Early age of onset is an independent predictor for worse disease-free survival in sporadic rectal cancer patients. A comparative analysis of 980 consecutive patients

Comparative Analysis of Tumor Characteristics, Treatment Response, and Oncological Outcomes in Early-Onset Versus Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

 Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with distinct clinical features observed between early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC, ≤50 years) and late-onset colorectal cancer (LOCRC, >50 years). Recent trends indicate an alarming rise in EOCRC incidence, underscoring the importance of understanding its unique tumor biology and clinical behavior. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the tumor characteristics, clinico-pathological features, and oncological outcome between EOCRC and LOCRC.

STUDY METHODOLOGY

 This retrospective cohort study evaluated 162 patients with histopathologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma who underwent treatment with curative intent at Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, Pakistan, between August 2018 and July 2023. Patients were stratified into EOCRC (n=78) and LOCRC (n=84) groups. Clinical data, including demographics, tumor location, histological differentiation, staging, treatment modalities, and recurrence patterns, were extracted from medical records and analyzed using chi-square tests and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates.

RESULTS

 EOCRC patients more frequently presented with rectal tumors, poorly differentiated histology, and advanced stage disease at diagnosis. Although pathological staging and resection margins were comparable, the EOCRC group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of distant recurrence and lower rates of complete pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. At 24 months, both disease-free and overall survival were markedly lower in EOCRC compared to LOCRC patients.

CONCLUSION

 The study demonstrates that EOCRC is characterized by aggressive tumor behavior and poorer oncological outcomes. These findings support the need to revise screening strategies, such as lowering the age threshold and incorporating flexible sigmoidoscopy, to enhance early detection and improve patient prognosis.

Prognosis of early-onset versus late-onset sporadic colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In the last years, a dramatic increase in colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnoses in early-onset (EO) patients has been observed. The prognosis of EO-CRC compared to late-onset (LO) patients is still unclear. This meta-analysis aims to clarify whether there is any difference in the prognosis between the two groups.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted on EMBASE-Medline, Pubmed and Cochrane Library in March 2024 to identify studies comparing overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence (LR) and distant recurrence (DR) risk outcomes between EO-CRC (<50 years old) and LO-CRC (>50 years old) with at least 50 patients per group and one year of follow-up. The risk of bias was assessed with the ROBINS-E tool. Data from stage prevalence and survival were extracted and meta-analysed. Meta-regression was used to identify impacting effect modifiers. The PROSPERO registration number was CRD42024573264.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies were identified; 1,062,037 patients (13.4% EO-CRC and 86.6% LO-CRC) were included in the stage prevalence and 567,689 in the prognostic meta-analysis. Overall, 60% of the EO-CRC and 49% of the LO-CRC were diagnosed with an advanced stage (III-IV) of disease (RR 1.26, 95%CI 1.19-1.35, I2=87%). EO-CRC had a better OS than LO-CRC (HR 0.89, 95%CI 0.81-0.99, I2=89%) but equal CSS (HR 0.94, 95%CI 0.83-1.06, I2=82%), DFS (HR 1.05 95%CI 0.94-1.16, I2=76%), LR (HR 1.41, 95%CI 0.62-3.18, I2=49%) and DR (HR 1.51, 95%CI 0.79-2.89) risk. Meta-regression analysis identified a worse DFS in the EO-CRC rectal cancer subgroup (HR 1.14, 95%CI 1.00-1.30, I2=0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the high heterogeneity of existing studies, EO-CRC patients are diagnosed with significantly more advanced stages than LO-CRC, although this is not reflected in any difference in cancer-related survival. There is an urgent need for increased vigilance in the early detection of CRC in young patients.

Five-year overall survival of early- and late-onset colorectal cancer in Medellín, Colombia: a comparative study

PURPOSE

Early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) (EOCRC, < 50 years) has distinct clinicopathological features from late-onset CRC (LOCRC, ≥ 50 years). However, evidence on survival outcomes is contradictory. We aimed to analyse the differences in 5-year overall survival (OS) between EOCRC and LOCRC.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted during 2018-2022. Individuals aged ≥ 18 years diagnosed with CRC at two hospitals in Medellín, Colombia were included. Clinicopathological and survival data were retrieved from the medical records and a public government database. Patients were categorized into EOCRC and LOCRC groups. Five-year OS rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and prognostic factors for OS were identified through Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Among 1022 patients, 52.5% were female, and 13.5% (n = 138) had EOCRC. Patients with EOCRC showed higher 5-year OS rates than LOCRC patients (54% vs. 32%). Univariable analyses indicated a 37% lower risk of death for EOCRC compared to LOCRC (HR: 0.633, 95%CI: 0.476-0.840, p = 0.002). After multivariable analyses, advanced staging and higher tumour grading were prognostic factors for worse OS (HR: 2.127, 95% CI:1.405-3.220, p = 0.0001; and HR: 12.896, 95%CI: 6.310-26.355, p = 0.000; respectively), and being in the EOCRC group remained as a prognostic factor for higher OS (HR: 0.482, 95% CI: 0.336-0.690, p = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

