Antibodies against synthetic deamidated gliadin peptides and tissue transglutaminase for the identification of childhood celiac disease

Celiac Disease-Narrative Review on Progress in Celiac Disease

Celiac disease is defined as a systemic immunological disorder caused by gluten (gliadin and other prolamin) in genetically predisposed individuals, who present with a variety of gluten-dependent symptoms, specific antibodies, the presence of the HLA DQ2 and DQ8 histocompatibility antigen, and enteropathy. Its prevalence, depending on the studied population and methodology, is estimated at 0.75-1.6% of the general population. During the complex immune reaction it induces, most cells involved in inflammatory processes are activated, which leads to the gradual atrophy of intestinal villi and the proliferation of enterocytes within intestinal crypts. The pathogenesis of celiac disease is extremely complicated and is still the subject of research. According to the current diagnostic guidelines, the following criteria should be taken into account: clinical symptoms (intestinal and extraintestinal), the presence of antibodies against tissue transglutaminase in the IgA class, the level of total IgA, and the presence of typical histological changes in duodenal biopsies. Diet-resistant celiac disease is one of the most important clinical challenges, causing serious complications. Currently, the basic method for treating celiac disease is an elimination diet (i.e., the exclusion of products that may contain gluten from the diet), however, new therapeutic strategies are still being sought, mainly based on supplementation with exogenous endopeptidases, modification of the immune response, and the use of zonulin inhibitors and transglutaminase 2 inhibitors. Clinical trials of new drugs are ongoing. The gradually expanding knowledge about the pathogenesis of celiac disease may allow for the development of new therapeutic strategies for both patients with a mild disease course, as well as those that are diet-resistant.

Serological testing for celiac disease in children

INTRODUCTION

Celiac disease is one of the most common chronic immune-mediated gastrointestinal conditions, characterized by the presence of disease-specific serum antibodies against self-antigen transglutaminase 2. Even though modern serological assays can identify most untreated celiac disease patients and are also increasingly being used to establish a diagnosis, several challenges are associated with the tests, including a lack of standardization, the variable sensitivity and specificity of commercial assays, and inadequate sensitivity for monitoring adherence to a gluten-free diet.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review outlines the current use of serological tests in case-finding and screening, as well as in the follow-up of dietary treatment. Additionally, the possible challenges and pitfalls of serological tests, along with future directions, are addressed.

EXPERT OPINION

The excellent accuracy of modern autoantibody tests, especially for greatly elevated levels of transglutaminase 2 antibodies and positive endomysial antibodies, enables using serological testing in establishing a diagnosis. However, better international standardization of the assays is required, the necessity of endomysial antibody testing needs to be further scrutinized, and additional research is needed to improve noninvasive tools for follow-up and to further expand the no-biopsy criteria for celiac disease.

Performance Assessment of a Novel Multianalyte Methodology for Celiac Disease Biomarker Detection and Evaluation of the Serology-Alone Criteria for Biopsy-Free Diagnosis

CONTEXT.—

Serology plays a vital role in celiac disease (CD) diagnosis, and the latest European guidelines advocate for biopsy-free diagnoses in patients with ≥10× the upper limit of normal (ULN) of anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies.

OBJECTIVE.—

To assess performance characteristics of a novel automated particle-based multianalyte technology (Aptiva) for anti-tTG and anti-deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) antibody detection as compared to the traditional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (QUANTA Lite). Performance characteristics of the ≥10× ULN anti-tTG IgA criteria for serologic diagnosis of CD were also evaluated.

DESIGN.—

Sera samples from 703 patients were tested for anti-tTG IgA, anti-tTG immunoglobulin G (IgG), anti-DGP IgA, and anti-DGP IgG antibodies on both platforms. In total, 127 patients had medical information and were classified as CD-positive (n = 58) and CD-negative (n = 69) based on biopsy results. Clinical performance characteristics were evaluated.

RESULTS.—

Anti-tTG IgA detection showed equal clinical sensitivity and specificity of 91% sensitivity and 99% specificity on both platforms. Anti-tTG IgG resulted in moderate sensitivity of 69% and 72%, but high specificity of 100% and 94% on Aptiva and QUANTA Lite, respectively. Anti-DGP IgG displayed comparable sensitivity of 90% and 81%, and a specificity of 94% and 99%, on Aptiva and QUANTA Lite, respectively. Anti-DGP IgA demonstrated greater sensitivity on QUANTA Lite (83%) than Aptiva (69%) and similar specificities of 97% and 98% on QUANTA Lite and Aptiva, respectively. At ≥10× ULN levels for anti-tTG IgA, Aptiva displayed a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 100%, and QUANTA Lite showed a sensitivity of 69% and a specificity of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Aptiva is a reliable method to measure CD biomarkers with reduced hands-on necessity and high-throughput capabilities. This study supports the use of a ≥10× ULN anti-tTG IgA biopsy-free approach for serologic diagnosis of CD.

Diagnostic performances of celiac disease serological tests among Saudi patients

BACKGROUND

: The prevalence of celiac disease (CD) is relatively high in Saudi Arabia, and little is known about the accuracy of serological markers in the local population. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of various serological markers for detecting CD in Saudi children and adults.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 148 CD patients and 512 controls to assess the diagnostic performances of IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (TTG), IgG anti-TTG, IgA anti-deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies (anti-DGP), IgG anti-DGP, and endomysium antibodies (EMA).

RESULTS

: Immunoglobulin A (IgA) anti-TTG was the most sensitive test [98.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 94.1-99.8%)], while EMA was the most specific [100%, 95%CI 98.6-100%]. By applying the criteria of IgA anti-TTG titers ≥10 × upper limit of normal (ULN) and positive EMA, 57.3% of patients could have avoided intestinal biopsy. IgG anti-DGP test had a sensitivity of 85.9% (95% CI = 77.3-91.5%) and a specificity of 93.5% (95% CI = (90.0-95.9%). Titers of IgA anti-TTG, IgA anti-DGP, and IgG anti-DGP were higher in CD patients with the Marsh 3c class than in those with the Marsh 3b and Marsh 3a classes. IgG anti-TTG and IgA anti-DGP had no additional diagnostic value.

CONCLUSIONS

: IgA anti-TTG and EMA are excellent CD markers in children and adults. The use of IgA anti-TTG titers ≥10 × ULN and positive EMA as criteria for CD diagnosis in children and adults might be a good alternative to intestinal biopsy.

Diagnostic Accuracy of IgA Anti-Transglutaminase and IgG Anti-Deamidated Gliadin for Diagnosis of Celiac Disease in Children under Two Years of Age: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The need of adding the determination of anti-deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) IgG to anti-transglutaminase (TTG) IgA antibodies for diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) in children <2 years of age is controversial. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate, by head-to-head comparison, the diagnostic accuracy of TTG IgA and DGP IgG antibodies. We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase databases up to January 2021. The diagnostic reference was intestinal biopsy. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of these tests and the odds ratio (OR) between the tests. Fifteen articles were eligible for the systematic review and ten were eligible for the meta-analysis. Sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.91–0.98) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.85–0.99) for DGP IgG and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.88–0.97) and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96–0.99) for TTG IgA, respectively. TTG IgA specificity was significantly higher (OR 9.3 (95% CI, 2.3–37.49); p < 0.001) while the sensitivity of DGP IgG was higher without reaching statistical significance (OR: 0.6 (95% CI, 0.24–1.51); p = 0.28). Both the meta-analysis and the systematic review showed that some children with early CD are missed without the DGP IgG test. In children <2 years of age, TTG IgA is the best CD screening test; however, the addition of DGP IgG may increase the diagnostic sensitivity.

Celiac disease: Understandings in diagnostic, nutritional, and medicinal aspects

Celiac disease (CD) is characterized by clinical polymorphism, with classic, asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic, and extra-intestinal forms, which may lead to diagnostic delay and exposure to serious complications. CD is a multidisciplinary health concern involving general medicine, pediatric, and adult gastroenterology, among other disciplines. Immunology and pathology laboratories have a fundamental role in diagnosing and monitoring CD. The diagnosis consists of serological testing based on IgA anti-transglutaminase (TG2) antibodies combined with IgA quantification to rule out IgA deficiency, a potential misleading factor of CD diagnosis. Positive TG2 serology should be corroborated by anti-endomysium antibody testing before considering an intestinal biopsy. Owing to multiple differential diagnoses, celiac disease cannot be confirmed based on serological positivity alone, nor on isolated villous atrophy. In children with classical signs or even when asymptomatic, with high levels of CD-linked markers and positive HLA DQ2 and/or DQ8 molecules, the current trend is to confirm the diagnosis on basis of the non-systematic use of the biopsy, which remains obligatory in adults. The main challenge in managing CD is the implementation and compliance with a gluten-free diet (GFD). This explains the key role of the dietitian and the active participation of patients and their families throughout the disease-management process. The presence of the gluten in several forms of medicine requires the sensitization of physicians when prescribing, and particularly when dispensing gluten-containing formulations by pharmacists. This underlines the importance of the contribution of the pharmacist in the care of patients with CD within the framework of close collaboration with physicians and nutritionists.

