Molecular Landscape of the Ribosome Pre-initiation Complex during mRNA Scanning: Structural Role for eIF3c and Its Control by eIF5

Inhibitors of eIF1A-ribosome interaction unveil uORF-dependent regulation of translation initiation and antitumor and antiviral effects

During translation initiation, eIF1A binds the ribosome through its N- and C-terminal tails, but the functional importance of this temporal interaction in mammalian cells is lacking. Using a high-throughput drug screen targeting eIF1A-RPS10 interaction, we identified inhibitors (1Ais) for eIF1A, RPS10, or both. Applying 1Ais in biochemical assays along specific and global translation experiments, we confirmed known functions of eIF1A and uncovered new roles for both eIF1A and RPS10. Specifically, the eIF1A N-terminal tail (NTT) binding inhibitors revealed the requirement of eIF1A for translation re-initiation. Moreover, a cytosine at position +5 relative to the start codon AUG, located near eIF1A-NTT in the 48S structure, enhances sensitivity to 1Ais, suggesting that the initiating ribosome recognizes a broader AUG context than the conventional Kozak. Additionally, eIF1A-specific 1Ais predominately affect cancer-related pathways. In xenograft models of ovarian cancer, these 1Ais reduced tumor growth without apparent toxicity. Furthermore, inhibition of RPS10, but not eIF1A, modulates a context-dependent regulatory translation initiation at CUG codon of SARS-CoV-2 and impedes infection. Our study underscores 1Ais as effective means to study the role of eIF1A and RPS10 in translation and suggests their targeted inhibition as potential therapies for cancer and viral infections.

Raman spectroscopy and bioinformatics-based identification of key genes and pathways capable of distinguishing between diffuse large B cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are subtypes of non-Hogkin lymphoma (NHL) that are generally distinct form one cases, but the transformation of one of these diseases into the other is possible. Some patients with CLL, for instance, have the potential to develop Richter transformation such that they are diagnosed with a rare, invasive DLBCL subtype. In this study, bioinformatics analyses of these two NHL subtypes were conducted, identifying key patterns of gene expression and then experimentally validating the results. Disease-related gene expression datasets from the GEO database were used to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and DEG functions were examined using GO analysis and protein-protein interaction network construction. This strategy revealed many up- and down-regulated DEGs, with functional enrichment analyses identifying these genes as being closely associated with inflammatory and immune response activity. PPI network analyses and the evaluation of clustered network modules indicated the top 10 up- and down-regulated genes involved in disease onset and development. Serological analyses revealed significantly higher ALB, TT, and WBC levels in CLL patients relative to DLBCL patients, whereas the opposite was true with respect to TG, HDL, GGT, ALP, ALT, and NEUT% levels. In comparison to the CLL and DLBCL groups, the healthy control samples demonstrated higher signals of protein peak positions (621, 643, 848, 853, 869, 935, 1003, 1031, 1221, 1230, 1260, 1344, 1443, 1446, 1548, 1579, 1603, 1647 cm-1), nucleic acid peak positions (726, 781, 786, 1078, 1190, 1415, 1573, 1579 cm-1), beta carotene peak positions (957, 1155, 1162 cm-1), carbohydrate peak positions (842 cm-1), collagen peak positions (1345 cm-1), and lipid peak positions (957, 1078, 1119, 1285, 1299, 1437, 1443, 1446 cm-1) compared to the CLL and DLBCL groups. Verification of these key genes in patient samples yielded results consistent with findings derived from bioinformatics analyses, highlighting their relevance to diagnosing and treating these forms of NHL. Together, these analyses identified genes and pathways involved in both DLBCL and CLL. The set of molecular markers established herein can aid in patient diagnosis and prognostic evaluation, providing a valuable foundation for their therapeutic application.

Molecular basis for the interactions of eIF2β with eIF5, eIF2B, and 5MP1 and their regulation by CK2

The heterotrimeric GTPase eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2) delivers the initiator Met-tRNA i to the ribosomal translation preinitiation complex (PIC). eIF2β has three lysine-rich repeats (K-boxes), important for binding to the GTPase-activating protein eIF5, the guanine nucleotide exchange factor eIF2B, and the regulator eIF5-mimic protein (5MP). Here, we combine X-ray crystallography with NMR to understand the molecular basis and dynamics of these interactions. The crystal structure of yeast eIF5-CTD in complex with eIF2β K-box 3 reveals an extended binding site on eIF2β, far beyond the K-box. We show that eIF2β contains three distinct binding sites, centered on each of the K-boxes, and human eIF5, eIF2Bε, and 5MP1 can bind to all three sites, while reducing each other's affinities. Our results reveal how eIF2B speeds up the dissociation of eIF5 from eIF2-GDP to promote nucleotide exchange; and how 5MP1 can destabilize eIF5 binding to eIF2 and the PIC, to promote stringent start codon selection. All these affinities are increased by CK2 phosphomimetic mutations, highlighting the role of CK2 in both remodeling and stabilizing the translation apparatus.

Recruitment of the 40S ribosomal subunit by the West Nile virus 3' UTR promotes the cross-talk between the viral genomic ends for translation regulation

Flaviviral RNA genomes are composed of discrete RNA structural units arranged in an ordered fashion and grouped into complex folded domains that regulate essential viral functions, e.g. replication and translation. This is achieved by adjusting the overall structure of the RNA genome via the establishment of inter- and intramolecular interactions. Translation regulation is likely the main process controlling flaviviral gene expression. Although the genomic 3' UTR is a key player in this regulation, little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying this role. The present work provides evidence for the specific recruitment of the 40S ribosomal subunit by the 3' UTR of the West Nile virus RNA genome, showing that the joint action of both genomic ends contributes the positioning of the 40S subunit at the 5' end. The combination of structural mapping techniques revealed specific conformational requirements at the 3' UTR for 40S binding, involving the highly conserved SL-III, 5'DB, 3'DB and 3'SL elements, all involved in the translation regulation. These results point to the 40S subunit as a bridge to ensure cross-talk between both genomic ends during viral translation and support a link between 40S recruitment by the 3' UTR and translation control.

The molecular basis of translation initiation and its regulation in eukaryotes

The regulation of gene expression is fundamental for life. Whereas the role of transcriptional regulation of gene expression has been studied for several decades, it has been clear over the past two decades that post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression, of which translation regulation is a major part, can be equally important. Translation can be divided into four main stages: initiation, elongation, termination and ribosome recycling. Translation is controlled mainly during its initiation, a process which culminates in a ribosome positioned with an initiator tRNA over the start codon and, thus, ready to begin elongation of the protein chain. mRNA translation has emerged as a powerful tool for the development of innovative therapies, yet the detailed mechanisms underlying the complex process of initiation remain unclear. Recent studies in yeast and mammals have started to shed light on some previously unclear aspects of this process. In this Review, we discuss the current state of knowledge on eukaryotic translation initiation and its regulation in health and disease. Specifically, we focus on recent advances in understanding the processes involved in assembling the 43S pre-initiation complex and its recruitment by the cap-binding complex eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) at the 5' end of mRNA. In addition, we discuss recent insights into ribosome scanning along the 5' untranslated region of mRNA and selection of the start codon, which culminates in joining of the 60S large subunit and formation of the 80S initiation complex.

