Minimal clinically important differences in the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function scale

Drop the "M": Minimally Important Difference and Change Are Not Independent Properties of an Instrument and Cannot Be Determined as a Single Value Using Statistical Methods

OBJECTIVES

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments typically give a score on a scale, making it difficult to know whether a given difference between an experimental treatment and control in a clinical trial is large enough to warrant use of that treatment. The minimally important difference (MID) is used for designing and interpreting clinical research. We aim to explore the rationale and statistical underpinnings of the idea that MID can be defined as an inherent property of a particular PRO instrument.

METHODS

We undertook a narrative review of the empirical and methodologic literature on MIDs.

RESULTS

Both methods of estimating MID-anchor or distribution based-are, at best, highly questionable. Anchor-based methods are problematic because patients may experience changes in health that are poorly captured by a general anchor question about whether health is better, worse, or about the same; distribution-based methods are conditioned on sample-dependent variability of an instrument, and there is no clear rationale as to why the relevance of a specific patient's change in health can be meaningfully referenced to some prior sample's score dispersion. Moreover, the degree of change we would require on a given scale is higher for a treatment that is costly, invasive, unpleasant, or associated with side effects than it is for a safe, well-tolerated, cheap, and convenient alternative or one that is associated with other benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

MID must be estimated within a specific study context. It is best to think of PRO measures in terms of "ID" and leave the "M" to case-by-case, context-based interpretation.

Comparison of the effectiveness of 2 shockwave therapy protocols for the treatment of vascular erectile dysfunction: a randomized, multicenter, open-label, noninferiority, phase 4 clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Shockwave therapy is an optional adjuvant treatment for vascular erectile dysfunction (ED). There is variability in treatment protocols and challenges with patients adherence to the weekly protocol, which is the most commonly used.

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the noninferiority of a monthly shockwave therapy protocol compared to the weekly protocol for treating vascular ED.

METHODS

A randomized, open-label, control active, multicenter clinical trial was conducted. A total of 184 men diagnosed with vascular ED, without comorbid conditions associated with secondary dysfunction or active treatment for ED, were included across 5 clinics in Mexico and Colombia. Patients were randomized to receive either 6 sessions of weekly or monthly shockwave therapy, applying the same parameters for both groups.

OUTCOMES

The primary outcome was the change in the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EF) Questionnaire score at 24 weeks after treatment, assessed using a noninferiority approach. Secondary outcomes included clinical improvement, erection hardness, and self-esteem (SEAR Questionnaire) at posttreatment, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks of follow-up.

RESULTS

At 24-week posttreatment, the average change in IIEF-EF was 1.93 (± 6.55; 95% CI 0.49-3.38) in the weekly group and 4.30 (± 6.78; 95% CI 2.69-5.9) in the monthly group, demonstrating noninferiority of the monthly protocol (difference -2.36; 95% CI -4.4 to -0.2; noninferiority P < .0001). At the end of treatment, clinical improvement was achieved by 55.2% of participants in the monthly protocol and 30.9% in the weekly (P = .042). No significant differences were found in other outcomes.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

A 6-session monthly shockwave therapy regimen could improve erectile function in men with ED.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

This is the largest clinical trial to date evaluating shockwave therapy regimens for ED. The principal limitations were the absence of objective vascular assessment of the changes produced by shockwaves, and the absence of a placebo control group.

CONCLUSION

A monthly protocol of 6 shockwave therapy sessions is noninferior to a weekly protocol up to 6 months after therapy, in men with vascular ED.

Effect of NeuroSAFE-guided RARP versus standard RARP on erectile function and urinary continence in patients with localised prostate cancer (NeuroSAFE PROOF): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Sparing the periprostatic neurovascular bundles during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) improves postoperative erectile function and early urinary continence recovery. The NeuroSAFE technique, a standardised frozen section analysis, enables accurate real-time detection of positive surgical margins during nerve-sparing, increasing the likelihood of successful nerve preservation. However, the impact of the technique on patient outcomes remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the effect of NeuroSAFE-guided RARP versus standard RARP on erectile function and urinary continence.

METHODS

NeuroSAFE PROOF was a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial done at five National Health Service hospitals in the UK. Key eligibility criteria were a diagnosis of non-metastatic prostate cancer deemed suitable to undergo RARP, good erectile function (defined as a score of ≥22 on the first 5 items of the International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF]) without medical erectile function assistance, and no previous prostate cancer treatment. No age limits were applied. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to standard RARP or NeuroSAFE-guided RARP using block randomisation, stratified by site. Masking of participants to allocation was maintained throughout, but patients were informed of their nerve-sparing status after the operation. Due to the nature of the intervention, operating teams were aware of treatment group. Nerve-sparing was guided by a preoperative plan in the standard RARP group and by intraoperative NeuroSAFE assessment in the NeuroSAFE group. The primary outcome was erectile function at 12 months, assessed using the IIEF-5 score, in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all randomly assigned participants who had surgery. Secondary endpoints were urinary continence scores at 3 and 6 months, evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ), and the erectile function domain of the IIEF (IIEF-6) scores at 12 months. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03317990.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 6, 2019, and Dec 6, 2022, 407 patients were recruited, of whom 381 had surgery (190 participants in the NeuroSAFE group and 191 participants in the standard RARP group), and were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. Data for the primary outcome (IIEF-5 score at 12 months) were available for 344 participants (173 in the NeuroSAFE group and 171 participants in the standard RARP group). Median follow-up was 12·3 months (IQR 11·8-12·7). At 12 months, the mean IIEF-5 score was 12·7 (SD 8·0) in the NeuroSAFE group versus 9·7 (7·5) in the standard RARP group (adjusted mean difference 3·18 [95% CI 1·62 to 4·75]; p<0·0001). At 3 months, the ICIQ score was significantly lower in the NeuroSAFE group than the standard RARP group (adjusted mean difference -1·41 [95% CI -2·42 to -0·41]; p=0·006). At 6 months, no significant difference in ICIQ score was observed between groups (adjusted mean difference -0·37 [95% CI -1·35 to 0·62]; p=0·46). At 12 months, the mean IIEF-6 score was higher in the NeuroSAFE group than in the standard RARP group (15·3 [SD 9·7] vs 11·5 [SD 9·0]; adjusted mean difference 3·92 [95% CI 2·01 to 5·83]; p<0·0001). Serious adverse events occurred in six (3%) of 190 patients in the NeuroSAFE group, and and in five (3%) of 191 patients in the standard RARP group. All adverse events were postoperative complications; no serious adverse events or deaths were attributed to the study intervention.

INTERPRETATION

The use of NeuroSAFE to guide nerve-sparing during RARP improves patient-reported IIEF-5 scores at 12 months and short-term urinary continence. The erectile function benefit is enhanced in patients who would not otherwise have undergone bilateral nerve-sparing by standard practice.

FUNDING

National Institute of Healthcare Research, JP Moulton Charitable Foundation, UCLH Charity, St Peters Trust, and Rosetrees Trust.

Efficacy of extracorporeal shock waves therapy for erectile dysfunction treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Erectile dysfunction is becoming a public health problem, affecting 22% of men over 40 years of age, where one of the first lines of treatment for this pathology is the use of drugs, so it is necessary to know the effectiveness of new non-invasive alternative therapies that limit the consumption of these substances in the general population. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal shock waves therapy for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. To achieve this, a systematic review was carried out through the databases PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Cinhal, Medline, and Web of Science; using the search terms, Erectile Dysfunction, Physical Therapy Modalities, Physical Therapy Specialty, Rehabilitation and Shock Wave Therapy.

RESULTS

The search ended with a total of 15 articles, differentiating between two study groups, those patients suffering from organic erectile dysfunction (n = 12) and those suffering from the same pathology after undergoing radical prostatectomy with nerve sparing (n = 3). The combined analysis showed that the group treated with extracorporeal shock waves therapy had a significant increase in erectile function compared to the controls. The Difference in Means was 2.96 points (95% CI: 1.93 to 4.61; p < 0.001; I2 = 63.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Extracorporeal shock waves therapy appears to have a positive effect in the treatment of erectile dysfunction, with these changes being reflected in different variables such as erectile function, erectile efficacy or sexual satisfaction. Its efficacy seems to increase with interventions that include two weekly sessions and with the application at least 6000 pulses in each session.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO Registration code: CRD42021230001.

Exercise and Psychosexual Education to Improve Sexual Function in Men With Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Sexual dysfunction is a common adverse effect of prostate cancer treatment, and current management strategies do not adequately address physical and psychological causes. Exercise is a potential therapy in the management of sexual dysfunction.

Objective

To investigate the effects of supervised, clinic-based, resistance and aerobic exercise with and without a brief psychosexual education and self-management intervention (PESM) on sexual function in men with prostate cancer compared with usual care.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A 3-arm, parallel-group, single-center randomized clinical trial was undertaken at university-affiliated exercise clinics between July 24, 2014, and August 22, 2019. Eligible participants were men with prostate cancer who had previously undergone or were currently undergoing treatment and were concerned about sexual dysfunction. Data analysis was undertaken October 8 to December 23, 2024.

Interventions

Participants were randomized to (1) 6 months of supervised, group-based resistance and aerobic exercise (n = 39 [34.8%]), (2) the same exercise program plus PESM (n = 36 [32.1%]), or (3) usual care (n = 37 [33.0%]). Exercise was to be undertaken 3 days per week.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was sexual function assessed with the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). Secondary outcomes included body composition, physical function, and muscle strength. Analyses were undertaken using an intention-to-treat approach.

Results

In total, 112 participants (mean [SD] age, 66.3 [7.1] years) were randomized. Mean adjusted difference in IIEF score at 6 months favored exercise compared with usual care (3.5; 95% CI, 0.3-6.6; P = .04). The mean adjusted difference for intercourse satisfaction was not significant (1.7; 95% CI, 0.1-3.2; P = .05). PESM did not result in additional improvements. Compared with usual care, exercise also significantly improved fat mass (mean adjusted difference, -0.9 kg; 95% CI, -1.8 to -0.1 kg; P = .02), chair rise performance (mean adjusted difference, -1.8 seconds; 95% CI, -3.2 to -0.5 seconds; P = .002), and upper (mean adjusted difference, 9.4 kg; 95% CI, 6.9-11.9 kg; P < .001) and lower (mean adjusted difference, 17.9 kg; 95% CI, 7.6-28.2 kg; P < .001) body muscle strength.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial of supervised exercise, erectile function in patients with prostate cancer was improved. PESM resulted in no additional improvements. Patients with prostate cancer should be offered exercise following treatment as a potential rehabilitation measure.

