Pembrolizumab in combination with nab-paclitaxel for the treatment of patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer - A single-arm phase II trial (NeoImmunoboost, AGO-B-041)

Role of imaging based response assesment for adapting neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer: A systematic review

PURPOSE

The objective of this systematic review is to investigate the role of imaging in response monitoring during neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) for breast cancer and assess whether treatment modifications based on imaging response are implemented in clinical practice.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted, analyzing five clinical practice guidelines and 147 clinical trial publications involving NST for breast cancer. The snowballing technique was employed, using a "start set" of clinical guidelines to trace relevant trials. Additionally, a PubMed search was conducted to identify trials published between 2023-2024. The review analyzed the use of imaging modalities, timing, and response criteria, and whether escalation, de-escalation, or change of treatment occurred based on imaging response.

RESULTS

Imaging was utilized in 81 % (119/147) of the trials, with ultrasound, MRI, and mammography being the most frequently employed modalities. Mid-treatment imaging was applied in 56 % (83/147) of the trials. However, only 15 % (22/147) of the trials implemented treatment modifications based on imaging response, highlighting the limited application of imaging response-guided therapy. No standardized imaging protocols or consistent response-guided treatment strategies were identified across the trials or clinical practice guidelines, with considerable variability in imaging methods, timing, and response criteria.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review underscores the critical need for standardized imaging protocols, response assessment criteria and image-guided treatment decisions. It is therefore evident that imaging for response monitoring during treatment should preferably be performed within clinical trials.

Current Status of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Treatment Responsive Biomarkers for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), accounting for about 10%-20% of all breast cancer cases, is characterized by its aggressive nature, high recurrence rates, and poor prognosis. Unlike other breast cancer subtypes, TNBC lacks hormone receptors and specific molecular targets, limiting therapeutic options. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promise in treating TNBC by targeting immune evasion mechanisms. Despite these advancements, several issues remain unresolved, including low response rates in programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) negative TNBC subtypes and the challenge of predicting which patients will benefit from ICIs. Consequently, there is growing interest in identifying reliable biomarkers beyond PD-L1 expression. This review synthesizes recent studies to provide a comprehensive perspective on ICI therapy in TNBC, clarifying the status of single-agent ICI therapies and combination strategies, emphasizing the need for further research into biomarkers. These insights provide clues for more personalized and effective treatment approaches, ultimately aiming to improve clinical outcomes for patients with TNBC.

A system review of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade for breast cancer

Background

The clinical application of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)-based neoadjuvant therapy has been approved in breast cancer since 2021. However, no studies have evaluated its efficacy and safety in randomized and non-randomized settings. Additionally, there exists controversy about which specific subpopulation can benefit from this management strategy.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for prospective clinical trials of ICB-based neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer. Information regarding pathological complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) were pooled to estimate the efficacy and safety. Hazard ratio, relative risk (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

Results

Among 22 eligible trials including 6134 women with resectable breast cancer, there were 11 randomized studies with 5574 patients. Pooled analysis on pCR (RR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.20-1.58; P<0.001), EFS (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.54-0.81; P<0.001), and OS (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.35-0.91; P=0.01) revealed that ICB-based neoadjuvant therapy was associated with favorable outcomes over conventional treatment. Moreover, the benefits of EFS were independent of PD-L1 expression (Pinteraction =0.57) and pCR (Pinteraction =0.37) in neoadjuvant immunotherapy. However, combining ICB with conventional neoadjuvant treatment significantly increased the risk of high-grade TRAE (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12; P=0.03), serious TRAE (RR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.26-1.94; P<0.001), treatment discontinuation due to TRAE (RR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.14-1.90; P=0.003), and potentially fatal adverse event (RR, 2.25; 95% CI, 0.80-6.31; P=0.12).

Conclusion

The combination of ICB with conventional neoadjuvant treatment is associated with favorable clinical outcomes and importantly, increased grade 3+ toxicities. Clinicians should meticulously monitor patients to minimize the risk of treatment discontinuation in individuals with potentially curable breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant Strategies for Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

Triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly aggressive subtype of breast cancer, characterized by poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) remains the established treatment approach, its suboptimal efficacy associated with TNBC highlight the urgent need for optimized treatment strategies to improve pathological complete response (pCR) rates. This review provides a comprehensive overview of recent advancements in neoadjuvant treatment for TNBC, emphasizing pivotal breakthroughs in therapeutic strategies and the ongoing pursuit of innovative approaches to enhance precision medicine. It emphasizes the clinical value of platinum‐based agents, such as carboplatin and cisplatin, which have shown significant improvements in pCR rates, particularly in TNBC patients with BRCA mutations. Additionally, the review explores progress in targeted therapies, including PARP inhibitors, AKT inhibitors, and Antiangiogenic agents, showcasing their potential for personalized treatment approaches. The integration of immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitor like pembrolizumab and atezolizumab, with chemotherapy has demonstrated substantial efficacy in high‐risk TNBC cases. Future research priorities include refining biomarker‐driven strategies, optimizing therapeutic combinations, developing antibody‐drug conjugates (ADCs) targeting TROP2 and other biomarkers, and reducing treatment‐related toxicity to develop safer and highly personalized neoadjuvant therapies. Furthermore, artificial intelligence has also emerged as a transformative tool in predicting treatment response and optimizing therapeutic decision‐making in TNBC. These advancements aim to improve long‐term outcomes and quality of life for patients with TNBC.

Advancements in clinical research and emerging therapies for triple-negative breast cancer treatment

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), defined by the lack of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) expression, is acknowledged as the most aggressive form of breast cancer (BC), comprising 15%-20% of all primary cases. Despite the prevalence of TNBC, effective and well-tolerated targeted therapies remain limited, with chemotherapy continuing to be the mainstay of treatment. However, the horizon is brightened by recent advancements in immunotherapy and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), which have garnered the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for various stages of TNBC. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi), particularly for TNBC with BRCA mutations, present a promising avenue, albeit with the challenge of resistance that must be addressed. The success of phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K) pathway inhibitors in hormone receptor (HR)-positive BC suggests potential applicability in TNBC, spurring optimism within the research community. This review endeavors to offer a comprehensive synthesis of both established and cutting-edge targeted therapies for TNBC. We delve into the specifics of PARPi, androgen receptor (AR) inhibitors, Cancer stem cells (CSCs), PI3K/Protein Kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β), Ntoch, Wnt/β-catenin, hedgehog (Hh) pathway inhibitors, Epigenetic target-mediated drug delivery, ADCs, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)and novel immunotherapeutic solutions, contextualizing TNBC within current treatment paradigms. By elucidating the mechanisms of these drugs and their prospective clinical applications, we aim to shed light on the challenges and underscore the beacon of hope that translational research and innovative therapies represent for the oncology field.

Depression decreases immunity and PD-L1 inhibitor efficacy via the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis in triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Depression weakens antitumor immunity, yet the underlying mechanisms linking depression and tumor growth remain unclear. This study examines the influence of depression on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, immunological function, and effectiveness of immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients.

METHODS

A mouse model of comorbid TNBC and depression was established via chronic restraint stress (CRS) and 4T1 tumor transplantation. A programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor was used to manage mice with TNBC, and the ability of metyrapone to reverse the immune system changes induced by HPA axis activation in depression was evaluated. Mouse peripheral blood was used to measure HPA axis activity, immune cell numbers and cytokine levels.

RESULTS

Depression activates the HPA axis, leading to increased levels of glucocorticoids. Depression led to an increase in the B-cell number and a reduction in the CD4+ T-cell and CD8+ T-cell numbers, without a statistically significant difference in the regulatory T (Treg) cell number. Furthermore, depression increased the levels of the cytokines interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α while decreasing the levels of IL-2 and IL-10. Similar results were observed in the context of PD-L1 inhibitor therapy. The depressed mice presented an increased tumor burden and a poor response to the PD-L1 inhibitor. The application of metyrapone during PD-L1 inhibitor treatment resulted in partial restoration of these depression-related alterations.

CONCLUSIONS

Depression reduces the effectiveness of PD-L1 inhibitors by altering the number of immune cells and the levels of cytokines through activation of the HPA axis.

TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE

Depression is common in breast cancer patients and is associated with reduced antitumor immunity. There is limited knowledge regarding the specific mechanisms through which depression impairs antitumor immunity. Immunotherapy, which promotes the restoration of antitumor immunity, represents a promising treatment strategy for TNBC patients. However, the efficacy of immunotherapy can be compromised by depressive symptoms and the administration of glucocorticoids during treatment. It is still uncertain whether increasing glucocorticoid levels can reduce the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with depression. The potential benefits of combining immunotherapy with glucocorticoid inhibitors compared with immunotherapy alone need to be evaluated for TNBC patients with concurrent depressive symptoms. Therefore, further clarification of the specific mechanisms by which depression impairs antitumor immunity is needed to inform future optimization of immunotherapy strategies.