EOCRC is associated with significantly better 5-year OS rates and prognosis compared to LOCRC. Advanced stage and higher tumour grading are predictors of lower OS among all CRC patients. These findings highlight the importance of age-related risk stratification and personalized therapeutic approaches in CRC.

Prognosis of early-onset vs. late-onset stage II/III colorectal cancer patients with adjuvant chemotherapy: a multicenter propensity score matched study

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major global health concern, with a rising incidence in young individuals. Early-onset CRC displays unique clinicopathological and molecular characteristics, necessitating a closer examination of prognosis, particularly in the context of adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the prognosis of early-onset CRC patients (< 50 years) diagnosed at stage II/III compared to older counterparts, utilizing propensity score matching to minimize heterogeneity.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 3324 stage II/III CRC patients aged < 70 years was conducted, focusing on age-based subgroups (< 50 vs. ≥ 50 years). Propensity score matching balanced clinical characteristics. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

In stage II CRC, age of onset did not impact prognosis after adjuvant chemotherapy, with no significant differences in RFS (5-year RFS rates: 80% in both groups, p = 0.98) and OS (5-year OS rates: 96% vs. 92%, p = 0.17). In stage III, a trend suggested slightly poorer OS in patients aged < 50 years than those ≥ 50 years (5-year OS rates: 85% vs. 88%, p = 0.077). However, in a propensity score-matched cohort, age-dependent differences were attenuated (5-year OS rates: 85% vs. 88%, p = 0.32).

CONCLUSION

In the context of stage II/III CRC patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, age was not an independent predictor of prognosis. Age alone should not be the sole factor guiding treatment decisions.

Survival prognostic in different age groups of patients undergoing local versus radical excision for rectal cancer: a study based on the SEER database

Age significantly affects the prognosis of patients with rectal cancer after radical excision (RE), and local excision (LE) is an alternative surgical procedure to RE. To compare the survival prognosis in different age groups of LE versus RE for rectal cancer. Patients diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma treated by LE or RE from 2010 to 2017 were obtained from the SEER database. The primary outcomes are 5-year OS and CSS. A total of 11,170 patients were eventually included, and there were 490 patients in LE and RE groups, respectively, after 1:1 propensity score matching. The 5-year OS and CSS after LE were significantly better in < 50 years and 50-66 years groups than in > 66 years group (5-year OS: 95.70% vs 88.40% vs 67.00%, P < 0.001; 5-year CSS: 95.70% vs 96.30% vs 82.60%, P < 0.001). No statistical significance was found for the differences in 5-year OS and CSS between LE and RE in < 50, 50-66, and > 66 years group (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed age > 66 years, poorly differentiated or undifferentiated (Grade III/IV), and tumor size 3 to 5 cm was independent risk factors for 5-year OS after LE; age > 66 years, perineural invasion, and tumor size 3 to 5 cm were the 5-year CSS independent risk factors for after LE. We found that the survival prognosis of younger rectal cancer patients treated with LE was significantly better than older (> 66 years) patients, and the survival prognosis of rectal cancer patients in the three age groups was similar between LE and RE.

The histological and molecular characteristics of early-onset colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC), defined as diagnosis before age 50, has increased in recent decades. Although more often diagnosed at advanced stage, associations with other histological and molecular markers that impact prognosis and treatment remain to be clarified. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis concerning the prevalence of prognostic and predictive tumor markers for early- vs. late-onset CRC, including oncogene mutations, microsatellite instability (MSI), and emerging markers including immune cells and the consensus molecular subtypes.

Methods

We systematically searched PubMed for original research articles published between April 2013-January 2024. Included studies compared the prevalence of tumor markers in early- vs. late-onset CRC. A meta-analysis was completed and summary odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained from a random effects model via inverse variance weighting. A sensitivity analysis was completed to restrict the meta-analysis to studies that excluded individuals with Lynch syndrome, a hereditary condition that influences the distribution of tumor markers for early-onset CRC.

