Comparison of simplified score with the revised original score for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis: a new or a complementary diagnostic score?

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic liver disease of unknown aetiology which may affect any patient irrespective of age, sex, and ethnicity. At baseline, the clinical spectrum of the disease varies largely from asymptomatic cases to acute liver failure with massive hepatocyte necrosis. The aim of these EASL guidelines is to provide updated guidance on the diagnosis and management of AIH both in adults and children. Updated guidance on the management of patients with variants and specific forms of AIH is also provided, as is detailed guidance on the management of AIH-associated cirrhosis, including surveillance for portal hypertension and hepatocellular carcinoma, as well as liver transplantation in decompensated cirrhosis.

NMR-based metabolomic signature: An important tool for the diagnosis and study of pathogenesis of autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Metabolomics is used to predict, diagnose, and monitor metabolic disorders but altered metabolomic signatures have also been reported in diverse diseases, including autoimmune disorders. However, the metabolomic profile in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) has not been investigated in depth. Therefore, we investigated the metabolomic signature of AIH and its significance as a diagnostic and pathogenetic tool.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Metabolites in plasma samples from 50 patients with AIH at diagnosis, 43 healthy controls, 72 patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), 26 patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated liver disease, and 101 patients with chronic viral hepatitis were determined by 1 H NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) spectroscopy. Fifty-two metabolites were quantified, and metabolic pathway analysis was performed. Multivariate analysis revealed that AIH could be differentiated from healthy controls and each of the disease controls ( p <0.001). Fifteen metabolites differentiated AIH from disease controls (PBC+chronic viral hepatitis+metabolic dysfunction-associated liver disease) (95% sensitivity and 92% specificity). Ten distinct metabolic pathways were altered in AIH compared to disease controls. The metabolic pathway of branched-chain amino acids (lower valine, leucine, and isoleucine levels and their catabolic intermediates in PBC), methionine (lower methionine, 2-aminobutyrate, and 2-hydroxybutyrate levels in PBC), alanine-aspartate-glutamate (lower metabolites in PBC), and that of metabolites associated with gut microbiota (lower choline, betaine, and dimethylamine levels in PBC) were significantly different between AIH and PBC ( p <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

1 H NMR spectroscopy could be a promising novel tool to diagnose and study AIH pathogenesis as there is no need for much sample handling, is highly reproducible with high sensitivity and specificity, and low cost.

Autoimmune Hepatitis: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Overview

Autoimmune hepatitis is an immune-mediated inflammatory condition of the liver of undetermined cause that affects both sexes, all ages, races, and ethnicities. Its clinical presentation can be very broad, from having an asymptomatic and silent course to presenting as acute hepatitis, cirrhosis, and acute liver failure potentially requiring liver transplantation. The diagnosis is based on histological abnormalities (interface hepatitis), characteristic clinical and laboratory findings (increased aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and serum IgG concentration), and the presence of one or more characteristic autoantibodies. The large heterogeneity of these clinical, biochemical, and histological findings can sometimes make a timely and proper diagnosis a difficult task. Treatment seeks to achieve remission of the disease and prevent further progression of liver disease. First-line therapy includes high-dose corticosteroids, which are later tapered to decrease side effects, and azathioprine. In the presence of azathioprine intolerance or a poor response to the standard of care, second-line therapy needs to be considered, including mycophenolate mofetil. AIH remains a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge, and a further understanding of the pathophysiological pathways of the disease and the implementation of randomized controlled trials are needed.

Diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis is an inflammatory disease of the liver of unknown cause that may progress to liver cirrhosis and end stage liver failure if diagnosis is overlooked and treatment delayed. The clinical presentation is often that of acute hepatitis, sometimes very severe; less frequently, it can be insidious or completely asymptomatic. The disease can affect people of any age and is more common in women; its incidence and prevalence seem to be on the rise worldwide. An abnormal immune response targeting liver autoantigens and inducing persistent and self-perpetuating liver inflammation is the pathogenic mechanism of the disease. A specific set of autoantibodies, increased IgG concentrations, and histological demonstration of interface hepatitis and periportal necrosis are the diagnostic hallmarks of autoimmune hepatitis. Prompt response to treatment with corticosteroids and other immunomodulatory drugs is almost universal and supports the diagnosis. The aims of treatment are to induce and maintain long term remission of liver inflammation. Treatment can often even reverse liver fibrosis, thus preventing progression to advanced cirrhosis and its complications. Most patients need lifelong maintenance therapy, and repeated follow-up in experienced hands improves the quality of care and quality of life for affected patients.

Autoimmmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a T-cell mediated, inflammatory liver disease affecting all ages and characterized by female preponderance, elevated serum transaminase and immunoglobulin G levels, positive circulating autoantibodies, and presence of interface hepatitis at liver histology. AIH type 1, affecting both adults and children, is defined by positive anti-nuclear and/or anti-smooth muscle antibodies, while type 2 AIH, affecting mostly children, is defined by positive anti-liver-kidney microsomal type 1 and/or anti-liver cytosol type 1 antibody. While the autoantigens of type 2 AIH are well defined, being the cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6) and the formiminotransferase cyclodeaminase (FTCD), in type 1 AIH they remain to be identified. AIH-1 predisposition is conferred by possession of the MHC class II HLA DRB1*03 at all ages, while DRB1*04 predisposes to late onset disease; AIH-2 is associated with possession of DRB1*07 and DRB1*03. The majority of patients responds well to standard immunosuppressive treatment, based on steroid and azathioprine; second- and third-line drugs should be considered in case of intolerance or insufficient response. This review offers a comprehensive overview of pathophysiological and clinical aspects of AIH.

Diagnostic and prognostic scoring systems for autoimmune hepatitis: a review

INTRODUCTION

Auto-immune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare condition which primarily affects young women. Several diagnostic scoring systems exist based on clinical, biochemical, immunologic and histologic characteristics of AIH. Additionally, prognostic parameters can be identified. The purpose of this literature review is to compare the clinical value, strengths and limitations of these diagnostic and prognostic scoring systems.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in two databases and selected based on diagnostic and prognostic criteria. Only studies concerning AIH in adults were included.

