High prevalence of nonconvulsive and subtle status epilepticus in an ICU of a tertiary care center: a three-year observational cohort study

Unveiling the clinical spectrum of herpes simplex virus CNS infections in adults: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections of the central nervous system (CNS) are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Prompt recognition and antiviral treatment are critical to improve patient outcomes. This systematic review of the literature aimed to aggregate the symptoms described with HSV infections of the CNS which may provide a framework to aid in early diagnosis.

METHODS

This review was registered (PROSPERO; CRD42022366036) and adheres to PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically screened for studies including adult patients with HSV infections confirmed by histopathology or polymerase chain reaction. Demographics, clinical characteristics, diagnostics, and outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 21 studies from 18 countries describing 1605 patients, the most frequently reported symptoms were fever (75%), headache (65%), neck stiffness (55%), and language/speech abnormalities (41%). Other common symptoms included seizures (36%) and gastrointestinal issues (35%). Information regarding a combination of symptoms was not provided. Diagnostics often included lumbar puncture and magnetic resonance imaging, revealing temporal lobe abnormalities in 88%. While mortality was 13%, 72% of survivors had good neurological outcomes. The risk of bias was high in most studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Fever, headache, neck stiffness, and language/speech abnormalities were frequently reported clinical findings in patients with proven HSV infection of the CNS. Despite limited evidence, these symptoms warrant a high index of suspicion, prompting early empiric antiviral therapy, especially when alternative diagnoses lack strong support. The predictive value of these symptoms and their combination for diagnosing HSV infection of the CNS should be further investigated, as they could accelerate diagnostics and treatment.

Emergent Management of Status Epilepticus

OBJECTIVE

Status epilepticus is a neurologic emergency that can be life- threatening. The key to effective management is recognition and prompt initiation of treatment. Management of status epilepticus requires a patient-specific-approach framework, consisting of four axes: (1) semiology, (2) etiology, (3) EEG correlate, and (4) age. This article provides a comprehensive overview of status epilepticus, highlighting the current treatment approaches and strategies for management and control.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Administering appropriate doses of antiseizure medication in a timely manner is vital for halting seizure activity. Benzodiazepines are the first-line treatment, as demonstrated by three randomized controlled trials in the hospital and prehospital settings. Benzodiazepines can be administered through IV, intramuscular, rectal, or intranasal routes. If seizures persist, second-line treatments such as phenytoin and fosphenytoin, valproate, or levetiracetam are warranted. The recently published Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial found that all three of these drugs are similarly effective in achieving seizure cessation in approximately half of patients. For cases of refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus, IV anesthetics, including ketamine and γ-aminobutyric acid-mediated (GABA-ergic) medications, are necessary. There is an increasing body of evidence supporting the use of ketamine, not only in the early phases of stage 3 status epilepticus but also as a second-line treatment option.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

As with other neurologic emergencies, "time is brain" when treating status epilepticus. Antiseizure medication should be initiated quickly to achieve seizure cessation. There is a need to explore newer generations of antiseizure medications and nonpharmacologic modalities to treat status epilepticus.

The Role of Routine Electroencephalography in the Diagnosis of Seizures in Medical Intensive Care Units

Seizures should be diagnosed and treated to ensure optimal health outcomes in critically ill patients admitted in the medical intensive care unit (MICU). Continuous electroencephalography is still infrequently used in the MICU. We investigated the effectiveness of routine EEG (rEEG) in detecting seizures in the MICU. A total of 560 patients admitted to the MICU between October 2018 and March 2023 and who underwent rEEG were reviewed. Seizure-related rEEG constituted 47% of all rEEG studies. Totally, 39% of the patients experienced clinical seizures during hospitalization; among them, 48% experienced the seizure, and 13% experienced their first seizure after undergoing an rEEG study. Seventy-seven percent of the patients had unfavorable short-term outcomes. Patients with cardiovascular diseases were the most likely to have the suppression/burst suppression (SBS) EEG pattern and the highest mortality rate. The rhythmic and periodic patterns (RPPs) and electrographic seizure (ESz) EEG pattern were associated with seizures within 24 h after rEEG, which was also related to unfavorable outcomes. Significant predictors of death were age > 59 years, the male gender, the presence of cardiovascular disease, a Glasgow Coma Scale score ≤ 5, and the SBS EEG pattern, with a predictive performance of 0.737 for death. rEEG can help identify patients at higher risk of seizures. We recommend repeated rEEG in patients with ESz or RPP EEG patterns to enable a more effective monitoring of seizure activities.

Economic review of point-of-care EEG

Aims: Point-of-care electroencephalogram (POC-EEG) is an acute care bedside screening tool for the identification of nonconvulsive seizures (NCS) and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). The objective of this narrative review is to describe the economic themes related to POC-EEG in the United States (US).Materials and methods: We examined peer-reviewed, published manuscripts on the economic findings of POC-EEG for bedside use in US hospitals, which included those found through targeted searches on PubMed and Google Scholar. Conference abstracts, gray literature offerings, frank advertisements, white papers, and studies conducted outside the US were excluded.Results: Twelve manuscripts were identified and reviewed; results were then grouped into four categories of economic evidence. First, POC-EEG usage was associated with clinical management amendments and antiseizure medication reductions. Second, POC-EEG was correlated with fewer unnecessary transfers to other facilities for monitoring and reduced hospital length of stay (LOS). Third, when identifying NCS or NCSE onsite, POC-EEG was associated with greater reimbursement in Medical Severity-Diagnosis Related Group coding. Fourth, POC-EEG may lower labor costs via decreasing after-hours requests to EEG technologists for conventional EEG (convEEG).Limitations: We conducted a narrative review, not a systematic review. The studies were observational and utilized one rapid circumferential headband system, which limited generalizability of the findings and indicated publication bias. Some sample sizes were small and hospital characteristics may not represent all US hospitals. POC-EEG studies in pediatric populations were also lacking. Ultimately, further research is justified.Conclusions: POC-EEG is a rapid screening tool for NCS and NCSE in critical care and emergency medicine with potential financial benefits through refining clinical management, reducing unnecessary patient transfers and hospital LOS, improving reimbursement, and mitigating burdens on healthcare staff and hospitals. Since POC-EEG has limitations (i.e. no video component and reduced montage), the studies asserted that it did not replace convEEG.

Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus: A Review for Emergency Clinicians

BACKGROUND

Status epilepticus is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and is divided into convulsive status epilepticus and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE).

OBJECTIVE

This review provides a focused evaluation of NCSE for emergency clinicians.

