Evaluating the risk of drug-drug interactions with pharmacokinetic boosters: the case of ritonavir-enhanced nirmatrelvir to prevent severe COVID-19

New anti-SARS-CoV-2 aminoadamantane compounds as antiviral candidates for the treatment of COVID-19

Here, the antiviral activity of aminoadamantane derivatives were evaluated against SARS-CoV-2. The compounds exhibited low cytotoxicity to Vero, HEK293 and CALU-3 cells up to a concentration of 1,000 µM. The inhibitory concentration (IC50) of aminoadamantane was 39.71 µM in Vero CCL-81 cells and the derivatives showed significantly lower IC50 values, especially for compounds 3F4 (0.32 µM), 3F5 (0.44 µM) and 3E10 (1.28 µM). Additionally, derivatives 3F5 and 3E10 statistically reduced the fluorescence intensity of SARS-CoV-2 protein S from Vero cells at 10 µM. Transmission microscopy confirmed the antiviral activity of the compounds, which reduced cytopathic effects induced by the virus, such as vacuolization, cytoplasmic projections, and the presence of myelin figures derived from cellular activation in the face of infection. Additionally, it was possible to observe a reduction of viral particles adhered to the cell membrane and inside several viral factories, especially after treatment with 3F4. Moreover, although docking analysis showed favorable interactions in the catalytic site of Cathepsin L, the enzymatic activity of this enzyme was not inhibited significantly in vitro. The new derivatives displayed lower predicted toxicities than aminoadamantane, which was observed for either rat or mouse models. Lastly, in vivo antiviral assays of aminoadamantane derivatives in BALB/cJ mice after challenge with the mouse-adapted strain of SARS-CoV-2, corroborated the robust antiviral activity of 3F4 derivative, which was higher than aminoadamantane and its other derivatives. Therefore, aminoadamantane derivatives show potential broad-spectrum antiviral activity, which may contribute to COVID-19 treatment in the face of emerging and re-emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.

The Development of an Oral Solution Containing Nirmatrelvir and Ritonavir and Assessment of Its Pharmacokinetics and Stability

Paxlovid®, a co-packaged medication comprised of separate tablets containing two active ingredients, nirmatrelvir (NRV) and ritonavir (RTV), exhibits good effectiveness against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the size of the NRV/RTV tablets makes them difficult for some patients to swallow, especially the elderly and those with dysphagia. Therefore, an oral liquid formulation that can overcome this shortcoming and improve patient compliance is required. In this study, we developed a liquid formulation containing NRV and RTV by adopting strategies that used co-solvents and surfactants to enhance the solubility and inhibit possible recrystallization. The in vitro release results showed that NRV and RTV could be maintained at high concentrations in solution for a certain period in the investigated media. In vivo studies in rats showed that the oral bioavailability of NRV/RTV solution was significantly enhanced. Compared to Paxlovid® tablets, the AUC(0-t) of NRV and RTV increased by 6.1 and 3.8 times, respectively, while the Cmax increased by 5.5 times for both. Furthermore, the promoting effect of the absorption of RTV on the bioavailability of NRV was confirmed. Experiments with a beagle showed a similar trend. Stability studies were also conducted at 4 °C, 25 °C, and 40 °C for 90 days, indicating that the oral liquid formulation was physically and chemically stable. This study can be used as a valuable resource for developing and applying oral liquid NRV/RTV formulations in a clinical context.

Leritrelvir for the treatment of mild or moderate COVID-19 without co-administered ritonavir: a multicentre randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

Background

Leritrelvir is a novel α-ketoamide based peptidomimetic inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 main protease. A preclinical study has demonstrated leritrelvir poses similar antiviral activities towards different SARS-CoV-2 variants compared with nirmatrelvir. A phase 2 clinical trial has shown a comparable antiviral efficacy and safety between leritrelvir with and without ritonavir co-administration. This trial aims to test efficacy and safety of leritrelvir monotherapy in adults with mild-to-moderate COVID-19.

Methods

This was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre phase 3 trial at 29 clinical sites in China. Enrolled patients were from 18 to 75 years old, diagnosed with mild or moderate COVID-19 and not requiring hospitalization. Patients had a positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test (NAT) and at least one of the COVID-19 symptoms within 48 h before randomization, and the interval between the first positive SARS-CoV-2 NAT and randomization was ≤120 h (5 days). Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a 5-day course of either oral leritrelvir 400 mg TID or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the time from the first dose to sustained clinical recovery of all 11 symptoms (stuffy or runny nose, sore throat, shortness of breath or dyspnea, cough, muscle or body aches, headache, chills, fever ≥37 °C, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea). The safety endpoint was the incidence of adverse events (AE). Primary and safety analyses were performed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05620160.