RESULTS

The backbone of scoring systems remains the revised AIH criteria published in 1999 and the simplified from 2008. The revised system shows a higher sensitivity, lower specificity and lower diagnostic accuracy compared to the simplified. Limitations to these scoring systems include limited diagnostic accuracy in acute or fulminant liver failure, insufficient inclusion of atypical auto-antibodies and lacking diagnostic power in presence of overlap syndromes. Concerning these overlap syndromes, the Paris criteria show a higher diagnostic accuracy compared to the scoring systems for AIH. Presently, no clinical prognostic scoring systems are available. However, a first system based on response to treatment accurately predicts long-term survival in AIH.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic scoring systems are useful in diagnosing AIH and have complementary value. However, they are no substitute for the gold standard of appropriate clinical assessment and are mostly useful in defining cohorts for research purposes. An evolution towards a more dynamic scoring system, using prognostic parameters and the progression of typical features, seems more valuable than the current diagnostic systems.

Alcoholic liver disease and autoimmune hepatitis: Sometimes a closer look under the surface is needed

AIMS

Differential diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) incorporates various liver diseases, including alcoholic liver disease (ALD). We report on clinical, laboratory and outcome characteristics of AIH patients who were initially referred as ALD based on increased alcohol consumption (AIH/ALD).

METHODS

From 2000-2019, we retrospectively identified 12 AIH/ALD patients [9 males, age: 61 (30-73) years] in our prospective data base of 317 AIH patients.

RESULTS

AIH diagnosis was based on aminotransferases elevation in 10 patients, high IgG in 8, compatible autoantibody profile in all and typical/compatible histology in all 9 with available biopsy. There were no significant differences of baseline demographics, presentation, cirrhosis at diagnosis, response to treatment and simplified score compared to 45 age- and sex-matched AIH patients without alcohol consumption and 44 age- and sex-matched ALD patients. However, the AIH/ALD cohort was characterized by more frequent progression to cirrhosis, higher liver-related deaths and overall mortality compared to AIH, though similar to the ALD group. AST/ALT ratio>1 seems to bear a good positive (0.84) and negative predictive value (0.88) for ALD and AIH diagnosis, respectively, but cannot help in discriminating the AIH/ALD variant.

CONCLUSIONS

AIH should not be forgotten in patients with alcohol use when clinical and laboratory features hint towards the diagnosis of AIH/ALD variant as this group seems to have worse outcome compared to those with AIH alone suggesting the need for closer follow-up and surveillance. Reliable autoantibody testing and cautious interpretation of liver histology appear mandatory for AIH diagnosis in these difficult to diagnose cases.

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis or autoimmune hepatitis? Sometimes a closer look under the surface is needed

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is nowadays the most common liver disease worldwide. Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a relatively rare disease of the liver characterised by female predominance, circulating autoantibodies, polyclonal hypergammaglobulinaemia, interface hepatitis on histology and favourable response to immunosuppression. The possibility of an additional AIH diagnosis in patients with NAFLD (NAFLD/AIH concurrence) or the presence of AIH alone instead of a supposed NAFLD diagnosis represents a challenge for clinicians. We report herein two adult patients (a 33-year-old woman and a 59-year-old man) with a previous NAFLD diagnosis who proved finally to suffer from AIH alone. These two representative cases indicate how difficult and complicated could be sometimes the diagnosis of patients with AIH highlighting the range of disease manifestations and severity while they also underline that although NAFLD is by far the most frequent chronic liver disease this could not be always the case.

NAFLD and autoimmune hepatitis: Do not judge a book by its cover

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease (almost 25% of the general population). Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a relatively rare liver disease of unknown aetiology characterized by female predominance and large heterogeneity regarding epidemiology, clinical manifestations, genetics, serology and liver pathology. The potential NAFLD/AIH coincidence or an AIH diagnosis alone instead of NAFLD represent a challenge for clinicians, both in making a correct and timely diagnosis but also in the management of these diseases. The diagnosis of both diseases can be challenging as: (a) reliable laboratory tests to confidently diagnose or exclude NAFLD or AIH are missing; (b) physicians and pathologists are much more familiar with a very common disease like NAFLD so, they do not consider an alternative or additional diagnosis; (c) most NAFLD studies do not investigate the patients for all autoantibodies involved in AIH diagnosis, apply the diagnostic scoring systems for AIH or address the possibility of AIH features on liver histology and (d) the recent European and American practice guidelines for NAFLD do not mention clearly the importance of IgG determination and liver autoimmune serology according to the AIH guidelines. Patients with NAFLD/AIH coincidence have significantly more frequently hypertension, diabetes, obesity, older age, lower transaminases, bilirubin and simplified score for AIH diagnosis but no female predominance compared to AIH patients only. The true outcome of NAFLD/AIH patients is practically unknown while their management is quite problematic because official clinical practice guidelines for this condition are missing.

Long-term outcomes of pediatric-onset primary sclerosing cholangitis: A single-center experience in Japan

AIM

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is very rare in Japan. Although a large-scale cohort study of 781 pediatric-onset PSC patients in Europe and North America showed that the 5-year survival with native liver was 88%, the long-term outcomes of pediatric-onset PSC in Japan are unknown. Here, we evaluated the clinical outcomes of pediatric-onset PSC in Japan.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective cohort study with a medical records review of pediatric PSC patients diagnosed between 1986 and 2017 at a single center. The PSC diagnoses were based on cholangiography, liver histology, and biochemical findings. The patients' survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

We identified 39 pediatric-onset PSC patients (22 boys, 17 girls). The median age at diagnosis was 9 years (interquartile range 6.0-13.5 years). The median follow-up period was 5.5 years (interquartile range 3.4-8.7 years). The phenotypes of PSC-autoimmune hepatitis, PSC-inflammatory bowel disease, and small-duct PSC were diagnosed in 13 (33.3%), 36 out of 38 (94.8%), and three (7.7%) patients, respectively. The 5-year liver transplantation-free survival of the whole cohort was 93.5%. Nine patients underwent liver transplantation, and four of these nine cases resulted in death. Both the univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the phenotype of "PSC-autoimmune hepatitis overlap" was an independent poor prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall survival of pediatric-onset PSC in Japan was comparable to those in Western countries. The phenotype of PSC-autoimmune hepatitis was identified as a prognostic factor associated with a poorer long-term outcome.

