Preoperative Frailty Evaluation: A Promising Risk-stratification Tool in Older Adults Undergoing General Surgery

Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes in patients ≥ 75 years old: an NSQIP analysis of 4343 patients

BACKGROUND

The benefits of MIS in older adults are conflicting. This study evaluates demographics and early outcomes, for older patients (≥75) undergoing minimally invasive (MIS) versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).

METHOD

We categorized elderly patients who underwent PD from 2017 to 2021 NSQIP databases by surgical approach (open vs MIS). Baseline characteristics were examined with bivariate analysis, and multivariate logistic regression assessed the independent effect of minimally invasive surgery on 30-day serious complications and mortality.

RESULTS

Amongst 4137 patients, 150 (3.63 %) underwent MIS PD. Patients demographics were similar. Open cohorts were older (79.1 vs 78.4 years; p = 0.011) with greater tumor invasion (36.6 % vs. 27.0 %; p = 0.018). MIS had longer operations (133.1 vs 119.6 min; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that MIS approach was associated with increased serious complications (OR 2.21; p < 0.001), but not mortality (OR 2.11; p = 0.173). Post hoc analysis excluding cases converted to open demonstrated no difference in serious complications (OR 1.94; p = 0.070) or mortality (OR 3.58; p = 0.094). PSM analysis estimated a 14.7 % higher rate of serious complications in MIS but similar mortality (p = 0.291).

CONCLUSIONS

MIS PD uptake in elderly patients remains limited, with early findings indicating longer operations and higher complications. Further research on patient selection differences, technique modifications, and center expertise is required.

The concept of dynamic frailty: an exploratory study of the trajectory to postoperative mortality

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a heightened vulnerability to stress due to decreased physical and mental abilities. Preoperative frailty has been associated with poorer outcomes. However, frailty is not static, and those patients who eventually die appear to become more frail. Our hypothesis is in-patient, postoperative changes in frailty after major operations predicts the trajectory to postoperative discharge alive or in-hospital mortality.

STUDY DESIGN

The accumulating deficit model of frailty was used. Data from the medical records of patients who have undergone major operations were used to determine the mFI preoperatively, postoperative day 1, and day before discharge or death. Of the 1063 patients who met inclusion criteria, 50 patients with in-hospital postoperative death and 50 patients discharged alive were randomly selected.

RESULTS

Patients in the in-hospital mortality group had significantly greater median preoperative mFI scores than those in the discharged alive (0.178 vs. 0.115 p = 0.00009). This significant difference was present on postoperative day 1, while also increasing in margin (0.240 vs. 0.143, p < 0.00001). Median Pre-Post mFI differences were also significant between the two groups, with operations leading to in-hospital mortality experiencing a greater increase in mFI (0.06 vs. 0.01 p = 0.00019), and the day before death or discharge (0.276 vs. 0.014, p < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative mFI is a useful predictor of postoperative mortality. Moreover, worsening mFI score as early as day 1 and continued worsening scores throughout hospitalization are associated with a postoperative trajectory toward mortality. Recognition of worsening frailty may be helpful in identifying patients in need of early intervention.

Association between Braden Scale and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage: analysis of the MIMIC-IV database

The Braden Scale (BS) is a routine nursing measure used to predict the risk of pressure ulcer events; recent studies suggest its use as a tool for identifying frailty. However, it remains unclear whether the BS holds prognostic value for patients with severe non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). In this retrospective study, participants from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database were categorized into two groups based on their Braden Scale (BS) scores: the high-risk group (BS ≤ 15) and the low-risk group (BS > 15). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 3 months. A Cox proportional hazards model was constructed to examine the association between BS and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. A restricted cubic spline model was employed to assess the relationship between BS and outcomes. A total of 750 patients were included in the study, with 43% being male. The mortality rates at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year were 21%, 25%, and 29%, respectively. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis revealed that the Braden Scale (BS) was independently associated with the risk of death at 1 month (HR, 2.84 [1.26-2.81], P=0.002 ), 3 months (HR, 2.84 [1.73-4.66], P<  0.001), and 1 year (HR, 1.65 [1.15-2.38], P = 0.006). The restricted cubic spline regression model showed that the risk of death at 3 months increased linearly with decreasing BS scores. The BS is significantly associated with all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with non-traumatic SAH. This finding suggests that the BS may be useful in identifying non-traumatic SAH patients at higher risk of all-cause mortality.

The effect of comprehensive geriatric assessment on treatment decisions, supportive care received, and postoperative outcomes in older adults with cancer undergoing surgery: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Surgery is an essential part of cancer treatment, particularly for localised solid tumours. Geriatric assessments (GA) with tailored interventions or comprehensive GA (CGA) can identify frailty factors and needs of older adults with cancer, assisting treatment decisions and care strategies to reduce postoperative complications. This systematic review summarises the effects of GA/CGA compared to usual care for older adults with cancer intended for surgery: their impact on treatment decisions, supportive care interventions, postoperative complications, survival, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PubMed (January 2000-October 2022) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies with a comparison group on the effects of GA/CGA in older adults with cancer (≥65 years) intended for surgery. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Due to heterogeneity in study designs and reporting, a meta-analysis was not possible; results are narratively described.

RESULTS

From 12,440 citations, 312 were selected for full-text review. Thirteen studies reporting on 12 trials were included for analysis: four RCTs and eight cohort studies with comparison groups (three prospective, five retrospective). RCTs ranged in sample size (122-475; mean 249), with variability in who performed GA/CGA, disciplines involved, and team integration. Primary outcomes included impact of GA/CGA on postoperative delirium (two studies), Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade II-V postoperative complications (one study), hospital length of stay (one study), and a composite criterion including mortality, functional impairment, and weight loss (one study). All RCTs scored high for risk of bias due to underpowering for their primary outcome; none met their primary endpoint. After adjustment for prespecified factors in secondary analyses, one RCT found GA/CGA significantly reduced the odds of postoperative complications (CD grade I-V) (adjusted-OR: 0.33, 95 %CI: 0.11-0.95; p = 0.05) due to fewer grade I-II complications. One RCT reported no significant difference between groups in HRQOL: intervention patients reported less pain at discharge, but this difference disappeared at three-month follow-up.

DISCUSSION

Well-powered, high-quality trials are needed to determine the impact of GA/CGA on optimising surgical treatment decisions, supportive care and postoperative outcomes for older adults with cancer.

Frailty screening in older patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery: Comparative study of seven screening instruments

BACKGROUND

Frailty screening instruments are increasingly studied as risk predictors for adverse postoperative outcomes. However, because of the lack of comparative research, it is unclear which screening instrument performs best. This study therefore compared the diagnostic accuracy of seven frailty screening instruments for adverse postoperative outcomes in patients aged ≥70 years undergoing colorectal surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study at an academic hospital, examining the Fried and Robinson frailty criteria, the Edmonton Frail Scale, the Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale, the Modified Frailty Index, the FRAIL questionnaire, and the Geriatric 8 for predicting postoperative complications with a Clavien-Dindo (CD) severity grade ≥2. Secondary outcomes were complications with CD severity grade ≥3, prolonged length of stay, increased care level after discharge, and functional decline in basic or instrumental activities of daily living up to 1 month after surgery.

RESULTS

The study included 172 consecutive patients. Positive frailty screening ranged from 13.4% to 73.8%. CD≥2 complications were present in 37.8% of patients. At the original cutoffs, most instruments had a high specificity (76.7%-92.4%) at the expense of sensitivity (21.5%-38.5%) with a moderate negative predictive value (NPV) for predicting CD≥2 complications. The Geriatric 8 showed the opposite pattern (sensitivity 81.5%-specificity 30.8%) and a high NPV. Diagnostic accuracy was moderate for all screening instruments, since the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve did not exceed 0.61 across instruments. Altering the cutoff scores did not yield sufficient improvement. Comparable results were found for the secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparing the predictive value of the screening instruments showed that frailty screening cannot be used in isolation as risk predictor for adverse postoperative outcomes. Further research should focus on a two-step approach in which additional diagnosis of frailty by means of comprehensive geriatric assessment is included in the prediction model.

The utility of the 5-Item frailty index in assessing the risk of complications and mortality following surgical management of non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage

The modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5), an index of reduced physiological reserve, has risen as a predictor of complications following surgical procedures. We examined the association of mFI-5 and surgical outcomes following the management of nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (nSAH). We queried the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for patients who received surgical management of nSAH between 2006 and 2021. We computed the mFI-5 by granting a point for each of 1) congestive heart failure, 2) hypertension requiring medications, 3) diabetes, 4) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or pneumonia within 30 days before surgery, and 5) dependent functional status. Our 30-day endpoints were minor complications (Clavien-Dindo: 1 & 2), major complications (Clavien-Dindo: 3 & 4), and mortality. Using the Chi-squared test, we compared baseline patient demographics and comorbidities between patients with a mFI-5 ≥ 2, patients with a mFI-5 = 1, and non-frail patients. Then, we fitted a multivariable logistic regression adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, operative time, and frailty status. The cohort included 1,139 patients, of which 33.7 % were men and 2.9 % had a bleeding diathesis. After adjusting for covariates, mFI-5 ≥ 2 was independently associated with minor complications (1.93, 95 %CI: 1.31-2.84, p = 0.001), major complications (aOR: 1.62, 95 %CI: 1.10-2.37, p = 0.015), and mortality (aOR: 2.90, 95 %CI: 1.66-5.08, p = 0.003). The mFI-5 can be independently used by surgeons for risk stratification and postoperative planning.

