Medication adherence to multidrug regimens

Medication Refill Adherence in Patients with Chronic Inflammatory Eye Disease

PURPOSE

To utilize pharmacy dispenses to investigate adherence rates to immunosuppressive therapy (IMT) for the treatment of noninfectious inflammatory eye disease (IED), impact of adherence on disease control, factors associated with nonadherence, and association between adherence in the medical record and pharmacy dispenses.

METHOD

Retrospective medical chart review was conducted on patients followed for at least 2 years in the uveitis clinic. Appointment and lab attendance, and provider documentation, determined adherence through the medical record. Dispense history was obtained from pharmacies, and IMT infusion dates were noted. Disease control was determined by clinical exam findings.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients qualified for the study. The mean age was 49 years (SD = 19.4), 76.2% were female, 36.5% were Black/African American, and 96.8% were taking 1 or 2 IMTs. Pharmacy refill data was collected from 58 patients to determine an adherence rate (AR) of 63.9%. Thirty-nine patients (67.2%) had an average AR < 85% by pharmacy refill data and were thus deemed nonadherent. The majority of patients (86.2%) achieved ocular inflammation control. Nonadherence was 4.72 times more likely in patients taking >1 medication compared to one medication alone (95% CI: 1.02-21.86, p = 0.047). Comparing adherence from information in the medical record to pharmacy refill data, 71.6% of IMT comparisons were congruent (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Patients taking IMT for >2 years demonstrated an AR < 65% based on pharmacy data. Most patients achieved ocular quiescence. Using pharmacy information as an objective measure of adherence correlates with assessing adherence through medical record information.

Increased Myocardial MARK4 Expression in Patients with Heart Failure and Sleep-Disordered Breathing

Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, underscoring the urgent need for novel therapeutic targets and strategies. The kinase MARK4 (MAP (microtubule-associated proteins)/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase 4) regulates microtubule-associated proteins pivotal for cell polarity, protein stability, and intracellular signaling. Animal models of heart failure revealed elevated MARK4 levels, which correlated with impaired cardiac contractility. However, the involvement of MARK4 and its potential as a molecular drug target has not yet been explored in the myocardium of cardiovascular patients. We investigated the MARK4 mRNA expression in human myocardial biopsies of 152 high-risk cardiovascular patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Comprehensive echocardiography as well as testing for sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), a critical comorbidity in heart failure, were assessed preoperatively. We observed a substantial upregulation of myocardial MARK4 expression in patients with impaired cardiac contractility, resulting in an inverse correlation with the left ventricular ejection fraction. Myocardial MARK4 expression also correlated with echocardiographic E/e', a central parameter of diastolic dysfunction. Mechanistically, our analyses revealed that MARK4 expression increases in SDB and under hypoxic conditions, as evidenced by significant correlations between myocardial MARK4 expression and factors like mean oxygen saturation, time with oxygen saturation below 90%, and the oxygen desaturation index. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that both left ventricular ejection fraction and mean oxygen saturation were independently associated with dysregulated MARK4 levels, even when controlling for important clinical covariables as potential confounders. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that MARK4 expression is highly increased in the myocardium of cardiovascular high-risk patients, suggesting it is a potential molecular target against cardiovascular diseases.

Dual effects of Camellia sinensis and Andrographis paniculata on hyperglycemia and infection in Drosophila

The coexistence of hyperglycemia and infectious diseases represents a critical global health challenge, particularly in resource-limited settings where it amplifies disease severity and complicates treatment approaches. Medicinal plants such as Camellia sinensis and Andrographis paniculata have gained recognition for their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties, making them promising candidates for addressing this double health burden. The aim of this study was to establish a preclinical model of hyperglycemia and infection (HI model) using Drosophila melanogaster and to investigate the therapeutic potential of C. sinensis and A. paniculata extracts in alleviating the burden associated with the HI condition. In this study, the HI model was established by simultaneously exposing D. melanogaster larvae to a high-concentration sucrose solution and Staphylococcus aureus for 24 hours. The larvae were then transferred to a high-sucrose diet supplemented with C. sinensis or A. paniculata extracts. Survival assays and molecular analyses were subsequently performed to evaluate the outcomes. Our findings revealed that the combination of hyperglycemia and infection significantly reduced survival rates in the Drosophila model. However, treatment with 1.25% C. sinensis and A. paniculata extracts notably improved survival, attributed to their antibacterial activity and regulation of key molecular pathways involved in immune responses, metabolic balance, and endogenous antioxidant defenses. These findings validate the utility of D. melanogaster as a model organism for investigating the double burden of HI. Furthermore, the study offers compelling evidence of the dual therapeutic potential of C. sinensis and A. paniculata in mitigating the detrimental effects of this condition. Overall, this research underscores the significant promise of plant-derived compounds in managing HI and paves the way for future studies to explore their underlying mechanisms and potential clinical applications.

Factors Influencing Medication Adherence in Heart Failure Patients-A Survey Among Cardiac Healthcare Providers

Adhering to medication regimens is key behavior to alleviate symptoms and slow disease progression in heart failure (HF). This study explores cardiac healthcare providers' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing medication adherence (MA) in HF patients, with findings contributing to developing a HF-specific MA assessment scale. Using a cross-sectional, mixed methods design, we conducted an online survey with both closed and open-ended questions distributed to cardiac healthcare providers, working at the National University Hospital in Iceland. The survey consisted of 103 questions divided into 18 themes. Analysis included descriptive statistics of the participants' responses to closed responses with simplified scoring. Free-text responses were grouped into thematic categories and then into subthemes. Of 104 healthcare providers invited, 73 (70%) participated. Key factors identified as most beneficial for supporting MA included supportive patient-provider relationships (97%), selecting suitable drug formulation (96%), healthcare support at home (95%), and multi-dose dispensing from pharmacies (93%). The youngest and oldest HF patients were believed to be at the highest risk of medication non-adherence, particularly among males. Other patients estimated at increased risk included those with alcohol and/or substance abuse (89%), those with limited knowledge of medication effects (89%), those perceiving medication as useless (88%), and those with cognitive impairment (86%). Most participants (73%) agreed that healthcare providers should assess and document MA in clinical care. These findings provide a comprehensive overview of factors that cardiac healthcare providers believe influence non-adherence in HF patients, contributing to the development of a HF-specific MA scale.

Starting Two or More Drugs Concurrently in Primary Care: How Often Is It Done, How Often Is It Needed?

BACKGROUND

There is growing awareness of the need for more cautious, conservative prescribing. One conservative prescribing principle urges prescribers, whenever possible, to start only one new medication at a time. Little is known about how often primary care physicians (PCPs) start multiple medications at the same time, and when that is needed.

OBJECTIVE

To describe how frequently PCPs start multiple prescriptions at the same time, evaluate evidence supporting the necessity of initiating multiple prescriptions concurrently, and describe PCP and clinical sites' prescribing variability.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

PCPs at four sites who wrote prescriptions during January 2017-December 2018.

MAIN MEASURES

Frequency of initiating two or more new prescriptions during the same session.

KEY RESULTS

Across the four sites, 4646 PCPs wrote 7,849,914 new prescriptions. The Veterans Administration (VA) site had the highest percentage of encounters with multiple concurrent new drug starts (27.2%), followed by Northwestern (NW) (19.7%), Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) (16.1%), and University of Illinois Chicago (UIC) (14.0%). Within each site, there was wide variation among PCPs in percentage of encounters where they prescribed multiple new medications. Interquartile range varied: 11.0-18.5% (BWH), 15.1-22% (NW), 11.0-15.8% (UIC), and 22.9-31.0% (VA). Reviewing the most frequent combinations, only 0.6% had strong evidence for starting them concurrently. Most were drugs either recommended to be taken together (16.8%) or reasonable to be taken together, but with no evidence supporting starting them simultaneously (71.5%). A smaller percentage of concurrent starts were potentially problematic (10.4%) or contraindicated (0.7%) due to overlapping side effects or drug-drug interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

PCPs frequently started multiple medications concurrently, often without compelling evidence, with notable variations across prescribers and institutions. Although we could not conduct detailed chart review for each encounter, classification of the most frequent drug pairs concurrently prescribed in our study suggests opportunities to potentially improve prescribing safety.

Prevalence of adherence and its impact on quality of life in oral anticoagulant users in Egypt: A cross-sectional study from two Egyptian university hospitals

BACKGROUND

Oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) is critical for managing thromboembolic disorders, but adherence challenges significantly impact its effectiveness and patients' quality of life (QoL). This study explores the predictors of adherence and their effects on QoL among OAT users in Egypt.

METHODS

This multi-center cross-sectional descriptive study with an analytical component was conducted at Mansoura University Hospital and Ain Shams University Hospital. Participants were adults over 18 years old, on OAT for at least one month, who provided informed consent. Convenience sampling was used to recruit 212 participants. Data were collected using a survey that included socio-demographic details, the Arabic Version of the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS), and the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, Student's t-tests, and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

The study included 212 participants, with an average age of 55 years, 57% female and 43% male. Among the participants, 25.5% were adherent to their anticoagulant regimen, while 74.5% were non-adherent. Adherence was significantly higher among NOAC users (44.4%) compared to warfarin users (19.0%). Key predictors of adherence included the use of NOACs (OR = 2.7), residency in rural areas (OR = 2.4), and having first-degree relatives in medical specialties (OR = 2.4). Quality of life scores were significantly higher for NOAC users in psychological, social, and environmental domains compared to warfarin users. The overall QoL score was also higher in NOAC users. Poorer adherence was associated with lower scores in these QoL domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that NOACs enhance adherence and quality of life relative to VKAs. Key adherence predictors include NOAC use, rural residency, and having relatives in medical professions. Educational level, initially significant, did not persist as a predictor in multivariate analysis. Targeted strategies are needed to improve adherence and patient outcomes.

