1
|
Wu R, Zhang Q, Li Z. A meta-analysis of metformin and insulin on maternal outcome and neonatal outcome in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2024; 37:2295809. [PMID: 38124287 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2023.2295809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of metformin for treating gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) remains controversial because it can pass through the placenta. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of metformin and insulin on maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with GDM. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, focusing on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the impacts of metformin and insulin on both maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with GDM. RESULTS Twenty-four RCTs involving 4934 patients with GDM were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with insulin, metformin demonstrated a significant reduction in the risks of preeclampsia (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.78, p < .0001), induction of labor (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.98, p = .02), cesarean delivery (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.98, p = .01), macrosomia (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.83, p = .0004), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.86, p < .0001), neonatal hypoglycemia (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.63, p < .00001), and large for gestational age (LGA) (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.94, p = .007). Conversely, metformin showed no significant impact on gestational hypertension (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.06, p = .15), spontaneous vaginal delivery (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.08, p = .05), emergency cesarean section (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.16, p = .58), shoulder dystocia (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.39, p = .27), premature birth (RR 0. 92, 95% CI 0.61 to 1.39, p = .69), polyhydramnios (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.30, p = .77), birth trauma (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.39, p = .56), 5-min Apgar score < 7 (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.68, p = .55), small for gestational age (SGA) (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.22, p = .62), respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.08, p = .11), jaundice (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.25, p = .24) or birth defects (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.74, p = .57). CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest that metformin can reduce the risk of certain maternal and neonatal outcomes compared with insulin therapy for GDM. However, long-term follow-up studies of patients with GDM taking metformin and their offspring are warranted to provide further evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Wu
- Department of Life Sciences and Biopharmaceutics, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Qingqing Zhang
- Wuya College of Innovation, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Zuojing Li
- School of Medical Devices, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Castorino K, Osumili B, Lakiang T, Banerjee KK, Goldyn A, Piras de Oliveira C. Insulin Use During Gestational and Pre-existing Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Study Design. Diabetes Ther 2024; 15:929-1045. [PMID: 38494573 PMCID: PMC11043323 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-024-01541-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Insulin is the first-line pharmacologic therapy for women with diabetes in pregnancy. However, conducting well-designed randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and achieving recommended glycemic targets remains a challenge for this unique population. This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to understand the evidence for insulin use in pregnancy and the outcome metrics most often used to characterize its effect on glycemic, maternal and fetal outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and in pregnant women with diabetes. METHODS An SLR was conducted using electronic databases in Medline, EMBASE via Ovid platform, evidence-based medicine reviews (2010-2020) and conference proceedings (2018-2019). Studies were included if they assessed the effect of insulin treatment on glycemic, maternal or fetal outcomes in women with diabetes in pregnancy. Studies on any type of diabetes other than gestational or pre-existing diabetes as well as non-human studies were excluded. RESULTS In women diagnosed with GDM or pre-existing diabetes, most studies compared treatment of insulin with metformin (n = 35) followed by diet along with lifestyle intervention (n = 24) and glibenclamide (n = 12). Most studies reporting on glycemic outcomes compared insulin with metformin (n = 22) and glibenclamide (n = 4). Fasting blood glucose was the most reported clinical outcome of interest. Among the studies reporting maternal outcomes, method of delivery and delivery complications were most commonly reported. Large for gestational age, stillbirth and perinatal mortality were the most common fetal outcomes reported. CONCLUSION This SLR included a total of 108 clinical trials and observational studies with diverse populations and treatment arms. Outcomes varied across the studies, and a lack of consistent outcome measures to manage diabetes in pregnant women was observed. This elucidates a need for global consensus on study design and standardized clinical, maternal and fetal outcomes metrics.