Evaluating a digital prehabilitation tool in patients with colorectal surgery: protocol for a multisite randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality in the USA and occurs most frequently in older adults. These patients are at increased risk of adverse outcomes following major cancer surgery. While prehabilitation has been shown to mitigate this risk, multiple barriers to implementation remain. Our team created a digital tool co-designed with older adults that employs an algorithm to assess patient-specific geriatric vulnerabilities and generate personalised prehabilitation programmes before surgery.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We have designed a multisite, unblinded randomised trial to be completed at three high-volume academic cancer centres located in California or Texas. Our study population is individuals aged 65 and older with planned colorectal cancer resection who are proficient in English and have home internet access. We aim to enroll 132 patients who will be randomised in a 2:1 ratio to receive the intervention (assistance from a home health coach and access to the web application (web app)) or control (usual care with written prehabilitation materials). Our primary outcome is patient engagement with prehabilitation activities.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

A properly executed, written, informed consent will be obtained from each subject prior to entering the subject into the trial. Information will be given in both oral and written form, and subjects may withdraw at any time from the study without effect on their medical care. The protocol and consent form have been approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of each participating centre. We anticipate publication of results in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05520866.

Nursing Intervention Based on the Interactive Attainment Model

This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of nursing that was based on the interactive attainment model in alleviating anxiety and pain during colonoscopy. This retrospective study included 213 patients, divided into intervention and control groups. Both groups underwent normal or painless colonoscopy. Anxiety and pain were evaluated using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), respectively. The intervention group reported significantly lower anxiety and VAS pain scores compared with the control group. The interactive attainment model of nursing effectively reduces patient anxiety and pain and lowers complication rates in patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Prevalence of physical frailty and its associated factors among elderly patients undergoing hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery in China

Frailty is a geriatric syndrome characterized by a multisystem physiological decline, increased vulnerability to stressors, and adverse clinical outcomes. However, there is a knowledge gap regarding the association between frailty and its influencing factors. This study aimed to understand the current status of preoperative frailty in elderly patients with hepatobiliary pancreatic disease (HBP) and analyze debilitation-related factors. We enrolled 220 participants aged ≥ 65 years who underwent HBP surgery at two hospitals in China between December 2023 and February 2024. The physical frailty of elderly participants in communities with different characteristics was compared using Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the factors influencing preoperative frailty. A total of 212 patients were included in the analysis based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with an overall prevalence of frailty at 53 (25%). Ordinal logistic regression analysis results showed that current smoking (odds ratio [OR] = 2.584, p = 0.006) was an independent risk factor for preoperative frailty in elderly participants with HBP. In contrast, exercise habits (OR = 0.323, p < 0.001), two or more multimorbidity statuses (OR = 0.495, p = 0.033), and independent status (OR = 0.216, p < 0.001) were protective factors. Our results suggest that having good exercise habits, not smoking, and independent status can prevent frailty progression in older adults who require HBP surgery. Interventions for frail elderly patients should be supported preoperatively by strengthening exercises to improve tolerance to surgery.

Clinical Impact of Sarcopenia in the Decision-Making Process for Patients with Acute Diverticulitis

Background: Acute diverticulitis (AD), an inflammatory complication of diverticulosis, affects around 4% of individuals with diverticulosis, with increased incidence in older populations. This study aims to assess the impact of sarcopenia, the age-related loss of muscle mass, on the clinical decision-making and outcomes of patients with AD. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 237 patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) between January 2014 and February 2022. Patients diagnosed with AD Hinchey ≥ 2 via contrasted tomography (CT) were included. Sarcopenia was assessed using CT scans at the third lumbar vertebra (L3), with skeletal muscle area (SMA) normalized by height to calculate the skeletal muscle index (SMI). Patients were divided into two groups based on sarcopenia status and analysed for surgical outcomes, non-operative management (NOM) success, and complications. Results: The prevalence of sarcopenia was 46%. Sarcopenic patients were significantly older and had lower BMI and higher frailty scores. A higher proportion of sarcopenic patients underwent Hartmann, while non-sarcopenic patients more often had anastomosis. Sarcopenia did not significantly affect overall morbidity, mortality, or the failure rate of NOM. However, sarcopenic patients with a BMI > 25 had a higher likelihood of requiring redo surgeries. Conclusions: Sarcopenia plays a critical role in the surgical management of AD but does not predict worse clinical outcomes. The decision to perform surgery, particularly Hartmann's procedure, is influenced by sarcopenia, yet morbidity and mortality rates are comparable between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients. These findings highlight the need for sarcopenia to be considered in preoperative assessments.

Influence of preoperative comprehensive education on anxiety, depression, pain, and sleep in elderly patients operated under general anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Owing to the particularities of their physical characteristics, older patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia experience great surgical traumas. Thus, exploring more refined and individualized nursing approaches is an urgent need to mitigate the negative effects of surgery on such patients.

AIM

To analyze the influence of preoperative comprehensive education on anxiety, depression, pain, and sleep in older patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia.

METHODS

In total, 163 older adults who underwent surgery under general anesthesia between June 2022 and November 2023 were selected, 77 of them received routine nursing care (control group), and 86 received preoperative comprehensive education (research group). Subsequently, comparative analyses were performed from the following perspectives: Surgical indicators (operation time, time to complete regain of consciousness, and temperature immediately after the procedure and upon recovery from anesthesia) before and after nursing care; negative emotions [self-rating anxiety scale (SAS)/self-rating depression scale (SDS)]; pain severity [visual analog scale (VAS)]; sleep quality [Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI)]; incidence of sleep disturbances (difficulties in falling asleep for the first time, falling asleep again after waking up frequently at night, falling asleep again after waking up early, and falling asleep all night); and incidence of adverse events (airway obstruction, catheter detachment, aspiration, and asphyxia).

RESULTS

The research group had significantly lower operation time and time to complete regain of consciousness than the control group after nursing care and markedly better recovery of postoperative body temperature and body temperature at awakening. In addition, more notable decreases in SAS, SDS, VAS, and PSQI scores were observed in the research group than in the control group. Furthermore, the incidence rate of sleep disturbance (8.14% vs 29.87%) and adverse events (4.65% vs 19.48%) were lower in the research group than in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative comprehensive education in older patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia can improve postoperative indicators, effectively reduce the occurrence of anxiety and depression, alleviate postoperative pain, and improve sleep quality.

Comparison of a Risk Calculator With Frailty Indices in Patients Undergoing Lung Cancer Resection

INTRODUCTION

While frailty has gained attention for its utility in risk stratification, no studies have directly compared them to existing risk calculators. The objective of this study was to compare the risk stratification of the American College of Surgeons Surgical Risk Calculator (ACS-SRC), the Revised Risk Analysis Index (RAI-rev), and the Modified Frailty Index (5-mFI). The primary outcomes were 30-day postoperative morbidity, 30-day postoperative mortality, unplanned readmission, unplanned reoperation, and discharge disposition other than home.

METHODS

Patients undergoing anatomic lung resection for primary, nonsmall cell lung cancer were identified within the ACS National Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. Tools were compared for discrimination in the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

9663 patients undergoing anatomic lung resection for cancer between 2012 and 2014 were included. The cohort was 53.1% female. Median age at diagnosis was 67 (IQR 59-74) years. Perioperative morbidity and mortality rates were 10.9% (n = 1048) and 1.6% (n = 158). Rates of 30-day postoperative unplanned readmission and reoperation were 7.5% (n = 725) and 4.8% (n = 468). The ACS-SRC had the highest discrimination for all measured outcomes, as measured by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and corresponding confidence interval (95% CI). This included perioperative mortality (AUC 0.74, 95% CI 0.71-0.78), compared to RAI-rev (AUC 0.66, 95% CI 0.62-0.69) and 5-mFI (AUC 0.61, 95% CI 0.57-0.65; p < 0.001). The RAI-rev and 5-mFI had similar discrimination for all measured outcomes.

CONCLUSION

ACS-SRC was the perioperative risk stratification tool with the highest predictive discrimination for adverse, 30-day, postoperative events for patients with cancer treated with anatomic lung resection.

Comparison of a risk calculator with frailty indices in patients undergoing lung cancer resection

INTRODUCTION

Perioperative risk stratification is an essential component of preoperative planning for cancer surgery. While frailty has gained attention for its utility in risk stratification, no studies have directly compared it to existing risk calculators. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the risk stratification of the American College of Surgeons Surgical Risk Calculator (ACS-SRC), the Revised Risk Analysis Index (RAI-rev), and the Modified Frailty Index (5-mFI). The primary outcomes were 30-day postoperative morbidity, 30-day postoperative mortality, unplanned readmission, unplanned reoperation, and discharge disposition other-than-home.