Barriers to Implementing Effective Healthcare Practices for the Aging Population: Approaches to Identification and Management

The aging population presents a growing challenge to healthcare systems, necessitating urgent adaptations to meet the complex needs of older adults. Existing healthcare models often lack integration and fail to provide patient-centered care, leading to fragmented services, suboptimal outcomes, increased hospitalizations, and escalating healthcare costs. This narrative review aims to systematically identify and categorize the key barriers to effective healthcare implementation for the elderly, evaluate current healthcare models and their limitations, and explore evidence-based strategies to improve care delivery. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published from 2000 to October 2024. The identified barriers span multiple domains, including patient-related challenges such as low health literacy and socioeconomic disparities, disease-specific factors like frailty and multimorbidity, provider-related constraints such as inadequate geriatric training, and system-wide deficiencies in primary care infrastructure and policy support. To address these challenges, this review explores emerging solutions, including risk stratification tools, integrated healthcare models, digital health innovations, and artificial intelligence-driven interventions. By providing a structured analysis of barriers and solutions, this review aims to inform policy and healthcare practices that enhance elderly care, reduce hospital readmissions, and optimize resource utilization in aging populations.

Myocardial DYRK1B Expression Is Increased in Patients with Impaired Cardiac Contractility and Sleep-Disordered Breathing

Heart failure and cardiovascular disease represent a significant burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Recent evidence associates an increased expression of the dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1B (DYRK1B) with an impaired cardiac function in mice. However, there remains a paucity of data on myocardial DYRK1B expression in patients with cardiovascular disease in the context of other comorbidities. In our study, we examined DYRK1B mRNA expression in human right atrial appendage biopsies from 159 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery. Each patient was tested for sleep-disordered breathing the night prior to surgery. In this large representative study cohort with cardiovascular high-risk patients, we found that an impaired cardiac function as well as sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), including various oxidative stress parameters, were associated with an increased myocardial DYRK1B expression. A multivariate regression analysis revealed left ventricular ejection fraction and the presence of SDB as significant predictors of the myocardial DYRK1B expression independent of other clinical covariates. Based on these findings, DYRK1B represents a promising molecular target in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction as well in patients with sleep-disordered breathing.

Effects of pharmacist-led home visit services and factors influencing medication adherence improvement

BACKGROUND

The use of medicines is crucial in treatment, but nonadherence poses an important challenge, particularly when managing polypharmacy and long-term conditions. Pharmacist-led home visit services offer a promising solution to enhance the outcomes associated with medication use. However, the effects and the factors contributing to this improvement remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the effects of pharmacist-led home visit services on medication adherence and general medication knowledge. Additionally, we analyzed the factors associated with improved medication adherence.

METHODS

Face-to-face, pharmacist-led home visit services were conducted via opportunistic sampling in community settings. Data were collected between 2017 and 2019. The program included participants aged ≥65 years or taking ten or more medications, in need of care, and who were willing to participate. We estimated the effects of the program by improved medication adherence and general knowledge about taking medications. Medication adherence was measured using the Morisky Scale. We used McNemar's test to evaluate the statistical differences in outcomes before and after consultation. To identify factors influencing improvements in medication adherence, odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using multivariate logistic regression with adjustments for covariates.

RESULTS

Among the 1,194 participants in the program, 874 were included in the analysis. Pharmacist-led home visit services improved both medication adherence (from 69.2% to 85.8%) and mean scores for general knowledge of taking medications (from 65.3% to 89.5%). Participants aged ≥70 years showed less improvement in overall adherence than those aged <70 years (OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.317-0.817). The program was significantly more effective at improving adherence for participants with higher level of medication knowledge (OR = 2.93; 95% CI = 1.78-4.81) compared to those with lower level of knowledge.

CONCLUSION

These quantitative findings highlight the importance of pharmacist-led interventions and suggest a framework for future programs about medication management.

Non-adherence to antidementia medications and associated factors: a study of Spanish population-based registry data

Introduction

With an increasing prevalence, dementia is one of the most disabling diseases among the elderly. Impaired cognitive function and behavioral and psychological symptoms predispose patients to medication non-adherence, resulting in increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of non-adherence to antidementia medications and to identify the main predictors.

Methods

A population-based registry study was conducted in 2022 in Castile and Leon, Spain. A total of 17,563 patients with dementia were included. The medication possession ratio (MPR) was used as an indirect method to measure adherence. The cut-off point for determining that a patient was nonadherent was 80% of MPR. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of nonadherence based on sociodemographic and health-related variables.

Results

In 2022, 6.2% of the population over 80 years old used antidementia medications. Of these patients, 70% were women, 28.15% were institutionalized, and over 90% were polymedicated and had multiple prescribers. The most used medicines were donepezil (43.49%), rivastigmine (36.84%), and memantine (30.7%). The combined use of an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor plus memantine was relevant (13.33%). Men were less adherent than women, and the prevalence of non-adherence decreased with age. The medication associated with the highest prevalence of non-adherence was rivastigmine (19%), followed by donepezil (17%) and memantine (13.23%). Institutionalized patients (13%) and patients on combination therapy (13.29%) had the lowest prevalence of non-adherence. Protective factors against non-adherence include institutionalization, polymedication, use of memantine or combination therapy, and comorbid mental illness.

Conclusions

In Castile and Leon, one in six patients were non-adherent to antidementia medications. Younger male patients with cardiometabolic disease are more likely to be non-adherent to antidementia medications. On the other hand, institutionalization is a protective factor against non-adherence, but still 10% of nursing home patients are non-adherent to antidementia medications.

Magnitude of multiple drug use and determinants of vulnerability among chronic kidney disease inpatients in Ethiopia: a multi-center study

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney disease frequently face various nutritional and metabolic problems that necessitate the use of multiple medications. This multiple drug use can lead to several drug-related problems including adverse drug events, hospital admissions, poor medication adherence, harmful drug interactions, inadequate therapeutic outcomes, and death. Despite these challenges, there is a notable lack of studies on the extent of multiple drug use and its determinants among patients with chronic kidney disease in Ethiopia. This study aims to assess the magnitude of multiple drug use and identify the determinants of vulnerability among patients with chronic kidney disease in Ethiopia.

METHOD

A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted among patients with chronic kidney disease. Eligible participants were selected using a simple random sampling technique. Frequency and percentage calculations were performed for categorical variables, while means and standard deviations were used for continuous variables. The chi-square test and t-test were used to compare the proportions and means, respectively. Binary logistic regression was used to identify the determinants of multiple drug use, with statistical significance determined by a p-value of less than 0.05 and a 95% confidence interval. Guidelines and previous literature were utilized to assess the magnitude of multiple drug use.

RESULTS

A total of 230 patients were enrolled, with more than half being male. The overall magnitude of multiple drug use was 83.0%. Diuretics being the most frequently prescribed medication class followed by angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors. Patients aged 65 years and above (AOR = 4.91 (95% CI 1.60-15.03)), CKD stage five (AOR) = 5.48 (95% CI 1.99-15.09)), and the presence of comorbid conditions (AOR) = 3.53 (95% CI 1.55-8.06)) were significantly associated with multiple drug use.

CONCLUSION

Chronic kidney disease patients exhibited a high rate of multiple drug use. The presence of comorbid conditions, disease progression and older age are significant determinates of this vulnerability. Health care providers should pay particular attention to these factors to manage and mitigate the risks associated with multiple drug use.

Managing medications among individuals with mild cognitive impairment and dementia: Patient-caregiver perspectives

BACKGROUND

With changing cognitive abilities, individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia face challenges in successfully managing multidrug regimens. We sought to understand how individuals with MCI or dementia and their family caregivers manage multidrug regimens and better understand patient-to-caregiver transitions in medication management responsibilities.

METHODS

We conducted qualitative interviews among patient-caregiver dyads. Eligibility included: patients with a diagnosis of MCI, mild or moderate dementia, managing ≥3 chronic conditions, ≥5 prescription medications, who also had a family caregiver ≥18 years old. Semi-structured interview guides, informed by the Medication Self-Management model, ascertained roles and responsibilities for medication management and patient-to-caregiver transitions in medication responsibilities.

RESULTS

We interviewed 32 patient-caregiver dyads. Older adults and caregivers favored older adult autonomy in medication management, and individuals with MCI and mild dementia largely managed their medications independently using multiple strategies (e.g., establishing daily routines, using pillboxes). Among individuals with moderate dementia, caregivers assumed all medication-related responsibilities except when living separately. In those scenarios, caregivers set up organizers and made reminder calls, but did not observe family members taking medications. Patient-to-caregiver transitions in medication responsibilities frequently occurred after caregivers observed older adults making errors with medications. As caregivers sought to assume greater responsibilities with family members' medicines, they faced multiple barriers. Most barriers were dyadic; they affected both the older adult and the caregiver and/or the relationship. Some barriers were specific to caregivers; these included caregivers' competing responsibilities or inaccurate perceptions of dementia, while other barriers were related to the healthcare system.