Trial Registration

ANZCTR Identifier: ACTRN12613001179729.

Discrepancy Between Patient versus Provider Assessment of Erection Quality

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the discrepancy between patients' and providers' assessments of erection rigidity and its association with patient characteristics and penile ultrasound parameters.

METHODS

Patients presenting for penile Doppler ultrasound between July 2022 and October 2023 were reviewed retrospectively. After intracavernosal injection, patients and providers independently rated erection rigidity from 1 to 10 prior to ultrasound. We defined discrepancy as a difference of 2 out of 10 or greater between the two assessments. Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for hypothesis testing.

RESULTS

65/297 (22%) of patients demonstrated a discrepancy in perceived erection quality. 58/65 (89%) of these patients rated their erections lower than their providers. There was a higher incidence of erectile dysfunction as the primary diagnosis in the discrepant group as compared to the concordant group (P = .01). The discrepant group also showed a higher resistive index on penile ultrasound (P = .04), with no difference in peak systolic velocity, end diastolic velocity, or other clinical variables between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Discrepancy in perceived erection rigidity was mainly driven by lower patient perception, although these patients had noninferior penile hemodynamics to their peers. These findings underscore the influence of subjective perception of virility on sexual function. It is critical for clinicians to identify patients with poor perception of erectile function out of proportion to physiologic abnormalities. Thoughtful counseling about treatment goals and expectations, emphasizing functional outcomes, and adjunctive treatments such as sex therapy or psychotherapy are critical to therapeutic success in this population.

Bedtime sildenafil oral suspension improves sexual spontaneity and time-concerns compared to on-demand treatment in men with erectile dysfunction: results from a real-life, cross-sectional study

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i) are among the first line treatment options in men with erectile dysfunction (ED). On-demand sildenafil has proved to be an effective PDE5i but with lower spontaneity scores compared to daily tadalafil treatment. We aimed to investigate the impact of on-demand sildenafil compared to bedtime use on efficacy and spontaneity scores in men with ED. We retrospectively analysed data from a cohort of men with mild/moderate ED treated for three months with on-demand sildenafil 50 mg oral suspension formulation (OSF) (group 1, n = 40), bedtime sildenafil 50 mg OSF (group 2, n = 40) and bedtime sildenafil 37.5 mg OSF (group 3, n = 40). After three months patients were evaluated with the International Index of Erectile Function-5 items (IIEF-5) and the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales-Short Form (PAIRS-SF) questionnaires. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for baseline confounders. The IIEF-5 and PAIRS-SF scores were compared between groups at follow-up with the repeated measures ANOVA test. Linear regression analyses tested the associations between study variables and spontaneity scores. After matching, median patient's age and ED duration were 56 (50-61) years and 18 (10-20) months, respectively. Compared to baseline, IIEF-5 scores significantly improved after sildenafil OSF treatment, irrespective of the therapeutic approach (all p < 0.01 vs. baseline). The PAIRS-SF spontaneity score was significantly better in group 2 [15 (13-16), p < 0.01] and group 3 [14 (14-16), p < 0.01] compared to the on-demand use [13 (12-13)]. Fewer time concerns were reported for bedtime use than on-demand sildenafil. Sildenafil OSF bedtime use was found to be an independent predictor for better spontaneity and fewer time concerns scores (all p < 0.001). Bedtime sildenafil OSF showed similar efficacy but better spontaneity scores than on-demand use. Bedtime sildenafil is a valuable option for men with ED prioritizing efficacy and sexual spontaneity.

Effect and prognosis of thoracolumbar fracture combined with incomplete spinal cord injury on male sexual function

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Severe thoracolumbar fractures are associated with spinal cord injury that potentially leads to sexual dysfunction. Our purpose is to study the factors that influence sexual dysfunction and its prognosis.

METHODS

This study included 117 male patients with thoracolumbar fractures and incomplete spinal cord injury. Data reflecting spinal cord functions and male sexual functions, including American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade, Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) score, International Index of Erectile Function-5(IIEF-5) score and The International Spinal Cord Injury Male Sexual Function Basic Data Set was obtained prior to injury, 3 months post-injury, at 2-year follow-up, and at final follow-up. Wilcoxon signed ranks test is used to verify whether there are differences in IIEF-5 and PEDT scores over time. Kendall's Tau-b correlation analysis is used to investigate factors affecting sexual function impairment and recovery.

RESULTS

The IIEF-5 score is 19.5 ± 6.4 before injury and 8.7 ± 8.0 after injury, representing a significant difference. The PEDT score is 5.3 ± 3.1 before injury and 6.9 ± 5.2 after injury, representing a significant difference. The IIEF-5 score at 2-year follow-up was 17.5 ± 7.1, markedly improved relative to post-injury; the average PEDT at 2-year follow-up is 6.4 ± 5.1, showing no considerable difference from post-injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracolumbar fractures combined with incomplete spinal cord injury may lead to decreased erectile function and premature ejaculation. The degree of spinal cord injury and the injured segment exhibit a strong correlation with the extent of reduced sexual function post-injury. Approximately 70% of patients have sexual function recover to pre-injury levels at the 2-year postoperative follow-up.

Testosterone Treatment and Sexual Function in Men: Secondary Analysis of the T4DM (Testosterone for Diabetes) Trial

CONTEXT

The combined effects of testosterone treatment and lifestyle intervention on sexual function in men at high risk of type 2 diabetes are unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of testosterone treatment with a lifestyle intervention in men aged 50-74 years at high risk of, or newly diagnosed with, type 2 diabetes (OGTT).

DESIGN

A secondary analysis of the Testosterone for the Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes (T4DM) trial, a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted across six Australian centers.

INTERVENTIONS

Intramuscular testosterone undecanoate (1000 mg) or placebo, 3 monthly for 2 years alongside a community-based lifestyle program.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Sexual function measured using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-15 questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of 1007 participants, 792 (79%) had complete IIEF-15 data. Baseline domain scores were inversely related to age and waist circumference, but unrelated to serum testosterone or estradiol levels. Testosterone treatment improved all five IIEF-15 domain scores, with stronger effects on sexual desire and orgasmic function in older men, and sexual desire in men with higher depression scores. Testosterone had no impact on depression. Independent of treatment, reductions in waist circumference were associated with improved erectile function, and reductions in depression scores correlated with better sexual function. Clinically significant improvement (CSI) in erectile function and sexual desire occurred in 3% and 10% of men, respectively, and was inversely related to baseline function. CSI improvements in erectile function and sexual desire were greater in younger and older men respectively.

CONCLUSION

Testosterone treatment enhanced sexual desire and, to a lesser extent, erectile function, particularly in older men and those with higher waist circumference or depressive symptoms. Reduced waist circumference and depression independently improved sexual function.

Safety and Efficacy of Intra-Prostatic Injection of Betamethasone for Refractory Chronic Nonbacterial Prostatitis: A Prospective Cohort Clinical Study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of TRUS guided betamethasone injections in refractory cases of chronic nonbacterial prostatitis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-five patients with refractory CNP were included in a prospective cohort clinical trial. Six injections of betamethasone sodium sulfate were guided by TRUS. After injection: assessment of NIH-CPSI, IPSS, IIEF, GRA and VAS were performed 1, 4, and 12 weeks after injection. Prostatitis symptoms were measured by NIH-CPSI. We considered the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) as a 25% decrease or a six-point reduction from baseline. We considered the MCID of the IIEF to be at least an increase of 4 points. We considered the MCID of the IPSS score to be three points and the MCID for the VAS score to be a 25%-35% change of the initial score. Regarding the global response assessment (GRA), scores 5-7 means significant success rate of perceived treatment.

RESULTS

According to total NIH CPSI score, the success rate of injected cases was 71% after 1 week, dropping to 55.6% after 4 weeks and 44.4% after 12 weeks. According to IPSS questionnaire, the MD (mean difference) is -4.09 ± 3.5, -3.8 ± 3.83 and -3.47 ± 3.92. According to the IIEF questionnaire, the success rate was 22% and 26.7% after 4 and 12 weeks respectively. According to GRA, successful pain control was reported in 82%, 71% and 64.4% after 1, 4 and 12 weeks, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Intraprostatic betamethasone injection is a simple, safe, and feasible procedure in refractory cases with CNP with predominant pain and urinary symptoms.

Venous Leak Embolization Results in Clinical Improvement of Patients with Mixed Arterio-Venous Erectile Dysfunction Not Responding to Arterial Revascularization Alone

PURPOSE

To analyze the safety and efficacy of additional venous leak embolization after an initial arterial revascularization to treat patients with combined arteriogenic and venogenic erectile dysfunction (ED).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single-center observational study from October 1, 2019, to September 30, 2022, including 26 patients with ED resistant to phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitors (PDE5i) and without significant clinical benefit after arterial revascularization of erection-related arteries. Additional treatment with venous leak embolization was performed 458 ± 424 days after arterial revascularization. Arterial obstruction and venous leak were verified based on color Doppler flow analysis, computed tomography angiography, and computed tomography cavernosography. The primary safety endpoint was any major adverse event 6 weeks after the procedure. The primary feasibility endpoint was defined as an IIEF-6 (International Index of Erectile Function-6) score improvement of ≥ 4 points at 6-week follow-up post intervention.

RESULTS

Procedural success was achieved in all patients with no major adverse events on follow-up. The primary feasibility endpoint at 6-week follow-up was reached with 3/26 (11.5%) of patients following arterial revascularization only. Six weeks after additional venous embolization, the primary feasibility endpoint was reached in 17/26 (65.4%) of patients.

CONCLUSION

Venous leak embolization yields additional clinical improvement and treatment potential in patients with vasculogenic ED not responding to PDE5i due to mixed arterio-venous disease and insufficient clinical improvement after arterial revascularization alone.

