Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Minimally Invasive Tricuspid Valve Surgery: An Alternative Surgical Approach in the Era of Transcatheter Interventions

There has been significant growth in minimally invasive valve surgery over the past 2 decades, with novel approaches including video-assisted minithoracotomy, totally endoscopic, and robotic assisted. Outcomes of these techniques suggest that they can improve patient-reported outcomes, enhance mobility, reduce blood loss, and facilitate earlier discharge and return to work. Minimally invasive tricuspid valve surgery now provides surgeons and patients with an alternative option for treating tricuspid valve disease. These operations can be conducted safely and yield favorable outcomes with carefully selected patients. Herein, we provide a comprehensive overview of minimally invasive tricuspid valve surgery, including a summary of the current literature on minithoracotomy valve repair or replacement, beating heart, redo, and multiple-valve surgery. Finally, we contextualize how minimally invasive tricuspid valve surgery can play an important role in the era of emerging transcatheter strategies.

Defining centres of expertise for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and volume-outcome meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) is increasingly performed, but outcomes such as repair rate, mortality and survival likely depend on expertise. Still, the definition of a high-volume centre varies in the literature and lacks an evidence-based substantiation. Consequently, this study aims to determine the volume-outcome relation in MIMVS in conjunction with a volume threshold, in order to define 'high-volume centres', applying a novel statistical concept.

METHODS

The study was preregistered in PROSPERO (CRD42022376293, registered 26 November 2022). A systematic search was applied to three databases, including consecutive patients undergoing MIMVS. Studies describing patients undergoing transcatheter procedures were excluded. Restricted cubic spline analyses were applied and the elbow method was used to retrieve the threshold volume. Long-term outcomes were analysed using reconstructed Kaplan-Meier curves and a novel statistical concept to assess the volume-outcome relation for time-to-event outcomes was applied. The primary outcome was early mortality, secondary outcomes were repair rate, stroke, and long-term survival, freedom from reoperation, and freedom from more than moderate mitral regurgitation. Leave-one-out analyses were performed for sensitivity purposes.

RESULTS

Data from 68 unique centres were included (n=23 495 patients). Early mortality was 1.3% (95% CI 1.1% to 1.6%), without a statistically significant non-linear relation for this endpoint, nor for stroke. There was a statistically significant volume-outcome relation for mitral valve repair rate (p=0.018). Based on the repair rate, the threshold to define a high-volume centre was 60 cases/year (number needed to treat to prevent a replacement ≤7). A significant volume-outcome relation was observed for long-term outcomes as well, with a threshold of 53 and 54 cases/year for long-term survival and freedom from reoperation, respectively. These results were robust across the sensitivity analyses for the various endpoints.

CONCLUSIONS

The threshold to define a high-volume centre ranges between 53 and 60 cases/year based on repair rate, long-term survival and freedom-from reoperation. These findings have the potential to facilitate centralisation of MIMVS.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42022376293.

Deep Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Multimodal Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery Performed via Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated if the serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) within a multimodal analgesia scheme would reduce acute post-operative pain and intravenous opioid consumption in patients admitted to the intensive care unit after isolated minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Patients were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the University Hospital of Siena (Italy).

INTERVENTIONS

Patients treated with intravenous opioids (OP-G) as a postoperative analgesic regimen were compared to those managed with an opioid-sparing protocol consisting of a single-shot SAPB with 0.5% ropivacaine plus 4 mg dexamethasone administered 1 hour before the extubation (SAPB-G). The behavioral pain scale (BPS) for intubated (I) or non-intubated patients (NI) and the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) scores were collected at ICU admission and every 8 hours during the initial 24 postoperative hours.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

One hundred five patients (50 SAPB-G; 55 OP-G) were enrolled (median age 67 [60-70]; male 67 [64%]). RASS score at 8 hours after ICU admission was higher in the SAPB-G (0 [0, 0] v OP-G -2 [-3, 0], p < 0.001). At 24 hours after ICU admission, the number of patients with a BPS/BPS-NI score >4 was lower in the SAPB-G (4.0% v 18.2% OP-G, p = 0.048). SAPB-G received a lower number of opioid rescue doses during the first 24 hours (20% v 84% OP-G, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The SAPB may be effective in reducing the postoperative use of opioids in patients undergoing minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Prospective randomized studies are warranted.

Contemporary Review of Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: Current Considerations and Innovations

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) has become a well-established alternative to traditional median sternotomy at high-volume surgical centers. Advancements in surgical instruments have led to further refinement of MIMVS. However, MIMVS remains limited to select patients in select settings. In this review, we provide a brief overview of the evolution of MIMVS, as well as a technical description of the most relevant aspects of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

Biomarkers of inflammation and coagulation after minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a prospective comparison to conventional surgery

OBJECTIVES

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery techniques are increasingly used but have longer cardiopulmonary bypass time, which may increase inflammatory response and negatively affect coagulation. Our aim was to compare biomarkers of inflammation and coagulation as well as transfusion rates after minimally invasive mitral valve repair and mitral valve surgery using conventional sternotomy.

DESIGN

A prospective non-randomized study was performed enrolling 71 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery (35 right mini-thoracotomy and 36 conventional sternotomy procedures). Blood samples were collected pre- and postoperatively to assess inflammatory response. Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) was performed to assess coagulation, and transfusion rates were monitored.

RESULTS

The minimally invasive group had longer cardiopulmonary bypass times compared to the sternotomy group: 127 min ([115-146] vs 79 min [65-112], p < 0.001) and were cooled to a lower temperature during cardiopulmonary bypass, 34 °C vs 36 °C (p = 0.04). IL-6 was lower in the minimally invasive group compared to the conventional sternotomy group when measured at the end of the surgical procedure, (38 [23-69] vs 61[41-139], p = 0.008), but no differences were found at postoperative day 1 or postoperative day 3. The transfusion rate was lower in the minimally invasive group (14%) compared to full sternotomy (35%, p = 0.04) and the chest tube output was reduced, (395 ml [190-705] vs 570 ml [400-1040], p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data showed that despite the longer use of extra corporal circulation during surgery, minimally invasive mitral valve repair is associated with reduced inflammatory response, lower rates of transfusion, and reduced chest tube output.

Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement for High-Risk Populations: Transaxillary Access Enhances Survival in Patients with Obesity

Background/Objectives: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery is often avoided in patients with obesity due to exposure and surgical access concerns. Nonetheless, these patients have elevated periprocedural risks. Minimally invasive transaxillary aortic valve surgery offers a sternum-sparing "nearly no visible scar" alternative to the traditional full sternotomy. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients with obesity compared to a propensity score-matched full sternotomy cohort. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 1086 patients with obesity (body mass index [BMI] of >30 kg/m2) undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement from 2014 to 2023. Two hundred consecutive patients who received transaxillary minimally invasive cardiac lateral surgery (MICLAT-S) served as a treatment group, while a control group was generated via 1:1 propensity score matching from 886 patients who underwent full sternotomy. The final sample comprised 400 patients in both groups. Outcomes included major adverse cardio-cerebral events, mortality, and postoperative complications. Results: After matching, the clinical baselines were comparable. The mean BMI was 34.4 ± 4.0 kg/m2 (median: 33.9, range: 31.0-64.0). Despite the significantly longer skin-to-skin time (135.0 ± 37.7 vs. 119.0 ± 33.8 min; p ≤ 0.001), cardiopulmonary bypass time (69.1 ± 19.1 vs. 56.1 ± 21.4 min; p ≤ 0.001), and aortic cross-clamp time (44.0 ± 13.4 vs. 41.9 ± 13.3 min; p = 0.044), the MICLAT-S group showed a shorter hospital stay (9.71 ± 6.19 vs. 12.4 ± 7.13 days; p ≤ 0.001), lower transfusion requirements (0.54 ± 1.67 vs. 5.17 ± 9.38 units; p ≤ 0.001), reduced postoperative wound healing issues (5.0% vs. 12.0%; p = 0.012), and a lower 30-day mortality rate (1.5% vs. 6.0%; p = 0.031). Conclusions: MICLAT-S is safe and effective. Compared to traditional sternotomy in patients with obesity, MICLAT-S improves survival, reduces postoperative morbidity, and shortens hospital stays.