Vanishing white matter

"Vanishing white matter" (VWM) is a leukodystrophy caused by autosomal recessive pathogenic variants in the genes encoding the subunits of eukaryotic initiation factor 2B (eIF2B). Disease onset and disease course are extremely variable. Onset varies from the antenatal period until senescence. The age of onset is predictive of disease severity. VWM is characterized by chronic neurologic deterioration and, additionally, episodes of rapid and major neurologic decline, provoked by stresses such as febrile infections and minor head trauma. The disease is dominated by degeneration of the white matter of the central nervous system due to dysfunction of oligodendrocytes and in particular astrocytes. Organs other than the brain are rarely affected, with the exception of the ovaries. The reason for the selective vulnerability of the white matter of the central nervous system and, less consistently, the ovaries is poorly understood. eIF2B is a central regulatory factor in the integrated stress response (ISR). Genetic variants decrease eIF2B activity and thereby cause constitutive activation of the ISR downstream of eIF2B. Strikingly, the ISR is specifically activated in astrocytes. Modulation of eIF2B activity and ISR activation in VWM mouse models impacts disease severity, revealing eIF2B-regulated pathways as potential druggable targets.

Translation Fidelity and Respiration Deficits in CLPP-Deficient Tissues: Mechanistic Insights from Mitochondrial Complexome Profiling

The mitochondrial matrix peptidase CLPP is crucial during cell stress. Its loss causes Perrault syndrome type 3 (PRLTS3) with infertility, neurodegeneration, and a growth deficit. Its target proteins are disaggregated by CLPX, which also regulates heme biosynthesis via unfolding ALAS enzymes, providing access for pyridoxal-5'-phosphate (PLP). Despite efforts in diverse organisms with multiple techniques, CLPXP substrates remain controversial. Here, avoiding recombinant overexpression, we employed complexomics in mitochondria from three mouse tissues to identify endogenous targets. A CLPP absence caused the accumulation and dispersion of CLPX-VWA8 as AAA+ unfoldases, and of PLPBP. Similar changes and CLPX-VWA8 co-migration were evident for mitoribosomal central protuberance clusters, translation factors like GFM1-HARS2, the RNA granule components LRPPRC-SLIRP, and enzymes OAT-ALDH18A1. Mitochondrially translated proteins in testes showed reductions to <30% for MTCO1-3, the mis-assembly of the complex IV supercomplex, and accumulated metal-binding assembly factors COX15-SFXN4. Indeed, heavy metal levels were increased for iron, molybdenum, cobalt, and manganese. RT-qPCR showed compensatory downregulation only for Clpx mRNA; most accumulated proteins appeared transcriptionally upregulated. Immunoblots validated VWA8, MRPL38, MRPL18, GFM1, and OAT accumulation. Co-immunoprecipitation confirmed CLPX binding to MRPL38, GFM1, and OAT, so excess CLPX and PLP may affect their activity. Our data mechanistically elucidate the mitochondrial translation fidelity deficits which underlie progressive hearing impairment in PRLTS3.

Translational fidelity screens in mammalian cells reveal eIF3 and eIF4G2 as regulators of start codon selectivity

The translation initiation machinery and the ribosome orchestrate a highly dynamic scanning process to distinguish proper start codons from surrounding nucleotide sequences. Here, we performed genome-wide CRISPRi screens in human K562 cells to systematically identify modulators of the frequency of translation initiation at near-cognate start codons. We observed that depletion of any eIF3 core subunit promoted near-cognate start codon usage, though sensitivity thresholds of each subunit to sgRNA-mediated depletion varied considerably. Double sgRNA depletion experiments suggested that enhanced near-cognate usage in eIF3D depleted cells required canonical eIF4E cap-binding and was not driven by eIF2A or eIF2D-dependent leucine tRNA initiation. We further characterized the effects of eIF3D depletion and found that the N-terminus of eIF3D was strictly required for accurate start codon selection, whereas disruption of the cap-binding properties of eIF3D had no effect. Lastly, depletion of eIF3D activated TNFα signaling via NF-κB and the interferon gamma response. Similar transcriptional profiles were observed upon knockdown of eIF1A and eIF4G2, which also promoted near-cognate start codon usage, suggesting that enhanced near-cognate usage could potentially contribute to NF-κB activation. Our study thus provides new avenues to study the mechanisms and consequences of alternative start codon usage.

Molecular mechanisms of eukaryotic translation fidelity and their associations with diseases

Converting genetic information into functional proteins is a complex, multi-step process, with each step being tightly regulated to ensure the accuracy of translation, which is critical to cellular health. In recent years, advances in modern biotechnology, especially the development of cryo-electron microscopy and single-molecule techniques, have enabled a clearer understanding of the mechanisms of protein translation fidelity. Although there are many studies on the regulation of protein translation in prokaryotes, and the basic elements of translation are highly conserved in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, there are still great differences in the specific regulatory mechanisms. This review describes how eukaryotic ribosomes and translation factors regulate protein translation and ensure translation accuracy. However, a certain frequency of translation errors does occur in translation, so we describe diseases that arise when the rate of translation errors reaches or exceeds a threshold of cellular tolerance.

Between Order and Chaos: Understanding the Mechanism and Pathology of RAN Translation

Repeat-associated non-AUG (RAN) translation is a pathogenic mechanism in which repetitive sequences are translated into aggregation-prone proteins from multiple reading frames, even without a canonical AUG start codon. Since its discovery in spinocerebellar ataxia type 8 (SCA8) and myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), RAN translation is now known to occur in the context of 12 disease-linked repeat expansions. This review discusses recent advances in understanding the regulatory mechanisms controlling RAN translation and its contribution to the pathophysiology of repeat expansion diseases. We discuss the key findings in the context of Fragile X Tremor Ataxia Syndrome (FXTAS), a neurodegenerative disorder caused by a CGG repeat expansion in the 5' untranslated region of FMR1.

Neuronal RNA-Binding Protein HuD Interacts with Translation Initiation Factor eIF3

Translation initiation is the rate-limiting step of protein synthesis and is the main target of translation regulation. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are key mediators of the spatiotemporal control of translation and are critical for cell proliferation, development, and differentiation. We have previously shown that HuD, one of the neuronal RBPs, enhances cap-dependent translation through the direct interaction with eukaryotic initiation factor 4A (eIF4A) and poly(A) tail using a HeLa-derived in vitro translation system. We have also found that translation stimulation of HuD is essential for HuD-induced neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells. However, it remains unclear how HuD is involved in the regulation of translation initiation. Here, we report that HuD binds to eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3) via the eIF3b subunit, which belongs to the functional core of mammalian eIF3. eIF3 plays an essential role in recruiting the 40S ribosomal subunit onto mRNA in translation initiation. We hypothesize that the interaction between HuD and eIF3 stabilizes the translation initiation complex and increases translation efficiency. We also showed that the linker region of HuD is required for the interaction with eIF3b. Moreover, we found that eIF3b-binding region of HuD is conserved in all Hu proteins (HuB, HuC, HuD, and HuR). These data might also help to explain how Hu proteins stimulate translation in a cap- and poly(A)-dependent way.