Collapse
|
3
|
Paschou SA, Shalit A, Gerontiti E, Athanasiadou KI, Kalampokas T, Psaltopoulou T, Lambrinoudaki I, Anastasiou E, Wolffenbuttel BHR, Goulis DG. Efficacy and safety of metformin during pregnancy: an update. Endocrine 2024; 83:259-269. [PMID: 37798604 PMCID: PMC10850184 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-023-03550-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
During the last decades, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) prevalence has been on the rise. While insulin remains the gold standard treatment for GDM, metformin use during pregnancy is controversial. This review aimed to comprehensively assess the available data on the efficacy and safety of metformin during pregnancy, both for the mother and the offspring. Metformin has been validated for maternal efficacy and safety, achieving comparable glycemic control with insulin. Additionally, it reduces maternal weight gain and possibly the occurrence of hypertensive disorders. During the early neonatal period, metformin administration does not increase the risk of congenital anomalies or other major adverse effects, including lower APGAR score at 5 min, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, and respiratory distress syndrome. Several studies have demonstrated a reduction in neonatal hypoglycemia. Metformin has been associated with an increase in preterm births and lower birth weight, although this effect is controversial and depends on the indication for which it was administered. Evidence indicates possible altered fetal programming and predisposition to childhood obesity and metabolic syndrome during adulthood after use of metformin in pregnancy. With critical questions still requiring a final verdict, ongoing research on the field must be conducted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stavroula A Paschou
- Endocrine Unit and Diabetes Center, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
| | - Almog Shalit
- Endocrine Unit and Diabetes Center, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Eleni Gerontiti
- Endocrine Unit and Diabetes Center, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Kleoniki I Athanasiadou
- Endocrine Unit and Diabetes Center, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Theodoros Kalampokas
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Theodora Psaltopoulou
- Endocrine Unit and Diabetes Center, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Irene Lambrinoudaki
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion University Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel
- Department of Endocrinology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Dimitrios G Goulis
- Unit of Reproductive Endocrinology, First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li C, Gao C, Zhang X, Zhang L, Shi H, Jia X. Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of insulin and oral hypoglycemic drugs in the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of 26 randomized controlled trials. Gynecol Endocrinol 2022; 38:303-309. [PMID: 34907818 DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2021.2015761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Oral hypoglycemic drugs for the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are still controversial because they can pass through the placenta. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of oral hypoglycemic drugs. METHODS PubMed, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched (inception to 20 April 2021). Rev Man 5.0 was used to analyze the data. A random-effects model was used to compute the summary risk estimates. RESULTS There were 26 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 4921 GDM patients which were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with metformin, insulin had a significant increase in the risk of preeclampsia (odds ratio [OR], 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06 to 2.45; I2=40%; p < .05), hypertension (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.99; I2=0%; p < .05), hypoglycemia (OR, 3.93; 95% CI, 1.27 to 12.19; I2=0%; p < .05), neonatal hypoglycemia (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.34 to 2.76; I2=41%; p < .0001), neonatal jaundice (OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.12 to 6.52; I2=0%; p < .05), and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Admission (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.95; I2=39%; p < .05), but the risk of neonatal macrosomia (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.40; I2=0%; p < .05) and neonatal injury (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.89; I2=0%; p < .01) is lower. CONCLUSIONS Metformin is comparable with insulin in glycemic control and neonatal outcomes and has the potential to replace insulin therapy in clinical practice. Glyburide is behind metformin and insulin, and more RCTs are needed to verify its safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaolin Li
- Sichuan Chengdu Jinniu District Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Chengdu, China
- Non-coding RNA and Drug Discovery Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
| | - Can Gao
- Key Laboratory of Microbial Drugs Innovation and Transformation, Medical College, Yan'an University, Yan'an, China
| | - Xianqin Zhang
- Non-coding RNA and Drug Discovery Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
- Basic Medical College, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
| | - Lin Zhang
- College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Pharmacy, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Shaoxing, China
| | - Hao Shi
- Sichuan Chengdu Jinniu District Maternal and Child Healthcare Hospital, Chengdu, China
| | - Xu Jia
- Non-coding RNA and Drug Discovery Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
