1
|
Pandey P, Chaudhary R, Tripathi D, Lavudi K, Dua K, Weinfeld M, Lavasanifar A, Rajinikanth PS. Personalized treatment approach for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Med Oncol 2024; 41:252. [PMID: 39320608 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-024-02504-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2024] [Accepted: 09/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/26/2024]
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is a leading global concern for women, with 30% being HER2-positive cases linked to poorer outcomes. Targeted therapies like trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and T-DM1 have revolutionized HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treatment. Although these therapies have improved MBC management and patient outcomes, resistance can develop, reducing effectiveness. Personalized strategies based on tumor characteristics offer hope for better responses and longer outcomes. This review outlines insights into MBC patients responding well to anti-HER2 treatments, even across multiple treatment regimen. Recent immunotherapy, locoregional therapy, and liquid biopsy breakthroughs are covered, suggesting ways to increase long-term responders. Personalized approaches have boosted HER2-positive MBC outcomes, and ongoing research is crucial to uncover new treatments and biomarkers, potentially elevating long-term response rates and prognoses. This may aid in providing new direction to breast cancer clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prashant Pandey
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2H7, Canada
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226025, India
| | - Rishabh Chaudhary
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226025, India
| | - Devika Tripathi
- PSIT-Pranveer Singh Institute of Technology (Pharmacy), Kanpur, India
| | - Kousalya Lavudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Kamal Dua
- Discipline of Pharmacy, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - Michael Weinfeld
- Cross Cancer Institute and Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1Z2, Canada
| | - Afsaneh Lavasanifar
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2H7, Canada
- Department of Chemical and Material Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2V4, Canada
| | - P S Rajinikanth
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226025, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moreira A, Li W, Berlin A, Carpino-Rocca C, Chung P, Conroy L, Dang J, Dawson LA, Glicksman RM, Hosni A, Keller H, Kong V, Lindsay P, Shessel A, Stanescu T, Taylor E, Winter J, Yan M, Letourneau D, Milosevic M, Velec M. Prospective evaluation of patient-reported anxiety and experiences with adaptive radiation therapy on an MR-linac. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100240. [PMID: 38445180 PMCID: PMC10912905 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose An integrated magnetic resonance scanner and linear accelerator (MR-linac) was implemented with daily online adaptive radiation therapy (ART). This study evaluated patient-reported experiences with their overall hospital care as well as treatment in the MR-linac environment. Methods Patients pre-screened for MR eligibility and claustrophobia were referred to simulation on a 1.5 T MR-linac. Patient-reported experience measures were captured using two validated surveys. The 15-item MR-anxiety questionnaire (MR-AQ) was administered immediately after the first treatment to rate MR-related anxiety and relaxation. The 40-item satisfaction with cancer care questionnaire rating doctors, radiation therapists, the services and care organization and their outpatient experience was administered immediately after the last treatment using five-point Likert responses. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results 205 patients were included in this analysis. Multiple sites were treated across the pelvis and abdomen with a median treatment time per fraction of 46 and 66 min respectively. Patients rated MR-related anxiety as "not at all" (87%), "somewhat" (11%), "moderately" (1%) and "very much so" (1%). Positive satisfaction responses ranged from 78 to 100% (median 93%) across all items. All radiation therapist-specific items were rated positively as 96-100%. The five lowest rated items (range 78-85%) were related to general provision of information, coordination, and communication. Overall hospital care was rated positively at 99%. Conclusion In this large, single-institution prospective cohort, all patients had low MR-related anxiety and completed treatment as planned despite lengthy ART treatments with the MR-linac. Patients overall were highly satisfied with their cancer care involving ART using an MR-linac.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Moreira
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Winnie Li
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Cathy Carpino-Rocca
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Peter Chung
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Leigh Conroy
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jennifer Dang
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Laura A. Dawson
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rachel M. Glicksman
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ali Hosni
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Harald Keller
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Vickie Kong