INT6/eIF3e represses E-cadherin expression through HIF2α in lung carcinoma A549 cells

Hypoxia-inducible factor 2 α (HIF2α), a transcription factor playing a vital role in hypoxia, promotes cancer metastasis. We had previously reported that the cancer-related gene integration site 6/eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit e (INT6/eIF3e) negatively regulates the protein stability of HIF2α in an oxygen-independent manner. Presently, the downstream targets for INT6/eIF3e-regulated HIF2α are unknown. Given the roles of HIF2α and INT6/eIF3e in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) that promotes cancer metastasis, we hypothesized that INT6/eIF3e-regulated HIF2α controls EMT. This study shows that INT6/eIF3e knockdown in lung carcinoma A549 cells led to increased expression of HIF2α protein and an EMT-like phenotypic change. The increased HIF2α subsequently repressed the E-cadherin gene. Mechanistically, HIF2α interacts with the twist family bHLH transcription factor 1 (TWIST1) known to regulate EMT process, and binds to the proximal promoter region of E-cadherin, repressing it. Collectively, our work demonstrates that HIF2α, regulated by INT6/eIF3e, represses the E-cadherin gene through TWIST1 to enhance EMT, suggesting a role of the INT6/eIF3e-HIF2α axis in cancer metastasis.

Label-free protocol to quantify protein affinity using isothermal titration calorimetry and bio-layer interferometry of a human eIF5-mimic protein

eIF5-mimic protein (5MP) controls translation through its interaction with eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF) 2 and eIF3 and alters non-AUG translation rates for oncogenes in cancer and repeat expansions in neurodegenerative disease. To precisely evaluate the effect of 5MP mutations on binding affinity against eIFs, here we describe two label-free protocols of affinity measurement for 5MP binding to eIF2 or eIF3 protein segments, termed isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and bio-layer interferometry (BLI), starting with how to purify proteins used. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Singh et al. (2021).

eIF3 Interacts with Selenoprotein mRNAs

The synthesis of selenoproteins requires the co-translational recoding of an in-frame UGASec codon. Interactions between the Selenocysteine Insertion Sequence (SECIS) and the SECIS binding protein 2 (SBP2) in the 3'untranslated region (3'UTR) of selenoprotein mRNAs enable the recruitment of the selenocysteine insertion machinery. Several selenoprotein mRNAs undergo unusual cap hypermethylation and are not recognized by the translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) but nevertheless translated. The human eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3), composed of 13 subunits (a-m), can selectively recruit several cellular mRNAs and plays roles in specialized translation initiation. Here, we analyzed the ability of eIF3 to interact with selenoprotein mRNAs. By combining ribonucleoprotein immunoprecipitation (RNP IP) in vivo and in vitro with cross-linking experiments, we found interactions between eIF3 and a subgroup of selenoprotein mRNAs. We showed that eIF3 preferentially interacts with hypermethylated capped selenoprotein mRNAs rather than m⁷G-capped mRNAs. We identified direct contacts between GPx1 mRNA and eIF3 c, d, and e subunits and showed the existence of common interaction patterns for all hypermethylated capped selenoprotein mRNAs. Differential interactions of eIF3 with selenoprotein mRNAs may trigger specific translation pathways independent of eIF4E. eIF3 could represent a new player in the translation regulation and hierarchy of selenoprotein expression.

Inhibitors of eIF4G1-eIF1 uncover its regulatory role of ER/UPR stress-response genes independent of eIF2α-phosphorylation

During translation initiation, eIF4G1 dynamically interacts with eIF4E and eIF1. While the role of eIF4E-eIF4G1 is well established, the regulatory functions of eIF4G1-eIF1 are poorly understood. Here, we report the identification of the eIF4G1-eIF1 inhibitors i14G1-10 and i14G1-12. i14G1s directly bind eIF4G1 and inhibit translation in vitro and in the cell, and their effects on translation are dependent on eIF4G1 levels. Translatome analyses revealed that i14G1s mimic eIF1 and eIF4G1 perturbations on the stringency of start codon selection and the opposing roles of eIF1-eIF4G1 in scanning-dependent and scanning-independent short 5' untranslated region (UTR) translation. Remarkably, i14G1s activate ER/unfolded protein response (UPR) stress-response genes via enhanced ribosome loading, elevated 5'UTR translation at near-cognate AUGs, and unexpected concomitant up-regulation of coding-region translation. These effects are, at least in part, independent of eIF2α-phosphorylation. Interestingly, eIF4G1-eIF1 interaction itself is negatively regulated by ER stress and mTOR inhibition. Thus, i14G1s uncover an unknown mechanism of ER/UPR translational stress response and are valuable research tools and potential drugs against diseases exhibiting dysregulated translation.

Non-AUG translation initiation in mammals

Recent proteogenomic studies revealed extensive translation outside of annotated protein coding regions, such as non-coding RNAs and untranslated regions of mRNAs. This non-canonical translation is largely due to start codon plurality within the same RNA. This plurality is often due to the failure of some scanning ribosomes to recognize potential start codons leading to initiation downstream—a process termed leaky scanning. Codons other than AUG (non-AUG) are particularly leaky due to their inefficiency. Here we discuss our current understanding of non-AUG initiation. We argue for a near-ubiquitous role of non-AUG initiation in shaping the dynamic composition of mammalian proteomes.

Conformational rearrangements upon start codon recognition in human 48S translation initiation complex

Selection of the translation start codon is a key step during protein synthesis in human cells. We obtained cryo-EM structures of human 48S initiation complexes and characterized the intermediates of codon recognition by kinetic methods using eIF1A as a reporter. Both approaches capture two distinct ribosome populations formed on an mRNA with a cognate AUG codon in the presence of eIF1, eIF1A, eIF2–GTP–Met-tRNA_i^Met and eIF3. The ‘open’ 40S subunit conformation differs from the human 48S scanning complex and represents an intermediate preceding the codon recognition step. The ‘closed’ form is similar to reported structures of complexes from yeast and mammals formed upon codon recognition, except for the orientation of eIF1A, which is unique in our structure. Kinetic experiments show how various initiation factors mediate the population distribution of open and closed conformations until 60S subunit docking. Our results provide insights into the timing and structure of human translation initiation intermediates and suggest the differences in the mechanisms of start codon selection between mammals and yeast.

Translational recoding by chemical modification of non-AUG start codon ribonucleotide bases

In contrast to prokaryotes wherein GUG and UUG are permissive start codons, initiation frequencies from non-AUG codons are generally low in eukaryotes, with CUG being considered as strongest. Here, we report that combined 5-cytosine methylation (5mC) and pseudouridylation (Ψ) of near-cognate non-AUG start codons convert GUG and UUG initiation strongly favored over CUG initiation in eukaryotic translation under a certain context. This prokaryotic-like preference is attributed to enhanced NUG initiation by Ψ in the second base and reduced CUG initiation by 5mC in the first base. Molecular dynamics simulation analysis of tRNAiMet anticodon base pairing to the modified codons demonstrates that Ψ universally raises the affinity of codon:anticodon pairing within the ribosomal preinitiation complex through partially mitigating discrimination against non-AUG codons imposed by eukaryotic initiation factor 1. We propose that translational control by chemical modifications of start codon bases can offer a new layer of proteome diversity regulation and therapeutic mRNA technology.

Role of eIF3C Overexpression in Predicting Prognosis of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Elevated expression of eukaryotic initiation factor 3c (eIF3C) was recently uncovered to promote several types of cancer progression by inducing cell proliferation. Here, we aimed to assess the expression and prognostic value of eIF3C in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients.