DISCUSSION

NCSE is a form of status epilepticus presenting with prolonged seizure activity. This disease is underdiagnosed, as it presents with nonspecific signs and symptoms, most commonly change in mental status without overt convulsive motor activity. Causes include epilepsy, cerebral pathology or injury, any systemic insult such as infection, and drugs or toxins. Mortality is primarily related to the underlying condition. Patients most commonly present with altered mental status, but other signs and symptoms include abnormal ocular movements and automatisms such as lip smacking or subtle motor twitches in the face or extremities. The diagnosis is divided into electrographic and electroclinical, and although electroencephalogram (EEG) is recommended for definitive diagnosis, emergency clinicians should consider this disease in patients with prolonged postictal state after a seizure with no improvement in mental status, altered mental status with acute cerebral pathology (e.g., stroke, hypoxic brain injury), and unexplained altered mental status. Assessment includes laboratory evaluation and neuroimaging with EEG. Management includes treating life-threatening conditions, including compromise of the airway, hypoglycemia, hyponatremia, and hypo- or hyperthermia, followed by rapid cessation of the seizure activity with benzodiazepines and other antiseizure medications.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of the presentation and management of NCSE can assist emergency clinicians in the care of these patients.

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in neurocritical care: A critical reappraisal of outcome prediction scores

OBJECTIVE

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is a frequent condition in the neurocritical care unit (NCCU) patient population, with high morbidity and mortality. We aimed to assess the validity of available outcome prediction scores for prognostication in an NCCU patient population in relation to their admission reason (NCSE vs. non-NCSE related).

METHODS

All 196 consecutive patients diagnosed with NCSE during the NCCU stay between January 2010 and December 2020 were included. Demographics, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II), NCSE characteristics, and in-hospital and 3-month outcome were extracted from the electronic charts. Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS), Epidemiology-Based Mortality Score in Status Epilepticus (EMSE), and encephalitis, NCSE, diazepam resistance, imaging features, and tracheal intubation score (END-IT) were evaluated as previously described. Univariable and multivariable analysis and comparison of sensitivity/specificity/positive and negative predictive values/accuracy were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 30.1% died during the hospital stay, and 63.5% of survivors did not achieve favorable outcome at 3 months after onset of NCSE. Patients admitted primarily due to NCSE had longer NCSE duration and were more likely to be intubated at diagnosis. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for SAPS II, EMSE, and STESS when predicting mortality was between .683 and .762. The ROC for SAPS II, EMSE, STESS, and END-IT when predicting 3-month outcome was between .649 and .710. The accuracy in predicting mortality/outcome was low, when considering both proposed cutoffs and optimized cutoffs (estimated using the Youden Index) as well as when adjusting for admission reason.

SIGNIFICANCE

The scores EMSE, STESS, and END-IT perform poorly when predicting outcome of patients with NCSE in an NCCU environment. They should be interpreted cautiously and only in conjunction with other clinical data in this particular patient group.

Prevalence, electroclinical spectrum and effect on the outcome of non-convulsive status epilepticus in critically ill patients; the utility of routine electroencephalogram

OBJECTIVES

To highlight the importance of routine electroencephalogram (rEEG) in detecting non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), describing the electroclinical spectrum and effect on outcome in critically ill patients with altered mental status (CIPAMS).

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted at King Fahd University Hospital. Clinical data and EEG recordings of CIPAMS to rule out NCSE were reviewed. All patients had at least 30 minutes of EEG recording. The Salzburg Consensus criteria (SCC) were applied to diagnose NCSE. The data analysis was performed using SPSS version 22.0. The chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables such as etiologies, EEG findings, and functional outcomes. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify the predictors of unfavorable outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 323 CIPAMS referred to rule out NCSE were enrolled (mean age 57.8 ± 20 years). Nonconvulsive status epilepticus was diagnosed in 54 (16.7%) patients. A significant association was found between subtle clinical features and NCSE (P =< 0.01). Acute ischemic stroke (18.5%), sepsis (18.5%), and hypoxic brain injury (22.2%) were the main etiologies. The previous history of epilepsy was significantly associated with NCSE (P = 0.01). Acute stroke, cardiac arrest, mechanical ventilation, and NCSE were statistically associated with unfavorable outcomes. Nonconvulsive status epilepticus was an independent predictor of unfavorable outcomes (P = 0.02, OR = 2.75, CI = 1.16-6.48) during multivariable analysis. Sepsis was associated with higher mortality (P =< 0.01, OR = 2.4, CI = 1.4-4.0).

SIGNIFICANCE

Our study findings suggest that the utility of rEEG in detecting NCSE in CIPAMS should not be underestimated. Important observations further indicate that repeating rEEG is advisable, as this would increase the likelihood of identifying NCSE. Thus, physicians should consider and repeat rEEG when evaluating CIPAMS in order to detect NCSE, which is an independent predictor of unfavorable outcomes. Nonetheless, further studies comparing rEEG and cEEG yields are required to augment the current understanding of the electroclinical spectrum and better describe NCSE in CIPAMS.

Specific profiles of new-onset vs. non-inaugural status epilepticus: From diagnosis to 1-year outcome

While new-onset status epilepticus (NOSE) is a harbinger of chronic epilepsy, prospective medical data are sparse in terms of specifying whether the evolution of status epilepticus (SE) and seizure expression in NOSE resembles what occurs in patients who have already been diagnosed with epilepsy [non-inaugural SE (NISE)] in all aspects apart from its inaugural nature. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical, MRI, and EEG features that could distinguish NOSE from NISE. We conducted a prospective monocentric study in which all patients ≥18 years admitted for SE over a 6-month period were included. A total of 109 patients (63 NISE and 46 NOSE cases) were included. Despite similar modified Rankin scores before SE, several aspects of the clinical history distinguished NOSE from NISE patients. NOSE patients were older and frequently had neurological comorbidity and preexisting cognitive decline, but they had a similar prevalence of alcohol consumption to NISE patients. NOSE and NISE evolve in the same proportions as refractory SE (62.5% NOSE, 61% NISE) and share common features such as the same incidence (33% NOSE, 42% NISE, and p = 0.53) and volumes of peri-ictal abnormalities on MRI. However, in NOSE patients, we observed greater non-convulsive semiology (21.7% NOSE, 6% NISE, and p = 0.02), more periodic lateral discharges on EEG (p = 0.004), later diagnosis, and higher severity according to the STESS and EMSE scales (p < 0.0001). Mortality occurred in 32.6% of NOSE patients and 21% of NISE patients at 1 year (p = 0.19), but with different causes of death occurring at different time points: more early deaths directly linked to SE at 1 month occurred in the NOSE group, while there were more remote deaths linked to causal brain lesions in the NISE group at final follow-up. In survivors, 43.6% of the NOSE cases developed into epilepsy. Despite acute causal brain lesions, the novelty related to its inaugural nature is still too often associated with a delay in diagnosing SE and a poorer outcome, which justifies the need to more clearly specify the various types of SE to constantly raise awareness among clinicians. These results highlight the relevance of including novelty-related criteria, clinical history, and temporality of occurrence in the nosology of SE.

Reducing seizure to needle times in nonconvulsive status epilepticus with multifaceted quality improvement initiatives

OBJECTIVES

Delayed management of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) can lead to an increased morbidity and mortality. We previously established that inefficient treatment of NCSE at our institution stemmed from delayed initiation of emergent anti-seizure medications (ASM). In the present study, we assessed the trajectories of these time parameters and determined patient outcomes following the specific quality improvement (QI) interventions.

