1
|
Xiao Q, Mao X, Ploner A, Grassmann F, Rodriguez J, Eriksson M, Hall P, Czene K. Cancer risks among first-degree relatives of women with a genetic predisposition to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:911-919. [PMID: 38366028 PMCID: PMC11160497 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Associations between germline alterations in women and cancer risks among their relatives are largely unknown. METHODS We identified women from 2 Swedish cohorts Karolinska Mammography Project for Risk Prediction of Breast Cancer (KARMA) and prevalent KARMA (pKARMA), including 28 362 women with genotyping data and 13 226 with sequencing data. Using Swedish Multi-Generation Register, we linked these women to 133 389 first-degree relatives. Associations between protein-truncating variants in 8 risk genes and breast cancer polygenic risk score in index women and cancer risks among their relatives were modeled via Cox regression. RESULTS Female relatives of index women who were protein-truncating variant carriers in any of the 8 risk genes had an increased breast cancer risk compared with those of noncarriers (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.52 to 2.27), with the strongest association found for protein-truncating variants in BRCA1 and 2. These relatives had a statistically higher risk of early onset than late-onset breast cancer (P = .001). Elevated breast cancer risk was also observed in female relatives of index women with higher polygenic risk score (HR per SD = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.23 to 1.32). The estimated lifetime risk was 22.3% for female relatives of protein-truncating variant carriers and 14.4% for those related to women in the top polygenic risk score quartile. Moreover, relatives of index women with protein-truncating variant presence (HR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.06 to 1.59) or higher polygenic risk score (HR per SD = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01 to 1.07) were also at higher risk of nonbreast hereditary breast and ovary cancer syndrome-related cancers. CONCLUSIONS Protein-truncating variants of risk genes and higher polygenic risk score in index women are associated with an increased risk of breast and other hereditary breast and ovary syndrome-related cancers among relatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qingyang Xiao
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Xinhe Mao
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alexander Ploner
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Felix Grassmann
- Institute for Clinical Research and Systems Medicine, Health and Medical University, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Juan Rodriguez
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mikael Eriksson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ceci F, Airò Farulla LS, Bonatto E, Evangelista L, Aliprandi M, Cecchi LG, Mattana F, Bertocchi A, DE Vincenzo F, Perrino M, Cordua N, Borea F, Zucali PA. New target therapies in prostate cancer: from radioligand therapy, to PARP-inhibitors and immunotherapy. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF... 2024; 68:101-115. [PMID: 38860274 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.24.03575-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) remains a significant global health challenge, particularly in its advanced stages. Despite progress in early detection and treatment, PCa is the second most common cancer diagnosis among men. This review aims to provide an overview of current therapeutic approaches and innovations in PCa management, focusing on the latest advancements and ongoing challenges. We conducted a narrative review of clinical trials and research studies, focusing on PARP inhibitors (PARPis), phosphoinositide 3 kinase-protein kinase B inhibitors, immunotherapy, and radioligand therapies (RLTs). Data was sourced from major clinical trial databases and peer-reviewed journals. Androgen deprivation therapy and androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors remain foundational in managing castration-sensitive and early-stage castration-resistant PCa (CRPC). PARPi's, such as olaparib and rucaparib, have emerged as vital treatments for metastatic CRPC with homologous recombination repair gene mutations, highlighting the importance of personalized medicine. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown clinical benefit limited to specific subgroups of PCa, demonstrating significant improvement in efficacy in patients with microsatellite instability/mismatch repair or cyclin-dependent kinase 12 alteration, highlighting the importance of focusing ongoing research on identifying and characterizing these subgroups to maximize the clinical benefits of ICIs. RLTs have shown effectiveness in treating mCRPC. Different alpha emitters (like [225Ac]PSMA) and beta emitters compounds (like [177Lu]PSMA) impact treatment differently due to their energy transfer characteristics. Clinical trials like VISION and TheraP have demonstrated positive outcomes with RLT, particularly [177Lu]PSMA-617, leading to FDA approval. Ongoing trials and future perspectives explore the potential of [225Ac]PSMA, aiming to improve outcomes for patients with mCRPC. The landscape of PCa treatment is evolving, with significant advancements in both established and novel therapies. The combination of hormonal therapies, chemotherapy, PARPis, immunotherapy, and RLTs, guided by genetic and molecular insights, opens new possibilities for personalized treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Lighea S Airò Farulla
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy -
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Bonatto
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Evangelista
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Aliprandi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi G Cecchi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Mattana
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Bertocchi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio DE Vincenzo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Perrino
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Nadia Cordua
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Borea
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo A Zucali
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Limijadi EKS, Muniroh M, Prajoko YW, Tjandra KC, Respati DRP. The role of germline BRCA1 & BRCA2 mutations in familial pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0299276. [PMID: 38809921 PMCID: PMC11135687 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Familial Pancreatic Cancer (FPC) presents a notable risk, with 3-10% of pancreatic adenocarcinoma cases having a family history. Studies link FPC to syndromes like HBOC, suggesting BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations play a role. BRCA gene functions in DNA repair impact FPC management, influencing sensitivity to therapies like PARP inhibitors. Identifying mutations not only aids FPC treatment but also reveals broader cancer risks. However, challenges persist in selectively applying genetic testing due to cost constraints. This Systematic Review focuses on BRCA1/BRCA2 significance in FPC, diagnostic criteria, prognostic value, and limitations. METHOD Original articles published from 2013 to January 2023 were sourced from databases such as Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect. Inclusion criteria comprised observational cohort or diagnostic studies related to the role of BRCA1/2 mutation in correlation to familial pancreatic cancer (FPC), while article reviews, narrative reviews, and non-relevant content were excluded. The assessment of bias used ROBINS-I, and the results were organized using PICOS criteria in a Google spreadsheet table. The systematic review adhered to the PRISMA 2020 checklist. RESULT We analyzed 9 diagnostic studies encompassing 1325 families and 4267 patients from Italy, USA, and Poland. Despite the limitation of limited homogenous PICO studies, our findings effectively present evidence. BRCA1/2 demonstrates benefits in detecting first-degree relatives FPC involvement with 2.26-10 times higher risk. These mutation findings also play an important role since with the BRCA1/2 targeted therapy, Poly-ADP Ribose Polymerase inhibitors (PARP) may give better outcomes of FPC treatment. Analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 administration's impact on odds ratio (OR) based on six and five studies respectively. BRCA1 exhibited non-significant effects (OR = 1.26, P = 0.51), while BRCA2 showed significance (OR = 1.68, P = 0.04). No heterogeneity observed, indicating consistent results. Further research on BRCA1 is warranted. CONCLUSION Detecting the BRCA1/2 mutation gene offers numerous advantages, particularly in its correlation with FPC. For diagnostic and prognostic purposes, testing is strongly recommended for first-degree relatives, who face a significantly higher risk (2.26-10 times) of being affected. Additionally, FPC patients with identified BRCA1/2 mutations exhibit a more favorable prognosis compared to the non-mutated population. This is attributed to the availability of targeted BRCA1/2 therapy, which maximizes treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Kurnia Setiawan Limijadi
- Doctoral Study Program of Medical and Health Science, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Pathology, Universitas Diopnegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
| | - Muflihatul Muniroh
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
| | - Yan Wisnu Prajoko
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical Oncology, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
- Kariadi General Hospital, Semarang, Indonesia
| | - Kevin Christian Tjandra
- Kariadi General Hospital, Semarang, Indonesia
- Faculty of Medicine, Departement of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
| | - Danendra Rakha Putra Respati
- Kariadi General Hospital, Semarang, Indonesia
- Faculty of Medicine, Departement of Medicine, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ellis ET, Fairman BJ, Stahr SD, Bensen JT, Mohler JL, Song L, Butler EN, Su LJ, Hsu PC. Cigarette smoking and prostate cancer aggressiveness among African and European American men. Cancer Causes Control 2024:10.1007/s10552-024-01883-3. [PMID: 38758522 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-024-01883-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Smoking is a modifiable lifestyle factor that has not been established as a prostate cancer risk factor, nor emphasized in prostate cancer prevention. Studies have shown that African American (AA) smokers have a poorer cancer prognosis than European Americans (EAs), while having a lower prevalence of heavy smoking. We examined the relationship between cigarette smoking and prostate cancer aggressiveness and assessed racial differences in smoking habits on the probability of high-aggressive prostate cancer. METHODS Using data from the North Carolina-Louisiana Prostate Cancer Project (n = 1,279), prostate cancer aggressiveness was defined as high or low based on Gleason scores, serum prostate-specific antigen levels, and tumor stage. Cigarette smoking was categorized as current, former, or never smokers. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS Self-reported current (OR = 1.99; 95% CI 1.30-3.06) smoking was associated with high-aggressive prostate cancer relative to never smokers. When stratified by self-reported race, the odds of having high-aggressive cancer increased among AA current (OR = 3.58; 95% CI 2.04-6.28) and former smokers (OR = 2.21; 95% CI 1.38-3.53) compared to AA never smokers, but the odds were diminished among the EA stratum (Pself-reported race x smoking status = 0.003). CONCLUSION Cigarette smoking is associated with prostate cancer aggressiveness, a relationship modulated by self-reported race. Future research is needed to investigate types of cigarettes smoked and metabolic differences that may be contributing to the racial disparities observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edgar T Ellis
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St., #820, Little Rock, AR, 72205-7190, USA
| | - Brian J Fairman
- Department of Epidemiology, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA
| | - Shelbie D Stahr
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St., #820, Little Rock, AR, 72205-7190, USA
| | - Jeannette T Bensen
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - James L Mohler
- Department of Urology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA
| | - Lixin Song
- School of Nursing & Mays Cancer Center, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA
| | - Eboneé N Butler
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - L Joseph Su
- Peter O'Donnell Jr. School of Public Health, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Ping-Ching Hsu
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W Markham St., #820, Little Rock, AR, 72205-7190, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tiwari P, Yadav A, Kaushik M, Dada R. Cancer risk and male Infertility: Unravelling predictive biomarkers and prognostic indicators. Clin Chim Acta 2024; 558:119670. [PMID: 38614420 DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2024.119670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2024] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a global increase in cases of male infertility. There are about 30 million cases of male infertility worldwide and male reproductive health is showing rapid decline in last few decades. It is now recognized as a potential risk factor for developing certain types of cancer, particularly genitourinary malignancies like testicular and prostate cancer. Male infertility is considered a potential indicator of overall health and an early biomarker for cancer. Cases of unexplained male factor infertility have high levels of oxidative stress and oxidative DNA damage and this induces both denovo germ line mutations and epimutations due to build up of 8-hydroxy 2 deoxygunaosine abase which is highly mutagenic and also induces hypomethylation and genomic instability. Consequently, there is growing evidence to explore the various factors contributing to an increased cancer risk. Currently, the available prognostic and predictive biomarkers associated with semen characteristics and cancer risk are limited but gaining significant attention in clinical research for the diagnosis and treatment of elevated cancer risk in the individual and in offspring. The male germ cell being transcriptionally and translationally inert has a highly truncated repair mechanism and has minimal antioxidants and thus most vulnerable to oxidative injury due to environmental factors and unhealthy lifestyle and social habits. Therefore, advancing our understanding requires a thorough evaluation of the pathophysiologic mechanisms at the DNA, RNA, protein, and metabolite levels to identify key biomarkers that may underlie the pathogenesis of male infertility and associated cancer. Advanced methodologies such as genomics, epigenetics, proteomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics stand at the forefront of cutting-edge approaches for discovering novel biomarkers, spanning from infertility to associated cancer types. Henceforth, in this review, we aim to assess the role and potential of recently identified predictive and prognostic biomarkers, offering insights into the success of assisted reproductive technologies, causes of azoospermia and idiopathic infertility, the impact of integrated holistic approach and lifestyle modifications, and the monitoring of cancer susceptibility, initiation and progression. Comprehending these biomarkers is crucial for providing comprehensive counselling to infertile men and cancer patients, along with their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prabhakar Tiwari
- Lab for Molecular Reproduction and Genetics, Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi 110029, India.