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Patricia Lindsay
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrea Shessel
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Teo Stanescu
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Edward Taylor
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jeff Winter
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michael Yan
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Daniel Letourneau
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michael Milosevic
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Michael Velec
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hardcastle N, Liu Y, Siva S, David S. [ 18F]NaF PET/CT imaging of response to single fraction SABR to bone metastases from breast cancer. FRONTIERS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE (LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 3:1197397. [PMID: 39380960 PMCID: PMC11460292 DOI: 10.3389/fnume.2023.1197397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2024]
Abstract
Breast cancer commonly metastasises to the skeleton, and stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SABR) is an emerging treatment for oligometastatic disease. Accurately imaging bone metastases and their response to treatment is challenging. [18F]NaF-PET has a higher sensitivity and specificity than conventional bone scans for detecting breast cancer bone metastases. In this pre-defined secondary analysis of a prospective trial, we evaluated the change in [18F]NaF uptake after SABR. Patients with oligometastatic breast cancer received a single fraction of 20 Gy to up to three bone metastases. [18F]NaF-PET was acquired before and 12 months after SABR. Pre- and post-treatment [18F]NaF-PET images were registered to the treatment planning CT. The relative change in tumour SUVmax and SUVmean was quantified. The intersection of each of the radiation therapy isodose contours with a non-tumour bone was created. The change in SUVmean in sub-volumes of non-tumour bone receiving doses of 0-20 Gy was quantified. In total, 14 patients, with 17 bone metastases, were available for analysis. A total of 15 metastases exhibited a reduction in SUVmax; the median reduction was 42% and the maximum reduction 82%. An increased absolute reduction in SUVmax was observed with higher pre-treatment SUVmax. One patient exhibited increased SUVmax after treatment, which was attributed to normal peri-tumoural bone regeneration in the context of a bone metastasis. There was a median reduction of 15%-34% for non-tumour bone in each dose level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Hardcastle
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Yang Liu
- Western Health Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Shankar Siva
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Steven David
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Burgaleta AM, Burguete AB, Gutiérrez LR, Nuín EB, Felipe GA, de la Vega FA. Local treatment in oligometastasis from breast cancer: an overview. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:2861-2867. [PMID: 37106239 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03170-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
Oligometastasic breast cancer (OMBC) consists of breast cancer patient with a limited number of systemic metastases (≤ 5), all of them candidates for local ablative treatment with the intention of achieving long-term control of the metastasis and, eventually, an increase in survival The first consensus for the management of patients with oligometastatic breast cancer (OMBC) was published in 2007, establishing that a more aggressive multidisciplinary strategy is recommended in order to increase the survival while maintaining a good quality of life. The current scientific evidence is based on observational studies, mainly retrospective, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and only a randomized nonexclusive study of oligometastatic (OM) published. All trials with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in OM cancer have shown excellent tolerance and good local control, although first trials on Lung SBRT did not prove so excellent tolerance and had some deaths due to bronchus irradiation and secondary hemoptysis. There are multiple ongoing studies researching the benefit of SBRT in oligometastatic breast cancer. Despite the lack of impact on survival seen in the NRG BR-002 Trial, SBRT probably allows the delay of the systemic treatment until progression, and so, improves the quality of life of patients. We have to wait for the results of the ongoing and future studies for clarification of the role of local treatment in OMBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Manterola Burgaleta
- Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Radiation Oncology Service, University Hospital of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain
- Service of Radiotherapy Oncology, University Hospital of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | | | - Erkuden Burillo Nuín
- Service of Radiotherapy Oncology, University Hospital of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Gemma Asín Felipe
- Multidisciplinary Breast Cancer Unit, Radiation Oncology Service, University Hospital of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain
- Service of Radiotherapy Oncology, University Hospital of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Fernando Arias de la Vega
- Service of Radiotherapy Oncology, University Hospital of Navarre, Pamplona, Spain.
