Trends in lower extremity amputations in people with and without diabetes in England, 1996-2005

A critical literature review highlighting the methodological differences within epidemiological studies: Pedal Amputations in England

INTRODUCTION

There is an absence in the application of standardised epidemiological principles when calculating and reporting on lower extremity amputation (LEA) rates [1]. The rates of minor LEAs in the diabetic population range from 1.2-362.9 per 100,000 and in the population without diabetes 0.9-109.4 per 100,000. The reported rates of major lower limb amputations vary from 5.6-600 per 100,000 in the diabetic population and 3.6-58.7 per 100,000 in the total population [1]. The variation in methodology does not facilitate comparison across populations and time. All studies published using the population from England, UK, describing minor amputations were systematically reviewed and rates and methodologies compared.

METHOD

A systematic search was carried out using (PRISMA) guidelines [2] to reveal primary data of minor lower extremity amputation rates in England between 1988-2018. This was carried out using electronic databases, grey literature and reference list searching. The search yielded eleven studies that were eligible for review.

RESULTS

Significant variation in the reporting of minor lower extremity amputation rates across regional and gender groups in England was found. Rates in the diabetic and non-diabetic population varied from 1.2 to 362.9 per 100,000 and 0.9 to 109.4 per 100,000 respectively. This was predominately a result of poorly describing numerator and denominator populations and defining minor amputations differently. As a result, there was an inability to confidently establish regional, gender and time trends.

CONCLUSION

The inconsistent nature of reporting minor amputations makes drawing conclusions on temporal and population change difficult. Future studies should describe and present basic numerator and denominator population characteristics e.g. number, age and sex and use the standard definition of minor amputation as one that is at or below the ankle.

Impact of diabetes on medical costs in the pre- and postoperative year of lower extremity amputations in Belgium

AIMS

To compare the medical costs of individuals undergoing lower extremity amputation (LEA) in Belgium with those of amputation-free individuals.

METHODS

Belgian citizens undergoing LEAs in 2014 were identified. The median costs per capita in euros for the 12 months preceding and following minor and major LEAs were compared with those of matched amputation-free individuals.

RESULTS

A total of 3324 Belgian citizens underwent LEAs (2295 minor, 1029 major), 2130 of them had diabetes. The comparison group included 31,716 individuals. Amputation was associated with high medical costs (individuals with diabetes: major LEA €49,735, minor LEA €24,243, no LEA €2,877 in the year preceding amputation; €45,740, €21,445 and €2,284, respectively, in the post-amputation year). Significantly higher costs were observed in the individuals with (versus without) diabetes in all groups. This difference diminished with higher amputation levels. Individuals undergoing multiple LEAs generated higher costs (individuals with diabetes: €39,313-€89,563 when LEAs preceded index amputation; €46,629-€92,877 when LEAs followed index amputation). Individuals dying in the year after a major LEA generated remarkably lower costs.

CONCLUSIONS

LEA-related medical costs were high. Diabetes significantly impacted costs, but differences in costs diminished with higher amputation levels. Individuals with multiple amputations generated the highest costs.

The health-related quality of life in patients with diabetic foot ulcers in the Kingdom of Bahrain

AIMS

The aims of this study were to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of adult Bahraini patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) and to explore factors associated with poor HRQoL.

METHODS

Cross-sectional HRQoL data were obtained from a sample of patients in active treatment for DFU at a large public hospital in Bahrain. Patient-reported HRQOL was measured using the following instruments: DFS-SF, CWIS and EQ-5D.

RESULTS

The patient sample included 94 patients, with a mean age of 61.8 (SD: 9.9) years, 54 (57.5%) were males, and 68 (72.3%) were native Bahrainis. Poorer HRQoL was found among patients who were unemployed, divorced/widowed, and those with a shorter duration of formal education. Additionally, patients with severe DFUs, persisting ulcers, and a longer duration of diabetes reported statistically significantly poorer HRQoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings from this study demonstrate a low level of HRQoL among Bahraini patients with DFUs. A longer duration of diabetes, in addition to ulcer severity and status statistically significantly influence HRQoL.

Predictors of Ambulatory Status at 1 Year Following Major Lower Extremity Amputation

Nearly 60,000 major lower extremity amputations (AKA/BKA) are performed annually in the United States. We created a simple risk score for predicting ambulation at 1 year following AKA/BKA. We queried the Vascular Quality Initiative amputation database for patients who underwent above-knee (AKA) or below-knee (BKA) amputation (2013-2018). The primary endpoint was ambulation at 1 year either independently or with assistance. The cohort was divided into 80% derivation and 20% validation. Using the derivation set, a multivariable model identified preoperatively available independent predictors of 1 year ambulation and an integer-based risk-score was created. Scores were calculated to assign patients to risk groups-low, medium, or high chance of being ambulatory at 1 year. Internal validation was performed by applying the risk score to the validation set. Of 8725 AKA/BKA, 2055 met inclusion criteria-excluded: 2644 nonambulatory prior to amputation, 3753 missing 1-year follow-up ambulatory status. The majority-n = 1366, 66% were BKAs. The indications were CLTI; 47%, ischemic tissue loss; 9%, ischemic rest pain; 35%, infection/neuropathic; 9%, acute limb ischemia. Ambulation at 1 year was higher for BKA than AKA: 67%, versus 50%, p < .0001. In the final prediction model, contralateral BKA/AKA was the strongest predictor of nonambulation. The score provided reasonable discrimination (C-statistic = 0.65) and was well calibrated (Hosmer-Lemeshow p = .24). Sixty-two percent of patients who were ambulatory preoperatively remained ambulatory at 1 year. An integer-based risk score can stratify patients according to chance of ambulation at 1 year after major amputation and may be useful for preoperative patient counseling and selection.

Outcome of Modified Pirogoff Amputation for Diabetic Foot Infection: A Single-Center Case Series

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic-related foot condition is one of the most debilitating complications with a higher rate of failure in limb correction, reconstruction, or salvage surgery. Amputation is the final option after other surgical treatments have failed. Major amputation increases energy consumption, resulting in high dependency, decreased mobility, and poor prognosis. Consequently, minor amputation is preferred to resolve these problems but elevated wound complications leading to inadequate prosthesis fit, became a detriment to minor amputation. Strict selection of patients is crucial to ensure success and good functional outcomes as demonstrated in this retrospective study of this case series. Methods: This case series included six patients who underwent Pirogoff amputation with the modification described by Nather and reported the procedure's outcome. The inclusion criteria for subjects were the presence of palpable posterior tibial artery (PTA) or at least biphasic Doppler signal and ankle-brachial systolic index (ABSI) more than 0.70. Other demographic data as well as hematological, inflammatory, and biochemical parameters that may affect wound healing such as Hb, HbA1c, ESR, CRP, WBC, and albumin were recorded as well. The rate and time for wound healing and bone union, presence of complications, and final ambulatory status of patients were determined as the outcome of this study.

RESULTS

All of the patients had diabetic foot infections involving only the forefoot region with the presence of either palpable PTA or biphasic Doppler signal. Although the majority of the cases had deranged blood parameters, soft tissue and bone healing were achieved at variable times. Four had good outcomes as they were able to ambulate. One case was complicated with chronic wound dehiscence and another one had Pirogoff stump infection and required transtibial amputation.

CONCLUSION

With strict selection criteria, Pirogoff amputation may provide a good functional outcome with a lesser degree of complications compared to major amputation.

Health utility in community-dwelling adults with dysvascular lower limb loss

PURPOSE

Adults with dysvascular lower extremity amputation (LEA) experience a large number of secondary health conditions yet there is a gap in the literature on health utility scores for this population. A health utility score relates to a person's state of well-being, and is a single metric anchored at 0 (death) and 1 (perfect health). This study aimed to provide a descriptive account of health utility scores in community-dwelling adults with dysvascular LEA.