Effectiveness and patient satisfaction with the new sildenafil oral suspension formulation compared to sildenafil oro-dispersible film: a real-life study

Sildenafil is one of the most used phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) in clinical practice. A new oral suspension formulation (OSF) of sildenafil has been introduced to overcome the drawbacks of previous formulations. We assess the efficacy and patients' experience with sildenafil 50 mg OSF in men with ED who were taking the sildenafil oro-dispersible film (ODF). Demographics and clinical data from 70 consecutive men with mild-moderate ED were analysed. Patients were treated with sildenafil 50 mg ODF for 12 weeks (follow-up 1), then, after 2-week washout, were administered sildenafil 50 mg OSF for 12 weeks (follow-up 2). At each follow-up, patients completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), and the Psychological and Interpersonal Relationship Scales-Short Form (PAIRS-SF) questionnaires. Descriptive statistics described the whole cohort. The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test assessed potential differences in psychometric scores at different follow-up assessments. Logistic regression analyses tested the associations between study variables and satisfaction after sildenafil OSF treatment. Overall, median age was 56 (51-62) years, and median IIEF-EF score was 14 (12-17). Compared to baseline, IIEF-EF scores significantly improved after sildenafil ODF and OSF treatment (all p < 0.01) with no differences between the two formulations. IIEF-overall satisfaction (OS) was higher after sildenafil OSF than ODF (p < 0.001). Similarly, median PGI-I score were better after sildenafil OSF than ODF (p < 0.001). The PAIRS-SF spontaneity scores were significantly higher after OSF than ODF (p < 0.01). At multivariable logistic regression analysis, younger age (p = 0.02) and lower baseline IIEF-EF scores (p = 0.01) were independent predictors of improved satisfaction with OSF compared to ODF. The sildenafil OSF and ODF had similar efficacy, however the new OSF provides higher satisfaction and spontaneity scores compared to the oro-dispersible film.

Antioxidant Supplementation for Erectile Dysfunction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of antioxidant supplementation for treating erectile dysfunction (ED).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of oral antioxidant supplementation in men with ED. Erectile function was assessed by the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain (IIEF-EF) score. Using random-effects meta-analysis models, antioxidant and placebo groups were compared for erectile function using the mean difference in IIEF-EF score adjusted to a 6-30 scale and for side effects using the log risk ratio.

RESULTS

The review included 23 trials of 1,583 men (median age 51 years) treated with antioxidant supplementation or placebo for a median of 12 weeks (range, 4 weeks to 6 months). Antioxidant supplementation significantly improved erectile function compared to placebo, with a mean difference of 5.5 points (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.7 to 7.3; p<0.001) on the IIEF-EF. In meta-regression, the treatment benefit was greater in men with more severe ED (p<0.001). Side effects were uncommon, none were serious, and the frequency was comparable between antioxidant (3.8%) and placebo (2.1%) groups (log risk ratio=0.36; 95% CI: -0.24 to 0.97; p=0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

Antioxidant supplementation appears safe and significantly improves erectile function in men with ED, particularly those with more severe symptoms. Limitations of this review included unknown long-term efficacy and safety and the inability to make specific product and dosing recommendations due to the variety of antioxidants and regimens studied.

Efficacy of Hongjing I granule, an herbal medicine, in patients with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction in a randomized controlled trial

Background

HJIG is a potential treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) that has been used in China for over 20 years. We conducted a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the Chinese Herbal Medicine, Hongjing I granule (HJIG), in patients with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction (ED).

Methods

This study is structured as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, executed across multiple centers. The recruitment strategy is primarily oriented towards patients demonstrating a pronounced preference for solely leveraging traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) interventions, a preference that is widely observed within TCM healthcare settings. A total of 100 patients, presenting with mild to moderate ED, specifically linked to the traditional diagnostic criteria of qi deficiency and blood stasis, will be enrolled. These participants will be randomly distributed between the HJIG (N = 50) and placebo (N = 50) arms. The designated treatment period is set at 8 weeks. Primary outcome measures encompass the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain (IIEF-EF) score, the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP), and scores derived from the traditional Chinese medicine symptom evaluation.

Results

Of the 122 men enrolled, the baseline IIEF-EF score averaged 16.00 [IQR: 13.00, 18.00]. Eight weeks post-randomization, the HJIG group demonstrated a mean change in IIEF-EF scores of 7.80 (±3.25), compared to 3.33 (±3.90) in the placebo group, signifying a marked difference (P < 0.001). The median alterations in SEP3 scores were 0.50 [IQR: 0.36, 0.75] for the HJIG group and 0.50 [0.20, 0.67] for the placebo group, revealing a statistically relevant distinction (P = 0.05). In both primary outcomes, HJIG proved superior to the placebo. Additionally, improvements in TCM symptom scores were notably greater in the HJIG group relative to the placebo, with no adverse events reported across both groups.

Conclusion

The Hongjing I granule significantly improved symptoms in patients with mild to moderate ED. However, to validate these findings, further extended randomized trials are warranted.

Clinical Trial Registration

The study has been registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) and the registration number was ChiCTR2000041127.

Regenerative therapies for erectile dysfunction: a systematic review, Bayesian network meta-analysis, and meta-regression

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines advocate a shared decision-making process approach to erectile dysfunction management, and while there is growing interest in regenerative therapies such as stem cell therapy, platelet-rich plasma injections, and low-intensity shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction, comparative data on the efficacy of these modalities are limited.

AIM

This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to compare stem cell therapy, platelet-rich plasma injections, and low-intensity shockwave therapy for managing erectile dysfunction and quantify their impact on the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF).

METHODS

In January 2024, a systematic search of online databases was performed to identify randomized clinical trials related to stem cell therapy, platelet-rich plasma injections, and low-intensity shockwave therapy in erectile dysfunction. Eligible articles reported outcomes using the IIEF score. Data were inputted into Review Manager 5.4 for pairwise meta-analysis. Data were then used to build a network in R Studio. These networks were used to model 200 000 Markov Chains via MonteCarlo sampling. The results are expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Meta-regression was used to adjust for PDE5is use.

OUTCOMES

Impact on the International Index of Erectile Function.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies involving 907 patients were analyzed. The standardized mean difference (SMD) vs control for stem cell therapy was 0.92 [95% CrI -0.49, 2.3]. For platelet-rich plasma, the SMD vs control was 0.83 [95% CrI 0.15, 1.5], and for low-intensity shockwave therapy, the SMD vs control was 0.84 [95% CrI 0.49, 1.2]. When stratifying low-intensity shockwave therapy by dose, the SMD vs control at 0.15 mJ/mm2 was 1.1 [95% CrI 0.36, 1.9], while at 0.09 mJ/mm2, it was 0.75 [95% CrI 0.26, 1.2]. Meta-regression adjusting for the administration of PDE5 inhibitors yielded non-significant results.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The findings suggest that stem cells, platelet-rich plasma, and low intensity shockwave therapy, particularly at 0.15 and 0.09 mJ/mm2, may offer improvements in erectile function.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

The strength is the robust statistical methods. Limitations are in heterogeneity in control groups and follow-up durations among included studies.

CONCLUSION

Shockwave therapy and platelet-rich plasma demonstrated statistically significant improvements, though the clinical relevance and extent of their impact remain questionable. Further research is necessary to determine the efficacy of stem cell therapies for erectile function.

App-based Therapy of Erectile Dysfunction Using a Digital Health Application (EDDIG Study): A Randomized, Single-blind, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

While international guidelines advocate for a multifaceted approach to treating erectile dysfunction (ED) involving physical activities, psychological support, and education, structured programs are infrequent. To address this gap, an app-based therapy was developed, offering a systematic approach. This randomized, single-blind controlled trial aimed to assess the effectiveness of an app-based therapeutic in improving ED.

METHODS

A total of 241 patients (49.74, standard deviation 12.73 yr) with ED (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF]-5 <22) were randomized to the 12-wk app-based therapy (treatment group [TG], n = 122) or a waiting list for the app with continuation of their current management protocol (control group [CG], n = 119). Patients on long-term medication for ED were included, but subsequent exclusion occurred for those starting new medication. Coprimary endpoints were improvements from baseline to 12 wk in erectile function (IIEF-5), disease-related quality of life (QOL-Med-15), and patient activation (Patient Activation Measure [PAM-13]).

KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS

Erectile function (IIEF-5) improved by 4.5 points in the TG versus 0.2 points in the CG (p < 0.0001, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.4-5.0) group. Quality of life (QOL-Med) improved by 20.5 points in the TG versus -0.0 points in the CG (p < 0.0001, 95% CI 19.2-26.0) group. Patient activation (PAM-13) improved by 11.2 points in the TG versus 0.6 points in the CG (p < 0.0001, 95% CI 9.1-13.6) group. Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor intake had no influence on all observed treatment effects.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

App-based therapy of patients with ED provided a significant, clinically meaningful improvement. Quality of life and patient activation were also enhanced significantly. This program has the potential to change clinical practice in the treatment of ED.

PATIENT SUMMARY

A therapy app improved sexual function and overall well-being for men experiencing erectile dysfunction, leading to better quality of life.

Indications for testosterone therapy in men

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Testosterone replacement therapy for men with organic hypogonadism due to medical disease of the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular (HPT) axis is uncontroversial. In these men, testosterone replacement replaces the deficient hormone and relieves the signs and symptoms of androgen deficiency. In contrast, the role of testosterone treatment in middle-aged or older men who have clinical features consistent with androgen deficiency accompanied by reductions in serum testosterone but lack identifiable HPT axis disease, a scenario sometimes referred to as 'functional' or 'late onset' hypogonadism, has been uncertain.

RECENT FINDINGS

Three large randomized controlled clinical trials, discussed in this review, have reported new data regarding short-term to medium-term benefits and risks of testosterone therapy in such middle-aged and older men, including effects on sexual function, vitality, cognition and mood, glucose metabolism, physical function, hematologic parameters, as well as bone, cardiovascular and prostate health.

SUMMARY

The findings of these trials allow for a more nuanced, personalized approach to testosterone therapy in such men. However, long-term benefits and risk of testosterone therapy (beyond 3-4 years) remain unknown.

