Aspirin protects against Barrett's esophagus in a multivariate logistic regression analysis

Risk Factors for the Development of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the most widely established precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Despite current screening guidelines, more than 90% of EAC patients lack a previous diagnosis of BE. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify the most important risk factors for the development of BE or EAC.

RECENT FINDINGS

PubMed.gov, Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched through March 15, 2024. Studies comparing characteristics of patients with endoscopically diagnosed BE or EAC to control groups satisfied our inclusion criteria. Dual extraction provided data for random-effects meta-analyses. Sufficient data were extracted from 54 included studies to perform our meta-analyses. There were five risk factors with significant associations for the development of BE: symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux at least once weekly (OR, 3.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.03-6.25; p = 0.004) tobacco smoking (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.30-1.51; p < 0.001); alcohol use (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10-1.71; p = 0.008); male gender (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.19-1.57; p < 0.001); and obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2) (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.09-1.39; p = 0.003). Tobacco smoking was significantly associated with the diagnosis of EAC (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.85-2.43; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Five risk factors showed significant associations with the development of BE and one with the development of EAC, with over a three-fold increase in BE for patients with gastroesophageal reflux more than once weekly. These data could prove useful in developing diagnostic paradigms with higher emphasis on patients experiencing more frequent acid reflux.

Cancer Risk in Barrett's Esophagus: A Clinical Review

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is rapidly increasing in incidence and is associated with a poor prognosis. Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a known precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma. This review aims to explore Barrett's esophagus, esophageal adenocarcinoma, and the progression from the former to the latter. An overview of the definition, diagnosis, epidemiology, and risk factors for both entities are presented, with special attention being given to the areas of debate in the literature. The progression from Barrett's esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma is reviewed and the relevant molecular pathways are discussed. The definition of Barrett's esophagus remains debated and without international consensus. This, alongside other factors, has made establishing the true prevalence of Barrett's esophagus challenging. The degree of dysplasia can be a histological challenge, but is necessary to guide clinical management. The progression of BE to EAC is likely driven by inflammatory pathways, pepsin exposure, upregulation of growth factor pathways, and mitochondrial changes. Surveillance is maintained through serial endoscopic evaluation, with shorter intervals recommended for high-risk features.

Analysis of Barrett's Esophagus and Its Risk Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study of 10,122 Subjects at a Japanese Health Examination Center

INTRODUCTION

Helicobacter pylori eradication is expected to significantly change the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus (BE). However, few reports on this relationship exist. We analyzed the risk factors of BE using the current consensus on length of BE considering H. pylori infection status.

METHODS

We analyzed 10,122 individuals (5,962 men; mean age = 52.9 ± 9.9 years) who had undergone esophagogastroduodenoscopy as part of a medical checkup. Correlations among factors including H. pylori infectious status, endoscopic findings, and BE ≥1 cm were analyzed.

RESULTS

Prevalence of BE, long-segment BE, and esophageal adenocarcinoma was 22.5%, 0.014%, and 0%, respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that the risk factors for BE were hiatal hernia (odds ratio [OR]: 2.89 [2.59-3.24]), female sex (OR: 0.52 [0.46-0.59]), social drinking (OR:0.77 [0.68-0.87]), H. pylori eradication therapy (OR: 1.34 [1.19-1.51]), proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use (OR: 1.52 [1.18-1.96]), bile reflux (OR: 1.18 [1.04-1.33]), age ≥50 years (OR: 1.13 [1.02-1.26]), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use (OR: 1.29 [1.02-1.62]). Although reflux esophagitis (RE) was more common in H. pylori-negative patients (17.2%) than in those after H. pylori eradication therapy (11.8%, p < 0.00001), the latter was correlated with BE, disputing RE as a strong risk factor for BE. Therefore, we conducted a subgroup analysis; most of the risk factors except for PPI use (p = 0.75), H2-receptor antagonist use (p = 0.078), and atrophic gastritis absence (p = 0.72) were positively correlated with BE after H. pylori eradication therapy compared with H. pylori-negative status.

CONCLUSIONS

H. pylori eradication, bile reflux, PPI use, and NSAID use were risk factors for BE along with hiatal hernia, male sex, and older age.

Platelets: the point of interconnection among cancer, inflammation and cardiovascular diseases

INTRODUCTION

The association between thrombosis, cancer and inflammation is well-established. Platelets play a major role in atherosclerosis, inflammation and immune response. Furthermore, growing evidence suggests that they are also significantly involved in tumor development and progression so that anti-platelet agents may prevent cancer and improve outcomes in oncological patients. In this review, we aimed at analyzing the relationship between platelets, cardiovascular diseases and cancer. A comprehensive study in the main educational platforms was performed and high-quality original articles and reviews were included.

AREAS COVERED

This review will focus on the role of platelets in cardiovascular disease and in cancer genesis and progression, analyzing their function as immune cells that link inflammation to thrombosis. Finally, it will examine the recent controversies on the use of anti-platelet agents as cancer medications, in particular the already known anti-tumor properties of aspirin, as well as the new perspectives regarding P2Y12 inhibitors.

EXPERT OPINION

Platelet-cancer crosstalk generates a vicious feed-back loop involving tumor cells and secreting molecules that activate platelets, which in turn promote cancer-associated inflammation, proliferation, spreading and immune system evasion. Therefore, platelets inhibition may represent an innovative therapeutical strategy offered to cancer patients, in the perspective of personalized medicine.

Lifestyle interventions can reduce the risk of Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 62 studies involving 250,157 participants

Background

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a well‐established risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Our objective was to investigate the effectiveness of lifestyle interventions on BE risk.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to 30 September 2020. The summary relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the highest versus lowest categories of exposure were assessed. Analyses of subgroup, dose–response, sensitivity, and publication bias were conducted.

Results

Sixty‐two studies were included that involved more than 250,157 participants and 22,608 cases. Seven lifestyle factors were investigated: smoking, alcohol, body mass index (BMI), physical activity, sleep time, medication, and diet. We observed statistically significant increased BE risks for smoking (RR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.16–1.57), alcohol intake (RR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.13–1.34), body fatness (RR = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.03–1.13), less sleep time (RR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.24–2.49), and proton pump inhibitors use (RR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.17–2.29). Reduced risks of BE were found for aspirin (RR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.58–0.84) and the intake of vitamin C (RR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.44–0.80), folate (RR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.31–0.71), and fiber (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.93–0.97). The quality of most included studies was high and the subgroup analysis according to the quality score showed significant results (p < 0.05). There was no publication bias for smoking and alcohol. Although the analysis suggested significant evidence of publication bias for BMI, sensitivity analysis showed that the changes in the recalculated RRs were not significant.