CONCLUSIONS

To ease medication management transitions, balance must be sought between preservation of older adult autonomy and early family caregiver involvement. Clinicians should work to initiate conversations with family caregivers and individuals living with MCI or dementia about transitioning medication responsibilities as memory loss progresses, simplify regimens, and deprescribe, as appropriate.

Stakeholders' perspectives about challenges, strategies and outcomes of importance associated with adherence to appropriate polypharmacy in older patients - A qualitative study

Background

Older patients experience challenges when taking polypharmacy. Studies have applied different interventions to improve adherence to polypharmacy. However, inconsistencies in outcomes have impeded the synthesis of evidence. To generate high-quality studies and selectively report outcomes, a Core Outcome Set (COS) is advocated.

Objectives

This study explored stakeholders' perspectives about the challenges older patients face when taking polypharmacy, strategies to overcome each challenge, and outcomes of importance that may contribute to COS development.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with academics, healthcare professionals, and public participants. A series of open-ended questions investigated challenges with adherence to polypharmacy in older patients and strategies to overcome these challenges. A list of outcomes (n = 7) compiled from previous studies associated with adherence to polypharmacy was presented to participants for their views. Content analysis was conducted to identify key themes and outcomes proposed by participants.

Results

Participants suggested 11 multidimensional healthcare system-related, medication-related, patient-related, and socioeconomic-related challenges and 16 educational and behavioural strategies associated with adherence to polypharmacy in older patients. Participants agreed with the importance of the seven outcomes presented and suggested a further six outcomes they deemed to be important for use in trials aimed at improving adherence to appropriate polypharmacy in older patients.

Conclusions

Adherence to polypharmacy was deemed challenging, requiring supportive interventions. A list of 13 outcomes in the context of adherence to appropriate polypharmacy in older patients was identified to inform a future study that will develop a COS for clinical trials targeting interventions to improve adherence to appropriate polypharmacy in older patients.

Total cost of care of Medicare Advantage beneficiaries participating in an appointment-based model in a national pharmacy chain

BACKGROUND

The appointment-based model (ABM) is a pharmacy service to improve medication-related health outcomes. ABM involves medication synchronization and medication review, plus other services such as medication reconciliation, medication therapy management, vaccine administration, and multimedication packaging. ABM can improve medication adherence, but the economic impact is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of a national pharmacy chain's ABM program for Medicare Advantage beneficiaries on total cost of care (TCOC).

METHODS

This study analyzed administrative claims data from April 7, 2017, through February 29, 2020, for Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with Part D using a propensity score-matched cohort design. The national pharmacy chain provided a list of ABM participants. Eligibility criteria for the ABM and control (non-ABM) groups included age 65 years or older on the index date (initial participation, ABM; random fill date, control) and continuous enrollment from at least 6 months pre-index (baseline) date through at least 6 months post-index (follow-up) date. Medical inflation-adjusted (2020) TCOC was calculated as the sum of all health care spending from Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with Part D plan and patient paid amounts, standardized to per patient per month (PPPM), during the follow-up period. Secondary outcomes included medication adherence calculated across prevalent maintenance therapeutic classes using proportion of days covered (PDC).

RESULTS

Each group contained 5,225 patients with balanced characteristics after matching: 64% female, 73% White, mean age 75 years, mean Quan-Charlson comorbidity index score 0.9, and hypertension and dyslipidemia, each >65%. Median baseline all-cause PPPM health care costs in the ABM and control groups, respectively, were $517 and $548 ($221 and $234 medical, $135 and $164 pharmacy). Baseline PDC of at least 80% was 83% in the ABM group and, similarly, 84% in the control group. The mean (SD) follow-up was 604 (155) days for the ABM group and 598 (151) days for the control group. During the follow-up period, the median PPPM TCOC for the ABM group was $656 and was $723 for the control group (P = 0.011). Median pharmacy costs were also significantly less in the ABM group ($161 vs $193, P < 0.001), whereas median medical costs were $328 in the ABM group and $358 among controls (P = 0.254). More patients in the ABM group were adherent during follow-up, with 84% achieving PDC of at least 80% vs 82% among controls (P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

The ABM program was associated with significantly lower follow-up median total costs (medical and pharmacy), driven primarily by pharmacy costs. More patients were adherent in the ABM program. Payers and pharmacies can use this evidence to assess ABM programs for their members.

Effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on heart failure outcomes and cardiovascular death across the cardiometabolic disease spectrum: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been studied in patients with heart failure, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, and acute myocardial infarction. Individual trials were powered to study composite outcomes in one disease state. We aimed to evaluate the treatment effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on specific clinical endpoints across multiple demographic and disease subgroups.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we queried online databases (PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and SCOPUS) up to Feb 10, 2024, for primary and secondary analyses of large trials (n>1000) of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with heart failure, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (including acute myocardial infarction). Outcomes studied included composite of first hospitalisation for heart failure or cardiovascular death, first hospitalisation for heart failure, cardiovascular death, total (first and recurrent) hospitalisation for heart failure, and all-cause mortality. Effect sizes were pooled using random-effects models. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024513836.

FINDINGS

We included 15 trials (N=100 952). Compared with placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of first hospitalisation for heart failure by 29% in patients with heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] 0·71 [95% CI 0·67-0·77]), 28% in patients with type 2 diabetes (0·72 [0·67-0·77]), 32% in patients with chronic kidney disease (0·68 [0·61-0·77]), and 28% in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (0·72 [0·66-0·79]). SGLT2 inhibitors reduced cardiovascular death by 14% in patients with heart failure (HR 0·86 [95% CI 0·79-0·93]), 15% in patients with type 2 diabetes (0·85 [0·79-0·91]), 11% in patients with chronic kidney disease (0·89 [0·82-0·96]), and 13% in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (0·87 [0·78-0·97]). The benefit of SGLT2 inhibitors on both first hospitalisation for heart failure and cardiovascular death was consistent across the majority of the 51 subgroups studied. Notable exceptions included acute myocardial infarction (22% reduction in first hospitalisation for heart failure; no effect on cardiovascular death) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (26% reduction in first hospitalisation for heart failure; no effect on cardiovascular death).

INTERPRETATION

SGLT2 inhibitors reduced heart failure events and cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. These effects were consistent across a wide range of subgroups within these populations. This supports the eligibility of a large population with cardiorenal-metabolic diseases for treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors.

FUNDING

None.

Effect of an in-hospital medication self-management intervention (SelfMED) on medication adherence in polypharmacy patients postdischarge: protocol of a pre-post intervention study

INTRODUCTION

Healthcare providers usually manage medication for patients during hospitalisation, although patients are expected to self-manage their medication after discharge. A lack of self-management competencies is found to be associated with low adherence levels and medication errors harming patients' health. Currently, patients seldom receive support or education in medication self-management. When self-management is allowed during hospitalisation, it is rarely provided using a structured, evidence-based format. Therefore, an in-hospital medication self-management intervention (ie, SelfMED) was developed based on current evidence. To date, empirical data demonstrating the effect of SelfMED on medication adherence are lacking. This study primarily aims to evaluate the effect of the SelfMED intervention on medication adherence 2 months postdischarge in polypharmacy patients, as compared with usual care.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A multicentre pre-post intervention study will be conducted. The study will start with a control phase investigating usual care (ie, medication management entirely provided by healthcare providers), followed by an intervention period, investigating the effects of the SelfMED intervention. SelfMED consists of multiple components: (1) a stepped assessment evaluating patients' eligibility for in-hospital medication self-management, (2) a monitoring system allowing healthcare providers to follow up medication management and detect problems and (3) a supportive tool providing healthcare providers with a resource to act on observed problems with medication self-management. Polymedicated patients recruited during the control and intervention periods will be monitored for 2 months postdischarge. A total of 225 participants with polypharmacy should be included in each group. Medication adherence 2 months postdischarge, measured by pill counts, will be the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include self-management, medication knowledge, patient and staff satisfaction, perceived workload and healthcare service utilisation.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The ethics committee of the Antwerp University Hospital approved the study (reference no: B3002023000176). Study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and summaries in layman's terms.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN15132085.

Evaluation of methods measuring medication adherence in patients with polypharmacy: a longitudinal and patient perspective

PURPOSE

To explore patients' willingness to have medication adherence measured using different methods and evaluate the feasibility and validity of their combination (i.e., pill counts, a medication diary and a questionnaire assessing adherence two months post-discharge).

METHODS

(1) A cross-sectional evaluation of the willingness of patients with polypharmacy to have their medication adherence measured post-discharge. (2) Medication adherence was monitored during two months using pill counts based on preserved medication packages and a diary in which patients registered their adherence-related problems. During a home visit, the Probabilistic Medication Adherence Scale (ProMAS) and a questionnaire on feasibility were administered.

RESULTS

A total of 144 participants completed the questionnaire at discharge. The majority was willing to communicate truthfully about their adherence (97%) and to share adherence-related information with healthcare providers (99%). More participants were willing to preserve medication packages (76%) than to complete a medication diary (67%) during two months. Most participants reported that preserving medication packages (91%), completing the diary (99%) and the ProMAS (99%) were no effort to them. According to the majority of participants (60%), pill counts most accurately reflected medication adherence, followed by the diary (39%) and ProMAS (1%). Medication adherence measured by pill counts correlated significantly with ProMAS scores, but not with the number of diary-reported problems. However, adherence measured by the medication diary and ProMAS correlated significantly.

