1
|
Cho H, Lee H, Hwang D. Development of Novel Fluticasone/Salmeterol/Tiotropium-Loaded Dry Powder Inhaler and Bioequivalence Assessment to Commercial Products in Rats. Pharmaceutics 2025; 17:103. [PMID: 39861751 PMCID: PMC11769347 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17010103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2024] [Revised: 01/07/2025] [Accepted: 01/12/2025] [Indexed: 01/27/2025] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Inhaler devices have been developed for the effective delivery of inhaled medications used in the treatment of pulmonary diseases. However, differing operating procedures across the devices can lead to user errors and reduce treatment efficacy, especially when patients use multiple devices simultaneously. To address this, we developed a novel dry powder inhaler (DPI), combining fluticasone propionate (FP), salmeterol xinafoate (SX), and tiotropium bromide (TB) into a single device designed for bioequivalent delivery compared to existing commercial products in an animal model. Methods: The micronized FP/SX/TB-loaded capsule was prepared by sieving, blending, and filling capsules. Capsule suitability of the drugs was investigated from the comparison of the stability of drugs within various capsule formulations to that of commercial products. The particle size of the drugs was adjusted using spiral air jet milling, and the ratio of lactose hydrate carriers was optimized by comparing the aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) with that of commercial products. To investigate the bioequivalence of micronized FP/SX/TB-loaded DPI to commercial products, the dissolution profile of FP/SX/TB particles and pharmacokinetics in rats were evaluated and compared to commercial products. Results: Capsules with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) without a gelling agent showed superior stability of the drugs compared to commercial products. The deposition pattern was influenced by the particle size of the drugs, and fine particle mass exhibited a significant correlation with the amount of fine carrier. Micronized FP/SX/TB-loaded DPI gave a similar APSD and dissolution profile compared to the commercial products and showed dose uniformity by the DPI device. Furthermore, micronized FP/SX/TB-loaded DPI exhibited bioequivalence to commercial products, as evidenced by no significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters following intratracheal administration in rats. Conclusions: A novel triple-combination DPI containing FP/SX/TB was successfully developed, demonstrating comparable pharmacological performance to commercial products. Optimized FP/SX/TB-loaded DPI with HPMC capsule achieved bioequivalence in rat studies, suggesting its potential for improved patient compliance and therapeutic outcomes. This novel single-device DPI offers a promising alternative for triple therapy in pulmonary diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyukjun Cho
- College of Pharmacy, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyunji Lee
- College of Pharmacy, Kyungsung University, Busan 48434, Republic of Korea;
| | - Duhyeong Hwang
- College of Pharmacy, Keimyung University, Daegu 42601, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stucki AO, Sauer UG, Allen DG, Kleinstreuer NC, Perron MM, Yozzo KL, Lowit AB, Clippinger AJ. Differences in the anatomy and physiology of the human and rat respiratory tracts and impact on toxicological assessments. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2024; 150:105648. [PMID: 38772524 PMCID: PMC11198871 DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024]
Abstract
Inhalation is a critical route through which substances can exert adverse effects in humans; therefore, it is important to characterize the potential effects that inhaled substances may have on the human respiratory tract by using fit for purpose, reliable, and human relevant testing tools. In regulatory toxicology testing, rats have primarily been used to assess the effects of inhaled substances as they-being mammals-share similarities in structure and function of the respiratory tract with humans. However, questions about inter-species differences impacting the predictability of human effects have surfaced. Disparities in macroscopic anatomy, microscopic anatomy, or physiology, such as breathing mode (e.g., nose-only versus oronasal breathing), airway structure (e.g., complexity of the nasal turbinates), cell types and location within the respiratory tract, and local metabolism may impact inhalation toxicity testing results. This review shows that these key differences describe uncertainty in the use of rat data to predict human effects and supports an opportunity to harness modern toxicology tools and a detailed understanding of the human respiratory tract to develop testing approaches grounded in human biology. Ultimately, as the regulatory purpose is protecting human health, there is a need for testing approaches based on human biology and mechanisms of toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ursula G Sauer
- Scientific Consultancy - Animal Welfare, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - David G Allen
- International Collaboration on Cosmetics Safety (ICCS), Mount Royal, NJ, USA
| | - Nicole C Kleinstreuer
- National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NC, USA
| | - Monique M Perron
- US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Krystle L Yozzo
- US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Anna B Lowit
