Biomarkers, Clinical Features, and Rechallenge for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Renal Immune-Related Adverse Events

A case series of adrenal insufficiency (likely due to hypophysitis) in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

The number of approved immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and their indications have significantly increased over the past decade. Immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) of ICIs vary widely in presentation and symptoms and can present diagnostic challenges to emergency department (ED) physicians. Moreover, when ICIs are combined with radiotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, or targeted therapy, the attribution of signs and symptoms to an immune-related cause is even more difficult. Here, we report a series of 5 ED cases of adrenal insufficiency in ICI-treated cancer patients. All 5 patients presented with severe fatigue and nausea. Four patients definitely had and one patient possibly had central adrenal insufficiency, and 4 patients had undetectable serum cortisol levels. The majority of the patients had nonspecific symptoms that were not recognized at their first ED presentation. These cases illustrate the need for a heightened level of suspicion for adrenal insufficiency in ICI-treated cancer patients with hypotension, nausea and/or vomiting, abdominal pain, fatigue, or hypoglycemia. As ICI use increases, irAE-associated oncologic emergencies will become more prevalent. Thus, ED physicians must update their knowledge regarding the diagnosis and management of irAEs and routinely inquire about the specific antineoplastic therapies that their ED patients with cancer are receiving. A random cortisol level (results readily available in most EDs) with interpretation taking the circadian rhythm and the current level of physiological stress into consideration can inform the differential diagnosis and whether further investigation of this potential irAE is warranted.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting the occurrence of renal dysfunction after treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor: a retrospective case-control study

PURPOSE

The administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may lead to renal adverse events, notably including renal dysfunction. To early predict the probability of renal dysfunction after ICIs therapy, a retrospective case-control study was conducted.

METHODS

Clinical information on ICIs-treated patients was collected. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to identify risk factors for renal dysfunction after ICIs treatment. Moreover, a nomogram model was developed and validated internally.

RESULTS

A total of 442 patients were included, among which 35 (7.9%) experienced renal dysfunction after ICIs treatment. Lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (OR 0.941; 95% CI 0.917 to 0.966; p<0.001), concurrent exposure of platinum(OR 4.014; 95% CI 1.557 to 10.346; p=0.004), comorbidities of hypertension (OR 3.478; 95% CI 1.600 to 7.562; p=0.002) and infection (OR 5.402; 95% CI 1.544 to 18.904; p=0.008) were found to be independent associated with renal dysfunction after ICIs treatment. To develop a predictive nomogram for the occurrence of renal dysfunction after ICIs treatment, the included cases were divided into training and validation groups in a ratio of 7:3 randomly. The above four independent risk factors were included in the model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the predictiive model were 0.822 (0.723-0.922) and 0.815 (0.699-0.930) in the training and validation groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower baseline eGFR, platinum exposure, comorbidities of hypertension and infection were predictors of renal dysfunction in ICIs-treated patients with cancer. A nomogram was developed to predict the probability of renal dysfunction after ICIs treatment, which might be operable and valuable in clinical practice.

Cancer drugs and acute kidney injury: new therapies and new challenges

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cancer therapies continue to evolve at a rapid pace and although novel treatments, including immunotherapies and targeted therapies have allowed for substantial improvements in cancer survival, they carry associated risks of acute kidney injury (AKI). We aim to summarize the existing literature on AKI associated with the spectrum of systemic cancer treatments, including conventional chemotherapies, newer immunotherapies, and the growing number of targeted cancer therapies, which may be associated with both AKI and 'pseudo-AKI'.

RECENT FINDINGS

Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies (e.g. cisplatin and other platinum-based agents, methotrexate, pemetrexed, ifosfamide, etc.) with well recognized nephrotoxicities (predominantly tubulointerstitial injury) remain in widespread use. Immunotherapies (e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitors and CAR-T therapies) may be associated with kidney immune-related adverse events, most often acute interstitial nephritis, and rarely, glomerular disease. Recently, multiple targeted cancer therapies have been associated with reduced renal tubular secretion of creatinine, causing elevations in serum creatinine and apparent 'pseudo-AKI'. To complicate matters further, these agents have had biopsy-proven, 'true' kidney injury attributed to them in numerous case reports.

SUMMARY

Clinicians in nephrology and oncology must be aware of the various potential kidney risks with these agents and recognize those with clinically meaningful impact on both cancer and kidney outcomes.

Diagnosis, management, and outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor induced acute interstitial nephritis: A single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-associated acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is a recognized complication of immunotherapy (IO), but literature on its management and outcomes is limited.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who received ICIs and developed biopsy-proven or clinically-suspected ICI-associated AIN at the University of Virginia Comprehensive Cancer Center from 2012-2023. We analyzed baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes, including treatment interruption and rechallenge rates. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined as a ≥ 1.5-fold increase in baseline creatinine under seven days, a two-fold increase above the upper limit of normal, or an increase by ≥0.3 mg/dL. Kidney function returning to within 0.3 mg/dL or less than twice baseline was considered complete (CRc) and partial (PRc) recovery, respectively.

RESULTS

We identified 12 cases of ICI-AIN: four by biopsy (33%) and eight (67%) by clinical suspicion. Two patients received anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD1, six received anti-PD1 alone, and four received chemo-immunotherapy. The majority (58%) of patients developed AIN within the first 5 cycles. Eight patients developed ≥ Grade 3 AKI, and six developed multiple irAEs. ICI was permanently discontinued in seven patients (58%) and temporarily interrupted in four (30%). The CRc and PRc rates were 67% and 8%, respectively. Upon AIN onset, the best disease response was stable disease in five patients, partial response in three, and progressive disease in three. Median overall survival was 4.87 years, and progression-free survival was 1.5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Rechallenge with IO after kidney irAE may be possible in some patients but requires careful evaluation on an individual basis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and acute kidney injury

As a new type of anti-tumor immunotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved the prognosis of multiple malignancies. However, renal complications are becoming more frequent. Nephrotoxicity often manifests as acute kidney injury (AKI), and the most common histopathological type is acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN). Based on previous studies of the incidence and potential risk factors for nephrotoxicity, in this review, we describe the mechanism of AKI after ICIs treatment, summarize the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of AKI, and discuss the diagnosis and management of immune checkpoint inhibitors-associated acute kidney injury (ICI-AKI). In addition, we review the current status of ICIs rechallenge and the therapeutic strategies of ICIs applied in kidney transplant recipients. Finally, we emphasize the importance of collaboration between nephrologists and oncologists to guide the treatment of ICIs and the management of renal complications.