Total resection via right mini-thoracotomy for left atrial myxoma in juvenile Carney complex: a case report

BACKGROUND

Carney complex is a rare syndrome characterized by skin pigmentation, endocrine disorders, and myxomas. It is particularly notorious for its tendency to exhibit aggressive cardiac myxomas. Herein, we present a case of a juvenile female patient diagnosed with Carney complex who underwent a right lateral mini-thoracotomy.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 13-year-old girl presented with sudden-onset left hemiplegia and dysarthria. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple areas of restricted diffusion. Echocardiography identified a tumor in the left atrium, suspected to be related to Carney complex based on her medical history and physical examination findings. Surgery was performed via right lateral mini-thoracotomy, which minimized the risk of embolism and ensured a cosmetically favorable outcome. The left atrial wall defect was repaired with autologous pericardium. At 3 years postoperatively, follow-up echocardiography indicated no tumor recurrence and normal cardiac function.

CONCLUSIONS

Ongoing follow-ups are essential due to the aggressive nature of the Carney complex and its high recurrence rates. Right lateral mini-thoracotomy offers the advantage of avoiding re-sternotomy and minimizing adhesion dissection, making it the optimal choice for this case.

Total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy: Comparison of early- and mid-term results with conventional surgery

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of total coronary revascularization via left anterior thoracotomy (TCRAT) by comparing it to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with median sternotomy.

Methods

In this retrospective study, 108 patients (95 males, 13 females; mean age: 57.1±8.8; range, 41 to 75 years) who underwent TCRAT (Group 1) and 154 patients (126 males, 28 females; mean age: 61.2±9.8; range, 31 to 79) who underwent conventional CABG (Group 2) between February 1, 2021, and September 1, 2022, were evaluated. The operations were performed by the same surgical team. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data of patients and mid-term follow-up data were analyzed.

Results

Mean cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times, respectively, were 167.70±68.93 and 77.03±38.18 min in Group 1 and 106.64±38.27 and 62.21±24.06 min in Group 2 (p<0.001). During the postoperative period, the all-cause mortality rate was 5.8% (n=9) in Group 2, while it was 0.9% (n=1) in Group 1; there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.037). Nevertheless, the mean preoperative EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) II was 2.59±2.3 in Group 2, which was significantly higher than the mean EuroSCORE II of Group 1 (1.37±1.5; p<0.001). The mean hospitalization duration for Group 2 was 6.99±3.37 days, and the mean hospitalization duration for Group 1 was 6.77±4.24 days. Duration of hospitalization was statistically significantly shorter in Group 1 (p=0.047). In addition, the mean perioperative number of erythrocyte suspension transfusions in Group 1 was 1.51±1.74, while it was 1.86±1.75 in Group 2. Significantly fewer erythrocyte suspension transfusions were performed in Group 1 (p=0.033).

Conclusion

The findings of our study indicate that TCRAT is a safe and viable technique when performed on a select patient group compared to the conventional method.

Minimally invasive technique facilitates early extubation after cardiac surgery: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative time to extubation plays a role in prognosis after heart valve surgery; however, its exact impact has not been clarified. This study compared the postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery and conventional sternotomy, focusing on early extubation and factors influencing prolonged mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

Data from 744 patients who underwent heart valve surgery at the Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital between August 2019 and June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The outcomes in patients who underwent conventional median sternotomy (MS) and minimally invasive (MI) video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and Kaplan-Meier curves. Clinical data, including surgical data, postoperative cardiac function, postoperative complications, and intensive care monitoring data, were analyzed.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching and IPTW, 196 cases of conventional MS were compared with 196 cases of MI video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Compared to patients in the conventional MS group, those in the MI video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group in the matched cohort had a higher early postoperative extubation rate (P < 0.01), reduced incidence of postoperative pleural effusion (P < 0.05), significantly shorter length of stay in the intensive care unit (P < 0.01), shorter overall length of hospital stay (P < 0.01), and lower total cost of hospitalization (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Successful early tracheal extubation is important for the intensive care management of patients after heart valve surgery. The advantages of MI video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery over conventional MS include significant reductions in the duration of use of mechanical ventilation support, reduced length of intensive care unit stay, reduced total length of hospitalization, and a favorable patient recovery rate.

Survival and Durability of Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Repair: Insights from Different Repair Techniques

This study evaluates the long-term outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve repair (MIMVR) in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation, focusing on survival, mitral valve repair failure, and re-operation rates. A cohort of patients undergoing three primary repair techniques-quadrangular resection, edge-to-edge repair, and artificial chordae implantation-was analyzed using time-to-event methods. The overall survival rates at 1, 10, and 20 years were high and comparable among the techniques, indicating effective long-term benefits of MIMVR. However, freedom from recurrence of moderate mitral regurgitation (MR) ≥ 2 was significantly higher in the quadrangular resection and edge-to-edge groups compared to the artificial chordae group. No significant differences were observed for recurrent MR ≥ 3. Re-operation rates were low and similar across all techniques, underscoring the durability of MIMVR. Pre-discharge residual MR ≥ 2 was identified as a strong predictor of long-term repair failure. These findings confirm the effectiveness of MIMVR, with all techniques demonstrating excellent long-term survival and durability.

Minimally Invasive Approach versus Sternotomy for Cardiac Surgery in Jehovah's Witness Patients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) compared with the sternotomy approach for Jehovah's Witness (JW) patients who cannot receive blood transfusions DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational study.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a specialized cardiovascular intervention and surgery institute.

PARTICIPANTS

The study cohort comprised JW patients undergoing cardiac surgery between September 2016 and July 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

None MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients (n = 63) were divided into MICS (n = 19) and sternotomy (n = 44) groups, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. There was no difference in types of operation except coronary bypass grafting (n = 1 [5.3%] in the MICS group v n = 20 [45.5%] in the sternotomy group; p = 0.005). There were no between-group differences in early mortality and morbidities. Overall survival did not differ significantly during the follow-up period (mean, 43.9 ± 24.4 months). The amount of chest tube drainage was significantly lower in the MICS group on the first postoperative day (mean, 224.0 ± 122.7 mL v 334.0 ± 187.0 mL in the sternotomy group; p = 0.022). The mean hemoglobin level was significantly higher in the MICS group on the day of operation (11.7 ± 1.3 mg/dL v 10.6 ± 2.0 mg/dL in the sternotomy group; p = 0.042) and the first postoperative day (12.3 ± 1.8 mg/dL v 11.2 ± 1.9 mg/dL; p = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

MICS for JW patients showed favorable early outcomes and mid-term survival compared to conventional sternotomy. MICS may be a viable option for JW patients who decline blood transfusions.