Conclusions

The large meta‐analysis revealed that lifestyle modifications could reduce the risks of BE and, consequently, esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on Barrett's esophagus risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Conflicting evidence exists regarding the effect of NSAIDs on the risk of Barrett's esophagus. The purpose of this study is to systematically assess this effect through a meta-analysis.

METHODS

Accordingly, clinical studies on NSAID use and Barrett's esophagus risk were searched on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Following this, meta-analyses were conducted using the RevMan 5.3 software. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as the effect size.

RESULTS

Seven eligible studies (one cohort study and six case-control studies) were included for the present meta-analysis by adopting a fixed-effect model, which demonstrated that NSAIDs could reduce Barrett's esophagus risk (OR: 0.84, 95%CI:0.75-0.94, P＜0.05). Moreover, subgroup analyses done according to sex showed that NSAIDs could reduce Barrett's esophagus risk in females (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73-0.99; P = 0.04), without heterogeneity between studies (P = 1.00 and I² = 0%). However, this relationship was not evident in males (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.68-1.07; P = 0.16).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this meta-analysis provided high quality evidence that use of NSAIDs is associated with a reduced risk of Barrett's esophagus. However, the presence of a sex-dependent difference remains to be clarified.

Current management of Barrett esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma

Barrett esophagus is found in 5% to 15% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and is a precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma, yet the condition often goes undiagnosed. Patients with reflux disease who are male, over age 50, or white, and who smoke or have central obesity or a family history of Barrett esophagus or esophageal adenocarcinoma, should undergo initial screening endoscopy and, if no dysplasia is noted, surveillance endoscopy every 3 to 5 years. Dysplasia is treated with endoscopic eradication by ablation, resection, or both. Chemoprotective agents are being studied to prevent progression to dysplasia in Barrett esophagus. The authors discuss current recommendations for screening and management.

Targeting the COX1/2-Driven thromboxane A2 pathway suppresses Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma development

Background

Barrett's esophagus (BE), a complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), predisposes patients to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Reliable biomarkers for early detection and discovery of potential drug targets are urgently needed for improved BE and EAC patient outcomes.

Methods

Patient biopsy samples were evaluated for COX1/2, and thromboxane A2 synthase (TBXAS) expression. Circulating prostaglandins biosynthesis was determined using enzyme immunoassay kits. Anchorage-independent cell growth assay, crystal violet staining assay, and xenograft experiments were conducted to assess BE and EAC cell growth. A surgical mouse model of reflux (i.e., esophagoduodenostomy) was established and samples were analyzed using an enzyme immunoassay kit, immunohistochemistry, immunoblotting, or RT-PCR. Esophageal biopsy samples (pre- and post-intervention) were obtained from a randomized clinical trial in which participants were administered esomeprazole (40 mg) twice daily in combination with an acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) placebo or 81 or 325 mg ASA for 28 days. Esophageal biopsy specimens before and after the intervention period were analyzed.

Findings

COX2 and TBXAS are highly expressed in BE and EAC patients accompanied by a pronounced elevation of circulating TXA2 levels. ASA suppressed BE and EAC growth by targeting the TXA2 pathway. Additionally, biopsies from 49 patients (with similar baseline characteristics) showed that ASA substantially decreased serum TXA2 levels, resulting in reduced inflammation.

Interpretation

This study establishes the importance of the COX1/2-driven TXA2 pathway in BE and EAC pathophysiology and lays the groundwork for introducing a TXA2-targeting strategy for EAC prevention and early detection.

Funding

Hormel Foundation, Exact Sciences, Pentax Medical, Intromedic and National Cancer.

Chemoprevention of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Barrett's esophagus is common in Western countries, but progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma is uncommon. Chemoprevention therefore needs to consider whether benefits outweigh risks given an otherwise healthy population. This will depend on the particular population at risk and the relative safety of a potential preventive agent. Most evidence regarding the potential benefit of chemoprevention of Barrett's esophagus and prevention of progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma is based on observational studies such as case-control and cohort studies. Given the potential benefits and relatively low risks, patients with BE should receive once-daily PPI therapy, but routine use of twice-daily PPI is not recommended unless necessitated by poor control of reflux symptoms or esophagitis. Recent data suggest that the inverse associations between aspirin/NSAID use and esophageal adenocarcinoma may be the result of reducing neoplastic progression (from metaplasia to dysplasia and carcinoma) rather than initiation of Barrett's esophagus. While substantial associative data suggest a potential benefit of aspirin and nonaspirin NSAIDs in reducing the risk of progression of Barrett's esophagus, the low risk of progression and the potential risks (gastrointestinal bleeding, complicated ulcer disease, hemorrhagic stroke) do not warrant routine use, unless dictated by cardiovascular risk. Chemoprevention after mucosal ablation in those at highest risk of post-ablation recurrence (dysplastic Barrett's) is currently under investigation.

Aspirin prevents NF-κB activation and CDX2 expression stimulated by acid and bile salts in oesophageal squamous cells of patients with Barrett's oesophagus

OBJECTIVE

In previous studies using oesophageal squamous cells from patients with Barrett's oesophagus (normal oesophageal squamous (NES)-B cells) and from patients without Barrett's oesophagus (NES-G cells), we showed that acid and bile salts induced caudal-related homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2) expression only in NES-B cells. CDX2, a transcription factor required to form intestinal epithelium, is a target of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) signalling, which can be inhibited by aspirin. We explored mechanisms underlying differences between NES-B and NES-G cells in CDX2 expression and effects of aspirin on that CDX2 expression.

DESIGN

We exposed NES-B and NES-G cells to acid and bile salts, with and without aspirin, and evaluated effects on IκB-NF-κB-PKAc complex activation, p65 NF-κB subunit function, and CDX2 expression.

RESULTS

In both NES-B and NES-G cells, acid and bile salts activated nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase to generate H₂O₂, which activated the IκB-NF-κB-PKAc complex. NES-B cells exhibited higher levels of phosphorylated IκB and p65 and greater NF-κB transcriptional activity than NES-G cells, indicating greater IκB-NF-κB-PKAc complex activation by acid and bile salts in NES-B cells, and p65 siRNA prevented their increased expression of CDX2. Aspirin blocked IκB phosphorylation, p65 nuclear translocation, CDX2 promoter activation and CDX2 expression induced by acid and bile salts in NES-B cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences between NES-B and NES-G cells in NF-κB activation by acid and bile salts can account for their differences in CDX2 expression, and their CDX2 expression can be blocked by aspirin. These findings might explain why some patients with GORD develop Barrett's oesophagus while others do not, and why aspirin might protect against development of Barrett's oesophagus.