Antibody Concentrations Decrease 14-Fold in Children With Celiac Disease on a Gluten-Free Diet but Remain High at 3 Months

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Celiac disease can be identified by a serologic test for IgA against tissue transglutaminase (IgA-TTG) in a large proportion of children. However, the increased concentrations of antibody rarely normalize within the months after children are placed on a gluten-free diet (GFD). Early serologic predictors of sufficient adherence to GFD are required for optimal treatment.

METHODS

In a prospective study, we observed the response to a GFD in 345 pediatric patients (67% girls; mean age, 8.4 y) who underwent duodenal biopsy to confirm or refute celiac disease from October 2012 through December 2015. Baseline serum samples were tested centrally for IgA-TTG and IgG against deamidated gliadin. Follow-up serologic analyses of children on a GFD were performed about 3 months later.

RESULTS

The geometric mean concentration of IgA-TTG decreased from 72.4-fold to 5.2-fold the upper limit of normal (ULN), or by a factor of 14.0 (95% CI, 12.0-16.4). A substantial response (defined as a larger change than the typical variation in patients not on a GFD) was observed in 80.6% of the children. Only 28.1% of patients had a substantial response in the concentration of IgG against deamidated gliadin. Concentration of IgA-TTG remained above 1-fold the ULN in 83.8% of patients, and above 10-fold the ULN in 26.6% of patients with a substantial response.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum concentration of IgA-TTG decreases substantially in most children with celiac disease within 3 months after they are placed on a GFD, but does not normalize in most. This information on changes in antibody concentrations can be used to assess patient response to the diet at short-term follow-up evaluations. Patients with a substantial response to a GFD often still have high antibody levels after 3 months. German Clinical Trials Registry no. DRKS00003854.

Celiac disease: from etiological factors to evolving diagnostic approaches

Celiac disease has advanced from a medical rarity to a highly prevalent disorder. Patients with the disease show varying degrees of chronic inflammation within the small intestine due to an aberrant immune response to the digestion of gliadin found in wheat. As a result, cytokines and antibodies are produced in celiac patients that can be used as specific biomarkers for developing diagnostic tests. This review paper describes celiac disease in terms of its etiological cause, pathological effects, current diagnostic tests based on mucosal biopsy, and the genetic basis for the disease. In addition, it discusses the use of gliadin-induced cytokines, antibodies and autoantibodies as a diagnostic tool for celiac disease. Despite good initial results in terms of sensitivity and specificity, when these immunological tests were used on a large scale, even in combination with genetic testing, the results showed lower predictive value. This review addresses that issue and ends with an outlook on future work required to develop diagnostic tests with greater accuracy in predicting celiac disease in the general public, thus avoiding the need for endoscopy and mucosal biopsy.

Clinical and biological correlations in celiac disease in children: the prospective single experience of a romanian tertiary center: A case-control study (Strobe-Compliant study)

Celiac disease-a chronic inflammatory disease of the intestine-is triggered by gluten or associated protein consumption.The aim of our study was to assess the sensitivity, specificity of the combined anti-transglutaminase 2 (TG2)/deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies (DGP), and antiendomisium antibodies (EMA), to determine the distribution of HLA-DQ2/DQ8 for the 140 tested patients, and also to evaluate the clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients admitted with the suspicion of celiac disease (CD). Children included in the study were divided into: group 1, patients with confirmed CD; group 2, patients with "potential' CD; group 3, control group, patients without CD. We assessed the standard laboratory data, the level of TG2/DGP and EMA antibodies, as well as the distribution of HLA molecules in the selected patients. Histopathological examination was considered the criterion standard for diagnosis in most cases.The sensitivity of TG2/DGP was 85% and the specificity 92%. EMA showed a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 98%. The vast majority of patients diagnosed with CD were either HLA-DQ2.5 (encoded by DQA1*05 & DQB1*02) positive (87.5%) or HLA-DQ8 (encoded by DQB1*03:02) positive (12.5%). One patient showed a positivity only for HLA-DQ2.2 (encoded by DQA1*02 & B1*02).Our study showed that the genetic risk for CD was present in more than one-third of the cases without a confirmed diagnosis of CD. Therefore, the awareness of genetic susceptibility for CD is essential because of the fact that these individuals can develop the disease at any point of their lives. The sensitivity of TG2/DGP and EMA were very similar, whereas EMA presented a higher specificity as that of TG2/DGP.

Simultaneous detection of IgA and IgG antibodies against tissue transglutaminase: The preferred pre-biopsy test in childhood celiac disease

OBJECTIVES

IgA antibodies against tissue transglutaminase (anti-TG2) is a reliable marker of celiac disease (CD). However, IgA-deficient patients are not identified and young children may lack IgA anti-TG2. Combined detection of IgA and IgG (IgA/IgG) against deamidated gliadin peptides (DGP) has shown a high diagnostic performance for untreated CD. Here we examined the utility of IgA/IgG anti-TG2, IgA/IgG anti-DGP and IgA/IgG against a mix of TG2 and DGP (anti-TG2/DGP) in finding CD among children.

METHODS

Serum antibodies against TG2, DGP, and TG2/DGP were determined with ELISA in 242 children referred to a paediatric gastroenterologist. Fifty had untreated CD verified by an intestinal biopsy and 192/242 children had other diseases than CD.

RESULTS

Forty-eight untreated CD children had increased IgA/IgG anti-TG2, 47/50 had increased IgA/IgG anti-DGP and 46/50 had increased IgA/IgG anti-TG2/DGP. One control subject had increased IgA/IgG anti-TG2 and IgA/IgG anti-TG2/DGP, whereas 7/192 control subjects had increased IgA/IgG anti-DGP. The IgA/IgG anti-TG2 assay had the best performance with a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 99.5% and the area under the ROC-curve was 0.996 (95% CI 0.992-1, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Detection of one antibody is not sufficient when screening for untreated CD among children due to cases of IgA deficiency. The inclusion of DGP antigens in the IgA/IgG combination assays seems to affect the sensitivity and specificity negatively, whereas detection of IgA/IgG anti-TG2 has the potential of finding most untreated CD patients, including those with IgA deficiency.

Serologic assay for diagnosis of celiac disease based on a patient-derived monoclonal antigliadin antibody

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with celiac disease can be identified based on the detection of serum antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptides (DGPs). Recombinant human monoclonal antibodies (hmAb) against gliadin are produced by cloning antibody genes from single IgA-producing plasma cells isolated from lesions of patients with celiac disease. We developed an assay to identify patients with celiac disease based on the ability of antibodies from their serum to inhibit the binding of a gliadin-specific hmAb (1002-1E03) to a specific peptide antigen (inhibition assay).

METHODS

We selected 2 peptides (a 34-mer and a 26-mer) found in ω-gliadins and low-molecular-weight glutenins that had been identified as specific targets of the hmAb 1002-1E03 from a digest of gliadin treated by transglutaminase 2. These peptides contained repeat sequence motifs; their interaction with hmAb 1002-1E03 was assessed in an amplified luminescent proximity homogeneous inhibition assay. We also tested peptides we created that included 3 repeated sequence motifs. Serum samples from untreated patients diagnosed with celiac disease (n = 106) and 2 control groups (198 blood donors, 151 patients with Crohn's disease) were analyzed using the assay, as well as in conventional commercial assays that measure IgA against transglutaminase 2 (TG2) or IgG against DGP.

RESULTS

In our inhibition assays, the 34-mer peptide showed the best results, and identified patients with celiac disease with 86.8% sensitivity and 98.6% specificity. Its diagnostic accuracy was comparable with that of commercial anti-DGP IgG (sensitivity, 87.9%; specificity, 98.0) and anti-TG2 IgA (sensitivity, 81.1%; specificity, 98.9) assays, and it detected most of the patients with anti-TG2 IgA-negative celiac disease without a significant decrease in specificity. Combined use of the anti-ω34 and the anti-TG2 assays produced specificity and sensitivity values of 95.3% and 98.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed an antigliadin inhibition assay that identifies patients with celiac disease with high levels of specificity and sensitivity. It may prove useful as an adjunct to the current assay for anti-TG2 IgA.