CONCLUSION

Combining tools for measuring adherence seems feasible and can provide insight into the accordance of patients' actual medication use with their prescribed regimen, but also into problems contributing to non-adherence.

The development and evaluation of a medication diary to report problems with medication use

Purpose

The study aimed to develop and evaluate a medication diary for patients to report problems with medication use to enable shared-decision making and improve medication adherence.

Methods

Based on a search for existing diaries, a review of the content, and a list of medication self-management problems compiled from previous research, a paper and pencil version of a medication diary was developed. The diary was reviewed for clarity and overall presentation by five healthcare providers and nine patients. Afterwards, user-friendliness was evaluated by 69 patients with polypharmacy discharged from hospital during a quantitative prospective study.

Results

The medication diary consists of several parts: (1) a medication schedule allowing patients to list their medicines, (2) information sheets allowing patients to write down specific medication-related information, (3) a monthly overview to indicate daily whether medication-related problems were experienced, (4) problem sheets elaborating on the problems encountered, (5) space for specific medication-related questions for healthcare providers to facilitate shared-decision making. The review phase resulted in minor textual adjustments and one extra problem in the problem sheet. Most participants, who tested the medication diary for two months, found the diary user-friendly (80%) and easy to fill in (89%). About 40% of participants reported problems with medication use. Half of the patients indicated that the diary can facilitate discussing problems with healthcare providers.

Conclusion

The medication diary offers patients the opportunity to report problems regarding their medication use in a proven user-friendly manner and to discuss these problems with healthcare providers. Reporting and discussing problems with medication use can serve as a first step towards making shared decisions on how to address the problems encountered.

Short-term prognosis of polypharmacy in elderly patients treated in emergency departments: results from the EDEN project

Background

Polypharmacy is a growing phenomenon among elderly individuals. However, there is little information about the frequency of polypharmacy among the elderly population treated in emergency departments (EDs) and its prognostic effect. This study aims to determine the prevalence and short-term prognostic effect of polypharmacy in elderly patients treated in EDs.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of the Emergency Department Elderly in Needs (EDEN) project's cohort was performed. This registry included all elderly patients who attended 52 Spanish EDs for any condition. Mild and severe polypharmacy was defined as the use of 5-9 drugs and ⩾10 drugs, respectively. The assessed outcomes were ED revisits, hospital readmissions, and mortality 30 days after discharge. Crude and adjusted logistic regression analyses, including the patient's comorbidities, were performed.

Results

A total of 25,557 patients were evaluated [mean age: 78 (IQR: 71-84) years]; 10,534 (41.2%) and 5678 (22.2%) patients presented with mild and severe polypharmacy, respectively. In the adjusted analysis, mild polypharmacy and severe polypharmacy were associated with an increase in ED revisits [odds ratio (OR) 1.13 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04-1.23) and 1.38 (95% CI: 1.24-1.51)] and hospital readmissions [OR 1.18 (95% CI: 1.04-1.35) and 1.36 (95% CI: 1.16-1.60)], respectively, compared to non-polypharmacy. Mild and severe polypharmacy were not associated with increased 30-day mortality [OR 1.05 (95% CI: 0.89-2.26) and OR 0.89 (95% CI: 0.72-1.12)], respectively.

Conclusion

Polypharmacy was common among the elderly treated in EDs and associated with increased risks of ED revisits and hospital readmissions ⩽30 days but not with an increased risk of 30-day mortality. Patients with polypharmacy had a higher risk of ED revisits and hospital readmissions ⩽30 days after discharge.

Exploring Drug-Drug Interactions between Losartan and Carbamazepine: A Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Study

BACKGROUND

Hypertension, which affects 1.28 billion people globally aged 30 to 79, is characterized by continuously high blood pressure (140/90 or more) and raises the risk of premature death. Losartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), is suggested for patients under the age of 55 who cannot take ACE inhibitors as a first treatment option. Epilepsy, a chronic neurological illness marked by repeated seizures, affects more than 50 million individuals worldwide and is the third most common chronic brain disorder. Both hypertension and epilepsy are frequent chronic illnesses, with increased blood pressure greatly raising the risk of epilepsy due to its relationship with cerebrovascular disease, doubling the risk when compared to people with normal blood pressure.

OBJECTIVE

The effect on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of losartan on concomitant administration with carbamazepine was investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Wistar rats of either sex, with a minimum of six animals per group, were used in the investigation. The rats were treated with Losartan and Losartan-Carbamazepine for 30 days. Blood samples were taken via retro-orbital plexus at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours after treatment concluded, and they were subjected to high-performance liquid chromatography for plasma analysis to calculate AUC, t1/2, and Clearance. A pharmacodynamic evaluation was done by inducing hypertension in rats using a 10% fructose solution and the effect of pretreated Losartan and Losartan-Carbamazepine on blood pressure was determined.

RESULTS

In the Losartan and Carbamazepine treated group, there was a reduction in the AUC and t1/2 and a reported increase in the clearance value compared to Losartan alone treated rats. In fructose-induced hypertension model to evaluate the effect of losartan and carbamazepine on BP showed an increase in mean arterial pressure, plasma glucose, and a reduction in triglycerides level was noted in comparison to Losartan alone treated rats indicating therapeutic failure of Losartan.

CONCLUSION

Based on these studies, it is concluded that CBZ has reduced the effectiveness of losartan and therefore, co-administration of these drugs should be avoided.

Relationship Between Diet Quality and Statin Use Among Adults With Metabolic Syndrome From the CARTaGENE Cohort

Background

In metabolic syndrome (MetS), cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk reduction relies on the complementary use of diet and lipid-lowering medication. Evidence suggests that initiating such medication may impede diet quality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between diet quality and statin use among adults with MetS and free of CVD from the Province of Québec.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 2481 adults with MetS (40-69 years of age) from the CARTaGENE Québec population-based cohort, of whom 463 self-reported using statin monotherapy. Diet was assessed using the Canadian Dietary History Questionnaire II, a food- frequency questionnaire, and diet quality was assessed using the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI).

Results

In multivariable-adjusted linear regression models, statin users had lower AHEI (%) compared with nonusers (users: 40.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 38.9, 41.2 vs nonusers: 41.2; 95% CI, 40.4, 42.0; P = 0.03] because of a lower consumption of vegetables and whole grains. Stratified interaction analyses showed that the lower diet quality among statin users was mostly prevalent among men aged ≥ 50 years and women aged ≥ 60 years, among individuals with annual household incomes of < $50,000 and persons who self-reported history of high blood pressure.

Conclusions

In this cohort of adults with MetS from Quebéc, the use of statin monotherapy in primary prevention of CVD was associated with a slightly lower diet quality. These data suggest suboptimal complementarity between diet quality and use of cholesterol-lowering medication in primary prevention of CVD in MetS.

Treatment patterns in essential tremor: Real-world evidence from a United Kingdom and France primary care database

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Essential tremor (ET) is one of the most common neurological disorders, but information on treatment pattern is still scant. The aim of this study was to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and determinants of drug use in patients with newly diagnosed ET in France and the United Kingdom.

METHODS

Incident cases of ET diagnosed between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018 with 2 years of follow-up were identified by using The Health Improvement Network (THIN®) general practice database. During the follow-up, we assessed the daily prevalence of use and potential switches from first-line to second-line treatment or other lines of treatment. Logistic regression models were conducted to assess the effect of demographic and clinical characteristics on the likelihood of receiving ET treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 2957 and 3249 patients were selected in the United Kingdom and France, respectively. Among ET patients, drug use increased from 12 months to 1 month prior the date of index diagnosis (ID). After ID, nearly 40% of patients received at least one ET treatment, but during follow-up drug use decreased and at the end of the follow-up approximately 20% of patients were still on treatment. Among treated patients, ≤10% maintained the same treatment throughout the entire follow-up, nearly 20% switched, and 40%-75% interrupted any treatment. Results from the multivariate analysis revealed that, both in France and the United Kingdom, patients receiving multiple concomitant therapies and affected by psychiatric conditions were more likely to receive an ET medication.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that ET is an undertreated disease with a lower-than-expected number of patients receiving and maintaining pharmacological treatment. Misclassification of ET diagnosis should be acknowledged; thus, results require cautious interpretation.

Relationship Between Diet Quality and Antihypertensive Medication Intensity Among Adults With Metabolic Syndrome-Associated High Blood Pressure

Background

Management of high blood pressure (BP), a key feature of the metabolic syndrome (MetS), relies on diet and medication. Whether these modalities are used as complements has never been evaluated in real-world settings. This study assessed the relationship between diet quality and antihypertensive medication intensity among adults with MetS-associated high BP.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 915 adults with MetS-associated high BP from the CARTaGENE cohort (Québec, Canada), of whom 677 reported using BP-lowering medication. Antihypertensive medication intensity was graded per the number of BP-lowering classes used simultaneously. Diet quality was assessed using the Dietary Approach to Stop Hypertension (DASH) score.

