1
|
Paz-Martín J, Schüller A, Bourgouin A, Gago-Arias A, González-Castaño DM, Gómez-Fernández N, Pardo-Montero J, Gómez F. Evaluation of the two-voltage method for parallel-plate ionization chambers irradiated with pulsed beams. Med Phys 2025. [PMID: 40219618 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2024] [Revised: 03/05/2025] [Accepted: 03/06/2025] [Indexed: 04/14/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Air-vented ionization chambers exposed to clinical radiation beams may suffer from recombination during the drift of the charge carriers towards the electrodes. Thus, dosimetry protocols recommend the use of a correction factor, usually denominated saturation factor (k sat $k_{\rm sat}$ ), to correct the ionization chamber readout for the incomplete collection of charge. The two-voltage method (TVM) is the recommended methodology for the calculation of the saturation factor, however, it is based on the early Boag model, which only takes into account the presence of positive and negative ions in the ionization chamber and does not account for the electric field screening or the free electron contribution to the signal. PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of a more realistic approach to the saturation problem that accounts for the free electron fraction. METHODS The saturation factor of four ionization chambers (two Advanced Markus and two PPC05) was experimentally determined in the ultra-high dose per pulse reference beam of the German National Metrology Institute (Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt [PTB]) for voltages ranging from 50 to 400 V and pulse durations between 0.5 and 2.9 μ s $\umu{\rm s}$ . Several analytical models and a recently developed numerical model are used to calculate the saturation factor as a function of the dose per pulse and compare it to the obtained experimental data. Parameterizations of the saturation factor against the ratio of charges at different voltages are given for parallel plate ionization chamber with a distance between electrodes of 0.6 and 1 mm in pulsed beams for different pulse durations. RESULTS The saturation factors calculated using the different Boag analytical models do not agree neither with each other nor with the numerical simulation even at the lowest dose per pulse of the investigated range ( < $<$ 30 mGy). A recently developed analytical model by Fenwick and Kumar agrees with the numerical simulation in the low dose per pulse regime but discrepancies are observed when the dose becomes larger (i.e., > $>$ 40 mGy for Advanced Markus) due to the electric field perturbation. The numerical simulation is in a good agreement with the experimentally determined charge collection efficiency (CCE) with an average discrepancy of 0.7% for the two PPC05 and 0.5% for the two Advanced Markus. The saturation factor obtained with the numerical simulation of the collected charge has been fitted to a third-order polynomial for different voltage ratios and pulse duration. This methodology provides a practical way fork sat $k_{\rm sat}$ evaluation wheneverk sat < 1.05 $k_{\rm sat}<1.05$ . CONCLUSIONS The numerical simulation shows a better agreement with the experimental data than the current analytical theories in terms of CCE. The classical TVM, systematically overestimates the saturation factor, with differences increasing with dose per pulse but also present at low dose per pulse. These results may have implications for the dosimetry with ionization chambers in therapy modalities that use a dose per pulse higher than conventional radiotherapy such as intraoperative radiotherapy but also in conventional dose per pulse for ionization chambers that suffer from significant charge recombination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Paz-Martín
- Departamento de Física de Partículas, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Andreas Schüller
- Dosimetry for Radiotherapy, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Alexandra Bourgouin
- National Research Council of Canada, Metrology Research Center, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Araceli Gago-Arias
- Departamento de Física de Partículas, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | | | - Nicolás Gómez-Fernández
- Laboratorio de Radiofísica, Universidade de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Juan Pardo-Montero
- Group of Medical Physics and Biomathematics, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
- Department of Medical Physics, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Faustino Gómez
- Departamento de Física de Partículas, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
- Laboratorio de Radiofísica, Universidade de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schönfeld AA, Hildreth J, Bourgouin A, Flatten V, Kozelka J, Simon W, Schüller A. A 2D detector array for relative dosimetry and beam steering for FLASH radiotherapy with electrons. Med Phys 2025; 52:1845-1857. [PMID: 39688375 PMCID: PMC11880641 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2024] [Revised: 11/27/2024] [Accepted: 12/02/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND FLASH radiotherapy is an emerging treatment modality using ultra-high dose rate beams. Much effort has been made to develop suitable dosimeters for reference dosimetry, yet the spatial beam characteristics must also be characterized to enable computerized treatment planning, as well as quality control and service of a treatment delivery device. In conventional radiation therapy, this is commonly achieved by beam profile scans in a water phantom using a point detector. In ultra-high dose rate beams, the delivered dose needed for a set of beam profile scans may exceed the