METHODS

Patients undergoing anatomic lung resection for primary, non-small cell lung cancer were identified within the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database. The ACS-SRC, RAI-rev, and 5-mFI tools were used to predict adverse postoperative events. Tools were compared for discrimination in the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

9663 patients undergoing anatomic lung resection for cancer between 2012 and 2014 were included. The cohort was 53.1% female. Median age at diagnosis was 67 (interquartile range = 59-74) years. Cardiothoracic surgeons performed 89% and general surgeons performed 11.0% of the operations. Perioperative morbidity and mortality rates were 10.9% (n = 1048) and 1.6% (n = 158). Rates of 30-day postoperative unplanned readmission and reoperation were 7.5% (n = 725) and 4.8% (n = 468). The ACS-SRC had the highest discrimination for all measured outcomes, as measured by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and corresponding confidence interval (95% confidence interval [CI]). This included perioperative mortality (AUC = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.71-0.78), compared to RAI-rev (AUC = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.62-0.69) and 5-mFI (AUC = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.57-0.65; p < 0.001). The RAI-rev and 5-mFI had similar discrimination for all measured outcomes.

CONCLUSION

ACS-SRC was the perioperative risk stratification tool with the highest predictive discrimination for adverse, 30-day, postoperative events for patients with cancer treated with anatomic lung resection.

Comprehensive Peri-Operative Risk Assessment and Management of Geriatric Patients

Background: As the population ages, the prevalence of surgical interventions in individuals aged 65+ continues to increase. This poses unique challenges due to the higher incidence of comorbidities, polypharmacy, and frailty in the elderly population, which result in high peri-operative risks. Traditional preoperative risk assessment tools often fail to accurately predict post-operative outcomes in the elderly, overlooking the complex interplay of factors that contribute to risk in the elderly. Methods: A literature review was conducted, focusing on the predictive value of CGA for postoperative prognosis and the implementation of perioperative interventions. Results: Evidence shows that CGA is a superior predictive tool compared to traditional models, as it more accurately identifies elderly patients at higher risk of complications such as postoperative delirium, infections, and prolonged hospital stays. CGA includes assessments of frailty, sarcopenia, nutritional status, cognitive function, mental health, and functional status, which are crucial in predicting post-operative outcomes. Studies demonstrate that CGA can also guide personalized perioperative care, including nutritional support, physical training, and mental health interventions, leading to improved surgical outcomes and reduced functional decline. Conclusions: The CGA provides a more holistic approach to perioperative risk assessment in elderly patients, addressing the limitations of traditional tools. CGA can help guide surgical decisions (e.g., curative or palliative) and select the profiles of patients that will benefit from perioperative interventions to improve their prognosis and prevent functional decline.

Predictors of Morbidity, Mortality, and Hospital Utilization Among Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography-related Hospitalizations: A Five-year Nationwide Assessment

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the hospital frailty risk score on the inpatient mortality, morbidity, and health care resource utilization among endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related hospitalizations.

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the inpatient mortality, morbidity, and health care resource utilization of ERCP among frail individuals remain limited.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we compared the odds of inpatient mortality and morbidity of ERCP-related hospitalizations among individuals with low frailty scores, intermediate frailty scores (IFSs), and high frailty scores (HFSs).

RESULTS

Overall, 776,025 ERCP-related hospitalizations were recorded from 2016 to 2020. 552,045 had a low frailty score, whereas 217,875 had an IFS, and 6105 had an HFS. Frail individuals had a 5-fold increase in mortality [IFS: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 4.81, 95% CI: 3.77-6.14; HFS: aOR = 4.62, 95% CI: 2.48-8.63]. An IFS was associated with a 24% increase in post-ERCP pancreatitis (aOR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.11-1.41), a 3-fold increase in post-ERCP bleeding (aOR = 2.59, 95% CI: 1.82-3.67), and a 2-fold increase in post-ERCP duct perforation (aOR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.38-2.64). Frail individuals experienced higher odds of in-hospital morbidity, including secondary sepsis, respiratory failure, acute kidney injury, cerebrovascular accidents, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, our study presents strong evidence in support of using the hospital frailty risk score as an index to predict mortality and morbidity during ERCP-related hospitalizations. Additional caution is warranted in the management of frail individuals undergoing ERCP.

Modified 5-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5) may predict postoperative outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic Cancer

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) primarily affects older individuals with diminished physiological reserves. The Modified 5-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5) is a novel risk stratification tool proposed to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to validate the mFI-5 for predicting surgical outcomes in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for PDAC.

METHODS

Our retrospective PDAC database included patients who underwent PD between 2014 and 2023. Patients were stratified by mFI-5 scores (0 best - 5 worst), which assess preoperative CHF, diabetes mellitus, history of COPD or pneumonia, functional health status, and hypertension requiring medication. Associations between mFI-5 scores and outcomes, including postoperative complications and mortality, were analyzed using logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

RESULTS

Among 250 PDAC patients undergoing PD, 142 (56.8%) had mFI-5 scores ≤ 1, and 25 (10%) had scores ≥ 3. No patients had scores > 4. Higher mFI-5 scores correlated with older age (p < 0.001) and tobacco use (p = 0.036). Multivariate analysis identified age (RR 1.02, p = 0.038), ASA class (ASA III; RR 2.61, p < 0.001; ASA IV; RR 2.63, p = 0.026), and moderate alcohol consumption (RR 0.56, p = 0.038) as frailty predictors. An mFI-5 score > 2 independently associated with higher mortality (HR 2.08, p = 0.026). Median overall survival was significantly lower for patients with mFI-5 scores > 2 than for those with scores ≤ 2 (21.3 vs. 42.1 months, p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

The mFI-5 is a valuable tool for predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in PDAC patients undergoing PD. Integrating frailty assessment into preoperative evaluations can enhance patient selection and surgical outcomes. Future research should focus on incorporating frailty assessments into surgical planning and patient management to improve outcomes in this vulnerable population.

Preoperative frailty and postoperative complications after non-cardiac surgery: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Many tools have been used to assess frailty in the perioperative setting. However, no single scale has been shown to be the most effective in predicting postoperative complications. We evaluated the relationship between several frailty scales and the occurrence of complications following different non-cardiac surgeries.

METHODS

This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023473401). The search strategy included PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase, covering manuscripts published from January 2000 to July 2023. We included prospective and retrospective studies that evaluated frailty using specific scales and tracked patients postoperatively. Studies on cardiac, neurosurgical, and thoracic surgery were excluded because of the impact of underlying diseases on patients' functional status. Narrative reviews, conference abstracts, and articles lacking a comprehensive definition of frailty were excluded.

RESULTS

Of the 2204 articles identified, 145 were included in the review: 7 on non-cardiac surgery, 36 on general and digestive surgery, 19 on urology, 22 on vascular surgery, 36 on spinal surgery, and 25 on orthopedic/trauma surgery. The reviewed manuscripts confirmed that various frailty scales had been used to predict postoperative complications, mortality, and hospital stay across these surgical disciplines.

CONCLUSION

Despite differences among surgical populations, preoperative frailty assessment consistently predicts postoperative outcomes in non-cardiac surgeries.

The impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment on postoperative outcomes in elderly surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The elderly population experiences more postoperative complications. A comprehensive geriatric assessment, which is multidimensional and coordinated, could help reduce these unfavorable outcomes. However, its effectiveness is still uncertain.

METHODS

We searched multiple online databases, including Medline, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAL, ProQuest, and Wiley, for relevant literature from their inception to October 2023. We included randomized trials of individuals aged 65 and older undergoing surgery. These trials compared comprehensive geriatric assessment with usual surgical care and reported on postoperative outcomes. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the certainty of evidence from the identified articles. We conducted a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 to calculate the Odds Ratio (OR) and Mean Difference (MD) of the pooled data.

RESULTS

The study included 1325 individuals from seven randomized trials. Comprehensive geriatric assessment reduced the rate of postoperative delirium (28.5% vs. 37.0%; OR: 0.63; CI: 0.47-0.85; I2: 54%; P = 0.003) based on pooled data. However, it did not significantly improve other parameters such as length of stay (MD: -0.36; 95% CI: -0.376, 3.05; I2: 96%; P = 0.84), readmission rate (18.6% vs. 15.4%; OR: 1.26; CI: 0.86-1.84; I2: 0%; P = 0.24), and ADL function (MD: -0.24; 95% CI: -1.27, 0.19; I2: 0%; P = 0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

Apart from reducing delirium, it is still unclear whether comprehensive geriatric assessment improves other postoperative outcomes. More evidence from higher-quality randomized trials is needed.

Impact of frailty on postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The impact of frailty on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing hepatectomy is still unclear.

AIM

To study the influence of frailty on postoperative outcomes, such as mortality, rate of complications, and length of hospitalization, following hepatectomy.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched for observational studies with adult (≥ 18 years) patients after planned/elective hepatectomy. A random-effects model was used for all analyses, and the results are expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD), relative risk (RR), or hazards ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Analysis of the 13 included studies showed a significant association of frailty with elevated risk of in-hospital mortality (RR = 2.76, 95%CI: 2.10-3.64), mortality at 30 d (RR = 4.60, 95%CI: 1.85-11.40), and mortality at 90 d (RR = 2.52, 95%CI: 1.70-3.75) in the postoperative period. Frail patients had a poorer long-term survival (HR = 2.89, 95%CI: 1.84-4.53) and higher incidence of "any" complications (RR = 1.69, 95%CI: 1.40-2.03) and major (grade III or higher on the Clavien-Dindo scale) complications (RR = 2.69, 95%CI: 1.85-3.92). Frailty was correlated with markedly lengthier hospital stay (WMD = 3.65, 95%CI: 1.45-5.85).

