1
|
Huang C, Chu LM, Liang B, Wu HL, Li BS, Ren S, Hou ML, Nie HC, Kong LY, Fan LQ, Du J, Zhu WB. Comparative genetic analysis of blood and semen samples in sperm donors from Hunan, China. Ann Med 2025; 57:2447421. [PMID: 39757988 PMCID: PMC11721621 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2447421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2024] [Accepted: 11/22/2024] [Indexed: 01/07/2025] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES At present, most genetic tests or carrier screening are performed with blood samples, and the known carrier rate of disease-causing variants is also derived from blood. For semen donors, what is really passed on to offspring is the pathogenic variant in their sperm. This study aimed to determine whether pathogenic variants identified in the sperm of young semen donors are also present in their blood, and whether matching results for blood are consistent with results for sperm. METHODS We included 40 paired sperm and blood samples from 40 qualified semen donors at the Hunan Province Human Sperm Bank of China. All samples underwent exome sequencing (ES) analysis, and the pathogenicity was assessed according to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) guidelines. Scoring for sperm donation matching, which was based on gene scoring and variant scoring, was also used to assess the consistency of sperm and blood genetic test results. RESULTS A total of 108 pathogenic (P)/likely pathogenic (LP) variants in 82 genes were identified. The highest carrier had 7 variants, and there was also one donor did not carry any P/LP variant. On average, each donor carried 2.7 P/LP variants. Among all the P/LP variants, missense mutation was the dominant type and most of them were located in exonic regions. Chromosome 1 harboured the largest number of variants and no pathogenic copy number variants (CNV) was identified in semen donors. The P/LP variant of all the 40 semen donors was consistent by comparing sperm and blood. Except for one case that was slightly different, the rest simulated matching results for blood were all consistent with results for sperm. CONCLUSIONS It is reasonable to choose either blood or sperm for genetic screening in semen donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuan Huang
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive & Genetic Hospital of International Trust and Investment Corporation (CITIC)-Xiangya, Changsha, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Li-Ming Chu
- Basecare Medical Device Co., Ltd, Suzhou, China
| | - Bo Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic and Developmental Sciences, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hui-Lan Wu
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive & Genetic Hospital of International Trust and Investment Corporation (CITIC)-Xiangya, Changsha, China
| | - Bai-Shun Li
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive & Genetic Hospital of International Trust and Investment Corporation (CITIC)-Xiangya, Changsha, China
| | - Shuai Ren
- Basecare Medical Device Co., Ltd, Suzhou, China
| | | | - Hong-Chuan Nie
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive & Genetic Hospital of International Trust and Investment Corporation (CITIC)-Xiangya, Changsha, China
| | | | - Li-Qing Fan
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive & Genetic Hospital of International Trust and Investment Corporation (CITIC)-Xiangya, Changsha, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Juan Du
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive & Genetic Hospital of International Trust and Investment Corporation (CITIC)-Xiangya, Changsha, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Wen-Bing Zhu
- Clinical Research Center for Reproduction and Genetics in Hunan Province, Reproductive & Genetic Hospital of International Trust and Investment Corporation (CITIC)-Xiangya, Changsha, China
- NHC Key Laboratory of Human Stem Cell and Reproductive Engineering, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pennings G, Lassen E, Lemmen JG, Thirup L, Pacey A, Skytte AB. The emotions, concerns and reactions of sperm donor candidates to their rejection by a sperm bank. J Assist Reprod Genet 2025; 42:451-457. [PMID: 39680360 PMCID: PMC11871279 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03357-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2024] [Accepted: 12/11/2024] [Indexed: 12/17/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore the emotions, concerns and reactions of sperm donor candidates to their rejection by the sperm bank. METHODS An online questionnaire was administered at Cryos International in the USA and Denmark to sperm donor candidates who had received notification that they were ineligible to donate. RESULTS A total of 101 rejected donor candidates completed the questionnaire. The majority were disappointed and surprised by the rejection but only a relatively small group had concerns about their health, fertility or manhood. More than half of them (54.5%) were satisfied with the way they were informed of their ineligibility while 17.8% were neutral, and 27.7% were dissatisfied. Approximately half (47.5%) thought that the information provided to them was sufficient while 24.8% were neutral and one in four (27.8%) considered it as insufficient. The most frequent suggestions for improvement were to provide an information leaflet specific to the reason of rejection, offer personal counselling and explain better what the implications are for them. CONCLUSION There is room for improvement in the information provided to donor candidates about the reason for their rejection. Although some information is already currently provided, a minority of donor candidates considered this to be insufficient. However, rejected candidates do not request more information on their own initiative. Routine provision of an information sheet specific to each reason for rejection may improve the experience of these men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Pennings
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Bioethics Institute Ghent (BIG), Universiteit Gent, Blandijnberg 2, B-9000, Gent, Belgium.
