Comparison of Treatment Response among GLB and non-GLB Street Living Youth

Psychotherapy is not just for Rich White People: Outcomes for Clients from Minoritized Backgrounds and in a Community Training Clinic

Although dose-response and similar psychotherapy outcome studies have been plentiful in recent years, most assume a one-size-fits-all approach. They often rely on homogeneous populations, which usually means wealthy, Eurocentric groups. Although financial hardship, race, ethnicity, and sexual minoritized status are associated with significantly worse mental health outcomes, these samples remain underrepresented in psychotherapy research. Previous research on the contributions of these demographic factors has produced mixed results. Understanding whether these factors impact psychotherapy outcomes will help to advance the inclusivity of psychotherapy research and provide guidance on how to better tailor treatments to meet the needs of the wider population. We examined the impact of financial hardship, race/ethnicity, and sexual minoritized status on baseline symptoms, and changes in symptoms during the course of psychotherapy using multilevel growth models. At a community-based graduate training clinic, 137 adult clients (18-81 years old, 39.4% clients of color, 21.9% LGBTQ +) completed weekly anxiety and depression symptom measures. Clients of color and clients endorsing high financial hardship reported significantly more severe anxiety symptoms at baseline than those without financial hardship. Clients with moderate or high financial hardship reported significantly greater depression symptoms at baseline. There were no other significant differences in symptom trajectories based on financial hardship, race/ethnicity, and sexual minoritized status. Consistent with the literature, those reporting financial hardship were more likely to enter psychotherapy with more severe symptoms than those without these characteristics; however, these clients benefitted from psychotherapy in a similar way.

Psychosocial Strengths and Resilience Among Sexual and Gender Minority Youth Experiencing Homelessness: A Scoping Review

Youth (ages 13-25) who identify as sexual and gender minorities (SGMs) are at elevated risk for becoming homeless and for worsening psychosocial and physical health while experiencing homelessness. Although the risks for this group are clear, relatively little is known about the internal assets and external resources that foster resilience. In this scoping review, we synthesized existing research on SGM youth experiencing homelessness using the Resilience Portfolio model. We searched PsycINFO, PubMed, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, and Social Science Citation Index, locating 41 empirical articles on psychosocial strengths and resilience among this population. Through a careful data extraction process, we identified strengths across all three Resilience Portfolio domains. Important regulatory strengths for SGM youth experiencing homelessness included psychological endurance, self-efficacy, and psychological acceptance. Among interpersonal strengths, the most widely endorsed source of social support was identity-affirming "chosen families." Informal informational networks and tailored comprehensive services were key resources among youth's broader social ecologies. Youth cultivated meaning by expressing authentic identities, maintaining hope, resisting oppression, and defining their own beliefs. Overall, the existing research base primarily consists of small qualitative studies. Existing quantitative studies suffered from several methodological limitations, such as cross-sectional analyses and poor measurement of resilience. We discuss several implications for future research, particularly a need for larger-scale, longitudinal studies measuring multiple strengths and their associations with resilient outcomes. We also make recommendations for practice and policy, including youth-serving programs, child welfare system reform, and broader socioeconomic changes needed to end homelessness.

Understanding Homelessness Among Young People to Improve Outcomes

In the United States, an estimated 4.2 million young people experience homelessness during critical stages in their development-adolescence and emerging adulthood. While research on youth homelessness often emphasizes risk and vulnerability, the field must situate these issues within the developmental trajectories of adolescence and emerging adulthood to effectively prevent and end youth homelessness. This review uses the Risk Amplification and Abatement Model (RAAM) as a conceptual framework for contextualizing the landscape of youth homelessness research in the United States since 2010. An extension of ecological models of risk-taking, RAAM emphasizes both risk and resilience, positing that negative as well as positive socialization processes across interactions with family, peers, social services, and formal institutions affect key housing, health, and behavioral outcomes for youth experiencing homelessness. This review applies RAAM to our understanding of the causes and consequences of youth homelessness, recent interventions, and recommendations for future directions.

Sexual minority disparities in psychosocial functioning following substance use recovery among a representative sample of US adults

Purpose

Sexual minority (SM; e.g., gay, lesbian, bisexual) individuals are disproportionately impacted by alcohol and other drug (AOD) use disorders and psychosocial factors that can exacerbate AOD use disorders and hinder recovery. This study examines SM sub-group differences (monosexual [gay/lesbian] versus bisexual) regarding adaptation to recovery measured by indices of psychosocial functioning. Identifying differential needs of gay/lesbian versus bisexual individuals could improve services to better meet the needs of SM individuals in recovery.