Results

In total, 149 articles were identified. Tumors from early-onset CRC are less likely to include mutations in KRAS (OR, 95% CI: 0.91, 0.85-0.98), BRAF (0.63, 0.51-0.78), APC (0.70, 0.58-0.84), and NRAS (0.88, 0.78-1.00) but more likely to include mutations in PTEN (1.68, 1.04-2.73) and TP53 (1.34, 1.24-1.45). After limiting to studies that excluded Lynch syndrome, the associations between early-onset CRC and BRAF (0.77, 0.64-0.92) and APC mutation (0.81, 0.67-0.97) were attenuated, while an inverse association with PIK3CA mutation was also observed (0.88, 0.78-0.99). Early-onset tumors are less likely to develop along the CpG Island Methylator Phenotype pathway (0.24, 0.10-0.57), but more likely to possess adverse histological features including high tumor grade (1.20, 1.15-1.25), and mucinous (1.22, 1.16-1.27) or signet ring histology (2.32, 2.08-2.57). A positive association with MSI status (1.31, 1.11-1.56) was also identified. Associations with immune markers and the consensus molecular subtypes are inconsistent.

Discussion

A lower prevalence of mutations in KRAS and BRAF is consistent with extended survival and superior response to targeted therapies for metastatic disease. Conversely, early-onset CRC is associated with aggressive histological subtypes and TP53 and PTEN mutations, which may serve as therapeutic targets.

Distinct clinical characteristics in stage III rectal cancer among different age groups and treatment outcomes after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Background

There is a rapidly increasing incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC) which threatens the survival of young people, while aging also represents a challenging clinical problem.

Objectives

We aimed to investigate the differences in the clinical characteristics and prognosis in stage III rectal cancer (RC), to help optimize treatment strategies.

Design and methods

This study included 757 patients with stage III RC, all of whom received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision. The whole cohort was categorized as very early onset (VEO, ⩽30 years old), early onset (EO, >30 years old, ⩽50 years old), intermediate onset (IO, >50 years, ⩽70 years), or late onset (LO, >70 years old).

Results

There were more female VEO patients than males, more mucinous adenocarcinoma, signet-ring cell carcinoma, pre-treatment cT4 stage, and higher pre-treatment serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 compared with the other three groups. VEO patients had the worst survival with the highest RC-related mortality (34.5%), recurrence (13.8%), and metastasis (51.7%). LO patients had the highest non-RC-related mortality rate (16.6%). The Cox regression model showed VEO was a negative independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival [DFS, hazard ratio (HR): 2.830, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.633-4.904, p < 0.001], distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS, HR: 2.969, 95% CI: 1.720-5.127, p < 0.001), overall survival (OS, HR: 2.164, 95% CI: 1.102-4.249, p = 0.025), and cancer-specific survival (CSS, HR: 2.321, 95% CI: 1.145-4.705, p = 0.020). LO was a negative independent factor on DFS (HR: 1.800, 95% CI: 1.113-2.911, p = 0.017), DMFS (HR: 1.903, 95% CI: 1.150-3.149, p = 0.012), OS (HR: 2.856, 95% CI: 1.745-4.583, p < 0.001), and CSS (HR: 2.248, 95% CI: 1.282-3.942, p = 0.005). VEO patients had better survival in the total neoadjuvant therapy-like (TNT-like) pattern on DFS (p = 0.039). IO patients receiving TNT-like patterns had better survival on DFS, OS, and CSS (p = 0.006, p = 0.018, p = 0.006, respectively).

Conclusion

In stage III RC, VEO patients exhibited unique clinicopathological characteristics, with VEO a negative independent prognostic factor for DFS, DMFS, OS, and CSS. VEO and IO patients may benefit from a TNT-like treatment pattern.

Long-term trend of future Cancer onset: A model-based prediction of Cancer incidence and onset age by region and gender

OBJECTIVES

This study provided estimates of cancer incidence rate and onset age by Socio-demographic Index (SDI) regions and gender from 2020 to 2040, aiming to clarify the long-term patterns of future cancer onset.

METHOD

Based on the incidence data from the Global Burden of Diseases (GBD) 2019 study, we constructed the Bayesian age-period-cohort model to calculate the age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) of cancers from 2020 to 2040. Using the average annual percentage change (AAPC) to quantify the trends of ASIR and the onset age. In addition, the incidences in 2019 were fixed to distinguish the age onset changes caused by demographic and incidence from 2020 to 2040.