- "Clinical Research Group in Radiation Oncology", Health Research Institute of Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pasquier D, Bidaut L, Oprea-Lager DE, deSouza NM, Krug D, Collette L, Kunz W, Belkacemi Y, Bau MG, Caramella C, De Geus-Oei LF, De Caluwé A, Deroose C, Gheysens O, Herrmann K, Kindts I, Kontos M, Kümmel S, Linderholm B, Lopci E, Meattini I, Smeets A, Kaidar-Person O, Poortmans P, Tsoutsou P, Hajjaji N, Russell N, Senkus E, Talbot JN, Umutlu L, Vandecaveye V, Verhoeff JJC, van Oordt WMVDH, Zacho HD, Cardoso F, Fournier L, Van Duijnhoven F, Lecouvet FE. Designing clinical trials based on modern imaging and metastasis-directed treatments in patients with oligometastatic breast cancer: a consensus recommendation from the EORTC Imaging and Breast Cancer Groups. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:e331-e343. [PMID: 37541279 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00286-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer remains the most common cause of cancer death among women. Despite its considerable histological and molecular heterogeneity, those characteristics are not distinguished in most definitions of oligometastatic disease and clinical trials of oligometastatic breast cancer. After an exhaustive review of the literature covering all aspects of oligometastatic breast cancer, 35 experts from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Imaging and Breast Cancer Groups elaborated a Delphi questionnaire aimed at offering consensus recommendations, including oligometastatic breast cancer definition, optimal diagnostic pathways, and clinical trials required to evaluate the effect of diagnostic imaging strategies and metastasis-directed therapies. The main recommendations are the introduction of modern imaging methods in metastatic screening for an earlier diagnosis of oligometastatic breast cancer and the development of prospective trials also considering the histological and molecular complexity of breast cancer. Strategies for the randomisation of imaging methods and therapeutic approaches in different subsets of patients are also addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Pasquier
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; University of Lille and CNRS, Centrale Lille, UMR 9189-CRIStAL, Lille, France.
| | - Luc Bidaut
- College of Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
| | - Daniela Elena Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nandita M deSouza
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein-Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Laurence Collette
- Former European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Wolfgang Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Yazid Belkacemi
- AP-HP, Radiation Oncology Department, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France; INSERM Unit 955 (-Bio), IMRB, University of Paris-Est (UPEC), Créteil, France
| | - Maria Grazia Bau
- Azienda Ospedaliera Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Ospedale Sant'Anna, Turin, Italy
| | - Caroline Caramella
- Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France
| | - Lioe-Fee De Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands; Department of Radiation Science and Technology, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
| | - Alex De Caluwé
- Radiotherapy Department, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Olivier Gheysens
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Institut du Cancer Roi Albert II, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Isabelle Kindts
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Centre, General Hospital Groeninge, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Michalis Kontos
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Sherko Kümmel
- Breast Unit, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Barbro Linderholm
- Department of Oncolgy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Institution of Clinical Sciences, Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg , Sweden
| | | | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Ann Smeets
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Oncology Institute, Sheba Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel; Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp, Belgium; University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Pelagia Tsoutsou
- Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Site de Cluse-Roseraie, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nawale Hajjaji
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Laboratoire Protéomique, Réponse Inflammatoire, et Spectrométrie De Masse (PRISM), Inserm U1192, Lille, France
| | - Nicola Russell
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoekziekenhuis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Jean-Noël Talbot
- Institut National des Sciences et Techniques Nucléaires, CEA-Saclay, Paris, France
| | - Lale Umutlu
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Joost J C Verhoeff
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | | | - Helle D Zacho
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Centre, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Laure Fournier
- Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Frederieke Van Duijnhoven
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoekziekenhuis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Frédéric E Lecouvet