CONCLUSION

Frailty correlates with elevated risks of mortality, complications, and prolonged hospitalization, which need to be considered in surgical management. Further research is essential to formulate strategies for improved outcomes in this vulnerable cohort.

Impact of frailty on perioperative outcomes following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in older persons: evidence from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample

To evaluate the impact of frailty on perioperative outcomes of older patients undergoing PCNL, utilizing the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Data of hospitalized patients ≥ 60 years who received PCNL were extracted from the 2010 to 2020 NIS database, and included demographics, clinical, and hospital-related information. Patients were assigned to low (< 5), medium (5-15), and high frailty risk (> 15) groups based on the hospital frailty risk score (HFRS). Associations between frailty risk and perioperative outcomes including total hospital cost were determined using population-weighted linear and logistic regression analyses. Data of 30,829 hospitalized patients were analyzed (mean age 72.5 years; 55% male; 78% white). Multivariable analyses revealed that compared to low frailty risk, increased frailty risk was significantly associated with elevated in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 10.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.38-18.62), higher incidence of unfavorable discharge (aOR = 5.09, 95% CI: 4.43-5.86), prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS; aOR = 7.67, 95% CI: 6.38-9.22), increased transfusion risk (aOR = 8.05, 95% CI: 6.55-9.90), increased total hospital costs (adjusted Beta = 37.61, 95% CI: 36.39-38.83), and greater risk of complications (aOR = 8.52, 95% CI: 7.69-9.45). Frailty is a significant prognostic indicator of adverse perioperative outcomes in older patients undergoing PCNL, underscoring importance of recognizing and managing frailty in older patients.

Factors associated with one-year mortality after curative surgery for primary clinical T4 and locally recurrent rectal cancer in elderly patients

INTRODUCTION

Despite advancements in colorectal cancer care, one-year post-operative mortality rates remain high for elderly patients who have undergone curative surgery for primary clinical T4 rectal cancer (cT4RC) or locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). This study aimed to identify factors associated with one-year mortality and to evaluate the causes of death.

MATERIALS & METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients aged ≥70 years who underwent surgery with curative intent for cT4RC or LRRC between January 2013 and December 2020. Clinical and follow-up data were collected and analyzed to determine survival rates and investigate factors associated with mortality within one year after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 183 patients (94 cT4RC, 89 LRRC) were included. One-year mortality rates were 16.0% for cT4RC and 28.1% for LRRC (P = 0.064). In cT4RC patients, factors associated with one-year mortality were preoperative anemia (OR 3.83, P = 0.032), total pelvic exenteration (TPE) (OR 7.18, P = 0.018), multivisceral resections (OR 5.73, P = 0.028), pulmonary complications (OR 13.31, P < 0.001) and Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications (OR 5.19, P = 0.025). In LRRC patients, factors associated with one-year mortality were TPE (OR 27.00, P = 0.008), the need for supported care after discharge (OR 3.93, P = 0.041) and Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications (OR 3.95, P = 0.006). The main causes of death in cT4RC and LRRC patients were failure to recover (cT4RC 26.6%, LRRC 28.0%) and disease recurrence (cT4RC 26.6%, LRRC 60.0%).

CONCLUSION

In order to tailor treatment in elderly with cT4RC and LRRC, factors associated with increased one-year mortality (e.g. pre-operative anemia, TPE) should be incorporated in the decision-making process.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

The significance of G8 and other geriatric assessments in urologic cancer management: A comprehensive review

In urologic oncology, which often involves older patients, it is important to consider how to manage their care appropriately. Geriatric assessment (GA) is a method that can address the specific needs of older cancer patients. The GA encompasses various assessment domains, but these domains exhibit variations across the literature. Some of the common items include functional ability, nutrition, comorbidities, cognitive ability, psychosocial disorders, polypharmacy, social and financial support, falls/imbalance, and vision/hearing. Despite the diversity of domains, there is limited consensus on reliable measurement methods. This review discusses the role of GA in managing urologic cancer in unique scenarios, such as those necessitating temporary or permanent urinary catheters or stomas due to urinary diversion. A comprehensive GA is time and human-resource-intensive in real-world clinical practice. Hence, simpler tools such as the Geriatric-8 (G8), capable of identifying high-risk patients requiring a detailed GA, are also under investigation in various contexts. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review on the G8. Our findings indicate that patients with low G8 scores encounter difficulties with stoma self-care after urinary diversion and have higher risks of urinary tract infections and ileus after radical cystectomy. The utilization of G8 as a screening tool for urologic cancer patients may facilitate the delivery of appropriate and personalized treatment and care.

Comparison of frailty indexes as predictors of clinical outcomes after major thoracic surgery

Background

Despite greater appreciation for the importance of frailty in surgical patients, due to improved understanding that frailty is often linked to poor outcomes, the optimal method of assessment remains unknown. In this study, we sought to evaluate the prevalence of frailty in patients considered for elective thoracic surgery and to test the ability of several frailty measurements to predict postoperative outcomes.

Methods

Patients included were candidates for major elective thoracic surgery. Preoperative assessment of frailty included the Fried frailty phenotype, the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS), the modified frailty index (mFI), the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and additional components of frailty. Outcome data include days with chest drain, length of hospital stay, and postoperative adverse events.

Results

According to the Fried frailty phenotype, 53% of 94 patients included were prefrail or frail. A significant association between frailty and postoperative complications was found (odds ratio 7.65; P=0.001). No association between CFS, mFI, EFS, and complications was observed. The Frailty Phenotype seemed the most accurate in predicting postoperative complications, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.77. Twenty-seven percent of patients meet the criteria for depression according to the Geriatric Depression Scale and they showed a higher risk of postoperative complications (OR 2.47; P=0.03). A lower psoas muscle index was associated with a higher risk of complications (OR 3.40; P=0.04).

Conclusions

According to our results, the Fried frailty phenotype seems the most accurate tool to test frailty in patients undergoing thoracic resections. Surgeons should be aware that, although these aspects are not routinely tested, they are potential targets to improve clinical outcomes. Studies on additional interventions specifically targeting frail people in the setting of elective thoracic surgery are required.

The risk analysis index is an independent predictor of outcomes after lung cancer resection

BACKGROUND

The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) is a frailty assessment tool based on an accumulation of deficits model. We mapped RAI to data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Database to determine whether RAI correlates with postoperative outcomes following lung cancer resection.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

This was a national database retrospective observational study based on data from the STS Database. Study patients underwent surgery 2018 to 2020. RAI was divided into four increasing risk categories. The associations between RAI and each of postoperative complications and administrative outcomes were examined using logistic regression models. We also compared the performance of RAI to established risk indices (American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI)) using areas under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC). Results: Of 29,420 candidate patients identified in the STS Database, RAI could be calculated for 22,848 (78%). Almost all outcome categories exhibited a progressive increase in marginal probability as RAI increased. On multivariable analyses, RAI was significantly associated with an incremental pattern with almost all outcomes. ROC analyses for RAI demonstrated "good" AUC values for mortality (0.785; 0.748) and discharge location (0.791), but only "fair" values for all other outcome categories (0.618 to 0.690). RAI performed similarly to ASA and CCI in terms of AUC score categories.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

RAI is associated with clinical and administrative outcomes following lung cancer resection. However, its overall accuracy as a surgical risk predictor is only moderate and similar to ASA and CCI. We do not recommend routine use of RAI for assessment of individual patient risk for major lung resection.

[Prevalence of frailty in a population aged 70 and older who pay a visit to health center and its detection in primary care]

INTRODUCTION

The detection of frailty in the elderly is key to preventing disability. The main objective of this study is to find out the proportion of frail people in subjects aged 70 and over who attend a health center in A Coruña (Spain).

METHODS

Cross-sectional study, carried out from August 2020 to April 2021. Consecutive selection of patients ≥70 years, with Barthel ≥90, who accessed the health center.

DEPENDENT VARIABLES

Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), Get Up and Go (TUG) and Gait Speed (MV); independent: gender, age, number of falls in the last year, number of drugs used chronically, and Charlson index.

RESULTS

The sample was 114 people. The proportion of frail people is 16.7% (95% CI 10.94-24.57) with the SPPB, 28.6% in those aged 80 and over; and 36.8% using VM. The risk of frailty increases by at least 4.1% for each year of age after 70. Being a woman multiplies the risk by at least 1.5. The concordance between frailty according to the SPPB and MV is 46.8% (95% CI 30.85-62.77).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of frailty in independent people for basic ADL who attend a health center is at least 10.94%. Both the SPPB and the MV are feasible and useful methods in primary care.

Preoperative diagnosis of frailty

The aging world population obliges physicians to establish measures to optimize and estimate the outcomes of increasingly frail patients. Thus, in the last few years there has been an increase in the application of frailty indices. Multiple scales have emerged that can be applied in the perioperative setting. Each one has demonstrated some utility, either by way of establishing postoperative prognosis or as a method for the clinical optimization of patient care. Anaesthesiologists are offered a wide choice of scales, the characteristics and appropriate management of which they are often unaware. This narrative review aims to clarify the concept of frailty, describe its importance in the perioperative setting and evaluate the different scales that are most applicable to the perioperative setting. It will also establish paths for the future optimization of patient care.