Comparative efficacy of anthracycline-free and anthracycline-containing neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy regimens for triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The selection of appropriate chemotherapy backbone agents in combination with neoadjuvant immunotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains unclear. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anthracycline-free and anthracycline-containing regimens coupled with neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

METHOD

This retrospective study included 87 patients with TBNC who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with various chemotherapy regimens at three research centers from November 2020 to November 2023. The primary objective was pathological complete response (pCR), while secondary objectives included overall response rates, event-free survival (EFS), and the incidence of adverse events. A subgroup analysis was performed to delineate patients who may substantially benefit from distinct therapeutic strategies.

RESULTS

Coupled with immunotherapy, anthracycline-free regimens achieved comparable pCR rates (55.1 % vs. 51.4 %; Odds ratio, 1.16; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.49-2.74; p = 0.73) and EFS (Hazard ratio, 0.66; 95 % CI, 0.18-2.45; p = 0.53) to anthracycline-containing regimens. According to subgroup analyses, the tumor stage (p = 0.017) and lymph node stage (p = 0.011) exhibit contradictory predictive power for the pCR rate of anthracycline-free regimens when compared with that of anthracycline-containing regimens. Specifically, anthracycline-free regimens yielded significantly higher pCR rates in patients without lymph node metastasis than anthracycline-containing regimens (p = 0.021). Pooled analyses further confirmed the results of both total and subgroup analyses. Most adverse events were grades 1-2, and no new adverse reactions were observed.

CONCLUSION

Anthracycline-free neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens could serve as an effective and safe alternative immunotherapy partner for patients with TNBC, particularly in those without lymph node metastasis.

Evolving immunotherapeutic solutions for triple-negative breast carcinoma

Triple-negative breast carcinoma (TNBC) remains a formidable clinical hurdle owing to its high aggressiveness and scant therapeutic options. Nonetheless, the evolving landscape of immunotherapeutic strategies opens up promising avenues for tackling this hurdle. This review discusses the advancing immunotherapy for TNBC, accentuating personalized interventions due to tumor microenvironment (TME) diversity. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) hold pivotal significance, both as single-agent therapies and when administered alongside cytotoxic agents. Moreover, the concurrent inhibition of multiple immune checkpoints represents a potent approach to augment the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. Synergistic effects have been observed when ICIs are combined with targeted treatments like PARP inhibitors, anti-angiogenics, and ADCs (antibody-drug conjugates). Emerging tactics include tumor vaccines, cellular immunotherapy, and oncolytic viruses, leveraging the immune system's ability for selective malignant cell destruction. This review offers an in-depth examination of the diverse landscape of immunotherapy development for TNBC, furnishing meticulous insights into various advancements within this field. In addition, immunotherapeutic interventions offer hope for TNBC, needing further research for optimization.

The landscape of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with novel Therapies: Secret alliances against breast cancer

This review focuses on the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the context of breast cancer (BC) management. These innovative treatments, by targeting proteins expressed on both tumor and immune cells, aim to overcome tumor-induced immune suppression and reactivate the immune system. The potential of this approach is the subject of numerous clinical studies. Here, we explore the key studies and emerging therapies related to ICIs providing a detailed analysis of their specific and combined use in BC treatment.

The Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Patients With T1N0M0 Triple-Negative and HER-2 Positive Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Based on the SEER Database

BACKGROUND

The utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) originated in the treatment of locally advanced breast cancer (BC). Our study is designed to elucidate the effects of NAC on patients with T1N0M0 triple-negative and HER-2 positive BC.

METHODS

This study involved the selection of 10,614 patients diagnosed with T1N0M0 triple-negative and HER-2 positive breast cancer (BC) from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database. To ascertain the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on T1a, T1b, and T1c N0M0 BC, we conducted multivariate Cox regression analyses. Similarly, we performed multivariate Cox regression analyses to compare the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy against adjuvant chemotherapy on T1N0M0 BC. The Kaplan-Meier method was employed to delineate survival curves for different molecular subtypes and clinical stages.

RESULTS

The data results from the SEER database reveal a significant enhancement of overall survival (OS) in T1c BC patients as a result of NAC. For T1b BC patients, NAC does not present any significant effect. Contrarily, NAC seems to adversely impact the OS of T1a triple-negative BC patients. However, the prognosis comparison between neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for T1N0M0 breast cancer did not show any significant difference, with the exception of T1a triple-negative BC.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with T1cN0M0 triple-negative and HER-2 positive BC may derive OS benefits from NAC. Additionally, NAC could be detrimental to T1a triple-negative BC.