METHODS

Expression of eIF3C was analyzed by immunohistochemistry in tissue microarrays (TMAs) containing 138 ICC and paired peritumoral tissues from ICC patients. Then, the roles of eIF3C in ICC cells were investigated by RNA interference, and the relationship between the eIF3C and KI67 expression was explored in ICC cells and tissues. Finally, the relation between the eIF3C level and clinicopathologic features of ICC was probed, and Kaplan-Meier and Cox's analyses were performed to assess the prognostic merit of eIF3C and KI67 in ICC patients.

RESULTS

The expression of eIF3C was elevated in ICC tissues compared to paired peritumoral tissues, which was consistent with the result from the GEPIA database. The downregulation of eIF3C in ICC cells impaired the cellular invasion, metastasis, colony formation, and proliferation. Moreover, we further found a positive relationship between the eIF3C and KI67 expression in ICC cells and tissues. The expression of eIF3C in ICC tissues was positively correlated with lymphatic metastasis (p = 0.049), and the high level of KI67 was frequently found in ICC patients with the large tumor (p = 0.028), high serum AFP (p = 0.019), or lymphatic metastasis (p = 0.039). Notably, patients with the eIF3C or KI67 overexpression had shorter overall survival and higher disease-free survival rates than those with low expression of eIF3C or KI67, and the combination of eIF3C or KI67 expression was an independent parameter for predicting the prognosis and recurrence of ICC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated eIF3C expression promotes ICC development, and combination of eIF3C and KI67 is a valuable predictor of the survival and recurrence of ICC patient.

Dynamic interaction network involving the conserved intrinsically disordered regions in human eIF5

Translation initiation in eukaryotes requires multiple eukaryotic translation initiation factors (eIFs) and involves continuous remodeling of the ribosomal preinitiation complex (PIC). The GTPase eIF2 brings the initiator Met-tRNA_i to the PIC. Upon start codon selection and GTP hydrolysis, promoted by eIF5, eIF2-GDP is released in complex with eIF5. Here, we report that two intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) in eIF5, the DWEAR motif and the C-terminal tail (CTT) dynamically contact the folded C-terminal domain (CTD) and compete with each other. The eIF5-CTD•CTT interaction favors eIF2β binding to eIF5-CTD, whereas the eIF5-CTD•DWEAR interaction favors eIF1A binding, which suggests how intramolecular contact rearrangement could play a role in PIC remodeling. We show that eIF5 phosphorylation by CK2, which is known to stimulate translation and cell proliferation, significantly increases the eIF5 affinity for eIF2. Our results also indicate that the eIF2β subunit has at least two, and likely three eIF5-binding sites.

Regulation of the interactions between human eIF5 and eIF1A by the CK2 kinase

Translation initiation in eukaryotes relies on a complex network of interactions that are continuously reorganized throughout the process. As more information becomes available about the structure of the ribosomal preinitiation complex (PIC) at various points in translation initiation, new questions arise about which interactions occur when, their roles, and regulation. The eukaryotic translation factor (eIF) 5 is the GTPase-activating protein (GAP) for the GTPase eIF2, which brings the initiator Met-tRNA_i to the PIC. eIF5 also plays a central role in PIC assembly and remodeling through interactions with other proteins, including eIFs 1, 1A, and 3c. Phosphorylation by casein kinase 2 (CK2) significantly increases the eIF5 affinity for eIF2. The interaction between eIF5 and eIF1A was reported to be mediated by the eIF5 C-terminal domain (CTD) and the eIF1A N-terminal tail. Here, we report a new contact interface, between eIF5-CTD and the oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding fold (OB) domain of eIF1A, which contributes to the overall affinity between the two proteins. We also show that the interaction is modulated by dynamic intramolecular interactions within both eIF5 and eIF1A. CK2 phosphorylation of eIF5 increases its affinity for eIF1A, offering new insights into the mechanisms by which CK2 stimulates protein synthesis and cell proliferation.

•

eIF5-CTD interacts with both the N-terminal tail and the OB domain of eIF1A.

•

The OB domain contacts stabilize the overall interaction.

•

The eIF1A C-terminal tail and the eIF5 DWEAR motif interfere with OB domain binding.

•

CK2 phosphorylation of eIF5 increases its affinity for eIF1A.

Human oncoprotein 5MP suppresses general and repeat-associated non-AUG translation via eIF3 by a common mechanism

eIF5-mimic protein (5MP) is a translational regulatory protein that binds the small ribosomal subunit and modulates its activity. 5MP is proposed to reprogram non-AUG translation rates for oncogenes in cancer, but its role in controlling non-AUG initiated synthesis of deleterious repeat-peptide products, such as FMRpolyG observed in fragile-X-associated tremor ataxia syndrome (FXTAS), is unknown. Here, we show that 5MP can suppress both general and repeat-associated non-AUG (RAN) translation by a common mechanism in a manner dependent on its interaction with eIF3. Essentially, 5MP displaces eIF5 through the eIF3c subunit within the preinitiation complex (PIC), thereby increasing the accuracy of initiation. In Drosophila, 5MP/Kra represses neuronal toxicity and enhances the lifespan in an FXTAS disease model. These results implicate 5MP in protecting cells from unwanted byproducts of non-AUG translation in neurodegeneration.

BZW2/5MP1 acts as a promising target in hepatocellular carcinoma

Basic leucine zipper and W2 domain 2 (BZW2), also known as 5MP1, is a protein related to translation regulation. Evidence from previous studies indicates that BZW2 is involved in tumorigenesis in several cancers. However, little is known about the role of BZW2 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, we first analyzed the gene expression profile of BZW2 in multiple HCC datasets. Next, we explored the biological effects of BZW2 in HCC cell lines. BZW2 was overexpressed in different HCC cohorts. Multivariate analysis confirmed that increased BZW2 expression is an independent prognostic indicator of shorter overall survival. BZW2 coexpressed genes were mainly enriched in the biological processes of ribonucleoprotein complex biogenesis, rRNA metabolism, translational initiation, and negative regulation of metabolic processes. BZW2 depletion reduced proliferation, clonality, and invasion and increased apoptosis in MHCC97-H cells. Furthermore, BZW2 overexpression or knockdown enhanced or impaired c-Myc expression, respectively. Overall, these findings identified BZW2 as a biomarker of HCC and provided novel insight that the effect of BZW2 on the translatome is a potential mechanism that promotes HCC progression via the c-Myc pathway.

Free energy landscape of RNA binding dynamics in start codon recognition by eukaryotic ribosomal pre-initiation complex

Specific interaction between the start codon, 5'-AUG-3', and the anticodon, 5'-CAU-3', ensures accurate initiation of translation. Recent studies show that several near-cognate start codons (e.g. GUG and CUG) can play a role in initiating translation in eukaryotes. However, the mechanism allowing initiation through mismatched base-pairs at the ribosomal decoding site is still unclear at an atomic level. In this work, we propose an extended simulation-based method to evaluate free energy profiles, through computing the distance between each base-pair of the triplet interactions involved in recognition of start codons in eukaryotic translation pre-initiation complex. Our method provides not only the free energy penalty for mismatched start codons relative to the AUG start codon, but also the preferred pathways of transitions between bound and unbound states, which has not been described by previous studies. To verify the method, the binding dynamics of cognate (AUG) and near-cognate start codons (CUG and GUG) were simulated. Evaluated free energy profiles agree with experimentally observed changes in initiation frequencies from respective codons. This work proposes for the first time how a G:U mismatch at the first position of codon (GUG)-anticodon base-pairs destabilizes the accommodation in the initiating eukaryotic ribosome and how initiation at a CUG codon is nearly as strong as, or sometimes stronger than, that at a GUG codon. Our method is expected to be applied to study the affinity changes for various mismatched base-pairs.