Frailty as a predictor of postoperative outcomes in neurosurgery: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Baseline frailty status has been utilized to predict a wide range of outcomes and guide preoperative decision making in neurosurgery. This systematic review aims to analyze existing literature on the utilization of frailty as a predictor of neurosurgical outcomes.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines. Studies that utilized baseline frailty status to predict outcomes after a neurosurgical intervention were included in this systematic review. Studies that utilized sarcopenia as the sole measure of frailty were excluded. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library was searched from inception to March 1st, 2023, to identify relevant articles.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Overall, 244 studies met the inclusion criteria. The 11-factor modified frailty index (mFI-11) was the most utilized frailty measure (N.=91, 37.2%) followed by the five-factor modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) (N.=80, 32.7%). Spine surgery was the most common subspecialty (N.=131, 53.7%), followed by intracranial tumor resection (N.=57, 23.3%), and post-operative complications were the most reported outcome (N.=130, 53.2%) in neurosurgical frailty studies. The USA and the Bowers author group published the greatest number of articles within the study period (N.=176, 72.1% and N.=37, 15.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty literature has grown exponentially over the years and has been incorporated into neurosurgical decision making. Although a wide range of frailty indices exist, their utility may vary according to their ability to be incorporated in the outpatient clinical setting.

Treatment Options for Early Stage Inoperable Breast Cancer: Cryoablation or Radiotherapy?

Background

Surgical removal of the tumour is the gold standard treatment for early stage invasive breast cancer. However, with a global ageing population, a larger number of diagnoses are occurring in women with comorbidities that render them unsuitable for surgery. Hence, it is of interest to explore alternative treatment strategies for this group of women.

Summary

Our narrative review aims to explore two such techniques, cryoablation and external beam radiotherapy, providing a brief summary of the evidence behind each technique. Following this, we discuss which groups of patients would gain the most benefit from each technique. Factors favouring the use of radiotherapy include patients with larger tumours, more superficial tumours, and those with less well-demarcated tumours where there is uncertainty regarding tumour extent. Meanwhile, patients who may benefit more from cryoablation include those who desire a smaller number of treatment sessions, have concerns regarding cosmesis and skin pigmentation, or who have relative contraindications to radiotherapy such as scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematosus, reduced lung function, or cardiac comorbidities.

Key Messages

Continued advancements in both cryoablation and radiotherapy technologies are taking place, in tandem with imaging technologies enabling greater certainty in tumour detection and delineation. These factors will help increase local control rates in this group of non-operable early stage breast cancer patients. Through this review, we hope to aid in the clinical decision-making process regarding the selection and referral of patients for each treatment.

Relation between frailty and adverse outcomes in elderly patients with gastric cancer: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Playing an exemplary role, frailty have crucial effect on the preoperative evaluation of elderly patients. Previous studies have shown that frailty is associated with complications and mortality in patients with gastric cancer (GC). However, with the development of the concept of "patient-centered", the range of health-related outcomes is broad. The differences in relation between frailty and various adverse outcomes will be further explored.

METHOD

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan Fang, and Chinese Biomedical Literature databases were searched for keywords, including frailty (such as frail) and gastric cancer (such as stomach neoplasms or stomach cancer or gastrectomy or gastric surgery). The search period is until August 2023. The included studies were observational or cohort studies with postoperative related adverse outcomes as primary or secondary outcome measures. Valid assessment tools were used. The Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-sectional Studies was used to assess methodological quality in the included literature.

RESULT

Fifteen studies were included, including 4 cross-sectional studies, 8 retrospective cohort studies, and 3 prospective cohort studies. Among them, 6 studies were rated as "Good" and 9 studies were rated as "Fair," indicating that the quality of the literature was high. Then, 10 frailty assessment tools were summarized and classified into two broad categories in accordance with frailty models. Results of the included studies indicated that frailty in elderly patients with GC was associated with postoperative complications, mortality, hospital days, readmissions, quality of life, non-home discharge, and admission to the intensive care unit.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review concludes that high levels of preoperative frailty increase the risk of adverse outcomes in elderly patients with GC. Frailty will be widely used in the future clinical evaluation of elderly gastric cancer patients, precise risk stratification should be implemented for patients, and frailty management should be implemented well to reduce the occurrence of adverse treatment outcomes.

A new risk calculation model for complications of hepatectomy in adults over 75

BACKGROUND

Owing to poor organ function reserve, older adults have a high risk of postoperative complications. However, there is no well-established system for assessing the risk of complications after hepatectomy in older adults.

METHODS

This study aimed to design a risk assessment tool to predict the risk of complications after hepatectomy in adults older than 75 years. A total of 326 patients were identified. A logistic regression equation was used to create the Risk Assessment System of Hepatectomy in Adults (RASHA) for the prediction of complications (Clavien‒Dindo classification ≥ II).

RESULTS

Multivariate correlation analysis revealed that comorbidity (≥ 5 kinds of disease or < 5 kinds of disease, odds ratio [OR] = 5.552, P < 0.001), fatigue (yes or no, OR = 4.630, P = 0.009), Child‒Pugh (B or A, OR = 4.211, P = 0.004), number of liver segments to be removed (≥ 3 or ≤ 2, OR = 4.101, P = 0.001), and adjacent organ resection (yes or no, OR = 1.523, P = 0.010) were independent risk factors for postoperative complications after hepatectomy in older persons (aged ≥ 75 years). A binomial logistic regression model was established to evaluate the RASHA score (including the RASHA scale and RASHA formula). The area under the curve (AUC) for the RASHA scale was 0.916, and the cut-off value was 12.5. The AUC for the RASHA formula was 0.801, and the cut-off value was 0.2106.

CONCLUSION

RASHA can be used to effectively predict the postoperative complications of hepatectomy through perioperative variables in adults older than 75 years.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Research Registry: researchregistry8531. https://www.researchregistry.com/browse-the-registry#home/registrationdetails/63901824ae49230021a5a0cf/ .

Association between frailty and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing craniotomy-systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND

Frailty in patients undergoing craniotomy may affect perioperative outcomes. There have been a number of studies published in this field; however, evidence is yet to be summarized in a quantitative review format. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the effects of frailty on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing craniotomy surgery.

METHODS

Our eligibility criteria included adult patients undergoing open cranial surgery. We searched MEDLINE via Ovid SP, EMBASE via Ovid SP, Cochrane Library, and grey literature. We included retrospective and prospective observational studies. Our primary outcome was a composite of complications as per the Clavien-Dindo classification system. We utilized a random-effects model of meta-analysis. We conducted three preplanned subgroup analyses: patients undergoing cranial surgery for tumor surgery only, patients undergoing non-tumor surgery, and patients older than 65 undergoing cranial surgery. We explored sources of heterogeneity through a sensitivity analysis and post hoc analysis.

RESULTS

In this review of 63,159 patients, the pooled prevalence of frailty was 46%. The odds ratio of any Clavien-Dindo grade 1-4 complication developing in frail patients compared to non-frail patients was 2.01 [1.90-2.14], with no identifiable heterogeneity and a moderate level of evidence. As per GradePro evidence grading methods, there was low-quality evidence for patients being discharged to a location other than home, length of stay, and increased mortality in frail patients.

CONCLUSION

Increased frailty was associated with increased odds of any Clavien-Dindo 1-4 complication. Frailty measurements may be used as an integral component of risk-assessment strategies to improve the quality and value of neurosurgical care for patients undergoing craniotomy surgery.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Formal ethical approval is not needed, as primary data were not collected.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO identification number: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=405240.

Impact of frailty on complications and length of stay after minimally invasive adrenalectomy surgery

BACKGROUND

Adrenal disease requiring surgery incidence increases with age, and minimally invasive adrenalectomy procedures have improved the safety of adrenal surgery. This study evaluates the perioperative outcomes of elective adrenalectomies when performed in older patients and how frailty affects such outcomes.

METHODS

Patients undergoing elective minimally invasive adrenalectomy were identified using the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Targeted File years 2005 to 2020. The surgical indication was categorized as a benign disease, an endocrine disorder, or a malignant disease. Frailty was defined using the 5-item modified frailty index. Multivariable regressions were used to model the relationship of age and frailty with surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

In 8,693 minimally invasive adrenalectomy patients, 5,281 (61%) were female, 5,026 (58%) were White, and 1,924 (22%) were aged 65 years or older. Surgical indications were benign disease 5,487 (63%), endocrinopathy 2,850 (33%), and malignancy 356 (4%). Patients aged <65 years (compared to those aged ≥65) were more likely to have a 5-item modified frailty index = 0 (26% vs 14%, respectively) and less likely to have a 5-item modified frailty index = ≥3 (2% vs 4%, respectively; P < .001).

OUTCOMES

30-day mortality 20 (0.2%), complications 459 (5%), return to operating room 73 (0.8%), and median length of stay 2 days. Thirty-day mortality was associated with a 5-item modified frailty index ≥3 (P = .009) and endocrine disease (P = .005) but not with age. Complications were associated with a 5-item modified frailty index ≥2 (≤P < .001) and malignant disease (P = .002), but not with age.

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive adrenalectomy has low 30-day mortality and complication rates that increase with frailty and not age. Frailty is a better predictor than the age of most adverse outcomes after elective minimally invasive adrenalectomy.

Administrative coding of frailty: Its association with clinical outcomes and resource use in kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Although not formalized into current risk assessment models, frailty has been associated with negative postoperative outcomes in many specialties. However, national analyses of the association between frailty and post-transplant outcomes following kidney transplantation (KT) are lacking.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of adults undergoing KT from 2016 to 2020 in the Nationwide Readmissions Databases. Frailty was defined using the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty indicator.