- Basic Medical College, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ouyang H, Wu N. Effects of Different Glucose-Lowering Measures on Maternal and Infant Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes: A Network Meta-analysis. Diabetes Ther 2021; 12:2715-2753. [PMID: 34482529 PMCID: PMC8479018 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-021-01142-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A network meta-analysis was conducted to compare and rank the effects of different glucose-lowering measures on maternal and infant outcomes in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS We searched the PubMed, CNKI, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, and Weipu databases for relevant studies published between database establishment and June 2021. Study retrieval involved subject-heading and keyword searches. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with different glucose-lowering treatments for GDM patients were included. The Cochrane tool was used to assess bias risk. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were used to compare and rank the effects of different hypoglycemic measures on maternal and infant outcomes in pregnant women with GDM. RESULTS We included 41 RCTs involving 6245 pregnant women with GDM. Patients treated with insulin had a higher incidence of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) occupancy (1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.7) than those treated with metformin. The insulin (1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1 and 1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.3) and glyburide (2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.2 and 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-8.4) groups exhibited higher incidences of neonatal hypoglycemia and large for gestational age (LGA) newborns than the metformin group. The glyburide group exhibited a lower probability of cesarean section than the metformin (0.76, 95% CI 0.55-1.0) and insulin (0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.96) groups. Preeclampsia incidence in the diet and exercise groups was significantly lower than in the metformin (0.19, 95% CI 0.043-0.72) and insulin (0.15, 95% CI 0.032-0.52) groups. No intervention significantly reduced the incidences of macrosomia, preterm birth, gestational hypertension, or respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The ranking results showed that the metformin group had the lowest rates of neonatal hypoglycemia, macrosomia, LGA, and NICU occupancy. The glyburide group had the lowest NICU occupancy and cesarean section rates and the highest neonatal hypoglycemia, LGA, preeclampsia, and gestational hypertension rates. The diet and exercise group had the lowest preterm delivery and preeclampsia rates and the highest NICU occupancy rate. CONCLUSION Metformin is a potentially superior choice for GDM treatment because it is associated with minimal incidences of multiple adverse pregnancy outcome indicators and does not lead to high values of certain adverse outcome indices. Other hypoglycemic agent or diet groups exhibit high incidences of certain adverse outcomes. Therefore, when selecting a GDM treatment strategy, the efficacies and risks of different treatment programs should be evaluated according to the scenario in hand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Ouyang
- Department of Endocrinology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Na Wu
- Department of Endocrinology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
- Clinical Skills Practice Teaching Center, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
He K, Guo Q, Ge J, Li J, Li C, Jing Z. The efficacy and safety of metformin alone or as an add-on therapy to insulin in pregnancy with GDM or T2DM: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 randomized controlled trials. J Clin Pharm Ther 2021; 47:168-177. [PMID: 34363237 DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.13503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE Pregnant women are increasingly being exposed to metformin for conditions including gestational diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metformin has been found to exhibit maternal to foetal transfer, and the long-term influence is uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of metformin alone or as add-on therapy to insulin and insulin in pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus or type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS We performed a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared metformin to insulin in pregnancy. Risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to synthesize the results. Two authors independently extracted the data, evaluated study quality and calculated pooled estimates. RESULTS Twenty-one studies involving 4,545 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with insulin, metformin significantly reduced the risks of maternal weight gain [MD -1.51 kg, 95%CI (-1.90 kg, -1.12 kg), P < 0.00001], gestational age at birth [MD -0.12 week, 95%CI (-0.21 week, -0.02 week), P = 0.02], gestational hypertension [RR 0.63, 95%CI (0.48, 0.82), P = 0.0006], maternal hypoglycaemia [RR 0.33, 95%CI (0.15, 0.73), P = 0.006], birthweight [MD -0.13 kg, 95%CI (-0.20 kg, -0.07 kg), P < 0.0001], neonatal hypoglycaemia [RR 0.56, 95%CI (0.49, 0.64), P < 0.00001], neonatal intensive care unit admission [RR 0.73, 95%CI (0.64, 0.83), P < 0.00001], birthweight ≥4000 g [RR 0.70, 95%CI (0.59, 0.83), P < 0.0001], and large for gestational age [RR 0.83, 95%CI (0.72, 0.97), P = 0.02] and significantly increased the risk of small for gestational age [RR 1.43, 95%CI (1.08, 1.89), P = 0.01] in pregnancy. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION Metformin may have potential benefits for pregnant women and newborns in terms of maternal and foetal outcomes. More studies with long-term follow-up of offspring exposed to metformin in utero are needed to provide evidence for the future use of metformin in pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke He