- Department of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Institut du Cancer Roi Albert II, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shi W, Li Y, Sun H, Zhang L, Meng J, Wang X, Chen X, Zhang X, Mei X, Ma J, Mo M, Zhou C, Liang F, Shao Z, Zhang Z, Guo X, Yu X, Yang Z. Favorable prognosis of breast cancer brain metastases patients with limited intracranial and extracranial metastatic lesions. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:107. [PMID: 37393259 PMCID: PMC10314440 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02293-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) are highly heterogenous with widely differing survival. The prognosis of the oligometastatic breast cancer (BC) patients with brain metastases (BM) has not been well studied. We aimed to investigate the prognosis of BCBM patients with limited intracranial and extracranial metastatic lesions. METHODS Four hundred and forty-five BCBM patients treated between 1st January 2008 and 31st December 2018 at our institute were included. Clinical characteristics and treatment information were obtained from patient's medical records. The updated breast Graded Prognostic Assessment (Breast GPA) was calculated. RESULTS The median OS after diagnosis of BM were 15.9 months. Median OS for patients with GPA 0-1.0, 1.5-2, 2.5-3 and 3.5-4 were 6.9, 14.2, 21.8, 42.6 months respectively. The total number of intracranial and extracranial metastatic lesions, in addition to the Breast GPA, salvage local therapy and systemic therapy (anti-HER2 therapy, chemotherapy and endocrine therapy) were demonstrated to be associated with prognosis. One hundred and thirteen patients (25.4%) had 1-5 total metastatic lesions at BM diagnosis. Patients with 1-5 total metastatic lesions had a significantly longer median OS of 24.3 months compared to those with greater than 5 total metastatic lesions with a median OS of 12.2 months (P < 0.001; multivariate HR 0.55, 95% CI, 0.43-0.72). Among the patients with 1-5 metastatic lesions, median OS for GPA 0-1.0 was 9.8 months, compared to 22.8, 28.8 and 71.0 for GPA 1.5-2.0, 2.5-3.0 and 3.5-4.0 respectively, which is much longer than the corresponding patients with greater than 5 total metastatic lesions, with medium OS of 6.8, 11.6, 18.6 and 42.6 months respectively for GPA 0-1.0, 1.5-2.0, 2.5-3.0 and 3.5-4.0. CONCLUSIONS The patients with 1-5 total metastatic lesions demonstrated better OS. The prognostic value of the Breast GPA and the survival benefit of salvage local therapy and continuation of systemic therapy after BM were confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Yang Li
- Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, 272029, Shandong, China
| | - Hua Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Li Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Jin Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xiaofang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xingxing Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xiaomeng Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xin Mei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Jinli Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Miao Mo
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Clinical Statistics Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Changming Zhou
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Clinical Statistics Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Fei Liang
- Department of Biostatistics, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhimin Shao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Zhen Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xiaomao Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China
| | - Xiaoli Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| | - Zhaozhi Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong-An Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
- Shanghai Clinical Research Center for Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai, 200032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rodríguez Pérez A, Felip Font E, Chicas-Sett R, Montero-Luis Á, de Paz Arias L, González-Del-Alba A, López-Campos F, López López C, Hernando Requejo O, Conde-Moreno AJ, Arranz Arija JÁ, de Castro Carpeño J. Unravelling oligometastatic disease from the perspective of radiation and medical oncology. Part I: non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:882-896. [PMID: 36525231 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-03011-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Oligometastatic disease (OMD) defines a cancer status that is intermediate between localized and widely spread metastatic disease, and can be treated with curative intent. While diagnostic imaging tools have considerably improved in recent years, unidentified micrometastases can still evade current detection techniques, allowing the disease to progress. The various OMD scenarios are mainly defined by the number of metastases, the biological and molecular tumour profiles, and the timing of the development of metastases. Increasing knowledge has contributed to the earlier and improved detection of OMD, underlining the importance of early disease control. In view of increasing OMD detection rates in current real-world clinical practice and the lack of standardized evidence-based guidelines to treat this cancer status, a board of experts from the Spanish Societies of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) and Medical Oncology (SEOM) organized a series of sessions to update the current state-of-the-art on OMD from a multidisciplinary perspective, and to discuss how results from clinical studies might translate into promising treatment options. This expert review series summarizes what is known and what it is pending clarification in the context of OMD in the scenarios of non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer (Part I), and prostate cancer and colorectal cancer (Part II), aiming to offer specialists a pragmatic framework to help improve patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurora Rodríguez Pérez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Ruber Internacional, C. de La Masó, 38, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Enriqueta Felip Font