METHODS

The QI interventions, including the revision of the educational content for trainees and pharmacy workflow optimization were implemented between January 2019 and September 2021 by a dedicated multidisciplinary task force. The times needed to initiate and administer the ASMs for patients with NCSE as well as patient mortality were assessed in comatose and noncomatose patients and compared with the corresponding values prior to the interventions.

RESULTS

There were 79 occurrences of NCSE in 74 patients. The median time from seizure detection on EEG to the order of the first and second ASM for NCSE was reduced by 4 (p = 0.83) and 8 min (p = 0.52), respectively compared to the times prior to the initiation of interventions. The median times from the order to administration of the first and third ASM for all NCSE occurrences were reduced by 8 and 10 min, respectively (p = 0.28 and p = 0.10). In the present cohort of comatose patients, the median time spent to order the first ASM was reduced by 16.5 min and the time to administer it reduced by 35 min compared to that in our previous study. The overall patient mortality was decreased by 11.1%.

SIGNIFICANCE

More efficient delivery of rescue ASMs in patients with NCSE and improvement in their mortality can be achieved with multidisciplinary team efforts aimed at streamlining the functioning of pharmacy and strengthening the education of trainees and nurses.

Severity scores for status epilepticus in the ICU: systemic illness also matters

BACKGROUND

Current prognostic scores for status epilepticus (SE) may not be adequate for patients in ICU who usually have more severe systemic conditions or more refractory episodes of SE. We aimed to compare the prognostic performance of two SE scores, Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS) and Epidemiology-Based Mortality Score in Status Epilepticus (EMSE) score, with four systemic severity scores, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation 2 (APACHE-2), Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2 (SAPS-2), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and Inflammation, Nutrition, Consciousness, Neurologic function and Systemic condition (INCNS) score in critically ill patients with SE.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study of a prospectively identified SE cohort was conducted in the ICU at a tertiary-care center. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and associations with outcomes of STESS, EMSE, INCNS, APACHE-2, SAPS-2, and SOFA score for the prediction of in-hospital mortality and no return to baseline condition were assessed.

RESULTS

Between January 2015 and December 2020, 166 patients with SE in ICU were included in the study. In predicting in-hospital death, APACHE-2 (0.72), SAPS-2 (0.73), and SOFA score (0.71) had higher AUCs than STESS (0.58) and EMSE (0.69). In predicting no return to baseline condition, the AUC of APACHE-2 (0.75) was the highest, and the AUC of INCNS (0.55) was the lowest. When the specificity approached 90%, the sensitivity values of these scores were not quite acceptable (< 40%). Neither SE scores nor systemic severity scores had desirable prognostic power. In the multivariate logistic regression analyses, the best combinations of scores always included at least one or more systemic severity scores.

CONCLUSIONS

STESS and EMSE were insufficient in outcome prediction for SE patients in ICU, and EMSE was marginally better than STESS. Systemic illness matters in ICU patients with SE, and SE scores should be modified to achieve better accuracy in this severely ill population. This study mostly refers to severely ill patients in the ICU.

The Outcome of Status Epilepticus Among Adults in Aseer Region of Saudi Arabia

Introduction

Epileptic seizure episodes can vary from brief and nearly undetectable to long periods of vigorous shaking. These episodes can result in physical injuries, occasionally including broken bones. With epilepsy, seizures tend to recur and, as a rule, have no immediate underlying cause. Status epilepticus (SE) is an attack of a seizure lasting for more than five minutes or two or more seizures without the person returning to normal between the attacks. Previous definitions used a 30-minute time limit. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcome of SE among adult patients in the Aseer region.

Materials and methods

A retrospective record-based cohort study design was conducted, targeting all accessible medical files of adult patients with SE who were admitted to the Aseer central hospital and military hospital from 2010 to 2017. Data were extracted from all complete and accessible files. Records with missing data were excluded. Clinical outcomes for the cases included were assessed and categorized into cases of complete recovery (without sequelae), cases with incomplete recovery, and death.

Results

The study included 19 adult patients with SE whose ages ranged from seven to 87 years with a mean age of 33.4 ± 22.5 years. Men made up 63.2% of the cases. Infection was the most recorded risk factor among the cases, followed by anti-epileptic drug withdrawal. Only two cases recovered with sequelae, while the remaining 17 cases recovered completely. There were no deaths.

Conclusions

The study revealed that nearly all cases recovered completely with no complications, particularly men who immediately received IV treatment. Early diagnosis and receiving treatment under careful observation via follow-up are recommended.

Frequency and Types of Complications Encountered in Patients With Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus in the Neurological ICU: Impact on Outcome

Objectives. The frequency and types of complications in patients with nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) who are followed up in the intensive care unit (ICU), and the impact of these complications on outcome are not well-known. We investigated the complications and their effects on prognosis in NCSE patients. Methods. After reviewing the video-EEG monitoring (VEEGM) reports of all the consecutive patients who were followed up in our ICU between 2009 and 2019, we identified two groups of patients: 1-patients with NCSE (study group) and 2-patients who underwent VEEGM for possible NCSE but did not have ictal recordings (no-NCSE group). Electronic health records were reviewed to identify demographic and clinical data, duration of ICU care, medical and surgical complications, pharmacologic treatment, and outcome. These parameters were compared statistically between the groups. We also investigated the parameters affecting prognosis at discharge. Results. Thirty-two patients with NCSE comprised the study group. Infection developed in 84%. More than half were intubated, had tracheostomy or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy application. Refractory NCSE was associated with significantly more frequent complications and worse outcome. There was a higher tendency of infections in the study group (P = .059). Higher organ failure scores and prolonged stay in ICU predicted worse outcome (P < .05). Conclusion. The frequency of complications in patients with NCSE who are cared for in the ICU is considerable. Most of the complications are similar to the other patients in ICU, except for the higher frequency of infections. Increased physician awareness about modifiable parameters and timely interventions might help improve prognosis.

De-novo non-convulsive status epilepticus in adult medical inpatients without known epilepsy: Analysis of mortality related factors and literature review

Background

Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) often goes unnoticed and is not easily detected in patients with a decreased level of consciousness, especially in older patients. In this sense, lack of data in this population is available.

Aims

The aim of the present study was to examine daily clinical practice and evaluate factors that may influence the prognosis of NCSE in non-epileptic medical inpatients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis including patients admitted by any cause in an Internal Medicine ward. All patients with compatible symptoms, exclusion of other causes, clinical suspicion or diagnosis of NCSE, and compatible EEG were included. Patients with a previous diagnosis of epilepsy were excluded. We also conducted a literature review by searching the PubMed/Medline database with the terms: Nonconvulsive Status OR Non-Convulsive Status.

Results

We included 54 patients, mortality rate reached 37% and the main factors linked to it were hypernatremia (OR = 16.2; 95% CI, 1.6–165.6; P = 0.019) and atrial fibrillation (OR = 6.7; 95% CI, 1.7–26; P = 0.006). There were no differences regarding mortality when comparing different diagnosis approach or treatment regimens. Our literature review showed that the main etiology of NCSE were neurovascular causes (17.8%), followed by antibiotic treatment (17.2%) and metabolic causes (17%). Global mortality in the literature review, excluding our series, reached 20%.