- Department of Pharmacy, The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang/ Shijiazhuang Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
| | - Qing Guo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang/ Shijiazhuang Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
| | - Jun Ge
- Department of Pharmacy, The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang/ Shijiazhuang Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
| | - Jingxin Li
- Department of Chinese Pharmacy, Hebei Maternity Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
| | - Caixia Li
- Department of Pharmacy, The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang/ Shijiazhuang Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
| | - Zeng Jing
- Department of Pharmacy, The Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang/ Shijiazhuang Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wang X, Liu W, Chen H, Chen Q. Comparison of Insulin, Metformin, and Glyburide on Perinatal Complications of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2021; 86:218-230. [PMID: 33979807 DOI: 10.1159/000515893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
AIM This systematic and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of insulin, metformin, and glyburide on perinatal complications for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, The Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL], and Cochrane Methodology Register), Web of Science (Science and Social Science Citation Index), and ClinicalTrials (Clinicaltrials.gov) were searched, as well as manual searching. We included randomized controlled trials comparing efficacy and safety of metformin versus glyburide, metformin versus insulin, and glyburide versus insulin in patients with GDM. RESULTS We included 32 articles including 5,964 patients published from inception to July 2020. Compared with insulin, metformin was more effective at lower incidence of macrosomia (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50-0.88, p = 0.005), lower incidence of neonatal intensive care unit admission (RR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.67-0.91, p = 0.002), less neonatal hypoglycemia (RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.56-0.80, p < 0.0001), decreased birth weight (BW) (SMD: -0.37, 95% CI: -0.62 to -0.12, p = 0.004), lower incidence of large for gestational age (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.50-0.90, p = 0.002), shorter gestation age at delivery (MD: -0.22, 95% CI: -0.34 to -0.10, p = 0.0002), lower maternal weight gain (MD: -1.41, 95% CI: -2.28 to -0.55, p = 0.001), less incidence of caesarean section delivery (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78-0.95, p = 0.0004), lower maternal postprandial blood glucose (SMD: -0.41, 95% CI: -0.72 to -0.11, p = 0.008), and lower incidence of pregnancy-induced hypertension (RR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.27-0.83, p = 0.01). However, glyburide, compared with insulin, was associated with higher BW (MD: 54.95, 95% CI: 3.87-106.03, p = 0.03) and increased the incidence of neonatal hypoglycemia (RR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.12-2.07, p = 0.007). Meanwhile, compared to glyburide, metformin was associated with higher maternal fasting blood glucose (SMD: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05-0.36, p = 0.01) and lower incidence of induction of labor (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.97, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS This review suggests that metformin can decrease the incidence of perinatal complications, and it should be considered as a generally safe alternative to insulin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xian Wang
- School of Clinical Medicine, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China,
| | - Wanting Liu
- Department of Chinese Medicine, The Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China
| | - Huizhen Chen
- School of Clinical Medicine, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
| | - Qiu Chen
- Department of Endocrinology, Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tarry-Adkins JL, Ozanne SE, Aiken CE. Impact of metformin treatment during pregnancy on maternal outcomes: a systematic review/meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2021; 11:9240. [PMID: 33927270 PMCID: PMC8085032 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-88650-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
We systematically assessed the impact of metformin treatment on maternal pregnancy outcomes. PubMed, Ovid Embase, Medline, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane databases were systematically searched (inception-1st February 2021). Randomised controlled trials reporting pregnancy outcomes in women randomised to metformin versus any other treatment for any indication were included. Outcomes included gestational weight gain (GWG), pre-eclampsia, gestational hypertension, preterm birth, gestational age at delivery, caesarean section, gestational diabetes, glycaemic control, and gastrointestinal side-effects. Two independent reviewers conducted screening, with a third available to evaluate disagreements. Risk-of-bias and GRADE assessments were conducted using Cochrane Risk-of-Bias and GRADE-pro software. Thirty-five studies (n = 8033 pregnancies) met eligibility criteria. GWG was lower in pregnancies randomised to metformin versus other treatments (1.57 kg ± 0.60 kg; I2 = 86%, p < 0.0001), as was likelihood of pre-eclampsia (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.95; I2 = 55%, p = 0.02). The risk of gastrointestinal side-effects was greater in metformin-exposed versus other treatment groups (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.53-3.84; I2 = 76%, p = 0.0002). The risk of other maternal outcomes assessed was not significantly different between metformin-exposed versus other treatment groups. Metformin for any indication during pregnancy is associated with lower GWG and a modest reduced risk of pre-eclampsia, but increased gastrointestinal side-effects compared to other treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane L. Tarry-Adkins