Quality control of 40S ribosome head assembly ensures scanning competence

During translation initiation, 40S ribosomes scan the mRNA until they encounter the start codon, where conformational changes produce a translation-competent 80S complex. Destabilizing the scanning complex results in misinitiation at non-AUG codons, demonstrating its importance for fidelity. Here, we use a combination of biochemical and genetic analyses to demonstrate that the ability of the nascent subunit to adopt the scanning complex is tested during assembly via structural mimicry. Specifically, formation of the 80S-like assembly intermediate, which structurally resembles scanning complexes, requires the correct folding of two rRNA elements in the subunit head and the proper positioning of the universally conserved head proteins Rps3, Rps15, Rps20, and Rps29. rRNA misfolding impairs the formation of 80S-like ribosomes, and bypass of individual checkpoints using cancer-associated mutations produces ribosomes defective in accurate start-site selection. Thus, the formation of 80S-like assembly intermediates is a quality control step that ensures scanning competence of the nascent subunit.

eIF3 interacts with histone H4 messenger RNA to regulate its translation

In eukaryotes, various alternative translation initiation mechanisms have been unveiled for the translation of specific mRNAs. Some do not conform to the conventional scanning-initiation model. Translation initiation of histone H4 mRNA combines both canonical (cap-dependent) and viral initiation strategies (no-scanning, internal recruitment of initiation factors). Specific H4 mRNA structures tether the translation machinery directly onto the initiation codon and allow massive production of histone H4 during the S phase of the cell cycle. The human eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3), composed of 13 subunits (a-m), was shown to selectively recruit and control the expression of several cellular mRNAs. Whether eIF3 mediates H4 mRNA translation remains to be elucidated. Here, we report that eIF3 binds to a stem-loop structure (eIF3-BS) located in the coding region of H4 mRNA. Combining cross-linking and ribonucleoprotein immunoprecipitation experiments in vivo and in vitro, we also found that eIF3 binds to H1, H2A, H2B, and H3 histone mRNAs. We identified direct contacts between eIF3c, d, e, g subunits, and histone mRNAs but observed distinct interaction patterns to each histone mRNA. Our results show that eIF3 depletion in vivo reduces histone mRNA binding and modulates histone neosynthesis, suggesting that synthesis of histones is sensitive to the levels of eIF3. Thus, we provide evidence that eIF3 acts as a regulator of histone translation.

Translational control of coronaviruses

Coronaviruses represent a large family of enveloped RNA viruses that infect a large spectrum of animals. In humans, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is responsible for the current COVID-19 pandemic and is genetically related to SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus (MERS-CoV), which caused outbreaks in 2002 and 2012, respectively. All viruses described to date entirely rely on the protein synthesis machinery of the host cells to produce proteins required for their replication and spread. As such, virus often need to control the cellular translational apparatus to avoid the first line of the cellular defense intended to limit the viral propagation. Thus, coronaviruses have developed remarkable strategies to hijack the host translational machinery in order to favor viral protein production. In this review, we will describe some of these strategies and will highlight the role of viral proteins and RNAs in this process.

A structural inventory of native ribosomal ABCE1-43S pre-initiation complexes

In eukaryotic translation, termination and ribosome recycling phases are linked to subsequent initiation of a new round of translation by persistence of several factors at ribosomal sub‐complexes. These comprise/include the large eIF3 complex, eIF3j (Hcr1 in yeast) and the ATP‐binding cassette protein ABCE1 (Rli1 in yeast). The ATPase is mainly active as a recycling factor, but it can remain bound to the dissociated 40S subunit until formation of the next 43S pre‐initiation complexes. However, its functional role and native architectural context remains largely enigmatic. Here, we present an architectural inventory of native yeast and human ABCE1‐containing pre‐initiation complexes by cryo‐EM. We found that ABCE1 was mostly associated with early 43S, but also with later 48S phases of initiation. It adopted a novel hybrid conformation of its nucleotide‐binding domains, while interacting with the N‐terminus of eIF3j. Further, eIF3j occupied the mRNA entry channel via its ultimate C‐terminus providing a structural explanation for its antagonistic role with respect to mRNA binding. Overall, the native human samples provide a near‐complete molecular picture of the architecture and sophisticated interaction network of the 43S‐bound eIF3 complex and the eIF2 ternary complex containing the initiator tRNA.

Structure of a human 48S translational initiation complex

A key step in translational initiation is the recruitment of the 43S preinitiation complex by the cap-binding complex [eukaryotic initiation factor 4F (eIF4F)] at the 5' end of messenger RNA (mRNA) to form the 48S initiation complex (i.e., the 48S). The 48S then scans along the mRNA to locate a start codon. To understand the mechanisms involved, we used cryo-electron microscopy to determine the structure of a reconstituted human 48S The structure reveals insights into early events of translation initiation complex assembly, as well as how eIF4F interacts with subunits of eIF3 near the mRNA exit channel in the 43S The location of eIF4F is consistent with a slotting model of mRNA recruitment and suggests that downstream mRNA is unwound at least in part by being "pulled" through the 40S subunit during scanning.

Structural Differences in Translation Initiation between Pathogenic Trypanosomatids and Their Mammalian Hosts

Canonical mRNA translation in eukaryotes begins with the formation of the 43S pre-initiation complex (PIC). Its assembly requires binding of initiator Met-tRNA_i^Met and several eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) to the small ribosomal subunit (40S). Compared to their mammalian hosts, trypanosomatids present significant structural differences in their 40S, suggesting substantial variability in translation initiation. Here, we determine the structure of the 43S PIC from Trypanosoma cruzi, the parasite causing Chagas disease. Our structure shows numerous specific features, such as the variant eIF3 structure and its unique interactions with the large rRNA expansion segments (ESs) 9^S, 7^S, and 6^S, and the association of a kinetoplastid-specific DDX60-like helicase. It also reveals the 40S-binding site of the eIF5 C-terminal domain and structures of key terminal tails of several conserved eIFs underlying their activities within the PIC. Our results are corroborated by glutathione S-transferase (GST) pull-down assays in both human and T. cruzi and mass spectrometry data.