Methods

Using data from the National Recovery Study, a nationally representative cross-sectional sample of US adults who reported resolving an AOD problem (N = 2,002), we compared heterosexual to monosexual and bisexual SM individuals on socio-demographic characteristics, AOD use and treatment, and psychosocial variables.

Results

Bisexual individuals were significantly younger than heterosexual individuals (p = .002 and p ≤ 0.001 among men and women, respectively) and reported significantly fewer years since AOD problem resolution compared to heterosexual individuals (p = .004 and p = .003 among men and women, respectively). Most notably, bisexual individuals, but not gay/lesbian individuals, reported significantly lower quality of life (QOL), happiness, self-esteem, and significantly higher distress compared to heterosexual individuals.

Conclusion

Bisexual, but not monosexual, SM individuals in recovery from an AOD use disorder, were younger and reported worse psychosocial functioning than heterosexual individuals. Findings highlight significant differences between monosexual versus bisexual identified individuals with a notable disadvantage experienced by bisexual individuals. More needs to be learned about the challenges faced by bisexual individuals in recovery to better address their needs and support long-term AOD recovery.

Sociodemographic and Behavioral Risk Correlates of PrEP Interest and Use Among Young Adults Experiencing Homelessness in Los Angeles

Young adults experiencing homelessness (YAEH) are at elevated risk for HIV compared to their stably housed peers. Preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective at preventing HIV infection, yet YAEH have been largely overlooked in PrEP efforts to date despite YAEH reporting high overall interest in PrEP. We assessed individual, social, and structural variables associated with PrEP interest and use among a sample of 195 YAEH (ages 18-25) recruited from drop-in centers across Los Angeles County who met criteria for HIV risk. In the current sample, though most had heard of PrEP (81.0%), the majority were not interested in taking PrEP (68.2%) and only a minority had used/were using PrEP (11.8%). YAEH who identified as sexual and/or gender minority, reported knowing someone who had used PrEP, or recently accessed sexual health services were more likely to have used and/or reported interest in using PrEP. Those who reported more episodes of heavy drinking were less likely to report having used PrEP. Suggestions are provided for better integrating PrEP-related services into existing behavioral and health service programs for YAEH, as well as leveraging peers and fostering positive social norms to reduce PrEP-related stigma and increase interest and use of PrEP among YAEH.

Mental healthcare for young and adolescent LGBTQ+ individuals in the Indian subcontinent

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a significant change in the way healthcare is dispensed. During the pandemic, healthcare inequities were experienced by various sections of society, based on gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. The LGBTQ individuals were also affected by this inequity. There is a lack of information on this topic especially in the developing countries. Hence this issue requires further exploration and understanding. Previous literature briefly explored the mental, physical, and emotional turmoil faced by the LGBTQ community on a regular basis. They feared rejection by family and friends, bullying, physical assault, and religious biases. These issues prevented them from publicly speaking about their sexual orientation thereby making it difficult to collect reliable data. Although they require medical and psychological treatment, they are afraid to ask for help and access healthcare and mental health services. Being mindful of these difficulties, this article explores the various underlying causes of the mental health problems faced by LGBTQ individuals, especially, in the Indian subcontinent. The article also examines the status of healthcare services available to Indian sexual minorities and provides recommendations about possible remedial measures to ensure the well-being of LGBTQ individuals.

Group mindful self-compassion training to improve mental health outcomes for LGBTQIA+ young adults: Rationale and protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Young adults who are lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer or questioning, intersex, asexual and other diverse genders and sexualities (LGBTQIA+) are more likely to experience mental health difficulties and are at significantly elevated risk of substance abuse, self-harm and suicide, relative to their heterosexual, endosex and cisgender peers. There is a need for effective mental health interventions for LGBTQIA+ young adults. Mindful Self-Compassion training is a promising approach; among LGBTQIA+ individuals, self-compassion accounts for more variation in mental health outcomes than bullying, victimization, and adverse childhood experiences combined. Furthermore, LGBTQIA+ individuals with high self-compassion report more positive identity and happiness, less self-stigma, and lower suicidality than those with low self-compassion.

METHOD

This paper outlines the rationale and protocol for a single-blind CONSORT-compliant randomised controlled trial, comparing group Mindful Self-Compassion to a delayed-treatment waitlist control group, for improving mental health, decreasing self-criticism and increasing self-compassion in LGBTQIA+ young adults (age 18-25 years). Mindful Self-Compassion training is an 8-week group program that focuses on cultivating self-compassion and mindfulness. While typically delivered as a face-to-face program, the proposed trial will investigate efficacy of the program when provided via videoconferencing.