| | - Anjali Yadav
- Lab for Molecular Reproduction and Genetics, Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Meenakshi Kaushik
- Lab for Molecular Reproduction and Genetics, Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi 110029, India
| | - Rima Dada
- Lab for Molecular Reproduction and Genetics, Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi 110029, India.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mitchell J, Camacho N, Shea P, Stopsack KH, Joseph V, Burren O, Dhindsa R, Nag A, Berchuck JE, O'Neill A, Abbasi A, Zoghbi AW, Alegre-Díaz J, Kuri-Morales P, Berumen J, Tapia-Conyer R, Emberson J, Torres JM, Collins R, Wang Q, Goldstein D, Matakidou A, Haefliger C, Anderson-Dring L, March R, Jobanputra V, Dougherty B, Carss K, Petrovski S, Kantoff PW, Offit K, Mucci LA, Pomerantz M, Fabre MA. Characterising the contribution of rare protein-coding germline variants to prostate cancer risk and severity in 37,184 cases. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.05.10.24307164. [PMID: 38766261 PMCID: PMC11100931 DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.10.24307164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
The etiology of prostate cancer, the second most common cancer in men globally, has a strong heritable component. While rare coding germline variants in several genes have been identified as risk factors from candidate gene and linkage studies, the exome-wide spectrum of causal rare variants remains to be fully explored. To more comprehensively address their contribution, we analysed data from 37,184 prostate cancer cases and 331,329 male controls from five cohorts with germline exome/genome sequencing and one cohort with imputed array data from a population enriched in low-frequency deleterious variants. Our gene-level collapsing analysis revealed that rare damaging variants in SAMHD1 as well as genes in the DNA damage response pathway (BRCA2, ATM and CHEK2) are associated with the risk of overall prostate cancer. We also found that rare damaging variants in AOX1 and BRCA2 were associated with increased severity of prostate cancer in a case-only analysis of aggressive versus non-aggressive prostate cancer. At the single-variant level, we found rare non-synonymous variants in three genes (HOXB13, CHEK2, BIK) significantly associated with increased risk of overall prostate cancer and in four genes (ANO7, SPDL1, AR, TERT) with decreased risk. Altogether, this study provides deeper insights into the genetic architecture and biological basis of prostate cancer risk and severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Mitchell
- Centre for Genomics Research, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Niedzica Camacho
- Centre for Genomics Research, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Patrick Shea
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Konrad H Stopsack
- Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Vijai Joseph
- Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Oliver Burren
- Centre for Genomics Research, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ryan Dhindsa
- Centre for Genomics Research, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Abhishek Nag
- Centre for Genomics Research, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Amanda O'Neill
- Centre for Genomics Research, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ali Abbasi
- Centre for Genomics Research, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anthony W Zoghbi
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jesus Alegre-Díaz
- Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Copilco Universidad, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - Pablo Kuri-Morales
- Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Copilco Universidad, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, Mexico
- Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, Tecnológico, Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
| | - Jaime Berumen
- Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Copilco Universidad, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - Roberto Tapia-Conyer
- Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Copilco Universidad, Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - Jonathan Emberson
- Clinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jason M Torres
- Clinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Rory Collins
- Clinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Quanli Wang
- Centre for Genomics Research, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA
| | - David Goldstein
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Athena Matakidou
- Centre for Genomics Research, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Carolina Haefliger
- Centre for Genomics Research, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lauren Anderson-Dring
- Centre for Genomics Research, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ruth March
- Centre for Genomics Research, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Vaidehi Jobanputra
- Institute for Genomic Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Keren Carss
- Centre for Genomics Research, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Slavé Petrovski
- Centre for Genomics Research, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
| | - Philip W Kantoff
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Convergent Therapeutics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Cancer Biology and Genetics Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lorelei A Mucci
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- American Cancer Society, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mark Pomerantz
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Margarete A Fabre
- Centre for Genomics Research, Discovery Sciences, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Haematology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Agahi R, Veselaj F, Islami DA, Selmani E, Khan O, Hoxha I. Impact of Prostate Cancer in Eastern Europe and Approaches to Treatment and Policy. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2024; 38:87-103. [PMID: 37516633 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2023.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is among the most prevalent cancer globally and within Eastern Europe, where there are also higher levels of mortality compared with Western Europe. Cancer control plans exist in most countries in the region. Attention should be given to devising and implementing optimal screening initiatives. Our review has identified that a lack of resources and health system dysfunctions hamper progress in ameliorating the burden of prostate cancer. Regional cooperation is needed as well as drawing on guidelines and findings from elsewhere. Health institutions must also know the latest developments and set up systems that allow swift adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riaz Agahi
- Department of Diagnostic Health Sciences, Heimerer College, Prishtina 10000, Kosovo; Evidence Synthesis Group, Ali Vitia Street PN, Prishtina 10000, Kosovo
| | - Fahredin Veselaj
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Prishtina, Prishtina 10000, Kosovo.
| | - Dafina Ademi Islami
- Oncology Clinic, University Clinical Center of Kosovo, Prishtina 10000, Kosovo
| | - Erza Selmani
- Evidence Synthesis Group, Ali Vitia Street PN, Prishtina 10000, Kosovo; Research Unit, Heimerer College, Prishtina, Kosovo
| | - Olga Khan
- World Bank Ukraine, Kyiv 01010, Ukraine
| | - Ilir Hoxha
- Evidence Synthesis Group, Ali Vitia Street PN, Prishtina 10000, Kosovo; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zheng L, Shi S, Sun X, Lu M, Liao Y, Zhu S, Zhang H, Pan Z, Fang P, Zeng Z, Li H, Li Z, Xue W, Zhu F. MoDAFold: a strategy for predicting the structure of missense mutant protein based on AlphaFold2 and molecular dynamics. Brief Bioinform 2024; 25:bbae006. [PMID: 38305456 PMCID: PMC10835750 DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbae006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Protein structure prediction is a longstanding issue crucial for identifying new drug targets and providing a mechanistic understanding of protein functions. To enhance the progress in this field, a spectrum of computational methodologies has been cultivated. AlphaFold2 has exhibited exceptional precision in predicting wild-type protein structures, with performance exceeding that of other methods. However, predicting the structures of missense mutant proteins using AlphaFold2 remains challenging due to the intricate and substantial structural alterations caused by minor sequence variations in the mutant proteins. Molecular dynamics (MD) has been validated for precisely capturing changes in amino acid interactions attributed to protein mutations. Therefore, for the first time, a strategy entitled 'MoDAFold' was proposed to improve the accuracy and reliability of missense mutant protein structure prediction by combining AlphaFold2 with MD. Multiple case studies have confirmed the superior performance of MoDAFold compared to other methods, particularly AlphaFold2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingyan Zheng
- College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
- Industry Solutions Research and Development, Alibaba Cloud Computing, Hangzhou 330110, China
| | - Shuiyang Shi
- College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Xiuna Sun
- College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
- Industry Solutions Research and Development, Alibaba Cloud Computing, Hangzhou 330110, China
| | - Mingkun Lu
- College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
- Industry Solutions Research and Development, Alibaba Cloud Computing, Hangzhou 330110, China
| | - Yang Liao
- College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Sisi Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Elemene Class Anti-cancer Chinese Medicines, School of Pharmacy, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 311121, China
| | - Hongning Zhang
- College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Ziqi Pan
- College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
| | - Pan Fang
- Industry Solutions Research and Development, Alibaba Cloud Computing, Hangzhou 330110, China
- Innovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine of Zhejiang University, Alibaba-Zhejiang University Joint Research Center of Future Digital Healthcare, Hangzhou 330110, China
| | - Zhenyu Zeng
- Industry Solutions Research and Development, Alibaba Cloud Computing, Hangzhou 330110, China
- Innovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine of Zhejiang University, Alibaba-Zhejiang University Joint Research Center of Future Digital Healthcare, Hangzhou 330110, China
| | - Honglin Li
- School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
| | - Zhaorong Li
- Industry Solutions Research and Development, Alibaba Cloud Computing, Hangzhou 330110, China
- Innovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine of Zhejiang University, Alibaba-Zhejiang University Joint Research Center of Future Digital Healthcare, Hangzhou 330110, China
| | - Weiwei Xue
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chongqing University, Chongqing 401331, China
| | - Feng Zhu
- College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
- Industry Solutions Research and Development, Alibaba Cloud Computing, Hangzhou 330110, China
- Innovation Institute for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine of Zhejiang University, Alibaba-Zhejiang University Joint Research Center of Future Digital Healthcare, Hangzhou 330110, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Paulo P, Cardoso M, Brandão A, Pinto P, Falconi A, Pinheiro M, Cerveira N, Silva R, Santos C, Pinto C, Peixoto A, Maia S, Teixeira MR. Genetic landscape of homologous recombination repair genes in early-onset/familial prostate cancer patients. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2023; 62:710-720. [PMID: 37436117 DOI: 10.1002/gcc.23190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PrCa) is one of the three most frequent and deadliest cancers worldwide. The discovery of PARP inhibitors for the treatment of tumors with deleterious variants in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes has placed PrCa on the roadmap of precision medicine. However, the overall contribution of HRR genes to the 10%-20% of carcinomas arising in men with early-onset/familial PrCa has not been fully clarified. We used targeted next-generation sequencing (T-NGS) covering eight HRR genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CHEK2, NBN, PALB2, and RAD51C) and an analysis pipeline querying both small and large genomic variations to clarify their global and relative contribution to hereditary PrCa predisposition in a series of 462 early-onset/familial PrCa cases. Deleterious variants were found in 3.9% of the patients, with CHEK2 and ATM being the most frequently mutated genes (38.9% and 22.2% of the carriers, respectively), followed by PALB2 and NBN (11.1% of the carriers, each), and finally by BRCA2, RAD51C, and BRIP1 (5.6% of the carriers, each). Using the same NGS data, exonic rearrangements were found in two patients, one pathogenic in BRCA2 and one of unknown significance in BRCA1. These results contribute to clarify the genetic heterogeneity that underlies PrCa predisposition in the early-onset and familial disease, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Paulo
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) /RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) /Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
| | - Marta Cardoso
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) /RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) /Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
| | - Andreia Brandão
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) /RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) /Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Pinto
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) /RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) /Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ariane Falconi
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) /RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) /Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
| | - Manuela Pinheiro
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) /RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) /Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
| | - Nuno Cerveira
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) /RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) /Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Laboratory Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
| | - Rui Silva
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) /RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) /Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
| | - Catarina Santos
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) /RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) /Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Laboratory Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
| | - Carla Pinto
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) /RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) /Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Laboratory Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ana Peixoto
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) /RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) /Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Laboratory Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
| | - Sofia Maia
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) /RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) /Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
- Medical Genetics Unit, Hospital Pediátrico de Coimbra, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Manuel R Teixeira
- Cancer Genetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP) /RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) /Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Laboratory Genetics, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto)/Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center, Porto, Portugal
- School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Peyrottes A, Rouprêt M, Fiard G, Fromont G, Barret E, Brureau L, Créhange G, Gauthé M, Baboudjian M, Renard-Penna R, Roubaud G, Rozet F, Sargos P, Ruffion A, Mathieu R, Beauval JB, De La Taille A, Ploussard G, Dariane C. [Early detection of prostate cancer: Towards a new paradigm?]. Prog Urol 2023; 33:956-965. [PMID: 37805291 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2023.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a public health issue. The diagnostic strategy for PCa is well codified and assessed by digital rectal examination, PSA testing and multiparametric MRI, which may or may not lead to prostate biopsies. The formal benefit of organized PCa screening, studied more than 10 years ago at an international scale and for all incomers, is not demonstrated. However, diagnostic and therapeutic modalities have evolved since the pivotal studies. The contribution of MRI and targeted biopsies, the widespread use of active surveillance for unsignificant PCa, the improvement of surgical techniques and radiotherapy… have allowed a better selection of patients and strengthened the interest for an individualized approach, reducing the risk of overtreatment. Aiming to enhance coverage and access to screening for the population, the European Commission recently promoted the evaluation of an organized PCa screening strategy, including MRI. The lack of screening programs has become detrimental to the population and must shift towards an early detection policy adapted to the risk of each individual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Peyrottes
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, membre junior, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP Centre, Université de Paris, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France.
| | - M Rouprêt
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sorbonne university, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, urology, Pitié-Salpétrière hospital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - G Fiard
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Department of urology, Grenoble Alpes university hospital, université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, TIMC-IMAG, Grenoble, France
| | - G Fromont
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Department of pathology, CHRU, 37000 Tours, France
| | - E Barret
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Department of urology, institut mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - L Brureau
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Department of urology, CHU de Pointe-à-Pitre, university of Antilles, university of Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail), UMR S 1085, 97110 Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe
| | - G Créhange
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Department of radiotherapy, institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - M Gauthé
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sintep nuclear medicine, 38100 Grenoble, France
| | - M Baboudjian
- Department of urology, La Conception Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Marseille, France
| | - R Renard-Penna
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sorbonne university, AP-HP, radiology, Pitie-Salpétrière hospital, 75013 Paris, France
| | - G Roubaud
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Department of medical oncology, institut Bergonié, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - F Rozet
- Sorbonne university, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, urology, Pitié-Salpétrière hospital, 75013 Paris, France; Department of urology, institut mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | - P Sargos
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Department of radiotherapy, institut Bergonié, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - A Ruffion
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - R Mathieu
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Department of urology, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - J-B Beauval
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Department of urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - A De La Taille
- Department of urology, university hospital Henri-Mondor, AP-HP, Créteil, France
| | - G Ploussard
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Department of urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - C Dariane
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association Française d'Urologie, groupe prostate, maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP Centre, Université de Paris, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tsydenova IA, Ibragimova MK, Tsyganov MM, Litviakov NV. Human papillomavirus and prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2023; 13:16597. [PMID: 37789036 PMCID: PMC10547781 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-43767-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The involvement of human papillomavirus (HPV) in the prostate carcinogenesis is a controversial issue. The presented meta-analysis was carried out to systematize the currently available research results regarding this question. The meta-analysis includes case-control studies from 1991 to 2022, which were collected from publicly available bibliometric databases. The meta-analysis was performed using Meta-Essentials_1.5 software. We used Begg's and Egger's methods to assess publication bias. Cochran's Q test was used to assess heterogeneity and the I2 index was employed for calculating the variation in the pooled estimations. The analysis was based on data from 27 case-control studies, which in total yielded 1607 tumour tissue samples of prostate and 1515 control samples (317 samples of normal tissue, 1198 samples of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)). According to the data obtained, there was high risk of prostate cancer by HPV infection in both cases. HPV was found in prostate cancer in 25.8% of cases, while in normal tissue samples the virus was detected in 9.2% of cases and in 17.4% with BPH as a control. In particular, more studies on the association of HPV and prostate cancer are needed to prove the role of HPV in the development of prostate cancer. In addition to the controversial question of whether HPV infection is associated with prostate cancer risk, it is worth considering whether the samples used as a control have an impact on the results. The impact of HPV in prostate tumour tissue samples on outcome should also be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina A Tsydenova
- Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia, 634028.
