected and non-injected lesions. TILT-123 was detected in injected and non-injected tumors, and virus was observed in blood after intravenous and intratumoral injections. Treatment resulted in reduction of lymphocytes in blood, with concurrent lymphocyte increases in tumors, findings compatible with trafficking.

CONCLUSIONS

TILT-123 was safe and able to produce antitumor effects in local and distant lesions in heavily pre-treated patients. Good tolerability of TILT-123 facilitates combination studies, several of which are ongoing (NCT04217473, NCT05271318, NCT05222932, and NCT06125197). See related commentary by Silva-Pilipich and Smerdou, p. 3649.

Cryoablation and post-progression immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic melanoma: a phase II trial

Image-guided percutaneous cryoablation is an established minimally invasive oncologic treatment. We hypothesized that cryoablation may modify the immune microenvironment through direct modulation of the tumor, thereby generating an anti-tumor response in tumors refractory to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI). In this non-randomized phase II single-center study (NCT03290677), subjects with unresectable melanoma progressing on ICI underwent cryoablation of an enlarging metastasis, and ICI was continued for a minimum of two additional cycles. The primary endpoints were safety, feasibility and tumor response in non-ablated lesions. From May 2018 through July 2020, 17 patients were treated on study. The study met its primary endpoints with the combination strategy found to be safe and feasible with an objective response rate of 23.5% and disease control rate of 41% (4 partial response, 3 stable disease). Our data support further study of this synergistic therapeutic approach.

Fecal microbiota transplantation improves anti-PD-1 inhibitor efficacy in unresectable or metastatic solid cancers refractory to anti-PD-1 inhibitor

The gut microbiome significantly influences immune responses and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. We conducted a clinical trial (NCT04264975) combining an anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor with fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) from anti-PD-1 responder in 13 patients with anti-PD-1-refractory advanced solid cancers. FMT induced sustained microbiota changes and clinical benefits in 6 of 13 patients, with 1 partial response and 5 stable diseases, achieving an objective response rate of 7.7% and a disease control rate of 46.2%. The clinical response correlates with increased cytotoxic T cells and immune cytokines in blood and tumors. We isolated Prevotella merdae Immunoactis from a responder to FMT, which stimulates T cell activity and suppresses tumor growth in mice by enhancing cytotoxic T cell infiltration. Additionally, we found Lactobacillus salivarius and Bacteroides plebeius may inhibit anti-tumor immunity. Our findings suggest that FMT with beneficial microbiota can overcome resistance to anti-PD-1 inhibitors in advanced solid cancers, especially gastrointestinal cancers.

PD-1/PD-L1 axis: implications in immune regulation, cancer progression, and translational applications

The PD-1/PD-L1 axis is a complex signaling pathway that has an important role in the immune system cells. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) acts as an immune checkpoint on the T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, natural killer (NK), macrophages, dendritic cells (DCs), monocytes, and myeloid cells. Its ligand, the programmed cell death 1 ligand (PD-L1), is expressed in the surface of the antigen-presenting cells (APCs). The binding of both promotes the downregulation of the T cell response to ensure the activation to prevent the onset of chronic immune inflammation. This axis in the tumor microenvironment (TME) performs a crucial role in the tumor progression and the escape of the tumor by neutralizing the immune system, the engagement of PD-L1 with PD-1 in the T cell causes dysfunctions, neutralization, and exhaustion, providing the tumor mass production. This review will provide a comprehensive overview of the functions of the PD-1/PD-L1 system in immune function, cancer, and the potential therapeutic implications of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway for cancer management.

Biomarker development for PD-(L)1 axis inhibition: a consensus view from the SITC Biomarkers Committee

Therapies targeting the programmed cell death protein-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (abbreviated as PD-(L)1) axis are a significant advancement in the treatment of many tumor types. However, many patients receiving these agents fail to respond or have an initial response followed by cancer progression. For these patients, while subsequent immunotherapies that either target a different axis of immune biology or non-immune combination therapies are reasonable treatment options, the lack of predictive biomarkers to follow-on agents is impeding progress in the field. This review summarizes the current knowledge of mechanisms driving resistance to PD-(L)1 therapies, the state of biomarker development along this axis, and inherent challenges in future biomarker development for these immunotherapies. Innovation in the development and application of novel biomarkers and patient selection strategies for PD-(L)1 agents is required to accelerate the delivery of effective treatments to the patients most likely to respond.

Latest evidence on clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of advanced urothelial carcinoma in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a narrative review

The management of advanced (locally advanced or metastatic) urothelial carcinoma has been revolutionized since pembrolizumab was introduced in 2017. Several prognostic factors for advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab have been reported, including conventional parameters such as performance status and visceral (especially liver) metastasis, laboratory markers such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, sarcopenia, histological/genomic markers such as programmed cell death ligand 1 immunohistochemistry and tumor mutational burden, variant histology, immune-related adverse events, concomitant medications in relation to the gut microbiome, primary tumor site (bladder cancer versus upper tract urothelial carcinoma) and history/combination of radiotherapy. The survival time of advanced urothelial carcinoma has been significantly prolonged (or 'doubled' from 1 to 2 years) after the advent of pembrolizumab, which will be further improved with novel agents such as avelumab and enfortumab vedotin. This review summarizes the latest evidence on clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of advanced urothelial carcinoma in the contemporary era of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Radiotherapy with or without immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma: efficacy and tolerability

INTRODUCTION

Radiotherapy (RT) is primarily considered as a palliative treatment in patients with metastatic melanoma. However, observations suggest that when RT is combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), it can induce an immune response leading to an anti-tumoral effect also distant from the irradiated area - a phenomenon called 'abscopal effect'. The frequency and circumstances of abscopal effect among metastatic melanoma patients remains uncertain and further research is necessary.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This retrospective study included all metastatic melanoma patients who received non-stereotactic RT in Stockholm, Sweden in 2015-2020. Patients were grouped depending on if RT was given at start of ICI (RT + ICI(start)), at ICI progression (RT + ICI(salvage)) or without ICI (RT(only)). Response rates in irradiated (RR(irradiated)) and overall response rates in non-irradiated (ORR(non-irradiated)) metastases were evaluated together with survival and toxicity in each cohort.

RESULTS

In the RT + ICI(start) (n = 47), RT + ICI(salvage) (n = 41) and RT(only) (n = 55) cohorts, RR(irradiated) was 70.7%, 67.5% and 43.1% (p = 0.018) while the ORR(non-irradiated) was 36.1%, 14.8% and 0.0% (p = 0.003), and the median overall survival was 18.2, 15.0 and 7.2 months, respectively (p = 0.014). Local response to RT was in all cohorts associated with longer survival (p < 0.001). The frequency of grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events was 17.0% and 19.5% in the RT + ICI(start) and RT + ICI(salvage) cohorts. No increased frequency of RT-related adverse events was seen in the RT + ICI cohorts, compared to the RT(only) cohort.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study showed that melanoma patients receiving RT in combination with ICI had a superior antitumoral response in both irradiated and non-irradiated lesions as compared to patients receiving only RT. Additionally, a subgroup of patients receiving RT when progressing on ICI experienced tumor regression also in non-irradiated areas.