•

Structure of the 43S pre-initiation complex from Trypanosoma cruzi is solved at 3.33 Å

•

The kinetoplastids’ eIF3 core is a septamer that binds mainly the unique, extended ES7^s

•

A kinetoplastid-specific DDX60-like helicase binds to the 43S PIC entry pore

•

The 40S positions of eIF5-CTD and key tails of several eIFs are determined

Artificial Protein-Responsive Riboswitches Upregulate Non-AUG Translation Initiation in Yeast

Artificial control of gene expression is one of the core technologies for engineering biological systems. Riboswitches are cis-acting elements on mRNA that regulate gene expression in a ligand-dependent manner often seen in prokaryotes, but rarely in eukaryotes. Because of the poor variety of such elements available in eukaryotic systems, the number of artificially engineered eukaryotic riboswitches, especially of the upregulation type, is still limited. Here, we developed a design principle for upregulation-type riboswitches that utilize non-AUG initiation induced by ribosomal stalling in a ligand-dependent manner in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Our design principle simply required the proper positioning of a near-cognate start codon relative to the RNA aptamer. Intriguingly, the CUG codon was the most preferable for non-AUG ON switches in terms of output level and switch performance. This work establishes novel choices for artificial genetic control in eukaryotes with versatile potential for industrial and biomedical applications as well as basic research.

eIF1 discriminates against suboptimal initiation sites to prevent excessive uORF translation genome-wide

The translation preinitiation complex (PIC) scans the mRNA for an AUG codon in a favorable context. Previous findings suggest that the factor eIF1 discriminates against non-AUG start codons by impeding full accommodation of Met-tRNA_i in the P site of the 40S ribosomal subunit, necessitating eIF1 dissociation for start codon selection. Consistent with this, yeast eIF1 substitutions that weaken its binding to the PIC increase initiation at UUG codons on a mutant his4 mRNA and particular synthetic mRNA reporters; and also at the AUG start codon of the mRNA for eIF1 itself owing to its poor Kozak context. It was not known however whether such eIF1 mutants increase initiation at suboptimal start codons genome-wide. By ribosome profiling, we show that the eIF1-L96P variant confers increased translation of numerous upstream open reading frames (uORFs) initiating with either near-cognate codons (NCCs) or AUGs in poor context. The increased uORF translation is frequently associated with the reduced translation of the downstream main coding sequences (CDS). Initiation is also elevated at certain NCCs initiating amino-terminal extensions, including those that direct mitochondrial localization of the GRS1 and ALA1 products, and at a small set of main CDS AUG codons with especially poor context, including that of eIF1 itself. Thus, eIF1 acts throughout the yeast translatome to discriminate against NCC start codons and AUGs in poor context; and impairing this function enhances the repressive effects of uORFs on CDS translation and alters the ratios of protein isoforms translated from near-cognate versus AUG start codons.

Binding of eIF3 in complex with eIF5 and eIF1 to the 40S ribosomal subunit is accompanied by dramatic structural changes

eIF3 is a large multiprotein complex serving as an essential scaffold promoting binding of other eIFs to the 40S subunit, where it coordinates their actions during translation initiation. Perhaps due to a high degree of flexibility of multiple eIF3 subunits, a high-resolution structure of free eIF3 from any organism has never been solved. Employing genetics and biochemistry, we previously built a 2D interaction map of all five yeast eIF3 subunits. Here we further improved the previously reported in vitro reconstitution protocol of yeast eIF3, which we cross-linked and trypsin-digested to determine its overall shape in 3D by advanced mass-spectrometry. The obtained cross-links support our 2D subunit interaction map and reveal that eIF3 is tightly packed with its WD40 and RRM domains exposed. This contrasts with reported cryo-EM structures depicting eIF3 as a molecular embracer of the 40S subunit. Since the binding of eIF1 and eIF5 further fortified the compact architecture of eIF3, we suggest that its initial contact with the 40S solvent-exposed side makes eIF3 to open up and wrap around the 40S head with its extended arms. In addition, we mapped the position of eIF5 to the region below the P- and E-sites of the 40S subunit.

The role of eukaryotic initiation factor 3 in plant translation regulation

Regulation of translation represents a critical step in the regulation of gene expression. In plants, the translation regulation plays an important role at all stages of development and, during stress responses, functions as a fast and flexible tool which not only modulates the global translation rate but also controls the production of specific proteins. Regulation of translation is mostly focused on the initiation phase. There, one of essential initiation factors is the large multisubunit protein complex of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3). In all eukaryotes, the general eIF3 function is to scaffold the formation of the translation initiation complex and to enhance the accuracy of scanning mechanism for start codon selection. Over the past decades, additional eIF3 functions were described as necessary for development in various eukaryotic organisms, including plants. The importance of the eIF3 complex lies not only at the global level of initiation event, but also in the precise translation regulation of specific transcripts. This review gathers the available information on functions of the plant eIF3 complex.

Relevance of Translation Initiation in Diffuse Glioma Biology and its Therapeutic Potential

Cancer cells are continually exposed to environmental stressors forcing them to adapt their protein production to survive. The translational machinery can be recruited by malignant cells to synthesize proteins required to promote their survival, even in times of high physiological and pathological stress. This phenomenon has been described in several cancers including in gliomas. Abnormal regulation of translation has encouraged the development of new therapeutics targeting the protein synthesis pathway. This approach could be meaningful for glioma given the fact that the median survival following diagnosis of the highest grade of glioma remains short despite current therapy. The identification of new targets for the development of novel therapeutics is therefore needed in order to improve this devastating overall survival rate. This review discusses current literature on translation in gliomas with a focus on the initiation step covering both the cap-dependent and cap-independent modes of initiation. The different translation initiation protagonists will be described in normal conditions and then in gliomas. In addition, their gene expression in gliomas will systematically be examined using two freely available datasets. Finally, we will discuss different pathways regulating translation initiation and current drugs targeting the translational machinery and their potential for the treatment of gliomas.

A network of eIF2β interactions with eIF1 and Met-tRNAi promotes accurate start codon selection by the translation preinitiation complex

In translation initiation, a 43S preinitiation complex (PIC) containing eIF1 and a ternary complex (TC) of GTP-bound eIF2 and Met-RNA_i scans the mRNA for the start codon. AUG recognition triggers eIF1 release and rearrangement from an open PIC conformation to a closed state with more tightly-bound Met-tRNA_i (P_IN state). Cryo-EM models reveal eIF2β contacts with eIF1 and Met-tRNA_i exclusive to the open complex that should destabilize the closed state. eIF2β or eIF1 substitutions disrupting these contacts increase initiation at UUG codons, and compound substitutions also derepress translation of GCN4, indicating slower TC recruitment. The latter substitutions slow TC loading while stabilizing TC binding at UUG codons in reconstituted PICs, indicating a destabilized open complex and shift to the closed/P_IN state. An eIF1 substitution that should strengthen the eIF2β:eIF1 interface has the opposite genetic and biochemical phenotypes. eIF2β is also predicted to restrict Met-tRNA_i movement into the closed/P_IN state, and substitutions that should diminish this clash increase UUG initiation in vivo and stabilize Met-tRNA_i binding at UUG codons in vitro with little effect on TC loading. Thus, eIF2β anchors eIF1 and TC to the open complex, enhancing PIC assembly and scanning, while impeding rearrangement to the closed conformation at non-AUG codons.

Control of Translation at the Initiation Phase During Glucose Starvation in Yeast

Glucose is one of the most important sources of carbon across all life. Glucose starvation is a key stress relevant to all eukaryotic cells. Glucose starvation responses have important implications in diseases, such as diabetes and cancer. In yeast, glucose starvation causes rapid and dramatic effects on the synthesis of proteins (mRNA translation). Response to glucose deficiency targets the initiation phase of translation by different mechanisms and with diverse dynamics. Concomitantly, translationally repressed mRNAs and components of the protein synthesis machinery may enter a variety of cytoplasmic foci, which also form with variable kinetics and may store or degrade mRNA. Much progress has been made in understanding these processes in the last decade, including with the use of high-throughput/omics methods of RNA and RNA:protein detection. This review dissects the current knowledge of yeast reactions to glucose starvation systematized by the stage of translation initiation, with the focus on rapid responses. We provide parallels to mechanisms found in higher eukaryotes, such as metazoans, for the most critical responses, and point out major remaining gaps in knowledge and possible future directions of research on translational responses to glucose starvation.