Findings

Between Nov 12 and Dec 30, 2022 when the zero COVID policy was abolished nationwide, a total of 1359 patients underwent randomization, 680 were assigned to leritrelvir group and 679 to placebo group. The median time to sustained clinical recovery in leritrelvir group was significantly shorter (251.02 h [IQR 188.95-428.68 h]) than that of Placebo (271.33 h [IQR 219.00-529.63 h], P = 0.0022, hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.35). Further analysis of subgroups for the median time to sustained clinical recovery revealed that (1) subgroup with positive viral nucleic acid tested ≤72 h had a 33.9 h difference in leritrelvir group than that of placebo; (2) the subgroup with baseline viral load >8 log 10 Copies/mL in leritrelvir group had 51.3 h difference than that of placebo. Leritrelvir reduced viral load by 0.82 log10 on day 4 compared to placebo. No participants in either group progressed to severe COVID-19 by day 29. Adverse events were reported in two groups: leritrelvir 315 (46.46%) compared with placebo 292 (43.52%). Treatment-relevant AEs were similar 218 (32.15%) in the leritrelvir group and 186 (27.72%) in placebo. Two cases of COVID-19 pneumonia were reported in placebo group, and one case in leritrelvir group, none of them were considered by the investigators to be leritrelvir related. The most frequently reported AEs (occurring in ≥5% of participants in at least one group) were laboratory finding: hypertriglyceridemia (leritrelvir 79 [11.7%] vs. placebo 70 [10.4%]) and hyperlipidemia (60 [8.8%] vs. 52 [7.7%]); all of them were nonserious.

Interpretation

Leritrelvir monotherapy has good efficacy for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 and without serious safety concerns.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Multidisciplinary Innovation Team Project of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Science and Technology Foundation, Guangzhou Science and Technology Planning Project and R&D Program of Guangzhou Laboratory.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions of Paxlovid Involving CYP3A Enzymes and P-gp Transporter: An Overview of Clinical Data

BACKGROUND

The US FDA has approved paxlovid, a combination of nirmatrelvir and ritonavir, as the first oral treatment for the management of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 patients.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review article is to explore the clinical data that is currently available regarding the drug-drug interactions (DDIs) of paxlovid with various medications.

METHODS

Keywords, such as drug interactions, paxlovid, ritonavir, nirmatrelvir, pharmacokinetic interactions, CYP3A, and P-glycoprotein, were used to search online databases, including LitCOVID, Scopus, Embase, EBSCO host, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and reference lists.

RESULTS

Paxlovid interacted with a variety of medications due to strong inhibition of CYP3A4 and P-gp transporter protein by ritonavir and the dual function of nirmatrelvir as a substrate and inhibitor of CYP3A enzymes and P-gp transporter protein. Numerous case reports and other studies determined that the risk of toxicities of several drugs, including anticoagulants (warfarin, rivaroxaban), calcium channel blockers (nifedipine, manidipine, verapamil), statins (atorvastatin), immunosuppressants (tacrolimus), antiarrhythmics (amiodarone), antipsychotics (clozapine, quetiapine), and ranolazine have been enhanced by the concomitant administration of paxlovid.

CONCLUSION

Adverse effects of paxlovid from DDIs can range from less-than-ideal therapeutic responses to potentially fatal toxicities. Effective management requires close observation, adjustments to dosage, and assessment of substitute treatments. Collaboration between pharmacists and other medical professionals is necessary to guarantee effective and safe treatment outcomes of paxlovid therapy.

Pairwise synthetic cytotoxicity between Paxlovid and 100 frequently prescribed FDA-approved small molecule drugs on liver cells

Paxlovid is a recent FDA approved specific drug for COVID-19. Extensive prescription of Paxlovid could induce potential synthetic cytotoxicity with drugs. Herein, we aimed to examine pairwise synthetic cytotoxicity between Paxlovid and 100 frequently FDA approved small molecule drugs. Liver cell line HL-7702 or L02 was adopted to evaluate synthetic cytotoxicity between Paxlovid and the 100 small molecule drugs. Inhibitory concentration IC-10 and IC-50 doses for all the 100 small molecule drugs and Paxlovid were experimentally acquired. Then, pairwise synthetic cytotoxicity was examined with the fixed dose IC-10 for each drug. The most 4 significant interactive pairs (2 positively interactive and 2 negatively interactive) were further subjected to molecular docking simulation to reveal the structural modulation with Caspase-8, a key mediator for cell apoptosis.

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of chalcone derivatives as potent and orally active hCYP3A4 inhibitors