Association of sporadic and familial Barrett's esophagus with breast cancer

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the only known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Based on striking aggregation of breast cancer and BE/EAC within families as well as shared risk factors and molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis, we hypothesized that BE may be associated with breast cancer. Pedigree analysis of families identified prospectively at multiple academic centers as part of the Familial Barrett's Esophagus Consortium (FBEC) was reviewed and families with aggregation of BE/EAC and breast cancer are reported. Additionally, using a matched case-control study design, we compared newly diagnosed BE cases in Caucasian females with breast cancer (cases) to Caucasian females without breast cancer (controls) who had undergone upper endoscopy (EGD). Two familial pedigrees, meeting a stringent inclusion criterion, manifested familial aggregation of BE/EAC and breast cancer in an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern with incomplete penetrance. From January 2008 to October 2016, 2812 breast cancer patient charts were identified, of which 213 were Caucasian females who underwent EGD. Six of 213 (2.82%) patients with breast cancer had pathology-confirmed BE, compared to 1 of 241 (0.41%) controls (P-value < 0.05). Selected families with BE/EAC show segregation of breast cancer. A breast cancer diagnosis is marginally associated with BE. We postulate a common susceptibility between BE/EAC and breast cancer.

Insights Into the Pathophysiology of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Although researchers have identified genetic alterations that contribute to development of esophageal adenocarcinoma, we know little about features of patients or environmental factors that mediate progression of chronic acid biliary reflux to Barrett's esophagus and cancer. Increasing our understanding of the mechanisms by which normal squamous epithelium progresses to early-stage invasive cancer will help formulate rational surveillance guidelines and allow us to divest resources away from patients at low risk of malignancy. We review the cellular and genetic alterations that occur during progression of Barrett's esophagus, based on findings from clinical studies and mouse models of disease. We review the features of the luminal and mucosal microenvironment of Barrett's esophagus that promote, in a small proportion of patients, development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Markers of clonal evolution can be used to determine patient risk for cancer and set surveillance intervals.

Carpe low-dose aspirin: the new anti-cancer face of an old anti-platelet drug

Cancer metastasis is a dynamic process during which cancer cells separate from a primary tumor, migrate through the vessel wall into the bloodstream, and extravasate at distant sites to form secondary colonies. During this process, circulating tumor cells are subjected to shear stress forces from blood flow, and in contact with plasma proteins and blood cells of the immune and hemostatic system, including platelets. Many studies have shown an association between high platelet count and cancer metastasis, suggesting that platelets may play an occult role in tumorigenesis. This mini-review summarizes recent and emerging discoveries of mechanisms by which cancer cells activate platelets and the role of activated platelets in promoting tumor growth and metastasis. Moreover, the review discusses how aspirin has the potential for being clinically used as an adjuvant in cancer therapy.

Impact of smoking, alcohol consumption, and NSAID use on risk for and phenotypes of eosinophilic esophagitis

There are few data exploring modifiable risk factors for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We aimed to determine if smoking, alcohol consumption, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use were risk factors for EoE, and to assess their impact on EoE phenotypes and treatment outcomes. We performed a case-control study analyzing data collected from a prospective cohort of adults undergoing upper endoscopy for symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. Incident EoE cases were diagnosed via consensus guidelines. Exposure data were collected via standardized patient questionnaire. Follow-up assessments for cases were made after treatment, with histologic response defined as <15 eosinophils per high-power field (eos/hpf). Exposures were compared between EoE cases and controls, among EoE cases with and without fibrostenosis, and among EoE responders and nonresponders. A total of 115 cases and 225 controls were analyzed. Cases were less likely to have ever smoked cigarettes (23% vs. 47%, P < 0.001) or currently use NSAIDs (17% vs. 40%, P < 0.001) compared to controls. These relations persisted after multivariate analysis. Although alcohol use was more common among cases (75% vs. 51%, P < 0.001), the effect was abrogated after multivariate analysis. Smoking, alcohol, and NSAID use were not associated with the fibrostenotic phenotype. There was a trend toward improved histologic response among EoE patients concomitantly using NSAIDs (87% vs. 63%, P = 0.08; aOR 6.97 (95% CI: 0.81-60.3). In conclusion, NSAID and smoking were inversely associated with EoE compared to endoscopy-based controls. Alcohol use was more prevalent in the EoE cases, although not an independent risk factor. Concomitant NSAID use may improve treatment response and is worthy of future study.

Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Use is Not Associated With Reduced Risk of Barrett's Esophagus

OBJECTIVES

Regular use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is associated with a reduced risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Epidemiological studies examining the association between NSAID use and the risk of the precursor lesion, Barrett's esophagus, have been inconclusive.

METHODS

We analyzed pooled individual-level participant data from six case-control studies of Barrett's esophagus in the Barrett's and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Consortium (BEACON). We compared medication use from 1,474 patients with Barrett's esophagus separately with two control groups: 2,256 population-based controls and 2,018 gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) controls. Study-specific odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression models and were combined using a random-effects meta-analytic model.

RESULTS

Regular (at least once weekly) use of any NSAIDs was not associated with the risk of Barrett's esophagus (vs. population-based controls, adjusted OR=1.00, 95% CI=0.76-1.32, I²=61%; vs. GERD controls, adjusted OR=0.99, 95% CI=0.82-1.19, I²=19%). Similar null findings were observed among individuals who took aspirin or non-aspirin NSAIDs. We also found no association with highest levels of frequency (at least daily use) and duration (≥5 years) of NSAID use. There was evidence of moderate between-study heterogeneity; however, associations with NSAID use remained non-significant in "leave-one-out" sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of NSAIDs was not associated with the risk of Barrett's esophagus. The previously reported inverse association between NSAID use and esophageal adenocarcinoma may be through reducing the risk of neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Pathogenesis and progression of oesophageal adenocarcinoma varies by prior diagnosis of Barrett's oesophagus

Background:

The absolute risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) among individuals with Barrett's oesophagus (BE) is low and a majority of EA cases are diagnosed among individuals with no prior BE diagnosis. To ensure that insights from EA case–control studies are transferable to clinical management of BE populations, we conducted a case–case study to compare the clinical presentation, medical history and survival of EA cases with and without a prior BE diagnosis in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Medicare database.

Methods:

Eligible EA cases were diagnosed at age ⩾68 years during 1994–2009. There were 5271 EA cases in this study, 87% of which did not have a prior diagnosis of BE (EA-no prior BE).