- National Research Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia, 634050.
| | - Marina K Ibragimova
- Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia, 634028
- National Research Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia, 634050
- Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk, Russia, 634050
| | - Matvey M Tsyganov
- Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia, 634028
| | - Nikolai V Litviakov
- Cancer Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia, 634028
- National Research Tomsk State University, Tomsk, Russia, 634050
- Siberian State Medical University, Tomsk, Russia, 634050
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Leni R, Gandaglia G, Stabile A, Mazzone E, Pellegrino F, Scuderi S, Robesti D, Barletta F, Cirulli GO, Cucchiara V, Zaffuto E, Dehò F, Montorsi F, Briganti A. Is Active Surveillance an Option for the Management of Men with Low-grade Prostate Cancer and a Positive Family History? Results from a Large, Single-institution Series. Eur Urol Oncol 2023; 6:493-500. [PMID: 37005213 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Family history (FH) of prostate cancer (PCa) is associated with an increased risk of PCa and adverse disease features. However, whether patients with localized PCa and FH could be considered for active surveillance (AS) remains controversial. OBJECTIVE To assess the association between FH and reclassification of AS candidates, and to define predictors of adverse outcomes in men with positive FH. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Overall, 656 patients with grade group (GG) 1 PCa included in an AS protocol at a single institution were identified. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Kaplan-Meier analyses assessed the time to reclassification (GG ≥2 and GG ≥3 at follow-up biopsies) overall and according to FH status. Multivariable Cox regression tested the impact of FH on reclassification and identified the predictors among men with FH. Men treated with delayed radical prostatectomy (n = 197) or external-beam radiation therapy (n = 64) were identified, and the impact of FH on oncologic outcomes was assessed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 119 men (18%) had FH. The median follow-up was 54 mo (interquartile range 29-84 mo), and 264 patients experienced reclassification. The 5-yr reclassification-free survival rate was 39% versus 57% for FH versus no FH (p = 0.006), and FH was associated with reclassification to GG ≥2 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.60, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-2.15, p = 0.002). In men with FH, the strongest predictors of reclassification were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density (PSAD), high-volume GG 1 (≥33% of cores involved or ≥50% of any core involved), and suspicious magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate (HRs 2.87, 3.04, and 3.87, respectively; all p < 0.05). No association between FH, adverse pathologic features, and biochemical recurrence was observed (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Patients with FH on AS are at an increased risk of reclassification. Negative MRI, low disease volume, and low PSAD identify men with FH and a low risk of reclassification. Nonetheless, sample size and wide CIs entail caution in drawing conclusions based on these results. PATIENT SUMMARY We tested the impact of family history in men on active surveillance for localized prostate cancer. A significant risk of reclassification, but not adverse oncologic outcomes after deferred treatment, prompts the need for cautious discussion with these patients, without precluding initial expectant management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Leni
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Armando Stabile
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Pellegrino
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Scuderi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Robesti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Ottone Cirulli
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Vito Cucchiara
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Zaffuto
- Department of Urology, Circolo and Fondazione Macchi Hospital-ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy; University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Federico Dehò
- Department of Urology, Circolo and Fondazione Macchi Hospital-ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy; University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Pei L, Yan D, He Q, Kong J, Yang M, Ruan H, Lin Q, Huang L, Huang J, Lin T, Qin H. LncRNA MIR4435-2HG drives cancer progression by modulating cell cycle regulators and mTOR signaling in stroma-enriched subtypes of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Cell Oncol (Dordr) 2023; 46:1509-1527. [PMID: 37355516 PMCID: PMC10618329 DOI: 10.1007/s13402-023-00826-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk for recurrence and metastasis after treatment for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) is high. Therefore, identifying efficient prognostic markers and novel therapeutic targets is urgently needed. Several long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been reported to be correlated with UCB progression. In this study, we found that the subtype-specific lncRNA MIR4435-2 host gene (MIR4435-2HG) plays a novel oncogenic role in UCB. METHODS RNA-Seq data of TCGA/BLCA were analyzed. The expression of MIR4435-2HG was measured by qRT-PCR in 16 pairs of bladder cancer tissues and adjacent normal tissues. The clinical relecance of MIR4435-2HG was validated via in situ hybridization performed on an in-house cohort of 116 UCB patient samples. RNA pull-down followed by mass spectrometry was performed to identify MIR4435-2HG-binding proteins. To identify signaling pathways involved in MIR4435-2HG activity, comprehensive in vitro and in vivo studies and RNA-Seq assays were performed using UCB cells in which MIR4435-2HG expression was knocked down or exogenously overexpressed. In addition, we performed RNA immunoprecipitation and Western blot analyses to validate the identified MIR4435-2HG-binding proteins and to determine the molecular mechanisms by which MIR4435-2HG promotes UCB progression. RESULTS We found that MIR4435-2HG was significantly upregulated in the stromal-enriched subtype of UCB. Increased MIR4435-2HG expression was positively correlated with a high histological grade, advanced T stages, larger tumors, lymph node metastasis and a poor prognosis. In vitro experiments revealed that MIR4435-2HG expression silencing suppressed cell proliferation and induced apoptosis. Inhibition of MIR4434-2HG delayed xenograft tumor growth, while MIR4435-2HG overexpression reversed the MIR4435-2HG silencing-induced inhibition of UCB tumor phenotype acquisition. Mechanistically, we found that MIR4435-2HG positively regulated the expression of a variety of cell cycle regulators, including BRCA2 and CCND1. Knocking down MIR4435-2HG increased the sensitivity of tumor cells to the VEGFR inhibitor cediranib. Furthermore, we found that MIR4435-2HG regulated mTOR signaling and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) signaling pathways by modulating the phosphorylation of mTOR, 70S6K and 4EBP1. Finally, we confirmed that MIR4435-2HG enhances tumor metastasis through regulation of the EMT pathway. CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that upregulated MIR4435-2HG expression levels are significantly correlated with a poor prognosis of UCB patients. MIR4435-2HG promotes bladder cancer progression, mediates cell cycle (de)regulation and modulates mTOR signaling. MIR4435-2HG is an oncogenic lncRNA in UCB that may serve as a diagnostic and therapeutic target.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Pei
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dong Yan
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qingqing He
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianqiu Kong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Meihua Yang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Honglian Ruan
- School of Public Health, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiongqiong Lin
- Department of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital & Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Lifang Huang
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jian Huang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Tianxin Lin
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Haide Qin
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Feng D, Li L, Shi X, Zhu W, Wang J, Wu R, Li D, Wei W, Han P. Identification of senescence-related lncRNA prognostic index correlating with prognosis and radiosensitivity in prostate cancer patients. Aging (Albany NY) 2023; 15:9358-9376. [PMID: 37742230 PMCID: PMC10564441 DOI: 10.18632/aging.204888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An increasing number of studies are shown how crucial a role cellular senescence plays in tumor development. In this study, we developed a senescence-related lncRNA prognostic index (SRLPI) to forecast radiosensitivity and the probability of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). METHODS PCa cohorts in TCGA and GEO databases were downloaded. Senescence-and prognosis-related lncRNA with differential expression in tumor and normal samples were identified and used to establish the SRLPI score. Mutation landscape, function pathway, tumor stemness and heterogeneity and tumor immune microenvironment were also analyzed. We performed the analysis using R 3.6.3 and the appropriate tools. RESULTS A SRLPI score was constructed based on SNHG1 and MIAT in the TCGA cohort. Our classification of PCa patients into high- and low-risk groups was based on the median SRLPI score. When compared to the low-SRLPI group, the high-SRLPI group was more vulnerable to BCR (HR: 3.33). In terms of BCR-free survival and metastasis-free survival, the GSE116918 showed similar findings. Surprisingly, the SRLPI score demonstrated a high level of radiosensitivity for diagnosis (AUC: 0.98). Age, Gleason score, T stage, N stage, positive lymph nodes, and residual tumor were all significantly greater in patients with high SRLPI scores. Furthermore, this score was significantly related to markers of senescence. Protein secretion and androgen response were found to be substantially enriched in the low-SRLPI group, whereas E2F targets were found to be strongly enriched in the high-SRLPI group for pathway analysis. For the tumor microenvironment assessment, B cells, CD8+ T cells, immune score and TIDE score were positively related to SRLPI score while endothelial level was negatively associated with SRLPI score with statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS We developed a SRLPI score that was related to prognosis and radiosensitivity and might be helpful in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dechao Feng
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Li Li
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Xu Shi
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Weizhen Zhu
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Jie Wang
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Ruicheng Wu
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Dengxiong Li
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Wuran Wei
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| | - Ping Han
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Brito Y, Wilson BW, Bacchus KI, Mwaniki J, Jorge J, Tiesenga F. Cutaneous Metastases in Progressive Prostate Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e46219. [PMID: 37905289 PMCID: PMC10613505 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.46219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer has an indolent progression course and commonly metastasizes to the vertebrae bone and regional lymph nodes. We report a patient with prostate cancer who has developed cutaneous metastases in multiple regions, including the right infraclavicular and abdominal area, as well as the left supraclavicular region. It presented as isolated, prominent nodules that were microscopically proven to be of prostate adenocarcinoma when biopsied. This rare presentation is a marker of an advanced disease course with a poor prognosis in castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Thorough clinical examination to rule out metastasis from the prostate and other dermatological conditions is paramount as well as ensuring early detection and optimizing patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yesenia Brito
- Surgery, St. George's University School of Medicine, True Blue, GRD
| | - Bruce W Wilson
- Surgery, St. George's University School of Medicine, True Blue, GRD
| | | | - Janice Mwaniki
- Surgery, St. George's University School of Medicine, True Blue, GRD
| | - Juaquito Jorge
- General and Bariatric Surgery, Tiesenga Surgical Associates, Elmwood Park, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Saeidi H, Bakrin IH, Raju CS, Ismail P, Saraf M, Khairul-Asri MG. Genetic aberrations of homologous recombination repair pathways in prostate cancer: The prognostic and therapeutic implications. Adv Med Sci 2023; 68:359-365. [PMID: 37757663 DOI: 10.1016/j.advms.2023.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most common cancer in men worldwide. Homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene defects have been identified in a significant proportion of metastatic castration-resistant PC (mCRPC) and are associated with an increased risk of PC and more aggressive PC. Importantly, it has been well-documented that poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibition in cells with HR deficiency (HRD) can cause cell death. This has been exploited for the targeted treatment of PC patients with HRD by PARP inhibitors. Moreover, it has been shown that platinum-based chemotherapy is more effective in mCRPC patients with HRR gene alterations. This review highlights the prognosis and therapeutic implications of HRR gene alterations in PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamidreza Saeidi
- Department of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia.
| | - Ikmal Hisyam Bakrin
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
| | - Chandramathi Samudi Raju
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Patimah Ismail
- Department of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
| | - Mohsen Saraf
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
| | - Mohd Ghani Khairul-Asri
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Logotheti S, Papadaki E, Zolota V, Logothetis C, Vrahatis AG, Soundararajan R, Tzelepi V. Lineage Plasticity and Stemness Phenotypes in Prostate Cancer: Harnessing the Power of Integrated "Omics" Approaches to Explore Measurable Metrics. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4357. [PMID: 37686633 PMCID: PMC10486655 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa), the most frequent and second most lethal cancer type in men in developed countries, is a highly heterogeneous disease. PCa heterogeneity, therapy resistance, stemness, and lethal progression have been attributed to lineage plasticity, which refers to the ability of neoplastic cells to undergo phenotypic changes under microenvironmental pressures by switching between developmental cell states. What remains to be elucidated is how to identify measurements of lineage plasticity, how to implement them to inform preclinical and clinical research, and, further, how to classify patients and inform therapeutic strategies in the clinic. Recent research has highlighted the crucial role of next-generation sequencing technologies in identifying potential biomarkers associated with lineage plasticity. Here, we review the genomic, transcriptomic, and epigenetic events that have been described in PCa and highlight those with significance for lineage plasticity. We further focus on their relevance in PCa research and their benefits in PCa patient classification. Finally, we explore ways in which bioinformatic analyses can be used to determine lineage plasticity based on large omics analyses and algorithms that can shed light on upstream and downstream events. Most importantly, an integrated multiomics approach may soon allow for the identification of a lineage plasticity signature, which would revolutionize the molecular classification of PCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Souzana Logotheti
- Department of Pathology, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece; (S.L.); (E.P.); (V.Z.)
| | - Eugenia Papadaki
- Department of Pathology, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece; (S.L.); (E.P.); (V.Z.)