DISCUSSION

Videoconference Mindful Self-Compassion training has the potential to improve the mental health of Australian LGBTQIA+ young adults and provide a possible cost-effective, scalable intervention for this population. The proposed trial will be the first to determine its efficacy for LGBTQIA+ young adults and will provide the first data on the delivery of the program via videoconferencing.

Sexual orientation and substance use treatment outcomes across five clinical trials of contingency management

Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals have elevated rates of substance use disorders and present to treatment with more severe substance use problems. Despite this health disparity, recent reviews highlight the paucity of studies reporting sexual orientation in substance use research (e.g., Flentje, Bacca, & Cochran, 2015). Using data from 5 clinical trials of contingency management (CM), the current study investigated the impact of sexual orientation on 3 substance use outcomes: treatment retention, longest duration of abstinence, and percent negative samples submitted. Participants (N = 912; mean age = 36.6 years; 51.1% female; 45% African American, 42.2% Caucasian) were randomized to standard care in community-based intensive outpatient treatment (IOP) or the same plus CM. Patients identifying as LGB made up 10.6% of the sample. A significant proportion identified as bisexual (8.2% of the total sample). Regardless of sexual orientation, participants receiving CM achieved better treatment outcomes than those receiving IOP alone. There were no statistically significant differences between LGB and heterosexual participants in their response to IOP in general, and CM specifically, across all 3 treatment outcomes (ps > .05). However, equivalence testing revealed that outcomes were not statistically equivalent for LGB and heterosexual participants, with the exception of percentage of negative samples, which was equivalent within the CM group only. Differences in treatment response to CM and standard community-based IOP do not reach the level of statistical significance; however, in most cases, we cannot conclude that treatment response is equivalent for LGB and heterosexual individuals. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

The scientific pursuit of sexual and gender minority mental health treatments: Toward evidence-based affirmative practice

The time has arrived for psychological science to translate the accumulating empirical research regarding sexual and gender minority (SGM) mental health into evidence-based affirmative treatments for this population. Far from the unscientific, homophobic theories of the early 20th century, several recent efforts in psychological science are starting to pave the way for evidence-based SGM-affirmative mental health treatments. These efforts include (a) identifying clear treatment targets for SGM, (b) conducting treatment studies that test the efficacy of therapy for SGM populations, (c) increased reporting of sexual orientation and gender diversity in existing randomized controlled trials conducted with the general population, and (d) reducing stigma itself, which has heretofore impeded the resources necessary to produce scientific evidence about SGM-affirmative treatments. This article reviews this progress and outlines future research directions needed to advance evidence-based practice for SGM, including determining whether and how existing evidence-based treatments need to be adapted to address SGM-specific concerns, why SGM-affirmative treatments work, and for whom and under what conditions SGM-affirmative treatments work best. A program of research is described that attempts to address these questions through randomized controlled trials with strong comparison conditions, psychotherapy process research of current SGM-affirmative practice, and tests of treatment moderators. To the extent that the mental health profession continues to pursue these solutions, it can ensure the continued flourishing of this population, whose visibility and vibrancy likely represent the surest route toward improving public acceptance and therefore its future mental health. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).

Interventions in individuals with specific needs

With the growing understanding of substance use problems among special populations like women, gender minority groups, as well as in the geriatric population, there is a drive to develop sensitive interventions catering to their unique needs. This chapter is a short review of psycho-social interventions targeted towards these individuals with specific needs.

Risk Factors for Homelessness Among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Youths: A Developmental Milestone Approach

Lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) youths are over-represented in the homeless population. To examine why some LGB youths become homeless, this report compares homeless and non-homeless LGB youths. Of the 156 LGB youths, 48% reported ever being homeless (i.e., running away or being evicted from home). Results indicate that sexual orientation awareness and the initiation of sexual behavior occurred earlier in homeless than in non-homeless LGB youths and predated the first homeless episode. Substance use was more frequent and first occurred at an earlier age in homeless as compared to non-homeless LGB youths; however, substance use occurred subsequent to first homelessness. Childhood sexual abuse was associated with homelessness; and, early sexual orientation development was related to homelessness among youths without a history of sexual abuse. Findings suggest that interventions should help youths cope with their unfolding sexual orientation and work to prevent or address the consequences of sexual abuse.