Radiofrequency energy in the treatment of erectile dysfunction-a novel cohort pilot study on safety, applicability, and short-term efficacy

The erectile mechanism depends, in part on the intactness of the collagen components in the penis. As such, impaired collagen may have a deleterious effect on erectile function. Radiofrequency energy has been shown to renew and restore spatial structural arrangement of collagen fibers; therefore, treatment of erectile dysfunction with radiofrequency could lead to anatomical and physiological changes at the penile tissue level and could lead to improvement in the erectile mechanism. We conducted this study to assess the effect of radiofrequency treatment on erection quality. We evaluated the safety, applicability, and efficacy of a self-applied, handheld, low-intensity radiofrequency device (Vertica®) in men with moderate and mild-to-moderate organic erectile dysfunction. The treatment protocol consisted of 12 treatments (twice a week during the 1st month, and once a week during the 2nd month), and each participant treated himself individually. Treatment outcomes were evaluated using the International Index of Erectile Function, Erection Hardness Scale, Erectile Dysfunction Index of Treatment Satisfaction, Benefit, Satisfaction & Willingness to continue, Quality of Erection Questionnaire, Sexual Quality of Life questionnaires and specific questions addressing side effects and ease of use. Twenty-eight out of 32 men (mean age 59.5 ± 9.8, range: 41-78 years) completed a one-month follow-up after treatment. Mean International Index of Erectile Function (43.7. ± 7.8 vs. 60.9 ± 10.8, p < 0.01), International Index of Erectile Function -Erection Function domain (16.8 ± 3.1 vs. 24.4 ± 4.4, p < 0.001), and Erection Hardness Scores (2.2 ± 0.8 vs. 3.2 ± 0.5, p = 0.01) were all significantly improved. Fifty percent of patients achieved normal erectile function parameters according to the International Index of Erectile Function -Erection Function domain score >25. High mean scores were achieved in the Erectile Dysfunction Index of Treatment Satisfaction (76.8 ± 20.3), Benefit, Satisfaction & Willingness to continue (4.83 ± 1.1), Quality of Erection Questionnaire (73.4 ± 23.8), and Sexual Quality of Life (67 ± 29.4) questionnaires. No side effects were reported and participants rated the device as very comfortable, simple, and easy to operate.

The potential role of intracavernosal injection of platelet-rich plasma for treating patients with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction: A GRADE-Assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has shown positive effects on enhancing erectile function in animal studies. Human clinical trials are limited and provide contradictory results. This review aims to conduct a meta-analysis of the available Randomized controlled trials (RCT) to assess the efficacy of PRP in males with ED.

METHODS

A systematic review was carried out following the Cochrane Handbook of Intervention and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023441655).

RESULTS

A total of three RCTs were included in the analysis for a total of 221 patients with mild to moderate ED. The patients receiving PRP reported significantly better improvement of IIEFEF score during 1,3- and 6-months follow-up compared to the placebo group (mean difference [MD] 2.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48 to 3.83, p < 0.01; MD 2.11, 95%CI 0.13 to 4.09, p = 0.04; MD 2.99, 95%CI 1.79 to 4.19, p < 0.01). The pooled analysis indicated that attainment of minimally clinical important difference (MCID) was significantly higher in patients receiving PRP compared to the placebo group during one and 6-month follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 5.51, 95%CI 1.2 to 254, p = 0.03; OR 5.64, 95%CI 2.05 to 15.55, p < 0.01; respectively). Encouragingly, no major AEs were reported in all three trials in the PRP and placebo groups (p = 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the potential role of PRP in providing short-term improvement of erectile function parameters for up to 6 months in mild to moderate ED patients. Future RCTs with longer-duration follow-ups and more standardized treatment protocols are necessary to gain sufficient details on PRP's long-term effectiveness and safety.

Erectile dysfunction and sleep related bruxism: An exploratory review of an improbable association

The World Health Organization recognizes sexual health as not merely the absence of disease, but a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in relation to one's sexuality. Achieving sexual satisfaction is pivotal for many individuals, as it significantly contributes to their quality of life. Among various sexual disorders, erectile dysfunction (ED) is notably prevalent, affecting an estimated 10-20 million men in the United States alone. This condition impacts not just the person experiencing it but also significantly influences their intimate connections with partners. Although the causes of ED are multifactorial, recent research highlights a compelling association between sleep disorders, such as sleep deprivation, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and insomnia, and the incidence of ED. Furthermore, engaging in night work has been observed to exacerbate the risk of developing ED. One common sleep disorder, sleep related bruxism (SRB), despite its prevalence, has not generally been associated with ED. However, there is some interesting evidence hinting at a potential relationship, including a few studies reporting a high prevalence of ED in individuals with SRB. This review delves into the epidemiological, etiological, and mechanistic links between ED and SRB, aiming to uncover potential intersections between these two conditions. These insights could pave the way for innovative research avenues, possibly exploring treatments like vasodilation medication, that might concurrently address both ED and SRB.

Efficacy of acupuncture on drinkers with chronic prostatitis / chronic pelvic pain syndrome: secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture in drinkers with chronic prostatitis / chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS).

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial across multiple centers, involving 224 drinkers. Patients received either acupuncture or sham acupuncture treatment. The primary outcome was the proportion of responders, defined as participants who had a reduction of 6 points or more from baseline in the National Institute of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) total score at weeks 8 and 32. Secondary outcomes measures included the Global Response Assessment (GRA), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5).

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve drinkers were included in each group (n = 224 in total). The proportion of responders in terms of NIH-CPSI was 58.9% versus 40.3% in the acupuncture group (AG) and sham acupuncture group (SAG), respectively, with a statistically significant difference of 18.6% (p = 0.002) at week 8. Higher proportions of responders with respect to NIH-CPSI (p < 0.001 at week 32) and GRA (p < 0.001 at week 8 and p = 0.01 at week 32) were observed in the AG compared with the SAG. No between-group differences were found in the changes in IPSS at any assessment time point. Changes in IIEF-5 score were significantly higher in the AG than in the SAG at weeks 20 and 32, while the difference was not statistically significant at week 8.

CONCLUSION

Acupuncture appeared to alleviate the symptoms of pain among drinkers with CP/CPPS and improve their quality of life, but had no demonstrable effect on urinary tract symptoms or erectile function among these patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03213938 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Scoping review exploring advancements in topical agent therapies for erectile dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common issue that affects older men and is often associated with various health conditions. Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors are commonly used to treat ED; however, their effectiveness may be limited, or the medication may be contraindicated. Therefore, topical gels are being developed as an alternative option for the pharmacologic treatment of ED.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to provide an overview of the efficacy and safety of topical agents for the treatment of ED.

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched. Articles were included that investigated ED and topical agents operating through the skin of the penis, evaluated the effectiveness of the treatment, and involved patients randomized into groups.

RESULTS

Topical alprostadil, glyceryl trinitrate (MED2005), and an over-the-counter formulation (MED3000) were used as alternative treatments for ED in 7 articles, which included 3475 patients. Topical alprostadil induced an erection in 67% to 75% of patients. Adequate erections for vaginal penetration were reported in 38.7% of the alprostadil-treated patients vs 6.9% of the placebo-treated patients. Topical alprostadil significantly and dose dependently improved the total score change on the International Index of Erectile Function as compared with the placebo. MED2005 exhibited a rapid onset of action, with nearly 70% effectiveness within 10 minutes. MED3000 met the minimal clinically important difference threshold of a 4-point increase on the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function, with an improvement of 5.73 points in 24 weeks. Topical therapy for ED also had acceptable safety profiles.

CONCLUSION

Topical agents via various mechanisms are effective and well-tolerated treatments for ED. A fast-acting drug that significantly reduces side effects as compared with other options has been discovered. However, its efficacy relative to current first-line therapies remains unclear. Topical agents present a viable therapeutic alternative for individuals who are unable or unwilling to take oral phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic review provides an overview of literature on the impact of magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with prostate cancer (PC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic search was performed in October 2023 in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. The Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study design (PICOS) framework was used to determine eligibility criteria. Included were studies assessing PROs following MRgRT for PC with a sample size >10. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane's Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies - of Interventions and Cochrane's risk of bias tool for randomized trials. Relevant mean differences (MDs) compared with pre-RT were interpreted using minimal important differences. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.

RESULTS

Eleven observational studies and 1 randomized controlled trial (n = 897) were included. Nine studies included patients with primary PC with MRgRT as first-line treatment (n = 813) and 3 with MRgRT as second-line treatment (n = 84). Substantial risk of bias was found in 5 studies. European Organization for Research and Treatment Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) core 30 (C30) and EORTC QLQ prostate cancer module (PR25) scores were pooled from 3 studies, and Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC)-26 scores were pooled from 4 studies. Relevant MDs for the urinary domain were found with the EPIC-26 (MD, -10.0; 95% CI, -12.0 to -8.1; I2 = 0%) and the EORTC QLQ-PR25 (MD, 8.6; 95% CI, -4.7 to 22.0; I2 = 97%), both at end-RT to 1-month follow-up. Relevant MDs for the bowel domain were found with the EPIC-26 (MD, -4.7; 95% CI, -9.2 to -0.2; I2 = 82%) at end-RT or 1-month follow-up, but not with the EORTC QLQ-PR25. For both domains, no relevant MDs were found after 3 months of follow-up. No relevant MDs were found in the general quality of life domains of the EORTC QLQ C30.

CONCLUSIONS

MRgRT for PC results in a temporary worsening of patient-reported urinary and bowel symptoms during the first month after treatment compared with pre-RT, resolving at 3 months. No clinically relevant changes were found for general quality of life domains. These results provide important information for patient counseling and can serve as a benchmark for future studies.

Platelet-rich plasma intracavernosal injections for the treatment of primary organic erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary controlled studies

We aim to summarize the latest evidence on platelet-rich plasma (PRP) intracavernosal injections efficacy in men affected by primary organic erectile dysfunction (ED). We reviewed the literature for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective and retrospective comparative studies evaluating PRP alone or in combination for ED treatment. A comprehensive search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed for English language full-text articles or conference abstracts. A qualitative and quantitative data synthesis was provided. Overall, seven records were included: three RCTs evaluated PRP vs. placebo, one study separately tested PRP and low-intensity shock wave therapy (Li-SWT), three studies compared Li-SWT or low-intensity pulsed ultrasound alone with their combination with PRP. Of 641 included patients, 320 received PRP. Despite the heterogeneity among inclusion criteria, dose and protocol of PRP administration, and outcomes measured, most studies independently reported better sexual outcomes in patients who received PRP, without significant severe side effects. In meta-analysis, where only placebo-controlled studies were included, patients treated with PRP showed higher International Index of Erectile Function (erectile function domain) score compared to patients who received placebo: pooled mean difference (95% Confidence Interval) of 2.99 (1.86, 4.13) after 1 month (209 patients) vs. 2.85 (1.61, 4.09) after 3 months (204 patients) vs. 3.21 (1.82, 4.60) after 6 months (199 patients) of follow-up. In men affected by primary organic ED, PRP intracavernosal injections demonstrated an objective improvement or at least a tendency in erectile function recovery. Patient numbers, and the short-term follow-up may limit the generalizability of these observations. High quality, large-scale, and standardized controlled trials are needed before recommending its definitive use in clinical practice.