- Department of Informatics, Ionian University, 49100 Corfu, Greece;
| | - Vasiliki Zolota
- Department of Pathology, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece; (S.L.); (E.P.); (V.Z.)
| | - Christopher Logothetis
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | | | - Rama Soundararajan
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Vasiliki Tzelepi
- Department of Pathology, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece; (S.L.); (E.P.); (V.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Feng Z, Yang X, Tian M, Zeng N, Bai Z, Deng W, Zhao Y, Guo J, Yang Y, Zhang Z, Yang Y. BRCA genes as candidates for colorectal cancer genetic testing panel: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:807. [PMID: 37644384 PMCID: PMC10464413 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11328-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutation carriers are at an increased risk for breast, ovarian, prostate and pancreatic cancers. However, the role of BRCA is unclear in colorectal cancer; the results regarding the association between BRCA gene mutations and colorectal cancer risk are inconsistent and even controversial. This study aimed to investigate whether BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations are associated with colorectal cancer risk. METHODS In this systematic review, we searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) were used to estimate the probability of Breast Cancer Type 1 Susceptibility gene (BRCA1) and Breast Cancer Type 2 Susceptibility gene (BRCA2) mutations in colorectal cancer patients. The associations were evaluated using fixed effect models. RESULTS Fourteen studies were included in the systematic review. Twelve studies, including seven case-control and five cohort studies, were included in the meta-analysis. A significant increase in the frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations was observed in patients with colorectal cancer [OR = 1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.02-1.76, P = 0.04]. In subgroup analysis, colorectal cancer patients had an increased odds of BRCA1 (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.10-2.01, P = 0.01) and BRCA2 (OR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.06-2.30, P = 0.02) mutations. CONCLUSIONS BRCA genes are one of the genes that may increase the risk of developing colorectal cancer. Thus, BRCA genes could be potential candidates that may be included in the colorectal cancer genetic testing panel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhewen Feng
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University & National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, No.95, Yong An Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Xiaobao Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University & National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, No.95, Yong An Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Mingwei Tian
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University & National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, No.95, Yong An Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Na Zeng
- School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhigang Bai
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University & National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, No.95, Yong An Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Wei Deng
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University & National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, No.95, Yong An Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Yanyan Zhao
- MyGene Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianru Guo
- MyGene Diagnostics Co., Ltd, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yingchi Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University & National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, No.95, Yong An Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Zhongtao Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University & National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, No.95, Yong An Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Yun Yang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University & National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, No.95, Yong An Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ueki A, Yoshida R, Kosaka T, Matsubayashi H. Clinical risk management of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostatic cancers for BRCA1/2 variant carriers in Japan. J Hum Genet 2023; 68:517-526. [PMID: 37088789 DOI: 10.1038/s10038-023-01153-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
Opportunities for genetic counseling and germline BRCA1/2 (BRCA) testing are increasing in Japan owing to cancer genomic profiling testing and companion diagnostics being covered by national health insurance for patients with BRCA-related cancers. These tests are useful not only to judge whether platinum agents and PARP inhibitors are indicated but also to reveal an autosomal-dominant inherited cancer syndrome: hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. In individuals with germline BRCA variants, risk of cancers of the breast, ovary, pancreas, and prostate is significantly increased at various ages of onset, but the stomach, uterus, biliary tract, and skin might also be at risk. For women with pathogenic BRCA variants, breast awareness and image analyses should be initiated in their 20s, and risk-reducing procedures such as mastectomy are recommended starting in their 30s, with salpingo-oophorectomy in their late 30s. For male BRCA pathogenic variant carriers, prostatic surveillance should be applied using serum prostate-specific antigen starting in their 40s. For both sexes, image examinations ideally using endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and blood testing should begin in their 50s for pancreatic surveillance. Homologous recombination pathway-associated genes are also causative candidates. Variant pathogenicity needs to be evaluated every 6-12 months when results are uncertain for clinical significance. Genetic counseling needs to be offered to the blood relatives of the pathogenic variant carriers with suitable timing. We review the recommended cross-organ BRCA risk management in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arisa Ueki
- Department of Clinical Genetics, The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR, 3-8-31, Ariake, Koto, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan
| | - Reiko Yoshida
- Institute for Clinical Genetics and Genomics, Showa University, 1-5-8 Hatanodai Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, 142-8555, Japan
| | - Takeo Kosaka
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Matsubayashi
- Division of Genetic Medicine Promotion, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi, Suntogun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Inoue T, Sekito S, Kageyama T, Sugino Y, Sasaki T. Roles of the PARP Inhibitor in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Mutated Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Direct Functions and Modification of the Tumor Microenvironment. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092662. [PMID: 37174127 PMCID: PMC10177034 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer cells frequently exhibit defects in DNA damage repair (DDR), leading to genomic instability. Mutations in DDR genes or epigenetic alterations leading to the downregulation of DDR genes can result in increased dependency on other DDR pathways. Therefore, DDR pathways could be a treatment target for various cancers. In fact, polyadenosine diphosphatase ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, such as olaparib (Lynparza®), have shown remarkable therapeutic efficacy against BRCA1/2-mutant cancers through synthetic lethality. Recent genomic analytical advancements have revealed that BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic variants are the most frequent mutations among DDR genes in prostate cancer. Currently, the PROfound randomized controlled trial is investigating the efficacy of a PARP inhibitor, olaparib (Lynparza®), in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The efficacy of the drug is promising, especially in patients with BRCA1/BRCA2 pathogenic variants, even if they are in the advanced stage of the disease. However, olaparib (Lynparza®) is not effective in all BRCA1/2 mutant prostate cancer patients and inactivation of DDR genes elicits genomic instability, leading to alterations in multiple genes, which eventually leads to drug resistance. In this review, we summarize PARP inhibitors' basic and clinical mechanisms of action against prostate cancer cells and discuss their effects on the tumor microenvironment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Inoue
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu 514-8507, Japan
| | - Sho Sekito
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu 514-8507, Japan
| | - Takumi Kageyama
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu 514-8507, Japan
| | - Yusuke Sugino
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu 514-8507, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sasaki
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-174 Edobashi, Tsu 514-8507, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dias A, Brook MN, Bancroft EK, Page EC, Chamberlain A, Saya S, Amin J, Mikropoulos C, Taylor N, Myhill K, Thomas S, Saunders E, Dadaev T, Leongamornlert D, Dyrsø Jensen T, Evans DG, Cybulski C, Liljegren A, Teo SH, Side L, Kote‐Jarai Z, Eeles RA. Serum testosterone and prostate cancer in men with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants. BJUI COMPASS 2023; 4:361-373. [PMID: 37025481 PMCID: PMC10071088 DOI: 10.1002/bco2.156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives The relation of serum androgens and the development of prostate cancer (PCa) is subject of debate. Lower total testosterone (TT) levels have been associated with increased PCa detection and worse pathological features after treatment. However, data from the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events (REDUCE) and Prostate Cancer Prevention (PCPT) trial groups indicate no association. The aim of this study is to investigate the association of serum androgen levels and PCa detection in a prospective screening study of men at higher genetic risk of aggressive PCa due to BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants (PVs), the IMPACT study. Methods Men enrolled in the IMPACT study provided serum samples during regular visits. Hormonal levels were calculated using immunoassays. Free testosterone (FT) was calculated from TT and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) using the Sodergard mass equation. Age, body mass index (BMI), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and hormonal concentrations were compared between genetic cohorts. We also explored associations between age and TT, SHBG, FT and PCa, in the whole subset and stratified by BRCA1/2 PVs status. Results A total of 777 participants in the IMPACT study had TT and SHBG measurements in serum samples at annual visits, giving 3940 prospective androgen levels, from 266 BRCA1 PVs carriers, 313 BRCA2 PVs carriers and 198 non-carriers. The median number of visits per patient was 5. There was no difference in TT, SHBG and FT between carriers and non-carriers. In a univariate analysis, androgen levels were not associated with PCa. In the analysis stratified by carrier status, no significant association was found between hormonal levels and PCa in non-carriers, BRCA1 or BRCA2 PVs carriers. Conclusions Male BRCA1/2 PVs carriers have a similar androgen profile to non-carriers. Hormonal levels were not associated with PCa in men with and without BRCA1/2 PVs. Mechanisms related to the particularly aggressive phenotype of PCa in BRCA2 PVs carriers may therefore not be linked with circulating hormonal levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Dias
- Oncogenetics TeamThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Instituto Nacional de Cancer Jose de Alencar Gomes da Silva INCARio de JaneiroBrazil
| | - Mark N. Brook
- Oncogenetics TeamThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Elizabeth K. Bancroft
- Oncogenetics TeamThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Academic Urology UnitRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | | | | | - Sibel Saya
- Oncogenetics TeamThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | - Jan Amin
- Clinical Biochemistry SectionRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Christos Mikropoulos
- Oncogenetics TeamThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Academic Urology UnitRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Natalie Taylor
- Oncogenetics TeamThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Academic Urology UnitRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Kathryn Myhill
- Oncogenetics TeamThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Academic Urology UnitRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Sarah Thomas
- Oncogenetics TeamThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | | | - Tokhir Dadaev
- Oncogenetics TeamThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
| | | | | | - D. Gareth Evans
- Genetic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Sciences CentreCentral Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustManchesterUK
| | - Cezary Cybulski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and PathologyPomeranian Medical University in SzczecinSzczecinPoland
| | - Annelie Liljegren
- Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Soo H. Teo
- Cancer Research Initiatives FoundationSubang Jaya Medical CentreSelangorDarul EhsanMalaysia
| | - Lucy Side
- Wessex Clinical Genetics ServicePrincess Anne HospitalSouthamptonUK
| | | | | | - Rosalind A. Eeles
- Oncogenetics TeamThe Institute of Cancer ResearchLondonUK
- Academic Urology UnitRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Rajwa P, Quhal F, D’Andrea D, Korn S, Petrov P, Yanagisawa T, Kawada T, Motlagh RS, Mostafaei H, Laukhtina E, Aydh A, König F, Pallauf M, Pradere B, Nyirády P, Abufaraj M, Marra G, Gandaglia G, Briganti A, Karakiewicz P, Ye DW, Haydter M, Chlosta P, Comperat E, Enikeev D, Shariat SF. Positive family history as a predictor for disease outcomes after radical prostatectomy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Arab J Urol 2023; 21:241-247. [PMID: 38178943 PMCID: PMC10763581 DOI: 10.1080/2090598x.2023.2196911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background While family history (FHx) of prostate cancer (PCa) increases the risk of PCa, comparably less is known regarding the impact of FHx on pathologic and oncologic outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods We retrospectively reviewed our multicenter database comprising 6,041 nonmetastatic PCa patients treated with RP. Patients with a FHx of PCa in one or more first-degree relatives were considered as FHx positive. We examined the association of FHx with pathologic outcomes and biochemical recurrence (BCR) using logistic and Cox regression models, respectively. Results In total, 1,677 (28%) patients reported a FHx of PCa. Compared to patients without FHx, those with, were younger at RP (median age of 59 vs. 62 years, p < 0.01), and had significantlymore favorable biopsy and RP histopathologic findings. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, positive FHx was associated with extracapsular extension (odds ratio [OR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.90, p < 0.01; model AUC 0.73) and upgrading (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.62-0.80, p < 0.01; model AUC 0.68). Incorporating FHx significantly improved the AUC of the base model for upgrading (p < 0.01). Positive FHx was not associated with BCR in pre- and postoperative multivariable models (p = 0.1 and p = 0.7); c-indexes of Cox multivariable models were: 0.73 and 0.82, respectively. Conclusions We found that patients with clinically nonmetastatic PCa who have positive FHx of PCa undergo RP at a younger age and have more favorable pathologic outcomes. Nevertheless, FHx of PCa did not confer better BCR rates, suggesting that FHx leads to potentially early detection and treatment without impact on BCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - David D’Andrea
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Stephan Korn
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Patrik Petrov
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Kawada
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Men’s Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Abdulmajeed Aydh
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, King Faisal Medical City, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Frederik König
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Nyirády
- Department of Urology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Special Surgery, Division of Urology, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Ding-wei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Martin Haydter
- Department of Urology, Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt, Vienna, Austria
| | - Piotr Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Eva Comperat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Shahrokh F. Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Division of Urology, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kwong A, Ho CYS, Shin VY, Ng ATL, Chan TL, Ma ESK. Molecular characteristics of Asian male BRCA-related cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 198:391-400. [PMID: 36637704 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06651-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Germline mutations of BRCA1 or BRCA2 predispose men to develop various cancers, including breast cancers and prostate cancers. Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease while prostate cancer (PRC) is uncommon in young men at the age of less than 40. The prevalence of BRCA genes in Asian male patients has to be elevated. METHODS Germline mutations screening was performed in 98 high-risk Chinese MBC and PRC patients. RESULT We have identified 16 pathogenic BRCA2 mutation carriers, 12 were MBC patients, 2 were PRC patients and 2 were patients with both MBC and PRC. The mutation percentages were 18.8%, 6.7% and 50% for MBC, PRC and both MBC and PRC patients, respectively. BRCA2 gene mutations confer a significantly higher risk of breast/prostate cancers in men than those with BRCA1 mutations. BRCA mutated MBC patients had a younger age of diagnosis and strong family histories of breast cancers while BRCA mutated PRC patients had strong family histories of ovarian cancers. CONCLUSION Male BRCA carriers with breast cancers or prostate cancers showed distinct clinical and molecular characteristics, a male-specific genetic screening model would be useful to identify male cancer patients who have a high risk of BRCA mutation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ava Kwong
- Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
- Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
- Department of Surgery, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
- Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Hong Kong, China.