Results:

Multivariable case–case comparisons evidenced adverse associations of GERD, ever cigarette smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia, weight loss, peptic ulcer and irritable bowel disease each in EA-prior BE compared with EA-no prior BE. Obesity, metabolic syndrome, impaired fasting glucose and diabetes did not differ between groups. EA-prior BE cases were diagnosed with less advanced disease, were more likely to undergo surgery and less likely to receive chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and had better overall mean survival (2.5 vs 1.4 years). This survival advantage persisted in the multivariable Cox model (HR=0.69, 95%CI: 0.60, 0.78), despite adjustment for many factors including stage, grade and clinical interventions.

Conclusions:

This study provides evidence that EA cases occurring among individuals previously diagnosed with BE are different from the large majority of EA cases that occur without a prior BE diagnosis. Regardless of whether these differences emanate from aetiology, biology and/or selection biases, they underscore the importance of a prudent approach in using knowledge from EAC case–control studies in the management of BE populations.

Risk prediction in Barrett's esophagus - aspects of a combination of molecular and epidemiologic biomarkers reflecting alterations of the microenvironment

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a chronic, metaplastic lesion of the esophagus and the only known precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma. The identification of risk factors to assess the risk for BE and their correspondence with hallmarks of malignant progression for early stratification purposes is critically needed. Data legitimate the assumption that aside of reflux symptoms and related conditions, also demographic and environmental factors are thought to be associated with the risk for BE and its progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Molecular biomarkers and inflammatory mechanisms are subjects of intensive research and dispone of promising features regarding risk assessment especially for progressive BE. The amount of investigated epidemiologic factors, as well as discovered biomarkers gets confusingly large. Despite the recognized potential relevance of environmental and molecular factors, the efforts to date have resulted in moderately applicable risk estimates. More prospective data is needed to allow an imputation of the mostly retrospectively assessed factors to reappraise their meaningfulness in risk prediction approaches.

Metabolic syndrome in relation to Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: Results from a large population-based case-control study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) causes local chronic inflammation that increases risks of Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA), yet symptomatic GERD is absent in approximately half of all such patients. Obesity exacerbates GERD and is also a component of metabolic syndrome (MetS). We evaluated the hypothesis that MetS is a GERD-independent mechanism by which obesity is associated with increased risks of BE and EA using data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. BE cases (n=10,215) and EA cases (n=592) were each individually matched to five population controls based on age, sex, and general practice. MetS was defined as occurrence of at least three of the following: obesity, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and high cholesterol. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using conditional logistic regression. MetS was marginally associated with BE (OR=1.12, 95%CI 1.00-1.25). Similar effects were found for the individual component factors of obesity, hypertension, and high cholesterol. History of GERD modified the association (P-effect modification <1E-5), with the MetS-BE association confined to patients without a history of GERD (OR=1.33, 95%CI 1.12-1.58). No association between MetS and risk of EA was detected in the main or stratified analyses. In this large population-based case-control study, individuals with MetS had a marginally increased risk of BE in the absence of GERD. The systemic inflammatory state (MetS) may represent a reflux-independent inflammatory pathway that increases the risk of BE. MetS did not increase risk of EA in this study population.

Risk factors for Barrett's esophagus: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Cancer of the esophagus is a highly lethal disease with many patients presenting with metastatic spread of their tumor at diagnosis; a consequence of this late presentation is the 5-year survival rate of <20 %. Barrett's esophagus (BE), a premalignant condition of the distal esophagus, is the main risk factor for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. The development of a risk prediction tool that could assist healthcare professionals in identifying people at increased risk of developing BE would be advantageous. Understanding the factors that influence the risk of developing BE is the first stage of developing a risk prediction tool.

METHODS

A scoping review was undertaken to address the following question 'what factors influence the risk of developing Barrett's esophagus?' Forty-six articles were included in this review.

RESULTS

The majority of articles reviewed were case-control or cohort studies. Samples sizes ranged from 68 to 84,606. Risk factors reported to be statistically significant were divided into three categories: demographic, lifestyle and clinical factors. Strongest risk factors identified include: male gender, increasing age, white race, smoking, obesity and gastro-esophageal reflux disease symptoms, while some aspects of a person's diet appear to act as a protective measure.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for BE are complex and need to be considered by healthcare professionals when identifying patients that could benefit from endoscopic eradication. These results provide a stepping stone for the future development of a risk prediction model.

Reduced Risk of Barrett's Esophagus in Statin Users: Case-Control Study and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Use of statins has been associated with a reduced incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in population-based studies. However there are few studies examining statin use and the development of Barrett's esophagus.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between statin use and the presence of Barrett's esophagus in patients having their first gastroscopy.

METHODS

We have performed a case-control study comparing statin use between patients with, and without, an incident diagnosis of non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Male Barrett's cases (134) were compared to 268 male age-matched controls in each of two control groups (erosive gastro-esophageal reflux and dyspepsia without significant upper gastrointestinal disease). Risk factor and drug exposure were established using standardised interviews. Logistic regression was used to compare statin exposure and correct for confounding factors. We performed a meta-analysis pooling our results with three other case-control studies.

RESULTS

Regular statin use was associated with a significantly lower incidence of Barrett's esophagus compared to the combined control groups [adjusted OR 0.62 (95 % confidence intervals 0.37-0.93)]. This effect was more marked in combined statin plus aspirin users [adjusted OR 0.43 (95 % CI 0.21-0.89)]. The inverse association between statin or statin plus aspirin use and risk of Barrett's was significantly greater with longer duration of use. Meta-analysis of pooled data (1098 Barrett's, 2085 controls) showed that statin use was significantly associated with a reduced risk of Barrett's esophagus [pooled adjusted OR 0.63 (95 % CI 0.51-0.77)].

CONCLUSIONS

Statin use is associated with a reduced incidence of a new diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus.

Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: The Influence of Medications Used to Treat Comorbidities on Cancer Prognosis

Esophageal adenocarcinoma has undergone a continuous rise in incidence since the early 1970s and is the fastest rising cancer among white men in the United States. Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that medications commonly used to treat multiple chronic conditions (for example, aspirin, non-aspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and statins) as well as powerful acid suppressants such as proton pump inhibitors are associated with a reduced risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. The chemopreventive potential of these classes of medications appears to be especially applicable to persons with Barrett's esophagus, the only known premalignant condition for esophageal adenocarcinoma. However, it is not known whether these medications also influence cancer recurrence and cancer-specific mortality in persons diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma. This is an important question because most patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma have 1 or more comorbid conditions at the time of their cancer diagnosis and are receiving medication to treat these conditions. This article summarizes the evidence on the associations between 4 commonly used classes of medications and (1) risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus and (2) risk of cancer recurrence and cancer-specific mortality in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

African American ethnicity is not associated with development of Barrett's oesophagus after erosive oesophagitis

BACKGROUND

Barrett's oesophagus is the primary risk factor for oesophageal adenocarcinoma; erosive oesophagitis is considered an intermediate step with Barrett's oesophagus development potential upon healing. Barrett's oesophagus occurs in 9-19% following erosive oesophagitis but minimal data exists in African Americans. The study aim was to determine if ethnicity is associated with Barrett's oesophagus formation following erosive oesophagitis.