METHODS

Participants were adults with dysvascular LEA who were 3 months post-amputation. Data collected included socio-demographic characteristics, the Special Interest Group in Amputee Medicine (SIGAM) grades, the dysvascular conditions scale (DCS), which is a scale developed for this study, and the Short Form-36 (SF-36). SF-6D health utility scores were derived from the SF-36 using a software algorithm. Participants were grouped into low-impact and high-impact groups based on self-reported severity of symptoms using the DCS. Health utility scores were compared between the low-impact and high-impact groups using independent t-tests.

RESULTS

A total of 231 participants were enrolled in the study. The mean SF-6D health utility score was 0.689 (0.127). A significant association was found between health utility score and SIGAM grade (p < 0.001, η2 = .09). Health utility was positively associated with age (r = 0.137, p = 0.037) and months post-amputation (r = 0.141, p = 0.032), and negatively associated with DCS severity (r = -0.526, p < 0.001). Health utility scores were lower for participants in the DCS high-impact groups for conditions such as diabetes mellitus, phantom limb pain, musculoskeletal pain, back pain, psychological distress, depression, vision problems, and other pain.

CONCLUSION

Cost-utility analyses rely on health utility estimates and our findings provide data for future economic evaluations that may assist policy makers in evidence informed allocation of healthcare resources for this population.

Temporal trends in major, minor and recurrent lower extremity amputations in people with and without diabetes in Belgium from 2009 to 2018

AIMS

This study assessed temporal trends in the incidence of lower extremity amputations (LEA) in Belgium from 2009 to 2018, and subsequent secondary amputation rates.

METHODS

Nationwide data on LEA were collected. Sex- and age-adjusted annual incidence rates were calculated. Time trends were analysed in negative binomial models. The incidence of secondary interventions, defined as either any ipsilateral reamputation or any contralateral amputation, was studied with death as competing risk.

RESULTS

41 304 amputations were performed (13 247 major, 28 057 minor). In individuals with diabetes, the amputation rate (first amputation per patient per year) decreased from 143.6/100.000 person-years to 109.7 (IRR 0.97 per year, 95 %CI 0.96-0.98, p < 0.001). The incidence of major LEAs decreased from 56.2 to 30.7 (IRR 0.93, 95 %CI 0.91-0.94, p < 0.001); the incidence of minor amputations showed a non-significant declining trend in women (54.3 to 45.0/100 000 person years, IRR 0.97 per year, 95 %CI 0.96-0.99), while this remained stable in men with diabetes (149.2 to 135.3/100 000 person years, IRR 1.00 per year, 95 %CI 0.98-1.01). In individuals without diabetes, the incidence of major amputation didn't change significantly, whereas minor amputation incidence increased (8.0 to 10.6, IRR 1.04, 95 %CI 1.03-1.05, p < 0.001). In individuals with diabetes, one-year secondary intervention rates were high (31.3% after minor, 18.4% after major LEA); the incidence of secondary amputations didn't change.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant decline in the incidence rate of major LEA was observed in people with diabetes. This decline was not accompanied by a significant rise in minor LEA. The incidence of secondary interventions remained stable.

Current Predictors of Mortality in Veteran Patients Undergoing Major Lower Extremity Amputations: Risk Factors Have Not Changed and Mortality Remains High

Major lower extremity amputation (LEA-above the ankle) carries a high rate of mortality. In the present study, we performed an institutional review of all patients submitting to LEAs at a Veteran Administration Hospital (between 2009 and 2021) accompanied with a review of the literature.For the past 12 years, 1042 LEAs were performed in 603 patients at our hospital. The 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortalities were 8.5%, 28.9%, and 53.0%, respectively. Age, hypoalbuminemia, and Clavien-Dindo Class were independent predictors of mortality in all the time intervals in the analysis. Cardiac disease was not an independent predictor of mortality. In 39 studies reviewed, the average 30-day, 1-year, and 5-year mortality was 14%, 36%, and 56%, respectively. There was no difference in mortality in multiple studies analyzed. No significant temporal variation was identified between 1950 and 2000 vs. 2001 and 2021. Predictors of mortality were not substantially different from our institutional experience.The mortality rate for LEAs remains constant over time. Increasing age and hypoalbuminemia are strong predictors of short- and long-term mortality.

Factors influencing lower extremity amputation outcomes in people with active foot ulceration in regional Australia: A retrospective cohort study

Australia has the second highest rate of non-traumatic lower extremity amputation (LEA) globally. Australia's large geographical size is one of the biggest challenges facing limb preservation services and may be contributing to LEA. The aim of this study was to determine what factors contribute to the likelihood of LEA in people with active foot ulceration in regional Australia. This retrospective cohort study audited patients with active foot ulceration in a multidisciplinary high risk foot service (HRFS) in regional Australia. Neurological, vascular and wound characteristics were systematically extracted, along with demographic information. Participants were followed for at least 12 months until healing or LEA occurred. Correlations between LEA and clinical and demographic characteristics were assessed using the Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient and chi squared test for independence. Significant variables (p < 0.05) were included in the model. Direct logistic regression assessed the independent contribution of significantly correlated variables on the likelihood of LEA. Of note, 1876 records were hand screened with 476 participants (25%) meeting the inclusion criteria. Geographical distance from the HRFS, toe systolic pressure (TSP), diabetes and infection were all significantly correlated with LEA and included in the logistic regression model. TSP decrease of 1 mmHg (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03), increased geographical distance (1 km) from HRFS (OR 1.006, 95% CI 1.001-1.01) infection (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.06-4.07) and presence of diabetes (OR 3.77, 95% CI 1.12-12.65) were all significantly associated with increased likelihood of LEA. HRFS should account for the disparity in outcomes between patients living in close proximity to their service, compared to those in rural areas. Optimal management of diabetes, vascular perfusion and control of infection may also contribute to preventing LEA in people with active foot ulceration.

Understanding variations in reported epidemiology of major lower extremity amputation in the UK: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Estimate the prevalence/incidence/number of major lower extremity amputations (MLEAs) in the UK; identify sources of routinely collected electronic health data used; assess time trends and regional variation; and identify reasons for variation in reported incidence/prevalence of MLEA.

DESIGN

Systematic review and narrative synthesis.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, EMcare, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, AMED, Scopus and grey literature sources searched from 1 January 2009 to 1 August 2021.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Reports that provided population-based statistics, used routinely collected electronic health data, gave a measure of MLEA in adults in the general population or those with diabetes in the UK or constituent countries were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data extraction and quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Instruments were performed by two reviewers independently. Due to considerable differences in study populations and methodology, data pooling was not possible; data were tabulated and narratively synthesised, and study differences were discussed.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven reports were included. Incidence proportion for the general population ranged from 8.2 to 51.1 per 100 000 and from 70 to 291 per 100 000 for the population with diabetes. Evidence for trends over time was mixed, but there was no evidence of increasing incidence. Reports consistently found regional variation in England with incidence higher in the north. No studies reported prevalence. Differences in database use, MLEA definition, calculation methods and multiple procedure inclusion which, together with identified inaccuracies, may account for the variation in incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

UK incidence and trends in MLEA remain unclear; estimates vary widely due to differences in methodology and inaccuracies. Reasons for regional variation also remain unexplained and prevalence uninvestigated. International consensus on the definition of MLEA and medical code list is needed. Future research should recommend standards for the reporting of such outcomes and investigate further the potential to use primary care data in MLEA epidemiology.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42020165592.

Editor's Choice - Trends in Lower Extremity Amputation Incidence in European Union 15+ Countries 1990-2017

OBJECTIVE

Lower extremity amputation (LEA) carries significant mortality, morbidity, and health economic burden. In the Western world, it most commonly results from complications of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) or diabetic foot disease. The incidence of PAOD has declined in Europe, the United States, and parts of Australasia. The present study aimed to assess trends in LEA incidence in European Union (EU15+) countries for the years 1990-2017.

METHODS

This was an observational study using data obtained from the 2017 Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study. Age standardised incidence rates (ASIRs) for LEA (stratified into toe amputation, and LEA proximal to toes) were extracted from the GBD Results Tool (http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool) for EU15+ countries for each of the years 1990-2017. Trends were analysed using Joinpoint regression analysis.