| | - Emilie Lassen
- Cryos International, Vesterbro Torv 3, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | | | - Lina Thirup
- Cryos International, Vesterbro Torv 3, 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Allan Pacey
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9NT, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Carriers of cystic fibrosis among sperm donors: complete CFTR gene analysis versus CFTR genotyping. Fertil Steril 2020; 114:524-534. [PMID: 32773111 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2019] [Revised: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the frequency of cystic fibrosis (CF) carriers among sperm donors in Spain studied through a complete analysis of the CFTR gene and to compare the results with those that would have been obtained by the 4 genotyping panels of the CFTR gene most commonly used as a carrier test in the context of assisted reproduction in our country. DESIGN Descriptive observational study. SETTING Private center. PATIENTS Nine hundred thirty-five sperm donors, from January 2014 to June 2019. INTERVENTION None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Presence of pathogenic variants in the CFTR gene. RESULTS 17% of the donors were carriers of at least 1 pathogenic variant in CFTR, with 39 different pathogenic variants detected. Only 4 of these 39 variants (10.27%) would have been detected by the 4 genotyping tests considered, and 22 variants (56.41%) would not have been detected by any of the genotyping tests. The pathogenic variants of the CFTR gene included in the different genotyping tests analyzed vary widely, and <50% are common to all of them. CONCLUSIONS Although the was not based in the general population, these results show that the use of genotyping tests is associated with a high reproductive risk, because the rate of detection of CF carriers was lower when these panels were applied, in comparison with the complete study of the CFTR gene. We recommend that complete sequencing of the CFTR gene by next-generation sequencing be performed as a screening method for CF in sperm donors.
Collapse
|
4
|
Bell SC, Mall MA, Gutierrez H, Macek M, Madge S, Davies JC, Burgel PR, Tullis E, Castaños C, Castellani C, Byrnes CA, Cathcart F, Chotirmall SH, Cosgriff R, Eichler I, Fajac I, Goss CH, Drevinek P, Farrell PM, Gravelle AM, Havermans T, Mayer-Hamblett N, Kashirskaya N, Kerem E, Mathew JL, McKone EF, Naehrlich L, Nasr SZ, Oates GR, O'Neill C, Pypops U, Raraigh KS, Rowe SM, Southern KW, Sivam S, Stephenson AL, Zampoli M, Ratjen F. The future of cystic fibrosis care: a global perspective. THE LANCET. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2020; 8:65-124. [PMID: 31570318 PMCID: PMC8862661 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(19)30337-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 633] [Impact Index Per Article: 126.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2019] [Revised: 07/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The past six decades have seen remarkable improvements in health outcomes for people with cystic fibrosis, which was once a fatal disease of infants and young children. However, although life expectancy for people with cystic fibrosis has increased substantially, the disease continues to limit survival and quality of life, and results in a large burden of care for people with cystic fibrosis and their families. Furthermore, epidemiological studies in the past two decades have shown that cystic fibrosis occurs and is more frequent than was previously thought in populations of non-European descent, and the disease is now recognised in many regions of the world. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine Commission on the future of cystic fibrosis care was established at a time of great change in the clinical care of people with the disease, with a growing population of adult patients, widespread genetic testing supporting the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis, and the development of therapies targeting defects in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR), which are likely to affect the natural trajectory of the disease. The aim of the Commission was to bring to the attention of patients, health-care professionals, researchers, funders, service providers, and policy makers the various challenges associated with the changing landscape of cystic fibrosis care and the opportunities available for progress, providing a blueprint for the future of cystic fibrosis care. The discovery of the CFTR gene in the late 1980s triggered a surge of basic research that enhanced understanding of the pathophysiology and the genotype-phenotype relationships of this clinically variable disease. Until recently, available treatments could only control symptoms and restrict the complications of cystic fibrosis, but advances in CFTR modulator therapies to address the basic defect of cystic fibrosis have been remarkable and the field is evolving rapidly. However, CFTR modulators approved for use to date are highly expensive, which has prompted questions about the affordability of new treatments and served to emphasise the considerable gap in health outcomes for patients with cystic fibrosis between high-income countries, and low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). Advances in clinical care have been multifaceted and include earlier diagnosis through the implementation of newborn screening programmes, formalised airway clearance therapy, and reduced malnutrition through the use of effective pancreatic enzyme replacement and a high-energy, high-protein diet. Centre-based care has become the norm in high-income countries, allowing patients to benefit from the skills of expert members of multidisciplinary teams. Pharmacological interventions to address respiratory manifestations now include drugs that target airway mucus and airway surface liquid hydration, and antimicrobial therapies such as antibiotic eradication treatment in early-stage infections and protocols for maintenance therapy of chronic infections. Despite the recent breakthrough with CFTR modulators for cystic fibrosis, the development of novel mucolytic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-infective