Prevalence of celiac disease autoimmunity in children with type 1 diabetes: regional variations across the Øresund strait between Denmark and southernmost Sweden

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to determine the prevalence of celiac disease autoimmunity in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) diagnosed in Denmark and Sweden.

METHODS

A total of 662 Swedish children with T1D were matched with 1080 Danish children with T1D and 309 healthy children from Sweden and 283 from Denmark served as controls. Sera were analyzed for the presence of IgA and IgG (IgAG) autoantibodies against deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) and tissue transglutaminase (tTG) with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and IgG-tTG separately in a radioligand binding assay (RBA). Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQB1 and DQA1 genotyping were determined in the T1D cohorts.

RESULTS

In the Swedish T1D cohort, 17.2% (114/662) were IgAG-DGP/tTG positive compared with 11.7% (126/1080) in the Danish T1D cohort (p = 0.001) and with 9.4% (29/309) Swedish (p = 0.001) and 5.7% (16/283) Danish (p = 0.003) controls. In the Swedish T1D cohort, both levels of IgAG-DGP/tTG and IgG-tTG were higher compared with the levels in the Danish T1D (p < 0.001). In the control group, 2.8% of the Danish children were positive for both IgAG-DGP/tTG and IgG-tTG, compared to 0.3% of the Swedish. Presence of HLA-DQ2 was equally distributed among 89 children with T1D positive for both IgAG-DGP/tTG and IgG-tTG.

CONCLUSION

The discrepancy in levels of IgAG-DGP/tTG and IgG-tTG between Swedish and Danish T1D cohorts was independent of HLA and suggests that regional variations in comorbidity of celiac disease in T1D is caused by difference in exposure to environmental factors.

Serological Screening for Celiac Disease in Adult Chinese Patients With Diarrhea Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Celiac disease (CD) is common in Caucasians, but thought to be rare in Asians. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of CD in Chinese patients with chronic diarrhea predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D).From July 2010 to August 2012, 395 adult patients with IBS-D and 363 age and sex-matched healthy controls were recruited in Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University and Xiaogan Central Hospital in Hubei province, central China. Patients with IBS-D were diagnosed according to the Rome III criteria. Serum Immunoglobulin (IgA/IgG) anti-human tissue transglutaminase (anti-htTG)-deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) antibodies were measured in a single ELISA (QUANTA Lite h-tTG/DGP Screen). Upper endoscopy with duodenal biopsies and HLA-DQA1 and HLA-DQB1 genotyping were performed in seropositive subjects and a gluten-free diet was prescribed.Seven IBS-D patients (7/395, 1.77%) and 2 healthy controls (2/363, 0.55%), were positive for anti-htTG/DGP antibodies. Of these 9 cases, 1 was lost to follow-up, 3 were suspected to have CD and 5 were eventually diagnosed as CD with intestinal histological lesions classified as Marsh Type II in 2 and Type III in 3. Of these 5 diagnosed CD patients, 4 (4/395, 1.01%) were from the IBS-D group and 1 (1/363, 0.28%) from the healthy control had asymptomatic CD. Two Type III CD patients with relatively high titers in the serologic assay were homozygous and heterozygous for haplotype HLA-DQA1*03-DQB1*03:03 (HLA-DQ9.3), respectively.In the present study, CD was present in 1.01% of patients with IBS-D and in 0.28% of the control group. We like to suggest that the haplotype HLA-DQA1*03-DQB1*03:03 (HLA-DQ9.3), which is common in Chinese, is a new susceptibility factor for CD in China. Larger screening and genetic studies are needed in the Chinese population of different regions.

Application of Deamidated Gliadin Antibodies in the Follow-Up of Treated Celiac Disease

Introduction

The role of serological tests such as IgA anti-transglutaminase autoantibodies has become increasingly important in celiac disease (CD) diagnosis. However, the efficiency of these tests for patient follow-up is controversial. We investigated the correlation of 12 different serological tests, including recent deamidated gliadin and actin IgA tests, with villous atrophy (VA) in a retrospective cohort of treated celiac patients.

Materials and Methods

Serum samples were collected from 100 treated CD patients who had intestinal biopsy in the course of their follow-up. Antibodies against transglutaminase, deamidated gliadin peptides, and native gliadin were measured, along with IgA anti-actin. The biopsy slides were all blind-reviewed and scored according to Marsh classification.

Results

For all deamidated gliadin and transglutaminase tests, we found that a positive result was significantly associated with persistence of intestinal VA, with a diagnostic efficacy up to 80%. Furthermore, antibodies titers directly correlated with the degree of VA, indicating a strong link between disease activity and presence of antibodies in the serum. Interestingly, the tests with the highest association with persistent VA were those for deamidated gliadin IgG. Using a test positivity pattern analysis, we were also able to identify several groups of patients with distinct antibody profiles that showed significant differences in intestinal damage and diet compliance.

Conclusions

Altogether, these results show that deamidated gliadin antibodies are strongly correlated with VA and should be considered valuable tools in CD follow-up and that multiplex serologic analysis for treated CD represents a promising tool for personalized patient management.

The diagnosis and treatment of dermatitis herpetiformis

Dermatitis herpetiformis (DH) is an inflammatory cutaneous disease with a chronic relapsing course, pruritic polymorphic lesions, and typical histopathological and immunopathological findings. According to several evidences, DH is considered the specific cutaneous manifestation of celiac disease, and the most recent guidelines of celiac disease have stated that, in celiac patients with a proven DH, a duodenal biopsy is unnecessary for the diagnosis. In this review, the most recent data about the diagnosis and the management of DH have been reported and discussed. In particular, in patients with clinical and/or histopathological findings suggestive for DH, the finding of granular IgA deposits along the dermal–epidermal junction or at the papillary tips by direct immunofluorescence (DIF) assay, together with positive results for anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody testing, allows the diagnosis. Thereafter, a gluten-free diet should be started in association with drugs, such as dapsone, that are able to control the skin manifestations during the first phases of the diet. In conclusion, although DH is a rare autoimmune disease with specific immunopathological alterations at the skin level, its importance goes beyond the skin itself and may have a big impact on the general health status and the quality of life of the patients.

Antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptide in diagnosis of celiac disease in children

OBJECTIVES

Determination of antibodies to synthetic deamidated gliadin peptides (anti-DGPs) may work as an alternative or complement the commonly used test for tissue transglutaminase antibodies (TGA) in the diagnosis of celiac disease (CD). We analyzed the performance of a time-resolved immunofluorometric anti-DGP assay (TR-IFMA) in the diagnosis of CD in children and also retrospectively analyzed the appearance of anti-DGP antibodies before TGA seroconversion.

METHODS

The study included 92 children with biopsy-confirmed CD. Serum samples were taken at the time or just before the clinical diagnosis. The control group comprised 82 TGA-negative children who were positive for human leucocyte antigen-DQ2 or -DQ8.

RESULTS

Based on receiver operating characteristic curves, the optimal cutoff value for immunoglobulin (Ig) A anti-DGP positivity was 153 arbitrary units (AUs) with a sensitivity of 92.4% and specificity of 97.6% and that for IgG anti-DGP 119 AU, with a sensitivity of 97.8% and specificity of 97.6%. All 92 children with CD were either IgA or IgG anti-DGP positive at the time of diagnosis. Sera from 48 children with CD were also analyzed retrospectively before the diagnosis. Anti-DGP antibodies preceded TGA positivity in 35 of the 48 children with CD and appeared a median of 1 year earlier.

CONCLUSIONS

The TR-IFMA assay for detecting anti-DGP antibodies shows high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of CD in children. In a majority of our study population, anti-DGP seropositivity preceded TGA positivity, indicating that earlier detection of CD may be possible by monitoring anti-DGP antibodies frequently in genetically susceptible children.

Assessing of Celiac Disease and Nonceliac Gluten Sensitivity

The publication of papers on the topic of gluten related disorders has substantially increased over the last few years. This has motivated healthcare professionals to pay attention not only to celiac disease and wheat allergy but also to a condition termed nonceliac gluten sensitivity (NCGS). Until now this condition has been diagnosed clinically on the basis of exclusion criteria and clinical response to gluten withdrawal. In addition, recent research in this field has shown that other food components distinct from gluten are implicated in NCGS cases, thereby changing our general understanding of NCGS diagnosis in either individuals on gluten containing diets or those already following a gluten-free diet with no proper diagnostic work-up of celiac disease. With this in mind, the assessment of NCGS will require extensive knowledge of celiac disease manifestations and the laboratory tests commonly performed during diagnosis of celiac disease.