RESULTS

Globally, two-thirds of cancers have escalating trends of incidence rate, and the proportion of cancer weighted average onset age above 60 years old will grow from 62% to 76% between 2020 and 2040. In five SDI regions, the proportion of weighted average onset age above 60 years old will rise above 10% in the next 20 years and increase sequentially with the rise of the SDI level. Preclude sex-specific cancers, the onset age is younger in men than in women in 2040. Rule out the influence of changing demographics, half of cancer's morbidity has a youth-oriented tendency globally, which is concentrated in hormone-related and digestive tract cancer.

CONCLUSION

From 2020 to 2040, the incidence and onset age changes demonstrate marked geographic and gender variations in the cancer spectrum. Cancer incidence and onset age are predicted to continuously increase worldwide in the future.

Identifying individualized prognostic signature and unraveling the molecular mechanism of recurrence in early-onset colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The incidence and mortality of early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC; < 50 years old) is increasing worldwide, with a high recurrence rate. The inherent heterogeneity of EOCRC makes its treatment challenging. Hence, to further understand the biology and reveal the molecular mechanisms of EOCRC, a recurrence risk signature is needed to guide clinical management.

METHODS

Based on the relative expression orderings (REOs) of genes in each sample, a prognostic signature was developed and validated utilizing multiple independent datasets. The underlying molecular mechanisms between distinct prognostic groups were explored via integrative analysis of multi-omics data.

RESULTS

The prognostic signature consisting of 6 gene pairs (6-GPS) could predict the recurrence risk for EOCRC at the individual level. High-risk EOCRC classified by 6-GPS showed a poor prognosis but a good response to adjuvant chemotherapy. Moreover, high-risk EOCRC was characterized by epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and enriched angiogenesis, and had higher mutation burden, immune cell infiltration, and PD-1/PD-L1 expression. Furthermore, we identified four genes associated with relapse-free survival in EOCRC, including SERPINE1, PECAM1, CDH1, and ANXA1. They were consistently differentially expressed at the transcriptome and proteome levels between high-risk and low-risk EOCRCs. They were also involved in regulating cancer progression and immune microenvironment in EOCRC. Notably, the expression of SERPINE1 and ANXA1 positively correlated with M2-like macrophage infiltration.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that 6-GPS can robustly predict the recurrence risk of EOCRC, and that SERPINE1, PECAM1, CDH1, and ANXA1 may serve as potential therapeutic targets. This study provides valuable information for the precision treatment of EOCRC.

Early Age of Onset Is an Independent Predictor for a Worse Response to Neoadjuvant Therapies in Sporadic Rectal Cancer Patients

The incidence of rectal cancer (RC) is increasing in the population aged ≤ 49 (early-onset RC-EORC). EORC patients are more likely to present with locally advanced disease at diagnosis than late-onset RC (LORC; aged ≥ 50) patients. As a consequence, more EORC patients undergo neoadjuvant therapies. The response to treatment in EORC patients is still unknown. This study aims to explore the effect of age of onset on the pathological response to neoadjuvant therapies in sporadic locally advanced RC (LARC) patients. Based on an institutional prospectively maintained database, LARC patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapies and radical surgery between January 2010 and December 2022 were allocated to the EORC and LORC groups. The primary endpoint was the rate of incomplete response (Dworak 0-2). A total of 326 LORC and 79 EORC patients were included. Pre-neoadjuvant tumor features were comparable. A significantly higher rate of incomplete response was observed in EORC patients (49% vs. 35%; p = 0.028). From multivariable analysis, early age of onset, smoking and extramural invasion presented as independent risk factors for a worse response. This study demonstrates that an early age of onset is related to a worse response and calls for different multimodal strategies in this group of patients.

Patients younger than 40 years with colorectal cancer have a similar prognosis to older patients

PURPOSE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. In recent years, the proportion of patients diagnosed with CRC at younger ages has increased. The clinicopathological features and oncological outcomes in younger patients with CRC remain controversial. We aimed to analyze the clinicopathological features and oncological outcomes in younger patients with CRC.

METHODS

We examined 980 patients who underwent surgery for primary colorectal adenocarcinoma between 2006 and 2020. Patients were divided into two cohorts: younger (< 40 years old) and older (≥ 40 years old).