METHODS

Retrospective review of endoscopies from September 2007 to December 2012 was performed. Inclusion criteria were erosive oesophagitis on index endoscopy, repeat endoscopy ≥6 weeks later and non-Hispanic white or African American ethnicity. Barrett's oesophagus frequency following erosive oesophagitis by ethnicity was compared.

RESULTS

A total of 14,303 patients underwent endoscopy during the study period; 1636 had erosive oesophagitis. Repeat endoscopy was performed on 125 non-Hispanic white or African American patients ≥6 weeks from the index procedure. Barrett's oesophagus occurred in 8% of non-Hispanic whites while no African American developed it on repeat endoscopy following erosive oesophagitis (p=0.029). No significant difference was seen between ethnic groups in any clinical parameter assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

African American ethnicity appears to result in decreased Barrett's oesophagus formation following erosive oesophagitis. Further investigation to demonstrate factors resulting in decreased Barrett's oesophagus formation among African Americans should be performed.

Barrett esophagus

Although there are many unanswered questions with Barrett esophagus, we can safely say that the incidence is increasing, chemoprevention strategies for the prevention of Barrett metaplasia and its progression to adenocarcinoma may be in the offing, surveillance should be considered for all patients who are discovered to have Barrett esophagus, RFA is the treatment of choice for those with HGD and strongly considered in those with LGD, EMR should be the treatment of choice for patients with nodular high-grade Barrett esophagus, and, finally, vagal-sparing esophagectomy reserved for patients with persistent HGD or a strong suspicion of carcinoma, with consideration of a concomitant fundoplication.

Detection and characterization of early malignancy in the esophagus: what is the best management algorithm?

Barrett's esophagus is a known precursor for esophageal adenocarcinoma. Early detection of dysplasia provides a window of opportunity for curative intervention. Several image-enhanced technologies have been developed to improve visualization of neoplasia. These however have not been found to be superior to the standard four quadrant random biopsy protocol. Patients are risk-stratified based on the degree of dysplasia found on biopsies and undergo either surveillance or treatment. Endoscopic therapy has become the mainstay of treatment for early neoplasia.

Medical Prevention of Barrett's Esophagus: Effects of Statins, Aspirin, Non-aspirin NSAIDs, Calcium, and Multivitamins

BACKGROUND

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a complication of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) that is a precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma. There is limited information regarding whether medications can reduce the risk of developing BE.

AIM

We analyzed medical records at a large veterans hospital to determine the effects of statins, aspirin, non-aspirin NSAIDs, calcium, or multivitamins on the risk of developing BE.

METHODS

In this retrospective case-control study, 250 patients with biopsy-confirmed Barrett's esophagus were compared with 250 controls with acid-peptic symptoms but no endoscopic BE. Medication histories were reviewed for the use of the above substances prior to endoscopic evaluation. Logistic and linear regression was used to determine predictors of the outcomes.

RESULTS

Mean age at diagnosis was significantly older in the Barrett's population compared with controls (61.2 vs. 56.7 years, P < 0.001), with no difference in mean BMI (29.1 vs. 29.0, respectively). On multivariate analysis, independently significant factors for risk of BE were found with multivitamins (OR 0.41, P = 0.001), statins (OR 0.53, P = 0.003), age (OR 1.033/year, P = 0.001), and Hispanic ethnicity (OR 0.38, P = 0.007). Furthermore, statin use was associated with less long-segment (3 cm or longer) BE and was inversely correlated with continuous BE length.

CONCLUSIONS

GERD patients with BE are less likely to use multivitamins and statins, as well as less likely to be of Hispanic ethnicity. Additionally, statins were inversely associated with BE length. Prospective studies of this topic are indicated.

Metabolic syndrome increases risk of Barrett esophagus in the absence of gastroesophageal reflux: an analysis of SEER-Medicare Data

GOALS

To evaluate the association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and risk of Barrett esophagus (BE) using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database compared with 2 control groups--Medicare population controls and endoscopy controls.

BACKGROUND

BE principally arises as an adaptation to the proinflammatory state induced by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The relationship between obesity and BE is presumed to be mediated by GERD. However, evidence suggests central adiposity also increases risk of BE independent of GERD. Central adiposity is one risk factor defining MetS, which confers a systemic proinflammatory state--a potential GERD-independent mechanism by which obesity could increase the risk of BE.

STUDY

MetS was defined as diagnosis of at least 3 of the following conditions: obesity, elevated triglycerides, high blood pressure, and elevated fasting glucose. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

In 2198 incident BE cases, prior MetS was significantly associated with BE (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval: 1.07, 1.36) compared with population controls. However, GERD status modified the association; among those without prior GERD, MetS increased risk of BE by 34%; however, no association was observed among those with a prior GERD diagnosis (P-value for effect modification <0.001). MetS was not associated with risk of BE compared with endoscopy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

MetS increased the risk of BE compared with population controls, an association driven by and confined to the non-GERD stratum. MetS may mediate an association between central adiposity and BE for those without GERD.

A review of the epidemiology of Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma

While the incidence rates of many cancers have decreased in past decades, the incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma continues to increase. The only known precursor for oesophageal adenocarcinoma is Barrett's oesophagus. Studies conducted have identified white race, male sex, GORD, cigarette smoking, obesity, and the absence of Helicobacter pylori status as risk factors for oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Other potential associations include dietary factors and the absence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. Many individual studies have been limited by sample size and several meta-analyses have pooled data from studies to address this limitation. In this review we present a synthesis of these studies and summarize current knowledge of risk factors for both oesophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett's oesophagus.

Aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and the risk of Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND

The use of aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may decrease the risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma; however, it is unknown where these agents may act in the proposed pathway from normal mucosa to Barrett's esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma.

AIM

The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between aspirin and NSAID use and Barrett's esophagus in a case-control study within a large community-based population.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study of aspirin/NSAID use and Barrett's esophagus within the Kaiser Permanente Northern California population. Cases had a new diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus between October 2002 and September 2005; controls were members without a diagnosis of Barrett's esophagus.