Autoimmune Hepatitis-Immunologically Triggered Liver Pathogenesis-Diagnostic and Therapeutic Strategies

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a severe liver disease that arises in genetically predisposed male and female individuals worldwide. Diagnosis of AIH is made clinically applying diagnostic scores; however, the heterotopic disease phenotype often makes a rapid determination of disease challenging. AIH responds favorably to steroids and pharmacologic immunosuppression, and liver transplantation is only necessary in cases with acute liver failure or end-stage liver cirrhosis. Recurrence or development of de novo AIH after transplantation is possible, and treatment is similar to standard AIH therapy. Current experimental investigations of T cell-mediated autoimmune pathways and analysis of changes within the intestinal microbiome might advance our knowledge on the pathogenesis of AIH and trigger a spark of hope for novel therapeutic strategies.

Adequacy of scoring systems in diagnosing paediatric autoimmune hepatitis: retrospective study using a control group children with Hepatitis B infection

AIM

To evaluate how correct is made the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in children, comparing the adults scoring systems - the 1999 revised scoring system by International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group and the 2007 Simplified Scoring System. The inaccuracies in diagnosis have been analysed.

METHODS

The two scoring systems have been applied for 28 children with AIH pre-treatment and 28 with Hepatitis B infection - matched by sex and age, all diagnosed between 2010 and 2017 in an emergency children's hospital in Bucharest, Romania. They were retrospectively followed throughout the period assessed.

RESULTS

Autoimmune hepatitis was present in 85.7% cases according to the 1999 revised score, respectively, 57.0% as per the 2007 simplified score. The 2007 simplified score led to false negative results when AIH was associated with another autoimmune disease (p = 0.009). Patients who did not undergo liver biopsy were associated with a downgraded diagnosis by the 2007 simplified score (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There is a need for a scoring system tailored to children's characteristics. Two compulsory components of the future score might be liver biopsy and associated autoimmune disorders. The existing scores could be used in children with consideration, preferably both at once and together with liver biopsy for increased accuracy.

Development and validation of a new simplified diagnostic scoring system for pediatric autoimmune hepatitis

BACKGROUND

Children with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) often exhibit particular features. Accordingly, seven pediatric-specific criteria have been proposed.

AIM

To develop a prediction model based on them, transform it into a scoring system and study its accuracy.

METHODS

A cohort of children under study for liver disease was consecutively selected. AIH diagnosis was based on classical criteria. Already proposed pediatric criteria were recorded. The best possible regression model was selected, and the beta coefficient of each criterion was translated into a whole number (points). Total scores were obtained following the points system and the best cut-off was calculated. Subsequently, accuracy of the diagnostic score was studied in the validation set.

RESULTS

Among 212 included patients, 100 had AIH. The score included 5 criteria: autoantibodies (0-2 points), hypergammaglobulinemia, exclusion of viral hepatitis, exclusion of Wilson's disease (1 point each) and liver histology (3 points). In addition, a normal cholangiogram is mandatory. The validation set was formed of 70 patients (24 with AIH). In this subsample, a score of ≥6 renders a sensitivity/specificity of 95.8%/100%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 97.1%.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric-specific criteria for the diagnosis of AIH can be reliably used as a scoring system.

Variant and Specific Forms of Autoimmune Cholestatic Liver Diseases

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are the main autoimmune cholestatic liver diseases. IgG4-associated sclerosing cholangitis is another distinct immune-mediated cholestatic disorder of unknown aetiology that is frequently associated with autoimmune pancreatitis or other IgG4-related diseases. Although the majority of PBC and PSC patients have a typical presentation, there are common and uncommon important variants or specific subgroups that observed in everyday routine clinical practice. In this updated review, we summarize the published data giving also our own experience on the variants and specific groups of autoimmune cholestatic liver diseases. Actually, we give in detail the underlining difficulties and the rising dilemmas concerning the diagnosis and management of these special conditions in the clinical spectrum of autoimmune cholestatic liver diseases including the IgG4-associated sclerosing cholangitis highlighting also the uncertainties and the potential new eras of the research agenda.

Autoimmune hepatitis in patients with multiple sclerosis: The role of immunomodulatory treatment

BACKGROUND

Development of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) has been sporadically reported in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) either concurrently or after treatment with immunomodulatory drugs, including interferon-beta (IFN-β) and steroids.

AIM

To report a large cohort of 14 patients with MS diagnosed with AIH during an assessment of deranged liver function tests (LFTs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2005 to 2017, we prospectively identified 14 (13 women) patients with MS who suffered also from AIH after investigation in our department for the presence of deranged LFTs. Age at diagnosis of MS was 36.7 ± 9.3 years while at diagnosis of AIH 43.1 ± 12 years.

RESULTS

AIH diagnosis was based on elevation of aminotransferases in all patients [alanine aminotransferase: 520 IU/L (range: 115-1219)], elevation of IgG in 6, compatible autoantibody profile in all, including 5 patients with liver-specific autoantibodies and typical or compatible histological features in 11 patients. 5 patients were under treatment with IFN-β plus methylprednisolone pulses, 3 with IFN-β plus oral steroids, 1 with IFN-β, 4 with methylprednisolone pulses whereas 1 patient was free of treatment. The median time from IFN-β initiation to the development of hepatitis was 12 months (range:1-120). Treatment for AIH was initiated in 13 patients with prednisolone (0.5-1 mg/kg/day) plus mycophenolate myfetil (2 g/day) in 10 and prednisolone plus azathioprine in 3 with complete and partial response in 11 and 2 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The differential diagnosis of hepatitis in MS patients should include AIH and in particular when immunomodulatory treatment has been preceded. Autoantibody testing and liver histology play fundamental role in establishing a prompt diagnosis of AIH in these patients. Treatment of AIH in patients with MS seems safe and efficient as complete or partial response was recorded in all of our patients.

