Long-term survival after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with peritoneal metastases of urachal cancer

Cytoreduction surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) as treatment choice of metastatic Urachal carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Urachal carcinoma accounts for approximately 0.01 % of all adult malignancies and 1 % of bladder cancers. Its prognosis remains poor, with a 5-year overall survival rate of less than 50 %.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 51-years-old black female, affected by peritoneal malignancies from urachal carcinoma, underwent multiple surgical cytoreduction (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) with different chemotherapy regimen, alternating with intravenous chemotherapy. Thirty-two months recurrence-free survival was registered, and overall survival was more than 5 years.

DISCUSSION

Our case suggests the importance of rigorous follow-up with both tumor marker testing (CEA) and imaging studies. Optimal debulking surgery plays a pivotal role in controlling primary and recurrent disease. The use of combined intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy may have contributed to her long-term survival.

CONCLUSION

CRS and HIPEC combined with intravenous chemotherapy may be potential candidates for treating patients with urachal carcinoma with peritoneal metastases. Our patient is a challenging case in daily surgical practice.

Modern methods in managing urachal adenocarcinoma

Objectives

We sought to evaluate modern diagnostic and treatment options for urachal adenocarcinoma (UAC) and to provide clarity regarding the available options and their outcomes for this poorly understood yet damaging disease.

Material and methods

We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed and Medline focusing on updated management of UAC.

Results

Surgical intervention continues to be the mainstay of treatment for localized UAC. However, with the increased availability of molecular and genetic profiling, chemotherapy has consistently demonstrated promising response rates and survival outcomes, especially for a disease that commonly presents in a metastatic stage. The role of checkpoint inhibitors remains under investigation. Cross-sectional imaging is vital during postoperative surveillance. However, there may also be a role for the adoption of cystoscopy to detect bladder recurrence.

Conclusions

Although the importance of surgical resection remains unchanged, improved survival outcomes with chemotherapy have been found in small retrospective studies. Randomized trial data are required to further assess the influence of systemic treatment as a primary or adjuvant therapy. Moreover, a stringent follow-up regimen incorporating evaluation for distant and local recurrence of UAC must be evaluated and adopted.

Clinical value of preoperative serum tumor markers CEA, CA19-9, CA125, and CA15-3 in surgically treated urachal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Urachal adenocarcinoma (UrAC) is a very rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. The role of preoperative serum tumor markers (STMs) in UrAC is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical value of elevated STMs including carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), and cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3) in surgically treated UrAC, and to evaluate their prognostic significance.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of consecutive patients with histopathologically confirmed UrAC who underwent surgical treatment at a single tertiary hospital. Blood levels of CEA, CA19-9, CA125, and CA15-3 were determined before surgery. The proportion of patients with elevated STMs was calculated, as well as the association between elevated STMs and clinicopathological characteristics, recurrence-free survival and disease-specific survival.

RESULTS

Of the 50 patients included; CEA, CA 19-9, CA125, and CA15-3 were elevated in 40%, 25%, 26%, and 6% respectively. Elevated CEA was associated with higher pT-stage (odds ratio [OR] 3.3 [95% confidence interval 1.0-11.1], P = 0.003), higher Sheldon stage (OR 6.9 [95% CI 0.8-60.4], P = 0.01), male sex (OR 4.7 [95% CI 1.2-18.3], P = 0.01), and the presence of peritoneal metastases at the time of diagnosis (OR 3.5 [95% CI 0.9-14.2], P = 0.04). Elevated CA19-9 was associated with signet-cell component (OR 1.7 [95% CI 0.9-3.3], P = 0.03) and elevated CA125 was associated with peritoneal metastases at the time of diagnosis (OR 6.0 [95% CI 1.2-30.6], P = 0.04). Elevated STMs before surgery were not associated with recurrence-free survival and/or disease-specific survival.

CONCLUSION

A subset of patients with surgically treated UrAC has elevated STMs preoperatively. CEA was most frequently (40%) elevated and correlated with unfavorable tumor characteristics. However, STM levels did not correlate with prognostic outcomes.

Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Originating From Urachal Carcinoma: Case Reports and Review of the Literature

Urachal carcinoma (UC) is a rare and aggressive tumor arising from the urachal remnants, with the potential for peritoneal dissemination. Patients diagnosed with UC often have a poor prognosis. To date, there is no standardized treatment. Our objective is to present two cases of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) secondary to an UC, who were treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic peroperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). A review of the literature on CRS and HIPEC in UC suggests CRS and HIPEC to be a safe and viable treatment option. Two patients with PC of UC underwent CRS and HIPEC in our institution. All available data were gathered and reported on. A literary search was carried out to find all available cases of patients with PC secondary to UC treated with CRS and HIPEC. Both patients underwent CRS and HIPEC and are currently free of recurrence. Literature research revealed nine other publications adding up to a total of 68 additional cases. CRS and HIPEC can provide satisfactory long-term oncological outcome with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates in patients with PC of urachal origin. It should be considered as a safe and feasible treatment option with curative potential.

Urachal carcinoma: The journey so far and the road ahead

Urachal carcinoma, a rare cancer arising from urachus, accounts for about 1% of bladder cancer. The diagnosis at stage I shows about 63% 5-year survival whereas only 8% of the patients at stage IV shows a 5-year survival. Above 90% of urachal carcinomas are adenocarcinomas and most of the urachal carcinoma cases are invasive, showing a high resemblance to adenocarcinoma of various origins, making it hard for a conclusive diagnosis. Even though inconclusive, immunohistochemistry can play a significant role in identifying urachal carcinoma. Most cases show the biomarkers CK20 and CDX2, whereas CK7 and β-catenin are expressed at a lesser frequency. Due to the few cases available, there is a lack of evidence regarding specific markers differentiating urachal carcinoma from colorectal or primary bladder adenocarcinomas. In addition to immunohistochemistry, genomic characterization is emerging to play a role in the classification and treatment of the disease. Urachal carcinoma has been reported to have a molecular level similarity with colorectal malignancies regarding certain gene expressions. The TP53 mutations inactivating the tumor suppressor can probably be explored as a possible target in treating urachal carcinoma. Additionally, certain targets identified in gastric and breast cancer along with anti-HER2 treatment strategies can be explored. Immuno-oncology utilizes immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of MSI-H tumors whereas a combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors along with immune checkpoint inhibitors are being studied to treat MSI stable tumors. The article is an in-depth overview of urachal carcinoma addressing the current landscape with an emphasis on the future scenario.

Urachal carcinoma: a large retrospective multicentric study from the French Genito-Urinary Tumor Group

Introduction

Urachal cancer (UrC) is a rare, non-urothelial malignancy. Its natural history and management are poorly understood. Although localized to the bladder dome, the most common histological subtype of UrC is adenocarcinoma. UrC develops from an embryonic remnant, and is frequently diagnosed in advanced stage with poor prognosis. The treatment is not standardized, and based only on case reports and small series. This large retrospective multicentric study was conducted by the French Genito-Urinary Tumor Group to gain a better understanding of UrC.

Material and Methods

data has been collected retrospectively on 97 patients treated at 22 French Cancer Centers between 1996 and 2020.

Results

The median follow-up was 59 months (range 44-96). The median age at diagnosis was 53 years (range 20-86), 45% were females and 23% had tobacco exposure. For patients with localized disease (Mayo I-II, n=46) and with lymph-node invasion (Mayo III, n=13) median progression-free-survival (mPFS) was 31 months (95% CI: 20-67) and 7 months (95% CI: 6-not reached (NR)), and median overall survival (mOS) was 73 months (95% CI: 57-NR) and 22 months (95% CI: 21-NR) respectively. For 45 patients with Mayo I-III had secondary metastatic progression, and 20 patients were metastatic at diagnosis. Metastatic localization was peritoneal for 54% of patients. Most patients with localized tumor were treated with partial cystectomy, with mPFS of 20 months (95% CI: 14-49), and only 12 patients received adjuvant therapy. Metastatic patients (Mayo IV) had a mOS of 23 months (95% CI: 19-33) and 69% received a platin-fluorouracil combination treatment.