Overview of biomarkers for diagnosis and monitoring of celiac disease

Among the adverse reactions caused by wheat, celiac disease (CD) is the longest studied and best-known pathology. The more recently defined non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) presents with symptoms which are often indistinguishable from CD. Diagnosis of CD is based on serologic, molecular, and bioptic testing. The IgA anti-transglutaminase (tTG) test is considered highly important, as it shows high sensitivity and specificity and its levels correlate to the degree of intestinal damage. Small bowel biopsy can be avoided in symptomatic patients with IgA anti-tTG levels above 10× the manufacturer's cut-off. Recently, tests of anti-deamidated peptides of gliadin (DGP) have replaced classic anti-native gliadin (AGA) tests. DGP assays have a considerably higher diagnostic accuracy than AGA assays, especially in the IgG class, and can replace anti-tTG tests in patients with selective IgA deficiency. The combination of IgG anti-DGP plus IgA anti-tTG assays show greater sensitivity than a single test, with very high specificity. EMA tests have great diagnostic accuracy but are not recommended by all the latest guidelines because they are observer dependent. Biopsy must still be considered the gold standard for CD diagnosis. HLA-DQ genotyping can be used to screen asymptomatic children and in cases of histology/serology disagreement. About half of NCGS patients are DQ2 positive and have IgG AGA. To diagnose NCGS, first CD and wheat allergy must be excluded; then the wheat dependence of symptoms must be verified by a gluten-free diet and subsequent gluten challenge.

Early diagnosis of celiac disease in IgA deficient children: contribution of a point-of-care test

Background

The serological diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) often relies on the presence of anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) IgA autoantibodies. Patients suffering from selective IgA deficiency (IgAD) are often not aware of their IgA deficiency and are tested as CD negative, delaying considerably the diagnosis. The detection of IgG against deamidated gliadin peptides (DGP) has high specificity and better sensitivity than IgG anti-tTG. A multi-analytic lateral-flow immunochromatographic assay (CD-LFIA) based on the detection of IgA and IgG anti-DGP and total IgA was shown to have a good diagnostic accuracy for CD. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical accuracy of its use in children suffering from IgAD.

Methods

45 IgAD children ranging from 1.1 to 17.4 years and suspected of CD or having high CD risk factors were referred from outpatient clinics located in the area of Rhone-Alpes (France) to the Hospices Civils de Lyon, Paediatric Hospital-Gastroenterology-Hepatology- Nutrition Department for further CD investigations. The CD investigations, including the sample collection, were performed within the Paediatric Hospital-Gastroenterology-Hepatology- Nutrition Department, and the serological testing was performed at the Lyon-Sud Hospital-Immunology Laboratory. The diagnosis of CD was based on IgG anti-tTG serology, biopsy results and patient follow-up. The serum samples were retrospectively tested on the CD-LFIA test.

Results

A total of eight (8) patients were diagnosed as new CD. All were correctly identified by the CD-LFIA. The test yielded four (4) false positive results. Two patients with positive IgG anti-tTG were negative on CD-LFIA, but were classified as CD negative based on biopsy results and patient follow-up. The remaining 33 patients were found negative by both methods. The specificity and sensitivity of CD-LFIA was of 89.2% [74.6-97.0] and of 100% [63.1-100] respectively. The negative predictive value (NPV) was of 100% [89.4-100], and the Likelihood Ratio for Negative Test (LR-) was of 0 [0.0-0.91].

Conclusions

CD-LFIA is a useful, non-invasive and rapid tool to rule out CD in primary care paediatric patients having CD-related symptoms and IgAD. Patients having a positive CD-LFIA result could be then readily directed to secondary care setting for further evaluation by standard serology and biopsy.

Antibodies in the diagnosis of coeliac disease: a biopsy-controlled, international, multicentre study of 376 children with coeliac disease and 695 controls

Diagnosis of coeliac disease (CD) relies on a combination of clinical, genetic, serological and duodenal morphological findings. The ESPGHAN suggested that biopsy may not be necessary in all cases. New guidelines include omission of biopsy if the concentration of CD-specific antibodies exceeds 10 times the upper limit of normal (10 ULN) and other criteria are met. We analysed the 10 ULN criterion and investigated multiple antibody-assays. Serum was collected from 1071 children with duodenal biopsy (376 CD patients, 695 disease-controls). IgA-antibodies to tissue transglutaminase (IgA-aTTG), IgG-antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptides (IgG-aDGL) and IgA-endomysium antibodies (IgA-EMA) were measured centrally. We considered 3 outcomes for antibody test procedures utilizing IgA-aTTG and/or IgG-aDGL: positive (≥10 ULN, recommend gluten-free diet), negative (<1 ULN, no gluten-free diet) or unclear (perform biopsy). Positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were based on clear test results. We required that they and their lower confidence bounds (LCB) be simultaneously very high (LCB >90% and PPV/NPV >95%). These stringent conditions were met for appropriate antibody-procedures over a prevalence range of 9–57%. By combining IgG-aDGL with IgA-aTTG, one could do without assaying total IgA. The PPV of IgG-aDGL was estimated to be extremely high, although more studies are necessary to narrow down the LCB. The proportion of patients requiring a biopsy was <11%. The procedures were either equivalent or even better in children <2 years compared to older children. All 310 of the IgA-aTTG positive children were also IgA-EMA positive. Antibody-assays could render biopsies unnecessary in most children, if experienced paediatric gastroenterologists evaluate the case. This suggestion only applies to the kits used here and should be verified for other available assays. Confirming IgA-aTTG positivity (≥10 ULN) by EMA-testing is unnecessary if performed on the same blood sample. Prospective studies are needed.

Serological assessment for celiac disease in IgA deficient adults

PURPOSE

Selective immunoglobulin A deficiency is the most common primary immunodeficiency disorder that is strongly overrepresented among patients with celiac disease (CD). IgG antibodies against tissue transglutaminase (tTG) and deamidated gliadin peptides (DGP) serve as serological markers for CD in IgA deficient individuals, although the diagnostic value remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of these markers in a large cohort of IgA deficient adults with confirmed or suspected CD and relate the findings to gluten free diet.

METHODS

Sera from 488,156 individuals were screened for CD in seven Swedish clinical immunology laboratories between 1998 and 2012. In total, 356 out of 1,414 identified IgA deficient adults agreed to participate in this study and were resampled. Forty-seven IgA deficient blood donors served as controls. Analyses of IgG antibodies against tTG and DGP as well as HLA typing were performed and a questionnaire was used to investigate adherence to gluten free diet. Available biopsy results were collected.

RESULTS

Out of the 356 IgA deficient resampled adults, 67 (18.8%) were positive for IgG anti-tTG and 79 (22.2%) for IgG anti-DGP, 54 had biopsy confirmed CD. Among the 47 IgA deficient blood donors, 4 (9%) were positive for IgG anti-tTG and 8 (17%) for anti-DGP. Four were diagnosed with biopsy verified CD, however, 2 of the patients were negative for all markers. Sixty-eight of 69 individuals with positive IgG anti-tTG were HLA-DQ2/DQ8 positive whereas 7 (18.9%) of the 37 individuals positive for IgG anti-DGP alone were not.

CONCLUSIONS

IgG anti-tTG seems to be a more reliable marker for CD in IgA deficient adults whereas the diagnostic specificity of anti-DGP appears to be lower. High levels of IgG antibodies against tTG and DGP were frequently found in IgA deficient adults despite adhering to gluten free diet.

Antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptides: an accurate predictor of coeliac disease in infancy

Immunoglobulin G antibodies against deamidated gliadin peptides are now known to have diagnostic accuracy comparable to tissue transglutaminase and endomysium autoantibodies in patients with coeliac disease. However, little is known about their predictive value in infants with a suspected gluten enteropathy. We tested whether deamidated gliadin immunoglobulin G antibodies are more reliable than traditional tests for coeliac disease screening in infancy. Sixty-five children under 2 years of age (42 with malabsorption, 23 controls) were tested for deamidated gliadin immunoglobulin G, tissue transglutaminase and endomysium immunoglobulin A, and gliadin immunoglobulins A and G . Thirty-seven of the 42 children with malabsorption had deamidated gliadin antibodies, associated with tissue transglutaminase and endomysial antibodies in 33, and with gliadin immunoglobulins A and G in 21 and 29, respectively. Intestinal biopsy was performed in 34 of the 37 children positive for deamidated gliadin antibodies. Thirty-two/34 showed villous atrophy consistent with coeliac disease, while the remaining two had a Marsh 1 and a normal mucosa, respectively. Only gliadin immunoglobulins A (4.3%) and G (39.1%) were found in controls. The sensitivity of deamidated gliadin, tissue transglutaminase and endomysial antibodies for coeliac disease was significantly higher than that of gliadin immunoglobulins G and A. High titre deamidated gliadin antibodies correlated with severe intestinal damage. Deamidated gliadin antibodies showed a higher diagnostic accuracy for coeliac disease than gliadin antibodies in infancy. High titre deamidated gliadin antibodies predict a severe gluten-dependent duodenal damage.