RESULTS

Of an estimated 95 765 patients undergoing KT during the study period, 4918 (5.1%) were frail. After risk adjustment, frail patients were associated with significantly higher odds of in-hospital mortality (AOR 2.17, 95% CI: 1.33-3.57) compared to their non-frail counterparts. Our findings indicate that frail patients had an average increase in postoperative hospital stay of 1.44 days, a $2300 increase in hospitalization costs, as well as higher odds of developing a major perioperative complication as compared to their non-frail counterparts. Frailty was also associated with greater adjusted risk of non-home discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty, as identified by administrative coding, is independently associated with worse surgical outcomes, including increased mortality and resource use, in adults undergoing KT. Given the already limited donor organ pool, novel efforts are needed to ensure adequate optimization and timely post-transplantation care of the growing frail cohort undergoing KT.

The role of geriatric nutritional risk index as a predictor for postoperative outcomes in gastrointestinal emergencies

BACKGROUND

The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) is a simple nutritional and inflammatory marker for older adults. The aim of the present study was to investigate the usefulness of the GNRI in older adults who underwent emergency gastrointestinal surgery.

METHODS

This study included 206 older adults who had undergone emergency gastrointestinal surgery. We retrospectively investigated the relationship between the GNRI and postoperative complications. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate risk factors for postoperative complications. We then evaluated the association between GNRI and clinical variables among older adults undergoing emergency gastrointestinal surgery.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, all complications occurred in 89 (43%) older adults, infectious in 53 (26%), and non-infectious in 36 (17%). In the multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.016), GNRI (p = 0.012), operative severity (p = 0.003), and operation time (p = 0.003) were independent risk factors for all postoperative complications. While the GNRI (p = 0.049) was an independent risk factor for infectious complications, age (p = 0.035) and bleeding volume (p = 0.035) were independent risk factors for postoperative non-infectious complications. In the low GNRI group, age (p = 0.029), serum C-reactive protein levels (p < 0.001), and proportion of sarcopenia (p < 0.001) were significantly higher, and the length of hospital stay (p < 0.001) was significantly longer than that in the high GNRI group. In Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, the skeletal mass index and the GNRI had a positive correlation (r = 0.415 and p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The GNRI may be a predictor of postoperative infectious complications in older adults after emergency gastrointestinal surgery, suggesting the usefulness of the GNRI as a nutritional marker and sarcopenia-related parameter.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

No. 22-16.

Chart-Derived Frailty Index and 90-Day Mortality After Burn Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Frailty is a reduced physiological reserve condition associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. The chart-derived frailty index (CFI) can measure frailty using demographic and laboratory values. We evaluated the association of preoperative CFI with 90-d mortality after burn surgery.

METHODS

This large retrospective study included burn intensive care unit (ICU) patients between 2012 and 2021 and calculated CFI using the sum of the following five variables: age >70 y, body mass index <18.5 kg/m2, hematocrit <35%, albumin <3.4 g/dL, and creatinine >2.0 mg/dL; high CFI was a score of 3-5. Postoperative 90-d mortality rate, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), pneumonia, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) requirement, and prolonged ICU stay (>60 d) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 1118 patients, 147 (13.1%) had high CFI. High CFI patients had a higher 90-d mortality rate than did low CFI patients (38.8% versus 22.6%, P < 0.001). A high CFI was significantly associated with postoperative 90-d mortality (hazard ratio = 4.124, 95% confidence interval = 2.980-5.707, P < 0.001) in multivariate Cox regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly different postoperative 90-d mortality rates between patients with high and low CFIs (log-rank test, P < 0.001). Incidences of postoperative MACE, pneumonia, the need for CRRT, and prolonged ICU stay were significantly higher in patients with high CFIs than in those with low CFIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative high CFI was associated with increased 90-d mortality, MACE, pneumonia, CRRT requirement, and ICU stay following burn surgery.

Optimization of Care for the Elderly Surgical Emergency Patient

Geriatric patients undergoing emergency surgery are at significantly higher risk for complications and death when compared with younger patients. Optimizing care for these patients requires a multidisciplinary team, special attention to physiologic changes and medication use, as well as targeted intervention to mitigate complications such as delirium, which can worsen overall outcomes. Frailty can be assessed preoperatively to identify patients at the highest risk for complications. Shared decision-making with both the family and patient during the consent process is integral to defining patient's goals of care in these high-risk situations.

Diagnosis of frailty and implications on surgical process in the elderly: A narrative review

Longevity has increased the proportion of the elderly in the population, and as a result ageing has become the leading factor for diseases such as cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disorders. It also makes surgical procedures more complex with potential life-threatening complications. In order to further investigate the role of ageing in modern healthcare, the term 'frailty' has been proposed to describe a condition of reduced functional reserve that leads to an increased risk of adverse health outcomes. The aim of this study was to review the pathophysiology of frailty and to highlight the most important tools to diagnose it, and their ability to predict the postoperative outcome. There are two major conceptual models that provide guidance for the detection of frailty: the Fried Phenotype Model and the Cumulative Deficit Model. These two main models have provided a base from which the assessment of frailty has developed. Two frailty assessment tools, the modified frailty index and the simplified frailty index play a key role in the preoperative setting because of their predictive power for postoperative risk quantification. Assessments of independence and/or cognitive function represent the main components that an ideal frailty tool should have to identify elderly people who are at risk of postoperative functional and cognitive deterioration. Cognitive impairment undoubtedly has a high association with frailty, but cognitive status is not included in many frailty assessments. In this regard, comprehensive geriatric assessment is a more complete evaluation tool, and it should be used whenever a frailty tool screening gives a positive result. Finally, frailty assessment is useful to explore the cumulative effect of comorbidities on the ageing patients' functional reserves and to identify the appropriate level of in-hospital and postdischarge care.

Frailty and Adverse Outcomes After SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Elderly Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Cohort Study

Purpose

Frailty is an important geriatric syndrome associated with aging and adverse events, especially in patients with severe infection. To help guide prognosis for elderly patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) who experience acute infection, this study investigated whether baseline (pre-infection) frailty may be associated with adverse outcomes in elderly patients undergoing MHD who suffer SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection.

Patients and Methods

Patients (aged ≥60 y) receiving MHD had been assessed for overall frailty and the 5 frailty components based on the Fried Frailty Phenotype scale within 3 months prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Results

There were 59 and 98 patients in the frail and non-frail groups, respectively. Three months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, 21 (13.4%) and 45 (28.7%) patients had died or were in hospital. The multivariate COX proportional risk model suggested that the all-cause mortality rate in patients judged overall frail or with low activity was significantly higher compared with that of the non-frail (P = 0.049; 0.003). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that hospitalization 3 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with both overall frailty and low activity (OR 2.276, 95% CI: 1.034-5.010, P = 0.041; OR 2.809, 95% CI: 1.311-6.020, P = 0.008, respectively).

Conclusion

Overall frailty and specifically low activity were significantly associated with all-cause mortality and hospitalization in this elderly MHD population after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Early assessment of frailty and effective interventions are recommended to improve the prognosis of patients receiving MHD who are at higher risk of acute infection.

Efficacy of a modified FRAIL scale in predicting the peri-operative outcome of hepatectomy in older adults (aged ≥ 75 years): a model development study

BACKGROUND

The FRAIL scale for evaluating frailty consists of five items: fatigue, resistance, aerobic, illness, and loss of weight. However, it is difficult to obtain a specific weight loss value. Since the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT) is simple, accurate, and easy to perform, we replaced weight loss with the TUGT in the FRAIL scale, with the remaining four items unchanged, and named it the FRAIT scale. The aim of this study was to determine the value of the FRAIT scale in predicting the peri-operative outcome of hepatectomy.

METHODS

This model development study was conducted between January 2017 and December 2021. The reliability, validity and area under the curve (AUC) of the FRAIL/FRAIT scales were calculated. The frailty status of patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent hepatectomy was measured using the FRAIL/FRAIT scales. Logistic regression was used to compare the relationship between FRAIL/FRAIT scores/grades and perioperative outcomes.

RESULTS

The AUCs for predicting operation duration, intraoperative bleeding, complications, and death based on the FRAIL score were 0.692, 0.740, 0.709, and 0.733, respectively, and those based on the FRAIT score were 0.700, 0.745, 0.708, and 0.724, respectively. The AUCs for predicting operation duration, intraoperative bleeding, complications, and death based on the FRAIL grade were 0.693, 0.735, 0.695, and 0.755, respectively, and those based on the FRAIT grades were 0.700, 0.758, 0.699, and 0.750, respectively. The FRAIL score has three effective predictors (intraoperative bleeding, complications, and death), while the FRAIT score has four effective predictors (operation duration, intraoperative bleeding, complications, and death). The FRAIL grade has two effective predictors (intraoperative bleeding and death), while the FRAIT grade has three effective predictors (operation duration, intraoperative bleeding, and death).

CONCLUSIONS

This study describes a new and more effective tool for the assessment of preoperative frailty in older adults undergoing hepatectomy. The items of the FRAIT scale are easier to obtain than those of the FRAIL scale, and the predictive effect of the FRAIT scale is stronger than that of the FRAIL scale.