Neoadjuvant anthracycline followed by toripalimab combined with nab-paclitaxel in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer (NeoTENNIS): a single-arm, phase II study

Background

Toripalimab, a novel PD-1 antibody, is approved for treatment of multiple solid tumors; however, its neoadjuvant use with chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains unevaluated. Additionally, induction chemotherapy followed by de-escalation of neoadjuvant immunotherapy remains underexplored. Therefore, we conducted a phase II trial investigating a novel neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy regimen including de-escalation of immunotherapy for early-stage TNBC.

Methods

Chemotherapy and anti-PD-1 therapy were sequentially administered in a neoadjuvant setting to female patients with histologically confirmed stage II-III TNBC between June 9, 2020, and March 24, 2022. Patients received neoadjuvant therapy with four cycles of epirubicin-cyclophosphamide every 2 weeks, followed by toripalimab (240 mg) every 3 weeks plus nab-paclitaxel weekly for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was total pathological complete response (tpCR; ypT0/is ypN0). Key secondary endpoints included breast pCR (bpCR; ypT0/is), event-free survival and biomarker analysis. Safety was also assessed. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04418154).

Findings

Among 70 enrolled patients (median age, 51 years; 62.9% stage III), 66 completed treatment without progression and subsequently underwent surgery. The percentages of patients with a tpCR and bpCR were 39 of 70 (55.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 43.3-67.6) and 41 of 70 (58.6%, 95% CI 46.2-70.2), respectively. Sixteen (22.9%) patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs), frequently neutropenia (12, 17.1%) and leukopenia (11, 15.7%). The most common immune-related AE was hypothyroidism (5, 7.1%, all grade 1-2).

Interpretation

Including 12 weeks of toripalimab in neoadjuvant chemotherapy conferred encouraging activity and manageable toxicity in patients with early TNBC, and this regimen warrants further investigation.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China, Junshi Biosciences, and Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals.

A review concerning the breast cancer-related tumour microenvironment

Breast cancer (BC) is currently the most common malignant tumour in women and one of the leading causes of their death around the world. New and increasingly personalised diagnostic and therapeutic tools have been introduced over the last few decades, along with significant advances regarding the study and knowledge related to BC. The tumour microenvironment (TME) refers to the tumour cell-associated cellular and molecular environment which can influence conditions affecting tumour development and progression. The TME is composed of immune cells, stromal cells, extracellular matrix (ECM) and signalling molecules secreted by these different cell types. Ever deeper understanding of TME composition changes during tumour development and progression will enable new and more innovative therapeutic strategies to become developed for targeting tumours during specific stages of its evolution. This review summarises the role of BC-related TME components and their influence on tumour progression and the development of resistance to therapy. In addition, an account on the modifications in BC-related TME components associated with therapy is given, and the completed or ongoing clinical trials related to this topic are presented.

Incidence of thyroid dysfunction caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been associated with many adverse reactions. Thyroid dysfunction, the most common adverse reaction of the endocrine system, has also attracted significant attention. This study aimed to analyse the effect of ICIs combined with chemotherapy on thyroid function in patients with TNBC.

METHODS

As of November 4, 2023, we searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for clinical trials of ICIs combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of TNBC. The incidence of hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism was calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

In the final analysis, 3,226 patients from 19 studies were included. The total incidence of all-grade hypothyroidism induced by the combination of ICIs and chemotherapy in treating TNBC (12% (95% confidence intervals(CI): 0.10-0.15)) was higher than that of hyperthyroidism (5% (95% CI: 0.04-0.06)). Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy caused the highest incidence of all grades of hypothyroidism for 13% (95% CI: 0.05-0.06). Durvalumab combined with chemotherapy caused the highest incidence of all grades of hyperthyroidism, at 7% (95% CI: 0.03-0.11). ICIs combined with chemotherapy caused a higher incidence of all grades of hypothyroidism in advanced TNBC (15% (95% CI: 0.13-0.17)) than in early stage TNBC (10% (95% CI: 0.07-0.13)).

CONCLUSION

In TNBC, the incidence of hypothyroidism caused by the combination of ICIs and chemotherapy was significantly higher than that caused by hyperthyroidism. Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy resulted in the highest incidence of hypothyroidism. The incidence of hypothyroidism in patients with advanced TNBC was significantly higher than that in patients with early stage TNBC. In addition, ICIs combined with chemotherapy resulted in 16 out of 3,226 patients experiencing grade ≥ 3 thyroid dysfunction. Although the incidence of severe thyroid dysfunction is low, it requires attention.