Long-term effects of combination treatment comprising low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy and tadalafil for patients with erectile dysfunction: a retrospective study

This study retrospectively examined the effects of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy and tadalafil on erectile dysfunction patients. 116 patients got low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy twice weekly for 3 weeks, 5 mg of tadalafil daily for 3 weeks, and adjuvant therapy for 6 months. Group A (1 year), Group B (2 years), Group C (3 years), and Group D (4+ years) were treated patients' follow-up groups. The patients' International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) scores were gathered at the start of treatment via face-to-face interviews and at the end of follow-ups by telephone conversations. IIEF-5 scores and the minimal clinically significant differences were the main outcomes. Mean follow-up length, age, and IIEF-5 scores of the patients were 2 ± 1.16 years, 47.34 ± 12.65 years, and 12.09 ± 3.66 points, respectively. Compared to baseline, treatment increased the median IIEF-5 scores of patients in groups A, B, C, and D by 7 [3-12], 6 [0-8], 7 [1-9], and 6.5 [2.5-10] points, respectively (p = 0.001). 71%, 63%, 65.8%, and 65% of treated patients in groups A, B, C, and D met the minimal clinically significant differences criteria (n = 77). Mild disease patients were 9.14 times more likely to respond to treatment than severe illness patients (OR, 9.14; 95% CI, 1.28-65.46; P = 0.02). Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy and 5 mg of tadalafil can treat erectile dysfunction for up to 4 years with sustained outcomes. This treatment is optimal for mild illnesses.

A contemporary review of the treatments and challenges associated with penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy including a proposed optimal approach

Prostate cancer is one of the most prevalent malignancies affecting men worldwide. Despite advancements in understanding prostate anatomy and minimally invasive approaches to surgical treatment, surgery can have significant adverse effects on sexual function. Penile rehabilitation strategies have emerged as a promising approach to mitigate the impact of prostate cancer treatments on erectile function and improve quality of life. Several methods have been employed for penile rehabilitation, including pharmacotherapy, vacuum erection devices, intracavernous injections, and emerging novel techniques. Yet, there is no consensus on the exact programs or timing of initiation that should be utilized for optimal recovery after surgery. This review discusses various rehabilitation protocols and long-term outcomes and explores the cost-effectiveness of different interventions. Additionally, this review discusses the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to penile rehabilitation which includes patient education, counseling, and the selection of an appropriate rehabilitation strategy tailored to each individual's needs and preferences. Continued research and collaboration among healthcare professionals are essential to refine rehabilitation approaches and ensure optimal outcomes for patients with prostate cancer.

Role of the Triglyceride-Glucose Index as a Predictor of Therapeutic Response to Tadalafil in Patients With Erectile Dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

The triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index is an easily calculable indicator of endothelial dysfunction. We aimed to evaluate the effect of the TyG index on treatment response in patients using tadalafil for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED).

METHODS

The data of patients who used tadalafil for ED in our urology clinic between January 2018 and January 2023 were reviewed. The patients completed the 5-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire before treatment and in the 3rd month of treatment. Response to tadalafil treatment was accepted as an increase in IIEF category. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to treatment response. Factors affecting response to treatment were evaluated with a multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 134 patients included in the study, 99 (73.3%) responded to tadalafil treatment. Mean age and body mass index (BMI) of the patient group responding to treatment were significantly lower than in the untreated group. The rates of diabetes mellitus (DM) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) were significantly lower in the group responding to treatment. Fasting glucose, triglyceride and total cholesterol values were significantly lower in the group responding to treatment than in the treatment-resistant group. The TyG index was 130.0 (102.0-180.0) in the group responding to treatment and 245.0 (182.0-320.0) in the treatment-resistant group (p=0.001). In the multivariate analysis, age, BMI, DM, MetS, and TyG index were affecting treatment response.

CONCLUSION

A high TyG index negatively affects the response to treatment in patients using tadalafil for ED. In addition, age, BMI, presence of DM and MetS are other factors affecting the response to treatment.

Testosterone therapy in older men: clinical implications of recent landmark trials

Testosterone therapy for men with hypogonadism due to identifiable hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular (HPT) pathology is uncontroversial. However, the risks and benefits of testosterone for men with clinical features of hypogonadism in the absence of identifiable HPT axis pathology have been uncertain. Recent landmark placebo-controlled trials assessed the benefits and risks of testosterone therapy (≤3 years) for middle-aged and older men with symptoms and possible signs of hypogonadism or end-organ androgen deficiency, low or low-normal serum testosterone concentrations, but no HPT pathology: Testosterone therapy (1) had modest-but clinically significant-benefits on average self-reported energy and mood, sexual function, and satisfaction; (2) in conjunction with a lifestyle programme, reversed or reduced incident type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) in men at high risk of or newly diagnosed with T2D; (3) modestly improved objectively assessed muscle strength and timed walking distance; (4) increased bone density and strength, but did not reduce falls or typical osteoporotic fractures and surprisingly increased the risk of fractures typically attributable to trauma; and (5) did not significantly increase the risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, or prostate cancer. These landmark trials help to inform clinical decision-making about testosterone therapy for men.

Impact of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy on vascular parameters and sexual function in patients with arteriogenic erectile dysfunction

Previous published studies have shown an improvement of penile hemodynamic parameters after low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT). However, the clinical significance of these findings remains unclear, and definitive selection criteria for Li-ESWT based on preexisting comorbidities have yet to be established. This was an observational study of 113 patients with ED, evaluated between January 2019 and December 2021 in Andrology Unit at the Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia (Foggia, Italy). Penile dynamic Doppler was performed to evaluate vascular parameters and 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF-5) questionnaire was administered to assess the severity of ED. This was repeated 1 month after treatment. Patients with a peak systolic velocity (PSV) <30 cm s -1 were considered eligible for Li-ESWT. Our protocol consisted of 8 weekly sessions with 1500 strokes distributed in 5 different locations along the penis. After treatment, a significant mean (±standard deviation [s.d.]) PSV increase of 5.0 (±3.4) cm s -1 was recorded and 52/113 (46.0%) patients reached a PSV >30 cm s -1 at posttherapeutic penile dynamic Doppler. A clinically significant IIEF-5 score improvement was observed in 7 patients, 21 patients, and 2 patients with mild-to-moderate, moderate, and severe pretreatment ED, respectively. No different outcomes were assessed based on smoking habits, previous pelvic surgery, or use of oral phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i). On the other side, only 1 (6.7%) in 15 patients with diabetes mellitus showed an IIEF-5 score improvement after Li-ESWT. Shockwave treatment determined a significant increase in PSV and correlated IIEF-5 improvement in ED patients. This advantage seemed particularly evident for moderate ED and was not affected by smoking habits, previous pelvic surgery, and use of PDE5i. Conversely, diabetic patients did not benefit from the treatment.

Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-arm study to evaluate the efficacy of coadministration of garlic as a hydrogen sulfide donor and tadalafil in patients with erectile dysfunction not responding to tadalafil alone - A pilot study

OBJECTIVE

The objective is to evaluate the efficacy of coadministration of garlic (as a hydrogen sulfide [H2S] donor) and tadalafil for patients with ED using a placebo-controlled, prospective, randomized, two-arm pilot study in patients responding poorly to tadalafil alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The patients with complaints of ED (with normal penile Doppler) who failed to maintain sustained improvement in erectile function with tadalafil were recruited after excluding those with comorbidities. The study sample was randomized into two groups. Group A received garlic 5 g twice a day orally and Group B received a placebo twice daily orally for 4 weeks. Both groups continued tadalafil 5 mg in the night for 4 weeks. Their erectile function was assessed at the beginning and at the end of 4 weeks using the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF), erectile function domain and compared. A value of P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients in Group A (mean age 37.5 ± 10.6 years) and 16 patients in Group B (mean age 39.6 ± 9.6 years) participated in the pilot study conducted from May 2022 to August 2022. The participants treated with garlic (as an H2S donor) as a coadministrant had statistically significant improvement in IIEF-EF score (P ≤ 0.0001) at the end of 4 weeks compared to placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Garlic (as an H2S donor) as adjunctive therapy was beneficial in our study participants responding poorly to tadalafil alone.

Impact of cardiac rehabilitation on erectile dysfunction in cardiovascular patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and erectile dysfunction (ED) frequently co-occur, significantly affecting the quality of life of individuals.

Aim

To assess the impact of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) on ED in patients with CVD through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

This study analyzed randomized controlled trials and other studies comparing CR with usual care for adult males (≥18 years) with any cardiac disease. Literature searches were extensive, and the risk of bias was evaluated by the Cochrane Collaboration tool. Data from 6 studies involving 668 participants were included in the meta-analysis.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was the improvement in ED, as measured with the International Index of Erectile Function.

Results

A statistically significant improvement in erectile function was observed across 6 studies, with a Morris dppc2 effect size of 0.38 (95% CI, 0.17-0.59). Despite initial high heterogeneity (I 2 = 95.7%), identification and correction for selective outcome reporting bias mitigated this issue.

Clinical Translation

CR has a modest but statistically significant impact on improving ED in patients with CVD, indicating its potential positive contribution to the quality of life of this group.

Strengths and Limitations

The study's strengths include a comprehensive literature search and a rigorous methodological approach. Limitations involve high heterogeneity among studies and a low level of evidence due to small sample sizes and study quality; however, the source of heterogeneity was identified and mitigated following risk-of-bias assessment.

Conclusion

The results suggest that CR has a statistically significant but modest impact on improving ED in patients with CVD. Clinicians should consider the integration of CR into the clinical management of these individuals. This study underscores the potential for CR to contribute positively to the quality of life for patients with CVD by addressing associated ED (PROSPERO: CRD42022374625).

The association of smoking with urinary and sexual function recovery following radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Urinary and sexual dysfunction after radical prostatectomy remains a major cause of morbidity, despite widespread availability of pharmacological and rehabilitative treatments. Smoking is a modifiable risk factor known to correlate with erectile and urinary dysfunction and we hypothesise that smoking cessation may improve post-prostatectomy urinary and sexual function recovery. Our objective is to systematically evaluate literature describing the association of smoking status with urinary and sexual function in men following radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

In total, 310 unique records were identified through a systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL and CENTRAL databases up to February 2023. Nine studies reported smoking status and post radical prostatectomy urinary and sexual function outcomes in men with localized prostate cancer. Risk of bias was assessed and meta-analysis included six studies.