All-cause and immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute kidney injury in immune checkpoint inhibitor users: a meta-analysis of occurrence rate, risk factors and mortality

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the occurrence rate of ICI-related AKI has not been systematically examined. Additionally, exposure to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were considered as risk factors for AKI, but with inconclusive results in ICI-related AKI. Our aim was to analyse the occurrence rate of all-cause AKI and ICI-related AKI and the occurrence rates of severe AKI and dialysis-requiring AKI, and to determine whether exposure to PPIs and NSAIDs poses a risk for all-cause and ICI-related AKI.

Methods

This study population was adult ICI recipients. A systematic review was conducted by searching MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed through October 2023. We included prospective trials and observational studies that reported any of the following outcomes: the occurrence rate of all-cause or ICI-related AKI, the relationship between PPI or NSAID exposure and AKI development or the mortality rate in the AKI or non-AKI group. Proportional meta-analysis and pairwise meta-analysis were performed. The evidence certainty was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework.

Results

A total of 120 studies comprising 46 417 patients were included. The occurrence rates of all-cause AKI were 7.4% (14.6% from retrospective studies and 1.2% from prospective clinical trials). The occurrence rate of ICI-related AKI was 3.2%. The use of PPIs was associated with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.77 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-2.18] for all-cause AKI and an OR of 2.42 (95% CI 1.96-2.97) for ICI-related AKI. The use of NSAIDs was associated with an OR of 1.77 (95% CI 1.10-2.83) for all-cause AKI and an OR of 2.57 (95% CI 1.68-3.93) for ICI-related AKI.

Conclusions

Our analysis revealed that approximately 1 in 13 adult ICI recipients may experience all-cause AKI, while 1 in 33 adult ICI recipients may experience ICI-related AKI. Exposure to PPIs and NSAIDs was associated with an increased OR risk for AKI in the current meta-analysis.

Nephrotoxicity in the Age of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Management

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) revolutionized cancer therapy by augmenting anti-tumor immunity via cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1). However, this breakthrough is accompanied by immune-related adverse effects (irAEs), including renal complications. ICI-related nephritis involves complex mechanisms like auto-reactive T cells, auto-antibodies, reactivation of drug-specific T cells, and cytokine-driven inflammation culminating in AKI. ICI-AKI typically manifests weeks to months into treatment, often with other irAEs. Timely detection relies on monitoring creatinine levels and urine characteristics. Biomarkers, like soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) and urine cytokine levels, provide non-invasive insights, while renal biopsy remains the gold standard for confirmation. Management of ICI-AKI requires a balance between discontinuing ICI therapy and prompt immunosuppressive intervention, typically with corticosteroids. Some cases permit ICI therapy resumption, but varying renal recovery rates highlight the importance of vigilant monitoring and effective therapy. Beyond its clinical implications, the potential of irAEs to predict positive treatment responses in certain cancers raises intriguing questions. Data on nephritis-treatment response links are limited, and ongoing research explores this complex interaction. In summary, ICI therapy's transformative impact on cancer treatment is counterbalanced by irAEs, including nephritis. Early recognition and management are vital, with ongoing research refining diagnostic and treatment strategies.

The renal damage and mechanisms relevant to antitumoral drugs

Over the past few decades, significant progress has been made in the development of drugs to combat cancer. It is unfortunate that these drugs can also lead to various kidney injuries and imbalances in electrolyte levels. Nephrotoxicity caused by chemotherapy drugs can impact different parts of the kidneys, including the glomeruli, renal tubules, interstitium, or renal microvessels. Despite the existing knowledge, our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the renal damage caused by antitumoral drugs remains incomplete. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the specific types of kidney injury and the mechanisms responsible for the drug-mediated renal damage, and briefly discuss possible prevention and treatment measures. Sensitive blood and urine biomarkers can provide clinicians with more information about kidney injury detection and reference value for subsequent treatment options. In addition, we emphasize that both oncologists and nephrologists have a responsibility to remain vigilant against the potential nephrotoxicity of the drugs. It's crucial for experts in both fields to collaborate in early detection, monitoring and prevention of kidney damage.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and their interaction with proton pump inhibitors-related interstitial nephritis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy and outcomes, leading to an expanding use in millions of patients worldwide. However, they can cause a spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Essentially, any organs can be affected by irAEs, which have emerged as therapy-limiting side effects. In the kidneys, ICI-associated acute interstitial nephritis (ICI-AIN) leads to acute kidney injury (AKI) in 2%-5% of patients on ICI therapy. AKI associated with ICI therapy pathologically presents with AIN in nearly 90% of the cases, but the pathophysiology of ICI-AIN remains to be defined. The generation of autoreactive T cells in patients receiving AIN-inducible drugs, such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), is one of the leading theories, supported by a higher incidence of ICI-AIN in patients on these AIN-inducible drugs. In this review, we will discuss our understanding of the incidence, potential pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical presentations, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of PPI-related AIN and its interaction with ICI therapy.

Proton pump inhibitors and adverse kidney outcomes during immune checkpoint blockade: time to sound the alarm?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly altered the treatment landscape for cancer in the last decade. However, their benefits are often offset by therapy-limiting immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is the most common renal irAE, but the exact mechanisms underlying its development are poorly understood. ICI-induced immune activation against drug-derived antigens, leading to an inflammatory response within the kidney interstitium, has been postulated, evidenced by current observations of a higher incidence of ICI-associated AIN in patients receiving AIN-inducing drugs such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The role of PPIs in this specific context has garnered significant attention, given their ubiquitous use and sometimes misuse. In this issue of CKJ Miao et al. summarise and synthesize the best available evidence to clarify the interactions of PPIs with ICIs in the development of AIN and other adverse kidney outcomes. The sum of evidence provided appear to implicate PPIs in the development of clinically significant short- and long-term kidney-related adverse effects in patients on immune checkpoint blockade, although causality cannot be proven. In this editorial we discuss the key practical implications of these findings and emphasize the need for further quality studies to delineate the true relationship of ICIs and PPIs in the development of AIN.