RESULTS

Between 1990 and 2017, variable trends in the incidence of LEA were observed in EU15+ countries. For LEAs proximal to toes, increasing trends were observed in six of 19 countries and decreasing trends in nine of 19 countries, with four countries showing varying trends between sexes. For toe amputation, increasing trends were observed in eight of 19 countries and decreasing trends in eight of 19 countries for both sexes, with three countries showing varying trends between sexes. Australia had the highest ASIRs for both sexes in all LEAs at all time points, with steadily increasing trends. The USA observed the greatest reduction in all LEAs in both sexes over the time period analysed (LEAs proximal to toes: female patients -22.93%, male patients -29.76%; toe amputation: female patients -29.93%, male patients -32.67%). The greatest overall increase in incidence was observed in Australia.

CONCLUSION

Variable trends in LEA incidence were observed across EU15+ countries. These trends do not reflect previously observed reductions in incidence of PAOD over the same time period.

Analysis of Diabetes Mellitus-Related Amputations in the State of Espírito Santo, Brazil

Background and objectives: Diabetes mellitus (DM) stands out among the most important public health problems worldwide since it represents a high burden on health systems and is associated with higher hospitalization rates, and a higher incidence of cardiovascular diseases. Amputations are among the most common complications, leading to disability and increasing care costs. This research aims to analyze the prevalence of DM-related amputations, comorbidities and associated risk factors in the diabetic population residing in the State of Espírito Santo, Brazil. Materials and Methods: This is a quantitative, exploratory, cross-sectional study with a time series design and the use of secondary data registered and followed by the system of Registration and Monitoring of Hypertension and Diabetes-SisHiperdia. Results: The sample consisted of 64,196 diabetic patients, out of them, 3.9% had type 1 DM, 10.9% with type 2 DM, and 85.2% with DM coexisting with hypertension. Most were female (66.6%), aged 40 to 59 years (45.6%), and 60 years and older (45.2%). The prevalence of DM-related amputations in the analyzed sample was 1.2% in type 1 DM, 1.5% in type 2 DM, and 2.2% in concomitant DM and hypertension. Higher amputation rates were observed in males in the age group above 60 years in type 1 DM and type 2 DM and were slightly higher in the age groups up to 29 years in DM with hypertension. A higher prevalence of amputation was related to smoking, physical inactivity, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and diabetic foot (DF) in all types of DM. Conclusions: The present study showed a significant prevalence of DM-related amputations. An increased prevalence was evidenced when correlated with smoking, physical inactivity, AMI, stroke, CKD, and DF with significant statistical associations, except for a sedentary lifestyle in type 1 DM.

Preoperative sepsis is a predictive factor for 30-day mortality after major lower limb amputation among patients with arteriosclerosis obliterans and diabetes

BACKGROUND

While many patients with lower limb ischemia also have severe infections, few studies have investigated whether the presence of preoperative sepsis affects patient prognosis following lower limb amputation (LLA). Therefore, we investigated the factors (including sepsis as defined in SEPSIS-3) that contribute to the acute mortality rate in patients who underwent LLA due to arteriosclerosis obliterans (ASO) or diabetes mellitus (DM).

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center, 10-year chart review study, 122 adult patients who underwent LLA due to ASO and/or DM were identified from 56,438 surgery cases. Patient characteristics, including co-morbidities, surgical conditions, the presence/absence of sepsis, and acute physiological condition after surgery, were investigated in patients who died within 30 days of LLA and those who survived. Univariate analysis between groups was performed using the chi-square test. Comparisons of age and American Society of Anesthesiologists-Physical Status classification between groups were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Risk factors for 30-day mortality after LLA were examined using stepwise logistic regression (backward elimination). Statistical results were considered significant at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

Eight cases of mortality (6.6%) were found; we identified the causes as sepsis, myocardial infarction, fatal arrhythmia, and mesenteric artery occlusive disease in 5 (62.5%), 1 (12.5%), 1 (12.5%), and 1 (12.5%) cases, respectively. Using univariate analysis, we identified that age (≥74), delirium, sepsis, intensive care unit admission, non-DM (ASO only), hemodialysis, and acute kidney injury were significantly higher in the mortality group. In logistic regression analysis, non-DM (odds ratio [OR]: 35.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.8-432) and sepsis (OR: 80.7, 95% CI: 6.7-959) were potential risk factors for 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that cases resulting in amputation due to ASO pathology alone might have poor prognosis and that preoperative sepsis can increase perioperative mortality; hence, the decision to amputate must be considered before the development of sepsis.

Trends and outcomes of non-traumatic major lower extremity amputations in an Irish tertiary referral hospital

OBJECTIVES

Data on vascular patients following amputation in Ireland is lacking, limiting capability to plan services. This paper seeks to benchmark survival and rehabilitation outcomes among vascular patients in Ireland following lower extremity amputation (LEA), and compare subgroups of those undergoing transfemoral (TFA) or transtibial amputation (TTA).

METHODS

A review was conducted of all patients who underwent non-traumatic TFA or TTA from 2000 to 2009 in a tertiary vascular surgery centre. Demographics, surgical data, perioperative outcomes, medium-term functional outcomes, and survival were assessed.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-two patients (2:1 male: female) underwent 192 non-traumatic LEAs. Median age for TFA was 75 years and TTA 67 (p = 0.002). A percentage of 36.5% had undergone prior attempts at surgical revascularization, 25% had undergone prior distal amputation or debridement. Thirty-three (17%) required stump revision. Twenty-three (13.2%) died in hospital. Median survival for those who died in hospital was 17 days (0-367), versus 17 months (2-106) for those who survived to discharge.

CONCLUSION

LEA for vascular pathology has significant morbidity and mortality, with long in-patient stays and short median survival; there is need to focus on improving quality of life in postoperative pathways.

An in-depth assessment of diabetes-related lower extremity amputation rates 2000-2013 delivered by twenty-one countries for the data collection 2015 of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)

BACKGROUND

International comparisons of diabetes-related lower extremity amputation rates are still hampered by different criteria used for data collection and analysis. We aimed to evaluate trends and variation of major/minor amputations, using agreed definitions adopted by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in 2015.

METHODS

Direct age-sex standardized rates were calculated per 100,000 subjects per year between 2000 and 2013, using major/minor amputations with diabetes diagnosis as numerators and the total population or number of people with diabetes as denominators. Longitudinal trends were investigated using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

Twenty-one countries reported major amputations referred to the general population, showing a mean reduction from 10.8 to 7.5 per 100,000 (- 30.6%). Eleven countries also reported major amputations among people with diabetes, showing a mean reduction from 182.9 to 128.3 per 100,000 (- 29.8%). Minor amputations remained stable over the study period. Longitudinal trends showed a significant average annual decrease of - 0.19 per 100,000 in the general population (95% CI - 0.36 to - 0.02; p = .03) and - 4.52 per 100,000 among subjects with diabetes (95% CI - 6.09 to - 2.94; p < .001). The coefficient of variation of major amputation rates between countries was fairly high (64%-in the total population, 67% among people with diabetes).

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlighted a clinically significant reduction of major amputations, in both the general population and among people with diabetes. The use of standardized definitions, while increasing the comparability of multinational data, highlighted remarkable differences between countries. These results can help identifying and sharing best practices effectively on a global scale.

Changes in rates of vascular procedure types and lower extremity amputations in Finland for 2007-2017 inclusive, a population cohort study of 69,523 revascularizations

INTRODUCTION

Since 2000 the numbers of both open and endovascular revascularization procedures have increased. Despite these increases, the number of major lower extremity amputations (LEAs) has remained relatively constant. The aim of the present study was to assess the number of vascular procedures in relation to the frequency of major LEAs in Finland.