RESULTS

Smokers had inferior erectile function after prostatectomy compared to non-smokers (OR 0.73, [95% CI 0.56-0.95]) during follow-up, while urinary incontinence was not statistically different between groups (OR 1.20, [95% CI 0.75-1.91]). Smoking cessation improved the EPIC-26 sexual domain score with 6.6 points on average [p = 0.03] to a clinically significant maximum of 12.5 points at 18-24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking is associated with impaired sexual function recovery after radical prostatectomy and quitting may improve sexual function >18 months. Current evidence shows no such association for urinary outcomes. Further studies are needed to corroborate findings.

Platelet-rich plasma therapy in erectile dysfunction and Peyronie's disease: a systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as a regenerative therapy has gained interest in the field of andrology for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) and Peyronie's disease (PD). This systematic review aims to critically evaluate the current evidence on the use of PRP for these conditions.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search according to the PRISMA guidelines using PubMed and Scopus databases in December 2023. Studies were included if they evaluated the effect of PRP therapy for ED or PD in humans.

RESULTS

We identified 164 articles, 17 of which were included, consisting of 11 studies on ED, 5 studies on PD, and 1 study on both. We included four randomized controlled trials, 11 prospective cohort studies, and three retrospective cohort studies including a total of 1099 patients. The studies on ED and PD generally showed small to moderate benefits with mild and transient side effects and no major adverse events were reported. General limitations included variations in PRP protocols, small sample sizes, short follow-up periods, and lack of control groups except in the three randomized trials on ED and the one on PD.

CONCLUSION

The literature on PRP therapy in andrology is limited and difficult to interpret due to variations in protocols and methodological drawbacks. Further research is necessary to determine the optimal preparation and treatment protocols for PRP therapy and clarify its effectiveness in andrology.

The effect of combination treatment with low-intensity shockwave therapy and daily tadalafil on severe erectile dysfunction: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe erectile dysfunction (ED) remain the most challenging group in terms of available noninvasive treatment modalities.

AIM

The study sought to assess the role of combination therapy with low-intensity shockwave therapy (LiST) and daily tadalafil 5 mg in a highly select group of patients with severe vasculogenic ED through a double-blind, randomized trial.

METHODS

Forty-eight sexually active men were randomly assigned to 12 sessions of LiST 3 times weekly and tadalafil 5 mg once daily (n = 34) or sham therapy and tadalafil (n = 17) for 4 weeks. Patients were assessed at 1 and 3 months after completion of treatment.

OUTCOMES

Improvement of erectile function was evaluated through the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain (IIEF-EF) or 6-item IIEF and the Sexual Encounter Profile (SEP) diary. The primary outcome was the difference between the groups in the IIEF-EF at 3 months after completion of treatment. Secondary outcomes comprised (1) the difference between the groups in the IIEF-EF at 1 month after completion of treatment, (2) the difference between the groups in the "yes" responses to question 3 of the SEP diary at 1 and 3 months, and (3) the treatment-related adverse events. The number of patients attaining a minimal clinically important difference in the IIEF-EF (improvement of at least 7 points) was also assessed.

RESULTS

After treatment, the absolute scores in the IIEF-EF were higher in patients receiving LiST and tadalafil vs sham therapy and tadalafil both at the 1-month (12.1 ± 2.4 vs 10.2 ± 1.7; P = .002) and at the 3-month (12.9 ± 2.1 vs 10.8 ± 1.8; P < .001) evaluation. Between the 2 groups, the proportion of "yes" responses to question 3 of the SEP diary was not statistically significant, whereas the number of patients attaining a minimal clinically important difference in the IIEF-EF was statistically significant only at the 3-month evaluation. No adverse events occurred.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Application of LiST in patients with severe vasculogenic ED receiving daily dose tadalafil may further improve erectile function compared with tadalafil as a stand-alone treatment on the short term.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

Although we provided the first study in the field, severe vasculogenic ED was defined based on medical history and clinical examination and not based on penile ultrasound measures.

CONCLUSION

The combination of 12 sessions LiST 3 times weekly and daily tadalafil for 4 weeks led to a 2-point difference in the IIEF-EF compared with sham therapy and daily tadalafil among patients with severe vasculogenic ED after 1 and 3 months from completion of treatment.

Effect of Mirabegron in Men With Overactive Bladder and Erectile Dysfunction: A Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

As it has been observed that the erect penis has been the epitome of virility for the male community for decades, it became necessary to search for alternative treatments for the cause. So, the study was performed to evaluate the potential impact of mirabegron in men with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction (ED) and overactive bladder (OAB).

METHODS

It was a prospective, observational study that was carried out at the Department of Urology at Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, for a duration of two years and included a total of two hundred fifty patients. The individuals included had a diagnosis of mild to moderate erectile dysfunction (ED) along with symptoms of OAB. The overactive bladder questionnaire (OAB-q) score and the International Index of Erectile Dysfunction-5 (IIEF-5) score were used, respectively, to measure the impact of mirabegron on ED and OAB. Then, the changes in ED and OAB were evaluated at two, four, eight, and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Among the total 250 patients recruited, around 32.5% of them had mild ED, 17.5% were diagnosed with mild to moderate ED, and 50% suffered from moderate ED. The IIEF-5 scores improved by four points or more in 86.25%, 91.25%, and 71.25% of patients after four, eight, and 12 weeks, respectively. OAB-q scores were likewise shown to decline in the fourth (13.1 ± 4.3) and eighth (12.8 ± 4.2) weeks when compared to the baseline (17.4 ± 5.5). Also, adverse events reported did not hamper the progress of the study.

CONCLUSION

The study concluded that mirabegron has a beneficial impact on controlling OAB symptoms among men diagnosed with mild to moderate ED. The effects last for only eight weeks, and then they decline. Furthermore, mirabegron was well-tolerated among patients and had no safety concerns with its use.

Effectiveness of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Erectile Dysfunction: An Analysis of Sexual Function and Penile Hardness at Erection: An Umbrella Review

The present umbrella review of five systematic reviews and meta-analyses was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (Li-ESWT) in the treatment of vascular origin Erectile Dysfunction (ED). A search was carried out in the databases of Pubmed, Scopus, Medline, Scielo and Embase. Participants were divided into two groups: an experimental group receiving Li-ESWT and a control group receiving simulated shock waves. The main variable of this study is ED, measured using the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) and the Erection Hardness Score (EHS) scale. The results showed a statistically significant increase in the mean IIEF-EF score in the experimental group. Overall, four out of five articles reported an increase in the EHS score in the Li-ESWT group compared to the placebo. Concerning the treatment parameters, better outcomes were observed with an energy density of 0.09 mJ/mm2 and the application of 1500-2000 pulses. Additionally, a follow-up of 6-12 months resulted in greater improvement in ED compared to 3 months, although more studies investigating follow-ups beyond 12 months are needed. Obtaining conclusive and clear results is challenging; however, everything indicates that Li-ESWT is an innovative therapeutic alternative for vascular-origin ED due to its low risk and improvement in erectile function.

Testosterone replacement in men with sexual dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines recommend testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) for men with sexual dysfunction and testosterone deficiency. However, TRT is commonly promoted in men without testosterone deficiency and existing trials often do not clearly report participants' testosterone levels or testosterone-related symptoms. This review assesses the potential benefits and harms of TRT in men presenting with complaints of sexual dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of testosterone replacement therapy compared to placebo or other medical treatments in men with sexual dysfunction.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of CENTRAL (the Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the trials registries ClinicalTrials.gov and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, with no restrictions on language of publication or publication status, up to 29 August 2023.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in men (40 years or over) with sexual dysfunction. We excluded men with primary or secondary hypogonadism. We compared testosterone or testosterone with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDEI5I) to placebo or PDE5I alone.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the literature, assessed the risk of bias, extracted data, and rated the certainty of evidence (CoE) according to GRADE using a minimally contextualized approach. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model and interpreted them according to standard Cochrane methodology. Predefined primary outcomes were self-reported erectile dysfunction assessed by a validated instrument, sexual quality of life assessed by a validated instrument, and cardiovascular mortality. Secondary outcomes were treatment withdrawal due to adverse events, prostate-related events, and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). We distinguished between short-term (up to 12 months) and long-term (> 12 months) outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 43 studies with 11,419 randomized participants across three comparisons: testosterone versus placebo, testosterone versus PDE5I, and testosterone with PDE5I versus PDE5I alone. This abstract focuses on the most relevant comparison of testosterone versus placebo. Testosterone versus placebo (up to 12 months) Based on a predefined sensitivity analysis of studies at low risk of bias, and an analysis combing data from the similar International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) and IIEF-5 instruments, TRT likely results in little to no difference in erectile function assessed with the IIEF-EF (mean difference (MD) 2.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.67 to 3.08; I² = 0%; 6 RCTs, 2016 participants; moderate CoE) on a scale from 6 to 30 with larger values reflecting better erectile function. We assumed a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of greater than or equal to 4. TRT likely results in little to no change in sexual quality of life assessed with the Aging Males' Symptoms scale (MD -2.31, 95% CI -3.63 to -1.00; I² = 0%; 5 RCTs, 1030 participants; moderate CoE) on a scale from 17 to 85 with larger values reflecting worse sexual quality of life. We assumed a MCID of greater than or equal to 10. TRT also likely results in little to no difference in cardiovascular mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.83, 95% CI 0.21 to 3.26; I² = 0%; 10 RCTs, 3525 participants; moderate CoE). Based on two cardiovascular deaths in the placebo group and an assumed MCID of 3%, this would correspond to no additional deaths per 1000 men (95% CI 1 fewer to 4 more). TRT also likely results in little to no difference in treatment withdrawal due to adverse events, prostate-related events, or LUTS. Testosterone versus placebo (later than 12 months) We are very uncertain about the longer-term effects of TRT on erectile dysfunction assessed with the IIEF-EF (MD 4.20, 95% CI -2.03 to 10.43; 1 study, 42 participants; very low CoE). We did not find studies reporting on sexual quality of life or cardiovascular mortality. We are very uncertain about the effect of testosterone on treatment withdrawal due to adverse events. We found no studies reporting on prostate-related events or LUTS.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In the short term, TRT probably has little to no effect on erectile function, sexual quality of life, or cardiovascular mortality compared to a placebo. It likely results in little to no difference in treatment withdrawals due to adverse events, prostate-related events, or LUTS. In the long term, we are very uncertain about the effects of TRT on erectile function when compared to placebo; we did not find data on its effects on sexual quality of life or cardiovascular mortality. The certainty of evidence ranged from moderate (signaling that we are confident that the reported effect size is likely to be close to the true effect) to very low (indicating that the true effect is likely to be substantially different). The findings of this review should help to inform future guidelines and clinical decision-making at the point of care.