Accuracy of the Simplified Criteria for Autoimmune Hepatitis in Children: Systematic Review and Decision Analysis

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Several studies have been conducted on the accuracy of simplified criteria for autoimmune hepatitis that were presented in 2008 as an alternative to original criteria. Our purpose is to summarize the evidence available regarding their accuracy in children and to carry out a basic clinical decision analysis based on it.

METHODS

Electronic and manual searches were performed with keywords related to diagnostic validity terms. Data from included studies were extracted, and summary estimates of accuracy measures were calculated. An effect model was chosen depending on heterogeneity, and the presence of publication bias was also studied. Therapeutic threshold was calculated based on the already published data. Through a Bayesian approach, simplified criteria's clinical utility was simulated, taking into account the meta-analyzed indicators and several assumptions on the prevalence of autoimmune hepatitis.

RESULTS

The search yielded 166 studies, four of which were finally included, providing a total population of 437 patients. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of the simplified criteria for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis in children was 77% and 95%, respectively, with a diagnostic odds ratio of 67. No evidence of publication bias was found. For prevalences ranging from 8.5 to 85.7, the predictive value of either a positive or a negative result moved beyond the therapeutic threshold (estimated at 56%).

CONCLUSIONS

The simplified criteria show high specificity and moderate sensitivity for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis in children. A positive result can justify starting a therapeutic assay, but a negative result does not seem sufficient to rule out this condition.

Hellenic Association for the Study of the Liver Clinical Practice Guidelines: Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a relatively rare acute or chronic liver disease of unknown etiology characterized by large heterogeneity. Its distribution is global, covering all ages, both sexes and all ethnic groups. The aim of the present Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) of the Hellenic Association for the Study of the Liver was to provide updated guidance and help to gastroenterologists, hepatologists, internists and general practitioners for AIH diagnosis and management. AIH diagnosis is based on clinicopathological characteristics: namely, polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia, particularly of immunoglobulin G (IgG), circulating autoantibodies, interface hepatitis on liver histology, absence of viral hepatitis, and a favorable response to immunosuppression. Clinical manifestations at disease onset are variable, ranging from asymptomatic to the acute/severe form. Aminotransferase and bilirubin levels vary, while the presence of hepatitis at the histological level is a prerequisite for diagnosis. Autoantibodies are the hallmark for AIH diagnosis; therefore, the CPG describe the appropriate serological algorithm for their detection. AIH therapy should aim to achieve complete biochemical (normalization of IgG and aminotransferases) and histological remission. All patients who have active disease, even those with cirrhosis, should be treated with individualized and response-guided induction therapy using prednisolone in combination with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil as first-line therapy. Immunosuppression should be given for at least 3 years and for at least 2 years after the achievement of complete biochemical response, while a liver biopsy should be recommended before treatment discontinuation. Current CPG are also provided for several specific conditions and difficult-to-treat patients.

Diagnosis, presentation and initial severity of Autoimmune Hepatitis (AIH) in patients attending 28 hospitals in the UK

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There is limited information regarding patients with AIH outside relatively few large centres. We describe here the presenting features of patients with AIH, collected as part of an audit involving 28 UK hospitals.

METHODS

Patients (incident since 1/1/2007 or prevalent since 1/1/2000) were ≥18 years and either met 1999 International AIH Group (IAIHG) diagnostic criteria (n = 1164), or received immunosuppressive therapy for clinically diagnosed AIH (n = 103).

RESULTS

Of 1267 patients (80% women, 91% Caucasian, age (median(range)) 55(8-86) years, 0.5% had acute viral hepatitis (CMV/EBV/HEV); 2% were taking Nitrofurantoin and 0.7% Khat. Twenty-one percent had clinical decompensation and/or a MELD score of >15. Time from first abnormal liver tests to diagnosis was ≥1 year in 19% and was longer in jaundiced vs non-jaundiced patients. HBV and HCV serology were undocumented in 4%, serum immunoglobulins in 31% and autoantibodies in 11%-27%. When documented, ≥1 antibody was present in 83%. LKM-1-positive and autoantibody-negative patients had more severe disease. Histological cirrhosis was reported in 23%, interface hepatitis 88%, predominant lymphocytes/plasma cells 75%, rosettes 19% and emperipolesis 0.4%. Only 65% of those meeting 1999 IAIHG criteria also met simplified IAIHG criteria. University Hospitals compared to District General Hospitals, were more likely to report histological features of AIH.

CONCLUSIONS

This cohort from across the UK is older than other multicentre AIH cohorts. One-fifth had decompensation or MELD >15. Diagnosis was delayed in 19%, diagnostic testing was incomplete in one-third and rosettes and emperipolesis were infrequently reported.

Autoimmune Hepatitis in the Elderly: Diagnosis and Pharmacologic Management

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) may present as acute or chronic hepatitis in the elderly. Advanced hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis are common on first presentation in this population. In this review, we discuss the presentation, approach to diagnosis and management of AIH in the elderly. As polypharmacy is common in the elderly, careful medication use history is essential for detecting drug-induced AIH-like hepatitis. Steroid-sparing or minimizing therapeutic regimens are preferred to treat AIH in the elderly. For the purpose of induction, budesonide or lower dose prednisone in combination with azathioprine (AZA) regimens are preferred over high-dose prednisone monotherapy due to the higher risk of side effects of the later in the elderly. The goal of maintenance therapy should be to achieve full biochemical and histologic remission. Bone density monitoring and interventions to prevent steroid-related bone disease should be implemented throughout the course of the disease. Liver transplantation should be considered in the elderly patient with liver failure or early hepatocellular carcinoma if there are no significant comorbidities or compromise in functional status.

Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a severe liver disease that affects children and adults worldwide. The diagnosis of AIH relies on increased serum transaminase and immunoglobulin G levels, presence of autoantibodies and interface hepatitis on liver histology. AIH arises in genetically predisposed individuals when a trigger, such as exposure to a virus, leads to a T cell-mediated autoimmune response directed against liver autoantigens; this immune response is permitted by inadequate regulatory immune control leading to a loss of tolerance. AIH responds favourably to immunosuppressive treatment, which should be started as soon as the diagnosis is made. Standard regimens include fairly high initial doses of corticosteroids (prednisone or prednisolone), which are tapered gradually as azathioprine is introduced. For those patients who do not respond to standard treatment, second-line drugs should be considered, including mycophenolate mofetil, calcineurin inhibitors, mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors and biologic agents, which should be administered only in specialized hepatology centres. Liver transplantation is a life-saving option for those who progress to end-stage liver disease, although AIH can recur or develop de novo after transplantation. In-depth investigation of immune pathways and analysis of changes to the intestinal microbiota should advance our knowledge of the pathogenesis of AIH and lead to novel, tailored and better tolerated therapies.

Accuracy of the 2008 Simplified Criteria for the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Hepatitis in Children

PURPOSE

Classical criteria for diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) are intended as research tool and are difficult to apply at patient's bedside. We aimed to study the accuracy of simplified criteria and the concordance with the expert diagnosis based on the original criteria.

METHODS

A cohort of children under study for liver disorder was selected through consecutive sampling to obtain the prevalence of AIH within the group of differential diagnoses. AIH was defined, based on classical criteria, through committee review of medical reports. Validity indicators of the simplified criteria were obtained in an intention to diagnose approach. Optimal cut-off and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were calculated.

RESULTS

Out of 212 cases reviewed, 47.2% were AIH. For the optimal cut-off (6 points), the simplified criteria showed a sensitivity of 72.0% and a specificity of 96.4%, with a 94.7% positive and a 79.4% negative predictive value. The area under the ROC curve was 94.3%. There was a good agreement in the pre-treatment concordance between the classical and the simplified criteria (kappa index, 0.775).

CONCLUSION

Simplified criteria provide a moderate sensitivity for the diagnosis of AIH, but may help in indicating treatment in cases under suspicion with 6 or more points.

Validation of the Simplified Criteria for the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Hepatitis in Chilean-Hispanic Patients

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

In 2008 the International autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) Group proposed the simplified diagnostic criteria for this disease. The original cohort study was performed in 11 international centers, but validation studies are scarce in Latin-America. The aim of this study is validate these criteria in Hispanic patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort of patients undergoing percutaneous liver biopsy and follow-up of at least 12 months was recruited from a Chilean University hospital. Patients with previous immunosuppressive therapy and liver transplant recipients were excluded. The diagnostic accuracy was analyzed using as gold standard the clinical course during long-term follow-up. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) and area under the ROC curve (AUROC) were calculated.

RESULTS

Four hundred eighty one patients were evaluated, 294 were included. 218 (74.15%) were female, mean age 48.5 (± 12.3) years, mean follow-up 34 (± 18) months. 66 patients had AIH or overlap syndrome (22.45%), 96 (32.65%) non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, 40 (13.61%) primary biliary cholangitis, 31 (10.54%) hepatitis C, 8 (2.72%) hepatitis B, 53 (18.02%) other etiologies. The AUROC for AIH simplified criteria was 0.976. Using a cutoff ≥ 6 and ≥ 7 points, the sensitivity was 86.4% and 54.6%; specificity, 98.7% and 99.6%; PPV, 95% and 97.3%; and NPV, 96.2% and 88.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Simplified criteria for the diagnosis of AIH have a high accuracy in our Chilean-Hispanic cohort. The female gender is strongly associated to AIH and could help in difficult cases. Further studies with a prospective design are necessary to confirm these observations.

Autoimmune Hepatitis Overlap Syndromes and Liver Pathology

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) may have an atypical serum alkaline phosphatase elevation, antimitochondrial antibodies, histologic features of bile duct injury/loss, or cholangiographic findings of focal biliary strictures and dilations. These manifestations characterize the overlap syndromes. Patients can be classified as having AIH with features of primary biliary cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, or a cholestatic syndrome. The gold standard of diagnosis is clinical judgment. Histologic evaluation is a major diagnostic component. Treatment is based on algorithms; outcomes vary depending on the predominant disease component. Combination therapy has been the principal recommendation.

Autoantibody profiles in autoimmune hepatitis and chronic hepatitis C identifies similarities in patients with severe disease

AIM

To determine how the auto-antibodies (Abs) profiles overlap in chronic hepatitis C infection (CHC) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and correlate to liver disease.

METHODS

Levels of antinuclear Ab, smooth muscle antibody (SMA) and liver/kidney microsomal-1 (LKM-1) Ab and markers of liver damage were determined in the sera of 50 patients with CHC infection, 20 AIH patients and 20 healthy controls using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and other immune assays.

RESULTS

We found that AIH patients had more severe liver disease as determined by elevation of total IgG, alkaline phosphatase, total serum bilirubin and serum transaminases and significantly higher prevalence of the three non-organ-specific autoantibodies (auto-Abs) than CHC patients. Antinuclear Ab, SMA and LKM-1 Ab were also present in 36% of CHC patients and related to disease severity. CHC cases positive for auto-Abs were directly comparable to AIH in respect of most markers of liver damage and total IgG. These cases had longer disease duration compared with auto-Ab negative cases, but there was no difference in gender, age or viral load. KLM-1⁺ Ab CHC cases showed best overlap with AIH.

CONCLUSION

Auto-Ab levels in CHC may be important markers of disease severity and positive cases have a disease similar to AIH. Auto-Abs might have a pathogenic role as indicated by elevated markers of liver damage. Future studies will unravel any novel associations between these two diseases, whether genetic or other.