METHODS

The Finnish National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL) administers a national registry of all procedures conducted by official healthcare providers in Finland. Data regarding all revascularization procedures and major LEAs between 2007 and 2017 inclusive, were collected from the THL registry. The rates of both open and endovascular procedures were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 69,523 revascularization procedures were registered over the 11-year period. Of all revascularizations, 22.6% were endovascular in 2007, which rose to 60.5% in 2017. The annual rates of vascular procedures per 100,000 inhabitants increased from 66 in 2007 to 172 in 2017 (increase 10 procedures per year, 95% CI 8.6-12.3, P < 0.01) There was a significant increase (by 141 per year, 95% CI 110-174, P < 0.01) for open revascularizations (2705 operations in 2007, 3992 operations in 2017) and (by 491 per year, 95% CI 433-550, P < 0.01) for endovascular revascularizations (791 in 2007-5514 in 2017). Open aorto-iliac segment revascularization decreased, whereas the numbers of procedures increased for all other arterial segments. The overall frequency of amputations was 18-20 per 100,000. The frequency of amputations in the subpopulation over 65 years old decreased from 93 in 2007 to 72 in 2017 (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated increases in vascular surgery procedures over the 11-year study-period. The increase was greatest for endovascular procedures. During the same period, there was a significant decrease in the frequency of major LEAs in the >65-year-old subpopulation.

Mortality, Reamputation, and Preoperative Comorbidities in Patients Undergoing Dysvascular Lower Limb Amputation

BACKGROUND

Historically, mortality rates after major lower limb amputations (LLAs) have been very high. However, there are inconsistencies regarding the risk factors. The reamputation rate after major LLAs is largely unknown. The aim of this study is to report the 30-day and 1-year mortality and 1-year reamputation rates after major LLA and to identify potential risk factors.

METHODS

An observational cohort study in which all patients undergoing dysvascular major LLA in 2012-2013 in 12 hospitals in the northern region of the Netherlands is included.

RESULTS

Of total 382 patients, who underwent major LLA, 65% were male and the mean age (standard deviation [SD]) was 71.9 ± 12.5 years. Peripheral arterial disease was observed in 88% and diabetes mellitus (DM), in 56% of patients. No revascularization or prior LLA on the amputated side was observed among 26%, whereas 56% had no minor or major LLA on either limb before the study period. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were 14% and 34%, respectively. Patients aged 75-84 and >85 years had 3-4 times higher odds of dying within 1 year. Transfemoral amputations (odds ratio [OR], 2.2), history of heart failure (OR, 2.3), myocardial infarction (OR, 1.7), hemodialysis (OR, 5.7), immunosuppressive medication (OR, 2.8), and guillotine amputations (OR, 5.1) were independently associated with 1-year mortality. Twenty-six percent underwent ipsilateral reamputation within 1 year, for which no risk factors were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The mortality rate in the first year after major LLA is high, particularly among those undergoing transfemoral amputations, which is likely to be indicative of more severe vascular disease. Higher mortality among the most elderly patients, those with more severe cardiac disease and who underwent hemodialysis reflects the frailty of this population. Interestingly, DM, revascularization history, and prior minor or major LLA were not associated with mortality rates.

Efficacy and safety of platelet-rich plasma in treating cutaneous ulceration: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The biological mechanisms underlying the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), as well as the efficacy and possible adverse effects of PRP, have not yet been fully elucidated. Prior studies have evaluated PRP for cutaneous ulceration. However, the benefits from PRP still remain controversial and few have assessed the effects of ulceration etiologies. The purpose of our study is to determine the efficacy and safety of PRP and which kind of ulcer is more suitable for PRP by analyzing the effects of PRP on ulcers with different causes.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding the application of PRP from PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. The data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3.

RESULTS

A total of nineteen RCTs (909 patients) were included. In contrast with conventional treatments, PRP achieved higher healing rate, higher percentage of area reduction, and smaller final area in vascular ulcers. However, the advantage disappeared in diabetic and pressure ulcers. Concerning adverse events, PRP showed lower incidence in the short term, but higher in the long term. No significant differences were found in ulcer closure velocity and healing time.

CONCLUSION

Platelet-rich plasma effectiveness and safety in treating cutaneous ulceration depend on what is the ulceration etiology. For diabetic ulcers, PRP showed no satisfactory results suggesting that PRP may not be suitable for diabetic patients. However, PRP could be efficient and more beneficial for vascular ulcers and effects on pressure ulcers remain unclear. Thus, PRP option should be carefully considered for each patient in accordance with their ulceration etiologies.

Incidence rates of dysvascular lower extremity amputation changes in Northern Netherlands: A comparison of three cohorts of 1991-1992, 2003-2004 and 2012-2013

Objective

To analyze the incidence rates of dysvascular major lower extremity amputations (LEA) in Northern Netherlands in 2012–2013 compared to previous cohorts in 1991–1992 and 2003–2004.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Participants

Adults (N = 343) with first ever dysvascular LEA at ankle disarticulation or more proximal levels. The median age (interquartile range) was 74.2 years (64.5–81.9), 64% were male and 55% had been diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM).

Main outcome measures

Crude and age-standardized incidence rates of major LEA per 100.000 person-years.

Results

Crude incidence rate (IR) of first ever major LEA in 2012–2013 was 9.9 per 100.000 person-years, while the age-standardized IR was 7.7 per 100.000 person-years. A Poisson regression analysis showed that amputation rates among men were 2.3 times higher compared to women (95%CI 1.9–2.6), while in 2012–2013 the population aged >63 years had decreased amputation rates compared to 1991–1992. In the DM population the crude IR decreased from 142.6 per 100.000 person-years in 2003–2004 to 89.2 per 100.000 person-years in 2012–2013 (p<0.001).

Conclusions

In 2012–2013 a decrease in age-standardized IR for the general population and a decrease in crude IR for the DM population were observed compared to cohorts from the previous two decades, despite considerable shifts in the age distribution of the Dutch population towards more elderly people and increased prevalence of DM. These findings might suggest that improved treatment of patients at risk of dysvascular amputations is associated with reduced incidence rates of major LEA at the population level.

Diabetes-related amputations create considerable public health burden in the UK

AIMS

The main aim of this study was to assess the cost of diabetic amputation (both direct and indirect) to the National Health Service from the point of amputation onwards.

METHODS

This systematic review involved searches of published literature between January 2007 and March 2017 mainly using the bibliographic databases, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE via Ovid®, MEDLINE via Ovid®, as well as grey literature, both in print and in electronic formats published through non-commercial publications, which reported the cost of amputation due to diabetic foot ulcers.

RESULTS

The studies included in this review varied considerably in estimating the cost including cost elements and how those costs were categorised. The cost estimates for inpatient care associated with amputation involving admissions or procedures on amputation stumps in people with diabetes was £43.8 million. The annual expenditure for post-amputation care involving prosthetic care, physiotherapy, transport and wheelchair use was £20.8 million.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a considerable public health and economic burden caused by diabetes-related amputations in England. More focussed research is needed with improved methods of estimating costs that would account for direct and indirect costs associated with diabetic amputation.

A systematic review describing incidence rate and prevalence of dysvascular partial foot amputation; how both have changed over time and compare to transtibial amputation

BACKGROUND

Partial foot amputation (PFA) is a common consequence of advanced peripheral vascular disease. Given the different ways incidence rate and prevalence data have been measured and reported, it is difficult to synthesize data and reconcile variation between studies. As such, there is uncertainty in whether the incidence rates and prevalence of PFA have increased over time compared to the decline in transtibial amputation (TTA). The aims of this systematic review were to describe the incidence rate and prevalence of dysvascular PFA over time, and how these compare to TTA.

METHOD

Databases (i.e., MEDLINE, EMBASE, psychINFO, AMED, CINAHL, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health) were searched using MeSH terms and keywords related to amputation level and incidence rate or prevalence. Original research published in English from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2015 were independently appraised, and data extracted, by two reviewers. The McMaster Critical Review Forms were used to assess methodological quality and bias. Results were reported as narrative summaries given heterogeneity of the literature and included the weighted mean annual incidence rate and 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Twenty two cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. Twenty one reported incidence rate data for some level of PFA; four also included a TTA cohort. One study reported prevalence data for a cohort with toe(s) amputation. Samples were typically older, male and included people with diabetes among other comorbidities. Incidence rates were reported using a myriad of denominators and strata such as diabetes type or initial/recurrent amputation.

