Association Between Serum Level of Hepatitis B Surface Antigen at End of Entecavir Therapy and Risk of Relapse in E Antigen-Negative Patients

Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Seroclearance Rate After Stopping Nucleos(t)ide Analogues in Chronic Hepatitis B-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AIM

To identify factors influencing HBsAg seroclearance rates after stopping nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search in databases from inception to July 2024. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed to determine factors associated with HBsAg seroclearance, including ethnicity, HBV genotype, NA therapy duration, end-of-treatment (EOT) qHBsAg levels, HBeAg status, cirrhosis status, and follow-up duration.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 62 studies (n = 9867) with a pooled HBsAg seroclearance rate of 10% (95%CI: 8%-12%, I2 = 92%) after NA cessation. HBeAg-negative patients showed significantly higher rates than HBeAg-positive patients (11% vs. 5%, p = 0.030). Subgroup analysis revealed higher seroclearance with follow-up of >5 years (18%, p = 0.004), showing significantly higher rates were observed in studies with longer follow-up periods. Caucasians showed a higher rate (12%) than Asians (9%, p = 0.067). Studies adhering to AASLD, EASL, or APASL stopping rules showed no significant differences in rates. Patients with EOT qHBsAg ≤2.0 log IU/mL had higher rates (23%) than those with >2.0 log IU/mL (11%). Re-treated patients had lower seroclearance (6%) compared to those not re-treated (17%, p = 0.178). Meta-regression identified ethnicity, HBeAg status, and follow-up duration as significant contributors to heterogeneity. Egger's test showed no evidence of publication bias (p = 0.1928).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis highlights the role of ethnicity, EOT qHBsAg levels, HBeAg-status, and follow-up duration in determining HBsAg seroclearance rates. These findings stress the need for personalized NA discontinuation strategies and further research on HBV genotypes and biomarkers to improve treatment outcomes and predict seroclearance more accurately.

Association Between Elevation of Serum Alanine Aminotransferase and HBsAg Seroclearance After Nucleos(t)ide Analog Withdrawal

BACKGROUND

Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) frequently elevates in chronic hepatitis B patients stopping nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs).

AIMS

To clarify the association between ALT elevation and HBsAg seroclearance after NA withdrawal.

METHODS

This multicenter cohort study reviewed consecutive patients discontinuing NA between 2004/04/01 and 2022/05/24. Treatment initiation and discontinuation generally followed the Asian-Pacific guidelines. Eligible patients had negative HBeAg and undetectable HBV DNA before treatment cessation, without malignancy, organ transplant or autoimmune disorders. We used competing risk analysis to estimate HBsAg seroclearance incidence and a time-dependent model to investigate post-cessation ALT elevation.

RESULTS

Among 841 patients (74.7% male; median age, 53.2 years; median treatment duration, 34.7 months), 38 patients cleared HBsAg over a median follow-up of 3.7 years, with a 10-year cumulative incidence of 12.4%. The median peak ALT level was significantly lower in patients achieving HBsAg seroclearance versus not (93 vs. 127 U/L; p < 0.001). Hepatitis flare after NA cessation (> 5 times upper limit) was inversely associated with HBsAg seroclearance in the univariable analysis (sub-distribution hazard ratio [SHR], 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.73; p = 0.007), and the association was not significant (adjusted SHR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.09-2.01; p = 0.28) in the multivariable analysis adjusted for pretreatment HBV DNA. Consistent results were observed in the sensitivity analyses with different ALT cutoffs and subgroup analysis adjusted for HBsAg levels at treatment cessation.

CONCLUSION

ALT elevation after NA cessation is not associated with HBsAg seroclearance following NA withdrawal, suggesting cytolytic pathways are not essential for a functional cure.

Discontinuation of Nucleos(t)ide Analogues in HBeAg Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: Risks and Benefits

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains a major threat to global public health, affecting 296 million people worldwide. Although there is no curative treatment for CHB today, the virus can be effectively controlled with current antiviral treatment strategies. Since HBsAg loss can rarely (1%) be achieved with current nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) options, lifelong treatment is usually required in HBeAg-negative patients. In recent years, guidelines have stated that long-term NA treatments can be discontinued for HBeAg-negative patients without achieving HBsAg loss. There is no general consensus on how discontinuation of NA can be included in the treatment approach. This review aimed to evaluate the current literature regarding the discontinuation of NA treatment in HBeAg-negative patients. Patients with HBeAg-negative CHB who have a higher chance of response after discontinuation of NA therapy can be defined as non-cirrhotic patients who have low HBsAg, HBcrAg, and HBV RNA levels at the discontinuation of treatment and accept close follow-up. The management of relapses that develop after NA discontinuation in patients is also unclear. The agent used in NA treatment itself may also affect the pattern of relapse development. Relapse after NA treatment occurs significantly slower and less frequently with entecavir compared to other regimens, including tenofovir dipivoxil. Prospective studies are needed in order to maintain the chance of HBsAg clearance in case of exacerbation and to treat acute exacerbations that can be fatal in a timely manner. Algorithms to be developed for use after discontinuation of NA treatment will help the clinician manage the patient safely.

Long Term HBsAg Responses to Peg-Interferon Alpha-2b in HBeAg Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Developing Clinical Relapse after Stopping Long-Term Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Therapy

Background and aims

A high proportion of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients develop clinical relapse after stopping long-term nucleotide analogues (NAs). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alpha 2b in inducing hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss in such patients.