- grid.5335.00000000121885934Metabolic Research Laboratories and MRC Metabolic Diseases Unit, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK ,grid.5335.00000000121885934Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Rosie Hospital and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Susan E. Ozanne
- grid.5335.00000000121885934Metabolic Research Laboratories and MRC Metabolic Diseases Unit, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Catherine E. Aiken
- grid.5335.00000000121885934Metabolic Research Laboratories and MRC Metabolic Diseases Unit, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK ,grid.5335.00000000121885934Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Rosie Hospital and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bao LX, Shi WT, Han YX. Metformin versus insulin for gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2019; 34:2741-2753. [PMID: 31558075 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1670804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metformin is increasingly used in clinical practice for the treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus. However, its safety and long-term effects on fetuses exposed to metformin in uterus remain controversial. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane database (last search was updated on 1 May 2019) for randomized controlled trials comparing metformin with insulin. Two reviewers extracted the data and calculated pooled estimates by use of a random-effects model. RESULTS Twenty-four studies were included. Among these, seventeen RCTs (N = 2828 participants) were included for quantitative analyses and seven studies were included only for qualitative synthesis. Metformin lowered the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension (p = .03; risk ratio (RR) = 0.64; confidence interval (95%CI) [0.44, 0.95]), large for gestational age babies (p = .04; RR = 0.82; 95% CI [0.68, 0.99]), macrosomia (p = .01; RR = 0.63; 95%CI [0.45, 0.90]), neonatal hypoglycemia (p = .001; RR = 0.72; 95%CI [0.59, 0.88]), and neonatal intensive care unit admission (p = .01; RR = 0.74; 95%CI [0.58, 0.94]). Metformin did not increase premature delivery (p = .11; RR = 1.28; 95%CI [0.95, 1.73]), preeclampsia (p = .45; RR = 0.89; 95%CI [0.65, 1.21]), caesarean delivery (p = .20; RR = 0.94; 95%CI [0.85, 1.04]), small for gestational age babies (p = .95; RR = 0.99; 95%CI [0.69, 1.42]). The long-term results seemed to have no adverse effect, but the information was still limited. CONCLUSIONS According to our review, metformin may have potential benefits for pregnant women and newborns with no obvious adverse effects. However, even more studies are needed to provide evidence for the future use of metformin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Le-Xin Bao
- Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao, University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, People's Republic of China
| | - Wan-Ting Shi
- Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao, University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu-Xin Han
- Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao, University, Qingdao University, Qingdao, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tarry-Adkins JL, Aiken CE, Ozanne SE. Neonatal, infant, and childhood growth following metformin versus insulin treatment for gestational diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2019; 16:e1002848. [PMID: 31386659 PMCID: PMC6684046 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Metformin is increasingly offered as an acceptable and economic alternative to insulin for treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in many countries. However, the impact of maternal metformin treatment on the trajectory of fetal, infant, and childhood growth is unknown. METHODS AND FINDINGS PubMed, Ovid Embase, Medline, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane database were systematically searched (from database inception to 26 February 2019). Outcomes of GDM-affected pregnancies randomised to treatment with metformin versus insulin were included (randomised controlled trials and prospective randomised controlled studies) from cohorts including European, American, Asian, Australian, and African women. Studies including pregnant women with pre-existing diabetes or non-diabetic women were excluded, as were trials comparing metformin treatment with oral glucose-lowering agents other than insulin. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for eligibility and risk of bias, and conflicts were resolved by a third reviewer. Outcome measures were parameters of fetal, infant, and childhood growth, including weight, height, BMI, and body composition. In total, 28 studies (n = 3,976 participants) met eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. No studies reported fetal growth parameters; 19 studies (n = 3,723 neonates) reported measures of neonatal growth. Neonates born to metformin-treated mothers had lower birth weights (mean difference -107.7 g, 95% CI -182.3 to -32.7, I2 = 83%, p = 0.005) and lower ponderal indices (mean difference -0.13 kg/m3, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.00, I2 = 0%, p = 0.04) than neonates of insulin-treated mothers. The odds of macrosomia (odds ratio [OR] 0.59, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.77, p < 0.001) and large for gestational age (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.99, p = 0.04) were lower following maternal treatment with metformin compared to insulin. There was no difference in neonatal height or incidence of small for gestational age between groups. Two studies (n = 411 infants) reported measures of infant growth (18-24 months of age). In contrast to the neonatal phase, metformin-exposed infants were significantly heavier than those in the insulin-exposed group (mean difference 440 g, 95% CI 50 to 830, I2 = 4%, p = 0.03). Three studies (n = 520 children) reported mid-childhood growth parameters (5-9 years). In mid-childhood, BMI was significantly higher (mean difference 0.78 kg/m2, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.33, I2 = 7%, p = 0.005) following metformin exposure than following insulin exposure, although the difference in absolute weights between the groups was not significantly different (p = 0.09). Limited evidence (1 study with data treated as 2 cohorts) suggested that adiposity indices (abdominal [p = 0.02] and visceral [p = 0.03] fat volumes) may be higher in children born to metformin-treated compared to insulin-treated mothers. Study limitations include heterogeneity in metformin dosing, heterogeneity in diagnostic criteria for GDM, and the scarcity of reporting of childhood outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Following intrauterine exposure to metformin for treatment of maternal GDM, neonates are significantly smaller than neonates whose mothers were treated with insulin during pregnancy. Despite lower average birth weight, metformin-exposed children appear to experience accelerated postnatal growth, resulting in heavier infants and higher BMI by mid-childhood compared to children whose mothers were treated with insulin. Such patterns of low birth weight and postnatal catch-up growth have been reported to be associated with adverse long-term cardio-metabolic outcomes. This suggests a need for further studies examining longitudinal perinatal and childhood outcomes following intrauterine metformin exposure. This review protocol was registered with PROSPERO under registration number CRD42018117503.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane L. Tarry-Adkins
- Metabolic Research Laboratories and MRC Metabolic Diseases Unit, Wellcome Trust–MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine E. Aiken
- Metabolic Research Laboratories and MRC Metabolic Diseases Unit, Wellcome Trust–MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rosie Hospital and NIHR Cambridge Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Susan E. Ozanne
- Metabolic Research Laboratories and MRC Metabolic Diseases Unit, Wellcome Trust–MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Guo L, Ma J, Tang J, Hu D, Zhang W, Zhao X. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Metformin, Glyburide, and Insulin in Treating Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis. J Diabetes Res 2019; 2019:9804708. [PMID: 31781670 PMCID: PMC6875019 DOI: 10.1155/2019/9804708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Revised: 08/03/2019] [Accepted: 08/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
To compare the efficacy and safety of metformin, glyburide, and insulin in treating gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted. PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library to November 13, 2018, were searched for RCT adjusted estimates of the efficacy and safety of metformin, glyburide, and insulin treatments in GDM patients. There were 41 studies involving 7703 GDM patients which were included in this meta-analysis; 12 primary outcomes and 24 secondary outcomes were detected and analyzed. Compared with metformin, insulin had a significant increase in the risk of preeclampsia (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.72; P < 0.001), NICU admission (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.87; P < 0.001), neonatal hypoglycemia (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.66; P < 0.001), and macrosomia (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.86; P < 0.05). To the outcomes of birth weight and gestational age at delivery, insulin had a significant increase when compared with metformin (MD, 114.48; 95% CI, 37.32 to 191.64; P < 0.01; MD, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.34; P < 0.001; respectively). Of the two groups between glyburide and metformin, metformin had lower gestational weight gain compared with glyburide (MD, 1.67; 95% CI, 0.26 to 3.07; P < 0.05). Glyburide had a higher risk of neonatal hypoglycemia compared with insulin (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.32 to 2.36; P < 0.001). This meta-analysis found that metformin could be a safe and effective treatment for GDM. However, clinicians should pay attention on the long-term offspring outcomes of the relative data with GDM patients treated with metformin. Compared with insulin, glyburide had a higher increase of neonatal hypoglycemia. The use of glyburide in pregnancy for GDM women appears to be unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lanlan Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Jing Ma
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, China
| | - Jia Tang
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200041, China
| | - Dingyao Hu
- The Second Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical College, Zunyi 563000, China
| | - Xue Zhao
- Department of Nephrology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan 250021, China
| |
Collapse
|