Incidence of Clinical Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Valvular Surgery at the Ignacio Chávez National Institute of Cardiology

Minimally invasive cardiac valve replacement surgery (MICS) is a technique that has reported equivalent rates of mortality and reintervention when compared to conventional median sternotomy (CS). Additionally, MICS has inconsistently been reported to be associated with fewer postoperative complications, better cosmetic outcomes, and shorter hospital stays at the expense of longer surgical time, aortic clamp time, and extracorporeal circulation time. When comparing populations undergoing MICS vs CS at the Ignacio Chávez National Institute of Cardiology (INCICh), it was proven that there is a longer surgical, extracorporeal circulation, and aortic clamp durations in the MICS intervention, but no statistically significant difference in global mortality. MICS was also associated with a shorter hospital stay and less surgical discomfort. MICS can be considered an alternative and equivalent approach to CS for patients undergoing aortic and mitral valve replacement surgery in the Mexican population.

Maximizing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery With Enhanced Recovery (ERAS)

We convened a group of cardiac surgeons, intensivists, and anesthesiologists with extensive experience in minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) and perioperative care to identify the essential elements of a MICS program and the relationship with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS). The MICS incision should minimize tissue invasion without compromising surgical goals. MICS also requires safe management of hemodynamics and preservation of cardiac function, which we have termed myocardial management. Finally, comprehensive perioperative care through an ERAS program should be provided to allow patients to achieve optimal recovery. Therefore, we propose that MICS requires 3 elements: (1) a less invasive surgical incision (non-full sternotomy), (2) optimized myocardial management, and (3) ERAS. We contend that the full benefit of MICS can be achieved only by also utilizing an ERAS platform.

Anterolateral Minithoracotomy Mitral Valve Surgery with Central Cannulation: A Three-year Single-Center Experience

Introduction

In recent years, minimally invasive mitral valve surgery has become a standard procedure all over the world. A simplified and reproducible technique for performing mitral valve surgery through a right minithoracotomy with central aortocaval cannulation from the same incision, utilizing conventional instruments, has been developed. This innovative approach eliminates the requirement for endoscopic assistance, femoral arterial cannulation, and associated complications. This study aims to analyze the outcomes of patients who underwent minimally invasive mitral valve replacements (MVRs) with central cannulation between January 2016 and June 2018.

Methods

To conduct this analysis, preoperative variables, intraoperative data, and postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing minimally invasive MVRs were prospectively collected in our database from January 2016 to June 2018.

Results

A total of 350 patients underwent minimally invasive MVR surgery, with a mean age of 33.40 ± 10.89 years. Among them, 9.4% underwent concomitant procedures, such as tricuspid valve surgery and atrial septal defect closure. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times were 54.45 ± 4.95 min and 36.85 ± 4.39 min, respectively. Conversion to sternotomy was required in none of the patients. Major morbidities included stroke (n = 1; 0.29%) and new-onset dialysis requirement (n = 3; 0.85%). The mean blood transfusion requirement was 0.15 ± 0.27 units. The mean intensive care unit stay was 2.13 ± 0.32 days, and the hospital stay was 5.36 ± 1.12 days.

Conclusions

This study represents a valuable option in MVR surgery. Thoracotomy MVR is a safe and reproducible technique with excellent cosmesis.

Neuron-specific enolase levels immediately following cardiovascular surgery is modulated by hemolysis due to cardiopulmonary bypass, making it unsuitable as a brain damage biomarker

Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) is one of the biomarkers used as an indicator of brain disorder, but since it is also found in blood cell components, there is a concern that a spurious increase in NSE may occur after cardiovascular surgery, where cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) causes hemolysis. In the present study, we investigated the relationship between the degree of hemolysis and NSE after cardiovascular surgery and the usefulness of immediate postoperative NSE values in the diagnosis of brain disorder. A retrospective study of 198 patients who underwent surgery with CPB in the period from May 2019 to May 2021 was conducted. Postoperative NSE levels and Free hemoglobin (F-Hb) levels were compared in both groups. In addition, to verify the relationship between hemolysis and NSE, we examined the correlation between F-Hb levels and NSE levels. We also examined whether different surgical procedures could produce an association between hemolysis and NSE. Among 198 patients, 20 had postoperative stroke (Group S) and 178 had no postoperative stroke (Group U). There was no significant difference in postoperative NSE levels and F-Hb levels between Group S and Group U (p = 0.264, p = 0.064 respectively). F-Hb and NSE were weakly correlated (r = 0.29. p < 0.01). In conclusion, NSE level immediately after cardiac surgery with CPB is modified by hemolysis rather than brain injury, therefore it would be unreliable as a biomarker of brain disorder.

Comparison of the Effects of Full Median Sternotomy vs. Mini-Incision on Postoperative Pain in Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

It is not yet clear whether cardiac surgery by mini-incision (minimally invasive cardiac surgery [MICS]) is overall less painful than the conventional approach by full sternotomy (FS). A meta-analysis is necessary to investigate polled results on this topic.

METHODS

PubMed®/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (or LILACS), and Scientific Electronic Library Online (or SciELO) were searched for all clinical trials, reported until 2022, comparing FS with MICS in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), mitral valve surgery (MVS), and aortic valve replacement (AVR), and postoperative pain outcome was analyzed. Main summary measures were the method of standardized mean differences (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and P-values (considered statistically significant when < 0.05).

RESULTS

In AVR, the general estimate of postoperative pain effect favored MICS (SMD 0.87 [95% CI 0.04 to 1.71], P=0.04). However, in the sensitivity analysis, there was no difference between the groups (SMD 0.70 [95% CI -0.69 to 2.09], P=0.32). For MVS, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis with the included studies, because they had different methodologies. In CABG, the general estimate of the effect of postoperative pain did not favor any of the approaches (SMD -0.40 [95% CI -1.07 to 0.26], P=0.23), which was confirmed by sensitivity analysis (SMD -0.02 [95% CI -0.71 to 0.67], P=0.95).

CONCLUSION

MICS was not globally less painful than the FS approach. It seems that postoperative pain is more related to the degree of tissue retraction than to the size of the incision.

Anomalous circumflex artery encircling the aortic annulus: implications for mitral valve repair

Injury to coronary arteries during mitral surgery is a rare but life-threatening procedural complication, an anomalous origin and course of the left circumflex artery (LCx) increase this risk. Recognizing the anomaly by the characteristic angiographic pattern and identifying its relationship with the surrounding anatomical structure using imaging techniques, mainly transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) or coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), is of crucial importance in setting up the best surgical strategy. We report a case of anomalous origin of a circumflex artery (LCx) from the proximal portion of the right coronary artery (RCA) with a pathway running retroaortically through the mitro-aortic space. An integrated diagnostic approach using a multidisciplinary team with a cardiologist and an imaging radiologist allowed us to decide the surgical strategy. We successfully performed a mitral valvular repair using a minimally invasive minithoracotomic approach and implanting a complete semirigid ring.

One-year postprocedural quality of life following mitral valve surgery: data from The Netherlands heart registration

OBJECTIVES

The aim of surgical treatment of mitral valve disease is to reverse heart failure and to restore life expectancy and quality of life (QoL). In mitral valve surgery, QoL has not been studied extensively, especially regarding the surgical approach. The current study aimed to evaluate QoL after mitral valve surgery through full sternotomy and a minimally invasive approach (MIMVS).

METHODS

All patients undergoing mitral valve surgery between 2013-2018 through sternotomy or a MIMVS approach (right anterolateral mini-thoracotomy, sternal-sparing), with or without concomitant tricuspid valve surgery, surgical ablation, or atrial septal defect closure were eligible for inclusion in this multicentre nationwide registry in the Netherlands. Quality of life was measured using the 12- and 36-item short form surveys, before surgery and postoperatively at 1 year. Independent predictors for loss of QoL were evaluated.