Diagnosis and Management of Autoimmune Hepatitis: Current Status and Future Directions

Autoimmune hepatitis is characterized by autoantibodies, hypergammaglobulinemia, and interface hepatitis on histological examination. The features lack diagnostic specificity, and other diseases that may resemble autoimmune hepatitis must be excluded. The clinical presentation may be acute, acute severe (fulminant), or asymptomatic; conventional autoantibodies may be absent; centrilobular necrosis and bile duct changes may be present; and the disease may occur after liver transplantation or with features that suggest overlapping disorders. The diagnostic criteria have been codified, and diagnostic scoring systems can support clinical judgment. Nonstandard autoantibodies, including antibodies to actin, α-actinin, soluble liver antigen, perinuclear antineutrophil antigen, asialoglycoprotein receptor, and liver cytosol type 1, are tools that can support the diagnosis, especially in patients with atypical features. Prednisone or prednisolone in combination with azathioprine is the preferred treatment, and strategies using these medications in various doses can ameliorate treatment failure, incomplete response, drug intolerance, and relapse after drug withdrawal. Budesonide, mycophenolate mofetil, and calcineurin inhibitors can be considered in selected patients as frontline or salvage therapies. Molecular (recombinant proteins and monoclonal antibodies), cellular (adoptive transfer and antigenic manipulation), and pharmacological (antioxidants, antifibrotics, and antiapoptotic agents) interventions constitute future directions in management. The evolving knowledge of the pathogenic pathways and the advances in technology promise new management algorithms.

Autoimmune hepatitis, one disease with many faces: Etiopathogenetic, clinico-laboratory and histological characteristics

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an unresolving progressive liver disease of unknown etiology characterized by hypergammaglobulinemia, autoantibodies detection and interface hepatitis. Due to the absence of specific diagnostic markers and the large heterogeneity of its clinical, laboratory and histological features, AIH diagnosis may be potentially difficult. Therefore, in this in-depth review we summarize the substantial progress on etiopathogenesis, clinical, serological and histological phenotypes of AIH. AIH has a global distribution affecting any age, both sexes and all ethnic groups. Clinical manifestations vary from asymptomatic to severe or rarely fulminant hepatitis. Hypergammaglobulinemia with selective elevation of IgG is found in most cases. Autoimmune attack is perpetuated, possibly via molecular mimicry, and favored by the impaired control of T-regulatory cells. Histology (interface hepatitis, emperipolesis and hepatic rosette formation) and autoantibodies detection although not pathognomonic, are still the hallmark for a timely diagnosis. AIH remains a major diagnostic challenge. AIH should be considered in every case in the absence of viral, metabolic, genetic and toxic etiology of chronic or acute hepatitis. Laboratory personnel, hepato-pathologists and clinicians need to become more familiar with disease expressions and the interpretation of liver histology and autoimmune serology to derive maximum benefit for the patient.

Cholestatic phenotypes of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis can have cholestatic features that are outside the codified diagnostic criteria. These features have uncertain effects on the clinical presentation and progression of disease. Patients with autoimmune hepatitis can have antimitochondrial antibodies and coincidental bile duct injury or loss (2%-13% of patients), focal biliary strictures and dilations based on cholangiography (2%-11%), or histologic changes of bile duct injury or loss in the absence of other features (5%-11%). These findings probably represent atypical manifestations of autoimmune hepatitis or variants of primary biliary cirrhosis or primary sclerosing cholangitis, depending on the predominant findings. Serum levels of alkaline phosphatase and γ-glutamyl transferase, histologic features of bile duct injury, and findings from cholangiography are associated with responsiveness to corticosteroid therapy and individualized alternative treatments. Corticosteroid therapy, in combination with low-dose ursodeoxycholic acid, has been promulgated by international societies, but these recommendations are not based on strong evidence. The frequency, variable outcomes, and uncertainties in diagnosis and management of the cholestatic phenotypes must be addressed by a collaborative investigational network. This network should define the genetic and pathologic features of these disorders, standardize their nomenclature, and establish a treatment algorithm. In this review, the different cholestatic phenotypes of autoimmune hepatitis, mechanisms of pathogenesis, current management strategies and outcomes, and opportunities for improving understanding and therapy are presented.

Evaluation of the revised versus the simplified scoring system in patients with autoimmune hepatitis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the simplified and revised scoring systems for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Seventy-seven patients diagnosed with AIH via the revised scoring system were enrolled in this study. Statistical analysis was performed by means of the χ² test and logistic regression analysis. A total of 39 patients with definite AIH and 38 patients with probable AIH were diagnosed by the revised scoring system, whereas among these 77 patients, the simplified scoring system classified nine cases as definite AIH, 39 as probable AIH and 29 without AIH. In this study, the parameters contributing to the discrepant diagnosis of AIH were compared using the revised and simplified systems. A χ² test showed that antinuclear antibody (ANA) or smooth muscle antibody (SMA) titers were significantly lower in the patients with discrepant diagnoses (χ²=15.0, P=0.001). Logistic regression with backward selection revealed that for the discrepant diagnosis of patients, the presence of other concurrent autoimmune diseases [odds ratio (OR)=7.25; P=0.018; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.41–37.29] was the only independent risk factor. In addition, the presence of anti-soluble liver antigen/liver-pancreas antigen (SLA/LP) or perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (pANCA) (OR=0.12; P=0.022; 95% CI, 0.02–0.74), the level of immunoglobulin G (IgG) with 1–1.1 × Normal (N) (OR=0.02; P=0.044; 95% CI, 0.00–0.89) and ANA or SMA titers ≥1:80 (OR=0.04; P=<0.001; 95% CI, 0.01–0.23) were three independent protective factors. In conclusion, the revised scoring system has a superior performance in the diagnosis of patients with AIH compared with the simplified scoring system. According to the simplified scoring system, other concurrent autoimmune diseases are the risk factor for the AIH diagnosis.