Novel oncogene 5MP1 reprograms c-Myc translation initiation to drive malignant phenotypes in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Translational reprogramming through controlled initiation from non-AUG start codons is considered a crucial driving force in tumorigenesis and tumor progression. However, its clinical impact and underlying mechanism are not fully understood.

METHODS

Using a bioinformatics approach, we identified translation initiation regulator 5MP1/BZW2 on chromosome 7p as a potential oncogenic driver gene in colorectal cancer (CRC), and explored the biological effect of 5MP1 in CRC in vitro or in vivo. Pathway analysis was performed to identify the downstream target of 5MP1, which was verified with transcriptomic and biochemical analyses. Finally, we assessed the clinical significance of 5MP1 expression in CRC patients.

FINDINGS

5MP1 was ubiquitously amplified and overexpressed in CRC. 5MP1 promoted tumor growth and induced cell cycle progression of CRC. c-Myc was identified as its potential downstream effector. c-Myc has two in-frame start codons, AUG and CUG (non-AUG) located upstream of the AUG. 5MP1 expression increased the AUG-initiated c-Myc isoform relative to the CUG-initiated isoform. The AUG-initiated c-Myc isoform displayed higher protein stability and a stronger transactivation activity for oncogenic pathways than the CUG-initiated isoform, accounting for 5MP1-driven cell cycle progression and tumor growth. Clinically, high 5MP1 expression predicts poor survival of CRC patients.

INTERPRETATION

5MP1 is a novel oncogene that reprograms c-Myc translation in CRC. 5MP1 could be a potential therapeutic target to overcome therapeutic resistance conferred by tumor heterogeneity of CRC. FUND: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Priority Issue on Post-K computer; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation; KSU Johnson Cancer Center.

Role of integrative structural biology in understanding transcriptional initiation

Integrative structural biology combines data from multiple experimental techniques to generate complete structural models for the biological system of interest. Most commonly cross-linking data sets are employed alongside electron microscopy maps, crystallographic structures, and other data by computational methods that integrate all known information and produce structural models at a level of resolution that is appropriate to the input data. The precision of these modelled solutions is limited by the sparseness of cross-links observed, the length of the cross-linking reagent, the ambiguity arisen from the presence of multiple copies of the same protein, and structural and compositional heterogeneity. In recent years integrative structural biology approaches have been successfully applied to a range of RNA polymerase II complexes. Here we will provide a general background to integrative structural biology, a description of how it should be practically implemented and how it has furthered our understanding of the biology of large transcriptional assemblies. Finally, in the context of recent breakthroughs in microscope and direct electron detector technology, where increasingly EM is capable of resolving structural features directly without the aid of other structural techniques, we will discuss the future role of integrative structural techniques.

Knockdown of EIF3C promotes human U-2OS cells apoptosis through increased CASP3/7 and Chk1/2 by upregulating SAPK/JNK

Background

As a component of the EIF3 complex, EIF3C is essential for several steps in protein synthesis initiation. Recently, it has been addressed that EIF3C is overexpressed in several human cancers and plays a pivotal role in cell proliferation and tumorigenesis.

Materials and methods

Immunohistochemistry, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), and Western blotting assays were employed to determine the expression of EIF3C in osteosarcoma (OsC) tissues obtained from 60 patients. The levels of EIF3C mRNA and protein were assessed by qPCR and Western blotting, respectively. The effect of EIF3C knockdown on OsC cell proliferation was detected by MTT and colony formation assays, respectively. Cell apoptosis induced by EIF3C silencing was analyzed by flow cytometric analysis. PathScan stress and apoptosis signaling antibody array kit was used to analyze the potential effects of EIF3C knockdown on OsC cells.

Results

The levels of EIF3C were high in OsC tissues and cell lines. In addition, EIF3C knockdown by lentivirus-mediated shRNA targeting EIF3C significantly suppressed cell proliferation and colony formation and induced apoptosis in U-2OS cells. Moreover, EIF3C knockdown led to the upregulated expression of CASP3/7, Chk1/2, and SAPK/JNK, indicating that the downregulated expression of EIF3C might be associated with pro-apoptosis of U-2OS cells.

Conclusion

EIF3C may be a promising target for gene therapy of human OsC. However, the precise mechanisms behind the effect of EIF3C on OsC tumorigenesis require further analysis.

Protein Synthesis Initiation in Eukaryotic Cells

This review summarizes our current understanding of the major pathway for the initiation phase of protein synthesis in eukaryotic cells, with a focus on recent advances. We describe the major scanning or messenger RNA (mRNA) m⁷G cap-dependent mechanism, which is a highly coordinated and stepwise regulated process that requires the combined action of at least 12 distinct translation factors with initiator transfer RNA (tRNA), ribosomes, and mRNAs. We limit our review to studies involving either mammalian or budding yeast cells and factors, as these represent the two best-studied experimental systems, and only include a reference to other organisms where particular insight has been gained. We close with a brief description of what we feel are some of the major unknowns in eukaryotic initiation.

Human eIF5 and eIF1A Compete for Binding to eIF5B

Eukaryotic translation initiation is a multistep process requiring a number of eukaryotic translation initiation factors (eIFs). Two GTPases play key roles in the process. eIF2 brings the initiator Met-tRNA_i to the preinitiation complex (PIC). Upon start codon selection and GTP hydrolysis promoted by the GTPase-activating protein (GAP) eIF5, eIF2-GDP is displaced from Met-tRNA_i by eIF5B-GTP and is released in complex with eIF5. eIF5B promotes ribosomal subunit joining, with the help of eIF1A. Upon subunit joining, eIF5B hydrolyzes GTP and is released together with eIF1A. We found that human eIF5 interacts with eIF5B and may help recruit eIF5B to the PIC. An eIF5B-binding motif was identified at the C-terminus of eIF5, similar to that found in eIF1A. Indeed, eIF5 competes with eIF1A for binding and has an ∼100-fold higher affinity for eIF5B. Because eIF5 is the GAP of eIF2, the newly discovered interaction offers a possible mechanism for coordination between the two steps in translation initiation controlled by GTPases: start codon selection and ribosomal subunit joining. Our results indicate that in humans, eIF5B displacing eIF2 from Met-tRNA_i upon subunit joining may be coupled to eIF1A displacing eIF5 from eIF5B, allowing the eIF5:eIF2-GDP complex to leave the ribosome.

Tma64/eIF2D, Tma20/MCT-1, and Tma22/DENR Recycle Post-termination 40S Subunits In Vivo

The recycling of ribosomal subunits after translation termination is critical for efficient gene expression. Tma64 (eIF2D), Tma20 (MCT-1), and Tma22 (DENR) function as 40S recycling factors in vitro, but it is unknown whether they perform this function in vivo. Ribosome profiling of tma deletion strains revealed 80S ribosomes queued behind the stop codon, consistent with a block in 40S recycling. We found that unrecycled ribosomes could reinitiate translation at AUG codons in the 3' UTR, as evidenced by peaks in the footprint data and 3' UTR reporter analysis. In vitro translation experiments using reporter mRNAs containing upstream open reading frames (uORFs) further established that reinitiation increased in the absence of these proteins. In some cases, 40S ribosomes appeared to rejoin with 60S subunits and undergo an 80S reinitiation process in 3' UTRs. These results support a crucial role for Tma64, Tma20, and Tma22 in recycling 40S ribosomal subunits at stop codons and translation reinitiation.