A systematic review of predictive accuracy via c-statistic of preoperative frailty tests for extended length of stay, post-operative complications, and mortality

Frailty, as an age-related syndrome of reduced physiological reserve, contributes significantly to post-operative outcomes. With the aging population, frailty poses a significant threat to patients and health systems. Since 2012, preoperative frailty assessment has been recommended, yet its implementation has been inhibited by the vast number of frailty tests and lack of consensus. Since the anesthesiologist is the best placed for perioperative care, an anesthesia-tailored preoperative frailty test must be simple, quick, universally applicable to all surgeries, accurate, and ideally available in an app or online form. This systematic review attempted to rank frailty tests by predictive accuracy using the c-statistic in the outcomes of extended length of stay, 3-month post-operative complications, and 3-month mortality, as well as feasibility outcomes including time to completion, equipment and training requirements, cost, and database compatibility. Presenting findings of all frailty tests as a future reference for anesthesiologists, Clinical Frailty Scale was found to have the best combination of accuracy and feasibility for mortality with speed of completion and phone app availability; Edmonton Frailty Scale had the best accuracy for post-operative complications with opportunity for self-reporting. Finally, extended length of stay had too little data for recommendation of a frailty test. This review also demonstrated the need for changing research emphasis from odds ratios to metrics that measure the accuracy of a test itself, such as the c-statistic.

Neuraxial anesthesia for abdominal surgery, beyond the pandemic: a feasibility pilot study of 70 patients in a suburban hospital

The aim of this study is to establish the feasibility of awake laparotomy under neuraxial anesthesia (NA) in a suburban hospital. A retrospective analysis of the results of a consecutive series of 70 patients undergoing awake abdominal surgery under NA at the Department of Surgery of our Hospital from February 11th, 2020 to October 20th, 2021 was conducted. The series includes 43 cases of urgent surgical care (2020) and 27 cases of elective abdominal surgery on frail patients (2021). Seventeen procedures (24.3%) required sedation to better control patient discomfort. Only in 4/70 (5.7%) cases, conversion to general anesthesia (GA) was necessary. Conversion to GA was not related to American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score or operative time. Only one of the four cases requiring conversion to GA was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) postoperatively. Fifteen patients (21.4%) required postoperative ICU support. A statistically non-significant association was observed between conversion to GA and postoperative ICU admission. The mortality rate was 8.5% (6 patients). Five out of six deaths occurred while in the ICU. All six were frail patients. None of these deaths was related to a complication of NA. Awake laparotomy under NA has confirmed its feasibility and safety in times of scarcity of resources and therapeutic restrictions, even in the most frail patients. We believe that this approach should be considered as an useful asset, especially for suburban hospitals.

The Risk Analysis Index Has Superior Discrimination Compared With the Modified Frailty Index-5 in Predicting Worse Postoperative Outcomes for the Octogenarian Neurosurgical Patient

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE

Healthcare systems continuously strive to improve quality and value of care. Advances in surgical technologies, enhanced perioperative surgical planning, and multidisciplinary care strategies are increasing the number of elective procedures in the geriatric population. However, frail older adults are still more likely to have poor postoperative outcomes. We examined the impact of frailty on postoperative outcomes, we compared the discriminative thresholds for the Risk Analysis Index (RAI), modified Frailty Index-5 (mFI-5), and increasing patient age.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

Octogenarian patients undergoing spine, cranial, and other procedures captured in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program between 2012 and 2020 were included. We used receiver operating characteristic curve to examine discriminative thresholds of RAI, mFI-5, and increasing patient age. Multivariable analyses were performed. Our primary outcomes were 30-day mortality, extended length of stay (eLOS [≥75th percentile]), and continued inpatient care >30 days (pLOS). Secondary outcomes were skilled care facility (skilled nursing facility [SNF]) discharges and readmissions.

DISCUSSION

In total, 20 710 octogenarians were included, with a mean age of 83 years (SD, 2.5) and a men (52.7%) and White (79.8%) majority. The RAI had higher predictive discriminative thresholds for 30-day mortality (C-statistic of 0.743), eLOS (C-statistic: 0.692), and pLOS (C-statistic: 0.697) compared with the mFI-5 (C-statistic: 0.574, 0.556, and 0.550, respectively), and increasing patient age (C-statistic: 0.577, 0.546, and 0.504, respectively), P < .001. On multivariable analyses, RAI showed a larger effect size with adverse postoperative outcomes by increasing frailty strata than mFI-5 and increasing patient age. Nonetheless RAI showed decreased risk for SNF discharges.

CONCLUSION

We found that RAI was a more accurate predictor than mFI-5 and increasing patient age for 30-day mortality, eLOS, and pLOS in octogenarian neurosurgery patients. More research is needed on RAI's performance in different specialized neurosurgical populations. Moreover, it is increasingly clear that comprehensive risk assessment strategies tailored to optimize perioperative care should be prioritized to potentially improve outcomes for this at-risk population.

Efficacy of breast reconstruction in elderly women (>60 years) using deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps: A comparative study

BACKGROUND

The indications for microsurgical breast reconstruction remain debated, particularly concerning the safety of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps in elderly women. Free tissue transfer still carries a risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. We conducted this comparative study to clarify this issue.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all unilateral DIEP breast reconstructions performed at a single institution. Patients were divided into two groups based on age: an elderly (60 years or older) and a non-elderly cohort (younger than 60 years). Demographic and comorbidity data were secondary predictor variables. The primary outcomes were complete flap loss, partial flap loss, and the need for flap re-exploration. The secondary outcomes included surgical site occurrences, such as wound healing-related complications, seroma, and others.

RESULTS

We included 214 flaps, 177 in the non-elderly and 37 in the elderly cohort. Elderly women had slightly higher comorbidity rates than those of non-elderly women, although these differences were not statistically significant. BMI was significantly lower in elderly women than in non-elderly women. The incidence of total or partial flap loss did not differ significantly between the two cohorts (2.7% vs 1.1%, p = 0.459% and 0.0% vs 5.1%, p = 0.161), nor did the flap re-exploration (8.1% vs 10.1%, p = 0.937). Similarly, postoperative complication rates did not differ significantly between the two groups (45.9% vs 61.8%, p = 0.074). On logistic regression, being elderly was not a risk factor for complete flap loss, nor for any complications. The overall success rate for the non-elderly cohort was 98.7%, whereas that for the elderly cohort was 97.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Microsurgical breast reconstruction using DIEP is safe in elderly patients, as it achieves outcomes and complications rates comparable to those observed in a younger population. Patients should not be denied DIEP flaps because of their age alone.

The five-item modified frailty index predicts long-term outcomes in elderly patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

Frailty has been globally recognized as a predictor of adverse postoperative outcomes. Frailty assessment using the five-factor modified frailty index (5-mFI) has recently gained traction; however, long-term outcomes are unknown in colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. This study aimed to investigate whether the 5-mFI predicted long-term survival and cause of death on the basis of frailty severity in elderly patients who underwent CRC surgery and to determine the risk factors for mortality.

METHODS

A total of 299 patients underwent CRC surgery with curative intent between January 2013 and December 2017. Patients were divided into three groups by the 5-mFI score: group 1 (5-mFI: 0 or 1; n = 164): no frailty; group 2 (5-mFI: 2; n = 91): moderate frailty; and group 3 (5-mFI: ≥ 3; n = 44): severe frailty. Clinicopathological variables, namely comorbidities, 5-mFI, prognostic nutrition index, operative/postoperative data, and outcome, including cause of death, were compared between the three groups. To identify factors associated with death from CRC- and non-CRC-related causes, univariate and multivariate analyses using a Cox regression model were performed.

RESULTS

The immediate postoperative morbidity of patients with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III complications (9.1%) in group 3 was not significantly different from that in group 1 (9.1%) or group 2 (14.3%); however, the 30-day mortality rate (4.5%) in group 3 was significantly higher. Long-term disease-free survival was similar between frailty groups, suggesting that CRC surgery provides oncological benefit to patients irrespective of frailty. The 5-year survival rates in groups 1, 2, and 3 were 83.5%, 71.2%, and 47.9%, respectively, showing a significantly lower survival rate as frailty advanced. Sixty percent of the deaths in frail patients were due to respiratory failure and cardiovascular diseases. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that advanced age, higher 5-mFI score, and longer postoperative hospital stay were risk factors for mortality unrelated to CRC. Multivariate analysis also revealed that advanced tumor stage, carcinoembryonic antigen ≥ 5 ng/ml, undifferentiated tumor, and R1 resection were risk factors for CRC-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5-mFI score can predict postoperative short- and long-term outcomes and risk factors for mortality unrelated to CRC. Additionally, long-term survival was negatively associated with the 5-mFI score.

The Burden of Streptococcus pneumoniae-Related Admissions and In-Hospital Mortality: A Retrospective Observational Study between the Years 2015 and 2022 from a Southern Italian Province

Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) has high worldwide incidence and related morbidity and mortality, particularly among children and geriatric patients. SP infection could manifest with pneumonia, bacteremia, sepsis, meningitis, and osteomyelitis. This was a retrospective study aimed at evaluating the incidence, comorbidities, and factors associated with in-hospital mortality of pneumococcal disease-related hospitalization in a province in southern Italy from the years 2015 to 2022. This study was performed in the Local Health Authority (LHA) of Pescara. Data were collected from hospital discharge records (HDRs): this database is composed of 288,110 discharge records from LHA Pescara's hospitals from 2015 to 2022. Streptococcus Pneumoniae-related hospitalizations were about 5% of the hospitalizations; 67% of these were without comorbidities; 21% were with one comorbidity; and 13% were with two or more comorbidities. Regarding mortality of SP infection, the most affected age group was older people, with the percentage of cases among the over-65s being more than 50% compared to the other age groups. HDRs represent a valid and useful epidemiological tool for evaluating the direct impact of pneumococcal disease on the population and also indirectly for evaluating the effectiveness of vaccination strategies and directing them.