therapies is likely to remain important, especially for patients with more advanced stages of lung disease. As the median age of patients with cystic fibrosis increases, with a rapid increase in the population of adults living with the disease, complications of cystic fibrosis are becoming increasingly common. Steps need to be taken to ensure that enough highly qualified professionals are present in cystic fibrosis centres to meet the needs of ageing patients, and new technologies need to be adopted to support communication between patients and health-care providers. In considering the future of cystic fibrosis care, the Commission focused on five key areas, which are discussed in this report: the changing epidemiology of cystic fibrosis (section 1); future challenges of clinical care and its delivery (section 2); the building of cystic fibrosis care globally (section 3); novel therapeutics (section 4); and patient engagement (section 5). In panel 1, we summarise key messages of the Commission. The challenges faced by all stakeholders in building and developing cystic fibrosis care globally are substantial, but many opportunities exist for improved care and health outcomes for patients in countries with established cystic fibrosis care programmes, and in LMICs where integrated multidisciplinary care is not available and resources are lacking at present. A concerted effort is needed to ensure that all patients with cystic fibrosis have access to high-quality health care in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott C Bell
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
| | - Marcus A Mall
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany; German Center for Lung Research, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Milan Macek
- Department of Biology and Medical Genetics, Second Faculty of Medicine, Motol University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Susan Madge
- Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jane C Davies
- Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Pierre-Régis Burgel
- Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Institut Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Elizabeth Tullis
- St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Claudio Castaños
- Hospital de Pediatria "Juan P Garrahan", Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Carlo Castellani
- Cystic Fibrosis Centre, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genoa, Italy
| | - Catherine A Byrnes
- Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand; University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Fiona Cathcart
- Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sanjay H Chotirmall
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | | | | | - Isabelle Fajac
- Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Institut Cochin, Paris, France
| | | | - Pavel Drevinek
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Motol University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Anna M Gravelle
- Cystic Fibrosis Clinic, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Trudy Havermans
- Cystic Fibrosis Centre, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nicole Mayer-Hamblett
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | - Joseph L Mathew
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Edward F McKone
- School of Medicine, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; University College Dublin School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Lutz Naehrlich
- Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center, German Center of Lung Research, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Samya Z Nasr
- CS Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Steven M Rowe
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Kevin W Southern
- Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, UK; University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Sheila Sivam
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anne L Stephenson
- St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marco Zampoli
- Division of Paediatric Pulmonology and MRC Unit for Child and Adolescent Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Felix Ratjen
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Paediatrics, Translational Medicine Research Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Amor DJ, Kerr A, Somanathan N, McEwen A, Tome M, Hodgson J, Lewis S. Attitudes of sperm, egg and embryo donors and recipients towards genetic information and screening of donors. Reprod Health 2018; 15:26. [PMID: 29426347 PMCID: PMC5807856 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-018-0468-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2017] [Accepted: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gamete and embryo donors undergo genetic screening procedures in order to maximise the health of donor-conceived offspring. In the era of genomic medicine, expanded genetic screening may be offered to donors for the purpose of avoiding transmission of harmful genetic mutations. The objective of this study was to explore the attitudes of donors and recipients toward the expanded genetic screening of donors. METHODS Qualitative interview study with thematic analysis, undertaken in a tertiary fertility centre. Semi-structured in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted with eleven recipients and nine donors from three different cohorts (sperm, egg and embryo donors/recipients). RESULTS Donors and recipients acknowledged the importance of genetic information and were comfortable with the existing level of genetic screening of donors. Recipients recognised some potential benefits of expanded genetic screening of donors; however both recipients and donors were apprehensive about extended genomic technologies, with concerns about how this information would be used and the ethics of genetic selectivity. CONCLUSION Participants in donor programs support some level of genetic screening of donors, but are wary of expanding genetic screening beyond current levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Amor