Methods

NAs were stopped in 118 HBeAg-negative CHB patients fulfilling the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of Liver (APASL) 2015 criteria for stopping NAs; they had received NAs for a median interquartile range (IQR) of 60 (48-84) months.

Results

Overall, 82 of 118 (69.5%) patients developed clinical relapse after stopping NAs; 44 within 12 months (and treated with PEG-IFN alpha 2b 1.5 mcg/kg weekly subcutaneous injections for 48 weeks); and 38 after 12 months [and treated with tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) 25 mg daily] of follow-up. The decision to treat with either PEG-IFN or TAF was not a time-bound decision but was due to logistical problems.During the median IQR follow-up of 48 (43.5-52.5) months after the start of PEG-IFN, 14 of 44 (31.8%) patients developed clinical relapse after stopping PEG-IFN and were started on TAF. At the last follow-up visit, HBsAg was found to be negative in 7/44 (15.9%) of patients receiving PEG-IFN.Among 38 patients treated with TAF for clinical relapse, during the median IQR follow-up of 18 (12-30) months after start of TAF, no patient became HBsAg negative.36 patients did not develop clinical relapse during the follow-up, and after a median IQR follow-up of 60 (60-60) months after stopping NAs, HBsAg negative was found in 1/36 (2.8%) of patient at the last follow-up.

Conclusions

Among patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B who developed clinical relapse after stopping long-term NAs therapy and were subsequently treated with PEG-IFN alpha 2b, 15.9% achieved HBsAg loss on long-term follow-up.

Hepatitis B core-related antigen dynamics and risk of subsequent clinical relapses after nucleos(t)ide analog cessation

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Finite nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) therapy has been proposed as an alternative treatment strategy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB), but biomarkers for post-treatment monitoring are limited. We investigated whether measuring hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) after NA cessation may stratify the risk of subsequent clinical relapse (CR).

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter analysis enrolled adults with CHB who were prospectively monitored after discontinuing entecavir or tenofovir with negative HBeAg and undetectable HBV DNA at the end of treatment (EOT). Patients with cirrhosis or malignancy were excluded. CR was defined as serum alanine aminotransferase > two times the upper limit of normal with recurrent viremia. We applied time-dependent Cox proportional hazard models to clarify the association between HBcrAg levels and subsequent CR.

RESULTS

The cohort included 203 patients (median age, 49.8 years; 76.8% male; 60.6% entecavir) who had been treated for a median of 36.9 months (interquartile range [IQR], 36.5-40.1). During a median post-treatment follow-up of 31.7 months (IQR, 16.7-67.1), CR occurred in 104 patients with a 5-year cumulative incidence of 54.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47.1-62.4%). Time-varying HBcrAg level was a significant risk factor for subsequent CR (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.53 per log U/mL; 95% CI, 1.12-2.08) with adjustment for EOT HBsAg, EOT anti-HBe, EOT HBcrAg and time-varying HBsAg. During follow-up, HBcrAg <1,000 U/mL predicted a lower risk of CR (aHR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21-0.81).

CONCLUSION

Dynamic measurement of HBcrAg after NA cessation is predictive of subsequent CR and may be useful to guide post-treatment monitoring.

Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B (version 2022)

To facilitate the achieving of the goal of "eliminating viral hepatitis as a major public health threat by 2030" set by the World Health Organization, the Chinese Society of Hepatology together with the Chinese Society of Infectious Diseases (both are branches of the Chinese Medical Association) organized a panel of experts and updated the guidelines for prevention and treatment of chronic hepatitis B in China (version 2022). With the support of available evidence, this revision of the guidelines focuses on active prevention, large scale testing, and expansion of therapeutic indication of chronic hepatitis B with the aim of reducing the hepatitis B related disease burden.

Safety considerations for withdrawal of nucleos(t)ide analogues in patients with chronic hepatitis B: First, do no harm

Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NA) are widely used to treat hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, but they cannot eradicate the virus and treatment duration can be lifelong if the endpoint is set at seroclearance of the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). As an alternative strategy, finite NA therapy without the prerequisite of HBsAg seroclearance has been proposed to allow treatment cessation in patients with sustained undetectable HBV viremia for two to three years. However, reactivation of viral replication almost always follows NA withdrawal. Whereas HBV reactivation might facilitate HBsAg seroclearance in some, it could lead to serious acute flare-ups in a certain proportion of patients. Occurrence and consequences of NA withdrawal flares are complicated with various factors involving the virus, host, and treatment. Accurate risk prediction for severe flares following NA cessation is essential to ensure patient safety. The risks of life-threatening flares in patients who discontinued NA according to the stopping rules of current guidelines or local reimbursement policies have recently been quantitatively estimated in large-scale studies, which also provided empirical evidence to help identify vulnerable patients at risk of devastating outcomes. Moreover, risk predictors were further explored and validated to hopefully aid in patient selection and management. In this narrative review with a focus on patient safety, we summarize and discuss current literature on the incidence of severe flares following NA cessation, risk stratification for candidate selection, rules of posttreatment monitoring, and indications for treatment resumption. We also share our thoughts on the limitations of existing knowledge and suggestions for future research.

Discontinuation of nucleot(s)ide analogue therapy in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Sustained virological suppression and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss have been described after nucleot(s)ide analogue (NA) discontinuation for patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We performed a meta-analysis of the clinical outcomes after NA discontinuation for HBeAg-negative CHB.