Discussion

We present the largest series of NCSE cases in medical patients, which showed that this entity is probably misdiagnosed in older patients and is linked to a high mortality.

Conclusion

The presence of atrial fibrillation and hypernatremia in patients diagnosed with NCSE should advise physicians of a high mortality risk.

Status Triphasicus Versus Status Epilepticus?

SUMMARY

Generalized periodic patterns with triphasic wave morphology, long referred to as triphasic waves [TWs], had been associated with metabolic encephalopathies, although other neurologic and systemic causes have since been identified. In a recent classification of periodic patterns, TWs were formally grouped with the generalized periodic discharges, which are often associated with ictal activity. The interpretation of generalized periodic patterns with TWs as nonictal can have significant implications in the management of comatose patients in nonconvulsive status epilepticus. Electrographic characteristics that help distinguish nonictal periodic patterns with TWs from generalized periodic discharge ictal patterns include (1) TWs in long runs of periodic bilaterally synchronous and symmetric discharges, maximal in frontocentral or posterior head regions with and without a frontal-to-occipital lag or posterior-to-anterior lag, respectively; (2) recurrent spontaneous and/or low-dose benzodiazepine-induced attenuation and/or suppression of the periodic pattern and replacement with a diffuse slow wave activity throughout a prolonged EEG recording; and (3) stimulation-induced activation and/or increase in frequency and/or organization of TWs. We coined the term of status triphasicus to describe the electrographic periodic pattern of TWs with these three distinct characteristics. In this article, we discuss the advantages and limitations of keeping the status triphasicus pattern as a distinct electrographic entity different from periodic ictal generalized periodic discharge patterns. We discuss the circumstances in which a status triphasicus pattern can be associated with ictal activity and propose a simple pragmatic classification of status triphasicus that encompasses the different clinical scenarios it can be associated with.

Predictors of long length of hospital stay among elders admitted with seizures in a tertiary centre: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

Population ageing is a global phenomenon, and life expectancy in Brazil is growing fast. Epilepsy is the third most important chronic neurological disorder, and its incidence is higher among elderly patients than in any other segment of the population. The prevalence of epilepsy is greater among inpatients than in the general population and it is related to long length of hospital stay (LOS), which is associated with hospital mortality and higher healthcare costs. Despite these facts, reports of elderly inpatients admitted with seizures and associated outcomes are scarce. To identify predictors of long LOS among elderly inpatients admitted with seizures.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled elders admitted with epileptic seizures or who experienced seizures throughout hospitalization between November 2015 and August 2019. We analysed demographic data, neurological disorders, clinical comorbidities, and seizure features to identify risk factors.

RESULTS

The median LOS was 11 days, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 5-21 days. The frequency of long LOS (defined as a period of hospitalization ≥12 days) was 47%. Multivariate analysis showed there was an exponential increase in long LOS if a patient showed any of the following conditions: intensive care unit (ICU) admission (OR=4.562), urinary tract infection (OR=3.402), movement disorder (OR=5.656), early seizure recurrence (OR=2.090), and sepsis (OR=4.014).

CONCLUSION

Long LOS was common among elderly patients admitted with seizures, and most predictors of long LOS found in this cohort might be avoidable; these findings should be confirmed with further research.

Outcomes of status epilepticus and their predictors in the elderly-A systematic review

Status epilepticus (SE) is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Although SE is frequently seen in elderly patients, there is a lack of a cohesive report of outcome measures and associated factors within this population. Our aim was to systematically review studies reporting outcomes of SE among elderly patients and factors influencing these outcomes. A literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Complete, and Cochrane Library from database conception to April 22, 2018. A total of 85 studies were included in this systematic review. The included studies show that mortality is higher in elderly patients than in adult patients. Lesional etiologies, higher number of comorbidities, NCSE, RSE, longer hospital and intensive care unit stays, and infection during hospitalization are associated with poor outcome. Future studies should consider measuring functional outcomes, comparative studies between elderly and adults and AED clinical trials specific for elderly with SE.

Markers in Status Epilepticus Prognosis

Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurologic emergency with high morbidity and mortality. The assessment of a patient's prognosis is crucial in making treatment decisions. In this review, we discuss various markers that have been used to prognosticate SE in terms of recurrence, mortality, and functional outcome. These markers include demographic, clinical, electrophysiological, biochemical, and structural data. The heterogeneity of SE etiology and semiology renders development of prognostic markers challenging. Currently, prognostication in SE is limited to a few clinical scores. Future research should integrate clinical, genetic and epigenetic, metabolic, inflammatory, and structural biomarkers into prognostication models to approach "personalized medicine" in prognostication of outcomes after SE.

Non-convulsive seizures in the encephalopathic critically ill cancer patient does not necessarily portend a poor prognosis

Background

Non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is present in 10–30% of ICU patients with altered mental status (AMS) and is associated to poor outcomes. To our knowledge, there is no data describing the prevalence and outcomes of critically ill cancer patients with AMS associated to non-convulsive seizures (NCS) or NCSE. We aim to describe the outcomes and risk factors of critically ill cancer patients with encephalopathy associated with non-convulsive seizures (NCS).

Methods

This is a 3-year prospective observational study in a mixed oncological ICU at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Data of ICU patients with moderate to severe encephalopathy (Glasgow Coma Score < 13) that underwent EEG monitoring to rule out NCS were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors and outcomes.

Results

Of the 317 patients with encephalopathy who underwent EEG monitoring, 14.5% had NCS. Known risk factors such as sepsis, CNS infection, antibiotics, and cardiac arrest were not associated with increased risk of NCS. Patients with NCS were more likely to have received recent chemotherapy (41.3% vs 21.4%; p = 0.0036), have a CNS disease (39% vs 24.4%; p = 0.035), and abnormal brain imaging (60.9% vs 44.6%; p = 0.041). Patients with lower SOFA scores, normal renal function, and absence of shock were likely to have NCS as the cause of their encephalopathy (p < 0.03). After multivariate analysis, only abnormal brain imaging and absence of renal failure were associated with NCS. Mortality was significantly lower in patients with non-convulsive seizures when compared to those without seizures (45.7% vs 64%; p = 0.022); however, there was no significant association of seizures and mortality on a multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Conclusions

NCS in critically ill cancer patients is associated with abnormalities on brain imaging and lower prevalence of organ failure. Diagnosis and treatment of NCS should be a priority in encephalopathic cancer patients, as they can have lower mortality than non-seizing patients. Opposite to other populations, NCS should not be considered a poor prognostic factor in critically ill encephalopathic cancer patients as they reflect a reversible cause for altered mentation.

Acute Neurologic Complications During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

We determine the frequency, risk factors, and mortality of neurologic complications in adults on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and propose an algorithm for preventive strategies.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases.