- US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Washington, DC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rinderknecht CH, Ning M, Wu C, Wilson MS, Gampe C. Designing inhaled small molecule drugs for severe respiratory diseases: an overview of the challenges and opportunities. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2024; 19:493-506. [PMID: 38407117 DOI: 10.1080/17460441.2024.2319049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Inhaled drugs offer advantages for the treatment of respiratory diseases over oral drugs by delivering the drug directly to the lung, thus improving the therapeutic index. There is an unmet medical need for novel therapies for lung diseases, exacerbated by a multitude of challenges for the design of inhaled small molecule drugs. AREAS COVERED The authors review the challenges and opportunities for the design of inhaled drugs for respiratory diseases with a focus on new target discovery, medicinal chemistry, and pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and toxicological evaluation of drug candidates. EXPERT OPINION Inhaled drug discovery is facing multiple unique challenges. Novel biological targets are scarce, as is the guidance for medicinal chemistry teams to design compounds with inhalation-compatible features. It is exceedingly difficult to establish a PK/PD relationship given the complexity of pulmonary PK and the impact of physical properties of the drug substance on PK. PK, PD and toxicology studies are technically challenging and require large amounts of drug substance. Despite the current challenges, the authors foresee that the design of inhaled drugs will be facilitated in the future by our increasing understanding of pathobiology, emerging medicinal chemistry guidelines, advances in drug formulation, PBPK models, and in vitro toxicology assays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Miaoran Ning
- Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics, gRED, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Connie Wu
- Development Sciences Safety Assessment, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mark S Wilson
- Discovery Immunology, gRED, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Christian Gampe
- Discovery Chemistry, gRED, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang JS, Wong T, Wu KA, Mullikin TC, Armstrong A. Diffuse Pneumonitis after Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 Treatment in a Patient with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. BMJ Case Rep 2024; 17:e257772. [PMID: 38395466 PMCID: PMC10895240 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2023-257772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
We present the case of a patient with heavily pretreated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who received lutetium Lu-177 vipivotide tetraxetan (also known as 177Lu-PSMA-617) due to progressive disease despite chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and radiation, including palliative mediastinal and central nervous system radiation. He was subsequently hospitalised for worsening acute onset dyspnoea despite clinically responding to therapy. Interval imaging revealed progressive multifocal ground-glass opacities superimposed on a background of underlying peribronchovascular fibrosis. Further workup, including an extensive workup to identify a possible infectious aetiology, ruled out most aetiologies leaving radiation pneumonitis (RP), radiation recall pneumonitis (RRP) and drug-induced pneumonitis as possible diagnoses secondary to 177Lu -PSMA-617. The associated imaging findings of ground-glass opacities and consolidation can be like other aetiologies such as acute infection and subsequently may be treated incorrectly. In the use of theragnostics like 177Lu -PSMA-617, it is fundamental to apply the practices of radioprotection learnt from radiotherapy, as well as to consider prior radiotherapy treatments and their possible side effects when used in conjunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John S Wang
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Terence Wong
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Radiotheranostics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kevin A Wu
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Trey C Mullikin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Andrew Armstrong
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Center for Prostate & Urologic Cancers, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hastedt JE, Bäckman P, Cabal A, Clark A, Ehrhardt C, Forbes B, Hickey AJ, Hochhaus G, Jiang W, Kassinos S, Kuehl PJ, Prime D, Son YJ, Teague S, Tehler U, Wylie J. iBCS: 3. A Biopharmaceutics Classification System for Orally Inhaled Drug Products. Mol Pharm 2024; 21:164-172. [PMID: 38059771 PMCID: PMC10762654 DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.3c00685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Revised: 10/28/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