METHODS

Studies involving NA cessation in HBeAg-negative CHB individuals with a median follow-up of ≥12 months were included. Participants were HBeAg-negative at the time of NA initiation. Random effects meta-analyses were performed for the following clinical outcomes: (1) virological relapse (VR) at 6 and 12 months; (2) clinical relapse (CR) at 6 and 12 months and (3) HBsAg loss. Effect of other variables was estimated using subgroup analysis and meta-regression. Studies including patients stopping entecavir (ETV) and/or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) were considered separately to studies including patients stopping older generation NA.

RESULTS

N=37 studies met inclusion criteria. Cumulative incidence of VR and CR after stopping ETV/TDF was 44% and 17% at 6 months and 63% and 35% at 12 months. Similar relapse rates were observed after stopping older NAs. Among patients stopping ETV/TDF, TDF cessation was associated with increased CR rates at 6 months versus ETV. There was an association between follow-up ≥4 years and HBsAg loss rates when stopping older NAs. Hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma were rare but occurred more frequently in studies including cirrhotic individuals.

CONCLUSION

VR is common after NA discontinuation, however, CR was only seen in one-third of patients at 12 months. Stopping NA therapy can be followed by HBsAg clearance, and rates are higher with longer follow-up.

Severe Acute Exacerbation After Cessation of Nucleos(t)ide Analog for Chronic Hepatitis B: A Real-World Study of Routine Practice

There is an ongoing debate as to whether patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) may discontinue nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy before seroclearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg).1 Whereas treatment discontinuation may facilitate HBsAg seroclearance and avoid indefinite drug exposure,2 reactivation of viral replication almost always follows treatment cessation and frequently leads to clinical flares.3 In patients who encounter withdrawal flares, severe acute exacerbation (SAE) could occur with fatal consequences.4 Quantitative knowledge about the risk of SAE is imperative to inform the debate and also the practice.

Biomarkers for predicting nucleos(t)ide analogs discontinuation and hepatitis B virus recurrence after drug withdrawal in chronic hepatitis B patients

AIM

To summarize HBV-related biomarkers predicting nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) discontinuation and hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after drug withdrawal in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients, providing references for clinical medication, so as to manage CHB patients more scientifically.

METHODS

Related pieces of literature were retrieved in PubMed and the results were sorted out. We then analyzed and summarized these articles.

RESULTS

We found that HBV related biomarkers maybe could predict NAs withdrawal safely and the possibility of relapse after treatment cessation, including hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), HBV DNA, HBV RNA, pregenomic-RNA (pgRNA), hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), and models containing several indicators for predicting the effectiveness of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

HBV DNA, HBV RNA, pgRNA, HBcrAg, anti-HBc, as well as the prediction models formed by several biomarkers could predict the safe discontinuation of NAs before HBsAg loss and recurrence.

Hepatitis B surface antigen kinetics after discontinuation of and retreatment with oral antivirals in non-cirrhotic HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B

The outcome of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) discontinuation and retreatment is still uncertain. We evaluated hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) kinetics after NAs discontinuation and during retreatment due to off-treatment clinical relapse among non-cirrhotic HBeAg-positive CHB patients. Four groups were studied: 129 HBeAg-positive patients from a prospective cohort who stopped NAs therapy after achieving sustained response (Group A), 39 patients who received retreatment after off-treatment clinical relapse in the discontinuation group (Group B), 214 patients who maintained treatment after achieving sustained response (Group C) and 291 patients who firstly initiated antiviral treatment (Group D). During a 5-year follow-up, the cumulative incidence of HBsAg loss was significantly higher in Group A than Group C (22.3% vs. 1.6%, p < .001). The quantitative HBsAg (qHBsAg) level at enrolment and NAs discontinuation were independently associated with HBsAg loss. Additionally, patients in Group B showed significantly greater HBsAg loss than those in the Groups C and D, with 5-year cumulative incidences of 9.0%, 1.6% (p = .040) and 0.6% (p < .001), respectively. Moreover, patients in the Group B exhibited better virologic response (100% vs. 98.8%, p < .001) and HBeAg seroconversion (92.6% vs. 69.8%, p < .001) than those in Group D at year 5. Propensity score-matched analysis also showed the similar trend of HBsAg decline. NAs discontinuation with or without subsequent retreatment resulted in a more profound reduction of HBsAg in non-cirrhotic HBeAg-positive patients, suggesting that discontinuation may be a potential cure strategy for those with sustained virological suppression.

APASL guidance on stopping nucleos(t)ide analogues in chronic hepatitis B patients

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is currently incurable. Long-term treatment with potent and safe nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) can reduce hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis-related complications through profound viral suppression. However, indefinite therapy raises several crucial issues with pros and cons. Because seroclearance of hepatitis B surface (HBsAg) as functional cure is not easily achievable, a finite therapy including sequential 48-week pegylated interferon therapy may provide an opportunity to facilitate HBsAg seroclearance by the rejuvenation of exhausted immune cells. However, the cost of stopping NA is the high incidence of virological relapse and surge of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, which may increase the risk of adverse outcomes (e.g., decompensation, fibrosis progression, HCC, or liver-related mortality). So far, the APASL criteria to stop NA treatment is undetectable HBV DNA levels with normalization of ALT; however, this criterion for cessation of treatment is associated with various incidence rates of virological/clinical relapse and more than 40% of NA-stoppers eventually receive retreatment. A very intensive follow-up strategy and identification of low-risk patients for virological/clinical relapse by different biomarkers are the keys to stop the NA treatment safely. Recent studies suggested that decreasing HBsAg level at the end-of-treatment to < 100-200 IU/mL seems to be a useful marker for deciding when to discontinue NAs therapy. In addition, several viral and host factors have been reviewed for their potential roles in predicting clinical relapse. Finally, the APASL guidance has proposed rules to stop NA and the subsequent follow-up strategy to achieve a better prognosis after stopping NA. In general, for both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients who have stopped treatment, these measurements should be done every 1-3 months at the minimum until 12 months.