regulatory dose limit specified for a typical treatment room, or degrade components of the scanning system and scanning detector. Point detector scans also cannot quantify the pulse-to-pulse stability of a beam profile. Detector arrays can overcome these challenges, but to date, no detector arrays suitable for ultra-high dose rate beams are commercially available. PURPOSE The study presents the development and characterization of a two-dimensional detector array for measuring pulse-resolved spatial fluence distributions in real-time and temporal structure of intra-pulse dose rate of ultra-high pulsed dose rate (UHPDR) electron beams used in FLASH radiotherapy. METHODS The performance of the SunPoint 1 diode was evaluated by measuring the response of the EDGE Detector in a 20 MeV UHPDR electron beam with a dose per pulse of 0.04 Gy - 6 Gy at a pulse duration of 1 µs or 1.9 µs, and instantaneous dose rates of 0.040 - 3.2 MGy·s-1. Based on the findings regarding a suitable signal acquisition technique, a PROFILER 2 detector array made of SunPoint 1 diodes was then modified by minimizing trace resistance, applying a reverse bias, and implementing an RC component to each diode to optimize the transfer of the collected charge during a pulse. The resultant "FLASH Profiler" was then tested in the same UHPDR electron beam. RESULTS The FLASH Profiler exhibited a linear response within ± 3% deviation over the investigated dose per pulse range. The FLASH Profiler array showed good agreement with the absolute dose measured using a flashDiamond point detector and an integrating current transformer for dose-per-pulse values of up to 6 Gy. The FLASH Profiler was able to measure lateral beam profiles in real-time and on a single-pulse basis. The ability to capture and display the profiles during steering of UHPDR beams was demonstrated. The SunPoint 1 diode was able to measure the pulse duration and the intra-pulse dose rate with a time resolution of 4 ns. CONCLUSION The FLASH Profiler could be used for characterizing UHPDR electron beams and facilitating quality control and beam steering service of electron FLASH irradiators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeff Hildreth
- Research and DevelopmentSun Nuclear Corp.MelbourneFloridaUSA
| | - Alexandra Bourgouin
- Dosimetry for RadiotherapyPhysikalisch‐Technische BundesanstaltBraunschweig38116Germany
- Present address:
Metrology Research CenterNational Research Council of CanadaOttawaOntarioCanada
| | | | - Jakub Kozelka
- Research and DevelopmentSun Nuclear Corp.MelbourneFloridaUSA
| | - William Simon
- Research and DevelopmentSun Nuclear Corp.MelbourneFloridaUSA
| | - Andreas Schüller
- Dosimetry for RadiotherapyPhysikalisch‐Technische BundesanstaltBraunschweig38116Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu K, Holmes S, Khan AU, Hooten B, DeWerd L, Schüler E, Beddar S. Development of novel ionization chambers for reference dosimetry in electron flash radiotherapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:9275-9289. [PMID: 39311014 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2024] [Revised: 08/10/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 12/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reference dosimetry in ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) beamlines is significantly hindered by limitations in conventional ionization chamber design. In particular, conventional chambers suffer from severe charge collection efficiency (CCE) degradation in high dose per pulse (DPP) beams. PURPOSE The aim of this study was to optimize the design and performance of parallel plate ion chambers for use in UHDR dosimetry applications, and evaluate their potential as reference class chambers for calibration purposes. Three chamber designs were produced to determine the influence of the ion chamber response on electrode separation, field strength, and collection volume on the ion chamber response under UHDR and ultra-high dose per pulse (UHDPP) conditions. METHODS Three chambers were designed and produced: the A11-VAR (0.2-1.0 mm electrode gap, 20 mm diameter collector), the A11-TPP (0.3 mm electrode gap, 20 mm diameter collector), and the A30 (0.3 mm electrode gap, 5.4 mm diameter collector). The chambers underwent full characterization using an UHDR 9 MeV electron beam with individually varied beam parameters of pulse repetition frequency (PRF, 10-120 Hz), pulse width (PW, 0.5-4 µs), and pulse amplitude (0.01-9 Gy/pulse). The response of the ion chambers was evaluated as a function of the DPP, PRF, PW, dose rate, electric field strength, and electrode gap. RESULTS The chamber response was found to be dependent on DPP and PW, and these dependencies were mitigated with larger electric field strengths and smaller electrode spacing. At a constant electric field strength, we measured a larger CCE as a function of DPP for ion chambers with a smaller electrode gap in the A11-VAR. For ion chambers with identical electrode gap (A11-TPP and A30), higher electric field strengths were found to yield better CCE at higher DPP. A PW dependence was observed at low electric field strengths (500 V/mm) for DPP values ranging from 1 to 5 Gy at PWs ranging from 0.5 to 4 µs, but at electric field strengths of 1000 V/mm and higher, these effects become negligible. CONCLUSION This study confirmed that the CCE of ion chambers depends strongly on the electrode spacing and the electric field strength, and also on the DPP and the PW of the UHDR beam. A significant finding of this study is that although chamber performance does depend on PW, the effect on the CCE becomes negligible with reduced electrode spacing and increased electric field. A CCE of ≥95% was achieved for DPPs of up to 5 Gy with no observable dependence on PW using the A30 chamber, while still achieving an acceptable performance in conventional dose rate beams, opening up the possibility for this type of chamber to be used as a reference class chamber for calibration purposes of electron FLASH beamlines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Liu