In this article, we specify for the first time a quantitative biopharmaceutics classification system for orally inhaled drugs. To date, orally inhaled drug product developers have lacked a biopharmaceutics classification system like the one developed to navigate the development of immediate release of oral medicines. Guideposts for respiratory drug discovery chemists and inhalation product formulators have been elusive and difficult to identify due to the complexity of pulmonary physiology, the intricacies of drug deposition and disposition in the lungs, and the influence of the inhalation delivery device used to deliver the drug as a respirable aerosol. The development of an inhalation biopharmaceutics classification system (iBCS) was an initiative supported by the Product Quality Research Institute (PQRI). The goal of the PQRI iBCS working group was to generate a qualitative biopharmaceutics classification system that can be utilized by inhalation scientists as a "rule of thumb" to identify desirable molecular properties and recognize and manage CMC product development risks based on physicochemical properties of the drug and the deposited lung dose. Herein, we define the iBCS classes quantitatively according to the dose number and permeability. The proposed iBCS was evaluated for its ability to categorize marketed inhaled drugs using data from the literature. The appropriateness of the classification of each drug was assessed based on published development, clinical and nonclinical data, and mechanistic physiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling. The inhaled drug product development challenges for each iBCS classification are discussed and illustrated for different classes of marketed inhaled drugs. Finally, it is recognized that discriminatory laboratory methods to characterize regional lung deposition, dissolution, and permeability will be key to fully realizing the benefits of an iBCS to streamline and derisk inhaled drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayne E. Hastedt
- JDP
Pharma Consulting, San Carlos, California 94070, United States
| | | | - Antonio Cabal
- Eisai, Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey 07677, United States
| | - Andy Clark
- Aerogen
Pharma, San Mateo, California 94402, United States
| | - Carsten Ehrhardt
- School
of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin D02 PN40, Ireland
| | - Ben Forbes
- King’s
College London, London SE1 9NH, U.K.
| | - Anthony J. Hickey
- University
of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
- RTI
International, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27709, United States
| | | | - Wenlei Jiang
- Center
for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of Generic Drugs, Office
of Research and Standards, U.S. FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, United States
| | | | - Philip J. Kuehl
- Lovelace Biomedical, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87108, United States
| | - David Prime
- Pulmonary Drug
Delivery Consultant, Ware Royston, SG8 7ED, U.K.
| | - Yoen-Ju Son
- Genentech, South
San Francisco, California 94080, United States
| | | | - Ulrika Tehler
- Advanced
Drug Delivery, Pharmaceutical Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, 431 83 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jennifer Wylie
- Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey 07065, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kardynska M, Kogut D, Pacholczyk M, Smieja J. Mathematical modeling of regulatory networks of intracellular processes - Aims and selected methods. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2023; 21:1523-1532. [PMID: 36851915 PMCID: PMC9958294 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Regulatory networks structure and signaling pathways dynamics are uncovered in time- and resource consuming experimental work. However, it is increasingly supported by modeling, analytical and computational techniques as well as discrete mathematics and artificial intelligence applied to to extract knowledge from existing databases. This review is focused on mathematical modeling used to analyze dynamics and robustness of these networks. This paper presents a review of selected modeling methods that facilitate advances in molecular biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malgorzata Kardynska
- Dept. of Biosensors and Processing of Biomedical Signals, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Daria Kogut
- Dept. of Biosensors and Processing of Biomedical Signals, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.,Dept. of Systems Biology and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Marcin Pacholczyk
- Dept. of Biosensors and Processing of Biomedical Signals, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.,Dept. of Systems Biology and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Jaroslaw Smieja
- Dept. of Biosensors and Processing of Biomedical Signals, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.,Dept. of Systems Biology and Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Al-Jipouri A, Almurisi SH, Al-Japairai K, Bakar LM, Doolaanea AA. Liposomes or Extracellular Vesicles: A Comprehensive Comparison of Both Lipid Bilayer Vesicles for Pulmonary Drug Delivery. Polymers (Basel) 2023; 15:318. [PMID: 36679199 PMCID: PMC9866119 DOI: 10.3390/polym15020318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 01/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The rapid and non-invasive pulmonary drug delivery (PDD) has attracted great attention compared to the other routes. However, nanoparticle platforms, like liposomes (LPs) and extracellular vesicles (EVs), require extensive reformulation to suit the requirements of PDD. LPs are artificial vesicles composed of lipid bilayers capable of encapsulating hydrophilic and hydrophobic substances, whereas EVs are natural vesicles secreted by cells. Additionally, novel LPs-EVs hybrid vesicles may confer the best of both. The preparation methods of EVs are distinguished from LPs since they rely mainly on extraction and purification, whereas the LPs are synthesized from their basic ingredients. Similarly, drug loading methods into/onto EVs are distinguished whereby they are cell- or non-cell-based, whereas LPs are loaded via passive or active approaches. This review discusses the progress in LPs and EVs as well as hybrid vesicles with a special focus on PDD. It also provides a perspective comparison between LPs and EVs from various aspects (composition, preparation/extraction, drug loading, and large-scale manufacturing) as well as the future prospects for inhaled therapeutics. In addition, it discusses the challenges that may be encountered in scaling up the production and presents our view regarding the clinical translation of the laboratory findings into commercial products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Al-Jipouri