RESULTS

Of the 980 patients, 26 (2.7%) were under the age of 40 years. The younger group had more advanced disease (57.7% vs. 36.6%, p = 0.031) and more cases beyond the transverse colon (84.6% vs. 65.3%, p = 0.029) than the older group. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered more frequently in the younger group (50% vs. 25.8%, p < 0.01). Relapse-free survival and overall survival were similar between the groups at all stages. Moreover, in stages II and III they were also comparable, regardless of the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Younger patients with CRC have a prognosis equivalent to that of older patients. Further studies are needed to establish the optimal treatment strategies for these patients.

Prediction models for overall and cancer-specific survival in patients with metastatic early-onset colorectal cancer: a population-based study

PURPOSE

Metastatic early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC) is on the rise, yet there is a dearth of predictive models for this disease. Therefore, it is crucial to develop a nomogram to aid in the early detection and management of metastatic colorectal cancer in young patients.

METHODS

We retrieved data from the SEER database on patients with metastatic colorectal cancer aged 50 or younger between 2010 and 2017. The data were randomly allocated in a 7:3 ratio to training and validation cohorts, and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) at 1, 3, and 5 years. The nomograms were developed based on these factors, and their discriminatory and calibration capabilities were validated. Using the nomogram risk scores, patients were stratified into low-risk and high-risk groups.

RESULTS

The study included 2470 patients with metastatic EO-CRC. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis identified 12 independent risk factors that were included in the nomogram. The training cohort had a consistency index (C-index) of 0.71, while the validation cohort had a C-index of 0.70, demonstrating good predictive accuracy. Calibration plots showed a high level of consistency between the observed and predicted values, with overlapping plots along the diagonal. The decision curve analysis (DCA) revealed that the nomogram had a high clinical application value.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel nomograms were created to predict the prognosis of patients with metastatic EO-CRC, which can aid clinicians in developing more effective treatment strategies and contribute to more accurate prognostic assessments.

Delphi Initiative for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer (DIRECt) International Management Guidelines

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Patients with early-onset colorectal cancer (eoCRC) are managed according to guidelines that are not age-specific. A multidisciplinary international group (DIRECt), composed of 69 experts, was convened to develop the first evidence-based consensus recommendations for eoCRC.

METHODS

After reviewing the published literature, a Delphi methodology was used to draft and respond to clinically relevant questions. Each statement underwent 3 rounds of voting and reached a consensus level of agreement of ≥80%.

RESULTS

The DIRECt group produced 31 statements in 7 areas of interest: diagnosis, risk factors, genetics, pathology-oncology, endoscopy, therapy, and supportive care. There was strong consensus that all individuals younger than 50 should undergo CRC risk stratification and prompt symptom assessment. All newly diagnosed eoCRC patients should receive germline genetic testing, ideally before surgery. On the basis of current evidence, endoscopic, surgical, and oncologic treatment of eoCRC should not differ from later-onset CRC, except for individuals with pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants. The evidence on chemotherapy is not sufficient to recommend changes to established therapeutic protocols. Fertility preservation and sexual health are important to address in eoCRC survivors. The DIRECt group highlighted areas with knowledge gaps that should be prioritized in future research efforts, including age at first screening for the general population, use of fecal immunochemical tests, chemotherapy, endoscopic therapy, and post-treatment surveillance for eoCRC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The DIRECt group produced the first consensus recommendations on eoCRC. All statements should be considered together with the accompanying comments and literature reviews. We highlighted areas where research should be prioritized. These guidelines represent a useful tool for clinicians caring for patients with eoCRC.

Different Oncologic Outcomes in Early-Onset and Late-Onset Sporadic Colorectal Cancer: A Regression Analysis on 2073 Patients

The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing in the population aged ≤ 49 (early-onset CRC-EOCRC). Recent studies highlighted the biological and clinical differences between EOCRC and late-onset CRC (LOCRC-age ≥ 50), while comparative results about long-term survival are still debated. This study aimed to investigate whether age of onset may impact on oncologic outcomes in a surgical population of sporadic CRC patients. Patients operated on for sporadic CRC from January 2010 to January 2022 were allocated to the EOCRC and LOCRC groups. The primary endpoint was the recurrence/progression-free survival (R/PFS). A total of 423 EOCRC and 1650 LOCRC was included. EOCRC had a worse R/PFS (p < 0.0001) and cancer specific survival (p < 0.0001) compared with LOCRC. At Cox regression analysis, age of onset, tumoral stage, signet ring cells, extramural/lymphovascular/perineural veins invasion, and neoadjuvant therapy were independent risk factors for R/P. The analysis by tumoral stage showed an increased incidence of recurrence in stage I EOCRC (p = 0.014), and early age of onset was an independent predictor for recurrence (p = 0.035). Early age of onset was an independent predictor for worse prognosis, this effect was stronger in stage I patients suggesting a potentially—and still unknown—more aggressive tumoral phenotype in EOCRC.