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Ahtesham Ullah Khan
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Brian Hooten
- Standard Imaging Inc., Middleton, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Larry DeWerd
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Emil Schüler
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sam Beddar
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oh K, Hyun MA, Gallagher KJ, Yan Y, Zhou S. Characterization of a commercial plastic scintillator for electron FLASH dosimetry. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14451. [PMID: 38952057 PMCID: PMC11302813 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study investigated the potential of a commercially available plastic scintillator, the Exradin W2, as a real-time dosimeter for ultra-high-dose-rate (UHDR) electron beams. This work aimed to characterize this system's performance under UHDR conditions and addressed limitations inherent to other conventional dosimetry systems. METHODS AND MATERIALS We assessed the W2's performance as a UHDR electron dosimeter using a 16 MeV UHDR electron beam from the FLASH research extension (FLEX) system. Additionally, the vendor provided a beta firmware upgrade to better handle the processing of the high signal generated in the UHDR environment. We evaluated the W2 regarding dose-per-pulse, pulse repetition rate, charge versus distance, and pulse linearity. Absorbed dose measurements were compared against those from a plane-parallel ionization chamber, optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters and radiochromic film. RESULTS We observed that the 1 × 1 mm W2 scintillator with the MAX SD was more suitable for UHDR dosimetry compared to the 1 × 3 mm W2 scintillator, capable of matching film measurements within 2% accuracy for dose-per-pulse up to 3.6 Gy/pulse. The W2 accurately ascertained the inverse square relationship regarding charge versus virtual source distance with R2 of ∼1.00 for all channels. Pulse linearity was accurately measured with the W2, demonstrating a proportional response to the delivered pulse number. There was no discernible impact on the measured charge of the W2 when switching between the available repetition rates of the FLEX system (18-180 pulses/s), solidifying consistent beam output across pulse frequencies. CONCLUSIONS This study tested a commercial plastic scintillator detector in a UHDR electron beam, paving the way for its potential use as a real-time, patient-specific dosimetry tool for future FLASH radiotherapy treatments. Further research is warranted to test and improve the signal processing of the W2 dosimetry system to accurately measure in UHDR environments using exceedingly high dose-per-pulse and pulse numbers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyuhak Oh
- University of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaNebraskaUSA
| | - Megan A. Hyun
- University of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaNebraskaUSA
| | | | - Ying Yan
- University of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaNebraskaUSA
| | - Sumin Zhou
- University of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaNebraskaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fenwick JD, Kumar S, Pardo-Montero J. Collection efficiencies of cylindrical and plane parallel ionization chambers: analytical and numerical results and implications for experimentally determined correction factors. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:155023. [PMID: 39013400 PMCID: PMC11285487 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad63ed] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
Objectives.To derive a collection efficiency formula,fGauss, for cylindrical ionization chambers in pulsed radiation beams from a volume recombination model of Boaget al(1996Phys. Med. Biol.41885-97) including free electrons. To validatefGaussand a parallel plate chamber formulafexpusing an ion transport code and calculate changes in collection efficiencies caused by electric field charge screening at 0.1-100 mGy doses-per-pulse. And to determine collection efficienciesCE∞predicted at infinite voltage in the absence of avalanche effects by fitting scaled formulae to efficiencies computed for 100-400 V chamber voltages and 10 and 100 mGy doses-per-pulse.Approach.Calculations were performed for an idealized parallel plate chamber with 2 mm electrode separationd, and for an idealized cylindrical chamber with 0.5 and 2.333 mm inner and electrode radiirinandrout.Main results.fGaussandfexppredict the same collection efficiencies for cylindrical and parallel plate chambers satisfyingd2=(rout2-rin2)ln(rout/rin)/2, an equivalence condition met by the chambers studied. Without charge screening, efficiencies computed using the code equalledfGaussandfexp. With screening, efficiencies changed by ⩽0.03%, ⩽1.1% and ⩽21.3% at 1, 10 and 100 mGy doses-per-pulse, and differed between the chambers by ⩽0.9% and ⩽19.6% at ⩽10 and 100 mGy dose-per-pulse. For fits offexpandfGauss,CE∞values were ⩽1.2% and ⩽17.6% from unity at 10 and 100 mGy per pulse respectively, closer than for other formulae tested.Significance.Allowing for screening,fGaussandfexpdescribed computed collection efficiencies to within 0.03%, 1.1% and 21.3% at doses-per-pulse ⩽1, 10 and 100 mGy. Equivalence of the two chambers broke down at 100 mGy per pulse. Departures ofCE∞values from unity suggest that collection efficiencies determined experimentally by fittingfGaussorfexpto readings made at multiple voltages will be accurate to within 1.2% and 17.6% at 10 and 100 mGy per pulse respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D Fenwick