Effect of surgical, medical, and behavioral weight loss on hormonal and sexual function in men: a contemporary narrative review

This review explores the mechanisms and ramifications of weight loss achieved through lifestyle modifications, medical treatments, and bariatric surgery on testosterone levels and sexual health. Obesity significantly affects the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in men, leading to diminished libido and erectile dysfunction. Here, we delve into the physiological disruptions caused by this imbalance and the intricate interplay of hormonal factors contributing to the dysregulation associated with obesity to comprehensively grasp the consequences of weight loss via diverse mechanisms. Lifestyle modifications involving dietary adjustments and regular exercise represent a widely employed and efficacious means of weight loss. While adherence demands discipline, our review scrutinizes various studies specifically investigating the impact of weight loss, attained through lifestyle modifications, on serum hormone levels and sexual function. Notably, several randomized controlled trials within the existing body of literature corroborate the enhancement of testosterone levels and sexual function consequent to weight loss through lifestyle modifications. The realm of medical management in addressing obesity is growing, notably propelled by the popularity of pharmacotherapy. Despite its prevalence, the current literature exploring the effects of weight loss medications on men remains insufficient. Nonetheless, we examine available studies on the medical management of obesity and its implications for sexual health, emphasizing pivotal avenues requiring further investigation. Bariatric surgery stands as an effective approach for individuals seeking substantial weight loss. Our review assesses existing literature that evaluates the impact of various surgical techniques on serum hormone levels, sexual function, and semen parameters. Despite certain limitations, the available body of evidence suggests enhancements in hormone levels and sexual function post-surgery, with semen parameters generally exhibiting minimal changes. This review critically evaluates the landscape of weight loss and its correlation with sexual function, while highlighting crucial areas necessitating future research endeavors.

EMAS position statement: Testosterone replacement therapy in older men

INTRODUCTION

Late-onset hypogonadism is the clinical entity characterised by low testosterone concentrations associated with clinical symptoms in the absence of organic disease in ageing men. It has been associated with metabolic syndrome, reduced bone mineral density, and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality risk. Although testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) reverses most of these conditions in young hypogonadal men, the risk/benefit ratio of TRT in older men is debatable.

AIM

To update the 2015 EMAS statement on TRT in older men with new research on late-onset hypogonadism and TRT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature review and consensus of expert opinion.

SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS

TRT should be offered only to symptomatic older men with confirmed low testosterone concentrations after explaining the uncertainties regarding the long-term safety of this treatment. TRT may be offered to men with severe hypogonadism and erectile dysfunction to improve sexual desire, erectile, and orgasmic function. It should also be considered in hypogonadal men with severe insulin resistance or pre-diabetes mellitus. TRT may also be considered, in combination with proven treatment strategies, for osteoporosis, or for selected patients with persistent mild depressive symptoms and/or low self-perceived quality of life, combined with standard medical care for each condition. TRT is contraindicated in hypogonadal men actively seeking fertility treatment. Due to a lack of data, TRT should not be routinely used in older men to improve exercise capacity/physical function, improve cognitive function, or prevent cognitive decline. TRT must be avoided in older, frail men with known breast cancer or untreated prostate cancer and all men who have had myocardial infarction or stroke within the last four months, and those with severe or decompensated heart failure. The quality of evidence regarding patients with previous prostate cancer or cardiovascular disease is too low to draw definitive conclusions. Any limits on duration of use are arbitrary, and treatment should continue for as long as the man feels the benefits outweigh the risks for him, and decisions must be made on an individual basis. Withdrawal should be considered when hypogonadism is reversed after the resolution of underlying disorder. Short-acting transdermal preparations should be preferred for TRT initiation in older men, but injectable forms may be considered subsequently. Older men on TRT should be monitored at 3, 6, and 12 months after initiation and at least yearly thereafter, or earlier and more frequently if indicated. Evaluation should include assessment of the clinical response, and measurement of total testosterone, haematocrit, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations. Bone density and/or quality should also be assessed. Obese and overweight patients should be encouraged to undergo lifestyle modifications, including exercise and weight loss, to increase endogenous testosterone.

News and future perspectives of non-surgical treatments for erectile dysfunction

The significant discontinuation rate of available therapies and the paucity of curative options promoted the research on potential novel treatments suitable for erectile dysfunction patients. The aim of this study was to provide a summary of available evidence regarding the news and future perspectives related to the non-surgical treatment of erectile dysfunction. A narrative review of the literature was performed. A comprehensive search in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases was done. Papers in English-language, published until April 2022, were included. No chronological restriction was applied. Retrospective and prospective clinical studies, as well as meta-analyses, were considered. Oro-dispersible formulations of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors are particularly indicated in patients who have difficulty in swallowing solid dosage form; in addition, they constitute a discrete route of administration not requiring water. Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy is indicated in mild vasculogenic erectile dysfunction and in patients with vasculogenic erectile dysfunction poorly responsive to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors. Stem cell therapy, platelet-rich plasma injections, and gene therapy seem promising regenerative treatments for selected patients with erectile dysfunction. Novel oral formulations of drugs commonly used in erectile dysfunction patients have recently become part of standard clinical practice. Regenerative treatments have been emerging in recent years and could become routine curative options in the near future. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to provide conclusive evidence on this topic and guide appropriate recommendations.

Effect of aerobic exercise on erectile function: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The health benefits of regular aerobic exercise are well established, although there is limited high-quality evidence regarding its impact on erectile function.

AIM

To determine the effect of aerobic exercise on erectile function in men and to identify factors that may influence this effect.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of aerobic exercise on erectile function via the Erectile Function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF). The mean difference in IIEF-EF scores between the aerobic exercise and nonexercising control groups was estimated by a random-effects meta-analysis. Meta-regression was used to evaluate the association of moderator variables on meta-analysis results.

OUTCOMES

The IIEF-EF score is reported on a 6-30 scale, with higher values indicating better erectile function.

RESULTS

Among 11 randomized controlled trials included in the analysis, aerobic exercise resulted in statistically significant improvements in IIEF-EF scores as compared with controls, with a mean difference of 2.8 points (95% CI, 1.7-3.9; P < .001) and moderate heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 53%). The effect of aerobic exercise on erectile function was greater in men with lower baseline IIEF-EF scores, with improvements of 2.3, 3.3, and 4.9 points for mild, moderate, and severe erectile dysfunction, respectively (P = .02). The meta-analysis results were not influenced by publication bias or individual study effects.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Health care providers should consider recommending regular aerobic exercise as a low-risk nonpharmacologic therapy for men experiencing erectile difficulties.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

The primary strength of this review was the generation of level 1 evidence on a topic of general interest regarding sexual health in men. However, the included studies evaluated diverse groups, which may complicate data interpretation for specific segments of the population.

CONCLUSION

Regular aerobic exercise can improve the erectile function of men, particularly those with lower baseline IIEF-EF scores.

Metabolic syndrome and erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis study

PURPOSE

The clinical significance of metabolic syndrome (MetS) versus its single components in erectile dysfunction (ED) is conflicting. Thus, the purpose is to analyze the available evidence on the relationship between MetS-along with its components-and ED.

METHODS

All prospective and retrospective observational studies reporting information on ED and MetS were included. In addition, we here reanalyzed preclinical and clinical data obtained from a previously published animal model of MetS and from a consecutive series of more than 2697 men (mean age: 52.7 ± 12), respectively.

RESULTS

Data derived from this meta-analysis showed that MetS was associated with an up to fourfold increased risk of ED when either unadjusted or adjusted data were considered. Meta-regression analysis, performed using unadjusted statistics, showed that the MetS-related risk of ED was closely associated with all the MetS components. These associations were confirmed when unadjusted analyses from clinical models were considered. However, fully adjusted data showed that MetS-associated ED was more often due to morbidities included (or not) in the algorithm than to the MetS diagnostic category itself. MetS is also associated with low testosterone, but its contribution to MetS-associated ED-as derived from preclinical and clinical models-although independent, is marginal.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our analysis suggest that MetS is a useless diagnostic category for studying ED. However, treating the individual MetS components is important, because they play a pivotal role in determining ED.

Symptomatic benefits of testosterone treatment in patient subgroups: a systematic review, individual participant data meta-analysis, and aggregate data meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Testosterone replacement therapy is known to improve sexual function in men younger than 40 years with pathological hypogonadism. However, the extent to which testosterone alleviates sexual dysfunction in older men and men with obesity is unclear, despite the fact that testosterone is being increasingly prescribed to these patient populations. We aimed to evaluate whether subgroups of men with low testosterone derive any symptomatic benefit from testosterone treatment.

METHODS

We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate characteristics associated with symptomatic benefit of testosterone treatment versus placebo in men aged 18 years and older with a baseline serum total testosterone concentration of less than 12 nmol/L. We searched major electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) and clinical trial registries for reports published in English between Jan 1, 1992, and Aug 27, 2018. Anonymised individual participant data were requested from the investigators of all identified trials. Primary (cardiovascular) outcomes from this analysis have been published previously. In this report, we present the secondary outcomes of sexual function, quality of life, and psychological outcomes at 12 months. We did a one-stage individual participant data meta-analysis with a random-effects linear regression model, and a two-stage meta-analysis integrating individual participant data with aggregated data from studies that did not provide individual participant data. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42018111005.