Human cytochrome P450 3A4 (hCYP3A4), one of the most important drug-metabolizing enzymes, catalyze the metabolic clearance of ∼50% therapeutic drugs. CYP3A4 inhibitors have been used for improving the in vivo efficacy of hCYP3A4-substrate drugs. However, most of existing hCYP3A4 inhibitors may trigger serious adverse effects or undesirable effects on endogenous metabolism. This study aimed to discover potent and orally active hCYP3A4 inhibitors from chalcone derivatives and to test their anti-hCYP3A4 effects both in vitro and in vivo. Following three rounds of screening and structural optimization, the isoquinoline chalcones were found with excellently anti-hCYP3A4 effects. SAR studies showed that introducing an isoquinoline ring on the A-ring significantly enhanced anti-CYP3A4 effect, generating A10 (IC50 = 102.10 nM) as a promising lead compound. The 2nd round of SAR studies showed that introducing a substituent group at the para position of the carbonyl group on B-ring strongly improved the anti-CYP3A4 effect. As a result, C6 was identified as the most potent hCYP3A4 inhibitor (IC50 = 43.93 nM) in human liver microsomes (HLMs). C6 also displayed potent anti-hCYP3A4 effect in living cells (IC50 = 153.00 nM), which was superior to the positive inhibitor ketoconazole (IC50 = 251.00 nM). Mechanistic studies revealed that C6 could potently inhibit CYP3A4-catalyzed N-ethyl-1,8-naphthalimide (NEN) hydroxylation in a competitive manner (Ki = 30.00 nM). Moreover, C6 exhibited suitable metabolic stability in HLMs and showed good safety profiles in mice. In vivo tests demonstrated that C6 (100 mg/kg, orally administration) significantly increased the AUC(0-inf) of midazolam by 3.63-fold, and strongly prolonged its half-life by 1.66-fold compared with the vehicle group in mice. Collectively, our findings revealed the SARs of chalcone derivatives as hCYP3A4 inhibitors and offered several potent chalcone-type hCYP3A4 inhibitors, while C6 could serve as a good lead compound for developing novel, orally active CYP3A4 inhibitors with improved druglikeness properties.

Molecular mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 resistance to nirmatrelvir

Nirmatrelvir is a specific antiviral drug that targets the main protease (Mpro) of SARS-CoV-2 and has been approved to treat COVID-191,2. As an RNA virus characterized by high mutation rates, whether SARS-CoV-2 will develop resistance to nirmatrelvir is a question of concern. Our previous studies have shown that several mutational pathways confer resistance to nirmatrelvir, but some result in a loss of viral replicative fitness, which is then compensated for by additional alterations3. The molecular mechanisms for this observed resistance are unknown. Here we combined biochemical and structural methods to demonstrate that alterations at the substrate-binding pocket of Mpro can allow SARS-CoV-2 to develop resistance to nirmatrelvir in two distinct ways. Comprehensive studies of the structures of 14 Mpro mutants in complex with drugs or substrate revealed that alterations at the S1 and S4 subsites substantially decreased the level of inhibitor binding, whereas alterations at the S2 and S4' subsites unexpectedly increased protease activity. Both mechanisms contributed to nirmatrelvir resistance, with the latter compensating for the loss in enzymatic activity of the former, which in turn accounted for the restoration of viral replicative fitness, as observed previously3. Such a profile was also observed for ensitrelvir, another clinically relevant Mpro inhibitor. These results shed light on the mechanisms by which SARS-CoV-2 evolves to develop resistance to the current generation of protease inhibitors and provide the basis for the design of next-generation Mpro inhibitors.

Nirmatrelvir and ritonavir combination: an antiviral therapy for COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

The emergence of the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern in late November 2021 presaged yet another stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Paxlovid, a co-packaged dosage form of two antiviral drugs (nirmatrelvir and ritonavir) developed by Pfizer, received its first FDA Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) and conditional marketing by European Medical Agency in patients at high risk of developing severe COVID-19.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed the timeline of the drug nirmatrelvir from its discovery to authorization by FDA. After 1 year of its authorization, numerous studies and reports on paxlovid's use and post-use consequences are available. This review summarizes the complete journey of paxlovid from its development, preclinical studies, clinical trials, regulatory approvals, ongoing clinical trials, and safety measures, followed by discussions on recent updates on drug-drug interactions, adverse effects, and relapse of COVID-19.

EXPERT OPINION

Paxlovid, a new oral antiviral therapy for COVID-19, has shown promising results in clinical trials and has the potential to be effective against the pandemic, particularly for individuals at high risk of severe illness. Comorbidity usage and pharmacovigilance will play a significant stake in the future of paxlovid development. Second-generation Mpro inhibitors play an important role in the upcoming problems associated with COVID-19.

Nirmatrelvir and COVID-19: development, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, resistance, relapse, and pharmacoeconomics

Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (N/R) is one of the most effective antiviral drugs against SARS-CoV-2. The preclinical development, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of N/R are reviewed herein. Randomized clinical trials have been conducted exclusively with pre-Omicron variants of concern, but in vitro studies show that efficacy against all Omicron sublineages is preserved, as confirmed by post-marketing observational studies. Nevertheless, investigations of large viral genome repositories have shown that mutation in the main protease causing resistance to N/R are increasingly frequent. In addition, virological and clinical rebounds after N/R discontinuation have been reported in immunocompetent patients. This finding is of concern when translated to immunocompromised patients, in whom N/R efficacy has not been formally investigated in clinical trials. Economical sustainability and perspectives for this therapeutic arena are discussed.

Kidney Transplant and Dialysis Patients Remain at Increased Risk for Succumbing to COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Immunocompromised patients have been at an increased risk of succumbing to coronavirus disease 2019 COVID-19 since the beginning of the pandemic.

METHODS

Here, we analyzed mortality and case fatality data from dialysis and kidney transplant patients, and compared each with an age-matched subgroup of the general population.

RESULTS

We found that both patients on dialysis and kidney transplant patients remain at increased risk of succumbing to COVID-19 (despite all available countermeasures.

CONCLUSIONS

The analyses underline the need for additional protection for this vulnerable population.