- Department of Medical Physics and Bioengineering, 8th Floor, Malet Place Engineering Building, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, England, United Kingdom
| | - Sudhir Kumar
- Radiological Physics and Advisory Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, CT & CRS Building, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai 400094, India
| | - Juan Pardo-Montero
- Group of Medical Physics and Biomathematics, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Department of Medical Physics, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Subiel A, Bourgouin A, Kranzer R, Peier P, Frei F, Gomez F, Knyziak A, Fleta C, Bailat C, Schüller A. Metrology for advanced radiotherapy using particle beams with ultra-high dose rates. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:14TR01. [PMID: 38830362 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad539d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
Dosimetry of ultra-high dose rate beams is one of the critical components which is required for safe implementation of FLASH radiotherapy (RT) into clinical practice. In the past years several national and international programmes have emerged with the aim to address some of the needs that are required for translation of this modality to clinics. These involve the establishment of dosimetry standards as well as the validation of protocols and dosimetry procedures. This review provides an overview of recent developments in the field of dosimetry for FLASH RT, with particular focus on primary and secondary standard instruments, and provides a brief outlook on the future work which is required to enable clinical implementation of FLASH RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Subiel
- National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington TW11 0LW, United Kingdom
- University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom
| | - Alexandra Bourgouin
- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig, Germany
- National Research Council of Canada (NRC), 1200 Montreal Road, Ottawa, ON, K1A0R6, Canada
| | | | - Peter Peier
- Federal Institute of Metrology METAS, Lindenweg 50, 3003 Bern-Wabern, Switzerland
| | - Franziska Frei
- Federal Institute of Metrology METAS, Lindenweg 50, 3003 Bern-Wabern, Switzerland
| | - Faustino Gomez
- University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Adrian Knyziak
- Central Office of Measures (GUM), Elektoralna 2 Str., 00-139 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Celeste Fleta
- Instituto de Microelectrónica de Barcelona, Centro Nacional de Microelectrónica, IMB-CNM (CSIC), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Claude Bailat
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Schüller
- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fenwick JD, Mayhew C, Jolly S, Amos RA, Hawkins MA. Navigating the straits: realizing the potential of proton FLASH through physics advances and further pre-clinical characterization. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1420337. [PMID: 39022584 PMCID: PMC11252699 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1420337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Ultra-high dose-rate 'FLASH' radiotherapy may be a pivotal step forward for cancer treatment, widening the therapeutic window between radiation tumour killing and damage to neighbouring normal tissues. The extent of normal tissue sparing reported in pre-clinical FLASH studies typically corresponds to an increase in isotoxic dose-levels of 5-20%, though gains are larger at higher doses. Conditions currently thought necessary for FLASH normal tissue sparing are a dose-rate ≥40 Gy s-1, dose-per-fraction ≥5-10 Gy and irradiation duration ≤0.2-0.5 s. Cyclotron proton accelerators are the first clinical systems to be adapted to irradiate deep-seated tumours at FLASH dose-rates, but even using these machines it is challenging to meet the FLASH conditions. In this review we describe the challenges for delivering FLASH proton beam therapy, the compromises that ensue if these challenges are not addressed, and resulting dosimetric losses. Some of these losses are on the same scale as the gains from FLASH found pre-clinically. We therefore conclude that for FLASH to succeed clinically the challenges must be systematically overcome rather than accommodated, and we survey physical and pre-clinical routes for achieving this.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D. Fenwick
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher Mayhew
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Jolly
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Richard A. Amos
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maria A. Hawkins
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Clinical Oncology, Radiotherapy Department, University College London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Garibaldi C, Beddar S, Bizzocchi N, Tobias Böhlen T, Iliaskou C, Moeckli R, Psoroulas S, Subiel A, Taylor PA, Van den Heuvel F, Vanreusel V, Verellen D. Minimum and optimal requirements for a safe clinical implementation of ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy: A focus on patient's safety and radiation protection. Radiother Oncol 2024; 196:110291. [PMID: 38648991 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Garibaldi
- IEO, Unit of Radiation Research, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy.