STUDY SELECTION

Screening was performed using predefined search terms to identify cohort studies reporting neurologic complications in adults during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation from 1990 to 2017.

DATA EXTRACTION

The final reference list was generated on the basis of relevance to the discussed topics. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation classification of evidence scheme.

DATA SYNTHESIS

In 44 studies, the median frequency of acute neurologic complications is 13% (1-78%; 5% intracranial hemorrhages, 5% ischemic strokes, 2% seizures). Neurologic complications are reported more frequently with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation compared with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (14 vs eight studies) with a median proportion of complications of 15% (6-33%; 95% CI, 8-19) for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Median in-hospital mortality is higher with neurologic complications (83%; interquartile range, 54-100% vs 42%; interquartile range, 24-55% without neurologic complications; p < 0.001). Median mortality is 96% for hemorrhages, 84% for ischemic strokes 84%, and 40% for seizures. Risk factors are age, preextracorporeal membrane oxygenation cardiac arrest, hypoglycemia, and administration of inotropes. Hemorrhages are associated with female gender, duration of ventilation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, decreased serum fibrinogen, heparin, serum creatinine greater than 2.6 mg/dL, hemodialysis, and thrombocytopenia. Increased odds for ischemic stroke is seen with a preextracorporeal membrane oxygenation serum lactate greater than 10 mmol/L. No studies report daily coagulation monitoring and neurologic assessments, and quality of evidence was low to very low.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurologic complications are reported frequently and with high occurrence rate, especially with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and associated with high mortality calling for daily weaning from sedation and neuromuscular blockers for neurologic assessment and coagulation monitoring. The low quality of evidence indicates the need for higher quality studies in this context.

Status Epilepticus, Refractory Status Epilepticus, and Super-refractory Status Epilepticus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Status epilepticus, refractory status epilepticus, and super-refractory status epilepticus can be life-threatening conditions. This article presents an overview of the three conditions and discusses their management and outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Status epilepticus was previously defined as lasting for 30 minutes or longer but now is more often defined as lasting 5 minutes or longer. A variety of potential causes exist for status epilepticus, refractory status epilepticus, and super-refractory status epilepticus, but all three ultimately involve changes at the cellular and molecular level. Management of patients with status epilepticus generally requires several studies, with EEG of utmost importance given the pathophysiologic changes that can occur during the course of status epilepticus. Status epilepticus is treated with benzodiazepines as first-line antiepileptic drugs, followed by phenytoin, valproic acid, or levetiracetam. If status epilepticus does not resolve, these are followed by an IV anesthetic and then alternative therapies based on limited data/evidence, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, therapeutic hypothermia, immunomodulatory agents, and the ketogenic diet. Scores have been developed to help predict the outcome of status epilepticus. Neurologic injury and outcome seem to worsen as the duration of status epilepticus increases, with outcomes generally worse in super-refractory status epilepticus compared to status epilepticus and sometimes also to refractory status epilepticus.

SUMMARY

Status epilepticus can be a life-threatening condition associated with multiple complications, including death, and can progress to refractory status epilepticus and super-refractory status epilepticus. More studies are needed to delineate the best management of these three entities.

Does semiology of status epilepticus have an impact on treatment response and outcome?

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated whether there is an association between semiology of status epilepticus (SE) and response to treatment and outcome.

METHOD

Two hundred ninety-eight consecutive adult patients (160 females, 138 males) with SE at the University of Munich Hospital were prospectively enrolled. Mean age was 63.2±17.5 (18-97) years. Patient demographics, SE semiology and electroencephalography (EEG) findings, etiology, duration of SE, treatment, and outcome measures were investigated. Status epilepticus semiology was classified according to a semiological status classification. Patient's short-term outcome was determined by Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS).

RESULTS

The most frequent SE type was nonconvulsive SE (NCSE) (39.2%), mostly associated with cerebrovascular etiology (46.6%). A potentially fatal etiology was found in 34.8% of the patients. More than half (60.7%) of the patients had poor short-term outcome (GOS≤3) with an overall mortality of 12.4%. SE was refractory to treatment in 21.5% of the patients. Older age, potentially fatal etiology, systemic infections, NCSE in coma, refractory SE, treatment with anesthetics, long SE duration (>24h), low Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (≤8) at onset, and high Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS-3) (≥3) were associated with poor short-term outcome and death (p<0.05). Potentially fatal etiology and low GCS were the strongest predictors of poor outcome (Exp [b]: 4.74 and 4.10 respectively, p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Status epilepticus semiology has no independent association with outcome, but potentially fatal etiology and low GCS were strong predictive factors for poor short-term outcome of SE.

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus after convulsive status epilepticus: Clinical features, outcomes, and prognostic factors

OBJECTIVES

To investigate clinical characteristics and outcomes of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) after convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) and determine risk factors for unfavorable outcomes.

METHODS

We reviewed consecutive patients with NCSE after CSE over eight years in the neurological intensive care unit. Clinical presentations and the Salzburg EEG criteria for NCSE were used to identify patients with NCSE after CSE. Demographics, clinical features, and anti-epileptic treatment responses were collected and analyzed. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used to evaluate three-month outcomes. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to determine independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Among 145 consecutive patients with convulsive SE, 48 (33.1%) patents eventually evolved into NCSE. Two patients with cerebral anoxia were exclude. At three-month follow-up, 23 patients (50.0%) had mRS ≥ 3, and 16 (34.8%) died. Thirty-two patients (69.6%) were given continuous intravenous anesthetic drugs (CIVADs). Fourteen patients (30.4%) had CIVAD at the rate >50% proposed maximal dose (PMD). There was a single predictor factor found significant after multivariate logistic regression analysis: the recurrence of EEG seizures within two hours of initiation of CIVAD at a dose of greater than half the proposed maximal dose (OR, 9.63; 95%CI, 1.08-86.18; p = 0.043). The use of CIVAD, even with a high dose (>50% PMD), was not independently associated with unfavorable outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The recurrence of EEG seizures within two hours of initiation of CIVAD at a dose of greater than half the proposed maximal dose predicts unfavorable outcomes in NCSE after CSE. The refractoriness of the seizures might be a significantly greater risk for poor outcome in NCSE after CSE than treatment with CIVADs.

Pitfalls in the Diagnosis and Management of Invasive Pneumococcal Meningoencephalitis - What We Can Learn From a Case

Invasive pneumococcal meningitis is a life-threatening infectious disease affecting the central nervous system. It continues to be the most common type of community-acquired acute bacterial meningitides. Despite advances in neuro-critical care, the case fatality rate remains high. Rapid diagnosis and initiation of antibiotic therapy precludes mortality and long-term neurological sequelae in survivors. However, not all cases are easily recognised, and unanticipated complications may impede optimal course and outcome. Here, we describe a case of invasive pneumococcal meningoencephalitis in a 65-year-old man with an unusual initial presentation and pitfalls in the course of the disease. We highlight the importance of early diagnosis and treatment as well as recognition and management of complications.