RESULTS

485 patients were included (full sternotomy: n = 276, and MIMVS: n = 209). Overall, patients experienced a significant increase in physical component score (56 [42-75] vs 74 [57-88], p < 0.001) and mental component score at 1-year (63 [52-74] vs 70 [59-86], p < 0.001). Baseline QoL scores and new onset of atrial arrhythmia were independently associated with a clinically relevant reduction in physical and mental QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Mitral valve surgery is associated with significant improvement in physical and mental QoL. Baseline QoL scores and new onset of atrial arrhythmia are associated with a clinically relevant reduction in postoperative QoL.

Navigating the challenges of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a risk analysis and learning curve evaluation

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to report the risk and learning curve analysis of a minimally invasive mitral valve surgery program performed through a right mini-thoracotomy at a single institution.

METHODS

From January 2013 through December 2019, 266 consecutive patients underwent minimally invasive mitral valve surgery in our department and were included in the current study. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used for the adverse event outcome. Distribution over time of perioperative complications, defined as clinical endpoints in the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) consensus document, as well as CUSUM charts for assessment of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamping duration over time, has been performed for learning curve assessment.

RESULTS

Overall incidences of postoperative stroke (1.1%), myocardial infarction (1.1%), and thirty-day mortality (1.5%) were low. The mitral valve reconstruction rate in our series was 95%. Multivariable analysis revealed that concomitant tricuspid valve surgery (OR 4.44; 95%CI 1.61-11.80; p = 0.003) was significantly associated with adverse event outcomes. Despite a trend towards adverse event outcomes in patients with preexisting active mitral valve endocarditis (OR 2.69; 95%CI 0.81-7.87; p = 0.082), mitral valve pathology did not significantly impact postoperative morbidity and mortality. Distribution over time of perioperative complications, defined as clinical endpoints in the VARC-2 consensus document, showed a trend towards an improved complication rate after the initial 65-100 procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Mitral valve surgery via right-sided mini-thoracotomy can be implemented safely with low perioperative morbidity and mortality rates. Careful patient selection regarding isolated mitral valve surgery in the presence of degenerative mitral valve disease may represent a significant safety issue during the learning curve.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The cantonal ethics commission of Zurich approved the study (registration ID 2020-00752, date of approval 24 April 2020).

Elderly patients benefit from minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: perioperative risk management matters

OBJECTIVES

The goal was to assess the single-centre results of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) in the elderly population.

METHODS

All patients referred for minimally invasive valve surgery underwent a standardized preoperative screening. We performed a retrospective analysis of 131 consecutive elderly patients (≥75 years) who underwent endoscopic MIMVS through a right mini-thoracotomy. Survival and postoperative course were assessed in 2 groups: a repair group and a replacement group.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients underwent mitral valve repair, and 46 had mitral valve replacement. The mean age was 79 ± 2.9 years, and the median follow-up duration was 3.8 years. The cardiopulmonary bypass time (128.7 min vs 155.9 min, P = 0.012) and the cross-clamp time (84.9 min vs 124.1 min, P = 0.005) were significantly longer in the replacement group. Except for more reinterventions for bleeding in the replacement group (10.9% vs 0%, P = 0.005), there were no significant differences in the postoperative course between the 2 groups. Low mortality rates at the midterm follow-up were observed in both groups, and no differences were observed between the 4-and the 12-month follow-up. Survival rates after 1 year and 5 years were 97.6% and 88.6%, respectively, with no significant differences between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

MIMVS is an excellent treatment option in vulnerable elderly patients with excellent short- and long-term results. Although other studies suggest that repair could be superior to replacement even in older patients, our experience suggests that replacement is equivalent to repair in terms of mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Experience and standardized preoperative screening are mandatory to achieve optimal results.

Beyond Conventional Operations: Embracing the Era of Contemporary Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery

Over the past two decades, minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has gained a significant place due to the emergence of innovative tools and improvements in surgical techniques, offering comparable efficacy and safety to traditional surgical methods. This review provides an overview of the history of MICS, its current state, and its prospects and highlights its advantages and limitations. Additionally, we highlight the growing trends and potential pathways for the expansion of MICS, underscoring the crucial role of technological advancements in shaping the future of this field. Recognizing the challenges, we strive to pave the way for further breakthroughs in minimally invasive cardiac procedures.

Anaesthesia for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has been used since the 1990s and encompasses a wide range of techniques that lack full sternotomy, including valve and coronary artery graft surgery as well as transcatheter procedures. Due to the potential benefits offered to patients by MICS, these procedures are becoming more common. Unique anaesthetic knowledge and skills are required to overcome the specific challenges presented by MICS, including mastery of transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) and the provision of thoracic regional analgesia. This review evaluates the relevance of MICS to the anaesthetist and discusses pre-operative assessment, the relevant adjustments to intra-operative conduct that are necessary for these techniques, as well as post-operative care and what is known about outcomes.

Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery With Concomitant Cox Maze Procedure Is as Effective as a Median Sternotomy With Decreased Morbidity

OBJECTIVE

A right minithoracotomy (RMT) is a minimally invasive surgical approach that has been increasingly performed for the concomitant Cox maze IV procedure (CMP) and mitral valve surgery (MVS). Little is known regarding whether long-term rhythm and survival outcomes are affected by the RMT as compared with the traditional median sternotomy (MS) approach.

METHODS

Between April 2004 and April 2021, 377 patients underwent the concomitant CMP and MVS, of whom 38% had RMT. Propensity score matching yielded 116 pairs. Freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATA) was assessed with prolonged monitoring annually for 8 years. Survival, rhythm, and perioperative outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

The unmatched RMT cohort had a greater freedom from ATA recurrence at 1 year (99% vs 90%, P = 0.001) and 3 years (94% vs 86%, P = 0.045). The matched RMT cohort had longer cardiopulmonary bypass (median: 215 [199 to 253] vs 170 [136 to 198] min, P < 0.001) and aortic cross-clamp (110 [98 to 124] vs 86 [71 to 102] min, P < 0.001) times but shorter intensive care time (48 [24 to 95] vs 71 [26 to 144] h, P = 0.001) and length of stay (8 [6 to 11] vs 10 [7 to 14] h, P < 0.001). More pacemakers (18% vs 4%, P < 0.001) and postoperative transfusions (57% vs 41%, P = 0.014) occurred in the MS cohort. The 30-day mortality (P = 0.651) and 8-year survival (P = 0.072) was not significantly different between the cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Early 1-year and 3-year freedom from ATA recurrence was better in the RMT cohort compared with the MS cohort. Despite longer operative times, the RMT cohort had shorter lengths of stay, fewer postoperative transfusions, and fewer pacemakers placed.

Femoral or Axillary Cannulation for Extracorporeal Circulation during Minimally Invasive Heart Valve Surgery (FAMI): Protocol for a Multi-Center Prospective Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive heart valve surgery via anterolateral mini-thoracotomy with full endoscopic 3D visualization (MIS) has become the standard treatment of patients with valvular heart disease and low operative risk over the past two decades. It requires extracorporeal circulation and cardioplegic arrest. The most established form of arterial cannulation for MIS is through the femoral artery and is used by most surgeons, but it is suspected to increase the risk of stroke through retrograde blood flow. An alternative route of cannulation is the axillary artery, producing antegrade blood flow during extracorporeal circulation.

