1
|
Sayol F, Reijenga BR, Tobias JA, Pigot AL. Ecophysical constraints on avian adaptation and diversification. Curr Biol 2025; 35:1326-1336.e6. [PMID: 40043700 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2025.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2024] [Revised: 10/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2025] [Indexed: 03/27/2025]
Abstract
The evolution of morphological diversity is ultimately governed by physical laws and ecological contexts, which together impose a range of ecophysical constraints. Substantial progress has been made in identifying how these constraints shape the form and function of producers (plants), but similar knowledge is lacking for consumers, in part because the requisite data have not been available at sufficient scale for animals. Using morphometric measurements for all birds, we demonstrate that observed variation is restricted-both for beak shape and body shape-to triangular regions of morphospace with clearly defined boundaries and vertices (corners). By combining morphometric data with information on ecological and behavioral functions, we provide evidence that the extent of avian morphospace reflects a trade-off between three fundamental physical tasks for feeding (crush, engulf, and reach) that characterize resource acquisition and processing by the beak and three physical tasks (fly, swim, and walk) that characterize avian lifestyles or locomotion. Phylogenetic analyses suggest that trajectories of morphological evolution trend toward the vertices, with lineages evolving from a core of functional generalists toward more specialized physical tasks. We further propose that expansion beyond the current boundaries of morphospace is constrained by the shorter evolutionary lifespan of functional specialists, although patterns of speciation rate and current extinction risk provide only weak support for this hypothesis. Overall, we show that the structure of avian morphospace follows relatively simple rules defined by ecophysical constraints and trade-offs, shedding light on the processes shaping modern animal diversity and responses to environmental change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ferran Sayol
- CREAF, Cerdanyola del Vallès 08193, Spain; Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
| | - Bouwe R Reijenga
- Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3AN, UK
| | - Joseph A Tobias
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK
| | - Alex L Pigot
- Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fiennes S, Hardianto N, Ansari SD, Dwiyahreni AA, Jackson T, Holmes G, Birchall C, Hassall C. Rethinking extinction "crises": The case of Asian songbird trade. CAMBRIDGE PRISMS. EXTINCTION 2024; 2:e15. [PMID: 40078808 PMCID: PMC11895710 DOI: 10.1017/ext.2024.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2025]
Abstract
Different stakeholders and actors frequently describe environmental challenges as 'crises'. These crises are often wicked problems that are difficult to resolve due to the complex and contradictory nature of the evidence and knowledge systems surrounding them. Here, we examine a crisis narrative surrounding the IUCN-declared Asian Songbird Crisis (ASC), with its epicentre in Indonesia, where an extensive birdkeeping culture persists. We investigate how bird extinction is perceived by different actors, particularly conservation law enforcement and practitioners working in this space. We unravel local perspectives on the complex relationship between bird trade and extinction through one-to-one interviews and focus groups. Our examination reveals a diversity of attitudes to the ASC, with many law enforcement actors not recognising the crisis label. Market mechanisms result in complex shifts in harvesting pressure onto one or more closely related similar species. The findings challenge the prevailing notion that species extinction significantly affects wildlife trades, emphasising the plastic nature of trade and the coming and going of species fashions. By revealing the divergent views of actors on extinction and the ASC, we highlight the need for shared language, particularly the implications of the 'crisis' label, around species extinction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sicily Fiennes
- School of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Asri A. Dwiyahreni
- Research Centre for Climate Change, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
| | | | - George Holmes
- School of Earth and Environment, Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Christopher Hassall
- School of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Matthews TJ, Triantis KA, Wayman JP, Martin TE, Hume JP, Cardoso P, Faurby S, Mendenhall CD, Dufour P, Rigal F, Cooke R, Whittaker RJ, Pigot AL, Thébaud C, Jørgensen MW, Benavides E, Soares FC, Ulrich W, Kubota Y, Sadler JP, Tobias JA, Sayol F. The global loss of avian functional and phylogenetic diversity from anthropogenic extinctions. Science 2024; 386:55-60. [PMID: 39361743 DOI: 10.1126/science.adk7898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 08/08/2024] [Indexed: 10/05/2024]
Abstract
Humans have been driving a global erosion of species richness for millennia, but the consequences of past extinctions for other dimensions of biodiversity-functional and phylogenetic diversity-are poorly understood. In this work, we show that, since the Late Pleistocene, the extinction of 610 bird species has caused a disproportionate loss of the global avian functional space along with ~3 billion years of unique evolutionary history. For island endemics, proportional losses have been even greater. Projected future extinctions of more than 1000 species over the next two centuries will incur further substantial reductions in functional and phylogenetic diversity. These results highlight the severe consequences of the ongoing biodiversity crisis and the urgent need to identify the ecological functions being lost through extinction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J Matthews