Transition from intravenous to enteral ketamine for treatment of nonconvulsive status epilepticus

Background

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is a diagnosis that is often challenging and one that may progress to refractory NCSE. Ketamine is a noncompetitive N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonist that increasingly has been used to treat refractory status epilepticus. Current Neurocritical Care Society guidelines recommend intravenous (IV) ketamine infusion as an alternative treatment for refractory status epilepticus in adults. On the other hand, enteral ketamine use in NCSE has been reported in only 6 cases (1 adult and 5 pediatric) in the literature to date.

Case presentation

A 33-year-old woman with a history of poorly controlled epilepsy presented with generalized tonic-clonic seizures, followed by recurrent focal seizures that evolved into NCSE. This immediately recurred within 24 h of a prior episode of NCSE that was treated with IV ketamine. Considering her previous response, she was started again on an IV ketamine infusion, which successfully terminated NCSE. This time, enteral ketamine was gradually introduced while weaning off the IV formulation. Treatment with enteral ketamine was continued for 6 months and then tapered off. There was no recurrence of NCSE or seizures and no adverse events noted during the course of treatment.

Conclusion

This case supports the use of enteral ketamine as a potential adjunct to IV ketamine in the treatment of NCSE, especially in cases without coma. Introduction of enteral ketamine may reduce seizure recurrence, duration of stay in ICU, and morbidity associated with intubation.

Status epilepticus in the elderly patients: A national data study in Thailand

There are limited data in terms of incidence, clinical features, and outcomes in elderly patients with status epilepticus (SE) in national level. We retrospectively explored national data in Thailand for reimbursement of all SE in elderly patients admitted in the fiscal year 2004-2012. SE in elderly patients (age>60years old) were diagnosed and searched based on ICD 10 (G41) from the national database of from the National Health and Security Office. There were 3326 SE in elderly patients. The national incidence of SE was highest at 8.78patients/100,000/year in 2012. The average age was 72.02years and most were males (1379 patients; 58.8%). At discharge, 66% of patients had improved and in-hospital mortality rate was 14.5%. Predictors of poor outcomes were older age≥80years, being female, hospital levels, chronic renal failure, central nervous system infection, respiratory failure, pneumonia, septicemia, shock, acute renal failure, and hyperkalemia. In conclusion, the number of cases of SE in elderly patients in Thailand has been increasing annually. Increasing age was associated with poor outcome in admitted elderly SE patients.

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus in adults - insights into the invisible

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is a state of continuous or repetitive seizures without convulsions. Owing to the nonspecific symptoms and considerable morbidity and mortality associated with NCSE, clinical research has focused on early diagnosis, risk stratification and seizure termination. The subtle symptoms and the necessity for electroencephalographic confirmation of seizures result in under-diagnosis with deleterious consequences. The introduction of continuous EEG to clinical practice, and the characterization of electrographic criteria have delineated a number of NCSE types that are associated with different prognoses in several clinical settings. Epidemiological studies have uncovered risk factors for NCSE; knowledge of these factors, together with particular clinical characteristics and EEG observations, enables tailored treatment. Despite these advances, NCSE can be refractory to antiepileptic drugs, necessitating further escalation of treatment. The presumptive escalation to anaesthetics, however, has recently been questioned owing to an association with increased mortality. This Review compiles epidemiological, clinical and diagnostic aspects of NCSE, and considers current treatment options and prognosis.

Characteristics and outcome of patients with the ICU Admission diagnosis of status epilepticus in Australia and New Zealand

OBJECTIVES

Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency and may lead to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission. However, little is known about the characteristics and outcome of patients with the ICU admission diagnosis of SE.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients admitted to ICU with the primary admission diagnosis of SE as recorded in the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Adult Patient Database over more than a decade. We examined the ICU and population incidence, physiological and demographic features of such SE patients; compared ventilated and non-ventilated SE patients and assessed their mortality.

RESULTS

From 2000-2013, 12,926 patients (1.2% of all ICU admissions) were admitted to ANZ ICUs with SE as the main admission diagnosis. Over the study period, the ICU prevalence (0.93 vs 1.13%), population incidence (30 vs 61 per million population), ICU length of stay (1.45 vs 1.77 days) and the rate of discharge to a rehabilitation facility (2.3 vs 7.1%) of SE increased (P < .0001). In contrast, the use of mechanical ventilation (56.6 vs 47.2%), hospital length of stay (6.64 vs 5.81 days), ICU (2.6 vs 0.75%) and hospital (8.2 vs 4%) mortality decreased (P < .0001). Overall hospital mortality was 613 (4.7%) with 219 (1.7%) patients dying in ICU. Mortality was associated with advancing age, multiple co-morbidities, lower GCS on admission and higher APACHE III scores. From 2000 to 2013 ICU mortality decreased from 2.6% to 0.75%.

SIGNIFICANCE

Over a 14-year period in ANZ, there have been major changes in the features, management and outcome of patients admitted to ICU with the primary admission diagnosis of SE such that their ICU mortality is now <1%.

Electrophysiologic monitoring in acute brain injury

To determine the optimal use and indications of electroencephalography (EEG) in critical care management of acute brain injury (ABI). An electronic literature search was conducted for articles in English describing electrophysiological monitoring in ABI from January 1990 to August 2013. A total of 165 studies were included. EEG is a useful monitor for seizure and ischemia detection. There is a well-described role for EEG in convulsive status epilepticus and cardiac arrest (CA). Data suggest EEG should be considered in all patients with ABI and unexplained and persistent altered consciousness and in comatose intensive care unit (ICU) patients without an acute primary brain condition who have an unexplained impairment of mental status. There remain uncertainties about certain technical details, e.g., the minimum duration of EEG studies, the montage, and electrodes. Data obtained from both EEG and EP studies may help estimate prognosis in ABI patients, particularly following CA and traumatic brain injury. Data supporting these recommendations is sparse, and high quality studies are needed. EEG is used to monitor and detect seizures and ischemia in ICU patients and indications for EEG are clear for certain disease states, however, uncertainty remains on other applications.

Incidences and outcomes of status epilepticus: A 9-year longitudinal national study

INTRODUCTION

The national database of status epilepticus (SE) in Thailand is limited in terms of the characteristics of the demographics, outcome, and prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively explored national data in Thailand for reimbursement of all adult patients with SE admitted in the fiscal year 2004-2012. Patients with SE were diagnosed and searched based on ICD 10 (G41) from the national database of the Universal Health Coverage Insurance office.

RESULTS

There were 12,367 patients with SE. The average age was 48.14 years, and 8119 patients were males (65.7%). At discharge, 75.2% of patients were improved, while 16.4% were not improved, and in-hospital mortality rate was 8.4%. The first three most common comorbid conditions were hypertension (1790 patients, 14.5%), diabetes mellitus (1064 patients, 8.6%), and previous stroke (819 patients, 6.6%). The common complications were respiratory failure (3990 patients, 32.3%), pneumonia (1201 patients, 9.7%) and septicemia (876 patients, 7.1%). The mean (SD) hospital stay was 5.48 (11.44) days. Patients with SE with age over 60 years, female patients, and patients at primary care hospitals had higher proportions of poor outcomes at 36.1%, 39.6%, and 40.9%. Out of 11 comorbid conditions, six of them were significantly associated with poor outcomes. Additionally, 5 complications and two procedures were significant factors of poor outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors associated with poor outcome in admitted patients with SE by the national data were age, gender, hospital level, comorbid conditions, complications of SE, and procedural intervention. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Status Epilepticus".