Dynamic Interaction of Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4G1 (eIF4G1) with eIF4E and eIF1 Underlies Scanning-Dependent and -Independent Translation

Translation initiation of most mRNAs involves m7G-cap binding, ribosomal scanning, and AUG selection. Initiation from an m7G-cap-proximal AUG can be bypassed resulting in leaky scanning, except for mRNAs bearing the translation initiator of short 5' untranslated region (TISU) element. m7G-cap binding is mediated by the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E)-eIF4G1 complex. eIF4G1 also associates with eIF1, and both promote scanning and AUG selection. Understanding of the dynamics and significance of these interactions is lacking. We report that eIF4G1 exists in two complexes, either with eIF4E or with eIF1. Using an eIF1 mutant impaired in eIF4G1 binding, we demonstrate that eIF1-eIF4G1 interaction is important for leaky scanning and for avoiding m7G-cap-proximal initiation. Intriguingly, eIF4E-eIF4G1 antagonizes the scanning promoted by eIF1-eIF4G1 and is required for TISU. In mapping the eIF1-binding site on eIF4G1, we unexpectedly found that eIF4E also binds it indirectly. These findings uncover the RNA features underlying regulation by eIF4E-eIF4G1 and eIF1-eIF4G1 and suggest that 43S ribosome transition from the m7G-cap to scanning involves relocation of eIF4G1 from eIF4E to eIF1.

Regulation of translation initiation factor eIF2B at the hub of the integrated stress response

Phosphorylation of the translation initiation factor eIF2 is one of the most widely used and well-studied mechanisms cells use to respond to diverse cellular stresses. Known as the integrated stress response (ISR), the control pathway uses modulation of protein synthesis to reprogram gene expression and restore homeostasis. Here the current knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of eIF2 activation and its control by phosphorylation at a single-conserved phosphorylation site, serine 51 are discussed with a major focus on the regulatory roles of eIF2B and eIF5 where a current molecular view of ISR control of eIF2B activity is presented. How genetic disorders affect eIF2 or eIF2B is discussed, as are syndromes where excess signaling through the ISR is a component. Finally, studies into the action of recently identified compounds that modulate the ISR in experimental systems are discussed; these suggest that eIF2B is a potential therapeutic target for a wide range of conditions. This article is categorized under: Translation > Translation Regulation.

Translation initiation by cap-dependent ribosome recruitment: Recent insights and open questions

Gene expression universally relies on protein synthesis, where ribosomes recognize and decode the messenger RNA template by cycling through translation initiation, elongation, and termination phases. All aspects of translation have been studied for decades using the tools of biochemistry and molecular biology available at the time. Here, we focus on the mechanism of translation initiation in eukaryotes, which is remarkably more complex than prokaryotic initiation and is the target of multiple types of regulatory intervention. The "consensus" model, featuring cap-dependent ribosome entry and scanning of mRNA leader sequences, represents the predominantly utilized initiation pathway across eukaryotes, although several variations of the model and alternative initiation mechanisms are also known. Recent advances in structural biology techniques have enabled remarkable molecular-level insights into the functional states of eukaryotic ribosomes, including a range of ribosomal complexes with different combinations of translation initiation factors that are thought to represent bona fide intermediates of the initiation process. Similarly, high-throughput sequencing-based ribosome profiling or "footprinting" approaches have allowed much progress in understanding the elongation phase of translation, and variants of them are beginning to reveal the remaining mysteries of initiation, as well as aspects of translation termination and ribosomal recycling. A current view on the eukaryotic initiation mechanism is presented here with an emphasis on how recent structural and footprinting results underpin axioms of the consensus model. Along the way, we further outline some contested mechanistic issues and major open questions still to be addressed. This article is categorized under: Translation > Translation Mechanisms Translation > Translation Regulation RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein-RNA Interactions: Functional Implications.

The Jigsaw Puzzle of mRNA Translation Initiation in Eukaryotes: A Decade of Structures Unraveling the Mechanics of the Process

Translation initiation in eukaryotes is a highly regulated and rate-limiting process. It results in the assembly and disassembly of numerous transient and intermediate complexes involving over a dozen eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs). This process culminates in the accommodation of a start codon marking the beginning of an open reading frame at the appropriate ribosomal site. Although this process has been extensively studied by hundreds of groups for nearly half a century, it has been only recently, especially during the last decade, that we have gained deeper insight into the mechanics of the eukaryotic translation initiation process. This advance in knowledge is due in part to the contributions of structural biology, which have shed light on the molecular mechanics underlying the different functions of various eukaryotic initiation factors. In this review, we focus exclusively on the contribution of structural biology to the understanding of the eukaryotic initiation process, a long-standing jigsaw puzzle that is just starting to yield the bigger picture.

Translational autoregulation of BZW1 and BZW2 expression by modulating the stringency of start codon selection

The efficiency of start codon selection during ribosomal scanning in eukaryotic translation initiation is influenced by the context or flanking nucleotides surrounding the AUG codon. The levels of eukaryotic translation initiation factors 1 (eIF1) and 5 (eIF5) play critical roles in controlling the stringency of translation start site selection. The basic leucine zipper and W2 domain-containing proteins 1 and 2 (BZW1 and BZW2), also known as eIF5-mimic proteins, are paralogous human proteins containing C-terminal HEAT domains that resemble the HEAT domain of eIF5. We show that translation of mRNAs encoding BZW1 and BZW2 homologs in fungi, plants and metazoans is initiated by AUG codons in conserved unfavorable initiation contexts. This conservation is reminiscent of the conserved unfavorable initiation context that enables autoregulation of EIF1. We show that overexpression of BZW1 and BZW2 proteins enhances the stringency of start site selection, and that their poor initiation codons confer autoregulation on BZW1 and BZW2 mRNA translation. We also show that overexpression of these two proteins significantly diminishes the effect of overexpressing eIF5 on stringency of start codon selection, suggesting they antagonize this function of eIF5. These results reveal a surprising role for BZW1 and BZW2 in maintaining homeostatic stringency of start codon selection, and taking into account recent biochemical, genetic and structural insights into eukaryotic initiation, suggest a model for BZW1 and BZW2 function.

Competition between translation initiation factor eIF5 and its mimic protein 5MP determines non-AUG initiation rate genome-wide

In the human genome, translation initiation from non-AUG codons plays an important role in various gene regulation programs. However, mechanisms regulating the non-AUG initiation rate remain poorly understood. Here, we show that the non-AUG initiation rate is nearly consistent under a fixed nucleotide context in various human and insect cells. Yet, it ranges from <1% to nearly 100% compared to AUG translation, depending on surrounding sequences, including Kozak, and possibly additional nucleotide contexts. Mechanistically, this range of non-AUG initiation is controlled in part, by the eIF5-mimic protein (5MP). 5MP represses non-AUG translation by competing with eIF5 for the Met-tRNAi-binding factor eIF2. Consistently, eIF5 increases, whereas 5MP decreases translation of NAT1/EIF4G2/DAP5, whose sole start codon is GUG. By modulating eIF5 and 5MP1 expression in combination with ribosome profiling we identified a handful of previously unknown non-AUG initiation sites, some of which serve as the exclusive start codons. If the initiation rate for these codons is low, then an AUG-initiated downstream ORF prevents the generation of shorter, AUG-initiated isoforms. We propose that the homeostasis of the non-AUG translatome is maintained through balanced expression of eIF5 and 5MP.