PROSPERO

CRD42023477933.

Photothermal Ferrotherapy - Induced Immunogenic Cell Death via Iron-Based Ternary Chalcogenide Nanoparticles Against Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is highly malignant and prone to recurrence and metastasis. Patients with TNBC have limited therapeutic options, often resulting in poor prognosis. Some new treatments for TNBC have been considered in the past decade, such as immunotherapy, photothermal therapy (PTT), and ferroptosis therapy, that allow the rapid and minimally invasive ablation of cancer. However, a multifunctional nanodrug system with more potent efficacy for TNBC is still needed. The use of iron-based ternary chalcogenide nanoparticles (NPs), namely AgFeS2, is reported, which synergistically combines photothermal therapy, ferrotherapy, and immunotherapy in one system for the treatment of TNBC. AgFeS2 possesses excellent photothermal conversion performance for tumor near-infrared (NIR) phototherapy. Upon photoirradiation, these NPs generate heat, accelerate the release of iron ions, and effectively catalyze the Fenton reaction, resulting in cell apoptosis and ferroptosis. Additionally, AgFeS2 promotes the release of tumor-specific antigens and triggers an immune response via immunogenic cell death (ICD), thereby providing unique synergistic mechanisms for cancer therapy. The present study demonstrates the great potential of iron-based ternary chalcogenide as a new therapeutic platform for a combination of photothermal therapy, ferrotherapy, and immunotherapy for the suppression of TNBC.

Novel immunotherapies for breast cancer: Focus on 2023 findings

Immunotherapy has emerged as a revolutionary approach in cancer therapy, and recent advancements hold significant promise for breast cancer (BCa) management. Employing the patient's immune system to combat BCa has become a focal point in immunotherapeutic investigations. Strategies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), adoptive cell transfer (ACT), and targeting the tumor microenvironment (TME) have disclosed encouraging clinical outcomes. ICIs, particularly programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 inhibitors, exhibit efficacy in specific BCa subtypes, including triple-negative BCa (TNBC) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive cancers. ACT approaches, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, showed promising clinical outcomes in enhancing tumor recognition and elimination. Targeting the TME through immune agonists and oncolytic viruses signifies a burgeoning field of research. While challenges persist in patient selection, resistance mechanisms, and combination therapy optimization, these novel immunotherapies hold transformative potential for BCa treatment. Continued research and clinical trials are imperative to refine and implement these innovative approaches, paving the way for improved outcomes and revolutionizing the management of BCa. This review provides a concise overview of the latest immunotherapies (2023 studies) in BCa, highlighting their potential and current status.

Psychological distress and coping strategies in breast cancer patients under neoadjuvant therapy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

During neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) experience psychological distress (PD) and adopt appropriate coping strategies.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to examine the prevalence and changes in PD and coping strategies in patients with LABC during NAT and to evaluate effective interventions to reduce their PD.

DESIGN

Quantitative (cross-sectional, longitudinal, and interventional) and qualitative studies reporting PD and coping strategies related to NAT during LABC were included.

DATA SOURCES AND METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Wiley Online Library, and Web of Science databases were consulted to gather relevant literature from the first publications until July 25, 2023. Selection was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 41 articles were included, of which four were qualitative. The main results showed that the prevalence of depression before NAT ranged from 0% to 46% and that of anxiety from 5.5% to 54%. After NAT, the prevalence of depression ranged from 40% to 78.5% and anxiety accounted for 27%. Additionally, PD decreased during NAT. The main determinants of PD were perceived social support, living in joint families, being affected by COVID-19 infection, delays in diagnosis, and starting neoadjuvant treatment. For coping strategies, after NAT, "resigned coping" decreased, whereas "social support" increased, and active coping strategies were correlated with better PD. Some interventions found a reduction in PD, such as a mobile health application, fasting-mimicking diet, relaxation training, and guided imaging.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the importance of considering PD and coping strategies in patients with LABC from diagnosis to the end of NAT. The results suggest that effective psychological interventions should be implemented.