CONCLUSION

When appropriately grouped by denominator and strata, incidence rates were more homogenous than might be expected. Variation between studies did not necessarily reduce confidence in the conclusion; for example, incidence rate of PFA were many times larger in cohorts with diabetes (94.24 per 100,000 people with diabetes; 95% CI 55.50 to 133.00) compared to those without (3.80 per 100,000 people without diabetes; 95% CI 1.43 to 6.16). It is unclear whether the incidence rates of PFA have changed over time or how they have changed relative to TTA. Further research requires datasets that include a large number of amputations each year and lengthy time periods to determine whether small annual changes in incidence rates have a cumulative and statistically significant effect over time.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42015029186 .

The hospitalization profiles of patients with or without diabetes treated for nontraumatic lower extremity amputation in Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo State, Brazil, 2001-2008

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the hospitalizations of patients with or without diabetes mellitus (DM) who underwent nontraumatic lower extremity amputation (NLEA) with regard to demographic and hospitalization-related variables. It is a high proportion of hospital beds in developing countries, for patients with diabetes mellitus with lower extremity complications. Nontraumatic amputations of lower extremities rates is an important indicator to assess the effectiveness of efforts to reduce chronic complications related to diabetic foot.A total of 2,296 hospital admissions were analyzed with regard to gender, age, length of stay, type of financing, origin, diagnosis, number of hospital admissions and readmissions, and hospitalization outcome from 2001 to 2008 in a municipality of Southeast Brazil. The association between the independent variables and the number of hospitalizations of patients with or without diabetes was assessed using chi-square tests for gender, type of financing, and hospitalization outcome and using the Mann-Whitney U test for age and length of stay. A total of 58% were patients without diabetes, 62.6% were male, 74.5% were treated at a public health care service, and 7.6% died. The mean age was 62.7 years, the mean length of stay was of 9.5 days, and the mean number of readmissions was 2.29 times. The length of stay was higher (P < .001), and the number of men was lower (P = .001) among the patients with diabetes who were hospitalized compared with patients without diabetes.The number of hospitalizations related to NLEA increased among patients with diabetes but reduced among those without diabetes between 2001 and 2008.

Outcomes of dysvascular partial foot amputation and how these compare to transtibial amputation: a systematic review for the development of shared decision-making resources

BACKGROUND

Dysvascular partial foot amputation (PFA) is a common sequel to advanced peripheral vascular disease. Helping inform difficult discussions between patients and practitioners about the level of PFA, or the decision to have a transtibial amputation (TTA) as an alternative, requires an understanding of the current research evidence on a wide range of topics including wound healing, reamputation, quality of life, mobility, functional ability, participation, pain and psychosocial outcomes, and mortality. The aim of this review was to describe a comprehensive range of outcomes of dysvascular PFA and compare these between levels of PFA and TTA.

METHODS

The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42015029186). A systematic search of the literature was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, psychINFO, AMED, CINAHL, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health, and Web of Science. These databases were searched using MeSH terms and keywords relating to different amputation levels and outcomes of interest. Peer reviewed studies of original research-irrespective of the study design-were included if published in English between 1 January 2000, and 31 December 2015, and included discrete cohort(s) with dysvascular PFA or PFA and TTA. Outcomes of interest were rate of wound healing and complications, rate of ipsilateral reamputation, quality of life, functional ability, mobility, pain (i.e., residual limb or phantom pain), psychosocial outcomes (i.e., depression, anxiety, body image and self-esteem), participation, and mortality rate. Included studies were independently appraised by two reviewers. The McMaster Critical Review Forms were used to assess methodological quality and identify sources of bias. Data were extracted based on the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Review Group's data extraction template by a primary reviewer and checked for accuracy and clarity by a second reviewer. Findings are reported as narrative summaries given the heterogeneity of the literature, except for mortality and ipsilateral reamputation where data allowed for proportional meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine unique articles were included in the review, acknowledging that some studies reported multiple outcomes. Eighteen studies reported all-cause proportionate mortality. A smaller number of studies reported outcomes related to functional ability (two), mobility (four), quality of life (three), ipsilateral reamputation (six) as well as wound healing and complications (four). No studies related to pain, participation or psychosocial outcomes met the inclusion criteria. Subjects were typically older and male and had diabetes among other comorbidities. More detailed information about the cohorts such as race or sociodemographic factors were reported in an ad hoc manner. Common sources of bias included contamination, co-intervention, or lack of operational definition for some outcomes (e.g., wound healing) as illustrative examples.

CONCLUSIONS

Aside from mortality, there was limited evidence regarding outcomes of dysvascular PFA, particularly how outcomes differ between levels of PFA and TTA. Acknowledging that there is considerable uncertainty given the small body of literature on many topics where the risk of bias is high, the available evidence suggests that a large proportion of people with PFA experience delayed wound healing and ipsilateral reamputation. People with TTA have increased risk of mortality compared to those with PFA, which may reflect that those considered suitable candidates for TTA have more advanced systemic disease that also increases the risk of dying. Mobility and quality of life may be similar in people with PFA and TTA.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

CRD42015029186.

Re-organizing inpatient care saves legs in patients with diabetic foot infections

AIMS

In this study, we evaluated the effects of the re-organization of inpatient care for patients with a diabetic foot infection, and the implementation of a specialized multi-disciplinary wound department at an academic tertiary hospital.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study, comprising 272 patients treated for diabetic foot infections in 2006-2007 (Group 1, n=124) and 2013-2014 (Group 2, n=148). In 2012, inpatient care of all chronic wounds was centralized at a single wound department with a multi-disciplinary team. We assessed group outcome before and after the re-organization.

RESULTS

During the 7-year study period, the incidence of hospitalized patients with a diabetic foot infection increased 19%. After initiating the re-organization, the below-the-knee amputation rate was significantly reduced (25.8% vs. 9.5%, p<0.001). The median time from admission to surgical intervention decreased from 5days to 2days, p<0.001. The length of hospitalization also tended to decrease after the reorganization.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study demonstrate the benefits of treating diabetic foot infections at a specialized wound department with a multi-disciplinary team. The benefits were achieved by simply distributing the workload and organizing schedules, without new investments or additional personnel. The findings of this study indicate that patients with diabetic foot infections present a challenge that is beyond the expertise of a single field of medicine. A working collaboration between disciplines and a specialized wound department are central in achieving better results.

Retrospective study of the evolution of the incidence of non-traumatic lower-extremity amputations (2007-2013) and risk factors of reamputation

AIM

Describe the incidence of non-traumatic amputation in a Spain region and identify the risk factors associated with the level of amputation and reamputation.

METHODS

Retrospective study on non-traumatic lower-extremity amputees in a Spanish region between 2007 and 2013. A descriptive, bivariate and multivariate analysis was performed using bivariate logistic regression. Statistical significance p≤0.05, SPSS V.21.

RESULTS

495 amputations were carried out in 353 patients. 81.0% (n=286) were men, mean age 68.7±10.8 years. The most frequent levels of amputation were digital (45.9%) and above-knee (40.5%). About 30% of the patients were reamputated. The multivariate analysis revealed that the factors independently related to the need for a minor lower-extremity amputation were DM [OR 3.79 (CI 95% 2.0-7.27)], foot ulcer [OR 5.82 (CI 95% 2.24-15.11)] and previous ipsilateral amputation [OR 3.19 (CI 95% 1.21-8.42)]. The risk factors independently related to the need for reamputation were DM [OR 2.21 (CI95% 1.09-4.49)], smoking [OR 2.45 (CI95% 1.33-4.50)] and previous revascularization [OR 2.75 (CI95% 1.57-4.83)].

CONCLUSIONS

Determining the incidence of amputations in diabetic patients as an indicator of quality makes it possible for health services to be evaluated. In patients with DM the most common reamputations are minor and ipsilateral.

Prognostic Significance of Atrial Fibrillation in Lower Limb Amputee Patients

OBJECTIVE

In patients with risk factors or established atherothrombosis, atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with a poor prognosis compared with patients without AF. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of AF in patients with lower limb amputation (LLA) and its association with cardiovascular death and adverse cardiovascular events in long-term follow-up.