Results

No evidence of a relationship between antihypertensive medication intensity and diet quality was found (β for each additional antihypertensive = -0.05; 95% CI, -0.35; 0.26 DASH score points). However, among men aged < 50 years and women aged < 60 years, the DASH score was inversely associated with medication intensity (β = -0.72; 95% CI, -1.24, -0.19), whereas this relationship tended to be positive among older participants (β = 0.32; 95% CI, -0.05, 0.69). Among participants with low Framingham risk score, the DASH score was inversely associated with medication intensity (β = -0.70; 95% CI, -1.31, -0.09), but no evidence of an association was found among individuals at moderate (β = 0.00; 95% CI, -0.45, 0.45) or high (β = 0.30, 95% CI, -0.24, 0.84) risk.

Conclusions

In this cohort of adults with MetS-associated high BP, there was an overall lack of complementarity between diet quality and BP-lowering medication, especially among younger individuals and those with a lower risk for cardiovascular disease for whom diet quality was inversely associated with intensity of medication.

Challenges to medication adherence with intranasal corticosteroid irrigations

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate real-world adherence to intranasal corticosteroid irrigations using pharmacy data and assess factors associated with low adherence.

METHODS

Patients undergoing treatment with corticosteroid irrigations for any diagnosis during a 2-year period were prospectively recruited. Subjects completed a one-time set of questionnaires including the Barriers to Care Questionnaire (BCQ), 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), and a questionnaire assessing their experience with corticosteroid irrigations. Pharmacy data was used to calculate the medication possession ratio (MPR), a measure of medication adherence graded from 0 to 1.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients were enrolled. Patient diagnoses included chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) without nasal polyps (n = 37), CRS with nasal polyps (n = 24), or a non-CRS diagnosis, most commonly chronic rhinitis (n = 10). The MPR for the overall group was 0.44 ± 0.33. Just 9.9% of patients had a perfect MPR of 1. Despite low MPR, only 19.7% of patients reported problems taking the medication when directly asked. Lower education resulted in lower MPR (unstandardized B = 0.065, p = 0.046). Increasing BCQ score, indicating higher barriers to care, was associated with lower MPR (unstandardized B = -0.010, p = 0.033). The lower the MPR, the worse the patient SNOT-22 scores (unstandardized B = -15.980, p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

Adherence to corticosteroid irrigations was low and patients underreported issues with their medication. Education and barriers to care were associated with lower adherence, which, in turn, was associated with worse sinonasal quality of life.

Polypharmacy and medication fill nonadherence in a population-based sample of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors, 2008-2017

PURPOSE

We examined the association between polypharmacy-an established risk factor for nonadherence in the elderly-and medication fill nonadherence in a large national sample of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors (AYAs) in the USA.

METHODS

We pooled data (2008-2017) from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. We defined polypharmacy as ≥ 3 unique medications prescribed, based on self-report and pharmacy data, and medication fill nonadherence as self-reported delay or inability to obtain a necessary medication. We estimated prevalence of medication fill nonadherence among AYAs (age 18-39 years with a cancer history). We used logistic regression to estimate the association between (1) polypharmacy and medication fill nonadherence in AYAs, and (2) total number of medications prescribed and medication fill nonadherence, controlling for sex, number of chronic conditions, disability, and survey year.

RESULTS

AYAs (n = 598) were predominantly female (76.2%), age 30-39 years (64.9%), and non-Hispanic White (72.1%). Nearly half were poor (19.0%) or near-poor/low income (21.6%). One in ten AYAs reported medication fill nonadherence (9.75%). Of these, more than 70% cited cost-related barriers as the reason. AYAs with polypharmacy had 2.49 times higher odds of medication fill nonadherence (95%CI 1.11-5.59), compared to those without polypharmacy. Odds of medication fill nonadherence increased by 16% with each additional medication prescribed (AOR 1.16, 95% CI 1.07-1.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy may be an important risk factor for medication fill nonadherence in AYAs in the USA.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Improving AYAs' medication adherence requires eliminating cost-related barriers, particularly for those with polypharmacy.

Qualitative Analysis of Barriers and Facilitators to Glaucoma Medication Adherence in a Randomized Controlled Trial Intervention

OBJECTIVE

In the Medication Adherence In Glaucoma To Improve Care trial, 200 veterans with medically-treated glaucoma were randomized to an intervention designed to improve glaucoma medication adherence or to usual care. In the 6 months after intervention, the mean proportion of doses taken on schedule was higher for participants in the intervention group compared with controls (0.85 vs. 0.62, P < 0.001). The purpose of this study was to use a mixed-methods approach to compare barriers and facilitators with adherence among participants through qualitative analysis of structured interviews.

DESIGN

This is an analysis of interviews conducted from patients participating in a clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants from the intervention arm were separated into quartiles based on medication adherence according to the electronic monitor to sample from high and low responders to the intervention. We interviewed 23 participants; 11 participants with low adherence and 12 with high adherence.

METHODS

Interviews were conducted over telephone and transcribed. Staff members used grounded theory to conduct content analysis and code the transcribed interviews. The iterative process produced categories of common barriers and facilitators for medication adherence.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The frequency of responses addressing common barriers and facilitators were compared between participants with high and low adherence.

RESULTS

In the lowest- and highest-adherence groups, a difficult schedule was the most cited barrier for regular drop usage (63.6% and 58.3%, respectively). In the lowest and highest-adherence groups, the most cited facilitator for adherence was use of the smart bottle (100% and 91.7%, respectively). In the lowest-adherence group, 72.7% of participants cited that improved ability to administer drops was a benefit from the intervention. In the highest-adherence group, 75% of participants cited increased disease knowledge and formation of habits as facilitators from the intervention. Of the 22 of 23 participants who mentioned the smart bottle, 100% cited that they had increased adherence and would continue using the smart bottle.

CONCLUSIONS

Using dosing reminders and personalized patient education may be important avenues for addressing difficulties with adhering to an eye drop schedule to improve glaucoma self-management.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Does Therapy with Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists Have an Effect on Biochemical Markers of Metabolic-Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD)? Pleiotropic Metabolic Effect of Novel Antidiabetic Drugs in Patients with Diabetes-Interventional Study

Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) is associated with the excessive collection of lipids in hepatocytes. Over 75% of diabetes patients typically have MASLD, and, at the same time, the presence of MASLD increases the risk of diabetes by more than two times. Type 2 diabetes and MASLD are independent cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. New diabetes treatment should also take into account pleiotropic effects that reduce cardiovascular risk. The aim of our study is to investigate whether analogs of GLP1 receptors have a pleiotropic metabolic effect and global impact to decrease cardiovascular risk, and also reduce the risk of hepatic fibrosis in patients with MASLD. This study involved 41 patients with diabetes and dyslipidemia who also had atherosclerotic plaque and hepatic steatosis verified by ultrasonography and who were eligible to begin one of the GLP1 receptor agonists treatments. We observed a statistically significant decrease in: BMI (p < 0.001) waist and hip circumference (p < 0.001), glycated hemoglobin (p < 0.001) and creatinine (p < 0.05). Additionally, we obtained a decrease in FIB-4 (p < 0.001) and in the De Ritis (AST/ALT aminotransferase ratio) (p < 0.05). The positive correlation between the FIB-4 value and BMI, WHR, waist circumference and the De Ritis index was observed. In conclusion, semaglutide and dulaglutide had a beneficial effect on metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes. These medications had a positive effect on MASLD biochemical markers.

Prevalence and predictors of primary nonadherence to medications prescribed in primary care

BACKGROUND

Most research on medication adherence has focused on secondary nonadherence and persistence to therapy. Medication prescriptions that are never filled by patients (primary nonadherence) remain understudied in the general population.

METHODS

We linked prescribing data from primary care electronic medical records to comprehensive pharmacy dispensing claims between January 2013 and April 2019 in British Columbia (BC) to estimate primary nonadherence, defined as failure to dispense a new medication or its equivalent within 6 months of the prescription date. We used hierarchical multivariable logistic regression to determine prescriber, patient and medication factors associated with primary nonadherence among community-dwelling patients in primary care.

RESULTS

Among 150 565 new prescriptions to 34 243 patients, 17% of prescriptions were never filled. Primary nonadherence was highest for drugs prescribed mostly on an as-needed basis, including topical corticosteroids (35.1%) and antihistamines (23.4%). In multivariable analysis, primary nonadherence was lower for prescriptions issued by male prescribers (odds ratio [OR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.88). Primary nonadherence decreased with patient age (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.90-0.92 for each additional 10 years) but increased with polypharmacy among patients aged 65 years or older. Patients filled more than 82% of their medication prescriptions within 2 weeks after their primary care provider visit.

INTERPRETATION

The prevalence of primary nonadherence to new prescriptions was 17%. Interventions to address primary nonadherence could target older patients with multiple medication use and within the first 2 weeks of the prescription issue date.

Relationship between People's Interest in Medication Adherence, Health Literacy, and Self-Care: An Infodemiological Analysis in the Pre- and Post-COVID-19 Era

The prevalence of non-communicable diseases has risen sharply in recent years, particularly among older individuals who require complex drug regimens. Patients are increasingly required to manage their health through medication adherence and self-care, but about 50% of patients struggle to adhere to prescribed treatments. This study explored the relationship between interest in medication adherence, health literacy, and self-care and how it changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. We used Google Trends to measure relative search volumes (RSVs) for these three topics from 2012 to 2022. We found that interest in self-care increased the most over time, followed by health literacy and medication adherence. Direct correlations emerged between RSVs for medication adherence and health literacy (r = 0.674, p < 0.0001), medication adherence and self-care (r = 0.466, p < 0.0001), and health literacy and self-care (r = 0.545, p < 0.0001). After the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak, interest in self-care significantly increased, and Latin countries showed a greater interest in self-care than other geographical areas. This study suggests that people are increasingly interested in managing their health, especially in the context of the recent pandemic, and that infodemiology may provide interesting information about the attitudes of the population toward chronic disease management.