Intestinal biopsy is not always required to diagnose celiac disease: a retrospective analysis of combined antibody tests

Background

The objective of this study was to compare celiac disease (CD)– specific antibody tests to determine if they could replace jejunal biopsy in patients with a high pretest probability of CD.

Methods

This retrospective study included sera from 149 CD patients and 119 controls, all with intestinal biopsy. All samples were analyzed for IgA and IgG antibodies against native gliadin (ngli) and deamidated gliadin peptides (dpgli), as well as for IgA antibodies against tissue transglutaminase and endomysium.

Results

Tests for dpgli were superior to ngli for IgG antibody determination: 68% vs. 92% specificity and 79% vs. 85% sensitivity for ngli and dpgli, respectively. Positive (76% vs. 93%) and negative (72% vs. 83%) predictive values were also higher for dpgli than for ngli. Regarding IgA gliadin antibody determination, sensitivity improved from 61% to 78% with dpgli, while specificity and positive predictive value remained at 97% (P < 0.00001). A combination of four tests (IgA anti-dpgli, IgG anti-dpgli, IgA anti- tissue transglutaminase, and IgA anti-endomysium) yielded positive and negative predictive values of 99% and 100%, respectively and a likelihood ratio positive of 86 with a likelihood ratio negative of 0.00. Omitting the endomysium antibody determination still yielded positive and negative predictive values of 99% and 98%, respectively and a likelihood ratio positive of 87 with a likelihood ratio negative of 0.01.

Conclusion

Antibody tests for dpgli yielded superior results compared with ngli. A combination of three or four antibody tests including IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase and/or IgA anti- endomysium permitted diagnosis or exclusion of CD without intestinal biopsy in a high proportion of patients (78%). Jejunal biopsy would be necessary in patients with discordant antibody results (22%). With this two-step procedure, only patients with no CD-specific antibodies would be missed.

Performance of anti-deamidated gliadin peptides antibodies in celiac disease diagnosis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the usefulness of anti-deamidated gliadin peptides antibodies (a-DGP), in the diagnostic of celiac disease (CD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and three untreated CD patients (67 children and 36 adults) and 36 celiac patients under gluten-free diet were studied. Two hundred and seventy-four subjects served as controls (114 healthy blood donors, 80 healthy children and 80 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis). a-DGP (IgG and IgA) and anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (AtTG) were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Elisa). Anti-endomysium antibodies (AEA) were detected by indirect immunofluorescence on human umbilical cord.

RESULTS

The sensitivitiy of IgG and IgA a-DGP were 94% and 97% respectively, compared to 96% for AEA and AtTG. The specificity of a-DGP was 93.6% for IgG and 92% for IgA. The specificity of AEA and AtTG were 100%. The frequency of IgG and IgA a-DGP was significantly higher in patients with CD than in control group (94% vs. 4.4%, P<10(-7); 97% vs. 8%, P<10(-7)). The frequency of IgG a-DGP was the same in children and adult (94%). The frequency of IgA a-DGP were similar in children and adults (95.5% vs. 100%).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that a-DGP increases neither the sensitivity nor the specificity of AEA and AtTG.

Serological diagnosis of celiac disease: comparative analysis of different strategies

BACKGROUND

Different serologic tests are available for the diagnosis of celiac disease (CD).

AIM

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) and anti-deamidated gliadin (DGP) for the serologic diagnosis of CD.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 107 consecutive adult CD and 542 consecutive disease controls who underwent an intestinal biopsy. Samples were tested for total IgA, IgA anti-tTG, and IgG anti-DGP antibodies using assays from 2 manufacturers (INOVA and Thermo Fisher). Samples were also tested by a screening assay that simultaneously detects IgA and IgG antibodies to tTG and DGP (tTG/DGP screen) (INOVA).

RESULTS

Positivity for anti-DGP or anti-tTG had a likelihood ratio for CD that varied between 20 and 115, depending on the assay. Double positivity (positive for anti-tTG and anti-DGP) had the highest likelihood ratio (≥ 215) for CD. The likelihood ratios for single positivity (positivity for one assay combined with negativity for the other) had a likelihood ratio between 0.8 and 10.1. The likelihood ratio for CD was lowest (≤ 0.12) for double negative test results. Decision tree analysis revealed that determining IgA anti-tTG and IgG anti-DGP in all patients performed better than other serologic strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of likelihood ratios improves the clinical interpretation of serologic testing for CD. Double positive test results had the highest likelihood ratio for CD, whereas double negative test results had the lowest likelihood ratio.

Diagnostic value of anti-deamidated gliadin peptide IgG antibodies for celiac disease in children and IgA-deficient patients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to analyze the diagnostic performance of anti-deamidated gliadin peptide (dGp) immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgA regarding the age at celiac disease (CD) diagnosis and the anti-dGp IgG usefulness for diagnosing CD IgA-deficient patients.

METHODS

Anti-dGp IgG and IgA and anti-native gliadin (nGlia) IgA were determined by enzyme fluoroimmunoassay in 100 newly diagnosed anti-tissue transglutaminase (tTG) IgA-positive pediatric and adult patients with CD and in 100 age-matched patients with other digestive pathologies. Anti-dGp IgG was evaluated in 6 CD IgA-deficient patients.

RESULTS

When analyzing all of the patients, the anti-dGp IgG assay showed higher diagnostic accuracy (area under receiver operating characteristic curve), specificity, and positive predictive value than anti-dGp IgA and anti-nGlia IgA. All of the diagnostic parameters corresponding to anti-dGp IgG reached the same values as anti-tTG IgA in children 7 years or younger. In older patients, both anti-dGp isotypes showed an inverse behavior, IgG having a higher specificity and positive predictive value but a lower sensitivity and negative predictive value than IgA. Anti-dGp levels were associated with the severity of intestinal lesions, and an inverse association was found regarding age at diagnosis. Both anti-dGp IgG and IgA were found to be positive in the 9 patients with minimal intestinal changes included in the study. All of the patients with CD with IgA deficiency were positive for anti-dGp IgG.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic performance of anti-dGp depends on the antibody isotype and on the age at CD diagnosis, anti-dGp IgG being a serological marker at least as useful as anti-tTG IgA for detecting CD in children ages 7 years or younger. Our data also indicate that anti-dGp IgG can improve the diagnosis of IgA-deficient patients.

Accuracy of diagnostic antibody tests for coeliac disease in children: summary of an evidence report

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to summarise the evidence from 2004 to September 2009 on the performance of laboratory-based serological and point of care (POC) tests for diagnosing coeliac disease (CD) in children using histology as reference standard.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies reporting on children for tests based on IgA and IgG anti-gliadin (AGA), endomysial (EmA), anti-transglutaminase-2 (TG2), and anti-deamidated gliadin peptides (DGP) antibodies or POC tests. For inclusion, histological analysis of duodenal biopsies and sensitivity and specificity for index tests had to be reported. Data were pooled and summary measures calculated for sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios ("LR+", "LR-"), and diagnostic odds ratios (DOR). In case of elevated statistical heterogeneity, studies reaching 90% sensitivity or specificity were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 2510 articles were reviewed; 16 entered meta-analysis, reporting on 3110 patients (1876 with CD, 1234 without CD). For IgA-EmA, sensitivity was ≥90% in 7/11 studies and pooled specificity 98.2%. For IgA-anti-TG2, 11/15 studies yielded sensitivities ≥90% and 13/15 specificities ≥90%. For IgA-DGP, sensitivity ranged between 80.7% and 95.1% (specificity 86.3%-93.1%); for IgG-DGP between 80.1% and 98.6% (specificity 86.0-96.9%). IgA-EmA had the highest pooled DOR (554) and LR+ (31.8) for a laboratory test, followed by IgA-anti-TG2, IgG-DGP, IgA-DGP and IgA-AGA. POC tests showed a pooled sensitivity of 96.4% for IgA-TG2 (specificity 97.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

IgA-EmA and IgA-anti-TG2 tests appear highly accurate to diagnose CD. IgG-anti-DGP tests may help in excluding CD. IgA-AGA and IgA-DGP tests show inferior accuracy. POC tests may achieve high accuracy in the hands of experienced readers, but IgA-anti-TG2/EmA were superior.