METHODS

Observational prospective study of consecutive patients after index major (transfemoral and transtibial) LLA. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular death and secondary endpoint was a composite of adverse cardiovascular events at follow-up (acute myocardial infarction, contralateral lower limb amputation, and ischaemic stroke).

RESULTS

Of 282 patients with LLA, 46 (16.3%) patients had AF. AF patients were significantly older compared with patients without AF (median 74.0, IQR 13.0 vs. median 67.0, IQR 14.8 years, p < .001). Diabetes and smoking on the other hand were significantly less prevalent in patients with AF compared with those without AF (41.3% vs. 72.0%, p < .001 and 56.5% vs. 76.3%, p = .01, respectively). 54.3% of patients with AF were on oral anticoagulation therapy. At a median follow-up of 24.0 months (IQR 19.0-32.0), 28.3% patients with AF died of cardiovascular causes versus 17.8% without AF (HRR 1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.4, p = .06). Adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 32.6% of patients with AF during follow-up versus 22.0% without AF (HRR 1.9, 95% CI 1.0-3.3, p = .03). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, AF (HRR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.2, p = .01) and diabetes (HRR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-3.9, p = .02) were identified as independent predictors of adverse cardiovascular events during the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

AF is common in patients with LLA and associated with higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events during long-term follow-up.

Long-term mortality after lower-limb amputation

BACKGROUND

Mortality after amputation is known to be extremely high and is associated with a number of patient features. We wished to calculate this mortality after first-time lower-limb amputation and investigate whether any population or treatment factors are associated with worse mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To follow up individuals after lower limb amputation and ascertain the mortality rate as well as population or treatment features associated with mortality.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective cohort study.

METHODS

Prospective lower-limb amputations over 1 year (N = 105) at a Regional Rehabilitation Centre were followed up for 3 years.

RESULTS

After 3 years, 35 individuals in the cohort had died, representing a mortality of 33%. On initial univariate analysis, those who died were more likely to have diabetes mellitus (χ(2) = 7.16, df = 1, p = 0.007) and less likely to have been fitted with a prosthesis (χ(2) = 5.84, df = 1, p = 0.016). There was no association with age, gender, level of amputation, social isolation, significant medical co-morbidity other than diabetes or presence of mood disorders. A multi-variable logistic regression (backward step) confirmed that diabetes (odds ratio = 3.04, confidence intervals = 1.25-7.40, p = 0.014) and absence of prosthesis-fitting (odds ratio = 2.60, confidence interval = 1.16-6.25, p = 0.028) were independent predictors of mortality.

CONCLUSION

Mortality after amputation is extremely high and is increased in individuals with diabetes or in those who are not fitted with a prosthesis after amputation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The link between diabetes and mortality after amputation has been noted by others, but this is the first study to find an effect from prosthetic limb-wearing. This requires further investigation to ascertain why the wearing of a prosthetic limb, confers an independent survival benefit that is not related to the presence of medical co-morbidity.

Optimising the quality and outcomes of treatments for diabetic foot infections

INTRODUCTION

Infection is the commonest foot complication that arises in people with diabetes and may lead to amputation and even death. The emergence of multidrug resistant bacteria, especially in Gram negative rods, may have a negative impact on the chances of cure in these patients.

AREAS COVERED

We searched the Medline and Pubmed databases for studies using the keywords 'diabetic foot infection' and 'diabetic foot osteomyelits' from 1980 to 2016. Expert commentary: Much has been done in the field of diabetic foot infection regarding pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. The construction of multidisciplinary teams is probably the most efficient way to improve the patients' outcome. The rational use of antibiotics and surgical skills are essential in these potentially severe infections. Each case of diabetic infection deserves to be discussed in the light of the current guidelines and the local resources. Because of the overal poor outcome of these infections, prevention remains a priority.

A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of prognostic factors for foot ulceration in people with diabetes: the international research collaboration for the prediction of diabetic foot ulcerations (PODUS)

BACKGROUND

Annual foot risk assessment of people with diabetes is recommended in national and international clinical guidelines. At present, these are consensus based and use only a proportion of the available evidence.

OBJECTIVES

We undertook a systematic review of individual patient data (IPD) to identify the most highly prognostic factors for foot ulceration (i.e. symptoms, signs, diagnostic tests) in people with diabetes.

DATA SOURCES

Studies were identified from searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE.

REVIEW METHODS

The electronic search strategies for MEDLINE and EMBASE databases created during an aggregate systematic review of predictive factors for foot ulceration in diabetes were updated and rerun to January 2013. One reviewer applied the IPD review eligibility criteria to the full-text articles of the studies identified in our literature search and also to all studies excluded from our aggregate systematic review to ensure that we did not miss eligible IPD. A second reviewer applied the eligibility criteria to a 10% random sample of the abstract search yield to check that no relevant material was missed. This review includes exposure variables (risk factors) only from individuals who were free of foot ulceration at the time of study entry and who had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (either type 1 or type 2). The outcome variable was incident ulceration.

RESULTS

Our search identified 16 cohort studies and we obtained anonymised IPD for 10. These data were collected from more than 16,000 people with diabetes worldwide and reanalysed by us. One data set was kept for independent validation. The data sets contributing IPD covered a range of temporal, geographical and clinical settings. We therefore selected random-effects meta-analysis, which assumes not that all the estimates from each study are estimates of the same underlying true value, but rather that the estimates belong to the same distribution. We selected candidate variables for meta-analysis using specific criteria. After univariate meta-analyses, the most clinically important predictors were identified by an international steering committee for inclusion in the primary, multivariable meta-analysis. Age, sex, duration of diabetes, monofilaments and pulses were considered most prognostically important. Meta-analyses based on data from the entire IPD population found that an inability to feel a 10-g monofilament [odds ratio (OR) 3.184, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.654 to 3.82], at least one absent pedal pulse (OR 1.968, 95% CI 1.624 to 2.386), a longer duration of a diagnosis of diabetes (OR 1.024, 95% CI 1.011 to 1.036) and a previous history of ulceration (OR 6.589, 95% CI 2.488 to 17.45) were all predictive of risk. Female sex was protective (OR 0.743, 95% CI 0.598 to 0.922).

LIMITATIONS

It was not possible to perform a meta-analysis using a one-step approach because we were unable to procure copies of one of the data sets and instead accessed data via Safe Haven.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings from this review identify risk assessment procedures that can reliably inform national and international diabetes clinical guideline foot risk assessment procedures. The evidence from a large sample of patients in worldwide settings show that the use of a 10-g monofilament or one absent pedal pulse will identify those at moderate or intermediate risk of foot ulceration, and a history of foot ulcers or lower-extremity amputation is sufficient to identify those at high risk. We propose the development of a clinical prediction rule (CPR) from our existing model using the following predictor variables: insensitivity to a 10-g monofilament, absent pedal pulses and a history of ulceration or lower-extremities amputations. This CPR could replace the many tests, signs and symptoms that patients currently have measured using equipment that is either costly or difficult to use.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42011001841.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Cardiovascular Autonomic Dysfunction Predicts Diabetic Foot Ulcers in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Without Diabetic Polyneuropathy

We investigated the factors that might influence the development of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) in type 2 diabetes patients without diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN).From January 2000 to December 2005, a total of 595 patients who had type 2 diabetes without DPN between the ages of 25 and 75 years, and had no prior history of DFUs were consecutively enrolled in the study. A cardiovascular autonomic function test was performed to diagnose cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) using heart rate variability parameters.The median follow-up time was 13.3 years. Among the 449 (75.4%) patients who completed the follow-up evaluation, 22 (4.9%) patients developed new ulcers, and 6 (1.3%) patients underwent the procedure for lower extremity amputations. The patients in the DFUs group had a longer duration of diabetes, higher baseline HbA1c levels, higher rates of nephropathy, and CAN. A Cox hazard regression analysis results revealed that the development of DFUs was significantly associated with the presence of CAN (normal vs definite CAN; HR, 4.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-15.33) after adjusting for possible confounding factors.The development of DFUs was independently associated with CAN in patients with type 2 diabetes without DPN. We suggested the importance of CAN as a predictor of DFUs even in the patients without DPN, and the need to pay attention to patients with definite CAN and type 2 diabetes.