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario del Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ángel Montero-Luis
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura de Paz Arias
- Medical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol, A Coruña, Spain
| | | | | | - Carlos López López
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Merloni F, Palleschi M, Gianni C, Casadei C, Curcio A, Romeo A, Rocchi M, Cima S, Sirico M, Sarti S, Cecconetto L, Mariotti M, Di Menna G, De Giorgi U. Locoregional treatment of de novo stage IV breast cancer in the era of modern oncology. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1083297. [PMID: 36793604 PMCID: PMC9923000 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1083297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Approximately 6% of metastatic breast cancers arise de novo. While systemic therapy (ST) remains the treatment backbone as for patients with metachronous metastases, locoregional treatment (LRT) of the primary tumor remains a controversial method. The removal of the primary has an established role for palliative purposes, but it is unclear if it could also determine a survival benefit. Retrospective evidence and pre-clinical studies seem to support the removal of the primary as an effective approach to improve survival. On the other hand, most randomized evidence suggests avoiding LRT. Both retrospective and prospective studies suffer several limitations, ranging from selection bias and outdated ST to a small sample of patients. In this review we discuss available data and try to identify subgroups of patients which could benefit the most from LRT of the primary, to facilitate clinical practice decisions, and to hypothesize future studies design on this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Merloni
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Michela Palleschi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Caterina Gianni
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Chiara Casadei
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Annalisa Curcio
- Breast Surgery Unit, Pierantoni-Morgagni Hospital Forlì and Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital Ravenna, Forli, Italy
| | - Antonino Romeo
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Maddalena Rocchi
- Breast Surgery Unit, Pierantoni-Morgagni Hospital Forlì and Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital Ravenna, Forli, Italy
| | - Simona Cima
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Marianna Sirico
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Samanta Sarti
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Cecconetto
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Marita Mariotti
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Giandomenico Di Menna
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pérez-Montero H, Lozano A, de Blas R, Sánchez JJ, Martínez E, Laplana M, Gil-Gil M, Garcia-Tejedor A, Pernas S, Falo C, Godino Ó, Pla MJ, Guedea F, Navarro-Martin A. Ten-year experience of bone SBRT in breast cancer: analysis of predictive factors of effectiveness. CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE FEDERATION OF SPANISH ONCOLOGY SOCIETIES AND OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE OF MEXICO 2023; 25:1756-1766. [PMID: 36645616 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03073-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Data on the benefit of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with breast cancer (BC) and bone metastases remain limited. The purpose of this study is to report our 10-year experience of bone SBRT, analyzing toxicity and prognostic factors for local control (LC); progression-free survival, and overall survival (OS). METHODS/PATIENTS We analyzed all spine and non-spine bone SBRT performed in patients with BC during the 2012-2022 period at our institution. Treatments carried out with ablative intent in stereotactic conditions with dose/fraction ≥ 5 Gy in 5 or fewer sessions were considered. Demographic, treatment, and toxicity data were recorded according to CTCAEv4. Risk factors were assessed through univariate and multivariate analysis by Cox regression. RESULTS 60 bone SBRT treatments were performed during the study period. 75% were spine SBRT and 25% were non-spine SBRT (median BED4Gy was 80 Gy4). The median age was 52.5 years (34-79). The median tumor volume was 2.9 cm3 (0.5-39.4). The median follow-up was 32.4 months (1.2-101.7). 1 and 2 years LC were 92.9 and 86.6%, respectively. 1 and 2 years OS were 100 and 90.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis (MVA) associated volume of the treated lesion ≥ 13 cm3 with worse LC (p = 0.046; HR 12.1, 95%CI = 1.1-140.3). In addition, deferring SBRT > 3 months after lesion diagnosis to prioritize systemic treatment showed a significant benefit, improving the 2 years LC up to 96.8% vs. 67.5% for SBRT performed before this period (p = 0.031; HR 0.1, 95%CI = 0.01-0.8). Hormonal receptors, the total number of metastases, and CA15-3 value were significantly associated with OS in MVA. During follow-up, three non-spine fractures (5%) were observed. CONCLUSIONS According to our data, bone SBRT is a safe and effective technique for BC. Upfront systemic treatment before SBRT offers a benefit in LC. Therefore, SBRT should be considered after prior systemic treatment in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Héctor Pérez-Montero