Conclusion

UrC is a rare tumor of the bladder where patients are younger with a higher number of females, and a lower tobacco exposure than in standard urothelial carcinoma. For localized tumor, partial cystectomy is recommended. The mOS and mPFS were low, notably for patients with lymph node invasion. For metastatic patients the prognosis is poor and standard therapy is not well-defined. Further clinical and biological knowledge are needed.

Current Management of Urachal Carcinoma: An Evidence-based Guide for Clinical Practice

Urachal carcinoma is a rare urological disease. The shortage of data about diagnosis and surgical treatment in literature makes it hard for clinicians to make a decision. Indeed, urachal carcinoma is an aggressive disease that requires prompt staging and treatment to ensure the best outcome for patients. We reviewed the last evidence about the management of urachal carcinoma to provide an easy-to-use guide for clinical practice.

Patient summary

Urachal carcinoma is a rare malignancy. The literature on this challenging disease remains limited. Herein, we provide a practical guide for its management from diagnosis to treatment, which in most cases requires surgical intervention or chemotherapy.

Construction and Validation of Novel Prediction Tools Based on Large Population-Based Database to Predict the Prognosis of Urachal Cancer After Surgery

Background

Urachal cancer is a rare neoplasm in the urological system. To our knowledge, no published study has explored to establish a model for predicting the prognosis of urachal cancer. The present study aims to develop and validate nomograms for predicting the prognosis of urachal cancer based on clinicopathological parameters.

Methods

Based on the data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, 445 patients diagnosed with urachal cancer between 1975 and 2018 were identified as training and internal validation cohort; 84 patients diagnosed as urachal cancer from 2001 to 2020 in two medical centers were collected as external validation cohort. Nomograms were developed using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis in the training cohort, and their performance was evaluated in terms of its discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical usefulness by statistical analysis.

Results

Three nomograms based on tumor–node–metastasis (TNM), Sheldon and Mayo staging system were developed for predicting cancer-specific survival (CSS) of urachal cancer; these nomograms all showed similar calibration and discrimination ability. Further internal (c-index 0.78) and external (c-index 0.81) validation suggested that Sheldon model had superior discrimination and calibration ability in predicting CSS than the other two models. Moreover, we found that the Sheldon model was able to successfully classify patients into different risk of mortality both in internal and external validation cohorts. Decision curve analysis proved that the nomogram was clinically useful and applicable.

Conclusions

The nomogram model with Sheldon staging system was recommended for predicting the prognosis of urachal cancer. The proposed nomograms have promising clinical applicability to help clinicians on individualized patient counseling, decision-making, and clinical trial designing.

The Diagnostic Value of FDG-PET/CT for Urachal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Urachal carcinoma (UrC) is a rare malignancy that often presents at an advanced stage with metastases in up to a quarter of patients. There is no consensus on the optimal form of staging for patients with UrC. In the present study, we evaluated the diagnostic value of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emitted tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for UrC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We evaluated 40 consecutive patients who were staged for urachal cancer between 2010 and 2020. They underwent a total of 62 FDG-PET/CTs (40 for primary staging, and 22 during follow-up), which were compared with standard-of-care contrast-enhanced CT (CECT). The metabolic detection of primary tumors, lymph node metastases (LNMs), peritoneal metastases (PMs), distant metastases (DMs), and local recurrence by FDG-PET/CT was evaluated. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated compared with CECT. Histopathology or follow-up imaging was the reference standard.

RESULTS

Of all 40 patients, 33 patients (83%) had urachal adenocarcinoma-26 (65%) with a mucinous component and 7 (17%) with invasive urothelial carcinoma. All local UrC tumors could be visualized on CT, and 80% showed increased FDG uptake. At initial staging, FDG-PET/CT detected FDG-avid LNMs, PMs, and DMs in 50%, 17%, and 25% of patients, respectively. These metastases were also visualized on CECT. During follow up, FDG-PET/CT revealed FDG-avid local recurrences that were not seen on CT in two out of eight patients (25%).