Betahistine Prescribing Practices in England: An Analysis of Prescribing and National Spending Pre- and Post-BEMED Trial

OBJECTIVE

Betahistine has not been proven to be superior to placebo in the BEMED study, a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial. Our study aimed to establish the prescribing practices of clinicians in England in relation to betahistine and to assess if there has been any change in prescribing practices since the publication of the BEMED trial.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study and clinician survey.

PATIENTS

All patients who were prescribed betahistine from primary care.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Total quantity of betahistine prescribed and total actual cost.

RESULTS

The average total monthly quantity prescribed was 11,143,253 tablets (range, 10,056,516-12,276,423). Prescribing did not decrease from the period before (January 2014-February 2016) to after (February 2016-February 2021) the publication of the BEMED trial, with the average monthly prescribing before publication being 11,294,848 tablets (range, 10,280,942- 12,276,423) and the average monthly prescribing after publication being 11,081,123 tablets (range, 10,056,516-11,915,707). The average actual monthly cost increased from the period before publication to after publication from a sum of £279,264.82 to a sum of £428,846.22. Most (90.5%) of the survey respondents prescribed betahistine for Menière's disease. Less than half (38.09%) prescribed betahistine for indications other than Menière's disease. Only 45.24% of the clinicians were aware of the results of the BEMED trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of the BEMED trial among otology and neurotology subspecialists is lacking. The results of the BEMED have made no difference to prescribing practice, and in fact, the cost of the medication to the health bill has increased.

Medication self-management interventions for persons with stroke: A scoping review

The use of multiple medications is common following a stroke for secondary prevention and management of co-occurring chronic conditions. Given the use of multiple medications post-stroke, optimizing medication self-management for this population is important. The objective of this scoping review was to identify and summarize what has been reported in the literature on interventions related to medication self-management for adults (aged 18+) with stroke. Electronic databases (Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, EBSCO CINAHL, Ovid PsycINFO, Web of Science) and grey literature were searched to identify relevant articles. For inclusion, articles were required to include an adult population with stroke undergoing an intervention aimed at modifying or improving medication management that incorporated a component of self-management. Two independent reviewers screened the articles for inclusion. Data were extracted and summarized using descriptive content analysis. Of the 56 articles that met the inclusion criteria, the focus of most interventions was on improvement of secondary stroke prevention through risk factor management and lifestyle modifications. The majority of studies included medication self-management as a component of a broader intervention. Most interventions used both face-to-face interactions and technology for delivery. Behavioural outcomes, specifically medication adherence, were the most commonly targeted outcomes across the interventions. However, the majority of interventions did not specifically or holistically target medication self-management. There is an opportunity to better support medication self-management post-stroke by ensuring interventions are delivered across sectors or in the community, developing an understanding of the optimal frequency and duration of delivery, and qualitatively exploring experiences with the interventions to ensure ongoing improvement.

Factors Associated With Non-adherence to Anti-depressant Medication in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The present meta-analysis has been conducted to review currently available literature to examine the factors associated with adherence to anti-depressant medications in adults. This meta-analysis and systematic review followed the MOOSE (Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. According to this analysis, the three most important electronic resources for research were CINAHL, EMBASE, and Medline. Google Scholar was used to supplementing the articles already available for review. Keywords used to find relevant articles included "predictors," "non-adherence," "anti-depressants," and "adults." Medical subject headings (MeSH) terms and Boolean operators ("AND" and "OR") were used in the search strategy to refine the search further. Studies included in this meta-analysis had information on factors associated with non-adherence to anti-depressant medication. The study evaluated samples of adult participants over 18 years with a diagnosis of depression and who had been prescribed anti-depressants. In conclusion, this meta-analysis examined the relationship between demographic factors and non-adherence to anti-depressant medications. The findings revealed that gender, educational status, income level, marital status, and area of residence did not significantly predict non-adherence to anti-depressants. However, older age and polypharmacy were significant predictors of adherence to anti-depressants. The study also found that individuals living in urban areas were more likely to adhere to anti-depressants, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Medication Adherence and Contributing Factors Among Type 2 Diabetes Patients at Adama Hospital Medical College in Eastern Ethiopia

Introduction

Good glycemic control and preventing early complications are the ultimate targets of diabetes management, which depends on patients' adherence to regimens. Even though highly potent and effective medications have been developed and manufactured with astonishing advancement over the past few decades, excellent glycemic control has remained elusive.

Objective

This study aimed to assess the magnitude and factors associated with medication adherence among type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients on follow-up at Adama Hospital Medical College (AHMC) in East Ethiopia.

Methods

A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 245 T2D patients on follow-up at AHMC from March 1 to March 30, 2020. Medication adherence reporting scale-5 (MARS-5) was utilized to collect information regarding patients' medication adherence. The data were entered and analyzed using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 21. The level of significance was declared at a p-value of  < .05.

Results

Of the 245 respondents, the proportion of respondents who adhere to diabetes medication was 29.4%, 95% CI [confidence interval] (23.7%-35.1%). After adjusting for khat chewing and adherence to blood glucose testing as confounding factors, being married (AOR [adjusted odds ratio]  =  3.43, 95%CI [1.27-4.86]), government employee (AOR  =  3.75, 95%CI [2.12-7.37]), no alcohol drinking (AOR  =  2.25, 95%CI [1.32-3.45]), absence of comorbidity (AOR  =  1.49, 95%CI [1.16-4.32]), and having diabetes health education at health institution (AOR  =  3.43, 95%CI [1.27-4.86]) were the factors associated with good medication adherence.

Conclusion

The proportion of T2D patients who adhere to medication in the study area was remarkably low. The study also found that being married, government employee, no alcohol drinking, absence of comorbidity, and having diabetes health education at a health institution were the factors associated with good medication adherence. Therefore, imparting health education on the importance of diabetes medication adherence by health professionals at each follow-up visit should be considered. Besides, awareness creation programs regarding diabetes medication adherence should be considered using mass media (radio and television).

Benzodiazepines and Mood Stabilizers in Schizophrenia Patients Treated with Oral versus Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics-An Observational Study

Schizophrenia is a chronic, invalidating, and polymorphic disease, characterized by relapses and remission periods. The main treatment option in schizophrenia are antipsychotics, administered as an oral or as a long-acting injectable (LAI) formulation. Although international guidelines rarely recommend it, mood stabilizers (MS) and/or benzodiazepines (BZD) are frequently prescribed as adjunctive therapy in schizophrenia patients for various reasons. This is an observational, cross-sectional study including stabilized schizophrenia patients. A total of 315 patients were enrolled. Of these, 77 patients (24.44%) were stabilized on LAIs and 238 (75.56%) patients on oral antipsychotics (OAP). Eighty-four patients (26.66%) had concomitant treatment with MS and 119 patients (37.77%) had concomitant benzodiazepine treatment. No statistical significance was observed in MS or BZD use between LAIs and OAPs. In total, 136 patients (43.17%) were stabilized on antipsychotic monotherapy. Our study shows that the long-term use of benzodiazepines and mood stabilizers remains elevated among stabilized schizophrenia patients, regardless of the antipsychotic formulation (oral or LAI). Patients receiving second-generation LAI antipsychotics (SGA-LAI) seem to be more likely to be stabilized on monotherapy compared to those receiving oral antipsychotics. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary in order to clarify the benefits of the current drug polypharmacy trends.

Adherence and Discontinuation of Disease-Specific Therapies for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

In patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), the use of disease-specific therapies (i.e., endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors, soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators, prostacyclins, and prostanoids) has been associated with disease improvement and decreased mortality risk. We aimed to quantify the adherence and discontinuation rates for patients prescribed PAH-specific therapies.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review via searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from their inception to 4 March 2022 for observational studies published in English that reported data on adherence to and persistence with PAH-targeted therapies. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to explore average adherence and discontinuation rates.

RESULTS

In all, 14 studies involving 14,861 individuals prescribed PAH-targeted therapies were included. The overall pooled proportion of patients adherent to their PAH-targeted medications was 60.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 52.3-69.1%). The pooled proportions of patients adherent in questionnaire-based studies and in studies using prescription/dispensing data were 52.9% (95% CI 48.9-56.9%) and 62.9% (95% CI 53.1-72.2%), respectively. The pooled proportion of patients who discontinued their PAH-targeted medications was 42.3% (95% CI 31.6-53.3). Factors reported to impact adherence included administration frequency, length of time on treatment, co-payment, and occurrence of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

In the real world, a considerable proportion of patients prescribed PAH-specific therapies were non-adherent or discontinued. As diverse factors may influence treatment adherence, multifaceted interventions are needed to address this trend in order to improve patient outcomes.

REGISTRATION

The systematic review protocol was registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022316638).

A Qualitative Study on the Perception of Medication Adherence by the Social Circles of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Introduction

Studies have indicated that half of all patients with diabetes do not take their medication as prescribed. Patient social circles, including professionals (health care providers) and nonprofessionals (family and friends) might contribute to low medication adherence. Therefore, this study explored the point of view of healthcare providers and family members of patients with diabetes on patient medication adherence.