A Novel Mobile App to Identify Patients With Multimorbidity in the Emergency Setting: Development of an App and Feasibility Trial

BACKGROUND

Multimorbidity is associated with an increased risk of poor surgical outcomes among older adults; however, identifying multimorbidity in the clinical setting can be a challenge.

OBJECTIVE

We created the Multimorbid Patient Identifier App (MMApp) to easily identify patients with multimorbidity identified by the presence of a Qualifying Comorbidity Set and tested its feasibility for use in future clinical research, validation, and eventually to guide clinical decision-making.

METHODS

We adapted the Qualifying Comorbidity Sets' claims-based definition of multimorbidity for clinical use through a modified Delphi approach and developed MMApp. A total of 10 residents input 5 hypothetical emergency general surgery patient scenarios, common among older adults, into the MMApp and examined MMApp test characteristics for a total of 50 trials. For MMApp, comorbidities selected for each scenario were recorded, along with the number of comorbidities correctly chosen, incorrectly chosen, and missed for each scenario. The sensitivity and specificity of identifying a patient as multimorbid using MMApp were calculated using composite data from all scenarios. To assess model feasibility, we compared the mean task completion by scenario to that of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator (ACS-NSQIP-SRC) using paired t tests. Usability and satisfaction with MMApp were assessed using an 18-item questionnaire administered immediately after completing all 5 scenarios.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the task completion time between the MMApp and the ACS-NSQIP-SRC for scenarios A (86.3 seconds vs 74.3 seconds, P=.85) or C (58.4 seconds vs 68.9 seconds,P=.064), MMapp took less time for scenarios B (76.1 seconds vs 87.4 seconds, P=.03) and E (20.7 seconds vs 73 seconds, P<.001), and more time for scenario D (78.8 seconds vs 58.5 seconds, P=.02). The MMApp identified multimorbidity with 96.7% (29/30) sensitivity and 95% (19/20) specificity. User feedback was positive regarding MMApp's usability, efficiency, and usefulness.

CONCLUSIONS

The MMApp identified multimorbidity with high sensitivity and specificity and did not require significantly more time to complete than a commonly used web-based risk-stratification tool for most scenarios. Mean user times were well under 2 minutes. Feedback was overall positive from residents regarding the usability and usefulness of this app, even in the emergency general surgery setting. It would be feasible to use MMApp to identify patients with multimorbidity in the emergency general surgery setting for validation, research, and eventual clinical use. This type of mobile app could serve as a template for other research teams to create a tool to easily screen participants for potential enrollment.

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors in axial chondroblastomas: a retrospective analysis of 61 cases and comparison with extra-axial chondroblastomas

BACKGROUND

A comprehensive understanding of the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors associated with axial chondroblastoma (ACB) is still lacking. This study aimed to understand the clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of axial chondroblastoma (ACB) and compare them with extra-axial chondroblastoma (EACB).

METHODS

A retrospective review of our institution's local database was conducted, encompassing a total of 132 CB patients, of which 61 were diagnosed with ACB and 71 with EACB. Immunohistochemistry was employed to evaluate the expression levels of vimentin, S100, and cytokeratin.

RESULTS

ACB and EACB shared similar characteristics, with the exception of advanced age, tumor size, elevated Vim expression, incidence of surrounding tissue invasion, and postoperative sensory or motor dysfunction. While wide resection and absence of surrounding tissue invasion consistently showed a favorable association with survival in both ACB and EACB cohorts during univariate analysis, most parameters exhibited differential prognostic significance between the two groups. Notably, the significant prognostic factors for local recurrence-free survival in the ACB cohort included the type of resection and the presence of chicken-wire calcification. In the multivariate analysis of overall survival, the type of resection emerged as a significant predictor in the ACB cohort, whereas in the EACB group, the type of resection and the occurrence of postoperative sensory or motor dysfunction were predictive of overall survival.

CONCLUSION

There may exist distinct biological behaviors between ACB and EACB, thereby providing valuable insights into the prognostic characteristics of ACB patients and contributing to enhanced outcome prediction in this particular patient population.

Retrospective In-Hospital Mortality Analysis of GeriatricPatients Treated in a Level 1 Trauma Center

The aim of this study is to determine the critical time intervals and influencing covariates for in-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma and orthopedic patients. During a period of five years, we retrospectively review patients aged > 60 years who were hospitalized at the Department of Trauma, Orthopedic, and Plastic Surgery. The primary outcome is the mean time to death. Survival analysis is performed using an accelerated failure time model. A total of 5388 patients are included in the analysis. Two-thirds underwent surgery (n = 3497, 65%) and one-third were conservatively treated (n = 1891, 35%). The in-hospital mortality rate is 3.1% (n = 168; surgery, n = 112; conservative, n = 56). The mean time to death is 23.3 days (±18.8) after admission in the surgery group and 11.3 days (±12.5) in the conservative treatment group. The greatest accelerating effect on mortality is found in the intensive care unit (16.52, p < 0.001). We are able to identify a critical time interval for in-hospital mortality between days 11 and 23. The day of death on weekend days/holidays, hospitalization for conservative treatment, and treatment at the intensive care unit significantly increase the risk of in-hospital mortality. Early mobilization and a short hospitalization duration seem to be of major importance in fragile patients.

Risk factors for postoperative complications in patients with Parkinson disease: A single center retrospective cohort study

Surgical treatment for patients with Parkinson disease (PD) under general anesthesia has become frequent. PD is a significant predictor of postoperative complications. However, the factors that predict complications in patients with PD remain unknown. We retrospectively recruited patients with PD who underwent surgery between April 2015 and March 2019. The prevalence of postoperative complications was analyzed. We compared the patient characteristics, medical data, and surgical data between patients with and without postoperative complications. We also estimated the odds ratios (OR) for postoperative complications in patients with PD who underwent surgery. Sixty-five patients were enrolled. Eighteen patients presented with 22 complications, including urinary tract infections (UTI) (n = 3; 5%), pneumonia (n = 1; 2%), surgical site infections (SSI) (n = 3; 5%), postoperative delirium (POD) (n = 7; 10%), and others (n = 8; 12%). Four patients presented with 2 complications each. The operation time, the red blood cell transfusion and the rate of rotigotine usage were higher in patients with complications than those without (314 ± 197 min vs 173 ± 145 min, P = .006; 0 [0-560] mL vs 0 [0-0] mL, P = .02; 39% vs 6%, P = .003, respectively) (mean ± standard deviation or median [interquartile range]). Preoperative rotigotine usage (OR: 9.33; 95% confidential interval [CI]: 2.07-42.07; P = .004) was an independent risk factors for postoperative complications. The findings indicate that clinicians should closely monitor postoperative complications when patients with PD who have received transdermal dopamine agonists undergone longer time surgery.

The modified 5-item frailty index determines the length of hospital stay and accompanies with mortality rate in patients with bone and implant-associated infections after trauma and orthopedic surgery

BACKGROUND

Bone and implant-associated infections are severe complications after trauma and orthopedic surgery. The modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5) is an easily applicable score to predict adverse outcome after surgery. The current literature regarding mFI-5 is focused on a period of 30-days postoperative.

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the impact of frailty in orthopedic trauma patients with bone and implant-associated infections. mFI-5 was calculated from a database, which prospectively collects data about factors potentially correlated with peri- and postoperative complications since 2014.

METHODS

In a level I trauma center a total of 345 patients with surgical site infections were enrolled in this study. Hereof, patients with fracture-related infections after osteosynthesis, periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee and post-operative osteomyelitis were included. Extensive medical baseline examination was performed in 2013/14, a three-year follow-up was organized as a telephone interview. The mFI-5 score was calculated based on the 5 factor-principle as established by Subramaniam. The nutritional status was assessed using the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS-2002).

RESULTS

130 patients were included, whereof seven had died, resulting in 123 patients. A grouping of our patients was performed in mFI-5 = 0 (n = 46; 36,4%), mFI-5 = 1 (n = 41; 33,3%) or mFI-5 ≥ 2 (n = 36; 29,3%). Sex distribution showed 69,1% male and 30,9% female patients. Frailty did neither impact on the re-admission (p = 0,433) nor the reoperation (p = 0,327) rate in our cohort. The mortality risk nearly doubled (1,7 times) in frail patients, but did not reach significance. In hospital stay was prolonged due to frailty (12,1 ± 11,8; p = 0,004) compared to those with a mFI-5 = 0 (5,9 ± 5,1) or mFI-5 = 1 (6,9 ± 5,9). Frailty goes along with a risk of malnutrition and increases with age.

CONCLUSION

The modified 5-item frailty index is not a suitable screening tool for predicting revision rate, re-admission rate, and mortality in our orthopedic trauma patient population with bone and implant-associated infections. Nevertheless, frailty is associated with an increased risk of malnutrition and increases with age.