European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease

OBJECTIVE

Diagnostic criteria for coeliac disease (CD) from the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) were published in 1990. Since then, the autoantigen in CD, tissue transglutaminase, has been identified; the perception of CD has changed from that of a rather uncommon enteropathy to a common multiorgan disease strongly dependent on the haplotypes human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8; and CD-specific antibody tests have improved.

METHODS

A panel of 17 experts defined CD and developed new diagnostic criteria based on the Delphi process. Two groups of patients were defined with different diagnostic approaches to diagnose CD: children with symptoms suggestive of CD (group 1) and asymptomatic children at increased risk for CD (group 2). The 2004 National Institutes of Health/Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality report and a systematic literature search on antibody tests for CD in paediatric patients covering the years 2004 to 2009 was the basis for the evidence-based recommendations on CD-specific antibody testing.

RESULTS

In group 1, the diagnosis of CD is based on symptoms, positive serology, and histology that is consistent with CD. If immunoglobulin A anti-tissue transglutaminase type 2 antibody titers are high (>10 times the upper limit of normal), then the option is to diagnose CD without duodenal biopsies by applying a strict protocol with further laboratory tests. In group 2, the diagnosis of CD is based on positive serology and histology. HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 testing is valuable because CD is unlikely if both haplotypes are negative.

CONCLUSIONS

The aim of the new guidelines was to achieve a high diagnostic accuracy and to reduce the burden for patients and their families. The performance of these guidelines in clinical practice should be evaluated prospectively.

Early developing celiac disease in children with cerebral palsy

OBJECTIVES

We have reported on increased levels of antibodies against gliadin and/or transglutaminase 2 (TG2) in children with cerebral palsy (CP) but without having increased prevalence of celiac disease (CD). The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether these children have mucosal signs of early developing CD, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQ2/DQ8, and antibodies against deamidated gliadin peptides (DGP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Stored blood samples from 16 children with CP were analyzed regarding HLA-DQ2/DQ8 and anti-DGP antibodies. HLA-DQ2/DQ8 were analyzed by polymerase chain reaction sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes. Anti-DGP antibodies were analyzed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Small-bowel biopsies from 15 of these children were available for immunohistochemistry regarding IgA colocalized with TG2, densities of α/β+ and γ/δ+ intraepithelial lymphocytes.

RESULTS

Mucosal immunoglobulin A (IgA) deposits colocalized with TG2 were found in the small-bowel biopsy from 1 patient with serum IgA-class anti-TG2 antibodies, HLA-DQ2, and gastrointestinal complaints. Another 2 children had slightly increased numbers of mucosal α/β+ and/or γ/δ+ intraepithelial lymphocytes. In total, 10 of 16 children were HLA-DQ2 and/or DQ8-positive. Anti-DGP antibodies were detected in sera from 4 of 16 children.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, 1 child with CP had IgA colocalizing with TG2 in the small-bowel mucosa, suggesting CD at an early stage. Although the majority of children with CP and elevated levels of CD-related seromarkers are HLA-DQ2 and/or DQ8-positive, they have neither classical nor early developing CD.

Assessment of a combination screening assay for celiac disease

PURPOSE

A serological screening assay for celiac disease (CD), designed to simultaneously detect IgA and IgG anti-tissue transglutaminase (a-tTG) and IgA and IgG deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies (a-DGP), was recently developed. In this study, we establish the performance of this assay.

METHODS

We enrolled 41 CD patients and 18 CD patients on gluten-free diets. The diagnosis of CD was based on histological and serological criteria, including concomitant positive serology tests (a-tTG, IgA anti-endomysial antibodies). As control population, we enrolled 169 subjects: 145 disease controls and 24 blood donors. In all cases, serum samples were tested for: IgA a-tTG, IgG a-tTG, IgA a-DGP, IgG a-DGP, IgA anti-endomysial antibodies (EMA), IgA and IgG for a-tTG and a-DGP in a single assay.

RESULTS

The new test, QUANTA Lite (™) h-tTG/DGP Screen, detects all IgA and IgG antibodies against atTG and a-DGP present in a sample. In our study, the test showed 100% sensitivity and 91.12% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed additional value of the new h-tTG/DGP Screen assay, which proved superior to more conventional assays and can be considered the best initial test for CD. Further studies are necessary to determine whether combination of h-tTG/DGP Screen with IgA a-tTG or IgA a-DGP can be used to obviate the need for duodenal biopsy in high- and low-risk populations.

Immunoglobulin G antibodies against deamidated-gliadin-peptides outperform anti-endomysium and tissue transglutaminase antibodies in children <2 years age

To investigate the usefulness of deamidated-gliadin-peptides-antibodies in the diagnosis of celiac disease, serology was tested in 212 children suspected with celiac disease who had undergone a small-intestinal-biopsy. For deamidated-gliadin-peptides-antibodies, two kits were tested. Positive and negative predictive values for IgA deamidated-gliadin-peptides-antibodies using the Bindazyme-kit were 89% and 74%, while the Quanta-Lite-kit had values of 89% and 85%, respectively. For the IgG subtype using the Bindazyme-kit, these values were 85% and 89%, while they were 85% and 91% for the Quanta-Lite-kit. The positive predictive values for endomysium and tissue-transglutaminase antibodies were disappointing (77% and 87%), although the negative predictive values were better (97% and 96%). When the analysis was restricted to the 41 children aged <2 years, no misclassifications occurred with IgG deamidated-gliadin-peptides-antibodies giving 100% accuracy in both kits. The positive predictive value reached 100% for tissue-transglutaminase antibodies and both kits for IgA deamidated-gliadin-peptides-antibodies, while the negative predictive value was 94% in these assays. Positive and negative predictive values for endomysium antibodies were 96% and 93%, respectively. In conclusion, although deamidated-gliadin-peptides-antibodies do not outperform anti-endomysium antibodies in the total study population, the IgG subtype seems to be the best test in children aged <2 years, reaching 100% accuracy.

Use of deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies to monitor diet compliance in childhood celiac disease

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate performance of serum antibodies against deamidated gliadin peptides (a-DGPs) in detecting compliance with gluten-free diet (GFD) in children with celiac disease (CD).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Serum samples were collected the same day of endoscopy in 95 children with CD and 106 controls. We preliminarily calculated the cutoff of a-DGP immunoglobulin A (IgA) and a-DGP IgA+G in our population by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Of 95 children with CD, 28 were studied during the first year after GFD introduction, with interview and serum collection every 3 months. In addition, serum samples were collected in 106 children with CD on GFD for more than 1 year (range 1-14). In both groups of children with CD on GFD, we compared a-DGP IgA and IgA+G performance in monitoring compliance with GFD with anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (anti-tTG) IgA and anti-gliadin antibody (AGA) IgA.

RESULTS

The cutoff resulted in 13.1 arbitrary units (AU) for a-DGP IgA (sensitivity 87.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 79%-92%, specificity 97.2, 95% CI 92%-99%) and 16.5 for a-DGP IgA+G (sensitivity 94.7, 95% CI 88%-98%, specificity 89.6, 95% CI 84%-95%). In the first year of GFD, at 6 to 8 months prevalence of positive a-DGPs was significantly higher in partially versus strictly compliant children, and at 9 to 12 months only prevalence of positive a-DGP IgA+G remained significantly higher. Moreover, at 9 to 12 months sensitivity to detect transgressions to GFD was 44% for a-DGP IgA and 100% for a-DGP IgA+G (P = 0.03). In the 106 children on GFD for more than 1 year, sensitivity to detect transgressions to GFD was 60% for a-DGP IgA and 76% for a-DGP IgA+G. Anti-tTG IgA and AGA IgA sensitivity was much lower (24% and 4%, respectively). The 4 tests showed comparable high specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Both a-DGPs showed higher sensitivity than anti-tTG IgA and AGA IgA in monitoring compliance with GFD, but a-DGP IgA+G seemed to perform better. a-DGPs did not outperform anti-tTG IgA for CD screening.

New screening tests enrich anti-transglutaminase results and support a highly sensitive two-test based strategy for celiac disease diagnosis

BACKGROUND

The identification of specific serological algorithms allowing the diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) is a new challenge for both the clinic and the laboratory. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of three new tests proposed for CD screening with that of the well established IgA tTG, and ascertained whether any combination of these tools might enhance accuracy in diagnosing CD.