Serum HBV RNA Dynamic and Drug Withdrawal Predictor Value in Patients With Chronic HBV Infection on Long-term Nucleos(t)ide Analogue (NA) Therapy

AIMS

This study aimed to investigate the dynamic pattern of serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients on long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy and evaluate predictor value of end-of-treatment (EOT) serum HBV RNA status on drug-withdrawal durability.

METHODS

We carried out a real-life cohort study of 326 CHB patients on NA treatment between February 12, 2016 and February 21, 2018. Thirty of these patients discontinued NA treatment after enrollment, and were included in 2-year off-therapy follow-up. Serum HBV RNA levels were determined using the RNA simultaneous amplification testing method.

RESULTS

Both serum HBV RNA and DNA levels declined significantly in long-term antiviral progress. When the treatment duration was longer than 3 years, the undetectable rates of HBV RNA and DNA were 55.10% and 97.0%, respectively. The serum HBV RNA-negative rate was 39.5%. The cumulative 2-year off-therapy viral and clinical relapse rate was 40.56%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 21.51-59.61 and 31.31%; 95% CI, 11.32-51.29 in all patients, respectively. Patients with EOT hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)≤1000 IU/mL plus HBV RNA negativity had a relatively lower cumulative 2-year off-therapy viral relapse rate (23.01%; 95% CI, 0.17-45.99). EOT HBsAg≤1000 IU/mL plus HBV RNA negativity showed obvious superiority for the EOT HBsAg≤1000 IU/mL single in drug withdrawal durability prediction, with better specificity (18.18% vs. 72.73%, P=0.03), and the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 76.92% and 47.06%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In the long-term antiviral process, both serum HBV RNA and DNA levels declined significantly. EOT serum HBV RNA negativity was not an independent drug withdrawal marker, but can complement the HBsAg titer to monitor drug withdrawal in CHB patients on long-term NA therapy.

The Yin and the Yang of Treatment for Chronic Hepatitis B-When to Start, When to Stop Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Therapy

Over 257 million individuals worldwide are chronically infected with the Hepatitis B Virus (HBV). Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) are the first-line treatment option for most patients. Entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are both potent, safe antiviral agents, have a high barrier to resistance, and are now off patent. They effectively suppress HBV replication to reduce the risk of cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Treatment is continued long-term in most patients, as NA therapy rarely induces HBsAg loss or functional cure. Two diverging paradigms in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B have recently emerged. First, the public health focussed "treat-all" strategy, advocating for early and lifelong antiviral therapy to minimise the risk of HCC as well as the risk of HBV transmission. In LMICs, this strategy may be cost saving compared to monitoring off treatment. Second, the concept of "stopping" NA therapy in patients with HBeAg-negative disease after long-term viral suppression, a personalised treatment strategy aiming for long-term immune control and even HBsAg loss off treatment. In this manuscript, we will briefly review the current standard of care approach to the management of hepatitis B, before discussing emerging evidence to support both the "treat-all" strategy, as well as the "stop" strategy, and how they may both have a role in the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B.

HBsAg quantification predicts off-treatment response to interferon in chronic hepatitis B patients: a retrospective study of 250 cases

BACKGROUND

For chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients without willingness to extend the routine duration of interferon (IFN) therapy, it is important to identify patients who will benefit from treatment cessation. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) quantification is recommended for management of IFN therapy. At present, the understanding on end-of-treatment (EOT) HBsAg level predicting post-treatment response to IFN is still finite.

METHODS

A total of 2451 non-cirrhosis, HBsAg-postive patients treated with IFN-based therapy during the period from December 2010 to December 2017 at Nanfang Hospital were enrolled in this study. Serum HBsAg levels at EOT were measured to evaluate the associations between EOT HBsAg levels (Group 1, HBsAg > 0.05 and ≤ 10 IU/mL; Group 2, HBsAg > 10 and ≤ 200 IU/mL; Group 3, HBsAg > 200 IU/mL) with post-treatment HBsAg loss. Chi-squared, t-test,,Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression analysis, and Multivariate Logistic regression analysis were used to analyse and evaluate differences between the there groups.

RESULTS

The cumulative HBsAg loss rates 5 years after treatment in Group 1-3 were 30.4% (17/56), 9.8%(4/41) and 0%(0/153) (p < 0.001). An EOT HBsAg level of > 10 IU/mL showed relatively high negative predictive value (NPV) of up to 97.9% for HBsAg loss. Low baseline HBsAg level < 25,000 IU/mL, on-treatment HBsAg decline > 1 log10IU/mL at week 24 and EOT HBsAg level ≤ 10 IU/mL were found significantly associated with HBsAg loss. A total of 6 patients have achieved HBsAg loss at EOT and 17 patients with EOT HBsAg level ≤ 10 IU/mL have achieved post-treatment HBsAg loss. Baseline characteristics, dynamic changes of on-treatment HBsAg and duration of IFN therapy were balanced across patients with EOT or post-treatment HBsAg loss.