Epidemiology of Diabetic Foot Ulcers and Amputations in Romania: Results of a Cross-Sectional Quality of Life Questionnaire Based Survey

This is a post hoc analysis of quality of life in diabetic neuropathy patients in a cross-sectional survey performed in 2012 in Romania, using the Norfolk QOL-DN in which 21,756 patients with self-reported diabetes were enrolled. This current analysis aims to expand research on the diabetic foot and to provide an update on the number of foot ulcers found in Romania. Of the 21,174 patients included in this analysis, 14.85% reported a history of foot ulcers and 3.60% reported an amputation. The percentage of neuropathy patients with foot ulcers increased with age; the lowest percentage was observed in the 20-29-year age group (6.62%) and the highest in the 80-89-year age group (17.68%). The highest number of amputations was reported in the 70-79-year age group (largest group). Compared to patients without foot ulcers, those with foot ulcers had significantly higher scores for total DN and all its subdomains translating to worse QOL (p < 0.001). This analysis showed a high rate of foot ulcers and amputations in Romanian diabetic patients. It underscores the need for implementation of effective screening and educational programs.

Temporal changes in the prevalence and associates of diabetes-related lower extremity amputations in patients with type 2 diabetes: the Fremantle Diabetes Study

Background

To determine temporal changes in the prevalence and associates of lower extremity amputation (LEA) complicating type 2 diabetes.

Methods

Baseline data from the longitudinal observational Fremantle Diabetes Study (FDS) relating to LEA and its risk factors collected from 1296 patients recruited to FDS Phase 1 (FDS1) from 1993 to 1996 and from 1509 patients recruited to FDS Phase 2 (FDS2) from 2008 to 2011 were analysed. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine associates of prevalent LEA in individual and pooled phases. Generalised linear modelling was used to examine whether diabetes related LEA prevalence and its associates had changed between Phases.

Results

There were 15 diabetes-related LEAs at baseline in FDS1 (1.2 %) and 15 in FDS2 (1.0 %; P = 0.22 after age, sex and race/ethnicity adjustment). In multivariable analysis, independent associates of a baseline LEA in FDS1 were a history of vascular bypass surgery or revascularisation, urinary albumin:creatinine ratio, peripheral sensory neuropathy and cerebrovascular disease (P ≤ 0.035). In FDS2, prevalent LEA was independently associated with a history of vascular bypass surgery or revascularisation, past hospitalisation for/current foot ulcer and fasting serum glucose (P ≤ 0.001). In pooled analyses, a history of vascular bypass or revascularisation, past hospitalisation for/current foot ulcer at baseline, urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (P < 0.001), as well as FDS Phase as a binary variable [odds ratio (95 % confidence interval): 0.28 (0.09–0.84) for FDS2 vs FDS1, P = 0.023] were associated with a lower risk of LEA at study entry.

Conclusions

The risk of prevalent LEA in two cohorts of patients with type 2 diabetes from the same Australian community fell by 72 % over a 15-year period after adjustment for important between-group differences in diabetes-related and other variables. This improvement reflects primary care foot health-related initiatives introduced between Phases, and should have important individual and societal benefits against a background of a progressively increasing diabetes burden.

Early Post-operative Mortality After Major Lower Limb Amputation: A Systematic Review of Population and Regional Based Studies

OBJECTIVE

Lower limb amputation is often associated with a high risk of early post-operative mortality. Mortality rates are also increasingly being put forward as a possible benchmark for surgical performance. The primary aim of this systematic review is to investigate early post-operative mortality following a major lower limb amputation in population/regional based studies, and reported factors that might influence these mortality outcomes.

METHODS

Embase, PubMed, Cinahl and Psycinfo were searched for publications in any language on 30 day or in hospital mortality after major lower limb amputation in population/regional based studies. PRISMA guidelines were followed. A self developed checklist was used to assess quality and susceptibility to bias. Summary data were extracted for the percentage of the population who died; pooling of quantitative results was not possible because of methodological differences between studies.

RESULTS

Of the 9,082 publications identified, results were included from 21. The percentage of the population undergoing amputation who died within 30 days ranged from 7% to 22%, the in hospital equivalent was 4-20%. Transfemoral amputation and older age were found to have a higher proportion of early post-operative mortality, compared with transtibial and younger age, respectively. Other patient factors or surgical treatment choices related to increased early post-operative mortality varied between studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Early post-operative mortality rates vary from 4% to 22%. There are very limited data presented for patient related factors (age, comorbidities) that influence mortality. Even less is known about factors related to surgical treatment choices, being limited to amputation level. More information is needed to allow comparison across studies or for any benchmarking of acceptable mortality rates. Agreement is needed on key factors to be reported.

Trends in diabetes-related lower extremities amputations in Romania-A five year nationwide evaluation

The aim of the study was to perform a nationwide evaluation of the frequency, incidence and trends of diabetes-related LEA (lower extremities amputations) in Romania. We have retrospectively analysed DRG data (ICD 10 AM codes) from all hospitals in the country, over a 5 year period (2006-2010). Knowing the shortcomings of this approach, we have assumed that our study can serve as a platform for future comparisons. The total number of non-traumatic diabetes related LEA procedures was 24,312, they were performed in 16,873 patients with diabetes, 22.55% with type 1 diabetes, 70.26 with type 2 diabetes and 7.19% with non-specified diabetes at discharge. The total number of hospital admissions for these patients was 46,985. During the five years of the study there was an increase in the absolute number of major amputations (above the ankle), as well as of minor amputations. The rate of amputations decreased in type 1 diabetes, from baseline (2006): -8.15% in 2007, -25.83% in 2008, -23.43% in 2009, -27.71% in 2010, whereas it increased in type 2 diabetes in the respective years: 16.96%, 60.75%, 66.91%, and 104.64%, due to an increase in minor amputations and mainly in elderly people. Male: female amputations rate was 2:1 in type 1 diabetes patients and 2.4:1 in type 2 diabetes patients. This study, the first of its kind in the Romanian population, offers a starting point for future comparisons and identifies a target for preventive measures.

National trends in incidence and outcomes in lower extremity amputations in people with and without diabetes in Spain, 2001-2012

AIMS

To describe trends in the incidence and outcomes of lower-extremity amputations (LEAs) in patients with T1DM and T2DM in Spain, 2001-2012.

METHODS

We used national hospital discharge data. Incidence of discharges attributed to LEA procedures were calculated stratified by diabetes status and type of LEA. Joinpoint log-linear regression for incidence trends and logistic regression for factors associated with in-hospital mortality were used.

RESULTS

From 2001 to 2012, 73,302 minor LEAs and 64,710 major LEAs were performed. We found that incidence of minor LEA procedures in T1DM patients decreased by 9.84% per year from 2001 to 2008 and then remained stable through 2012. In T2DM patients, LEA increased by 1.89% per year over the entire study period. Among patients with T1DM, major LEA incidence rate decreased by 10.5% from 2001 to 2012. In patients with T2DM, it increased by 4.29% from 2001 to 2004, and then decreased by 1.85% through 2012. In-hospital mortality after major or minor LEAs was associated with older age in all groups and with being female in T2DM and in people without diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our national data show a decrease in the incidence of minor LEAs in patients with diabetes and in major LEAS in patients with T1DM over the period of study. In patients with T2DM, we found a decrease between 2004 and 2012. An additional improvement in preventive care, such as the introduction of diabetes foot units in hospitals, is necessary.

Incidence of lower extremity amputation in the diabetic compared to the non-diabetic population: a systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND

Diabetic individuals have a largely increased risk of lower extremity amputation (LEA) compared with non-diabetic patients. Prior systematic reviews of incidence of LEA have some limitations with respect to lack of consensus in the definition of LEA, level of LEA (all, major, minor), and definition of source population (general population or population with diabetes at risk). The purpose of our review is to evaluate the incidence of LEA in the diabetic population and its differences with regard to sex, ethnicity, age, and regions; to compare the incidence rate (IR) in the diabetic and non-diabetic population; and to investigate time trends.