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, D-45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Samah Hamed Almurisi
- Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Kulliyyah of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan 25200, Malaysia
| | - Khater Al-Japairai
- Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Process Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Gambang 26300, Malaysia
| | - Latifah Munirah Bakar
- Faculty of Applied Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Selangor, Shah Alam 40450, Malaysia
| | - Abd Almonem Doolaanea
- Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University College MAIWP International (UCMI), Kuala Lumpur 68100, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ladumor MK, Unadkat JD. Predicting Regional Respiratory Tissue and Systemic Concentrations of Orally Inhaled Drugs through a Novel PBPK Model. Drug Metab Dispos 2022; 50:519-528. [PMID: 35246463 PMCID: PMC9073946 DOI: 10.1124/dmd.121.000789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Oral inhalation (OI) of drugs is the route of choice to treat respiratory diseases or for recreational drug use (e.g., cannabis). After OI, the drug is deposited in and systemically absorbed from various regions of the respiratory tract. Measuring regional respiratory tissue drug concentrations at the site of action is important for evaluating the efficacy and safety of orally inhaled drugs (OIDs). Because such a measurement is routinely not possible in humans, the only alternative is to predict these concentrations, for example by physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. Therefore, we developed an OI-PBPK model to integrate the interplay between regional respiratory drug deposition and systemic absorption to predict regional respiratory tissue and systemic drug concentrations. We validated our OI-PBPK model by comparing the simulated and observed plasma concentration-time profiles of two OIDs, morphine and nicotine. Furthermore, we performed sensitivity analyses to quantitatively demonstrate the impact of key parameters on the extent and pattern of regional respiratory drug deposition, absorption, and the resulting regional respiratory tissue and systemic plasma concentrations. Our OI-PBPK model can be applied to predict regional respiratory tissue and systemic drug concentrations to optimize OID formulations, delivery systems, and dosing regimens. Furthermore, our model could be used to establish the bioequivalence of generic OIDs for which systemic plasma concentrations are not measurable or are not a good surrogate of the respiratory tissue drug concentrations. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Our OI-PBPK model is the first comprehensive model to predict regional respiratory deposition, as well as systemic and regional tissue concentrations of OIDs, especially at the drug's site of action, which is difficult to measure in humans. This model will help optimize OID formulations, delivery systems, dosing regimens, and bioequivalence assessment of generic OID. Furthermore, this model can be linked with organs-on-chips, pharmacodynamic and quantitative systems pharmacology models to predict and evaluate the safety and efficacy of OID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayur K Ladumor
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jashvant D Unadkat
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Anderson S, Atkins P, Bäckman P, Cipolla D, Clark A, Daviskas E, Disse B, Entcheva-Dimitrov P, Fuller R, Gonda I, Lundbäck H, Olsson B, Weers J. Inhaled Medicines: Past, Present, and Future. Pharmacol Rev 2022; 74:48-118. [PMID: 34987088 DOI: 10.1124/pharmrev.120.000108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to summarize essential pharmacological, pharmaceutical, and clinical aspects in the field of orally inhaled therapies that may help scientists seeking to develop new products. After general comments on the rationale for inhaled therapies for respiratory disease, the focus is on products approved approximately over the last half a century. The organization of these sections reflects the key pharmacological categories. Products for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease include β -2 receptor agonists, muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists, glucocorticosteroids, and cromones as well as their combinations. The antiviral and antibacterial inhaled products to treat respiratory tract infections are then presented. Two "mucoactive" products-dornase α and mannitol, which are both approved for patients with cystic fibrosis-are reviewed. These are followed by sections on inhaled prostacyclins for pulmonary arterial hypertension and the challenging field of aerosol surfactant inhalation delivery, especially for prematurely born infants on ventilation support. The approved products for systemic delivery via the lungs for diseases of the central nervous system and insulin for diabetes are also discussed. New technologies for drug delivery by inhalation are analyzed, with the emphasis on those that would likely yield significant improvements over the technologies in current use or would expand the range of drugs and diseases treatable by this route of administration. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This review of the key aspects of approved orally inhaled drug products for a variety of respiratory diseases and for systemic administration should be helpful in making judicious decisions about the development of new or improved inhaled drugs. These aspects include the choices of the active ingredients, formulations, delivery systems suitable for the target patient populations, and, to some extent, meaningful safety and efficacy endpoints in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Anderson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Paul Atkins