METHODS

Femoral or axillary cannulation for extracorporeal circulation during minimally invasive heart valve surgery (FAMI) is a multicenter randomized controlled trial designed to determine whether axillary cannulation is superior to femoral cannulation for the outcome of a manifest stroke within 7 days postoperatively. The target sample size was 848 participants. Patients ≥ 18 years of age, with valvular regurgitation or stenosis scheduled for minimally invasive surgery via anterolateral mini-thoracotomy, were randomized to axillary cannulation (treatment group) or to femoral cannulation (standard care). Patients were followed up for seven days postoperatively. A CT scan was performed pre-operatively to screen patients for vascular calcifications and to assess the safety of femoral cannulation. The standard of care is femoral artery cannulation, but is performed only in patients without significant vascular calcifications or severe kinking of the iliac arteries and in patients with sufficient vessel diameter. The cannulation is performed via Seldinger's technique, and the vessel closed percutaneously using a plug-based vascular closure device. Only patients without significant vascular calcifications are considered for femoral cannulation, as an increased risk of stroke is assumed. In patients with vascular calcifications, axillary cannulation is the standard of care to avoid these risks. Retrospective studies have hinted that, even in patients without vascular calcifications, there may be a lower stroke risk with axillary cannulation compared to femoral cannulation. We present a protocol for a multi-center randomized trial to investigate this hypothesis.

DISCUSSION

To date, evidence on the best access for peripheral artery cannulation during minimally invasive heart valve surgery has been scarce. Patients may benefit from axillary cannulation for extracorporeal circulation in terms of stroke risk and other neurological and vascular complications, though femoral cannulation is the gold standard. The aim of this study is to determine the risks of peri-operative stroke in a prospective randomized comparison of femoral vs. axillary cannulation.

Minimally Invasive Extirpation of Benign Atrial Cardiac Tumors: Clinical Follow-Up and Survival

OBJECTIVE

Evidence determining the optimal treatment for cardiac tumors is rare. We report our midterm clinical outcome and patient characteristics of our series undergoing atrial tumor removal through a right lateral minithoracotomy (RLMT).

METHODS

From 2015 to 2021, 51 patients underwent RLMT for atrial tumor extirpation. Patients receiving concomitant atrioventricular valvular, cryoablation, and/or patent foramen ovale closure surgery were included. Follow-up was performed using standardized questionnaires (mean: 1,041 ± 666 days). Follow-up involved any tumor recurrence, clinical symptoms, and any recurrent arterial embolization. Survival analysis was successfully achieved in all patients.

RESULTS

Successful surgical resection was achieved in all patients. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamping times were 75 ± 36 and 41 ± 22 min, respectively. The most common tumor location was the left atrium (n = 42, 82.4%). Mean ventilation time was 12.74 ± 17.23 h, intensive care unit stay ranged from 1 to 1.9 days (median: 1 day). Nineteen patients (37.3%) received concomitant surgery. Histopathological analysis showed 38 myxoma (74.5%), 9 papillary fibroelastoma (17.6%), and 4 thrombus (7.8%). Thirty-day mortality was observed in 1 case (2%). One patient (2%) suffered a stroke postoperatively. No patient had a relapse of cardiac tumor. Three patients (9.7%) showed arterial embolization during follow-up. Thirteen follow-up patients (25.5%) were in New York Heart Association class ≤II. Overall survival was 90.2% at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

A minimally invasive approach for benign atrial tumor resection is effective, safe, and reproducible. Of the atrial tumors, 74.5% were myxoma and 82% were located in the left atrium. A low 30-day mortality rate with no manifestation of recurrent intracardiac tumor was observed.

Minithoracotomy versus sternotomy in mitral valve surgery: meta-analysis from recent matched and randomized studies

BACKGROUND

There is still ongoing debate about the benefits of mini-thoracotomy (MTH) approach in mitral valve surgery in comparison with complete sternotomy (STER). This study aims to update the current evidence with mortality as primary end point.

METHODS

The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched through June 2022. Two randomized studies and 16 propensity score matched studies published from 2011 to 2022 were included with a total of 12,997 patients operated on from 2005 (MTH: 6467, STER: 6530). Data regarding early mortality, stroke, reoperation for bleeding, new renal failure, new onset of atrial fibrillation, need of blood transfusion, prolonged ventilation, wound infection, time-related outcomes (cross clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, ventilation time, length of intensive care unit stay, length of hospital stay), midterm mortality and reoperation, and costs were extracted and submitted to a meta-analysis using weighted random effects modeling.

RESULTS

The incidence of early mortality, stroke, reoperation for bleeding and prolonged ventilation were similar, all in the absence of heterogeneity. However, the sub-group analysis showed a significant OR in favor of MTH when robotic enhancement was used. New renal failure (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.06-2.62, p = 0.03), new onset of atrial fibrillation (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.15-1.51, p = 0.001) and the need of blood transfusion (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.39-2.27, p = 0.001) were significantly lower in MTH group. Regarding time-related outcomes, there was evidence for important heterogeneity of treatment effect among the studies. Operative times were longer in MTH: differences in means were 20.7 min for cross clamp time (95% CI 14.9-26.4, p = 0.001), 36.8 min for CPB time (95% CI 29.8-43.9, p = 0.001) and 37.7 min for total operative time (95% CI 19.6-55.8, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in ventilation duration; however, the differences in means showed significantly shorter ICU stay and hospital stay after MTH compared to STER: - 0.6 days (95% CI - 1.1/- 0.21, p = 0.001) and - 1.88 days (95% CI - 2.72/- 1.05, p = 0.001) respectively, leading to a significant lower hospital cost after MTH compared to STER with difference in means - 4528 US$ (95% CI - 8725/- 326, p = 0.03). The mid-term mortality was significantly higher after STER compared to MTH: OR = 1.50, 1.09-2.308 (95% CI), p = 0.01; the rate of mid-term reoperation was reported similar in MTH and STER: OR = 0.76, 0.50-1.15 (95% CI), p = 0.19.

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis confirms that the MTH approach for mitral valve disease remains associated with prolonged operative times, but it is beneficial in terms of reduced postoperative complications (renal failure, atrial fibrillation, blood transfusion, wound infection), length of stay in ICU and in hospitalization, with finally a reduction in global cost. MTH approach appears associated with a significant reduction of postoperative mortality that must be confirmed by large randomized study.

Minimal Access Tricuspid Valve Surgery

Tricuspid valve diseases are a heterogeneous group of pathologies that typically have poor prognoses when treated medically and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality with traditional surgical techniques. Minimal access tricuspid valve surgery may mitigate some of the surgical risks associated with the standard sternotomy approach by limiting pain, reducing blood loss, lowering the risk of wound infections, and shortening hospital stays. In certain patient populations, this may allow for a prompt intervention that could limit the pathologic effects of these diseases. Herein, we review the literature on minimal access tricuspid valve surgery focusing on perioperative planning, technique, and outcomes of minimal access endoscopic and robotic surgery for isolated tricuspid valve disease.

A journey from resect to respect to restore: aiming at optimal physiological surgical mitral valve repair

The concept of 'repairing' a degenerated mitral valve in order to restore the native competence means achieving the best physiological result coupled with the least invasive approach: this represents an interesting challenge for cardiac surgeons. The evolution of cardiac surgery through the years has involved techniques and technologies in every field of interest. From 'resect', to 'respect', to 'restore': the micro-invasive approach based on Neochord implant implies a transapical beating heart surgery which is based on the concept of implanting artificial chordae, preserving the physiological dynamics of the mitral annulus and avoiding the disadvantages of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest of the heart.