| | - Cecilia Yuen Sze Ho
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Ada Tsui Lin Ng
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Tsun Leung Chan
- Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Hong Kong, China
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| | - Edmond Shiu Kwan Ma
- Hong Kong Hereditary Breast Cancer Family Registry, Hong Kong, China
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, Hong Kong Sanatorium & Hospital, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Liu J, Yao L, Sun J, Hu L, Chen J, Zhang J, Xu Y, Xie Y. Cancer risk in relatives of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers in a large series of unselected patients with breast cancer. Cancer Biol Med 2023; 20:j.issn.2095-3941.2022.0593. [PMID: 36861435 PMCID: PMC9978892 DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2022.0593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The spectrum and risk of cancer in relatives of BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers in the Chinese population have not been established. METHODS A family history of cancer in 9903 unselected breast cancer patients was retrospectively analyzed. BRCA1/2 status was determined for all patients and relative risks (RRs) were calculated to evaluate cancer risk in relatives of the patients. RESULTS The incidences of breast cancer in female relatives of BRCA1 carriers, BRCA2 carriers, and non-carriers were 33.0%, 32.2%, and 7.7%, respectively. The corresponding incidences of ovarian cancer were 11.5%, 2.4%, and 0.5%, respectively. The incidences of pancreatic cancer in male relatives of BRCA1 carriers, BRCA2 carriers, and non-carriers were 1.4%, 2.7%, and 0.6%, respectively. The corresponding incidences of prostate cancer were 1.0%, 2.1%, and 0.4%, respectively. The risks of breast and ovarian cancers in female relatives of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers were significantly higher than female relatives of non-carriers (BRCA1: RR = 4.29, P < 0.001 and RR = 21.95, P < 0.001; BRCA2: RR = 4.19, P < 0.001 and RR = 4.65, P < 0.001, respectively). Additionally, higher risks of pancreatic and prostate cancers were noted in male relatives of BRCA2 carriers than non-carriers (RR = 4.34, P = 0.001 and RR = 4.86, P = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Female relatives of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers are at increased risk for breast and ovarian cancers, and male relatives of BRCA2 carriers are at increased risk for pancreatic and prostate cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaming Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Lu Yao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Jie Sun
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Li Hu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Jiuan Chen
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Juan Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Ye Xu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Yuntao Xie
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Familial & Hereditary Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
- Correspondence to: Yuntao Xie, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Genetic Risk Prediction for Prostate Cancer: Implications for Early Detection and Prevention. Eur Urol 2023; 83:241-248. [PMID: 36609003 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Prostate cancer (PCa) is a leading cause of death and partially heritable. Genetic risk prediction might be useful for strategies to reduce PCa mortality through early detection and prevention. OBJECTIVE To review evidence for genetic risk prediction for PCa. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A collaborative literature review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar. Search terms included genetic, risk, prediction, and "prostate cancer". Articles addressing screening, early detection, or prevention were prioritized, as were studies involving diverse populations. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Rare pathogenic mutations (RPMs), especially in DNA damage repair genes, increase PCa risk. RPMs in BRCA2 are most clearly deleterious, conferring 2-8.6 times higher risk of PCa and a higher risk of aggressive disease. Common genetic variants can be combined into genetic risk scores (GRSs). A high GRS (top 20-25% of the population) confers two to three times higher risk of PCa than average; a very high GRS (top 1-5%) confers six to eight times higher risk. GRSs are not specific for aggressive PCa, possibly due to methodological limitations and/or a field effect of an elevated risk for both low- and high-grade PCa. It is challenging to disentangle genetics from structural racism and social determinants of health to understand PCa racial disparities. GRSs are independently associated with a lethal PCa risk after accounting for family history and race/ancestry. Healthy lifestyle might partially mitigate the risk of lethal PCa. CONCLUSIONS Genetic risk assessment is becoming more common; implementation studies are needed to understand the implications and to avoid exacerbating healthcare disparities. Men with a high genetic risk of PCa can reasonably be encouraged to adhere to a healthy lifestyle. PATIENT SUMMARY Prostate cancer risk is inherited through rare mutations and through the combination of hundreds of common genetic markers. Some men with a high genetic risk (especially BRCA2 mutations) likely benefit from early screening for prostate cancer. The risk of lethal prostate cancer can be reduced through a healthy lifestyle.
Collapse
|
26
|
Zannini G, Facchini G, De Sio M, De Vita F, Ronchi A, Orditura M, Vietri MT, Ciardiello F, Franco R, Accardo M, Zito Marino F. Implementation of BRCA mutations testing in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of different cancer types. Pathol Res Pract 2023; 243:154336. [PMID: 36736144 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BRCA1 and BRCA2 are onco-suppressor genes involved in the DNA repair mechanism. The presence of BRCA1/2 mutations confers a higher risk of developing several cancer types. To date, the FDA approved various PARP inhibitors to treat selected BRCA1/2 mutated oncologic patients. At first, PARP inhibitors were approved for patients with ovarian and breast cancers, and subsequently for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after the treatment with chemotherapy. The current guidelines for BRCA testing are very heterogeneous between the different types of tumors regarding the diagnostic algorithm and the type of sample to analyze, such as the blood for the germline mutations and the tumoral tissue for the somatic mutations. Few data have currently been described regarding the detection of BRCA1/2 somatic mutations in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. In this review, we propose an overview of the BRCA mutations in FFPE samples of several cancers, including breast, ovarian, fallopian tube, primary peritoneal, prostate, and pancreatic cancer. We summarize the types and the frequency of BRCA mutations, the guidelines approved for the test, the molecular assays used for the detection and the PARP inhibitors approved for each tumor type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppa Zannini
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via L. Armanni 5, Naples 80138, Italy.
| | - Gaetano Facchini
- Medical Oncology Unit, SM delle Grazie Hospital, Via Domitiana, Pozzuoli 80078, Italy.
| | - Marco De Sio
- Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via S. Pansini 5, Naples 80131, Italy.
| | - Ferdinando De Vita
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via S. Pansini 5, Naples 80131, Italy.
| | - Andrea Ronchi
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via L. Armanni 5, Naples 80138, Italy.
| | - Michele Orditura
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via S. Pansini 5, Naples 80131, Italy.
| | - Maria Teresa Vietri
- U.O.C. Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via L. De Crecchio 7, Naples 80138, Italy.
| | - Fortunato Ciardiello
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via S. Pansini 5, Naples 80131, Italy.
| | - Renato Franco
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via L. Armanni 5, Naples 80138, Italy.
| | - Marina Accardo
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via L. Armanni 5, Naples 80138, Italy.
| | - Federica Zito Marino
- Pathology Unit, Department of Mental and Physical Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Via L. Armanni 5, Naples 80138, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mehra N, Kloots I, Vlaming M, Aluwini S, Dewulf E, Oprea-Lager DE, van der Poel H, Stoevelaar H, Yakar D, Bangma CH, Bekers E, van den Bergh R, Bergman AM, van den Berkmortel F, Boudewijns S, Dinjens WN, Fütterer J, van der Hulle T, Jenster G, Kroeze LI, van Kruchten M, van Leenders G, van Leeuwen PJ, de Leng WW, van Moorselaar RJA, Noordzij W, Oldenburg RA, van Oort IM, Oving I, Schalken JA, Schoots IG, Schuuring E, Smeenk RJ, Vanneste BG, Vegt E, Vis AN, de Vries K, Willemse PPM, Wondergem M, Ausems M. Genetic Aspects and Molecular Testing in Prostate Cancer: A Report from a Dutch Multidisciplinary Consensus Meeting. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 49:23-31. [PMID: 36874601 PMCID: PMC9975012 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Germline and tumour genetic testing in prostate cancer (PCa) is becoming more broadly accepted, but testing indications and clinical consequences for carriers in each disease stage are not yet well defined. Objective To determine the consensus of a Dutch multidisciplinary expert panel on the indication and application of germline and tumour genetic testing in PCa. Design setting and participants The panel consisted of 39 specialists involved in PCa management. We used a modified Delphi method consisting of two voting rounds and a virtual consensus meeting. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Consensus was reached if ≥75% of the panellists chose the same option. Appropriateness was assessed by the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. Results and limitations Of the multiple-choice questions, 44% reached consensus. For men without PCa having a relevant family history (familial PCa/BRCA-related hereditary cancer), follow-up by prostate-specific antigen was considered appropriate. For patients with low-risk localised PCa and a family history of PCa, active surveillance was considered appropriate, except in case of the patient being a BRCA2 germline pathogenic variant carrier. Germline and tumour genetic testing should not be done for nonmetastatic hormone-sensitive PCa in the absence of a relevant family history of cancer. Tumour genetic testing was deemed most appropriate for the identification of actionable variants, with uncertainty for germline testing. For tumour genetic testing in metastatic castration-resistant PCa, consensus was not reached for the timing and panel composition. The principal limitations are as follows: (1) a number of topics discussed lack scientific evidence, and therefore the recommendations are partly opinion based, and (2) there was a small number of experts per discipline. Conclusions The outcomes of this Dutch consensus meeting may provide further guidance on genetic counselling and molecular testing related to PCa. Patient summary A group of Dutch specialists discussed the use of germline and tumour genetic testing in prostate cancer (PCa) patients, indication of these tests (which patients and when), and impact of these tests on the management and treatment of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niven Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Corresponding author. Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Postbus 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Tel. +31 243610354; Fax: +31 243615025.
| | - Iris Kloots
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel Vlaming
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Shafak Aluwini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UMCG, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Els Dewulf
- Centre for Decision Analysis & Support, Ismar Healthcare NV, Lier, Belgium
| | - Daniela E. Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Herman Stoevelaar
- Centre for Decision Analysis & Support, Ismar Healthcare NV, Lier, Belgium
| | - Derya Yakar
- Department of Radiology, UMCG, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chris H. Bangma
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elise Bekers
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Andries M. Bergman
- Department of Medical Oncology and Oncogenomics, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Steve Boudewijns
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jurgen Fütterer
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tom van der Hulle
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Guido Jenster
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Michel van Kruchten
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Pim J. van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Walter Noordzij
- Department of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Irma Oving
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ziekenhuis Groep Twente, Almelo, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ivo G. Schoots
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ed Schuuring
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J. Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud UMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ben G.L. Vanneste
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht UMC, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Erik Vegt
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André N. Vis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kim de Vries
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maurits Wondergem
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Margreet Ausems
- Division Laboratories, Pharmacy and biomedical Genetics, Department of Genetics, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Nyberg T, Brook MN, Ficorella L, Lee A, Dennis J, Yang X, Wilcox N, Dadaev T, Govindasami K, Lush M, Leslie G, Lophatananon A, Muir K, Bancroft E, Easton DF, Tischkowitz M, Kote-Jarai Z, Eeles R, Antoniou AC. CanRisk-Prostate: A Comprehensive, Externally Validated Risk Model for the Prediction of Future Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:1092-1104. [PMID: 36493335 PMCID: PMC9928632 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Revised: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Prostate cancer (PCa) is highly heritable. No validated PCa risk model currently exists. We therefore sought to develop a genetic risk model that can provide personalized predicted PCa risks on the basis of known moderate- to high-risk pathogenic variants, low-risk common genetic variants, and explicit cancer family history, and to externally validate the model in an independent prospective cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS We developed a risk model using a kin-cohort comprising individuals from 16,633 PCa families ascertained in the United Kingdom from 1993 to 2017 from the UK Genetic Prostate Cancer Study, and complex segregation analysis adjusting for ascertainment. The model was externally validated in 170,850 unaffected men (7,624 incident PCas) recruited from 2006 to 2010 to the independent UK Biobank prospective cohort study. RESULTS The most parsimonious model included the effects of pathogenic variants in BRCA2, HOXB13, and BRCA1, and a polygenic score on the basis of 268 common low-risk variants. Residual familial risk was modeled by a hypothetical recessively inherited variant and a polygenic component whose standard deviation decreased log-linearly with age. The model predicted familial risks that were consistent with those reported in previous observational studies. In the validation cohort, the model discriminated well between unaffected men and men with incident PCas within 5 years (C-index, 0.790; 95% CI, 0.783 to 0.797) and 10 years (C-index, 0.772; 95% CI, 0.768 to 0.777). The 50% of men with highest predicted risks captured 86.3% of PCa cases within 10 years. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first validated risk model offering personalized PCa risks. The model will assist in counseling men concerned about their risk and can facilitate future risk-stratified population screening approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tommy Nyberg
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Mark N. Brook
- Oncogenetics Team, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Lorenzo Ficorella
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Lee
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Joe Dennis
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Xin Yang
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Naomi Wilcox
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Tokhir Dadaev
- Oncogenetics Team, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Koveela Govindasami
- Oncogenetics Team, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Lush
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Goska Leslie
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Artitaya Lophatananon
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Kenneth Muir
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth Bancroft
- Oncogenetics Team, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Cancer Genetics Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Douglas F. Easton
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Zsofia Kote-Jarai
- Oncogenetics Team, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rosalind Eeles
- Oncogenetics Team, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Cancer Genetics Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Antonis C. Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Prostate cancer risk, screening and management in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations. Nat Rev Urol 2023; 20:205-216. [PMID: 36600087 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00680-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumour suppressor genes are associated with prostate cancer risk; however, optimal screening protocols for individuals with these mutations have been a subject of debate. Several prospective studies of prostate cancer incidence and screening among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers have indicated at least a twofold to fourfold increase in prostate cancer risk among carriers of BRCA2 mutations compared with the general population. Moreover, BRCA2 mutations are associated with more aggressive, high-grade disease characteristics at diagnosis, more aggressive clinical behaviour and greater prostate cancer-specific mortality. The risk for BRCA1 mutations seems to be attenuated compared with BRCA2. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement or prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone is an imperfect indicator of clinically significant prostate cancer; therefore, BRCA1/2 mutation carriers might benefit from refined risk stratification strategies. However, the long-term impact of prostate cancer screening is unknown, and the optimal management of BRCA1/2 carriers with prostate cancer has not been defined. Whether timely localized therapy can improve overall survival in the screened population is uncertain. Long-term results of prospective studies are awaited to confirm the optimal screening strategies and benefits of prostate cancer screening among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers, and whether these approaches ultimately have a positive impact on survival and quality of life in these patients.