Immunological mechanisms underlying clinical phenotypes and noninvasive diagnosis of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced kidney disease

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a mainstay of cancer therapy, with over 80 FDA-approved indications. Used in a variety of settings and in combination with each other and with traditional chemotherapies, the hyperactive immune response induced by ICIs can often lead to immune-related adverse events in bystander normal tissues such as the kidneys, lungs, and the heart. In the kidneys, this immune-related adverse event manifests as acute interstitial nephritis (ICI-AIN). In the era of widespread ICI use, it becomes vital to understand the clinical manifestations of ICI-AIN and the importance of prompt diagnosis and management of these complications. In this review, we delve into the clinical phenotypes of ICI-AIN and how they differ from traditional drug-induced AIN. We also detail what is known about the mechanistic underpinnings of ICI-AIN and the important diagnostic and therapeutic implications behind harnessing those mechanisms to further our understanding of these events and to formulate effective treatment plans to manage ICI-AIN.

Adverse renal effects of check-point inhibitors (ICI) in cancer patients: Recommendations of the Onco-nephrology Working Group of the Spanish Society of Nephrology

The most widely used approach in the immunotherapy treatment of cancer is the administration of monoclonal antibodies directed against regulatory molecules of immune control that inhibit the activation of T cells, the so-called check point inhibitors (ICI). ICI nephrotoxicity epidemiology and pathology; its diagnosis with or without kidney biopsy; the type and duration of treatment; the possibility of rechallenging after kidney damage; and its indication in patients with cancer and renal transplantation are certainly controversial. In the absence of definitive studies, this document is intended to specify some recommendations agreed by the group of Onconephrology experts of the Spanish Society of Nephrology in those areas related to ICI nephrotoxicity, in order to help decision-making in daily clinical practice in Onconephrology consultations.

Immunotherapy in oncology and the kidneys: a clinical review of the evaluation and management of kidney immune-related adverse events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are now widely used in the treatment of many cancers, and currently represent the standard of care for multiple malignancies. These agents enhance the T cell immune response to target cancer tissues, and have demonstrated considerable benefits for cancer outcomes. However, despite these improved outcomes, there are important kidney immune-related adverse events (iRAEs) associated with ICI. Acute tubulo-interstitial nephritis remains the most frequent kidney iRAE, however glomerular lesions and electrolytes disturbances are increasingly being recognized and reported. In this review, we summarize clinical features and identify risk factors for kidney iRAEs, and discuss the current understanding of pathophysiologic mechanisms. We highlight the evidence basis for guideline-recommended management of ICI-related kidney injury as well as gaps in current knowledge. We advocate for judicious use of kidney biopsy to identify ICI-associated kidney injury, and early use of corticosteroid treatment where appropriate. Selected patients may also be candidates for re-challenge with ICI therapy after a kidney iRAE, in view of current data on recurrent rates of kidney injury. Risk of benefits of re-challenge must be considered on an individual considering patient preferences and prognosis. Lastly, we review current knowledge of ICI use in the setting of patients with end-stage kidney disease, including kidney transplant recipients and those receiving dialysis, which suggest that these patients should not be summarily excluded from the potential benefits of these cancer therapies.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Nephrotoxicity

CONTEXT

The clinical indications for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are rapidly expanding. However, adverse events affecting multiple organs, including kidneys leading to ICI-associated acute kidney injury (AKI), remain a significant challenge with ICI therapy. Although AKI is considered a rare complication, it can be severe and result in treatment interruption or discontinuation of ICIs. Despite a generally favorable kidney prognosis, the possibility of re-challenging ICI therapy remains a subject of debate, particularly for patients who have exhausted other treatment options or experienced severe AKI. Subject of Review: In a recent review article, Sprangers et al. provide a comprehensive overview of the possible mechanisms and clinical manifestations of ICI-associated AKI [Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022;18(12):794-805]. The authors propose a practical strategy for diagnosing and managing suspected cases of ICI-associated AKI, which includes identifying a subset of eligible patients who may be re-exposed to ICIs following an episode of AKI. Second Opinion: The authors of the review article offer several recommendations on the diagnosis and treatment of ICI-associated nephrotoxicity. While we generally agree with the recommendations proposed by the authors, it is important to acknowledge that the available data primarily rely on small retrospective studies, as the authors have recognized. In addition, there are two key questions that need be carefully addressed in future studies: (1) the optimal dose and duration of corticosteroids and the use of alternative immunosuppressive agents in patients with ICI-associated nephrotoxicity and (2) a clear guideline for restarting ICI treatment in patients with AKI who have not fully recovered their kidney function.

Incidence and risk factors of acute kidney injury in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The incidence and risk factors of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with malignancies receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are being extensively reported with their widespread application.

Objective

This study aimed to quantify the incidence and identify risk factors of AKI in cancer patients treated with ICIs.

Methods

We searched the electronic databases of PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane and Embase before 1 February 2023 on the incidence and risk factors of AKI in patients receiving ICIs and registered the protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42023391939). A random-effect meta-analysis was performed to quantify the pooled incidence estimate of AKI, identify risk factors with pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) and investigate the median latency period of ICI-AKI in patients treated with ICIs. Assessment of study quality, meta-regression, and sensitivity and publication bias analyses were conducted.

Results

In total, 27 studies consisting of 24048 participants were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The overall pooled incidence of AKI secondary to ICIs was 5.7% (95% CI: 3.7%-8.2%). Significant risk factors were older age (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.03), preexisting chronic kidney disease (CKD) (OR: 2.90, 95% CI: 1.65-5.11), ipilimumab (OR: 2.66, 95% CI: 1.42-4.98), combination of ICIs (OR: 2.45, 95% CI: 1.40-4.31), extrarenal immune-related adverse events (irAEs) (OR: 2.34, 95% CI: 1.53-3.59), and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (OR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.88-2.64), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) (OR: 2.61, 95% CI: 1.90-3.57), fluindione (OR: 6.48, 95% CI: 2.72-15.46), diuretic (OR: 1.78, 95% CI: 1.32-2.40) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs) (pooled OR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.15-2.68) use. Median time from ICIs initiation to AKI was 108.07 days. Sensitivity and publication bias analyses indicated robust results for this study.