| | - Sam Beddar
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nicola Bizzocchi
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Charoula Iliaskou
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, 79106, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Serena Psoroulas
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Anna Subiel
- National Physical Laboratory, Medical Radiation Science, Teddington, UK
| | - Paige A Taylor
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Frank Van den Heuvel
- Zuidwest Radiotherapeutisch Institute, Vlissingen, the Netherlands; Dept of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Verdi Vanreusel
- Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp University (Centre for Oncological Research, CORE), Antwerpen, Belgium; SCK CEN (Research in Dosimetric Applications), Mol, Belgium
| | - Dirk Verellen
- Iridium Netwerk, Antwerp University (Centre for Oncological Research, CORE), Antwerpen, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liu K, Holmes S, Schüler E, Beddar S. A comprehensive investigation of the performance of a commercial scintillator system for applications in electron FLASH radiotherapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:4504-4512. [PMID: 38507253 PMCID: PMC11147715 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dosimetry in ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) beamlines is significantly challenged by limitations in real-time monitoring and accurate measurement of beam output, beam parameters, and delivered doses using conventional radiation detectors, which exhibit dependencies in ultra-high dose-rate (UHDR) and high dose-per-pulse (DPP) beamline conditions. PURPOSE In this study, we characterized the response of the Exradin W2 plastic scintillator (Standard Imaging, Inc.), a water-equivalent detector that provides measurements with a time resolution of 100 Hz, to determine its feasibility for use in UHDR electron beamlines. METHODS The W2 scintillator was exposed to an UHDR electron beam with different beam parameters by varying the pulse repetition frequency (PRF), pulse width (PW), and pulse amplitude settings of an electron UHDR linear accelerator system. The response of the W2 scintillator was evaluated as a function of the total integrated dose delivered, DPP, and mean and instantaneous dose rate. To account for detector radiation damage, the signal sensitivity (pC/Gy) of the W2 scintillator was measured and tracked as a function of dose history. RESULTS The W2 scintillator demonstrated mean dose rate independence and linearity as a function of integrated dose and DPP for DPP ≤ 1.5 Gy (R2 > 0.99) and PRF ≤ 90 Hz. At DPP > 1.5 Gy, nonlinear behavior and signal saturation in the blue and green signals as a function of DPP, PRF, and integrated dose became apparent. In the absence of Cerenkov correction, the W2 scintillator exhibited PW dependence, even at DPP values <1.5 Gy, with a difference of up to 31% and 54% in the measured blue and green signal for PWs ranging from 0.5 to 3.6 µs. The change in signal sensitivity of the W2 scintillator as a function of accumulated dose was approximately 4%/kGy and 0.3%/kGy for the measured blue and green signal responses, respectively, as a function of integrated dose history. CONCLUSION The Exradin W2 scintillator can provide output measurements that are both dose rate independent and linear in response if the DPP is kept ≤1.5 Gy (corresponding to a mean dose rate up to 290 Gy/s in the used system), as long as proper calibration is performed to account for PW and changes in signal sensitivity as a function of accumulated dose. For DPP > 1.5 Gy, the W2 scintillator's response becomes nonlinear, likely due to limitations in the electrometer related to the high signal intensity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Liu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Emil Schüler
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sam Beddar
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bancheri J, Seuntjens J. A semi-analytical procedure to determine the ion recombination correction factor in high dose-per-pulse beams. Med Phys 2024; 51:4458-4471. [PMID: 38446555 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The conventional theories and methods of determining the ion recombination correction factor, such as Boag theory and the related two voltage method and Jaffé plot extrapolation, do not seem to yield accurate results in FLASH /high dose per pulse (DPP) beams ( > $>$ 10 mGy DPP). This is due to the presence of a large free electron fraction that distorts the electric field inside the chamber sensitive volume. To understand the influence of these effects on the ion recombination correction factor and to develop new expressions for it, it is necessary to re-visit the underlying physics. PURPOSE To present a mathematical procedure to develop an analytical expression for the ion recombination correction factor. The expression is the basis for an extrapolation method so the correction factor can be determined in a clinical setting. METHODS A semi-analytical solution method, the homotopy perturbation method (HPM), is used to solve the partial differential equations (PDEs) describing the charge carrier physics, including space charge and free electrons. The electron velocity and attachment rate are modeled as functions of the electric field strength. An expression for the charge collection efficiency and ion recombination correction factor are developed. A fit procedure based on this expression is used to compare it to measured data from previously published articles. Another fit procedure using a general equation is also proposed and compared to the data. RESULTS The series obtained for the charge collection efficiency and the ion recombination correction factor are determined to be asymptotic series and the optimal truncation established. The ion recombination correction factor exhibits a1 / V 2 $1/V^2$ dependency due to the free electron presence. The fit using this expression agrees well with measured data as long as (1) the DPP is below 1 Gy for chambers with a 1 mm plate separation and (2) when the DPP is below 3 Gy for chambers with a 0.5 mm plate separation. In these DPP ranges, the deviation between measured and fit value did not exceed 6%. In both chamber cases the voltage range where the fit applies decreases as DPP increases. The general equation yielded comparable results. CONCLUSIONS The HPM was shown to be applicable to a complex system of PDEs and generate meaningful and novel solutions, as they include both space charge and free electrons. The HPM also lends itself to other chamber geometries. The fit procedure was also shown to yield accurate results for the ion recombination correction up to the 1 Gy DPP level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Bancheri