Predicting outcome of status epilepticus

BACKGROUND

Status epilepticus (SE) is a frequent neurological emergency complicated by high mortality and often poor functional outcome in survivors. The aim of this study was to review available clinical scores to predict outcome.

METHODS

Literature review. PubMed Search terms were "score", "outcome", and "status epilepticus" (April 9th 2015). Publications with abstracts available in English, no other language restrictions, or any restrictions concerning investigated patients were included.

RESULTS

Two scores were identified: "Status Epilepticus Severity Score--STESS" and "Epidemiology based Mortality score in SE--EMSE". A comprehensive comparison of test parameters concerning performance, options, and limitations was performed. Epidemiology based Mortality score in SE allows detailed individualization of risk factors and is significantly superior to STESS in a retrospective explorative study. In particular, EMSE is very good at detection of good and bad outcome, whereas STESS detecting bad outcome is limited by a ceiling effect and uncertainty of correct cutoff value. Epidemiology based Mortality score in SE can be adapted to different regions in the world and to advances in medicine, as new data emerge. In addition, we designed a reporting standard for status epilepticus to enhance acquisition and communication of outcome relevant data. A data acquisition sheet used from patient admission in emergency room, from the EEG lab to intensive care unit, is provided for optimized data collection.

CONCLUSION

Status Epilepticus Severity Score is easy to perform and predicts bad outcome, but has a low predictive value for good outcomes. Epidemiology based Mortality score in SE is superior to STESS in predicting good or bad outcome but needs marginally more time to perform. Epidemiology based Mortality score in SE may prove very useful for risk stratification in interventional studies and is recommended for individual outcome prediction. Prospective validation in different cohorts is needed for EMSE, whereas STESS needs further validation in cohorts with a wider range of etiologies. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Status Epilepticus".

Intravenous anesthesia in treatment of nonconvulsive status epilepticus: Characteristics and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To determine factors associated with continuous anesthetic drug (IVAD) use in nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of patients who met clinical and EEG criteria of NCSE from 2009 to 2014 at a tertiary academic medical center. Patients were categorized according to IVAD use. Outcome variables were response to treatment and in-hospital death. We used descriptive analyses for baseline characteristics and outcome variable differences among patients who did and did not receive IVAD.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients had a total of 45 NCSE episodes. IVAD was used in 69% of the episodes. Patients treated with IVAD were younger (53.1 ± 14.1 vs 64.1 ± 13.3, p = 0.019). The episodes treated with IVAD occurred more frequently in patients with an acute neurologic pathology (58% vs 21%, p = 0.024) and those presenting in a coma (39% vs 7%, p = 0.030). NCSE resolved in 74% of the patients who received IVAD. Duration of NCSE did not differ significantly by treatment group. There were total 13 in-hospital deaths: ten in IVAD users vs three in the no-IVAD group (p > 0.05). Only one in-hospital death appeared to be a direct consequence of IVAD use. Mortality was more common among episodes that were not treated according to the published status epilepticus treatment guidelines compared to the episodes where guidelines were followed.

CONCLUSION

Our findings showed that factors such as younger age, acute neurologic pathology and coma at presentation were associated with IVAD use in patients with NCSE. These factors should be controlled in the future outcome and effectiveness studies to determine the effect of IVAD use on outcome of NCSE.

The Clinical Features and Prognosis of Patients With Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus in the Neurological Intensive Care Unit of a Tertiary Referral Center in Turkey

The availability of video electroencephalography monitoring (VEEGM) in neurological intensive care units has allowed the recognition and treatment of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). However, little is known about characteristics, management, and outcomes in patients with NCSE in developing countries. We retrospectively reviewed the video-EEG reports of 120 patients who were monitored from November 2009 to March 2013. Indications for video-EEG were mostly unexplained alterations of consciousness or witnessed convulsive seizures. We identified the clinical characteristics, treatment regimes, and outcomes of patients with NCSE and tried to determine which parameters were associated with prognosis. NCSE was detected in 12/120 (10%) patients (3 females, 9 males; age 24-86 years). Admission diagnoses were: stroke (3), epilepsy (3), autoimmune limbic encephalitis (3), herpes encephalitis (1), presumed encephalitis-cardiac arrest (1), and malignancy (1). Eight patients had witnessed convulsive seizures before video-EEG. Interictal periodic epileptiform discharges were detected in 9 patients. In one-third of patients, ≥2 EEG recordings were required to capture seizures. In addition to anticonvulsants, 3 patients received immunosuppressive therapy, while intravenous anesthetics were given to 7 patients. Four patients (33.3%; 1 female, 3 males; age 51-67 years; etiology: stroke, autoimmune encephalitis, encephalitis-cardiac arrest, and malignancy; Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score <8 in 3 patients; all had periodic discharges; intravenous anesthetics were used) died in the intensive care unit. NCSE is not an infrequent finding in neurological intensive care units, thus necessitating prolonged video-EEG monitoring in patients at risk. Witnessed convulsions may indicate the presence of nonconvulsive seizures in patients with altered consciousness. Repeated recordings may increase the detection of ictal events. Periodic epileptiform discharges are commonly observed and may predict poor prognosis. Mortality seems to be influenced mostly by the underlying etiology.

Early predictors of refractory status epilepticus: an international two-center study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Status epilepticus (SE) refractory to first- and second-line antiepileptic drugs carries high mortality. Little is known on early prediction of refractory SE (RSE)—an essential tool for planning appropriate therapy. Our aim was to identify and validate independent early RSE predictors in adults.

METHODS

Clinical and laboratory data on consecutive intensive care unit patients with SE from two academic care centers (a derivation data set from a Swiss center and a validation data set from a US center) were assessed. Multivariable analysis was performed with the derivation set to identify RSE predictors at SE onset. Their external validity was evaluated with an independent validation set. Measures of calibration and discrimination were assessed.

RESULTS

In all, 302 patients were analyzed (138 with and 164 without RSE), 171 in the derivation data set and 131 in the validation data set. Acute SE etiology, coma/stupor and serum albumin <35 g/l at SE onset were independent predictors for RSE in the derivation data set [odds ratio (OR) 2.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-4.07; OR 4.83, 95% CI 2.42-9.68; OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.16-5.16]. The prediction model showed good measures of calibration (Hosmer-Lemesow goodness-of-fit test P = 0.99) and discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.8) on the derivation data set—results that were similar in the validation data set (Hosmer-Lemeshow P = 0.24; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the independent prognostic value of readily available parameters for early RSE prediction. Prospective studies are needed to identify additional robust predictors, which could be added to the proposed model for further optimization towards a reliable prediction scoring system.