Review article: autoimmune hepatitis -- current management and challenges

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a disease of unknown aetiology characterised by interface hepatitis, hypergammaglobulinaemia, circulating autoantibodies and a favourable response to immunosuppression.

AIM

To review recent advancements in understanding aetiopathogenesis, clinical, serological and histological features, diagnostic criteria and treatment strategies of AIH.

METHODS

Published studies on AIH extracted mainly from PubMed during the last 15 years.

RESULTS

Autoimmune hepatitis has a global distribution affecting any age, both sexes and all ethnic groups. Clinical manifestations are variable ranging from no symptoms to severe acute hepatitis and only seldom to fulminant hepatic failure. Autoimmune attack is perpetuated, possibly via molecular mimicry mechanisms, and favoured by the impaired control of regulatory T-cells. A typical laboratory finding is hypergammaglobulinaemia with selective elevation of IgG, although in 15-25% of patients - particularly children, elderly and acute cases - IgG levels are normal. Liver histology and autoantibodies, although not pathognomonic, still remain the hallmark for diagnosis. Immunosuppressive treatment is mandatory and life-saving; however, to meet strict response criteria, the conventional therapy with prednisolone with or without azathioprine is far from ideal.

CONCLUSIONS

Autoimmune hepatitis remains a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The clinician, the hepato-pathologist and the laboratory personnel need to become more familiar with different expressions of the disease, interpretation of liver histology and autoimmune serology. According to the strict definition of treatment response issued by the 2010 AASLD guidelines, many patients are nonresponders to conventional treatment. Newer immunosuppressive agents targeting pathogenetic mechanisms can improve patient management, which needs to be tailored on a case-by-case basis.

Autoimmune hepatitis type-2 and Epstein-Barr virus infection in a toddler: art of facts or an artifact?

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) can cause frequently asymptomatic (or anicteric) and self-limited hepatitis, while occasionally may result in considerable cholestatic hepatitis. Herein, we describe the case of a previously healthy toddler (26 month old girl) with prolonged cholestasis, elevated serum transaminases, EBV serology compatible with recent EBV infection and positive anti liver kidney microsomal antibody type 1 which is characteristic of new-onset autoimmune hepatitis type 2. Liver biopsy was also typical of autoimmune hepatitis as attested by the presence of portal inflammation with predominant T-lymphocytes and plasma cells and interface hepatitis. Persistent EBV-related hepatitis was excluded by the absence of viral inclusions and steatosis on liver specimens and negative liver EBV-PCR. In conclusion, our case strongly suggests that in children with prolonged cholestatic hepatitis, positive EBV serology cannot exclude the presence of other causes of liver disease. In this context, autoimmune hepatitis should be considered as an alternate diagnosis, particularly when there is specific liver-related autoantibody detection. In such conditions, liver biopsy seems mandatory in an attempt to achieve a correct and timely diagnosis of a potentially catastrophic disease as autoimmune hepatitis. Although some cases of autoimmune hepatitis type 1 following EBV infection have been reported in adults, to the best of our knowledge, the present case of autoimmune hepatitis type 2 after EBV infection represents the first case in children ever reported in the English literature.

Autoimmune Hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis is a chronic necroinflammatory disease of unknown etiology that is characterized by increased aminotransferases, serum autoantibodies, increased immunoglobulin G levels, and histological interface hepatitis. The disease does not have a pathognomonic clinical, laboratory, or histological feature; diagnosis depends on a combination of clinical and pathologic criteria which also form the basis for a weighted scoring system to aid diagnosis. Liver biopsy is an essential part of the diagnostic criteria and is also crucial to the management of the disease. This review focuses on the diagnosis, microscopic features, differential diagnosis and overlap syndromes of autoimmune hepatitis.

Cholestatic liver disease overlap syndromes

Primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis share some clinical features with autoimmune hepatitis, but when features of autoimmune hepatitis are present, prognosis can be affected and immunosuppressive treatment warranted. The presence of severe interface hepatitis in primary biliary cirrhosis portends a worse prognosis and should prompt evaluation for possible autoimmune hepatitis overlap and treatment with immunosuppression. Specific models to identify which subjects benefit most from the addition of immunosuppression need to be developed. Drug-induced liver injury and IgG4 disease may masquerade as autoimmune hepatitis or primary sclerosing cholangitis and are important to consider in the differential diagnosis of the overlap or variant syndromes.

Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a progressive necroinflammatory liver disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Mainly affecting females, AIH has a varied clinical presentation from minor symptomatology to acute liver failure. The diagnosis should be considered in anyone with abnormal liver function tests. Diagnostic features include biochemical evidence of transaminitis, elevated IgG and positive autoantibodies. Liver biopsy may show interface hepatitis with portal-based plasma cell infiltrates. A clinical and pathological spectrum of disease exists with other autoimmune liver disease in rare cases. AIH responds promptly to immunosuppression therapy, including corticosteroids (prednis(ol)one or budesonide) with azathioprine. Treatment failure can be addressed with several second-line immunosuppressive agents. Liver transplantation remains a successful salvage therapy for acute autoimmune liver failure or treatment failure in chronic AIH complicated by synthetic dysfunction, portal hypertension or hepatocellular carcinoma.

Diagnosis and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis is a chronic liver disease characterized by elevated aminotransferase levels, autoantibodies, increased γ-globulin or IgG levels and biopsy evidence of interface hepatitis. Recent advances include new practice guidelines that redefine criteria for remission to require complete biochemical and histological normalization on therapy; comparisons between the revised original and simplified diagnostic scoring systems; refined characterization of autoantibodies and their diagnostic performance parameters; proof of the safety and efficacy of combination budesonide and azathioprine therapy for non-cirrhotic patients; scrutiny of overlap syndromes; further analyses of the outcomes of orthotopic liver transplantation and the diagnosis and treatment of recurrent and de novo autoimmune hepatitis after transplantation. Anticipated consequences of the application of the new definition of therapeutic remission include a reduction in the proportion of patients achieving remission with conventional immunosuppression regimens and a corresponding increase in the need for alternative therapies.