Conclusion

The occurrence of AKI following ICIs was not uncommon, with an incidence of 5.7% and a median time interval of 108.07 days after ICIs initiation. Older age, preexisting chronic kidney disease (CKD), ipilimumab, combined use of ICIs, extrarenal irAEs, and PPI, NSAID, fluindione, diuretics and ACEI/ARB use are risk factors for AKI in patients receiving ICIs.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023391939.

Genitourinary Cancer: Updates on Treatments and Their Impact on the Kidney

Genitourinary cancers are diverse in their presentation, prevalence, and mortality risk. Although there have been significant advancements in medical (eg, immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors) and surgical treatments of genitourinary cancers, patients are still at risk for chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and electrolyte derangements in the short and long term. In addition, pre-existing kidney disease may increase the risk of developing some genitourinary cancers. This review focuses on the kidney-related effects of treatments for renal cell carcinoma and bladder and prostate cancers.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated AKI: Debates in Diagnosis, Management, and Rechallenge

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now established treatments for advanced cancer and their use is now ubiquitous. The high upside of ICIs is tempered by their toxicity profile affecting almost every organ, including the kidneys. Although acute interstitial nephritis is the major kidney-related adverse effect of checkpoint inhibitors, other manifestations such as electrolyte abnormalities and renal tubular acidosis have been described. With increasing awareness and recognition of these events, the focus has shifted to non-invasive identification of ICI-acute interstitial nephritis, with sophisticated approaches involving biomarkers and immunologic signatures being studied. Although the management of immune-related adverse events with corticosteroids is straightforward, there now are more data to help guide immunosuppressive regimens, ICI rechallenge, and delineate risk and efficacy in special populations such as individuals on dialysis or those who have received a transplant.

Evaluation and management of acute high-grade immunotherapy-related neurotoxicity

Immune checkpoint inhibitor monoclonal antibodies allow the host's immune system to attack tumors, which has revolutionized cancer care over the last decade. As the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors has expanded, so have autoimmune-like complications known as immune-related adverse events. These include the infrequent but increasingly more common, potentially deadly neurological immune related adverse events. When feeling acutely ill, patients will often seek care not from their oncologist but from their family physician, clinics, emergency, and urgent care sites, or other available providers. Thus, while assessing acutely ill cancer patients who are experiencing neurological symptoms, non-oncologists should be prepared to recognize, diagnose, and treat neurological immune related adverse events in addition to more familiar conditions. This narrative review is designed to update acute care clinicians on current knowledge and to present a symptom-based framework for evaluating and treating neurological immune related adverse events based on the leading immunotoxicity organizations' latest recommendations.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor–Associated Sarcoidosis Reaction in the Kidney: A Case Report

Sarcoid-like granulomas can be a manifestation of immune-related adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment. To our knowledge, kidney biopsy-proven sarcoid-like granulomas have not been described in the context of a sarcoid-like reaction associated with ICI treatment. We describe a man in his early 60s with renal cell carcinoma who was undergoing treatment with the ICIs nivolumab and ipilimumab, and was hospitalized for treatment of acute kidney injury stage 3, hypercalcemia, and hyponatremia 10 weeks after starting ICI treatment. Results from his workup showed parathyroid hormone-independent hypercalcemia (ionized calcium, 3.3 mEq/L) with an elevated 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D level. A kidney biopsy specimen showed sarcoid-like noncaseating granulomas. The patient began a corticosteroid regimen with a 500 mg bolus dose of methylprednisolone and continued treatment with prednisone, 80 mg once daily for the first week and then a taper for 8 weeks. His kidney function gradually improved as hypercalcemia resolved. After 2 weeks of treatment, his creatinine values returned to baseline. This case shows that ICI treatment can be associated with kidney sarcoidosis. Because ICIs are increasingly used to treat cancer, physicians should be aware of this possible inflammatory complication so that they can use appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

Cytokines and Immune Cell Phenotype in Acute Kidney Injury Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Introduction

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) induce impressive antitumor responses but may lead to acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with ICI therapy (AKI-ICI). Biomarkers distinguishing AKI-ICI from AKI because of other causes (AKI-other) are currently lacking. Because ICIs block immunoregulatory pathways, we hypothesized that biomarkers related to immune cell dysregulation, including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and other markers of B and T cell activation in the systemic circulation and kidney tissue, may aid with the diagnosis of AKI-ICI.

Methods

This is a prospective study consisting of 24 participants who presented with AKI during ICI therapy, adjudicated to either have AKI-ICI (n = 14) or AKI-other (n = 10). We compared markers of kidney inflammation and injury (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, kidney injury molecule-1) as well as plasma and urine levels of T cell-associated cytokines (TNF-α, interferon-γ, interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-9, and IL-10) between groups. We also compared T-cell responses in the systemic circulation and in kidney tissue across groups, using mass cytometry systems.

Results

We observed increase in several specific immune cells, including CD4 memory, T helper cells, and dendritic cells in the kidney tissue, as well as in the urine cytokines IL-2, IL-10, and TNF-α, in patients who developed AKI-ICI compared to patients with AKI-other (P < 0.05 for all). The discriminatory ability of TNF-α on AKI cause was strong (area under the curve = 0.814, 95% confidence interval: 0.623-1.00. The CD4+ T cells with memory phenotype formed the dominant subset.

Conclusion

These results suggest that specific T-cell responses and their respective cytokines may be indicative of AKI associated with ICI therapy and may help to differentiate AKI-ICI from AKI-other. Urine TNF-α is a promising biomarker for AKI-ICI, which is most often caused by acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), and TNF-α pathway may serve as a potential target for therapeutic intervention.