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Per Bäckman
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - David Cipolla
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Andrew Clark
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Evangelia Daviskas
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Bernd Disse
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Plamena Entcheva-Dimitrov
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Rick Fuller
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Igor Gonda
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Hans Lundbäck
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Bo Olsson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Jeffry Weers
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aulin LBS, Tandar ST, van Zijp T, van Ballegooie E, van der Graaf PH, Saleh MAA, Välitalo P, van Hasselt JGC. Physiologically Based Modelling Framework for Prediction of Pulmonary Pharmacokinetics of Antimicrobial Target Site Concentrations. Clin Pharmacokinet 2022; 61:1735-1748. [PMID: 36401151 PMCID: PMC9676785 DOI: 10.1007/s40262-022-01186-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Prediction of antimicrobial target-site pharmacokinetics is of relevance to optimize treatment with antimicrobial agents. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model framework was developed for prediction of pulmonary pharmacokinetics, including key pulmonary infection sites (i.e. the alveolar macrophages and the epithelial lining fluid). METHODS The modelling framework incorporated three lung PBPK models: a general passive permeability-limited model, a drug-specific permeability-limited model and a quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR)-informed perfusion-limited model. We applied the modelling framework to three fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Incorporation of experimental drug-specific permeability data was found essential for accurate prediction. RESULTS In the absence of drug-specific transport data, our QSPR-based model has generic applicability. Furthermore, we evaluated the impact of drug properties and pathophysiologically related changes on pulmonary pharmacokinetics. Pulmonary pharmacokinetics were highly affected by physiological changes, causing a shift in the main route of diffusion (i.e. paracellular or transcellular). Finally, we show that lysosomal trapping can cause an overestimation of cytosolic concentrations for basic compounds when measuring drug concentrations in cell homogenate. CONCLUSION The developed lung PBPK model framework constitutes a promising tool for characterization of pulmonary exposure of systemically administrated antimicrobials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda B. S. Aulin
- grid.5132.50000 0001 2312 1970Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastian T. Tandar
- grid.5132.50000 0001 2312 1970Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Torben van Zijp
- grid.5132.50000 0001 2312 1970Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Etienne van Ballegooie
- grid.5132.50000 0001 2312 1970Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Piet H. van der Graaf
- grid.5132.50000 0001 2312 1970Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands ,Certara QSP, Canterbury, UK
| | - Mohammed A. A. Saleh
- grid.5132.50000 0001 2312 1970Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Pyry Välitalo
- grid.9668.10000 0001 0726 2490University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland ,grid.490668.50000 0004 0495 5912Finnish Medicines Agency, Kuopio, Finland
| | - J. G. Coen van Hasselt
- grid.5132.50000 0001 2312 1970Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Replacement Strategies for Animal Studies in Inhalation Testing. SCI 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/sci3040045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Animal testing is mandatory in drug testing and is the gold standard for toxicity and efficacy evaluations. This situation is expected to change in the future as the 3Rs principle, which stands for the replacement, reduction, and refinement of the use of animals in science, is reinforced by many countries. On the other hand, technologies for alternatives to animal testing have increased. The need to develop and use alternatives depends on the complexity of the research topic and also on the extent to which the currently used animal models can mimic human physiology and/or exposure. The lung morphology and physiology of commonly used animal species differs from that of human lungs, and the realistic inhalation exposure of animals is challenging. In vitro and in silico methods can assess important aspects of the in vivo effects, namely particle deposition, dissolution, action at, and permeation through, the respiratory barrier, and pharmacokinetics. This review discusses the limitations of animal models and exposure systems and proposes in vitro and in silico techniques that could, when used together, reduce or even replace animal testing in inhalation testing in the future.