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences (GEES) and Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (CE3C), Azorean Biodiversity Group, CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute, and Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Environment, Universidade dos Açores, Angra do Heroísmo, Açores, Portugal
| | - Kostas A Triantis
- Department of Ecology and Taxonomy, Faculty of Biology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens GR-15784, Greece
| | - Joseph P Wayman
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences (GEES) and Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Thomas E Martin
- School of Natural Sciences, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
- Operation Wallacea, Wallace House, Old Bolingbroke, Lincolnshire, UK
| | - Julian P Hume
- Bird Group, Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Tring, UK
| | - Pedro Cardoso
- Laboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research (LIBRe), Finnish Museum of Natural History Luomus, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- CE3C, CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Søren Faurby
- Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Chase D Mendenhall
- Physician Assistant Studies, Slippery Rock University, Slippery Rock, PA 16057, USA
| | - Paul Dufour
- Center for Functional and Evolutionary Ecology (CEFE), Université de Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE-PSL University, IRD, Montpellier, France
- Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat, Arles, France
| | - François Rigal
- Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes (CE3C), Azorean Biodiversity Group, CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute, and Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Environment, Universidade dos Açores, Angra do Heroísmo, Açores, Portugal
- CNRS - Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour - E2S UPPA, Institut Des Sciences Analytiques et de Physico Chimie pour l'Environnement et les Materiaux, UMR5254, Pau, France
| | - Rob Cooke
- UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - Robert J Whittaker
- School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Alex L Pigot
- Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK
| | - Christophe Thébaud
- Centre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement (CRBE), UMR 5300 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Université Paul Sabatier (Toulouse III), Toulouse Cedex 9, France
| | - Maria Wagner Jørgensen
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences (GEES) and Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Eva Benavides
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences (GEES) and Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Filipa C Soares
- CE3C, Departamento de Biologia Animal, CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Werner Ulrich
- Department of Ecology and Biogeography, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland
| | - Yasuhiro Kubota
- Faculty of Science, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan
| | - Jon P Sadler
- School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences (GEES) and Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Joseph A Tobias
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot, UK
| | - Ferran Sayol
- CREAF, Edifici C Campus UAB, E08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Affleck S, McGeoch MA. Global Avian Functional Diversity Depends on the World's Most Widespread and Distinct Birds. Ecol Lett 2024; 27:e14552. [PMID: 39422176 DOI: 10.1111/ele.14552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 09/17/2024] [Accepted: 09/21/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024]
Abstract
The relationship between global trait distinctiveness and geographic range size is an emerging pattern of interest in macroecology. Early observations suggested that the relationship was positive, implying that globally widespread species hold the rarest combinations of traits. Here, we formally describe and test the relationship in the world's birds and consider its implications for global functional diversity and redundancy. We demonstrate that the relationship is best described as triangular with a positive upper boundary, with its linear model significance lost when including phylogenetic effects. The triangular relationship is formed by groups of phylogenetically related widespread species with moderate and high trait distinctiveness. Decomposing the relationship further using quantile regression highlights the unique traits of these widespread birds. Overall, the triangular relationship emphasises that while not all widespread species have rare trait combinations, those that do should not be overlooked in conservation efforts, regardless of their current threat status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saxbee Affleck
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melodie A McGeoch