Onconephrology 2022: An Update

Onconephrology is an upcoming and expanding subspecialty that deals with the intersections between hematology/oncology and nephrology. With the paradigm shift in the understanding of cancer immunobiology and mechanisms of oncotherapeutic drug toxicities, it is important for a nephrologist to have a sound understanding of this field. Over the last 5 years, there have been immense developments in our understanding of kidney-related adverse events from various targeted, immuno- and cellular-based therapies. Pathogenic mechanisms of electrolyte imbalance, hypertension (oncohypertension), and AKI from multiple forms of cancer therapies have been explored. Significant research has also been conducted in the field of transplant onconephrology. In this review, we have tried to assimilate the most recent updates in the last 2 years in this ever-growing and fascinating field.

Soluble and cell-based markers of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated nephritis

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ICI-nephritis) are urgently needed. Because ICIs block immune checkpoint pathways that include cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4), we hypothesized that biomarkers of immune dysregulationpreviously defined in patients with congenital CTLA4 deficiency, including elevated soluble interleukin-2 receptor alpha (sIL-2R) and flow cytometric cell-based markers of B and T cell dysregulation in peripheral blood may aid the diagnosis of ICI-nephritis.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of patients diagnosed with ICI-nephritis was compared with three prospectively enrolled control cohorts: ICI-treated controls without immune-related adverse events, patients not on ICIs with hemodynamic acute kidney injury (hemodynamic AKI), and patients not on ICIs with biopsy proven acute interstitial nephritis from other causes (non-ICI-nephritis). sIL-2R level and flow cytometric parameters were compared between groups using Wilcoxon rank sum test or Kruskal-Wallis test. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to define the accuracy of sIL-2R and flow cytometric biomarkers in diagnosing ICI-nephritis. The downstream impact of T cell activation in the affected kidney was investigated using archived biopsy samples to evaluate the gene expression of IL2RA, IL-2 signaling, and T cell receptor signaling in patients with ICI-nephritis compared with other causes of drug-induced nephritis, acute tubular injury, and histologically normal controls.

RESULTS

sIL-2R level in peripheral blood was significantly higher in patients with ICI-nephritis (N=24) (median 2.5-fold upper limit of normal (ULN), IQR 1.9-3.3), compared with ICI-treated controls (N=10) (median 0.8-fold ULN, IQR 0.5-0.9, p<0.001) and hemodynamic AKI controls (N=6) (median 0.9-fold-ULN, IQR 0.7-1.1, p=0.008). A sIL-2R cut-off point of 1.75-fold ULN was highly diagnostic of ICI-nephritis (area under the curve >96%) when compared with either ICI-treated or hemodynamic AKI controls. By peripheral blood flow cytometry analysis, lower absolute CD8+T cells, CD45RA+CD8+ T cells, memory CD27+B cells, and expansion of plasmablasts were prominent features of ICI-nephritis compared with ICI-treated controls. Gene expressions for IL2RA, IL-2 signaling, and T cell receptor signaling in the kidney tissue with ICI-nephritis were significantly higher compared with controls.

CONCLUSION

Elevated sIL-2R level and flow cytometric markers of both B and T cell dysregulation may aid the diagnosis of ICI-nephritis.

Cardiovascular, Renal and Pulmonary Toxicity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer: What the GP Should Know

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is administered in different cancer types and can lead to a wide range of immune-related adverse events including toxicity in vital organs such as the lungs, the kidneys, and the heart. The main hypothesis suggests an overactivation of the immune cells in the different organs. Whereas immune-related cardiotoxicity is very rare but life threatening, ICI-induced acute kidney injury and pneumonitis are more frequent but in general less severe. Renal toxicity corresponds in more than 90% to an acute tubulo-interstitial nephritis. Checkpoint inhibitors pneumonitis is diagnosed mainly on respiratory symptoms with new radiological features, especially under the form of a cryptogenic organising pneumonia. Cardiotoxicity is predominantly marked by myocarditis but also pericarditis and arrhythmias, among others. Early recognition, temporary or definitive cessation of ICI therapy and rapid initiation of high-dose corticosteroids are the cornerstones of the management, which must to be multidisciplinary in a specialised center.

Use of proton pump inhibitors and macrolide antibiotics and risk of acute kidney injury: a self-controlled case series study

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used for the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders such as peptic ulcer disease and dyspepsia. However, several studies have suggested that PPI use increases the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). PPIs are often concomitantly used with antibiotics, such as macrolides and penicillins for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Although macrolide antibiotics are considered to have relatively low nephrotoxicity, they are well known to increase the risk of AKI due to drug-drug interactions. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association between PPI use and the development of AKI. We also evaluated the effect of concomitant use of PPIs and macrolide antibiotics on the risk of AKI.

METHODS

This self-controlled case series study was conducted using electronic medical records at Kyoto University Hospital. We identified patients who were prescribed at least one PPI and macrolide antibiotic between January 2014 and December 2019 and underwent blood examinations at least once a year. An adjusted incident rate ratio (aIRR) of AKI with PPI use or concomitant use macrolide antibiotics with PPIs was estimated using a conditional Poisson regression model controlled for the estimated glomerular filtration rate at the beginning of observation and use of potentially nephrotoxic antibiotics.

RESULTS

Of the 3,685 individuals who received PPIs and macrolide antibiotics, 766 patients with episodes of stage 1 or higher AKI were identified. Any stage of AKI was associated with PPI use (aIRR, 1.80 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.60 to 2.04)). Stage 2 or higher AKI was observed in 279 cases, with an estimated aIRR of 2.01 (95% CI 1.57 to 2.58, for PPI use). For the period of concomitant use of macrolide antibiotics with PPIs compared with the period of PPIs alone, an aIRR of stage 1 or higher AKI was estimated as 0.82 (95% CI 0.60 to 1.13).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings added epidemiological information for the association between PPI use and an increased risk of stage 1 or higher AKI. However, we did not detect an association between the concomitant use of macrolide antibiotics and an increased risk of AKI in PPI users.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) post-mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with cancer, treated with immune check point inhibitor (ICPi): An immune double whammy!

Background:

Immune check point inhibitors (ICPi) have become the first line treatment for most of the cancers and have shown promising results. However, they can provoke reactions, the most feared being immune related adverse events (irAE).

Case presentation:

We present a series of three cases, of patients recieving ICPi. All three patients developed AKI after administration of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. Two patients had kidney-biopsy-proven acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) which responded to ICPi discontinuation and treatment with steroids. One had presumed AIN based on the high levels of CRP and urine retinol binding protein to creatinine ratio and responded to cessation of ICPi alone.