RESULTS

Persons with Barrett's esophagus were less likely to use aspirin than population controls [odds ratio (OR) 0.59, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.87]; a stronger association was found among cases and controls with reflux symptoms (OR 0.49, 95 % CI 0.32-0.75; p value interaction = 0.004). Similar associations were found with the use of either aspirin and/or non-aspirin NSAIDs (OR 0.53, 95 % CI 0.35-0.81), although NSAID use alone was not significantly associated with Barrett's esophagus (OR 0.74, 95 % CI 0.47-1.16). The strength of the association was highest among persons with at least moderate-to-high total medication intake.

CONCLUSIONS

Regular use of aspirin or NSAIDs was associated with a decreased risk of Barrett's esophagus, particularly among persons with gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. These findings have implications for chemoprevention, as some of the previously described protective association between aspirin/NSAIDs and esophageal adenocarcinoma may be explained by events that occur prior to the development of Barrett's esophagus.

Esophageal COX-2 expression is increased in Barrett's esophagus, obesity, and smoking

BACKGROUND

Increased esophageal cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression has been associated with Barrett's esophagus (BE); however, it is unknown whether COX-2 expression varies among patient groups with different clinical or socio-demographic factors.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study among eligible patients scheduled for elective esophagogastroduodenoscopy and patients eligible for screening colonoscopy recruited from primary clinics. We compared 39 BE tissue samples and 47 squamous tissue samples from BE cases and 240 squamous tissue samples from controls. Clinical and socio-demographic data were prospectively collected. Immunohistochemical staining for esophageal COX-2 was performed and scored.

RESULTS

The median COX-2 score was significantly higher in BE tissue than squamous tissue from cases or controls (p < 0.001). Median COX-2 expression levels were higher in tissue samples from participants with a waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) in the 2nd tertile [unadjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.04; 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) 1.17-3.57] and 3rd tertile (unadjusted OR 2.24; 95 % CI 1.20-4.16) compared with the 1st tertile and from current smokers compared with former or non-smokers (unadjusted OR 1.68; 95 % CI 1.03-2.75). In the multivariate analysis, WHRs in the 2nd tertile (OR 1.92; 95 % CI 1.07-3.45) and the 3rd tertile (OR 2.14; 95 % CI 1.10-4.16) were associated with high COX-2 compared with the 1st tertile, as was current smoking (OR 1.78; 95 % CI 1.06-2.97) compared with former and non-smoking.

CONCLUSION

We found a significant association between elevated esophageal mucosa COX-2 levels and the presence of BE tissue, as well as between elevated COX-2 levels and high WHR and current tobacco smoking. This information may assist in identifying patients likely to benefit from chemoprevention with COX-2 inhibitors.

The prevalence of Barrett's-esophagus-associated dysplasia in Puerto Rico

OBJECTIVE

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the strongest risk factor of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). A previous study found a lower incidence of EAC in Puerto Rico (PR) as compared to other racial/ethnic groups in the United States (US). Notwithstanding, BE epidemiology in PR is unknown. Study aims: i) to determine BE prevalence among individuals with gastroenterological pathology reports from three major anatomic pathology laboratories in PR and ii) to describe the association between dysplastic BE with age and gender.

METHODS

Clinic-based study examined data collected from three anatomic pathology laboratories encompassing the majority of gastroenterology practices in PR. Individuals with histology confirmed BE (January 2007-December 2011) were analyzed (n = 1,232). We estimated BE prevalence and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) to assess magnitude of association between dysplastic BE with age and gender using logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Overall BE prevalence was 4.4% (95% CI = 4.1-4.6). Most BE patients were males (male-to-female ratio = 2.3:1) with mean age of 64 ± 13 years. Ninety one percent of BE biopsies showed no dysplasia whereas 6.2% had EAC. BE patients age > 74 years had an increased risk of EAC (AOR: 2.38, 95% CI = 1.14-4.94) compared to those < 55 years old. Males had increased EAC risk (AOR: 2.23, 95% CI = 1.23-4.06) compared to females.

CONCLUSION

BE prevalence in PR is similar to that of non-Hispanic whites and Hispanics in US. The lower occurrence of dysplastic BE in PR could explain EAC incidence disparities between PR and other groups in the US.

Pathophysiological mechanisms linking obesity and esophageal adenocarcinoma

In recent decades there has been a dramatic rise in the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) in the developed world. Over approximately the same period there has also been an increase in the prevalence of obesity. Obesity, especially visceral obesity, is an important independent risk factor for the development of gastro-esophageal reflux disease, Barrett's esophagus and EAC. Although the simplest explanation is that this mediated by the mechanical effects of abdominal obesity promoting gastro-esophageal reflux, the epidemiological data suggest that the EAC-promoting effects are independent of reflux. Several, not mutually exclusive, mechanisms have been implicated, which may have different effects at various points along the reflux-Barrett's-cancer pathway. These mechanisms include a reduction in the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection enhancing gastric acidity and possibly appetite by increasing gastric ghrelin secretion, induction of both low-grade systemic inflammation by factors secreted by adipose tissue and the metabolic syndrome with insulin-resistance. Obesity is associated with enhanced secretion of leptin and decreased secretion of adiponectin from adipose tissue and both increased leptin and decreased adiponectin have been shown to be independent risk factors for progression to EAC. Leptin and adiponectin have a set of mutually antagonistic actions on Barrett's cells which appear to influence the progression of malignant behaviour. At present no drugs are of proven benefit to prevent obesity associated EAC. Roux-en-Y reconstruction is the preferred bariatric surgical option for weight loss in patients with reflux. Statins and aspirin may have chemopreventative effects and are indicated for their circulatory benefits.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been suggested to protect against esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). This study examined the effect of NSAIDs on the risk of developing Barrett's esophagus (BE), the precursor lesion to EAC.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study among eligible patients scheduled for either elective esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) or recruited from primary care clinics to undergo a study EGD. We compared 323 patients with BE (296 nondysplastic and 27 dysplastic) with 2 separate control groups: 1347 patients from the elective EGD group (endoscopy controls) and 502 patients from the primary care group (primary care controls) with no endoscopic or histopathologic BE. Use of aspirin products and 23 nonaspirin NSAIDs was ascertained from detailed, self-reported questionnaires. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using multivariable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in self-reported NSAID use between all BE cases and all controls (58.2% vs 54.6%; P = .33); this was seen for aspirin products (43.0% vs 37.4%; P = .08) and nonaspirin NSAIDs (7.7% vs 8.9%; P = .46). These findings persisted in the multivariable model for any NSAIDs (adjusted OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.75-1.28), aspirin (adjusted OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.90-1.51), and nonaspirin NSAIDs (adjusted OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.55-1.39). Use of a combination of aspirin and nonaspirin NSAIDs was reported in 7.4% of cases and 8.3% of controls, and a nonsignificant inverse association with BE was seen (adjusted OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.44-1.11). There was no significant association between BE and daily NSAID use (adjusted OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.78-1.37). Similar findings were observed for comparisons involving nondysplastic or dysplastic BE cases, and endoscopy or primary care control groups separately or combined.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of NSAIDs was not associated with a reduced risk of BE. It is likely that the protective mechanism of NSAIDs on EAC occurs subsequent to the development of BE.