A Real-World Study of the Incidence and Outcomes of Early-Onset Well-differentiated Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence and outcomes of adults with early-onset (20 to 34 y) diagnosis of well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms.

METHODS

Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-18 database was accessed, and patients with well-differentiated lung or digestive tract neuroendocrine neoplasms diagnosed 2000 to 2018 were reviewed. Annual percent changes (APCs) were calculated for the 3 disease subsites (foregut, midgut, and hindgut) stratified by age group. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates/log-rank testing were used to examine differences in overall survival between the 3 age groups. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate factors affecting overall and cancer-specific survivals.

RESULTS

Throughout the study period, patients with early-onset disease (20 to 34 y) have experienced the greatest APC (20 to 34 y: 9.7; 35 to 49 y: 5.4; ≥50 y: 4.1). When APCs were stratified by disease subsite, this difference in APCs appears to be driven by midgut tumors (20 to 34 y: 19.2; 35 to 49: 8.4; ≥50 y: 3.8). Using multivariable Cox regression modeling, the following variables were associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (worse overall survival): male sex (hazard ratio [HR] 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22-1.31), African American race (HR vs. white race: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.15-1.26), nonhindgut primary (HR foregut vs. hindgut primary: 2.02; 95% CI: 1.91-2.13; HR midgut vs. hindgut primary: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.95-2.24), distant disease (HR vs. regional disease: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.96-2.18), no surgery to the primary (HR: 2.34; 95% CI: 2.24-2.46), and older age (HR: 5.80; 95% CI: 4.87-6.91).

CONCLUSION

Cases of early-onset well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms have disproportionately increased over the past 2 decades (compared with other age groups), and this appears to have been driven mainly by midgut tumors.

Early-onset non-metastatic colon cancers do not portend worse prognosis - implications for adjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Early-onset colon cancers are increasing and the independent influence of age on prognosis and therapeutic efficacy of adjuvant therapy is unclear. The primary aim of the present study was to determine if young age was an independent prognostic factor for survival. Secondarily, age would be used in the context of known factors that predict benefit with adjuvant chemotherapy in stages II and III.

METHODS

Retrospective, single centre study of operated, non-metastatic colon cancer (> 15 cm from anal verge) without pre-operative therapy. Early onset cancers were defined as age ≤ 45 years. Primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

Six-hundred thirty-three patients were included with 206 (32.5%) early-onset cancers. With a median follow-up of 48 months, 5-year DFS was 79.5% and 76.2% for early and late-onset cancers, respectively (p - 0.585). In multivariate analysis, only tumour sidedness, family history, T4 stage, node positivity and microsatellite instability status influenced DFS and not the age of onset (HR - 0.969; 95% - 0.63-1.49). These results were consistent with different models and with stage-wise distribution.

CONCLUSIONS

Early-onset colon cancers treated with curative intent had survivals similar to older cohorts. Age was not an independent prognostic factor for recurrences. Age did not influence disease-free survival when stage-wise predictive variables for therapeutic benefit with adjuvant chemotherapy were considered.

The Burden of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer and Its Risk Factors from 1990 to 2019: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

BACKGROUND

The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed before age 50 has been increasing over the past decades. Hence, we examined the global, regional, and national burden of early-onset CRC and its risk factors from 1990 to 2019.

METHODS

Using data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Study 2019, we reported the incidence, deaths, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) attributable to the risk factors of early-onset CRC. All estimates were reported with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs).

RESULTS

The global numbers of early-onset CRC for incidence, deaths, and DALYs in 2019 were 225,736 (95% UI, 207,658 to 246,756), 86,545 (80,162 to 93,431), and 4,259,922 (3,942,849 to 4,590,979), respectively. Despite large variations at the regional and national levels, the global incidence rate, death rate, and DALY rate increased from 1990 to 2019. Diets low in milk, diets low in calcium, and alcohol use were the leading risk factors in 2019. From 1990 to 2019, a high body mass index and high fasting plasma glucose ranked remarkably higher among males and females, while smoking and diets low in fiber ranked lower among both sexes, with a more profound change among females.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite large variations in regional and national levels, the global incidence rate, death rate, and DALY rate increased during the past three decades. These findings may provide policymakers with an accurate quantification of the burden of early-onset CRC and targeted identification of those most at risk to mitigate the burden of early-onset CRC.