- School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Securing Antarctica's Environmental Future, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wayman JP, Sadler JP, Martin TE, Graham LJ, White HJ, Tobias JA, Matthews TJ. Unravelling the complexities of biotic homogenization and heterogenization in the British avifauna. J Anim Ecol 2024; 93:1288-1302. [PMID: 39120041 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.14145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
Biotic homogenization is a process whereby species assemblages become more similar through time. The standard way of identifying the process of biotic homogenization is to look for decreases in spatial beta-diversity. However, using a single assemblage-level metric to assess homogenization can mask important changes in the occupancy patterns of individual species. Here, we analysed changes in the spatial beta-diversity patterns (i.e. biotic heterogenization or homogenization) of British bird assemblages within 30 km × 30 km regions between two periods (1988-1991 and 2008-2011). We partitioned the change in spatial beta-diversity into extirpation and colonization-resultant change (i.e. change in spatial beta-diversity within each region resulting from both extirpation and colonization). We used measures of abiotic change in combination with Bayesian modelling to disentangle the drivers of biotic heterogenization and homogenization. We detected both heterogenization and homogenization across the two time periods and three measures of diversity (taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional). In addition, both extirpation and colonization contributed to the observed changes, with heterogenization mainly driven by extirpation and homogenization by colonization. These assemblage-level changes were primarily due to shifting occupancy patterns of generalist species. Compared to habitat generalists, habitat specialists had significantly (i) higher average contributions to colonization-resultant change (indicating heterogenization within a region due to colonization) and (ii) lower average contributions to extirpation-resultant change (indicating homogenization from extirpation). Generalists showed the opposite pattern. Increased extirpation-resultant homogenization within regions was associated with increased urban land cover and decreased habitat diversity, precipitation, and temperature. Changes in extirpation-resultant heterogenization and colonization-resultant heterogenization were associated with differences in elevation between regions and changes in temperature and land cover. Many of the 'winners' (i.e. species that increased in occupancy) were species that had benefitted from conservation action (e.g. buzzard (Buteo buteo)). The 'losers' (i.e. those that decreased in occupancy) consisted primarily of previously common species, such as cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Our results show that focusing purely on changes in spatial beta-diversity over time may obscure important information about how changes in the occupancy patterns of individual species contribute to homogenization and heterogenization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph P Wayman
- GEES (School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences) and Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Operation Wallacea, Spilsby, UK
| | - Jonathan P Sadler
- GEES (School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences) and Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Thomas E Martin
- Operation Wallacea, Spilsby, UK
- School of Natural Sciences, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Laura J Graham
- GEES (School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences) and Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Biodiversity Ecology & Conservation Group, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria
| | - Hannah J White
- School of Life Sciences, Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK
| | - Joseph A Tobias
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Ascot, UK
| | - Thomas J Matthews
- GEES (School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences) and Birmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes/Azorean Biodiversity Group and Universidade dos Açores-Depto de Ciências Agráriase Engenharia do Ambiente, Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pearman PB, Broennimann O, Aavik T, Albayrak T, Alves PC, Aravanopoulos FA, Bertola LD, Biedrzycka A, Buzan E, Cubric-Curik V, Djan M, Fedorca A, Fuentes-Pardo AP, Fussi B, Godoy JA, Gugerli F, Hoban S, Holderegger R, Hvilsom C, Iacolina L, Kalamujic Stroil B, Klinga P, Konopiński MK, Kopatz A, Laikre L, Lopes-Fernandes M, McMahon BJ, Mergeay J, Neophytou C, Pálsson S, Paz-Vinas I, Posledovich D, Primmer CR, Raeymaekers JAM, Rinkevich B, Rolečková B, Ruņģis D, Schuerz L, Segelbacher G, Kavčič Sonnenschein K, Stefanovic M, Thurfjell H, Träger S, Tsvetkov IN, Velickovic N, Vergeer P, Vernesi C, Vilà C, Westergren M, Zachos FE, Guisan A, Bruford M. Monitoring of species' genetic diversity in Europe varies greatly and overlooks potential climate change impacts. Nat Ecol Evol 2024; 8:267-281. [PMID: 38225425 PMCID: PMC10857941 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-023-02260-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