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates that most UrC can be visualized on FDG-PET/CT. At initial diagnosis, FDG-PET/CT does not seem to yield additional information compared with CECT; however, FDG-PET/CT may be helpful during follow-up. This is a small study, and the findings should be corroborated with larger series.

Urachal carcinoma: A case of a rare neoplasm

INTRODUCTION

Urachal carcinoma is a rare type of non-urothelial malignancy that arises from the urachal ligament, a remnant of fetal development. It frequently involves the dome of the bladder or its midline, with adenocarcinoma being the most common histological type. This malignancy is generally diagnosed in advanced stages and is associated with poor prognosis.

CASE REPORT

A 40-year-old woman was referred to hospital due to recurrent urinary tract infections. Imaging studies showed the presence of a 3.7 cm tumor in the bladder dome that extended to the posterior region of the umbilicus. A biopsy through cystoscopy confirmed the diagnosis of urachal carcinoma. Since there were no metastases, the patient underwent partial cystectomy and resection of the urachal ligament and the umbilicus. Surgical margins were negative and it was considered a complete resection. Nine months later, disease progression occurred, with peritoneal carcinomatosis, multiple adenopathies and a 4 cm mass in the pelvic cavity with invasion of the vagina, rectum, and sigmoid colon. She began palliative chemotherapy with cisplatine and 5-fluorouracil. After 7 cycles, progression was again observed, with an increase of the pelvic mass, vaginal and rectal hemorrhage, multiple intramuscular implants, bilateral axillary adenopathies, as well as lesion in the right breast, which was compatible with metastasis from urachal carcinoma. She underwent hemostatic radiotherapy to the pelvic mass and second line palliative chemotherapy with gemcitabine and paclitaxel. After 4 cycles, the patient clinically deteriorated and eventually died.

CONCLUSION

Urachal carcinoma is an aggressive malignancy. Although systemic treatment may be effective in disease control, a standard chemotherapy regimen is yet to be determined. Multicenter trials are needed to clarify the best treatment approach in these patients.

Ex vivo modelling of drug efficacy in a rare metastatic urachal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Ex vivo drug screening refers to the out-of-body assessment of drug efficacy in patient derived vital tumor cells. The purpose of these methods is to enable functional testing of patient specific efficacy of anti-cancer therapeutics and personalized treatment strategies. Such approaches could prove powerful especially in context of rare cancers for which demonstration of novel therapies is difficult due to the low numbers of patients. Here, we report comparison of different ex vivo drug screening methods in a metastatic urachal adenocarcinoma, a rare and aggressive non-urothelial bladder malignancy that arises from the remnant embryologic urachus in adults.

METHODS

To compare the feasibility and results obtained with alternative ex vivo drug screening techniques, we used three different approaches; enzymatic cell viability assay of 2D cell cultures and image-based cytometry of 2D and 3D cell cultures in parallel. Vital tumor cells isolated from a biopsy obtained in context of a surgical debulking procedure were used for screening of 1160 drugs with the aim to evaluate patterns of efficacy in the urachal cancer cells.

RESULTS

Dose response data from the enzymatic cell viability assay and the image-based assay of 2D cell cultures showed the best consistency. With 3D cell culture conditions, the proliferation rate of the tumor cells was slower and potency of several drugs was reduced even following growth rate normalization of the responses. MEK, mTOR, and MET inhibitors were identified as the most cytotoxic targeted drugs. Secondary validation analyses confirmed the efficacy of these drugs also with the new human urachal adenocarcinoma cell line (MISB18) established from the patient's tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

All the tested ex vivo drug screening methods captured the patient's tumor cells' sensitivity to drugs that could be associated with the oncogenic KRAS^G12V mutation found in the patient's tumor cells. Specific drug classes however resulted in differential dose response profiles dependent on the used cell culture method indicating that the choice of assay could bias results from ex vivo drug screening assays for selected drug classes.

Diagnostic Laparoscopy and Abdominal Cytology Reliably Detect Peritoneal Metastases in Patients with Urachal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Urachal adenocarcinoma (UrAC) is a rare malignancy that can cause peritoneal metastases (PM). Analogous to other enteric malignancies, selected patients with limited PM of UrAC can be treated by cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to address the value of diagnostic laparoscopy (DLS) and abdominal cytology (ACyt) for the detection and evaluation of the extent of PM in patients with UrAC.