FINDINGS

9871 citations were identified through database searches. After exclusion of duplicates and publications not meeting inclusion criteria, 225 full texts were assessed for inclusion, of which 109 publications reporting 35 primary studies (with a total 5601 participants) were included. Of these, 17 trials provided individual participant data (3431 participants; median age 67 years [IQR 60-72]; 3281 [97%] of 3380 aged ≥40 years) Compared with placebo, testosterone treatment increased 15-item International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) total score (mean difference 5·52 [95% CI 3·95-7·10]; τ2=1·17; n=1412) and IIEF-15 erectile function subscore (2·14 [1·40-2·89]; τ2=0·64; n=1436), reaching the minimal clinically important difference for mild erectile dysfunction. These effects were not found to be dependent on participant age, obesity, presence of diabetes, or baseline serum total testosterone. However, absolute IIEF-15 scores reached during testosterone treatment were subject to thresholds in patient age and baseline serum total testosterone. Testosterone significantly improved Aging Males' Symptoms score, and some 12-item or 36-item Short Form Survey quality of life subscores compared with placebo, but it did not significantly improve psychological symptoms (measured by Beck Depression Inventory).

INTERPRETATION

In men aged 40 years or older with baseline serum testosterone of less than 12 nmol/L, short-to-medium-term testosterone treatment could provide clinically meaningful treatment for mild erectile dysfunction, irrespective of patient age, obesity, or degree of low testosterone. However, due to more severe baseline symptoms, the absolute level of sexual function reached during testosterone treatment might be lower in older men and men with obesity.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment Programme.

Low-intensity shockwave therapy improves baseline erectile function: a randomized sham-controlled crossover trial

Background

Low-intensity shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction is emerging as a promising treatment option.

Aim

This randomized sham-controlled crossover trial assessed the efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy in the treatment of erectile dysfunction.

Methods

Thirty-three participants with organic erectile dysfunction were enrolled and randomized to shockwave therapy (n = 17) or sham (n = 16). The sham group was allowed to cross over to receive shockwave therapy after 1 month.

Outcomes

Primary outcomes were the changes in Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) score and Erection Hardness Score at 1 month following shockwave therapy vs sham, and secondary outcomes were erectile function measurements at 1, 3, and 6 months following shockwave therapy.

Results

At 1 month, mean SHIM scores were significantly increased in the shockwave therapy arm as compared with the sham arm (+3.0 vs -0.7, P = .024). Participants at 6 months posttreatment (n = 33) showed a mean increase of 5.5 points vs baseline (P < .001), with 20 (54.6%) having an increase ≥5. Of the 25 men with an initial Erection Hardness Score <3, 68% improved to a score ≥3 at 6 months. When compared with baseline, the entire cohort demonstrated significant increases in erectile function outcomes at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment.

Clinical Implications

In this randomized sham-controlled crossover trial, we showed that 54.6% of participants with organic erectile dysfunction met the minimal clinically important difference in SHIM scores after treatment with low-intensity shockwave therapy.

Strengths and Limitations

Strengths of this study include a sham-controlled group that crossed over to treatment. Limitations include a modest sample size at a single institution.

Conclusions

Low-intensity shockwave therapy improves erectile function in men with erectile dysfunction as compared with sham treatment, which persists even 6 months after treatment.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04434352.

Platelet-rich plasma for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies

INTRODUCTION

There has been tremendous growth in regenerative medicine during the last decade. For erectile dysfunction (ED), after the inclusion of low-intensity shockwave therapy as a treatment modality for ED management by the European Association of Urology sexual health guidelines, intracavernosal injection of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has gained popularity between urologists and patients as a novel ED therapeutic modality with initial promising results. However, limited clinical data exist regarding efficacy and safety in patients with ED. Furthermore, despite numerous preclinical studies in other tissues and organs, the mechanism of action for restoring erectile function remains undetermined.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aims to present the current status of preclinical and clinical evidence regarding the use of PRP as treatment option for ED.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane, and ScienceDirect databases, until February 2023 for studies exploring the effect of PRP on ED.

RESULTS

We identified 517 articles, 23 of which were included in this review. These were 7 preclinical (of which 1 was a comparative trial and 6 were placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials) and 16 clinical studies (of which 1 was a comparative trial, 5 were randomized trials, and 2 were placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials). Preclinical data support the regenerative role of PRP in erectile tissue, in accordance with existing evidence in other tissues. Randomized clinical studies, as well as the first 2 available randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials, showed promising efficacy and a lack of any adverse events.

CONCLUSION

As PRP for ED is widely used worldwide, there is an urgent need for high-quality studies with long-term follow-up. Standardization of research protocols, especially on the quality of PRP preparation, is also needed.

Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the treatment of erectile dysfunction - a narrative review

OBJECTIVES

To provide an overview of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (LIEST) for erectile dysfunction (ED), pointing out which concepts are already consolidated and which paths we still need to advance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a narrative review of the literature on the role of shockwave therapies in erectile dysfunction, selecting publications in PUBMED, including only relevant clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

RESULTS

We found 11 studies (7 clinical trials, 3 systematic review and 1 meta-analysis) that evaluated the use of LIEST for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. One clinical trial evaluated the applicability in Peyronie's Disease and one other clinical trial evaluated the applicability after radical prostatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature presents little scientific evidence but suggests good results with the use of LIEST for ED. Despite a real optimism since it is a treatment modality capable of acting on the pathophysiology of ED, we must remain cautious, until a larger volume of higher quality studies allows us to establish which patient profile, type of energy and application protocol will achieve clinically satisfactory results.

Long-Term Outcomes of Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Patients With Atherosclerotic Erectile Dysfunction not Responding to PDE-5-Inhibitors

PURPOSE

Endovascular therapy of erection-related arteries was shown to be a promising treatment option for patients with severe erectile dysfunction. Purpose of this study was to assess the longer-term safety and clinical success rate of endovascular revascularization of erection-related arteries with the Angiolite BTK stent in patients with arteriogenic erectile dysfunction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 147 consecutive men (63.5±9.3 years) with erectile dysfunction due to 345 atherosclerotic lesions underwent endovascular revascularization. Patients received an International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-15 questionnaire at 30.3±7.2 months (follow-up [FU] period no less than 18 months) after stenting. An improvement by 4 points in the erectile function domain consisting of 6 questions (IIEF-6) was defined as minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 99% of lesions. One major adverse event occurred after endovascular revascularization. Sixty-eight (46%) patients completed their latest FU at least 18 months following the last intervention. Minimal clinically important difference was achieved in 54% (37/68) of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with arteriogenic erectile dysfunction not responding to phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitors (PDE-5-Is), endovascular therapy with a novel thin-strut sirolimus-eluting stent is a safe and effective treatment option during short- and longer-term FU.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Patients with severe erectile dysfunction profit greatly from endovascular therapy of erection-related arteries. Stable clinical outcomes are seen beyond a 1-year timeframe. It is proven that, the drug-eluting stent therapy for atherosclerotic ED in patients who have not responded to PDE-5-I therapy is safe and effective during longer-term follow-up.

Impact of female stress urinary incontinence and related treatments on the sexual function of male partners: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

No conclusions have been reached on whether female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and related treatments affect male partners' sexual function.

AIM

To assess the effects of female SUI and related treatments on male partners' sexual function.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus databases was performed up to September 6, 2022. Studies were included that investigated the effect of female SUI and related treatments on male partners' sexual function.

OUTCOME

Male partners' sexual function.

RESULTS

Of the 2294 citations identified, 18 studies with 1350 participants were included. Two studies assessed the effect of female SUI without treatment on male partners' sexual function, finding that partners had more erectile dysfunction, more sexual dissatisfaction, and less sexual frequency than partners of women without urinary incontinence. Seven studies directly assessed the effect of female SUI treatments on male partners' sexual function by surveying the male partners. Among these, 4 assessed transobturator suburethral tape (TOT) surgery; 1 assessed TOT and tension-free vaginal tape obturator surgery; and the remaining 2 assessed pulsed magnetic stimulation and laser treatment. Among the 4 TOT studies, 3 used the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). TOT surgery significantly improved the total IIEF score (mean difference [MD] = 9.74, P < .00001), along with erectile function (MD = 1.49, P < .00001), orgasmic function (MD = 0.35, P = .001), sexual desire (MD = 2.08, P < .00001), intercourse satisfaction (MD = 2.36, P < .00001), and overall satisfaction (MD = 3.46, P < .00001). However, the improvements in IIEF items may be of unclear clinical significance, as 4 points in the erectile function domain of the IIEF are typically defined as the minimal clinically important difference. In addition, 9 studies indirectly assessed the effect of female SUI surgery on male partners' sexual function by surveying patients with the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire. The results demonstrated no significant differences in erectile function (MD = 0.08, P = .40) or premature ejaculation (MD = 0.07, P = .54).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The effects of female SUI and related treatments on male partners' sexual function were summarized for the first time, providing a reference for future clinical practice and scientific research.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

A limited number of studies that used various scales met the standardized eligibility criteria.

CONCLUSION

Female SUI may affect male partners' sexual function, and female patients' anti-incontinence surgery does not appear to have a clinically significant improvement on the sexual function of their partners.

Safety and Effectiveness of Repeated Botulinum Toxin A Intracavernosal Injections in Men with Erectile Dysfunction Unresponsive to Approved Pharmacological Treatments: Real-World Observational Data

Intracavernosal injections of botulinum toxin A (BTX/A ic) may be effective for difficult-to-treat erectile dysfunction (ED). This is a retrospective case series study of the effectiveness of repeated off-label BTX/A ic (onabotulinumtoxinA 100U, incobotulinumtoxinA 100U or abobotulinumtoxinA 500U) in men with ED and insufficient response to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) or prostaglandinE1 intracavernosal injections (PGE1 ICIs), defined as an International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function domain score (IIEF-EF) < 26 on treatment. Further injections were performed on patients' requests, and the files of men who underwent at least two injections were reviewed. The response to BTX/A ic was defined as the achievement of the minimally clinically important difference in IIEF-EF adjusted to the severity of ED on treatment at baseline. Out of 216 men treated with BTX/A ic and PDE5-Is or PGE1-ICIs, 92 (42.6%) requested at least a second injection. The median time since the preceding injection was 8.7 months. In total, 85, 44 and 23 men received, respectively, two, three and four BTX/A ic. The overall response rate was 77.5%: 85.7% in men with mild ED, 79% for moderate ED and 64.3% for severe ED on treatment. The response increased with repeated injections: 67.5%, 87.5% and 94.7%, respectively, after the second, third and fourth injections. Post-injection changes in IIEF-EF were similar across injections. The time from injection to request for a further injection varied little. Four men reported penile pain at the time of injection (1.5% of all injections), and one experienced a burn at the penile crus. Repeated BTX/A injections combined with PDE5-Is or PGE1-ICIs produced an effective and durable response, with acceptable safety.