Genetic monitoring of populations currently attracts interest in the context of the Convention on Biological Diversity but needs long-term planning and investments. However, genetic diversity has been largely neglected in biodiversity monitoring, and when addressed, it is treated separately, detached from other conservation issues, such as habitat alteration due to climate change. We report an accounting of efforts to monitor population genetic diversity in Europe (genetic monitoring effort, GME), the evaluation of which can help guide future capacity building and collaboration towards areas most in need of expanded monitoring. Overlaying GME with areas where the ranges of selected species of conservation interest approach current and future climate niche limits helps identify whether GME coincides with anticipated climate change effects on biodiversity. Our analysis suggests that country area, financial resources and conservation policy influence GME, high values of which only partially match species' joint patterns of limits to suitable climatic conditions. Populations at trailing climatic niche margins probably hold genetic diversity that is important for adaptation to changing climate. Our results illuminate the need in Europe for expanded investment in genetic monitoring across climate gradients occupied by focal species, a need arguably greatest in southeastern European countries. This need could be met in part by expanding the European Union's Birds and Habitats Directives to fully address the conservation and monitoring of genetic diversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter B Pearman
- Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain.
- IKERBASQUE Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Spain.
- BC3 Basque Center for Climate Change, Leioa, Spain.
| | - Olivier Broennimann
- Department of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, Geopolis, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Tsipe Aavik
- Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Tamer Albayrak
- Science and Art Faculty, Department of Biology, Lab of Ornithology, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey
| | - Paulo C Alves
- CIBIO-InBIO Laboratório Associado & Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências do Porto, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Portugal
- BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, CIBIO, Campus de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, Vairão, Portugal
- EBM, Estação Biológica de Mértola, Mértola, Portugal
| | - F A Aravanopoulos
- Faculty of Agriculture, Forest Science and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Laura D Bertola
- Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Elena Buzan
- Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences, and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia
- Faculty of Environmental Protection, Velenje, Slovenia
| | | | - Mihajla Djan
- Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Ancuta Fedorca
- Department of Wildlife, National Institute for Research and Development in Forestry 'Marin Dracea', Brasov, Romania
- Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Silviculture and Forest Engineering, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania
| | - Angela P Fuentes-Pardo
- Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Barbara Fussi
- Bavarian Office for Forest Genetics, Teisendorf, Germany
| | - José A Godoy
- Doñana Biological Station (EBD-CSIC), Seville, Spain
| | - Felix Gugerli
- Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
| | - Sean Hoban
- Center for Tree Science, Morton Arboretum, Lisle, IL, USA
| | - Rolf Holderegger
- Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
- Department of Environmental Systems Sciences D-USYS, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Laura Iacolina
- Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, Department of Biodiversity, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Belma Kalamujic Stroil
- Institute for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Peter Klinga
- Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovak Republic
- Department of Forest Ecology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Maciej K Konopiński
- Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
| | | | - Linda Laikre
- Department of Zoology, Division of Population Genetics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Margarida Lopes-Fernandes
- Centre for Research in Anthropology, Lisbon, Portugal
- Institute for Nature Conservation and Forests, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Barry John McMahon
- UCD School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Joachim Mergeay
- Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Geraardsbergen, Belgium
- Ecology, Evolution and Biodiversity Conservation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Charalambos Neophytou
- Institute of Silviculture, Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria
- Department of Forest Nature Conservation, Forest Research Institute Baden-Württemberg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Snæbjörn Pálsson
- Department of Biology, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Ivan Paz-Vinas
- Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Diana Posledovich
- Department of Zoology, Division of Population Genetics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Craig R Primmer
- Faculty of Biological & Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Baruch Rinkevich
- Israel Oceanographic and Limnological Research, National Institute of Oceanography, Haifa, Israel
| | - Barbora Rolečková
- Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Dainis Ruņģis
- Genetic Resource Centre, Latvian State Forest Research Institute 'Silava', Salaspils, Latvia
| | - Laura Schuerz
- Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Milomir Stefanovic
- Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Henrik Thurfjell
- Swedish Species Information Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Sabrina Träger
- Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ivaylo N Tsvetkov