Safety and Efficacy of the Transaxillary Access for Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery-A Propensity Matched Competitive Analysis

Background and Objectives: Transaxillary access is a straightforward “single incision—direct vision” concept, based on a 5 cm skin incision in the right anterior axillary line. It is suitable for aortic, mitral and tricuspid surgery. The present study evaluates the hospital outcomes of the transaxillary access for isolated mitral valve surgery compared with full sternotomy. Patients and Methods: The final study group included 480 patients. A total of 160 consecutive transaxillary patients served as treatment group (MICS-MITRAL). Based on a multivariate logistic regression model including age, sex, body-mass-index, EuroScore II and LVEF, a 1:2 propensity matched control-group (n = 320) was generated out of 980 consecutive sternotomy patients. Redo surgeries, endocarditis or combined procedures were excluded. The mean age was 66.6 ± 10.6 years, 48.6% (n = 234) were female. EuroSCORE II averaged 1.98 ± 1.4%. Results: MICS-MITRAL had longer perfusion (88.7 ± 26.6 min vs. 68.7 ± 32.7 min; p < 0.01) and cross-clamp (64.4 ± 22.3 min vs. 49.7 ± 22.4 min; p < 0.01) times. This did not translate into longer procedure times (132 ± 31 min vs. 131 ± 46 min; p = 0.76). Both groups showed low rates of failed repair (MICS-MITRAL: n = 6/160; 3.75%; Sternotomy: n = 10/320; 3.1%; p = 0.31). MICS-MITRAL had lower transfusion rates (p ≤ 0.001), less re-exploration for bleeding (p = 0.04), shorter ventilation times (p = 0.02), shorter ICU-stay (p = 0.05), less postoperative hemofiltration (p < 0.01) compared to sternotomy patients. No difference was seen in the incidence of stroke (p = 0.47) and postoperative delirium (p = 0.89). Hospital mortality was significantly lower in MICS-MITRAL patients (0.0% vs. 3.4%; p = 0.02). Conclusions: The transaxillary access for MICS-MITRAL provides superior cosmetics and excellent clinical outcomes. It can be performed at least as safely and in the same time frame as conventional mitral surgery by sternotomy.

Propensity-matched comparison of right mini-thoracotomy versus median sternotomy for isolated mitral valve repair

BACKGROUND

A right mini-thoracotomy (RT) versus median sternotomy (MS) approach for isolated mitral valve (MV) repair has been associated with less postoperative morbidity, shorter hospital stay, and faster functional recovery, but with consistently longer cross-clamp time and higher operative costs.

METHODS

We assessed the impact of a modified operative technique on outcomes in 158 RT versus 129 MS patients treated with myxomatous MV repair from 2016 through 2021. Propensity matching based upon the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Risk Score was used to compare 108 patients in each cohort.

RESULTS

Propensity-matched RT patients had reductions in total ventilation time (P=0.025), postoperative atrial fibrillation (P=0.019), and hospital length of stay (P<0.001). RT and MS patients had similar cross-clamp times (66.4±13.7 vs 64.8±16.0 minutes, P=0.414), with less overall leaflet resection (32.4% vs 57.4%, P<0.001) and fewer Gore-Tex NeoChords implanted per patient (1.7±0.7 vs 2.1±1.0, P=0.028) in the RT group. The two cohorts did not differ with respect to 30-day major surgical complications. No patient died and there was no difference between the two groups with respect to freedom from re-operation (98.2% vs 98.2%, P=0.800) at a mean follow-up of 21.4±18.5 months. Direct total hospital costs were lower for the RT group (P=0.018), with reductions in postoperative charges offsetting increased operating room costs.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-center study, the RT compared to the MS approach for myxomatous MV repair resulted in less postoperative morbidity and shorter hospital length of stay, with similar cross-clamp time, reduced total hospital costs, and comparable intermediate outcomes.

Does concomitant tricuspid valve surgery increase the risks of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery? A multicentre comparison based on data from The Netherlands Heart Registration

OBJECTIVES

Mitral valve (MV) disease is often accompanied by tricuspid valve (TV) disease. The indication for concomitant TV surgery during primary MV surgery is expected to increase, especially through a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) approach. The aim of the current study is to investigate the safety of the addition of TV surgery to MV surgery in MIMVS in a nationwide registry.

METHODS

Patients undergoing atrioventricular valve surgery through sternotomy or MIS between 2013 and 2018 were included. Patients undergoing MV surgery only through sternotomy or MIS were used as comparison. Primary outcomes were short-term morbidity and mortality and long-term survival. Propensity score matching was used to correct for potential confounders.

RESULTS

The whole cohort consisted of 2698 patients. A total of 558 patients had atrioventricular double valve surgery through sternotomy and 86 through MIS. As a comparison, 1365 patients underwent MV surgery through sternotomy and 689 patients through MIS. No differences in 30- and 120-day mortality were observed between the groups, both unmatched and matched. 5-year survival did not differ for double atrioventricular valve surgery through either sternotomy or MIS in the matched population (90.1% vs. 95.3%, Log-Rank p = .12). A higher incidence of re-exploration for bleeding (n = 12 [15.2%] vs. n = 3 [3.8%], p = .02) and new onset arrhythmia (n = 35 [44.3%] vs. n = 13 [16.5%], p < .001) was observed in double valve surgery through MIS. Median length of hospital stay (LOHS) was longer in the minimally invasive double valve group (9 days [6-13]) compared with sternotomy (7 days [6-11]; p = .04).

CONCLUSION

No differences in short-term mortality and 5-year survival were observed when tricuspid valve was added to MV surgery in MIS or sternotomy. The addition of tricuspid valve surgery is associated with higher incidence of re-exploration for bleeding, new onset arrhythmia. A longer LOHS was observed for MIS compared to sternotomy.

Robotic and endoscopic mitral valve repair for degenerative disease

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive mitral valve repair has been proven to be a safe alternative to open sternotomy and may be accomplished through classic endoscopic and robotic endoscopic approaches. Outcomes across different minimally invasive techniques have been insufficiently described. We compare early and late clinical outcomes across matched patients undergoing robotic endoscopic and classic endoscopic repair.

METHODS

From 2011 to 2020, 786 patients underwent minimally invasive mitral surgery, from which we were able to generate 124 matched patients (62 patients in each cohort). Clinical results were then compared between the two matched populations. Survival analysis was used to compare freedom from mortality to 10 years among matched classic endoscopic and robotic endoscopic mitral valve repair cohorts and to calculate freedom from moderate or severe mitral insufficiency at latest follow-up. Histograms of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp times were constructed, and mean bypass and cross-clamp times were compared between classic endoscopic and robotic endoscopic cohorts.

RESULTS

There was no difference in early or late mortality at 10 years in either cohort. Freedom from moderate or severe mitral regurgitation or mitral valve replacement at last echocardiogram was 86.4% vs. 73.5% at 10 years, P=0.97. Patients undergoing robotic endoscopic mitral repair had a significantly longer CPB run when compared to the classic endoscopic cohort, with 148 min of CPB in the robotic endoscopic cohort compared to 133 min in the classic endoscopic group, P=0.03. Overall post-operative length of stay was not statistically significant between the robotic endoscopic and classic endoscopic groups, 6.3±0.5 and 6.0±0.3 days, respectively. No patients in either cohort developed renal failure or wound infection. The classic endoscopic group had a slightly higher risk of prolonged ventilation when compared to the robotic endoscopic group, with three classic endoscopic patients remaining intubated >8 hours post-operatively, compared to a single patient in the robotic endoscopic group. There were no unplanned reoperations in either group. Rates of postoperative stroke were comparable between groups (three in the classic endoscopic cohort, and two in the robotic endoscopic cohort).

CONCLUSIONS

Index mitral valve surgery via a classic endoscopic approach yields similar clinical outcomes when compared to robotic endoscopic surgery. We demonstrate that both classic endoscopic and robotic endoscopic approaches allow repair of degenerative mitral valves with excellent short- and medium-term outcomes in a tertiary referral center.