CONCLUSION

EOT HBsAg level can serve as a monitoring indicator for IFN therapy. EOT HBsAg level ≤ 10 IU/mL was found to lead to high rate of post-treatment HBsAg loss. For patients without willingness to extend IFN treatment, off-treatment follow-up could be considered when HBsAg level decreased to ≤10 IU/mL.

Current practice and contrasting views on discontinuation of nucleos(t)ide analog therapy in chronic hepatitis B

Introduction: Long-term, even indefinite treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) is the current first-line therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), regardless of its histological stage. Guidelines and recommendations on duration and endpoints of NA therapy in CHB are not identical and change over time.Areas covered: The authors review NA discontinuation approaches and views with an emphasis on HBeAg-negative patients based on published studies relevant to the topic, stressing on whether or not the optimal endpoint of HBsAg loss is practically achievable.Expert opinion: Discontinuation of NA therapy in HBeAg-negative noncirrhotic patients has to be considered after long-term effective treatment with controlled liver disease activity, undetectable viremia, and significant decline in serum HBsAg titers. Close post-treatment monitoring is required for early intervention in cases of severe clinical relapse. Immediate retreatment hampers the favorable outcome of HBsAg clearance (functional cure) and should be avoided in transient ALT flares. Predictors of such relapses are still under investigation and include viral and patient factors. For HBeAg-positive noncirrhotic patients, there is wide acceptance of the endpoint of HBeAg seroconversion, after a long consolidation period.

Nucleos(t)ide analogue continuous therapy associated with reduced adverse outcomes of chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy reduces the risk of disease progression in chronic hepatitis B virus-infected patients. However, the risk of liver decompensation, hepatic failure, and mortality after discontinuation of NA therapy remains unknown.

METHODS

Among 51,574 chronic hepatitis B patients who received NAs in the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, we identified 8,631 patients who continued NA therapy (treatment cohort) and 8,631 propensity-score matched patients who stopped NA therapy after their initial 1.5 years treatment (off-therapy cohort) between October 1, 2003 and December 31, 2011. All study subjects were followed up from the index date, that is, the date 1.5 years after the first prescription of NA, until development of liver decompensation and hepatic failure, death or end of 18-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

Treatment cohort had significantly lower risks of liver decompensation (1.05%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81%-1.30% vs 2.13%; 95% CI, 1.82%-2.45%; p < 0.001), hepatic failure (0.35%; 95% CI, 0.21%-0.49% vs 0.63%; 95% CI, 0.46%-0.80%; p = 0.008) and overall mortality (1.67%; 1.37%-1.98% vs 2.44%; 95% CI, 2.10%-2.77%; p < 0.001) during the 18-month follow-up period. After adjusting for potential confounders, NA continuous therapy was associated with reduced risks of liver decompensation (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.47; 95% CI, 0.36-0.62, p < 0.001), hepatic failure (HR: 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33-0.86, p = 0.01) and overall mortality (HR: 0.67; 95% CI, 0.53-0.84, p = 0.001). The number needed to reduce one less disease progression and mortality was 47. The protective effect of NA continuous therapy was found in nearly all subgroups.

CONCLUSION

NA continuous therapy is associated with reduced risks of liver decompensation, hepatic failure, and overall mortality.

Okuda lecture: Challenges of hepatitis B in the era of antiviral therapy

Nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) are effective, safe, and convenient antiviral therapy to suppress replication of hepatitis B virus, which can be translated into improved long-term outcome of chronic hepatitis B patients. The current recommended first-line NAs, namely, entecavir and tenofovir, are largely free from problems of drug resistance. Nonetheless, there are still a few challenges in the era of NA. First, the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma can only be reduced but not eliminated, particularly among cirrhotic patients. For cirrhotic patients who have persistent low-level viremia on NA, that is, partial responders, the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma is higher than those with complete viral suppression. The best strategy to manage partial responders to entecavir or tenofovir is uncertain. Second, immune-tolerant patients are very difficult to treat with NA. A significant proportion of immune-tolerant patients will have detectable viremia despite a few years of continuous NA treatment, and the rate of hepatitis B e-antigen seroconversion is very low. Third, most patients need long-term treatment as NA cannot eliminate covalently closed circular DNA in the hepatocytes. Some patients can consider stop NA according to treatment guidelines, but viral and clinical relapses often occur after treatment cessation. There is no concrete consensus on when one should stop NA in a hepatitis B e-antigen-negative patient among different treatment guidelines. New biomarkers such as hepatitis B surface antigen level can be used to select patients to stop NA, but the data are still preliminary.

Combining hepatitis B core-related and surface antigens at end of nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment to predict off-therapy relapse risk

BACKGROUND

There remains an unmet need for convenient biomarkers to assess the risks of discontinuing nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

AIM

To investigate if hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) is an independent of surface antigen (HBsAg) for risk prediction of NA cessation.

METHODS

This prospective multicentre study enrolled 135 CHB patients who stopped entecavir or tenofovir after achieving viral remission for a median of 25.2 months. All patients stopped NA with negative HBeAg and undetectable viral DNA, and were then observed for clinical relapse and HBsAg loss. Predictors including HBsAg and HBcrAg levels were explored using Cox proportional hazard model and weighted to develop a risk score.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 25.9 months, clinical relapse and HBsAg loss occurred in 66 and eight patients, respectively, with a 5-year cumulative incidence of 56.1% (95% CI 46.7-66.0%) and 8.8% (95% CI 4.3-17.4%), respectively. HBcrAg was an independent relapse predictor, as well as HBsAg, age, ALT and tenofovir use. A score (SCALE-B) was calculated by the equation of 35*HBsAg (log IU/mL) + 20*HBcrAg (log U/mL) + 2*age (year) + ALT (U/L) + 40 for tenofovir use. The concordance rates for clinical relapse were 0.87, 0.88, 0.87, 0.85 and 0.90 at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years, respectively. Moreover, HBsAg loss occurred exclusively in low-risk patients predicted by the score.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum HBcrAg and HBsAg levels were independent predictors of off-NA relapse and can be factored into a risk score to guide treatment cessation in patients with CHB.