Collapse
|
30
|
Cioffi A, De Cobelli O, Veronesi P, La Vecchia C, Maisonneuve P, Corso G. Prevalence of Germline BRCA1/2 Variants in Ashkenazi and Non-Ashkenazi Prostate Cancer Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15010306. [PMID: 36612302 PMCID: PMC9818251 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS International guidelines recommend testing BRCA2 in men with prostate cancer, due to the presence of a strong association with this gene. Some ethnicities present disparities in genetic distribution for the relation with specific founder variants. Ashkenazi Jewish people are, importantly, at high risk of breast cancer for their inherited cluster with germline BRCA1/2 variants. However, in Ashkenazi men with prostate cancer, the prevalence of BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 is not well defined. We assessed the frequency of these variants in Ashkenazi vs. non-Ashkenazi men with prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: In accord with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, we revised all germline BRCA variants reported in MEDLINE from 1996 to 2021 in Ashkenazi and non-Ashkenazi men with prostate cancer. Results: Thirty-five original studies were selected for the analysis. Among populations from Israel and North America, Ashkenazi Jewish men presented higher prevalence of BRCA1 variants [0.9% (0.4-1.5) vs. 0.5% (0.2-1.1), p = 0.09] and a lower prevalence of BRCA2 variants [1.5% (1.1-2.0) vs. 3.5% (1.7-5.9), p = 0.08] in comparison to the non-Ashkenazi population. Conclusions: Since germline BRCA1 variants are more prevalent and BRCA2 variants are less prevalent in PCa patients of Ashkenazi Jewish ethnicity in comparison to non-Ashkenazi patients, prostate cancer genetic screening in Ashkenazi men should not be restricted to the BRCA2 gene.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Cioffi
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Veronesi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo La Vecchia
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Patrick Maisonneuve
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Corso
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
- European Cancer Prevention Organization (ECP), 20122 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-02-9437-5161
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chitra Veena S, Vajagathali M, Ramakrishnan V. A systematic review on the association between ovarian and prostate cancer with <I>BRCA1</I> and <I>BRCA2</I> gene. SIBERIAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2023; 21:145-155. [DOI: 10.21294/1814-4861-2022-21-6-145-155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
Background. BRCA1 and BRCA2 were discussed as the basis of inherited adenocarcinoma and breast and ovarian malignancy. Ovarian cancer is uncommon in women below 40 years of age, and prostate cancer mainly occurs in older men cause 90 % in those above sixty-fve.Objective. The main objective of this paper is to investigate the relationship between ovarian and prostate cancer with the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.Material and Methods. The ovarian and prostate cancer mechanism is discussed in detail, and their preventive measures with screening techniques are also demonstrated. This systematic review collected the related articles from online databases using the key terms ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, BRCA genes, mutation, polymorphism, carcinoma, sarcoma, and genetic association.Results. Based on the obtained information, it is found that the BRCA genes are highly associated with prostate cancer in men, and in women, it is significantly linked with breast cancer than ovarian cancer.Conclusion. Therefore, early diagnosis and genetic testing for BRCA1&BRCA2 genes in both men and women are necessary. In some cases, these genes might even cause different types of cancer like pancreatic cancers. Identifying individuals with tumour-HRD through mutations in the homologous repair pathway and determining this gene expression is essential to improve treatment techniques developed during the previous decade and rapidly make their way into clinical trials practice. However, the safe introduction of these medicines into everyday practice will require a thorough understanding of treatment targets and associated adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarpparajan Chitra Veena
- Human Cytogenetics and Genomics Laboratory, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam
| | - Mohammed Vajagathali
- Human Cytogenetics and Genomics Laboratory, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam
| | - Veerabathiran Ramakrishnan
- Human Cytogenetics and Genomics Laboratory, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education, Kelambakkam
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Crowley F, Mihalopoulos M, Gaglani S, Tewari AK, Tsao CK, Djordjevic M, Kyprianou N, Purohit RS, Lundon DJ. Prostate cancer in transgender women: considerations for screening, diagnosis and management. Br J Cancer 2023; 128:177-189. [PMID: 36261584 PMCID: PMC9902518 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01989-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Transgender individuals represent 0.55% of the US population, equivalent to 1.4 million transgender adults. In transgender women, feminisation can include a number of medical and surgical interventions. The main goal is to deprive the phenotypically masculine body of androgens and simultaneously provide oestrogen therapy for feminisation. In gender-confirming surgery (GCS) for transgender females, the prostate is usually not removed. Due to limitations of existing cohort studies, the true incidence of prostate cancer in transgender females is unknown but is thought to be less than the incidence among cis-gender males. It is unclear how prostate cancer develops in androgen-deprived conditions in these patients. Six out of eleven case reports in the literature presented with metastatic disease. It is thought that androgen receptor-mediated mechanisms or tumour-promoting effects of oestrogen may be responsible. Due to the low incidence of prostate cancer identified in transgender women, there is little evidence to drive specific screening recommendations in this patient subpopulation. The treatment of early and locally advanced prostate cancer in these patients warrants an individualised thoughtful approach with input from patients' reconstructive surgeons. Both surgical and radiation treatment for prostate cancer in these patients can profoundly impact the patient's quality of life. In this review, we discuss the evidence surrounding screening and treatment of prostate cancer in transgender women and consider the current gaps in our knowledge in providing evidence-based guidance at the molecular, genomic and epidemiological level, for clinical decision-making in the management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fionnuala Crowley
- Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai Morningside West, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Meredith Mihalopoulos
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Simita Gaglani
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ashutosh K Tewari
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Che-Kai Tsao
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Miroslav Djordjevic
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Natasha Kyprianou
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology & Molecular and Cell Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rajveer S Purohit
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
| | - Dara J Lundon
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Park SY, Kim Y, Kim S, Katapodi MC. Informational needs of individuals from families harboring BRCA pathogenic variants: A systematic review and content analysis. Genet Med 2022; 25:100001. [PMID: 36549594 DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.100001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Personalized information is paramount to patient-centered communication and decision-making regarding risk management in hereditary cancer syndromes. This systematic review identified information needs of individuals from families harboring BRCA pathogenic variants and compared findings based on gender (women vs men) and clinical characteristics (patients with cancer vs previvors and BRCA heterozygotes vs untested relatives). METHODS We screened 8115 studies identified from databases and citation searching. The quality of selected studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Narrative synthesis was conducted based on content analysis. RESULTS From 18 selected studies including 1063 individuals, we identified 9 categories of information needs. Risk of bias in the selected studies was moderate. Men, untested relatives, and racial and ethnic minorities were underrepresented. Frequently required information was personalized cancer risk and risk-reducing strategies, including decision-making, family implications of hereditary cancers, psychological issues, and cascade testing. Subgroup analyses showed that information needs depended on gender, personal cancer history, and cascade testing in relatives. CONCLUSION We identified comprehensive and detailed informational needs of individuals from families harboring BRCA pathogenic variants and gaps in international guidelines. Needs for personalized information varied based on gender, health, and genetic testing status. Findings of this study have implications for genetic counseling, tailoring educational materials, and personalizing interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun Young Park
- College of Nursing, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea; National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yoonjoo Kim
- Department of Nursing, College of Healthcare Sciences, Far East University, Eumseong-gun, Chungcheongbuk-do, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sue Kim
- College of Nursing, Mo-Im Kim Nursing Research Institute, Yonsei University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Maria C Katapodi
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
The BRCA1 BRCT promotes antisense RNA production and double-stranded RNA formation to suppress ribosomal R-loops. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:e2217542119. [PMID: 36490315 PMCID: PMC9897471 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2217542119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
R-loops, or RNA:DNA hybrids, can induce DNA damage, which requires DNA repair factors including breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) to restore genomic integrity. To date, several pathogenic mutations have been found within the tandem BRCA1 carboxyl-terminal (BRCT) domains that mediate BRCA1 interactions with proteins and DNA in response to DNA damage. Here, we describe a nonrepair role of BRCA1 BRCT in suppressing ribosomal R-loops via two mechanisms. Through its RNA binding and annealing activities, BRCA1 BRCT facilitates the formation of double-stranded RNA between ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and antisense-rRNA (as-rRNA), hereby minimizing rRNA hybridization to ribosomal DNA to form R-loops. BRCA1 BRCT also promotes RNA polymerase I-dependent transcription of as-rRNA to enhance double-stranded rRNA (ds-rRNA) formation. In addition, BRCA1 BRCT-mediated as-rRNA production restricts rRNA maturation in unperturbed cells. Hence, impairing as-rRNA transcription and ds-rRNA formation due to BRCA1 BRCT deficiency deregulates rRNA processing and increases ribosomal R-loops and DNA breaks. Our results link ribosomal biogenesis dysfunction to BRCA1-associated genomic instability.
Collapse
|
35
|
Detection of BRCA1, and BRCA2 Alterations in Matched Tumor Tissue and Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Patients with Prostate Cancer in a Real-World Setting. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10123170. [PMID: 36551924 PMCID: PMC9776086 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are approved for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer harboring deleterious or suspected deleterious BRCA1 and/or 2 mutations. Identifying patients with prostate cancer harboring these mutations may be challenging. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) provides an avenue for an easier detection of these mutations. Herein, we aimed to evaluate the concordance of BRCA mutations in the tumor tissue and cfDNA in patients with metastatic prostate cancer in the real-world setting. METHODS Somatic genomic profiling results were obtained from a clinical cohort of patients at our institution who had at least two samples tested. One of the samples needed to be from either primary or metastatic tissue. Concordance was adjusted to not include mutation types that the cfDNA platforms were not designed to detect. RESULTS The presence or absence of mutations in the BRCA gene was assessed in a total of 589 samples, including 327 cfDNA samples, from 260 patients with metastatic prostate cancer. The median time between the first test and any subsequent test was 22.8 (0.0-232) months. BRCA mutation was present in the patient's original prostate tissue in 23 samples (3.9%) of patients. The adjusted concordance between prostate tumor tissue and cfDNA was 97.9% [95% CI, 95.3-99.1%]. The adjusted concordance between metastatic samples and cfDNA was 93.5% [95% CI, 86.4-97.3%]. Of the patients who had a BRCA mutation detected in their prostate tissue, there was a 70% probability of detecting a BRCA mutation in the patient's cfDNA as well. For patients who did not have a detectable BRCA mutation in their primary prostate tissue, the probability of detecting a subsequent one later in the disease course was less than 0.9%. CONCLUSION There is a high level of concordance between tissue and blood for BRCA mutations. Testing cfDNA can provide reliable information on BRCA mutational status and is a viable alternative to solid tissue sequencing when unavailable. The development of a new BRCA mutation later in the disease course is a rare event.
Collapse
|
36
|
Sardar M, Recio-Boiles A, Mody K, Karime C, Chandana SR, Mahadevan D, Starr J, Jones J, Borad M, Babiker H. Pharmacotherapeutic options for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2022; 23:2079-2089. [PMID: 36394449 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2149322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a lethal malignancy projected to be the 2nd leading cause of cancer related death in the USA by 2030. This manuscript discusses current and evolving treatment approaches in patients with pancreatic cancer. AREAS COVERED PDAC is classified as: a) resectable, b) borderline resectable, c) unresectable (locally advanced and metastatic). The standard of care for patients who present with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma is six months of adjuvant modified (m) FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine plus capecitabine, or single agent gemcitabine. For many reasons, there has been a paradigm shift to employing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. For resectable and borderline resectable patients, we generally start with systemic therapy and reevaluate resectability with subsequent scans specifically when the tumor is located in the head or body of the pancreas. Combined chemoradiation therapy can be employed in select patients. The standard of care for metastatic PDAC is FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel. Germline and somatic genomic profiling should be obtained in all patients. Patients with a germline BRCA mutation can receive upfront gemcitabine and cisplatin. EXPERT OPINION Thorough understanding of molecular pathogenesis in PDAC has opened various therapeutic avenues. We remain optimistic that future treatment modalities such as targeted therapies, cellular therapies and immunotherapy will further improve survival in PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Sardar
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Az, USA
| | - Alejandro Recio-Boiles
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Az, USA
| | - Kabir Mody
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Daruka Mahadevan
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Texas, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Jason Starr
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Jeremy Jones
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Mitesh Borad
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Hani Babiker
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Barilla S, Lindblom A, Helgadottir HT. Unravelling genetic variants of a swedish family with high risk of prostate cancer. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2022; 20:28. [PMID: 35870994 PMCID: PMC9308349 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-022-00234-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Prostate cancer is the most prevalent cancer in men worldwide. It is a polygenic disease with a substantial proportion of heritability. Identification of novel candidate biomarkers is crucial for clinical cancer prevention and the development of therapeutic strategies. Here, we describe the analysis of rare and common genetic variants that can predispose to the development of prostate cancer.
Methods
Whole-genome sequencing was performed on germline DNA of five Swedish siblings which were diagnosed with prostate cancer. The high-risk variants were identified setting the minor allele frequency < 0.01, CADD > 10 and if tested in PRACTICAL, OR > 1.5, while the low-risk variants were identified minor allele frequency > 0.01, CADD > 10 and if tested in PRACTICAL, OR > 1.1.
Results
We identified 38 candidate high-risk gene variants and 332 candidate low-risk gene variants, where 2 and 14 variants were in coding regions, respectively, that were shared by the brothers with prostate cancer.
Conclusions
This study expanded the knowledge of potential risk factor candidates involved in hereditary and familial prostate cancer. Our findings can be beneficial when applying targeted screening in families with a high risk of developing the disease.