The role of obesity in oesophageal cancer development

The incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma has increased dramatically in the developed world in the last half century. Over approximately the same period there has been an increase in the prevalence of obesity. Multiple epidemiological studies and meta-analyses have confirmed that obesity, especially abdominal, visceral obesity, is a risk factor for gastro-oesophageal reflux, Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Although visceral obesity enhances gastro-oesophageal reflux, the available data also show that visceral obesity increases the risk of Barrett's oesophagus and adenocarcinoma via reflux-independent mechanisms. Several possible mechanisms could link obesity with the risk of oesophageal adenocarcinoma in addition to mechanical effects increasing reflux. These include reduced gastric Helicobacter pylori infection, altered intestinal microbiome, factors related to lifestyle, the metabolic syndrome and associated low-grade inflammation induced by obesity and the secretion of mediators by adipocytes which may directly influence the oesophageal epithelium. Of these adipocyte-derived mediators, increased leptin levels have been independently associated with progression to oesophageal adenocarcinoma and in laboratory studies leptin enhances malignant behaviours in cell lines. Adiponectin is also secreted by adipocytes and levels decline with obesity: decreased serum adiponectin levels are associated with malignant progression in Barrett's oesophagus and experimentally adiponectin exerts anticancer effects in Barrett's cell lines and inhibits growth factor signalling. At present there are no proven chemopreventative interventions that may reduce the incidence of obesity-associated oesophageal cancer: observational studies suggest that the combined use of a statin and aspirin or another cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor is associated with a significantly reduced cancer incidence in patients with Barrett's oesophagus.

Statin use is associated with a decreased risk of Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Statins have been associated with a reduced risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma, but little is known about their effect on development of Barrett's esophagus. We evaluated the association between statins and risk of Barrett's esophagus.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study among eligible patients scheduled for elective esophagogastroduodenoscopy and patients eligible for screening colonoscopy, recruited from primary care clinics at a Veterans Affairs center. We compared 303 patients with Barrett's esophagus with 2 separate sex-matched control groups: 606 elective endoscopy controls and 303 primary care controls without Barrett's esophagus. Use of statins and other lipid-lowering medications was ascertained by reviewing filled prescriptions in electronic pharmacy records during a 10-year period before the Barrett's esophagus diagnosis date for patients and study endoscopy date for controls. We calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using conditional multivariable logistic-regression models among 276 patients and 828 controls further matched on age.

RESULTS

A smaller proportion of Barrett's esophagus patients filled statin prescriptions (57.4%) than endoscopy controls (64.9%; P = .029) or primary care controls (71.3%; P < .001). Controls had longer durations of statin prescriptions filled than patients (28.6 vs 22.1 months; P = .001). Statin use was associated with a significantly lower risk of Barrett's esophagus (adjusted OR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.38-0.87) compared with the combined control groups. The risk of Barrett's esophagus was especially lower with statin use among obese patients (OR = 0.26; 95% CI: 0.09-0.71), as was the risk for Barrett's esophagus segments ≥ 3 cm (OR = 0.13; 95% CI: 0.06-0.30). We found no significant association between Barrett's esophagus and nonstatin lipid-lowering medications (P = .452).

CONCLUSIONS

In a case-control study of veterans, statin use was associated with a reduced risk of Barrett's esophagus. The greatest level of risk reduction was observed for obese patients and for long-segment Barrett's esophagus.

Operable gastro-oesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma: Where to next?

Oesophageal junctional adenocarcinoma is a challenging and increasingly common disease. Optimisation of pre-operative staging and consolidation of surgery in large volume centres have improved outcomes, however the preferred adjunctive treatment approach remains a matter of debate. This review examines the benefits of neoadjuvant, peri-operative, and post-operative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in this setting in an attempt to reach an evidence based conclusion. Recent findings relating to the molecular characterisation of oesophagogastric cancer and their impact on therapeutics are explored, in addition to the potential benefits of fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) directed therapy. Finally, efforts to decrease the incidence of junctional adenocarcinoma using early intervention in Barrett’s oesophagus are discussed, including the roles of screening, endoscopic mucosal resection, ablative therapies and chemoprevention.

Cyclooxygenase inhibitors use is associated with reduced risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett's esophagus: a meta-analysis

Background:

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has high mortality and is increasing in incidence. Barrett's esophagus (BE) increases the risk for EAC. Studies have reported inconsistent findings on the association between use of cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors and the risk of neoplastic progression in BE patients. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate this association.

Methods:

A meta-analysis was undertaken among a total of 9 observational studies using fixed- and random-effects models, comprising 5446 participants; 605 had EAC or high-grade dysplasia (HGD).

Results:

Overall, COX inhibitors use was associated with a reduced risk of EAC/HGD among BE patients (relative risk (RR)=0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.53–0.77). Aspirin use also reduced the risk of EAC/HGD (RR=0.63, 95% CI=0.43–0.94), as well as non-aspirin COX inhibitors (RR=0.50, 95% CI=0.32–0.78). The chemopreventive effect seemed to be independent of duration response.

Conclusions:

Cyclooxygenase inhibitors use is associated with a reduced risk of developing EAC in patients with BE. Both low-dose aspirin and non-aspirin COX inhibitors are associated with a reduced risk of neoplasia. More well-designed randomised controlled trials are needed to increase our understanding of the chemopreventive effect of COX inhibitors.

Circulating inflammatory cytokines and adipokines are associated with increased risk of Barrett's esophagus: a case-control study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Obesity is associated with Barrett's esophagus (BE) and with changes in circulating levels of adipokines (leptin and adiponectin) and cytokines. Although studies have reported that adipokines and inflammatory cytokines are necessary for the development of BE, their role is controversial.