Methods

Our study included health care providers and family members using in-depth, semi structured interviews. The theoretical domain framework (TDF) was used to explore their perspectives. TDF was used to build a topic guide and to frame the data analysis. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed using the MAXQDA 2022 program.

Results

The participants identified a variety of factors potentially associated with diabetes medication adherence. Most factors were related to the environmental context and resources such as the burden of polypharmacy, medication shortages, and long wait times for care. In addition, factors related to patient beliefs concerning diabetes complications and insulin injections were reported. Several factors were identified that related to knowledge and social influences.

Discussion

Interventions that target the factors identified by the social circle of patients with diabetes might improve medication adherence and promote better disease management outcomes.

Non-Adherence to Antidepressant Treatment and Related Factors in a Region of Spain: A Population-Based Registry Study

Antidepressants are a commonly prescribed psychotropic medication, and their use has increased in recent years. Medication non-adherence in patients with mental disorders is associated with worse health outcomes. A population-based registry study to assess antidepressant non-adherence during 2021 has been carried out. An indirect method based on the medication possession ratio (MPR) has been utilized. Patients with a MPR under 80% were classified as non-adherent. A multivariate logistic regression to identify non-adherence predictors has been used, considering sociodemographic (age, sex, institutionalization and urbanicity) and health related variables (diagnostics, antidepressant class, multiple prescribers, and polypharmacy). In 2021, 10.6% of the Castile and Leon population used antidepressants. These patients were institutionalized (7.29%), living in urban areas (63.44%), polymedicated with multiple prescribers (57.07%), and using serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (54.77%), other antidepressants (46.82%) or tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) (13.76%). Antidepressants were prescribed mainly for depression (36.73%) and anxiety (29.24%). Non-adherence to antidepressants was more frequent in men (20.56%) than in woman (19.59%) and decreased with increasing age (32% up to 17 years old vs. 13.76% over 80 years old). TCAs were associated with the highest prevalence of non-adherence (23.99%), followed by SSRIs (20.19%) and other antidepressants (18.5%). Predictors of non-adherence in patients on antidepressants were: living in urban areas, using TCAs, and pain occurrence. Non-adherence to antidepressants decreases with aging. Being female, institutionalization, being polymedicated and having depression/anxiety alongside another psychiatric diagnosis are protective factors against non-adherence. The MPR is a robust indicator for the clinician to identify non-adherent patients for monitoring, and adopt any necessary corrective actions.

Association between Polypharmacy and Cardiovascular Autonomic Function among Elderly Patients in an Urban Municipality Area of Kolkata, India: A Record-Based Cross-Sectional Study

We assessed the association between polypharmacy and cardiovascular autonomic function among community-dwelling elderly patients having chronic diseases. Three hundred and twenty-one patients from an urban municipality area of Kolkata, India were studied in August 2022. The anticholinergic burden and cardiac autonomic function (Valsalva ratio, orthostatic hypotension, change in diastolic blood pressure after an isometric exercise, and heart rate variability during expiration and inspiration) were evaluated. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to find out the association of polypharmacy and total anticholinergic burden with cardiac autonomic neuropathy. A total of 305 patients (age, 68.9 ± 3.4; 65.9% male) were included. Of these patients, 81 (26.6%) were on polypharmacy. Out of these 81 patients, 42 patients were on ninety-eight potential inappropriate medications. The anticholinergic burden and the proportion of patients with cardiac autonomic neuropathy were significantly higher among patients who were on polypharmacy than those who were not (8.1 ± 2.3 vs. 2.3 ± 0.9; p = 0.03 and 56.8% vs. 44.6%; p = 0.01). The presence of polypharmacy and a total anticholinergic burden of > 3 was significantly associated with cardiac autonomic neuropathy (aOR, 2.66; 95% CI, 0.91−3.98 and aOR, 2.51; 95% CI, 0.99−3.52, respectively). Thus, polypharmacy was significantly associated with cardiac autonomic neuropathy among community-dwelling elderly patients.

Medication Adherence to Intranasal Corticosteroids in Allergic Rhinitis Patients with Comorbid Medical Conditions

Background: To determine medication adherence to intranasal corticosteroid spray (INCS) among allergic rhinitis (AR) patients with comorbid medical conditions. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted. Adults above 18 years old with persistent symptoms of AR and comorbid physician-diagnosed asthma, eczema, diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HPT) were included. The severity of symptoms was assessed by the total nasal symptom score (TNSS), medication adherence was based on the patients’ diaries and barriers to adherence were analyzed by the Brief Medication Questionnaire. Results: 185 participants were enrolled. The medication adherence was 58.9%. Medication adherence was significantly superior in participants with elevated total serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) (χ2 = 8.371, p < 0.05), house dust mite (HDM) allergy to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP) type (χ2 = 5.149, p < 0.05) and severe TNSS at the first visit (χ2 = 37.016, p < 0.05). Adherence was twice more likely in DP allergy, 2.7 times more likely in elevated total IgE and 15 times more likely in severe TNSS at the first visit. Among the barriers to adherence was lack of symptoms, taking medication only when necessary, fear of adverse effects, running out of medication, experiencing bothersome effects, ineffective response, forgetfulness and taking too many medications. Only lack of symptoms, taking medication when symptomatic, fear of adverse effects and running out of medication were significant. No significant association was found between asthma/eczema (χ2 = 0.418, p > 0.05), HPT/DM (χ2 = 0.759, p > 0.05) and multi-medicine use (χ2 = 1.027, p > 0.05) with medication adherence. Conclusions: Patients having AR with severe nasal symptoms at first presentation, who are sensitized to DP HDM and who have elevated total serum IgE levels have a higher adherence to INCS use. The use of multiple medicines had no impact on the adherence to INCS. As a lack of symptoms was a barrier towards adherence, the benefits of using INCS according to the prescribed dose and frequency must be emphasized to patients with mild and moderate AR at each medical visit. A good rapport between patients and their health care providers is needed to build trust and overcome the barriers, particularly to allay the fears of adverse effects of INCS. The other barriers, such as running out of supply, can be overcome by posting medications directly to patients by the healthcare providers.

Attitudes towards adherence and deprescribing among polypharmacy patients: a cross-sectional study

Objectives

Deprescribing is the process of optimization of medication regimens through cessation of potentially inappropriate or unnecessary medications or adjustment of doses with the goal of managing polypharmacy and improving outcomes. Deprescribing potentially improves adherence by reducing polypharmacy. This study aimed to assess polypharmacy patients’ adherence attitudes and their attitudes towards deprescribing.

Methods

A cross-sectional study that targeted polypharmacy patients at outpatient clinics at King Abdullah University Hospital. The inclusion criteria were (1) patients ≥18 years old, (2) patients taking five or more medications, and (3) patients who do not require a caregiver or assistance at home. We excluded patients that showed any signs of moderate or severe cognitive impairment. Patients who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were interviewed by a clinical pharmacist and completed two survey instruments: revised Patients’ Attitudes Toward Deprescribing (rPATD) and Adherence Attitude Inventory (AAI).

Key findings

In total, 501 patients took part in this study. Over half of the participants were not satisfied with their current medicines and over 70% of them perceived that their current medications are a burden to them and would like their prescribers to initiate deprescribing. The majority of the participants have low to medium adherence attitudes primarily due to ineffective patient–provider communication. Logistic regression analysis revealed that self-efficacy, commitment to adherence, education and age were significantly associated with participants’ willingness to stop one or more of their medications.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that polypharmacy patients have negative attitudes towards their medication therapy and favour deprescribing. These reported attitudes had been associated with negative adherence attitudes. Study findings offer schematic direction for future investigations of the role of adherence on key health-related outcomes in patients on polypharmacy. Furthermore, research is warranted to investigate the impact of deprescribing on polypharmacy patients’ medication adherence.

Adherence to Post-Stroke Pharmacotherapy: Scale Validation and Correlates among a Sample of Stroke Survivors

Background and Objectives: Adherence to post-stroke pharmacotherapy has been less studied compared with other cardiovascular diseases, and previous research in this context utilized generic tools without cross-validating for stroke specific factors and patient characteristics. This study aimed to validate the Lebanese Medication Adherence Scale (LMAS-14) among stroke survivors to assess adherence to post-stroke pharmacotherapy. It also aimed to determine the socioeconomic, clinical characteristics, and health related quality of life correlates of medication adherence among stroke survivors. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study that included stroke survivors from districts throughout Lebanon. A well-structured questionnaire consisting of three parts was developed and utilized to collect data. The first part included questions about the sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics. The second part included questions about medical history, current clinical characteristics of the patients, and use of medications. The third part included validated scales to assess stroke outcomes, daily performance and activities, and quality of life. Results: A total of 172 stroke survivors were included. The LMAS-14 structure was validated over a solution of three factors, with a Kaiser−Meyer−Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy = 0.836 and a significant Bartlett’s test of sphericity (p < 0.001). Severe difficulty in obtaining medications within the current Lebanese economic crisis was significantly associated with lower medication adherence (Beta = −8.473, p = 0.001). Lower medication adherence was also associated with poor stroke prognosis (Beta = −3.264, p = 0.027), higher number of used medications (Beta = −0.610, p = 0.034), and longer duration of stroke diagnosis (Beta = −4.292, p = 0.002). Conclusions: The LMAS−14 is a valid and reliable tool to assess medication adherence in stroke practice and research. Severe difficulty in obtaining medications due to unpredictable availability and shortage of supplies is associated with lower medication adherence, and thus places stroke survivors at higher risk of complications and morality. Additional measures and urgent action by stroke care providers and public health stakeholders are necessary to ensure adequate post-stroke management and outcomes.