- Department of Physics & Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jan Seuntjens
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, University Health Network, Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ciarrocchi E, Ravera E, Cavalieri A, Celentano M, Del Sarto D, Di Martino F, Linsalata S, Massa M, Masturzo L, Moggi A, Morrocchi M, Pensavalle JH, Bisogni MG. Plastic scintillator-based dosimeters for ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron radiotherapy. Phys Med 2024; 121:103360. [PMID: 38692114 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Abstract
This paper reports the development of dosimeters based on plastic scintillating fibers imaged by a charge-coupled device camera, and their performance evaluation through irradiations with the electron Flash research accelerator located at the Centro Pisano Flash Radiotherapy. The dosimeter prototypes were composed of a piece of plastic scintillating fiber optically coupled to a clear optical fiber which transported the scintillation signal to the readout systems (an imaging system and a photodiode). The following properties were tested: linearity, capability to reconstruct the percentage depth dose curve in solid water and to sample in time the single beam pulse. The stem effect contribution was evaluated with three methods, and a proof-of-concept one-dimensional array was developed and tested for online beam profiling. Results show linearity up to 10 Gy per pulse, and good capability to reconstruct both the timing and spatial profiles of the beam, thus suggesting that plastic scintillating fibers may be good candidates for low-energy electron Flash dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Ciarrocchi
- University of Pisa, Department of Physics, Pisa, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Section of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - E Ravera
- University of Pisa, Department of Physics, Pisa, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Section of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - A Cavalieri
- University of Pisa, Department of Physics, Pisa, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Section of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - M Celentano
- University of Pisa, Department of Physics, Pisa, Italy; Azienda ospedaliero-universitaria pisana, U.O. Fisica Sanitaria, Pisa, Italy; Centro Pisano ricerca e implementazione clinical Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR-CISUP), Pisa, Italy
| | - D Del Sarto
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Section of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Azienda ospedaliero-universitaria pisana, U.O. Fisica Sanitaria, Pisa, Italy; Centro Pisano ricerca e implementazione clinical Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR-CISUP), Pisa, Italy; University of Pisa, Center for Instrument Sharing of the University of Pisa (CISUP), Pisa, Italy
| | - F Di Martino
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Section of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Azienda ospedaliero-universitaria pisana, U.O. Fisica Sanitaria, Pisa, Italy; Centro Pisano ricerca e implementazione clinical Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR-CISUP), Pisa, Italy
| | - S Linsalata
- Azienda ospedaliero-universitaria pisana, U.O. Fisica Sanitaria, Pisa, Italy
| | - M Massa
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Section of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - L Masturzo
- University of Pisa, Department of Physics, Pisa, Italy; Azienda ospedaliero-universitaria pisana, U.O. Fisica Sanitaria, Pisa, Italy; Centro Pisano ricerca e implementazione clinical Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR-CISUP), Pisa, Italy; SIT Sordina IORT Technologies, Aprilia, Italy
| | - A Moggi
- National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Section of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - M Morrocchi
- University of Pisa, Department of Physics, Pisa, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Section of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
| | - J H Pensavalle
- University of Pisa, Department of Physics, Pisa, Italy; Azienda ospedaliero-universitaria pisana, U.O. Fisica Sanitaria, Pisa, Italy; Centro Pisano ricerca e implementazione clinical Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR-CISUP), Pisa, Italy; SIT Sordina IORT Technologies, Aprilia, Italy
| | - M G Bisogni
- University of Pisa, Department of Physics, Pisa, Italy; National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Section of Pisa, Pisa, Italy; Centro Pisano ricerca e implementazione clinical Flash Radiotherapy (CPFR-CISUP), Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Konradsson E, Ericsson Szecsenyi R, Wahlqvist P, Thoft A, Blad B, Bäck SÅ, Ceberg C, Petersson K. Reconfiguring a Plane-Parallel Transmission Ionization Chamber to Extend the Operating Range into the Ultra-High Dose-per-pulse Regime. Radiat Res 2024; 201:252-260. [PMID: 38308528 DOI: 10.1667/rade-23-00177.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the feasibility of enhancing the charge collection efficiency (CCE) of a transmission chamber by reconfiguring its design and operation. The goal was to extend the range of dose-per-pulse (DPP) values with no or minimal recombination effects up to the ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) regime. The response of two transmission chambers, with electrode distance of 1 mm and 0.6 mm, respectively, was investigated as a function of applied voltage. The chambers were mounted one-by-one in the electron applicator of a 10 MeV FLASH-modified clinical linear accelerator. The chamber signals were measured as a function of nominal DPP, which was determined at the depth of dose maximum using EBT-XD film in solid water and ranged from 0.6 mGy per pulse to 0.9 Gy per pulse, for both the standard voltage of 320 V and the highest possible safe voltage of 1,200 V. The CCE was calculated and fitted with an empirical logistic function that incorporated the electrode distance and the chamber voltage. The CCE decreased with increased DPP. The CCE at the highest achievable DPP was 24% (36%) at 320 V and 51% (82%) at 1,200 V, for chambers with 1 mm (0.6 mm) electrode distance. For the combination of 1,200 V- and 0.6-mm electrode distance, the CCE was ∼100% for average dose rate up to 70 Gy/s at the depth of dose maximum in the phantom at a source-to-surface distance of 100 cm. Our findings indicate that minor modifications to a plane-parallel transmission chamber can substantially enhance the CCE and extending the chamber's operating range to the UHDR regime. This supports the potential of using transmission chamber-based monitoring solutions for UHDR beams, which could facilitate the delivery of UHDR treatments using an approach similar to conventional clinical delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Konradsson