Management of Hepatitis B Virus Infection: 2018 Guidelines from the Canadian Association for the Study of Liver Disease and Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is an important public health problem in Canada. In keeping with evolving evidence and understanding of HBV pathogenesis, the Canadian Association for the Study of Liver Disease periodically publishes HBV management guidelines. The goals of the 2018 guidelines are to (1) highlight the public health impact of HBV infection in Canada and the need to improve diagnosis and linkage to care, (2) recommend current best-practice guidelines for treatment of HBV, (3) summarize the key HBV laboratory diagnostic tests, and (4) review evidence on HBV management in special patient populations and include more detail on management of HBV in pediatric populations. An overview of novel HBV tests and therapies for HBV in development is provided to highlight the recent advances in HBV clinical research. The aim and scope of these guidelines are to serve as an up-to-date, comprehensive resource for Canadian health care providers in the management of HBV infection.

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection is a global public health threat that causes considerable liver-related morbidity and mortality. It is acquired at birth or later via person-to-person transmission. Vaccination effectively prevents infection and chronic hepatitis B virus carriage. In chronically infected patients, an elevated serum hepatitis B virus DNA concentration is the main risk factor for disease progression, although there are other clinical and viral parameters that influence disease outcomes. In addition to liver biochemistry, virological markers, and abdominal ultrasonography, non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis is emerging as an important assessment modality. Long-term nucleos(t)ide-analogue therapy is safe and well tolerated, achieves potent viral suppression, and reduces the incidence of liver-related complications. However, a need to optimise management remains. Promising novel therapies are at the developmental stage. With current vaccines, therapies, and an emphasis on improving linkage to care, WHO's goal of eliminating hepatitis B virus as a global health threat by 2030 is achievable.

Development of a scoring system to predict hepatocellular carcinoma in Asians on antivirals for chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) during antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is inadequately predicted by the scores built from untreated patients. We aimed at developing and validating a risk score to predict HCC in patients with CHB on entecavir or tenofovir treatment.

METHODS

This study analysed population-wide data from the healthcare databases in Taiwan and Hong Kong to identify patients with CHB continuously receiving entecavir or tenofovir. The development cohort included 23,851 patients from Taiwan; 596 (2.50%) of them developed HCC with a three-year cumulative incidence of 3.56% (95% CI 3.26-3.86%). The multivariable Cox proportional hazards model found that cirrhosis, age (cirrhosis and age interacted with each other), male sex, and diabetes mellitus were the risk determinants. These variables were weighted to develop the cirrhosis, age, male sex, and diabetes mellitus (CAMD) score ranging from 0 to 19 points. The score was externally validated in 19,321 patients from Hong Kong.

RESULTS

The c indices for HCC in the development cohort were 0.83 (95% CI 0.81-0.84), 0.82 (95% CI 0.81-0.84), and 0.82 (95% CI 0.80-0.83) at the first, second, and third years of therapy, respectively. In the validation cohort, the c indices were 0.74 (95% CI 0.71-0.77), 0.75 (95% CI 0.73-0.78), and 0.75 (95% CI 0.72-0.77) during the first three years, and 0.76 (95% CI 0.74-0.78) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.74-0.77) in the extrapolated fourth and fifth years, respectively. The predicted and observed probabilities of HCC were calibrated in both cohorts. A score <8 and >13 points identified patients at distinctly low and high risks.

CONCLUSIONS

The easily calculable CAMD score can predict HCC and may inform surveillance policy in patients with CHB during oral antiviral therapy.

LAY SUMMARY

This study analyses population-wide data from the healthcare systems in Taiwan and Hong Kong to develop and validate a risk score that predicts hepatocellular carcinoma during oral antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B. The easily calculable CAMD score requires only simple information (i.e. cirrhosis, age, male sex, and diabetes mellitus) at the baseline of treatment initiation. With a scoring range from 0 to 19 points, the CAMD score discriminates the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma with a concordance rate of around 75-80% during the first three years on therapy. The risk prediction can be extrapolated to five years on treatment with similar accuracy. Patients with a score <8 and >13 points were exposed to distinctly lower and higher risks, respectively.

The incidence and predictors of HBV relapse after cessation of tenofovir therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients

This study investigates the incidences and predictors of hepatitis B virus (HBV) relapse after tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) therapy in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and -negative patients. We retrospectively recruited 143 chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients without cirrhosis (39 HBeAg-positive and 104 HBeAg-negative patients) who were previously treated with TDF and had post-treatment follow-up for at least 6 months (median: 55, IQR 36-85 weeks). All the patients fulfilled the stopping criteria of APASL 2012. The virological and clinical relapse rates at 104 weeks in HBeAg-positive patients were 66.6% and 59.1%, while they were 72.3% and 55.9%, respectively, in HBeAg-negative patients. Cox regression analysis revealed that the higher end-of-treatment HBsAg levels were an independent factor of virological relapse in HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. The end-of-treatment HBsAg levels of 200 (area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC): 0.624) and 80 IU/mL (AUROC: 0.959) were the optimal values for predicting HBV relapse in HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients, respectively. The virological relapse rate at 78 weeks was 14.3% and 19.6% in HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients who achieved HBsAg ≤200 IU/mL and HBsAg ≤80 IU/mL, respectively. Two patients experienced hepatic decompensation upon hepatitis flares, and no patient died after timely retreatment. Seven patients experienced off-therapy HBsAg loss. The cumulative rates of HBsAg loss at 104 weeks were 45.5% and 59.3% in patients with end-of-treatment HBsAg ≤80 IU/mL and ≤50 IU/mL, respectively. In conclusions, the end-of-treatment HBsAg levels were a useful marker for predicting HBV relapse in HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative CHB patients.