Validation and modification of simplified diagnostic criteria for autoimmune hepatitis in children

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Criteria for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) were formalized in 1993 and revised in 1999. Simplified criteria were developed in 2008 for adults only. We aimed to establish clinically useful diagnostic criteria for AIH in children by validating the 2008 criteria in a pediatric cohort.

METHODS

Baseline data were available in 37 and 31 AIH and 40 and 26 non-AIH subjects to calculate 1999 and 2008 criteria, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of the simplified criteria were calculated using 1999 criteria as the standard for subjects with available data for both criteria.

RESULTS

The 1999 standard designated 29 of 31 subjects (94%) as definite AIH and 2 of 31 subjects (6%) as probable AIH. The simplified criteria identified 25 of 31 subjects (81%) as definite AIH, 2 of 31 subjects (6%) as probable AIH. Only 1 of 5 patients with AIH who presented with fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) was identified by the simplified criteria as having AIH. The 2008 diagnostic criteria had a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 89% (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.98). After removing data from patients with FHF from the analysis, the sensitivity increased to 100%. Modifying the 2008 diagnostic criteria to include either level of globulin or immunoglobulin G resulted in a similar sensitivity (92%) and specificity (95%) values (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

The 2008 criteria diagnose AIH in children with high levels of sensitivity and specificity, and are easier to use in the clinic. Diagnosis of AIH in patients who present in FHF requires the 1999 criteria. Levels of globulin and immunoglobulin G can be used interchangeably in the simplified diagnostic criteria.

Epidemiology and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the liver that occurs worldwide with a low and probably underestimated prevalence. Although it typically affects young and middle-aged women, it can occur in both sexes and across all age groups. AIH runs a fluctuating course, but can present as severe and even fulminant hepatic failure or at a stage of advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. Prognosis of severe AIH is poor if untreated. The pathogenesis is complex, combining environmental factors (external chemical or infectious triggers) and host genetic susceptibility. The diagnosis is based, after exclusion of other etiologies of chronic liver disease, on a combination of different elements, including the presence of elevated transaminases, elevated immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels, the presence and pattern of typical autoantibodies, and a liver biopsy showing interface hepatitis and other characteristic features. No single test can be used to make the diagnosis. Response to treatment can also help to establish the diagnosis. Simplified criteria can be used to make a bedside diagnosis with relatively high accuracy. Treatment consists of corticosteroids or other immunosuppressive regimens according to the severity of the disease, the response to the treatment, and the tolerance to therapy, with liver transplantation as an ultimate remedy in treatment-resistant cases with liver decompensation.

Diagnostic criteria for autoimmune hepatitis

The clinical spectrum of autoimmune hepatitis is very wide. In addition, autoimmune hepatitis can present in any age group. Diagnosis is usually made by a combination of clinical, laboratory and histological features. Diagnostic scores can help both in the daily diagnostic work-up of patients, and in allowing comparability of clinical scientific studies. However, all diagnostic scores have limitations in individual cases, which are discussed in this review.

Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis was one of the first liver diseases for which an effective treatment was developed and the benefit proven by randomized controlled trials. Nonetheless, both the diagnosis and the treatment of autoimmune hepatitis remain full of challenges. The clinical spectrum is very wide, ranging from subclinical non-progressive disease to fulminant hepatic failure. Diagnostic criteria based on elevation of IgG, demonstration of characteristic autoantibodies, and histological features of hepatitis in the absence of viral disease are very helpful. However, in some patients, diagnosis remains a clinical challenge. Adequately dosed steroids are the mainstay of remission induction treatment, while remission maintenance is best achieved by azathioprine. Therapeutic alternatives are required in a small group of patients responding insufficiently to these drugs or intolerant to their side effects.

Validation of the simplified criteria for diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis in Chinese patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

In 1999, the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) revised the diagnostic criteria for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). It subsequently developed the simplified criteria in 2008 to enhance clinical applicability and practicability. In this study, we validated the simplified diagnostic criteria in Chinese patients with AIH or other chronic liver diseases in comparison with the revised original criteria.

METHODS

Diagnostic scores were determined using the revised original criteria and the simplified criteria in 405 patients with diverse liver diseases. The sample included 127 patients with AIH type I diagnosed by the descriptive criteria, 77 patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), 6 patients with AIH-PBC overlap syndrome, 47 patients with drug-induced liver injury (DILI), 36 patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), 82 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), and 30 patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). The simplified criteria were compared to the revised original criteria based on sensitivity, specificity, and predictability for the pre-treatment diagnosis of AIH.

RESULTS

The simplified criteria had sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 95%, respectively, for the diagnosis of probable AIH in the Chinese patients. This compares well with the more rigorous revised original criteria, which had sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 93%, respectively, for probable AIH. On definite AIH, the simplified criteria had sensitivity and specificity of 62% and 99%, respectively, compared to 64% and 100% for definite AIH by the revised original criteria. In addition, the predictabilities of the revised original criteria and simplified criteria were 96% and 94% for probable AIH, and 88% and 87% for definite AIH, respectively, in our groups. Using the revised original criteria, 84 patients were diagnosed with definite AIH. On the other hand, among these 84 patients, the simplified criteria diagnosed only 61 patients with definite AIH (accordant diagnosis) and provided the 23 other patients with downgraded diagnosis. Comparison of the clinical and laboratory features of these two groups (accordant diagnosis vs. downgraded/excluded diagnosis) showed that the patients with downgraded diagnosis had significantly higher histological scores than the patients with accordant diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The simplified criteria are comparable to the revised original criteria and have high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of AIH in Chinese patients. Liver histology is critical for the diagnosis of AIH especially when using the simplified criteria. Further study or prospective evaluation is needed to confirm these observations, however, due to the small group of CHC patients as well as the absence of primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients in our study.