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Pontus Wahlqvist
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Andreas Thoft
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Börje Blad
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sven Åj Bäck
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Crister Ceberg
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Motta S, Dal Bello R, Christensen JB, Bossin L, Yukihara EG. Dosimetry of ultra-high dose rate electron beams using thermoluminescence and optically stimulated luminescence detectors. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:035022. [PMID: 38198704 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad1cf5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
Objective.The aim of this work is to investigate the dose rate dependence of thermoluminescence and optically stimulated luminescence detectors (TLDs and OSLDs) in a wide uniform ultra-high dose rate electron beam and demonstrate the potential use of TLDs and OSLDs to correct the ion recombination in air-filled ionization chambers. This study avoids previously reported complications related to the field size and homogeneity.Approach.Two types of OSLDs (BeO and Al2O3:C) and three types of TLDs (LiF:Mg,Ti, LiF:Mg,Cu,P, CaF2:Tm) were irradiated simultaneously in a uniform 16 MeV electron beam generated by a clinically decommissioned C-Arm LINAC, modified to deliver doses per pulse between 8.3 × 10-4Gy and 1.255 Gy, corresponding to instantaneous dose rates between 2 × 102Gy s-1and 3 × 105Gy s-1. A prototype ultra-thin parallel plate ionization chamber was employed as reference detector.Main results.Reproducible results were achieved both at conventional (standard deviation of the data <2%) and at the highest dose per pulse (standard deviation of the data <4%). No trend in the dose rate response of the TLDs and OSLDs was observed in the investigated dose per pulse range. The Al2O3:C OSLD was found to be the most precise detector, with a standard deviation of the data <2% at all investigated dose rates and dose levels.Significance.The dose rate independence of the investigated TLDs and OSLDs make them good candidates for dosimetry at ultra-high dose rates, at least up to 3 × 105Gy s-1. A dose rate independent method to measure the dose per pulse is proposed, which can be applied to characterize ultra-high dose rate electron beams and correct for ion recombination in ionization chambers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Motta
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
- Department of Physics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - R Dal Bello
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - J B Christensen
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - L Bossin
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | - E G Yukihara
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Konradsson E, Wahlqvist P, Thoft A, Blad B, Bäck S, Ceberg C, Petersson K. Beam control system and output fine-tuning for safe and precise delivery of FLASH radiotherapy at a clinical linear accelerator. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1342488. [PMID: 38304871 PMCID: PMC10830783 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1342488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction We have previously adapted a clinical linear accelerator (Elekta Precise, Elekta AB) for ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron delivery. To enhance reliability in future clinical FLASH radiotherapy trials, the aim of this study was to introduce and evaluate an upgraded beam control system and beam tuning process for safe and precise UHDR delivery. Materials and Methods The beam control system is designed to interrupt the beam based on 1) a preset number of monitor units (MUs) measured by a monitor detector, 2) a preset number of pulses measured by a pulse-counting diode, or 3) a preset delivery time. For UHDR delivery, an optocoupler facilitates external control of the accelerator's thyratron trigger pulses. A beam tuning process was established to maximize the output. We assessed the stability of the delivery, and the independent interruption capabilities of the three systems (monitor detector, pulse counter, and timer). Additionally, we explored a novel approach to enhance dosimetric precision in the delivery by synchronizing the trigger pulse with the charging cycle of the pulse forming network (PFN). Results Improved beam tuning of gun current and magnetron frequency resulted in average dose rates at the dose maximum at isocenter distance of >160 Gy/s or >200 Gy/s, with or without an external monitor chamber in the beam path, respectively. The delivery showed a good repeatability (standard deviation (SD) in total film dose of 2.2%) and reproducibility (SD in film dose of 2.6%). The estimated variation in DPP resulted in an SD of 1.7%. The output in the initial pulse depended on the PFN delay time. Over the course of 50 measurements employing PFN synchronization, the absolute percentage error between the delivered number of MUs calculated by the monitor detector and the preset MUs was 0.8 ± 0.6% (mean ± SD). Conclusion We present an upgraded beam control system and beam tuning process for safe and stable UHDR electron delivery of hundreds of Gy/s at isocenter distance at a clinical linac. The system can interrupt the beam based on monitor units and utilize PFN synchronization for improved dosimetric precision in the dose delivery, representing an important advancement toward reliable clinical FLASH trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elise Konradsson
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Pontus Wahlqvist
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Andreas Thoft
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Börje Blad
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sven Bäck
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Crister Ceberg
- Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kristoffer Petersson