Long-Term Follow-up and Quantitative Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Monitoring in North American Chronic HBV Carriers

INTRODUCTION

Quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg) combined with HBV DNA may be useful for predicting chronic hepatitis B (CHB) activity and nucleoside analogue (NA) response.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study we evaluated qHBsAg levels according to CHB disease phase and among patients on treatment. Random effect logistic regression analysis was used to analyze qHBsAg change with time in the NA-treated cohort.

RESULTS

545 CHB carriers [56% M, median age 48 y (IQR 38-59), 73% Asian] had qHBsAg testing. In the untreated group (44%), 8% were classified as immune tolerant, 10% immune clearance, 40% inactive, and 43% had HBeAg- CHB and the median HBsAg levels were 4.6 (IQR 3.4-4.9), 4.0 (IQR 3.4-4.5), 2.9 (IQR 1.4-3.8), and 3.2 log IU/mL (IQR 2.6-4.0), respectively; p < 0.001. In the NA-treated group (28% entecavir, 68% tenofovir, 4% lamivudine), no significant change in qHBsAg levels occured with time. However, 19% of patients on long-term NA had sustained qHBsAg < 2 log10 IU/mL.

CONCLUSION

qHBsAg titers were associated with CHB phase and remained stable in those on long-term NA. A significant number of treated patients had low-level qHBsAg, of which some may be eligible for treatment discontinuation without risk of flare.

Quantification of serum hepatitis B core antibody to predict off-entecavir relapse in patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The predictors of off-therapy response in patients treated with neucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) have not been elucidated. It remained unexplored whether serum level of hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) at the end of NA therapy was associated with relapse risks.

METHODS

This prospective study monitored 82 chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients after discontinuing entecavir. All patients had been treated for 3 years or longer and serologically negative for viral DNA and HBeAg at treatment cessation. Patients were monitored for virological relapse (viral DNA > 2000 IU/mL), and clinical relapse (serum alanine aminotransferase > 80 U/L plus virological relapse). The association between anti-HBc levels and the risk of relapse was assessed by the Cox analysis.

RESULTS

Clinical and virological relapses occurred in 29 and 60 participants, respectively, with the cumulative incidences of 23.7% (95% CI, 15.8-34.6%) and 62.0% (95% CI, 51.5-72.5%) at 1 year, and 36.2% (95% CI, 26.2-48.4%) and 78.8% (95% CI, 68.2-87.8%) at 2 years, respectively. There was a trend for an inverse association between anti-HBc and clinical relapse (crude hazard ratio [HR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.24-1.05). All 3 patients with the level <100 IU/mL had a rapid clinical relapse (P = 0.002). This trend remained after adjustment for HBsAg and age (adjusted HR 0.50, 95% CI, 0.24-1.03). On the other hand, anti-HBc quantity was unrelated to virological relapse (crude HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.58-1.62; adjusted HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.58-1.60).

CONCLUSION

This pilot study suggests a trend for an inverse association between anti-HBc levels and clinical relapse in CHB patients off entecavir.

Time-varying serum gradient of hepatitis B surface antigen predicts risk of relapses after off-NA therapy

Background

The serum gradient of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) varies over time after cessation of nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The association between the time-varying HBsAg serum gradient and risk of relapse has not been elucidated.

Methods

This multicenter cohort study prospectively enrolled CHB patients who discontinued 3 year-NA treatment. Eligible patients were serologically negative for HBeAg and viral DNA at NA cessation. The participants (n = 140) were followed every 3 months through HBsAg quantification. Virological and clinical relapses were defined as viral DNA levels >2000 IU/mL and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels >80 U/mL, respectively. The association of time-varying HBsAg levels with relapses was assessed through a time-dependent Cox analysis.

Results

During a median follow-up of 19.9 (interquartile range [IQR], 10.6–25.3) months, virological and clinical relapses occurred in 94 and 49 patients, with a 2-year cumulative incidence of 79.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70.9%–86.4%) and 42.9% (95% CI, 34.1%–52.8%), respectively. The serum level of HBsAg was associated with virological (P < 0.001) and clinical (P = 0.01) relapses in a dose–response manner, with adjusted hazard ratios of 2.10 (95% CI, 1.45–3.04) and 2.32 (95% CI, 1.28–4.21). Among the patients (n = 19) whose HBsAg levels ever dropped below 10 IU/mL, only one and three patients subsequently developed clinical and virological relapses.

Conclusion

The serum gradient of HBsAg measured throughout the off-therapy observation is associated with the subsequent occurrence of virological and clinical relapses in CHB patients who discontinue NA treatment.