One-stage hybrid coronary revascularization for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease— Periprocedural and long-term results from the “HYBRID-COR” feasibility study

Background

The constant growth of interest in hybrid coronary artery revascularization (HCR) is apparent. Yet, few studies report outcomes of the one-stage HCR. Consequently, the status of such procedures is not adequately supported in clinical guidelines. The aim of this study was to report the safety, feasibility, and long term-outcomes of the one-stage HCR.

Methods and results

Patients were enrolled in the prospective one-stage hybrid coronary revascularization program (HYBRID-COR). They underwent a one-stage hybrid revascularization procedure while on double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with Ticagrelor: endoscopic atraumatic coronary artery bypass grafting (EACAB) for revascularization of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery and percutaneous intervention in non-LAD arteries with contemporary drug-eluting stents. The composite primary endpoint included MACCE (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events: death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and repeated revascularization) in long-term observation. The study cohort consisted of 30 patients (68% male) with stable coronary artery disease (26.7%) and unstable angina (73.3%). Procedural success was 100%. No death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke were observed in the perioperative period. One patient (3.3%) required chest revision and blood transfusion due to surgical bleeding. Kidney injury was noted in two patients (6.6%). In a long-term follow-up (median; IQR: 4.25; 2.62–4.69 years), two patients (6.6%) underwent repeated revascularization and one patient (3.3%) died due to MI. The overall primary endpoint rate was 9.9%.

Conclusion

One-stage hybrid revascularization, on DAPT, is a feasible, safe, and efficient way of achieving complete revascularization in selected patients. The complication rate is low and acceptable. Further randomized trials are required.

Decision Making during the Learning Curve of Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery: A Focused Review for the Starting Minimally Invasive Surgeon

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is evolving rapidly since the early 1990’s and is now increasingly adopted as the standard approach for mitral valve surgery. It has a long and challenging learning curve and there are many considerations regarding technique, planning and patient selection when starting a minimally invasive program. In the current review, we provide an overview of all considerations and the decision-making process during the learning curve.

Antegrade axillary arterial perfusion in 3D endoscopic minimally-invasive mitral valve surgery

Background

Minimally-invasive (MIS) mitral valve (MV) surgery has become standard therapy in many cardiac surgery centers. While femoral arterial perfusion is the preferred cannulation strategy in MIS mitral valve surgery, retrograde arterial perfusion is known to be associated with an increased risk for cerebral atheroembolism, particularly in atherosclerosis patients. Therefore, antegrade perfusion may be beneficial in such cases. This analysis aimed to compare outcomes of antegrade axillary vs. retrograde femoral perfusion in the MIS mitral valve surgery.

Methods

This analysis includes 50 consecutive patients who underwent MIS between 2016 and 2020 using arterial cannulation of right axillary artery (Group A) due to severe aortic arteriosclerosis. Perioperative outcomes of the study group were compared with a historical control group of retrograde femoral perfusion (Group F) which was adjusted for age and gender (n = 50). Primary endpoint of the study was in-hospital mortality and perioperative cerebrovascular events.

Results

Patients in group A had a significantly higher perioperative risk as compared to Group F (EuroSCORE II: 3.9 ± 2.5 vs. 1.6 ± 1.5; p = 0.001; STS-Score: 2.1 ± 1.4 vs. 1.3 ± 0.6; p = 0.023). Cardiopulmonary bypass time (group A: 172 ± 46; group F: 178 ± 51 min; p = 0.627) and duration of surgery (group A: 260 ± 65; group F: 257 ± 69 min; p = 0.870) were similar. However, aortic cross clamp time was significantly shorter in group A as compared to group F (86 ± 20 vs. 111 ± 29 min, p < 0.001). There was no perioperative stroke in either groups. In-hospital mortality was similar in both groups (group A: 1 patient; group F: 0 patients; p = 0.289). In group A, one patient required central aortic repair due to intraoperative aortic dissection. No further cardiovascular events occurred in Group A patients.

Conclusion

Selective use of antegrade axillary artery perfusion in patients with systemic atherosclerosis shows similar in-hospital outcomes as compared to lower risk patients undergoing retrograde femoral perfusion. Patients with higher perioperative risk and severe atherosclerosis can be safely treated via the minimally invasive approach with antegrade axillary perfusion.

Minimally-invasive cardiac surgery: a bibliometric analysis of impact and force to identify key and facilitating advanced training

Background

The number of citations an article receives is a marker of its scientific influence within a particular specialty. This bibliometric analysis intended to recognise the top 100 cited articles in minimally-invasive cardiac surgery, to determine the fundamental subject areas that have borne considerable influence upon clinical practice and academic knowledge whilst also considering bibliometric scope. This is increasingly relevant in a continually advancing specialty and one where minimally-invasive cardiac procedures have the potential for huge benefits to patient outcomes.

Methods

The Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) data citation index database was searched with the following terms: [Minimal* AND Invasive* AND Card* AND Surg*]. Results were limited to full text English language manuscripts and ranked by citation number. Further analysis of the top 100 cited articles was carried out according to subject, author, publication year, journal, institution and country of origin.

Results

A total of 4716 eligible manuscripts were retrieved. Of the top 100 papers, the median (range) citation number was 101 (51–414). The most cited paper by Lichtenstein et al. (Circulation 114(6):591–596, 2006) published in Circulation with 414 citations focused on transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation as a viable alternative to aortic valve replacement with cardiopulmonary bypass in selected patients with aortic stenosis. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery published the most papers and received the most citations (n = 35; 3036 citations). The United States of America had the most publications and citations (n = 52; 5303 citations), followed by Germany (n = 27; 2598 citations). Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, published the most papers of all institutions. Minimally-invasive cardiac surgery pertaining to valve surgery (n = 42) and coronary artery bypass surgery (n = 30) were the two most frequent topics by a large margin.

Conclusions

This work establishes a comprehensive and informative analysis of the most influential publications in minimally-invasive cardiac surgery and outlines what constitutes a citable article. Undertaking a quantitative evaluation of the top 100 papers aids in recognising the contributions of key authors and institutions as well as guiding future efforts in this field to continually improve the quality of care offered to complex cardiac patients.

Early Discharge After Minimally Invasive Aortic and Mitral Valve Surgery

BACKGROUND

We investigated patient outcomes in relation to their postoperative length of stay after minimally invasive valve surgery.

METHODS

All adults who survived elective, uncomplicated minimally invasive aortic or mitral valve surgery at a single center between 2012 and 2019 were classified by postoperative length of stay: early discharge (≤3 days) or late discharge (>3 days). The trend in early discharge was investigated over the study period, predictors of early discharge were identified using multivariate logistic regression modeling, and 1:1 propensity score matching was used to determine which patients in the late-discharge cohort had similar health to patients discharged early. Adjusted outcomes of 30-day mortality, readmission, and direct costs were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 1262 consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive valve surgery, 618 were elective and uncomplicated, 25% (n = 162) of whom were discharged early. The proportion of early-discharge patients increased over time (P for trend < .05). A history of congestive heart failure, stroke, or smoking and higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons predictive risk of mortality score negatively predicted early discharge (P < .05). Propensity score matching identified 101 (22%) late-discharge patients comparable with early-discharge patients. Adjusted 30-day mortality and readmission rates were comparable between cohorts. The median direct costs per patient ($20,046 vs $22,124, P < .05) were significantly lower in the early-discharge cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

In well-selected patients early discharge after minimally invasive valve surgery was associated with lower costs but comparable postoperative outcomes. About one-fifth of patients who remain in the hospital beyond postoperative day 3 may be candidates for earlier discharge.