Collapse
|
12
|
Prediction of pharmacokinetic parameters of inhaled indacaterol formulation in healthy volunteers using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model. Eur J Pharm Sci 2021; 168:106055. [PMID: 34742834 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2021.106055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inhaled formulations are the first choices for treating asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), attracting the increasing investment and development in the pharmaceutical industry. Both the equivalence of local and systemic exposures need to be considered when assessing the equivalence of generic inhaled drugs, which has become a dilemma in the development of generic inhaled drugs. There is an urgent need for reliable methods such as physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to assist in the development of inhaled drugs. METHOD To test the strategy that in silico simulation is an effective tool in developing inhaled products and further assessing their clinically feasibility, a long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists indacaterol, which was referred as the first-line therapy for patient with COPD, was selected as a tool drug. The PBPK model was established and the predicted plasma concentration curve was obtained by inputting the physicochemical properties of indacaterol and adjusting model parameters. The accuracy of simulation was verified by an alignment with the actual data. The main factor affecting PK in vivo was investigated by parameter sensitivity analysis. The biological equivalent size of indacaterol was investigated by virtual bioequivalence analysis. RESULTS The models of indacaterol after intravenous and oral administration were established and confirmed, and used as a background for PBPK model of inhaled administration. All those models showed favorable stability and applicability. Appropriate lung deposition was generated in the PBPK model, and the predicted plasma profile of indacaterol was consistent with the clinical actual observation values. Particle size is the most important factor affecting the PK of indacaterol in vivo. Furthermore, virtual bioequivalence simulation exhibited statistically comparable results between the particle size fluctuates in the range of 3.5-6.5 μm and baseline levels (D90 = 5 μm). CONCLUSIONS The PBPK model can simulate the pharmacokinetics and lung deposition of indacaterol, which will be a powerful tool to assist the development of inhaled drugs.
Collapse
|
13
|
Selo MA, Sake JA, Kim KJ, Ehrhardt C. In vitro and ex vivo models in inhalation biopharmaceutical research - advances, challenges and future perspectives. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2021; 177:113862. [PMID: 34256080 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.113862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Oral inhalation results in pulmonary drug targeting and thereby reduces systemic side effects, making it the preferred means of drug delivery for the treatment of respiratory disorders such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or cystic fibrosis. In addition, the high alveolar surface area, relatively low enzymatic activity and rich blood supply of the distal airspaces offer a promising pathway to the systemic circulation. This is particularly advantageous when a rapid onset of pharmacological action is desired or when the drug is suffering from stability issues or poor biopharmaceutical performance following oral administration. Several cell and tissue-based in vitro and ex vivo models have been developed over the years, with the intention to realistically mimic pulmonary biological barriers. It is the aim of this review to critically discuss the available models regarding their advantages and limitations and to elaborate further which biopharmaceutical questions can and cannot be answered using the existing models.