Collapse
|
38
|
Trendowski MR, Sample C, Baird T, Sadeghpour A, Moon D, Ruterbusch JJ, Beebe-Dimmer JL, Cooney KA. Germline Variants in DNA Damage Repair Genes and HOXB13 Among Black Patients With Early-Onset Prostate Cancer. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2200460. [PMID: 36446039 PMCID: PMC9812633 DOI: 10.1200/po.22.00460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Genetic studies of prostate cancer susceptibility have predominantly focused on non-Hispanic White men, despite the observation that Black men are more likely to develop prostate cancer and die from the disease. Therefore, we sought to identify genetic variants in Black patients diagnosed with early-onset prostate cancer. METHODS Whole-exome sequencing of germline DNA from a population-based cohort of Black men diagnosed with prostate cancer at age 62 years or younger was performed. Analysis was focused on a panel of DNA damage repair (DDR) genes and HOXB13. All discovered variants were ranked according to their pathogenic potential based upon REVEL score, evidence from existing literature, and prevalence in the cohort. Logistic regression was used to investigate associations between mutation status and relevant clinical characteristics. RESULTS Among 743 Black prostate cancer patients, we identified 26 unique pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variants in 14 genes (including HOXB13, BRCA1/2, BRIP1, ATM, CHEK2, and PALB2) among 30 men, or approximately 4.0% of the patient population. We also identified 33 unique variants of unknown significance in 16 genes among 39 men. Because of the rarity of these variants in the population, most associations between clinical characteristics did not achieve statistical significance. However, our results suggest that carriers for P or LP (P/LP) variants were more likely to have a first-degree relative diagnosed with DDR gene-associated cancer, have a higher prostate-specific antigen at time of diagnosis, and be diagnosed with metastatic disease. CONCLUSION Variants in DDR genes and HOXB13 may be important cancer risk factors for Black men diagnosed with early-onset prostate cancer, and are more frequently observed in men with a family history of cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tara Baird
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI,Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
| | - Azita Sadeghpour
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - David Moon
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | - Julie J. Ruterbusch
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI,Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
| | - Jennifer L. Beebe-Dimmer
- Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI,Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI,Jennifer L. Beebe-Dimmer, MPH, PhD, Karmanos Cancer Institute, 4100 John R, MM04, Detroit, MI 48201; e-mail:
| | - Kathleen A. Cooney
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC,Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Mosler T, Baymaz HI, Gräf JF, Mikicic I, Blattner G, Bartlett E, Ostermaier M, Piccinno R, Yang J, Voigt A, Gatti M, Pellegrino S, Altmeyer M, Luck K, Ahel I, Roukos V, Beli P. PARP1 proximity proteomics reveals interaction partners at stressed replication forks. Nucleic Acids Res 2022; 50:11600-11618. [PMID: 36350633 PMCID: PMC9723622 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PARP1 mediates poly-ADP-ribosylation of proteins on chromatin in response to different types of DNA lesions. PARP inhibitors are used for the treatment of BRCA1/2-deficient breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer. Loss of DNA replication fork protection is proposed as one mechanism that contributes to the vulnerability of BRCA1/2-deficient cells to PARP inhibitors. However, the mechanisms that regulate PARP1 activity at stressed replication forks remain poorly understood. Here, we performed proximity proteomics of PARP1 and isolation of proteins on stressed replication forks to map putative PARP1 regulators. We identified TPX2 as a direct PARP1-binding protein that regulates the auto-ADP-ribosylation activity of PARP1. TPX2 interacts with DNA damage response proteins and promotes homology-directed repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Moreover, TPX2 mRNA levels are increased in BRCA1/2-mutated breast and prostate cancers, and high TPX2 expression levels correlate with the sensitivity of cancer cells to PARP-trapping inhibitors. We propose that TPX2 confers a mitosis-independent function in the cellular response to replication stress by interacting with PARP1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - H Irem Baymaz
- Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz 55128, Germany
| | - Justus F Gräf
- Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz 55128, Germany
| | - Ivan Mikicic
- Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz 55128, Germany
| | | | - Edward Bartlett
- Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3RE, UK
| | | | | | - Jiwen Yang
- Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz 55128, Germany
| | - Andrea Voigt
- Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz 55128, Germany
| | - Marco Gatti
- Department of Molecular Mechanisms of Disease, University of Zurich, Zurich CH-8057, Switzerland
| | - Stefania Pellegrino
- Department of Molecular Mechanisms of Disease, University of Zurich, Zurich CH-8057, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Altmeyer
- Department of Molecular Mechanisms of Disease, University of Zurich, Zurich CH-8057, Switzerland
| | - Katja Luck
- Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz 55128, Germany
| | - Ivan Ahel
- Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3RE, UK
| | | | - Petra Beli
- Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz 55128, Germany
- Institute of Developmental Biology and Neurobiology (IDN), Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Kimura H, Mizuno K, Shiota M, Narita S, Terada N, Fujimoto N, Ogura K, Hatano S, Iwasaki Y, Hakozaki N, Ishitoya S, Sumiyoshi T, Goto T, Kobayashi T, Nakagawa H, Kamoto T, Eto M, Habuchi T, Ogawa O, Momozawa Y, Akamatsu S. Prognostic significance of pathogenic variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM and PALB2 genes in men undergoing hormonal therapy for advanced prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 2022; 127:1680-1690. [PMID: 35986085 PMCID: PMC9596487 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01915-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prognostic significance of germline variants in homologous recombination repair genes in advanced prostate cancer (PCa), especially with regard to hormonal therapy, remains controversial. METHODS Germline DNA from 549 Japanese men with metastatic and/or castration-resistant PCa was sequenced for 27 cancer-predisposing genes. The associations between pathogenic variants and clinical outcomes were examined. Further, for comparison, DNA from prostate biopsy tissue samples from 80 independent patients with metastatic PCa were analysed. RESULTS Forty-four (8%) patients carried germline pathogenic variants in one of the analysed genes. BRCA2 was most frequently altered (n = 19), followed by HOXB13 (n = 9), PALB2 (n = 5) and ATM (n = 5). Further, the BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2 and ATM variants showed significant association with a short time to castration resistance and overall survival (hazard ratio = 1.99 and 2.36; 95% CI, 1.15-3.44 and 1.23-4.51, respectively), independent of other clinical variables. Based on log-rank tests, the time to castration resistance was also significantly short in patients with BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2 or ATM somatic mutations and TP53 mutations. CONCLUSIONS Germline variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2 or ATM are independent prognostic factors of the short duration of response to hormonal therapy in advanced PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroko Kimura
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kei Mizuno
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masaki Shiota
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Shintaro Narita
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan
| | - Naoki Terada
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Naohiro Fujimoto
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyusyu, Japan
| | - Keiji Ogura
- Department of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Otsu Hospital, Otsu, Japan
| | - Shotaro Hatano
- Department of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Otsu Hospital, Otsu, Japan
| | - Yusuke Iwasaki
- Laboratory for Genotyping Development, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Nozomi Hakozaki
- Laboratory for Genotyping Development, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ishitoya
- Department of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Otsu Hospital, Otsu, Japan
| | - Takayuki Sumiyoshi
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takayuki Goto
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hidewaki Nakagawa
- Laboratory for Cancer Genomics, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Kamoto
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Eto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tomonori Habuchi
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan
| | - Osamu Ogawa
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yukihide Momozawa
- Laboratory for Genotyping Development, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Shusuke Akamatsu
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
- Laboratory for Cancer Genomics, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Zhang D, Xu X, Wei Y, Chen X, Li G, Lu Z, Zhang X, Ren X, Wang S, Qin C. Prognostic Role of DNA Damage Response Genes Mutations and their Association With the Sensitivity of Olaparib in Prostate Cancer Patients. Cancer Control 2022; 29:10732748221129451. [PMID: 36283420 PMCID: PMC9608002 DOI: 10.1177/10732748221129451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Evidence shows that gene mutation is a significant proportion of genetic factors associated with prostate cancer. The DNA damage response (DDR) is a signal cascade network that aims to maintain genomic integrity in cells. This comprehensive study was performed to determine the link between different DNA damage response gene mutations and prostate cancer. Materials and methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. Papers published up to February 1, 2022 were retrieved. The DDR gene mutations associated with prostate cancer were identified by referring to relevant research and review articles. Data of prostate cancer patients from multiple PCa cohorts were obtained from cBioPortal. The OR or HR and 95% CIs were calculated using both fixed-effects models (FEMs) and random-effects models (REMs). Results Seventy-four studies were included in this research, and the frequency of 13 DDR genes was examined. Through the analysis of 33 articles that focused on the risk estimates of DDR genes between normal people and PCa patients, DDR genes were found to be more common in prostate cancer patients (OR = 3.6293 95% CI [2.4992; 5.2705]). Also, patients in the mutated group had a worse OS and DFS outcome than those in the unmutated group (P < .05). Of the 13 DDR genes, the frequency of 9 DDR genes in prostate cancer was less than 1%, and despite differences in race, BRCA2 was the potential gene with the highest frequency (REM Frequency = .0400, 95% CI .0324 - .0541). The findings suggest that mutations in genes such as ATR, BLM, and MLH1 in PCa patients may increase the sensitivity of Olaparib, a PARP inhibitor. Conclusion These results demonstrate that mutation in any DDR pathway results in a poor prognosis for PCa patients. Furthermore, mutations in ATR, BLM, and MLH1 or the expression of POLR2L, PMS1, FANCE, and other genes significantly influence Olaparib sensitivity, which may be underlying therapeutic targets in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Zhang
- The State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Xinchi Xu
- The State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Yuang Wei
- The State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Xinglin Chen
- The State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Guangyao Li
- The State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Zhongwen Lu
- The State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Xu Zhang
- The State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Xiaohan Ren
- The State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Shangqian Wang
- The State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China,Chao Qin, The State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China. ; Shangqian Wang, The State Key Lab of Reproductive; Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
| | - Chao Qin
- The State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China,Chao Qin, The State Key Lab of Reproductive, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China. ; Shangqian Wang, The State Key Lab of Reproductive; Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Liang Y, Chiu PKF, Zhu Y, Wong CYP, Xiong Q, Wang L, Teoh JYC, Cao Q, Wei Y, Ye DW, Tsui SKW, Ng CF. Whole-exome sequencing reveals a comprehensive germline mutation landscape and identifies twelve novel predisposition genes in Chinese prostate cancer patients. PLoS Genet 2022; 18:e1010373. [PMID: 36095024 PMCID: PMC9499300 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most inheritable cancer with approximately 42% of disease risk attributed to inherited factors by studies of twins, indicating the importance of additional genetic screening to identify predisposition variants. However, only DNA damage repair (DDR) genes have been investigated thoroughly in prostate cancer. To determine the comprehensive germline mutation landscape in Chinese prostate cancer patients, we performed whole exome sequencing in 100 Han Chinese patients with prostate cancer in Hong Kong and identified deleterious germline mutations. A total of 36 deleterious germline variants in 25 genes were identified in 29% patients. Variants were found in eight pathways, including DNA methylation, DDR, and tyrosine-protein kinase. These findings were validated in an independent Chinese cohort of 167 patients with prostate cancer in Shanghai. Seven common deleterious-variant-containing genes were found in discovery cohort (7/25, 28%) and validation cohort (7/28, 25%) with three genes not described before (LDLR, MYH7 and SUGCT) and four genes previously reported (FANCI, ITGA6, PABPC1 and RAD54B). When comparing with that of a cohort of East Asian healthy individuals, 12 non-DDR novel potential predisposition genes (ADGRG1, CHD4, DNMT3A, ERBB3, GRHL1, HMBS, LDLR, MYH7, MYO6, NT5C2, NUP98 and SUGCT) were identified using the discovery and validation cohorts, which have not been previously reported in prostate cancer patients in all ethnic groups. Taken together, this study reveals a comprehensive germline mutation landscape in Chinese prostate cancer patients and discovers 12 novel non-DDR predisposition genes to lay the groundwork for the optimization of genetic screening. Prostate cancer is the most inheritable cancer with about 42% of disease risk attributed to inherited factors, indicating the importance of additional genetic screening to identify predisposition variants. However, only DNA damage repair (DDR) genes have been studied thoroughly in prostate cancer. To determine the comprehensive germline mutation landscape in Chinese prostate cancer patients, we performed whole exome sequencing in 100 Han Chinese patients with prostate cancer in Hong Kong and identified deleterious germline mutations. A total of 36 deleterious germline variants in 25 genes were identified in 29% patients. Variants were found in eight pathways, including DNA methylation, DDR, and tyrosine-protein kinase. These findings were validated in an independent Chinese cohort of 167 patients with prostate cancer in Shanghai. Seven common deleterious-variant-containing genes were found in discovery cohort and validation cohort with three genes not described before (LDLR, MYH7 and SUGCT) and four genes previously reported. When comparing with that of a cohort of East Asian healthy individuals, 12 non-DDR novel potential predisposition genes were identified using the discovery and validation cohorts, which have not been previously reported in prostate cancer patients in all ethnic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yonghao Liang
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Peter Ka-Fung Chiu
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yao Zhu
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Christine Yim-Ping Wong
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Qing Xiong
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Hong Kong Bioinformatics Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Lin Wang
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Qin Cao
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Hong Kong Bioinformatics Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yu Wei
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ding-Wei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Stephen Kwok-Wing Tsui
- School of Biomedical Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- Hong Kong Bioinformatics Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- * E-mail: (SK-WT); (C-FN)
| | - Chi-Fai Ng
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
- * E-mail: (SK-WT); (C-FN)
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Minoura Y, Takahashi M, Maeda H, Kuwahara S, Tachikawa H, Yamamoto M, Tomioka N, Watanabe K, Sakurai A. Significance of prostate/pancreatic/skin cancer family history for detecting BRCA2 pathogenic variant careers among patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2022; 29:808-813. [PMID: 35641852 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-022-01360-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When considering BRCA1/2 genetic testing for diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC), family history (FH) of breast and ovarian cancer is commonly considered. However, FH of other HBOC-related cancers, such as prostate, pancreatic, and skin cancer (malignant melanoma), is often overlooked. METHODS Among 945 patients who received genetic testing of BRCA1/2 at our hospital between October 2010 and September 2021, we compared the FH of 123 patients diagnosed with HBOC and 669 other patients who had breast cancer and had a documented FH. This study focused on the FH of HBOC-related cancers such as breast, ovarian, prostate, pancreatic, and skin cancer, as well as colorectal, gastric, liver, lung, and uterine cancers, which are common among Japanese, and other cancers. RESULTS FH of prostate, pancreatic, and skin cancer was significantly higher in the BRCA2 pathogenic variant (PV) cases than in the wild-type (WT) cases. The mean number of family members are as follows: BRCA1 PV/ BRCA2 PV/ WT; prostate cancer: 0.05/ 0.34/ 0.09 (P < 0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparisons test), pancreatic cancer: 0.13/ 0.21/ 0.10 (P = 0.01637), and skin cancer: 0.03/ 0.07/ 0.01 (P = 0.00129), respectively. CONCLUSIONS When considering BRCA1/2 genetic testing, FH of prostate, pancreatic, and skin cancers may also be examined as HBOC-related cancers to provide testing for patients who would benefit from it. However, further studies for the association between skin cancer and HBOC will be required because it has not been reported in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuko Minoura
- Genome Medical Center, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, 2-3-54, Kikusui 4, Shiroishi-ku, Sapporo, 003-0804, Japan
- Department of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, S1 W17, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, 060-8556, Japan
| | - Masato Takahashi
- Genome Medical Center, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, 2-3-54, Kikusui 4, Shiroishi-ku, Sapporo, 003-0804, Japan.