Tenofovir alafenamide as compared to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in the management of chronic hepatitis B with recent trends in patient demographics

Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) has recently been approved for chronic hepatitis B (CHB). It is more stable than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in the plasma and can provide similar efficacy with lower circulating concentration in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Areas covered: This synopsis will review the current anti-HBV standard practice and the changing epidemiology of CHB, specifically the controversies surrounding the renal and bone safety associated with TDF use in the context of an aging CHB population. We will review data from phase 3 registration trials, which demonstrated TAF was not inferior to TDF in antiviral efficacy for both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients, while associated with less reduction in the estimated glomerular filtration rate and bone mineral density. Expert commentary: Current data supports the use of TAF as one of the first-line antiviral agents for general CHB patients without hepatic decompensation. However, more real-world data with long-term observation are needed to better define the role of TAF among other oral regimens. Additional studies are also needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TAF in special populations such as those with impaired hepatic function, existing impaired renal and/or bone function, and in pregnant women.

Serum viral load at the virological relapse predicts subsequent clinical flares in chronic hepatitis B patients off entecavir therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Therapeutic duration of nucleos(t)ide analogues for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is not indefinite in many parts of the world. Viral reactivation is common off therapy, but the risk of subsequent clinical outcome remains unclear and unpredictable. We aimed to quantify the incidence of and explore the predictors for clinical flare following virological relapse in CHB patients who discontinue entecavir therapy.

METHODS

This multicenter cohort study prospectively monitored 133 CHB patients who were HBeAg-negative and viral DNA-undetectable when discontinuing entecavir after at least 3 years on therapy. Following virological relapse (viral DNA >2,000 IU/mL) that occurred in 92 patients, the incidences of subsequent clinical flare and persistent (unremittent for 3 months) or severe hepatitis (with jaundice or coagulopathy) were determined, and risk factors were explored. Patients did not resume antiviral therapy until occurrence of persistent or severe hepatitis.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of clinical hepatitis 2 years after virological relapse was 61.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.9-72.3%) and that of persistent or severe hepatitis was 53.0% (95% CI, 40.9-66.2%). Serum viral load at the virological relapse was associated with both clinical hepatitis (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.31 per log IU/mL; 95% CI, 1.07-1.60) and persistent or severe hepatitis (adjusted HR, 1.63 per log IU/mL; 95% CI, 1.27-2.10), after adjustment for serum aminotransferase and alfa-fetoprotein levels in the multivariate analysis. Viral DNA >100 000 IU/mL predicted a nearly inevitable occurrence of clinical flare (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

A high viral load at the virological relapse predicts subsequent clinical hepatitis in CHB patients who discontinue entecavir.

What is new on HBsAg and other diagnostic markers in HBV infection?

Challenges in the management of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection involve the prediction of the natural course to identify patients who require antiviral therapy and the prediction of functional cure as ultimate goal of antiviral therapy. HBV DNA as marker for viral replication is important but not sufficient for an adequate management of patients with chronic HBV infection. Data on the quantification of additional HBV marker such as hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg) and hepatitis B virus RNA (HBV RNA) have accumulated in recent years. Here we review the current evidence how to use these markers and discuss open issues that require additional research.

Elimination of Hepatitis B: Is It a Mission Possible?

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a global public health issue. Although the disease cannot be cured effectively, disease management has been improved over the past decade. The introduction of potent nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) to suppress viral replication represented a giant leap in the control of this disease. It has been shown that tenofovir treatment, a potent NA, complements current immunoprophylaxis to diminish mother-to-infant transmission in pregnant women with a high viral load. For patients with chronic HBV infection, quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen is a useful tool to define inactive carriers and to guide antiviral therapy. Quantification of HBV mutants is also useful in predicting long-term outcomes more precisely than ever. The next challenge is how to achieve an HBV cure; although immunotherapy is a promising strategy, the current results from two clinical trials using therapeutic vaccines to induce HBV-specific immune response in patients with chronic HBV infection are disappointing. In the coming years, we are expecting to see a combination of therapeutic agents with various modes of action to complete the mission of HBV elimination.

Recent advances in treatment of chronic hepatitis B with entecavir

Entecavir (ETV) is a potent hepatitis B virus inhibitor with a high barrier to resistance, and it has been recommended as one of the first-line drugs for treating chronic hepatitis B (CHB) by guidelines from several international and national societies. This paper reviews the recent advances in the treatment of CHB with ETV, in terms of treatment adherence, efficacy in the treatment of various kinds of patients with CHB, management of patients with partial virological response, viral resistance or treatment failure to ETV, treatment cessation, sequential or combination therapy with ETV and pegylated interferon, as well as the surveillance of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection-2017

Since the registration of the first effective nucleoside analogue against the hepatitis B virus almost two decades ago, major progress has been made in the management of chronic hepatitis B infection. However, hepatitis B-related morbidity and mortality remain a major global health threat. This is partly due to the escalating costs and the decrease in compliance related to the need for prolonged therapy for most patients who cannot be "cured". New biomarkers such as quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen might help to determine if hepatitis B e antigen negative patients can be taken off nucleos(t)ide analogues. On the other hand, novel compounds that target the viral life cycle or modulate host immune response are in the pipeline. In the next few years, one should expect breakthrough advancement to be made leading to a "cure" for patients with chronic hepatitis B infection by inducing hepatitis surface antigen loss with or without the development of the hepatitis B surface antibody. In addition, attention and necessary actions should also be taken in patients with hepatitis B infection who are being treated with immunosuppressive therapy and direct anti-viral (DAAs) agents for hepatitis C infection to prevent hepatitis from hepatitis B reactivation.