METHODS

A consecutive series of cN0M0 patients with UrAC who underwent DLS with or without ACyt at a tertiary referral center between 2000 and 2018 was assessed. Patients were staged with computed tomography (CT) and/or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT or bone scan. DLS was performed to rule out PM and to evaluate the extent and resectability of PM if seen on imaging. Sensitivity and specificity values were calculated for imaging, DLS, ACyt, and the combination of DLS and ACyt.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients with UrAC underwent DLS. ACyt was obtained in 19 patients. Four patients had suspicion of PM on imaging. In the 28 patients who were PM-negative on imaging, DLS and ACyt revealed PM in 6 (21%) patients, of whom 5 had macroscopically visible PM; 1 patient had positive ACyt without visible PM. Sensitivity of combined DLS/ACyt for the detection of PM was 91%, with a specificity of 100%, whereas sensitivity of imaging was 36%. DLS correctly predicted resectability in all patients.

CONCLUSION

Combined DLS/ACyt proved an effective tool to detect occult PM and to evaluate the extent of PM to select UrAC patients for possible treatment with CRS/HIPEC.

Clinicopathological features of malignant urachal tumor: A hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan

OBJECTIVES

To identify the clinicopathological features of malignant urachal tumor in Japan, and analyze the 5-year overall survival of malignant urachal tumor patients.

METHODS

We used the hospital-based cancer registry data to extract malignant urachal tumor cases that were diagnosed in 2008-2009 and 2012-2015, histologically confirmed, and received the first course of treatment. We analyzed the 5-year overall survival using the 2008-2009 cohort's data.

RESULTS

We identified 456 patients, and malignant urachal tumor accounted for 0.4% of all malignant bladder cancers. The median age was 61 years (range 2-97), and 66% were men. The most common histology was adenocarcinoma (80%), followed by urothelial carcinoma (11%) and squamous cell carcinoma (3%). The proportions of patients were: 19% Ta/Tis/T1N0M0, 55% T2-3N0M0, 13% T4/N+ and 13% M+. Regarding the initial treatment, the proportions of surgery alone were 79% and 33% in cases of T3 or less N0M0 and T4/N+, respectively. The proportion of combination therapy including surgery and chemotherapy were 13% and 44% in T2-3N0M0 and T4/N+, respectively. Radiation therapy was not common at any stage. In the 2008-2009 cohort, the 5-year overall survival rate in Ta/Tis/T1N0M0, T2-3N0M0, T4/N+ and M+ were 60%, 64%, 63% and 12%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Malignant urachal tumors are quite rare in Japan, and most of those without metastasis are likely to be treated by surgery alone, even at advanced stages. A standard of care must be established for malignant urachal tumor patients at advanced stages or with metastasis, as the prognosis of these patients can be poor.

Imaging of urachal anomalies

Urachal anomalies are classified into four types depending on the level of persistence of the embryonic urachal remnants between the urinary bladder and the umbilicus: patent urachus, umbilical-urachal sinus, urachal cyst, and vesico-urachal diverticulum. Due to the increasing use of cross-sectional imaging, urachal anomalies are frequently detected as incidental findings. Imaging plays a pivotal role in the initial diagnosis, evaluation of complications, treatment follow-up, and long-term surveillance of patients with urachal anomalies. Different urachal anomalies demonstrate characteristic imaging features that aid in a timely diagnosis and guide treatment. A patent urachus is visualized as an elongated tubular structure between the umbilicus and the urinary bladder. While umbilical-urachal sinus appears as focal dilatation at the umbilical end of the urachal remnant, the vesico-urachal diverticulum presents as a focal outpouching of the urinary bladder at anterosuperior aspect. Urachal cysts are identified as midline fluid-filled sacs most frequently located near the dome of the urinary bladder. Untreated urachal anomalies could progress into potential complications, including infection and malignancy. Knowledge regarding imaging features of urachal anomalies helps in timely diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and early detection of complications.