METHODS/DESIGN

We will perform a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Knowledge, and publisher databases such as Journals@OVID and ScienceDirect. We will develop comprehensive systematic search strategies according to established guidelines for meta-analyses of observational studies in epidemiology (the MOOSE group). Two authors will independently screen abstracts and full text of all references on the basis of inclusion criteria with respect to types of study, types of population, and the main outcome. We will exclude studies if they report solely incidences of LEA among persons with diabetes mellitus when referring to the total population (diabetic and non-diabetic) and not exclusively to the diabetic population. Data extraction and assessment of risk of bias will be undertaken by two review authors working independently. We will assess incidence rate (IR) or cumulative incidence (CumI), relative risk of amputations comparing the diabetic to non-diabetic populations, cause of LEA, and type of diabetes. If we find subsets of studies to be homogeneous enough, we will perform meta-analyses for incidence rates by Poisson generalized linear mixed models (GLMM).

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42015017809.

Temporal trends in initial and recurrent lower extremity amputations in people with and without diabetes in Western Australia from 2000 to 2010

AIMS

To examine temporal trends in lower extremity amputations in people with type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) without diabetes in Western Australia (WA) from 2000 to 2010.

METHODS

We used linked health data to identify all non-traumatic lower extremity amputations in adults aged ≥20 years with diabetes and/or CVD from 2000 to 2010 in WA. Annual age- and sex-standardised rates of total, initial and recurrent amputations, stratified by major and minor status, were calculated for type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and CVD without diabetes, from the at-risk population for each group. Age- and sex-adjusted trends were estimated from Poisson regression models.

RESULTS

5891 lower extremity amputations were identified. Peripheral vascular disease (71%), hypertension (70%) and chronic kidney disease (60%) were highly prevalent. Average annual rates of total amputations were 724, 564 and 66 per 100,000 person-years in type 1, type 2 diabetes and CVD without diabetes respectively. Rates of initial amputations fell significantly by 2.4%/year (95% CI -3.5, -1.4) in type 2 diabetes, with similar declines for type 1 diabetes and CVD without diabetes (interaction p=0.96), driven by large falls in major amputations. There was limited improvement in recurrence rates overall, with recurrent minor amputations increasing significantly in type 2 diabetes (+3.5%/year, 95% CI +1.3%, +5.7%).

CONCLUSION

Lower extremity amputation rates have declined at a population level in people with diabetes and CVD without diabetes, suggesting improvements in prevention and management for this high-risk patient group, however limited declines in recurrent amputations requires further investigation.

Trends in Major Lower Limb Amputation Related to Peripheral Arterial Disease in Hungary: A Nationwide Study (2004-2012)

OBJECTIVES

To assess the trends of peripheral arterial disease associated major lower limb amputation in Hungary over a 9 year period (2004-2012) in the whole Hungarian population.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study employing administrative health care data. Major amputations were identified in the entire Hungarian population during a 9 year period (2004-2012) using the health care administrative data. Direct standardization was used to eliminate the potential bias induced by the different age and sex structure of the compared populations. For external direct standardization, the ESP 2013 was chosen as reference.

RESULTS

76,798 lower limb amputations were performed. The number of major amputations was 38,200; these procedures affected 32,084 patients. According to case detection, 50.4% of the amputees were diabetic. The overall primary amputation rate was 71.5%. The annual crude and age adjusted major amputation rates exhibited no significant long-term pattern over the observation period. The major lower limb amputation incidence for the overall period was 42.3/10(5) in the total population and 317.9/10(5) in diabetic population.

CONCLUSION

According to this whole population based study from Hungary, the incidence of lower limb major amputation is high with no change over the past 9 years. An explanation for this remains to be determined, as the traditional risk factors in Hungary do not account for it. The characteristics of major amputation (the rate of primary amputation, the ratio of below to above knee amputation and the age of the affected population) underline the importance of screening, early detection, improved vascular care and an optimal revascularization policy. Standardization and validation of amputation detection methods and reporting is essential.

Motivation, effort and life circumstances as predictors of foot ulcers and amputations in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIM

To investigate the predictive value of both patients' motivation and effort in their management of Type 2 diabetes and their life circumstances for the development of foot ulcers and amputations.

METHODS

This study was based on the Diabetes Care in General Practice study and Danish population and health registers. The associations between patient motivation, effort and life circumstances and foot ulcer prevalence 6 years after diabetes diagnosis and the incidence of amputation in the following 13 years were analysed using odds ratios from logistic regression and hazard ratios from Cox regression models, respectively.

RESULTS

Foot ulcer prevalence 6 years after diabetes diagnosis was 2.93% (95% CI 1.86-4.00) among 956 patients. General practitioners' indication of 'poor' vs 'very good' patient motivation for diabetes management was associated with higher foot ulcer prevalence (odds ratio 6.11, 95% CI 1.22-30.61). The same trend was seen for 'poor' vs 'good' influence of the patient's own effort in diabetes treatment (odds ratio 7.06, 95% CI 2.65-18.84). Of 1058 patients examined at 6-year follow-up, 45 experienced amputation during the following 13 years. 'Poor' vs 'good' influence of the patients' own effort was associated with amputation (hazard ratio 7.12, 95% CI 3.40-14.92). When general practitioners assessed the influence of patients' life circumstances as 'poor' vs 'good', the amputation incidence increased (hazard ratio 2.97, 95% CI 1.22-7.24). 'Poor' vs 'very good' patient motivation was also associated with a higher amputation incidence (hazard ratio 7.57, 95% CI 2.43-23.57), although not in fully adjusted models.

CONCLUSIONS

General practitioners' existing knowledge of patients' life circumstances, motivation and effort in diabetes management should be included in treatment strategies to prevent foot complications.

Toward a change in syntax in diabetic foot care: prevention equals remission

Because neuroischemic complications are associated with a high rate of recurrence, we propose a slight shift in the mechanism by which we counsel and communicate risk daily with our patients. If the epidemiology of this problem is comparable with that of cancer, and recurrences are common, then perhaps language commensurate with such risks should follow. After initial healing of an index wound, our unit now refers to patients not as being cured but rather as being "in remission." This concept is easy for the patient and the rest of the team to understand. We believe that it powerfully connotes the necessity for frequent follow-up and rapid intervention for inevitable minor and sometimes major complications.

The system of care for the diabetic foot: objectives, outcomes, and opportunities

Most cases of lower extremity limb loss in the United States occur among people with diabetes who have a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). These DFUs and the associated limb loss that may occur lead to excess healthcare costs and have a large negative impact on mobility, psychosocial well-being, and quality of life. The strategies for DFU prevention and management are evolving, but the implementation of these prevention and management strategies remains challenging. Barriers to implementation include poor access to primary medical care; patient beliefs and lack of adherence to medical advice; delays in DFU recognition; limited healthcare resources and practice heterogeneity of specialists. Herein, we review the contemporary outcomes of DFU prevention and management to provide a framework for prioritizing quality improvement efforts within a resource-limited healthcare environment.

Evaluation of the effects of homologous platelet gel on healing lower extremity wounds in patients with diabetes

The treatment of chronic diabetic wounds remains complicated, despite new insight into the cellular and molecular basis of wound healing and cutaneous regeneration. A growing body of clinical trials has shown that platelet release has a notable effectiveness on refractory ulcer healing. However, patients with chronic diabetic ulcers usually have poor general health, and the large-volume blood absence required to produce autologous platelet-rich plasma often causes adverse effects. To overcome the limitation, the homologous platelet gel (PG) from healthy donor was used for the treatment of chronic diabetic lower extremity wound in the study. We show here that homologous derived platelets significantly enhanced EVC304 cell and HaCaT cell proliferation and homologous PG was capable of prompting cell migration. Twenty-one patients with refractory diabetic lower extremity ulcers, who had no response to conventional treatments, were treated in this study. Our data indicated that homologous PG was effective for the enhancement and acceleration of diabetic lower extremity wounds healing. We propose that homologous PG appeared to enhance vascularization and epithelialization, which might induce a quicker healing process and and encourage controlled studies in future.