METHODS

We performed a case-control study; cases (n = 141) were patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy and were found to have BE, which was based on endoscopy and histology, and controls (n = 139) were primary care patients eligible for screening colonoscopies who agreed to undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy. We examined the association between BE and circulating levels of adipokines and cytokines (interleukin [IL]-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-12p70; tumor necrosis factor-α; and interferon-γ). Cases and controls were compared by calculating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and using unadjusted and multiple logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, race, waist-hip ratio, use of proton pump inhibitors and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and Helicobacter pylori infection.

RESULTS

The adjusted ORs for BE were 2.62 (95% CI, 1.0-6.8), 5.18 (95% CI, 1.7-15.7), and 8.02 (95% CI, 2.79-23.07) for the highest quintile vs the lowest quintile of levels of IL-12p70, IL-8, and leptin, respectively, but the OR was not significant for IL-6 (2.39; 95% CI, 0.84-6.79). The adjusted OR for BE was 0.14 for highest quintile of IL-10 compared with lowest quintile (95% CI, 0.05-0.35) and 0.03 for IL-1β ≥ median vs none detected (95% CI, 0.006-0.13). Higher levels of IL-8 and leptin and lower levels of IL-10 and IL-1β were associated with the presence of long-segment (≥3 cm) and short-segment BE. There were no differences between cases and controls in levels of interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α, adiponectin, or insulin.

CONCLUSIONS

BE is associated with circulating inflammatory cytokines and leptin and low levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines. These findings could partly explain the effect of obesity on BE.

Association between obesity and Barrett's esophagus in a Japanese population: a hospital-based, cross-sectional study

Background

The association between obesity and Barrett’s esophagus (BE) in the Japanese population remains unclear. The prevalence of BE and its associated risk factors was examined.

Methods

A cross-sectional study of 1581 consecutive individuals who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was conducted. The prevalence of endoscopically suspected BE (ESBE) was evaluated. Obesity was evaluated by body mass index (BMI, ≥ 25 kg/m²) and waist circumference (WC) (males, ≥ 85 cm; females, ≥ 90 cm). Because endoscopic diagnosis of ultra-short ESBE (<1 cm in extent) is difficult and highly unreliable, this type of ESBE was excluded from the study.

Results

In proton pump inhibitor (PPI) non-users, the prevalence of ESBE ≥ 1 cm was 5.6%. In univariate analysis, male sex and reflux esophagitis (RE) were significantly associated with BE, but BMI, WC, and reflux symptoms were not. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, only RE (odds ratio [OR] = 3.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.89-6.41, p < 0.0001) was an independent risk factor for BE; obesity and the other factors were not. In contrast, RE (OR 5.67, p = 0.0004) and large WC (OR 5.09, p = 0.0005) were significant risk factors for ESBE ≥ 1 cm in PPI users. Only male sex, but not obesity or the other risk factors, was associated with an increased risk of RE in patients not taking PPIs.

Conclusions

RE, but not obesity, may have an independent association with the risk of ESBE in the Japanese population. Furthermore, obesity measures were not independent risks for RE. Interestingly, PPI-refractory RE and large WC were risk factors for ESBE ≥1 cm in patients taking PPIs.

Association of Barrett's esophagus with type II Diabetes Mellitus: results from a large population-based case-control study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Central obesity could increase the risk for Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma by mechanical and/or metabolic mechanisms, such as hyperinsulinemia. We performed an epidemiologic study to determine whether prior type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) is associated with BE.

METHODS

We performed a population-based case-control study using the General Practice Research Database, a UK primary care database that contains information on more than 8 million subjects, to identify cases of BE (using previously validated codes; n = 14,245) and matched controls without BE (by age, sex, enrollment date, duration of follow-up evaluation, and practice region by incidence density sampling; n = 70,361). We assessed the association of a prior diagnosis of DM2 with BE using conditional univariate and multivariable regression analysis. Confounders assessed included smoking, obesity measured by body mass index (BMI), and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

RESULTS

BE cases were more likely than controls to have smoked (52.4% vs 49.9%), have a higher mean BMI (27.2 vs 26.9), and a higher prevalence of DM2 than controls (5.8% vs 5.3%). On multivariable analysis, DM2 was associated with a 49% increase in the risk of BE, independent of other known risk factors (odds ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.91). This association was stronger in women than men. Results remained stable with sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large population-based case-control study, DM2 was a risk factor for BE, independent of obesity (as measured by BMI) and other risk factors (smoking and gastroesophageal reflux disease). These data suggest that metabolic pathways related to DM2 should be explored in BE pathogenesis and esophageal carcinogenesis.

Complications of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is on the rise with more than 20% of the western population reporting symptoms and is the most common gastrointestinal disorder in the United States. This increase in GORD is not exactly clear but has been attributed to the increasing prevalence of obesity, changing diet, and perhaps the decreasing prevalence of H. pylori infection. Complications of GORD could be either benign or malignant. Benign complications include erosive oesophagitis, bleeding and peptic strictures. Premalignant and malignant lesions include Barrett's metaplasia, and oesophageal cancer. Management of both the benign and malignant complications can be challenging. With the use of proton-pump inhibitors, peptic strictures (i.e., strictures related to reflux) have significantly declined. Several aspects of Barrett's management remain controversial including the stage in the disease process which needs to be intervened, type of the intervention and surveillance of these lesions to prevent development of high grade dysplasia and oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Optimization and expansion of predictive models for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: could a life-course exposure history be beneficial?

Thrift et al. provide preliminary evidence that younger age of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease exposure is associated with increased risk of Barrett's esophagus. If these findings are confirmed in other studies, the next logical steps are to test whether this, and other age-specific exposures, can help optimize predictive models of Barrett's esophagus and progression to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Expansion of these models to the general population and the greater Barrett's esophagus population, respectively, will be required for a screening and surveillance approach to be clinically successful and cost-effective.

Management strategies of Barrett's esophagus

Barrett's esophagus is a condition resulting from chronic gastro-esophageal reflux disease with a documented risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Current strategies for improved survival in patients with Barrett's adenocarcinoma focus on detection of dysplasia. This can be obtained by screening programs in high-risk cohorts of patients and/or endoscopic biopsy surveillance of patients with known Barrett's esophagus (BE). Several therapies have been developed in attempts to reverse BE and reduce cancer risk. Aggressive medical management of acid reflux, lifestyle modifications, antireflux surgery, and endoscopic treatments have been recommended for many patients with BE. Whether these interventions are cost-effective or reduce mortality from esophageal cancer remains controversial. Current treatment requires combinations of endoscopic mucosal resection techniques to eliminate visible lesions followed by ablation of residual metaplastic tissue. Esophagectomy is currently indicated in multifocal high-grade neoplasia or mucosal Barrett's carcinoma which cannot be managed by endoscopic approach.