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alicia Lozano
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rodolfo de Blas
- Medical Physics and Radiation Protection Department, Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan José Sánchez
- Radiodiagnostic Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, S/N, 08907, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Evelyn Martínez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María Laplana
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miguel Gil-Gil
- Medical Oncology Department, Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Amparo Garcia-Tejedor
- Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, S/N, 08907, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sonia Pernas
- Medical Oncology Department, Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Catalina Falo
- Medical Oncology Department, Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Óscar Godino
- Neurosurgery Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, S/N, 08907, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria J Pla
- Gynecology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Carrer de la Feixa Llarga, S/N, 08907, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ferrán Guedea
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Arturo Navarro-Martin
- Radiation Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Avinguda de la Gran Via de l'Hospitalet, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 199-203, 08908, Barcelona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sigurdson S, Thibodeau S, Korzeniowski M, Moraes FY. A Precise Approach for Radiotherapy of Breast Cancer. Cancer Treat Res 2023; 188:175-198. [PMID: 38175346 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-33602-7_7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is an integral part of the multidisciplinary management of breast cancer (BC). There have been multiple recent advances in the delivery of radiotherapy, reviewed with a critical discussion of the evidence from trials investigating adjuvant ultra-hypofractionation and partial breast irradiation for early-stage BC, and the locoregional management of lymph nodes in locally advanced BC. Multiple precision medicine-based approaches have been developed as prognostic and/or predictive for BC patients and identifying biomarkers of radioresistance could help identify patients that may benefit from dose-escalated radiotherapy or radiosensitizers. Radiotherapy after breast reconstruction is an area of current controversy in the field, and we evaluated the decision-making considerations in this situation. The oligometastatic state is an emerging field for many cancer sites based on recent trials investigating ablative radiotherapy for oligometastatic BC. This chapter is an overview of radiotherapy for BC, with a focus on recent advances in early-stage, locally advanced, and oligometastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Sigurdson
- Department of Oncology - Division of Radiation Oncology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre and Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Stephane Thibodeau
- Department of Oncology - Division of Radiation Oncology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre and Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Martin Korzeniowski
- Department of Oncology - Division of Radiation Oncology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre and Queen's University, Kingston, Canada
| | - Fabio Ynoe Moraes
- Department of Oncology - Division of Radiation Oncology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre and Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Merloni F, Palleschi M, Casadei C, Romeo A, Curcio A, Casadei R, Stella F, Ercolani G, Gianni C, Sirico M, Cima S, Sarti S, Cecconetto L, Di Menna G, De Giorgi U. Oligometastatic breast cancer and metastasis-directed treatment: an aggressive multimodal approach to reach the cure. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231161412. [PMID: 36950272 PMCID: PMC10026139 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231161412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Metastatic breast cancer (BC) is considered an incurable disease and is usually treated with palliative intent. However, about 50% of metastatic BCs present with only a few metastatic lesions and are characterized by longer overall survival. These patients, defined as oligometastatic, could benefit from a multimodal approach, which combines systemic therapy with metastasis-directed treatment (stereotactic ablative therapy or surgery). The current definition of oligometastatic seems incomplete since it is based only on imaging findings and does not include biological features, and the majority of relevant data supporting this strategy comes from retrospective or non-randomized studies. However, the chance of reaching long-term complete remission or even a cure has led to the development of randomized trials investigating the impact of combined treatment in oligometastatic BC (OMBC). The SABR-COMET trial, the first randomized study to include BC patients, showed promising results from a combination of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy and systemic therapy. Considering the randomized trial's results, multidisciplinary teams should be set up to select OMBC patients who could achieve long-term survival with aggressive multimodal treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michela Palleschi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto
Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola,
Italy
| | - Chiara Casadei
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto
Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola,
Italy
| | - Antonino Romeo
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per
lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Annalisa Curcio
- Breast Surgery Unit, Pierantoni-Morgagni
Hospital Forlì and Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Roberto Casadei
- Orthopedic Unit, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital,
Ausl Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Franco Stella
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of
Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine—DIMES of the Alma Mater
Studiorum, University of Bologna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Giorgio Ercolani
- Department of Medical and Surgical
Sciences-DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum – University of Bologna, Bologna,
Italy
- General and Oncology Surgery,
Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Ausl Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Caterina Gianni
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto
Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola,
Italy
| | - Marianna Sirico
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto
Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola,
Italy
| | - Simona Cima
- Radiotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo
per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola, Italy
| | - Samanta Sarti
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto
Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola,
Italy
| | - Lorenzo Cecconetto
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto
Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola,
Italy
| | - Giandomenico Di Menna
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto
Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola,
Italy
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto
Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola,
Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Systemic Therapy Combined with Locoregional Therapy Improved Survival in Oligometastatic Breast Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2022; 2022:7839041. [PMID: 36245976 PMCID: PMC9553526 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7839041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The optimal therapeutic options, adding locoregional therapy (LRT) to systemic therapy (ST) or not, for patients with oligometastatic breast cancer (OMBC) have not been fully elucidated. Hence, we designed a retrospective observational study which enrolled patients with measurable extracranial OMBC having less than 5 metastatic lesions not necessarily in the same organ. We retrospectively reviewed a total of 199 patients diagnosed with extracranial OMBC, including 28 receiving ST followed by LRT (ST to LRT group), 44 receiving LRT followed by ST (LRT to ST group), and 127 receiving ST alone (ST alone group). After a median follow-up of 28.7 months, patients receiving both ST and LRT had a significantly better prognosis than those receiving ST alone: the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 16.3, 14.0, and 9.3 months (P < 0.001) and the median overall survival (OS) was 39.8, 70.5, and 26.7 months (P < 0.001) in the ST to LRT, LRT to ST, and ST alone groups, respectively. Sequence of ST and LRT had no significant impact on survival among patients receiving both. Further exploratory analysis identified ST plus LRT as an independent predictor for longer PFS. In conclusion, we demonstrated that adding LRT to ST was associated with survival benefits for patients with OMBC, and further prospective studies were warranted.
Collapse
|
13
|
Oligometastasis in breast cancer—current status and treatment options from a radiation oncology perspective. Strahlenther Onkol 2022; 198:601-611. [PMID: 35527272 PMCID: PMC9217902 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-022-01938-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
AbstractEvidence from a few small randomized trials and retrospective cohorts mostly including various tumor entities indicates a prolongation of disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) from local ablative therapies in oligometastatic disease (OMD). However, it is still unclear which patients benefit most from this approach. We give an overview of the several aspects of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in extracranial OMD in breast cancer from a radiation oncology perspective. A PubMed search referring to this was conducted. An attempt was made to relate the therapeutic efficacy of SBRT to various prognostic factors. Data from approximately 500 breast cancer patients treated with SBRT for OMD in mostly in small cohort studies have been published, consistently indicating high local tumor control rates and favorable progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Predictors for a good prognosis after SBRT are favorable biological subtype (hormone receptor positive, HER2 negative), solitary metastasis, bone-only metastasis, and long metastasis-free interval. However, definitive proof that SBRT in OMD breast cancer prolongs DFS or OS is lacking, since, with the exception of one small randomized trial (n = 22 in the SBRT arm), none of the cohort studies had an adequate control group. Further studies are needed to prove the benefit of SBRT in OMD breast cancer and to define adequate selection criteria. Currently, the use of local ablative SBRT should always be discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board.