METHODS

In sera from 329 CD and 374 control children, the following were assayed: IgA tTG; IgA/IgG, which identify tTG-gliadin complexes (Aeskulisa Celi Check and CeliCheck IgGA); IgA/IgG, which identify deamidated gliadin peptides and tTG (QUANTA Lite(TM) h-tTG/DGP Screen).

RESULTS

When specificity was set at 100%, the most sensitive index of CD was IgA tTG (75.7%, cut-off=100U), followed by QUANTA Lite(TM) h-tTG/DGP Screen (65.3%, cut-off 145U), Aeskulisa Celi Check (62.6%, cut-off 909U/mL) and CeliCheck IgGA (59.6%, cut-off 977U/mL). Three algorithms were obtained by combining IgA tTG with each of the new tests. The algorithm obtained by measuring IgA tTG and QUANTA Lite(TM) h-tTG/DGP Screen allowed the correct identification of CD in 78.7% of cases (negative predictive value=97.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

The two-test based strategy could be used for the cost effective diagnosis of CD.

IgA anti-actin antibodies in celiac disease

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of IgA anti-actin antibodies (IgA-AAA) for celiac disease (CD), to investigate their usefulness as a marker of compliance in CD patients to the gluten-free diet (GFD), and to assess the relationship between their presence in the sera of CD patients and severity of intestinal mucosal damage.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 182 patients with CD were studied: 63 patients were untreated; 50 patients were following a strict GFD; and 69 patients were non-compliant with a GFD. IgA-AAA was detected using a homemade enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

IgA-AAA showed a sensitivity of 41.3% and a specificity of 71.4% for a diagnosis of CD. In children, the frequency of IgA-AAA detection was lower in those following a strict GFD (23.1%) compared with untreated patients (39.4%) and those not complying with a GFD (32.5%). In patients following a strict GFD, IgA-AAA detection was significantly less frequent in children than in adults (23.1% vs. 58.3%, respectively; P<0.001). IgA-AAA was found in 17 out of 52 CD patients with total villous atrophy (32.7%), and in one out of 11 patients with subtotal villous atrophy (9%).

CONCLUSION

IgA-AAA cannot replace anti-endomysium and anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies in the diagnosis algorithm of CD, but it can serve as a reliable marker of severe intestinal mucosal damage in CD patients.

Celiac disease serology in patients with different pretest probabilities: Is biopsy avoidable?

AIM: To establish the diagnostic performance of several serological tests, individually and in combination, for diagnosing celiac disease (CD) in patients with different pretest probabilities, and to explore potential serological algorithms to reduce the necessity for biopsy.

METHODS: We prospectively performed duodenal biopsy and serology in 679 adults who had either high risk (n = 161) or low risk (n = 518) for CD. Blood samples were tested using six assays (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) that detected antibodies to tissue transglutaminase (tTG) and deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP).

RESULTS: CD prevalence was 39.1% in the high-risk population and 3.3% in the low-risk group. In high-risk patients, all individual assays had a high diagnostic efficacy [area under receiving operator characteristic curves (AU ROC): 0.968 to 0.999]. In contrast, assays had a lower diagnostic efficacy (AU ROC: 0.835 to 0.972) in the low-risk group. Using assay combinations, it would be possible to reach or rule out diagnosis of CD without biopsy in 92% of cases in both pretest populations. We observed that the new DGP/tTG Screen assay resulted in a surplus compared to more conventional assays in any clinical situation.

CONCLUSION: The DGP/tTG Screen assay could be considered as the best initial test for CD. Combinations of two tests, including a DGP/tTG Screen, might be able to diagnose CD accurately in different clinical scenarios making biopsy avoidable in a high proportion of subjects.

Antibodies against deamidated gliadin peptides identify adult coeliac disease patients negative for antibodies against endomysium and tissue transglutaminase

BACKGROUND

This study was done to evaluate the diagnostic utility of antibodies against deamidated gliadin peptides compared to traditional markers for coeliac disease.

AIM

To evaluate diagnostic utility of antibodies against deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP).

METHODS

Sera from 176 adults, referred for endoscopy without previous analysis of antibodies against tissue transglutaminase (tTG) or endomysium (EmA), were retrospectively analysed by ELISAs detecting IgA/IgG antibodies against DGP or a mixture of DGP and tTG, and compared with IgA-tTG and EmA. Seventy-nine individuals were diagnosed with coeliac disease.

RESULTS

Receiver operating characteristic analyses verified the manufacturers' cut-off limits except for IgA/IgG-DGP/tTG. In sera without IgA deficiency, the sensitivity was higher for IgA/IgG-DGP (0.85-0.87) compared with IgA-tTg (0.76) and EmA (0.61). All tests showed high specificity (0.95-1.00). Eighteen coeliac disease-sera were negative regarding IgA-tTG, nine of which were positive for IgA/IgG-DGP. Sera from coeliac disease-patients >70 years were more often negative for IgA-tTG (50%) and IgA/IgG-DGP (36%) than younger patients (15% and 8% respectively) (P < 0.01). Three of the four IgA-deficient patients were positive in the IgA/IgG-DGP assay.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of patients unselected regarding IgA-tTg/EmA, thus unbiased in this respect, IgA/IgG-DGP identified adult coeliac disease patients negative for antibodies against endomysium and tissue transglutaminase. Serology is often negative in elderly patients with coeliac disease; a small bowel biopsy should therefore be performed generously before coeliac disease is excluded.

Autism spectrum disorders and allergy: observation from a pediatric allergy/immunology clinic

IgE-mediated allergic diseases (e.g., allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, atopic asthma and food allergy) are prevalent (up to 30%) in the general population and are increasing in developed countries. In infants and young children, non-IgE-mediated food allergy is also prevalent. In addition to easily recognized organ-specific symptoms, allergic diseases can cause neuropsychiatric symptoms, such as irritability and hyperactivity, in otherwise healthy individuals. This is also likely to occur in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Moreover, the discomfort and pain associated with allergic diseases could aggravate behavioral symptoms in ASD children. Allergic conditions are easily treatable; however, ASD children may be underdiagnosed and/or undertreated for allergic and other common childhood diseases, in part due to their impaired communication skills. Practicing physicians should be aware of the potential impact of allergic diseases on behavioral symptoms and cognitive activity in ASD children. However, they also need to be aware that certain symptoms often attributed to 'allergy' by caregivers may not be immune mediated and should understand that behavioral symptoms can also be affected by many non-IgE-mediated causes.

New Serology Assays Can Detect Gluten Sensitivity among Enteropathy Patients Seronegative for Anti–Tissue Transglutaminase

Background: Some patients with celiac disease (CD) may be seronegative with the commonly used test for IgA anti–tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG) antibodies. Our aim was to explore whether newer assays incorporating synthetic deamidated gliadin-related peptides (DGPs) or other TG isoenzymes as antigen are useful for detecting gluten sensitivity in IgA anti-tTG–seronegative patients.

Methods: We assayed serum samples obtained at diagnosis from (a) anti-tTG–seronegative patients with a CD-like enteropathy (n = 12), (b) skin biopsy–proven dermatitis herpetiformis (DH) patients (n = 26), and (c) IgA anti-tTG–positive CD patients (n = 26). All patients had typical total IgA concentrations. All patients underwent intestinal biopsy and serum testing for (a) detection of IgA and IgG isotypes of both anti-DGP and anti-tTG in a single assay (tTG/DGP Screen; INOVA Diagnostics), (b) simultaneous detection of both IgA and IgG anti-DGP antibody isotypes (DGP Dual; INOVA Diagnostics), and (c) detection of antibodies to transglutaminase 3 (TG3) or transglutaminase 6 (TG6).

Results: All anti-tTG–seropositive patients also tested positive in anti-DGP assays. Overall, tTG/DGP Screen detected 6 (31.6%) of the 19 anti-tTG seronegatives, and anti-DGP Dual produced positive results in 5 (26.3%) of these cases. Whereas both assays detected 2 anti-tTG–negative DH patients with partial villous atrophy, they were positive in only 2 of the 5 cases with no histologically discernible mucosal damage. Testing for antibodies to TG3 and TG6 identified 7 (36.8%) of the 19 anti-tTG–negative patients, 5 of which were also positive for anti-DGP.