Conclusion:

These three cases demonstrate that a strong immune response from the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine combined with an uninhibited immune system under influence of ICPi led to an amplification of autoimmunity leading to AKI presenting as AIN.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor related nephrotoxicity: Advances in clinicopathologic features, noninvasive approaches, and therapeutic strategy and rechallenge

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used increasingly to treat more than 17 cancers and have shown promising therapeutic results. However, ICI use can result in a variety of immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) which can occur in any organ, including the kidneys. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is the most common nephrotoxicity, classically related to acute interstitial nephritis. Much more diverse patterns and presentations of ICI-related kidney injury can occur, and have implications for diagnostic and therapeutic management approaches. In this review, we summarize the recently approved ICIs for cancer, the incidence and risk factors for nephrotoxicity, our current understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms and the key clinicopathological features of ICI-related AKI, and therapeutic strategies. We also explore important knowledge that require further investigation, such as the risks/benefits of ICI rechallenge in patients who recover from an episode of ICI-related AKI, and the application of liquid biopsy and microbiome to identify noninvasive biomarkers to diagnose and predict kidney injury and guide ICI therapy.

Diagnosis and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute kidney injury

Since their introduction into clinical practice a decade ago, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have had an overwhelming impact on cancer treatment. Use of these agents in oncology continues to grow; however, the increased use of these agents has been associated with a parallel increase in ICI-associated immune-related adverse events, which can affect virtually any organ, including the kidneys. ICI-associated acute kidney injury (ICI-AKI) occurs in 2-5% of patients treated with ICIs. Its occurrence can have important consequences, including the temporary or permanent discontinuation of ICIs or other concomitant anticancer therapies and the need for prolonged treatment with corticosteroids. Various mechanisms have been proposed to underlie the development of ICI-AKI, including loss of tolerance to self-antigens, reactivation of drug-specific effector T cells, and the production of kidney-specific autoantibodies. ICI-AKI most commonly manifests as acute tubulo-interstitial nephritis on kidney biopsy and generally shows a favourable response to early initiation of corticosteroids, with complete or partial remission achieved in most patients. The evaluation of patients with suspected ICI-AKI requires careful diagnostic work-up and kidney biopsy for patients with moderate-to-severe ICI-AKI to ensure accurate diagnosis and inform appropriate treatment.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and kidney disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the landscape of cancer treatment. However, use of ICIs can be limited by inflammatory toxicities referred to as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). ICI-associated acute kidney injury (ICI-associated AKI) affects 3-5% of ICI users.

RECENT FINDINGS

With the rapidly growing indication of ICI, knowledge of ICI-associated kidney toxicity has also expanded from case series to large multicentre cohort studies. In this review, we discuss the clinical features, risk factors, clinicopathological correlations and prognosis of ICI-associated AKI from the most recent rigorously conducted retrospective cohort studies. We also discuss recent advances in diagnostic biomarker investigation, treatment and the unique challenge faced in the kidney transplant population.

SUMMARY

With more comprehensive understanding of the clinical features and risk factors, ICI-associated AKI is commonly diagnosed clinically, especially given the inherent challenges performing a kidney biopsy in the cancer population; however, this highlights the urgent need for improved noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers to aid diagnosis and prognosis. Prospective studies are needed to better define the optimal treatment of ICI-associated AKI and to minimize the risk of graft loss in patients with kidney transplant who require ICIs.

Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients with Cancer

Advances in cancer therapy have significantly improved overall patient survival; however, AKI remains a common complication in patients with cancer, occurring in anywhere from 11% to 22% of patients, depending on patient-related or cancer-specific factors. Critically ill patients with cancer as well as patients with certain malignancies (e.g., leukemias, lymphomas, multiple myeloma, and renal cell carcinoma) are at highest risk of developing AKI. AKI may be a consequence of the underlying malignancy itself or from the wide array of therapies used to treat it. Cancer-associated AKI can affect virtually every compartment of the nephron and can present as subclinical AKI or as overt acute tubular injury, tubulointerstitial nephritis, or thrombotic microangiopathy, among others. AKI can have major repercussions for patients with cancer, potentially jeopardizing further eligibility for therapy and leading to greater morbidity and mortality. This review highlights the epidemiology of AKI in critically ill patients with cancer, risk factors for AKI, and common pathologies associated with certain cancer therapies, as well as the management of AKI in different clinical scenarios. It highlights gaps in our knowledge of AKI in patients with cancer, including the lack of validated biomarkers, as well as evidence-based therapies to prevent AKI and its deleterious consequences.

The role of kidney biopsy in immune checkpoint inhibitor nephrotoxicity

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, medications that boost host immune response to tumor cells, are now at the forefront of anti-cancer therapy. While efficacious in the treatment of patients with advanced cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitors can lead to serious autoimmune side effects involving any organ in the body. Immune checkpoint inhibitor nephrotoxicity is an increasingly recognized cause of acute kidney injury in patients with cancer. This review discusses the clinical and histopathologic diagnosis of immune checkpoint inhibitor nephrotoxicity, highlighting the need for more reliable non-invasive diagnostic testing. We focus on the controversy surrounding the role of kidney biopsy in diagnosis and management of suspected immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicity with inclination toward pursuing kidney biopsy in certain outlined circumstances. Finally, we briefly discuss treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor nephrotoxicity and the decision to re-challenge immunotherapy in patients who experience these adverse events.

Compartmentalization of Intrarenal Programmed Cell Death Protein 1-Ligand 1 and Its Receptor in Kidney Injury Related to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Nephrotoxicity

Background

Due to advances in cancer therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are new classes of drugs targeting programmed cell death protein 1-ligand 1 (PD-L1) or its receptor (PD-1) used in many cancer therapies. Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is a potential and deleterious immune-related adverse events (irAE) and the most common biopsy-proven diagnosis in ICI-related nephrotoxicity. AIN in patients receiving ICIs is was only seen in cases with tubular PD-L1 positivity, while PD-1 expression is limited to inflammatory cells and also observed in injured kidneys independent of ICI therapy. We have previously described that PD-L1 positivity can also be detected in glomerular and endothelial compartments. We here aimed to describe compartmentalization of renal PD-L1 expression specifically in injured kidneys with confirmed nephrotoxicity related to ICIs, its association with presence of PD-1, and clinical findings.