Spectrogram screening of adult EEGs is sensitive and efficient

OBJECTIVE

Quantitatively evaluate whether screening with compressed spectral arrays (CSAs) is a practical and time-effective protocol for assisting expert review of continuous EEG (cEEG) studies in hospitalized adults.

METHODS

Three neurophysiologists reviewed the reported findings of the first 30 minutes of 118 cEEGs, then used CSA to guide subsequent review ("CSA-guided review" protocol). Reviewers viewed 120 seconds of raw EEG data surrounding suspicious CSA segments. The same neurophysiologists performed independent page-by-page visual interpretation ("conventional review") of all cEEGs. Independent conventional review by 2 additional, more experienced neurophysiologists served as a gold standard. We compared review times and detection rates for seizures and other pathologic patterns relative to conventional review.

RESULTS

A total of 2,092 hours of cEEG data were reviewed. Average times to review 24 hours of cEEG data were 8 (±4) minutes for CSA-guided review vs 38 (±17) minutes for conventional review (p < 0.005). Studies containing seizures required longer review: 10 (±4) minutes for CSA-guided review vs 44 (±20) minutes for conventional review (p < 0.005). CSA-guided review was sensitive for seizures (87.3%), periodic epileptiform discharges (100%), rhythmic delta activity (97.1%), focal slowing (98.7%), generalized slowing (100%), and epileptiform discharges (88.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

CSA-guided review reduces cEEG review time by 78% with minimal loss of sensitivity compared with conventional review.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that screening of cEEG with CSAs efficiently and accurately identifies seizures and other EEG abnormalities as compared with standard cEEG visual interpretation.

Outcome predictors for status epilepticus--what really counts

In adult patients with status epilepticus (SE)-a life-threatening state of ongoing or repetitive seizures--the current evidence regarding outcome prediction is based on clinical, biochemical and EEG determinants. These predictors of outcome involve clinical features such as age, history of prior seizures or epilepsy, SE aetiology, level of consciousness, and seizure type at SE onset. The clinical risk-benefit calculation between the danger of undertreated persistent seizure activity and, conversely, the potential damage from unwarranted aggressive treatments remains a constant challenge. Improved knowledge of outcome determinants, as well as increased availability of reliable outcome prediction models early in the course of SE, is paramount for optimization of treatment of patients who develop this disorder. In this Review, we discuss the major prognostic determinants of outcome in SE. Through consideration of studies that provide measures of association between predictors of SE outcome and death, we propose a detailed--but as yet unvalidated--paradigm for assessment of these predictors during the course of SE. Such an algorithm could guide the organization of results from existing trials and provide direction with regard to the parameters that should be monitored in future studies of SE.

Continuous electroencephalographic monitoring in critically ill patients: indications, limitations, and strategies

OBJECTIVE

Continuous electroencephalography as a bedside monitor of cerebral activity has been used in a range of critically ill patients. This review compiles the indications, limitations, and strategies for continuous electroencephalography in the ICU.

DATA SOURCE

The authors searched the electronic MEDLINE database.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

References from articles of special interest were selected.

DATA SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSION

Electroencephalographically-defined suppression is routinely used as the basis for titration of pharmacologic therapy in refractory status epilepticus and intracranial hypertension. The increasing use of continuous electroencephalography reveals a clinically underappreciated burden of epileptiform and epileptic activity in patients with primary acute neurologic disorders, and also in critically ill patients with acquired encephalopathy. Status epilepticus is reported with continuous electroencephalography in 1% to 10% of patients with ischemic stroke, 8% to 14% with traumatic brain injury, 10% to 14% with subarachnoid hemorrhage, 1% to 21% with intracerebral hemorrhage, and 30% of patients following cardiorespiratory arrest. These figures underscore the importance of continuous electroencephalography in the critically ill. The interpretation of continuous electroencephalography in the ICU is challenged by electroencephalography artifacts and the frequent subtle differences between ictal and interictal patterns.

Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of nonconvulsive status epilepticus: Opening Pandora's box

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is a state of continuous seizure activity for at least 30 minutes, with cognitive or behavioral changes. It may be classified according to EEG evidence of focal or generalized epileptic activity, but may be further categorized by etiology and level of consciousness, both with prognostic weight. There have been several attempts to define the electrographic characteristics of NCSE. Clinical challenges arise from the frequent subtle clinical manifestations, the need for EEG confirmation of ongoing epileptic activity, and physicians' lack of awareness of the possibility of NCSE. This underdiagnosis may have deleterious consequences. This review encompasses epidemiologic, clinical, diagnostic, and prognostic aspects of NCSE in adults, and delineates strategies for management.

Topiramate as an adjunctive treatment in patients with refractory status epilepticus: an observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) is the most severe manifestation of status epilepticus (SE), often requiring intensive care and therapeutic coma. It is associated with prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays, as well as increased morbidity and mortality. Treatment involves both intravenous anaesthetics and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) that can be administrated intravenously, by nasogastric tube or by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Experience with some of the newer AEDs for the treatment of RSE is restricted and higher-class evidence regarding tolerability and efficacy is lacking. Topiramate is a potent broad-spectrum AED with several modes of action, including blockade of the ionotropic glutamatergic AMPA receptor, which is likely to be an important mechanism for the treatment of SE. While there is no commercially available intravenous formulation, topiramate can be administered enterally, which may make it suitable for the treatment of RSE.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the tolerability, safety profile and efficacy of adjunctive and enterally administered topiramate in patients with RSE.

METHODS

A medical chart review was performed of all consecutive patients treated for RSE between August 2004 and December 2011 at the ICU of the University Hospital Basel (Basel, Switzerland).

RESULTS

113 (43%) of all consecutive 268 patients with SE developed RSE. Of those, 35 (31%) were treated with topiramate. Median age was 60.5 years. Topiramate was used as an add-on treatment after 1-6 (median 4) prior administered AEDs had failed. It was introduced after a median of 2 (range 2-23) days for a duration of 1-24 (median 3) days. The response rate after topiramate administration as the third AED was 86% (6/7 patients), and remained stable at 67% after administration as the fourth, fifth, sixth or seventh AED when the groups of successfully and probably successfully treated patients were pooled. Overall, RSE was terminated in 71% of patients within 72 hours after first administration of topiramate, in 9% of patients, within 24 hours (none in the 800 mg/day group; 9% in the 400-799 mg/day group; and 11% in the <400 mg/day group). Mortality was 31% and was not strictly dependent on failure to terminate RSE, but also on the underlying aetiology of RSE. There were no serious or fatal adverse events directly attributable to topiramate. Adverse effects included slight hyperchloremic acidosis and hyperammonemia (all associated with co-medication with valproic acid).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with enterally administered topiramate was feasible, well tolerated and had a good safety profile in patients with RSE in this observational, single-centre, cohort study. Refractory SE was terminated in the majority of patients within 3 days after initiation of topiramate. Prospective studies are warranted to further evaluate topiramate for the treatment of RSE.