Charge collection efficiency of commercially available parallel-plate ionisation chambers in ultra-high dose-per-pulse electron beams

Objective. This investigation aims to experimentally determine the charge collection efficiency (CCE) of six commercially available parallel-plate ionisation chamber (PPIC) models in ultra-high dose-per-pulse (UHDPP) electron beams.Approach. The CCE of 22 PPICs has been measured in UHDPP electron beams at the National Metrology Institution of Germany (PTB). The CCE was determined for a dose per pulse (DPP) range between 0.1 and 6.4 Gy (pulse duration of 2.5μs). The results obtained with the different PPICs were compared to evaluate the reproducibility, intra- and inter-model variation, and the performance of a CCE empirical model.Main results. The intra-model variation was, on average, 4.0%, which is more than three times the total combined relative standard uncertainty and was found to be greater at higher DPP (up to 20%). The inter-model variation for the PPIC with 2 mm electrode spacing, which was found to be, on average, 10%, was also significant compared to the relative uncertainty and the intra-model variation. The observed CCE variation could not be explained only by the expected deviation of the electrode spacing from the nominal value within the manufacturing tolerance. It should also be noted that a substantial polarity effect, between 0.914(5) and 1.201(3), was observed, and significant intra- and inter-model variation was observed on this effect.Significance. For research and pre-clinical study, the commercially available PPIC with a well-known CCE (directly measured for the specific chamber) and with a small electrode spacing could be used for relative and absolute dosimetry with a lower-limit uncertainty of 1.6% (k= 1) in the best case. However, to use a PPIC as a secondary standard in UHDPP electron beams for clinical purposes would require new model development to reduce the ion recombination, the polarity effect, and the total standard uncertainty on the dose measurement.

Noradrenergic and serotonergic blockade inhibits BDNF mRNA activation following exercise and antidepressant

Antidepressants and physical exercise have been shown to increase the transcription of hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Much evidence regarding the initial actions of antidepressant medications as well as exercise leads to the hypothesis that noradrenergic (NE) and/or serotonergic (5-HT) activation is a key element in the BDNF transcriptional elevation common to both interventions. Currently, we used short-term beta-adrenergic, 5-HT(1A), or 5-HT(2A/C) receptor blockade to characterize the influence of NE and 5-HT systems on BDNF transcription during physical exercise and antidepressant treatment. In situ hybridization revealed that beta-adrenergic blockade significantly blunted the BDNF mRNA elevations due to exercise, and also inhibited the modest elevations in the CA3 and dentate gyrus following short-term treatment with tranylcypromine. In contrast, 5-HT(2A/C) blockade only minimally altered exercise-induced BDNF mRNA levels, but inhibited up-regulation of BDNF transcription via tranylcypromine. Finally, 5-HT(1A) blockade did not inhibit exercise-induced BDNF mRNA elevations, but significantly enhanced levels above those achieved with exercise alone in the CA4. These results suggest that NE activation via beta-adrenergic receptors may be essential for both exercise and antidepressant-induced BDNF regulation. 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(2A/C) activation, on the other hand, appear to be most important for antidepressant-induced BDNF regulation, but may also participate significantly in exercise-induced regulation in the CA4.

[Effect of weekly mouthrinses with 0.2% neutral NaF solution on caries incidence in first permanent molars]

A 32-month study was undertaken to determine the caries inhibitory effect of a weekly rinse for one minute with a solution of 0.2% NaF on the first permanent molars. Subjects who participated in the study were 295 school children aged from 5 to 13 years who were divided by random selection in two groups, test and control who rinsed with either 0.2% NaF solution or a placebo under double-blind conditions. Reductions in caries increments on first permanent molars (20.7% DMFT and 31.9% DMFS) were seen in the test group as compared with the control group. A preventive effect was also seen in all first permanent molars surfaces, being the major protective effect in approximal surfaces (52% reduction) followed by occlusal (36%) and bucolingual surfaces (16%).