Methods

We included human kidney samples with AIN related to ICI therapy to describe PD-L1 and PD-1 expression localized to different renal compartments in association with clinical and laboratory parameters.

Results

We herein report compartmentalization of PD-L1 with tubular positivity in all cases, partially overlapping with glomerular and endothelial PD-L1 positivity. Furthermore, we provide evidence that tubular PD-L1 in ICI-related nephrotoxicity correlates with levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), while glomerular and endothelial PD-L1 positivity with lower serum levels of complement component C4. Interestingly, glomerular PD-L1 correlated with kidney function, while interstitial cell PD-1 positivity specifically with severity of kidney injury. Finally, we provide evidence for signaling pathways associated with intrarenal PD-L1/PD-1 expression.

Conclusion

Our findings implicate that that AIN related to ICI therapy requires presence of interstitial cells positive for PD-1, and that blocking PD-L1/PD-1 signaling may contribute to nephrotoxicity specifically related to these agents.

Immunotherapy and the Spectrum of Kidney Disease: Should We Individualize the Treatment?

The new targeted cancer therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been demonstrated to improve the survival of oncological patients, even in cases of metastatic cancer. In the past 5 years, several studies have revealed that ICI can produce several immune-mediated toxicities involving different organs, such as the skin, the gastrointestinal tract, the liver, and, of course, the kidney. The most frequent lesion of immunotoxicity in the kidney is acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), although other nephropathies have also been described as a consequence of the use of ICI, such as glomerulonephritis and acute thrombotic microangiopathy, among others. In addition, kidney rejection has also been reported in kidney transplant patients treated with ICI. Normally randomized clinical trials with ICI exclude patients with end-stage kidney disease, namely, patients undergoing dialysis and kidney transplant patients. Several important questions need to be addressed in relation to immunotherapy and patients with kidney disease: (a) when to start corticosteroid therapy in a patient with suspected acute kidney injury (AKI) related to ICI, (b) the moment of nephrologist referral and kidney biopsy indication, (c) management of ICI in patients undergoing dialysis, and (d) the effect of ICI in kidney transplantation, immunosuppressive personalized treatment, and risk of allograft rejection in kidney transplant patients. The objective of this review was to summarize the recently published literature on a wide spectrum of kidney disease patients with cancer and ICI. This review will address three main important groups of individuals with kidney disease and cancer immunotherapy, AKI associated with ICI, patients undergoing dialysis, and kidney transplant recipients. We believe that the information provided in this review will enlighten the personalized ICI treatment in individuals with a broader spectrum of kidney diseases.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge and Resumption: a Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

The reintroduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) after disease progression (rechallenge) or immune-related adverse events (irAEs) recovering (resumption) raises questions in terms of efficacy and safety.

RECENT FINDINGS

Here, we reviewed literature data about ICIs rechallenge/resumption in cancer patients along with their clinical characteristics to explore those factors associated with better outcomes. Heterogenous results were pointed out across rechallenge studies with an overall response rate between 0 and 54%, and a progression free survival ranged from 1.5 to 12.9 months and an overall survival between 6.5 and 23.8 months. Better outcomes have been recorded in patients with good ECOG PS, longer duration of initial ICI, discontinuation reason of initial ICI other than progression, and those who received ICI sequence other than the switch between anti-PD1 and anti-PDL1. Studies about ICI resumption highlighted that certain types of irAEs were more likely to relapse at retreatment. These results suggest that ICI rechallenge/resumption can be an interesting strategy for selected patients.

Incidence, predictors and 6-month overall outcome of acute kidney injury in Chinese patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors

Aim: To explore the incidence, risk factors and overall outcome of the first episode of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related acute kidney injury (ICI-AKI) in Chinese patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors. Methods: Data for patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors at Jiangsu Province Hospital between December 2017 and January 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: A total of 5.6% of 551 patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors developed ICI-AKI. Concomitant use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ICI cycles and extrarenal immune-related adverse events may be independently associated with ICI-AKI. ICI-AKI may not be a risk factor for increased mortality or worse progression-free survival. Conclusions: ICI-AKI is relatively rare and its occurrence may not affect the overall six-month outcome of patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors. Further studies are needed to verify these findings.

Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Resumption after Interruption for Immune-Related Adverse Events, a Narrative Review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of care for several types of cancer due to their superiority in terms of survival benefits in first- and second-line treatments compared to conventional therapies, and they present a better safety profile (lower absolute number of grade 1-5 adverse events), especially if used in monotherapy. However, the pattern of ICI-related adverse events is totally different, as they are characterized by the development of specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that are unique in terms of the organs involved, onset patterns, and severity. The decision to resume ICI treatment after its interruption due to irAEs is challenged by the need for tumor control versus the risk of occurrence of the same or different irAEs. Studies that specifically assess this point remain scarce, heterogenous and mostly based on small samples of patients or focused only on the recurrence rate of the same irAE after ICI resumption. Moreover, patients with grade ≥3 irAEs were excluded from many of these studies. Herein, we provide a narrative review on the field of safety of ICI resumption after interruption due to irAE(s).

Association between Body Mass Index and Immune-Related Adverse Events (irAEs) among Advanced-Stage Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Pan-Cancer Analysis

Simple Summary

Currently, clinical studies exploring the impact of high body fat on toxicities after receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) among cancer patients are limited. Here, we analyze data from a health care system serving the mid-Atlantic geographic region to assess how body fat can affect the development of toxicities of ICIs. In our study, body mass index (BMI) was used as the measure of body fat, and the results suggested that cancer patients with a high BMI were more likely to have toxicities after receiving ICIs. Our study suggests that symptom management should be incorporated in the cancer care continuum of patients who receive ICIs, especially those with high BMI. In clinical settings, oncologists should inform cancer patients receiving ICIs with high BMI that their risk of post-treatment toxicities can be higher compared to their counterparts with lower BMI.