Unveiling the Immune Microenvironment's Role in Breast Cancer: A Glimpse into Promising Frontiers

Breast cancer (BC), one of the most widespread and devastating diseases affecting women worldwide, presents a significant public health challenge. This review explores the emerging frontiers of research focused on deciphering the intricate interplay between BC cells and the immune microenvironment. Understanding the role of the immune system in BC is critical as it holds promise for novel therapeutic approaches and precision medicine strategies. This review delves into the current literature regarding the immune microenvironment's contribution to BC initiation, progression, and metastasis. It examines the complex mechanisms by which BC cells interact with various immune cell populations, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). Furthermore, this review highlights the impact of immune-related factors, such as cytokines and immune checkpoint molecules. Additionally, this comprehensive analysis sheds light on the potential biomarkers associated with the immune response in BC, enabling early diagnosis and prognostic assessment. The therapeutic implications of targeting the immune microenvironment are also explored, encompassing immunotherapeutic strategies and combination therapies to enhance treatment efficacy. The significance of this review lies in its potential to pave the way for novel therapeutic interventions, providing clinicians and researchers with essential knowledge to design targeted and personalized treatment regimens for BC patients.

Update Breast Cancer 2023 Part 3 - Expert Opinions of Early Stage Breast Cancer Therapies

The St. Gallen (SG) International Breast Cancer Conference is held every two years, previously in St. Gallen and now in Vienna. This year (2023) marks the eighteenth edition of this conference, which focuses on the treatment of patients with early-stage breast carcinoma. A panel discussion will be held at the end of this four-day event, during which a panel of experts will give their opinions on current controversial issues relating to the treatment of early-stage breast cancer patients. To this end, questions are generally formulated in such a way that clinically realistic cases are presented - often including poignant hypothetical modifications. This review reports on the outcome of these discussions and summarises the data associated with individual questions raised.

Recent advances in targeted strategies for triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a highly aggressive subtype of breast cancer, negatively expresses estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Although chemotherapy is the main form of treatment for patients with TNBC, the effectiveness of chemotherapy for TNBC is still limited. The search for more effective therapies is urgent. Multiple targeted therapeutic strategies have emerged according to the specific molecules and signaling pathways expressed in TNBC. These include PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors, epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, Notch inhibitors, poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates. Moreover, immune checkpoint inhibitors, for example, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, and durvalumab, are widely explored in the clinic. We summarize recent advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy in TNBC, with the aim of serving as a reference for the development of individualized treatment of patients with TNBC in the future.

A Holistic Approach to Hard-to-Treat Cancers: The Future of Immunotherapy for Glioblastoma, Triple Negative Breast Cancer, and Advanced Prostate Cancer

Immunotherapy represents an attractive avenue for cancer therapy due to its tumour specificity and relatively low frequency of adverse effects compared to other treatment modalities. Despite many advances being made in the field of cancer immunotherapy, very few immunotherapeutic treatments have been approved for difficult-to-treat solid tumours such as triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), and advanced prostate cancer (PCa). The anatomical location of some of these cancers may also make them more difficult to treat. Many trials focus solely on immunotherapy and have failed to consider or manipulate, prior to the immunotherapeutic intervention, important factors such as the microbiota, which itself is directly linked to lifestyle factors, diet, stress, social support, exercise, sleep, and oral hygiene. This review summarises the most recent treatments for hard-to-treat cancers whilst factoring in the less conventional interventions which could tilt the balance of treatment in favour of success for these malignancies.

Progress in immune checkpoint inhibition in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been particularly effective in treating cancers with robust immune microenvironments and have been successfully incorporated into the management of metastatic ER-negative and HER2-negative breast cancer. This has prompted investigation of immunotherapy in early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) to address the suboptimal clinical outcomes and limited therapeutic options.

AREAS COVERED

This review highlights the studies examining the use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy with standard chemotherapy in the management of early-stage TNBC and explores ongoing areas of study including the role of adjuvant checkpoint inhibition and novel combination therapies with immunotherapy.

EXPERT OPINION

The current standard of care for early-stage ER-negative, HER2-negative breast cancer measuring ≥2 cm or with lymph node involvement is neoadjuvant chemotherapy with pembrolizumab followed by ongoing pembrolizumab in the adjuvant setting to complete 1 year of total therapy as per the KEYNOTE-522 study. This approach is associated with improved pathologic complete response (pCR) rate and event free survival, irrespective of PD-L1 status. Many questions remain regarding the optimization of chemotherapy partner(s) for immunotherapy, necessity of adjuvant immunotherapy for patients who achieve pCR, inclusion of other therapies in the adjuvant setting (particularly capecitabine or olaparib), and use of adjuvant immunotherapy when it was not received in the neoadjuvant setting.