Medication Adherence among Patients with Chronic Diseases in Saudi Arabia

Introduction: The management of chronic illnesses commonly includes a long-term pharmacological approach. Although these medications effectively control disease, their full benefits are often not realized because approximately 50% of patients do not take their medications as prescribed. Medication adherence has become a big concern to clinicians and healthcare systems in Saudi Arabia and worldwide because of growing evidence associating nonadherence with adverse outcomes and higher costs of care. Despite it being a well-recognized problem, few studies have investigated medication adherence in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, this study aims to gain a better perspective on medication adherence among patients with chronic diseases in Saudi Arabia. Method: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted among patients with chronic diseases in the Makkah region, Saudi Arabia, from 1 May to 31 July 2021. Patients aged 18 years and above who were taking prescribed or over-the-counter medications were included. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the participants’ characteristics, and categorical variables were reported as frequencies and percentages. A Chi-square test was used to test the relations between variables. Results: In total, 239 participants were included in the study. Females represented 62% of the participants. In terms of the history of chronic diseases, 44% had hypertension, 40% had diabetes mellitus, 21% had heart diseases and 9% had asthma. Nearly half (49%) of participants did not follow up regularly with a primary healthcare center and 42% said that they had forgotten to take their medications in the past. However, most of the participants (78%) stated that they took their medicine as instructed by their doctor or pharmacist, and 61% took their medications on time. The majority of participants (85%) said that the pharmacist explained the method of using the medications and the instructions for use, while 30% thought that the medications they took were too much. In regard to the reasons for medication nonadherence, having no specific reasons for medication nonadherence was the most common cause for nonadherence in our study. The relationship between patients taking medications as instructed by a healthcare provider (the doctor or pharmacist) and the healthcare provider giving clear instructions to patients about medication use was significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Failure to adhere is a significant problem that not only affects the patient but also the healthcare system. Additional research is needed to monitor medication adherence and identify factors contributing to this problem to provide successful strategies to improve medication adherence in Saudi Arabia.

Problems associated with effective pharmacotherapy of the elderly patients (geriatrics): A review

The worlds older population is growing dramatically. At the same time, ensuring an appropriate high standard of living for the elderly by reducing of morbidity and disability of geriatric patients is one of the main objectives of the modern healthcare system. However, changes associated with body aging necessitate application of novel approaches to the correction of pharmacotherapy and usage of specialized dosage forms. Such medicinal products provide both an appropriate therapeutic effect and facilitate their use. Presented review considers several features of pharmacotherapy of geriatric patients.

Strategies and Tools for Supporting the Appropriateness of Drug Use in Older People

Through this structured review of the published literature, we aimed to provide an up-to-date description of strategies (human-related) and tools (mainly from the digital field) facilitating the appropriateness of drug use in older adults. The evidence of each strategy and tool's effectiveness and sustainability largely derives from local and heterogeneous experiences, with contrasting results. As a general framework, three main steps should be considered in implementing measures to improve appropriateness: prescription, acceptance by the patient, and continuous monitoring of adherence and risk-benefit profile. Each step needs efforts from specific actors (physicians, patients, caregivers, healthcare professionals) and dedicated supporting tools. Moreover, how to support the appropriateness also strictly depends on the particular setting of care (hospital, ambulatory or primary care, nursing home, long-term care) and available economic resources. Therefore, it is urgent assigning to each approach proposed in the literature the following characteristics: level of effectiveness, strength of evidence, setting of implementation, needed resources, and issues for its sustainability.

Spotlight on the Challenges of Depression following Retirement and Opportunities for Interventions

As a major life transition characterized by changes in social, behavioral, and psychological domains, retirement is associated with numerous risk factors that can contribute to the development of depression in later life. Understanding how these risk factors intersect with overall health and functioning can inform opportunities for mental health promotion during this transition. The objective of this review is to summarize the literature on risk and protective factors for depression during retirement transitions, discuss challenges related to appropriate management of depression in later life, and describe opportunities for prevention and intervention for depression relating to retirement transitions, both within and beyond the health care system. Key implications from this review are that 1) the relationship between depression and retirement is multifaceted; 2) while depression is a common health condition among older adults, this syndrome should not be considered a normative part of aging or of retirement specifically; 3) the existing mental health specialty workforce is insufficient to meet the depression management needs of the aging population, and 4) therefore, there is a need for interprofessional and multidisciplinary intervention efforts for preventing and managing depression among older adults. In sum, both healthcare providers, public health practitioners, and community organizations have meaningful opportunities for promoting the mental health of older adults during such major life transitions.

Gastrointestinal bleeding during direct oral anticoagulants therapy in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and risk of polypharmacy

Although concomitant medications have been raised as a factor affecting hemorrhage during direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) therapy, details remain unelucidated. This study was conducted to clarify the relationship between concomitant medications with possible pharmacokinetic interactions and number of concomitant medications, and bleeding and embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation on DOACs. The subjects were 1,010 patients prescribed DOACs from a single-center at the Teikyo University Hospital between April 2011 and June 2018. This study was an exploratory analysis and investigated their course between the first prescription and December 2018, including the presence or absence of clinically relevant bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, and major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. Impacts of medications were evaluated by the general linear model with inverse probability-weighted propensity score. The observation period was 2,272 patient-years. The rate of bleeding was 4.7%/year, gastrointestinal bleeding was 2.8%/year, and major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events was 2.0%/year. Taking 10 or more oral medications concurrently was a significant risk for gastrointestinal bleeding (hazard ratio, 2.046 [1.188-3.526]; p = 0.010). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were the only significant risk for gastrointestinal bleeding. Clinicians should be aware of gastrointestinal bleeding when using DOACs with patients taking more than 10 medications and/or NSAIDs. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Medication use problems among older adults at a primary care: A narrative of literature review

Appropriate medication use is one of the most significant challenges among the older population. Although medication use problems are well documented at the secondary and tertiary health care level, the evidence at the primary care level of OECD region is limited. A narrative review of existing literature was conducted through a nonsystematic search for original articles through electronic search databases, Ovid Medline, Google Scholar from 2001 to 2021, and a combination of citation references. Medication use problems are prevalent in older adults at the primary care level. The main issues of medication use identified were as follows; nonadherence, adverse drug events, accessibility, polypharmacy, inappropriate medications, belief about medications, lack of knowledge and awareness, and lack of deprescribing. In addition, the current review has identified the possibilities of the problems: many medications, forgetfulness, lack of deprescribing, lack of communication, poor understanding, and limited awareness of inappropriate medications. This review found that various medication use problems subclusters were identified to impact the health care need among older adults. Therefore, effective interventions targeting these issues need to be developed to reduce medication use problems among older adults at a primary care level.

Prevalence of exposure to pharmacogenetic drugs by the Saudis treated at the health care centers of the Ministry of National Guard

Background

The drugs impacted by genetic variants are known as pharmacogenetic (PGx) drugs. Patients’ responses to these drugs may vary according to the variability in patients’ genetic makeup. Hence, exploring the pharmacogenes that affect drug treatment is vital to ensure optimal therapy and patients’ safety. This study aimed to describe the usage rate of PGx drugs and the frequency of relevant variants in the Saudi population.

Methodology

Prescription patterns over seven years (2015–2021) for Saudi patients on PGx drugs treated at the Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs (MNG-HA) were investigated. Only registered drugs in the MNG-HA formulary (n = 78) were included. The patients were subgrouped into four age groups: ≤24, 25–44, 45–64, and ≥65 years. Further subgrouping was made according to gender and drugs’ therapeutic categories following anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) classification.

Furthermore, an online searching was carried out to identify the pharmacogenes reported in the literature among healthy Saudis. The search included 45 genes that may affect drug outcomes based on evidence rated by either CPIC (A-B levels) or PharmGKB (1–2 levels).

Results

The screened patients were 1,483,905. Patients on PGx drugs accounted for 46.7% (n = 693,077 patients). The analgesic group was the most prescribed drug category (47%), which included ibuprofen (20.5%), celecoxib (6.3%), tramadol (5.8%), and others. Cardiovascular agents were the second-most utilized drug class (24.4%). Omeprazole was the second most commonly used medication (11.1%) but ranked third as a class (gastroenterology). Females used PGx drugs more frequently than males (53.5% versus 46.5%) and a higher usage rate by patients aged 45–64 years (31.3%) was noted. The cytochrome P450 genes (CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6) were estimated to impact responses of 54.3% (n = 1,156,113) of the used drugs (27.2% are possibly affected by CYP2C9, 12.8% by CYP2C19, and 14.3% by CYP2D6). Thirty-five pharmacogenes that characterize Saudi population and their variants’ allele frequencies were identified from previous reports. This study presents the largest reported number of genes that may affect drug therapies among Saudis.

Conclusion

This study confirmed that a high percentage of Saudi patients use PGx drugs and various genotypes of certain pharmacogenes are inherited by the Saudi population.