- Department of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, 2-3-54, Kikusui 4, Shiroishi-ku, Sapporo, 003-0804, Japan.
| | - Hideki Maeda
- Department of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, 2-3-54, Kikusui 4, Shiroishi-ku, Sapporo, 003-0804, Japan
| | - Sayuri Kuwahara
- Department of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, 2-3-54, Kikusui 4, Shiroishi-ku, Sapporo, 003-0804, Japan
| | - Hanae Tachikawa
- Department of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, 2-3-54, Kikusui 4, Shiroishi-ku, Sapporo, 003-0804, Japan
| | - Mitsugu Yamamoto
- Department of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, 2-3-54, Kikusui 4, Shiroishi-ku, Sapporo, 003-0804, Japan
| | - Nobumoto Tomioka
- Department of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, 2-3-54, Kikusui 4, Shiroishi-ku, Sapporo, 003-0804, Japan
| | - Kenichi Watanabe
- Department of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, 2-3-54, Kikusui 4, Shiroishi-ku, Sapporo, 003-0804, Japan
| | - Akihiro Sakurai
- Department of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, S1 W17, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, 060-8556, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Matsumoto T, Shiota M, Blas L, Eto M. Role of Olaparib in the Management of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Japanese Clinician's Perspective. Cancer Manag Res 2022; 14:2389-2397. [PMID: 35967752 PMCID: PMC9373991 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s326114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Several studies have identified various targetable genomic alterations in prostate cancer, which accumulate during carcinogenesis and cancer progression. Genomic alterations in genes involved in DNA damage repair by homologous recombination repair may predict increased sensitivity to poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. The Phase 3 PROfound trial has shown that treatment with the PARP inhibitor olaparib was associated with an improved radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival among patients with homologous recombination repair-deficient metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after the treatment with androgen receptor targeting therapy, especially in men with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. In Japan, olaparib was approved in December 2020 for the treatment of mCRPC with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. In addition, genetic tests to detect BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation to select patients who are likely to benefit from olaparib were also approved. This review summarizes the status of olaparib treatment for mCRPC, focusing on the situation in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masaki Shiota
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Leandro Blas
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Eto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants in 8627 unselected patients with breast cancer: stratification of age at diagnosis, family history and molecular subtype. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022; 195:431-439. [PMID: 35974241 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06702-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Comprehensively analyzing the prevalence of BRCA1/2 germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in a large cohort of unselected Chinese patients with breast cancer has great clinical importance. METHODS Germline pathogenic variants in full-length BRCA1/2 genes were determined through next-generation sequencing and/or Sanger sequencing assays in 8627 unselected Chinese patients with breast cancer who were treated at the Breast Center of Peking University Cancer Hospital. The prevalence of BRCA1/2 PVs was further stratified by age at diagnosis, family history of cancer and molecular subtype. RESULTS We found that the overall prevalence of BRCA1/2 PVs was 6.0% in the entire cohort, 2.4% in BRCA1 and 3.7% in BRCA2. The prevalence of BRCA1/2 PVs in patients with early-onset breast cancer (age at diagnosis ≤ 40 years) was significantly higher than that in patients over the age of 40 (9.7% vs. 5.1%). The prevalence rates of BRCA1/2 PVs in patients with a family history of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer were 19.5%, 39.0%, 11.1%, and 12.8%, respectively. Moreover, the number of relatives affected by breast cancer was associated with a higher prevalence of BRCA1/2 PVs. Molecular subtypes were associated with the prevalence of BRCA1/2 PVs. Patients with the triple-negative phenotype had the highest prevalence of BRCA1/2 PVs (13.3%) among the three molecular groups, followed by the HR + and HER2- group (5.9%), and the lowest was in the HER2 + group (2.5%). CONCLUSION Our study provides the most comprehensive information to date on the prevalence of BRCA1/2 PVs in unselected Chinese patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
|
46
|
Stem Cells as Target for Prostate cancer Therapy: Opportunities and Challenges. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2022; 18:2833-2851. [PMID: 35951166 DOI: 10.1007/s12015-022-10437-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
Cancer stem cells (CSCs) and cells in a cancer stem cell-like (CSCL) state have proven to be responsible for tumor initiation, growth, and relapse in Prostate Cancer (PCa) and other cancers; therefore, new strategies are being developed to target such cellular populations. TLR3 activation-based immunotherapy using Polyinosinic:Polycytidylic acid (PIC) has been proposed to be used as a concomitant strategy to first-line treatment. This strategy is based on the induction of apoptosis and an inflammatory response in tumor cells. In combination with retinoids like 9cRA, this treatment can induce CSCs differentiation and apoptosis. A limitation in the use of this combination is the common decreased expression of TLR3 and its main positive regulator p53. observed in many patients suffering of different cancer types such as PCa. Importantly, human exposure to certain toxicants, such as iAs, not only has proven to enrich CSCs population in an in vitro model of human epithelial prostate cells, but additionally, it can also lead to a decreased p53, TLR3 and RA receptor (RARβ), expression/activation and thus hinder this treatment efficacy. Therefore, here we point out the relevance of evaluating the TLR3 and P53 status in PCa patients before starting an immunotherapy based on the use of PIC +9cRA to determine whether they will be responsive to treatment. Additionally, the use of strategies to overcome the lower TLR3, RARβ or p53 expression in PCa patients, like the inclusion of drugs that increase p53 expression, is encouraged, to potentiate the use of PIC+RA based immunotherapy in these patients.
Collapse
|
47
|
Boussios S, Rassy E, Moschetta M, Ghose A, Adeleke S, Sanchez E, Sheriff M, Chargari C, Pavlidis N. BRCA Mutations in Ovarian and Prostate Cancer: Bench to Bedside. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14163888. [PMID: 36010882 PMCID: PMC9405840 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14163888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary DNA damage is one of the hallmarks of cancer. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) —especially the high-grade serous subtype—harbors a defect in at least one DNA damage response (DDR) pathway. Defective DDR results from a variety of lesions affecting homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) for double strand breaks, base excision repair (BER), and nucleotide excision repair (NER) for single strand breaks and mismatch repair (MMR). Apart from the EOC, mutations in the DDR genes, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, are common in prostate cancer as well. Among them, BRCA2 lesions are found in 12% of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancers, but very rarely in primary prostate cancer. Better understanding of the DDR pathways is essential in order to optimize the therapeutic choices, and has led to the design of biomarker-driven clinical trials. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are now a standard therapy for EOC patients, and more recently have been approved for the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with alterations in DDR genes. They are particularly effective in tumours with HR deficiency. Abstract DNA damage repair (DDR) defects are common in different cancer types, and these alterations can be exploited therapeutically. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is among the tumours with the highest percentage of hereditary cases. BRCA1 and BRCA2 predisposing pathogenic variants (PVs) were the first to be associated with EOC, whereas additional genes comprising the homologous recombination (HR) pathway have been discovered with DNA sequencing technologies. The incidence of DDR alterations among patients with metastatic prostate cancer is much higher compared to those with localized disease. Genetic testing is playing an increasingly important role in the treatment of patients with ovarian and prostate cancer. The development of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors offers a therapeutic strategy for patients with EOC. One of the mechanisms of PARP inhibitors exploits the concept of synthetic lethality. Tumours with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations are highly sensitive to PARP inhibitors. Moreover, the synthetic lethal interaction may be exploited beyond germline BRCA mutations in the context of HR deficiency, and this is an area of ongoing research. PARP inhibitors are in advanced stages of development as a treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, there is a major concern regarding the need to identify reliable biomarkers predictive of treatment response. In this review, we explore the mechanisms of DDR, the potential for genomic analysis of ovarian and prostate cancer, and therapeutics of PARP inhibitors, along with predictive biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stergios Boussios
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK
- AELIA Organization, 9th Km Thessaloniki-Thermi, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
- Correspondence:
| | - Elie Rassy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institut, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Michele Moschetta
- Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, CH 4033 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Aruni Ghose
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barts Cancer Centre, St. Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, London KT1 2EE, UK
- Centre for Education, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Sola Adeleke
- High Dimensional Neurology Group, UCL Queen’s Square Institute of Neurology, London WC1N 3BG, UK
- Department of Oncology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK
| | - Elisabet Sanchez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK
| | - Matin Sheriff
- Department of Urology, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Windmill Road, Gillingham ME7 5NY, UK
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institut, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Nicholas Pavlidis
- Medical School, University of Ioannina, Stavros Niarchou Avenue, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Functions of Breast Cancer Predisposition Genes: Implications for Clinical Management. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23137481. [PMID: 35806485 PMCID: PMC9267387 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23137481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Approximately 5–10% of all breast cancer (BC) cases are caused by germline pathogenic variants (GPVs) in various cancer predisposition genes (CPGs). The most common contributors to hereditary BC are BRCA1 and BRCA2, which are associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). ATM, BARD1, CHEK2, PALB2, RAD51C, and RAD51D have also been recognized as CPGs with a high to moderate risk of BC. Primary and secondary cancer prevention strategies have been established for HBOC patients; however, optimal preventive strategies for most hereditary BCs have not yet been established. Most BC-associated CPGs participate in DNA damage repair pathways and cell cycle checkpoint mechanisms, and function jointly in such cascades; therefore, a fundamental understanding of the disease drivers in such cascades can facilitate the accurate estimation of the genetic risk of developing BC and the selection of appropriate preventive and therapeutic strategies to manage hereditary BCs. Herein, we review the functions of key BC-associated CPGs and strategies for the clinical management in individuals harboring the GPVs of such genes.
Collapse
|
49
|
Costanza A, Guaragnella N, Bobba A, Manzari C, L'Abbate A, Giudice CL, Picardi E, D'Erchia AM, Pesole G, Giannattasio S. Yeast as a Model to Unravel New BRCA2 Functions in Cell Metabolism. Front Oncol 2022; 12:908442. [PMID: 35734584 PMCID: PMC9207209 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.908442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Mutations in BRCA2 gene increase the risk for breast cancer and for other cancer types, including pancreatic and prostate cancer. Since its first identification as an oncosupressor in 1995, the best-characterized function of BRCA2 is in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by homologous recombination. BRCA2 directly interacts with both RAD51 and single-stranded DNA, mediating loading of RAD51 recombinase to sites of single-stranded DNA. In the absence of an efficient homologous recombination pathway, DSBs accumulate resulting in genome instability, thus supporting tumorigenesis. Yet the precise mechanism by which BRCA2 exerts its tumor suppressor function remains unclear. BRCA2 has also been involved in other biological functions including protection of telomere integrity and stalled replication forks, cell cycle progression, transcriptional control and mitophagy. Recently, we and others have reported a role of BRCA2 in modulating cell death programs through a molecular mechanism conserved in yeast and mammals. Here we hypothesize that BRCA2 is a multifunctional protein which exerts specific functions depending on cell stress response pathway. Based on a differential RNA sequencing analysis carried out on yeast cells either growing or undergoing a regulated cell death process, either in the absence or in the presence of BRCA2, we suggest that BRCA2 causes central carbon metabolism reprogramming in response to death stimuli and encourage further investigation on the role of metabolic reprogramming in BRCA2 oncosuppressive function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Costanza
- Institute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, National Research Council, Bari, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Guaragnella
- Institute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, National Research Council, Bari, Italy.,Department of Biosciences, Biotechnologies and Biopharmaceutics, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Antonella Bobba
- Institute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, National Research Council, Bari, Italy
| | - Caterina Manzari
- Department of Biosciences, Biotechnologies and Biopharmaceutics, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Alberto L'Abbate
- Institute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, National Research Council, Bari, Italy
| | - Claudio Lo Giudice
- Department of Biosciences, Biotechnologies and Biopharmaceutics, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Ernesto Picardi
- Institute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, National Research Council, Bari, Italy.,Department of Biosciences, Biotechnologies and Biopharmaceutics, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Anna Maria D'Erchia
- Institute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, National Research Council, Bari, Italy.,Department of Biosciences, Biotechnologies and Biopharmaceutics, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Graziano Pesole
- Institute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, National Research Council, Bari, Italy.,Department of Biosciences, Biotechnologies and Biopharmaceutics, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Sergio Giannattasio
- Institute of Biomembranes, Bioenergetics and Molecular Biotechnologies, National Research Council, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
An appraisal of genetic testing for prostate cancer susceptibility. NPJ Precis Oncol 2022; 6:43. [PMID: 35732815 PMCID: PMC9217944 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-022-00282-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Most criteria for genetic testing for prostate cancer susceptibility require a prior diagnosis of prostate cancer, in particular cases with metastatic disease are selected. Advances in the field are expected to improve outcomes through tailored treatments for men with advanced prostate cancer with germline pathogenic variants, although these are not currently offered in the curative setting. A better understanding of the value of genetic testing for prostate cancer susceptibility in screening, for early detection and prevention is necessary. We review and summarize the literature describing germline pathogenic variants in genes associated with increased prostate cancer risk and aggressivity. Important questions include: what is our ability to screen for and prevent prostate cancer in a man with a germline pathogenic variant and how does knowledge of a germline pathogenic variant influence treatment of men with nonmetastatic disease, with hormone-resistant disease and with metastatic disease? The frequency of germline pathogenic variants in prostate cancer is well described, according to personal and family history of cancer and by stage and grade of disease. The role of these genes in aggressive prostate cancer is also discussed. It is timely to consider whether or not genetic testing should be offered to all men with prostate cancer. The goals of testing are to facilitate screening for early cancers in unaffected high-risk men and to prevent advanced disease in men with cancer.
Collapse
|