Abstract

Evidence regarding the association between body mass index (BMI) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) among cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is limited. Here, we use cross-sectional hospital-based data to explore their relationship. Pre-treatment BMI was treated as an ordinal variable (<25, 25 to ≤30, ≥30 kg/m²). The outcome of interest was irAEs after ICI initiation. A multivariable logistic regression model estimated the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of BMI. A total of 684 patients with stage III or IV cancer were included in the study (lung: 269, melanoma: 204, other: 211). The mean age at the first dose of ICI was 64.1 years (SD = 13.5), 394 patients (57.6%) were male, and over one-third (N = 260, 38.0%) were non-White. Overall, 52.9% of patients had BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² (25 to ≤30: 217, ≥30: 145) and 288 (42.1%) had irAEs after ICI treatment. Patients with higher BMI tended to have a higher rate of irAEs (<25: 35.7%, 25 to ≤30: 47.0%, ≥30: 49.0%). The multivariable logistic regression yielded consistent results (BMI ≥ 30 vs. BMI < 25: aOR = 1.47, 95% CI = 0.96–2.23; 25 ≤ BMI < 30 vs. BMI < 25: aOR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.02–2.11, p-trend = 0.04). In conclusion, among patients with advanced cancer receiving ICIs, the rate of irAEs appears to be higher among those with higher BMI.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Kidney Toxicity: Advances in Diagnosis and Management

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are now approved for more than 50 indications, and increasing numbers of patients with advanced cancer are receiving immunotherapy. Immune-related adverse events that result from checkpoint inhibitors can affect any organ system. The most common kidney side effect is acute kidney injury, typically caused by acute interstitial nephritis. This review covers the most recent advances in immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced acute kidney injury. The review focuses on the differences between checkpoint inhibitor classes in causing acute kidney injury and differentiating immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced kidney damage from other causes of acute kidney injury. We describe the appropriate use of a kidney biopsy in the diagnosis of acute kidney injury and highlight the need for identification of noninvasive diagnostic and predictive biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced acute kidney injury. In the treatment section, approaches to corticosteroid use and the risks and benefits of rechallenging patients who experience acute kidney injury are debated. We also clarify the long-term adverse effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors on kidney function and the risk of chronic kidney disease in cancer survivors.

Acute kidney injury in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated acute kidney injury (ICPi-AKI) has emerged as an important toxicity among patients with cancer.

Methods

We collected data on 429 patients with ICPi-AKI and 429 control patients who received ICPis contemporaneously but who did not develop ICPi-AKI from 30 sites in 10 countries. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of ICPi-AKI and its recovery. A multivariable Cox model was used to estimate the effect of ICPi rechallenge versus no rechallenge on survival following ICPi-AKI.

Results

ICPi-AKI occurred at a median of 16 weeks (IQR 8–32) following ICPi initiation. Lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, and extrarenal immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were each associated with a higher risk of ICPi-AKI. Acute tubulointerstitial nephritis was the most common lesion on kidney biopsy (125/151 biopsied patients [82.7%]). Renal recovery occurred in 276 patients (64.3%) at a median of 7 weeks (IQR 3–10) following ICPi-AKI. Treatment with corticosteroids within 14 days following ICPi-AKI diagnosis was associated with higher odds of renal recovery (adjusted OR 2.64; 95% CI 1.58 to 4.41). Among patients treated with corticosteroids, early initiation of corticosteroids (within 3 days of ICPi-AKI) was associated with a higher odds of renal recovery compared with later initiation (more than 3 days following ICPi-AKI) (adjusted OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.16 to 3.79). Of 121 patients rechallenged, 20 (16.5%) developed recurrent ICPi-AKI. There was no difference in survival among patients rechallenged versus those not rechallenged following ICPi-AKI.

Conclusions

Patients who developed ICPi-AKI were more likely to have impaired renal function at baseline, use a PPI, and have extrarenal irAEs. Two-thirds of patients had renal recovery following ICPi-AKI. Treatment with corticosteroids was associated with improved renal recovery.

Is Rechallenge Appropriate in Patients that Develop Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated AKI?: PRO

This is an Early Access article. Please select the PDF button, above, to view it. Be sure to also read the CON: 10.34067/KID.0003902021 and the COMMENTARY 10.34067/KID.0005592021

Is Rechallenge Appropriate in Patients that Develop Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated AKI?: CON

This is an Early Access article. Please select the PDF button, above, to view it. Be sure to also read the PRO: 10.34067/KID.0003962021 and the COMMENTARY 10.34067/KID.0005592021

Immunotherapy-Related Acute Kidney Injury

Nephrotoxicity associated with immunotherapy is increasingly being encountered in clinical practice. Drugs that augment the immune system to eradicate cancer are revolutionary in the field of oncology. Older generation immunotherapies such as high-dose interleukin and interferon-alpha are now being replaced with more effective immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies, which have shown promising results in numerous clinical trials. Unfortunately, these treatments come with a unique baggage of adverse effects including nephrotoxicity. This onconephrology review summarizes the immunotherapies currently in use and their kidney-related toxicities, pathophysiology, and their management.

Checkpoint inhibitor therapy-associated acute kidney injury: time to move on to evidence-based recommendations

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment since their introduction ∼15 years ago. However, these monoclonal antibodies are associated with immune-related adverse events that can also affect the kidney, resulting in acute kidney injury (AKI), which is most commonly due to acute tubulointerstitial nephritis (ATIN). Limited data are available on the true occurrence of ICI-associated AKI. Furthermore, evidence to guide the optimal management of ICI-associated AKI in clinical practice is lacking. In this issue, Oleas et al. report a single-center study of patients with nonhematologic malignancies who received ICI treatment during a 14-month period, experienced AKI and underwent a kidney biopsy at the Vall d'Hebron University Hospital. Importantly, they demonstrate that only a minority of ICI-associated AKI patients was referred to the nephrology service and kidney biopsy was only performed in 6.4% of patients. Although the authors add to our knowledge about ICI-associated AKI, their article also highlights the need for the development of noninvasive diagnostic markers for ICI-associated ATIN, the establishment of treatment protocols for ICI-associated ATIN and recommendations for optimal ICI rechallenge in patients with previous ICI-associated AKI.