Collapse
|
14
|
David S, Tan J, Siva S, Karroum L, Savas P, Loi S. Combining Radiotherapy and Immunotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions. Biomedicines 2022; 10:821. [PMID: 35453571 PMCID: PMC9024725 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10040821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of radiotherapy and immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is of emerging interest in many solid tumours, including breast cancer. There is increasing evidence that the host's immune system plays an important role in influencing the response to treatment and prognosis in breast cancer. Several pre-clinical studies and clinical trials have reported on the 'abscopal effect-regression of distant untreated tumour sites, mediated by an immunological response following ionizing radiation to a targeted tumour site. Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) is a non-invasive technique used to augment various immune responses with an ablative tumoricidal dose when compared to conventional radiotherapy. SABR is characterized by typically 1-5 precision radiotherapy treatments that simultaneously deliver a high dose, whilst sparing normal tissues. Following SABR, there is evidence of systemic immune activation in patients with increased PD1 expression on CD8+ and CD4+ T cells. Studies continue to focus on metastatic triple-negative disease, a highly immunogenic subtype of breast cancer with poor prognosis. In this review, we discuss the immunological effect of SABR, alone and in combination with immunotherapy, and the importance of dose and fractionation. We also propose future strategies for treating oligometastatic disease, where this approach may be most useful for producing durable responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven David
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (J.T.); (S.S.); (L.K.)
| | - Jennifer Tan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (J.T.); (S.S.); (L.K.)
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (P.S.); (S.L.)
| | - Shankar Siva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (J.T.); (S.S.); (L.K.)
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (P.S.); (S.L.)
| | - Lama Karroum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (J.T.); (S.S.); (L.K.)
| | - Peter Savas
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (P.S.); (S.L.)
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Sherene Loi
- The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; (P.S.); (S.L.)
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor Antagonist [ 68Ga]RM2 PET/CT for Staging of Pre-Treated, Metastasized Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13236106. [PMID: 34885214 PMCID: PMC8656859 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13236106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) using the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor antagonist [68Ga]RM2 has shown to be a promising imaging method for primary breast cancer (BC) with positive estrogen receptor (ER) status. This study assessed tumor visualization by [68Ga]RM2 PET/CT in patients with pre-treated ER-positive BC and suspected metastases. METHODS This retrospective pilot study included eight female patients with initial ER-positive, pre-treated BC who underwent [68Ga]RM2 PET/CT. Most of these patients (seven out of eight; 88%) were still being treated with or had received endocrine therapy. [68Ga]RM2 PET/CTs were visually analyzed by two nuclear medicine specialists in consensus. Tumor manifestations were rated qualitatively (i.e., RM2-positive or RM2-negative) and quantitatively using the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). SUVmax values were compared between the two subgroups (RM2-positive vs. RM2-negative). RESULTS Strong RM2 binding was found in all metastatic lesions of six patients (75%), whereas tracer uptake in all metastases of two patients (25%) was rated negative. Mean SUVmax of RM2-positive metastases with the highest SUVmax per patient (in lymph node and bone metastases; 15.8 ± 15.1 range: 3.7-47.8) was higher than mean SUVmax of the RM2-negative metastases with the highest SUVmax per patient (in bone metastases; 1.6 ± 0.1, range 1.5-1.7). CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that RM2 binding is maintained in the majority of patients with advanced disease stage of pre-treated ER-positive BC. Thus, [68Ga]RM2 PET/CT could support treatment decision in these patients, radiotherapy planning in oligometastatic patients or selection of patients for RM2 radioligand therapy. Further studies with larger patient cohorts are warranted to confirm these findings.
Collapse
|