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia. .,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia. .,Melbourne IVF, East Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Annabelle Kerr
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Nandini Somanathan
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Alison McEwen
- Graduate School of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Jan Hodgson
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Sharon Lewis
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Verhaart IEC, Robertson A, Wilson IJ, Aartsma-Rus A, Cameron S, Jones CC, Cook SF, Lochmüller H. Prevalence, incidence and carrier frequency of 5q-linked spinal muscular atrophy - a literature review. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2017; 12:124. [PMID: 28676062 PMCID: PMC5496354 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-017-0671-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 425] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2017] [Accepted: 06/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Spinal muscular atrophy linked to chromosome 5q (SMA) is a recessive, progressive, neuromuscular disorder caused by bi-allelic mutations in the SMN1 gene, resulting in motor neuron degeneration and variable presentation in relation to onset and severity. A prevalence of approximately 1-2 per 100,000 persons and incidence around 1 in 10,000 live births have been estimated with SMA type I accounting for around 60% of all cases. Since SMA is a relatively rare condition, studies of its prevalence and incidence are challenging. Most published studies are outdated and therefore rely on clinical rather than genetic diagnosis. Furthermore they are performed in small cohorts in small geographical regions and only study European populations. In addition, the heterogeneity of the condition can lead to delays and difficulties in diagnosing the condition, especially outside of specialist clinics, and contributes to the challenges in understanding the epidemiology of the disease. The frequency of unaffected, heterozygous carriers of the SMN1 mutations appears to be higher among Caucasian and Asian populations compared to the Black (Sub-Saharan African ancestry) population. However, carrier frequencies cannot directly be translated into incidence and prevalence, as very severe (death in utero) and very mild (symptom free in adults) phenotypes carrying bi-allelic SMN1 mutations exist, and their frequency is unknown. More robust epidemiological data on SMA covering larger populations based on accurate genetic diagnosis or newborn screening would be helpful to support planning of clinical studies, provision of care and therapies and evaluation of outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid E. C. Verhaart
- John Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Agata Robertson
- John Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ian J. Wilson
- Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Annemieke Aartsma-Rus
- John Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Shona Cameron
- John Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | | | - Hanns Lochmüller
- John Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- John Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre, MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Central Parkway, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 3BZ UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Silver AJ, Larson JL, Silver MJ, Lim RM, Borroto C, Spurrier B, Morriss A, Silver LM. Carrier Screening is a Deficient Strategy for Determining Sperm Donor Eligibility and Reducing Risk of Disease in Recipient Children. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2016; 20:276-84. [PMID: 27104957 PMCID: PMC4892196 DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2016.0014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims: DNA-based carrier screening is a standard component of donor eligibility protocols practiced by U.S. sperm banks. Applicants who test positive for carrying a recessive disease mutation are typically disqualified. The aim of our study was to examine the utility of a range of screening panels adopted by the industry and the effectiveness of the screening paradigm in reducing a future child's risk of inheriting disease. Methods: A cohort of 27 donor applicants, who tested negative on an initial cystic fibrosis carrier test, was further screened with three expanded commercial carrier testing panels. These results were then compared to a systematic analysis of the applicants' DNA using next-generation sequencing (NGS) data. Results: The carrier panels detected serious pediatric disease mutations in one, four, or six donor applicants. Because each panel screens distinct regions of the genome, no single donor was uniformly identified as carrier positive by all three panels. In contrast, systematic NGS analysis identified all donors as carriers of one or more mutations associated with severe monogenic pediatric disease. These included 30 variants classified as “pathogenic” based on clinical observation and 66 with a high likelihood of causing gene dysfunction. Conclusion: Despite tremendous advances in variant identification, understanding, and analysis, the vast majority of disease-causing mutation combinations remain undetected by commercial carrier screening panels, which cover a narrow, and often distinct, subset of genes and mutations. The biological reality is that all donors and recipients carry serious recessive disease mutations. This challenges the utility of any screening protocol that anchors donor eligibility to carrier status. A more effective approach to reducing recessive disease risk would consider joint comprehensive analysis of both donor and recipient disease mutations. This type of high-resolution recessive disease risk analysis is now available and affordable, but industry practice must be modified to incorporate its use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Anne Morriss
- 1 GenePeeks, Inc. , Cambridge, Massachusetts.,2 GenePeeks, Inc. , New York, New York
| | - Lee M Silver
- 1 GenePeeks, Inc. , Cambridge, Massachusetts.,2 GenePeeks, Inc. , New York, New York.,3 Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University , Princeton, New Jersey
| |
Collapse
|