Conclusions: Detection of anti-DGP with tTG/DGP Screen or anti-DGP Dual, or detection of antibodies to other TG isoenzymes, enhances the sensitivity for detecting gluten sensitivity among non–IgA- deficient, anti-tTG–seronegative patients with CD-like enteropathy.

Positive deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies and negative tissue transglutaminase IgA antibodies in a pediatric population: to biopsy or not to biopsy

Reports from our clinical laboratory database show that 75% of children <2 years old tested for celiac serology who were found positive for deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) antibodies had negative results for tissue transglutaminase IgA. DGP levels were shown to decline and disappear without a gluten-free diet. This observation questions DGP's specificity for diagnosis of celiac disease.

IgG Antibodies against Deamidated Gliadin Peptides for Diagnosis of Celiac Disease in Patients with IgA Deficiency

Background: Assays for IgG antibodies against deamidated gliadin (IgG-anti-dGli) are comparable in performance with tests detecting IgA antibodies against tissue transglutaminase (IgA-anti-tTG) in diagnosing celiac disease (CD). IgA-anti-tTG are absent in IgA deficiency, a condition often associated with CD. In IgA deficiency, IgG-anti-tTG, which have a lower overall diagnostic accuracy, are routinely measured. We examined whether IgG-anti-dGli would be useful for diagnosing CD in patients with IgA deficiency.

Methods: We studied 34 IgA-deficient CD patients, 185 IgA-competent newly diagnosed children with CD, 316 children without CD, 400 adult blood donors, and 6 control IgA-deficient individuals without CD. Anti-dGli and anti-tTG were measured by ELISA, and endomysium antibodies (EmA) were measured by immunofluorescence on monkey esophagus (IgA as well as IgG class for all antibodies). We calculated diagnostic sensitivity (percentage of patients above cutoff with 95% CIs) according to age-specific cutoffs for 95% diagnostic specificity and according to cutoffs proposed by the manufacturer of the assays.

Results: No IgA-deficient CD patients were positive for any IgA-based antibody assay. Diagnostic sensitivity of IgG-anti-tTG was 91.2% (95% CI 76.3%–97.7%) according to age-specific cutoffs and 82.4% (66.1%–92.0%) according to manufacturer cutoffs. The diagnostic sensitivity of IgG-EmA was 75.8% (58.8%–87.4%) and the sensitivity of IgG-anti-dGli was 88.2% (72.8%–95.9%) according to both cutoffs.

Conclusions: IgG-anti-dGli and IgG-anti-tTG have comparable diagnostic sensitivities for IgA-deficient celiac patients. IgG-anti-dGli may be useful for diagnosing CD in IgA-deficient patients.

Deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies as a routine test for celiac disease: a prospective analysis

GOALS

This study was designed to establish whether deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies (DGP-AGA) could improve the serologic workup for celiac disease (CD).

BACKGROUND

The best serologic approach for CD screening is currently based on the combined detection of tissue transglutaminase (tTGA), endomysial (EmA), and gliadin antibodies (AGA).

STUDY

One hundred forty-four consecutive patients with gastrointestinal and extraintestinal signs suggestive for CD were investigated using serologic tests, that is, IgG and IgA DGP-AGA, IgA tTGA, IgA EmA, and duodenal biopsy.

RESULTS

Forty-eight out of 144 patients (33%) had CD with different severity of villous atrophy. IgA tTGA showed 93.7% sensitivity compared with 91.6% for IgA EmA, 84.3% for IgA DGP-AGA, and 82.3% for IgG DGP-AGA. Of the 3 cases negative for IgA tTGA, IgA EmA, and IgA DGP-AGA, 2 had total IgA deficiency, although both were positive for IgG DGP-AGA. IgG DGP-AGA showed a very high specificity for CD (98.9%), not only superior to IgA DGP-AGA (79.8%), but also to IgA tTGA (96.6%) and very close to IgA EmA (100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our prospective study shows that the combined search for IgA tTGA and IgG DGP-AGA provides the best diagnostic accuracy for CD, allowing the identification of all CD cases---except one---with a very high specificity. The serologic workup for CD screening could be significantly improved by the routine introduction of IgG DGP-AGA together with IgA tTGA, thus reducing the number of tests and with an obvious advantage in terms of cost-efficacy.

Old and new serological tests for celiac disease screening

Evaluation of: Lewis NR, Scott BB. Meta-analysis: deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) antibody and tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody compared as screening test for celiac disease. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 31(1), 73-81 (2010). In celiac disease (CD), deamidation of gliadin peptides, induced by tissue transglutaminase (tTG), generates novel antigenic epitopes evoking a specific immune response. Serological tests based on the detection of antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptides (DGP) have been developed with very promising results in terms of sensitivity and specificity for CD screening. In the present study, a meta-analysis of studies published from 1998 to 2008 was designed to compare the performance of DGP antibodies with that of tTG antibodies, the validated and routinely employed test for CD screening. The authors have limited their analysis to IgA class antibodies underlining that most of the considered studies had methodological imperfections, especially ascertainment bias. The results of this meta-analysis indicated that the pooled sensitivities for DGP and tTG antibodies were 87.8% (95% CI: 85.6-89.9) and 93% (95% CI: 91.2-94.5), respectively, and the pooled specificities were 94.1% (95%CI: 92.5-95.5) and 96.5% (95% CI: 95.2-97.5), respectively. In summary, although both tests represent a very good tool for identifying celiac patients, tTG antibodies display a higher predictive value than DGP antibodies, and must still be considered the best serological test for CD screening.

Serum and intestinal celiac disease-associated antibodies in children with celiac disease younger than 2 years of age

OBJECTIVES

In children younger than 2 years of age, a diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) is difficult to make because anti-endomysium (anti-EMA)/anti-tissue transglutaminase 2 (anti-TG2) antibodies are less sensitive than in older children. The aim of our study was to evaluate how many children younger than 2 years of age and diagnosed with CD, were negative for serum anti-TG2 antibodies and to test the hypothesis that in these patients, TG2-specific IgA deposits could instead be present at mucosal level.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 104 children younger than 2 years of age and 179 children older than 2 years, all of whom had been diagnosed with CD, were investigated for serum CD-associated antibodies (anti-gliadin [AGA] IgA and IgG, EMA-IgA, anti-TG2-IgA). The presence of intestinal anti-TG2 extracellular IgA deposits was searched by using double immunofluorescence in 56 of the patients younger than 2 years of age and in 40 of those who were older than 2 years.

RESULTS

In children with CD who were younger than 2 years of age, high levels of AGA-IgA were found in 93/104 (89%) and 98/104 (94%) were found of have high levels of AGA-IgG. In children older than the age of 2 years with CD, 120/179 (67%) had high levels of AGA-IgA and 151/179 (84%) had high levels of AGA-IgG. Serum EMA were present in 92/104 (88%) in the younger group and in 176/179 (98%) of the older group. Ninety-one of 104 children (87%) younger and 172/179 (96%) older than 2 years showed high serum levels of anti-TG2. Finally, 41/56 (73%) children younger than 2 years and all of the 40 children (100%) older than 2 years of age showed mucosal anti-TG2-IgA deposits.

CONCLUSIONS

EMA and anti-TG2-antibody measurements show higher sensitivity for the diagnosis of CD in children older than 2 years compared with younger children. The search for mucosal deposits of anti-TG2-IgA does not improve the diagnostic performance.

Meta-analysis: deamidated gliadin peptide antibody and tissue transglutaminase antibody compared as screening tests for coeliac disease

BACKGROUND

Following the appreciation of the importance of gliadin deamidation in the immunopathogenesis of coeliac disease, diagnostic tests based on antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptides have been developed and shown to have high sensitivity and specificity.

AIM

To compare the performance of the deamidated gliadin peptides antibody test with the current standard, the tissue transglutaminase antibody test, through a meta-analysis of published studies.

METHODS

Databases from 1998 to 2008 were searched for relevant studies. These were assessed for methodological quality and standard statistical tests were applied to compare particularly the sensitivity and specificity of the two tests for the diagnosis of coeliac disease.

RESULTS

Most studies had methodological flaws, especially ascertainment bias. The pooled sensitivities for the deamidated gliadin peptides antibody and tissue transglutaminase antibody tests were 87.8% (95% CI, 85.6-89.9) and 93.0% (95% CI, 91.2-94.5) respectively and the pooled specificities were 94.1% (95% CI, 92.5-95.5) and 96.5% (95% CI, 95.2-97.5) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although both tests perform well, the tissue transglutaminase antibody test outperforms the deamidated gliadin peptides antibody test and remains the preferred serological test for the diagnosis and/or exclusion of coeliac disease.