Non-robotic minimally invasive mitral valve repair: a 20-year single-centre experience

OBJECTIVES

Minimally invasive mitral valve repair (MVR) promises major advantages over median sternotomy regarding cosmetic results and faster recovery. However, the long-term functional outcome of minimally invasive MVR has been questioned by critics because the limited access may not exclusively promise high-quality repair. This study examines the long-term outcome regarding survival and reoperation rate.

METHODS

All patients undergoing minimally invasive MVR from February 2000 until March 2020 were included in this study. Baseline clinical and surgical characteristics were summarized from the internal database. Primary end points were survival and freedom from reoperation, analysed via Kaplan-Meier curves. Secondary end points were periprocedural complications after minimally invasive MVR and incidence for recurrent mitral regurgitation >II°.

RESULTS

A total of 1194 patients underwent minimally invasive MVR, in 17 cases mitral valve replacement was required. The mean age was 55.1 years [47.6; 62.7]. The successful minimally invasive repair rate was 97%. The 30-day mortality was 0.6%. Survival was 96.7% [standard deviation (SD): 5.8%], 91.6% (SD: 1.1%) and 80.0% (SD: 11.2%) at 5, 10 and 20 years. The incidence of reoperation was 4.4% (SD: 3.2%), 10.3% (SD: 7.4%) and 16.7% (SD : 7.4%) at 5, 10 and 20 years, respectively. Concomitant procedures such as tricuspid valve repair and modified Cryo-maze procedure were performed in 263 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive MVR for degenerative mitral regurgitation is safe, shows excellent functional long-term results and is associated with low perioperative and late mortality.

A Hybrid Intervention for Post-Infarction Papillary Muscle Rupture with Severe Mitral Regurgitation: A Case Report

Papillary muscle rupture with severe acute mitral regurgitation is a rare complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) that causes pulmonary congestion and cardiogenic shock. Moreover, it has a poor prognosis. Surgical intervention, including revascularization, is indicated; however, surgical mortality remains high. We report the case of an 85-year-old woman with cardiogenic shock from severe acute mitral regurgitation, in whom a hybrid intervention, combining percutaneous coronary intervention with mitral valve replacement via minithoracotomy, was performed after post-infarction papillary muscle rupture. She was discharged in a favorable clinical condition. We describe a novel hybrid intervention for treating a rare complication of AMI, which could minimize surgical invasion in elderly patients, prevent disuse syndrome after the intervention, and improve prognosis. However, mitral valve surgery via minithoracotomy for emergency cases requires technical proficiency, as well as collaboration with other healthcare professionals, and the choice to perform this procedure requires careful consideration.

Chronic postsurgical pain and quality of life after right minithoracotomy mitral valve operations

OBJECTIVES

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is a relatively common complication after cardio-thoracic operations with well-known consequences in terms of return to normal activities and quality of life. Little is known about the prevalence and severity of CPSP after minimally invasive cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to measure the rate of CPSP in patients undergoing right minithoracotomy mitral valve (MV) surgery and to compare the effectiveness of different approaches to pain control.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted between March 2019 and September 2020. All patients undergoing right minithoracotomy MV surgery treated with morphine, continuous serratus anterior plane block (SAPB), or continuous erector spinae plane block (ESPB) were included. The Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire was used to evaluate 6-month CPSP and quality of life.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were enrolled: postoperative pain control was obtained with morphine in 26 cases, with SAPB in 37 cases, and with ESPB in 37 cases. Median intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were 1 day and 6 days, respectively. Pain severity index was lower than 10 in 81 patients, and no differences were recorded between groups (p = .59). No patients reported chronic use of medications for pain management or severe pain interference in daily activities at follow-up.

DISCUSSION

Right minithoracotomy approach is not burdened by a high incidence of CPSP: pain severity index was lower than 10 in more than 90% of patients. Then, in our experience, chronic pain seems not to be related to the type of perioperative analgesia adopted.

Robotic Mitral Valve Surgery After Prior Sternotomy

Objective

Despite the recent increase in the use of minimally invasive approaches to mitral valve surgery in patients with a prior sternotomy, the outcomes of the robotic approach to mitral valve surgery in this patient population have not been examined.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 342 consecutive patients who underwent mitral valve surgery after a prior sternotomy between 2013 and 2020, in which the robotic approach was used in 21 patients (6.1%). We reviewed the clinical details of these 21 patients.

Results

The median age was 71 years [interquartile range 64.00, 74.00 years], and mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality was 4.2% ± 3.8%. The indication for mitral valve surgery was degenerative mitral valve disease in 33.3% (7/21), functional disease in 28.6% (6/21), mixed disease in 4.8% (1/21), rheumatic disease in 9.5% (2/21), and failed repair for degenerative disease in 23.8% (5/21). No cases required conversion from robotic assistance to alternative approaches, there were no intraoperative deaths, and intraoperative transesophageal echocardiogram confirmed complete elimination of mitral regurgitation in 90.5% (19/21) of cases. Thirty-day mortality was 0.0% (0/21), and 1-year mortality was 4.8% (1/21). There were no strokes or wound infections at 30 days, and 14.3% (3/21) of patients received intraoperative blood product transfusions.

Conclusions

The results of this retrospective review suggest that the robotic approach to mitral valve surgery in patients with a prior sternotomy is safe in experienced hands. Although some centers have considered prior sternotomy a relative contraindication to robotic mitral valve surgery, this approach is feasible and can be considered an option for experienced surgeons.

Case Series: Video-Assisted Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery During Pregnancy

Surgical intervention is expected to improve maternal outcomes in pregnant patients with heart disease once the conservative treatment fails. For pregnant patients with heart disease, the risk of cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) must be balanced due to the high fetal loss. The video-assisted minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has been progressively applied and shows advantages in non-pregnant patients over the years. We present five cases of pregnant women who underwent a video-assisted minimally invasive surgical approach for cardiac surgery and the management strategies. In conclusion, the video-assisted MICS is feasible and safe to pregnant patients, with good maternal and fetal outcomes under the multidisciplinary assessment and management.

Effect of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery compared to sternotomy on short- and long-term outcomes: a retrospective multicentre interventional cohort study based on Netherlands Heart Registration

OBJECTIVES

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) has been performed increasingly for the past 2 decades; however, large comparative studies on short- and long-term outcomes have been lacking. This study aims to compare short- and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing MIMVS versus median sternotomy (MST) based on real-world data, extracted from the Netherlands Heart Registration.

METHODS

Patients undergoing mitral valve surgery, with or without tricuspid valve, atrial septal closure and/or rhythm surgery between 2013 and 2018 were included. Primary outcomes were short-term morbidity and mortality and long-term survival. Propensity score matching analyses were performed.

RESULTS

In total, 2501 patients were included, 1776 were operated through MST and 725 using an MIMVS approach. After propensity matching, no significant differences in baseline characteristics persisted. There were no between-group differences in 30-day mortality (1.1% vs 0.7%, P = 0.58), 1-year mortality (2.6% vs 2.1%, P = 0.60) or perioperative stroke rate (1.1% vs 0.6%, P = 0.25) between MST and MIMVS, respectively. An increased rate of postoperative arrhythmia was observed in the MST group (31.3% vs 22.4%, P < 0.001). A higher repair rate was found in the MST group (80.9% vs 76.3%, P = 0.04). No difference in 5-year survival was found between the matched groups (95.0% vs 94.3%, P = 0.49). Freedom from mitral reintervention was 97.9% for MST and 96.8% in the MIMVS group (P = 0.01), without a difference in reintervention-free survival (P = 0.30).

CONCLUSIONS

The MIMVS approach is as safe as the sternotomy approach for the surgical treatment of mitral valve disease. However, it comes at a cost of a reduced repair rate and more reinterventions in the long term, in the real-world.