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Liu K, Holmes S, Hooten B, Schüler E, Beddar S. Evaluation of ion chamber response for applications in electron FLASH radiotherapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:494-508. [PMID: 37696271 PMCID: PMC10840726 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Ion chambers are required for calibration and reference dosimetry applications in radiation therapy (RT). However, exposure of ion chambers in ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) conditions pertinent to FLASH-RT leads to severe saturation and ion recombination, which limits their performance and usability. The purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate a set of commonly used commercially available ion chambers in RT, all with different design characteristics, and use this information to produce a prototype ion chamber with improved performance in UHDR conditions as a first step toward ion chambers specific for FLASH-RT. The Advanced Markus and Exradin A10, A26, and A20 ion chambers were evaluated. The chambers were placed in a water tank, at a depth of 2 cm, and exposed to an UHDR electron beam at different pulse repetition frequency (PRF), pulse width (PW), and pulse amplitude settings on an IntraOp Mobetron. Ion chamber responses were investigated for the various beam parameter settings to isolate their dependence on integrated dose, mean dose rate and instantaneous dose rate, dose-per-pulse (DPP), and their design features such as chamber type, bias voltage, and collection volume. Furthermore, a thin parallel-plate (TPP) prototype ion chamber with reduced collector plate separation and volume was constructed and equally evaluated as the other chambers. The charge collection efficiency of the investigated ion chambers decreased with increasing DPP, whereas the mean dose rate did not affect the response of the chambers (± 1%). The dependence of the chamber response on DPP was found to be solely related to the total dose within the pulse, and not on mean dose rate, PW, or instantaneous dose rate within the ranges investigated. The polarity correction factor (Ppol ) values of the TPP prototype, A10, and Advanced Markus chambers were found to be independent of DPP and dose rate (± 2%), while the A20 and A26 chambers yielded significantly larger variations and dependencies under the same conditions. Ion chamber performance evaluated under different irradiation conditions of an UHDR electron beam revealed a strong dependence on DPP and a negligible dependence on the mean and instantaneous dose rates. These results suggest that modifications to ion chambers design to improve their usability in UHDR beamlines should focus on minimizing DPP effects, with emphasis on optimizing the electric field strength, through the construction of smaller electrode separation and larger bias voltages. This was confirmed through the production and evaluation of a prototype ion chamber specifically designed with these characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Liu
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - Emil Schüler
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sam Beddar
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bourgouin A, Paz-Martín J, Gedik YC, Frei F, Peier P, Rossomme S, Schönfeld AA, Schüller A, Rodriguez FG, Kapsch RP. Charge collection efficiency of commercially available parallel-plate ionisation chambers in ultra-high dose-per-pulse electron beams. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:235002. [PMID: 37934049 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad0a58] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
Objective. This investigation aims to experimentally determine the charge collection efficiency (CCE) of six commercially available parallel-plate ionisation chamber (PPIC) models in ultra-high dose-per-pulse (UHDPP) electron beams.Approach. The CCE of 22 PPICs has been measured in UHDPP electron beams at the National Metrology Institution of Germany (PTB). The CCE was determined for a dose per pulse (DPP) range between 0.1 and 6.4 Gy (pulse duration of 2.5μs). The results obtained with the different PPICs were compared to evaluate the reproducibility, intra- and inter-model variation, and the performance of a CCE empirical model.Main results. The intra-model variation was, on average, 4.0%, which is more than three times the total combined relative standard uncertainty and was found to be greater at higher DPP (up to 20%). The inter-model variation for the PPIC with 2 mm electrode spacing, which was found to be, on average, 10%, was also significant compared to the relative uncertainty and the intra-model variation. The observed CCE variation could not be explained only by the expected deviation of the electrode spacing from the nominal value within the manufacturing tolerance. It should also be noted that a substantial polarity effect, between 0.914(5) and 1.201(3), was observed, and significant intra- and inter-model variation was observed on this effect.Significance. For research and pre-clinical study, the commercially available PPIC with a well-known CCE (directly measured for the specific chamber) and with a small electrode spacing could be used for relative and absolute dosimetry with a lower-limit uncertainty of 1.6% (k= 1) in the best case. However, to use a PPIC as a secondary standard in UHDPP electron beams for clinical purposes would require new model development to reduce the ion recombination, the polarity effect, and the total standard uncertainty on the dose measurement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Bourgouin
- Dosimetry for Radiation Therapy and Diagnostic Radiology, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig, Germany
| | - Jose Paz-Martín
- Departamento de Física de Partículas, Universidad de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Yunus Can Gedik
- Nuclear Energy Research Institute (NÜKEN), Turkish Energy Nuclear and Mineral Research Agency (TENMAK), Ankara, Turkey
| | - Franziska Frei
- Eidgenössisches Institut für Metrologie (METAS), Bern-Wabern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Peier
- Eidgenössisches Institut für Metrologie (METAS), Bern-Wabern, Switzerland
| | | | - Andreas A Schönfeld
- Sun Nuclear, A Mirion Medical Company, Melbourne, FL, United States of America
| | - Andreas Schüller
- Dosimetry for Radiation Therapy and Diagnostic Radiology, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig, Germany
| | | | - Ralf-Peter Kapsch
- Dosimetry for Radiation Therapy and Diagnostic Radiology, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Braunschweig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|