Collapse
|
14
|
Radivojev S, Luschin-Ebengreuth G, Pinto JT, Laggner P, Cavecchi A, Cesari N, Cella M, Melli F, Paudel A, Fröhlich E. Impact of simulated lung fluid components on the solubility of inhaled drugs and predicted in vivo performance. Int J Pharm 2021; 606:120893. [PMID: 34274456 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Revised: 07/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Orally inhaled products (OIPs) are gaining increased attention, as pulmonary delivery is a preferred route for the treatment of various diseases. Yet, the field of inhalation biopharmaceutics is still in development phase. For a successful correlation between various in vitro data obtained during formulation characterization and in vivo performance, it is necessary to understand the impact of parameters such as solubility and dissolution of drugs. In this work, we used in vitro-in silico feedback-feedforward approach to gain a better insight into the biopharmaceutics behavior of inhaled Salbutamol Sulphate (SS) and Budesonide (BUD). The thorough characterization of the in vitro test media and the impact of different in vitro fluid components such as lipids and protein on the solubility of aforementioned drugs was studied. These results were subsequently used as an input into the developed in silico models to investigate potential PK parameter changes in vivo. Results revealed that media comprising lipids and albumin were the most biorelevant and impacted the solubility of BUD the most. On the contrary, no notable impact was seen in case of SS. The use of simple media such as phosphate buffer saline (PBS) might be sufficient to use in solubility studies of the highly soluble and permeable drugs. However, its use for the poorly soluble drugs is limited due to the greater potential for interactions within in vivo environment. The use of in silico tools showed that the model response varies, depending on the used media. Therefore, this work highlights the relevance of carefully selecting the media composition when investigating solubility and dissolution behavior, especially in the early phases of drug development and of poorly soluble drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Snezana Radivojev
- Research Center Pharmaceutical Engineering GmbH, Inffeldgasse 13, Graz 8010, Austria; Center for Medical Research, Medical University of Graz, Stiftingtalstraße 24, Graz 8010, Austria
| | | | - Joana T Pinto
- Research Center Pharmaceutical Engineering GmbH, Inffeldgasse 13, Graz 8010, Austria
| | - Peter Laggner
- Research Center Pharmaceutical Engineering GmbH, Inffeldgasse 13, Graz 8010, Austria
| | | | - Nicola Cesari
- Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Via Palermo, 26 A, Parma, 43122, Italy
| | - Massimo Cella
- Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Via Palermo, 26 A, Parma, 43122, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Melli
- Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A., Via Palermo, 26 A, Parma, 43122, Italy
| | - Amrit Paudel
- Research Center Pharmaceutical Engineering GmbH, Inffeldgasse 13, Graz 8010, Austria; Institute of Process and Particle Engineering, Graz University of Technology, Inffeldgasse 13, Graz, 8010, Austria.
| | - Eleonore Fröhlich
- Research Center Pharmaceutical Engineering GmbH, Inffeldgasse 13, Graz 8010, Austria; Center for Medical Research, Medical University of Graz, Stiftingtalstraße 24, Graz 8010, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Drivers of absolute systemic bioavailability after oral pulmonary inhalation in humans. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2021; 164:36-53. [PMID: 33895293 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2021.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
There are few studies in humans dealing with the relationship between physico-chemical properties of drugs and their systemic bioavailability after administration via oral inhalation route (Fpulm). Getting further insight in the determinants of Fpulm after oral pulmonary inhalation could be of value for drugs considered for a systemic delivery as a result of poor oral bioavailability, as well as for drugs considered for a local delivery to anticipate their undesirable systemic effects. To better delineate the parameters influencing the systemic delivery after oral pulmonary inhalation in humans, we studied the influence of physico-chemical and permeability properties obtained in silico on the rate and extent of Fpulm in a series of 77 compounds with or without marketing approval for pulmonary delivery, and intended either for local or for systemic delivery. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed mainly that Fpulm was positively correlated with Papp and negatively correlated with %TPSA, without a significant influence of solubility and ionization fraction, and no apparent link with lipophilicity and drug size parameters. As a result of the small sample set, the performance of the different models as predictive of Fpulm were quite average with random forest algorithm displaying the best performance. As a whole, the different models captured between 50 and 60% of the variability with a prediction error of less than 20%. Tmax data suggested a significant positive influence of lipophilicity on absorption rate while charge apparently had no influence. A significant linear relationship between Cmax and dose (R2 = "0.79) highlighted that Cmax was primarily dependent on dose and absorption rate and could be used to estimate Cmax in humans for new inhaled drugs.
Collapse
|