- Department of Forest Genetics, Physiology and Plantations, Forest Research Institute, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Nevena Velickovic
- Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Philippine Vergeer
- Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Cristiano Vernesi
- Forest Ecology Unit, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Italy
| | - Carles Vilà
- Doñana Biological Station (EBD-CSIC), Seville, Spain
| | | | - Frank E Zachos
- Natural History Museum Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Evolutionary Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Genetics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| | - Antoine Guisan
- Department of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, Geopolis, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Michael Bruford
- School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Department of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
García-Moreno J. Zoonoses in a changing world. Bioscience 2023; 73:711-720. [PMID: 37854892 PMCID: PMC10580970 DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biad074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Animals are continuously exposed to pathogens but rarely get infected, because pathogens must overcome barriers to establish successful infections. Ongoing planetary changes affect factors relevant for such infections, such as pathogen pressure and pathogen exposure. The replacement of wildlife with domestic animals shrinks the original host reservoirs, whereas expanding agricultural frontiers lead to increased contact between natural and altered ecosystems, increasing pathogen exposure and reducing the area where the original hosts can live. Climate change alters species' distributions and phenology, pathogens included, resulting in exposure to pathogens that have colonized or recolonized new areas. Globalization leads to unwilling movement of and exposure to pathogens. Because people and domestic animals are overdominant planetwide, there is increased selective pressure for pathogens to infect them. Nature conservation measures can slow down but not fully prevent spillovers. Additional and enhanced surveillance methods in potential spillover hotspots should improve early detection and allow swifter responses to emerging outbreaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime García-Moreno
- Vogelbescherming Nederland, Zeist, Netherlands
- BirdLife, the Netherlands
- ESiLi, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR. Mutilation of the tree of life via mass extinction of animal genera. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2023; 120:e2306987120. [PMID: 37722053 PMCID: PMC10523489 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2306987120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Mass extinctions during the past 500 million y rapidly removed branches from the phylogenetic tree of life and required millions of years for evolution to generate functional replacements for the extinct (EX) organisms. Here we show, by examining 5,400 vertebrate genera (excluding fishes) comprising 34,600 species, that 73 genera became EX since 1500 AD. Beyond any doubt, the human-driven sixth mass extinction is more severe than previously assessed and is rapidly accelerating. The current generic extinction rates are 35 times higher than expected background rates prevailing in the last million years under the absence of human impacts. The genera lost in the last five centuries would have taken some 18,000 y to vanish in the absence of human beings. Current generic extinction rates will likely greatly accelerate in the next few decades due to drivers accompanying the growth and consumption of the human enterprise such as habitat destruction, illegal trade, and climate disruption. If all now-endangered genera were to vanish by 2,100, extinction rates would be 354 (average) or 511 (for mammals) times higher than background rates, meaning that genera lost in three centuries would have taken 106,000 and 153,000 y to become EX in the absence of humans. Such mutilation of the tree of life and the resulting loss of ecosystem services provided by biodiversity to humanity is a serious threat to the stability of civilization. Immediate political, economic, and social efforts of an unprecedented scale are essential if we are to prevent these extinctions and their societal impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerardo Ceballos
- Departamento de Ecologia de la Biodiversidad, Instituto de Ecologia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Tercer Circuito Exterior SN, C.U., 04510Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico
| | - Paul R. Ehrlich
- Department of Biology, Center for Conservation Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA94305
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Davies TJ. Extinction: The downsizing of morphospace. Curr Biol 2022; 32:R926-R928. [PMID: 36099899 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.07.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Birds with unusual traits are at elevated risk of extinction. Future avian assemblages are therefore likely to be less morphologically varied than they are today, reducing the diversity of ecosystems services they can support, and their capacity for adaptive change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Jonathan Davies
- Departments of Botany, Forest & Conservation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; African Centre for DNA Barcoding, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|